WEBVTT - Buck Brief - Democrat's Kamala Problem

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.777
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Let make

0:00:14.777 --> 0:00:17.697
<v Speaker 1>sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app

0:00:17.897 --> 0:00:21.177
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief.

0:00:21.217 --> 0:00:24.777
<v Speaker 1>We have Nancy Pelosi going back on the rules that

0:00:24.937 --> 0:00:29.777
<v Speaker 1>she herself changed because you know it's advantageous to her,

0:00:29.777 --> 0:00:33.897
<v Speaker 1>and she has no ethics, no moral compass. She's pretty

0:00:33.977 --> 0:00:37.897
<v Speaker 1>much the most sociopathic Democrat on Capitol Hill, which is

0:00:37.937 --> 0:00:40.937
<v Speaker 1>saying something. Also, what does she think of Kamala Harris,

0:00:40.937 --> 0:00:46.017
<v Speaker 1>the Vice president? Is Kamala ready to lead? It's a question,

0:00:46.377 --> 0:00:49.817
<v Speaker 1>it's a worthwhile question. Nancy Pelosi won't answer that question.

0:00:50.457 --> 0:00:52.137
<v Speaker 1>We shall discuss. And then where are we with the

0:00:52.217 --> 0:00:56.817
<v Speaker 1>biden economy, biden Omics they're calling it. How are things

0:00:56.817 --> 0:00:58.817
<v Speaker 1>actually looking out there? What's going on with inflation? We'll

0:00:58.817 --> 0:01:00.897
<v Speaker 1>touch on all these things. So let's start with this.

0:01:01.737 --> 0:01:04.777
<v Speaker 1>Here is Nancy Pelosi. I think this is important. Here's

0:01:04.857 --> 0:01:10.537
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi saying that she did not set a precedent

0:01:10.777 --> 0:01:16.857
<v Speaker 1>on impeachment by not holding a floor vote of the

0:01:16.937 --> 0:01:19.977
<v Speaker 1>House to open the inquiry. Here's what she.

0:01:19.937 --> 0:01:24.457
<v Speaker 2>Says, and Speaker Pelosi. Speaker McCarthy made the argument the

0:01:24.497 --> 0:01:27.937
<v Speaker 2>other day that. Well, Nancy Pelosi set this precedent. She

0:01:28.017 --> 0:01:29.737
<v Speaker 2>waited a long time to have a vote on the

0:01:29.777 --> 0:01:33.217
<v Speaker 2>first impeachment of Donald Trump. You did hold a vote,

0:01:33.257 --> 0:01:35.537
<v Speaker 2>we should add, but he said you made the rules,

0:01:35.537 --> 0:01:38.057
<v Speaker 2>and he's just following them now by not holding this

0:01:38.137 --> 0:01:40.457
<v Speaker 2>initial vote for an impeachment inquiry. What do you say

0:01:40.457 --> 0:01:40.777
<v Speaker 2>to that.

0:01:41.737 --> 0:01:45.217
<v Speaker 3>I say that that's hogwash. I mean, it's ridiculous, and

0:01:45.297 --> 0:01:47.857
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why the press keeps repeating it. The

0:01:47.937 --> 0:01:51.377
<v Speaker 3>fact is we said we were going to I assign

0:01:51.457 --> 0:01:56.857
<v Speaker 3>my speak committee chairs, six of them to develop the facts,

0:01:57.337 --> 0:02:00.817
<v Speaker 3>because you have to act upon the facts. That's a

0:02:00.857 --> 0:02:03.057
<v Speaker 3>strange thing to say, maybe around here, but have the

0:02:03.097 --> 0:02:05.377
<v Speaker 3>act upon the fact. We had a couple of weeks

0:02:05.377 --> 0:02:07.537
<v Speaker 3>of doing that, a few weeks of doing that, in

0:02:07.657 --> 0:02:10.457
<v Speaker 3>three or four weeks. We then prepared to bring the

0:02:10.857 --> 0:02:11.817
<v Speaker 3>bill to the floor.

0:02:12.537 --> 0:02:16.937
<v Speaker 1>Now, the problem with this is it is a lie. Now,

0:02:16.937 --> 0:02:19.057
<v Speaker 1>that's not a problem for Nancy. She doesn't care. She

0:02:19.097 --> 0:02:19.697
<v Speaker 1>lies all the time.

0:02:19.777 --> 0:02:23.977
<v Speaker 4>She's just sort of hastandly whatever she has to say.

0:02:24.097 --> 0:02:28.217
<v Speaker 4>She'll wag her little old bony finger in your face,

0:02:28.617 --> 0:02:31.897
<v Speaker 4>and then she'll take a private jet to her forty

0:02:31.937 --> 0:02:33.337
<v Speaker 4>million dollar mansion.

0:02:33.857 --> 0:02:35.577
<v Speaker 1>Or it's a fifteen million dollar mansion, whatever it is

0:02:35.617 --> 0:02:40.737
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. She's a person who is addicted to

0:02:41.057 --> 0:02:44.617
<v Speaker 1>the power and purpose of office. She's running again. As

0:02:44.657 --> 0:02:47.217
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see a lot of this, and it's

0:02:47.217 --> 0:02:50.257
<v Speaker 1>actually quite sad. People who do have families. She has children,

0:02:50.297 --> 0:02:53.097
<v Speaker 1>she has grandchildren, which is a beautiful thing, a blessing

0:02:53.777 --> 0:02:56.657
<v Speaker 1>their last years of life. They would rather spend in

0:02:56.697 --> 0:03:00.737
<v Speaker 1>front of CNN cameras on Capitol Hill accomplishing nothing other

0:03:00.777 --> 0:03:05.457
<v Speaker 1>than vanity imposturing. This is true of many people in

0:03:05.497 --> 0:03:09.017
<v Speaker 1>our leadership class, Republican and Democrat of that age, and

0:03:09.057 --> 0:03:12.657
<v Speaker 1>it really says something that's quite quite sad. I think

0:03:12.697 --> 0:03:17.217
<v Speaker 1>it's the fear of not being relevant anymore. But also

0:03:17.577 --> 0:03:19.537
<v Speaker 1>what was it all about? I mean, for someone like

0:03:19.617 --> 0:03:21.457
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, what was it all about? It was always

0:03:21.457 --> 0:03:25.697
<v Speaker 1>about Nancy Pelosi. Wasn't about the country, wasn't about serving

0:03:25.737 --> 0:03:30.217
<v Speaker 1>some bigger, broader purpose. In fact, her whole life professionally

0:03:30.257 --> 0:03:34.217
<v Speaker 1>publicly is a lie, the notion that she really cared

0:03:34.257 --> 0:03:38.137
<v Speaker 1>about the future of the country. No, she cared about acquiring, wielding,

0:03:38.417 --> 0:03:42.297
<v Speaker 1>and maintaining power. As Nancy Pelosi, that's it. She had

0:03:42.337 --> 0:03:45.497
<v Speaker 1>an addiction. She's really an addict. And when you understand

0:03:45.537 --> 0:03:49.217
<v Speaker 1>that these politicians are addicts for power, then so much

0:03:49.257 --> 0:03:52.897
<v Speaker 1>more about them make sense. So much more holds up,

0:03:52.937 --> 0:03:55.017
<v Speaker 1>and you can understand why things happened when they do.

0:03:55.097 --> 0:03:56.937
<v Speaker 1>But let's go back to the lie here for a second,

0:03:56.977 --> 0:04:00.737
<v Speaker 1>because impeachment inquiry being opened, and they're saying, oh, but

0:04:00.737 --> 0:04:04.377
<v Speaker 1>you're not holding a vote. Here is Nancy Pelosi on

0:04:04.497 --> 0:04:08.057
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth of October twenty nineteen saying there is no

0:04:08.177 --> 0:04:11.537
<v Speaker 1>requirement to open for a full House vote to open

0:04:11.617 --> 0:04:14.737
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment inquiry, as the same.

0:04:14.577 --> 0:04:18.057
<v Speaker 3>As chairman said, there's no requirement that we have a vote,

0:04:18.417 --> 0:04:20.617
<v Speaker 3>and so at this time we will not be having

0:04:20.657 --> 0:04:22.977
<v Speaker 3>a vote. And I'm very pleased with the thoughtfulness of

0:04:22.977 --> 0:04:26.737
<v Speaker 3>our caucus in terms of being supportive of the path

0:04:27.377 --> 0:04:30.137
<v Speaker 3>that we are on, in terms of fairness, in terms

0:04:30.177 --> 0:04:33.417
<v Speaker 3>of seeking the truth, in terms of upholding the constitution

0:04:33.897 --> 0:04:35.057
<v Speaker 3>of the United States.

0:04:35.417 --> 0:04:39.777
<v Speaker 1>All right, So did Pelosi forget that this is a

0:04:39.817 --> 0:04:43.417
<v Speaker 1>requirement and that she went forward? Does it matter? She

0:04:43.457 --> 0:04:46.497
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care. She doesn't care. She will say whatever she

0:04:46.537 --> 0:04:48.257
<v Speaker 1>has to say in the moment. Now, this is also

0:04:48.297 --> 0:04:50.297
<v Speaker 1>something I will say, we see with both parties now

0:04:51.017 --> 0:04:53.417
<v Speaker 1>politicians who will lie in the most brazen fashion. It

0:04:53.497 --> 0:04:56.977
<v Speaker 1>used to be because the Internet allowed us to fact

0:04:57.137 --> 0:05:00.217
<v Speaker 1>check them much more readily that there was I think

0:05:00.217 --> 0:05:04.617
<v Speaker 1>greater hesitation to do these kinds of brazen lies. I

0:05:04.657 --> 0:05:06.497
<v Speaker 1>think that used to be the case. It is no

0:05:06.577 --> 0:05:12.137
<v Speaker 1>longer the case. We have entered an air of weaponized untruth.

0:05:12.217 --> 0:05:15.457
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say where whoever lies the most,

0:05:16.417 --> 0:05:24.017
<v Speaker 1>the most shamelessly, gets the furthest This is what is

0:05:24.057 --> 0:05:26.617
<v Speaker 1>going on. Not a lot of truth telling going on

0:05:26.617 --> 0:05:28.657
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill these days. Not a lot of people

0:05:28.657 --> 0:05:30.817
<v Speaker 1>who are saying things you go, oh wow, yeah that's true,

0:05:30.857 --> 0:05:34.097
<v Speaker 1>and that's bad for that person's career right now to

0:05:34.137 --> 0:05:36.977
<v Speaker 1>say that, I'm not saying everything everyone saying capital is

0:05:37.017 --> 0:05:38.817
<v Speaker 1>a lie of course, Republican and Democrat. But if you

0:05:38.857 --> 0:05:42.817
<v Speaker 1>look at our political culture right now, consequences for the

0:05:42.857 --> 0:05:49.737
<v Speaker 1>most outrageous mendaciousness or mendacity one of those words is right,

0:05:51.257 --> 0:05:53.857
<v Speaker 1>their consequences are non existent. No one cares just do

0:05:53.937 --> 0:05:57.017
<v Speaker 1>it go for it doesn't work, does control the other side?

0:05:57.577 --> 0:06:00.857
<v Speaker 1>Everyone can say, oh, that's that's politics. You know, it's uh,

0:06:01.257 --> 0:06:07.177
<v Speaker 1>it's not flag football, it's tackle. It's full contact. All right, well,

0:06:07.217 --> 0:06:08.897
<v Speaker 1>this is where it leads to Nassy Pelosi gets to

0:06:08.937 --> 0:06:11.577
<v Speaker 1>lie and lie and no one even really cares. But

0:06:11.697 --> 0:06:15.417
<v Speaker 1>even more interesting to me was when Pelosi was asked

0:06:16.057 --> 0:06:20.097
<v Speaker 1>about whether Kamala Harris is ready to lead, because this

0:06:20.137 --> 0:06:23.137
<v Speaker 1>is the big problem for Democrats. Everyone knows Joe Biden's

0:06:23.137 --> 0:06:25.377
<v Speaker 1>too old, everybody, even Democrats. But they don't have a

0:06:25.377 --> 0:06:28.177
<v Speaker 1>good second option. They can't have an open primary, and

0:06:28.177 --> 0:06:29.817
<v Speaker 1>they don't want it to be Kamala. So that means

0:06:29.817 --> 0:06:32.737
<v Speaker 1>what are they left with Joe Biden? Yours, truly has

0:06:32.777 --> 0:06:35.777
<v Speaker 1>been so consistent. I've been taking all the arrows on

0:06:35.817 --> 0:06:38.137
<v Speaker 1>this for how many months now? How many months have

0:06:38.137 --> 0:06:39.897
<v Speaker 1>I been going on this show, on the big radio

0:06:39.937 --> 0:06:41.657
<v Speaker 1>show and saying, guys, it's gonna be Biden, It's gonna

0:06:41.657 --> 0:06:44.497
<v Speaker 1>be Biden. It's gonna be Biden. That's not because I

0:06:44.497 --> 0:06:46.137
<v Speaker 1>can tell the future. I can just tell what the

0:06:46.137 --> 0:06:49.137
<v Speaker 1>options are. I can just look at the pathways and say, well,

0:06:49.177 --> 0:06:50.617
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to do that one, and they're not

0:06:50.617 --> 0:06:54.097
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that one. This is their only option. And

0:06:54.137 --> 0:06:56.377
<v Speaker 1>you see this where Nancy has asked about it, and

0:06:56.457 --> 0:07:02.457
<v Speaker 1>here is her response. M Harris the best running mate

0:07:02.457 --> 0:07:03.137
<v Speaker 1>for this president.

0:07:03.737 --> 0:07:05.777
<v Speaker 3>He thinks so, and that's what matters.

0:07:06.657 --> 0:07:11.337
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Nancy has asked about Kamala in a leadership role

0:07:11.497 --> 0:07:15.217
<v Speaker 1>and does not come out the way that I'm sure

0:07:15.257 --> 0:07:19.257
<v Speaker 1>the big supporters of Kamala Harris would want it to,

0:07:20.297 --> 0:07:26.497
<v Speaker 1>which is avoiding the question, avoiding the question. I'm going

0:07:26.537 --> 0:07:28.937
<v Speaker 1>to get back into why that's significant here in a second.

0:07:29.617 --> 0:07:32.977
<v Speaker 1>You know, we are information accumulators, and I just want

0:07:32.977 --> 0:07:35.457
<v Speaker 1>to tell you this is some information you take on board.

0:07:35.497 --> 0:07:39.817
<v Speaker 1>This is from the Wall Street Journal earlier this yearl

0:07:39.857 --> 0:07:44.057
<v Speaker 1>BIT central bank digital currencies are coming, whether countries are

0:07:44.097 --> 0:07:47.977
<v Speaker 1>ready or not. It's in the Wall Street Journal. Central

0:07:47.977 --> 0:07:52.017
<v Speaker 1>bank digital currencies are coming, whether countries are ready or not.

0:07:53.137 --> 0:07:56.657
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's worth you checking out what former

0:07:56.777 --> 0:08:00.217
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street insider and digital currency Expertika Tawari has to

0:08:00.257 --> 0:08:02.977
<v Speaker 1>say about this. He thinks our federal government could soon

0:08:03.017 --> 0:08:06.097
<v Speaker 1>announce a change in the dollar. The inside thinking is

0:08:06.137 --> 0:08:09.497
<v Speaker 1>that our currency may soon become digital currency instead of

0:08:09.497 --> 0:08:11.657
<v Speaker 1>the paper current we've had our whole lives. Tik It

0:08:11.737 --> 0:08:14.577
<v Speaker 1>Twari is warning that the official announcement could come in

0:08:14.577 --> 0:08:17.217
<v Speaker 1>the next few months. He's put together a video explaining

0:08:17.257 --> 0:08:19.177
<v Speaker 1>all of this as well. As providing the three steps

0:08:19.177 --> 0:08:22.057
<v Speaker 1>you need to take to prepare. Go to Dollar Recall

0:08:22.177 --> 0:08:24.737
<v Speaker 1>dot Com to watch this video that some in the

0:08:24.737 --> 0:08:27.417
<v Speaker 1>government don't want you to see. Certainly not right now.

0:08:27.977 --> 0:08:30.417
<v Speaker 1>Dollar recall dot Com. Learn how to prepare before it's

0:08:30.457 --> 0:08:34.817
<v Speaker 1>too late. That's Dollar Recall dot Com paid for by

0:08:34.857 --> 0:08:38.937
<v Speaker 1>Palm Beach Research Group. So why won't they just say

0:08:39.537 --> 0:08:44.257
<v Speaker 1>kom was ready, She's in a great spot, She's fantastic.

0:08:44.817 --> 0:08:46.857
<v Speaker 1>Because there are some in the Democrat Party who I

0:08:46.857 --> 0:08:50.777
<v Speaker 1>think would rather push that forward, and they don't want

0:08:51.337 --> 0:08:54.457
<v Speaker 1>to get the Pelosies that the power structure of the

0:08:54.537 --> 0:08:59.977
<v Speaker 1>DNC and the Democrat apparatus, they don't want that to

0:09:00.017 --> 0:09:03.217
<v Speaker 1>create an opening here because they know they see the

0:09:03.257 --> 0:09:05.297
<v Speaker 1>analysis the way that I do. Pelosi sees it the

0:09:05.337 --> 0:09:07.977
<v Speaker 1>way that I do. And as much as people get

0:09:07.977 --> 0:09:09.377
<v Speaker 1>mad at me for saying this, I just say it

0:09:09.417 --> 0:09:13.377
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's so obviously true. The Democrats think

0:09:13.617 --> 0:09:16.857
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden is a great matchup for them. The

0:09:16.937 --> 0:09:22.057
<v Speaker 1>Democrats think that Joe Biden is the best option for

0:09:22.177 --> 0:09:24.737
<v Speaker 1>defeating Donald Trump, and they're already preparing for it to

0:09:24.737 --> 0:09:26.817
<v Speaker 1>be Trump. No. No one at this point that I

0:09:26.897 --> 0:09:29.097
<v Speaker 1>talked to in politics thinks it's going to be anyone

0:09:29.177 --> 0:09:32.737
<v Speaker 1>other than Trump in the Republican primary, unless with all

0:09:32.777 --> 0:09:35.777
<v Speaker 1>the provisos that no one can predict the future, something

0:09:35.897 --> 0:09:40.297
<v Speaker 1>crazy could happen, all the trials that are coming and

0:09:40.337 --> 0:09:42.497
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. But right now it's going

0:09:42.577 --> 0:09:44.817
<v Speaker 1>to be Trump. So you sit there and you say,

0:09:45.017 --> 0:09:49.017
<v Speaker 1>all right, why would Democrats allow this situation to play

0:09:49.017 --> 0:09:51.417
<v Speaker 1>out the way that it has. Why wouldn't they have

0:09:51.497 --> 0:09:56.057
<v Speaker 1>made given that they've seen that it's been Trump for

0:09:56.057 --> 0:09:58.657
<v Speaker 1>some time, why wouldn't they have made some kinds of

0:09:58.697 --> 0:10:04.297
<v Speaker 1>preparation to have Kamala take over run as an incumbent,

0:10:05.097 --> 0:10:07.057
<v Speaker 1>right because remember Joe Biden steps down, who becomes the

0:10:07.057 --> 0:10:09.617
<v Speaker 1>president Kamala Harris. She then gets run as an incumbent

0:10:09.657 --> 0:10:13.937
<v Speaker 1>president and pick a new vice president and try to

0:10:13.977 --> 0:10:17.897
<v Speaker 1>defeat Donald Trump. That's a very straightforward game plan that's

0:10:17.937 --> 0:10:21.937
<v Speaker 1>not complicated really when you think about it. The problem

0:10:22.017 --> 0:10:25.417
<v Speaker 1>is they think she can't win. Kamala is the problem.

0:10:26.497 --> 0:10:31.017
<v Speaker 1>Kamala is the problem for Democrats right now. That's what

0:10:31.057 --> 0:10:34.297
<v Speaker 1>you see playing out, and that is why they don't

0:10:34.297 --> 0:10:36.057
<v Speaker 1>even want to play this game of making it seem

0:10:36.057 --> 0:10:38.657
<v Speaker 1>like they have too. They can't undermine her entirely. She's

0:10:38.657 --> 0:10:41.137
<v Speaker 1>the vice president for his black female vice president, etc.

0:10:41.937 --> 0:10:45.217
<v Speaker 1>But they don't want people to get any ideas about, oh,

0:10:45.257 --> 0:10:50.177
<v Speaker 1>we can actually do this thing where Joe Biden steps

0:10:50.217 --> 0:10:53.337
<v Speaker 1>down and Kamala takes over, because that would be the

0:10:53.657 --> 0:10:58.937
<v Speaker 1>obvious that would be the obvious play. Let's talk about

0:10:58.977 --> 0:11:00.697
<v Speaker 1>the economy in a second. And since we're talking about

0:11:00.697 --> 0:11:04.057
<v Speaker 1>the economy, you know why the gold standard is a

0:11:04.057 --> 0:11:06.337
<v Speaker 1>phrase we still use even though we're off the gold standard,

0:11:06.377 --> 0:11:10.017
<v Speaker 1>because when all else is volatile, inflation, interest rates, her

0:11:10.457 --> 0:11:14.497
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, Gold is a standard of value and stability.

0:11:15.137 --> 0:11:17.577
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you want some gold in your savings plan,

0:11:17.657 --> 0:11:20.657
<v Speaker 1>on your retirement account. Right you want to diversify. You

0:11:20.697 --> 0:11:23.017
<v Speaker 1>will come to appreciate owning real gold as a way

0:11:23.057 --> 0:11:26.137
<v Speaker 1>to protect the value of what you've earned. Gold is good,

0:11:26.217 --> 0:11:29.257
<v Speaker 1>it's solid, it's a rare commodity, and it has long term,

0:11:29.537 --> 0:11:34.377
<v Speaker 1>enduring and historically proven value. Before purchasing your gold, make

0:11:34.377 --> 0:11:36.577
<v Speaker 1>sure you get it from the right the right entity,

0:11:36.617 --> 0:11:39.097
<v Speaker 1>the right group, the right people. That's the Oxford Gold Group.

0:11:39.137 --> 0:11:41.337
<v Speaker 1>This is why I've gotten my gold from four years

0:11:41.857 --> 0:11:44.497
<v Speaker 1>the Oxford Gold Group. Make sure that you can get

0:11:44.537 --> 0:11:47.617
<v Speaker 1>gold real gold and silver. If you want delivered secure,

0:11:47.617 --> 0:11:52.177
<v Speaker 1>I have both delivered securely to your home. I'm a

0:11:52.217 --> 0:11:54.217
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the Oxford Gold Group. I've been working

0:11:54.217 --> 0:11:56.857
<v Speaker 1>with them now and buying from them for over four years,

0:11:57.057 --> 0:11:59.897
<v Speaker 1>so I go way back with them. Call them today,

0:12:00.057 --> 0:12:01.897
<v Speaker 1>talk to them about the size of your portfolio. Talk

0:12:01.937 --> 0:12:05.417
<v Speaker 1>to them about what your interests are for diversification. They

0:12:05.457 --> 0:12:07.657
<v Speaker 1>want long term customers who are going to build up

0:12:07.697 --> 0:12:10.897
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate amount of precious metals for themselves for the

0:12:10.977 --> 0:12:13.097
<v Speaker 1>long term. They're not looking to make some quick sale

0:12:13.097 --> 0:12:14.817
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna be like, oh gosh, what about No. No,

0:12:15.257 --> 0:12:18.657
<v Speaker 1>they want you to be a happy, long term customer

0:12:18.777 --> 0:12:21.497
<v Speaker 1>like I am. Call the Oxford Gold Group eight three

0:12:21.657 --> 0:12:24.657
<v Speaker 1>three four to three zero buck that's a three three

0:12:24.817 --> 0:12:27.977
<v Speaker 1>four three zero b u c k. Or you can

0:12:27.977 --> 0:12:31.217
<v Speaker 1>go online to the website Oxford Gooldgroup dot com slash

0:12:31.257 --> 0:12:35.897
<v Speaker 1>buck that's Oxford Gooldgroup dot com slash b u ck.

0:12:36.977 --> 0:12:41.817
<v Speaker 1>So inflation is a problem right now. Inflation is an

0:12:41.897 --> 0:12:46.137
<v Speaker 1>issue for this election. They thought probably that it wouldn't be,

0:12:46.377 --> 0:12:49.617
<v Speaker 1>but it actually is turning out to be something that

0:12:49.697 --> 0:12:54.497
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking more about. This is now after

0:12:54.577 --> 0:12:58.377
<v Speaker 1>they've pretty much thrown everything they have at the inflation problem.

0:12:58.417 --> 0:13:01.257
<v Speaker 1>The fastest rise in rates that we've seen, and god

0:13:01.337 --> 0:13:04.697
<v Speaker 1>knows how long, a very long time. And I think

0:13:04.697 --> 0:13:06.897
<v Speaker 1>there's a recognition. I mean, here, for example, is Rick

0:13:06.977 --> 0:13:09.937
<v Speaker 1>Santelli CNBC, the guy who called for the tea party.

0:13:10.537 --> 0:13:13.257
<v Speaker 1>Here he is saying inflation is rising. It's up three

0:13:13.257 --> 0:13:15.497
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent over last year.

0:13:16.297 --> 0:13:19.897
<v Speaker 5>The consumer price Index for the month of August headline

0:13:19.937 --> 0:13:24.017
<v Speaker 5>expected up an aggressive six tenths, and the economist and

0:13:24.057 --> 0:13:28.457
<v Speaker 5>analysts delivered up six tenths, up six tenths. The last

0:13:28.457 --> 0:13:30.817
<v Speaker 5>time we had up six tenths on a month over

0:13:30.937 --> 0:13:34.457
<v Speaker 5>month was going way back. You have to go all

0:13:34.497 --> 0:13:38.617
<v Speaker 5>the way back to February. February of twenty twenty two

0:13:38.697 --> 0:13:41.417
<v Speaker 5>to find a bigger number. It was up seven tenths.

0:13:41.497 --> 0:13:44.297
<v Speaker 5>Actually in March it was up as well. So now

0:13:44.337 --> 0:13:47.457
<v Speaker 5>if we consider that the high water mark here in

0:13:47.457 --> 0:13:50.217
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and five was up one point two yes,

0:13:50.297 --> 0:13:53.777
<v Speaker 5>we've made progress, but this follows up two tents one percent.

0:13:53.817 --> 0:13:56.657
<v Speaker 5>Strip out food and energy up three tenths of one

0:13:56.697 --> 0:14:00.897
<v Speaker 5>percent year over year, up three point seven percent. That

0:14:01.017 --> 0:14:04.177
<v Speaker 5>is hotter than expected, hotter than the rearview mirror, and

0:14:04.297 --> 0:14:07.097
<v Speaker 5>three point seven. The last time we're anywhere near there

0:14:07.217 --> 0:14:09.057
<v Speaker 5>was up four percent in May.

0:14:09.817 --> 0:14:14.417
<v Speaker 1>Now you can tell me that this is, oh, just

0:14:14.537 --> 0:14:17.697
<v Speaker 1>part of the plan, but I would say it's obviously

0:14:17.737 --> 0:14:19.977
<v Speaker 1>not part of the plan. So don't tell me that,

0:14:19.977 --> 0:14:23.017
<v Speaker 1>because I would say that doesn't make any sense. They

0:14:23.017 --> 0:14:26.457
<v Speaker 1>thought they would curb inflation, they haven't. Food and energy

0:14:26.497 --> 0:14:31.497
<v Speaker 1>are more expensive, getting even more expensive. Middle classes getting squished.

0:14:32.977 --> 0:14:36.177
<v Speaker 1>Obamacare is a disaster. It's another thing, really interesting Wall

0:14:36.217 --> 0:14:38.977
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal piece about it. Obamacare is great if you

0:14:39.017 --> 0:14:42.377
<v Speaker 1>never get sick. If you never get sick, Obamacare is

0:14:42.377 --> 0:14:45.137
<v Speaker 1>a really nice healthcare plan. If you're somebody who actually

0:14:45.177 --> 0:14:48.217
<v Speaker 1>needs to use it, you have a problem. It gets

0:14:48.457 --> 0:14:52.977
<v Speaker 1>very expensive, and it's crappy, very narrow networks. Middle class people,

0:14:52.977 --> 0:14:55.497
<v Speaker 1>people making fifty sixty, seventy thousand dollars, they're the ones

0:14:55.537 --> 0:14:56.777
<v Speaker 1>who are the most affected by this.

0:14:57.937 --> 0:14:58.817
<v Speaker 4>Joe Biden talks.

0:14:58.617 --> 0:15:00.857
<v Speaker 1>About grow the economy from the middle out. You know,

0:15:01.737 --> 0:15:05.417
<v Speaker 1>it's all crap, it's all lies, But we'll continue to

0:15:05.457 --> 0:15:08.737
<v Speaker 1>speak the truth here on the Buck brief Shield time