Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Let make
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief.
Speaker 1: We have Nancy Pelosi going back on the rules that
Speaker 1: she herself changed because you know it's advantageous to her,
Speaker 1: and she has no ethics, no moral compass. She's pretty
Speaker 1: much the most sociopathic Democrat on Capitol Hill, which is
Speaker 1: saying something. Also, what does she think of Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: the Vice president? Is Kamala ready to lead? It's a question,
Speaker 1: it's a worthwhile question. Nancy Pelosi won't answer that question.
Speaker 1: We shall discuss. And then where are we with the
Speaker 1: biden economy, biden Omics they're calling it. How are things
Speaker 1: actually looking out there? What's going on with inflation? We'll
Speaker 1: touch on all these things. So let's start with this.
Speaker 1: Here is Nancy Pelosi. I think this is important. Here's
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi saying that she did not set a precedent
Speaker 1: on impeachment by not holding a floor vote of the
Speaker 1: House to open the inquiry. Here's what she.
Speaker 2: Says, and Speaker Pelosi. Speaker McCarthy made the argument the
Speaker 2: other day that. Well, Nancy Pelosi set this precedent. She
Speaker 2: waited a long time to have a vote on the
Speaker 2: first impeachment of Donald Trump. You did hold a vote,
Speaker 2: we should add, but he said you made the rules,
Speaker 2: and he's just following them now by not holding this
Speaker 2: initial vote for an impeachment inquiry. What do you say
Speaker 2: to that.
Speaker 3: I say that that's hogwash. I mean, it's ridiculous, and
Speaker 3: I don't know why the press keeps repeating it. The
Speaker 3: fact is we said we were going to I assign
Speaker 3: my speak committee chairs, six of them to develop the facts,
Speaker 3: because you have to act upon the facts. That's a
Speaker 3: strange thing to say, maybe around here, but have the
Speaker 3: act upon the fact. We had a couple of weeks
Speaker 3: of doing that, a few weeks of doing that, in
Speaker 3: three or four weeks. We then prepared to bring the
Speaker 3: bill to the floor.
Speaker 1: Now, the problem with this is it is a lie. Now,
Speaker 1: that's not a problem for Nancy. She doesn't care. She
Speaker 1: lies all the time.
Speaker 4: She's just sort of hastandly whatever she has to say.
Speaker 4: She'll wag her little old bony finger in your face,
Speaker 4: and then she'll take a private jet to her forty
Speaker 4: million dollar mansion.
Speaker 1: Or it's a fifteen million dollar mansion, whatever it is
Speaker 1: in San Francisco. She's a person who is addicted to
Speaker 1: the power and purpose of office. She's running again. As
Speaker 1: you know, we see a lot of this, and it's
Speaker 1: actually quite sad. People who do have families. She has children,
Speaker 1: she has grandchildren, which is a beautiful thing, a blessing
Speaker 1: their last years of life. They would rather spend in
Speaker 1: front of CNN cameras on Capitol Hill accomplishing nothing other
Speaker 1: than vanity imposturing. This is true of many people in
Speaker 1: our leadership class, Republican and Democrat of that age, and
Speaker 1: it really says something that's quite quite sad. I think
Speaker 1: it's the fear of not being relevant anymore. But also
Speaker 1: what was it all about? I mean, for someone like
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, what was it all about? It was always
Speaker 1: about Nancy Pelosi. Wasn't about the country, wasn't about serving
Speaker 1: some bigger, broader purpose. In fact, her whole life professionally
Speaker 1: publicly is a lie, the notion that she really cared
Speaker 1: about the future of the country. No, she cared about acquiring, wielding,
Speaker 1: and maintaining power. As Nancy Pelosi, that's it. She had
Speaker 1: an addiction. She's really an addict. And when you understand
Speaker 1: that these politicians are addicts for power, then so much
Speaker 1: more about them make sense. So much more holds up,
Speaker 1: and you can understand why things happened when they do.
Speaker 1: But let's go back to the lie here for a second,
Speaker 1: because impeachment inquiry being opened, and they're saying, oh, but
Speaker 1: you're not holding a vote. Here is Nancy Pelosi on
Speaker 1: the fifteenth of October twenty nineteen saying there is no
Speaker 1: requirement to open for a full House vote to open
Speaker 1: an impeachment inquiry, as the same.
Speaker 3: As chairman said, there's no requirement that we have a vote,
Speaker 3: and so at this time we will not be having
Speaker 3: a vote. And I'm very pleased with the thoughtfulness of
Speaker 3: our caucus in terms of being supportive of the path
Speaker 3: that we are on, in terms of fairness, in terms
Speaker 3: of seeking the truth, in terms of upholding the constitution
Speaker 3: of the United States.
Speaker 1: All right, So did Pelosi forget that this is a
Speaker 1: requirement and that she went forward? Does it matter? She
Speaker 1: doesn't care. She doesn't care. She will say whatever she
Speaker 1: has to say in the moment. Now, this is also
Speaker 1: something I will say, we see with both parties now
Speaker 1: politicians who will lie in the most brazen fashion. It
Speaker 1: used to be because the Internet allowed us to fact
Speaker 1: check them much more readily that there was I think
Speaker 1: greater hesitation to do these kinds of brazen lies. I
Speaker 1: think that used to be the case. It is no
Speaker 1: longer the case. We have entered an air of weaponized untruth.
Speaker 1: I guess you could say where whoever lies the most,
Speaker 1: the most shamelessly, gets the furthest This is what is
Speaker 1: going on. Not a lot of truth telling going on
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill these days. Not a lot of people
Speaker 1: who are saying things you go, oh wow, yeah that's true,
Speaker 1: and that's bad for that person's career right now to
Speaker 1: say that, I'm not saying everything everyone saying capital is
Speaker 1: a lie of course, Republican and Democrat. But if you
Speaker 1: look at our political culture right now, consequences for the
Speaker 1: most outrageous mendaciousness or mendacity one of those words is right,
Speaker 1: their consequences are non existent. No one cares just do
Speaker 1: it go for it doesn't work, does control the other side?
Speaker 1: Everyone can say, oh, that's that's politics. You know, it's uh,
Speaker 1: it's not flag football, it's tackle. It's full contact. All right, well,
Speaker 1: this is where it leads to Nassy Pelosi gets to
Speaker 1: lie and lie and no one even really cares. But
Speaker 1: even more interesting to me was when Pelosi was asked
Speaker 1: about whether Kamala Harris is ready to lead, because this
Speaker 1: is the big problem for Democrats. Everyone knows Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: too old, everybody, even Democrats. But they don't have a
Speaker 1: good second option. They can't have an open primary, and
Speaker 1: they don't want it to be Kamala. So that means
Speaker 1: what are they left with Joe Biden? Yours, truly has
Speaker 1: been so consistent. I've been taking all the arrows on
Speaker 1: this for how many months now? How many months have
Speaker 1: I been going on this show, on the big radio
Speaker 1: show and saying, guys, it's gonna be Biden, It's gonna
Speaker 1: be Biden. It's gonna be Biden. That's not because I
Speaker 1: can tell the future. I can just tell what the
Speaker 1: options are. I can just look at the pathways and say, well,
Speaker 1: they're not going to do that one, and they're not
Speaker 1: gonna do that one. This is their only option. And
Speaker 1: you see this where Nancy has asked about it, and
Speaker 1: here is her response. M Harris the best running mate
Speaker 1: for this president.
Speaker 3: He thinks so, and that's what matters.
Speaker 1: Okay, Nancy has asked about Kamala in a leadership role
Speaker 1: and does not come out the way that I'm sure
Speaker 1: the big supporters of Kamala Harris would want it to,
Speaker 1: which is avoiding the question, avoiding the question. I'm going
Speaker 1: to get back into why that's significant here in a second.
Speaker 1: You know, we are information accumulators, and I just want
Speaker 1: to tell you this is some information you take on board.
Speaker 1: This is from the Wall Street Journal earlier this yearl
Speaker 1: BIT central bank digital currencies are coming, whether countries are
Speaker 1: ready or not. It's in the Wall Street Journal. Central
Speaker 1: bank digital currencies are coming, whether countries are ready or not.
Speaker 1: So I think it's worth you checking out what former
Speaker 1: Wall Street insider and digital currency Expertika Tawari has to
Speaker 1: say about this. He thinks our federal government could soon
Speaker 1: announce a change in the dollar. The inside thinking is
Speaker 1: that our currency may soon become digital currency instead of
Speaker 1: the paper current we've had our whole lives. Tik It
Speaker 1: Twari is warning that the official announcement could come in
Speaker 1: the next few months. He's put together a video explaining
Speaker 1: all of this as well. As providing the three steps
Speaker 1: you need to take to prepare. Go to Dollar Recall
Speaker 1: dot Com to watch this video that some in the
Speaker 1: government don't want you to see. Certainly not right now.
Speaker 1: Dollar recall dot Com. Learn how to prepare before it's
Speaker 1: too late. That's Dollar Recall dot Com paid for by
Speaker 1: Palm Beach Research Group. So why won't they just say
Speaker 1: kom was ready, She's in a great spot, She's fantastic.
Speaker 1: Because there are some in the Democrat Party who I
Speaker 1: think would rather push that forward, and they don't want
Speaker 1: to get the Pelosies that the power structure of the
Speaker 1: DNC and the Democrat apparatus, they don't want that to
Speaker 1: create an opening here because they know they see the
Speaker 1: analysis the way that I do. Pelosi sees it the
Speaker 1: way that I do. And as much as people get
Speaker 1: mad at me for saying this, I just say it
Speaker 1: because I think it's so obviously true. The Democrats think
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden is a great matchup for them. The
Speaker 1: Democrats think that Joe Biden is the best option for
Speaker 1: defeating Donald Trump, and they're already preparing for it to
Speaker 1: be Trump. No. No one at this point that I
Speaker 1: talked to in politics thinks it's going to be anyone
Speaker 1: other than Trump in the Republican primary, unless with all
Speaker 1: the provisos that no one can predict the future, something
Speaker 1: crazy could happen, all the trials that are coming and
Speaker 1: all that kind of stuff. But right now it's going
Speaker 1: to be Trump. So you sit there and you say,
Speaker 1: all right, why would Democrats allow this situation to play
Speaker 1: out the way that it has. Why wouldn't they have
Speaker 1: made given that they've seen that it's been Trump for
Speaker 1: some time, why wouldn't they have made some kinds of
Speaker 1: preparation to have Kamala take over run as an incumbent,
Speaker 1: right because remember Joe Biden steps down, who becomes the
Speaker 1: president Kamala Harris. She then gets run as an incumbent
Speaker 1: president and pick a new vice president and try to
Speaker 1: defeat Donald Trump. That's a very straightforward game plan that's
Speaker 1: not complicated really when you think about it. The problem
Speaker 1: is they think she can't win. Kamala is the problem.
Speaker 1: Kamala is the problem for Democrats right now. That's what
Speaker 1: you see playing out, and that is why they don't
Speaker 1: even want to play this game of making it seem
Speaker 1: like they have too. They can't undermine her entirely. She's
Speaker 1: the vice president for his black female vice president, etc.
Speaker 1: But they don't want people to get any ideas about, oh,
Speaker 1: we can actually do this thing where Joe Biden steps
Speaker 1: down and Kamala takes over, because that would be the
Speaker 1: obvious that would be the obvious play. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: the economy in a second. And since we're talking about
Speaker 1: the economy, you know why the gold standard is a
Speaker 1: phrase we still use even though we're off the gold standard,
Speaker 1: because when all else is volatile, inflation, interest rates, her
Speaker 1: all that stuff, Gold is a standard of value and stability.
Speaker 1: And that's why you want some gold in your savings plan,
Speaker 1: on your retirement account. Right you want to diversify. You
Speaker 1: will come to appreciate owning real gold as a way
Speaker 1: to protect the value of what you've earned. Gold is good,
Speaker 1: it's solid, it's a rare commodity, and it has long term,
Speaker 1: enduring and historically proven value. Before purchasing your gold, make
Speaker 1: sure you get it from the right the right entity,
Speaker 1: the right group, the right people. That's the Oxford Gold Group.
Speaker 1: This is why I've gotten my gold from four years
Speaker 1: the Oxford Gold Group. Make sure that you can get
Speaker 1: gold real gold and silver. If you want delivered secure,
Speaker 1: I have both delivered securely to your home. I'm a
Speaker 1: big fan of the Oxford Gold Group. I've been working
Speaker 1: with them now and buying from them for over four years,
Speaker 1: so I go way back with them. Call them today,
Speaker 1: talk to them about the size of your portfolio. Talk
Speaker 1: to them about what your interests are for diversification. They
Speaker 1: want long term customers who are going to build up
Speaker 1: the appropriate amount of precious metals for themselves for the
Speaker 1: long term. They're not looking to make some quick sale
Speaker 1: that you're gonna be like, oh gosh, what about No. No,
Speaker 1: they want you to be a happy, long term customer
Speaker 1: like I am. Call the Oxford Gold Group eight three
Speaker 1: three four to three zero buck that's a three three
Speaker 1: four three zero b u c k. Or you can
Speaker 1: go online to the website Oxford Gooldgroup dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck that's Oxford Gooldgroup dot com slash b u ck.
Speaker 1: So inflation is a problem right now. Inflation is an
Speaker 1: issue for this election. They thought probably that it wouldn't be,
Speaker 1: but it actually is turning out to be something that
Speaker 1: we're gonna be talking more about. This is now after
Speaker 1: they've pretty much thrown everything they have at the inflation problem.
Speaker 1: The fastest rise in rates that we've seen, and god
Speaker 1: knows how long, a very long time. And I think
Speaker 1: there's a recognition. I mean, here, for example, is Rick
Speaker 1: Santelli CNBC, the guy who called for the tea party.
Speaker 1: Here he is saying inflation is rising. It's up three
Speaker 1: point seven percent over last year.
Speaker 5: The consumer price Index for the month of August headline
Speaker 5: expected up an aggressive six tenths, and the economist and
Speaker 5: analysts delivered up six tenths, up six tenths. The last
Speaker 5: time we had up six tenths on a month over
Speaker 5: month was going way back. You have to go all
Speaker 5: the way back to February. February of twenty twenty two
Speaker 5: to find a bigger number. It was up seven tenths.
Speaker 5: Actually in March it was up as well. So now
Speaker 5: if we consider that the high water mark here in
Speaker 5: two thousand and five was up one point two yes,
Speaker 5: we've made progress, but this follows up two tents one percent.
Speaker 5: Strip out food and energy up three tenths of one
Speaker 5: percent year over year, up three point seven percent. That
Speaker 5: is hotter than expected, hotter than the rearview mirror, and
Speaker 5: three point seven. The last time we're anywhere near there
Speaker 5: was up four percent in May.
Speaker 1: Now you can tell me that this is, oh, just
Speaker 1: part of the plan, but I would say it's obviously
Speaker 1: not part of the plan. So don't tell me that,
Speaker 1: because I would say that doesn't make any sense. They
Speaker 1: thought they would curb inflation, they haven't. Food and energy
Speaker 1: are more expensive, getting even more expensive. Middle classes getting squished.
Speaker 1: Obamacare is a disaster. It's another thing, really interesting Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal piece about it. Obamacare is great if you
Speaker 1: never get sick. If you never get sick, Obamacare is
Speaker 1: a really nice healthcare plan. If you're somebody who actually
Speaker 1: needs to use it, you have a problem. It gets
Speaker 1: very expensive, and it's crappy, very narrow networks. Middle class people,
Speaker 1: people making fifty sixty, seventy thousand dollars, they're the ones
Speaker 1: who are the most affected by this.
Speaker 4: Joe Biden talks.
Speaker 1: About grow the economy from the middle out. You know,
Speaker 1: it's all crap, it's all lies, But we'll continue to
Speaker 1: speak the truth here on the Buck brief Shield time