WEBVTT - Party Politics vs. The 2024 Presidential Race

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course party politics versus the twenty

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty four presidential race. Have voters, Politico's analysts, and the

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>media focused before with such intensity on a presidential race

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US more than a year before the actual vote. Perhaps,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm willing to say probably not. The reason why

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this race is so magnetic are overt Trump and trump

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Ism are in the air. Democracies on the table. Pivotal

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>policy issues are in play, reproductive rights, immigration, jobs in

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy, healthcare, public health and public safety, education, national security,

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law, and the funding and future shape

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of the federal government. Social media choose on all of this.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four to seven information and disinformation is ubiquitous, Ship

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is at a boiling point, and Democrats and Republicans are

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>maneuvering for position. It all matters. So spend some time

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>with me today and my guest, Peggy Collins, as we

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tee up all of this fear consideration. Peggy is the

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Bureau chief of Bloomberg News and a veteran national

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and local news reporter. She is a gifted editor and thinker,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and in a very shambolic world, she is a great

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>source of clarity. Welcome to crash course, Peggy.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me, Tim, So.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>To sort of get our arms around this, I thought

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we'd break up our discussion today into three big chunks,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at where the Democrats are situated, then looking at

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where the Republicans are situated, and then trying to do

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of tea leaf reading for what that

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>means in twenty twenty four is the race comes closer

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and closer to the finish line. And then how you,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>as a manager of a massive reporting process sort of

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>deploy your troops around all of that.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're trying to get our heads around that too,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>so it'll be helpful for me to think it through

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably circle back to you at midpoint sometime next

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>here so we can revisit all of this.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>That sounds great, So let's talk first.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>About the Democrats and Joe Biden and his stature as

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader. Obviously, like you know, the opinion polls have

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shown him as very weak, as not someone who'd be

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>coming into the selection with the kind of polling numbers

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that you would describe as wind at the back. It's

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>more like, you know, ball and chain around the ankle.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Talk a little bit about that and how where you

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>see him right now as a leader of his party.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a good question, Tim, because I think if

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>you ask a lot of people in the American public,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>what our reporting shows is that his age is one

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest liabilities. There's no doubt about that. It

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>comes up a lot. But if you talk to people

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 2>inside of Washington who are in his inner circle or

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>supportive of him, what we hear mostly is that they

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 2>point to the fact that he has actually passed or

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>been able to pass some really big legislation in his

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 2>first term as president. We look at the infrastructure bill.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>There's been so many administrations over the decades that haven't

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>actually been able to get a bipartisan infrastructure bill done

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>for the country, and he has. They'll point to two

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>other things. They'll also point to the IRA Bill that

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>he passed over last summer, where it's one of the

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 2>biggest investments in clean technology electric vehicles that we've seen,

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and that's really a tribute to the climate change efforts

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>that he has made, which a lot of young voters

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>consider one of their most important things that they're thinking

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of about the future of the country. And the third

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>is the Chips Act in terms of countering China and

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>national security and trying to bring more factories back to

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the US or near shoring with other countries. So if

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you think of those two to three legislative achievements, the

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Infrastructure Bill, IRA and the Chips Bill, Biden supporters will

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>say he's actually gotten a lot done, but the public

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>is looking more at okay, But we don't really feel

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that necessarily yet in our towns and our communities. And again,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>age is something that comes up a lot in our

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>reporting when it comes to President Biden, so.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can't bundle that a little bit. He

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>himself is surrounded by seniors on the hill of both

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>parties hill. Most likely it polls her to be believed

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be campaigning against another senior, Donald Trump. So it's not

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly like he's an old man surrounded by spring chickens.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But he also presents as having some acuity problems. He

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can be mush mouthed when he speaks, he can wander

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in his thinking. Although he's wandered in his thinking for

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>decades before he became an older American president. In addition

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to that, you know, it's sort of mysterious and interesting

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, this I guess messaging problem the Dems have

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you mentioned the IRA as a signature

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>legislative achievement. It's unfortunately named the Inflation Reduction Act, which

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they sort of set themselves up for criticism with that,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>given that inflation later like shot through the roof. But

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>putting inflation aside, it's cooled off since last year. The

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>metrics in the economy are good. The US economy is

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>robust compared to other Western industrialized economies. GDP is projected

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>derived more than two percent this year. Job and wage

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>growth have been strong, even with the inflation battle. Inflation

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is around three point seven percent. That's slightly above its

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.119
<v Speaker 1>historical average, but it's way below the eight percent plus

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that freaked everyone out last year. The FAT has jacked

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>up interest rates to deal with all of this. But

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, wage growth, job growth is high, but people

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>feel wary, and the Democrats are not getting credit for

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>an economy and all by most measures is doing very well.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you attribute that to? Is that sort of

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, human psychology, is it average folks still are

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing bread prices and gas prices and their basics going

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up in the food line helped me get unconfused on this.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you're right, Tim, I mean, the US

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 2>economy has a lot of good things going for and

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I was just talking to someone this week who actually

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>said it's been a bright spot not only for many

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 2>people in America, but for the world, you know, in

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>terms of economies around the world. But when you think

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>about what Americans are doing every day, driving cars, buying food,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>paying electricity bills, those have gone up for people and

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>they feel it. So when it comes to those daily

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 2>things that you're paying for or weekly or monthly bills,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>it feels like they've gone up and they've stayed there.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>So when economists are talking about inflation or the FED,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>or when we're covering it here at Bloomberg on a

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>monthly basis and we see the numbers going down, that

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't actually mean that people are seeing egg prices go

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>down in the grocery stores. It means that the rate

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that the prices are going up are not going up

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>as fast. That's the disconnect, right exactly.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And is there a way out here from a messaging standpoint,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>how does a party presiding of either side of the

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>aisle over a robust economy but not getting real credit

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for it. Is there a way to maneuver politically or

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>to message around that. Is it just a matter of

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>really just banging the and hoping for the best.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it is difficult, right. So what the

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration has really tried to do is lean in

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>on what they call Bidenomics. So they say, other people

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>call it Bidenomics, but they've really tried to lean into

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Bidenomics and say this is our economic policy, and our

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>economic policy has really helped not only keep your jobs

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and the job numbers up, but also is preparing us

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>for a future where we may have jobs that are

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>in future spaces like clean energy and tech and union

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>jobs that will set you up better for the future.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I do think there's this other theme in America

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that we've been reporting on a lot at Bloomberg, which

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>is when you're in the middle class. It's something that's

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>very quintessential to being American, but a lot of people

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in the middle class feel like it's getting harder and

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>harder to stay in the middle class or.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Move up because it is it is the middle class

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in years, has been fraying since the nineteen eighties. It's

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the central dynamics of our politics, I think,

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is how both parties respond to that, in good faith

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and in bad faith.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>And another key factor there tim which you've probably heard

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>of a lot from the people you talk to, is

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>housing affordability, because we cover it at Bloomberg in a

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of different ways. We cover it in terms of

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how many people have the ability to move

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>from a renter to a home, but also how much

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>private equity and other businesses have gone into the real

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>estate market and changed the structure of in America, particularly

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>since the financial crisis in two thousand and eight two

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>When one of those underpinnings of the American dream, the

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>idea that you could own your own home, came under

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>assault then and it's only gotten.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Harder, right exactly. And you know, this whole idea of

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the renters and homeowners is something that we really do

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 2>see changing in America. I mean, rent costs went up

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot in the last few years when we've been

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about inflation. That's one of the big drivers of

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 2>those inflation numbers being so high, and that is something

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that structurally has changed in America and is something that

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>policymakers are dealing with and that no matter who wins

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the pre residential race in November twenty twenty four, will

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So as the Democrats try to figure out how to

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>wrestle their way out of the economics messaging conundrum, they

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do have some other issues that suggest from voting patterns

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that they do have some wind at their back. One

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of the big ones, and it'll be an interesting one,

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, are reproductive rights. The Supreme Court in the

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs decision overturned Roe v.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Wade.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That certainly was a factor I think in the midterm

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>elections in twenty twenty two. It's undoubtedly going to be

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>an electoral issue in twenty twenty four. And some interesting

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>things have been happening in states where you would think

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>red states have actually come out to protect women's rights

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to access reproductive healthcare and abortions as needed. Kansas famously.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you see that playing out as an issue

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats in twenty twenty four, Well.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I definitely think it's going to be one of the

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>issues that they are going to lean into and we're

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot of reporting a bloomberg right now not

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>only on people's feelings about the economy and inflation, but

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>does that matter more than something like the decision on

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Row And as you were saying, Tim, there are a

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>number of cultural societal issues, civil rights issues that people

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>are looking at in this race, and that at the

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>end of the day may matter even more than the economy.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>That remains to be seen, but it is going to

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>be something that we're going to be tracking because there

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>have been so many huge decisions made at the Supreme

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Court level, not only Roe, but affirmative Action and then

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the student loan decision, So there are some signature things

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that have changed in the country since twenty twenty.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>And on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights, it obviously

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>resonates very powerfully for female voters, and they are an

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>all important voting block in swing states and in the

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of big cities in swing states. So that's going

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a very interesting phenomenon to watch play out

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how that decision lights up the electorate in those important

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>swing states.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and it is also an issue that Republicans

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Republican can dates are having to decide in

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>their own states and also in the presidential election where

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>they stand on it, because there's differences between the different

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Republican candidates in terms of where they fall not only

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>on row but on reproductive rights. So I think that's

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>another place where we're going to be watching how that

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>resonates for voters in different states around America.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I often think of foreign policy as a weak tea

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to winning the allegiance of voters. You know,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we elites, or we academics, or we observers, we journalists

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to foreign affairs in a way that the

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>average voter doesn't. But I do think the Biden administration

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has conducted a fairly exemplary policy in bobbing and weaving

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>out of how to support Ukraine in the wake of

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion and building coalitions in Europe, realigning Visa

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>v China in East Asia. I don't know that that'll

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have any meaning politically, but I do think it does

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>adhere to the idea of adult governance in a complim world.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I certainly think you're right on that, and I think

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>China is a big issue in this presidential race. There

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>may not be as many voters who really glom onto

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the specifics of foreign policy and foreign policy stances like

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, But I do think China is a

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>big issue for a lot of American voters in terms

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of how do we stay competitive so that we're able

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to keep our jobs or keep our communities growing and robust.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>So that is something that the Biden administration is really

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 2>trying to make a signature part of their campaign, pointing

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to things like the Chips Act and ways that they're

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to bring factories back to America into towns. It

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>will be interesting to see, though, if people actually see

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the impact of that by the time we get to

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>November twenty twenty four, right. I mean, it's not easy

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>to build the factory in six months, So that's one

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of the issues. And then the other that you mentioned

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 2>on the Ukraine Russia War. It certainly changed so much

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>over the past couple of years, and we are seeing

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>them Washington some support starting to wane for spending the

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>type of money and providing the type of aid to

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine that we did in the past. So that is

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be something that we're going to have to

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>watch really closely.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I mentioned in referencing how the Biden foreign

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>policy has been conducted as being adult or mature. Where

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>does this idea of sort of adult management of the

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>federal government reside with voters? You know, coming out of

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the confusion and chaos and attempts to sort of torch

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the constitution during the Trump era. Biden is old, but

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he surrounded himself with a competent team. They've tried to

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>execute in a rational way against clearheaded policies. Does that

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>matter to voters or does emotion always win the day?

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is the cult around the far right of trump Ism

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and then just standard Republican political allegiances, Does that sort

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of emotional affiliation win the day over demonstrable proofs of

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just you have your hands on the steering wheel and

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the car is staying in its lane.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think for a lot of voters, the car

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>staying in its lane is very important. That feeling of

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>stability was something that we saw in the twenty twenty

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>election be very important in terms that people wanted a

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>bit more common stability in the country. I will say though,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that there are a lot of people and the candidates

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>on the Republican side are talking about this a lot

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>who are thinking about how much we're spending as a

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>government and whether or not that is the amount that

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>we should be. So I think the Republicans are touching

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>on a nerve there when you talk about government spending

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>versus what the states are spending, and I think on

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>either side of the aisle, people are very frustrated by

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the lack of or the perception of the lack of

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>things getting done at all in Washington, let alone efficiently.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And well, yeah, we'll come back to that a little

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>bit later when we talk about the threat of apostible

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>government shutdown. But while we're focused right now on the Democrats,

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the issues that weigh against them.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The one of the ones that just seems stark ast

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to me as immigration. The Trump administration came under a

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of fire for how it conducted both governance of

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the border and the management of migrants and families and children. Famously,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump tried to build a wall. Famously, I feel like

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration hasn't really tackled that problem, and we're

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the ramifications of that with migrants coming

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>into cities and federal work rules don't make it easy

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for migrants to get a job so they can pay

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for their own food in housing, so the taxpayer ends

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>up having to pick up the tab for housing and food.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>That's become a flashpoint in a lot of places. There's

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>been cynicism around how some of the migrants got to

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the cities. Obviously then bus there courtesy of Greg Abbott

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and his constituents in Texas. But be that as it may,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of clarity of vision or of

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>political and policy purpose from the Dems around how to

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>deal with immigration in a holistic way.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. I think you've seen that going

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>back many administrations. Though I will say that on both

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat and Republican side that this has been an

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>that the country has grappled with and not been able

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to find a comprehensive solution for. And we're seeing cities

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>really start to break under the strain of it. I

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>mean it's New York, Chicago, Boston, as well as cities

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>on the border and in Florida and in California. So

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it is becoming a national issue that people are seeing

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 2>on television, they're seeing when they walk around their cities

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and towns, and it is such a human issue too.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I do think we have to remember that.

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>What I think is one of the things that the

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration has really struggled on is the fact that

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>they did try about a year ago to talk a

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 2>lot about their Latin American policy and how they could

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>try to address the root of the problem in terms

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 2>of unrest in some of the countries there.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>That is forcing migrants north exactly, local corruption, poverty, all

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that are making families for good reason try

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to come north to the US to a safe Harvard exactly.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's real, but that also is a big problem

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of, well, how do you solve that? And

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>they have been trying to to encourage more private investment

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 2>and deal with some of the countries in Latin America,

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>but that's been very difficult and we haven't seen a

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of signs of improvement there, so I think their

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 2>ability to message how much improvement they're making on that

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>front is limited. And then I think the other issue

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>is that Biden really does need Congress to help to

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>pass some legislation that would make some big changes around immigration,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're pretty realistic from our reporting that there's not

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hope there that that's going to get

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>done before the November twenty twenty four election.

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, cities that are struggling to house and support

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>migrants have also struggled in the COVID era around public safety,

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's been a big flashpoint as well. Some of

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the crime statistics have been sensationalized. Actually, the homicide rate

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>has come down sharply in recent months and even over

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the last year, but I still think there's a public

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>perception that street crime is rampant in many of our

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>big cities, and in some places shoplifting and looting of

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>stores has been ran and that tends to be a

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>local issue. Most presidents are hostage to governors and mayors

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>around that issue, but it is probably something I think

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are going to continue to try to hang around

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden's neck. How do you think of that playing out

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four as an issue.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it will be a big issue, and I

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>think to your point, Tim, it will be one that

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>they do try to put at the feet of Biden.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the issue of crime will be a big

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>one because again, it relates to people in their towns

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and cities all across America, and I do want to

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 2>make sure that we do separate the immigration issue and

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 2>migrant issue from crime, although oftentimes it is conflated. But

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 2>as you said, the number of times we hear or

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 2>see on TV instances of shop limiting and stores, or

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 2>just a number of cars that are being stolen, and

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 2>we have Bloomberg have reported about the uptick in cars

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>being stolen. That's again it goes back to things like inflation.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>When people can see it in their own towns or

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>hear their own friends talk about, Oh, someone broken to

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 2>my car and stole my car, my car, keys or whatnot,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>that's very relatable and much easier to shift the thinking

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>of people on well, who's going to lead us out

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 2>of this situation. I do also think again, the pandemic

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 2>has changed a lot of people's lives in America, and

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>we are still trying to recover from them, work.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Through all of the kind of existential and unusual challenges

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that presented that may well have been temporary exactly.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 2>And the number of people who got thrown out of

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>the job market in March April May of twenty twenty

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and who are still rebuilding their lives. I mean there's

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of people who never went back into

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the job market after the pandemic, and there are others

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that started a whole new kind of career or business

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 2>or whatnot. But there's so much fluidity still in our economy,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>so many people who moved around, and I think we're

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>still settling from all of it.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the last policy issues I wanted to focus

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on before we take a break is healthcare. I don't

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>know entirely how to think about where the Biden administration

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is with this, other than healthcare is still a massively

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>unaffordable thing for too many Americans. Insurance is prohibitively expensive.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there is an economic consequence of workers who

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't get proper healthcare, families who can't deliver health

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>care to their children so their children can grow up

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and be educated, productive members of society. It feels to

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me like it should be a tent pole policy issue

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>that we figured out. There's some measures around there the

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has taken to deal with that, most recently

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>empowering medicare to negotiate with big pharma companies around drug prices.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And yet the roles of the uninsured are growing again.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people being dropped off of state

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance roles in large numbers four million recently, it may

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>grow to as much as ten million next year. Where

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>will healthcare reside for voters when they think about whether

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>or not the Biden administration has helped them solve some

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of the most basic problems.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, Tim, you just talked about the Medicare and drug pricing.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>That is another one of the signature achievements that the

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration will point to, and they're hoping that another

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 2>big voting block and important voting block that being seniors,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to feel that and credit them for it.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>The issue, though, again, is it's not necessarily something so tangible.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Same is what we're talking about with infrastructure, where you

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>can see a building in your town and credit it

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to Biden. The likelihood that that's going to happen between

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 2>now and November twenty twenty four, even though they pass

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the infrastructure bill, is low, and the number of people

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 2>who may see their drug prices go down and instantly

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>credit Biden with it, I think is also kind of

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 2>going to be a challenge for the Biden camp to

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 2>keep reminding people of that if nothing else but healthcare

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is one of the issues in this country that on

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the aisle people do think needs improvement.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Let alone is broken, maybe depending on who you talk too.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>So I do think it's going to be an issue,

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's going to be one of those bubbling issues

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to boiling.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>On that note, we're going to take a quick break

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear from one of our sponsors and then we'll

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>come right back. We're back with Peggy Collins, Washington bureau

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>chief for Bloomberg News, and we're focusing on the battle

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for the White House in twenty twenty four, and we've

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>been talking about the Democrats, so let's turn to the GOP.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We began talking to the Democrats about its leadership, centering

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that discussion initially around Joe Biden. Thinking about where the

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>leadership is right now for the GOP, to me, is

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a more complex project. You have Mitch McConnell, you have

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin McCarthy, you obviously have Donald Trump, and you have

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a fractious and fractured party. When you think about leadership

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the GOP going into twenty twenty four, what resonates with.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>You, Well, certainly a lot of our reporting is showing

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that the party still see for President Trump as one

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 2>of its key leaders, in the sense that he's directing

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 2>the way some of the party is not only going,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>but what they're doing on certain policy issues. But Kevin

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>McCarthy has really could.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I stop you for one second, because I'm curious about this.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>When we say that the party sees Trump as its leader,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we know that in primaries it's the most passionate voters

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in both parties who come out and vote in primaries.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>That also tends to be the same population of people

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>who respond to poles. And I wonder to the extent

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when we see these polling numbers for Trump where he's

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>double digits ahead of everyone else, well ahead of Ronda Santis,

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>who's now fallen behind the vek Ramaswami and Nikki Haley

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Christy. Are those polls really reflective of the

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>party or are they reflective of the most passionate members

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of the party who have an affinity for Donald Trump.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we've seen time and time again that

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>polls haven't been right, so I think it's right to

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>have a question mark over them. I do think you're right, Tim,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that a lot of what we're hearing

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>right now, and where people are taking the temperature is

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>around the most passionate early primary voters, who you would

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>think are likely to go for Trump. However, I will say,

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>because of his messaging and because of his power potentially

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 2>with those primary voters, Trump is still having a lot

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>of sway in terms of where Republicans dodge or weave

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>or go.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I cut you off to focus on that when you

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>were about to say something that I'm sure was interesting

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>about Kevin McCarthy. So let's go back to that.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to say that Kevin McCarthy has

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>had a number of moments this year where people might

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>have expected he couldn't get something done, and he did actually,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's because his party is so fractured right now.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>He is really trying to corral some very passionate groups

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 2>of people within his party that are on pretty different

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 2>sides of issues in many cases. But we did see

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 2>him pull it out in the debt ceiling debate. I mean,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.120
<v Speaker 2>they took us up right to the last minute, working

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 2>through Memorial Day weekend, but he was able to bring

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 2>them together and get a consensus. We're starting to see

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>some of that build somewhat right now as we head

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>into the government shutdown, But he's got a very thin

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 2>line to walk because they are able to oust him

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>as a speaker much more easily now than for speakers

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in the past.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And if he wants to get legislation passed on a

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican line vote, he can only afford to lose. For Republicans, right.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 2>It's razor thin. And if you flip that for the

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in Biden, it's the same for them. And right

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>now it's so difficult to get anything passed in Washington

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>because you're really counting on a handful of people to

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 2>come with you or not.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as we speak right now, they are

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of looking at getting appropriations bills through

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and getting a deal done to keep the government open.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And McCarthy I think had a choice between either tilting

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>towards moderate Democrats who wanted to work with him and

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>negotiate on a compromise bill, or going to his right

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Maga folks who sort of held him hostage for

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>his speakership and gave him a bill of particular surrounding

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>how he had to conduct himself as speaker. That left

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>him I think a little hamstrung, and he's made a

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>choice at least right now as we speak, that he's

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going to tilt right and try to get this done. There.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I sort of wonder if he can't, if he's fatally wounded,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and if his constituency on the right, in the Republican

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Party in the House feels like he hasn't met their expectations,

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that they'll just happily pull the rug out and I'll

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have nowhere else to lean on because he's blown everyone

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>else off.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the one risk to that, and that

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>all of the Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 2>right now when it comes to the government shutdown, that

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 2>this again is something that's very relatable for the American people.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, hey, you need to keep the doors open,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the bill's paid, and so I think there's a risk

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 2>for everyone in Congress right now if you're going to

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>be the person who's going to basically shut the government down,

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 2>and then we have people who aren't able to go

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 2>to work, we have natural parks that aren't open, we

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 2>have checks that don't go out that people are expecting.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a risk on this one, like

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>there was with the debt ceiling, that if you're the

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>one standing in the way of getting something reasonable done

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that most people in their lives would think is a

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>part of your normal job, that you might not go

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>right off the cliff.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, when was the last time we couldn't

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>get a bipartisan defense spending bill pass? That seemed extraordinary

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is a sign of how fractured not only

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, Washington and Republican and Democrats are, but as

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, Tim like the fractures within the Republican

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 2>party itself.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that is interesting to me about this

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>era we're in, and I think it's one of the

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lessons of trump Ism, is that Trump campaigned on emotion,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>not on policy. I think he sensationalized race and anti

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>institutionalism to incent a certain population of the voters, and

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that has sort of captured the party's imagination. There's an

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>utter lack of policy prescriptions. To the time, the Republicans

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>rolled into the twenty twenty Republican Convention with no platform

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and sort of happily said, yes, that's by design. It

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an accident. We just don't have a platform. How

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? Is this the shape of

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>political battles now, is that it's by design not going

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to have policy prescriptions, and it's by design going to

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>appeal to people's emotions and in some cases some of

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>their worst instincts.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think emotions are easier to push buttons on right,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 2>love and fear and all of those. And I also

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 2>think in the age of social media, it's a lot

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>easier to hit people with emotions faster and on the

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>fly and on their phone. So I think there's that.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I also think policy is very difficult, Like we've already

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>talked about some really really hard problems, like solving immigration

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 2>is a big problem for not only cities, but for

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 2>our relations with other countries. So I think sometimes tapping

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>into emotions is just an easier route than trying to

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>really figure out how we want to deal with trade

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>with China or how to deal with AI and coming

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>up with a US policy on what we do with

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence. So that I do think is one of

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the reasons why it's easier to tap people's emotions.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, it's not a good hallmark for

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a mature, well functioning society when you tackle emotions and

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't tackle problems. Well.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. One of the things that we

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 2>do elect people for is to actually help us solve

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>some problems that cut across states and cities and counties,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and that is what people are hoping people in office

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>will do well.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's our conundrums human beings is we want policy solutions,

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but we tend to vote with our hearts.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and we tend to vote for people who like,

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>we relate to, or we like or things like that.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's human as well.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Ron DeSantis' candidacy has been interesting to me because he

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>was built up as someone who could be Trump in

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a better fitting suit and be an ambassador for some

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he did as governor in Florida

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that might get national traction. And then he really came

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the gates with this anti woke platform. You

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>know that your schools, the educational agenda was being taken

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>over by liberals and by woke people and people of color,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and that wokeism was this poison spread acast America. It

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just didn't get any traction. It might have sold in Florida,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't work for him nationally. And he's got

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>any number of oddities about him as a candidate that

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think hold him back. People discount how authentically charismatic

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is. It's not easy just to repackage yourself

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>as Donald Trump. I was just wondering what you thought

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>about DeSantis stumbling and these other candidates, some who are

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>also expressly sort of Trump wannabes like Ramaswami, others who

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are expressly Trump critics like Chris Christi, and then others

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of trying to figure out the middle road between

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>those like Nikki Haley. How does that sort out in

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the second tier of sort of people galloping behind Donald Trump.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think a couple of things you touched on there.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So Ronda sat had a really big night the midterm elections,

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think a lot of that actually had to

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>do with his COVID policies, you know, more so than

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe some of the cultural issues he then started to

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 2>turn to. I think a lot of our reporting has

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>shown that people in the business community and on Wall

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Street had wished he had stayed more in the lane

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 2>or focusing on the policies that he has enacted in Florida,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>not only maybe around COVID, but in terms of tax

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>policy and things about crime and schools in Florida, so

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of staying on those issues, but instead he really

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 2>did kind of go into the farther right cultural issues.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Tried to chase Disney out of the state of Florida right,

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>major employer and taxpayer right.

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's another sign of where the Republican Party is shifting.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, decades ago, the Republican Party was very pro business,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and that's a shift now. Some voters really do gravitate

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to DeSantis because of his policies around Disney, but others

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in the business community find that counterproductive to what they're

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>looking for, which is really lower taxes or policies that

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 2>help business. So I think that's the Desanta side of things.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>We talked about foreign policy earlier, but one of the

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>breakout moments for candidate Nikki Haley in the first Republican

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>debate was actually her handling of the questions around foreign policy,

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and her strength on that showed through on the stage.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think this second Republican debate on September twenty

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>seventh will be a real moment to see if people

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>like Haley, who made some traction in the first debate,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>can add more momentum to their campaign.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And Trump has said he's not going to be at

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this debate and stead he's going to speak to the

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>United Auto Workers union. That's interesting because Trump has always

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>positive in himself as a friend of the working American,

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>even if he's pursued policies that actually haven't resulted in

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>tangible benefits for working class people. Can he just sort

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of skate by the debate processes. He's sort of floating

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on that both the traction he has with a meaningful, say,

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of Republican voters, and his own celebrity, that

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't need to show up at any of

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these debates.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So far, it seems like that's right. I mean, he

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>skipped the first debate. He had counterprogramming on social media

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>where he was interviewed by Tucker Carlson, and it really

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem to dent him in any meaningful way. If anything,

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it really made the ground shift between the other Republican

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.239
<v Speaker 2>candidates more because they weren't really fighting him, they had

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>to kind of dig in with each other. I will

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>say that it's quite interesting that Trump's going to show

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 2>up in Detroit on the same day that the other

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>GOP candidates are in California. To your point, him, he

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 2>really has made a lot of strides with blue collar

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 2>workers and particularly union workers, which are historically more aligned

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 2>with the Democrats. And it's really interesting because President Biden

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>has made himself potentially the biggest pro union president of

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>our time. So seeing whether or not Trump is going

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to be able to resonate with union workers in a

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 2>swing state like Michigan is going to be a real

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>sign of how he could do next year.

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Which was a move Ronald Reagan perfected back with the teamsters.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Certain candidates have effectively done this out of the GOP

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the past.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I do think the issue of the union workers and

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 2>the autoworkers in Michigan also has some tension built into

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 2>it for Biden because there's not too much he can

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>do in terms of pulling levers to make this happen

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.479
<v Speaker 2>for the UAW workers. But also it's wrapped up in

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 2>some of the policies that Biden has been promoting, which

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>is he's very pro union and pro worker, but at

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the same time, some of his IRA money has been

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 2>pushing towards electric vehicles and pushing the car industry in

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>that direction, which has some of the workers there saying like,

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>we want to make sure we have protections as we

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>move into some of these type of futuristic jobs.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, some of that spending has been in right

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to work states, red states that are non unionized, and

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden is in this kind of where on the one hand,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he I think rightly sees climate change as an existential

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>threat and is trying to use the force of the

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>federal budget and federal policy to address that by supporting

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the development of electric vehicles, which is a good national

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>goal in my mind. At the same time, the unions

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and the auto workers, who have not seen wage increases

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully in decades, are agitating for that and are understandably

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>fearful of that kind of change. And Biden has to

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>decide where does he come down to what's the solemnic

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>solution to having these worthy goals and a constituency that

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>wants him to act in a certain way. And I

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think one of the tests for his leadership is what

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>limb will he walk out on? Because he's got to

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>walk out on one of them. I think at some

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>point he can't have it both.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Ways, And how do you message that right in a

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>clear and succinct way to people that make them understand

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that you're fighting for them, but you're also looking ahead

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 2>to the future, right.

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there have been you know, famously Lyndon Johnson

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.240
<v Speaker 1>after the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>got pushed through in the early nineteen sixties, his advisors

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.439
<v Speaker 1>in the White House said Democrats have lost the South

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>forever because of this, and Johnson famously said, well, then

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>what's a presidency for that. Sometimes you have to risk

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>your presidency to get on the right side of a

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>good legislation. And I don't know that Biden is there yet.

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is about McCarthy too. You know,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy hungered for the speakership and now he's right in

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle in this government shutdown negotiation. He's gonna have

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>to pick some size just to get political handiwork done,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and he may not be able to appease both. And

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear to me yet that he has the

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of backbone to drive in there and make a

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of leadership decision like that.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 2>But the interesting thing, Tim, I think is that when

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 2>you think about leaders over time, that people do often

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>gravitate to the leaders that are willing to ultimately make

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 2>a hard decision because they kind of understand that. Well,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 2>at least they thought about what I said, and then

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 2>ultimately they made a decision. But they're driving us towards something.

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Indecision by a leader is sometimes the worst kiss of death. Exactly.

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're going to take another break. I could just

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>keep going right past these breaks with you, but we're

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>going to take a break and then we'll come back

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and pick this discussion up again. I'm back with Peggy Collins,

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington Bureau chief of Bloomberg News, and we're talking politics.

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about the Democrats and the Republicans, Peggy, so

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how they'll actually face off in twenty

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. You know, we left off talking about where

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are situated. Donald Trump has four criminal indictments

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting on his doorstep. It hasn't pulled him down on

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the polls. It appears that loyalists don't care if he

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>breaks the law, even if he gets convicted of it.

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's unlikely to be a factor at this point. Though.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the trials play out, if some of

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 1>these come into a courtroom, Georgia will be televised. These

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>things tend to have an impact people can't anticipate once

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the public starts paying attention. It happened with the January

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth hearings. It's a wild card with the indictment. Still,

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, do you think there are vulnerabilities or around

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>his candidacy that Democrats haven't exploited yet?

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that what they're waiting to see, as

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you said, Tim, is the intersection of the two. So

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump has definitely made a strategic move to tie his

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>legal battles and his campaign very closely. He hasn't tried

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to like shed one for the other. Instead, he's really

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 2>intertwined them and kind of said to voters, you know

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that he feels the legal cases are unjust and as

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>part of an effort to obstruct his ability to win

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 2>for president again. But as you said, will the Biden

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>administration and the Biden campaign, as we get closer to

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 2>the time that Trump has to step into a courtroom

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 2>be able to really tie the two for voters in

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 2>terms of democracy and that theme and really hit on that.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 2>We saw the Biden administration and Biden himself make a

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 2>big speech right before the November midterms where he really

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 2>honed in on this is an election about democray. Will

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 2>he be able to do that at key times next

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 2>year if Trump is still the front runner that it

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>really resonates for people if they're seeing Trump in a

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 2>courtroom on TV related to January sixth.

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>So take me to task if I'm being too reductionists

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in this next question. But I'm thinking about six swing

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>states Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia. Will twenty

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four come down to where voters in those six

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>states decide to place their votes.

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're definitely looking at those states, and we've been

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 2>sending reporters there all year already to talk to things

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 2>about how they feel about the economy and a lot

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of the other issues in the campaign. I will say

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>we've also got our eyes on a few other states

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 2>as well. A lot of people moved during the pandemic

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and brought their votes with them. We're looking at states

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>like North Carolina as well. Virginia is also an interesting

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 2>state Colorado. But the states that you just mentioned, those

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>six key swing states that in twenty twenty were swing,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 2>are certainly going to be interesting. A couple of signs

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of why we saw the first Republican Debate placed in Milwaukee,

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Convention next summer in Milwaukee. So the Ross

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Belt for Biden and for Trump is going to be

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 2>huge again. And then the midterms, and in many ways

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, you know, Georgia was absolutely crucial. So those

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>are places where we're really trying to get a sense

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of what people care about most and how that will

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 2>influence their vote.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting factor in this next election could be at

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>third party movement No Labels. They call themselves No Labels.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not very transparent that crew about how they're funded

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>or who's behind it. They are asserting that they're an

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>authentically independent, nonpartisan movement that just wants to give voters

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>another option. No Labels critics say they're actually just a spoiler,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're in there to strip independence away from Biden

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and then make it easier for Trump, who's a weaker

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>national candidate than he is as a primary candidate, to

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 1>make it easier for him to win at the national level.

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about No Labels at this point?

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it much ado about nothing or are they going

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a factor.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I think what we've been hearing most about No Labels

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 2>divides into two camps. One when you think about the

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 2>business community, even some on Wall Street, they're a bit

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 2>intrigued and you know, looking at it because they think

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that the no Labels camp is voicing some of that

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 2>more pro business tax policy, moderate Republican policy stance that

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 2>some of them are gravitating for and don't see in

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the field right now. And then on the Democratic side,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 2>as you were saying to him, most of what we

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 2>hear is this concern that any type of third party

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 2>or even another Democrat right against Biden could really dent

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to him enough with independent voters that it could make

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the difference.

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>So in an environment like this, like, how do you

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think about deploying your artillery and spreading them out? Like

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what are priorities for you as you're managing both the

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>way you task your reporters and the kind of information

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or themes you want them to bring back home to

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>your readers.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, one of the most important things I've been saying

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.959
<v Speaker 2>in the newsroom here in DC is that we want

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we can credibly say to people

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 2>next summer, next fall, in twenty twenty four that Bloomberg

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>has been out in the different states around the country

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk to people on the ground really about how

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 2>they feel about the economy, what they think about the

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 2>people who are running for office, not just drop in

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 2>from New York or DC in October twenty twenty four.

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 2>We want to hear from them now and stay in

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 2>touch with them. So another big theme for us is

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the economy. How much will the

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 2>economy matter? Because this is a place where Bloomberg really shines.

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of people who are really knowledgeable

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 2>about the economy, about inflation, about trade, about the FED,

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and we can really add some value, I think, in

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that space to really delineate how people feel about the

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 2>economy and whether or not it is actually ultimately the

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 2>factor that drives people's vote. And I think the third

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>thing we're really looking at is this shift in industrial

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 2>policy because of the Biden administration's legislative wins. Does it

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 2>actually resonate in different places around the country that they

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 2>have been able to put some money into new factories,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 2>new jobs, clean energy, or does it end up not

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 2>either coming to communities in time for the election, or

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 2>they don't get credit for it and it doesn't end

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 2>up mattering.

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I always think of good politics as bread

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and butter issues like jobs, education, and healthcare. Elections come

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and go, but there's been a fairly steady readout from

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>voters for decades that those are the things. They want

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>food on the table, they want a better future for

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>their kids, they want a roof over their head. And

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>then there's a lot of other issues that we all

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about, but they're not as central to most voters. Thinking,

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you've watched a number of elections at this point over

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the years, what is there about this election that's different

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for you, distinctly different from other elections that you've watched

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and participated in.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that's going to be

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 2>most distinctly different from twenty twenty because you know, twenty

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty was the year of the pandemic, but we are

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly coming out of it now hopefully and settling in

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 2>as the effect of that, he's almost like coming out

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of a war, right, How does that actually change what

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 2>people want with their lives from their country, where they live,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and how they think the future or what the future

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 2>should look like. So I do think that's one of

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the biggest macro issues that will come out of this election,

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 2>but it's going to be almost impossible to really pin

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 2>down into people go into the voting box.

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I always like to end the show by asking my

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>esteem to guess what they've learned, And I'm wondering, what

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have you learned since twenty twenty about the landscape that

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you observe.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's so interesting, Tim because when I think about

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, we had all these grand plans going into now,

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 2>which we're trying again at this time to really roll out,

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 2>like I was saying to you, really getting reporters out

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 2>into different states around the country. We're really focusing on

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the middle class and trying to talk to people in

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the middle class and gather data about them so that

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 2>when we get to November twenty twenty four, we're really

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.760
<v Speaker 2>able to add value to the public by talking about

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.240
<v Speaker 2>issues and showing that we talk to people over time.

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 2>But the grand plans that we had going into twenty

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty and how to cover that election were completely updended

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 2>by the pandemic. So one of the things that it

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 2>taught me as a journalist is to keep reminding yourself

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 2>to expect the unexpected. That we really don't know what's

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 2>going to happen between now and November twenty twenty four.

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So many things will change, but one thing I'm almost

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 2>certain of is things are going to happen that nobody expects,

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and so our job as journalists is just to keep

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 2>doing the best that we can to tell people as

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 2>many of the facts as we can get.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I could talk to you for hours more. Will you

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>promise to come back on again?

0:45:57.600 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>I would love that.

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Peggy Collin is the Washington Bureau chief of Bloomberg News.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You can find her on Twitter at mk m Collins.

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Here at crash Course, we believe that collisions can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising,

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and always instructive. In today's Crash Course, I was reminded that,

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much we want to think that voters

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>focus on issues and policy when they go to the polls,

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes they're driven by emotion as much as anything else.

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 1>What did you learn? We'd love to hear from you.

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You can tweet at the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or me at Tim O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course.

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>right now and please leave us a review. It helps

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more people find the show. This episode was produced by

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the indispensable Ana ma asurakas Moses on Dom and Me.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks this week to Michael Falero. Our supervising producer

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is Magnus Hendrickson, and we had editing help from Sagebauman,

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Katie Boyce, Jeff Grocott, Mike Neitze and Christine Vanden Bilard

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Blake Maples does our sound engineering and our original theme

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>song was composed by Luis Garra. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be back next week with another crash Course