WEBVTT - FFW Week 15 (Fantasy Playoffs Week 2)

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, presented

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>by green Belt Premium and Devanny's, your weekly source for

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the nation's best fantasy football speculation and advice. Fantasy Football

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is brought to you by fanball dot Com, town

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Hall Family, Greater Twin Cities, Honda Dealers, Show Sensors, Hudson

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Ford and by Park Tavern now Wow along with fanball

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, Scott Fish, Matt Harrison, and Brian Johnson Gears

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the fans. Paul scharchy In, Welcome to the semi Finals.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you are alive and playing for the big game

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>next week. We'll help you gonna win this week, do

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>our very best time. Paul tarch In, My coast Today,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison, Good morning guys. Hello, I'm

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>not I missed you. Guys, you missed us. Yeah, it's

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>been a while. I'm gonna guess you're gonna say you

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't miss me though I didn't notice you had been gone.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll think that as a compliment. Actually maybe you should,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>uh feel free to if it makes you feel better. Um.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We uh, we have one more show to go, and

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what we at this show. We got one

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>more that's it, my last one of the year and

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>your last n by Yeah, your last segment of the

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>year coming up in six segments. We got plenty to

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get to. As always, will break down all the matchups,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>three hot questions, we'll have um the lightning round at

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the end, and of course take a chance on me

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the maybe we maybe. We just start with one quick

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>note from Thursday's games. A lot of chief Owners are

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit of trouble. Patrick Mahomes just an

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>okay game. Tyrek Hill didn't do much. Kelsey was modest. Um,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>so some Chiefs players unless you started Damian Williams. What

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Keenan Allen owners who are Keenan Allen owners.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen owners are found themselves in a really tough

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>spot um as we as we will frequently say after

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>these Thursday games, if you find yourself on the wrong

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>side of that, you might want to introduce a little

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>risk reward in your lineup. Guys like Josh Allen and

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson that potentially can have really big or really

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>bad games might be the right answer for you. And

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you also pair up the quarterback in the wide receiver

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to go double dip. You have tried to double dip.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And again, if you know, if they hook up a

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, you've got a big game. But they

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>don't hook up at all, maybe you end up losing.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>But if you're gonna lose anyway, why not. And regardless

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of who you played, if you played anyone in your

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>flex spot from Thursday night, stop doing it. And if

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you have anyone in today's games in your flex spot,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>get him out. Speaking of which, there's games today. We

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>got an afternoon game in an evening game today, So

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>don't be caught. Go set your line up without a doubt.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right into the matchups, beginning with the Packers

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Bears. Brian disaster scenario for Aaron Rodgers.

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>In all of whatever ten years he's been at starting quarterback,

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I've ranked him every single week, He's never been ranked

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as low as I've got him this week at quarterback

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>number two D one. And it's part in part because

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a great Bears team, but also in part because

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they're missing their starting two of their starting guard. Well wait,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one starting guard and the right tackle and then the

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>right tackles the guy who's gotta be uh. It's Brian Blaga.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy in Khalil Mack. So that feels like

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a disaster scenario against the Bears to be missing too

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>starting lineman. Yeah, I've certainly recommended starting other quarterbacks over

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers this week, this game, not on Saturday, by

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the way, but yeah, but uh, we'll start with Rogers.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a C for all the reasons

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you said and then some just look with the Bears

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>into the Rams last week, that is a serious cause

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for concern. But Rodgers does have this going for him.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>One of three quarterbacks to throw with three touchdowns against

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bears this year. Tom Brady did it, and Brock

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Oswiler obviously did it as well. Um, they're very good,

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if not great, quarterbacks have thrown multiple touchdowns against the

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bears as well, Russell Wilson, Kirk Cousins, Matt Stafford, and

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>even Sam Bradford before he died. So I'm gonna give

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Rogers the sea. But yeah, you gotta be very worried

0:03:57.800 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and explore other options if you have it. But if

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a bench on him, yeah, I was

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>borderline benching him, but it is let's move on. I

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk. Well, what about Davante Adams then,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know he's been he has been money in

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 1>every situation. He's had a plethora of great number one

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks that he's had to overcome, and he almost always does.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Can we queue up the peacock from last year's Shells

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Brewery Show when I said Adams is a top ten

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in twenty seventeen preseason last witness. I can't

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do that right off the top of it, like like

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>an old man peacock, like packing and wheezing. But Adams

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is so money in the bank it's unreal. Matt's gonna

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>put him as his number one wide receiver next year.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He said he beat me to that. But uh yeah,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one game, Davante hadhams dat Adams has with less than

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>ten Fantasy points this year, and that's in standard leaks.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>His worst game this year was eight catches for eighty

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>one yards. Yeah, that is his worst game this season.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand. What about the Bears, Well, he caught five

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for nine d in a touchdown in his last meeting

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears Week one. But I don't know I'm

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>playing Davanta Adams. I'm gonna give him a very hard beat.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>He deserves an a. But for all the the reasons

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we said you gotta worry about the Packers, I'm giving

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Adams would be but the only format you're not starting

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>him might be guillotine leaks. That's about it. But he's

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a solid b Randall Cobb on the bench. He did

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have nine for one forty two in Week one end

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown a week one against the Bears, but he's

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>on the bench easily as is Jimmy Graham. Just two

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>catches for eight yards in the Week one matchup. Chicago

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't allowed a tight end touchdown since Week eight, and

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick O'Leary has the most yardage recorded by a single

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>tight end against the Bears. You want to guess how

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>many yards he had over under two a little higher

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>forty nine yards. Yeah, So Jimmy Graham on the bench.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Explore other options at tight end and Aaron Jones again,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>awful matchup for him as well. I'm gonna give him

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>a c uh just because he's gonna get touches likely,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's another guy that if you have other options,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I would explore them willingly over the Bears. Treet Cohen

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>canna give him a B. Double digit touchdowns and five

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>straight and team highs and targets and catches over the

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. And uh, I don't know why we

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't nickname him this earlier locally TC the Bear. It's

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not bad. It's not bad. Moving on, Doc good quicksip

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of because you're here in the middle of a five

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>minute match. Is the sticky one man Jordan Howard Ce

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers just put starting defensive tackle Mike Daniels on i R.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Opposing running backs were already averaging nearly five yards per

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>carry against the Packers, so Howard is startable this week.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson startable as well. Listen as questionable. It was

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a full participant Friday. Friday had a modest four for

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>sixty one in the opener. That's probably his floor in

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. Is that secondary is absolutely decimated for Green Bay.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And for that reason, I will give Taylor Gabriel a

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>long shot. See at least seven targets in four straight games. Uh.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>He caught five passes in the Week one matchup, for

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, so I'll give him a see. I'm

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>benching Anthony Miller, though too much of a dart throw

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burt on the bench. He's been absolutely brutal. Just

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>two catches and twenty yards per game are his averages

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>over his last seven. So he's on the bench and

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Truebhisky gets a b uh. Green bands allowed multiple

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and three of the last four games three touchdowns,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and two of those three Josh Rosen was the only

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one who failed to do so. He's failed to do

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>anything this year, though, and Rubisky, always a threat with

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>his legs, ran for a touchdown in the first meeting

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. I like, I like your whiskey. Now you've

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>just uh, you've just said. We've been doing this twenty

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>four years. In the twenty four year history of this show,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we've never had somebody do such a long rambling matchup

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that they actually dehydrated on the air. And all time

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>first set by Brian Johnson, I've heard much longer rambles

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on this show. Trusting Dallas taking on Indianapolis Matt uh

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and Marie Cooper Dak Prescott about as hot as

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>any tandem in the NFL. But it's an indie secondary

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been shockingly good, albeit against bad opposition. What do

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you make of this one? Yeah, it's well. First off,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's worth note that All Pro guard Zack Martin will

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be out for this game. That's a big hit to

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas line. You know, Uh, I have Doc with

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. It's tough to bench a guy who

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just h torched his career high in passing yards by

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty yards. But is that today? That's

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe all the more reason to to be cautious because

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it was such an anomaly, And to be fair, it

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was a five quarter game. Only one quarterback topped three

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards in the last eight games against the Colts,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and we highlighted it last week. If Dac doesn't score

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, he's not a startable quarterback In most cases.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The Colts haven't allowed a rushing touchdown to a quarterback

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in five games. They've allowed three on the air two

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the three they did allow. We're a Derek Carr

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lean over the goal line and a Tom Brady lean

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>over the goal line. So unless we're getting that, and

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when they handoff to Zeke, anyway, we're

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we're not played Doc, uh Cooper. I'm giving a B.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>He's been the best wide receiver in Fantasy over the

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks. He runs into a Cults secondary though

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that has an allow out a hundred yard receiver since

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Week four, and over the last month, the Colts are

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing an average of only ninety total yards to the

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>position per game. Still so hot, I have to give

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>him a B. Zeke's getting an A grade. He's averaging

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy two total yards over his last

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>five games. He's awesome, Andrew luck Chart. Here we are again,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>here we are. What do you think Andrew lux great

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is this week? Um, I'm gonna guess you're gonna give

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>him a C. I gave him an A. I'm giving

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I gave him an A grade last week, and you

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>laughed at me for kind of the same reason. Charch

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>scoffed at me. And he had two against a very

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>good Texans defense in Indy. He's averaging nine yards per

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>attempt in his last four home games. That's better, that's good. Uh.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has given up multiple touchdown passes in four of

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>their last six games, including three touchdown passes to Carson

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Wentz last week. So I like lux ability to throw

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown passes and get it going. Now. The problem

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is is e y. Hilton's in a little bit of

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a sticky situation here. If you take Hilton out of

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that offense, I like him a lot less luck a

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>lot less. He hasn't practiced all week with an ankle

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>injuries listed as a game time decision. If he plays,

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a B grade. Uh if he does go,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Hilton's seen about of his targets from the slot this year,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>where the Cowboys have allowed seventy five plus yards or

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in nine of their last eleven games. So

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if Hilton's in, I like Hilton. Eric Ebron's an easy A.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have allowed the second most catches in the eighth

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>most yards to tight ends, and the running game Marlon

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Mack and company is on the bench. MATC had to

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week, which kind of saved it. But sixty

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>six total rushing yards from the running backs over their

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>last two games, that's an average of thirty three per game.

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't start any of that against the good Dallas defense.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Agree on all of that. Lions take on the Bills

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in a game in which there are virtually no starters.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, none of the Lions are startable this week.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford Kenny Golladay are out on this one. They

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if bench grades they're playing, They're not out. They're playing.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You might not know they're playing when you see the

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>box score. Bill's debt past defense has been awesome all year. Quietly,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bills allow the fewest fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the full season, and in the last month they

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ranked number one in fantasy points allowed. And here comes

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford with only one good receiver, Kenny Golladay, and

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who does he get Tradus White all game? Game over,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's over, it's done. You can't start. You can't start

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>any of those guys. Uh. And so they're all out.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Stafford's other starting wide receiver, Bruce

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Ellington out with a hamstring. So it's just an utter

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>disaster for the Lions offense right now. All the runners

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>are out. Carrie On Johnson is ruled out of the

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>game with his knee injuries. Zentner and Blunt are gonna

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>split carries of notedges in that scenario either, So all

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the lines are on the bench. Let's talk Josh Allen,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>because this is fascinating. Your highest scoring fantasy quarterback over

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks and it's not close. Is Josh Allen.

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>He's the second leading rusher behind Akuon Barkley over the

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>last three hundred thirty four rushing yards over the last

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks since he returned from his elbow injury. Now

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that all sounds great until you realize the Lions have

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest rushing yards. Two quarterbacks. Get a load

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. Cam Newton mobile quarterback right two yards. I

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think that was pre snacks Harrison even too, I think

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that was Dak Prescott mobile quarterback right two yards. Russell

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Wilson fifteen yards, m R. Bisky eighteen yards. Listen, there's

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of danger for if Josh Allen does not

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>run like he has been running, and he may not

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions. Needs a hundred yards for him to

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be fantasy startable. I don't you need almost a hundred

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. It's a little bit like Lamar Jackson. The

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers indicated, But those guys when we ran like two

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or three times each two, they weren't even attempting to

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>run the ball against Detroit. So yeah, so there is

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that as well, and so they may not even try

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to run Josh Allen in this game now. They don't

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of design runs for Josh. Most of

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the yards he picks up are just him just doing

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>improvisation behind the line of scrimmage. But he's not a

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>gifted passer. He's completing only fifty of his throws. He's

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been held to zero or one touchdown pass in seven

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of his eight games. It's worth noting that Detroit plays

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of zone coverage, so there might not be

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>breakdowns for him to go through holes and run down

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the field either. So I'm nervous. I've gotta be great

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on Josh Allen out of respect for what he could

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>do on the ground, But just know that I think

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the biggest high risk, high reward player on

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire slate this week. Josh Allen. The only other

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill I'm gonna mention is Robert Foster, a fast downfield

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>threat who just needs one, really one deep reception to

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>make an impact, but he's gonna see shadow coverage from

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay. Slays sometimes great, but he also gives up

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big plays. He's given up six touchdowns

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage, which is a lot for anyone cornerback

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at this stage of the season. Um, so he could

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>go any direction there. I've got to see great on

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert Foster, and the running backs are on the bench,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>neither McCoy or Ivor are healthy, and Snacks Harrison shuts

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>down the run anyway. You don't see slay on Za No,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the slot z's and I like slaves a

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>though the slaves I think you wanted. When we come back,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Nine players not normally in

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>your starting lineup, and yes, even in the Fantasy semi finals.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>These are guys that can help you tell you who

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they are when we come back. This is take a

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Let me, let me try that again.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a statement. This is take a chance on me.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ron Burgundy. There's typing the question mark in the telepropter.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you get see the stephen A. Smith Ron Burgundy

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>match up? No? Oh god, it's brilliant. I would gonna

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Henry bit. I was gonna do my first matchup as

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>stephen A. Smith. I'm banking on a big game from

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Bubba Franks week. That would have made if we would

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have had a Charger game today, you had to have

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>done it right. But the Charger game already happened. If

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we would have, that would have been great. Marry and

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Potts is gonna have a big game. Natron means Natron

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>means business. Let's go to uh, let's go to the

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. Nine guys, well not nine quarterbacks, three quarterbacks,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>nine total players you can start in your lineup that

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you normally would not Brian, Who's our first contestant? I'm

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going with Nick Mullins at home against the Seahawks. In

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>his five starts, Mullins is averaging more than two passing

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, which put some top five during that span.

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Before Kirk Cousins only threw one touchdown last week against Seattle,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks had conceded two passing touchdowns in six straight games,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which included a two touchdown game from Mullins in Week thirteen,

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>who also had four fourteen passing yards in that game.

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>How worth noting. I'm not predicting four hundred in this one,

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but there are some injuries to Seattle secondary safety Bradley

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>McDougald could be inactive after being added to the injury

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>report late this week, and backup safety Maurice Alexander's out,

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so they could be thin there. So I'm like in Mullins,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mollins, I've got Baker Mayfield for about the fifth

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>time this year. It really doesn't qualify. H you can

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>give me a anti peacock, maybe a sad trombone though,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because he was might take a chance on me guy

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. Uh. He topped three hundred yards thrown for

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in six of the last seven games except

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for last week, and he totally did not. Um. I'm

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>going back to the well though. In the in their

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>last six games, four quarterbacks have topped the three yard

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>mark and four quarterbacks have had multiple scores against the Broncos.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And over the last five weeks, in fact, the Broncos

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the most passing yards in the league, and

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that includes games against the aforementioned. Nick Mullins and Jeff

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Driskell Um mentioned this about your your selection of Baker Mayfield.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Last week. He threw four in completions for the whole game.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He actually had a really good game. It's not a

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy and fantasy. He had a good start to the

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>game and it just like dried up. Now here's a

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>real take a chance and he played Derek Carr with

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>back to back strong fantasy games and a potential cupcake

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on the schedule. He's throwing five touchdowns over the last

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. The Bengal secondary without Drake Kirkpatrick Tony McCrae

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>last week. They may both be missing this week as well.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Even though the Bengals shocked me by containing Philip Rivers

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhat last week, they're only two games removed from getting

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>destroyed by Baker Mayfield and then Drew Breese a couple

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks before that. Needless to say, starting any Raider

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>comes with a certain amount of danger. But Derek Carr

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>things are lining up for him. The Raiders are actually

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>playing competent quasi competent football right now. Let's go to

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the running back position, Brian, they're going to raise a

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>banner next year in the stadium saying they played That's

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>right what stadium? Which good point? What we're doing running back?

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Elijah McGuire at home against the Texans today,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so you better add him if you can. Uh. He's

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>probably not available in a ton of leagues, but Isaiah

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>crow Well is no more. Uh. McGuire stepped in last

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>week and logged eight plus combo yards in the game,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>winning touchdown and a tough matchup against the Bills. This

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is a tough matchup on paper as well. On the

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>ground at least, UH Texans are allowing less than four

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, but they have allowed four rushing touchdowns

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs over the last four weeks, and they do

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>allow the tenth most catches of running backs nearly six

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>per game. And McGuire is a able receiver. Able, I'd

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>leave it at able. I've got t J. Yeldon against

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington team. Washington is on their fourth string quarterback, a

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>guy who hasn't started a game in seven years, the

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>longest span since Doug Flutie came back to the league. UH.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Their line is toast, their defense has been brutal, and

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they just gave up forty points of the Giants last week.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So the game script favors the Jags jumping out to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a lead, and even if they don't spell for net

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yellen could play in the passing game pretty well. Washington's

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed receiving yardage days of one oh, two, sixty and

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy three two running backs this year. Two of those

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>were Chuck Quiz Rogers and Tevin Coleman. And if this

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>game is tight, Yeldon could be involved in that passing

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>game too. He's had eight targets and seven catches just

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, so I think that he'll be involved.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I love Kenneth Dixon this week. I believe he's right

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>around running back twenty seven for me by the and

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>dirt cheap on Van ball Head coach John Harbaugh at

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of last week's game said, we gotta get

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we gotta have an expanded role for Kenneth Dixon. I

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if he starts the game over Gus Edwards,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think we could be coming to that. Dixon

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>has scored in back to back games since coming half off.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I R and he gets Tampa Bay, the team allowing

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the second most rushing touchdowns, and Guest Edwards does not

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>catch at all. Kenneth Dixon does Tampa bottom five against

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>running back receptions dead la Auston running back receiving touchdowns.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>A great opportunity for Kenneth Dixon in this game. Let's

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>go to the wide receiver position. Brian all Right, this

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>could be a guy for those Keenan Allen owners who

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>are hurting. I'm going Dublin down on the Jets. Robbie

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Anderson today baby uh Sam Donalds had eyes for Anderson

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. He leads the team in targets

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and air yards nearly two hundred air yards this week,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and burner receivers have had success against the Texans. T

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton, Corey Davis, Antonio Callaway, something called Zach Pascal,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Rochard Higgins all scored touchdowns in recent weeks. In the

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks the Texans. The Texans steps surrendered a

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>career or league high thirteen completions of twenty plus yards.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is a boomer Bus play. He could wet

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the bed, or he could pile up the points as

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>if he were striping drives at Top Golf in Brooklyn Center,

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>my favorite place on Earth. I'm going back to the

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Jaguar as well as as well. D D Westbrook against Washington.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook is the slot and possession receiver in an offense

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that has a quarterback that does not throw downfield. That's

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons he saw ten targets, seven catches

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and eight eight yards last week against Tennessee and garbage time.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He did score in that game as well. Working from

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the slot has worked well against Washington as a recent sterling.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd scored last week. Golden Tate had seventy five in

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a touch in week thirteen. Kiki cut at seventy seven

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>yards two weeks prior to that, so good little matchup

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>for deed. Are you dehydrated after that lengthy d D Westbrook?

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Right up? Wasn't that? Wasn't that bad? Come on? Curtis

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Samuel's usage has exploded in the last two games nineteen

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>targets and that's resulted in two solid games for Curtis

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Samuel eighty eight and eighty yards operating from the slot.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll match up against the Saints weakest cornerback P. J. Williams,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>who is allowing a passer rating of one hundred twenty

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>five in his coverage. Curtis Samuel, excellent play, Kurt Sam,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Sam, you get a great opportunity to go with

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the d D hydrated their d D hydrated. That would

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have been good. Um, let's talk Cardinals, Falcons, Lion. I

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think David Johnson is an absolute lock here. Falcons give

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>up the most receptions to do you know why he's

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>such a lock? Church? Yeah, all right, No greater gift

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for running back then facing the Falcons on your birthday,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>especially a pass catching back. So there was injury concerns

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with dj ear in the week. He fully practiced Friday.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>He's good to go. He's a gay grade play without

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a doubt. I can give Larry Fitzgerald to B as well.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He has four touchdowns over his last seven games. Uh

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>No scored four and four of his last seven five

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns during that span. It's the only top fifty

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 1>five yards twice. Yeah, that's the He's two catches and

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in most games. Three catches and he's the

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Breights of wide receivers. He has a plus match

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>up with Brian Pool though, the Atlanti slot corner who

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>conceded a big game to Randall Cobb last week, so

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a fits is viable this week. I'll give

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him a B. Trent Sutfield not some people think he

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>could be I could take a chance to me type

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>play air. He led the team in receiving yards last week,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'll see plenty of Desmond Trudfont running majority of

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>these routes on the right side. So he's on the

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>bench as his Ricky Seals Jones. I'm done with him.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Has totaled just five catches in his last three games.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench, as is Josh Rosen, obviously going

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>over to the Falcons. Let's start with the running backs.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lead off with Edo Smith because he's outtouched

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman better than I have him ranked higher than

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman. But there I'll give him both the seed

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just for the fact that Arizona is conceding more than

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty three touches and a hundred seventy combo yards per

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>game to running backs. I'm forced to start Tevin Coleman

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>in one league if you have to, I can't fault you,

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta be a little worried about that. But

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they both get to see Julio Jones gets an a

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the Pat Pete shadowing. I don't care you're

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>playing Julio this week, but if Pat Pete shadows Julio,

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that could put Calvin Ridley in a very big spot

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and then give him a b uh. Ridley should see

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton of David Anderson, who is sitting on his

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>couch until about mid November when he was signed by Arizona.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So love and Ridley here and I'll give Mohammed Sanow

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a soft sea and PPR very very safe floor. Ten

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>points in PPR not a very high ceiling. He's top

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>four catches just three times this season. Buddha Baker is

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>playing hurt hasn't been as effective. So you can use

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Snow in a pinch, I wouldn't you can, I said, so,

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I would okay in a pinch, but Snow could see

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>more targets. Because I do not like Austin Hooper, I

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have him on the bench this week. He's very iffy

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with a knee injury already and only four tight ends

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I've hit the fifty yard mark against Arizona this year,

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually only three tight ends did it because George Kittle

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>did it twice and Austin Hooper is not George Kittle.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So I got Hooper on the bench. I'm gonna exploring

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other options there and Matt Ryan and give him a

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>b uh. Teams aren't forced to throw on Arizona their

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>bottom five and opponent pass pttempts per game. But you

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>gotta love Ryan at home, where he's averaging over three

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards and two touchdowns per game. Be based on volume. Um,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got him at a quasi bench grade. We'll find out.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>This is based on the volume, is based on everything.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>A game script, that's all. It should be a lot

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of running, Patrick Peterson, I like pudde Baker more than

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you do. We'll see I'm nervous about Matt Ryan in

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this game. When we come back, we'll talk about Cleveland

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>taking on Denver. Philip Lindsay's powered people into the playoffs.

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Will that continue? Find out when we come back. This

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is Fantasy Football Weekly presented by Devans on the Man.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the show. It is Fantasy Football Weekly

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Fan. Maybe more impressive that we have callers

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>from Toronto, Indiana, Milwaukee on hold that we never even

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>got the phone number on the show. These are people

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>who figured out how to call in despite the fact

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've never Um. Yeah, it's really not a secret,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but we just never need to mention it, so I

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>never do not on this show anyway. UM, you know

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we should mention what's that? We should mention that we

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>went toy shopping on Thursday with Scott Fish's Fantasy Cares

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>great call, uh and we bought almost twenty thousand dollars

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>worth of toys for toys for Tots at Target and

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>egan this Thursday, and he's reopened donations to Yeah, Fantasy

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Cares dot net. You wanna donate for next year's cause

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty great cause. Scott's doing great work. Scott's

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>doing great work with the Scott Fish Poll. It's entirely

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for charity and um and it's great to see this

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thing blow up. It was fifteen thousand dollars last year.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It's forty four thousand dollars this year, and it all

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>goes to toys for Tots and it's all funded by

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy players like you. It's the fantasy community getting involved.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So thank all you guys for being a part of it,

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to Scott for all the hours he puts

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>into running that running that charity. In the league, Cleveland

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>takes on Denver. Matt and you already said you like

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. Does you take a chance on the quarterback?

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Quasi take a chance? I mean quarterback? And he's little

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>too good for that. But I love Jarvis Landry in

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.239
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. Talk to me about him. I gave him

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. What my number ten wide receiver this week? Well,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's not that many good wide receivers this week chart. Actually,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of true. Landry bounce back with his

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>first touchdown in six games last week against the Panthers

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>only gets the B here because I'm worried that his

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>target total has just been awful over the last five

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>weeks four, nine, five, five, and seven. While he had

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>double he had double digit targets and eight games. Dr

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>John Ross about an awful target target total dropped significantly

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>charged It's it's bad for Jarvis Landry. He faces backup

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Justin Simmons, who gives up a passer rating

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred six and a catch rate of eight. Yeah,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Brits are allowing almost two hundred yards per

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>game to the wide receiver position. Landwards a C grade

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as of like two or three weeks ago. I'm giving

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>him a B. I think that's generous. He hasn't got

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the target total. Not seeing this correctly four targets last week,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Charch loud noises for David and Joko Uh. I'm giving

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade even though I don't like it

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. Last week, the Broncos almost allowed a single

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>game record for tight end yards to George Kittle. They

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>should have Uh, in joke, who has been a constant

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointment this season though you've never been able to play

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the right spot. He goes off in the

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>games he shouldn't. He doesn't score in the games that

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he should That's an understatement. How many games you've gone

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>often too? Yeah, that's about it. Uh, Nick Chubb, I'm

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B grade. Broncos are middle of the

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>pack matchup, although they have not a lot of running

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>back rushing touchdown in seven straight games. However, Chubb has

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>scored in six of the seven games since Carlos Hyde

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was traded, so something's got to give there. I think

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Chubb gets a touchdown over on the other side, there's

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>one starter, and it's Philip Lindsay. I gave him an

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>A grade, but I'm nervous about two things. First, he

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was bottled up last week. Uh. That was the first

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>week Emmanuel Sanders was gone for the offense. He only

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>had fourteen carries for thirty yards. Did get a touchdown

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>against the not great San Fran run defense. And Second,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>while Cleveland has been bad against the run overall on

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the season, they've been a bit better lately. McCaffrey did

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>score twice. Last week it was held to sixty three

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>yards on sixteen carries, and the prior couple of weeks

0:28:57.840 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't give up a touchdown to mix in the

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>land of backer Lamar Miller. So he's still in a grade.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But I can see a path where it's not an

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a quality uh stat line that he puts out case

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Keenum in the passing game is all on the bench

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>though Keenom has been held under two hundred yards in

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. The Browns give up a lot of yards,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're tied for the seventh fewest passing scores allowed,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and Brown's corner T. J. Kerry will be covering Sutton.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He's yet to allow a score in his coverage all year.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So uh, Courtland Sutton and day Shawn Hamilton's are both

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Vikings play play the Dolphins and plenty

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of moving parts with the Vikings because we have a

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>new offensive coordinator who's never called a play ever. And no,

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he has the Pro Bowl last year. Oh alright, I'll

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>take that left, okay, And then he was in the

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl Pro Bowl o C where they let the

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fans like vote the play. I'm pretty sure they should.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they do that. But I'll tell you what.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You want to make the Pro Bowl a lot more interesting,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Let the fans call all the offensive plays. They've done

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the fun, they've done a thing where you like tweet

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the play. I think they should. You know, it should

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be a Madden. They should build a Madden like in

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>her face where we've all got you know, all this

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>fans have got five six, seven seconds. You know, if

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there are play ends to call the next play and

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're running. You want to get people watching

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl that doing a second. Anyway, start with

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the passing game for the Vikings. I like Kirk Cousins

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>at a B level here, uh now. Granted, over the

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>past two games, Kirk is posted just two D one

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and two hundred eight yards UM, and a lot of

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>those yards came in garbage time. Fortunately, Miami secondary suffering

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with injuries Xavien Howard out and all probability, and that

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>does give some hope here. And if you subtract out

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a Sam Donald game over the past two months, the

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are giving up three passing touchdowns per game and

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.479
<v Speaker 1>two D seventy one yards. So are they cut Cousins bounces?

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Bounces back nicely here in part because the help that

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets from Adam thieland with an A grade, Stefan

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Diggs will will have a lot of successes well, in fact,

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>also have an A grade. In fact, let me start

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with Stefan Diggs with an A grade here because Xavian

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Howard is out. Um, this is a great opportunity. He'll

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>go up again Tory mctire, who really should be Tori Retire. Yeah,

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Savage burn. He got hammered by Tom Brady last week

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and on the season. Tory mctire giving up a passer

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>rating of one four. We're getting closing in on perfect

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>passer rating in his coverage. Stefon Diggs A grade, theeling

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade. He goes up against slack corner Bobby McCain,

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>who's given up a touchdown in three of the past

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>four games. I think the bouncebacks coming for Kirk in

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>his passing game. How about treadless mctire. I kind of

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. I like Tori Retire quite a bit though. Um.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph, I know he's been the forgotten man in

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings offense, but maybe that change is here with

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the jainted offensive coordinator and a struggling Dolphins team team

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends, They've allowed the most tight end scores

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, including four in the last three weeks. They've

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed three multiple touchdown games to a tight end this year.

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph c Grade and then finally Dalvin co. His

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thirteen rushing attempts against Seattle were his most since Week one,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which is depressing. Cook should get volume against a Dolphins team.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up twenty five rushing attempts per game one

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to opposing running backs. Again, We're not

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sure how Kevin Stefanski will use him, but it's probably

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>more than the usage was getting under John d Filippo.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>On the Miami side, everybody's on the bench. In the

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins five game road losing streak, they're scoring an average

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen points, and the Vikings are the toughest defense

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out of that group by a lot. In the passing game,

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings pass defense has been terrific against against far

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>better quarterbacks than Ryan Tannehill. The only receiver you might

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be tempted to start as Kenny Stills, but he's gonna

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>get Xavier Roads all games, so I think he's dead

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to us anyway. Kenyan Drake and Frank Gore are both

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Drake is scoring some touchdowns, um, but

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>he's only averaging nine touches per game. For whatever reason,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they won't play him, and so at nine touches per game,

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't start him, not against the Vikings. Frank Gore

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is still looking for his first rushing touchdown and if

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Kings are unlikely to give it up there on the

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bench as well. I don't know if you can count

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>miracle touchdowns either players. Well, they score, but you can't

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>really bank on one happening. If it happens in back

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to back games, how much of a miracle is it really.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Texans take on the Jets. That is a game for today.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Be sure you set your lineups on that the early game.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It is the early one which starts it I think

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>three or something, and we highlighted the Cleveland Denver game.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's also the Saturday games. That is the Saturday night game.

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't put any of these players in your flex Yeah, well, yeah,

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't want hammering that home today. That's fine.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Texans take on the Jets of Brian What are your

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on Lamar Miller? I think this could be a

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>fantastic game for a player who has been very good

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months. You want my overall thoughts

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on Lamar Mill, I really don't, because I remember how

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>much you loved him last year. I remember how much

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you loved Monty Ball a couple of years before. Okay,

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, that was not a couple of years ago.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a couple of years before, years ago, a

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of years before that. Yes, and it's years ago,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Monty Ball your number one running what's really number one?

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>It was a bad call that officially neutralizes my say,

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley number two this year. That's the ace up

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>my sleeve when it comes to Lamar Miller. And anyway,

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>today's game, I'm giving him a B and I hear

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm praising Lamar Miller and you got to pull out

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Monty ballgard. Well, what is this with this latent hostility?

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You know it's week fifteen. You know you praised him

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 1>today and nice and overall. Then you took the first stab.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>You took the first step. Okay, let's get along. B

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Over the last four games, the Jets are allowing a

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred three plus rushing yards and five rushing touchdowns have

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed that two opposing running backs. Miller is a lock

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen to twenty touches. Dante Foreman has been activated

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>off the pub list, but he'll eat into Alfred Blues

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>workload more than Miller. So if you're worried about Alfred

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Blues workload, you should be worried about Dante Forman. Anyway,

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Miller gets the B over the receiving game. Jandre Hopkins

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>obvious A uh. Damarius Thomas can give him a B.

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Kind of quiet since his two touchdown game in Week twelve.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Not kind of quiet, how about very quarry quiet. But

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>secondary boundary receivers have not been quiet against the Jets,

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>topping one hundred yards and three of New York's last

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>four games. It was done by Robert Foster, Taiwan Taylor,

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Foster. So there you go, and oh yeah

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to Mary's Thomas. Thomas actually had a good game as

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a Bronco against the Jets, catching fast for a hundred

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and five yards and a touchdown. He's got a better

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback now, so I like Thomas. He gets a B,

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 1>as does DeShawn Watson. On paper, you're likely to get

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to fifty and a touchdown and a half through the air,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>regardless of who he plays. New York is bottom seven

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>an opponent passing touchdown percentage, which doesn't bode well for Watson,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>but he's still a threat with his legs. Despite having

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>two rushing touchdowns on the season, he could do some

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>damage here. Mobile quarterbacks have had success against the Jets

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks, most notably Josh Allen's nine carries for

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a hundred one yards and a touchdown. Marcus Mariotta had

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>four p plus yards mitched whisky top fifty yards, so

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Watson can certainly do the same. And real Quick Kiki

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Qti has been ruled out, so you don't want to

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>contemplate him whatsoever. Over to the Jets really Quick Elijah

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>McGuire and Robby Anderson, where both might take a chance.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Of the players, McGuire is the more safer floor, Anderson's

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the boomero bust option there, and then Chris Herndon is

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>viable in the tight end waste Land. I'll give him

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a see. Houston has allowed seven touchdowns a tight ends

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past seven games, and over the past month

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they are allowing over eighty five yards per game to

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the position and They've allowed a tight end to score

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in four of their six road games this year. You

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>remember this preseason when Deshaun Watson, the question was whether

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or not he should be the number one ranked fantasy

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback because of all of the explosiveness that he showed

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. None of that explosiveness has shut up this year.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>He's got one explosive game on the season. In all reality,

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>people in the semi finals are probably not contemplating starting

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson's probably not. He's just been He's been utterly

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mundane a c LS last year at the quarterback position,

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and Watson and both of those guys are kind of

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>down this year and they and both of them had

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>done really well in no small part because of their mobility,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and you take that mobility away and it's just not

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the same for those guys. Could be next year, could

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be next maybe maybe another year removed, but I don't

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>know that they'll ever be this runners. They were Donovan

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>McNabb to go old school, how about r G three.

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 1>For a couple of years, Donovan McNabb was a really good, rushing,

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile quarterback and then he got hurt, had a major

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>knee injury and never really ran again at r G

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>three is an extreme example of that. One good season

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as an amazing rusher and then nothing. So yeah, it's

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times they don't ever become rushing quarterbacks. Again.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to stay. A couple of phone calls people

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>nice enough to be in hold for quite a while.

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh Colin in Indiana, Hello, good morning, Thank you for

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>taking my call. I appreciate it, no problem. Um, I'm

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit of a pickle here. I had

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like many Keenan Allen getting a zero. Yeah, the only

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>uh bonus was my homes had a bad game for

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my opponent. So I am starting an a rated Andrew

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Luck and the Chicago Bears defense. But I don't know

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>if I should rely on Hilton with the ankle or

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>popping Aaron Jones versus the Bears and hope for the best.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if Hilton is playing, you go Hilton, and

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>because you're down already, UM, maybe you do do that

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and you double up on the Luck Hilton combo. The

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Jones matchup just sucks. I I don't I don't really

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>want any part of that unless it's desperation time. Well

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram playing into this at all then no, he's

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so touchdown dependent. I didn't think so bad, but I ask, yeah, Um,

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you got I think you have

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>very good advice for something that needs to come back

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>from a deficit. I think that's the right way to go. Yeah,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks Colin. Appreciate the calling from Indiana, Bennon, Wisconsin. Hello,

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>hey guys, hopefully I can call in tomorrow next week

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than and uh, if not, marry Christmas. I appreciate you.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that so really quick. Um, I have to try

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to decide on a defense. All the rankings outside of Years,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which I usually go with, Years suggest Bears defense Packers

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>over the Ravens. Mm hmm. Well given given to the

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Redskins as well, given the newer news about the Bear

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the Packers being without their starting right tackle against Khalil Mack.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine I'd want to start anybody over the Bears.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You you don't like the Ravens at home against Jamis

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Winston the pick machine, I do, although Winston has been

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot better in that regard. The point is, as

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I went against Mike Williams and I sat the running

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>back for the Chiefs. Williams so really quick. If I

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can quick jump in, I'm I'm starting Tyler Boyd. Would

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you start him over Ridley or Pettis or maybe ye

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Ridley if he needs the ceiling. I think Ridley's got

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the high ceiling here boys got the Boy's got the

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and Nick Nelson in the also got Jeff driscoll Is.

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 1>This is true. Still, Yeah, I go Boyd, but that's

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>just that's just. If you want super high upside, I'd

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>go Ridley. I just hope that they throw away from

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson the whole game. Yeah, there's an angle there. Thanks, Ben,

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Yeah. Um. When we come back, Titans take

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Giants without Odell Beckham. Does that help or hurt?

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd and say Kwon Barkley in a tricky matchup?

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Find out more when we come back. This is Fantasy

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Man. Welcome back. It's our number two of

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a semifinals edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Ciarchi and

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, Brian Johnson with you. It is U. Before

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we get to three hot questions, I want to mention

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are ongoing. Thanks to our decade long sponsor, grain Belt Premium,

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the official beer a fantasy football. Do not forget to

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>play the free Crush Charts challenge at grain belt dot com.

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Win two thousand dollars in a trip to Manny's Steakhouse

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.479
<v Speaker 1>for the winner's banquet in January. As always, many thanks

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to our friends at the brewery Shawn Ryan Brett, Moss

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Lee Windinger and the owners Ted and Jody Marty, and

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of course at Manny's Dave Wilson, who puts the whole

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>thing together. Man, I can't wait already, very exciting. We

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>can't wait either. Yeah, well, what time do I show up? Um,

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be there on a Wednesday at two. Sounds good.

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited. Yeah, I think you show up then, I

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think you'll You'll be glad you're there. The winner of

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>last week's Crush Church challenges Hold on looking for the

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>name Pete Schletts. I had one of those that's right,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, true story. Schlitz in the seventies had twenty

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of the market. You know, you're striving to get

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>your beer to like right, Well now, yeah, of the market.

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Change their formula, change the flavor, and the whole thing

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>went on her. That's right. They knew coked it before

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>new coke themselves go they slets themselves in the schlets.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to uh pork, winner of the crush. Pete.

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Pete, and I gotta go see Pete a month. Pete,

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. We love you, Pete, and we and and

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but trust me with the last name like charge, and

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mock anybody's name. Hot question number one. You

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>think I would hold on, Let's do this more time.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Hot question number one in the chart league where we

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>use free agent blind bidding, I've been holding onto my

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>final dollar of free agent money for several weeks in

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the event my kicker gets hurt because I only got

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>one kicker. And at that way, if I need to

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>make an emergency transaction, I've got my dollar for that

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>one transaction. Should non waiver free agent claims just be

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>free hold and cost of dollar? Brian, I'll address your

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>kicker scenario when you tell me that I'm wrong for

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>saying you should get rid of the mandatory one dollar

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for claims, or even as I'm all for zero dollar

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>claims and zero dollar first come, first serve. As Once

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Weaver is run, you have to let teams give them

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a chance to field a roster in the event of emergency,

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and really out there there could be teams that at

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham, Kareem Hunt, A. J. Green, Melvin James, James

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Conner keeping it going mat rita A J. Green. And look,

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>if you let these guys make zero dollar claims, they're

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get anybody good. And if they do, they

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>deserve those players because everyone else in your league is

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>asleep at the wheel. And then first come, first serve.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>It should just be open for anyone. You just need

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to allow people to field a full roster. And if

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you make it where you have to pay one dollar,

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>then that's impossible. Yes, and obviously you're talking about fictional

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>money based on your for your your hundred dollar or

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever cap that you use, uh in your league for

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>free agent plan bidding. I think this question came about

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>because Chart you and I had lunch the other day

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I asked you, is the Chart League the epitome

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the perfect redraft league? And the first thing

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that you came up with was, I don't know if

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we should allow zero dollar bids in FAB and I

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think you should. It's something that we made a change

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on safe leagues. Uh. We used to have one dollar

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>minimum bids, and now we have zero dollar bids on

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>all Safe Leagues transactions. And it's just really well received

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>by the fantasy community. And I think that's the uh,

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the it's the more popular way to go

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. The case for having to charging a dollar

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>for free agent transactions after the waiver wire has run

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is this, every transaction should have cost, it should have

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>weight to it. By living within the cap, you're proving

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 1>something extra about your abilities as a team manager. Right

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's still some extra strategy involved in my

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>case saving they're saving this dollar just in case I

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>need it, or at some point do I risk the dollar?

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Right so, you know, do I do I right now?

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, do I risk that dollar and just say

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think my Dallas kicker is gonna be okay the

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. Um, there is some strategy to that.

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>But there's also the zero dollars. The zero dollar side

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of it is that, you know, transactions still do have

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a cost to built into them because I have to

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>drop somebody right now. A lot of leagues used to

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I think is, you know, it's not

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how I like to play when you've got twenty two

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>guys on your roster dropping somebody doesn't even have any weight,

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't like it there, But um, you know

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for my leagues that are almost universally with short rosters,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>uh you do have you know, it does cost you something.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And I like the idea of eliminating some element of

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 1>luck because you know, this kicker situation I'm in is luck.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 1>The situation that Brian just described, with all the eight

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>injuries that all hit one team, or even just three

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that hit one team at the end of the year,

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being really a matter of just bad luck.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's not how I want to decide leagues. So

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>after a lot of consternation and a lot of thinking,

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe the correct answer are zero dollar waiver wire bids,

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not waiver wire, post waiver wire free agent costs. Question

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>number two, Carson wentz season is almost certainly over next year.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Is he a top five quarterback, top ten quarterback or

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>lower than ten? Matt uh. Here are the quarterbacks that

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I will have ranked higher than Wentz next season. Mahomes,

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>big Ben, Matt, Ryan, Luck, Newton, Breeze, Goff, Watson, Rivers, Rogers,

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Brady Cousins Wilson. That's a thirteen right there, so I

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>guess he's below ten. Yeah, I don't have much to add.

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think Jimmy Garoppolo could even All those guys

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I named, by the way, have more Fantasy points per

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>game than Wentz this year too. Yeah, I think this

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>year is gonna be tricky this year. In my league,

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>charch League, he's quarterback twelve in the weeks he's played

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks third, three through fourteen, so that puts him in

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the conversation for top ten. Um there are I gotta

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I got my list of guys as well, but they're

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in My list is very very similar to your list.

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But here's why I'm gonna take some of the guys

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>out of your list. Brady and Breeze. I think I'd

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rather be a week a year early than a week

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>too late on the end coming for those guys, and

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think they're going to be outside of my

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Outside of that group you just mentioned, Golf I think

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to be outside because Girly just siphons off

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>too many scores in some games and he leaves you

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with a bad box score in too many games. So

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Golf is gonna be on the outside of that.

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So that takes my thirteen Mine was thirteen two down

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to ten and I have exactly right now number ten.

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Now that's it. If you told me Golden Tate's not

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>coming back, that might be enough to get me out.

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 1>He's in a contract year. But I'm just I'm gonna

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>assume that the team that's got his rights now and

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>could potentially either transition tag him or franchise tag him,

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna keep Golden Tate. And I think given that

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>top ten is the correct answer. Oh wait, did you go?

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Did I skip you? Vanni's hot question? Number three? Odell

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Backham season is probably done. What I know next year

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is he a top five wide receiver, a top ten

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver or lower than ten. We go to our

0:48:56.040 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Giant's desk and Brian Johnson, Uh, his injury is not

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>threatening the start of next season. So I'm just gonna

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>keep it short and sweet and say he's definitely inside

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>my top five. Just think I mean, Michael Thomas, DeAndre Hopkins,

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know Julio. People have mixed emotions about Julio will

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be in the top five wide receiver. But I'm just

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, yes, I will have Odell Beckham inside my

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>top five unless something unforeseen happens over the summer, which

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>is very well could with him. Actually, here are the

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers I for sure want over Odell next year.

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, Michael Thomas, Julio Jones, Davante Adams, Adam Theelan

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Killed, DeAndre Hopkins, and Juju Smith Schuster. That's eight

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>right there. There's a whole bunch of wide receivers that

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are kind of in that same tier with Beckham, Keenan Allen, A. J. Green,

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, and Mark Cooper Stefon Diggs. So that comes

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>down to who's the quarterback in New York next year?

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I Can it get worse than Eli? It certainly could.

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that Joe Flacco? Is it Blake Bortles? Is that

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston? I don't know yet, So I think he's

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>lower than tent Right now, did you really put Amari

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Cooper in the same categories Odell Beckham? Absolutely, he's a

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>better wide receiver right now? Yeah? Right? Sample size all right? Whatever? Okay? Uh.

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt summed this up almost point by point through my list,

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>including your list of receivers, was identical to mind with

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one exception. And I had also had my secondary list

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>filled with all the same guys that you talk except

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods. And then you throw in this mystery at

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback where I think there's a decent chance that an

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>even older and worse and more noodle arm lay Man,

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>he's still your quarterback. I think that he will not

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:34.399
<v Speaker 1>crack my top ten Odell Beckham outside of the top

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ten next year. And by the way, and as somebody

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that's i've owned him in in in my twenty team

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 1>league in back to back years, got him. I tired

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of his injuries. Jeez, it's you know, Willie play, won't play?

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Will he finish a game? You know? And then he

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>missed all last year most of last year. We might

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as well say a J. Green sucks too. I don't

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>even have Green. I don't have Green out my list.

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't even have Green in this list. I noticed.

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean that there's something I didn't mention to.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The addition se Kwan makes it not as important for

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Odell to be the feature in that offense because Kuan

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is so good and he's gonna be probably RB one.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>If he's not RB one, you're doing it wrong. Next year,

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>well Odell was on a ridiculous stretch from his injury too,

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So don't forget that. But I'm gonna forget it. Titans

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>take on the Giants, matt Um, I don't really, I don't.

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I was gonna try to lead

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in with something compelling about the Titans. How about this

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>last week the Derrick Henry bit, will he have one

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 1>third of the yardage? Maybe I gave him a B grade.

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I started looking at the backfields the Giants have faced recently,

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and let me know if any of these like stick

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>out to you. Is super good backfields? Washington, Chicago, Philly, Tampa,

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>San fran Washington again, Atlanta, Philly again. Those are the

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>last eight games. Chicago is pretty good backfield. It's not

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:59.720
<v Speaker 1>super impressive though, right there's not There's not a fantasy

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff it in there. Mostly those are not good back

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Eight different running backs have topped eighty total yards in

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that list right there. That's crazy. Uh So this stat's

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of Evan Silva. By the way, uh Derrick Henry's

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>averaging five point four yards per carry and a touchdown

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>per game in career December games and four point one

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry with a quarter touchdown in games in

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 1>any other month. So Henry gets the B grade. But

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he's still splitting touches with Dion Lewis, and so Dean

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis gets us C grade as well. I just highlighted

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the giants deficiency against backs since Snacks left. I'll add

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that they've allowed the third most receiving yards to opposing

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs in their last five, so Dean Lewis is

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in play. Marcus Mariota barely startable. The Giants have allowed

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>an average of twenty seven points per game over their

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>last three while facing Josh Jackson, Chase Daniel, Nick Mullins,

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 1>So that's good for Mariota. But on the other hand,

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he's throwing twenty four or fewer pass attempts in four

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the last five, and the Giants have only allowed

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>multiple passing scores in one of their last eight games.

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>With at Corey Davis is just a C grade two.

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really tough to rely on him. He's super inconsistent,

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and he faces generous Jenkins this week, who over the

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks has only allowed twenty two yards in

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>his coverage, and granted, remember the quarterbacks he faced over

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>those three, So it's uh, it's not great. Uh. Anthony

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Firkser is a real life person. And if you're extremely

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>desperate for a tight end, John H. Smith had I

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.240
<v Speaker 1>r we are in the playoffs. Yeah, the Giants allowed

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most receptions to tight ends. But Anthony ferks

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.439
<v Speaker 1>is not in your line up. Play him over Jimmy Graham. Yeah,

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's probably yeah. Uh. O'Dell's ruled out with a quad

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>injury and very quickly, ELI in the passing game are

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 1>all on the bench. Maybe Evan Ingram. Uh. Titans are

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>top five in passing yards and touchdowns allowed. Stirling Shepard

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't topped thirty seven yards since weeks seven. Evan Ingram

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>did catch three passes for seventy seven yards last week

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and tends to be only relevant when Odell Beckham is

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not in play. O'Dell's not playing this week, So if

0:53:56.480 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing any part of that passing game, it's Evan Ingram. Uh. People,

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I've had a bunch of people reach out on Twitter

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or just personally that they want to start Sterling Shepherd

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:07.399
<v Speaker 1>because Odell Beckham's gone. I'm like, that doesn't help him,

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that hurts him. This is that's no help with Sterling.

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Sterling was good last year when Beckham was gone for

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for quite a bit of the season, but he just

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been there the last couple of months. No, and

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he I frankly, I just think if you're

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop somebody in that passing him means take away

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd and you go make Russell Shepherd beat you.

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And there was no virtually no running game for the

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Giants last year, and that has completely changed this season.

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that is true. Raiders take on the Bengals.

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I already mentioned Derek Carr might take a chance on

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback. I've got a C grade on him. Jared

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Cook all the way up in an a. There are

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>only three quality tight ends who have faced the Bengals

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all year. All three of them scored. Eric Keebron, Travis Kelsey,

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>O j Howard. Cook has been on a tear for

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the last month. Touchdowns in three games out of four

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and back to back one hundred yard games for a

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end. That's awesome. A grade on Jared Cook. Jordy

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Nelson clocking in with a C grade. Finally healthy in

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, He's been targeted eighteen times, while

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 1>posting how many is that per game? Nine times, while

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:12.320
<v Speaker 1>posting almost one hundred fifty yards in the two games.

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>He is a plausible dart throw against a very inconsistent

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Bengals secondary. Let's go to the running game, Doug Martin

0:55:18.239 --> 0:55:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to a B this week. Bengals

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have given up at least one touchdown to a running

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:24.760
<v Speaker 1>back in twelve straight games, and no team has allowed

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 1>more fantasy points to running backs this year than the Bengals.

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>After a very promising start, though, Doug Martin has reverted

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to his old self. He's averaging just barely three yards

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>per carry over the last two games, and he hasn't

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:39.400
<v Speaker 1>topped seventy two rushing yards or ninety two combine yards

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 1>all season, So that does tap his upside a little bit.

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But a very strong matchup and for once, the Raiders

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 1>probably aren't playing from a big deficit. So I like

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin here, and I think he's a sneaky play.

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you know, is what's his what's his cost in

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>on fan ball? Do you know? Look really look it

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:57.800
<v Speaker 1>up really quick. I know Georgy is a great play.

0:55:57.840 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Doug might be too let's while you're looking

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at I'll mentioned Jalon or Shard while we're talking Raiders

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and wrap it up there. The Bengals have allowed the

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>most touchdowns to opposing runners through the air. Six. That's

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the bid on Richard who never scores, but still six

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 1>h six passing touchdowns to running backs is a lot.

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>They've also allowed forty four or more receiving yards to

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a runner six different times. Jalen Richard, Jalen Richard is

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a is A is a reasonable play here in PPR

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>leagues to muscle Hamster. That's it's also a goodbye. I

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>just I just think people just see Raiders and I'm like,

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm out. But I think this is when you

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:34.879
<v Speaker 1>see Bengals defense, you go, I'm in. I'm in. This

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>game is the reason fantasy football exists as oaklind Cincinnati

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:41.640
<v Speaker 1>without it down that the only people watching, the only

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>people who care. People in Oakland don't even care anymore.

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Bengal side. Joe Mixon gets a beat.

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>He saw a season high thirty one touches last week

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with this is with a j green out, Uh that

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you know this offense really does go through Joe Mixon.

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>He's also topped one hundred thirty eight yards and two

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last three weeks in Oakland's LAS two games,

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>they held backups Spencer wear and Jalen Samuel's in check.

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>But overall, let's remember the Raiders rank bottom three and

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts and rushing yards per game, and their twenty

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry. This is a very plus matchup

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Mixon. We'll give him a B grade. Tyler

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Boyd also with a B. Raiders secondaries a lot of

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>four scores and one one yard game to opposing receivers

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and just their last three games. Tyler Boyd runs mostly

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>from the slot, where he'll see struggling slot cornerback Nick Nelson.

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Nelson allows a passer rating of one hundred thirty and

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he's given up at least eighty three yards in two

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of his last four games. So Tyler Boyd a nice

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Here. John Ross is on the bench. I

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>know he has scored in six different games, but and

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so you might be thinking John Ross is better than

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he is. What you probably don't realize those touchdowns are

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>masking one point eight receptions per game and twenty yards

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>per game for John Ross. That's it. If he does

0:57:55.920 --> 0:58:00.439
<v Speaker 1>not score, he daggers your team. How we do not time?

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break. When we come back, more matchups,

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>including Seahawks taking on the forty Niners. Does Tyler Lockett

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>continue his strong season? Russell Wilson? Will he bounce back

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>after a dreadful fantasy game against the Vikings? Find out

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. This is Fantasy my green bill

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Premium on the van. If your league did not knock

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 1>out Todd Gurley last week, you got a big problem coming.

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you about the Rams game in um a

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>little later in the show. But that's that was your

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>big opportunity. Knockout Todd Gurley last week. This week he's

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 1>my number one ranked running back. It's gonna be tricking.

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Why did you whisper that a little seductively there? Because

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what what he's what he the box score he's gonna

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 1>put up is it's going to be borderline sexual for

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>his owners? Yeah? There, uh yeah. In most cases the

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>guys who guys and girls who you know, the Rams

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:11.000
<v Speaker 1>propelled them to the playoffs. Most of them probably had

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a bye last week. Was there is there a better

0:59:13.480 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>times Fantasy Football by wedding of the Rams. Absolutely, absolutely

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks take on the forty Niners. Brian Russell Wilson, speaking

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of bad last week's seventy passing yards last week scoreless

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, probably bounces back nicely here against the forty

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Niners though, right, Yeah, these teams just played in week

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.640
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. I hate it when they do that. Yeah,

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of bizarre, real quick. The Saints and Panthers.

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>They're playing for the first time this week, right week seventeen.

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a second game. That's even weird. But anyway,

0:59:44.160 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, I'm gonna give him an a. Despite just

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen pass attempts a couple of weeks ago, he did

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>throw for four touchdowns, and the only quarterbacks who have

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>failed to throw for multiple touchdowns against the forty Niners

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 1>are case Keenum, Derek Are and Josh Rosen. So Russell

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Wilson still an elite play giving him an a. His

0:59:59.240 --> 1:00:01.919
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver Tyler Lockett can give him an a as well.

1:00:02.480 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Only had one catch in the first meeting, but it

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was for a fifty two yard touchdown. There's just should

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be more volume passing for Seattle in this game to

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lock it is an obvious A. I'm benching Doug Baldwin.

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Pete Carroll's optimistic Baldwin will play. He actually played in

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that first meeting and scored a touchdown on one catch

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. But I'm not trusting them in in the

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoffs and groin injuries and receivers reinjure all the time,

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and and I I'm not going as far as uh

1:00:25.760 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the more h Moore or John brown Um. And then

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>tight end, I don't remember who starts for tight end

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle either, not recommending you start him either whoever

1:00:34.480 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it is in this gamet or Ed Dixon or who knows.

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And then Chris Carson. Lastly, he gets an a thirteen

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>carries for sixty nine nice yards against the Niners in

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that Week thirteen game. Penny eight into his workload in

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that game with seven carries for sixty five yards in

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. But Rashott Penny has been ruled out, so

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson is an elite play this week, giving him

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>an A. Uh. Speaking of elite, let's go over to

1:00:57.120 --> 1:01:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners and George Kittle. George Kittle has over

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred yards after the catch. Wown high tight ends

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have seven hundred yards probably none. The second highest is

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>juju in like the five fifty range. Wow. There are

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven players with seven hundred regular receiving yards in

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL this year. Are Jugo has seven hundred after

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the catch? Make your call right now that you're gonna

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have Kittles your number one tight end next year. There

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are only three other tight ends besides Kittle that have

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Kidle has after the catch. I've already

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>put him. I got him ahead of Earth's. I still

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta go Kelsey first. But yeah, Kittle, I got killed

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bub Earth right now. But anyway, he's in a uh

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>despite having just six catches for seventy yards in the

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>first meeting. That's probably his floor in this one. You're

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly not gonna bench Kittle, and if you are, I

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear about what league you're in. So

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets in a Marky's Goodwin. Sadly on the bench.

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Added to the injury report on Thursday with the calf injury.

1:01:50.800 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Just the lost season for him. Pretty sad he's on

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Dante Pettis is not, by the way, He'll

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be a nice last pick of your draft next year. Definitely,

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be way off radars next year to himself

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and Dante Pettis. I canna give him a be He's

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of that hail Mary play you might be

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for if you're a Keenan Allen owner. He's certainly

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>paid off two weeks ago with a hundred twenty nine

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>yards and two touchdowns. Not guaranteeing that repeat performance, but

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he is a viable play as the top pass catcher

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to wide receivers for of course, uh

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and for that reason, I like those two. I like

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Nickmullins might take a chance let me quarterback. You can

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to the podcast if you missed that.

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And then for the running backs, Matt Brita limited all

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we can practice. You just don't he could pop up

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and play. You never know, you never know. That's so frustrating.

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he plays in this one and every other

1:02:35.360 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>time that he's been active, he ends up starting the game,

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but then you never know if he's gonna finish it.

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>When frustrating. Yeah, So if you're banking on Justin Williams

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>as a Justin Wilson as a starter, you better be

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>wary of that. But it is a good matchup for

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Since week nine, the Stoks are giving up

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred sixty plus combo yards and one plus touchdowns

1:02:52.920 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>per game, and uh Wilson had a hundred three or

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>four compo yards in that first meeting, So you got

1:02:57.520 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you got a monitor of that situation very closely. Though

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for sure Washington takes on the Jaguars Matt. In my mind,

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there's one startable player in this entire matchup, Leonard four Nett.

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else you like yelled in though I had yell

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>starting great on anyone else other than for Net and

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>yelled in. I had yelled in, and then I Westbrook

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as might take a chance on the wide receiver as well.

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't even feel that great about those guys. So

1:03:19.200 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you shouldn't know, I I try to take these

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>stabs to to find some some lower level guys that yeah, okay,

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfielah, you know, I'm I'm I'm I'm a man

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the people. Uh four Nett. I gave the A

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>grade two. Over the last three weeks, Washington's allowed one

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to Zeke one se both Lamar Miller and Josh Adams

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>top to eighty five yards apiece. UH. Tackle Jeremy Parnell

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is out for the Jaguars. That's a that's a little

1:03:42.760 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>bad for for net, but he's gonna get thirty touches

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game. UH. Cody Kessler in the passing game,

1:03:48.360 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>all on the bench forty three passing attempts. Last week

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for Kessler, all I could manage was to forty and one.

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>In the prior week when they kept the ball on

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground, he only had twenty four attempts. That's probably

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna see this game, and he only two

1:04:00.160 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty yards. So basically the passing game is

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>all on the bench. On the other side, it's Adrian Peterson.

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I gave a C grade two, although if you take

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>away his nine d yard run. It's been a disaster

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>APS averaging under two yards per carry since Colt mccoig

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>broke his leg. But a similarly big running back did

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>torch this Jaguars defense for two d some yards and

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns. When was that last week? Really? We never

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>saw it coming, So yeah, I mean you the Jaguars

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really mail it in again and play with as as

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as little energy and effort as they did last week.

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's possible. Uh, Josh Johnson and the passing game are

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Yeah, stop, just right there. Good, Okay,

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers taking on the Ravens. Let's start with Jamis Winston

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade here in a brutally tough matchup.

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Now to Jamis is Jamison's Jamis's credit. Jamison is whiskey. Yes,

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's delicious. Whiskey is what it is. Since his most

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>recent unbenching, Winston has limited his mistakes with just one

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pick in three full games. He's also thrown exactly two

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in each of them, which isn't bad, but you

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>don't get two touchdowns against an elite raven secondary very easily.

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Since Jimmy Smith's returned from suspension, the Ravens are giving

1:05:18.200 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>up just two sixteen passing yards one and a half

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. There are several injuries though in the

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Ravens secondary. Check their status on Sunday. On Sunday morning,

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they had a bunch of questionable guys. Three three starters

1:05:29.480 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and their secondary. They're all questionable. Check their status. That

1:05:32.240 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>might give you a ray of hope for Winston. If

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>some of those guys do miss time Mike Evans gets

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, it feels like a major letdown coming here.

1:05:39.760 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>No receiver has scored a touchdown. Get this, No receivers

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown against Baltimore in the last three weeks,

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and that includes Julio Jones and Tyreek hill Church. Come on,

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>let's be ballsy. Mike Evans is on the bench. He's

1:05:52.280 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bench in this game. You don't start him

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in this I don't know if I can flat out

1:05:57.000 --> 1:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>put him on the bench. I don't think I can.

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, I'm not. I'm close. Evans hasn't faced the

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>defense that ranks in the top ten against receivers all season,

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so this should be tougher than what he's seen. Baltimore's

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>only allowed three catches of more than forty yards on

1:06:09.960 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the season, so the deep ball is not going to

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be there either. But if you think Winston's gonna have well,

1:06:15.600 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, here's the catch. If you think Winston

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is good for a touchdown, it's going to the guy

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with an A grade, Cameron Braid. He has scored three

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four games since Winston took over. Again, his

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>senses unbenching Baltimore although a great secondary shockingly bad against

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. They've allowed the third most fantasy points to

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends over the last five weeks. Four straight opponents

1:06:38.480 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have posted tight end scores against Baltimore. Really, so break

1:06:42.800 --> 1:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an A grade here. I don't how much left

1:06:44.800 --> 1:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>over Mike. Are you worried about his receiving totals? Had

1:06:49.760 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>two three three two one three for reception totals. It's

1:06:55.440 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not strong. He has to score touchdowns on every catch

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>for him to get a grade every He had two

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>catches twelve yards, two touchdowns last week. He's got to

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>score every time. Adam Humphreys is on the bench in

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this tough matchup. I don't think I need to expand

1:07:09.320 --> 1:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on that. A lot of them to say that slot

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers have struggled against the Ravens and better ones than him.

1:07:14.600 --> 1:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd did nothing, snow nothing, conly nothing. So uh,

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphreys on the bench, Peyton Barber's on the bench.

1:07:22.040 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>He's failed to top three yards per carry in three

1:07:24.520 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>straight games, and that street continues here against the defense

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that gives up less than three and a half yards

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>per carry. He faces a run defense that's top three

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and rushing yards allowed, top three yards per carry allowed,

1:07:35.000 --> 1:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>top three and rushing touchdowns allowed. It's a brutal matchup

1:07:38.680 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for Peyton Barber. Let's flip it over to the other side.

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is fascinating in this game. Tremendous upside and

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially heartbreaking downside in Lamar Jackson. The two mobile quarterback

1:07:51.600 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks who have faced the Bucks, Mitch Robinsky and Cam

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Newton on two different occasions, average six yards per carry,

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's about what Lamar Jackson averages, right around six

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. If he's going to continue to get

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ish carries at six yards per carry, the MAT says, sixty,

1:08:12.400 --> 1:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to do this before you start. That's a

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:17.719
<v Speaker 1>one hundred two yard rushing day. Hundred two yard rushing

1:08:17.800 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>day potentially on tap for Lamar Jackson. Meanwhile, the Bucks

1:08:21.120 --> 1:08:24.719
<v Speaker 1>secondary is allowed passing touchdowns in every single game. Lamar

1:08:24.800 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's coming off his first ever two touchdown passing effort,

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 1>so it all feels like it's going well for Lamar Jackson.

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got an A grade on. But Joe Flacco is healthy.

1:08:36.040 --> 1:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a scenario out there where Lamar Jackson throws a

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:44.519
<v Speaker 1>pick early or can play has a four completion first half,

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>which is in him. He is not a good passer,

1:08:46.800 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and here comes Joe Flacco. Just be aware there is

1:08:49.960 --> 1:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a Flacco. There is a Flacco scenario out there that

1:08:52.920 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that kills Lamar Jackson. It seems like injury for me.

1:08:56.760 --> 1:08:59.599
<v Speaker 1>They've totally changed their offense to be a Lamar Jackson

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 1>based offense now, and it seems to tell like they

1:09:03.520 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a Joe Flacco offense at their disposal. They

1:09:06.400 --> 1:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>running Flacco offense for ten years through that in the

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:11.879
<v Speaker 1>garbage can and lit it on the fire. It's gone.

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Dixon was my Yes, Kenneth Dickson was might take

1:09:15.960 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance of me running back? Uh, And I've got

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on him. I've got Gus Edwards down

1:09:19.960 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to a sea grete I mentioned earlier in the show,

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Kennet Dickson could be your starter in this game. And

1:09:23.880 --> 1:09:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Gus is trailing, is going the wrong direction with his attempts,

1:09:26.640 --> 1:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>his yards per carried decreasing over the last three weeks um.

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks have given up one yard rushing game and

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>four the last seven games. They've also given up a

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>very very robust five point seven yards per carried backs

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in those last seven games, so Gus Edwards can still

1:09:42.080 --> 1:09:44.599
<v Speaker 1>get something done here, but I prefer Dixon, especially through

1:09:44.600 --> 1:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the air, and all of the wide receivers and tight

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ends are on the bench because Lamar Jackson does not throw.

1:09:50.479 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember when Gus Edwards was in

1:09:53.160 --> 1:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>an exciting bill Cow. He wasn't exciting. He wasn't exciting

1:09:56.479 --> 1:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bell Cow for about a week and a half and

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>then that was it. We'll take a break when we

1:10:01.160 --> 1:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>come back our final set of matchups and lightning round looming.

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned. Final segment of the semifinals edition of Fantasy

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. This is Fantasy Football Weekly, presided man. Final

1:10:27.280 --> 1:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. We've got three matchups left

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to get to. Paul Ciarchi and Matt Harrison and Brian

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Johnson with you. We begin with the game with the

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>highest over under for the weekend, Patriots Steelers. Brian, is

1:10:38.560 --> 1:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there anybody you don't play in this one? Not when

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the passing game, but there are some

1:10:42.720 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>questions in the running games on both sides. We'll start

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with um New England side uh in the game is

1:10:48.400 --> 1:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, Real quick, Tom Brady Gronk obvious as they

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are feeding off each other. Now that Gronk is healthy,

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Brady's back to posting monster numbers. Amazing those two running

1:10:56.280 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>parallel Brady's success absolutely and UH. For the wide received ris,

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelin and Josh Gordon both get very strong vise.

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh secondary has been struggling lately, having allowed for wide

1:11:05.760 --> 1:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns over the last three games. It's hard to

1:11:07.920 --> 1:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're benching Edelman or Gordon if you have them

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>on roster. Uh. Now over the running backs, though, starting

1:11:13.360 --> 1:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with James White, give him a B and PPR, a

1:11:17.200 --> 1:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>C and standard though it's not a great matchup for

1:11:19.360 --> 1:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>him through the air the Pittsburgh Pittsburgh is only allowing

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven yards per game through the air to opposing

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs. So I'm not loving James White and this one.

1:11:28.080 --> 1:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm definitely not loving Sony Michelle because of James Devlin,

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate vulture who saw that coming. If you have

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>told me Rex Burke had was had done this, I'd

1:11:39.000 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 1>be like, Okay, I can see that Burke had has

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>been invisible and James Devlin, so yeah, insert Fantasy Football

1:11:46.200 --> 1:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Weekly talking about Bill Belichick running backs for the last

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years. And then let's not forget Rex Burkhead is

1:11:52.640 --> 1:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>active to he could always but yeah, Pittsburgh is not

1:11:55.160 --> 1:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>allowed to. They've a lowed one one hud yard rusher

1:11:57.640 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>all season, I believe, so your hope from Michelle is

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a goal line plunge. But now that's that's not who knows,

1:12:04.080 --> 1:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So it wouldn't surprise me if Devlin doesn't get a

1:12:07.680 --> 1:12:11.519
<v Speaker 1>touch though either. Yeah, absolutely definitely not allow to get

1:12:11.560 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a touch at all. But I'm gonna give him Michelle

1:12:13.160 --> 1:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a see, but certainly explore other options. He's not a

1:12:15.720 --> 1:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He's not a slam dunk start by any means. Uh.

1:12:18.200 --> 1:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of slam dunk starts on the Pittsburgh side, Ben Roethlisberger,

1:12:21.560 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith, Schuster, and Antonio Brown obvious a's Vans McDonald

1:12:26.120 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>borderline A and the tight end WASTELANDE. I'll give him

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a B though, with the Patriots have allowed seven touchdowns

1:12:30.479 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends this year and opposing tight ends are

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>averaging nearly sixty yards per game, so McDonald is viable

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:38.519
<v Speaker 1>in the shootout. And then more questions at running back

1:12:38.560 --> 1:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for Pittsburgh is James Connor gonna play. I do not know,

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows. Uh, he's a game time decision right now.

1:12:45.680 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh if he goes, I would give him a B

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty good matchup. New England's getting gashed lately

1:12:50.200 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>by running backs, most notably Frank Gore running all over

1:12:53.160 --> 1:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the place last week, So I'll give Connor the B,

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>even though you gotta be a little worried that he's

1:12:57.560 --> 1:13:01.519
<v Speaker 1>not a But if Connor is out, Jalen Samuel's the

1:13:01.560 --> 1:13:04.639
<v Speaker 1>starting running back slash tight end. Depending on what fantasy

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>site you play on, I'd give him the see uh,

1:13:07.240 --> 1:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just in this matchup because he can't catch the ball.

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:10.599
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. You just gotta wait and see

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>what you can't really wait and see because this is

1:13:12.160 --> 1:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a night game. It's a very scary proposition if you

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>don't own both Connor and Samuel. So right, see what happens.

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Eagles take out the Rams, Matt Nick Foles at the

1:13:21.080 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>helm for the Eagles. That does not help the fantasy

1:13:24.040 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>prospects of any of the Eagles. And I don't think

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I would start anybody in the passing game outside of

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Zach Ertz. But that's just me. How do you got it?

1:13:30.600 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>How you got it. Do you just want to do

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this matchup for me? I got zach Ertz is an

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a uh. It feels like we're due for a giant

1:13:37.479 --> 1:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Earth's game. There is virtually no change in his production

1:13:40.760 --> 1:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in both last year and this year when Falls

1:13:43.000 --> 1:13:45.519
<v Speaker 1>was in versus Wentz. So that's a good thing for

1:13:45.560 --> 1:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Earth's and Falls targeted Earth's more than any player and

1:13:48.160 --> 1:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>his two starts this season, however, Nick Foles only through

1:13:52.560 --> 1:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown pass and two starts earlier this year. And

1:13:54.840 --> 1:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the Rams secondary is really good again now. Uh. In

1:13:57.800 --> 1:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>their four complete games with a keep to leave in

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, the Rams have not allowed a wide receiver

1:14:02.680 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and no wide receiver has topped fifty yards. Nickel

1:14:06.240 --> 1:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Robie Coleman lines up against Golden Tate. He hasn't allowed

1:14:09.439 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty yards in coverage in eleven of twelve

1:14:12.040 --> 1:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>games this year. So the whole passing game is on

1:14:15.160 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench. It's all benched except for zach Ertz, and

1:14:18.280 --> 1:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the running game, Josh Adams and Darren Sprawls are

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:22.759
<v Speaker 1>on the bench too. It's worth noting that Corey Clement

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>will be out and Sprawls led the team in snaps

1:14:25.240 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 1>last week figure. But the Rams are top five in

1:14:29.520 --> 1:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>every category against pass catching running backs over the last

1:14:32.800 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, which leaves Adams to pick up the scraps.

1:14:36.160 --> 1:14:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I kind of I kind of like Adams here. I

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:41.479
<v Speaker 1>don't he's gonna be on the field for like a

1:14:41.640 --> 1:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>third No, I think the climent out. I think he's

1:14:44.000 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the field more than that. Rams are

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:49.639
<v Speaker 1>giving up five and a half yards per carry over

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the last month of games. It's it's just too tough shot.

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Penny rode over them. So did La Garrett Blunt, so

1:14:57.720 --> 1:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>did Jordan Howard. You're straight ahead bigger runners, and I

1:15:01.200 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think Josh Adams has got a chance here. I'm going

1:15:03.960 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to give the advice to not start Josh Adams in

1:15:06.240 --> 1:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a playoff matchup chart will and you can direct the

1:15:08.880 --> 1:15:12.519
<v Speaker 1>hate mail too at Paul Charchy and on Twitter. On

1:15:12.560 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Todd Gurley obvious a worth noting that

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles have the fifth most missed tackles in the

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:21.639
<v Speaker 1>league this season. That's good for Gurley to get back

1:15:21.640 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>on the horse here. Jared Goff, I'm giving an a

1:15:24.320 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>grade two as well. The Eagles have allowed the third

1:15:26.320 --> 1:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most yards and the seventh most passing touchdowns over the

1:15:29.120 --> 1:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks, although it's worth noting one of them

1:15:31.840 --> 1:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>will probably have a really good game, the other one

1:15:34.200 --> 1:15:37.599
<v Speaker 1>will probably have a okay game because that's how it's

1:15:37.600 --> 1:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>gone this year for Goff and Gurley. Uh. All the

1:15:40.800 --> 1:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, Robert Woods, Brandon Cooks, and Josh Reynolds all

1:15:44.400 --> 1:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>get a B grade. Woods has led the team in

1:15:47.000 --> 1:15:50.479
<v Speaker 1>targets since Cooper cups a c L tear forty six

1:15:50.520 --> 1:15:52.719
<v Speaker 1>for Woods, a thirty eight for Cooks, and then twenty

1:15:52.720 --> 1:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>six for Reynolds, and Philly's secondary has allowed the second

1:15:55.960 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>most catches and yards to wide receivers this season. So

1:15:59.080 --> 1:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds gets the because he's had two thirty three air

1:16:02.000 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>yards over the last three weeks. That's top thirty in

1:16:04.080 --> 1:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFL during that span. And uh, it's just a

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:11.559
<v Speaker 1>good matchup for everybody. It is. It really is. If

1:16:11.560 --> 1:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you didn't, as I mentioned earlier, if you didn't knocked

1:16:13.400 --> 1:16:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley out last week, like you said, I think

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that team is more than likely going to the champion.

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It's worth noting that Woods is probably a borderline A

1:16:22.479 --> 1:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and Cooks is the huge upside guy, so for sure. Yeah. Uh,

1:16:26.960 --> 1:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>final final game to break down before we go to

1:16:29.600 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>your call, Saints taking on the Panthers Monday Night Football. Obviously,

1:16:34.120 --> 1:16:38.479
<v Speaker 1>grades for Drew Brees, Michael Thomas, Alvin Kamara. All of

1:16:38.520 --> 1:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>them rank inside my top four this week. In fact,

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Breeze and Thomas are my number one players at their position.

1:16:43.479 --> 1:16:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to mark Ingram, who's got a trickier, trickier outlook.

1:16:47.120 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Since his big games in weeks ten and eleven, He's

1:16:50.880 --> 1:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>averaged only forty four yards on a very mundane and

1:16:53.280 --> 1:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>four point two yards per carry, also not chipping in

1:16:56.360 --> 1:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the passing game at all, having not seen more than

1:16:59.439 --> 1:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>three target it's in a game all season long. The

1:17:01.720 --> 1:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Panthers give up the fifth fewest rushing attempts in the

1:17:04.400 --> 1:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sixth fewest rushing yards per game. So if he's just

1:17:06.880 --> 1:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>got to get it done on the ground, I don't

1:17:08.479 --> 1:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>know the market Ingram does. He drops down to a

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>C grade here, and I'd have a lot, a lot

1:17:13.320 --> 1:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of hesitancies starting mark Ingram. He will be somewhere else

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on some other team and will be a leading running

1:17:18.160 --> 1:17:19.519
<v Speaker 1>back on some other team next year, and you all

1:17:19.560 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the better season then, um, all the rest of the

1:17:22.120 --> 1:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers besides Michael Thomas around the bench, bre he

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>spreads the ball around too much. He can't trust Tray

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith, Kith Kirkwood, Austin Carr and who they just signed.

1:17:30.160 --> 1:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>They just signed some kid off the practice squad from

1:17:32.160 --> 1:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins him either. Alright, not that guy, Not that guy,

1:17:36.160 --> 1:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whoever that guy is. Let's go to the Carolina side.

1:17:39.200 --> 1:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. Have still got an A grade on him,

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But dark is this a tough matchup? The Saints rank

1:17:44.200 --> 1:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>number one in rushing attempts per game, number one in

1:17:47.360 --> 1:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game, number one in rushing yards per carry.

1:17:51.720 --> 1:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But who cares. He's like the fifteen ranked wide receiver

1:17:54.520 --> 1:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this season. That's where he helps you out. Fortunately, as

1:17:58.280 --> 1:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a dual back threat, he does have a shot here.

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Say Kwon Barkley, Todd Gurley, Ezekiel Elliott all managed to

1:18:04.080 --> 1:18:06.559
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred total yards and each found the end

1:18:06.600 --> 1:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>zone against the Saints last season. McCaffrey averaged eighty three

1:18:10.160 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>yards scored in each game against them as well. He's

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>got to get it done through the air, where you

1:18:13.880 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can get a little something done against the Saints. But

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>make no mistake, a very tough matchup, and the A

1:18:18.360 --> 1:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>grade I have a Christian McCaffrey is only because he

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is so talented. Let's go to the passing game. Cam

1:18:24.280 --> 1:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Newton gets a B. He's produced exactly two passing touchdowns

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and nearly every game this year, and that feels about

1:18:30.040 --> 1:18:32.799
<v Speaker 1>right against the defense that's averaging one point eight passing touchdowns.

1:18:32.840 --> 1:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's go for two touchdowns for Newton. He's not

1:18:34.880 --> 1:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>getting many carries this year, but I will note that

1:18:37.200 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the Saints have allowed the most quarterback rushing touchdowns four

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of them, so maybe maybe Newton surprises us with a

1:18:43.720 --> 1:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>rare rushing touchdown in this one. D J. Mort gets

1:18:46.880 --> 1:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a B. It's a juicy matchup for him. They're allowing

1:18:49.400 --> 1:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Saints allowing the most fantasy points to receivers on the season.

1:18:52.720 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Saints secondary has improved a bit lately, allowing just one

1:18:55.240 --> 1:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to receivers over the last four weeks, but receivers

1:18:57.720 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>are still wrecking a tent plenty of yards. Sick players

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have totaled at least seventy four yards against the Saints

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in just the last three weeks, so two players a

1:19:06.720 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>game topping seventy four yards. I think Dj Moore will

1:19:09.360 --> 1:19:11.599
<v Speaker 1>get to that point as well. Maybe he gets lucky

1:19:11.640 --> 1:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>with a with a touchdown, and Curtis Samuel Was might

1:19:14.720 --> 1:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me wide receiver, and I've got

1:19:16.320 --> 1:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to be greade on him too. So a lot of

1:19:18.280 --> 1:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>guys to go to there. If you're going to Ian

1:19:19.920 --> 1:19:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Thomas at tight end, don't Only one tight end is

1:19:22.560 --> 1:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>top forty yards against the Saints all season, and only

1:19:25.160 --> 1:19:29.519
<v Speaker 1>two have scored against them all year as well. It

1:19:29.680 --> 1:19:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is time for Lightning Round semifinals edition. You know the rules.

1:19:33.720 --> 1:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>One question between two players. We will move on and

1:19:37.439 --> 1:19:39.719
<v Speaker 1>hang up on you right about the time you finish

1:19:39.760 --> 1:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>your question. You can listen on the delay on your

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in your car at your home streaming device. Will take

1:19:48.920 --> 1:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>plenty of calls zero five, three to six h Jessica,

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you've been on hold for the better part of two hours.

1:19:54.760 --> 1:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your patients. Sure, I'm looking at uh

1:20:00.720 --> 1:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's flying Jush Edwards or James White standard scoring.

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for touchdowns. Yeah wow, I'm gonna go Edwards

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks. The Bucks give up so many rushing touchdowns.

1:20:16.960 --> 1:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that's the right flying touchdown

1:20:19.120 --> 1:20:23.479
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Tom, You are next. Hi, guys, Um, I'm

1:20:23.520 --> 1:20:25.599
<v Speaker 1>up pretty big and I'm actually in an all play leaf.

1:20:25.680 --> 1:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to be two out of my three opponents. Um,

1:20:28.520 --> 1:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for actually a lower risk between the two

1:20:31.200 --> 1:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty high risk players out the two Kennis Kenneth Diskenny

1:20:34.560 --> 1:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Golladay in my flex. I have a strong opinion on this.

1:20:38.520 --> 1:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think though, the highest risk is Kenny Golladay, So

1:20:42.280 --> 1:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely go Dixon in this matchup. Matt, thank

1:20:45.960 --> 1:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you for your patients. You've been on hold a long

1:20:47.680 --> 1:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>time too. Oh sure you, guys, I gotta drop Austin Hooper. Uh.

1:20:53.000 --> 1:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Not very good choices, really, its choices Vernon Davis or

1:20:55.720 --> 1:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Griffin. Oh man, I'd go Griffin. He's actually been

1:20:59.720 --> 1:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>quas i active lately. And you can't How do you

1:21:03.120 --> 1:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>start a redskin on a fourth string quarterback who hasn't

1:21:05.720 --> 1:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>started a game in seven years? I we can't do that. Chris,

1:21:10.800 --> 1:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>your next hey, half point PPR Kyle Rudolph or that

1:21:16.160 --> 1:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>McGuire cat. That McGuire cat. Now, I'm waking my part

1:21:22.400 --> 1:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right now and back to the quick call it before

1:21:25.479 --> 1:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>check for Foster too. Brookser intrigues me? Or can can

1:21:30.640 --> 1:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we help Chris out here. I said the cat you did, OK,

1:21:34.040 --> 1:21:36.559
<v Speaker 1>just making cat and not say the cat. He just

1:21:36.640 --> 1:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah right and said he's licking his I don't

1:21:38.920 --> 1:21:43.479
<v Speaker 1>think i'd randomly MEO. So that's you. You do your wife,

1:21:43.479 --> 1:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you do it a lot. Yeah, Joe in Toronto, thank

1:21:46.280 --> 1:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you for your patience. You also have been holding virtually.

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll show thank you. Beck. Um. I don't know if

1:21:52.320 --> 1:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he Wi is playing tomorrow. UM, I gotta choose between

1:21:55.240 --> 1:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>these two receivers today in a fifty fifty league, UM,

1:21:58.720 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's or b Anderson Robbie Anderson and the huge Upside

1:22:03.200 --> 1:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot better than Hamilton's. Thanks your patience, Joe, Mike,

1:22:06.840 --> 1:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You're next on the fans. Hey, guys, Uh standards Uh

1:22:12.240 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Jante Pettis or Dickson, Uh Pettis or Ed Dixon Non Dixon,

1:22:19.439 --> 1:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Dixon. Uh. If you need the ceiling, if you

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:26.799
<v Speaker 1>need the safer play, it's it's Dixon. I would say,

1:22:26.960 --> 1:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Dickson. Either way I would take. I

1:22:29.439 --> 1:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would take Dixon on either side of that. Mark your

1:22:32.040 --> 1:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>next standard Lee Plex Aaron Jones or Julian Edeleman. I

1:22:38.479 --> 1:22:42.599
<v Speaker 1>like this soft Jay Jeman Aaron Jones or Julian Edelman.

1:22:42.880 --> 1:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>What if he has Julio Jones on his team. Rich,

1:22:45.640 --> 1:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you're on the fan, Hello Hard Rich Rich, Yeah that's you. Sorry,

1:22:53.800 --> 1:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mandatory tight end, PPR great or Thomas Thomas. Yeah. I

1:23:01.840 --> 1:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just had him as a bench five three minutes ago.

1:23:04.160 --> 1:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, this one, this one's I think pretty clear.

1:23:09.560 --> 1:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I like how you had to tell Rich who he was. Yeah,

1:23:12.240 --> 1:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that's you. Yeah, that is you, Rich, Dan. Your next

1:23:18.280 --> 1:23:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Dan is not is listening and listening to the radio,

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't Jordan Howard or what he was. Just a

1:23:27.479 --> 1:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bad connection. Yeah, I'm sorry, Dan, I'm sorry tweet us

1:23:31.360 --> 1:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at explosive output. I thought I thought I heard ourselves

1:23:34.400 --> 1:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>back at that. Sorry Dan, Dave, you're next. Yeah, Hi,

1:23:40.000 --> 1:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks everything. That's your guys. Oh, thank you. I'm enjoying

1:23:43.320 --> 1:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>watching your bracket right now. I love it. Um I

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>got for the fourth grade week the mar Jackson or

1:23:51.120 --> 1:23:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Cameron the cat mutiny. Brian, are you gonna meet out again? No,

1:23:57.560 --> 1:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go l Jacks just because of the shoulder

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>injured or the shoulder concerns with Newton's there's something. Hi, Trevor,

1:24:04.920 --> 1:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>You're next, Standard League, Ivory or McGuire, a right, I'd

1:24:11.720 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>go McGuire, Yeah, I would do Jared that you are

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like uh standard league Coin or Howard against US Slackers

1:24:21.720 --> 1:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's standard. I would take Howard in a cold

1:24:25.320 --> 1:24:28.599
<v Speaker 1>weather Chicago game and let's see if he can get

1:24:28.600 --> 1:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>his way into the end zone. Bill, you're next on

1:24:30.800 --> 1:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the fan. Hey, fellows, we are not penalized for turnovers

1:24:34.960 --> 1:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston or Derek Carr. Not. Anytime you're talking about

1:24:40.080 --> 1:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston, you need to clarify it's Car in that matchup.

1:24:43.320 --> 1:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trust and Winston in Baltimore, even with no penalty.

1:24:48.080 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the upside here might be Winston, though, especially

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're not penalized for turnovers against the Ravens. Come on, upset,

1:24:55.760 --> 1:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Derek Car's got the Bengals upside fine, thank you. They

1:25:02.439 --> 1:25:04.559
<v Speaker 1>issued Patrick Mahomes in this Kansas game and he just

1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:09.719
<v Speaker 1>threw a touchdown. Stand that's amazing. Brent, you're next. Hey, guys,

1:25:09.800 --> 1:25:12.519
<v Speaker 1>hate to do this half point PPR. This is really ugly.

1:25:12.600 --> 1:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But Gus Edwards or Tony Michelle, Um, I'm really down

1:25:18.120 --> 1:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>on I'm really down at Edwards and I I think

1:25:20.720 --> 1:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Dixon is gonna is going to get the majority of

1:25:22.720 --> 1:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the work. But that's very speculative. This is just my

1:25:24.920 --> 1:25:27.719
<v Speaker 1>personal opinion brand, so I don't know that you should

1:25:28.000 --> 1:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily automatically do that. But if you're with me on this,

1:25:31.000 --> 1:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>then we're taking Sony Michelle. It's r Beloved Meat Sauce,

1:25:38.960 --> 1:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>two co workers, and Tonio Brown or Adam Steeling because

1:25:42.640 --> 1:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I need one of them to score more points, so

1:25:44.479 --> 1:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one of my co workers doesn't have to write a

1:25:46.160 --> 1:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven and a half bus right charges pointing at

1:25:51.400 --> 1:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>me because this is a conflict of interest. I think

1:25:53.920 --> 1:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right exactly, because I am concerned that Miami will

1:25:58.080 --> 1:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>struggle mightily to score points. I'm going on Brown in

1:26:00.680 --> 1:26:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the shootout meets us good luck Man, good Luck Sauce.

1:26:04.800 --> 1:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>No Saturdays with Sauceday or else would have just walked

1:26:06.960 --> 1:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>into the studio and asked his question Wild versus Calgary

1:26:10.360 --> 1:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up after this, Dan, thank you for calling back,

1:26:12.920 --> 1:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry again about hanging up on you. That's

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all right. I was going with the soft j Jordan

1:26:17.280 --> 1:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Howard or Elijah McGuire M half PPR. I think we're

1:26:24.160 --> 1:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go at the McGuire cat meal. Look what's happened.

1:26:28.600 --> 1:26:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Look what's happened? Thank you? This Hey, it will be forgotten,

1:26:33.240 --> 1:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>says no, that says this is not gonna stick. Jerry,

1:26:36.240 --> 1:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you're next, that McGuire, Jerry, Yeah, PPPR League, Austin Hooper

1:26:43.439 --> 1:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or Evan Ingram. Don't play Hooper, Yeah, don't play Ooper.

1:26:48.720 --> 1:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You might not even right. We'll go Evan Ingram here

1:26:51.120 --> 1:26:53.559
<v Speaker 1>and hope that without Odell they just throwed him that

1:26:53.640 --> 1:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>much more might be on. A good game might be,

1:26:56.720 --> 1:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but what a disaster season for a guy that I

1:26:58.680 --> 1:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thought was gonna be good. Yeah, I thought that injuries though,

1:27:04.439 --> 1:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think he'd be Monty ballgood. Chris your next,

1:27:08.320 --> 1:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Raapert Evan Ingram? All right, it's great. We gave him

1:27:12.720 --> 1:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the A grade. Gary, you're on the fan. Guys, I've

1:27:16.520 --> 1:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to call a hundred times in this last two hours.

1:27:19.200 --> 1:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Man enough you didn't get in that physic. I'm glad

1:27:21.680 --> 1:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you got through. Gary. Thank you for don't hang out

1:27:23.760 --> 1:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on him, Charch Yeah, don't hang out on Gary, and

1:27:25.880 --> 1:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>don't ask about three players. Yeah, don't blow it now.

1:27:28.840 --> 1:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a mail carrier. Don't make me go. Uh

1:27:34.520 --> 1:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>just a quarterback question. It's a big one. Hot Jah

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan or uh, Josh Allen says, guys, I don't

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>like him here you don't Nope, Yeah, and I've listened,

1:27:49.479 --> 1:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>listened to all week Charch, that's all you said. If

1:27:51.160 --> 1:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't like Matt Ryan all week, nervous you might

1:27:54.520 --> 1:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>die on the Josh Allen hill. That's the problem. I may,

1:27:58.080 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I may, Okay, Well, it's just I think if it's me,

1:28:00.920 --> 1:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Josh Allen. I don't know if it was

1:28:02.800 --> 1:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you got Shane, you're up? Uh, Samuels, I can start

1:28:07.400 --> 1:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>him a tight end or kittle cattle? How dare you? Yeah?

1:28:11.439 --> 1:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I agreed you can kittle. There should be a rule

1:28:14.520 --> 1:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can't ask about kittle on lightning ground. Pete

1:28:17.400 --> 1:28:23.559
<v Speaker 1>your next, Elsha and Jeffrey or Chris Gotlin Scotwin's got

1:28:23.600 --> 1:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a brutal matchup in Baltimore. Go to the wire man.

1:28:27.040 --> 1:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All of our take a chance on me, guys. All

1:28:29.000 --> 1:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of them are better. Churtis Samuel, who are you guys again?

1:28:32.479 --> 1:28:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson, Me Anderson and west Field? Over those Let's

1:28:39.000 --> 1:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>come on, Nick Foles regular collar taco. Hello, Hey guys,

1:28:44.560 --> 1:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Uh non ppr lock it or boyd? I got lock it? Uh?

1:28:50.560 --> 1:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you say it was non PPR, then unlock it.

1:28:52.880 --> 1:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>If it's PPR, then I would I'd go a different way, Megan,

1:28:56.040 --> 1:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>your next high Hi one point PPR? Do I do

1:28:59.640 --> 1:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>steel Ard digs Theling or Diggs? Is that is that

1:29:03.000 --> 1:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we asked full PPR? If Xavian Howard doesn't go, Diggs

1:29:06.840 --> 1:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as our guy against Tory mc tire, retire, retread. You

1:29:12.960 --> 1:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>pointed Brian on that. Brian, I think I think Howard's

1:29:17.280 --> 1:29:19.559
<v Speaker 1>not going to go. I would take Diggs. Stevie are

1:29:19.680 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>last caller today? Hey, half point PPR Aaron Jones or

1:29:24.360 --> 1:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of six H Jones. I'd still play Jones. Yeah,

1:29:29.160 --> 1:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more guaranteed volume even in a brutal match. Good luck

1:29:32.040 --> 1:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in the semifinals. Everybody, it's um you know it's Stewart.

1:29:36.960 --> 1:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I well, thank you, thank you for a great season.

1:29:40.040 --> 1:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Scott Fish will be in your place

1:29:41.960 --> 1:29:44.559
<v Speaker 1>for the big, the big final show of the year,

1:29:44.880 --> 1:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Championship Week, Week number sixteen. If you miss any part

1:29:47.760 --> 1:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of the show, check out the podcast cafe and fan

1:29:49.880 --> 1:29:53.679
<v Speaker 1>on demand Wild pregame coming up next. Bye bye, you're

1:29:53.720 --> 1:29:54.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to the fan