1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:06,520 Speaker 1: Body Bags with Joseph Scott Morton. Most folks out there 2 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 1: know me as a death investigator. As a matter of fact, 3 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: if you ever see me pop up on any of 4 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: these television platforms or even on a podcast somewhere, they'll 5 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:21,400 Speaker 1: say death investigator Joseph Scott Morton. But you know, there's 6 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:23,800 Speaker 1: actually a bit more to me other than that. From 7 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:29,720 Speaker 1: a professional standpoint, At this point in my life, I 8 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: have spent as much time now in academia as I 9 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,519 Speaker 1: did as a death investigator. So you can call me 10 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:42,600 Speaker 1: a death investigator if you want, But I'm also a 11 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 1: professor and right now I teach at Jacksonville State University 12 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:51,879 Speaker 1: in Jacksonville, Alabama. I've been here for just over a decade. 13 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 1: The one thing that motivated me to start this podcast, 14 00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:02,960 Speaker 1: Bodybags is there's a need for people to receive an 15 00:01:03,080 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: education in forensics, at least at a baseline. And considering that, 16 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:17,479 Speaker 1: I know that I have been infinitely blessed with the 17 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 1: circumstances in my life and with the opportunities I've had. 18 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:27,440 Speaker 1: So with that spirit in mind, this is going to 19 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 1: mark the first in an ongoing series of let's just 20 00:01:32,280 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 1: say it, an introduction to forensic science, and I want 21 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,680 Speaker 1: to offer this up to all of our listeners as 22 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:44,319 Speaker 1: kind of a peak behind the curtain and maybe, just 23 00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:49,040 Speaker 1: maybe you'll come away with more of an understanding of 24 00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 1: my world and the world of forensic science. I'm Joseph 25 00:01:55,040 --> 00:02:03,720 Speaker 1: Scott Morgan and this is Bodybacks Dave. To start off, 26 00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 1: I have to say I got to confess a bit 27 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 1: of I want to make a confession here. When I 28 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 1: started off as a young man, I was let's see, 29 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: how can I say it? I was compelled, motivated by 30 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 1: envy and jealousy. And here's what I mean by that. 31 00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: After I got into the field, and mind you, I 32 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 1: was uneducated. I came into my field and had no education. Literally, 33 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,120 Speaker 1: starting from a matter of fact confession here, I was 34 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:52,079 Speaker 1: working on an associate's degree when I first started. I 35 00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:54,920 Speaker 1: hadn't finished it yet. But I happened to be in 36 00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 1: the right place the right time. And I don't know 37 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:02,440 Speaker 1: what day it happened on, but I suddenly found myself 38 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: surrounded by people that had a lot of letters after 39 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,920 Speaker 1: their names, and I knew that not only did I 40 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: have to have practical validation in my field. I'm not 41 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 1: talking about law enforcement here, I'm talking about in forensic science. 42 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:22,280 Speaker 1: I had to have academic validation because, let's face it, 43 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 1: if you go to sit on a stand and you 44 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:29,919 Speaker 1: claim that you're a forensic practitioner and you're not degreed, necessarily, 45 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:33,639 Speaker 1: there will be questions that will be asked, well, why 46 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 1: didn't you ever think it was important enough to get 47 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 1: a degree? The cool thing about it is I had 48 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 1: people that were all around me at that point in 49 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: time that encouraged me. As dark as it got, as 50 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: hard as it was, I had people that were around 51 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:57,960 Speaker 1: me that would push me. And so couple that motivation 52 00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:01,760 Speaker 1: from that perspective and then the motivation of jealousy and 53 00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 1: envy warning those things that I did not have, I 54 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 1: wound up in a position where I began to teach. 55 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 1: It started out when I was still working at the 56 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 1: Medical Examiner. I'd go to police academies and I do 57 00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: seminars and teach that way. But then the bug really 58 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,400 Speaker 1: bit me. I loved being in a classroom, and I 59 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 1: loved taking all of that knowledge coupled with the horrible 60 00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:30,840 Speaker 1: things that I'd worn witness to and trying to impart that. 61 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:34,919 Speaker 1: So you and I have been in ongoing discussions for 62 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 1: a while now, and I thank you for your encouragement 63 00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 1: in this because I think that it's a worthy pursuit 64 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 1: on our part and I want to be able to teach. 65 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:50,040 Speaker 1: I want this to be kind of the opening salvo, 66 00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:53,119 Speaker 1: if you will, as we start out on this journey together. 67 00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 1: My friend. 68 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:58,120 Speaker 2: You know, it's interesting the way you approach this job 69 00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 2: as an educational thing, and it really comes from the 70 00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:04,840 Speaker 2: fact that in the last couple of years, as forensics 71 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 2: has become more of a player in terms of covering 72 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 2: crime stories, not just within say, the world of Nancy Grace, 73 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,480 Speaker 2: but beyond that. You're on TV on networks almost on 74 00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:19,440 Speaker 2: a nightly basis because people are interested in the forensics 75 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 2: of crime and how they're used to solve crimes. And 76 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 2: I think it's partly due to television, it's partly due 77 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 2: to just the education of crime and the interests that 78 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:32,880 Speaker 2: there is. But there's a constant thing that keeps popping 79 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,599 Speaker 2: up that the uneducated in all of us, that we 80 00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:42,280 Speaker 2: don't know the difference between terms the manner and cause 81 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 2: of death. When we hear these things spoken about, they 82 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:50,160 Speaker 2: don't mean it doesn't mean something very specific but to 83 00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:54,320 Speaker 2: the delay person, but they all mean something totally different 84 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 2: and you and you've actually I've covered stories with you 85 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,560 Speaker 2: when you went that's not even right. What they're saying 86 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 2: on this network program is not correct terminology. They're different things. 87 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:11,279 Speaker 2: And I think it's important before people open their mouths 88 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:15,719 Speaker 2: about something as important as forensics, about death and about 89 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 2: studying crimes, that you better know what you're talking about. 90 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, you do, And I listen. I've been caught by people, 91 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:26,120 Speaker 1: you know, where I will misspeak about something or uh, 92 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:29,040 Speaker 1: you know. And and of course the world is is 93 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 1: uh is full of critics. I can't remember. There's a 94 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:36,960 Speaker 1: famous uh, there's a famous quote by Teddy Roosevelt about 95 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:41,120 Speaker 1: critic critics and he's arguably my favorite favorite president of 96 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 1: all time, Teddy Roosevelt. And and it was something to 97 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:48,919 Speaker 1: the effect that, you know, being a critic really doesn't 98 00:06:48,920 --> 00:06:52,200 Speaker 1: take that much effort, you know, And doesn't that sound 99 00:06:52,279 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 1: like something he would say? 100 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:53,960 Speaker 2: It? 101 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:54,400 Speaker 1: Does it? 102 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:56,840 Speaker 2: You know what, anybody can be a critic. Anybody can 103 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 2: claim as a career I'm a writer really had been published, 104 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 2: not yet, but I'm really. 105 00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:01,599 Speaker 1: Yeah, what do you write? 106 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:02,920 Speaker 3: Okay? 107 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:05,400 Speaker 2: You know you can just claim things without proving it. 108 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, you're right, you're right. I blush when people refer 109 00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:12,720 Speaker 1: to me as an author and I've written one book. 110 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: I've participated in other books, but I've written one book 111 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 1: and people will say, well, I'm an author, and you know, 112 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:21,880 Speaker 1: I kind of shy away from that because there are 113 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 1: people that are out there that have written copious volumes 114 00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:28,400 Speaker 1: of work out there that you know, are truly authors. 115 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: I mean, it is their craft, it is their profession. 116 00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 1: It's not what do they say, it's not a hobby. 117 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: It is in fact a vocation. So with that said, 118 00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:41,520 Speaker 1: I can tell you what is not merely a hobby 119 00:07:41,560 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 1: for me, and that is forensics and delving into that world. 120 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 1: And one more little aside that that I love about 121 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:58,680 Speaker 1: forensics is this, it is an applied science. It's not theoretical. Now, 122 00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 1: there are theoretical elements that are involved in all pursuits. 123 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: In forensics, you know, you begin to think about chemistry 124 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 1: and physics and biology, the three big ones, of course, 125 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 1: and you can take elements from that theoretical science and 126 00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:18,840 Speaker 1: apply it to solving crime. And there's a direct application. 127 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:21,720 Speaker 1: And I've mentioned this before, but I'll say it again. 128 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 1: How many folks in the sound of my voice recall 129 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,240 Speaker 1: when you were in high school and you walked into 130 00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:31,280 Speaker 1: a chemistry lab for the first time, and you said, 131 00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:33,160 Speaker 1: you're going to take chemistry if it was one of 132 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:37,840 Speaker 1: your requirements. In my school, it was a requirement, and 133 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 1: I literally thought the teacher was speaking gibberish, like a 134 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 1: made up language the first day. I think I was 135 00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:48,920 Speaker 1: in the ninth or tenth grade. Biology kind of be 136 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:54,400 Speaker 1: easy to understand, but when you start to thinking about chemistry, 137 00:08:54,440 --> 00:09:00,959 Speaker 1: for instance, it's so it's not very tangible. You know, 138 00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 1: they try to make it tangible by giving you those 139 00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:10,400 Speaker 1: molecular models. You remember those, and certainly you conduct experiments, 140 00:09:10,400 --> 00:09:13,320 Speaker 1: but you know just to But when you look at 141 00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:21,319 Speaker 1: crime science and you think about perhaps taking that application 142 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: of chemistry and applying it to drug analysis, that opens 143 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 1: up a completely different world where you're able to look 144 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:33,679 Speaker 1: at a substance and you might think that it's cocaine 145 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 1: or it could be baby powder for all you know. 146 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 1: But that actually had a. 147 00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 2: Case in Georgia where a woman spent time in jail 148 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 2: while they were they tested cotton candy and came back 149 00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 2: as meth, and the woman lost everything, kids got taken 150 00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:50,440 Speaker 2: away and turned out it was cotton candy. Right, and 151 00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:53,080 Speaker 2: that happened in the last five years. We're not talking 152 00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 2: one hundred years ago. We're talking in the last five years. 153 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 2: Somebody messed up forensics so bad the woman lost everything. 154 00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:03,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's that's been something a through line. Also 155 00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 1: in the DNA world, there been I know one case 156 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: that's up in New England maybe Massachusetts. Lady was participating 157 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 1: in something called dry labbing and it was because she 158 00:10:14,800 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: relative to DNA and she essentially took samples and was 159 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,679 Speaker 1: running them through the process without actually running them through 160 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,079 Speaker 1: the prescribed process. And there were people that went to 161 00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: jail as a result. And she's now I think if 162 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:33,560 Speaker 1: she's not in state prison, she's in federal prison. And 163 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:37,440 Speaker 1: those cases are thrown out. And you know, that's why 164 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:40,240 Speaker 1: you have to you have to understand the basic science 165 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:43,839 Speaker 1: and you have to understand form and function. So with 166 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:48,959 Speaker 1: that said, I really would like to begin to address 167 00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 1: some of these topics along the way. I think that 168 00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 1: we'll do probably one per week, and you know, reach 169 00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:58,720 Speaker 1: out to us on social media. You can find me 170 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:02,760 Speaker 1: on Instagram and an x and now on Facebook to 171 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:07,080 Speaker 1: a certain degree. If you have a suggestion for not cases, 172 00:11:07,160 --> 00:11:10,800 Speaker 1: but what would you like us to kind of tackle 173 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,080 Speaker 1: relative to forensic practice, and I'm. 174 00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:15,640 Speaker 2: Going to step further. I've had a lot of people 175 00:11:15,679 --> 00:11:18,480 Speaker 2: reach out via Facebook. I'll use Facebook because devenant with you. 176 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:20,959 Speaker 2: I had other stuff going on, mess with all the others, 177 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:22,959 Speaker 2: and I know I should and I'm gonna work harder 178 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:24,040 Speaker 2: at it. Blah blah blah. 179 00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:25,760 Speaker 1: I don't want you to work harder at it. Sometimes 180 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:27,840 Speaker 1: if I get on X, I feel like I need 181 00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 1: to take my brain out and scrub it with comment 182 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:32,559 Speaker 1: I always do. It's just so cool of humanity. Most 183 00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 1: of the time. 184 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:34,640 Speaker 2: Those of you who have reached out to us, and 185 00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:36,280 Speaker 2: we have followed up with a couple of you on 186 00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:37,920 Speaker 2: different and we're working on one now. I had to 187 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:40,600 Speaker 2: put some things off to the side due to some 188 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:42,959 Speaker 2: personal issues, but we're back into the swing of these. 189 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:44,680 Speaker 2: And if you've got something that you want to send, 190 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 2: please do but in particular, and this is something I 191 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:50,640 Speaker 2: was so glad you wanted to address show because manner 192 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:55,959 Speaker 2: cause mechanism, all right, yeah to me, I look at 193 00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:00,160 Speaker 2: that and I'm just just blow you know, they all 194 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:03,760 Speaker 2: are very dramatically different when you break it down and 195 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:09,000 Speaker 2: you're trying to talk about intelligently crime solving. I remember 196 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 2: back and I told you this before, and it was 197 00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 2: the Wayne Williams trial, the Atlanta child killing trial that 198 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:16,960 Speaker 2: got my attention because it was one of the first, 199 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,320 Speaker 2: if not the first, one of the first that used 200 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 2: fiber analysis to a huge degree. With the carpet fibers 201 00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 2: that tied Nathaniel Cater to Wayne Williams to the trunk 202 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:31,560 Speaker 2: of his car, I believe was Cater. But then I 203 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:34,640 Speaker 2: found out who the actual fiber guy was and where 204 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:39,720 Speaker 2: he got his degree, and that for me changed everything. Now, 205 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:42,880 Speaker 2: you just said when you started this, you were working 206 00:12:42,880 --> 00:12:48,800 Speaker 2: on an associate's degree when you started the death investigation process. 207 00:12:49,160 --> 00:12:50,080 Speaker 2: Is that correct? 208 00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:50,760 Speaker 1: That's what you said? 209 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:54,360 Speaker 2: How does that happen? I'm not trying to divert where 210 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 2: we're headed, but I needed to know you were in it. 211 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 2: What were you in a hear associates program for that 212 00:12:58,880 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 2: led you down this. 213 00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: Path criminal justice in biology? And that's how that's how 214 00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 1: it started out. Yeah, yeah, wow, Yeah. And I knew 215 00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 1: that I'd always had a fascination with science, and of 216 00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:13,400 Speaker 1: course I love the law. Come from a family that 217 00:13:13,480 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 1: has a lot of lawyers in it, and at one 218 00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:19,680 Speaker 1: point time I thought that I wanted to do to 219 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:22,720 Speaker 1: become a lawyer at one point time, and it wasn't 220 00:13:22,720 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 1: because I had this huge passion for the law. Thank god, 221 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:31,840 Speaker 1: my uncle, who is quite famous in his own right 222 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:37,200 Speaker 1: relative to being a jurist, talked me out of it. Actually, 223 00:13:38,280 --> 00:13:40,720 Speaker 1: he tried to talk to me into medical school. And 224 00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:42,560 Speaker 1: he's like, as a matter of fact that he had 225 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 1: said at one point in time, if you got to 226 00:13:45,240 --> 00:13:47,280 Speaker 1: law school, I'll never speak to you again. And this 227 00:13:47,320 --> 00:13:49,959 Speaker 1: is a guy that was well learned. He's actually taught 228 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:54,440 Speaker 1: at the National Judges Academy at in Reno for many 229 00:13:54,559 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: years to teach new judges. 230 00:13:56,360 --> 00:14:00,640 Speaker 3: That's that's how highly thought of he was to Because 231 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:05,080 Speaker 3: your family is saying lawyer, doctor, mine was saying, Dave, 232 00:14:05,280 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 3: if you can't play sport ravish shovel, that's all you got. 233 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:13,320 Speaker 1: You know, well, you know, probably I've probably learned more 234 00:14:14,080 --> 00:14:16,959 Speaker 1: from people that are non degreed than I have from 235 00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:21,920 Speaker 1: those that are degreed. And here's why. The beauty of 236 00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: forensic science, like I said earlier, is an applied science. 237 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 1: It's something practical that you can put your hands on, 238 00:14:32,840 --> 00:14:35,720 Speaker 1: you can hold it, you can begin to understand it, 239 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 1: and it's not too much different than a trade. As 240 00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: a matter of fact, just a little insight. Even in 241 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,400 Speaker 1: the world of forensics, if you have a master's in 242 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:51,600 Speaker 1: forensic science and you want to be a ballistics expert, 243 00:14:51,640 --> 00:14:56,360 Speaker 1: for instance, did you know that even with a graduate degree, 244 00:14:56,560 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: you're still going to have to be in a print 245 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:03,280 Speaker 1: ship just like the old times and sit at the 246 00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 1: feet of a master. There are certain determinations in the 247 00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:29,080 Speaker 1: medical legal community that we are tasked with making, and 248 00:15:29,120 --> 00:15:34,640 Speaker 1: from the perspective of how someone died and how we're 249 00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:39,560 Speaker 1: going to categorize that and try to understand, try to 250 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:44,480 Speaker 1: understand literally how it happened. We're going to start off there, okay, 251 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 1: because a subset of that is human identification, which is 252 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:51,080 Speaker 1: one of our mandates. But we're going to save that 253 00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 1: lecture for another time. But I think that it's very important, Dave, 254 00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:59,720 Speaker 1: that we start off on this road that we often 255 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:04,960 Speaker 1: hear talked about in the news, and that is kind 256 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:09,040 Speaker 1: of the first, the first major stop along the way 257 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 1: when it comes to death investigation. That's a manner of death. 258 00:16:13,920 --> 00:16:18,640 Speaker 1: There are several cases that are that are in the news. 259 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:24,200 Speaker 1: One in particular, Oh God, I hate even saying this 260 00:16:24,280 --> 00:16:29,120 Speaker 1: woman's name, Karen Reid. I've spent many hours covering this, 261 00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,800 Speaker 1: particularly on Court TV, and you know, shout out to 262 00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:38,960 Speaker 1: my friend vinniepolitan uh and now thanks for the opportunities 263 00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 1: that I've had. But it's it's rather tedious. But when 264 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: it comes down to it and you look at Karen Reid, 265 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 1: the case is not about Karen Reid. The case, for 266 00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:53,560 Speaker 1: me is actually about John O'Keefe, Okay, Boston police officer. 267 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:59,880 Speaker 1: He is discovered unresponsive, I think, essentially dead in the snow, 268 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 1: and he's got some pretty significant trauma. But you know, Dave, 269 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:09,760 Speaker 1: they have charged and that is the prosecution the state. 270 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: They've charged Karen Reid, of course, with I think it's 271 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 1: like vehicular homicide. In other words, they're saying that she 272 00:17:22,280 --> 00:17:29,560 Speaker 1: is responsible for his death just because a prosecutor charges 273 00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:33,720 Speaker 1: someone with homicide or murder. And it depends on the 274 00:17:33,840 --> 00:17:38,360 Speaker 1: statute how it's written in each state. Like for instance, Georgia, 275 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 1: our neighbor here, they don't refer to homicide and the 276 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:46,800 Speaker 1: law they refer to it as murder. Talk about malice, 277 00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 1: murder and all those sorts of things over there. But 278 00:17:49,800 --> 00:17:53,520 Speaker 1: when it comes down to it, you're talking about death 279 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:57,520 Speaker 1: at the hand of another. Well, just because the prosecutor 280 00:17:57,600 --> 00:18:01,280 Speaker 1: says that this is a homicide, that don't mean the 281 00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:03,359 Speaker 1: medical examiner is going to call it that, all right? 282 00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:05,520 Speaker 1: And this particularly you see a big party in the 283 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:09,679 Speaker 1: ways in this world when it comes to motor vehicle 284 00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:14,359 Speaker 1: accidents for instance. Okay, but here's the hang up with 285 00:18:14,480 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 1: John O'Keeffe's death. The medical examiner in his case could 286 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:25,399 Speaker 1: not even call his death an accident. And this is 287 00:18:25,440 --> 00:18:28,560 Speaker 1: going back to when they made their final ruling, goes 288 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 1: back to twenty twenty three. Okay, they could not even 289 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:40,480 Speaker 1: make a final ruling of accident or homicide. They actually 290 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:45,880 Speaker 1: left his manner of death as undetermined essentially, do you see? 291 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 1: And I know that's confusing. 292 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:51,280 Speaker 2: It is no a bit, it's a lot confusing. I 293 00:18:51,359 --> 00:18:55,359 Speaker 2: assumed wrongly that you do the autopsy, you take all 294 00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:59,880 Speaker 2: the circumstances into play, and you're able to determine what happened, 295 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:02,760 Speaker 2: how did this person end up dead? So the manner 296 00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:05,280 Speaker 2: of death? What what are we actually talking about with 297 00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:06,840 Speaker 2: manner of death? 298 00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:09,760 Speaker 1: Okay? I want everybody in their in their mind's eye 299 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:13,199 Speaker 1: right now to envision a gigantic umbrella. And you know 300 00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 1: how umbrellas have those little ribs, you know, like the 301 00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:19,399 Speaker 1: little metal ribs that hold hold up well, I have 302 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:22,560 Speaker 1: something that's called the Morgan, the Morgan Umbrella of death, 303 00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:26,159 Speaker 1: all right, And each one of those little ribs we 304 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 1: have five. So under each rib of the umbrella you 305 00:19:31,359 --> 00:19:42,080 Speaker 1: have homicide, suicide, accident, natural, and undetermined. And it's beneath 306 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:46,520 Speaker 1: that umbrella that we begin to try to marry up 307 00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 1: causal factors relative to death, to try to determine how 308 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 1: we're going to classify, how we're going to classify death 309 00:19:56,000 --> 00:20:00,480 Speaker 1: and try to understand it and categorize it. This comes 310 00:20:00,520 --> 00:20:02,879 Speaker 1: into play obviously in the criminal justice system. Let me 311 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:07,760 Speaker 1: tell you another big area where this comes into play. 312 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:10,520 Speaker 1: And people don't think about this, okay, because you have 313 00:20:10,560 --> 00:20:14,560 Speaker 1: to understand something. And I'm not just specifically saying you 314 00:20:14,640 --> 00:20:17,679 Speaker 1: have to understand something, my friend. Everybody has to understand this. 315 00:20:18,359 --> 00:20:22,879 Speaker 1: What the medical legal community does is it is not. 316 00:20:23,040 --> 00:20:26,760 Speaker 1: In fact, we're not in the business of merely serving 317 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:31,280 Speaker 1: the criminal justice system, Okay. We're also in the business 318 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:35,399 Speaker 1: of serving people involved in civil courts as well. As 319 00:20:35,440 --> 00:20:37,920 Speaker 1: a matter of fact, a goodly amount of the work 320 00:20:37,960 --> 00:20:42,240 Speaker 1: that we do is demonstrated in civil courts and I'll 321 00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:46,960 Speaker 1: give you the best example. You have someone that has 322 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 1: a certain type of insurance policy, for instance, and certain 323 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:55,440 Speaker 1: manners of death will not pay out. Okay, but if 324 00:20:55,440 --> 00:21:00,320 Speaker 1: it's an accident, then you get double the amount. Okay. 325 00:21:00,400 --> 00:21:03,360 Speaker 1: Do you see how there's like the big big money. Yeah, 326 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,840 Speaker 1: like the movie Double Indemned it. You know, so you've 327 00:21:05,840 --> 00:21:08,840 Speaker 1: got you know, big big money that's involved. As a 328 00:21:08,840 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 1: matter of fact, And I'll give you a little insight 329 00:21:12,640 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 1: from the medical examiner's world. And this has happened countless occasions, 330 00:21:20,960 --> 00:21:23,280 Speaker 1: and it's very sad, and people don't hear about this 331 00:21:23,400 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: very much. I've had wives that have shown up at 332 00:21:28,880 --> 00:21:32,200 Speaker 1: the medical Examiner's office and they'll have stacks and reams 333 00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:35,919 Speaker 1: of paper day, wanting to get an audience with at 334 00:21:36,000 --> 00:21:40,560 Speaker 1: least an investigator, hopefully the medical examiners themselves, and they're 335 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:47,159 Speaker 1: in tears. And they're in tears because we have yet 336 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:52,640 Speaker 1: to rule a manner on a death and because they 337 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,680 Speaker 1: can't get funds released. And I'm sure that there are 338 00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:58,200 Speaker 1: many people in sond of my voice that can identify 339 00:21:58,440 --> 00:22:02,600 Speaker 1: having to deal with insurance companies about this because the 340 00:22:02,680 --> 00:22:05,920 Speaker 1: death has yet to be classified. I've had I've set 341 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 1: across the table from people that were going to have 342 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:11,359 Speaker 1: their homes were closed on. I had one lady I 343 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: remember distinctly, had already had her car repossessed, and the 344 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:18,119 Speaker 1: electricity had been cut off twice in our home, and 345 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:20,760 Speaker 1: she did not have a job. She was sole dependent 346 00:22:20,840 --> 00:22:25,800 Speaker 1: on her husband, and they had a rather robust, robust 347 00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:29,240 Speaker 1: insurance policy and it hadn't been paid out, and she 348 00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:33,040 Speaker 1: was living a hand of mouth existence. So there's a 349 00:22:33,080 --> 00:22:36,280 Speaker 1: lot more to this than merely you know, what you 350 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:38,880 Speaker 1: might see in true crime, you know where we're trying 351 00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:41,919 Speaker 1: to make these determinations like that. So a lot of 352 00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 1: this goes into, as you well mentioned, what kind of 353 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 1: history can we get about the event? Well, if you 354 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:53,760 Speaker 1: look at John O'Keefe and his death, what do we 355 00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 1: understand about that scene and how his death came about? 356 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:03,040 Speaker 1: Is there an enough information and has it been effectively 357 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:08,600 Speaker 1: relayed to the state medical examiner they're in Massachusetts so 358 00:23:08,640 --> 00:23:13,399 Speaker 1: that they can make a determination about what they're seeing. 359 00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: Keep in mind, you're not pitching this to a lawyer. 360 00:23:19,680 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 1: A lawyer has this massive canon of law that they 361 00:23:22,600 --> 00:23:26,480 Speaker 1: can choose from. We've only got five of the manners 362 00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:29,439 Speaker 1: of death, so we have to have enough information, and 363 00:23:29,520 --> 00:23:33,840 Speaker 1: plus you're talking to somebody that is of a scientific mind. 364 00:23:33,920 --> 00:23:37,320 Speaker 1: If it does not make sense to them logically, then 365 00:23:37,359 --> 00:23:40,960 Speaker 1: they will not move forward. One of the most difficult 366 00:23:41,000 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 1: cases I think for and I've been involved in a 367 00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:47,720 Speaker 1: couple of these over the years, for a medical examiner 368 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:50,920 Speaker 1: to make a determination many times is Russian Roulette cases 369 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:56,399 Speaker 1: because you can go down that road and it's like 370 00:23:56,960 --> 00:23:58,639 Speaker 1: one of the toughest colleges. I got to tell you this, 371 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:01,560 Speaker 1: one of the toughest college courses I ever took as 372 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:06,200 Speaker 1: an undergrad was logic. Aside from chemistry classes and everything else, 373 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 1: I hated logic and essentially you're sitting there working on proofs, 374 00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:13,880 Speaker 1: doing word problems. God bless all the philosophers out there, 375 00:24:13,920 --> 00:24:18,240 Speaker 1: because it is a tough class. I was happy to 376 00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 1: take a sea in that class, very happy. But when 377 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:25,680 Speaker 1: you begin to go down this road of logically what 378 00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:29,399 Speaker 1: logically makes sense here, you can get off into the 379 00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:35,359 Speaker 1: weeds relative to relative to something like Russian Roulette. And 380 00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:38,040 Speaker 1: it's actually something I do with my students at Jacksonville State. 381 00:24:38,520 --> 00:24:41,480 Speaker 1: I will tell them, Okay, we're going to pretend that 382 00:24:41,480 --> 00:24:45,879 Speaker 1: we're all medical examiners today, you're a corner. I have 383 00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 1: to get them out of the mind of pretending that 384 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:51,520 Speaker 1: they're a police officer. And we'll go down this road 385 00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 1: and I'll give them a scenario and I kind of 386 00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 1: tell I'll tell you what it is real. Briefly, you 387 00:24:55,920 --> 00:25:00,200 Speaker 1: got three guys. One guy says, hey, my grandpa as 388 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:05,240 Speaker 1: a retired police officer. He left me his revolver. And 389 00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 1: he says to the other two, do you want to 390 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,680 Speaker 1: see it? They've been drinking as well. Do you want 391 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:13,480 Speaker 1: to see it? And they say yeah enthusiastically. Then one 392 00:25:13,480 --> 00:25:16,320 Speaker 1: guy says, you got any bullets, Let's load it up 393 00:25:16,359 --> 00:25:19,240 Speaker 1: and let's only put one bullet in it. And then 394 00:25:19,280 --> 00:25:22,560 Speaker 1: one guy says, let's play a game. So they sit 395 00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:25,840 Speaker 1: down with the knowledge in mind that there is a 396 00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:29,240 Speaker 1: certain risk of lethality here, and they spin the weapon 397 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:31,040 Speaker 1: and they go through the whole process, and of course 398 00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 1: one winds up nine. You would be surprised, you might 399 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:35,879 Speaker 1: be shocked. I've got to have you. I'm going to 400 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:38,399 Speaker 1: have you come to my class, Dave, so that you 401 00:25:38,440 --> 00:25:41,280 Speaker 1: can bear witness to this, because I do this exercise 402 00:25:41,359 --> 00:25:45,280 Speaker 1: every semester with my medical legal class. You'd be surprised. 403 00:25:45,800 --> 00:25:49,480 Speaker 1: How the classroom breaks down as to what they would 404 00:25:49,560 --> 00:25:53,480 Speaker 1: rule the manner of death of as in a case 405 00:25:53,480 --> 00:25:56,520 Speaker 1: of Russian Roulette. It's amazing, you know, are you going 406 00:25:56,600 --> 00:26:00,320 Speaker 1: to rule it as a homicide? Is it in act 407 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:05,520 Speaker 1: a suicide? Is it an accidental event? Or is it undetermined? 408 00:26:06,119 --> 00:26:08,280 Speaker 1: I've actually had a few people say, well it was 409 00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:12,840 Speaker 1: natural I don't know. One person in the back shout 410 00:26:12,840 --> 00:26:17,040 Speaker 1: out natural selection, and so I you know, you know 411 00:26:17,840 --> 00:26:21,280 Speaker 1: it was me. So I'm going to have you come 412 00:26:21,320 --> 00:26:23,479 Speaker 1: to class just so that you if any of our 413 00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:27,160 Speaker 1: friends out there are curious asking you to bear witness 414 00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:29,199 Speaker 1: to this, you can actually kind of see the numbers 415 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:32,359 Speaker 1: and how. And I do it with undergraduate classes and 416 00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:34,639 Speaker 1: I do it with police academy classes as well when 417 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:37,320 Speaker 1: I'm teaching them about death investigation, because you have to 418 00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:42,800 Speaker 1: have enough confirmatory scientific information to move forward. And does 419 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 1: it fit within the parameters of what we're talking about, 420 00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:47,680 Speaker 1: And let's just run through the mannor real quick. 421 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:49,880 Speaker 2: Let me ask you, Yeah, sure that Nextes and O's 422 00:26:49,960 --> 00:26:53,240 Speaker 2: Joe more than just Xtors and O's. I mean, what 423 00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:56,120 Speaker 2: if I'm playing Devil's advocate here, at least you've got 424 00:26:56,520 --> 00:27:02,040 Speaker 2: in your scenario what if my goal was I'm trying 425 00:27:02,040 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 2: to kill you off, and I've got us all drinking, 426 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:06,600 Speaker 2: and now I've got the gun and I'm the one 427 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:09,439 Speaker 2: pushing this whole thing, and I'm gearing it up, and 428 00:27:09,480 --> 00:27:11,600 Speaker 2: then you know, my goal was to have you dead. 429 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:14,280 Speaker 2: And you play a long boom, you shoot yourself in 430 00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:16,520 Speaker 2: the head. The other guy goes, man, Dave was really 431 00:27:16,520 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 2: working that hard. Hey man, you're the one, you know, 432 00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:23,159 Speaker 2: does that come into play? Do you have time with 433 00:27:23,320 --> 00:27:26,239 Speaker 2: police or investigators that they sit down and hey man, 434 00:27:26,280 --> 00:27:28,679 Speaker 2: we found out some information that might have to do 435 00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:30,560 Speaker 2: with this or is this purely no? 436 00:27:30,560 --> 00:27:33,240 Speaker 1: No, no, that's a that's a good point because lots of 437 00:27:33,240 --> 00:27:38,800 Speaker 1: times we'll do this exercise from the perspective of the 438 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:43,159 Speaker 1: medical examiner conintok cold and not having a lot of 439 00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:45,919 Speaker 1: input from police. Now if the medical and this is 440 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:52,920 Speaker 1: a great example, let's just say, John O'Keefe, what kind 441 00:27:52,960 --> 00:27:57,320 Speaker 1: of data did they show up with to try to 442 00:27:57,520 --> 00:28:01,040 Speaker 1: because listen to prosecutor in that case, they would really 443 00:28:01,080 --> 00:28:03,719 Speaker 1: prefer for the medical examiner to rule this as a homicide. 444 00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:06,480 Speaker 1: It just kind of bolsters their case. What did you 445 00:28:06,560 --> 00:28:09,000 Speaker 1: show up with? And you know, you get into the 446 00:28:09,240 --> 00:28:11,200 Speaker 1: to the eye word again. You know, you start to 447 00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:15,040 Speaker 1: think about intent. Sometimes it's referred to as specific intent, 448 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:18,399 Speaker 1: and that plays into a little bit of a to 449 00:28:18,480 --> 00:28:21,960 Speaker 1: what we do. But our ruling and our view of 450 00:28:22,040 --> 00:28:25,440 Speaker 1: things in the medical legal world is so desperately different 451 00:28:25,600 --> 00:28:30,320 Speaker 1: from what the legal eagles do. Yeah, if they came 452 00:28:30,359 --> 00:28:32,960 Speaker 1: to us with that information, we've developed something that he 453 00:28:33,160 --> 00:28:37,040 Speaker 1: said outside of what we saw at the scene. Yeah, 454 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:40,720 Speaker 1: watch this tonight. I want to get rid of both 455 00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:43,800 Speaker 1: these guys and this well that that would certainly give 456 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:48,160 Speaker 1: us pause. But if we have no other information, then 457 00:28:48,360 --> 00:28:52,720 Speaker 1: every medical examiner is going to view this as what 458 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 1: can I prove scientifically? And Dave, one more thing I 459 00:28:56,360 --> 00:29:03,480 Speaker 1: want to say about this is that amazing amazingly medical 460 00:29:03,480 --> 00:29:07,240 Speaker 1: examiners split on this topic, just like the students do. 461 00:29:08,680 --> 00:29:12,200 Speaker 1: And that's something so you will not You can go 462 00:29:12,640 --> 00:29:15,160 Speaker 1: to a variety of different medical examiners, you can put 463 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:17,720 Speaker 1: them in a room and let's just say it was 464 00:29:17,760 --> 00:29:21,080 Speaker 1: a silent ballot, because nobody likes to look like they're 465 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:23,520 Speaker 1: on the outside. If you if you just threw it 466 00:29:23,560 --> 00:29:26,520 Speaker 1: to them, of course, they've always got to debate one another. 467 00:29:26,560 --> 00:29:28,000 Speaker 1: That's one of the things they'd love to do when 468 00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:30,200 Speaker 1: they get together. But if you could just do it silently, 469 00:29:30,320 --> 00:29:32,720 Speaker 1: you'd be surprised how this breaks out. But at the 470 00:29:32,800 --> 00:29:35,400 Speaker 1: end of the day, you have to have enough information 471 00:29:36,080 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: to call this manner of death a certain thing, and 472 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 1: many times we're left wanting, as are many families. So 473 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:04,160 Speaker 1: we have manner considered at this moment, Tom, how are 474 00:30:04,160 --> 00:30:06,840 Speaker 1: we going to rule it? Remember we've only got five choices. 475 00:30:07,680 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 1: But on the flip side, if you refer back to 476 00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:14,960 Speaker 1: that imagery that I gave you of the umbrella, when 477 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:18,760 Speaker 1: it comes to a term that many people have heard 478 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:24,800 Speaker 1: for years now, it's the term cause of death. The 479 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:30,560 Speaker 1: cause of death and manner death are so desperately different. 480 00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:37,200 Speaker 1: So when we consider manner and cause of death, I 481 00:30:37,240 --> 00:30:42,680 Speaker 1: would argue that probably causal factors are more easily arrived 482 00:30:42,720 --> 00:30:50,040 Speaker 1: at than manner of death because you've got a limited 483 00:30:50,120 --> 00:30:52,480 Speaker 1: number of categories you can put any death into. But 484 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:56,640 Speaker 1: I can observe something and say, well, this is the 485 00:30:56,640 --> 00:31:00,640 Speaker 1: causal factor in an individual's death. I'll give you, for instance, 486 00:31:00,960 --> 00:31:05,840 Speaker 1: gunshot one of the head. Okay, well, the cause of 487 00:31:05,880 --> 00:31:08,800 Speaker 1: death that's going to be a gunshot one of the head. Okay, 488 00:31:09,080 --> 00:31:11,920 Speaker 1: Now you think about remember the umbrella. I talked about 489 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:16,920 Speaker 1: how many different of those categories under the umbrella of death. Well, 490 00:31:16,920 --> 00:31:20,960 Speaker 1: gunshot one of the head fit under. Okay, we've got 491 00:31:21,240 --> 00:31:26,880 Speaker 1: what's the most obvious one. I think probably suicide, self inflicted. 492 00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:34,080 Speaker 1: We've got homicide, We've got accident. Although anytime someone, as 493 00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:37,080 Speaker 1: an investigator tells me this is an accidental shooting, my 494 00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:41,200 Speaker 1: eyebrow goes up as high as it possibly can. You know, 495 00:31:41,680 --> 00:31:44,280 Speaker 1: particularly when it comes to police officers and people in 496 00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:48,040 Speaker 1: the military that have had a familiarity with weapons. I'm 497 00:31:48,040 --> 00:31:49,640 Speaker 1: going to take a long, hard look at that, and 498 00:31:49,720 --> 00:31:53,960 Speaker 1: then you do have undetermined events. So gunshot one of 499 00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:57,520 Speaker 1: the head is it's kind of straightforward, but there are 500 00:31:57,520 --> 00:31:59,560 Speaker 1: other things that come into play. And I got to 501 00:31:59,560 --> 00:32:02,840 Speaker 1: tell you one the biggest bugaboos recently that has really 502 00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:15,280 Speaker 1: is real burr underneath my saddle is this Virginia Roberts Jeffrey. 503 00:32:15,560 --> 00:32:18,400 Speaker 1: Because it seems like anybody out there that has the 504 00:32:18,440 --> 00:32:22,160 Speaker 1: ability to sling ink on a newspaper has been saying 505 00:32:22,280 --> 00:32:26,520 Speaker 1: her cause of death was a suicide. I can show 506 00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:31,280 Speaker 1: you article after article after article after article. Well, let 507 00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:35,840 Speaker 1: me pause one second here and just say, you're a 508 00:32:35,840 --> 00:32:42,080 Speaker 1: bunch of idiots. Did you get that last line? You're 509 00:32:42,080 --> 00:32:46,960 Speaker 1: an idiot because suicide is not her cause of death. 510 00:32:47,600 --> 00:32:50,560 Speaker 1: That's a manner of death. And still to this day, 511 00:32:52,240 --> 00:32:59,920 Speaker 1: the territorial coroner has yet to give us the call 512 00:33:00,400 --> 00:33:04,680 Speaker 1: death at the time of this taping. Okay, we don't know. 513 00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:07,840 Speaker 1: What we do know about about her case is that 514 00:33:07,920 --> 00:33:14,600 Speaker 1: it has apparently been ruled the manner has been ruled 515 00:33:14,640 --> 00:33:17,479 Speaker 1: as a suicide. But that's not the cause of death. 516 00:33:18,760 --> 00:33:22,080 Speaker 1: So you get hung up in this kind of and 517 00:33:22,120 --> 00:33:24,239 Speaker 1: it's not really a word salad. There aren't a lot 518 00:33:24,320 --> 00:33:28,120 Speaker 1: of words involved here. It's rather simplistic. You know. If 519 00:33:28,160 --> 00:33:30,960 Speaker 1: you look at the law, it's highly complex. But when 520 00:33:30,960 --> 00:33:35,040 Speaker 1: it comes to manner and cause of death, you think 521 00:33:35,080 --> 00:33:38,160 Speaker 1: about her and you think about you know, and it 522 00:33:38,160 --> 00:33:42,600 Speaker 1: makes you wonder, well, what could have brought about her death? Well, 523 00:33:43,200 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: they're limitless, you know. If they're saying that this is suicide, which, 524 00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:52,440 Speaker 1: by the way, suicide is defined as death at one's 525 00:33:52,480 --> 00:33:57,880 Speaker 1: own hand. And as you notice in that definition, which 526 00:33:57,920 --> 00:34:00,840 Speaker 1: is the actual definition that she used in medical legal circles, 527 00:34:01,920 --> 00:34:05,960 Speaker 1: death that one's on hand says nothing about intent because 528 00:34:06,000 --> 00:34:08,920 Speaker 1: intent is generally something that's left up to the legal 529 00:34:08,960 --> 00:34:11,160 Speaker 1: side of the House to prove. We don't have to 530 00:34:11,200 --> 00:34:13,800 Speaker 1: prove that. Now, it might influence us if they say 531 00:34:14,719 --> 00:34:16,920 Speaker 1: they've been intending to do this or they have talked 532 00:34:16,920 --> 00:34:20,319 Speaker 1: about it will factor that in. But our definition is 533 00:34:20,440 --> 00:34:23,680 Speaker 1: death that one's on hand. I'm Joseph Scott Morgan, and 534 00:34:23,920 --> 00:34:26,400 Speaker 1: this is bodybacks