WEBVTT - China Drives Global EV Sales as US Support Fades

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Tom Rowland's Reese and you're listening to Switched

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast brought to you by BNF. Today we're

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>discussing BNF's Electric Vehicle Outlook, our annual flagship report, analyzing

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how electrification will impact road transport between now and twenty fifty.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>In the very near.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Term, electric vehicle sales are set for yet another record

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>breaking year. That's a big deal, especially since headlines have

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on how the US is slashing support for evs.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But the EV story isn't just about the US. It's

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a global story and the number of countries getting into

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the EV game is growing. The biggest player is China,

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which continues to lead the EV adoption pack. Over fifty

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>percent of new passenger vehicle cells in China this year

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are set to come with a plug. China is also

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a star when it comes to sales of range extender evs,

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>which are now the fastest growing drivetrain in the world.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Even outside of its own borders, China is making a splash.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The market for electric vehicles was once considered top down,

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>with developed economies moving first, but Chinese automakers have been

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>targeting developing economies hard As a result. Thailand now has

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a higher passenger EV adoption rate than the US, and

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Brazil's adoption rate is higher than Japants. To learn more

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>about this global EV story, I'm joined by bnif's head

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of Clean Transport, Colin Mcherica, to discuss the Electric Vehicle

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Outlook twenty twenty five, which bn EF clients can find

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at BNF go on the Bloomberg terminal or on BNF

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. All right, let's get to talking about the

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Outlook for electric vehicles with Colin. Colin, thank you for

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>joining the podcast today.

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Pleasure to be here. Nice to speak to you. Tom.

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>We're here to talk about what we at BNF call EVO,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which stands for our Electric Vehicle Outlook. You've been doing

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this for a really long time, so can you tell

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about the history of it and

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what is new Because we do this again and again

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>every year, presumably we don't need to just update our

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers every year. I'm assuming that we do new and

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>cool things and that's what keeps us going because that's

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how it is at BNF. We always have to do

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>something new.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, So I've been doing this. I was sort

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of tallying it.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 4>This is actually the tenth year that I've run this report,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 4>and obviously a lot has changed since then, and I

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 4>would say sometimes it feels now like everybody and their

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 4>dog has a forecast for how this type of stuff

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 4>is going to evolve. I think back in twenty fifteen sixteen,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 4>when we were doing the first one, there was kind

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>of a few oil companies plus Opek, who are putting

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>out long term outlooks, and their view was very down

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 4>on anything to do with electrification and basically saying liquid

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 4>fuels or what's going to power the world's mobility mix indefinitely,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>and none of them saw any significant role reviews, and

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 4>we sort of thought, look, we've been looking at this

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 4>battery cost curve stuff for a while.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>We think we're on the cusp of something about to change.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 4>So when we try and do things at BNF, we're

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 4>always trying to do things with what's useful for our

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 4>clients and as well try and inform a public debate

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 4>as well. But at the first instance, be useful to

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 4>our clients and provide data to that's helpful. And so

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 4>whenever you get into long term stuff, you always have

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 4>to be a bit careful because I have a sort

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>of thesis that the further you go out in time,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 4>the fewer people that is operationally useful for. So if

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 4>you go all the way out to twenty forty and

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 4>spend a lot of time talking about twenty forty and fifty,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.119
<v Speaker 4>you just kind of lose people some people along the way. Now,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>it's not to say there aren't useful and interesting things

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>to talk about those long term parts, but you have

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 4>to balance it with some near term things that are

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 4>going on. So that's kind of what gets out. Your

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>other question is about what do we do that's beyond

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 4>just updating this outlook every year, because we have our

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>models and we have our adoption outlook that follows two

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 4>different scenarios and all this sort of stuff, and that

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 4>gets updated with the latest data. But then we do

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 4>try and say, okay, how can we keep making this

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 4>better every year? And after ten years you just keep

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 4>incrementally improving things, and sometimes that's new countries added. This year,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>we've done a bunch of things. We've added a new

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 4>drive train, so there's something called range extended electric vehicles

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that are included in there, and we've done more on

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 4>terrace and trade. How that's impacting things looked at some

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>of the regional dynamics for things like flex fuel vehicles

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 4>in Brazil or compressed natural gas vehicles in India, and

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>and you have to do a lot of work on

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 4>batteries and the supply chain, so there's a whole new

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>forecast there for solid state batteries, looking at electrolyte chemistry

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 4>as well as updating our anode and bathout chemistry forecasts.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 4>And then also looking at all the battery plants that

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>are coming online over capacity issues that are sort of

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 4>not just looming but actually here in that market. And

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 4>then lastly the three other things we've done this year.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Each year we do three what we call thematic highlights,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>so those are sort of special standalone chapters that look

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 4>at a growing or topical issue around emobility around the world.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 4>So this year's were the commercialization of solid state batteries,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 4>the rising cost of ev charging, and a special deep

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>dive on Brazil looking at alternative ways that Brazil's ethanol

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>could be used in a scenario where electrification displaces a

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of ethanol use in road transport.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you've gone above and beyond, because before

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you got even to talk about those thematic highlights. I

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, Wow, this is already a really complex year,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly with all the tariffs coming in and maybe changing

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the picture, as you say, especially if we're trying to

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure we talk about things that are relevant for

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. I mean, was it more of

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 1>a headache doing EVO this year than in previous years.

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So one of the things I've found after a decade,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 4>it's ten years now working for me work on auto,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 4>automotive related topics and transport related topics, and twenty years

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>now working in clean energy overall.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I started in May two.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 4>Thousand and five, and particularly on the auto stuff, I've

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 4>just kind of realized it's something every year, it's always

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 4>something different, but there's always something that kind of is

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 4>a big spanner in the works for what you might

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 4>think of as this business as usual that never seems

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>to go back to usual in the auto sector. And

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 4>so for a while that was COVID and okay, look,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 4>how do you how many cars are people going to buy?

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>What if people aren't moving around as much, what does

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 4>it do to energy demand? And keep in mind that

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 4>we're not just looking at how many cars get sold,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>We're looking at this work is what informs all of

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>our things around the road, fuel demand outlook and how

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 4>much gasoline and diesel are going to be consumed and

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>all these other things as well. So we're definitely not

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 4>just looking at cars and trucks sold. We're looking at movement,

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 4>and we're actually at the basis level starting with literally

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.239
<v Speaker 4>how much do people and goods move around the world,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 4>So that's in freight ten kilometers and trillions of passenger

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 4>kilometers traveled, and how is the mix of that changing.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 4>So with those sort of big, really big picture things

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 4>in mind, and the auto industry is about a two

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 4>and a half trillion dollar annual revenue industry, they're kind

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 4>of affected by everything. So one year it's COVID, the

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 4>next year it's a semiconductor shortage, the year after that

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 4>it's tariffs and trade drama. There's kind of always something,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 4>and to be honest, that's sort of what keeps it interesting.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 4>You could sort of look at that and sigh and say, oh,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 4>why can't we have a normal year, But another way

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 4>to look at it would be like, wow, we get

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 4>to work on some of these topics where the biggest

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 4>things in the world are relevant and are directly impactful,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 4>and I think automotive is a pretty fascinating lens to

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 4>look at the world through because it does tie in

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>technology developments, it tried ties in economics and trade, It

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 4>ties in politics, It ties in job creation and manufacturing

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 4>and industrial policy, and kind of each one of these

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 4>things is sort of getting flexed in a different way

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 4>in every year, So it makes it hard, it makes

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 4>it interesting. It also means that every time we finish

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 4>publishing it, there's already things that have changed, and there's

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 4>things that we wish we could have had time to include.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>But that's just sort of part of the game.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>And that's part of doing it as an annual thing

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 4>and not trying to constantly release this over and over

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>throughout the year, but rather sick once a year we're

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 4>going to step back and try and tie it all together.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 4>The rest of the year we're publicishing much more near term,

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 4>detailed work, and this is the once a year where

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 4>we sort of step back and try and figure out

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 4>how it all fits together.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting. You know, what I'm hearing is kind

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of this electric vehicle outlook. It is literally a forecast

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of the electric vehicle sector. But to what you're saying

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is it's like a lens through which you have to

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>look at everything going on in the world. It kind

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense. I mean we've talked about this before.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember I found this chart on what used to

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be called Twitter, and it was a map of the

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>world showing every country's top import really like, so it

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was a map showing what was the nature of global trade.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And the most imported physical goods were either cars or oil,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're looking electric vehicles, which is disrupting

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>both of those industries. So in a sense, it's not

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>surprising that it's like you say that it touches on

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>everything that matters to your report. We were chatting before

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we started recording. You know, you've been doing the rounds

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>promoting this report, and I think you said it was

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a list of eleven key takeaways that you'd come up with.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know if it was a word, was takeaways.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you had a better word, But could you

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>talk us through you know, I think we have time

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk through all eleven and you know, our clients

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>can access our reports, and I think we're putting out

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a webinar, But what were some of the more important ones?

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for sure, and so yeah, when we finished the report,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 4>the report has hundreds of figures, it's a couple hundred pages.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 4>There's all sorts of stuff in there, and each one

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 4>of our client we serve a lot of different client

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 4>types and different sectors and different roles, so each one,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>each person gets a slightly different an organization gets a

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 4>slightly different area. It has a slightly different area that

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be the most interested in. So I

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 4>would say there's lots in there and people can go

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 4>and read it. We try and draw out a few

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 4>just that are make good presentation slides and things, and

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 4>so some of them I guess, just kind of starting

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 4>from the top, is this is going to be another

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 4>record breaking year for EV sales. So we're pretty confident

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 4>on that. About one in four vehicles sold in the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 4>world this year will be a plug in either battery

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>electric or plug in hybrid.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's up from about twenty percent last year.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 4>If we look at the fleet, about four percent, so

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 4>one in every twenty five five cars on the road

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 4>in the world was electric.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And was this what you were expecting going into the analysis,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>because I know you say it'll be a record Yeah,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you know, like a lot of BNF

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sectors where we're looking at things that are emerging. That's

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what we've said every year, but I know there's been

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a few headwinds. So were you genuinely surprised at this

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>finding or were you kind of expecting it?

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I was expecting that.

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you work on electric vehicles, especially, you

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>hear every year about all the reasons why it's going

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 4>to fail, and then it goes up between twenty and

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent a year.

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>That's been pretty consistent.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>I think what's probably different this year, and that we

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 4>do talk a lot about in the report this year,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 4>is that the US market is set to slow down

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>pretty dramatically, and whatever happens in the US has an

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>outsized impact on the headlines that you read, because a

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of the new sources or groups covering things our

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 4>English speaking and the US is obviously a pretty dominant

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 4>force in a lot of areas. So if you were

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 4>to follow the US headlines, it's quite dark. And we

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>have dramatically reduced our US ev adoption forecast because of

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 4>things like the Trump administration rolling back cafe and taking

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 4>dismantling arts of the Inflation Reduction Act. And so certainly

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 4>that is a very real dynamic, and that is a

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to downplay that. If we're going to

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 4>get large scale electrification in the US, we need the

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 4>US market to go electric as well. We're not we

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 4>don't take a position on whether that should happen, but

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 4>just by the very nature of the size of the US,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 4>it's an important part of the global vehicle mix. So

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 4>just to give a sense of that, last year in

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 4>our outlook, we had about forty eight percent by twenty

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 4>thirty of vehicle sales in the US coming.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>With a plug.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 4>That was again based on really tight fuel economy regulations

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 4>under Biden. We had all the money being pumped in

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 4>by the Inflation Reduction Act, the support for evs from

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 4>tax credits, all these things sort are coming together, plus

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 4>California ZEV mandate and the states that follow it. This

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 4>year we've dramatically reduced that because many of those have

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 4>been rolled back. So now we have it going to

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven percent of sales by twenty thirty having a plug.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's both battery electrics, employment HIGHBRI and so what

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>was the number forty eight twenty seven?

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so pretty sharp, pretty sure drug, and to be honest,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 4>there's actually some downside, further downside risk to that because

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the outlook assumes that California does retain its waiver and

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration has gone after that and as of

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 4>now remove that, which is a decision that will get

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 4>tied up in the courts and is being tied up

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 4>in the courts. And to be honest, this was all

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 4>just happening as we were publishing, So our position was

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 4>let's keep it in there. But it means that to

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that twenty seven percent by twenty thirty, there's still a

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 4>fair bit of downside risk because if California loses that

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 4>ability to set its standards and that holds up in court,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 4>then we would see that for cast go down even further.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Did you ki Anamba?

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 4>We haven't yet, but that's kind of the next thing

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 4>up is to figure out how much further that goes

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 4>down in that case. But just to kind of give

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 4>a sense of scale, the US is not a huge

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 4>part of the overall TV market today. The biggest market

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 4>course is China, and one of the interesting findings, sometimes

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 4>one of the most interesting charts. So it came right

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 4>at the end and I was thinking, actually China EV

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 4>sales this year are going to get pretty close to

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 4>US total vehicle sales. So well, let's make a chart

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 4>of that, and basically, towards the end of this year,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 4>we think China's EV sales.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 3>Will surpass US total vehicle sales. That's pretty remarkable.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 4>So you see this chart where a few years ago

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 4>there's just a few hundred thousand evs a year sold

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 4>in China, and then now by the end of twenty

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, there will be more evs sold in China

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>than total cars sold in the US.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 3>And the Chinese market is still growing quickly. The European

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>market is also growing quite a bit right now.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 4>Because there's tightening vehicle CO two regulations. They've backed off

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 4>that a bit and averaged out the CO two regulations,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 4>so they don't tighten just in twenty twenty five, but

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>averaged out from twenty twenty five to twenty twenty seven.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 4>But so it wasn't a very long winded way of saying,

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't a real surprise. It was sort of what

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 4>we were expecting that it was going to be a

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 4>record year. But certainly there is a lot of regional

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 4>variation in that.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So It's really interesting what you're saying about the difference

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>between the US and a lot of other markets, and

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it does make me wander two things, and I say

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this as someone who's currently living in the US, is

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is the US missing the boat on the future of

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the automotive sector and any aspirations of becoming a vehicle exporter?

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So first, I what does this mean for the future

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of the US automotive sector?

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And then the other thing I.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Wonder is, and this is maybe more of a slow

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>burn how quickly this begins to dig in, But is

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the US going to be uniquely exposed to oil prices

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the future because everyone else has more of an

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>electric fleet and has less dependency. I don't know if

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something you know you have thoughts on.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely.

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 4>In terms of the second question actually around whether the

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 4>US is more uniquely exposed to that, the US already

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 4>is more uniquely exposed to that because the efficiency of

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 4>the vehicle fleet is significantly lower than other parts of

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 4>the world and the alternatives are very limited. Right, So

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 4>in cert some countries, if the cost of driving goes up,

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 4>there's a realistic option for some people to shift to

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 4>public transit. Their driving distances aren't as high, and their

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 4>efficiency is better, whereas in the US there's very little

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 4>to do other than just pay it and maybe complaint

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 4>when gasoline prices go up, and understandably so in some cases.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.119
<v Speaker 3>So I would say that it is already uniquely.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Exposed when oil prices go up and gasoline prices follow.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 4>But yes, to sort of zoom out a bit from there, yes,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 4>there is a real risk that the US, particularly the

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 4>US automakers get left behind in this transition because they

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>are sort of protected right now.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 3>So right now in the US, there's one hundred percent

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>tariff on Chinese EV's or Chinese made EV's.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 4>Even if they're an EV made by a Western automaker

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 4>in China, which I think is important because you were

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>starting to see more and more automakers make their vehicles

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 4>in China and then ship them to international markets, so that.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Means they're not exposed to the full level of competition

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>that you're starting to see elsewhere.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 4>And anytime you have a market that is not exposed

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to the full global competition, then it is possible that

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 4>it sort of evolves down a different evolutionary path. I

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 4>think one of the things that was interesting in digging

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>through this year's EV numbers in different countries is that

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>the single biggest determinant you could probably look at for

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 4>which countries or regions are going fast on EV adoption

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 4>which ones are going slower, is the ones that are

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 4>open to Chinese automakers are going very fast. Indeed, so

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 4>markets like Brazil or Thailand, or Vietnam, Turkey, Mexico, even

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 4>the UK. The UK doesn't have the same important tariffs

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that the S THEU has on Chinese and the UKs

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 4>that has the highest level of EV adoption amongst major

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 4>economies outside of China, and all these other ones in

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Southeast Asia or Latin America and other places are growing

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 4>quite quickly and are now have significantly higher rates of

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 4>EV adoption than established, wealthier markets, which kind of inverts

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 4>this idea that many people have had for a long

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 4>time that electrification starts purely at the top and slowly

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 4>works its way down top of the market works its

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 4>way down. Instead, what we're seeing is much more sort

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of bottom up electrification happening and in many cases now

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 4>happening in emerging economies significantly faster than developed markets or

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 4>more economically developed markets, particularly those that have large incumbent

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 4>auto manufacturing bases, like Japan, the US, or Germany. So

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 4>there's some really interesting regional dynamics there. I think the

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 4>US is a bit at risk of sort of missing

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 4>this global trend and therefore struggling with some competitiveness as

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 4>a result. It's worth keeping in mind though, that while

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's sales are faltering, is still a major producer and

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>has been very innovative up to date and is an

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 4>American company. So certainly, I don't think it's a foregone

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 4>conclusion that the US and the US automakers are going

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 4>to fall further behind on this, but certainly the policies

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 4>that are in place right now are pushing things in

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 4>that direction.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Right And you know, in a way, maybe my question

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was predicated on the idea that the profit in the

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>future of this industry is going to be in the

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing of the vehicles, whereas it might be in other

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>things like the design. You know, I know that if

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we think of internal combustion engines, they are complex, and

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there's real expertise in certain countries that enables those countries

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to be major players in those areas. And I'm assuming

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where there's quite a bit of margin. If the

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>majority of the value is shifting towards the battery, maybe

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point becomes low margin. It might be that

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the actual profit is not necessarily in the making of

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle, but in other factors, like you know, I'm

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>just thinking of the difference between you know, where is

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the money made from iPhones? Is it made in the

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing of them, or is it Apple, a US based

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>company is making all of that money. Is that something

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you could see happening and is that maybe the sliver

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of hope for some countries that might feel they are

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>losing out on manufacturing, right.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 3>It's a tricky question.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what I would say is that automakers over

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 4>the last one hundred years have changed the way they

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 4>operate a lot, particularly around vertical integration. So if you

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>go back to the first mass manufacturing of cars, say forward,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 4>in the assembly line, there's a lot of vertical integration

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 4>at that point because there isn't really a supply chain.

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 4>So if you don't have enough rubber, you're setting up

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 4>plantations in Brazil kind of thing. And then over the

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>last fifty years, in particular, the trend has been automakers

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 4>divesting more and more of the process of making parts.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 4>So you have these Tier one suppliers and below them

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>tier two suppliers who are making components, and then the

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>automakers are more and more assembling vehicles. And so they

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 4>are incredibly complex supply chain management organizations that are really

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 4>good at that. They're really good at managing all those

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 4>delivery of all those supply chains, integration of all that,

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 4>assembling the vehicle, marketing the vehicle, getting them out places

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 4>in the right time. They're very good at that. But

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 4>they have sort of farmed out a lot of the

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 4>actual component making of different bits of the car. What's

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 4>really interesting right now that you're seeing is kind of

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 4>a trend in the other direction. So Tesla was already

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 4>doing this a bit, but BYD is the one that's

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 4>taken us the furthest So BYD is their view is

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 4>sort of, whatever we can make in house, we should,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 4>and so that's making the batteries. Of course, they've been

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 4>in the battery making business for a long time. They're

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 4>making semiconductors. In some cases, they're actually buying and building

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 4>their own car carrying ships that.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Are delivering these cars around the world.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 4>Kind of as vertically integrated as you can go all

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 4>the way down to the ocean going vessels that are

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 4>there delivering to make.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Their own roads as well special yeah roids.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And so that I think is kind of the

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 4>interesting trend is like, Okay, does that signify something else

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see from other automakers.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it a significant competitive advantage over time?

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Right now it looks like it is at the sort

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 4>of awn of this electrical age, but it'll be very

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 4>interesting to see how others react. We have seen some

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 4>moves from some of the others to get into cell

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing or it potentially even take stakes in minds of

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 4>critical raw materials. This is kind of like a moment

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 4>where something that was settled for a while that you

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 4>should farm out as much as you can and buy

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 4>from suppliers where you can is now sort of up

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 4>in the air. And I think BID is really sort

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 4>of pushing the limits here and growing incredibly quickly as

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 4>a result around the world. And so that's something certainly

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 4>we're watching quite closely this year.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So that, I mean, that's so fascinating. So Gy, going

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the start of this conversation,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you've kind of got these eleven key takeaways. The first

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>one was that we expect sales to increase this year,

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and we've unpacked a lot from talking about that, so

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we definitely unless we have a podcast for each one

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of these eleven pieces, we've probably got time to talk

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>about one, maybe two. We'll see how we do. But yeah,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>what's another of the big takeaways?

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Another one is around range extended electric vehicles. So I

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>hinted at this.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 4>These are vehicles where you have an onboard engine, but

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>it's essentially running as a generator, running in a very

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 4>constant cycle and purely being used to charge the battery.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 4>The battery is always powering the wheels, the engine is

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>never powering the wheels, so there's.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 3>A very inant unplug in hybrids.

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 4>But again the differences is that it's always the battery

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 4>powering the car, and so we did a deep dive

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 4>on that this year and there it's quite an interesting

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 4>story because it's growing extremely quickly in China.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's the fastest growing drive train.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 4>They almost look a bit more like pure electrics than

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 4>they do plug in hybrids because about seventy percent of

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 4>all kilometers traveled on these erevs or range extended vs

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 4>is in electric mode and some of them have quite

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 4>long ranges. So the average range we found of the

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 4>ones being sold today is one hundred and seventy kilometers

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of all electric range, battery pack size of around thirty

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 4>eight kilo hours, So just a.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Really interesting dynamic there.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 4>And in China, those are primarily going into larger SUVs

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that have been a.

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Bit difficult to fully electrify costs competitively.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 4>So one of the things we sort of flag is

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 4>that we were tracking a lot of automakers who were

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 4>planning on launching these over the next few years outside

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 4>of China. Can dive forward Stilantis, others, and it'll be

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>really interesting to see if that is a potential way

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 4>to electrify, particularly the full sized pickup truck market in

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 4>the US. And I think if there's something that might

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of open up the US market a bit more,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 4>it could be a solution like that where you still

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 4>have all the performance and longer range, but you can

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 4>probably do seventy eighty then ninety percent of total driving

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 4>in fully electric mode. So that's that's kind of one

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 4>that we that we flagged as well, and that I

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 4>think you'll hear more on in the next few years.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And so, I mean I'm a little unfamiliar with the concept.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>So's you know, I don't know if this is the

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>right technical words. It's essentially like a battery electric vehicle

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that has a generator inside it as well, that's right.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And how heavy is the generator, like, say, compared to

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>an internal combustion engine vehicle.

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a lot smaller than all the apparatus you

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 4>need for an engine because you think about the way

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 4>an engine works, and in traditional vehicles you need to

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 4>be able to directly drive the wheels from that. So

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 4>it has to be able to operate in all sorts

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 4>of different conditions. If you have a little I don't

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 4>know if you've ever seen just a gasoline generator, it's

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 4>not quite like that, but it's not too far off

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 4>that a little portable one. And so it's just a

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 4>much simpler engine, much smaller, much less integration with all

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the vehicle.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 3>So we had this thesis for.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 4>A long time that look, plug and hybrids never really

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 4>take over because they can never be cheaper than a

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>combustion vehicle because they still have an internal combustion engine

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 4>platform on board. I think erevs challenged that a bit,

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 4>because if your main costs are a small generator essentially

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 4>and a small fuel tank for that, it's not that

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 4>much money, and it's certainly not the full cost of

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 4>two totally distinct architectures. These vehicles are built as evs first,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and then you're sort of adding something afterwards, which is

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of the opposite of what we had with some

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 4>of the first evs that came out, which were actually

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 4>built as combustion vehicles first, and then you sort of

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 4>add made them electric, but on the same kind of

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 4>platform or chassis, which is things like the Volkswagen Egle.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's a really interesting technological solution, and

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing it rise really quickly in places in rural areas,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 4>in places where people don't have home charging options or

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 4>where there's just not as much charging infrastructure. So yeah,

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I want to watch.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>What I find really fascinating about this is because everything

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you've said to me makes sense of the merits of

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>these vehicles over plug in hybrids, And maybe it's not

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>an apples to apples comparison, because in a way, a

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>plug in hybrid is like an internal combustion engine vehicle

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with a little battery to help make it more efficient,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas this is like an electric car with little generator

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to make it more long range. Still, the question that's

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>ringing in my ears, as you've explained all to this,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is why hasn't this become a thing sooner? Because generators

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are not new technologies. Was there anything that has changed

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that has enabled this?

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 4>So the short answer is it has happened before. So

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 4>the Chevy Vault is essentially a version of this that

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 4>was launched in twenty eight ten.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think what's.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Different now is sort of the For one, when that

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 4>vehicle was launched, the battery prices were really high.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 3>And the supply chain didn't really exist to build that easily.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Now batteries are cheap and the supply chain is very

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 4>very well developed in China. And then also you have

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of startups. So one of the groups that's

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 4>pushing it quite hard is a group called Li Auto,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 4>which is one of the fast growing Chinese EV startups.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>But who really want to make this work like they're

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of in with both feet, They're not hedged, and

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that that makes a difference as well. You

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 4>need somebody who's like all in on the technology pushing

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 4>as hard as they can, and it's either we're going

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 4>to make this work or we're going to go bankrupt.

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a powerful motivator.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Couple that with some cheaper battery costs, and I think

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 4>that's part part of the reason why you're seeing it now.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 4>I think there's also some recognition that, again, in these

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 4>places where you've got really high levels of ev adoption,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 4>a big chunk of the market.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Does just go full battery electric.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 4>And then what you're trying to figure out here is

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 4>is there a solution that helps for some of the

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 4>other ones that are that are harder to reach, And again,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 4>I think erevs are a potential way.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 3>To do that.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 4>We'll have to see how they actually get used and

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 4>performance an uptake in other markets first, because I don't

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 4>want to oversell it as some sort of heroic technological

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 4>solution that's going to rescue things. But it's certainly, like

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 4>I said, one, we're keeping an eye on.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>No I mean, and just to sort of almost like

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>zoom out a bit and not talk about this specific technology.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>What I'm kind of taking from this is batteries are

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>getting cheap enough that you're now seeing companies able to

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>explore new possibilities and new innovations. I know that like

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's always been a conversation around

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this area, at least with people who like being contrarian

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or reading sci fi, is that, you know, our thinking

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on electric vehicles is so conservative because we're thinking in

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of the cars that we know, except with a

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>battery in them instead. You know there could be different paradigms,

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but that maybe haven't yet been explored. So I suppose

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>my takeaway from this is maybe batteries are getting to

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that point where they're cheap enough that is now enabling

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>new innovation, new startup companies to try new things based

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on this premise of cheap batteries without having to be

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a vertically integrated battery manufacturer themselves.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think I think in an era where

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 4>we're just getting started in electrification, you had to bet

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 4>on by far the most the safest, most likely to

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 4>succeed option, right, And in a world where we sort

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 4>of say okay, batteries and electrification are really spreading quickly.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 4>And again, if you're sitting in the US, maybe this

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 4>whole conversation sounds a bit crazy because you've seen all

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 4>the rollbacks that are happening there, but be really clear,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world, particularly Europe, China and a

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of these emerging markets are going electric quite quickly.

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 3>That is happening.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 4>It does sort of show that, well, yeah, there may

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 4>be a little bit more room for experimentation right now.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 4>So I'll give you another example of a technology that

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 4>was sort of seen as dead but is now coming

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 4>back is battery swapping. So, for heavy trucks in China,

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 4>almost half of electric heavy truck sales, which are rising

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 4>quite quickly, About fifteen percent of heavy, medium and heavy

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 4>truck sales in China are now electric, but half of

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 4>those have a swappable battery and they're used in port

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 4>operations or on large mining sites or industrial sites. And

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 4>again that was something that was tried a little bit

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 4>almost twenty years ago now and failed. But now there's

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 4>just a sort of acceptance that electrification is going to

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 4>play a big role, and there will probably be different

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 4>flavors of electrification that are used to solve different specific problems.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 4>And it may well be that in some sort of

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 4>port drayage application or in some sort of mining site

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that yeah, you can just swap batteries in and out

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.479
<v Speaker 4>and that works well there or similarly, we've seen that

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 4>take off quite rapidly for two wheelers. So a battery

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 4>that you can physically just lift up and go to

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a swap station and swap in and out a battery

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 4>that you've signed up to a subscription for with that provider,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 4>and there's a lot of them dotted around the city,

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and then it's significantly faster than refueling with petrol because

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 4>you're just walking in and literally swapping one.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Battery out and then driving off.

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 4>So again, I think we are getting to this point

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 4>where electrification is and cheap batteries, good quality batteries are

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of a baseline technology, and then there's a lot

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 4>of experimentation, new business models and new products you can

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 4>build from that, And I think this kind of gets

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 4>at something core is like each year when we sort

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 4>of ask ourselves, like do we still believe that this

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 4>trend is strong and is robust? The core thing that

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at is our batteries still getting better and cheaper,

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 4>And the data is very clear on this. Batteries are

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 4>still getting better and cheaper. There's a huge amount of

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 4>innovation both in emerging chemistries and also just the existing ones.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 4>So we do a big deep dive on solid state batteries,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 4>on sodium ion batteries, and those are going to play

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 4>a role in the future at some point. But even

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 4>just within regular with the myon batteries prices drop twenty

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 4>percent last year, there's more and more of them that

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 4>can do really fast charging, in some cases up to

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 4>a megawatch charging, which is getting pretty close to the

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 4>point where evs are can be refueled at the same

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 4>speed as a gasoline car. Now, the infrastructure is not

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 4>there to do it, and not all the vehicles can

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 4>do it, and that sort of thing, but the bottom

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 4>line is that technology is still getting better and cheaper,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and that's what sort of makes us confident that the

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>trend continues, even if it has some steps forward and

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 4>back and some regional variations. So I think that's a

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 4>quite important takeaway and is a big part of the

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 4>sort of technoeconomic modeling that we do to build these outlooks.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 4>We're not just sort of saying what do we think happens.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 4>We are running it through some fairly sophisticated models on

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 4>how much does it cost to make a car, and

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 4>then what does that mean for addressable market in each

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>given market.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, just reflecting on everything you're saying. You know,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I said before, it's like cheap batteries have enabled people

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to try new things. It's also like, from what I'm

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>picking up, maybe whereas before, if you were selling electric

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>cars or other kinds of vehicles, your differentiation was that

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your vehicle is electric. That is what it's USP is.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But now what we're seeing is vehicle manufacturers are competing

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>against other vehicles that are electric and it's not being

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>electric is no longer a USP in the same way then,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing other usps that are built on the

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>premise of being electric, but it's like it's electric.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, and I mean China.

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Fifty percent of vehicles sales now in China come with

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the plug, right, So within that there's companies And one

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 4>of the more sort of comical oversimplifications I hear is like, oh,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 4>that's just government policy, They're forcing people to do that.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That's definitely not the case.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Like the government targets in China are that we're for

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent of sales to be new energy vehicles so plugins.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's two and a half times over that Taiget.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah, so organic consumer demand has clearly taken off

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 4>and is just running away with it. That's where all

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 4>the cool tech is. And you have groups with a

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of brand cachet that are developing cars. So once

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 4>you get to fifty percent, you have all this competitive dynamics,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 4>different groups competing in different segments, launching vehicles as quickly

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 4>as they can, so there's development time for a new

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 4>vehicle has been compressed down to sort of eighteen months

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 4>instead of three or four years or five years even,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 4>and just really really cutthroat rapid competition. I will say

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 4>within China, the level of competition is so intense that

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of groups are not profitable, so there may

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 4>be some sort of reset that needs to happen there

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 4>as well. But certainly it gets at this point that

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>you have this sort of platform technology that's available now

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 4>and people are building and innovating from there, and once

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the dust settles, there's a few successful companies that will

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 4>come out of that and our world real national champions,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 4>and certainly there's a few of those already in the

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 4>form of view ID and CTL, but I think there'd

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 4>be a few more names. People start to see that

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 4>emerge from that intense competition as well on the global stage.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So fascinating and really exciting.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, for those of listeners who like me, are

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>based in the US where it feels like a little

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of a you know what the word is, the

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>rainy weather for the electric vehicle market, it's really actually

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>quite refreshing to hear this global perspective, and it's not

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just about the numbers. There's actually really exciting stuff going on.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, as you say, that might create challenges, but

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of going back to the very top where we're

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you've been doing this outlook year after year,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing it keeps it very interesting for you as

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the person leading this analysis.

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It definitely does, and you do learn things from it, right,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean there.

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Is something about saying, look, we've been doing this for

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 4>a decade. We will still be doing this another decade

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 4>from now. There's sort of an accountability that comes with

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 4>that too. I feel like it's quite easy to run

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>around and say, oh, it's all going to change and

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 4>here's my dramatic forecast, and get a lot of headlines.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 4>But then two years later, three years later, ten years later,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 4>did that hold up? Did it carry any water. Did

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 4>it make any sense? Certainly when we started doing this

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>a few years later, there were all these groups saying

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent of car sales are going to be

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 4>electric by twenty twenty five or twenty thirty, and generate

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 4>lots of headlines from that, and then they're never revisited

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 4>it and never followed up. And though those groups were

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>just sort of comically wrong, they didn't understand the market

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 4>that they were dealing with. So I think there is

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 4>some responsibility and some accountability that.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Comes from doing it for a long time.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 4>And also I should just say here, I'm very fortunate

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>to work with an incredible team of people at Bloomberg

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 4>an EF. There's literally dozens of analysts who contribute to

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 4>this report, looking at everything from the supply of lithium

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 4>to the cost of public charging in Germany, or the

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 4>road fuel demand impacts or two wheelers in Vietnam. So

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 4>we're really able to draw on a global team of

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 4>really sharp people with really extremely precise domain expertise, and

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 4>that's what sort of gives it wings and makes it

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 4>useful for our clients. I think you can sit and

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 4>draw curves and say, look, here's an s curve disruption

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 4>is coming. That may or may not be true, but

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 4>it's often not especially operationally useful for people. So the

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 4>goal that we're starting from is, let's provide things that

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 4>are operationally useful as well as digging into what the

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 4>big trend is. And I think again, in the ten

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 4>years of doing it, it's been a fruitful thing. And

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 4>it's also been a real pleasure to work with some

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 4>of the same people for ten years every year on

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>it and be able to tap into their expertise and

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 4>see their fingerprints on these improvements that we've made over

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 4>the years. To the modeling, or to the depth of coverage,

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.239
<v Speaker 4>to the country coverage or the segments and all those

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 4>sorts of things.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a really nice note to finish on. And

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they always say you should leave people wanting more.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So Colin said, there was eleven main findings.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Was it main findings? You said, what was the way?

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I said, eleven key findings. I think we got

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 4>through We convincingly got through three. And there's all sorts

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 4>of other ones around oil impacts, about cost of charging,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 4>about what's going on with electric big rigs and trucks,

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 4>about solid state batteries and overcapacity, and also about a

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit about net zero. We didn't talk about much

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 4>about net zero this year. More people, we found, and

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 4>more of our clients want to want to talk more

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 4>about the next five and ten years than the next

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 4>thirty and forty or twenty and thirty, I should say,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 4>so we didn't talk as much about net zero, but

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 4>there is some stuff in there as well if people

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 4>want to know where the scenarios are tracking and how

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 4>far on or off course different countries or segments are

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So we've given you three and there's eight more amazing

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>conversations out there.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Colin.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been really enjoyable and interesting as always talking to you,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>so Colin, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Tom.

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Sholling. Bloomberg NEF is a

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 3>This recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 3>as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 3>an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg A NEIF should not

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 3>be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>investment decision.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 4>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 4>of the information contained in this recording, and

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Any liability as a result of this recording is expressly

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 3>disclaimed