WEBVTT - Ep8 - Colin Callender: Turning the world into his Playground

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties podcast featuring conversations with industry

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>leaders about the business of entertainment. I'm Cynthia Littleton, Managing

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>editor of Television for Variety, and today my guest in

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>New York. As producer Colin Callendar. Calendar is known for

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>having excellent taste and the relationships to bring major stars

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to his productions. He's also long been an innovator in

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>financing his projects through international co productions. Collins spent more

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>than twenty years with HBO before launching his own company, Playground,

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve. Playground has a big presence in

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>TV on both sides of the Atlantic. This year, he's

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>done the adaptation of Howard's End for Stars in the BBC,

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>King Lear with Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson for the

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>BBC and Amazon, and Little Women for BBC and PBS.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He's also very active as a stage producer, and he

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>launched a little show on Broadway called Harry Potter and

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cursed Child. Here, Calendar sets the record straight about

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the high price tag for Cursed Child. Don't believe every

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>number you hear. He also talks about the booming worldwide

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>market for classy drama, and he offers up his Yelta

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>conference strategy for managing international production partners. Thanks for joining

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>us today, Colin Calendar, We really appreciate you stopping by.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's start by talking about your company, Playground. You have

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting mix of TV, film, stage projects, a

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>little show that just opened on Broadway called Harry Potter

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Cursed Child. Tell us about the growth of

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Playground since you launched the company in two thousand twelve.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>When I left, I was very keen to produce THEATA,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the very first thing I did after

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>eating was produced the nor Eron play Lucky Guy with

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks and Funny Enough. That had been a script

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that was a feature film that was developed by Sony

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and when solely passed on it, Nora Ephron brought it

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to me at HBO when I was there and we

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 1>we ended up not making it. But when I came

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>back when I started Playground, I really thought that Lucky

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Guy could be a play, and I went to Nora

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and said, have you ever thought of doing this as

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a play, because I don't think it's going to get

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>made as a movie anywhere, And she said, no, no,

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to do it as a movie, and she

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>she was flying out to UM Los Angeles to meet

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Julia Childs movie, and she said, but let

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>me I'm back in two weeks. Let me think about

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it and I'll give you a call. So about ten

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>days later, I get a call from Laura saying, well,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go to l A. We were caught. We

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>stuck in New York of a snowstorm. And I've written

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the play. Do you want to read it? Um? And

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of course then I went from there, I think, what's true?

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my career And the very first thing I produced

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as a producer was the television version of the Royal

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare Companies Nicholas Nickleby. It was a nine hour mini

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>series UM for the new Channel four in England, and

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact it was contract zero zero one Channel four.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This was This was and in many ways that project

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on Reflection with retrospect embodies a number of characteristics that

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>are that have sort of defined my work over time. UM. Firstly,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the production was a mix of theater, film and television

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>people all on the same production. It was a television

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>series director, it was a cinematography film cinematographer was shot

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like a single like a movie over nine over three months.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Um So, that was very much a sort of a

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>coming together of talent from different disciplines and I think

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's informed a lot, if not all, of what I've

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>done over the years, and it's certainly at the core

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of Playground, the idea of drawing on my relationships with

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talent in the film, theater and television world. The second

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is that that Nickleby was a co production. Um

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, when we approached Channel four, I had

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>already got Mobile Oil here in the States to sponsor

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it for syndication in America and a division of PolyGram

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time to handle the distribution. So I was

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>able to go to Channel four and say this is

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>going to cost five million pounds, We've got four million

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>pounds where you put in the remaining one million pounds

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and they did, and so that um So, that was

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the business model that I have actually gone back to

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, because after Nicholas you had you

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had a long, you know, twenty year nearly twenty year

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>run at HBO as as after Nicholas that the after Nickleby,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the it was about five years of producing in England.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I ended up at HBO was because

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we were the co producer of choice in England for

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>HBO because HBO's creative ambitions exceeded its financial reach and

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>so they needed partners. And I had met Michael Fuchs

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on the cuasette one one night um during the mip

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>TV Festival and uh as I say, we became that

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the the co producer of choice. So Playground has sort

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>of embodies those two things, both the the you know,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>working with Mark Rylands, the stage actor in something like

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wolf Hall, having Ken Lonagan, a playwright, adapt Howard's end

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Um making King Lear with the movie star Anthony Hopkins.

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>That that those are characteristics. I think that inform all

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the shows we've done, and they are all co productions

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>in my or another. Howard's end Sorry Warfall was of

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>co production between the BBC and Marspis Theater. Um Canlear

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is a co production between BBC and Amazon, and how

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Its end was Stars BBC. So we've been involved in

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>all our projects that have had both in American and

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK partner. What are the what are the benefits

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and what are some of the hurdles of doing a

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>co production for a for a you know, sizeable production

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like a Howard's End or a king Lear Well, there

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are enormous hurdles um and the hurdles are primarily creative hurdles,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and they are hurdles that I think a lot of

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>people are stumbling at at the moment um. The real

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>challenge is creating a show that that has creative integrity,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that that so that the actual creative team are only

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>serving one master, even if you, as the producer, are

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>actually having to serve several. I remember a story going

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>back to Nicholas Nickleby again, which is sort of apocryphal,

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>although I didn't realize it at the time. Nicholas Nickleby

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was nine hours long. The Channel four in England wanted

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to air it in two parts, as it played on

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>stage one night at four hours and one night at

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>five hours. Mobile wanted to syndicate it around independent stations

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US in four to hour chunks, and PolyGram

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to distributed internationally as nine wire one hour episodes.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And I remember thinking, there's no way we can make

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>this work. And I decided, and I tried to negotiate

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>individually with the various partners to try and find some consensus,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but didn't get anywhere. So I decided to hire what's

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what's called the Roosevelt Room at brown Hotel, Brown's Hotel

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in London and Album Art Street and convene the one

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>day sort of alta conference. And we had the guys

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from Mobile, the guys from Channel four, and the guys

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from the PolyGram distribution Company, and then I had David Egger,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the writer. I had Trevor on the original stage director,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Gottard, the new TV director, and myself and

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we had the room from nine to six in the evening.

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I started the meeting by saying, we have this room

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>till six o'clock. At the moment everybody wants something different,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to actually come away from this meeting with

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a consensus and support for one clear vision of the show.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And if we can't do that, then well it was

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a good, good try, and we tried, but it didn't

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>work out. And indeed, by the time we ended that meeting,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we did have a consensus at what the form of

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the show should be. And I didn't realize it at

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the time because I was a wet behind the years

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, kid producer. It was my as

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I say it, was my very first credit. But that

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>really is at the core of successful co productions. It's

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody sharing the same vision from day one, and um,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>if there is a slight gap in terms of that consensus,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like a rocket ship that's launched into space. The

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>curvature seems small at the beginning, but by the time

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the rocket is really in out of space, it's really

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>veered off course. And most troubles and problems that arise

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in co productions are a function of there being a

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>slight disconnect early on, which grows into a very large

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>disconnect later on once you're in production and once you're

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort of fix things that should have been

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>addressed right at the very beginning. So do you have

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a delta conference for when before you start any made

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>your co production? Now? No, because UM I I embody

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>the altar confidence might playground itself, UM navigates those that

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the requirements of that the co producers in the following way.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that you've got to have a clear vision

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of what the show is and as a producer, that's

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>your that's that's part of your job is to have

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a clarity of vision. And then once once you have

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that your job, as you bring together the creative team

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is to create a safe environment in which that team

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can do their very best work and to be the

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>first audience of one and to occasionally tap them on

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder, whether it's the writer or the director or whatever,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and say, is that what you really meant to do?

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Because we were heading in that direction, you've seem to

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be slightly going off. And that's the producer's job. And

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned having done all these co productions is

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that once you have that vision, that's that's the vision

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you what you sell to the the two partners, and

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>if the partners have different visions, if they don't buy

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>into that, then it's not going to work. But but

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what what the the important thing for a producer to

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>do in the middle of these co productions is is

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to have that clarity and to be and to be

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>dogged about protecting the visions so that when casting ideas

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or script ideas um are presented from one party or

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>another um that we as playground sort of we we

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we sort of edit that. We we we sort of

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>take on board what we think is right for the vision,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and we argue vehemently against things that we think are

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong for the vision. UM. The worst case scenario is

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>an example UM that happened a few years back, which

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was early on in Playground UM Life, when we did

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a co production between the BC and Sky on Dracula,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which I co produced with Carnival and Jonathan Jonathan Reesmires.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Was was the central character UM and the whole premise

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the show was he was Dracula was returning to

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Victorian England UM as a sort of an American, a

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of entrepreneur UM and as an outsider coming into

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>English society. About four weeks into the shoot, NBC wanted

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>us to turn that character into an englishman UM and

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole story structure, the whole the whole concept would

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>have just fallen in on itself, not to mention for

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a week, shop for four weeks of material, and we

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>got on the phone um Um, garrettonem and I got

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the phone with with NBC and we had a conversation.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>We persuaded him it was not a good idea. So

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so I I think the real hurdle is not falling

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>victim to the competing pressures of the financiers and the

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>producer really being the keeper of the flame. Can you

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the how the financials of co productions work? Um,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that there's probably no no two projects come

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>together in exactly the same way. But do you I

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>know you've done a lot with the BBC, a lot

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>for Stars, for Amazon, for HBO. Does is there usually

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>does it start with one network and you bring another,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like a US partner on board or can you talk

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about how the commissioning process happens? Usually? Yes, that the

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>model we've been following is that we find a UK

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>home for the show first develop it with them, because

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>under the British terms of trade, when a British broadcaster

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>puts up development money that they're basically buying an option

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>to finance. They don't own that the script that's actually developed.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Very very different, fundamentally different to the US business model,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why the UK business model, which is why

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Playground is focused on that UK business model, because we

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>end up owning the shows that we produce. So the

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>model is basically, we find a partner with the British

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>broadcaster to develop a project, get it to script stage,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and then find the appropriate home in America if it

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>needs a home in America. Having said that almost invariably

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>when I started. When we start a project, we know

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>where we want to take it, or you know where

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we think the home in America will be, whether it's Stars,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's PBS, Amazon, UM or others and UM. But

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that that that the models. So in terms of the financing, UH,

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's probably about a third of the money comes out

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the UK, a third of the money comes out

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the US, and the remaining third is a combination

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the tax um that the tax in center in

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK and an advance from a foreign distributor m HM.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And so because you because Playground owns that property, you

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>are you then responsible you take it around the world

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and license it to other broadcasters and there's that kind

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of where you make most of your profit. Well, the

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the It depends on the gap between

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the actual budget and the financing available. But more often

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>than not, the financing model entails before going as you're

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>setting up the production to go to a foreign distributor

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>UM and and getting an advance some sort of minimum

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>guarantee from them in advance that goes into the production

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>budget UM so that they then have the distribution rights.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're not actually selling territory by territory. We're dealing

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with various distributors who distribute on our behalf in return

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for them having put up some sort of minimum guarantee

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that helps financial the production. Is that model be coming

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>challenged in a world where you have you know, big

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>buyers like Netflix and Amazon that are increasingly want global

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, virtually all global rates so that they can

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so that they can air the program on their platforms,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, simultaneously around the world. Is that a challenge

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for that ability to bring money in from from sales

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in other international markets. I think that's going to have

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>little or no impact in terms of the business model

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for American based producers, but it is a funder. It

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is a challenge for British Brace producers because, as I say,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the the benefit and the opportunity for British producers in

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>England is to build a company in which you own,

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a catalog, You have your own catalog which

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>has has value over time which you can then maybe

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>down the road sell and be brought out and its

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously the case of a lot of British independent

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the drama area, have over time sold themselves

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to left Bank. Andy Harritty's company was sold so many

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Carnival that produced Danton Abbey was sold to NBC Universal

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>UM and they were able to sell their companies at

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a quite quite a decent price because they had distribution

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>rights that they owned the product. UM. So British producers

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to make a decision going forward

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not they're going to have to weigh

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in the balance on the one hand, the value of

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>owning your own show under the business model in which

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a U S partner is simply a licensee, versus the

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to increase the amount of production they make UM

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with some of the scot platforms who actually are as

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you quite right you say, insisting on owning all rights.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's it's it's a balance and a

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>strategic decision and a financial decision that British producers going

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>to face as they go forward. Do you think that

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>there could advantage places like Stars and PBS and Showtime

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that are still, if not strictly domestically focused, then very

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>regionally focused versus you know, a global platform like an

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or Netflix. Well, I I I have another theory

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about this, which is that I think that what happens

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with new platforms like the Amazons and the Hulus and

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes and Apple excuse me, is that in the

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>initial few years they they try various different creative models,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they look for different sort of creative um strategies, and

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>then they tend over time to sort of find their

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>own creative niche and their own creative focus. I think

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>within that time of experimentation, so to speak, there are

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for British producers. But I think what's going to

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>happen over time is as the Netflix is and the

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazons take on this really global perspective but rooted in

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the US marketplace, I think their taste is actually become

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>less eclectic and more focused, and I think that they

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>will be less interested in the long run in the

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of work that British producers do best. So I

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think in fact the market is going to sort of

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to um an equilibrium will will emerge that

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>actually um rather than rather than than that than these

0:19:52.840 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>platforms being multi genre and multi um and have a

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>whole range of programming. I think actually, funny enough, they're

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>going to do the reverse. And I think if you

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think about what Jeff Besos has said about Amazon UM

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and what his focus is with Amazon. I think the

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollar purchase of Lord of the Rings is

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an indication that he wants very big branded series on

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon UM. He doesn't want some of the smallest series

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and more niche programming that Amazon had explored and experimented

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with before. So I suspect that that that move from

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Besos will be reflected elsewhere, even though that's not

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>I acknowledge at the moment that's not the conventional wisdom.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do actually believe that's where it's going. With

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so many outlets out there, so many platforms, you know,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it behooves everybody to have more of a specialty than

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the than the big tent. Right now, that's an interesting

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll be interesting to see how those how

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those develop, um, you know your company. Among the among

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the productions right now are Howard's End, an adaptation of

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that of the terrific Forster novel Little Women, a true classic.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>King Lear doesn't need a lot of introduction, Are those um,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are those I mean obviously fantastic literary properties. Is there

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of built in recognition for the titles

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that is important? To you or these are these just

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>projects that you really wanted to tackle. It's less to

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>do with the instant recognition of the title itself, and

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's more to do with having a vision of how

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one's going to sell it, both to the broadcaster but

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>also to the marketplace once it's made. And I think that, um,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of as you say, there's a lot

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of noise out there, there's a lot of UM, there's

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of clutter. So the ambition with every project,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>at least for Playground, is to somehow break through that

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 1>clutter and to find a way of actually um like

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a laser sort of sort of cutting through the dog

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and getting through the other side. And so there's no

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>question that having a known title UM as part of

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the mix is uh. It is one element. It's not

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the only element. I mean clearly in the case of

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>How Its End, one way of cutting through the clutter

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that we did with How Its End was getting Clinton

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Arlington UM getting a writer of his stature. We were

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly lucky, of course, this was we actually commissioned Ken

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>before Manchester by the Sea, so UM we little did

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we know at the time that we would end up

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>having having the series written by an Oscar and Oscar

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>winning writer. It was a very nice thing to happen

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>along the way. UM But um so I think understanding

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>how uh how a show, how we will sell a

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>show and presented to the marketplace is central to the

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>initial thinking and it's part of the Playground brand. Frankly,

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we have decided that we were going to um focus

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on one sector of the scriptured business, which was the

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>top end event um high high end, high quality end

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of the market. UM. Up to now, most of our

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>work has been mini series. UM. We're about to launch

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>shortly and announced a couple of returning series that will

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>be that we're that we've been commissioned to make. And

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>UM but I think that uh, this is this is

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>an area that I think Playground us very that this

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is the area that we're focused on. And I think

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's the area that we can It's

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the part, it's the type of drama that we we

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>can do best. Um. Not everything that we're doing is historical.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We've we've started shooting this week with something called chi America,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which is for Channel four in England, which is a

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 1>drama about an American photojournalist in China and UM uh

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that that that that was based on a play actually

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>by Lucy Kirkwood and that's a sort of contemporary thriller. UM.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>But again it's the way we put it together with

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the creative team, with the casting and UM the material itself,

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it lends itself to being something that would be written about,

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not just on the entertainment pages, but off the entertainment

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>pages also. That's a lot of that's that's a goal

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>right now with so much out there, anything that can elevate.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I hear that from a lot of executives. UM for

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>SHI America, is that something that you're shopping for a

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>US partner? Well? Interesting in each America is an unusual situation.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>SHI America is a co production with Playground with with

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Channel four in England and a company called All Three

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Media UM and All three Media deficit finance the show

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>both at an equity level and as part of a

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with with the minimum guarantee against distribution. So actually all

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>three Media have the international rights, including the American rights.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So in this instance there isn't an there isn't an

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>American platform for cost cable company UM involved at the outset.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know they're having conversations, but we funded

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it without that being in place. Interesting when you when

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you think back to the days of Nicholas Nickleby and

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you know your initiative to bring on mobile oil and

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to get to get that kind of sponsorship, that sounds

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like a very entrepreneurial approach for that time in British

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>production when you think of so obviously you were you

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>were thinking big even from the get go. When you

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>think back though to those days compared to now in

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of the opportunity, the ability to monetize, the ability

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to distribute your shows around the world, it must be

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a night and day contract is night and day.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But just going back to what you said about the

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Mobile situation, it was doubly innovative because what Mobile did

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>it didn't go out. Mobile at the time was the

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>sole sponsor of Masterpiece Theater on PBS. But my but

0:25:55.400 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Mobile didn't put didn't uh air Nicholas a copy on PBS.

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>They put together a loose group of ninety percent of

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>independent stations around the country and created an ad hoc

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>network for the four nights that the show went out,

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and that that's this was three. I think it was

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>so back then. This was before Fox UM, this was

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>before cable, basic cable had exploded, and so this was

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>this was that that was a very bold move on

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their part. It went out here on UM it w

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>n W New York I think it was, and it

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was kat l A and in Los Angeles it wasn't.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't the PBS stations. It with the independent stations.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So has it changed, It's changed dramatically. I think that

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>uh the size that the big change for British producers

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular came with Dwanton Abbey. And it wasn't that

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Downton Abbey. The phenomenon of Danton Abbey wasn't that the

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>show as good as the show was and is it was,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a great show. It wasn't that it was

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the best British drama to have come out of England

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ever and therefore it became more successful. It wasn't that

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, because there had been lots of wonderful British

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>dramas before it. My own Nicholas Nick would be upstairs

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>downstairs dueling the crown and so on. But what that

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what distinguished Downtown Abbey was it was the first British

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:26.239
<v Speaker 1>drama on PBS to ride to catch and ride the

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>tsunami of s V O D. Because what happened was

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with that show, episodes were available on iTunes or on

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Netflix or uh Amazon within minutes of it actually being

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>on PPS. Normally, what would have happened on PBS is

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for a British show, is it would have played on

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday night at nine o'clock. It would have played

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>over the season and then maybe six nine months later

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you might have been able to get the box sets right,

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>they'd tell you a video right. So now with with

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Downton Abbey, suddenly a whole universe across the country had

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>access to this show in a way that never before,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which is why it became such a water cooler uh title,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because because many, many, many more people had access to

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it while it was going on on PBS, and that

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that was a big change, and I felt that that

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>created an enormous opportunity for British producers and um, you know,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's to a large extent, my own career has been

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>characterized by me me sort of sort of zelig like

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>being at the right time, right place, at the right time.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I was first, the first in the Channel four, Um

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with the first independent production out of the UK. I

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>got to HBO just before it became the phenomenon it was,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and we rode the wave of hbos and the impact

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>BO had on the marketplace, and I created Playground just

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time when the S. E O D marketplace

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was Now was the new dynamic that was changing the

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>marketplace UM and creating new opportunities. So I think that

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>part part of the fun of this for me is

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>constantly trying to reinvent and discover the new models. I mean,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the case of King Lear, we have a six

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>film deal with with Amazon for King Lear UM and

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Lear is the first of the six and there are

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be Shakespeare and no, no, no, they're going

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be English, They're going to be English dramas. In fact,

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what happened was we made Um well, we made something

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>called The Dresser with Anthony Hopkins and Ian McKellen, and

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon were very very keen to take The Dresser and

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that would have been the first of a six part deal.

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>What actually happened was it the time it took to

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiate the deal with Amazon. UM was it was taking

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>longer than I had because we had a particular window

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with with Antie Hopkinson and McKellen and in the end

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>stars Um stepped in and supported the film and were

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>wonderful partners. Um. But the idea is to find British

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>plays that we can do with the BBC and Amazon

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that will attract movie stars and so um, so it's

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>not Shakespeare, it's the fact that it's it's Antie Hopkins

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and Emma Thompson directed by Richard Air. That really is

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what drove king Lear project. It was great. You've got

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson and king Lear while doing

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>also doing a remakeup of Howard's You Are the This

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm such a fan of yours. You're the

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>first person to clock that or to mention that it's

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>doubly interesting because Haley Outwall m her mentor is Emma

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Thompson world. So it's a very small world. So um yeah,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but yes, that was funny. That's good. Let's talk about

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the business of stage you obviously, Harry Potter and the

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Christ and Child incredible record breaking run on the West

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>End just opened on Broadway. Not gonna worry about that

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one making, you know, recouping its costs. But outside of

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>something like a Harry Potter. Can you make money on stage?

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you make money producing plays? Um? The first player

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I produced was, as I said, Lucky Guy with Tom Hanks,

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 1>directed by George Wolfe, written by Nora Efron and Roy Furman,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who's a theater producer and investor. He has told me

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning that that's that completely spoiled me because

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>because that did make a lot of money. And at

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the time it was now four years ago. UM, at

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that point we were the highest grossing play in the

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>history of Broadway. We had the highest weekly gross of

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>any play ever on Broadway. UM. Yes, I think there

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>is uh, if you're smart art and and sophisticated in

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the in the putting together of the material and the

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>right creative talent. That said, it is a very very

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>tough time right now for straight players on Broadway, very

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tough time. I think there are only five or six

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>new players on Broadway this year. Um. And whereas in

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>London that the marketplace is much more compatible with or

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>much easier for a new play. I think some of

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the players that have done well over here, if you

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>take Curious Incident for example, I don't think that play

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>could ever have opened as an original play on Broadway

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the way it did in the UK. And that's

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>partly because of the National Theater and the Royal Shapes

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Bake Company and the way in which British theater companies

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have sort of government funding which allows them to take

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>certain sort of creative risks that is harder for the

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Broadway to do. But and the other thing is

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that the costs are very different. You know, a play,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a play in London that would cost food pounds to mount,

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would cost four million pounds to mount on Broadway. The

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>cost cost differentials are extraordinary. And is that mostly labor

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in town costs? Yeah, it's different. Um, Harry Potter and

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cursed Child has, you know, set records for budget

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and expectation. I would imagine it was daunting to when

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you sat down to really think about how are we

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going to translate this incredible franchise that means so much

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to so many kids, including my seventeen year old son,

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to translate that to it to an equally dazzling stage experience.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Two things, firstly, I got to correct this number. There's

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a number out there of sixty eight million that people

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are saying is what Harry cost to produce not okay,

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we're getting it on record here as um, that number

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>included it, um and I don't even know what the

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>final number was rolled into it. That the amount of

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 1>money that a t G. The Ambassador Theater Group, spent

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>on renovating the theater, that was completely that was a

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>completely separate capital card, had nothing to do with the

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>capitalization of the play. So the cost of the managing

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the play was was nowhere close to that. Can you

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>give us well, I mean, you know it's own public

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>records already is less so um. So that's the first thing.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is that, UM, my partner on Harry

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Potter Sonia Friedman, the two of us started from a

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>very simple place. We were interested in exploring, how does

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a kid who's grown up for eleven years living under

0:34:53.760 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the stairs alone with who's an orphan, um, who doesn't

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>know what happened to his parents, who's living with really

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of mean spirited arnt an uncle. Um, how did

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>he grow up to that to be an adult? And

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and above that, even more than that, how does he

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>how does he become a father? He hasn't he's never

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really had a father. He hasn't had a father. He

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been farther he did. He the notion of having

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 1>parents was and was something he never experienced. The final

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>chapter of the seventh book, it's not a chapter to

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>mean the pro The epilogue of the seventh book is

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a scene with Harry and Jinny taking their middle son

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two King's Cross to go to Hogwarts. So it's Harry

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and Jenny as adults, as parents with with with a

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>middle son who is a troubled kid. That epilogue is

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the opening scene of the play. And when we went

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to go and see J. K. Rowling, we said, we

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>think there is a play here in exploring this sort

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of emotional and psychological landscape of Harry as an adult,

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and in a way that maybe a book or a

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>film wouldn't necessarily do now, and it would need it

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily we set to we we we imagine because

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you created such such a sort of fully dimensional world

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of Harry, that there are things that you know about

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Harry and the characters that have actually never actually made

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>it into the books or the films, things that you've

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just had in your head as part of the creation

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of this whole parallel universe. And it would be interesting

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to explore some of those things. And one of the

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>joys of the play is a at the core of it,

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it is the story of a father and a son,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and a troubled father and a son. And so as

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an audience member, um, whether you're a kid, whether you

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>whether a teenager, or whether whether you're at thirty year

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>old that grew up with the books, or whether you're

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a parent, um uh, you'll relate in one form or

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>another to those characters. But the other thing that happens

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the play that's very interesting is that characters that

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you think you knew from the Seven Books or the films,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you actually begin to see in a new light you've

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>seen you learn more about them, um. And they open

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>up to each other in the way that adults would

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because they have the distance of time um in terms

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of looking back at their lives um and uh. And

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's it's it was. It's been very

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting to explore those characters that are otherwise familiar characters

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and look at the look at them in a more

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>dimensional way as adults. So it's a completely new story.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not an adaptation of an existing book. It's not

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not a musical. Um, it's in two parts with

0:37:56.400 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a cliffhanger at the end of part one. It's it's

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>unlike in fact, any other play that's that's been produced

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. You know, if you think about the players

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that are in two parts, most of them up to

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>now have been self contained parts. Angels of America, the

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>first play was performed a year or two before the

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 1>second play came out. UM, going back to Nicholas Nickoby

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, the first play was sort of self contained.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You could just see the self first play and not

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to see the second play to see

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how things resolve themselves. And we had a very interesting

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>experience here because what happened was uh when when the play,

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but when it began in previews, we were slightly worried

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that maybe people who weren't fan to the book, we

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the book would have would have would wouldn't

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>be able to follow the story, and we were thinking

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>about having some sort of digital display in the lobby

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that explained the stories and some of the characters. But

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>then as we watched the audience we were watching something

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>really quite wonderful happened, which was that people were talking

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to each other and people were asking questions of each other,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fans were telling the non fans or that

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what they were explaining certain parts of the story. And

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because the audience was staying with each other for the

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>whole day and for part one and part two, you're

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the same seat, so you have the same neighbors,

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people began to talk to each other and know each other,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly there was this extraordinary um dialogue going on

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>within the audience between people all of different ages, all

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with differing knowledges of Harry Potter. And it is actually

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that that that we've we're certainly true in

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>England that there are lots of people and we've seen

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 1>this online all the time who have made fast new

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>friends based on who they met when they saw the show. Um,

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>so we were so so what became clear was if

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>people didn't know what what, why were people wing and

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are in at that particular moment of who was that character?

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>They would ask people around them and the fans would explain.

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>And so we never put up the digital screen and

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>we we we just allowed that sort of that sort

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue and the communal reaction to we we try

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to foster it an old fashioned interactive experience, an old

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fashion throughout experience. Collin Calendar, thank you so much for

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>your time. It's been really interesting talking with you and

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hear and getting a visibility into into the the market

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for British productions and also for for playground. That's a pleasure.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, thanks for listening. Be sure to

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>join us next week for another episode of Strictly Business.