WEBVTT - Berkshire, Tyson, Activision, and Apple (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of an investor meeting over the weekend. Now,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>who has investor meetings like on a Saturday?

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>The ones that don't want to have them while markets

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>are publicly trading.

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's brilliant.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 3>And if you want to be the center of attention,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you know that people are going to pay attention on

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 3>a Saturday.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great, and some people actually go out

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the Omaha, Nebraska to attend. One of those people is

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Palozola. He's a senior insurance analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 1>How was Omaha?

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I was there. It was fine, it was supposed to

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 4>be warm. It was a little rainy the first day,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>but I got to stay in downtown Omaha, which had

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 4>some nice restaurants.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>No, so let's get disappointed, Paul, So, I mean, do

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you literally thousands of people go into an arena.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's the downtown arena there. They have two days.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 4>The first day is essentially a shopping day where all

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the companies are there, people are buying stuff hand over fist.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Did you get to talk to some of the managements

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>of the companies? Which is coal? And then the second

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 4>day is the actual meeting.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, wait at an arena like college orientation?

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Like, yeah, no, I think it's described. It's the Chi

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 4>or Chai. Actually don't know the name of the arena

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 4>in Omaha. And there are sports teams that play there,

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>so it's it's kind of like a smaller version of

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 4>a sports arena that you might see here.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, so takeaways here, occidental patrolling, let's start there.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>What's burshore Hathway saying they're going to do that?

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>So he shot that down. He specifically brought up, we're

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>not going to buy it. We don't want to buy

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>the whole company. We might buy more of the stock,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 4>but we're not interested in owning the whole company.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And is that anything more than that? Like we feel

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like we've got enough energy, we've had enough exposure. Why

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't they take a control you didn't.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Really touch on it. I mean they have a lot

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 4>of energy, they own a ton of Chevron as well.

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Those kind of operate in the same space. So and

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 4>he said, why would we want to do that, I mean,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>they own the preferreds. Why would they want to lose

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>that yield on those preferreds to own the stock.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, you are at its core, as I discovered this

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>morning an insurance guy. So give us the give us

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 3>the highlights from Geico here.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 4>So what was interesting is auto insurers have been really

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>taking it on the chin for the pasting year. The

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>first quarter results surprised on the upside because of Geico.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>So the results were better than I thought they'd be.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 5>A G.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Jane, who's in charge of the insurance business and vice chairman,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>pointed out they had favorable reserve development and it was

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of seasonality and he kind of talked

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>down the next two years. So it was a kind

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>of earnings beat on that. But the go forward outlook

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 4>not great.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So so like on the auto business, Detroitch making fewer cars,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>therefore there's fewer insurance policies. Therefore Geico's business growth that

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is coming down is that kind of the way I

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think about it.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Not necessarily. So what it is is maybe fewer cars

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 4>being built, prices of those cars going up, those cars

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>becoming more expensive to repair or replace, thus insurance claims

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 4>going up. Kiko is actually cutting claim cutting policies to

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>combat that. So their policies are going down, but not

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 4>for the reason that they're being less cars, for the

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 4>reason that they're just making less money so they want

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 4>to stop losing.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And they still spend a lot on advertising.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 4>They certainly do. All of them are cutting across the board,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 4>but cutting.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>From a large starting right, what else, I'm sorry, what

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>else in the insurance business? Like to explain those what else?

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire Hathaway has an insurance.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Business, so they have a I know, this is your

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 4>favorite business, reinsurance business, which is insurance for insurance companies.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>And what was very interesting was there's renewal points at

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 4>certain points in the year, and one of the big

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 4>ones is January first, and Berkshire was kind of a

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>non player in that huge player in the space. So

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 4>there was a question of what are they seeing that

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 4>we're not seeing, because this is the prices in reinsurance

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 4>are doing really well. And other reinsurance can be saying

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 4>this is great. It's a generational market. And Berkshire, known

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 4>as one of the smartest players, actually didn't participate and

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>we didn't know what happened. A jet actually said at

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the meeting, you know what, a lot of capacity came

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>on that undercut us in price in January, but in

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 4>April we saw that capacity come back. So they're jumping

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 4>back into reinsurance in a big way. Oh my gosh,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 4>so who ensures the reinsurance the retro reinsurance. There's another

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 4>level of it.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Actually, wait really yes, oh okay, that was scastic hing

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>every single day. Let's talk a little bit about the

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>cash pile of the Brickshire is sitting on here, so.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>One hundred and thirty billion ish in cash. What was

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 4>incredibly interesting is, you know, the takeaway a lot of

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 4>headlines where Buffett says operating companies going to make less

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 4>money next year, which he did say, and it was

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 4>an extraordinary environment in the past couple of years. That

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 4>demand was through the roof. If people couldn't buy one thing,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 4>they bought another, and that is slowing down, it's stopping.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 4>But the cash that they're earning or the interest they're

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 4>earning right, going from fifty million to five billion on

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 4>their cash and short term securities, which would essentially offset

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 4>any decline in demand they saw.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, is succession not the TV show? We're talking

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>about succession?

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 3>At so excited for just one second there?

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, Greg Abel he is the successor. He was

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>named in twenty twenty one. Is that whole succession question

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of off the table?

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Now?

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>I think, I mean, I think Greg Is is clearly

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 4>the one who's going to do it. They're trying to

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 4>get him out there a little bit more. He was

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 4>on the stage for the first half of the meeting.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Why I mean, I got Charlie and I got mister

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Munger there. Why don't I have the guy who's actually

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>running the business.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 4>So so he was. Greg and a Jet were in

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>the at the beginning of the meeting for a couple

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 4>of hours. Greg didn't get a lot of questions. Unfortunately,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 4>Ajet actually ended up talking more than Greg, but he

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 4>talked a lot in another interview. You know, Buffett and

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 4>Munger will will say that running their business is quote easy.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Clearly it's not, but they have a point in that

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 4>as constructed even just left alone, will generate significant amounts

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 4>of capital.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm going to ask you to go little

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wonky here, because we're coming into the summer, which means

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we're coming into hurricane season. How does the state of

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Florida ensure itself against hurricanes?

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 4>It's barely hanging on by a thread. So what is

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 4>going on in Florida is if.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I go buy a conda down there with like every

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>one of my neighbors who's moving down to Florida, which

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing, by the way, and that'd be the

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>last thing I do. Can I get insurance down there

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for my little.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 4>You can get it. It would be quite expensive. I

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 4>believe what was happening is it's not just the weather risk,

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 4>but the litigious environment in Florida was causing claims to

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 4>be multiples of what they should be. If a claim

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 4>was ten thousand dollars, you could end up being one

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand with legal costs and all these things. So

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 4>what happened is our friends, the reinsurers, actually said we're

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 4>not reinsuring you anymore, and that led to the primary

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>insurance companies losing financial strength ratings and going out of business.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 4>So the cost of it went through the roof, and

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 4>the state actually ensures a lot of that. Berkshire to

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 4>bring it back to them, actually jumped into Florida in

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>these reinsurance retals. So if there is a hurricane of

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Florida and you have me back here in a couple

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of months, Berkshire would actually be pretty exposed.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Now why do you think they got back into the

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Florida market?

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 4>So g was saying the pricing was probably just too

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 4>good to resist. And look, they're incredibly smart, so they

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>know the balance of what the capital are putting at

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 4>risk versus what they can make.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not ideal is it to have this state

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>as the insurance backbone of us?

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 4>It is not at all the insurance industry, I believe

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 4>it was Evan Greenberg, the CEO of Chubb, said, we

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 4>don't want the government taking our business, but there's some

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 4>point where it just it's not economically viable for them.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there a solution? Is it something on political?

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 4>So there is, So Florida has been working on it

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 4>and they have legislation going through. It's a little bit

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>of wait and see, but I think we're cautiously optimistic

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 4>that they may have helped the problem, maybe not solved,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>but helped.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You think, I mean again, coming into a hurricane season

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>again and our good friends down in Florida seems to

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>get just hammered it. It seems to be getting worse.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So I would think if I were a politician, I'd

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get this thing addressed.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the frequency and severity of hurricanes is definitely getting

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>worse than Florida.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll see how it plays out and we'll

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>get to it. All right, some good stuff, thank ver

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Palizoli. He covers all that good stuff for insurance.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>For Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the teenth Ken's her live program Bloomberg

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 8>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 8>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess earnings still matter. They certainly matter. For Tyson

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Foods stock is down th firteen percent today, fifty two

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>week low, kind of wiping out most of the year's

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gains here. I guess they missed some numbers here. People

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't eating chicken and what's going on here. Jen Bartash

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is senior Industry analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. She follows the

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>food industry Jen TSN, Tyson Foods. What happened.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>Well with Tyson? It's really a combination of things. One,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 5>you've got some structural market issues in the protein market

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 5>for both beef for beef, pork and chicken, and it's

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 5>hitting Tyson all simultaneously. And then second, you have some

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 5>execution issues that are Tyson owned in terms of not

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 5>running plants at full capacity and weak margins across the board.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 5>And so when you put all this together, it turned

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 5>out to be a really weak quarter for the company.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, There's so many cool things on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>PGeo is one of it. It kind of breaks down where

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>companies get their revenue from, and for Tyson it is awesome.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Beef thirty eight percent of the revenue, chicken thirty three

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the revenue, prepared foods nineteen percent of the revenue,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and pork ten percent of the revenue. So that's a

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>breakdown for you. So let's just focus on you mentioned

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>one's kind of an industry wide you know, protein issues.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? I'm meaning my proteins.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think everybody's eating their protein. But but when

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 5>it comes to the actual cycle of growing animals, there's

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 5>some structural issues that are happening. So if you remember,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 5>not that long ago, we were talking about the beef

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 5>market and we were talking about how herds were just

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 5>being we're just being obliterated, and it takes a long

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 5>time to actually rebuild beef herds, and so what we

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 5>still haven't really hit the bottom of the beef cycle yet,

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 5>And so what that means is that there are fewer

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 5>animals and the prices are higher, so it costs more

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 5>to get them, and prices at retail have been high,

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 5>so the demand hasn't been as strong. So there's some

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 5>some awkwardness going on there. And with Typhoning, everything everybody

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 5>wants to think about is with the chicken market, and

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Tyson is underperformed in chicken for a long time. They've

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 5>made some moves, they've you know, announced to their closing

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 5>a couple of plants, things like that, but that takes

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 5>time to actually see the benefit from. And so even

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 5>though they're you know, they're improving their full rates to customers,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 5>there's still there's still a lag in terms of execution

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 5>versus where the market is.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>So you guess you can't blame those darn vegetarians at all.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us a little bit about the timeline there

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 3>when you're talking about Tyson rebuilding that kind of hurt.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Is that a story of a quarter or years?

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, beefy By, you know, takes takes the

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 5>longest in terms of the cycle. We're talking probably twenty

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 5>twenty late twenty twenty four or early twenty twenty five

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 5>until we see a real change in that market. You know,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>for pork that's a slightly shorter time span, but we're

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 5>talking probably twenty twenty four, and for chicken it's a

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 5>short time span, but there are a lot of moving

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 5>parts to it. And that's the area where Tyson's business

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 5>has had the most execution issues. So although the company

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 5>is expecting proof performance in the second half of this year,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 5>realistically we may be looking at twenty twenty four before

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 5>things really settle down.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I watch Yellowstone, I think I fully understand

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this whole ranching cattle thing. Where does Tyson where do

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they get their cattle? Like how many ranches are out there?

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The Dutton ranch on Montana, mean, like how many ranches

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>are there out there? Like supply beef and all that

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, there are a large number of ranches out there,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 5>and Tyson they have long established relationships with individual ranchers

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 5>in terms of their supply, so that they are sure

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 5>that they have kind of that, you know, the supply

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 5>locked in. But it's been tough times. We've had years

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 5>of drought. You know, we've had higher costs to feed animals.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 5>It is not an easy time to be a rancher

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 5>right now, and so that makes it there's less incentive

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 5>to increase herd size when you've got a lot of

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 5>those kind of macroeconomic and you know pressures, and you know,

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 5>even interest rates are higher, it's you know, it's hard

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 5>or to invest in your in your ranch as well.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm really glad you mentioned just the higher pricing and

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>interest rates as well. Talk to us about the pricing

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the equation. I felt like a lot of food companies

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and consumer companies broadly, Uh, we're almost rewarded by the

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>stock market when they were able to say we're going

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to hike up our prices and still see that demand.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Just how sticky are those prices?

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, the prices so far have been sticky. But

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 5>what we're seeing when we look at transaction level data

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 5>from uh, you know, from what's what people are actually buying.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 5>What we're seeing is that that that tolerance for the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 5>price increases is abating. And so you know, in our perspective,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 5>what that really means is that as we get towards

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 5>the second and a half of the year, there's a

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 5>real chance that we're going to see an increase in

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 5>promotions and so you're going to see retailers running more sales. Now,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I think everyone's going to try to minimize, you know,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 5>the profit impact of those, but the the macro economic

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 5>environment is really setting these companies up to where they're

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 5>going to have to be more promotional in nature, and

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 5>consumers in parder demanding that so that tolerance for price

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 5>increases is almost gone. Now it's going to be harder

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 5>and harder for these companies to put more price more

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 5>price increases through. So it's it's going to be a

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 5>tricky second half of the year to navigate.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So, Jen, the troubles you outlined here for Tyson, are

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we seeing that with some of their peers like Pilgrim's

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Pride and some of those others. This is an industry

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wide type of issue.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, some of it is industry wide. So some of

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 5>those structural issues in terms of like animal availability, the

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 5>cost of feed, those impact everybody relatively equally. You know,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to actual internal challenges in terms of

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 5>how you're running your plants, are you fully staffed, you know,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 5>are you at your maximum capacity? That's where Tyson has

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 5>has had more challenges than some of their peers.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Jen, talk to us a little bit about the You

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>talked about the macroeconomic piece of it. Talk to us

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>about the interest rates specific piece of it. I think

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 3>you talked about how higher interest rates makes it harder

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 3>to invest in ranches specifically. Again, walk us to the

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>timeline on it. Is there an extra lag of from

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 3>one the Federal Reserve hikes interest rates to just how

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 3>much difficulty some of these kind of ranchers face, or

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>is this something that we kind of look at idiosyncratically.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that there's there's no there's no easy

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, there's no easy answer to that, to be honest.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, ranchers, you know, tend to be a conservative

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 5>bunch by nature, and it's it's not an easy business

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 5>to be in. And so anytime there in there are

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 5>factors that impact their ability to grow their business or

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 5>to invest in their business. That that puts puts them

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 5>on a more defensive footing, and so there there's definitely

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 5>a lag. So it will take time once interest rates,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 5>if they start to come down a little bit, it

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 5>will take a little bit of time for confidence to

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 5>come back that that is the right time to do

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>more investment. And so it's it's it's it's you know,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about people's you know, long term livelihoods, and

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 5>so it's it's not something that tends to move or

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 5>pivot very quickly.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Jen, you also cover the supermarket side of the supply

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>chain here, the food supply chain. So Entyson, they have

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>higher costs, therefore they raise their prices. Are the supermarkets

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>able to pass along those price increases to consumers?

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 5>They are passing through selectively, and so you know where

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 5>they can they do. I think the one advantage that

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 5>grocers have is because a lot of them offer private

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>label products, they're very in tune with what it costs

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 5>to manufacture certain products, and so they can have very

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>good negotiations with the packaged food companies and not just

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 5>accept price increases for the sake of price increases. You know,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 5>what what a grocer will do is they will pick

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 5>certain products where you know, they would have maintained their

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 5>their value perception in the minds of their customers, and

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 5>so if prices like hugely, say on a particular product,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 5>they may not pass the full price increase through just

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 5>so that their customers feel like they're still getting a

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 5>good deal, but they will pass through price on you know,

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 5>other products. So they kind of focus on key items

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 5>that drive value perception and manage that what they pass

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 5>through very carefully on those, and then they take a

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 5>little bit more they have a little bit more flexibility

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 5>on the rest of the store in terms of price increases.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Jen, very quickly thirty seconds. Do we see buybacks, dividend increases,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 3>any of that jazz in Tyson's future.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, they say that they're going to kind of maintain

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 5>the same courses they've had in terms of their capital allocation,

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 5>and so you know, don't don't anticipate any any cuts

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 5>to that, to that policy, and we'll have to see

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 5>what their quarter holds.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jen, thank you so much. We appreciate checking

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in with you. Talking about Tyson Food again. They had

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some a tough quarter, tough outlook for that business. Jen

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bartasha's senior industry antal. She covers all the whole food

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff all the way through to the retail and to

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the supermarkets. So a great understanding there.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 8>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk to professional here about these markets,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>because time and time you just feel like you're in

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a market with so many cross currents out there. Ecodata,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve movement, here, earnings, we're right finishing up the

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>earning season. We've got a little bit of a bank

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>turmoil here, and we put all that together and it's

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tough to come up with some big conviction buys. Let's

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>check in what somebody who does this for a living.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Efan Debit Chief Investment Officer of Manetta Group. Again, cross

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>currents out there. I'll be interested to get your perspective

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about how you think this market is behaving and where

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to go going forward.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 9>It's extremely difficult to give a sense of direction right

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 9>now because we're seeing such contrary indicators. We even have

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 9>to look at today's performance and markets versus Friday's performance

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 9>when we can see that markets really are moving on.

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 9>The smallest piece of news, most of which is contradictory,

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 9>was inflation coming into check. It looks like that at

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 9>some point last week we heard the said we potentially

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 9>a pause and that all looks very positive. And now

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 9>we come back with with commodity prices rising and it

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 9>looks like it could be persisting and saying quite supple again.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 9>This week you mentioned a little bit of turmoil in

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 9>the banking sector. That is a story that we think

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 9>has some way to run sometime, and there are potentially

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 9>a lot of unknowns unknowns when it comes to regional

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 9>banks and banks in general. So that's creating a lot

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 9>of uncertainty. And this is may remember May sell a

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 9>may and go away. I think traditionally there's not a

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 9>ton of optimism around the time of year, but a

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 9>lot going on for sure.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Even let's talk a little bit about the bond market.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Here Apple coming to the market with a five part

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 3>bond sale known to be timing the market very well,

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 3>and every time in the last I want to say,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 3>pre COVID, going back to twenty nineteen, they've issued five times,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>including today, and four not including today, have yielded higher

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>yields after that, essentially making them kind of issuing bonds

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 3>in the troughs that are yields fall it And for

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 3>lack of a better term, does that mean we should

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 3>expect higher yields in our near future as we expect

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Reserve to end their tightening cycle.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, so many bonds have been the after class I say,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 9>of the year, and because certainly they behaved so badly

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 9>last year, we're seeing a lot of people look again

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 9>at bombs. And that's part of the reason we're seeing

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 9>this money flow out of bank deposits, because bombs themselves

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 9>are paying so much. When it comes to looking again

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 9>at bonds, we can look certainly, we don't have to

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 9>take as much risk as in the past to get

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 9>a very decent, healthy yield four five percent for potentially

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 9>very low risk. So it doesn't surprise me that they're

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 9>would be strong demand for an Apple issue. It's certainly

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 9>seen as been the bluest of the blue ships in

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 9>terms of issuing and issuing debt, and certainly the equity

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 9>is so well supported that the debt has got to

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 9>be rock solid there. So in terms of what we

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 9>can expect from I don't see that rate's going that

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 9>much higher, actually, because I think the overwhelming view of

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 9>the market seems to be that we're in for a

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 9>pause or a pivot. It doesn't look like that today,

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 9>but that was certainly the mood that was coursing through

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 9>for the last few weeks.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And to that end, I guess the Federal Reserve will

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>be paying attention obviously Wednesday to the CPI data. I

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>guess CPI X Food and Energy looking to be up

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>five point five percent. That's smidged down from the prior

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>mounth of five point six percent. I mean, when you

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>see numbers like that, it feels like higher for longer.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>But Boy, as you mentioned, if in the market, the

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>future's market is really pressing in rate cuts later this year,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you guys think about that?

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, despite the Fed, it's been desperately to my telegraph

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 9>its actions. I'm really regained US and confidence. Just like

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 9>other central banks around the world, they've been doing a

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 9>decent job I think at clawing back some assurance markets

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 9>still are prone to second guessing them over and over,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 9>and we're certainly seeing that. So as far as the

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 9>inflation numbers, we do think that a lot of what's

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 9>feeding into that core inflation number is going to be

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 9>lagging indicators, say things like employment and the cost of labor.

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 9>Because that lags, we essentially don't necessarily expect it to persist.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 9>But previous to this week, we did see commodities coming

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 9>down that was going to be again feeding into lower

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 9>inflation overall, and there are still those deflationary sources out there.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 9>We speak every second day about AI and what that

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 9>means for employment. If that is in fact that a

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 9>long term trend, and of course it is at this point,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 9>we couldn't deny that will would that be deflationary. So

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 9>I think investors are trying to really parse this inflation

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 9>data and see what is in fact transitory, because some

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 9>of it is, and what's slightly to stick. So a

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 9>very mixed picture. But I'd say a pause is what

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 9>we're looking at at the moment, not a pivot and

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 9>I don't agree with that We're going to see more rate.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Hikes Ethan, what about the debt ceiling? Do we need

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 3>to worry about this kind of ticking time clock that

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 3>we have going June first? I believe Janet Yellen warning

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 3>about hitting that upper limit. How much of this is

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 3>just kind of a boy crying wolf.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 9>Very good point. I mean, we are though, if we've

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 9>learned anything from COVID and beyond, we are very adept

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 9>at kicking the can down the road. In every single

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 9>instance there's been pressure and the debt ceiling up to now,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 9>we will kick it down the road again. Will there

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 9>be political posturing and jostling and saber rattling as we

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 9>get to that point. Absolutely, But just as the inflation

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 9>data has been moving around, the tax receipt data has

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 9>been quite unclear. At the moment. We hear capital gains

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 9>redown last year, but then again we're hearing about the

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 9>employment picture being solid and income tax being solid, So

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 9>for that picture, we really don't know what the picture

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 9>looks like. There probably was a little bit of crying

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 9>wolves just to get people to think about this seriously.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 9>But again, if we think about how this has impacted

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 9>markets in the past. Just like most other political developments,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 9>they tend to be pretty short lived. So I think

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 9>there could be just more the sucking out of some

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 9>of that confidence out of the stock market as this

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 9>deadline nears. But I don't see it as being transformational

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 9>in terms of sentiments.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 3>The only one better Paul than me at procrastinating is

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 3>the US government apparently even let's talk again about the

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 3>trade here in our last thirty seconds or so, let's

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 3>say it's June first, in this last iteration that we've had,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I think twenty eleven, when the US did have that

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>credit rating downgrade, the immediate reaction was by American the

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 3>biggest paradox. Do we see that happen again?

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 9>It's full of paradoxes. Just as we've seen a little

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 9>bit of strengthen the dollar in recent days compared to

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 9>other currencies, we've also seen it come down from its

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 9>twenty year peak that it was at last year, and

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 9>so there's that move into the dollar, that discussion around dedollarization,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 9>that betting against the US economy versus not betting against

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 9>the US economy because it is essentially so tech driven.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 9>There is there's been we've heard arguments on both sides there.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 9>So I'd say, to what will happen with the death seating,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 9>I think there is definitely a tendency towards needing to

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 9>take some of the strength out of the dollar. It's

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 9>been too long for too it's been too high for

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 9>too long, and as other economies around the world are

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 9>actually perhaps being underestimated, in particular Europe, we are going

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 9>to see some strength return there. So I'd say I

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't say there'll be a mad rush into the US

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 9>even if this death seating is resolved.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:30.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ethan, thank you so much for joining us.

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Deviitchief, investment officer for Monet a Group. We appreciate

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>getting some of her time.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the Team kenzro Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 8>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 8>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listening on

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 8>demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Activision sixty nine billion dollars. It got your tention

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and that thing hit the tape, but some UK regulators

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>are saying that they're not to approve it. I mean,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of uncertainty there, even Warren Buffett weighed

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in on over the weekend saying he opposes the UK

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>blocking this deal. So let's get some of the experts

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the room to kind of talk about where

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we are with this deal. What does it mean for Microsoft,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for Activision? Jenrie, she's a senior

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>analyst covering antitrust litigation with Bloomberg Intelligence. She's got that

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the game covered and on a rag run

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a senior technology channels with BI he covers Microsoft. He's

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>done that for ages for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. Jen is in our studio here in

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. So Jen, start with you here. Warren Buffett

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ways in over the weekend. That kind of is interesting. Here,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>just summarize for us why the UK regulators are blocking

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's pending act pending acquisition for Activision.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 10>So what the UK is worried about is what they

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 10>think is going to be the next big thing in gaming,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 10>not not what's going on today where most people would

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 10>play a first shooter game like Activision's Call of Duty

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 10>on a console or on a PC, but down the road,

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 10>when they believe gamers will be playing through the cloud

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 10>and possibly through sub scription services. So they think Microsoft

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 10>already has a pretty big hole in the cloud market.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 10>And with this content, I think they think of Call

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 10>of Duty sort of must have content for gamers person

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 10>shooter gamers, they will be able to sort of corner

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 10>this up and coming cloud market. They'll be able to

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 10>somehow damage their rivals, take market share and dominate that area.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 10>And what they're trying to do is protect that, protect

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 10>what they think is going to be the future of gaming.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 11>So anra come in here. How much does Microsoft need

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 11>this deal?

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 12>I don't think they will do fine without the deal. Also,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 12>and you know, I'm no expert in cloud gaming, but

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, people who know a lot more than me

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 12>in this area, including Matt Miller, has told me that

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 12>it's you know, so far away latency issue and stuff.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 12>And I think, you know, Jen and I have talked

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 12>about it, and she's taught me that, you know, it's

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 12>not so much what's here, but what could happen three

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 12>to five years from now. And I think that's really

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 12>the reason why regulate it is that kind of worded here.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But Microsoft shareholders they like this deal, don't They don't

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>They want Microsoft to get into some more content businesses.

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean they should, you know when I think

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 12>I was surprised once that they took over. One of

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 12>the first acquisitions was Minecraft, and I said, well, what

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 12>the hell was Minecraft? I They had no clue about it,

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 12>and I don't. I'm sorry, I don't know anything about gaming.

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 12>And you know, they have a console business and they

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 12>are fighting neck to neck with Sony always about it,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 12>and you know, it's it's expanding their studios, expanding the games,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 12>the ecosystem, and this is just another way of it.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 12>So yeah, I mean from a shareholder point of view,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 12>it's fine if they have it, it's good. If they

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 12>don't have it, it's not their business is going to

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 12>die anytime soon. You know, it's just not as strong

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 12>as it would have been.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 11>So then what's next for Microsoft.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 7>They're going to appeal.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well they've talked about appealing, but you know, there

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 10>are a couple things that could stand in the way.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 10>So they do have a mid July end date to

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 10>the agreement, and at that point in time, unless they

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 10>extend it, Activision could walk away and collect a three

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars fig. Now, they extend that, and it looks

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 10>like they're pretty serious about going through this appeal. I've

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 10>seen some news about hiring great lawyers in the UK

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 10>and they've talked about it a lot, and they seem

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 10>to want to do this. It is a very high standard,

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 10>so you know, it's a long shot. It doesn't mean

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 10>they couldn't win, but it is a long shot. I

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 10>dug up some statistics for this and I did see

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 10>that in the last ten years or so, the UK's

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 10>one about seventy percent of these merger appeals. So you know,

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 10>just looking at that, you're looking at thirty percent.

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, Jen, why doesn't Microsoft just carve out the UK?

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean and the fifth and I mean, who cares?

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, here's the thing. You know, the UK is a

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 10>big economy and also it's a big gaming economy. This

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 10>is what I understand. I was a little bit surprised,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 10>but I guess the Brits love gaming, so you know,

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 10>that's a lot of revenue. And what they're going to

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 10>have to do is they're going to have to do

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 10>the economics of that and see is it worth it

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 10>for them to go ahead and close this worldwide? And

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 10>then withdraw out of the UK?

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 11>Does the US follow what the UK does?

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 10>How likely is that well, the US has actually already sued.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 10>But there's a really big difference because Microsoft here in

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 10>the US, I believe would winning court. I think they

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 10>have a really good shot. This is a vertical deal.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 10>It's very speculative as to whether there's going to be

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 10>this big cloud gaming in the future and whether this

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 10>deal would actually harm that area. You know, whether call

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 10>of duty is so important that everybody has to have

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 10>it in order to have a successful game subscription business,

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 10>so they have a better chance. Here in the UK

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 10>it's different. The standard's much higher. So what the court

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 10>has to decide that the decision is completely and totally irrational,

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 10>and that's worse than just bad judgment or not a

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 10>good decision.

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It has to be really bad an rac How what's

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what's Microsoft saying in terms of their willingness to and

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>how far they will take this? How hard are they

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>going to fight for this deal?

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Do you think I think they'll fight now whatever options

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 12>they have they have, I think given all the concessions

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 12>they could from their side, I don't think there's going

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 12>to be any more from here. But you know, from

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 12>my side, if it doesn't go through, I'll be happy

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 12>with some more buybacks.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So this is just signal we've got a democratic administration

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the there's a new sheriff in town, and we're

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just gonna take a tougher stance on M and A

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in general. Is that reflective of that or is that

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or is this more specific to this deal?

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 10>Oh no, I think it's absolutely about taking a more

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 10>aggressive stance, particularly in big tech, particularly when it's a

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 10>big incumbent that's buying a smaller company. And I think

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 10>also it's regrets regrets for past deals that the FTC

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 10>and the DJ allowed through like Google Dobble.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say, well Live Nation for sure.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, even Comcast NBCU from way back, there are

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 10>some regrets about that one, absolutely because they're allegations that

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 10>they violated their consent order. You have Facebook with Instagram

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 10>and WhatsApp, so you know, I think that the agencies

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 10>think we were asleep at the wheel too long, especially

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to big tech, and so we have

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 10>to be really careful. And technology moves fast, so we

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 10>need to be thinking about those future markets instead of

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 10>just looking at the market as it stands today.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 11>An rag is there an acquisition then that if this

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 11>doesn't go through that you would rather Microsoft be focusing

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 11>on or are to your point, are you just dividends focused?

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Buy back?

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 1>He's a tech guy. I like, I'm a dividend guy,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know it's strictly a buyback, sool.

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 12>I apologize the way I think about it. As far

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 12>as big tech is concerned, they can't even buy pizza now.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I would agree, all right, So you know.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 12>I think they the only thing left is buybacks then.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 5>All right?

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I mean so if I'm a Microsoft, I'm looking

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>at the P and L. I'm looking at the business model.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Now, It's only a question of what do

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I do with the cash?

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 12>Exactly?

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 6>All right?

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>All right enough for you then, I mean, so Jen,

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to you here. I mean, it's interesting

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>here if is there a sentiment out there that big

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>deals in general are facing a much higher hurdle just

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in general, even if it's not tech. I mean, if

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one consumer product company wants to buy another, it's a

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>different world than it was maybe three or four years ago.

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 10>Paul, Absolutely, And it's not just a sentiment. I mean

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 10>the statistics show it. In the last I think, well,

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 10>for sure, this quarter and possibly even in the last year.

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 10>Until this weekend, the DJ had not settled a deal

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 10>with a consent order, so they just settled a lockcase.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 10>The company asked to Abloyd that was in the middle

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 10>of trial, and they settled with some divestitures. And I

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 10>think it's because they could tell from what the judge

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 10>was saying, things weren't going very well for the DOJ

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 10>in trial. But it used to be that about four

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 10>percent of the deals that got filed would get these

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 10>in depth investigations and most of them would close with settlements.

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 10>Now hardly any of them closed with settlements. So from

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 10>the actions of the agencies, we're seeing that it's really

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 10>any big company, any big deal.

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 11>What does like my mom need to know about this, Like,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 11>if these deals are less likely to go through, is

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 11>that good for the consumer in the end because it

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 11>means more competition?

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, Well, first, is your mom a merger arbitrages

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 10>because she was going to have some serious concerns?

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 10>It depends on the deal, you know, And I think

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 10>it depends on your perspective. I think there are a

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 10>lot of people looking right now at Kroger Albertson's and thinking, oh,

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 10>I don't want that deal to close. You know, I

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 10>have a Kroger branded supermarket and announ person supermarket that

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 10>I go to. I don't want that to be owned

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 10>by one company. And that's a very consumer facing area. Pharmaceuticals.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 10>I think people who you know, getting older, they need

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 10>to have prescription drugs. They're not going to want to

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 10>see these big pharma deals. And actually, you haven't seen

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 10>a big farma deal in a while. You know that's

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 10>going to be a tough deal to close right now.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 10>So I really think it depends on your perspective. I'm

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 10>guessing your mom probably wouldn't care very much of Microsoft

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 10>blod Activision.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 11>I have a feeling no one in the Mills family

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 11>is not as.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Team honrog Ronnie. He covers all the tech stuff along

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>with his team at Bloomberg Intelligence and generally follows all

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the anti trust stuff, which is just critical when you

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>get a big deal, and then you get a big

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>deal that runs into some regulatory issues. We immediately turned

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to Jen and say, what's up, what's going on and

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>how's this going to play out? And she's got great

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>experience and we appreciate it.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 8>Getting it here, you're listening to the tape cancer Live

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 8>program Bloomberg Markets week days ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 8>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 8>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 8>from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg eleven.

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Thirty Today, time for our c suite conversation. Let's go

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a little tech uh, and we'll do that with Amitt Wallya.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO of Informatica. Informatica is a public traded company.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I n FA is a ticker to put into your

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Professional Service. You see that stock, it's got a

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>market cap at about four point two billion dollars, up

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about four tens a one percent today, stocks off about

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>ten percent year to date. Thanks so much for joining us.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>For our listeners, Let's just take a couple of take

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds to just give me an overview of what

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys do at Informatica.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 7>Well, thanks for hosting me, Paul and Madison. Great to

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 7>be here.

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 13>Well, I'm actually talking to you from Vegas maybe us

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 13>doing our annual user conference Informatical World. Where's we are

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 13>doing our user conference here?

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 7>Annual user conference in Las Vegas.

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 13>So speaking well, Informatica is the leader in what we

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 13>call data management. You know, it's the only platform out there,

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 13>and we help customers bring data from any source at

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 13>high quality, make sure you can make the most out

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 13>of it. Do analytics, make business decisions and govern it

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 13>for all kinds of regulatory compliance, and provision that data

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 13>for any user across the enterprise. That's what we do

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 13>across pretty much all large enterprise globally.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 11>So in your description, I'm stealing a Paul joke, but

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 11>you've got cloud in the title. I know you've got

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 11>some AI stuff going on. You've got all the good

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 11>buzzwords that markets are liking these days. How's the business doing,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 11>especially following some of the market reaction to your earnings report.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 13>Well, we had a great Q one, so to give

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 13>you some context, we guide it this year. Cloud is

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 13>a big number for us, and we guided this year

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 13>to a thirty five percent growth for our cloud RR

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 13>and we actually grew forty one percent in Q one,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 13>so we're off to.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 7>A great start. In fact, we crossed a big milestone

0:36:58.320 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 7>for subscription.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 13>RR, which is what Cloud is a part of, and

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 13>that grow twenty percent at a billion dollar round rate.

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 13>In fact, you've guided to a half a billion of

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 13>cloud r R in Q two, so we're feeling great.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 13>In fact, another good test of that is the usage

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 13>of a cloud platform I DMC and that usage grew

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 13>sixty nine.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 7>Percent year a year.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 13>So we feel good about cloud data and II the

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 13>trifactor and we see it in the middle of it.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, big data another term that's that's certainly

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>in the news. I mean that kind of feels like

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>your company is is benefit beneficiary of just kind of

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>big data? Is we put more and more stuff in

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the cloud, more and more data in the cloud. How

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>did your business kind of evolve, transform, manage its way

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>through the pandemic when there's such a you know, increased

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 1>increased importance of data.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 7>That's a great question.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 13>I mean, you know digital transformation, which is what's been

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 13>happening for the last many years.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 7>It's all about cloud and data.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 13>And to the point you made, it's not only about

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 13>growth of data, it's also about fragmentation of data.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 7>So that was a tail ring to us, and our.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 13>Transformation was that, you know, we pivoted more aggressively towards

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 13>the cloud, In fact, walking into this year, we only

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 13>sell cloud and our platform, as I sheard with you,

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 13>blued sixty nine percent year over year. So that has

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 13>been a tailment because the more the data, the more

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 13>the fragmentation, the more the complexity. That's where data management

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 13>becomes very handy. And given our scale, we'll be helping

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 13>that to customers like Kroger, Unilever, American Airlines, you know,

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 13>Banco to Brazil Cell comp you name those, those end

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 13>up being.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 11>Our customers within your customer base. Are you seeing any

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 11>potential recession signs just yet or are you still seeing

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 11>some strength?

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 13>Billion dollar question right I would say I'm not seeing

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 13>a recession sign for sure. I think what we when

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 13>you walked into this year the macro, what we saw

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 13>in Q four, we saw definitely enterprises as stretched, we

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 13>are being thoughtful deal siles as are obviously elongated. We

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 13>saw the same in Q one. In fact, we guide

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 13>it based on that macro. We assume that will stay

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 13>for the year, and as I said, we guide it

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 13>for like our thirty five percent cloud at our growth number,

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 13>qan ended up being better than that. Right now, I'm

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 13>at in fmat cover I user conference actually it's the

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 13>highest ever attended conference so far, we've exceeded twenty nineteen numbers.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 13>So I'd say the conversations around digital transformation are high.

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 13>AI powered digital transformation very high. We do see a

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 13>macro that stretched, but no verse or no better than

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 13>three months ago.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Met talk to us about cloud native AI powered platform.

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the kids call it Claire. What does that

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>mean for you? What's that business for you?

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 13>For us, you know, we built out one cloud native platform.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 13>All of our services are on one platform, so that's

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 13>one thing.

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 7>But the big thing there is that we natively integrated Claire,

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 7>which is our AI engine.

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 13>And the beauty of Claire is that we what we

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 13>all see in the world of consumers. We took all

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 13>of those machine learning algorithms and curated it for enterprises.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 13>As an example, you do photo tagging on Facebook, we

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 13>do that. Apply that for data taging, you do recommendations

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 13>on Amazon, you apply that for when people want recommendations

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 13>and data sets. NLP becomes data quality. So that's what

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 13>we've been doing. And in fact, to kind of give

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 13>you some sneak preview of tomorrow when we do keynotes

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 13>main stage, we're going to showcase clear in the context

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 13>of generative AI and how we're expanding it. There huge

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 13>amount of intelligence and productivity improved for enterprises and we

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 13>see tremendous interest over there.

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 11>Talk to me about that interest. Then, what specific tools

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 11>regarding generative AI, both on the intelligence and automation side,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 11>have you found to be most helpful for your customers.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 13>Well, one is everybody wants more productivity and automation, so

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 13>our tools end up being infrastructure tools.

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 7>So for example, you know, bringing.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 13>Data together from many places, we're automating that. You know,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 13>claier can infer what kind of data should go where

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 13>it can bring it to you and you can see

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 13>and if you have to do nothing, it just does it.

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 13>If you want to give it some intelligence towards the

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 13>last minile, you can do that call it you.

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 7>Data. You know we talk about.

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 13>AI EI is as good as the quality of data

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 13>you put in that model. So data quality is becoming

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 13>even more important. Governance of data, you know, in the

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 13>world of AI, ethics compliance become even more important.

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 7>So governance is seeing a big tailwin. So we're seeing

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 7>all of those.

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 13>Natural things bringing data from many places, quality and obserablity

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 13>of data governance of data. See tremendous amount of tailmind

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 13>and interest from our customers.

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Ahmed got about thirty seconds left. I see your stocks

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>down about twenty seven percent over the trailing twelve months.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the market getting something wrong or how do you

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>view that?

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 13>I think we went through a big transformation going from

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 13>on premise to cloud. I do believe that as we

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 13>go through this year and we have a great start,

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 13>I think they'll understand that.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 7>I believe obviously we are supremely undervalued.

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 13>Our job is to go execute, get our customers to

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 13>get value from our platform, and you know, the rest

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 13>of the things take care of itself.

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 7>There's a pretty fluid macro out there.

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 13>Our job is focus on the customer, keep innovaiting and

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 13>focus on the long term and things take care of itself.

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, is it?

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Equity analyst myself? I like one of my management teams

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>say that I got nine buys out there, five holes

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and zero cells as per the A n R function

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal for Informatica. So the street seems

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be behind this company, this management team. I'm at

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>wallya CEO of Informatica, joining us here, giving us the

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>latest on another segment of the tech space that is

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>influenced greatly by the cloud and the transformation for a

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of these tech businesses. In this case, you know,

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of big data into the world of the cloud.

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's good a couple minutes with mister Wallya.

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 8>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You're a company. Let's say you're a company and you

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>look at your balance sheet and you got about one

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty six billion dollars of cash, you got

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>some one hundred billion dollars or so of debts. You're

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>net cash positive. You're in a business that will somehow

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>throw off one hundred billion dollars a free cash flow

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>every year. So what do you do? You go issue debt?

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Go figure. They didn't teach that to me in business school.

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 1>But that Rob Shiftman, he knows all this stuff. Rob

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Shiftman he's a tech credit analyso Bloomberg Intelligence he joints

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is here. So Rob, is this just a case of me,

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>as a banker being really good at my job saying, Hey,

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you raise it when you can, you don't raise it

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 1>when you need it. Let's go ahead and throw some

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>bonds out there. There's demand. Is it as simple as that?

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 5>Not?

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 6>Really? I mean, I think it's more about.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:34.919
<v Speaker 1>That was my pitch that for many years.

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Last week it sounded good. I think it's more about

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 6>simple math. I mean, there's a weighted average cost to capital,

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.280
<v Speaker 6>and when you've got nearly three trillion dollars of equity,

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 6>even if you have one hundred billion dollars of debt,

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 6>you're weighted out of average cost of debt for Apple

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 6>is effectively zero. So it's really a cost effective method

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.320
<v Speaker 6>of spending your money. And I think, you know, we

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 6>got a lot of people asking us today, with rates

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 6>so much higher, why today, and why not just wait? Well,

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 6>when you have ten odd billion dollars of debt maturing

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 6>every single year and you don't know where rates are

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 6>going to be in three minutes, let alone three months

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 6>or three years, I think that's when it does come

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 6>to your theory is that you take the money down

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 6>now because it really doesn't cost you anything. The bigger

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 6>question is why aren't they just using their cash for

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 6>something else? Why do they have to borrow more? And

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 6>it really boils down to their target. They want to

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 6>be net cash neutral. So what does that mean. It's

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 6>the same amount of cash as they have debt, and

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 6>there's some fifty seven billion dollars away from that right now.

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 6>If you borrow money, So you borrow ten billion dollars today,

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 6>their net cash position doesn't change at all. It stays

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:56.439
<v Speaker 6>exactly what it.

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Is because they get all the free cash coming in.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 6>No, well you borrow ten billion, yep, so it's ten

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 6>billion a debt ten billion of cash.

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That's nice. They need a balance sheet.

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 6>They need to start spending money. And you've asked in

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 6>the past, like why don't some of these companies just

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 6>raise their dividend, Why don't they create a dividend? Well,

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 6>Apple just raised their dividend four percent.

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I could raise my I mean please, So they're just

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to placate me. Now, Tim Cook knows I'm looking

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for them.

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 6>They're spending let's say in and around fifteen billion dollars

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 6>a year in their dividend, but they've got one hundred

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars of free cash well every year. I think

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, years ago when we first started talking about Apple,

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 6>I said, for all the drinkers out there, it's like

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 6>you go to a restaurant, you order a bottle of wine,

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 6>you drink half your glass of wine, and a waiter

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 6>walks over and refills your glass. And that's sort of

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 6>what what Apple's balance sheet looks like. As soon as

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 6>they start spending the money, it gets reloaded and there's

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 6>nothing out there that they can really buy. So what

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 6>do they need to do. They need to meaningfully increase

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 6>shareholder returns, and I think they're going to be doing that.

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 6>They added ninety billion to the buyback authorization that gives

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 6>them about one hundred and ten billion of stock they

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 6>can buy back over the next year.

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>They did the same ninety billion last year.

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, well, they still had twenty billions sitting there. Okay.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 6>What it does is it sets them up that over time,

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 6>as they continue to use money for dividends and buybacks,

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 6>they're always going to be sitting on a mountain of cash.

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 6>If your net cash neutral, and they end up would

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 6>say one hundred and twenty five billion dollars a debt.

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 6>You know what that means. The mean you're going to

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 6>have one hundred twenty five billion dollars of cash on

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 6>the books at all times. And don't forget like you know,

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Apple's services business is exploding right now, it's still a

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 6>tiny percentage of their top line. The vast majority of

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 6>what this company is selling is hardware. And when you're

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 6>a hardware business, over the long term, you better have

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 6>a lot of capital and reserve. In this case, you

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 6>need to have tons of extra capitally one hundred billion

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 6>plus of cash sitting there all times. So why borrow now?

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Because it doesn't cost that much, It actually improves your

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 6>cost of capital, It gives them tons of flexibility, and

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 6>it just doesn't It doesn't take away from their long

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 6>term goals, which is they can do whatever they want,

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 6>whenever they want, where they're capital and if they find

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 6>a business they want to buy, they can buy it.

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 6>If they find a business they want to invest in,

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 6>they can invest in it. And it looks like the

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 6>bomb market's always going to be there, because it seems

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 6>like this company is only one more notch away from

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 6>being triple A across the board.

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 11>Is that the same thinking behind why Apple is working

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 11>with Goldman on the Hygield savings account or do you

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 11>think that's a different goal for them, No, like become

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 11>the bank for everyone as well for everyone.

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 6>So I think you need to you need to diversify

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 6>your revenue stream over time, and they've done a really

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.919
<v Speaker 6>good job of that. I mean, you know, a few

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 6>years ago people laughed at their watch, you know, and

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 6>you know now they're selling billions worth and I think

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:04.760
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of different things that they can sell,

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 6>these sort of add ons when it comes to Apple

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 6>Pay or payment processing or savings account, it's just it's

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 6>a way to expand their ecosystem and get their products

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 6>at a little stickier It doesn't really move the needle

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 6>at all.

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 8>Though.

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 6>The way they move their needle is they come up

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 6>with a really cool new iPhone fifteen and they sell

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:30.439
<v Speaker 6>three to four hundred million of those.

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Rob e colover all of Tech for Bloomberg Intelligence Credit.

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the best thing you're looking at right now, what's

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the best opportunity, what's the best that you're most excited

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>about out there in tech?

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Honestly, I think it's really the sector. I mean, people

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 6>nowadays are looking for safe havens, and I've actually always

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 6>thought tech is the safe haven. It's not the it's

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 6>not banks, it's not treasuries. It's buying cash rich, cash

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:05.919
<v Speaker 6>flow generating businesses that have long term competitive advantages where

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 6>there's huge barriers to entry, and whether that's Microsoft or

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 6>Apple or Alphabet or even names like a Qualcomm or

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 6>a Broadcom. I think across the spectrum of investment grade tech,

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 6>there's lots of opportunities not to earn incremental spread, but

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 6>to park your money when you don't have something better

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.959
<v Speaker 6>to invest in. I'm wildly bullish still on the tech space,

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 6>and it doesn't mean excess returns this year are going

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 6>to be enormous. It just means that the risk of

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 6>underperforming versus other asset classes I think is really very low.

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 6>We had a webinar I think I mentioned this with

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 6>you last week, paulse We had a webinar with S

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 6>and P and they went through all their low triple

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 6>B global tech names and they said, not one of

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 6>them is at risk of being downgraded. So when we've

0:49:56.280 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 6>got high quality banks that know if they're going to

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 6>be out of business tomorrow. You know, buy a name

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 6>in a ten year part of a treasury curve for

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 6>a spread of one hundred basis points and getting you know,

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 6>four and a half percent on your money. Man, I

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 6>think it's a great trade when you don't have to

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:17.919
<v Speaker 6>worry about that cash disappearing. So it's not one particular name,

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 6>it's really the sector. And I think that volatility and

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 6>equities has skewed what people's thoughts are about the defensiveness

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:29.479
<v Speaker 6>of the credit space. But I think across the board,

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you want to have a barbell strategy from

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 6>triple a's down to triple b's, all across the curve.

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Rob, thank you so much. We appreciate it

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as always. Rob Shiftman technology credit analysts of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Before that he was doing that at Credit Swiss.

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.919
<v Speaker 1>An I fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at Ptsweeney. Before

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio,