WEBVTT - Tech News: Twitter and Facebook Shut Down Pro-US Propaganda Campaign

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, Diamond Executive producer with I Heart Radio and

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, August twenty twenty two. We got a

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lot to get through. Let's do it. Twitter and Facebook

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>recently shut down a network of fake accounts spreading propaganda

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>that was attempting to portray a foreign country in a

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>positive light in various regions. The twist to this story

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is that for the first time, this campaign was pushing

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a pro US perspective in places like Asia in the

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. We've seen efforts like this originating out of

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>other places like China or Russia, that this is the

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>first time we're talking about this some lar campaign that

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>appears to have been based out of the United States

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and the United Kingdom. The effort used lots of recently

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>established fake accounts, all pushing pro US narratives in these

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>regions while also criticizing everything from Russia's war against Ukraine

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to human rights violations in China. But the use of

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fake accounts is against Facebook and Twitter's policies. No matter

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what the messaging is, and so those platforms have been

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>taking an active stance in weeding out and shutting down

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these profiles. Also, NBC reports that the campaign appeared to

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have a minimal impact and that the posts didn't have

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>much engagement from the general public. Most activity belonged to

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>other fake accounts in an effort to boost visibility. Fortune

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reports that major companies like Apple, Honda, and Mazda are

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>reevaluating their supply chain strategies. At the heart of the

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>matter is the dependence upon in China. The cheap labor

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and manufacturing costs in China have long attracted major companies,

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>which look to save on costs while making their products

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to maximize profit, but relying on China for

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing has become less attractive in recent years. The country's

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>no tolerance approach to COVID means that operations are routinely

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>interrupted as a region goes into lockdown with every outbreak.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The deteriorating relationship between China and the United States is

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a big threat to the optics are also not great

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>due to the aforementioned human rights violations in China. That's

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a very real thing. Propaganda campaigns aside, and in Central China,

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of these factories are located, a camastrophic

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>drought has dried up rivers. That means that dams are

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not able to generate enough electricity through hydro power to

0:02:55.160 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>supply factories, which has forced more interruptions in manufacture ring.

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's this real old saying that I'm sure all

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of you have heard that says don't put all your

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>eggs in one basket. But the truth is, for a

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>long time, many companies have essentially ignored that age old

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>wisdom when it comes to the supply chain, and as

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a result, a disproportionate amount of the work involved in

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>many supply chains happens in China. And now we're starting

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to see companies explore strategies meant to diversify the supply chain,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>something that has really become critically important as we've seen

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so many disruptions in supply chains reek havoc on company

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>plans and consumer experiences over the last couple of years.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean we'll see much more robust supply chains

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in the future. I'm kind of skeptical because I expect

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>most companies will seek out the next cheapest, viable solution

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to their manufacturing needs, rather than truly diversify their approach

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to spread out risk. In an ideal world, we would

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>see supply chains that are as robust as the Internet is.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Should one part of the supply chain falter, you would

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to route around it with minimal disruption, But

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's being overly optimistic. Nine to five MAC

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>reports that Apple maybe on the verge of allowing users

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>to delete the Apple Wallet app, which would be a

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal as Apple routinely integrates its own apps

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>into iOS in fundamental ways and doesn't allow users to

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>delete them from their iOS devices. So why would Apple

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>take this step giving users the chance to switch to

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some other digital wallet, particularly when doing so raises problems

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>when users want to make a purchase through Apple pay Well.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>This is likely due to the European Union's recent pressure

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on Apple. The argument is that Apple's integration of Apple

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Wallet and its refusal to grant other digital wallets the

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>same level of interoperability with Apple processes amounts to anti competitiveness,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and actually it reminds me of the massive antitrust lawsuit

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft faced in the nineties, which focused on how

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft made its own Internet Explorer browser and integrated part

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of Windows. That led Netscape to accuse Microsoft of engaging

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in anti competitive behavior, particularly since at that time Microsoft

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Windows was by far the dominant operating system in the

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>consumer market. Courts actually agreed, and Microsoft was very nearly

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>forced to break up into separate companies, but a subsequent

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>court decision would reverse that course anyway. One major issue

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the EU has is that Apple doesn't allow any other

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>digital wallet app but it's own to use the NFC

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>technology that's built into iPhones. NFC is near field communication

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is the short range wireless tech that allows

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for small data transfers, you know, like contactless payments, and

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the EU has argued that Apple holding back access to

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>NFC amounts to anti competitive behavior. So we haven't seen

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>anything official yet, at least not as the recording of

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but we're going to keep our eyes on

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this to see if Apple does allow users to actually

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fully remove Apple Wallet from their iOS devices. Speaking of

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple and anti competitive allegations, the company Match Group, which

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>owns the dating slash hook up app Tender, has filed

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, this time in India. Match

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Group says that Apple treats dating apps unfairly, that Apple

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has this in app commission required for any purchase that's

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>made within an app, uh, and that it doesn't do

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>this for some other types of companies like righte haling companies,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and I find that argument kind of interesting. See Apple

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and Google too for that matter. Has restricted its commission

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to only applying to apps that have in app digital purchases.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It does not charge a commission on apps that are

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>designed to purchase real world stuff. So, if you're playing

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a digital game and you want to pay for some

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in game content, while Apple will take a cut of that,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you're ordering a real world pizza to be

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>delivered to your home using an app, Apple does not

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>take a cut of that transaction. Well, what match Group

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is saying is that right hailing companies get a pass

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from Apple. Apple does not take a commission if you

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>were to use an app like Lift or Uber. But

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>match Group says that that doesn't make sense because they

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>get charged for Tender but not for Lift or Uber,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and that in all cases, these apps are really just

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>about bringing together people in the real world. You know,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>when you hail a ride, it's about arranging to meet

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>someone at a specific place at a specific time. So

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>match Group argues, that's what dating apps are doing too,

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and so why should it be fair for Apple to

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>take a cut of tenders in app purchases but not

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a cut from right hailing company transactions. Now, I'm not

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>convinced that that line of argument is bulletproof, because I

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a case to be made that right hailing

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is definitely more than just bringing two or more people

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>together in the same place at the same time. But anyway,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>match Group is hoping that India's competition regulator will force

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple to change its policies, similar to how regulators in

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the EU and in the US are pressuring Apple to

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>allow apps to offer alternative payment systems outside of Apple's

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>own system. And Video is getting ready to announce a

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>new generation of graphics processing cards in September. According to

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>The Verge, rumor has it, We're going to get a

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>new generation of GPUs designated by the prefix for zero

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or forty. So right now you have cards like thirty

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>eight and thirty ninety that are dominating in Video's portfolio

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from a performance perspective, that's like the top of the

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>line of Invidios products and recently, we've actually seen more

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>availability for those cards. You know, for a couple of years,

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in Video's most powerful cards were really hard to get

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hold of, and if you could find one, it was

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>chances are it was on the aftermarket and it was

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at a huge markup. And this was largely because of

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency miners, specifically ether miners as an ethereum miners. This

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was a thing that we saw a lot. Bitcoin had

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>actually reached a level where bitcoin miners were not relying

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>on GPUs anymore. They were not powerful enough. They had

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>switched to a SAC or application specific integrated circuit poward

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>riggs at that time. But cryptocurrency has gone into a

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>massive recession or a collapse or whatever you want to

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>call it, and that meant that the return on investment

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for running a power hungry mining operation really became too low.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it costs you more money to run

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your computer system then you are making out of the

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>mining operation. That's just not a good deal. It means

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you're just losing money. So this meant that there was

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>less demand for those GPUs, and in Video actually found

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>itself overstocked on graphics cards because demand had dropped and Finally,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>gamers actually have a decent chance to get their hands

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on these things as close to m s r P

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>or manufactured suggested retail price, so at the asking price

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for these things instead of those crazy markups. However, all

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that being said, with the possible debut of a new

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>generation of graphics cards within sight, presumably with much greater capabilities,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not the best time to scoop up that

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight or thirty nine card if you want the

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>best of the best. And keep in mind the that

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>m s RP is still pretty day expensive for the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the line models. So the Verge reminds us

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that there might be a significant gap between when in

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Video announces this next GPU architecture, which has the code

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>name love Lace. I think that's great, and when consumers

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>will actually have a chance to buy a card based

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>off that architecture. So if you've been waiting to finally

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>get one of these top performance cards, you might want

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to actually wait a little bit longer just to see

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what comes next and whether that's something you want. Also,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>when new cards come out, there's a chance, not a guarantee,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's a chance that those thirty eight and thirty

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety models might get a price reduction. Um kind of

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to say, because when you're talking about teetering on

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>economic recession and supply chain issues and all these other

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>economic issues that are affecting the world, you cannot guarantee

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see a price come down. But

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a possibility. All Right, We've got some more

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>stories to cover, but before we get into that, let's

0:11:51.120 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. The threat analysis group at Google

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is warning us that a tool called hyper skate can

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.359
<v Speaker 1>give hackers the ability to download a target's entire email inbox,

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and that this tool works with Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo Mail,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and others. Also, this tool does not require the hacker

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to trick someone into downloading some malware. However, it does

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the hacker does have to get access to the

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>target's account somehow, So that could mean using some other

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of malware in order to get access, or you know,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess or find a target's account password. You

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of times if you ever get those

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>messages that your your password might have been compromised in

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a database breach. This is one of the reasons you

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>should definitely pay attention to that and change those passwords,

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>because if someone has just a file of passwords, they

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>might be able to get access to your account and

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>then download all of your email using a tool like this.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is also a reason, by the way, why

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you should always enable multi factor authentication if it's available.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it can be a hassle, but it really

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is useful. It means that if someone does attempt to

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>log in as you, they're gonna have a harder time

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I'm not gonna say it's impossible, but i

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>will say it's harder, and you are likely to get

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>an alert that's saying something hinky is going on, which

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>gives you a chance to take action. So activate that

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>m F a option in in everything that offers it, y'all. Anyway,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the team over at Google reports that it looks like

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>most of the targeting activity that's using hyper escape right

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>now is happening inside Iran. Now to me, that suggests

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that this could be a state sponsored campaign in order

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to gain access to high profile targets email accounts. No

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>word on whom be responsible. I've got a few ideas,

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>but you know it would just be pure speculation, so

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll save them for myself. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Security Agency is urging companies and organizations to be super

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>proactive when it comes to adopting a post quantum cryptography standard.

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>What what alright? So on Tuesday I talked about a

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Japanese company and its plans to enter the quantum computer

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>market with a sixty four cubit machine, And on that episode,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that quantum computing has the potential to drastically

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>simplify a certain subset of computational problems that traditionally are

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult for classic computers to solve. So a classic

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>computer might take hundreds or thousands of years to solve

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these problems. But because quantum computing uses a

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>different approach, one that if you have the right algorithm,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the right program, you could solve these kinds of problems

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in a relatively fast and trivial manner. That means things

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>are poised to change drastically and soon. One of those

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>things is really important. It's encryption. It's how we encrypt

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>data so that people can't just see what that data is. Now.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to launch into a full explanation of

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>digital encryption here. I have done full episodes about that topic.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But I will oversimplify a little bit and say that

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you can think of modern encryption essentially depending upon taking

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>two very very large prime numbers with hundreds of digits,

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and then taking these two prime numbers, then performing a

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>mathematical operation on the two which gives you a third number,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and you use that to encode data, and to decode

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the data, you need to know at least one of

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the prime numbers that were used to make that third number.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Um really you need both, but you have that ability

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to decode to reverse the process that was used to

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>encrypt the information. Now, because we're talking about two really

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really really big prime numbers, figuring out which prime numbers

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>were used to encrypt something is really hard to do.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>For a classic computer essentially has to go, you know,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>case by case doing prime number, prime number, prime number,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>prime number, until it figures out the ones that were

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.239
<v Speaker 1>used to encrypt, and that can take thousands of years.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But a quantum computer, again, if paired with the right algorithm,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>could do the same process fairly quickly, at least with

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain percentage of uh certainty. So you might get

0:16:55.240 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a response that says it's, you know, certain that this

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>particular solution applies to the problem, and that's that's that

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>stands to completely change encryption. It means that should someone

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>actually have access to a quantum computer and that kind

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of algorithm, they could potentially decrypt everything that's ever been

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>encrypted up to now and have free access to all

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the secret information that's ever been on digital platforms. So

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously a huge security issue, right, I mean, it's

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest security issue. You can have no more secrets.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>So this agency is telling companies that they need to

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>start working on migrating to a post quantum encryption strategy,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>one that's fundamentally different from what we use for today's encryption,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and the agency has been working to standardize so far

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>for post quantum encryption algorithms. That in itself is not easy.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You might remember from a recent news item that one

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>proposed post quantum computing algorithm turned out to be vulnerable

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to a classic computer attack. A researcher actually found a

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>way to exploit that algorithm in a non quantum approach,

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So while it might have been robust from a quantum

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>computing approach, it wasn't from another angle. So making a

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>robust encryption process is pretty darned tricky. Today, the US

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>state of California is issuing rules that regard the state's

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>transition to a ban on new internal combustion engine vehicles

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>or the sale of them, I should say, so, the

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>plan is to have a total ban on the sale

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of new ice vehicles by five but this is going

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen in stages. So starting in TWI of all

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>new vehicles sold in the state of California will need

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be free of carbon emissions, so we're mainly talking

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>about things like electric vehicles here By it will need

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to be sixty eight percent of all new vehicles sold

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in California, and by all new vehicles sold in California

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>will need to be free of carbon emissions in their operation. Obviously,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing of vehicles itself creates carbon emissions, but that's

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a thing for another podcast. The used car market, as

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>far as I can tell, is going to be unaffected.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, yes, you cannot buy a new

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engine vehicle in California starting in but theoretically,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>at least you would still be able to buy used

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles in California. Now it's possible that we're gonna see

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>other states follow California's lead. California traditionally is the most

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>progressive when it comes to these kinds of of measures

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that are meant to tackle stuff like carbon emissions, you know,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the climate that kind of thing. But even if other

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>states are low to adopt California's approach, the size of

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>California alone, you know, they have a huge driving population

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to really force automakers to shift to more

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>e V production. That's one of the reasons why we're

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing that kind of stuff happen right now, with companies

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like Ford undergoing dramatic transformations, including thousands of layoffs. Unfortunately,

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as these companies adjust towards producing more electric vehicles. In Germany,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Lower Saxony, fifteen diesel trains have

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>been retired and have been replaced with trains running on

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen fuel cells. So the diesel trains were responsible for

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the consumption of more than four hundred twenty thousand gallons

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of diesel fuel each year, and of course diesel engines

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>are a source of carbon emissions. Hydrogen fuel cells do

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>not release carbon dioxide. Instead, the byproducts of a hydrogen

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>fuel cell our heat, electricity, and water, typically water, vapor,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>because fuel cells operate at a fairly high temperature, so

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the water tends to be emitted as steam. Now you

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>might wonder why we don't rely more on hydrogen fuel cells.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>The technology is old, it's proven. There are vehicles out

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there that are fuel cell vehicles, but we don't see

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>them all over the place. Why is why is it

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that fuel cells are not the standard if they operate

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at such a clean level. Well, the big sticking point

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is that it can get hard to get your hands

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on pure hydrogen. So hydrogen is the most plentiful element

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. However, it's also super friendly. By that,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's eager to bond with other elements. When

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that happens, that effectively locks hydrogen away. It forms these

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>molecular bonds. It is not going to let go of

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>those without putting up a fight. So we have to

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>actually spend energy in order to free hydrogen up, to

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>harvest it and then use it. Right now, Germany is

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>harvesting hydrogen as it is produced as a byproduct in

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>various chemical processes. But in the future, Germany says the

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>plan is to use renewable energy to generate hydrogen. And

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>my guess is that they're going to use electrolysis, that

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is where you direct a an electric current into water

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to break those molecular bonds between hydrogen

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and oxygen and then you harvest the hydrogen. Um. Yeah, so, like,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not that hydrogen is a bad fuel to use,

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in fuel cells. It's just that finding the right

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy to free hydrogen from whatever else is tricky. You know,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we are also living in a world where getting access

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to water can be tricky. You know, look at at

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>places that are undergoing massive drought, like the middle of

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>China or the American Southwest. It is tough to sell

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea of using water to generate hydrogen so that

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have fuel cells when you have people who

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>are depending on just a drinking source of water. So, yeah,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a complicated issue. It's not something that's so

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>simple to solve. It's too bad because again, hydrogen being

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so plentiful, if we could easily access a source of

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it without these other consequences, that would be a huge,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>huge thing. We would clearly see countries migrating over to

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen based economies. We just haven't really found the right

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>balance for that yet. All right, we've got a couple

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>more stories that we want to cover. Let's take another

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Mhm. One thing that I've learned about Japan,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and full disclosure, I have yet to visit the country,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but I really want to go. But one thing I've

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>learned is that people are dependent upon and and count

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>upon trains running on time. Like the fact that Japan

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is so good most of the time at operating trains,

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that the various companies in Japan do a really good

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>job of operating trains. It becomes, you know, second nature

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to just assume that your train is going to be

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>at the station on schedule. It's a huge deal in Japan.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Commuters rely on trains heavily in Japan, and they expect

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the train to be at the station precisely when it's

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be, and to leave the station not a

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>second early or late. In fact, there was an incident

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and seventeen in which a train left

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese station twenty five seconds early, and the company

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was obligated to apologize to commuters because a few were

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>left behind on the platform and they had to wait

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>for the next train which got them to their destination.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Six minutes late. Meanwhile, I'm over here in Atlanta, Georgia,

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes when I go to the public transportation system nearby,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the display will say that the next train will arrive

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sometime in all right, well, let's get back to the news.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese company j R. East, in an effort to

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>modernize operations, chose to digitize train time tables, and then

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they supplied train drivers with tablets that are meant to

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>access these new timetables. In fact, that's the only thing

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>these tablets are meant to do. The drivers actually have

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>other tablets for other tasks. So the thought was these

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>timetables could be updated in real time automatically and the

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>operators would just have to refer to their tablets to

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>stay on schedule. But a driver for the Fukushima Line

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>UH forgot their password to their tablet, so they weren't

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>able to access the digital timetable, and that gummed everything up.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>The driver actually had to refer to timetables posted in

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>various stations along the route, and delay started to chalk up,

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and by the time they got to the final destination

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the line, those delays added up,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and by the time the train reached the end of

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the line, the delays had accumulated to twenty three minutes. Now,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I can only imagine the level of freak out of

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a twenty three minute delay if a twenty five second

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy prompted an official apology back in Now, the company

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>says it's going to spend more time training drivers on

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the proper way to create an remember passwords, which honestly

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>is something I think a lot of people could use

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a refresher course on. But yeah, interesting story. The road

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to the metaverse, whatever that might be, can be a

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>treacherous one, as Capital Music Group discovered the company famously,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, signed a digital as in a

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>computer generated rap artist named f N Meka or Maka

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>m e k A. This rappers songs had melodies, beats,

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>lyrics that were at least partially generated by artificial intelligence.

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>So this wasn't some digital avatar being controlled by a

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>human artist who was responsible for creating everything that the

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>digital avatar said, although a black artist did uh contribute

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the voice for f N make up. But this story

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 1>is really complex. There's actually a lot of nuance to it,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. So let's start with what the

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>original plan was. So there is a pro Fortnite gamer

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>who uses the handle clicks c l i X. This

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>pro gamer is also associated with a rap track that's

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>called Florida Water. Florida Water features F and Makeup. Now, initially,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>clicks Is involvement caused some confusion because you can't actually

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hear Clicks on the track at all, but the name

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Clicks appears in association with the track, which, you know,

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, well, how is clicks even involved? Well,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>according to clicks as Manager, the gamer actually purchased the

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>rights to this track, and the rapper Gunna had laid

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>down vocals for the track already, so in other words,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this track was already on its way to being fully produced.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>But then, according to clicks as Manager, Capitol Records demanded

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that Clicks allow F and Makeup to be included on

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the track or else the company wasn't going to release it,

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>so they were, you know, effectively holding it hostage according

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to clicks as Manager, So Clicks, seeing no choice, allowed

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>F and Maker too record lyrics for the track. So

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>F and Maker's contribution included black coded lyrics, meaning that

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the lyrics are reminiscent of a black artist's work, not

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a specific black artist, but is indicative or typical from

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the black artist rap genre, and that brings up a

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of concerning questions. After all, F and Maka is

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not a real person, and yes, there is a black

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>artist who voices the character, but the character itself isn't

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>real and black artists didn't write its lyrics, or at

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>least not all of the lyrics, because they were at

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>least partially generated by artificial intelligence, and that brings up

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>questions relating to cultural appropriation and racism. I mean, F

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and Maker uses some racial slurs that are not appropriate

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone not of that culture to say. And it's

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>an artificial entity, so some critics called F and Make

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a digital black face. Now complicating matters further is that

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>many outlets have capitalized on black artists throughout history without

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>giving the original artists credit. I mean, this is not

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a newsplash. This is something that's been going on for

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for for more than a century, and you've seen company

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and people making bank off of black artist creations while

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously never acknowledging the actual creators themselves. So the controversy

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>surrounding F and Maka prompted Capital Music Group to drop

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Digital Rapper from their label. By the way, if

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to read a truly excellent write up of

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this story, including more insightful analysis of the precarious relationship

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>between big media companies and black artists, I recommend Patricia

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Hernandez's article titled label drops Ai Rapper with music project

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from Fortnite pro apologizing to black community. You can find

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that at Kotaku. It is a truly excellent article. Finally,

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I have some bad news for folks who want a

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>brand new PS five, unless those folks are in the

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. So announced that it is raising the price

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>tag for the PS five in regions like Canada, Mexico, Japan, China,

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and Europe. This is coming nearly two years

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>after the PS five first hit store shelves, or virtually

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>hit store shelves because he can't ever find the darned things.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So it kind of reminds me of how Meta recently

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>hiked the price on its VR gear the Quest too.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>That also was a price high like two years after

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the technology had been introduced. So why is Sony doing this?

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Jim Ryan said that it's due

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to global inflation rates and trends in various nations currencies

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So in Europe the PS five models

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up by fifty euro each. In

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK they're going up by thirty pounds each, and

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so on. Polygon dot Com actually has a breakdown for

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>every region as far as the price hikes go. And

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that really stinks. If you're out there and

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you were hoping to buy a new PS five, it's

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna cost you more money now. As I said, in

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States, we don't appear to be affected by

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this price hike, so presumably you will still be able

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy a PS five at the launch price, assuming

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you can find one somewhere. That's it for the tech

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>News for Thursday August. Hope you are well. If you

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, please let

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>me know. One way to do that is to leave

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>me a voice message. You can do that by downloading

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart radio app. It's free to download and use.

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Just navigate over to tech Stuff. There's a little microphone icon. Yeah,

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>click on that. You can leave up to thirty seconds

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of voice message to me. Please be nice. The other

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>way to do it is, of course, to reach out

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to me on Twitter. The handle we use for the

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff hs W and I'll talk out

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon YEA. Text Stuff is an

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.