WEBVTT - King Street's Brian Higgins On Navigating Distressed Markets

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Master's in Business with Barry red Holds on

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast What Can I Say?

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Brian Higgins has put together an amazing track record handling

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>distressed and stressed debts as well as other forms of credit,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate, collateralized obligations. King Street is a fascinating firm.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It was formed in nineteen ninety five. Over the course

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the past I don't know, twenty five years, they've

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>put together really an impressive track record. They have already

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>returned about eighty percent of the net gains they've had

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to their limited partners. Really, there are a few people

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world who have a better sense of distress, asset, credit,

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>real estate, and how to not only do the fundamental research,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:13.839
<v Speaker 1>but tactically trade around the positions. As an example, institutional

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>investors mentioned King Street in twenty twenty two, perhaps the

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>worst year for hedge funds since eight o nine. They

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>were down three point eight percent. Their benchmarks were down,

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, fixed income was fifteen percent, equities was twenty

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>something percent. To be low single digits is really just

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a testament to their performance. U there are a few

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are more knowledgeable about fixed income, credit, real

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>estate and distressed investing than Brian Higgins. I found this

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation to be fascinating, and I think you will also,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, King Streets Brian Higgins.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you very much, Barry me.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you being here. I've been looking forward to

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this conversation for a while. Let's jump right into it.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You get a bachelor's in business administration from Villanova University.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>What was investing always the career plan?

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually I started out electrical engineering.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Me too. That's funny you say that first first.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Two years electrial engeering. You graduate from high school. I'm

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 2>good at math and science, and you know, I always

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>had an idea with go into business, but I felt

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>that electrical engeering would be a good foundation, and that's

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>what I started at. But after two years it was

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of not very interesting, and I was intrigued by

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the markets at the time. In the mid eighties, you

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of stuff going on in terms of

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the merger boom, and Wall Street was rocking, and I said, hey,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>this is sort of interesting. I was probably the only

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>electrical engeering major that had a subscription to the Wall

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal. So my roommate, who was a mechanical engineer,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>said to me, what are you doing. Why don't you

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>just switch over to finance, which I said.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Sure, makes makes a lot of sense. So you come

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>out of Villanova, you end up at First Boston in

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven in the special Situations fund and distressed

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>securities group.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we started out. I started out banking the two

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>year banking program, which merchant banking was the group I

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>was in. My co founder was an analyst. He came

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>out of Yale. He was in the Bankruptcy Advisory group.

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>So we're in the analyst program together, sixty five of us.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>And after two years I went down to trade distress Proprietarily,

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I got promoted to associate without going to business school.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I had done an undergraduate business and felt that, you know, hey,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I can do this, but I want to get some

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>different just rather being the analyst that never left. I

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>want to get some markets experience, but you know, stay

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in the proprietary side. So there was a proprietary trading

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>group that was forming and I was joined that, and

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>it was an interesting time in high yield as you know,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>shortly thereafter Drexel, which goes from one day issuing commercial

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>paper and the next day they go bankrupt.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So what was it like trading distress securities in the

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>late eighties that had to be you know, a pretty

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let's call it target rich environment.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would say it was interesting because the Marcus

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 2>sophistication that we have today in terms of really the

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>fluidity of capital, structures, of trading desks, et cetera, seamlessness

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>which you had, you had. It was interesting. You'd see

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>things go from say the investment grade market to the

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>high yield market. There was a big disconnect as they

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>move positions that started to trade wider. The buyers didn't

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to go cross assets and a cross

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>let's say ratings as they are today. You know, mutual

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 2>funds were very siloed and now they're a bit wider mandates.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So it was yes, you had you know, ni CE

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>ratings changed for insurance companies post Drexel, and so there

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 2>was a number of less liquid markets that made for

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 2>quite wide spreads. You had a default cycle, so you

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 2>had trading with the crude and trading flat, and so

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 2>there was certainly a number of different movements, but there

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 2>was certainly downside of these things. So one had to

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>be very rigorous in your investing, in your analysis to

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>do the investing.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're at a big bank in eighty seven, you know,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously there were a lot of market dislocations later that year.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>What was that experience like for you? It was.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. I mean, it certainly was indoctrination into the world

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>of finance. You go from you know, these big parties

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>during the summer as you welcome to the new analysts,

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 2>to the market crash obviously in October of eighty seven.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the volatility that ensued and then you know

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the world's going to end, and then you know it

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>comes back. I think that just spoke to the resiliency markets,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>but also the certainly the volatili and fragility of certain

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>sectors that one has to be mindful of. And you know,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately there was a number of opportunities that

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>came out. I had no money back in eighty seven,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 2>but certainly, you know, some of the maging directors and

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>other people that had some money, they made quite a

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit of profits on some of the left

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 2>for dead Microsoft and others that were just you know,

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>sold to very low levels.

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So that sort of this location sounds like it was

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a formative experience.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure, and you know, many of these things I look at,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>you know growing up, you know, gas lines in the

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>seventies and you know, we had real recessions back of

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the seventies and eighties. These days, you know, it sounded

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 2>like an old, cranky, old guy. But when you you know,

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the challenge of prosperity that it doesn't really prepare

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>oneself investors too, right, you know, if you always have

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the FED put, if you always have you know just

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 2>QI forever, that that does have a lot of complacency.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>And you see it as you've gone from active to

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>passive investing, people are like, well, why do I pay

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you know for active investing? I could just you know,

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it's easy. And now is dispersion has increased in fixed income.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's brings back, you know, the active investing.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>But you know, structurally there's there's a lot of money

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that's gone into to pass investing, which we believe will

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>sew the seeds for the opportunity set for some time

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>going forward.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And arguably, passive doesn't work nearly as well on the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income side as it does on equities.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean again passive. You know it's nowadays if

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at the big banks, they're doing portfolio trading

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>with large swaths of their institutional clients. And so someone

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>will say I want give me a triple B single

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>A exposure and these industries, and they go out and

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 2>dial it up or down in terms of exposure.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>That creates opportunities within the trading market. So uh for

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>our long short credit hedge fund, you know there's there's

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 2>this locations and opportunities to trade, uh, to make money

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>in those situations. But I mean, you know it's in

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>these these markets as we as we pivot going forward. Again,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 2>if if you're saying I'm gonna earn five and change percent,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>you know my cash and you know, fixed income no

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>problem to Fault rates are near zero. Now, fault rates

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>are kind of skewed a bit because you do have

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 2>perhaps in high yield. If you look at you know,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>these liability management exercises and other restructurings out of court,

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't default, but then there's a lesser consideration you

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>get for your your claim. Uh, so it does factor enter.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you've had a very benign default environment

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>as we've had a lot of money printed for quite

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>some time. If you look at the Fed's balance sheet,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the M two that has been printed, you know there's

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>there's been a great tailwind. Huh.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting. So let's fast forward to nineteen ninety five.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>What led you guys to depart and co found King Street.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 2>So going from you know, First Boston banking, trading, distress proprietarily,

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>then we started internal hedge fund at First Boston and

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 2>that was from ninety one to ninety four, so I

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 2>think about I already had started, in effect helped form

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to these businesses. And so at the end of ninety four,

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>again many issues with First Boston, which became Credit Swiss,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>became ubs. They've I think I had five CEOs I

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>worked under for the seven eight years I was there,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and so we said we could do this, and my

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>co founder and myself we left around a few months

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>apart in ninety four form King Street started trading in

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety five. We never thought we'd start with the princely

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>sum of four million dollars, which is what we started with.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>We thought, oh, we're gonna start with fifty. All these

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 2>people are like, yeah, I'll give you five, I'll get

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you ten. You know, no problem in encouraging us to leave,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So be it. We started with fort One of the

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 2>first million dollars came from Jimmy Kine, who was chairman, yeah, chairman,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Bear Stearns. I had met him through another

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>friend of mine, Vince TC, and know him through golf

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and got to be friendly with him, and he heard

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 2>what I was doing and he said, you know, I'm

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>happy to give you a million dollars of my money

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to manage, and you can use my name in marketing,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, it was it was quite comical

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>because I have back then a list of references. Right.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It felt like I was going for a job interview

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>asking for money back then. And we were two guys

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine years old, as you know. My brother called

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>us two guys capital and we would you go around

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>all the usual suspects, begging for something, and we ended up,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>as I said, with four million. But you know, Jimmy

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>took a personal pride and he took and people say,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you mean I can call this guy he's CEO Bear

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Stearns said, I said, yeah, yeah, call him up. So

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he call him up and then immediately he'd called me opposite.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, how did I do you get the money yet?

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it was it was, it was very humbling.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 2>It was a very sweet, you know mentor of mine

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>as an Irish Catholic kid. You know, it's nice to

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>have a rabbi such as such as Jimmy and Vince

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, introduced us. And also Vince was incredibly helpful

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>so having to you know, fathers of King Street, if

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you will, And they asked for nothing in return except

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the satisfaction that they received by seeing us grow and prosper,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>which was again very very fortunate and blessed to have

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>that those two people in my life.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So from four million dollars you eventually grow assets over

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>time to twenty six twenty seven billion dollars. That's an

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible track record over twenty five years. And I also

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>can't help but notice it's been reported by places like

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Institutional Investor that you guys have distributed about eighty percent

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of those gains, which is really impressive. It tells me

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're concerned about scaling up too large. Tell us

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about why you kept the firm at

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a fairly modest size in terms of capital that you're trading.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think there's opportunities that EBB and flow, and

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to have the right structure, and

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>so we have a number of business lines. We have

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>our Cloudwise loan obligation business COLO business that is super

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting business. It does help feed into our long short

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>credit business, which is our long standing business that we

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>started in nineteen ninety five. We also have a number

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of drawdown businesses, drawdown meeting, drawdown credit, distress businesses, and

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>those have longer duration attached to them, which is commensurate

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>with the opportunities we're investing in. We also have a

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>real estate business that we so used to be. The

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>credit headphone business had what's called side pockets. A couple

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. We remove them and it's just the

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>liquid long short credit business. And the side pockets come

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in the form of these draw down fund structures. That

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>is something the industry has gravitated towards the last say

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 2>ten years, and.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Meaning as each of those things mature, they get paid

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out to the correct right LPs.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, so you got three or three or one year

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>extension perhaps which three are investing through harvesting and then

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 2>payout traditional but they can vary, and so that's really

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>having different buckets and one has to you know, it

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 2>gets complicated because you have different investors in different buckets,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and then there are different vintages and then they say, okay,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I need distributions and you know which ventures you do,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and the timing they can be, oh, I don't have

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 2>money this year for next year. So there's there's a

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>whole planning that goes on in terms of when you

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>launch different funds. But it for for us in the

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>long shore credit business, there's lots of lots of opportunities

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>as a number of the people that we used to

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 2>see all the time in the markets are no longer

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>around and so that we believe has shrunk the competition,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 2>if you will, in the long shore credit trading business

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 2>for stress to stress, and I think also it's it's

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>where are we in the cycle? Do we ever do

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 2>we believe that there will ever be a credit cycle?

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Do we think we'll ever have defaults again? Or you know,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>will we continue to grow? Depending on your math, we're

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I have two trillion of deficits and you know, then

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all these other amounts of debt around the world in

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the government side that is being printed to uh support

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>global economies. I think at a certain point we see

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>this competition for capital, if you will, between you know

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what the public sector, uh, the government sector, in the

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in the private sector is trying to you know. So

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be hard for rates to go

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 2>low because there's still you know, a lot of depths

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>that's spending out there. I mean, think about the deaths

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>thats we have when it's pretty much full employment, economy

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is still pretty strong.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>What are we one point eight trillion a year?

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean to some say two. You know, it always

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I see different numbers all the time. So it's always

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of like who's math, if you.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Will, huh really interesting. And it seems like everybody and

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>their brother managed to refinance both household and corporations in

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty tens when rates were low, except Uncle Sam

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't couldn't get around to it.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know you say that the I joke,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the greatest asset and many people's portfolio is their thirty

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>year two three percent mortgage, right, And so affordability has

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 2>been problematic because of the supply, you know, we're short

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>whatever five million homes, but the you know, the affordability

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>is still because of that and other factors, has been difficult.

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, I think they're they're you know, it's

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a very it's a complicated landscape on the consumer.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Side, to say the least. I mentioned earlier the Institutional

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Investor Lifetime Achievement Award you and your co founding partner received.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what that meant to you. That is not

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>something that many people get tagged with. I think there

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have been forty recipients of that from Institutional Investor. Tell

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>us what that meant?

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>That sort of recognition, It's an incredible honor and an

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>honor shared by all the current and past, you know,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>people that worked at King Street and so we are

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>some of the effort that has put forth over the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty years, not just the partners, but and also the

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>investors that believed in us and continue to believe in us,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>and counterparties, et cetera. And it sounds tripe, but it

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>is very appropriate and true that, you know, we're just

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>beneficiaries of, you know, some amazing people that we lucky

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to deem us worthy over the years. It's very humbling,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>it's very exciting, and it also you know, it's interesting

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>because you know there's there's always well why now, why

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 2>are you doing these podcasts? Or why would you do that?

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>And I guess it's it's really we have a story

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to tell and I'm very proud of King Street and

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 2>the people, and I think it's a great opportunity. And

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>it also is a sign of the times where we are.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think evolution personally and professionally as a firm

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>as an institution is so critical and I think that's

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>part of our staying power, is our desire to continuous improvement.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you look back and people might say, well,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>why do you focus on the past? Well, you know,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>focus on the past so that there is a future.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the Lifetime Achievement Award is it is kind

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of I thought they give it to dead guys whatever,

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 2>But you know, we're not dead yet and don't plan

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 2>it ever being so we're we're excited about the going forward.

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Like that concept you don't know where you're going unless

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you understand where you've already been. It makes a lot

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Let's talk a little bit about what you

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>guys do you mentioned earlier stressed and distressed. I know

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're two very different things, but there's some nuance

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there help us understand the distinction between stressed assets and

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>distressed assets.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it is kind of nuance in a way.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, distressed assets, you know, you're you're

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>on your way to default most times or restructuring. Stressed assets,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, can be out of favor assets. I think

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you're splitting hairs. You know. Some would say, oh, triple

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 2>C bucket, that's all distressed, and if you look in

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 2>single B, double B, oh, that's stressed. You know. I

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>think it also depends on where we are on the

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>cycle what can be stressed distressed. And also if you

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>look at a stressed infrastructure situation, that might not be

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 2>that wide in terms of total spread. So let's say

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>you have you know, a thousand basis points over the

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>treasury is a say, a distress situation. And then if

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you look at something that normally trades say one hundred over,

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's trading at two hundred over and that could

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>be stressed. Now you would say, well, that's in high yield.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 2>That's nothing we can see a you know, twenty fifty

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 2>hundred and two hundred spread widening or tightening, you know

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>in high yield. Now that is I'm giving a historical perspective.

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 2>It seems like the last couple of years, this is

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>not your father's high yield market when they you know,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>high yield meant junk bonds, and these days high yield

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>is trying to be an investment grade market given the

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>security five ye these days you had the FED come

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 2>in and push a lot of the banks and say, hey,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you can't have a ton of leverage on the high

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>yield issuance, and so they kind of help create the

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>private credit market, if you will, or it went into

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>loans and so and lack of covenant protection. But the

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the quality of the higher market is dramatically different than

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, once I came up.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like it's not so much that there's

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>any real distinction other than a spectrum of risk of

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>your debt is going to have a higher yield but

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>greater risk that comes along with it, and stressed distressed

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are just different points along that spectrum.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair? H? I think that's fair. I mean again,

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure some would have their own classification system as

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>it were I would, I would just liken it and

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>too you know, distressed as you know, real operational issues

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 2>or financial issues that as I say, inevitably preponderance of

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>outcomes is to a restructuring or a bankruptcy out of

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>quart or others, and so versus the stress which is

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 2>not always heading that way.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's delve into not your father's high yield market.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>How does the high yield market differ today than when

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you begin in the nineties, and how much credit or

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>blame lay at the feet of the Federal Reserve.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wouldn't say it's the Fed. I think the

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>markets have evolved dramatically. And if you look at markets

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 2>around the world, you know, the US capital markets or

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the envy of the world, because the banks have had

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 2>less and less responsibility, if you will, meaning they're twenty

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>five percent banking a traditional banks and seventy five percent

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>capital markets, which would be you know, all sorts of bonds,

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>private and public. You go to Europe, it's seventy five

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 2>percent banks. You go to developing markets, it's ninety five

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent banks. And so they're more susceptible boom and

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>buck bus because there's that lack of you know, cushion

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and the more systemic in terms of

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 2>their issues when when the economy turns. But if you

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 2>go back to the question on you know, a high

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>yield and how it's differentiated, there was just a lot

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>more leverage back then. I remember doing the Allied Federated deal. Now,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>granted the ristory rate was higher, but you had you know,

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>sixteen percent loans, seventy percent loans, You had you know,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>eight times ten times leverage, right, So so you have

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 2>less leverage, you know, lower spread going in as they said,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 2>higher quality and then and the greater leverage is being

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 2>found at times in some of the private credit or

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 2>or other loans. But I think this extreme leverage is

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>not as prevalent as it once was, and so I

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 2>would I would argue that, you know, the markets have

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>been more rational in terms of their approach to leverage

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>than ever before, at least you know, my almost forty

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>years doing this.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 1>So you also talked about the US markets versus you know,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Europe and emerging markets. How much credit it goes to

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>places like the FDIC or the SEC or is it

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>just the full faith and credit of the US government

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>standing on top of a very healthy macro economy.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the market construct comparing us versus the

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world. I think, you know, there's a

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 2>lot of credit due to the innovation, open regulation, but

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 2>also involving regulation, and also it helps having these large banks.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>If you look at there hasn't been the big bang

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 2>in Europe as they said it was going to be. Right,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at the wrestling going on between you to

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>credit and commerce bank, and you look at the German

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>banks and some of the issues the stagnant aspect of

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that economy. If you look at savings products over there,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>there's not the full depth and breadth of products that

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>we have.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Even money market you don't have money market funds to

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the same degree you have in here.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Lot of times they do it with you know, okay,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 2>like you have japan Post, you have Italian Post, you

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>have Deutsche Post, you have you know, the regulatory environment

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 2>for asset management in Europe is quite onerous and is

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>difficult to passport. I mean, they have that these days,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 2>but there's still the reality is there's still a lot

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>of inflexibility within the regulatory framework that and look, I

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, I've spent a fair amount of time with

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 2>regulators and central bankers and participated in a number of

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 2>forums and meetings on the topic. It does get complicated

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 2>because Europe is Europe, but it's still a number of

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 2>different countries within that. The US having this large, deep

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>market does help. And look, I think we do have

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the innovation, sophistication, and I think the beneficiarrea is the

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 2>world being able to buy sophisticated products that really are

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>solution providers in all way shapes of form.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to delve a little deeper into what makes

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>King Street so unique, not just its performance, but the

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>way you guys approach the world. You combine a fundamental

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>approach with very disciplined and opportunistic trading approach, which is

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually those are two totally different animals. It's

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see, especially in credit and stressed and distressed

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>see those two married. Tell us a little bit about

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>how that set of strategies evolved and what sort of

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities it's created for you.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I think going back to history, which is nineteen eighty nine, Well,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 2>so you can go back to A seven with the crash,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing the importance of tactical trading, go back to A nine,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the formation of the distress the prop group, the distressed

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>securities group on the trading desk, but being part of

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 2>that when you had very wide bits spreads and you

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>could see that execution and entering an exit position, there

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>was a massive amount of differentiation and performance that could

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>be created if one were to be able to trade

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 2>it tactically. So for example, if things go quite wide

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 2>and spreads where they can trade ten bond points wide,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>being able to buy on the bid side versus the

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 2>as side. If it's fifty sixty market, for example, that's

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent differential. So just your entry point is massive.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>And also we call ourselves short long investors.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And people say as opposed to long short.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct because many of our biggest longs start out as shorts.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 2>And why that's important is.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Meaning you cover the short and then go long correct

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the At the end of the

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>short trade, it's like, oh, if it's good enough to cover,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we want to completely reverse our original views.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, And so initially there's always the and we could

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>sit there a bit of time and it could expensive

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>carrying shorts, so you have to be mindful of that.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>It can take some time. However, it does enable us

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to have done a fair amount of work in advance,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and so let's say something breaks, hopefully we've been short

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 2>it and we have a fair amount of institutional knowledge

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 2>about that situation, and then we can cover it or wait,

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 2>it's going to get worse, because you know, oftentimes management

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>comes out and they say, okay, they find some guy,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 2>they shoot him and say that was the bad guy,

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and now we're back and you're like, wait a minute,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that guy, you know was the janitor. What do you

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 2>mean or are we going to execute on this or that?

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 2>And you say they've tried to execute you know, for

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the last three years, I have able to do it,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>so it really having a bit of perspective is important,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and then you can then time it appropriately. Now we're

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 2>not market timers, but it does give us, I think,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 2>a relative value perspective. So coupling the trading and understanding, okay,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sellers are coming out, there's more coming out.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Having that supply demand question answered is important as well.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So I want to put some flesh on the bones

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of what it looks like combining the tactical with the fundamental.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to quote numbers from institutional investor because

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I know as a regulated entity, I know what I

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot say. I know you can't give specific numbers, but

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I could cite what institutional investor had observed. Twenty twenty

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>two was the worst year for hedge funds since two

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine. The S and P five hundred and

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>down twenty percent, bonds down fourteen percent. King Street, according

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to II, was down only three point eight percent, a

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>massive outperformance to either the SMP or the Bloomberg AG.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what it was like trading in twenty twenty two,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>first time in forty years stocks and bonds were down

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>double digits together.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's set the table going back to

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>say twenty twenty if you look in the pandemic when

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you know world's going to end, and then you know,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of equity injected, and then then we had

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the vaccine news came out, everything rallied, but there was

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>so much stimulus being put and I think, you know,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>just let's say, I don't like losing money ever, and

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is my co founders say, you know, relative performance, but

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 2>you can't eat your relatives. So it's just important to

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>from our perspective, contextualize that. And so we are very disciplined.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that we looked to

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>was like, hey, let's go up in quality, up in liquidity,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and that was a concern. I think one of the

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>things took us by surprise was okay, you know how

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>much inflation really rooted and how quickly and how high

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 2>it went. So I'd say, you know, that was something

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>we missed. Again, we always try to focus on what

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>we did wrong and we correct those. Hopefully then the

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>going gets better going forward trading in twenty two, as

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I said, I wouldn't say it's too differentiated, but again,

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, an absence of a true distress cycle, I

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think that it loses the sort of meaning. But if

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you look at you know, in twenty twenty there was

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a number of things that is really for me at

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 2>more signature important time.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So I want to talk about a few specific investment

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>strategies that King Street does. In twenty seventeen, you launched

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a collateralized loan obligation business. Tell us a little bit

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about that strategy.

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So we've been investing in clos, mezzanine and opportunistically for

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>a number of years, equity and et cetera. We've always

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>had this credit expertise, and we felt that as a

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 2>compliment for our investors and to benefit our launch short

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>credit business. To have the CLO strategy was we think

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a distinctive manage and so we've had a terrific growth

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and successful business launch and continue to grow from strength

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to strength there in both the US and Europe issues

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>during twenty twenty, there was a number of opportunities that

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>came out to rescue finance a number of the companies

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>we had relationships with, and so it has proven very

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>complementary to our business. We describe our business in terms

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>of overlapping circles, and that is that we will have

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 2>different fund strategies and there might be a bond or

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a loan situation that we might see in different funds

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 2>if they meet the investment criteria liquidity duration that we

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 2>are looking for in that particular strategy, and so there

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 2>is real synergistic effects and ability to analyze these situations

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>quite rigorously.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about another overlapping business line, real estate. What

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>do you guys do in the real estate.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So we've been doing real estate, as we mentioned, first

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 2>real estate finance and then real estate buying the equity

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>or buying actual properties for quite some time a number

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. Go again, as I mentioned earlier, the

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 2>demise if you will, the stop doing side pockets and

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you set up separate real estate funds. And so we've

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>set up a number of funds. We've also invested in

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>some specialties such as student housing in Europe. We've done

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 2>last mile logistics, We've done movie studios. We've also done

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a number of financings as the banks have pulled back,

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 2>has created great opportunities in that. And then more recently,

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>we bought a data center business that specializes in AI

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and high performance compute, which is quite an exciting business.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's cul of war. I was reading about that and saying, wow,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be a little off of what I

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>was expecting. Liquid cooled, AI, data center, liquid cooled, what's

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that about?

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>So to give you the history, So years ago we

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>started focusing on growth lending, growth financing. You know, it's

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 2>funny VC distress. There's a lot of similarities between the two.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you don't know what's going to happen with

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the company, is it going to make it not make it?

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>So for example, Airbnb in door dash and twenty twenty

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we lent them money prior to their IPOs. Now, the

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>v on the LTV loan to value the value oftentimes

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the disparity because when you ask a tech person what's

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>this company worth, generally it's it's very very high numbers,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 2>which we don't always support from our valuation. But if

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the loan percentage is quite small five ten percent, then

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a margin of safety, and we have a lot

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of covenants to protect ourselves. And you say, we did

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>some of that. We looked at GPU financing, which GPU

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is the Navidia chip, that's what they produce, and so

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we looked at some financings there. Couldn't get quite comfortable

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 2>the depreciation curve because you know, Navidia comes out of every

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the other day with a new chip, and so we said,

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>why lend your money if every two years you're going

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>to have a new chip, and so worry about the

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>value eroding on that chip. And so even though we

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 2>over earning in terms of financing, now there'll be situations

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and opportunities that will make sense to lend in that sector.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>However that's we then you know, said, wow, this data

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 2>center business is going to have legs for quite some time.

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 2>We looked at the hyperscale business insanely competitive and said, okay,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 2>can't make a mark or find an edge there. And

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that's when we came up with colo Oar, which was

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 2>selling itself. They had been doing liquid cooling for thirteen years.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>They started company thirteen years the company ten years ago,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 2>operational in a co location business in Santa Clara, California,

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 2>in the heart of all these tech bohemoths, and they've

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>been DGX certified by Navidia for over five years. Liquid cooling,

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the way we do it is it's full true liquid cooling.

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Meaning it's more efficient, more productive.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so just think about just the construct right, So

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 2>you have the whole data center, you have three foot

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 2>raise floors, you have an intake outtake of water that's

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>ambient water temperature, goes, flows around and goes to the rack.

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Many will do liquid cooling to the rack, but separately,

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's very expensive because in effect you're retrofitting. Ninety

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>five plus percent of the data centers are air cooled.

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>As we know, air water is three thousand times more

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>effective cooling than air. And so the PUE, which is

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the efficiency rating that they utilize, we're like one point

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 2>three and many are one point five six, et cetera.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's very efficient. You can have a denser facility

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and it can handle the AI chips. The other metrics

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 2>that people use is the killowatz per cabinet, and so

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>we can host up to two hundred and fifty kilowats

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 2>per cabinet, where you know five ten twenty is these

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 2>traditional data centers air cooled and so as Winning Gretzky

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 2>used to say, I skate where the puck is going

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 2>to be and the chips are all about, we need

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 2>liquid cooling. Also, as we look to satisfy the future

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 2>which will be inferenced versus the l M, the big

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 2>training models, there will be a need for the data center.

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So we're having a number of conversations and across many

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 2>different verticals. Our real estate group is executing, plus the team.

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>It's super exciting and and it's again it's it's something

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 2>that evolved out of our overlapping circles with the financing.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, we we don't. There's always a method to

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 2>it that we evolve into.

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Huh, really fascinating. So let's let's start out talking about

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>why we're even talking. For for most of King Street's history.

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You've been a quiet firm. You You quoted one of

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues as saying, Hey, it's the spouting well that

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>gets harpoons. Tell us why we're even having this conversation now.

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Evolution is so important, self improvement, evolution. I think markets change,

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's important to adapt to survive. As

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the trite saying, we might say, we look at the

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 2>opportunities that we're facing, the business that we're building and

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 2>have built, and they're quite excited about it. And I

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's important to communicate for our investors, for perspective,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 2>partners and people that to attract the best and make

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 2>sure we have the best partners, to make sure our

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>story's out there. It's gotten incredibly noisy, if you will,

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>when everyone's out there. So to do nothing, I think

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 2>would be a disservice to the people in the business

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and our and our partners. Really, as you know, the

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 2>opportunities you know come to you know, as they say,

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 2>squeaky will gets the grease and so one has to.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, relationships are great. However, at times people you

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 2>know would say, oh, King Street, they still in business,

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, because if if you're you're not out there

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 2>with your LinkedIn presence or or I think it's just

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>a sign. Look we're not on Instagram, so uh, no

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 2>tiktoks from no no TikTok videos.

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, really really interesting. You know, there's some quotes

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of yours that I really like. One of the things

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you had said recently was what kills you in investing

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is a full sense of bravado, I have all the answers,

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I could beat this market, or that sort of approach.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We say, the work is never done and knowledge reduces risk.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Explain, well, it's it's from our perspective fairly simple. As

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 2>investors that focus on out of favor, distress, bankruptcy, we

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 2>see failure every day, and we would be incredibly delusional

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 2>to think that without and and sometimes it's no fault

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of the companies, right, it's it's some unforeseen act. It's

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, some fraud was perpetrated on it, you know.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's incumbent upon us to be tireless in our effort,

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 2>as there's multitude of competitors out there globally that we

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 2>go up against every day, and if we're not grinding

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it out, then you know there's there's going to be

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a shortfall, and we we don't plan on having that.

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Early in your career, someone would ask you what drives you,

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and your response would be paranoia and insecurity along the

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>same lines.

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, look paranoid insecurity it's it's it's I

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 2>try to be humorous and colorful because investors come in

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and to own on you know that it doesn't always

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 2>keep their attention. I think it's important to look at

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, we also talk about probability and you know proportionality,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>and so if you take those four things right, So

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the paranoid insecurity is like, Okay, did I do enough work?

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Does someone else know what can happen that I'm not seeing?

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>It keeps that drive to continue to ask those questions.

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 2>As we said, knowledge produces risk because you know, these

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 2>is a moving picture. This is not a still life photograph.

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And so there's many different variables that happen through a business,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.280
<v Speaker 2>through a cycle, through you lifetime owning, investment, and markets

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to change. So if you think about the number of variables,

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 2>one would be kidding oneself to think that they can

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 2>rest in their laurels. If you will, the work just

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 2>begins when that investment is made and so in the

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>paranoid it's ccurity. The only paranoid survivors, they say. And

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.479
<v Speaker 2>so we have to say, did I do enough work?

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Was there something I missed? Keeping one up at night

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 2>that constantly looking at it? I think if you look

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 2>at any piece of work, you know, an artist or

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 2>whomever it is, they put some work, they do some work,

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 2>they put it down, they come back, they look at

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 2>it from another light and oh I missed that. Let me,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 2>let me continue to refine it. And so investments, in

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 2>our mind are are bodies of work that need to

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>be continually refined because the elements, if you will, continue

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to challenge it. And then you look at probability and proportionality.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 2>One has to be careful on that right because if

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you say, well, you know this hurricane is going to happen,

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 2>you know the tragic hurricanes that we've had currently and

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:54.439
<v Speaker 2>just recently. Okay, if you had said never going to happen,

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>we haven't had for a while, and if it happens,

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it's it doesn't create much damage. Well, what's the probability

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that that could could outcome? Now, if you look at

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>geological faults and you're buying a piece of property, and

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you're building a data center, for example, and you say, well,

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>one in one point six million or billion years that

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, I feel good about that, right. But if

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you're down in Florida and you're saying I'm not going

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 2>to buy flood insurance now, question can you get it

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 2>these days for it? Right? But like, think about the

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 2>people the tragedy happened in North Carolina up and then

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, they didn't think they'd need flood insurance.

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>They were deep inland and at a fairly high elevation,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and yet they still got flooded out.

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Right. So these are things in terms of proportionality and probability,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and proportionality is okay. You can create a scenario with

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 2>any investment where you'd never make the investment. You could say, well,

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that could happen, and then you could say to certain,

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>well it's one in a million years and it's two

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 2>percent of the business. Is that really going to cause

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you to pass on that investment? So that's the constant

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 2>interplay that we feel is critical to arrive. You know,

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 2>the best decision you can make, and again the best

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 2>things you make today tomorrow look at it again and say,

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 2>oh I screwed up.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned earlier you wanted to be a little public

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because you want to attract and retain the best employees.

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>King Street has about two hundred and fifty people working

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for them, seventy of whom have been with the firm

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>for ten or more years. That's pretty unusual in the

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.839
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund world. Tell us a little bit about the

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>ten year club you guys created.

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it really again, as I said at the outset,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 2>it's celebrating the people that comprise King Street, as I

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 2>thought from the beginning, and talk to other people in leadership.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Remember that your greatest asset goes down the elevator every

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>day and you hope they come back up the next day,

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:57.879
<v Speaker 2>and so one has to again celebrate the teamwork. And

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 2>that's the approach that we have a King Street talked

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 2>about the overlapping circles and the ability to work on

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>different aspects of the business. But it's very much a

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 2>team and we look at the what what the operation team,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 2>the investment team, and the training team. There's a lot

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 2>of collaboration that is constantly occurring, and people get paid

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 2>on the well being of the overall firm, and so

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 2>it forces that teamwork and collaboration, and I think it's

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 2>important to celebrate events. You know, we we have outings,

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>we have different groups celebating our women, our diversity, our

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 2>charitable pursuits, or holiday party. We still have the old

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 2>school holiday party that we do every year. I think

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the summer outings, et cetera. These are all we believe

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 2>part of the building culture. You know, everyone the month end,

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone's birthday gets celebrated with you know, we had them

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 2>happen to every day. So we say, wait, we'll just

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to once a month all the February birthdays you know which,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and then you get to vote on it. So the

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 2>little things that I think create the family, and you

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time with people, and if there's

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 2>not that recognition of individuality and the effort put forth,

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 2>then it's a miss. We believe it's again to celebrate together.

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 2>What we've achieved is critical.

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I've heard a number of executives complain or at least

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>raise the issue. It was very difficult to either create

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>or maintain a corporate culture during the pandemic work from

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>home remote. How have you guys navigated that and how

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>important is corporate culture to a fund like yours?

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, culture is becomes what it becomes. It's you just

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone hopes that they're culture is sustainable and constructive and

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>not toxic, and so we strive to make sure there's

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 2>that communication openness. We do a lot of surveys. We've

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 2>always trying to better our scores. It's self improvement we

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 2>focus on. If you go back to a pandemic, it

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 2>was hard, right because you're on zoom and so you

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>know holiday party on zoom or you know scavenger hunts

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 2>on zoom. It was how do we create these ties

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that bind us over what It was incredibly challenging personally

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and professionally for a lot of people. And frankly, the markets,

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>as we all know back in the twenty twenty as

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 2>our reference earlier, were brutal and working incredible amount of hours.

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>The family challenges that people had with their kids at

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 2>home were trapped in different places and so and the

0:46:53.960 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 2>sicknesses and loss of life. So those are obviously in

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>any regular time important, but we believe, you know, corporate

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>culture has to play its role, uh and not to replace,

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 2>but to be a part of it, to be supportive

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 2>of of people. But it's it's and also think about

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 2>like there's there's We have offices, as you've indicated in

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the US and Europe and Asia Middle East. How do

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>we create that consistency, How do we create that that

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 2>fabric that runs throughout And it's a lot of times

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 2>we'll do our similar uh, you know, furniture and the like,

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 2>so they feel like, oh, this feels like a King

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Street office. Things of that nature. Similar events and uh

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 2>and the swag, if you will, that binds people.

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So your your co founder and partner of Francis BEYONDI

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>retired a couple of years ago. Two questions about Francis

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>First is he is he still sitting on the Yelle

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>investment committee or has he fully retired from asset management?

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And then second, you know, what was that transition? Like,

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>suddenly your co founder is no longer there every day?

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>How did you adjust to that?

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I believe the website's correct. He's still at Yale.

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 2>I know I've spoken to him recently, but I know

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 2>he's got a lot of pursuits and quite busy and

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.439
<v Speaker 2>with his family, and I think he's enjoying a well

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 2>deserved time. He and I had an incredible twenty five

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 2>years together. We call ourselves you know old married couple

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 2>or you know brothers of King Street whatever they call

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 2>us and two Guys Capital, two guys Capitol, right, so,

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 2>which is funnily enough, my brother named that. We grew

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 2>up in New Jersey and in East Brunswick and there

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 2>was a two guys which.

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Is giant Alexander Kolder on the outside of that building.

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Am I remembering that correctly? In Hackensack?

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, I was from I grew up in East Buswick,

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 2>so I don't know about the Hackensack one, but in

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the one it was a discount store and went bankrupt

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 2>in the eighties, which Fernado was part of the Portfolo

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 2>became then the so if it's funny history. But my

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 2>brother recently gave me a shirt you know, two Guys Capital,

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and we've got on a website somewhere. But anyway, so

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.839
<v Speaker 2>I had a saving events there, but no so, as

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:28.719
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier, having this team and this partners with

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 2>us over thirteen years on average and having mds thirty

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 2>eight plus mds with us over ten years on average,

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:40.760
<v Speaker 2>we've had a very deep, deep bench and fortunate to

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 2>have incredible depth and breadth to the organization where we

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't miss a beat, and you know that's that's something

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I think testament to the culture that fran and I

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 2>built the first twenty five years, which we hopeful we'll

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 2>continue for many, many years to come.

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump to our favorite questions that we ask all

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of our guests, starting with what have you been watching

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>these days? What's been keeping you entertained?

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've been watching the Mets a bit lately. I

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 2>went to my first Mets game and.

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 1>In October, which I can't remember the last time you

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.760
<v Speaker 1>could watch the Mets in October having grown up online.

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, yeah, I mean I grew up in New

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Jersey and my first Met game was nineteen sixty nine,

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 2>which when they went in the World Series. Yeah, from

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>a despicable like worst team ever. I think Chicago White

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Sox had taken that over. But anyway, so we went,

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 2>you know there, watch some of that. Also, I'm a

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Knicks fan. Is went to Villanova and they call him

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the Nova Knicks. Funny story. Years ago, I was fortunate

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 2>enough Jay Wright, who was the coach of Villanova, invited

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 2>me to speak to the team before the start of

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the season. They were in New York, and you know,

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 2>talking to the team, and I, you know, I said

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 2>to him, guys, I'm really really nervous here. You know,

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen, they were reigning national champions and if you

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 2>guys don't win the championship like they're, don't look at

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 2>me and blame me. And they were kind of looking

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 2>at me quizzically. And I picked one of the young players,

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 2>young freshmen, and I sat down right across from right

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:23.759
<v Speaker 2>up in his face, and I said, you know, look,

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm really nervous. I got this big meeting and you

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 2>got to help me, you know, can you what do

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 2>you say to me? You know? And he had like

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 2>deer in the headlights. Look, he was eighteen year old kid.

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 2>He was sort of like this, you know, old guy

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 2>with supposedly you know, successful guy coming in begging me

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>for advice, you know. And he said like quizzically, like

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 2>you can do it. And I said yeah. And it

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:55.959
<v Speaker 2>was funny watching the faces of all the older upper

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 2>class and they were laughing because they knew I was

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 2>just trying to see and I said, and I said,

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 2>it was interesting because Jay Wright had called me like

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 2>four times in advance because it was so but you

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 2>go back to leadership and culture. It was so important

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 2>with you want to make sure I was what message

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 2>I was going to give, And I said to the team,

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 2>I said, see, you all can be leaders. You all

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>can inspire. And when you're on the court and Jay

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 2>is you know fifty hundred feet away, who's going to

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 2>inspire and lead each other? And you can't just rely

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>on the coach. You got to look to each other

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 2>for leadership and to sponsor. And that's what when I

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 2>talked to my team and how do we have the culture?

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 2>How do we continually have that leadership If the partner

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 2>is not in the room, who's going to take that

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 2>mantle and who's going to push forward? And so on

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that I ingest. I got to have a

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of intake to have outtake, right because I got

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to do a lot of meetings. So I got to

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 2>find that time to refill the tank with information. And

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 2>so you know, on stuff I'll watch, whether it's if

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:02.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not sports, it will be some you know, mindless

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 2>spies things I like sort of because it's I like

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to travel and see things around the world and different

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 2>cultures and understand that and history, and so that usually

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>wraps up and say a spy things.

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a recommendation only because I watched

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this on the flight back from Europe and it's dead

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:23.720
<v Speaker 1>center of what you're talking about. The Ministry of Ungentlemanly

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Warfare is essentially Churchill's Special Teams creation as a way

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 1>of fighting Nazi submarines during World War Two. If you

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like global spy stuff and history, this is right in

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 1>your sweet timet.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I wrote it down and we'll put it on the

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 2>list for sure.

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and again we're recording this in October. I can't

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>remember the last time I was this excited about a

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>next season, Like, even injured, really distinguished themselves last year's playoffs.

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You know you could see, hey, if they were full strength,

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they could have gone pretty deep into uh to the finals.

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm super excited for this season and and sort

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of seeing what they could do as well.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned some of your mentors. Tell us about

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who helped shape your career.

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I mentioned Jimmy Kine and Vince.

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Tc They were the Vince Tincy was where.

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Vincent tc uh is on the number of boards to

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:36.439
<v Speaker 2>this days. He was Banking Commissioner State of New York.

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:40.080
<v Speaker 2>He was Urban Development chair. He had been a tax lawyer,

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 2>he was the commodities trader. So he had this incredible

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 2>varied career and life and quite successful entrepreneur, and so

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 2>he's always a wealth information contacts and always great great

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 2>advice and perspective. And Jimmy of course ran Barons Stearns

0:54:55.880 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously unfortunate ending to a storied career, but he was

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 2>very helpful in giving great advice.

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Right legendary CEO of Bear Stearns. Let's talk about some books.

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What are your favorites? What are you reading currently?

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I would say book wise, just let's say a genre

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:18.760
<v Speaker 2>books because I listened to them. I'm not a big

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 2>reader because I read so much in terms of research

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and consultants and sell side and our own internal research,

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 2>plus the papers, et cetera. And I try to ingest

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot there and then content deeper content on the

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.839
<v Speaker 2>weekends and then you know, just number of emails et

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 2>cetera you go through. So I'll listen to different whether

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 2>it's leadership or let's self help type things, but it's

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 2>more about I think, the self improvement and so how

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 2>do you get the most out of life if you will?

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 2>There's I love hacks if you will, in terms of

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:02.439
<v Speaker 2>health hacks or you know, efficiency hacks. I think that's

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 2>qurrically important technology to utilize to its followers. So that

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that's sort of the focal point. Let's talk and bye

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 2>on that. Just sorry is I found that blinkst is

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:18.840
<v Speaker 2>a great thing to utilize because the website, well, blinkest

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is sort of the reader's digest version of books, because

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 2>most books they have a concept, interesting concept, and they

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 2>spend two three hundred pages saying same thing seven different ways,

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, trying to convince you that that

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 2>versus blink is like, all right, here's the concept. You're like, okay,

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:36.720
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense. Interesting.

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:41.399
<v Speaker 1>And next, one of my partners likes to say most

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>books should be magazine articles, most magazine articles should be tweets,

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and most tweets should be deleted. And that's his same

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.439
<v Speaker 1>same sort of concepts as blinkst. So now we're down

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to our final two questions. What sort of advice would

0:56:56.680 --> 0:57:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you give to a recent college grad interested in a

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>career and either stressed or distressed investing.

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's the critical importance of analytical rigor, and so

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 2>if you're recent college gradu you can't necessarily go back

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and take the courses that would be helpful. And so

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 2>it's if you see some of the Ivy League kids,

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't have the accounting background. For example. I think

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking is important. I think having some understanding of

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the legal framework as that's become has always become such

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a big deal to get into let's say stress distress

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 2>out of favor. Look, there hasn't been as much interest,

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 2>frankly because the tech world has been such a you know,

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 2>robust world, and so it's important again, as I said,

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to work in the in the credit business to understand

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the those covenants, understand those companies, to get a generalist

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 2>type experience, because one never knows is it the utility sector,

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 2>is that the energy sector, Is it the TMT sector

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that will have issues or asbestos or you know, different issues,

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and then you're like, oh, I'm an expert in this.

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day, if you understand

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 2>casual generation, you understand balance sheets, you understand legal framework accounting,

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 2>then you can kind of learn most valuations frameworks.

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting and our final question, what do you know

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about the world of distressed credit today you wish you

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>knew back in nineteen eighty seven when you were first

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 1>getting started.

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess having the hindsight is twenty twenty perspective

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 2>on markets in general. I think it's important, you know,

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 2>pivoting globally. Also, the let's say, the broad product suite

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that we now have, I think are are are super interesting, informative.

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I I I never would have thought that we would

0:59:08.640 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 2>rebound so easily and quickly in so many different difficult times.

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:16.760
<v Speaker 2>And that that kind of me speaks to the resiliency,

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, of of markets and and the resilt you know,

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the commitment that the governments et cetera had to uh,

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, bail us out time and time again. And

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 2>so now thirty five plus trillion debt we got, you know,

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 2>massive amount of debt and to show for it since

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 2>eight Uh you know, we'll see how it all works out.

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's it's really the the sophistication UH

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and innovative nature of let's say, security design UH has

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 2>been enabled to have the flexibility of capital that has

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 2>been transformative certainly for the US count markets and then

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 2>then finds its way into other markets. But it enables

1:00:03.840 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, people say traffickers and tragedy. You know, it's

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting. We had, you know, one of one of

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the investors going to allocate ESG and he said, well,

1:00:14.160 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, distress, it's not ESG friendly. I said, well,

1:00:17.680 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>we're one hundred percent of ESG. We're trying to have

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>companies help companies survive and you know they have Batty

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is Chusco. We're trying to transform them into into productive

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 2>companies that are you know, doing better think about environment.

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 2>They might have had some spill that they had a

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>big liability from, or the governance was bad. That's why

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>they were, you know, in distress because it's some guy

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>who's stealing money or what have you. So you know,

1:00:42.560 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a number of things that we've been able to

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>prove bon bringing new management or cleaning up environmental issues

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that then the company valuation reabount it.

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Brian for being so generous with your time.

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Brian Higgins. He is co

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>founder and managing partner at King Street. If you enjoy

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, check out any of the past five hundred

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>or so discussions we've had over the past ten years.

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, Bloomberg YouTube, wherever

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you find your favorite podcast, and be sure and check

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>out my new podcast, At the Money, short ten minute

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>conversations with experts about specific topics involving your money, earning it,

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>spending it, and most importantly, investing it. At the Money

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>wherever you find your favorite podcasts or in the Masters

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and Business feed. I would be remiss if I did

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not thank the crack team that helps put these conversations

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>together each week. John Wasserman is my audio engineer. Anna

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Lucas my producer. Sean Russo is my head of research.

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. I'm Barry Retults.

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>What Baths