WEBVTT - TNF Preview, Trap Games & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us Underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode one seventy nine What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and this episode of What's Right is brought to you

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>by the McDonald's app. Ordering on the app is so easy.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I love the McDonald's app. I can order my favorites

0:00:55.520 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>anytime I want, have them delivered to me wherever and ever,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and it really is as easy as it sounds.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So easy.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to place in order right now. We did

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>this last week as well, and here we go.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Let me open it up.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm me turn this down on my phone so you

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>guys can hear me doing it. Last week I went

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>with two breakfast burritos, hash browns and orange juice. Today,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I am going to go with, you know, an old standard.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go sausage McMuffin, sausage, you know, sausage, biscuit,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>hash browns, orange juice, done and done, delivered a trintage

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully we'll have that before the end of the show.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>See how easy that was. Now focus on the show

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>while McDonald's brings the food right to my door. One

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of these days, we'll have it delivered to Demonsa in

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles. That day, however, is not today on today's show,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>our week three gambling show. Yeah, fresh off winning week

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>for that young man, winning week for this not quite

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>as young man, and I'm feeling great about the late

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I am in demons A picks competition with.

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Last year. Oh okay, no, so it's different.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>So so I'm in. In fact, let's just do this

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 3>real quick, because I meant to last week say why

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I was not giving out survivor picks on this year

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>A show, And the answer is because I am. Yes,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm in that survivor contest I was in last year,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>where you know, there's twenty thousand people in it for

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 3>twenty five bucks an entry and first prize like half

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 3>a million bucks. That's not the one I'm focused on, though.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the Circa Survivor contest Circa Casino in l

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 3>In Vegas. It's one thousand dollars an entry. There are

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 3>ten entries maximum. It's a nine million dollar prize because

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>there were nine thousand entries, okay, nine thousand injuries to

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>start the year. Me and a buddy spl it the

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>maximum entries ten entries, so we're so it's not like

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I have five hes five. We have ten, and we

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of try to hive mind.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>It through two weeks.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Of the original nine thousand entries, there are six thousand remaining,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>So already a third of the field has been lopped off.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Of our ten injuries. How many do you think are remaining.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd give it nine ten.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe let's go ten, let's go full ten. So we've

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>we I we've got a full ten remaining, and we

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>have used already on multiple entries Atlanta, Washington. In fact,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>let me let me just pull up, because this part

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 3>is public. Let me let me pull up. Who so

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 3>far we have used in our injuries three on Tampa,

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>one on Atlanta, two on Washington three last week on

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the Giants in the comeback. We have great teams remaining. Now,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the Circus Survivor Contest is unique because Thanksgiving Day and

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Christmas Day are their own weeks. So this Thanksgiving and Christmas,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 3>there's only three games each day, so you have to

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>make sure you're planning out that you have good teams. So,

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>for instance, just a little note, this week, the Chiefs

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Cowboys are both twelve plus point favorites, but

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people are gonna want to save the

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys for Thanksgiving and the Chiefs for Christmas. So there's

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 3>a lot of strategy. But that's why I'm not giving

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 3>out Survivor picks this year because we're talking real money

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and people, you know, once we get late in the year,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't want people to be able to try to get,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, game out where I'm going with it. So

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>that is so last week was great gambling week. We

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 3>had the live bet that we talked about on Tuesday.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 3>So all that we're going to get to the our

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>picks in the B block of the show. Demonse had

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 3>a great teaser last week that won with relative ease.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to all that, but before we get to that,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 3>we need to get to the stories of the day.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Here's what missed the cut. Kareem Hunt returning to Cleveland,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Jones telling Mike McCarthy to take a bow, and

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 3>Jason Kelsey jokingly confirms the rumors about his brother Travis

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>dating Taylor Swift. It is not for the show, demanse,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 3>but I broke that news. I guess it kind of

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>is for the show. To your mother this morning, that

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>that Travis might be dating. No, you nailed it, she No,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>you tried to know your honest instant reaction. You know,

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you you might know your mother better than me, and

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've known her for ten years longer, so

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I suppose maybe it's fair. But the she instantly got

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 3>upset and wanted to come on the show to discuss it.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>But her feelings on it were so strong. Yeah, really,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I was like, you know, I'm not sure if it's

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 3>safe for air. She was really upset about that. Maybe

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 3>if she moderates a bit, we can discuss it on

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a future pod or if it becomes officially official. All right,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>let's get to the show. What are we starting with today?

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, it's night the forty nine Ers play the

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Giants with no Saquan your Super Bowl pick in the NFC,

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Dallas plays the frisky Arizona Cardinals, and your Chiefs play

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bears. There are a bunch of other easy games

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 2>this week Indian Baltimore, Buffalo at Washington. To mind, if

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the if the favorites always win, betting would be super easy,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So teams are bound to get upset. Who do you

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>think is gonna be upset this weekend?

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I don't think Dallas or the Chiefs are real

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>upset candidates, But what I will say is the and

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna talk about the Bears later in this segments.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>You see the Justin Fields news. I actually think that

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the Fields press conference might bode well for his performance

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 3>this week, but we'll talk about that after I answer

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>this question. I I don't you know, Buffalo at an

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>undefeated Washington team that has played well coming off of

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>stirring victory. I don't consider that an easy game.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't consider that like a walk in the park

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>game that but that Washington defense is legit. Sam Howell,

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I gotta give him credit, played great in the second

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 3>half last week, and the other game that really jumps

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 3>out to me is the Dolphins and the Broncos. So

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos have fallen apart in the second half of

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 3>these games. But this is a kitchen sinks try to

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>save the season game for Sean Payton. It's a maybe

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 3>try to save his career as a starter game for

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson. I think that Dolphins defense can get got

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and so that to me is an interesting spot with

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Miami and Denver. But the one I want to talk

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 3>about is the game that's tonight the forty nine Ers

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>in the Giants. That is a ten and a half

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>point spread for a Giants team that it because there's

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>no Saquon is just gonna have to lean on your

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 3>guy Daniel Jones against that Niners defense. And this is

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>a real litmus test game. Not can he win because

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the Niners are better, but can he look competent? So

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask you, how confident are you that

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 3>your guy Daniel Jones can just look baseline competent against

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>this Niners defense.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm not super confident. I mean they haven't played

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 2>two super good teams. I mean the Cowboys are obviously good,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>but a yep, I think it's I think it's gonna

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>be a fourteen point loss.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh I'm taking well, that might show up in Nick's

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>picks the Giants and Niners for tonight, So I don't

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>want to spend too much more time on it because

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you and I might be on other sides of that one.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 3>But if I had to pick a trap, Indy Baltimore

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 3>is too hard to discuss right now because we don't

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>know if Anthony Richardson's playing, and I know he's a rookie,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>but he gives you more upside than Gardner does. Buffalo Washington, Yeah,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Lamar has been excellent or was excellent week two? Uh,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo Washington and Miami Denver are two that I have

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>a little let's take an extra beat looking at those games.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I like the fact that the producers didn't even include

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>as a possible trap game Jacksonville and the Texans. They

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>just know that I'm not gonna give any even the

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 3>slightest consideration that the Jags could falter to the Texans.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, All right, it's Week two and the

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Bears are already looking a hot mess. The defensive

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>coordinator resigned out of nowhere yesterday. Justin Fields blamed his

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 2>robotic play on the coaching staff. You can probably cash

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>her under seven and a half ticket already.

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>H you got about that bet. What a great preseason

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>wager by me. And you weren't on that show. Uh,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>we're you were not on the preseason game. You we did.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 3>You had gave her exact show exactly the initial show.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>My logic on the Bears were was very simple that

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 3>if they went seven and ten, it would be a

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>great season. They'd be thrilled with and the under would

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 3>still hit. Right now, Bears fans would crawl across shattered

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 3>glass if you told him they were gonna go seven

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and ten, they would be thrilled with that. I forgot

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I made that bet. What a great bet. Go ahead

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>all right?

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>So in your opinion, do you think Fields is redeemable

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>or is this all over?

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I do think he's redeemable. I think that Fields the

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I know you're gonna laugh at me, but he was

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 3>such a great high school and collegiate player, and he

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>has so many great physical tools that I'm not gonna

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>just throw him out. I'm not gonna just say okay,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the guy can't play.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Now they are doing right now? What inverse? Like? Oh,

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>he was super good in high school. In college, he

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>sucks in the pros, so I gotta give him a chance.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>But the guy high school in college and does good

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Oh, I've got to see more. I've

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 2>got I need more, David, But I get it. I

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>see it. Yes, I'm gonna harp on that every time

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>it comes up.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>By the way, that's fine, That's totally fine. But at

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>least I'm consistent that logical tree flows.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, no, it does, it does.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>You're right, and obviously right now, it's not as if

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>because of Justin Field's high school and collegiate resume, I

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>am then going to say I'm gonna say he's better

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>than brock Party right now, He's not better than Brock Party.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 3>Do I in my heart of hearts, if you were

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 3>to tell me one of these two quarterbacks is going

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 3>to one day be excellent, I would pick fields. But

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>if you were to ask me one of these two

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks is going to be washed out and a total

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 3>button Party can't really be a bus but you understand

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, like not even be a starting quarterback

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>in this league in three years. I would also pick

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 3>fields for that, Like to me, the because of his

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 3>play in the pros. We have to open up the

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>possibility that he's not gonna translate to this level. I

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 3>also did not think he was trying to throw his

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 3>coaches under the bus. Even if he was throwing his

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 3>coaches under the bus, the reality to me in Chicago

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 3>is very simple. He is not being coached well and

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>he is playing terribly, and then you are there are

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>certain things that are flatly on coaching. There's a great

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 3>clip going around the internet of the three plays that

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>led to the goal line pick six that ended the

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Bucks game that the Chicago Bears called an inside screen

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 3>to the running back on first down. It was unsuccessful,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>but Tampa was off sides, so now they have first

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and five. They lined up in the same formation and

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 3>called an inside screen to the running back again, same formation,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 3>same play. It was successful, but there was a holding penalty,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 3>so now they got Now they're in first down for

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>a third straight time. They ran an inside screen to

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the running back out of that formation for a third

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>play in a row, and it got picked and Tampa's

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 3>defense after the game was asked about it and said, yeah,

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>it was really easy. They kept running the same play

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>out of the same formation so we knew what was coming.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>That's coaching. That is flatly coaching. Now there's another clip

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of fields in the first half having a clean pocket

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>right around the red zone with res we were running

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>wide open into the end zone down the sea, and

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>he just doesn't see it, drops his eyes and runs

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and takes a sack. So he has not been good.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>The coaching has not been good. What is true, in

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 3>my opinion, is they are because they want him to

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 3>develop as a pocket passer. They are leaning too far

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>away from what makes him dangerous, which is the fact

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 3>that he is as good of a running thread at

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback position as we have ever seen. And if

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>they let that continue to be his fastball while making

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>defenses afraid of that first, the passing game will be easier.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But he also must be better in the passing game.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Fact the matter is, though the Bears had the number

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>one pick of the draft, traded it away because they

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>believe in fields. So they need to ride with justin

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>fields obviously, and try to figure this out. Now, what

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I will say is now, the thing with the decordinator

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>seems to be not football related. We don't know what

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 3>happened there, and there was some misinformation going on on

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the internet yesterday. I don't know what happened there. That

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 3>obviously hurts them for this weekend, but it's not a

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 3>football story, at least at the time being far.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 2>We know.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Fields talking about getting more to what he's comfortable with,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>not thinking too much, not being robotic. I think potentially

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 3>could help him this weekend for Kansas City. I think

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that as a Chiefs fan, I wanted them to change nothing.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 3>The fact that it looks like he might try to

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>go back to just doing what's natural for him will

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>give him more of a fighting chance. But that Chiefs

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 3>defense is legit.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. I think it's gonna be a pretty pretty

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>decent game. Got two quarterbacks struggling to throw the ball

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>right now, shoot Lake even out?

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 3>All right, Okay, next, just let's just move on to

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the next top.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Former Chiefs former chief former Chiefs offensive coordinator Eric Vietneme

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>was passed up for a head coaching job in the

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>last two seasons. BN me is now what in Washington

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and Sam Howe is two and zero and they just

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>put up thirty five in Denver. Meanwhile, the Chiefs lost

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>lost their offensive coordinator and they've struggled a bit. You've

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>also thought bne Me deserved a head coaching job. Do

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you think it's time for the rest of the league

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 2>to admit that they've missed out in the enemy? I

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 2>hate my last name. I'm sorry, that's all right.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Here's what I find interesting now. He is getting some

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 3>credit in the media for what Washington is doing, and

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>he deserves it. Probably more credit than he's getting, but

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 3>he deserves it. Sam Howell has looked good and the

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>hanging thirty five on that Denver defense and an eighteen

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 3>point comeback and howl dropping dimes. He deserves credit for that.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 3>I still think he's getting slighted a bit in this

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 3>regard last year when Josh Allen struggled what the general

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 3>media consensus was, Uh, he misses Brian Dabele. He misses

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Brian Abele. The Chiefs offense has not looked sharp through

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 3>two weeks. No one has said, oh, they miss Eric Benemy.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, so I still feel like he's only getting

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>half the credit he deserves.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 3>Am I concerned about the Chiefs because he's gone. Not

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 3>in the long term. I Angreid and Mahomes and Matt

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Nagy's there they'll figure it out. But I do think

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 3>that it is it is at least somewhat related that

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 3>the enemy's gone and the offense doesn't look as sharp.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Also think that his best path to being a head coach.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a weird spot because he kind of needs Washington

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 3>to falter, because his best path might be they fire

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Ron Rivera and then higher, you know, give him the

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 3>promotion from within. But if they fire Ron Rivera, that's

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 3>probably because Washington's offense has faltered, because I think that

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 3>defense is legit. So he's in a weird spot. But

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 3>through two weeks. And I made this point before and

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll just make it again very quickly. Here, uh the

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>fact that if we just want to go to the

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes era, right, since Mahomes has been a starting quarterback

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 3>in this league, the teams and they're off and they're

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 3>coordinators that have gotten head coaching jobs that were in

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl, Right, So the Patriots had Flores and

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>pardon me, Flores and Josh McDaniel, they're the coordinators. They

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 3>both get head coaching jobs eventually, the Rams there they

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>had that year in the twenty nineteen Super Bowl or

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen season, twenty nineteen, Brandon Staley's the DC. I

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 3>don't even I think Zach Taylor's the OC. They both

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>get head coaching jobs. The next year. For the Chiefs,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 3>it's Eric b Enemy and Steve Spagnolo. Now Spagnolo already

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>had been a head coach and got fired. He's a

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of a DC forever now, so he set him aside.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 3>B Enemy doesn't get it. The Niners defensive coordinators, Robert

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 3>sala he gets a head coaching job. The offensive coordinators

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Mike McDaniel, he gets a head coaching job, his protege

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.239
<v Speaker 3>on the on the defensive side for the Niners, by

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the way, to Miko Ryans, he also got a head

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>coaching job.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Tampa.

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Their coordinators don't get head coaching jobs. They're black coordinators.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs are in that Super Bowl. Obviously we talked

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 3>about it there. The Rams. Then it's Kevin O'Connell. He

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>gets a head coaching job Cincinnati. The who's the Zach

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Taylor who came from Sean McVay. He's now the Bengals

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>head coach. And the Eagles both their coordinators get head

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 3>coaching jobs. So it did seem wildly unfair and I

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 3>stand by all of that, and I think the early

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>returns are showing why the enemy should have gotten a

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 3>longer look or a fairer look than he was getting.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I understand it's early, but that's where I landed on

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 3>it then, and that's where I land on it now.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, well said, all right? On Tuesday, EU

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>teams that you wanted to talk about Dion and Colorado University.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Since then, Dion said his kids will be returning to

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Colorado next season. If there a season continues, why would

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>he return to Colorado next year? All right?

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So here's the deal on that. So Caleb is gonna

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 3>go number one in this draft no matter what. Shador

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 3>is right now projected to be the third or fourth

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>quarterback taken. So everybody has Caleb number one. Most people

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>have Drake may number two. Then there's debate bo Nicks

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 3>who he plays this week, Shadoor, you ares the kid

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>at Texas. Those are the other guys in the three

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>four five ring. The difference in money between being the

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>number one pick of the draft number one pick of

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 3>this last year's draft, Bryce Young got five years forty

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 3>million fully guaranteed. The number ten pick got five years

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty million fully guaranteed Shador has a real chance to

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 3>be the number one pick of the following year's draft.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 3>You then add this fact part to it, which is

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 3>a new element. Joel Klapp brought the up on the herd,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's correct. How much money can Shoudoor Sanders make

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 3>next year at Colorado? Could he make ten million dollars

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 3>in nil money? That's what Joel said. I think he's right.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Shador might actually be able to make more

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 3>money coming back for college in his unique situation, and

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>then also improve his draft stock. So because of that,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it is a unique spot. Now, it doesn't

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 3>mean he definitely should come back, and guys can get

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 3>hurt and there are different things that could happen.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>It's unreasonable to say you come back, give yourself a

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 3>chance to be the number one pick and make the

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 3>money anyway, and then also have a much larger starting

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>NFL contract. It might be the best thing for his

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>development as a player and for his finances. So in

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that regard, there it is. We're in a brave new

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 3>world of college athletics and what it makes sense for

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you guys to do. We're not to do. All right,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>what are the follow ups here?

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Do you think they can beat Oregon this week

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>without Travis Hunter? And then okay, hold on before get listen.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>They're twenty one point dogs for a reason. I do

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 3>think it's worth noting Colorado has played poorly or underachieved,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>if you will, in one game this year. That was

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the game they were a huge favorite. When they were

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 3>a massive dog to TCU. They played great when it

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 3>was a pick them against their two point line. Against Nebraska,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>they rolled them. So I think being an underdog suits them.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Oregon deserves to be favored. Oregon's at home, Oregon has

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 3>the better roster, and uh, Colorado is without it's you know,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>other than should or it's best player, number one, another

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 3>number one kid in high school, Travis Hunter. With that said,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 3>Oregon's not great at all defensively. Now, could I see

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 3>like these next two Colorado games could be games they

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 3>score thirty five points and lose the Colorado USC game

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 3>next week or you know, in ten days that honestly

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 3>could be sixty three to forty five. Like I don't

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>think Colorado could get one stop on USC, but I

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know, and I think USC could get a few

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>on Colorado. So what I do think is that this

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 3>is an opportunity for Shador to be on the same

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 3>field as Bo Nicks, a future NFL player, and Caleb Williams,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a future superstar, and see how he measures up. All right,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 3>what's the next one?

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Dion ranked his kids and said, all parents secretly do this?

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this true?

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you think.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 2>You know? I'm just kind of hoping that we're parenting

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 2>to some standard. I don't want to put that on you.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you do that. I don't think you

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 2>guys do that. You have it? What's what's the what's

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the hierarchy? Go ahead and tell it. Give me the

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>list right now, let's do it.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's fluid. It's listen, we love you all the same,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 3>but like, like right now, Deanna's in last place. It's

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 3>just a pain.

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Of me as she's the only one that's there.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, maybe that's why. Maybe that's why, uh the

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 3>there there was a period of like.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Period of time that I was last. I mean, I know.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Last, everyone's been last at different times the but there's

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 3>like if you'd asked me this Monday, Diora was number

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 3>one with a bullet on Monday, I just dropped her

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 3>off the college. I was so proud of her. All

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of these things. You owed me money. There's a lot

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>of things going on. You asked me this right now,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>this moment. You were excellent on the pod Tuesday, Diora

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>did not call me back yesterday when she promised she would.

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>You're in first place, and I mean, it just is

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 3>what it is. Deanna, on the other hand, on Tuesday

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 3>after school, Tuesday came home from school, had a little

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 3>mini meltdown because she left her chromebook at school so

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 3>she couldn't do her homework. She was panicked, I have

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to do better. I have to be more organized. I

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>know I'm gonna do better. Wednesday after school has her chromebook.

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Is so proud. I say, okay, let's do the project

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>we couldn't do Tuesday left the project at school so

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 3>last place.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, was that an even bigger meltdown? Or I mean, if.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>You're on YouTube, you can appreciate this. For the audio listeners,

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not a great but it's just the like.

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 4>I know it's here, I know, I checked, I know

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 4>it's here. I put my folder in my backpack in

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>my locker, but I didn't have it.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 3>In the folder. Obviously you had in the folder. Dianna,

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 3>can you email my teacher and tell im it's not

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 3>my fault, it is your fault. I'm not emailing your

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 3>teacher and so and then and then if she had

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 3>any any grace with your mother. This morning, she's getting

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 3>ready for school. Dianna's tenth birthday is in two weeks.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 3>She's getting ready for school, and she's wearing some outfit

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 3>your mother does not think is appropriate for the weather.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 3>And your mom says, you know you cannot wear that.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 3>You have to wear this. And Deanna looks your mom

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>in her eye and says, okay, mommy, but can we

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 3>agree when I turned ten, you're gonna let me pick

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>out my own clothes. Guess how that went? Not great?

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, last place she can. She can move back

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 3>up the rankings. But right, and yes, all parents love

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>their kids the same, but as far as how they

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>feel about them in any moments, they're ranked right now.

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it's oldest and Youngest demonte Diordiana Gambling Show next,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>What's Right.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Discover the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roeblas, who defined every expectation

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion. And Unstoppable, a new

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 5>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 3>All Right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick? Right

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 3>in this episode of What's Right with Nick Wright is

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 3>brought to you by the McDonald's App. How many times

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 3>you've been in that situation where you've had a really

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 3>long day, you're really hungry. Last thing you want to

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 3>do is cook a meal, or leave your house or

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to go pick something up. I don't want to exaggerate,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>but I've been there hundreds of times, and my saving

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 3>grace has been the McDelivery option. In the McDonald's app.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about getting McDonald's delivered right to your door,

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 3>just like this. Earlier in the show, right when we

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 3>were starting, Thank you so much, Jake, I ordered the

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's breakfast as I did last week. It's already here.

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It is helpful that the McDonald's up the street. But

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 3>this is perfect. I've got my hash brown, I've got

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>my biscuit. It's all right here. And I don't know

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the McDonald's orange juice. I understand. It's not like they

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 3>make it. It's the minute made orange juice. But it's delicious.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And now every time you order the McDelivery in the

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's app, it earns you points towards free food. Who

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't like free food? So there's always a reason to

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 3>order in the McDonald's app. Download the McDonald's app today.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 3>At participating McDonald's delivery, prices may be higher than at restaurants.

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Delivery and other fees may apply. Copyright twenty two twenty

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>three McDonald's. All right, so we're back to the show,

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Week three, Gambling show. I so last week what I

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 3>was when I was at the top of the show,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>when I was talking about the survivor thing, what I

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 3>was going to say was, I'm also in a picks

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 3>pool with a phil helm youth got me in it

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 3>with a bunch of professional gamblers, poker players, other people

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's last week. Hand to God in the picks pool,

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and this is so frustrating. I went eight and two.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Those two losses were five were two of the five

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 3>games that I picked for this show, and they were

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 3>two of the three I picked on television. So last

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>week I picked eight out of ten winners, but on

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>this show three out of five and on TV one

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 3>out of three, which is maddening. Now, with that said,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 3>so we'll go true. With that said, what I will

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>admit is some of these were slightly fortunate winners, but

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>it was a winning week. Tampa Bay minus two and

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a half against Chicago. I don't want to say there

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 3>was never a doubt there, but they Tampa didn't even

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 3>need the late pick six for that one. The Giants

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 3>minus six against Arizona. There was a period where it

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>looked like that was alive for a push, when it

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.959
<v Speaker 3>looked like that game might go to overtime. Obviously, they

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 3>won by field goal, since downty minus three against Baltimore

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 3>was bad bet this terrible process, terrible job by me.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>The Rams plus seven and a half against the Niners.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Sean McVay that field goal at the end, love you, buddy.

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 3>That was a hell of that was pretty damn lucky.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna lie. And then the Steelers plus two

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half against Cleveland they won outright, and they

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 3>were trailing in the fourth quarter and had negative fourth

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 3>quarter yards and won. Anyway, We'll get to Demons's winning

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 3>teaser in just a moment, but I feel great about

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>our picks this week. I like that we kind of

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 3>steadied the ship with a winning week three and two,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>so that would be plus point eight units, which means

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 3>on the year, I'm gonna I'm down. What am I down?

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm down a full you No, I'm down. Hold on, yeah,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm down half a unit on the year. So that's

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 3>not bad five and five because we got to do

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the big all right, Demanse, what's my first bet?

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Your first bet is the Giants plus ten and a

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>half at San Francisco.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that's tonight. So I know Daniel Jones is one

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and eleven in his career and Thursday night games also,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 3>that's a lot of Thursday Night games for Daniel Jones.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 3>That's like two a year. That's a crazy amount. But

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't need him to win outright, I need him

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to cover. And he's nineteen and eight against the spread

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 3>on the road or in neutral sites in his career,

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and oddly he's the most profitable quarterback in the last

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 3>four years on short rest. Also, these Thursday night games

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>are almost always sloppy, poorly played games. The last Thursday

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 3>night game we saw Eagles Vikings. There were five fumbles

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in that game. If you're giving me double digit points

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 3>for any team with a pulse on a Thursday night,

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take it. And I don't think this is

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 3>the type of game San Francisco looks at like, oh,

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to, you know, run up the score. San

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Francisco is looking at this as we have let's get

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 3>out of here with a win and then we have

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 3>a mini buy leading into an actual buye. And by

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.879
<v Speaker 3>an actual buye, I mean a home game against the

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals before they play one of the biggest games of

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the year against Dallas on Sunday Night Football and Week five.

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So I and I'm gonna go ahead and plant my

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 3>flag on this. I think brock Party turns it over tonight.

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 3>And I know the Giants have no Saquan and I

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>know they they don't have their left tackle, but I

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>think that they're they're gonna be able to move the

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>ball somewhat, and so I like the Giants to cover

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the ten and a half In this spot, where do

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you stand them? I will I know where you stand.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 3>You told me you liked the Niners to win by

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 3>two scores because all of a sudden, you're a big

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 3>brock party guy, not a huge.

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Rock party guy. But the Giants don't look good. That

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 2>was really funny what you said. I think Brock Party

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 2>will turn the ball over tonight. That's just crazy when

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 2>that's like, those are the hopes. I think that he'll

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 2>finally turn the ball over. That's just crazy. He's just

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>makes he just doesn't make enough mistakes. I just think

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 2>that's a very cool thing that you're looking for him

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 2>to make a pick. Patrick Mahomes has, like what two

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>on the season right now is too. This isn't about

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Pat Mahomes. I do love that guy. He's really good.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's got something going on, right Rick Mahomes.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, yes, yeah, I mean I will greatness, But yeah.

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I understanding it.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, next, you got Denver plus six and

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a half at Miami. Yeah, so.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Miami's defense has not been impressive to me this year.

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 3>The Chargers hung thirty four on them, and now the

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>defense stepped up at the very end of that game

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and got the you know up to in the waning

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 3>moments and got a sack on Herbert forced and intentional

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 3>grounding and won the game. But over the bulk of

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 3>that game, the defense wasn't great. I didn'tink the defense

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 3>looked great against mac Jones, letting Mac Jones. I don't

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 3>want to say slice and dice them, but kind of

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 3>dink and dunk them to a degree. This is a

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 3>must win game for Denver. Last week was and they

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 3>blew it. I don't know that they win, but I

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 3>think they could win. And I think that this is

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a kitchen sink game for Debt, and I think they

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 3>keep it.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 2>I get the point in there's like at the point

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in their season there and there's a lot of doubts,

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 2>but like calling it a must win when they're six

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and a half point underdogs, it's just like it's crazy.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So I understand what you're saying like that that you

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 3>usually there in a tough spots where correct, right, But

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 3>at owen three they're done. Because here's the problem for

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos. The Broncos are at Own. If they lose

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 3>this week, they're at Owen three and yes, next week

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 3>they have the Bears, but then here are their next

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 3>five home for the Jets. Sounds easy except for the

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 3>fact it's the Nat Hackett revenge game and every Jet

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 3>will be peak motivated for that spot. Then on a

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 3>short week on Thursday at Kansas City, then home for

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the Packers, who are good. Then against the Chiefs again,

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 3>then they're bye week, and then at Buffalo. So if

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 3>you fall to zero and three and you have two

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 3>games against Kansas City and against the Bills in your

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 3>next six plus Packers, Jets, Bears, you're just your best

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 3>case scenario. Best case is that you're three and six

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 3>through nine, Like they have to win this week if

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 3>they want to have Sean Payton said, you know, I'm

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna be pissed if we don't make the playoffs. Playoff

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 3>hope's dead if they lose this week, and so here

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>are some numbers for you. Russ is fourteen to four

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 3>and one against spread on two game losing streak. I

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>don't really actually care that much about that because he's

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 3>different player now. Sean Payton as an underdog. Only Mike

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Tomlin better amongst active coaches fifty thirty and two against

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the spread. Sharps are with me on this. Not surprisingly,

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Miami has been the second best team against the spread

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 3>since Tua got there. I think that that sounds impressive,

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 3>but I think that is flipping in this regard. The

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>reason Miami had been so good against the spread early

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 3>on in Tua's time is because nobody believed in Tua.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Now seemingly everyone believes in Tua, and it's reflected in

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 3>this point spread. So it because that So it is

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 3>to me, I to a had been, you know, a

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 3>guy who printed against the spread, But now people believe

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 3>in Miami, and so I, like Denver in this spot

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 3>plus six and a half, I think they absolutely could

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 3>win out right.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Next, you got New England minus two and a half

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>at the Jets. Yeah, so.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 3>That the Patriots have won fourteen consecutive games against the Jets.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Fourteen consecutive games against the Jets. Zach Wilson, who's been

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 3>bad against everyone. The worst opponent, he's the opponent that

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 3>has given him the most fits is the Patriots. He

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 3>has a passer rating of fifty and a completion percentage

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 3>of fifty against New England. Mac is Well, listen, all

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 3>these stats are going to talk about the Patriots owning

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the Jets. Now, they have not covered the spread the

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>last few years against the Jets, but we're now talking

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 3>about a spread of less than a field goal. So

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots have won without covering. That's very hard to

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 3>do as a two and a half point favorite. Now,

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 3>could it be a seventeen to sixteen game? I suppose.

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:49.479
<v Speaker 3>I think more likely is a seventeen to ten game.

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 3>And the Payton Now this would you agree to Monsey?

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Is an absolute must win for the Patriots. If they

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 3>want to have any hope of making the postseason, they

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 3>have to win. And so I just the the Jets.

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 3>They've beaten the Jets. That continues. Of course, it is

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>really miserable. It's it's gonna be a terrible football game.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 3>But I like the Patriots a lot there. All right?

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Next, are you got Jacksonville minus eight and a half

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>versus Houston?

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 3>All right? Every single note the producers gave me on

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 3>this is bad for Jacksonville. Fifth worst against the spread

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 3>under Trevor Lawrence Peterson twenty four and thirty against the

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 3>spread as a favorite. Week three road dogs cover sixty

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 3>three percent of the time in the last few years.

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Houston's the sharpest play of the week with forty three

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 3>the bets and eighty four percent of the money. So

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 3>why am I picking them? Here's why Right now people

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 3>are late to this party. The Chiefs have a great

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 3>defense and that is affecting how they feel about the Jags.

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 3>The Jags were supposed to be carried by their offense,

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 3>but we just saw a game where they couldn't score

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown against what people think is a mediocre defense.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 3>It's not a mediocre defense. It's a great defense. And

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 3>because of that, people are doubting the Jags ability to

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 3>go beat a Texans team by two scorers they are

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 3>at home. They also, I hate to sound cliche, this

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 3>isn't a must win, but it's must win adjacent. If

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 3>you're Jacksonville, your home game against the Texans is a

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 3>game you've got to have if you're gonna be, you know,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 3>not only win the division, but potentially be you know,

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 3>a top two seed in the AFC. Trevor absolutely will

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. The Texans have injuries on their offensive line

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and then their secondary. CJ. Stroud was excellent last week

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 3>for three hundred and eighty yards. I expect, you know,

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 3>he's a rookie quarterback. I expect that to go up

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 3>and down. I think this is something along the lines

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 3>of twenty seven to ten, thirty four to seventeen. This

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 3>is a game. I don't do these bets, but an

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I might this week. An alternate line for the Jags,

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 3>like the Jags minus sixteen and a half might be

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 3>a play that I make for this game. The Jags

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 3>minus eight and a half, I love it.

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Last one, you got Pittsburgh plus two and a half

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 2>at the Raiders.

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm just gonna keep riding Pittsburgh until the

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 3>general public catches up.

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Week one, they obviously got rolled. That's fine. But if

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna continue to give me Mike Tomlin catching points

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 3>against poorly coached teams with quarterbacks, I don't trust. I'm

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 3>gonna do it now. That didn't Week one. It's not

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 3>a poorly coach team. It was a quarterback. I didn't

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and they got annihilated.

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 2>So be it.

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Week two, the Browns, Stefanski and to Shawn, you gave

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 3>me points with Pittsburgh. I took it and now I

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 3>get Josh McDaniel and Jimmy g Of course I'm gonna

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 3>take it. I'm gonna add something to it. I don't

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 3>think Pittsburgh's offense is good, there's no argument to make

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 3>that it's good. However, they did go up against two

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 3>excellent defenses. The Niners have a great defense. The Browns

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 3>have a very very good defense. Against the Raiders, it's

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 3>gonna be the first time all year it feels like

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 3>that they're not up against an excellent defensive unit. The Raiders'

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 3>second best defensive player is on leave from the team

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 3>as he's dealing with things. The Raiders let the Bills

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:51.439
<v Speaker 3>roll all over them last week. I'm catching points, and yeah,

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 3>like listen, Tomlin's the most profitable coach in the NFL

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 3>as a dog, pickets five and zero against the spread

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 3>and night games. I don't really care about that, but

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 3>it's noteworthy. And so I understand that Jimmy Garoppolo has

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of great covering stats. Those are not Jimmy

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Garoppolo stats. Those are San Francisco forty nine ers and

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Shanahan's stats. Just like Purty's got all those stats

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 3>right now too, Those are not brock Purty stets. Those

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 3>are San Francisco forty nine ers and Kyle Shanahan's stats.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>So I like Pittsburgh and I like Pittsburgh to win

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 3>out right next Oh well, we'll do a recap. That's

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 3>all the picks. So I've got the Giants catching ten

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 3>and a half at tonight against San Francisco, Denver catching

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 3>six and a half at Miami, the Patriots laying two

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and a half against the at the Jets, Jags laying

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half at a home against Houston, and

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh plus two and a half at the Raiders. We

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 3>have four road teams. I'm alright with it. Three dogs,

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 3>two favorites, only one big favorite. All right, demon's your teaser.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Last week it was a seven point three team teaser

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 3>plus one twenty Take us through it, my man.

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, First, we had the Rams plus fourteen and

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>a half versus San Francisco. That cleared pretty well, that really.

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Was never in doubt, and there was a point in

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the second half they were down fourteen, but and they

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:20.439
<v Speaker 3>ended up obviously they got the late the field goal.

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 3>But this was a good example demonse of those half

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 3>points and key numbers potentially mattering. It didn't in this

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 3>specific case, but it could have. That was a great,

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:36.399
<v Speaker 3>great pick. Go ahead, next, Baltimore plus ten at Cincinnati.

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 3>I was I think there was almost never a doubt

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 3>with this one either. Yeah, never a doubt, no question

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 3>about it. And then the last one.

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 2>And then we got Jacksonville plus ten and a half

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 2>versus Kansas City. That one was the one that I

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 2>was the most on the edge of my seat for.

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Kind of came down to the very last.

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Covering the entire game. Yes, frustrating is had you lost

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 3>that one, it would have been a bad beat because

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 3>you were covering the entire game. And then yeah, almost

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 3>you almost lost by eleven.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just get it down at the offensive the end

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of the game, right, yep.

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's hear your one for this week.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, So this week's teaser one and one. Now,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 2>let's try to halt up to two and one. We

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 2>got a three team seven point teaser. We got a

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.760
<v Speaker 2>couple teams from last week's teaser in there. We're teasing

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:32.399
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens from minus one and a half to from

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 2>minus eight and a half, from minus eight and a

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 2>half to one and a half, sorry, Daniel, and then

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Chargers two plus six to minus one I mean minus

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 2>one to plus six, and then Jaggs to minus eight

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 2>and a half to minus one and a half. I

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 2>know there's some things there that are gonna flag, but

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I trust my process with these.

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not gonna flag too much of this. Actually,

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing. What I am going to encourage

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 3>you on is to consider demons making this a six

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 3>point teaser. So here's so, here's why I'm saying it.

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 3>The Ravens like you, instead of being plus one twenty,

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 3>you can get plus one forty and you still tease

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the Jags and the Ravens to under three. You understand

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying. Right now, you have the Ravens minus

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 3>one and a half and the Jags minus one and

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a half. You can get them both just minus two

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Now the Chargers one, instead of getting

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 3>plus six, you would only be getting plus five. Yeah,

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and so it's I I'm not really gonna fly. I

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 3>give this teaser an a minus. Yes, you're correct. I

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 3>don't love teasing across the zero. And if one of

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 3>these things screws you, I think it would be the

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Chargers that would just because the Chargers are not a

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 3>trustworthy team and the Vikings have shown the ability to

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 3>score points. But you know what, I actually take back

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 3>my own advice because the plus six with the Chargers

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 3>could be valuable because they they are such a cursed team.

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 3>You absolutely could see them losing in overtime again on

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 3>a Justin Jefferson touchdown, and you know what I mean,

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, it's six in overtime and then

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 3>at least you get to push there. This is not

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a bad one.

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly enough, I just still trust the Chargers more than

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I trust the Vikings. I think that they have the

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.839
<v Speaker 2>better quarterback, the better defense. They've also you said that

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings have shown the ability to put points on

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the board, but show some of the Chargers. It's like,

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, I just trust the Chargers to beat the

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Vikings in this game. But we'll see. I mean, obviously

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting six, so I don't think they're gonna blow

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:00.080
<v Speaker 2>them out.

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 3>The So listen the I think there's a pretty solid teaser,

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 3>can I Now? I made a real a teaser in

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.720
<v Speaker 3>real life that I didn't want to tell you about

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 3>until right now.

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear it.

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Uh so this is this is not a sharp bet.

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that on the front end. Uh it is

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 3>a four team ten point teaser. So four team ten

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 3>point those pay debt even money also on those and

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 3>this is important, pushes lose. You push one leg of it,

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 3>you lose the bet. Okay, so yours A push just

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 3>reduces it from a three teamer to a two teamer.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 3>But this is a vintage and for me, the I'm

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 3>not worried about the fact that pushes lose because all

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of these bets end on a half point, so it's

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 3>impossible for it to push, you know what I mean,

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 3>like none of my legs actually it can push. But

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 3>here is is the four team ten point teaser. I

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 3>am teasing the Chiefs and the Cowboys, both of them

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 3>down to minus two and a half from twelve and

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:16.280
<v Speaker 3>a half point favorites. I am teasing the Jags from

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they were when I made it minus nine and a

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 3>half down to plus a half point, meaning the Jags

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 3>just to win. And I am teasing the Patriots up

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to plus seven and a half. So it's a four

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:33.359
<v Speaker 3>team ten point teaser where the Patriots have to win

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 3>or lose by a touchdown or less. The Jags have

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to win outright or I guess tie. They were to

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 3>go to overtime and tie. The plus a half point

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 3>gets me a victory there, and then the Chiefs and

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys both have to win by at least a

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 3>field goal. That's a four team, ten point even money teaser.

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 3>That is my second teaser of the year. I placed

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 3>one in week one that was a disaster. Let me

0:51:58.200 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 3>look at what it was. Hold on, let me click

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 3>my settle bets. Oh when I click settled bets, I

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 3>see that twenty one k winner. Pay me. Oh. The

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 3>six point teaser I did in week one was I

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 3>teased the Commanders to minus one against the Cardinals. That

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 3>was a winner, the Packers to plus seven and a

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 3>half against the Bears, that was a winner. They won outright.

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And the Steelers to plus eight and a half against

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the fighting brock Parties. They lost by a thousand points.

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:33.360
<v Speaker 2>So nicks picks or Demons's teasers? Then, confused, we're given teasers.

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you know what, you know what, that's a good point.

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go let's head to the casino.

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, all right, we're heading back to the casino.

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 2>This week with the offer, Uh, we're going to Well,

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 2>first off, let's take a look at how we did

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 2>last week on the slot machine.

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, the money line NFC East parlay the Giants

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 3>to beat the Cardinals and the Cowboys to beat the Jets.

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's the Bills minus two and a half against

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders, the Chief minus two and a half against

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the Jags, and Washington to beat the Broncos. Outright, it's

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 3>plus four sixty Anthony Richardson running it in nine to

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 3>one first touchdown score props. Let's go ahead and do that.

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 3>We don't even need to worry about anything else. How

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 3>about that? Was that was off the dome went three?

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And oh that Anthony Richardson one was pretty great?

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.240
<v Speaker 2>What are you laughing about that? That was very solid?

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 2>You're off the dome references?

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm saying I didn't prep it, and I said

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 3>last week, I was like, maybe I should have No,

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I know, you know what it means. But the what

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the I said last week that maybe I should have

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 3>prepped for that, But I had such success that I'm

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna do it blind again this week. So we're gonna

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 3>go to the slot machine. You tell me the type

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 3>of the bet and then I'll see if I can

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 3>figure it out. All right, slot machine?

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, pull the lever bang. What do we have here?

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Tomorrow's sake?

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 2>We got our prop for the AFC West and the

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 2>double unit bet. You gotta bet more money than you

0:54:05.680 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 2>would usually bet. Sorry, well that I.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't I don't know that I agree to that idea

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 3>prop bet. You're forcing me to bet multiple units, But fine,

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll play along. So my possible options are for an

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 3>AFC West prop bet is, Oh, hold on, I've got

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a great one. A Steeler's Raiders prop bet. Hold on

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 3>a second, here, tell me there's a a Jimmy g

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Will he throw an interception? Prop bet? There's gotta be

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 3>because then I can hold on, where are some Jimmy

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 3>g Uh? I'm gonna find it real quick quick. I

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want quick bets. I don't want first quarter. This

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 3>is why I said I should have prepped these so

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 3>people don't have to listen to this stuff. But I

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 3>can't believe I can't find a Jimmy G Willy throw

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 3>an interception. This should just be any all right, then

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 3>we're off that one. So if we're not doing Raiders

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Steelers a Chiefs Bears prop. Oh, and it's a two

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 3>unit one.

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Chief spar Yo. You should bet bet for Justin Fields

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to run for more than sixty yards.

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not gonna do that. I don't know if

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 3>you've heard me say, this is the Chiefs of a

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 3>great defense. Jimmy Jimmy g interception is minus one twenty five.

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm told all right, I'm not taking that anymore. I

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 3>don't want to lay negative money. I am going to bet. Oh,

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.360
<v Speaker 3>this is you know what a two unit prop bet.

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna and Daniel you can tell me the odds

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to bet Isaiah Pachecko anytime touchdown score. That's

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:54.479
<v Speaker 3>the bet. Isaiah Pacheco hasn't scored a touchdown yet this year.

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna get in against the Bears. Isaiah Pichecko anytime

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 3>touchdown scorer that is, And we can fill in the

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 3>audience on what the odds are on it. That's my

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 3>two unit AFC Westrop bet. Next, well, let's go back

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:08.800
<v Speaker 3>to the slot machine.

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Let me till that lever.

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, back to the slot machine. Sorry, I'm throwing a

0:56:13.640 --> 0:56:16.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of things at the producers, all right, I'm pulling

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 3>the lever being all right, what are we doing here?

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Tomasey against the spread NFC South and a dog.

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:28.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, So my options there are Atlanta plus three,

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans plus two, Carolina plus six, and Tampa plus

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 3>four and a half. I am going to go now.

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:43.280
<v Speaker 3>This is the this is the I'm missing a point

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of line value because this was five and a half.

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 3>But the Eagles don't blow people out on the road,

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and that Eagles past defense can get got and Baker's

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 3>been playing great. Tampa plus four and a half is

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 3>my against the spread NFC South dog. I thought about

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons, and the Falcons are an interesting one, but

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 3>they're at Detroit and they're only catching three and a half.

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 3>And if it becomes a shootout, Ritter cannot hang in

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 3>a shootout. Bjon's of it unbelievable as expected. I don't

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 3>believe the Saints are gonna beat the Packers, and I'm

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 3>not laying points. I'm not laying I'm not betting on

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers in Seattle. So yeah, so I like Tampa

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 3>plus four and a half. I liked it more at

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 3>five and a half against Philly on Monday night. All right,

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 3>last one back to the slot machine machine. Let's go

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:41.959
<v Speaker 3>ahead and pull that lever.

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's take it. Let's see all right, all right, so

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 2>we got moneyline AFC North and a parlay.

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well part of half. That's easy because we're obviously

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna take the Steelers to win out right at the Raiders.

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 3>My other NFC North teams that I could take the

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Ravens outright against the Colts. No, I'm not doing it.

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not. I'm just not because I don't think

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 3>they beat the Colts. But it's just dumb to involve

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 3>myself in this.

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 2>We know.

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 3>But no, I already said I'm doing Pittsburgh, but I'm

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 3>not doing the Ravens or the Ravens cult until we

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 3>know who their quarterback is. For the Colts, I'm the

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 3>same thing with Cincinnati. I'm not doing that until we

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 3>know who their quarterback is. So then the obvious answer

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 3>is fading the Browns. So there we go Vrabel believing

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 3>in Vrabel of Vrabel plus one fifty six and the

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Titans and the Steelers plus one twenty six. That plays

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 3>that pays plus four eighty. So there's my AFC North parlay.

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 3>If we if we go three and oh on these again,

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 3>this might just become the total format of the gambling show.

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I might throw out all my prep all my hard

0:58:57.560 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 3>work and just try to just instant reac action find

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the bats without prepping them at all. Quick break right back,

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 3>answer your listener and viewer questions. Next, what's right?

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Before we get to the viewer questions, we do this

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 3>live from Trentadge, obviously Harlem's favorite women's boutique and the

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 3>owner of Trentage. My wife, Demanse's mother, Danielle, just walked

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 3>in and h dampoo. You don't have to come on

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 3>camera if you don't want to. But we were discussing

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 3>earlier that you had quite the hot tailor Swift Travis

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Kelcey take is that ready for prime time yet? Or

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:39.920
<v Speaker 3>do you want to continue to you know, kind of

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 3>think it over. She doesn't want to talk about.

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 2>It, okay, all right?

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 3>I was just you should have seen Demanse's face, all right, Well,

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I I yeah, he does already know. I asked Demanse

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:54.600
<v Speaker 3>live on the air. I was like, what do you

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 3>think your mom thinks of the Travis Kelsey Taylor Swift thing?

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is what he goes Oh she hates it.

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe she loves it. I'm like, no, she

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 3>hates it. It's like, okay, I thought so, but I

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>just didn't know if I was supposed to say that.

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he knows you quite well.

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, demanse, what are our questions?

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>All right? First off, we got machete gun ass Nick.

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>The Giants have burned you twice this year. Do you

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 2>think the Giants are the new Jags for this year's

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>gambling picks? Oh? Wow, well you would have thought that.

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:24.440
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, they burned me a couple times when they

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>came through in that single game on that live bet

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 3>the little the Giants were half of that huge win

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 3>forty to one. So maybe maybe, yes, maybe no, And

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna have it. I'm not gonna get shamed

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 3>out of betting them the way you guys tried to

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>shame me out of betting the Jags cost me all

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>that money last year. Oh that also, you know what,

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I realized that also happened with the Jags last year.

1:00:47.000 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 3>The Jags were the other side of the huge same

1:00:49.880 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 3>game parlay I made with the Chiefs, the one where

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelcey's final yard won me that bet.

1:00:55.200 --> 1:00:59.479
<v Speaker 2>All right. Next, Mitchell be said, Hey, Nick love the show.

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>We got to know if Dior claimed her cash yet,

1:01:02.560 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 2>way to make her fight for her right to party

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>go chiefs.

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>No, she is not. She has not watched the show.

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:14.000
<v Speaker 3>She also has not called me back, So that's on her.

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>She has not claimed her cash and she is not.

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I talked to her. Wait, oh yeah, but I called her.

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>She didn't call me. Some don't feel like left out

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>or anything.

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she's been Yeah, she's been having quite the time

1:01:28.520 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>at college already.

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, understandable. All right, So we got Derek

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Deckard asked, uh, question, where do you see the Cowboys

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>first loss and a follow up? Is it in a

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>follow up? Worth? Is it worth betting on them for

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>for being the last undefeated team?

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I well, I would have to know the odds on

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>them being the last undefeated team. I mean, here's the

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>fact of the matter is they're going to be underdogs

1:01:56.320 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>in Week five at San Francisco. Don't mean they can't

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>win that game, but they will be underdogs, probably two

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half point underdogs to the Niners. If they

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 3>win that Niners game. I mean you're probably looking at

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>November until at the Eagles could catch them. They play

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>at the Bills in December. I don't think they're gonna,

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, spit the bit against the Cardinals or the Patriots.

1:02:26.200 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But the fifty at being last undefeated plus three fifty.

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh written plus three fifty, Uh yeah, those are usually

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>bad bets. There's there's usually like not good value on those, Okay,

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>so I'm looking at it right now. The Eagles and

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Niners are both plus three okay, so on FanDuel, the

1:02:48.840 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Eagles and Niners are both plus three twenty to be

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>last undefeated, Cowboys plus four thirty. Now, that is Ravens

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>plus six hundred, Miami plus eight fifty, New Orleans ten

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>to one, at Lanta twelve to one, Tampa fourteen to one,

1:03:02.520 --> 1:03:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Washington twenty seven to one. That is a good little

1:03:05.280 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>gambling lesson right there. On these type of exotic bets,

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>you really should shop lines Like let's say you really

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like the Cowboys be the bet the last undefeated. They're

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>plus three point fifty and one. Shop they're plus four

1:03:19.760 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>p thirty on FanDuel. So if you're gonna take kind

1:03:22.520 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of a weird bet that's not just like a regular

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>game spread, make sure you're getting the best line. All right,

1:03:29.840 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>last one?

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>All right. Rock Perty's agent Christian Lazzo asked, Nick, is

1:03:34.720 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>there anything Brock can do tonight to impress you that

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't attribute solely to Shanahan's system.

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, make some high level throws. Here's what I just

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 3>ask of people. I ask of people to watch the

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Niners tonight and every time Brock Purty throws the ball,

1:03:54.880 --> 1:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>just that. Ask yourself the following question, Okay, could I

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>do that? Chart no, no, no, no, no, no no no.

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Chart how many throws you say, oh, he missed that,

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>that was a bad throw or an overthrow? And chart

1:04:16.160 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>how many times you say, man, that was a great throw.

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Because in this game against the Rams, how many times

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>he missed open guys? The answer is five? And how

1:04:28.560 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 3>many times you're like, holy, that was a hell of

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 3>a throw is zero? That's just what it was.

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Week one he had two, Holy moly, those were great throws,

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think he only missed a wide open guy once.

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 3>So Week one he played quite well. Week two he

1:04:46.280 --> 1:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>did not watch tonight and see how many times how

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>many of his completions are Well, there's Brandon Ayuk with

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>no one within twelve yards of him and he just

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>completed the layup. And how many times you're like, wow,

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>he has a great throw. And how many times is like, oh, man,

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Deebo has the guy beat, he's open. All that's six

1:05:06.840 --> 1:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>yards over his head. It's all I'm asking. I got

1:05:09.520 --> 1:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing against brock Purty personally, and everyone I know, they're like, oh, well, Nick,

1:05:15.040 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Iowa State was pretty damn good with him, and since

1:05:17.600 --> 1:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>he's left, they have him. And yeah, I understand that

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Breeshall was there. I had a little something to do

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>with that. Breeshall pretty good player. Seeing in the NFL

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>is pretty good. And they're in the same draft. And

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>even though quarterbacks the most valuable position, running back to

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the least valuable position, and they were on the same

1:05:33.520 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 3>college team. NFL evaluator said, Breeshall, you're worth a high

1:05:37.400 --> 1:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>second round pick and brock Perdy you're worth the last pick.

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Of the draft.

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying, so we'll see. Let's watch tonight. I

1:05:42.960 --> 1:05:44.800
<v Speaker 3>might be a Giants fan second week in a row.

1:05:44.960 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Who'd ever thought that would happen. Demons, you were excellent today.

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 3>You stay atop the right child rankings. The I'm just

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>telling you, you just do and Danielle right now, she

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 3>had to power rank the kids, not an order of love,

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>but an order of like rank one through three. How

1:06:04.440 --> 1:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>would you do it?

1:06:05.360 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Oof, this isn't great for Demanse.

1:06:09.000 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 3>She said. Demand is definitely number one. Won't talk about

1:06:11.360 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the other two. You know what that means. She's not

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>as mean as me. Diana is definitely in last place

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 3>after this morning. Give me a break. Yeah, we have

1:06:17.720 --> 1:06:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in the same Demonse de Ordiano. We'll talk to you

1:06:20.280 --> 1:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>guys on Tuesday. What's right,