WEBVTT - Tech and Crypto Market Rout and Twitter Cuts Costs

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, Saudi

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Aroundco overtakes Apple as the world's most valuable company. How

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the tech and crypto selloff, coupled with a surge in

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 1>oil prices is up ending the order of the biggest

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>forces in the global economy. Plus two top executives are

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>out at Twitter as the company looks to cut costs

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and freeze hires ahead of Elon Musk's takeover. This as

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk is looking for new funding as he cuts his

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla margin loan. And we will be here from some

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>top CEOs today. Ryan Chesky joins us to talk about

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb is quote the biggest change in a decade, and

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>how we thinks travelers will be hit by inflation. And

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear from Arms CEO as the chip company gets

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>ready for an I p O. All of that in

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a moment, But first I want to continue this conversation

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>now talk about Apple in particular falling again behind Saudi

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Aramco as the world's most valuable company. Pierre Farragou joining

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>us now who heads up the Global Tech Infrastructure team

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>at New Street Research. So, Pierre, is this a changing

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of the guard here or is this a momentary blip?

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Not much is happening if you if you take a

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>step back and look at Apple in the perspective of

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, I look at on the daily

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>basis there as as Ed mentioned, it down like that

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent from the high, seventeen percent from there average

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 1>value of the last eighteen months. Look at Tesla down

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine percent, Amazon down thirty Google down thirty percent.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So Apple, on the alative is exactually doing doing quite

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>all right? Um uh. And there are a lot of

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that. You know, they've done very well. They've

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>grown through the last five years earnings twenty more than uh.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And they've done very well in them uh in the

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>recent context, through the pandemic, through like inflationary pressure, they've

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>had actually a very strong demand. UM. And then when

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>UM investors look at Apple today in this massive set

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of that that's actually more you know, of a quality name,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like a safe heaven for them, UM, because they tend

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to to consider that Apple still has like a pretty

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>nice outlook that revenue growth could continue. You have new products,

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in are in UM in autos. So so like

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the longer term I would look for Apples still looks

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really attractive to investors, and that's the reason why I

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think they stuff didn't do that bad. So there's a

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>kind put in an Apple's fundamentals. What about the broader

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. I mean, Saudi Aramco has lived above all

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of them, and if you look at the top six

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>companies by market cap, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, all behind

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>an oil company. Yeah. So yeah, it's a good question.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what I've been working on interest studays. You know, what,

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what are the opportunities like names to buy in this

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in this like broad tech tex set of UM And

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the way I'd like to think about it is what

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>prey triggers the set of initially is inflation and the

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>concern of interest rates going up, because when, of course,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the very high growth company, if

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>interests go up, it is a very negative effect on

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the evaluation. Now here's the way I'm thinking about about it.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The million a lot of these companies are actually fairly

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>inflation proof. So if you get an Apple, Microsoft, an Amazon.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>There you to pass on costs is actually not too bad.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So in an fashionary environment, they should actually grow faster

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>because they'll be able to increase their prices with with inflation.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And so what I like doing are overreacting then yes,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I I think that the investors reaction is creating opportunities.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>And you need to look at these companies who have

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>good pricing power, who have very strong market position, and

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>who have been battered down in recent weeks and likely

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>even recent months, in the last six months, and you

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can find very I think, very interesting opportunities like the

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>three or all that UM popped to my eyes to

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the Artesla of course, the stocky string and forty five

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. It's down from a hundred and forty times

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>six months ago, and um it's still up to grow

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like earnings forty two fifty a year. Another one is

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>c SMC is the ship manufacturer, down thirty straight on

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen times earning, and it's it has a better gross

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>potential in my view, uh than Apple. And then the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>other one interesting worth mentioning is actually Nvidia, down almost

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>sev from the peak. And and here again a company

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of pricing power, very strong leadership

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in their market. Everybody needs their cheap and they steket

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you do very well in in the next few years.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So so I see opportunities um in that set of

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>even in the midst of pare even in the midst

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of a supply chain shortage and a lockdown in China,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean in video, I mean obviously Apple and Video

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is also exposed to that. Yeah, So yeah, it's a

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>good point. Like the next few the next few months

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or even you know, the next couple of quarters could

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.559
<v Speaker 1>be slightly challenging for for these players. But I don't

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>think you you have any like you know, incremental negative

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>negative news flow coming through on that front. So we

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are really in the deep of the supply constraints and

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>supply is now coming back to take time to get

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>supply back, but it is it is already on the

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>way up. And I think the situation in China, as

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>much as it is like a dramatic disruption for a

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of these businesses, it's actually were understood learning Like

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple talked about it from the Earning School not so

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>long ago, and investors are kind of putting their heads

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>around around that situation. So I tend to overlook that

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and think about, you know, what are like the great

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>compounding stories, like names that have this very high creaty

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>growth outlook that has been like taken let us suffered

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so much in this pullback, and that's where I see

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities. But of course you have to look through

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of quarters. Maybe. Well, thanks for helping

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>us try to make sense of it all here, fair,

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I was going to have your new Street research. Thank you.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean time to is making some changes at it

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as it awaits Elon Musk's forty four billion dollar takeover,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>including cutting some big costs. Bloom Berk's Kurt Wagner covers

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for US and joins US now, so Kurt, two

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 1>big executives leaving. Is this all because of Elon Musk?

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Or is this because of Twitter's own business problems. That's

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of the question that I'm trying to get to

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the answer to. As well. We have a new CEO,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, Paraguagor Wall, who took over last November, and

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's always natural for a new CEO to sort of

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>want to leave their imprints on the new company, makes

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some big changes, get their own kind of executive team

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in there. Of course, we're in this unique situation right

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>now with Twitter where everyone's kind of in a limbo

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>right there, waiting for Elon Musk to take over, So

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of interesting timing for him to make

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>two big moves right now. Although I'm told that this

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has sort of been in the works for a couple

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, so it's unclear exactly whether this was, you know,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a plan of Elon Musk's, or something that Parragu wanted

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, sort of with Elon's blessing. I to get

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the sense it's maybe the latter, So let's talk about

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>who is leaving. In the reaction, there were some not

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>happy tweets, as one might expect when people get fired

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter. Well, these are two long time product executives,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Cavon Baked Poor, who has been running product at Twitter

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for years now, and Bruce Falk, who has been running

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue product at the company. So two people who have

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>been there for a long time and who a lot

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of people did really like. And when you are in

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a situation like this right where employees are already wondering

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like what comes next? What is my job going to

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be secure? When Ellen takes over. Is the team I'm

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>working on going to be around when Ellen takes over.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you see two people who a lot of

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>people like and who have been there such a long

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>time kind of get booted unexpectedly. I think that creates

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of, you know, concern from employees. And so

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of what I've been hearing today, a lot

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of people scratching their head wondering what does this mean exactly,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and then what happens next for the rest of us. Meantime,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Mosk is still trying to get financing, scrapping part of

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>his Tesla margin loan. Are these two things related. I

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're related in the sense that everything that Ellen

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>does kind of either makes the deal seem more or

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>less likely. And I think the fact that he's perhaps

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to get rid of this margin loan

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because he's able to secure a little bit more equity financing,

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that just makes the deal more likely to

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>go through. Right. And so if you're sitting there as

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Twitter, you kind of have to prepare

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for two scenarios, the one in which maybe the deal

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen and suddenly you're still in charge what have

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>you been doing over these last six months to to

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>make that happen? And then the other where Ellen comes in,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you're wondering, you know, if you're progu am,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I still going to have a job under this new guy.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's probably trying to navigate that. And

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Ellen getting closer and closer to getting the

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>deal funded um probably dictates, you know, the timing of

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these things. Interesting. Alright, Well, more twists and

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>turns to come. I'm sure bloom works. Kurt Wagner. Thanks,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna give your timing, Emily, you know that.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Do I want the company to become a public company

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>at some point, of course, but I really want to

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the company that we do take public

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>is a company that's reflective of this uh new Bold

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Elevision Instagart CEO Fiji Cima their last month when I

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>asked her on studio at one point, oh, when the

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>company might go public? Well, Piers, now is the time

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has learned. The company has filed confidentially paperwork to

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>start the process with the sec The ten year old

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>grocery delivery up Start was once one of the most

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>highly valued of the gig economy companies and grew exponentially

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>through the pandemic, but now we'll navigate a very volatile market.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Instacart slashed its private market valuation by almost in March,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as orders have slipped in a post pandemic world. Well

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it was built as Airbnb's biggest change in a decade,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the company rolling out a number of new features, including

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>categories like Castles and Amazing Pools and homes that make

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you go OMG, as well as split stays and air cover,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which addresses one of the company's biggest issues, consumer protections.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Airbnb CEO and co founder Brian chess

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Ca about all the changes, along with concerns about rising prices,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation and how that will affect their customers. Take a listen. Well,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the reason that the price per night

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>went up was mostly because people are booking more expensive airbnbs.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So before the pandemic, a lot of people are traveling

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>by themselves or one person. They were booking one, two

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>bedroom homes. Now they're booking much bigger homes to travel

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with families and groups. And there's been a mixed shift

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>from Asia to North American Europe, and these are higher

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>price per knights. That's the primary contribution for the increase

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>of price. You are correct, though, a lot of people

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to be able to travel and be able

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to afford to travel. But another thing. Airbnb was started

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>during the Great Recession in two thousand eight, and people

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>used Airbnb because it wasn't a more affordable way to travel.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>After two years of people not being able to leave

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>their home, many people, I think they want to get

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out and this is going to be a travel rebound

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything we've ever seen before. Still, even though you're

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>projecting this travel rebound, you've got Airbnb shares down to

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>new lows. And I'm so curious how you're watching this

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>broader market turmoil. What's your take on this? I'm not

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>watching the broader market turmoil, and I would hope shareholders

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm obsessed over every single day. Are the

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>inputs to the stock price? Not the stock price. I

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's the very best thing for shareholders. So my

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>job is to make sure we have the best service,

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we have enough host they're prepared for the great travel season.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how I'm gonna worry about. We're gonna play a

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>long game, and I think the long term shareholders will

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>really benefit from that. I wonder how this impacts retention

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and recruiting though. Are actually seeing a lot of companies

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>that really uh, you know, Sword in the pandemic, struggling

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>coin Base, robin Hood as well. Do you think this

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>could impact hiring at all or the mood in Silicon Valley.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're actually completely overwhelmed with hiring. We're completely overwhelmed.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Two weeks ago we announced that Airbing employees can live

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and work anywhere in the world, and if you move

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want in the country, we're not gonna lower

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your pay. Since we made that announcement, more than one

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>million people visit our jobs and careers page. We only

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have six thousand people at the company, so um, I

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>do think that there might be some broader kind of considerations,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But Airbnb, we have quite a lot of interest, and

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that will change. So Twitter just announced

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a hiring freeze and cutting costs, potentially rescinding some offers

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for a different reason. And I wonder, with this, on

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>top of other companies pausing hiring, if this could be

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a moment of opportunity for you. Do you see this

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>as a chance to attract be a magnet for new talent.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people are reaching out to

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>us from other big tech companies, maybe because a lot

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of tech companies are asking people to go back to

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the office three days a week, or maybe because they're

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not hiring as many. But make no mistake, Airbnb is

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>stepping on the gas this summer. How are you stepping

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on the gas in China? We're seeing ongoing COVID lockdowns there.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I know it's been a priority for you in years past.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>What trends are you seeing in a pack and when

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>do you expect them to recover? You know, our China

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>business has primarily been people in China leaving China obviously

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>crossing a border, so it's cross border travel going to

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>other countries. Japan was a really popular corridor, South Korea,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They're going to like Europe, They're going to other places.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Because of the situation of China in COVID, there's not

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of outbound business right now, and so

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>our business in China is not super robust and it's

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be probably a while. It's really gonna track

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with the health crisis. Brian Chesky, Airbnb CEO and co founder.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You can catch our full interview at Bloomberg dot com.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, SO no CEO Patrick Spence joins us fresh

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>off the company's latest earnings results. Will also talk about

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>why so Nos is being compared to Amazon and Apple.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>He's next, This is Bloomberg. The same day that Sons

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>released its second quarter result of the company also announced

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of new products, including a voice activated assistant

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>called Sons Voice Control. This is the company's first step

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>into the world of digital assistance, which is largely dominated

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>by Amazon's Alexa and Apple's Series. Joining me now, so

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>no CEO Patrick spent So, Patrick, how is yours different?

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Ours is very different in the fact that all the

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>processing for it is done locally. Um and it's very

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's very private, very privacy focus, something we know

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our customers have been looking for. And

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is we've really focused it on the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Sons user experience. So think about music. All your audio

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>needs being able to move music from one room to

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>another for instance. So ours, I like to say, is

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know an inch wide and a mile deep. Whereas

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know our partners at Amazon and Google, they offer

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you one which is a mile wide and an inch deep,

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course, um, we want to provide customers choice,

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so you can actually use alexas simultaneously with the Sono's

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>voice control. So what's the long term goal with voice control?

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean tell us a little bit more, what you

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>mean using that mile wide into apart metaphor? Yeah, so

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>really making sure Yeah, I think I think we've seen

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a first wave, right, and UM, we usually

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>see this with I think Gartner's hype cycle in terms

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of the excitement that comes from that initial wave of um,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the first part of a technology curve, and

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw that with Alexa and Google Assistant, and now

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what you'll see is more purpose built assistance,

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which really focus on the actual user experience for a

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>particular product or a particular brand. And so you know,

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we've done a lot of work to make sure that

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you can get the music faster. It's recalling what music

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening to. It's very specific to the Sonos

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>use cases. And again, like I said, private and runs

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>locally because we heard from customers that that's important. And

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so what we're really trying to do is drive engagement

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because we know the more customers engage, the higher their

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lifetime value will be, the more chance they have to

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>come back and add another Sonos product to their system. Now,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw strong demand for your products in the last quarter,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but obviously inflation going up. So NOS products are discretionary products.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you think inflation is going to

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>impact sales this quarter and the rest of the year.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we continue to see very strong consumer demand. UM.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, last year we had a huge year UH

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>driving top line sales growth UM and this year we

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>planned for fift UM. We've reaffirmed that in yesterday's news

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>UM SO so we'd obviously taken into account the fact

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that we know we felt we got some tail wind

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously from people being at home UM. And we feel

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>very good about our business model. And you know this

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>supply wheel we have of existing customers telling their friends

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and family they should get so Nos. The number one

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>reason people come into so Nos is still from family

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and friends to telling them, and then we have existing

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>customers come back and buy the new products. And so

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with a whole set of new products we announced yesterday

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the great portfolio we have and we have a backlog emily,

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, we feel really good about where we

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>are today. Despite I know some of the macro challenges

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. You raise concerns about supply chain

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>issues and rising component prices, just how you know, difficult

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are those going to be to navigate over the next

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>several months. Yeah, you know, it's been something that we've

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with really for eight quarters at this point,

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and we had hoped, and I think the industry had

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hoped that by the second half of two UM most

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of those would have dissipated. That is not the case.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And obviously nobody anticipated China going back into a COVID

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>zero situation in Shanghai, and so that's really impacted things

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>as well. And so now we're expecting, and we've been

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>planning for the rest of twenty two to really be

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>challenged in terms of logistics and shipping and component costs,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we've built that into our model UM as

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we think about delivering the year. But I would say, Emily,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point, from everything I can see, expect the

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>supply chain challenges to continue for the industry for the

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of twenty two. All Right, Patrick Spence, CEO of Sonas,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Welcome back to boone. We're technology Emily changing

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Let's get back to the markets, and

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood is shoring in late trading after filings showed

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a new stakeholder. Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow here with who it

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is and take it away. Yeah, it's Sam Bankman Freed

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, co founder and CEO of f t X.

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got a seven point six percent stake according to

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory filing based on today on Thursday's closing price

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of eight dollars fifty six cents a share, that would

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>value his stake at five sixty seven million U S dollars.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And you can see the reaction in after hours. We

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>were up even higher just a few moments ago. We'll

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have to spend the next twenty four hours and I'm

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to work out what this means for the future

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of robin Hood. Of course, such a big year for

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the platform, build up a huge user base of retail traders,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but then transactions started drop off, volatility, volumes not what

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>investors thought. It would be one to watch going to

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Friday as well. Another interesting name in the world of markets.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at soft Bank reporting a record and your loss,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is Massaoshi son with a lot of problems.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>And you see these are the US listed shares of

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank. This is its Vision Fund unit that we're

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You're so familiar with it. But annual loss

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>having just closed out the fiscal year of twenty point

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars to zero point five billion US dollars.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is a company of knows that

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the invest principally in private sector right startups, but it

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>was its public bets that really suffer. Let's bring up

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the board and look at some of the biggest names.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>This is how they performed over a twelve month basis,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>names like uber, Kupu and d D. That is a

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of red and you can see how that kind

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of failing in the investment approach kind of failed ultimately

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for Vision Fund. I think the other big takeaway very quickly,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>m is that they've really cut back the funds that

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Vision Fund is deploying. You look at recent quarters,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the period January March, they only authorized two point five

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to put into their portfolio for new startups.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a real departure from what we've seen in recent quarters.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Think about two thousand and eighteen. You remember that one

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>M thirty three billion dollars in a single quarter for

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Vision Fund. Times to change for Massaci son how

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>could I forget Ludlow? Thank you well. One area where

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank was more bullish was ARM, It's chip design

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>unit that is preparing for an I p O. Massa

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>son As detailed how fast ARMS growing and how it

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>could ultimately become the most valuable asset in SoftBank's portfolio.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Joining us to talk about how ARM gets there. It's

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO Renee has Renee great to have you back with us.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna get to the SoftBank stuff. But let's

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about how ARM is moving into more markets and

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>also more valuable markets. What opportunities is that unlocking for you.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great year. We just announced our results

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier yesterday or wherever you pan time. Was record revenue,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>record profits, record royalties, record licensing. We're seeing demand for

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>armed technology emily across all the sectors, particularly though in

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the new markets such as automotive hyper scale or slush,

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and IoT. We've had huge growth in all those

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>areas that the demand for armed technology has never been better.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see specific opportunities for growth? Is it,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is it computing, is it automotive? You know, what are

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be the biggest parts of ARMS future In

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the future. One of the areas that we've been known

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>for historically is around power and power efficiency. And if

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you think about smartphone, where ARM has historically been known

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>for we've had great success. That is the ultimate device

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that's all about power and power efficiency. Now think about

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the data center or think about electronic vehicle. UH, both

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of those have the same type of requirements. They need

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>to be very power efficient, they be very mindful of performance,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and they have to be able to scale. UH. Those

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 1>are two areas where you've seen huge growth in the

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, and to your point, it's an

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>area that it needs to be a huge growth theory

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>form going forward. Still, investors are bailing out of chip stocks.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You look at the semi conductor index down further than

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>most of the major UH in the cry so far

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. What aren't investors getting? You know, demand is high,

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but still concerns about supply. You know, I can't really

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>comment on the on the valuations and what's going on

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is if I knew more about that,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be in this chair. But the supply issues

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I do think are going to stay with us for

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a while. The everything involved with semi conductors is complex.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Building new fabs is complex, Advanced technolog is complex. You

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>have more and more complex packages, which means you have substrates,

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you have different packaging techniques, and the layer on top

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. You know, these automobiles, for example, that require

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not only a significant semig it or content, but other

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>areas that need to be shipped into the car. The

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>supply change has been stretched in a way that we've

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not seen before with the pandemic, and I think that's

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>going to make the world really complex at least for

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the next year or so as far as I can see.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>And when are we going to see the end of

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>these shortages? Like how long does this go on for?

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>If I had a crystal ball again, I would probably

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be in in a different industry. But I think it's

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be with for a while, Emily, because again, when

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>you think about the investments required for semiconductors to build

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a five dentimeter or three dynimeter fab, there is a huge,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>huge lead time associated with that. The chips take longer

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and longer to build their longer and longer to manufacture,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>which means predictability gets harder. And then increasingly in some

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of these products you have more and more content and

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not just one chip that's not available. If you

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have an entire product that's all manufactured and you don't

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>have a diode, let's say a power diode that can

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>go into the car, the car can't ship. So again,

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I think going forward, UM, we've got to get our

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>arms around when this new world is teaching us relative

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to supply, and I think it's going to take a

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>little while. There's a report that soft Bank plans to

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>keep a majority steak in ARM after you spin it off.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>How big a steak are we talking about here? And

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what what conversations have you had about this? I can't

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>say too much about specifically we Massa son has said

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that ARM is preparing for an IPO, and they have

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>said publicly that they intend to have a controlling interest

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I think what that says is Massa thinks

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that the long term prospects for holding ARM is really good.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that says a lot about his confidence

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in our future going forward. How soon could an IPO happen? Yeah?

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't really say, hard for me to kind of

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>go forward on that area, but as we've said before,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we're preparing to make that happen. Okay, but how are

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you evaluating this market turmoil and could that delay or

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>influence your plans? Obviously, market timing is going to dictate

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. You know, who can say what

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the market's going to look like. We're just doing the

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of things that we need to prepare for an IPO.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Renehan, CEO of ARM Thank you. Coming up.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Crypto goes down and down some more. How the Tera

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>meltdown is giving fodder to crypto skeptics and how low

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can markets go? That is next? This is Bloomberg. I

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't characterize it at this scale as a real threat

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to financial stability, but they're growing very rapidly and they

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>present the same kind of risks that we have known

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for centuries in connection with bank runs. Dominoes are falling

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. First it was the collapse of algorithmic stable

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>coin terra USD. Now it's grown up cousin tether, wavering

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from the peg and fueling concern over its status as

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a place to hide in times of turbulence. Let's talk

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about what it all means with Bloomberg's own Olga. Careif

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>who covers the cryptocurrency market for us so Olga, I

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>guess it's fair to say we're in at winter. How

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is this winter different from the ones that have come before? Absolutely,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty clear we're in a crypto winter.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We had one in eighteen, but of course today what

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we have that's different is that we have a lot

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more institutional investors and that's why crypto is behaving more

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like a risk acid that's kind of moving in line

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the of the the market. So

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>remind us how the last crypto winter played out and

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how you expect this one to play out, given that

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there are more people with skin in the game. Absolutely,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely more people. So so what happened was in twenty eighteen,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands of coins basically died, and lots of projects went under,

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and lots of new projects got hatched. And I expect

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see the same thing happened now. You know, if

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this crypto winter is prolonged, a lot of this projects

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and coins will die and we'll see sort of a

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>clearing of the plate and we'll see what the strong

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>players are who are the survivors. Now, let's talk a

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about coin Base. Their valuation dropped precipitously and

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>just over the last few days. I'm curious when you

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>think this means, because coin Base has been, you know,

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in some ways a measure of what's happening in the

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>broader crypto space. Absolutely so, there obviously the biggest exchange

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto exchange in the US, and their value

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>dropped by more than you know in the last week.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh, basically it's a very sort of strange situation

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because just several months ago, much smaller competitors Blockchain, dot

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Com and Gemini raised money at very high evaluations. But

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously now all vcs that are looking to fund crypto

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>company you start looking at coin basis valuations and are saying,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the companies in our portfolios and the

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>companies coming to us are overvalued, and so this could

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have a ripple effect on venture capital activity in crypto.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, lots to continue to watch and digest. Thank

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you for giving us the temperature of this particular brand

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of winter ogo caref appreciate it. I want to continue

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the conversation with Nicola Julia for more on this. He's

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Sowhere, an n f T based free

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to play fantasy sports game that just announced a partnership

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with Major League Baseball and the MLB Players Association to

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>launch the official n f T based fantasy sports game

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for all MLB teams. Um, we're gonna get to baseball,

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a huge baseball fan, Nicola, But I want

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask you first about the markets and you know

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're we're in in the middle of

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a very cold spell. What's your take? Yeah, how many

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks thanks for having me. I think us a little

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like for us, like we are using NFT technology to

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of the funds. We don't have any cryptocurrency

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or token that we developed, um, and so you know,

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we are growing independently of the crypto currency market, which

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is again to the benefits of the time. But does

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this impact at least sentiment about the future of Web three,

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the future of n f T s and sort of

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the growth of this new frontier. I think in general obviously,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>as any regular innovation, you have cycles, right uh and

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and so Surreal has been founded in at M

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>during one of the biggest crypto winters, and I think,

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, building during the cycles helps because you have

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>less destructions, you have more focused uh and uh and

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the less opportunistic you know, like people building in the

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>space so um so like we love building in winters

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to uh. And yes, the sentiment maybe less good right now,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think the lead once of tomorrow will be

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>built right now. Now. There has been some controversy about

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening in the n f T market. The

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>number of traders is still growing, but n f T

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>prices are declining. I'm curious what you're seeing in terms

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of your own sales and the business that you're driving. Yeah,

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what sets around upon is the usage value

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of n f T s. So we we've seen, you know,

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of projects growing around the pre collectible value

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of these antist but you know, for us, it's all

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but what you can do with the n XT. So

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this fantasy game where you can play with

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>officially lessons and extis. And so we have been growing

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>consistently the last three hongths and in the last couple

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of weeks as well in terms of sales because five

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>million in salons and we will keep them growing we

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>expect to do seven hundred million. Uh and I think

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes all additions right, like what you can do

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can engage and retain defense because of the

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>experience you have. Now you just announced this partnership with

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>AMU and the players, who as we know, don't always

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily agree, how did you convince them to get on board?

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And white Baseball, I think they ask us free, free,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>big questions. The first one is like, like, are you

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the best bonner to help us grow this huge category

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and Steve fantasy um and uh. And you know we

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have proven with so con that we we created this

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>category and we are the best place to develop it

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with top two s pons. So that was question number one.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>The question number two was like, are you the best

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>bonner to help us grow the audience? Uh? And we are.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>We are selling in one hundred and eighty countries because

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the glob we have a global audience, and we're gonna

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna help the mld P and the MLB uh

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to to grow they reach again overseas.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the third question was like, are you the

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>best bonner to provide the best experience to the funds

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we are building an amazing team in the

0:32:55.640 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>US with people coming from ESPN and DraftKings in all

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this companies that do amazing products. Uh, and so we

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we are very confident, all right, excited to watch Nicola Juliets,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO of so Rare, Thank you for joining us. Let's

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>take a look now at China still battling a wave

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of COVID infections with strict lockdowns that are threatening the economy.

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of China's top statistics officials says the

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>outbreak has caused quote a huge shock to the economy,

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a rare recognition of the cost of the government's COVID

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>zero strategy. I want to bring in Bloomberg's Allen one

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>now for more on this. Who is joining us live

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>from Shanghai, Alan, Thank you so much for joining us.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>We've seen your reporting earlier in the middle of this lockdown,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw your refrigerator getting low. You talked about your

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>inability to go out and get more food. Talk to

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>us about how you're doing right now and what exactly

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you can and in the midst of this lockdown at

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this date, well, I was Tyde. I'm on date forty

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>three of my four day lockdown. And joking aside. Uh yeah,

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it's been. It's been incredibly talk very frustrating, as known

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as the people like me in the situation right now,

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I've actually walked downstairs, walk within my compound and and

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>get pick up like a food. Uh that's that's delivered

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. Obviously not not many shops are open, so um,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm sort of like sort of stuck to

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever is available. Although the other day I think get

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some connective fried chicken. So the food situation has ease

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but there's still a lot of concerned

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>about these cardin facilities. People are still being um casse

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in a course too into into going into these facilities

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if you test positive, and they've actually tightened some of

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>these restrictions before if you live in a building where

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you have some positive cases, as long as they're any

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>close contacts, you don't live in the same floor or

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>something that and you wouldn't have to go. But now

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>even if you test negative and as someone in the

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>building that test positive, the likelihood is that you know,

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you could be sent into these uh coin facilities. And

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some of these images that look pretty uh

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty grim. We've seen the frustration in social media post

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people who can't get food? How would you describe the mood?

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>How are people in Shanghai taking this well? I think

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people like me. Uh. I hate

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet his analogy, but I'm going to There's this

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>book by Elizabeth cool or Ross of Deaf and Dying,

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>where when you have some really bad news about about

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe your help or something, and you know,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you're go into shock and anger and moved through the

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>several stages of despair until you reach the final stage,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>which is uh, acceptance. And I think a lot of

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>us are at that stage of acceptance and which right

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're just waiting around hoping that you know, this

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>lockdown will end sooner or later. Right now, the most

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>important metric of all is this one called community spread

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>against the number of cases outside of these quarantining facilities.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are three three consecutive days of no community spread.

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Theoretically we should be able to be released from lockdown

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and last month for two days, and then the third

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>day there are a couple of kids that popped up

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're back to square one. So that's why we're

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at it right now. I mean number of cases,

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Shining has been falling, but communist spread has still been persistent.

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're hoping that at some point, um, you know,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be released. Like it's very frustrating and

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and we just got to wait and see. So there's

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously a question about how this impacts not just the

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 1>local economy but the global economy. Now we're also hearing

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>rumors about a lockdown in Beijing. The Chinese government, as

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, has denied those rumors, but we are

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lockdown light situation. What can you tell us, Well,

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I think two points. First impact on the economy into Paiging. Well,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, exactly, even though the number kids in Beijing,

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>um that there have been that maning you know, roughly

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>in the teens um. But the problem is that it's

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>it's still there. And the guvernment said that you know,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not gonna be locked out in Beijing. That's

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what we were told as well, you know, but it

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>seems that you know, they're moving in upper direction obviously

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>direction and did be shutting down subways, they would do

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot more mass testing. So I would tell us

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>some of my Beging friends stock up, especially coke. You know,

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>buy lots of coke because that's a valuable commodity during

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>its lockdown. And you're right, there's been a big impact

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>on the glotal economy, especially on you know recently we

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>see all the day to coming out of China. It's

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty ugly, manufacturers contracting. We don't of course, consumption is

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>weak and inflation is surging, just like in the rest

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of the world. Um so, and what

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>does I mean for China. I mean basically that it's

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not it's not going to meet his ambitious growth targets

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for this year. Why I don't think so anyway. Um now,

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>long for us from Shanghai. Thank you so much for

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us all. And I know it's early in the

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>morning there before. You really appreciate you giving us a

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>view from China that doesn't For the sedition of the show,

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be back tomorrow, I'll be joined by Greylock

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Partners and LinkedIn co founder Reid Hoffman. Always fun to

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>talk to him, and of course check out our new

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast anywhere you get your podcasts. I'm Emily Changing in

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. This is Bloomberg