WEBVTT - Listener Questions #20

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Quick note before today's episodes to let you know about

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>my new book, Do Aliens Speak Physics, which is available

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>for pre order now and can be at your house

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>on November fourth. It's all about my favorite scenario, aliens

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>arriving on Earth and what it would be like to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>try to talk to them about physics. Is that really possible?

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, but the book is a fun exploration

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the potential challenges. If you've enjoyed my science outreach,

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a nice way to support me. Check it

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out at www dot alienspeakphysics dot com. Okay, on to

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>today's episode. I like to think about alien life, But

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>where are they all? If aliens are so rife.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>If you don't metabolize and reproduce, then science says you're dead.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Does a recently discovered critter turn this definition on its head?

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A curious listener wants to know what would the universe

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be like if light were very slow?

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Whatever questions keep you up at night, Daniel and Kelly's

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>answers will make it right.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello. I'm Kelly Wader Smith. I study parasites and space,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm excited that we're talking about aliens today. And

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the reason I'm excited about that is because I'm really

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>excited about this book that's coming out called Do Aliens

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Speak Physics?

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, for a moment, I thought you were

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>going to tell me about another book about aliens, so

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to scoop mine. Oh no, my nightmare. Hi.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I do love

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about aliens because I worry that the way we

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>do science is somehow infected with our humanity and there's

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody out there getting deeper at the truth of the.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Matter infected by our humanity. That is a like surprisingly

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>negative view from you.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I was trying to speak biology, you know,

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's trying to use some sort of

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>parasitical language there.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I think you're implying that we're all like pessimists and negative.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>But you know I am. So that's that's fine with me.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you for bringing up my book, which is

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out in November. It's called Do Aliens Speak Physics?

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And you can get it all fine booksellers and probably

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>several others. And you're right that it's a little bit

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic because the book is in response to my concern

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that we were sort of putting ourselves at the center

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the universal intellectual stage by saying, like, everything we've

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>discovered is true, it's real, you know, it's universal that

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.839
<v Speaker 1>other scientists around the galaxy will find the same thing.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>To me, that smacks a little bit of like the

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Earth is the center of the solar system or the universe,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, or we are important somehow on a cosmic stage.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I just wanted to ask, like, well, is

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that really true? Are there ways that our humanity has

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>affected in our science? And so that's what the book

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is about, is what aliens do physics differently? And how

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>could we know?

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>And at a future date we will have a whole

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>episode talking about that question and what you learned while

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you were researching that problem. But today I wanted to

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>ask you what is your favorite part of writing a book?

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Very part of writing a book. Oh, it's definitely not

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>coming up with the title. I don't know why, but

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that's so frustrating. It's so hard to capture everything about

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the book in a few words. You know, you have

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to like meet the reader where they are, get them interested,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>tell them a little bit about the book. Also, it

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>should be like clever in some way. So, boy, that

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.119
<v Speaker 1>is really tough. And you and I have had lots

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of conversations and titles. It's tricky. Yeah, it's tricky. I

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think my favorite two parts of writing a book are

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>having the initial idea, Like it's always fun to come

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>up with a new idea for a project, you know,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>as an academic, Like new projects are shiny and fun,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and current projects are like, ugh, man, I just to

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>get that thing.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Finished, got to get it up the door.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But also the research, like I love digging in deep

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and reading a bunch of papers, and I wonder sometimes

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like why didn't I just do this before? But for

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some reason, like having a reason to dig in and

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to read up about it and to learn about it.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>If that excuses like I'm writing a book about this,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or I'm doing research for a listener or something. It's

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>easier to do, it's more fun. It feels like you're

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do it instead of you just goofing off

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and reading philosophy papers.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree with you, and that is also why

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I love our Listener Questions segment so much, is that

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>we whenever a question comes across my inbox where I'm like, oh,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to know more about that than I'm like,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that immediately goes in the listener questions pile. And then

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>while I'm researching it, I don't feel like I'm slacking off.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing my quote unquote work and it's awesome.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go. And so, is that also your favorite

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>part of writing a book? The deep research dive?

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>The two things I hate the most. I always write

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>the title last because I hate it, I agree, And

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>then I hate the part where I'm supposed to promote

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the book and ask people for favors, And that's my

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>least favorite part, but it's part of the job. But no,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>my favorite is just getting to do the research and

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 2>learning about new stuff, which is why I so rarely

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 2>write books about things I already know about, because I'd

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>rather have an excuse to read about something new and

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>like going through space law textbooks. On the one hand,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>there were days where I'm like, why do I enjoy.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This so much?

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Do I enjoy this? I'm not sure, I'm on the fence.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Then at the end of the day I'd be like,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>oh my gosh, I just learned about like the laws

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>governing and the cosmos and that's pretty cool, and also

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>how they are inadequate, and so yeah, it's a fun

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>research topic.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also really fun to discover the things

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that are interesting to you. And you've done a day

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of reading and then you come to dinner with a

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>family and you're like excited to talk about some nerdy

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>detail you read about that was really cool, or some

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>new critter or some crazy idea you thought about and

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>had never considered before. It shows you, like which parts

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of the universe inspire you and connect with you. And

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I love about science, that there's just so

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>much like that we just find cool. I mean, it's

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>an emotional response, right, And this is actually one of

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the things I'm curious about aliens, Like do aliens have

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the same emotional reaction to the mysteries of the universe?

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they curious? Do they care? Right? Is that human

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or is that universal? That's like a very basic question

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the answer to, but for me, it's

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite things about being human.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, Well, and what I want to know is

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.679
<v Speaker 2>do they care about us? Yeah, which leads us nicely

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>into our first question from a listener, So let's go

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>ahead and hear that question.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Hi, I'd love to hear your thoughts about the Fermi paradox.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Is it really a paradox? While I think the theory

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is about the great filter, like if there's some big

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 3>thing that always prevents beings from reaching interstellar travel. I

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>think that's a really interesting thought experiment. But in general,

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I've never really seen the Fermi paradox as a true paradox,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>just do to how big the universe is and how

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>spread out everything is, like the odds of two kinds

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>of intelligent life. Somehow intercepting just feels too unlikely not

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.239
<v Speaker 3>to mention the significant time delay. Like if alien friends

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 3>from thirty thousand light years away, which is, you know,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>relatively our neighbors on the scale of the universe, if

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>they sent out a signal right now, or even one

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred years ago or a thousand years ago, we're not

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 3>getting that signal for tens of thousands of years. Still,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Am I right to think that this isn't really a paradox?

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Or am I misunderstanding something or not thinking about it correctly.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I'd be happy to be proved wrong here, So I'm

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>looking forward to your answer, thank you.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yay, all right, Daniel, So tell us about the Fermi paradox,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>which in an earlier version of the book that I

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>read explains the Fermi paradox. So if anyone wants to

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>dive deeper, they should check out your book. I assume

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>it's still in there.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the Fermi paradox quickly is essentially asking, hey,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy is filled with stars and planets. There are

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of stars, and we now know that

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>most of them have planets and many planets, and so

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there are tens of billions at least of rocky planets

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>around stars, which are a lot of places for aliens

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to form and to learn and to develop technology and

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to send us messages or to come visit us. And

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>space is big, but the Milky Way is not that

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>big compared to its age. I mean, the Milky Way

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is like one hundred thousand light years across, so it

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>would take a long time to traverse it. But you know,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time is a few million years, and the

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Milky Way is billions and billions of years old. We

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think more than ten billion years old, and we've been

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>here for several billion. Of course, humanity is younger than that.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can imagine scenarios where aliens have traversed the

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>galaxy and left relics or filled it with messages. It's

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not that difficult to imagine. So the question is where

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is everybody? Why haven't we been contacted by aliens or

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>visited by aliens? So this famously and probably apocryphally, is

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>something Fermi said at lunch at Los Almos about fifty

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>or sixty years ago, and people have been wondering about since.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 2>But he did at some point make an equation, right,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So it maybe started as a lunch conversation, but where

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 2>did the equation come from?

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is an equation by Drake. That's the Drake

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>equation that tries to calculate how many aliens should be

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>contacting us. And it's pretty simple as an equations go.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just a multiplication of a bunch of factors. But

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a lot you can learn just from the

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>structure of the equation. So the equation is like the

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>number of stars times the fraction that have planets, times

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the fraction that might have life, times the fraction that

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>might be civilized, times of fraction you know that develop

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>technology and I don't remember exactly the structure of the terms,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that they're multiplied together is important because

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that emphasizes that to hear from aliens, all of those

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>factors have to be non zero. Like, it doesn't matter

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>if the universe is filled with life, if none of

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it is technological, right, if there's life everywhere but it's

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>all just like sheets of algae or heaps of microbes,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>then we're not hearing from anybody, we're not getting visited.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if they become intelligent, but none of them ever

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>developed technology, for example, So all of those things have

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to work. All of those factors have to be non

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>zero for us to hear. And we know that the

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>number of planets is large, number of stars is large.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, for example, what is the fraction of

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>those planets that have life on them. We know there's

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one hours, but it could be the only one, and

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the denominator is large, So it could be that the

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>fraction of planets with life on them is like one

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>over a gazillion, in which case we're the only life

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Milky Way. Or it could be fifty percent,

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, or ten percent, so that the Milky Way

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is filled with life. We just don't know so many

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of these fractions.

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>So Julie asks something about the Great Filter. What does

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the Great filter mean?

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Great filters suggests that there might be life everywhere,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and there might even be intelligent and civilized life everywhere,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but it might not just last very long. That civilizations

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>might essentially burn themselves out. And there's a few ways

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that this could happen. You know, civilizations might become technological

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and then develop the means to kill themselves and end

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>up basically nuking each other. And that might be like

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a trend that happens, not in the sense that it's

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>inevitable or that it has to happen necessarily. You could

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>never prove that, but it might be something that's fairly common.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be that civilizations pollute their atmospheres right

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>or cause global warming, or in some other way end

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up killing themselves off. So that's the idea of the

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Great Filter to explain the lack of contact or observation

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of aliens by saying that life is very short lived,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and remember time is very very deep, and so even

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>if there have been a thousand civilizations in the Milky Way,

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if each of them only lasted a few thousand years,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like the length of human civilization so far. Then in

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>space of billions of years, it's very unlikely that we

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would hear from them now, or that we would happen

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in life at the right moment to receive

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>messages from them.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's kind of a bummer, which is right up

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 2>my alley. So what do you think the answer is?

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So now we have to depart from well founded science,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>right and just speculate because we just don't know and

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>everything we're doing. I've heard a lot of you know,

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>semi scientific analyzes of these things, but in the end,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we're always extrapolating from one example, and you can learn

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>things from one example. You could say like life didn't

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>take very long to develop on Earth, so maybe it's

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not unusual, whereas intelligence did take a long time to

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>develop on Earth, so maybe that is weird and rare.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Like you can do those analyzes, but in the end,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just one. You know. It's like if you roll

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a die with a million sides on it and you

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>get a six, You're like, hmm, that's kind of a

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>weird number. But you'd like another roll, right, You'd like

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>more measurements before you decide if the die is fair

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or not. So you know, everything we're we talk about

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>now is non scientific extrapolation and really just wish fulfillment.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean we can't do it, you know.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And so my sense is that we're not great at

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>imagining the scope of possibilities. Right. We tend to do

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>perturbation theory basically, take our example and tweak it a

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And you know, that's what people did for

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a star trek, like you know, Klingons are humans with

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>weird foreheads or Vulcans are humans with weird ears. Right,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we tend to start from our example and then go

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>off in some direction. But aliens are not limited by that.

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to start from humanity and then tweak it.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They can start from a completely different place. And because

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we have only one example, it's very likely that we're

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>not considering the full landscape. And so the short answer is,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I expect aliens are going to be way more alien

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>than we can even imagine, in ways that would prevent

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>them from wanting to contact us, or from having what

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we would recognize as civilization or technology, or to send

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>us messages that we don't even interpret or notice or

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>understand to be alien. So my favorite explanation for the

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>firmi paradox is in that direction that aliens are too alien.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. So Eric Kershenbaum wrote Zoologists Guide to the Galaxy

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and great book. Great book, And you know, one of

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the arguments there is that you might expect to find

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>organisms to have happened upon some of the same solutions

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that we see here are on earth, because probably the

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>principles of natural selection act the same no matter where

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you are, and there are similar pressures and a lot

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>of environmental pressures in a lot of different places. And

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 2>so why give me some examples then of what you're thinking,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>and like why you expect things will be so different.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So, first of all, I really like that book. I

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>recommend everyone he read it. I had a lot of

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>fun reading it, and I actually chatted with him on

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the previous podcast about it, so folks can check that out.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that line of argument is a

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.239
<v Speaker 1>little dangerous. You know, it's sort of like post factor rationalization.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying, like it's easy to convince yourself that

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>humans are a natural endpoint to evolution, like well boy,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bipedalism makes a lot of sense. Having two eyes makes

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. It makes sense to have a

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>nose on your face, and you could get yourself towards

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>arguing like, yeah, aliens are going to look a lot

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like humans because we make sense. But what we don't

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>know is how many other ways evolution could have gone

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>right and arrives at other solutions that those folks would

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>also say, gosh, it just makes sense to have a

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hand sticking out of your forehead, you know, or to

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have a transient aus or whatever. Fun you could rationalize

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>those things. It's sort of like counting coincidences, right, We're

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not good at thinking about the breadth of possibilities. And specifically,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that our evolution a lot of the arguments

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that he makes, you know, like critters will eat other critters,

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>precise predation is universal, depend on the environment that we've

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>evolved in, you know, and some of the sort of

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental economics of it, like imagine if instead of critters

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>walking across a surface of a planet or even swimming

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in its ocean, and what if we were life forms

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that existed in the atmosphere of a star, right, we

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>were like currents of plasma and the distinction between alien

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bodies wasn't even that crisp, right. I think about where

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you define the edge of your body. Is it at

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>your skin? No, because it's hair there. Okay, your hair's

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But now you have like a weird fuzzy definition for

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like where it's Kelly and where it's not Kelly. And

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if you dig down and you're like really philosophical about it,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not well defined. Like there's a fuzzy edge between

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and the universe. And we like to think of

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ourselves as a thing, a one thing that's distinct from

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe because it's important to us sort of like

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>culturally and mentally. But what if we weren't you know,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if we were like flowed between each other and we

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like shared plasma or whatever, we would have a very

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>different sort of relationship with the idea of identity, and

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that could change fundamentally what it's like to be a

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>critter in that kind of you know, evolutionary economics, that's

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just one example, you know, or in that and if

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we evolved in a very different kind of situation, like

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a subsurface ocean. You know, we think that there might

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>be oceans even in our solar system, under thick layers

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of ice, and so if you're some sort of like

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>weird critter that flips around a completely dark ocean, you

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>might evolve, and then you might have no interest in

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the outer universe because you don't even know that it's there,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you don't develop thumbs or technology or do

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>anything interesting like that. And so there's lots of situations

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>where aliens are just weirder than I think zoologists mighte.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why you need to, you know, hone

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in on my people, but all right, I see your point,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think that your imagination is why I enjoyed

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>your science fiction so much.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I think the lesson here is that there

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of human patterns that we don't recognize

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>our human patterns, and the best thing about meeting aliens

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>will be discovering those things, will be understanding Oh my gosh,

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>we never even imagined that you didn't have to have X,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Y or Z for life, and would tell you what X,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Y and Z were if I knew now, But I

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>don't write, And so that's one of the reasons I

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>had so much fun writing that book. Is like thinking

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>about the edges of our knowledge and where we might

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>be making assumptions if we hadn't realized. And frankly, I

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>think biologists are way ahead of physicists in this regard.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, y'all have thought about like, hey, do we

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>need water for life? It might be possible to use ammonia.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we need carbon for our chemistry? No, you could

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>actually maybe use silicon. And that's been helpful because it's

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>changed the way we look for life and imagine where

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think physicists are well behind because they

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all just assume that aliens will do physics the way

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that we do, and that's probably wrong.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 2>On behalf of my community. I thank you for the compliments.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's see what Julie thinks of your answer,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>And thank you to Julie for giving me the opportunity

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to talk about how great Daniel's book is. Hi, thanks

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>for answering my question.

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I really like what you said about how the Milky

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Way isn't that big compared to its age, and there

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 4>would maybe be relics out there that in theory we'd

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 4>be able to detect. I was kind of just thinking

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 4>about how big the universe is without necessarily factoring in

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 4>how old it is too, so I think I'm overall

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 4>back on team Paradox. But the explanation for the paradox

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 4>could be many, many different things beyond just how far

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 4>apart everything is, like all of the many different factors

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 4>that you mentioned, and just how truly alien they could be.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 4>I think it's so fun to think about this stuff.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 4>So really enjoyed how you talked through it. Thanks again, Well,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 4>love the show.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, So next up we have a question from

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 2>our Discord channel, and if you want to join us

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 2>on Discord, and I really hope that you will, you

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 2>just go to our website at Danielandkelly dot org and

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 2>you can click the link to find our Discord group.

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And today's question is from Pip Darcat on what.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you do the day Kelly when somebody has a

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Discord handle that's not safe for podcasting?

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, I will ask our amazing audio engineer Matt Kesselman

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 2>to bleep it for me. No promises, I already have

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 2>a plan. Hey, they're extraordinaries. It turns out that listener

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Pip Darcat from Discord wasn't able to get back to

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 2>us in time for putting the audio together for this episode.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna go ahead and read her question from

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 2>the discord. Hi, Daniel and Kelly, I want to know

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>more about suk an ARCHAOM. I was reading a feed

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 2>about how this organism is a missing link between life

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and not life. Would you consider this for an episode, Kelly, Well,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Pip Darkat indeed, I would. Here's your answer. Hope you're

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>doing well?

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So tell me about this question. And how

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do we pronounce the name of this critter?

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on, man, you know I don't know the

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 2>answer to that. You know that I am notoriously bad

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>at pronouncing all of these names. So I'm gonna say

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it's su sukan archaeom.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Nice. That sounds plausible.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Because I said it fast. Yeah, that's why that was

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the trick. And so let's see, I'll jump ahead to

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>why it's named that. So in Japanese mythology, there is

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>a deity who is small and the name is Sukana.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, the deity's full name is Sukana Bikona. My apologies

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 2>to all of Japanese culture. And so they took the

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>first part of that deities name. And because this critter

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>is exceedingly small, in fact, we haven't even seen it

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 2>with our eyes yet. We've only found its genome and

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>sequenced it so far. They put that name in front,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 2>and then since it appears to be from the domain Arkaia,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 2>they named it's kind of Arkao very cool, which rolls

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 2>off the tongue. Whether it's correct or not. I like it.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Ar KaiA is really fascinating. Tell us a little bit

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about arkae. I think a lot of people don't even

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know that it exists. What is Arkaia and why is

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it so weird and different?

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So's it's incredible. And you know, I actually wonder

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>if you know more about this from dinner table conversations

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>with Katrina, so feel free to jump in.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We do have the Tree of Life run in front

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of our dining room table, so Arkia does come up sometimes.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Do you do you have like a painting of the

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Tree of Life in your kitchen?

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We have a big poster of it.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh that's amazing. I need that. And you know

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>what I learned in this episode is that you won't

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>find viruses on that tree.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's true, which.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Kind of makes sense but also kind of yeah, makes

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>me think of some evolutionary questions. But anyway, okay, way

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>back in our evolutionary history, so very close to the

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>base of that tree, you ended up getting three different domains.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So you ended up with three splits, and so you

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>get ar KaiA, bacteria and ukryota. Ukryota have membrane bound organelles,

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>so we are eukaryotes. We have these membrane bound organelles.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 2>We call them organadoes in a past episode, and I

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 2>thought that was cute, and I'll never forget.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's amazing that u caryotes basically have like

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a little clump of ocean, right, Like, yeah, we think

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>life started in the ocean, and we came out of

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the ocean, but we brought with us basically the ocean.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>We're basically little walking bags of ocean. It's sort of incredible.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 2>It is amazing. Yeah, And so these three different domains

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>differ in things like what makes up their cellular wall,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 2>how they structure their genes. For example, bacteria and Arcaea

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 2>tend to have circular chromosomes, and eukaryotes tend to have

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 2>linear chromosomes.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So eukaryots are distinguished because they have a nucleus. How

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>do you tell the difference between prokaryots and arcaea.

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so prokaryote is a phrase that just refers to

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>organisms that don't have membrane bound organelles, as I understand it,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 2>and I think that because we've created this distinction, people

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>often think that arka and bacteria are closely related because

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>they're both prokaryotes. But as I understand it, arka, bacteria,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and eukaryota are all pretty like similarly distant, Like arka

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 2>aren't that much closer to bacteria than they would be

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to us?

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, I feel like you trying to understand the

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>difference between leptons and hadrons and masons and stuff. So

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we have eukaryotes, which are on the side, then we

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>have prokaryotes, and within prokaryotes we have bacteria, and we

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have arkaa. Is that right?

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I think? So I did not prepare that ahead of time.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to pull this out of Kelly intro biobrain,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 2>but I never had to teach intro bios so it

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>never solidified.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So then why are arkaa thing? How are they different

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>from bacteria?

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So they're different in that they have like different kinds

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 2>of cell walls, they have a different way of initiating

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 2>protein synthesis. I think they differ in the way that

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 2>they translate and transcribe their chromosomes, so they differ in

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the way that they sort of read and turn into proteins.

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>The information that's in there genetic sequences, and those are

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the notes that I have written down.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And so tell us about viruses. Why are they not

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in the tree? Are they not alive? How do you

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>define life all this stuff?

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a number of different criteria depending on who you

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 2>talk to, Some of them will have different definitions than others.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 2>But two important features that tend to pop up in

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the definitions is that in order to

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>be alive, you need to be able to do some

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of your own metabolism, some of your own metabolic processes.

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>So you need to be able to like convert stuff

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>into energy that you can use, and you need to

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>be able to replicate yourself. And so viruses they don't

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 2>have any metabolic machinery. They just inject themselves into a

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>cell and then they hijack the cell's machinery to create

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 2>more virus particles that then burst out of the cell

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and go off and start that process again.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And is there some like philosophical justification for this or

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is this just an arbitrary dotted line the human draw

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>between a big continuum of biological activity.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be. What do I think?

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this like planets and dwarf planets all over again?

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I was wondering that while I was working

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>on this outline, and that's what kind of made me

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>go to the Tree of life. And I think part

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 2>of why we can't really fit them on the Tree

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of life is that they just sort of don't fit

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>anywhere on there neatly. And I wonder if because we

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>couldn't neatly fit them on there anywhere, we're like, all right, well,

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you don't do these other things that are important, and

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 2>if you were doing those things, you'd have more genetic

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 2>information and we could use that to help fit you

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>into the tree of life because we could see, like,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, what the blueprints were and how that fit

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 2>onto the tree. But you don't have that. And so

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if part of it is just like, well,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>we don't know where to put them on the tree

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 2>of life, so we're just gonna say they're not alive.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 2>And I've met a bunch of the people who come problem.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>It's solved. But and I'm sure a lot of people

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 2>who come up with these definitions are going to be like,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 2>that is a stupid answer. These are it's very important

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to be able to, like, you know, make your own

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>energy and reproduce, and they don't do it, so they

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>they are not as good as us in some way.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, if you have strong opinions about the

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>definition of life and whether viruses are alive or not,

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right to us with a strongly worded email. We would

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I would. I think it would be fun

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to have a battle about the different definitions of life

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and not a battle, a conversation, a genial conversation.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And I love when these mysteries have the context, you know.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really cool. Then when we look at planets,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>we also see other stuff that's almost a planet. It

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>helps us understand like where it sits in the bigger question.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And I love you know that there are other great

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>apes that are still around, Like I wish there were

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>more species of humans that survive to today because it

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would tell us so much more about our evolution and

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>our context. And so I think it's really cool that

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we have not just life and inert stuff. We have

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this like weird stuff on the boundary that helps us

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>understand like what life means. So that's very cool.

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>And so you might be wondering, why did we talk

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 2>about what arkaa are and then why are we talking

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>about if viruses are alive or not? And the answer

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 2>is that this there was a finding recently of a

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 2>new species of arkaa. Does Katrina pronounce it arkaa or

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 2>am i oka?

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Great, okay, because if Katrina does it, then I'm doing

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.479
<v Speaker 2>it right. So anyway, so there was a new species

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of Archaea that was discovered and it has a very

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>small genome and doesn't seem to do a lot of metabolizing.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 2>And so there was this idea that went around the

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>popular press that maybe this is like a transition between

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>things that are alive and not alive, because there's this

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>critical feature of being alive that is missing from this species.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 2>So more of the fuzzy context, more fuzzy context. So

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you a little bit more about this discovery.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>So they were looking in dino flagelets, which are these

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>single celled eukaryotes. You find a lot of them in

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the ocean. They tend to have like these two flagellum

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 2>which are like long, stringy things that they sort of

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 2>move around to help them get from one place to another.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that's interesting about them is

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that they produce bioluminescence, which you can see in the

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>ocean and creedy. Oh my gosh. Once I jumped into

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the ocean when the bioluminescing organisms were in there and

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>there was this like amazing blue light that just kind

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of like, oh, it was one of the coolest experiences orthing.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 2>This was in Maine and northern Maine. Yeah, I was

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>at a science conference. It's pretty sweet being a scientist sometimes.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, dinoflagelets they do that, but the scientists were

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>not interested in that. They were interested in the fact

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that the dinoflagelet that they were looking at was thought

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to have a symbiotic critter living inside of it, and

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>so they were trying to understand that symbiosis and how

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>this it was a cyanobacteria, might be benefiting the dinoflagelet

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and will and so they essentially opened up the dinoflagellate,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>sorry dude, and they sequenced the stuff that was inside

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>and when they sequenced the stuff that was inside, they

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>found an additional circular DNA sequence that they weren't expecting

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to see, and they did a bunch of extra studies

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to look at it and try to convince themselves that

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>they hadn't messed something up, because what was surprising about

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>it was that it was so stink and small. The

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>circular DNA was so small that it was about five

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>percent the length of a genome you'd find in something

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>like Ischeria coali or Ecoli, so like very common bacteria.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And again they thought it was a mistake, but they

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>kept sequencing it, and then they assembled it. And when

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you assemble it, what you essentially do is you look

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>at the genetic sequences and say, okay, do these sequences

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 2>match up with anything we see anywhere else in the

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 2>tree of life where we know what it does. So

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to get a handle on, like what might bese

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 2>sequences do based on what we know happens in other organisms.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>It was about two hundred and thirty ish KILLO base pairs,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>where kilo means like a thousand, right, Daniel, mm hmmm, yeah,

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I always double check these things. So super tiny, and

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 2>so once they convinced themselves that they weren't messing up something.

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>They put it on the tree of life and they

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>were like, Okay, this appears to be arkaa. It looks

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>like it's a whole different phylum of Arka that we

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen before. And then they went through and they

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>looked at what was in the genome and they're like, okay,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>based on what we know about other organisms, what do

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>these genome components do?

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So let me back up and ask you a question.

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure I understand, because my understanding is when

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you sequence something, you don't just like pull the whole

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>dema out of the nucleus and read the whole thing.

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You do this process. You basically like shred the cell,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>chop up the DNA in a bunch of short bits.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You sequence all the short bits like shotgun sequencing, and

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>then you use computer programs to like sew it back together.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is like Craig Benter's big innovation decades ago

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that made the human geno much faster. And so then

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you have this mystery sometimes of like, well where do

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>these pieces all go together? And I think what you're

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>saying is that when they were putting the puzzle together,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they realized, oh, we're solving two different puzzles here. This

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is not one big puzzle. It's like if you started

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>working on a jigsaw puzzle and you noticed, like, oh,

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of weird blue pieces that don't fit into

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle, but they do fit with themselves over here

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in the corner. Is that what happened?

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's an incredible explanation actually, And so they didn't

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>just find two critters. They actually found more than two

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 2>critters in there. And so they put multiple puzzles together,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the other puzzles they were like, Okay,

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>we've seen these puzzles before. But then then when they

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>found Sukuna arcam, they were like, what the heck is this?

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 2>They didn't trust that it was anything I see. But

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>once they convinced themselves that it was real and they

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>hadn't like made some mistake through the part of the process,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>they discovered that it appears to be a whole new

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>phylum of Archaea. And then they went through and there

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>are a bunch of public databases where people are like

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>they collect genetic information and then they put it online.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And when they started searching through that, they found a

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of other sequences that were looked kind of like this,

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and so they think that this is the first example

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in the filum that's been described, but that there's probably

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of other stuff out there that we've sort

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 2>of seen but not recognized yet.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, And so what makes this one different from

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>other archaea? What makes it have its own thylum and

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it, you know, whip through the popular press and

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>get an article in science.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So what was particularly exciting was that when they tried

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what the few genes that were there did,

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>most of them were associated with replicating the organism so

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>it could do its own reproduction. But there were very few,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 2>if any genes associated with matisabolism, and so it looks

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>like it's somewhere between alive and not alive. So I mentioned,

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the definition of being alive, you've got to

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>be able to do your own metabolism and your own reproduction.

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>This doesn't seem to be doing its own metabolism, so

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a parasite of some sort, but it can

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>do its own reproduction.

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So it can't do its own metabolism because even a

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>parasite like you know, something inside of you that's drinking

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>your blood, it's still metabolizing the blood and like feeding

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>its own internal chemistry. So what does it mean to

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not be able to do your own metabolism? Does it

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 1>mean that like you're just stealing directly the chemical products

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that store the energy.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, so I don't actually understand how you could

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>not metabolic I mean, I guess in the same way

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>viruses don't metabolize things. They just hijack machinery. I suspect

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that's what's happening here.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I see, Yeah, fascinating.

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so most of the paper is like scientific details,

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>but at the very end the authors say something to

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the effect of, like, maybe this is like an intermediate step,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and like this could tell us something about how organisms

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>go down the path to becoming a virus. Maybe you

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 2>lose a bunch of stuff as you go and you

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>end up with these very like shortened genomes. And not

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 2>everybody was convinced.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like a company that's deciding, hey, we don't need

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to have our own HR department, let's just outsource it

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>to some startup or AI or.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Something, and then they become parasites.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that was a quick step to criticizing corporate culture.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't it.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right, But that's.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating to suggest that viruses used to be more fully

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>alive and have sort of lost this capacity or optimized

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves so they realized they didn't need it. That's fascinating.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's an interesting idea. I don't know if it's

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 2>an idea that's been presented elsewhere, and this was just

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>an example that really illustrated that that idea might have

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 2>some legs. But you know, not everyone was convinced. So

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I read this paper in Science that was summarizing. So

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I should also mention that the paper we're talking about,

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the results are on bio archives, so they haven't gone

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 2>through peer review yet, but they're publicly available. But people

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 2>got immediately excited when it went on bioarchive, and Science

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 2>covered it, and Science did some interviews with other people

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 2>and they found a San Diego State University biologist whose

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>name is Elizabeth Waters. She wasn't part of this study,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 2>but she does look at small archaeol parasites, and she

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 2>said that maybe this is a virus in the making.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 2>She said, this is a bit of a jump. If true, amazing,

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 2>So she's like a little skeptical if it turns out

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that would be super cool. But there are other organisms

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 2>with very small genomes. I think this one is particularly small,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 2>but it's not necessarily the case that a small genome

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>organism is, you know, the missing link between becoming a virus.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>And this is an example of folks of good journalism

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>here because they went out and talked to somebody who

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't invested in hyping this result and who knows the details,

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and asked her like, are you impressed by this? And

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>she was like, hm, you know, she's holding her fire

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And that tells you, like, we're not

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>all convinced that this is a big change that you know,

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's now going to update the textbooks or something, but

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it is exciting and promising.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, And to me this highlights you know, so

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe this is a little bit of a self defensive

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>statement I'm about to make here. So you know, you've

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 2>said that when physics is doing well, it's doing more

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 2>than just taxonomy. This is essentially just taxonomy. They found

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 2>something new. They were like, well, let's look at this

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 2>new thing, and maybe this is leading to a brand

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>new understanding of life or not life, depending on what

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 2>you co virus is, you know, and just how things

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>work and understanding our world a little bit better. And

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.959
<v Speaker 2>so I would argue just taxonomy is really important. Thank

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 2>you for this fascinating just taxonomy, and thank you to

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Pip Darcat for this fantastic discord. Question.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, if I could comment, I think that this is

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic bit of science. But I think it's especially

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it's not just taxonomy, right. You're not just

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>putting it there and saying, well, look, it's just there.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking about the consequences, You're drawing analogies, you're asking

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>philosophical questions about what it all means. So taxonomy is

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>very valuable, partially because it inspires this kind of deeper

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking and making these connections. So I would say taxonomy

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is step one in a really fascinating and valuable process.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, But you can't get to step two without step one.

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But i'll give you Yeah, I agreed, Okay, I'll give

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 2>you that.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're back and we're answering questions from listeners. If

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you have a question about the universe you've never really

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had satisfactorily answered, please write to us. We would love

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>to give it a shot. You can email us to

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>questions at Daniel and Kelly dot org. You can join

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>our discord and you can find the link to that

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>on our website Daniel and Kelly dot org. We really

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear from you. So many people write

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in and we respond and then they say, oh, my gosh,

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you actually wrote back. Well, we really do.

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You will hear from us. Your message will not just

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>be ignored in the black hole of the internet.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We can't wait to hear from you, all.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, And so now we have a really fascinating physics

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>question from John.

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Daniel and Kelly. My name is John Chai. My

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 5>question is what would happen if the speed of light

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 5>suddenly changed, like let's say a giant cosmic switch were

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 5>flipped and suddenly the speed of light got cut in half.

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 5>Would it be completely catastrophic for all of existence or

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 5>would it go largely unnoticed because even half of the

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 5>speed of light is still really really fast. Thanks a lot,

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 5>and thanks for the great show.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, this is fantastic, And I think this is another

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>one of those questions where so you're always encouraging us

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to take what we know and think, you know, if

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 2>we tinkered with it a little bit, how would that,

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, break the universe? And essentially, like understanding how

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 2>tinkering with things would change things helps us understand if

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 2>we really understand what's happening. Yeah, and I use the

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 2>word understand a lot because I'm the most articulate person

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>on the planet. But you understand where I'm going.

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and this actually connects to our earlier conversation

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>about the Fermi paradox. You know, another way to imagine

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>what aliens might be like that would make them very

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>alien is if they lived in a relativistic environment. You know,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>what if they evolved in a situation where they're very

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>often going at eight tenths of the speed of light

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>relative to each other or relative to their houses or something,

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and so they observe relativity in action as children, and

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they develop an intuition for it, and to them it

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>makes perfect sense that moving clocks run slow, and moving

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>yardsticks look short and all this kind of stuff. You know,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>if to them, the universe would be very different and

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their path of their science would be very different than ours.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But here John is asking a different question. Basically, he's

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>imagining that he's at the control panel of the universe,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's got in front of him all these fundamental constants,

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because there are these weird numbers in the universe that

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to control how physics works. You know, why is

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the weak force week? Why is the strong force strong?

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is gravity so weak? Why is the universe this

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>big and not that big? Why are you galaxies this

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>size and not bigger? How come stars get this size?

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like they are all these numbers in physics, and

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>some of them seem arbitrary. And so he's wondering if

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he was at the control panel and he cut the

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>speed of light from three times ten to eight meters

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>per second down to half of that, what would change?

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>How would the universe look different? Would we notice? And

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the motivation for this question is

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that the speed of light is so fast that it's

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially infinite. You don't take into account when you're walking

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>down the hallway the fact that the light that's hitting

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>your eyeballs is a little bit out of date, and

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the person walking in the other direction is not actually

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>where they appear to be there slightly ahead of it

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because the light has taken some time to reach your eye.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We treat it as instantaneous. So I think he's wondering

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what life would be like, what the universe would be

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>like if it wasn't so instantaneous. If we sense that delay,

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if the speed of light was slower and like, maybe

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 1>closer to the speed of sound.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Can I guess so? I feel like, because it's going

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>so fast day to day, we wouldn't notice anything, but

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 2>when we were looking out at like stars, we'd have

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to take into account the fact that what we're seeing

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 2>was even farther back in the past. But how am

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:21.959
<v Speaker 2>I wrong?

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.439
<v Speaker 1>No? I think you're mostly right. But before we dig

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>into all those consequences, I have to nerd out for

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what it means to change the

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.720
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. I mean, I think if you're standing

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at the control panel of the universe, the speed of

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>light is not one of those numbers, one of the

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>knobs for determining the nature of physics. I think those

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>knobs need to be dimensionless numbers, not things with like

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>meters per second in them, and not just because meters

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and seconds are things humans invented, but because the dimensions

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.720
<v Speaker 1>make it connected to so many other constants, like for example,

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you could change the speed of light without noticing anything

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if you also, at the same time accommodated other things,

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like you changed the length of a meter and you

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>change the speed of light, we wouldn't even notice and

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be like if you scale up the whole universe and

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you scale up all the rulers, there's no change. You

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>can't tell if somebody does that. And so, for example,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>if you change the speed of light, do those other

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>constants also change? Like the speed of light can be

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>expressed in terms of quantities from electromagnetism, which include things

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>like the vacuum permittivity of space. So if you change

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, you also change those which change

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, how electricity works, or you somehow breaking the

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>universe and changing the laws of physics themselves. If you

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>change dimensionless constants, you can keep all the laws of

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>physics the same, and every time you change those you

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>really do get an effect. If you change dimension full constants,

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>then it's more complicated and ambiguous exactly how it propagates through.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we can make some simplifying assumptions and

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>play with it anyway.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 2>And see the speed of light is a dimension full constant.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Right yeah, because it's meters per second, right, has two

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>dimensions to it, And you're right, of light is super

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>duper fast, like the fastest any human has ever traveled

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>relative to like a nearby object, you know, on Earth

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is something like point zero zero three seven the speed

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of light wo and you know that's like astronauts in

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the space Shuttle orbiting the Earth. Right, And so we're

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about tiny, tiny fractions, which is why we don't

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>observe relativistic effects. But you're right. One of the ways

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that we do notice the speed of light is in

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of what fraction of the universe we can see.

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>We look out into space and we see back to

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of time, and we can do that because

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>light takes time to get to us, because the speed

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of light is not infinite, and so the furthest thing

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we can see is something where the photons were emitted

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.879
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning of the universe, essentially like three

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty thousand years after the Big Bang, and

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>have been flying to us ever since. And the speed

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of light limits how far we can see. So if

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light was half what it was, we

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>would be able to see less of the universe because

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these photons we're seeing now wouldn't have had time to

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get here if the speed of light was half of it.

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So the universe would still be the size that it is,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but we wouldn't see as much of it.

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And how would that impact our understanding of the universe?

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, yeah, that's a really fascinating question. You know, I

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think we would still see a lot of the structures. Obviously,

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we could still see the whole Solar System and the galaxy,

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and the structures of the galaxy like the galactic clusters

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the nearby galactic clusters. Those are not so far away,

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and we would still see the early universe. It's just

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that photons from the early universe were be coming from

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a closer bit of the early universe than in a

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>scenario where the speed of light was faster. So, to

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>directly answer your question, I don't think that would make

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. Right. We would still see the whole

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>history of the universe. It's just in a smaller chunk

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. But the chunk we're seeing right now is

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>really really big. It's big enough that already we can

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>see that when you zoom out, mostly the universe is uniform,

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>right that there's not a lot of structure at the

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>highest level, I mean the solar systems, galaxies and galactic clusters.

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But once you zooma up past that, it's basically just foam.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no real structure anywhere. And so we

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>can see enough to get that, which I think is

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest structure in the universe. And so it's big

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>enough in the universe is old enough for us to

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>glimpse that. But there is a connection there.

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 2>You're just a little bubble in the foam of the

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 2>universe that nobody would notice it start.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the structure of the universe also would

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be different if the speed of light was smaller, because

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light is not just the speed of light,

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the speed of information, and it limits the biggest

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>structure you can make at any point in the universe,

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Like in order for a structure to form, you have

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to have it interact and communicate. Like even gravity is

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>limited by the speed of light, and so there isn't time,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, to form a structure that's bigger than the

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>speed of light times the age of the universe. It

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't had time to like gravitationally assemble. And so

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if the speed of light is slow, that means the

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest structure you can have would be smaller in the universe.

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh so what is the biggest structure that we have

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:12.959
<v Speaker 2>what would be in small end by this slower speed

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of light.

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is actually kind of a current mystery because

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we see structures like the slowan great wall. This is

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like sheets of galactic clusters, which at the highest level

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>like the edges of those bubbles in the foam, though

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those are bigger than the speed of light

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>times the age of the universe. So it's a bit

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of a puzzle like how did that form? Are we

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreting it something that we didn't understand? You know, one

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite things about science is that we have

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>all these threads that should all tell one story because

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we think there's a thing that's happening in the universe,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and when they don't, that's a hint that there's something

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand. And there's so many different ways to

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>attack the same question. So that's a current mystery. But yes,

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>some of those biggest structures, you know, superclusters of galaxies

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>woven together into foams and voids would be smaller. So

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>basically like the foam would have smaller bubbles.

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, so we've looked at the very big picture.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 2>If we go back to Earth, what would be different?

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 2>So like when I turn on the light switch, I

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 2>probably wouldn't it wouldn't be I'm guessing that wouldn't be

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>like a noticeable difference in how long it took for

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the room to get right. What about other stuff?

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the speed of light is so fast that

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>even half the speed of light is crazy fast, and

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that you would even notice. But we

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>might have been able to measure the speed of light

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit sooner in our history, right, people tried

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to measure the speed of light for decades with all

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sorts of hilarious contraptions with lanterns across mountains, and basically

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there rose like, yeah, it's just too fast. We don't know.

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's faster than we can measure. So we would have

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>figured that out sooner, which might have given us a

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>handle on relativity earlier. And so I think in that

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>universe we might have figured out physics one hundred or

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:53.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years earlier, which is pretty cool.

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh then we wouldn't have had Einstein because what would

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 2>he have done? Probably not thing.

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Somebody else would have been Einstein.

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, all right, but what do you have

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 2>had the same hair? It's the important question.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Really, That's what it all comes down to. This whole

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 1>production is really just to get us to Einstein's hair.

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you imagine like slowing down the speed of

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>light even more so that its effects are visible every day. Like,

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine if cars moving along the highways were relativistic, you know,

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if they were moving at like eight tenths of the

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, you know, because the speed of light

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was crazy slower, then we would have that kind of

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>alien intuition. We would notice relativistic effects every day, right,

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Like we would see that cars moving along the highway

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are shrunken, and that you know, the people on airplane

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 1>trips don't age as much, right, And it would really

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>change the experience of going Like on a long flight,

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you take that fourteen hour flight to Dubai, it doesn't

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 1>feel like fourteen hours, right, It only feels like ten

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>minutes or something. So that's really cool. You don't get

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch seven movies but you also get your time back, right, Yeah,

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so that would be really cool, but it would also

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>make things really hard, Like it's already challenging for me

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to figure out my calendar with time zones, you know,

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like which time zone are they in? What does that

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 1>mean for me? Like, I don't know why that's so complicated.

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Now imagine that on top of that, you need to

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>take into account relativistic effects, so like where's Daniel Binn,

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Where is his clock? How much slower is it? It

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would make coordinating things much more complicated because we'd have

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to give up on the concept of simultaneity. One of

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest consequences of relativity is the fact that clocks

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are not synchronized, which means you don't all agree on

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the order of events. And mostly on the surface of

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, we can't notice that because everybody's moving very slowly.

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But if we were moving faster relative to the speed

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 1>of light, that would be a real effect and people

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>would disagree about important stuff, and yeah, that could have

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>real consequences. It would make life a lot more complicated.

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 2>And just to remind myself, you were talking about if

0:49:57.760 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 2>it was more than just half the speed of light,

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 2>it would have to be yeah, quite a bit more.

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, just half The speed of light probably would

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>have almost no measurable effect on life on Earth, except

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it would take longer to like download a movie

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from some website in Siberia, because the speed of light

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>also influences your download times, right, Like you're downloading data

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 1>from across the Earth. That's a significant difference, and so

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the ping time between your computer and that computer is

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>limited by the speed of light because that's the speed

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>signals move across the Internet, and so it would take

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer. You know. In that case, when

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you're downloading a big movie, the latency is not a

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>big effect. But if you're trying to have like a

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 1>conversation in real time with somebody on the other side

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth, then there could be more lags there.

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad that the speed of light is what

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it is then, because otherwise it would be hard to

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 2>record this podcast with you.

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. And then looking out into the cosmos,

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there would be other changes actually in what we see

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. Black Holes would be much more significant. The

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>size of the radius of a black hole depends on

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. You calculate the short siled radius,

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the point past which things can't escape the gravity of

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a black hole that has a factor in it from

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. It goes like one over the

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>speed of light is squared, So if you shrink at

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, that means a larger event horizon

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for the same mass. Right, So black holes with mass

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in our universe would have a much larger radius in

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.279
<v Speaker 1>this universe where the speed of light is smaller. This

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>means they could have like a bigger effect on their galaxies. Right.

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We have black holes at the center of all galaxies

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're really massive, but they're not that big, you know,

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they're tiny compared to the size of a galaxy. But

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>crank down the speed of light by a big factor

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and they can grow. And so like the centers of

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>galaxies could have like gargangcheu in black holes, not more

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>massive than the current ones, but just bigger, and that

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>could actually help them grow to more massive quantity. So

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it would really change black hole physics a lot if

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you change the speed of light.

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 2>But we probably would not get sucked up by a

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 2>black hole. I guess everything could be different if all

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the black holes were different sizes.

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:06.439
<v Speaker 1>In the end, you got to make it about yourself. Kelly, Right,

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the impact on Kelly's life?

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Have you met people? I'm just asking the question that

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the people are asking themselves.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You're right, y'all are going to be fine, don't worry.

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Daniel.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, thank you very much for that question. John.

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Let us know if we scratched your Doppler itch.

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Daniel and Kelly, thanks a lot for pondering my question.

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 5>And I really enjoyed listening to your speculation on how

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 5>our world might be different if the speed of light

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 5>got cut in half. And I also enjoyed listening to

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 5>you think about what might happen if we took it

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 5>to the extreme and it slowed down to like a

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 5>noticeably slow amount. To be honest, I was hoping for

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 5>some explanation of how change in the speed of light

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 5>might be catastrophic to our existence, but I guess in

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 5>science it really doesn't depend on what you're hoping for.

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 5>Thanks a lot, and thanks for the show.

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Thanks very much everybody who sent in their question. Please, pes,

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>please please don't be shy. We really do love hearing

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>from you write to us questions at Daniel and Kelly

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dot org tweeted us, interact with us on Blue Sky,

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or join us on the discord. Check out all those

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>directions at Daniel and Kelly dot org.

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:23.240
<v Speaker 2>See you then. Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:25.959
<v Speaker 2>by iHeartRadio. We would love to hear from you.

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We really would. We want to know what questions you

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have about this Extraordinary Universe.

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 2>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 2>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 2>back to you.

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at Danielankelly.

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Dot org, or you can find us on social media.

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 2>We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 2>all of those platforms. You can find us at d

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and kuniverse.

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't be shy write to us