WEBVTT - A 'Cheat Code' for the Bond Market

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up a Weekly markets podcast.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan, I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Emily Graffeo, across asset reporter at Bloomberg, filling

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in for Build on a Rich and this week on

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the show. Well, if you wanted to pick a single

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>day of market action to serve as a microcosm for

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole year, we got it. This week, stocks, bonds,

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and currency markets all had a collective freak out over

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this stubbornly high inflation. This after August consumer price index

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>came in a bit hotter than economists had expected, but

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it really highlighted what a tricky year it's been for

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>balanced portfolios that invest in both stocks and bonds. So

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how are managers of those funds dealing with this year's turbulence.

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into with with a fund manager with a

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>balance fund who's beating his benchmark pretty nicely this year.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>But first, Emily, I gotta say thank you for filling

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in for Vildonna, who's off again this week. Even though

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going to cause even more anxiety for Valdonna herself,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Yeah, no problem, you'd think, you know,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>she would go on that vacation and she would be

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>more relaxed. But I'm not sure if that is the case.

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll work on it. But the only rule you have

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to know, Emily, the only ground rule for a co

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>host is you have to laugh enthusiastically at my jokes,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>which I will absolutely and because I will add you

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to my professional network on LinkedIn. Yes, yes, finally, finally,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>because I gotta say Vldonna is not very good at

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that requiremental laughing at my jokes. I think it's a

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, she eats nothing but califlower. I think it's

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's a protein deficiency or some kind of vitamin deficiency.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That that's the story I'm going with. Yeah, yeah, too

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>many chickpeas, not enough meat. But one next, she's great

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at and she has a great journalist, and she's great

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>at finding excellent guests for this podcast, including this week.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>She brought this week's guests on and then abandon us.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But um, we're very excited to have them. Money tell

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>tell the listeners who this week's guest is. So today

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show, we have George Cippolini, and he is

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio manager of Pen mutual asset Management, and he

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>also co leads the management of the balanced income strategy

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at the firm. So, George, welcome to the show. And

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>most exciting is you're a Philly guys. So the most

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>important first question is you gotta give us your cheese

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>steak place. What's your what's your favorite cheesesteake place? Okay,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to give a little bit of a

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>nuanced answer if that's okay. It's definitely not Pats and Gino's,

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>which a lot about out of town or tend to like,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>um loved love John's Rose Pork, which again in the

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>name it says rose pork and not cheese steaks. But

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they make a great cheese steak. But the best sandwich

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in Philly, if anyone wants to go, it's in the

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>writing Terminal market and you go to the Nicks and

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you get a brisket of beef sandwich. It's outrageous, it's

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>even I mean, I think it's better than a Energies steak.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>That's my crest. I'll accept that answer. Actually, I you know,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I've heard about that place for years and I don't

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever actually had The next roast beef. But good,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's some good, solid research, Philly research right there, Emily,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy knows what he's talking about. Yeah, that sounds

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that sounds delicious. I think we'll have to have another

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>episode where we just talk about brisket and yes, yes, absolutely,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But George, why don't you start us off and talk

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your current role um and your

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>background and how you got to you know, where you

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are today at Pen Mutual. Sure, absolutely so a little

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different path than I think most portfolio

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>managers in terms of getting to where I am today

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>at Pen Mutual, which we're at a great place and

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we're grateful to be here. But but I grew up

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>doing concrete work with my family in Philadelphia. UM, at

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>around nineteen years old. I didn't take my S A

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>T S. I didn't do any of that good stuff,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>no plans to go to college. Then I met my wife,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>who's from South Philadelphians, pretty strong willed, and and she said,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go to college, and so I did.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I listened and um, and you know, it was a

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>great path for me, who ended up going to uh

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>A junior college, transferred over to Drexel University, worked on

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the floor of the Philly Stock Exchange back in the

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>late nineties. So um, really the the inception of my

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>career was very much impactful to me, as it is

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to most young people in terms of I got to

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>see an incredible boom in terms of the tech bubble

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and then a bust after and so that really was

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the inception of my career, which kind of led me

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to fortune. Fortunately to a small little investment shop called

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Killing Group in Berwin, p A. It was at

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>break even at the time. We got no bosses our

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>first few years in the business um, but but eventually

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we grew this small little income fund called the Berwin

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Income Fund from about forty fifty million in assets all

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the way up to two and a half billion in

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>assets u at at peak. And what we did was

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a little different. We were a little off the beaten

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>beaten path in terms of our strategy. We were a

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>small firm with twelve people, so we were very independent minded,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>very long term focus, traditional value investors. And what we

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>did was our director of research, Leader Out, had this

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>great investment process and I just kind of took it

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>um from what he did on the equity side and

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>applied it to the world of income and the fixed

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>income and the high owned bonds and investment grade bonds

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and preferred stocks and convertible bonds, and the process really worked.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a strategy that's differentiated in terms of

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we are very flexible. We can invest across market caps,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>we can invest across the company's capital structure, and with

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the sole goal really of just adding value within this universe.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't want we don't want necessarily the highest building securities.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We want the companies with and securities with the best

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>balance of risk and reward. Um in terms of that

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>uh um, you know that whole direction. So that's a

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>little quick and dirty. I ended up at Pen Mutual

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just just a few years ago. Um, you know, we

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sold our firm, the Killing Group, And and after taking

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>some time off, I wanted to stay in the business

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and keep doing this because it really is a passion

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and I just felt like I could. I

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>still had some uh some guests in the tank, and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and and wanted to contribute somewhere And was fortunate enough

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to join Peen Mutual, with which has you know, a

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>great staff of over thirty people on the investment team.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>They have a ton of resources manage over thirty billion

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in assets, the bulk of that being the insurance assets,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and then the resources again from a marketing and support

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>standpoint to start a new fund like like like our products.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>So I balanced income. So just really grateful to be

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>back in it. And uh, we have a two year

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>track record now and so far, so good. We're we're

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very highly ranked at the moment in

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of our morning Star category. And as you both mentioned,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>came right back into some really incredible and at concredible

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>times and his dark times for sure. That that's a

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>great backstory, George. You know, I'm glad you listen to

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>your wife. You know, I's all when friends get married.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I say. The key too's a successful marriage is you

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>have to start off with the assumption the wife is

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>always right. You get you gotta listen to her. That

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't talked to many people who worked on the

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Philly Stock Exchange. That's interesting too. What were you like

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a specialist market maker? So I also worked at a

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>specialist post for for Susquehanna, which and Mike, let me

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you something. You talk about experience, so you know,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and there is as a you know, young teenager, early twenties.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And and in the morning we had math class. We

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>went to work and they paid for a lunch which

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was awesome, breakfast in lunch Susquehanna is a great shop.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And then um, and right afterward we would go play poker.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, if you if you just think about

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, risk rewarding, game theory and math and just

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the application of all that on a daily basis, that

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>really stimulated my interest because before that I didn't know

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>much about investing at all. And um, but that really

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>stimulated my interest in the markets. Uh, my interest especially

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in risk and reward and the behavior of the markets,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think is something that's overlooked and maybe a

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>topic we can discuss later. But yeah, it really wasn't

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a great start. And and to your point, always listened

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to your wife, well talking about market behavior, George, what

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a what a crazy week? Um, But what I think

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is funny, you know. I one of the columns I

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>edit is, uh, this guy Cameron Christ he writes a

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>column called Macroman. He actually took off for a week

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and he came back to work the day after the

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>CPI numbers. You know, throw everything upside down, and you know,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>his column was about, like, what did I miss? You know,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the the equity markets actually exactly where it was before

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I left. Yields are exactly where they were, you know,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>because you had that, you had like this five percent

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>run up in the SMP five like in the four

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>days before to see p I report on Tuesday. So

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how big of a game changer you think

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it was. Um, despite this this massive autility we saw afterwards,

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>has that much much changed And you're thinking about, you know,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's reaction function for the rest of this cycle.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So I I think it did my get. And here's

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>why I usually don't like short term data points. I

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>really like long term data points. But I will say,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>within the context of this week, the market was very

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>much geared up. And I don't I don't mean just

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, the stock market, as you mentioned, but

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>also the bond market, even in the preferred market with

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>longer duration securities. People were making significant bets that the

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>CPI number was going to come in late and and

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED was going to back off. And if you

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think about really, for most of this year, the market

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has been waiting for the FED to pivot they've been

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting for Poal to give in. And I'm just going

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to say this one thing, and I think I sent

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it to you earlier, and I keep pointing to it.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>There was an exchange when when Pal gave testimony to

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and Senator Shelby asked him directly, directly back, then,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is your leadership prepared to do what it takes to

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>get inflation under control and protect price stability? And Pal

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>gave a very respectful nod to Vulgar and then he said,

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope history will record that the answer to your

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>question is yes, but the key thing is shall be

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pressed on And he said, are you prepared to do

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what it takes? And Pals gave a little more of

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a sheepish yes, but he did say yes. And I

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think really that's where the line of the line in

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the sand was and and kind of the part where

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the market is kind of missing in terms of the

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>expectation that was from March and it's already September. I mean,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this has been six months now, the market wanting a

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>pivot and they're not getting it. So I think to

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>your point, in the short term, that really was how

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the market was positioned Over the last month, credit spreads

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rallied a little bit tightened up, and the stock market rallied,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why they really want any indication

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that the FED can kind of shift course. George, I

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like all of this talk of are we going

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a FED pivot are we not? Has inflation peaked.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's led to a lot of near term volatility. But

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the big themes for this year is probably

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be that bonds have done so poorly, So

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>where are you looking for that income? Is it still

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in any part of bonds? Is it dividend stocks? Are

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you looking at cash? Yeah? And and so this is

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a great point. And and our perspective, I

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>think is a good one, not because we are brilliant

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>investors by any stretch, but because we have this flexible

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>approach and we are allowed to increase cash and we

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to wait it out. Last year, as as

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets rallied, our cash balance grew and grew up

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to over and so at the end of two thousand

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and one we had in cash over cash. And the

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>reason was there wasn't a lot of value there. Credit

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>spreads to Titan stock market had gripped um and and

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there just wasn't a lot. So so fortunately we were

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>able to We we believe in liquidity. The liquidity is

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like oxygen for us, and when we have it, you know,

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we feel like feel great, I feel like we can breathe.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And we did well last year. I mean, we were

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up the most ten percent, you know, not in the

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>nine percent range, and that was a great ranking in

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>our in our category to last year. So it's not

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like we missed out on much. So when the volatility

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kicked in for the most part this year, we had

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>liquidity available. And yes, to your point, around the June

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>time frame when things really blew out from a spread standpoint,

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we did put some money to work and I'd like

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk you know, and I'm sure we'll talk about

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>what we bought, uh specifically, not specific names, been in general,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but just to your point that this market is very,

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>very different. So the last eight times that the SMP

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>was down in a calendar year, bonds finished up and

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so it cushioned the blow for everybody, and it was,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, diversifier, and we haven't had that to share,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>as you well know. And now bonds are down a

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lot and and this could be the worst year in

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>recent history for sure, maybe in many many decades that

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that bonds have been down this much, and that's really different.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So that correlation rising between stocks and bonds and the

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>down market was something that we didn't know that that

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>would happen. And that's not why we went to cash.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But we were glad that we had the cash. And again,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>bonds were so overpriced if you look back now and

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the yields you can get today

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>versus just six months ago. So we're glad that we

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>had that flexible process. Yeah, that's a pretty high cash level.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Said now, George, I'm famous around here for asking like

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve part questions. So so I got bad news for you.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I got one coming for you. Do you have like

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>an assistant who can take notes notes on this question?

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I can do it on my own assistant. Let's go,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But I I'll make it easy for you. I'm just

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'll just monologue a little bit like here, like

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a villain in a movie, and then you you tell

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>me where I'm where I'm wrong, and and what your

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>reaction is to what I'm gonna say. Because I'm kind

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of fascinated you know, as you say you you're fund

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go your strategy, UH can go as much

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as equities. Looking on your website, you're in a little

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>less than thirty percent as of the end of June.

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So not quite bullish on equities, it would seem, um,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but while fifty one point seven percent in high yield

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit um And to me, I think that's fascinating.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a lot of credit guyes on the

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>show as much as we should, so I want to

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of unpack what the credit markets are signaling right

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>now because um, you know, for equity investors, they often

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the high yield market especially it's sort of

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that canary in the coal mine. You know, spreads started

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>blowing out before the market top in oh seven, They started,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, creeping higher before the dot com UH bust

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand. I'm looking this year and at least

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>according our index UH, you know, the spread on high

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.239
<v Speaker 1>yield UH corporates right now, according in the Bloomberg indexes,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like four hundred and fifty basis points.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And for listeners who don't know what that means, that's

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>basically just the the extra yield on high old bonds

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to treasuries. So so, George, to me, that doesn't

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>seem like a canary in the coal mine screaming recession

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just yet. You know, the spreads are why a lot

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wider than where they started the year, but they were

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>very tight to start the year. So I'm curious, just

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a you know, what are the spreads telling

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you as far as like a macro signal about a

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>recession that that investors in other asset classes, uh should

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>should be thinking about. But also, you know, the last

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>time spreads blew out, it was it was mostly that

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>energy sector, uh, that was the driver of that. So

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is that is that signal from the credit markets you

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think broken? Since energy companies um are a big component

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of high yield what they're they're doing really well these days. Wow.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Excellent question. Many points, and they're all court discussing for sure.

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So so number one, real quick, I think it is

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a little misleading when we look at our high

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>yield exposure in our strategy. And and the only reason

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>why I'll say that is that we generally tend to

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on double being single B security, so we really

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't delve too far down in the triple seas and

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know higher of high yield. The second thing

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is our duration is a lot shorter than many of

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the benchmarks. And then the third there is a little

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cheat code in the in the bond market,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and a great way to add value, especially

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in these types of markets, and so checodes where I

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have a fourteen year old son, so I might throw

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>out some like chicoads words or made like they have

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>all this yeah yeah, yeah exactly and so so so

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the cheat code in the bond market for me and

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for our strategy is, look, you can find companies, so

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so working you limit risk or working you lower risk

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in a high yield security, Well, you can find certain

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller securities because we're we're a small fund at the moment,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and we can buy these smaller securities, um smaller issues,

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can find companies that more cash than debt

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on the balance sheet. That is the ch code. So

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when I go to bed at night, I'm not worried

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>about the great majority of the high yield quote unquote

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds and our portfolio going bankrupt. I'm not really taking

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge bet. I'm getting paid for that extra credit spread.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not making a huge bet like the economy

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>has to do well. I literally can go to sleep

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at night and I know, for example, that the great

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of our bonds are going to get paid off

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because because the cash is already on the balance sheet,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they're managed by companies that are free cash flow positive

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and manage my management teams that have a great track

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>record of capital allocation. And so that's the ultimate margin

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of safety for us. And the good thing there is

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know, as Ben Graham said, the purpose of

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the margin of safety is to render the forecast unnecessary,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't have to project inflation rates or

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>where the where interest rates are going, or what the

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>economy is going to do. If you focus on that

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>company being able to pay off that piece of debt again,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you have you eliminate a lot of other concerns. So

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the cheat codes that we use and

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways that we've had value over the

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>past twenty years of managing this type of strategy. To

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your point, yes, credit credit spreads are absolutely a signal.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something we should all watch out for. I'll give

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you two schools of thought here. Number one, credit spreads

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>or wider they should be. Uh. The economic situation, broadly

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking from an earning standpoint is a lot more uncertain

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>today than it's been in a long time, and so

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>credit spreads should be wider now. The flip side of

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that argument is that interest rates were so low for

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so long that many or most companies were able to

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>refi it really really low rates, and they extended their debt.

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>That balances out. That's good in the near term, so

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect to see default rates kick up a

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>lot in the immediate near term. That said, there are

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of zombie companies, companies that cannot cover their

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>interest expense through operating earnings or EVA don that's that

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to me again means that you really need to be

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a good like I would never buy high yield broadly.

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't look I'm biased, right, I'm an active manager.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't buy a high yield e t F for

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the sole purpose of I don't trust all the companies

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>that are in the e t F. I trust this

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>company instead of that company. So that's my view, and

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we can ferret out and find value

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in that context. Um, but that's just two schools of thought, yes,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I still think credit spreads are very important indicator. Energy

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is a big part in near point going back to

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>fourteen fifteen sixteen, they blew up a lot of the

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>energy credits and went bankrupt and and and that's honestly

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>been one of the reasons why why that sector has

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of stayed so cheap, given how well they've performed

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>um this year. So those were just my thoughts on

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>those topics. So it's give maybe to dig in further.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Let me know I I did. I also want to

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ask you, you know when and I know you said,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you're not gonna go out on a

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>limb and try to predict inflation or pick the path

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of interest rates. But fingers crossed. I think we all

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of hope that maybe the peaks in

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for inflation at least and if if you're looking out

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>over five ten years, you know, uh again fingers crossed.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But boy, you gotta assume inflation, inflation is gonna come down,

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are gonna come down with it. So does

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this type of moment in time make you, um, sort

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of bullish on on longer maturities, you know, especially with

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>new issues. If if you can lock in a really

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>attractive rate for you know, twelve fifteen years. You know,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>does it change your thinking on maturities at all when

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when yields are this high, it's it certainly should so.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So the way we view it is, obviously we're getting

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>paid a lot more now than we were just and

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>full of months ago for just about every flavor of

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of income, which is which is great. I think Intel's

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>dividend just hit five percent today. For example, Um, if

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at short rates, money market rates are going

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>to pay about four percent soon. And you know, so

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you you look at the two year you name

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it across the board. So so to your point, like, yes,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>longer duration. Now, the thing with longer duration bonds is

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that the YO curve is flattening, so those rates are

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>not up as much as shorter term rates. Um. So

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we factor into as well. So the

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>way I look at it is what can I get

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for how much risk do I have to assume for

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of income? And now if I can

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>get four or five or six percent from a two

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>year convertible bond that's busted, that has a great balance sheet,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, that really might be my my bar. So

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>so my low end bar or my my my. The

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>basis for our fund is really okay, what can I

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get for free? And for free? It's not everyone's definition

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of free. This is a typical Philly guy. By the way, Emily,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this is how Philly guys think. Who's got the free

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>who's got the free fries with the cheese steak or

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the free drink. I I know exactly where he's coming from.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Their budget friendly. I like that. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, And

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you met my father, you would certainly understand

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he still has his lunch money from grade school, you know.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's the context. Seriously, though, it's funny because

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think about this a lot, like this is actually

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good point. So I grew up really close

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with my grandparents. I would go to do concrete work

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>with my grandfather. I'd go home, I have dinner with

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>my parents and my grandparents. And my grandmom was so

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>stigmatized and her whole family was by the Great Depression,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and that that really left the mark, Like you did

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>not waste a piece of food in the half like

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that was like, you know, that was immortal sin. And

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I would have to go to confession if I didn't

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>need all my dinner. You know, my dad had a big,

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>big beer belly, and he used to he passed away,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but he used to called out his savings account. You know,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what he's going to live live off off if

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>things got lean. But you're right, he never never left

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a single crumb on a on a plate ever. No, absolutely,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And so so you wonder like why you think a

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>certain way or you know why your behavior or why

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your decision making processes a certain way. And that, honestly

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what was was a big part of it. That's why

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>my bias is what it is. So so I'm constantly

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for for what can I get without taking any risk?

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I start with really good balance sheets and

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and and we really focus in on that for this

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>product of course, and um, and again we're what can

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I where can I get the most amount of risk?

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>If a two year bond from a convertible, you know

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a convertible security is going to give me four

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or five and I have up the upside that convertible,

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that optionality that a convertible bond gives us. Wow, I

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>would much rather have that risk reward A semest asymmetrically

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>positive risk reward profile versus you know, maybe a dollar

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>preferred that shielding five and equivalent yield. But to your point, yes,

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point it will make sense to go a

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>little longer. And we found certain securities. Okay, one more

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>cheat coats. I got one more cheat coats. Words. So

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>when you look at so we we tend to only

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>buy bonds that are trading at a discount, which is weird,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but if you think about it makes a lot of sense.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So when bonds were overvalued, we weren't paying one ten.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We just wouldn't do it. So what we do is

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>wait until they become discounted. Now to your point, Michael,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the long bonds are trading at sixty seventy

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar. For companies there are with outrageous

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets, outrageous balance sheets, good balance sheets that you

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>know the one I can't tell you the name, but

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the company is fourteen billion in cash with less than

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>two billion in death. And sure I'll go along in

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that name because I know that that balance sheet is

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>rock solid and and and the yields great. And then

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the cheat code is if you can find um bonds

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or we only buy bonds. We tried only buy bonds

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that have change of control provisions in the indenture and

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in the perspectives and the covenants. And if

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you do that, and let's just say that company gets

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bought out, you're getting one oh one on that bond.

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And so there's another way where you can add a

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of value. And you may only have one of

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>those every couple of years or five years maybe. But

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but again, the same thing with the convertible thing. If

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have a convert where the stock takes off

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and they do really well, I mean we've purchased some

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>bounds twenty five dollars and sold in the two fifty.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, so again we're looking at but we

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are to go back to the point of being cheap.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to pay for that obviously. We want

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to wait till the market gets busted. And it's pretty

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>busted at the moment. So that's how hopefully that helps

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of how we frame those types of

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions on the equity side. How are you thinking about

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>margin pressure as inflation remains hot. I feel like there's

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stories that I write about people talking

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>about how the Fed's reaction to hot inflation is going

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to hurt stock prices. But what about earnings? Is that

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the next shoot at fall for Yeah, and a great, great,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>great question. And I'll tell you why, because you know,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if you think of what we just went through, and

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>so so if we just ask ourselves, why is this

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>environment so difficult? Why is it so different? Well, we

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>go through COVID, and you know, if you think about

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how much money the government pumped into the pumped into

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and how much liquidity and how easy the

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 1>FED was over that period, it obscured a lot of

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the traditional data. And I think that's that's part of

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem now, is that you really cannot separate the

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>FEDS bailing out of the market over the last twenty

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>years versus you know, the surge and the money supply

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>over the last since COVID and the result. So let's

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about the result first. The result was earnings went crazy.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Sales sales went nuts for for most companies. And if

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the you know, if you

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>look at your d S four screen on Bloomberg, just

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to get Bloomberg a little plug you and see the

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter over, Yeah, you can give that. You can see

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the quarter of well, we'll allow that, George will allow

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg plug. Okay, cool, cool, awesome. Um. So, so

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>you can see the year over a year, quarter of

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarter results and you see these spectacular numbers in

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one. The problem now is that is

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that sustainable? And my question, my argument, and to answer

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>your question, is that a lot of it is not

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so so on so what we've seen so far in

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of decline was almost all pe declined so far.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem, the problematic thing about the market is if

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that he declines from here, which I think there's a

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good chance for a lot of companies that will, and

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so that could lead to a longer period of either

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going sideways for going down. And I keep saying this

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>line over and over. I can see the ceiling clearly.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We can see peak earnings clearly, because it's there in

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one. What we can't see at the

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>moment is the floor. And that's partially the scary part

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>because to your point, margins are under pressure. If you

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>look at sales, sales had peaked and and now we're

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>coming off peak. So what does that mean? And so

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, a group of factors that lead

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>me to be concerned about the E at this point.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I think we are. And then just

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to take that one step further, everybody talks in aggregate

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about the E about the SMPS earnings, and we really

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't because we look at and you know, we look

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at company by company, and so we want companies that

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>have sustainable earnings. But if you strip out the energy

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sector from you know, last quarters earnings, last quarters earnings

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>were negative, d earnings growth was negative, sorry, darrings growth

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was negative, and and so you know, I think that's

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>really important you strip that out, if you tend if

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to strip out the Apples and Microsofts of

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, and you leave you know the other you know,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>four hundred plus companies. This earning season really was not

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that good. And I think that's that's you know, the

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>other part that the market is kind of kind of

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>resisting at the moment, you know, Church when I look

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at sort of the market reaction. Uh. Ever, since you know,

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst days of COVID even um, you know, and

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and coming into this year, we had this a few

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>months there where the value factor was just totally outperforming growth. UM.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Then it kind of reversed back, uh and and growth

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 1>started out performing value again. Now it's you know, I'm

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>guessing it's gonna swing back the other way now that

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation is less and longer than everyone expected. But to me,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at it from sort of

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand feet, I feel like investors are just craving

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to get back to that world they're familiar with, that

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that nice, juicy bull market between the financial crisis and

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID where you know, sure GDP growth wasn't rate, but

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates were low, uh and growth stocks were just

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the only game in town. I wonder if we're all

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in for reckoning that those days are aren't coming back,

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That we're in a whole new paradigm now. And it's

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a very uncomfortable situation to try to wrap your head around.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>How how are you thinking about that sort of reversion

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to normalcy? Um? You know, is it? Do you think

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll ever get back to that scenario where, you know,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the that decade of of just a roaring bullmarket and

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>low yields? Or are we are we stuck in a

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>new sort of secular environment here? Yeah, and and and

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this this is an important topic mainly because of again

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the last few years, So what

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>really drove it? You know, I tend to believe that

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the FED obviously say so if you think about Druck

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and Miller's combat regarding liquidity, that liquidity means everything. And

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't even believe necessarily that it's as important as earnings,

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to which I would kind of debate with him a

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But anyway, he's a much better investor than

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. But liquidity is if you can get him

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on the show, you can debate him, you can you. Yeah,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>he seems like maybe if we all from a cheese

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>steak or the Nix brisket of beef sand which we

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>can uh, we can get them down here. Um. But anyway,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so so so if you think about if you think

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about those periods, there's boom and bust and again, you know,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>start off my career in one. You know, we saw

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one in the housing bubble, and then we saw one

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>now and you know, the FED really played a pretty

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>big role and where they played the role as again

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the pea side, on the valuation side, excess liquidity

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>finds its way into the craziest of assets and we

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that. So we saw the cryptos rally

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and the spacks rally and the meme stocks rally. All

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of that, my opinion, was malinvestment that was caused by

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>excess liquidity. There was just too much money floating around,

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not enough good places to put it. And most of

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who are investing that those funds were the

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>first time invests or novice investors, and and it just

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>again that that's not healthy. So from my standpoint of

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>being this value investor with traditional philosophies, that was not

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that to me, that's the anomaly. That's that's the period.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the tech bubble, you know, and that's the tech

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>bubble that came back, and it will come back again.

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>To your point, it might take another twenty years. But yeah,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in terms of what growth investors are

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for, they anchored. So so the behavioral aspect, our

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>definition of that is anchoring and their anchor to a

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>point um or to a spot in the market that

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just is no longer there. And I think I say

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. We can't anchor, you know, take

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>into account new information and and you know, let's change

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>our decision, you know, change change your mind change or decision,

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's important for the market to understand.

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Today you can't anchor to that point because that's gone.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think again everybody wants a FED pivot, But

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that type of excess liquidity is going

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to enter the market anytime soon, not until we see

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>some more demand destruction, you know, maybe declines in earnings,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe some future declines in in in those stocks.

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And and you see investors obviously like Cathy Woods and

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk down, you know, they really want the

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>FED to kind of back off her and Elon Musk,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, they both have growth backgrounds. They

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>want to fed the pivot um to kind of give

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that fuel back into the growth stocks. But ultimately, I

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>think what this has done today is it's prioritized, it's moved,

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>its shifted the priority from liquidity down to earnings. And

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there's always that tuggle war there in my opinion, And

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so right now you're earnings better be good, and if not,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no safety net. Now there's no safety net of

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>liquidity that's gonna levitate your stock. At a certain level,

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>your stock will go down. And we're seeing it today

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of commodity companies that are starting to

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>pre announce um, you know, and I can mention because

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know it, but like New Corporate announced today

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern and Chemical yesterday dal Chemical, Like you're seeing

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies starting to report and starting starting

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to show this degradation and a and and so I

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's where we are. So to your point, Mike, no,

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we go right back. I think again,

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just people anchoring to a point that we're passed

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. And so what you want to own a

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>really good companies, really good balance, she's really good management teams,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of those companies only existed because of

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>access liquidity, and that's part of the problem. Well, George,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>regular listeners of this show will know that the one

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thing we anchor to around here is the crazy things

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw in markets. So I don't want to segue

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to that a little bit early because I gotta sneak

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>peek at your crazy things, and they really they really

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>speak to the uh, you know, the actually the important

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>things of the market, which uh these days are the

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy things. Funnily enough, so talk to us about the

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>craziest things you've seen in markets recently. Yeah, and I

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>think it really is just going back to to what

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned, you know, was I mean, I'm not

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sure if you why if you're on Twitter at all,

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but some of the absolutely crazy videos that we saw

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>from the crypto community, from you know, the meme stock community,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and just really you know, it's just just things that

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>were completely detached from reality. And I'm sure you've covered

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this over the past year, so this is definitely not

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a new topic. But yeah, I just think, you know, ultimately,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the craziest thing is is that, you know, the market

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>tends to not want to be realistic and and and

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>again they do want to anchor, and so stripping out

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>energy right now, you strip out make it make a

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 1>cap tech under the surface. You know, the earnings picture

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very important over the next few quarters.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's again where I think the market can be

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a little um, a little bit disappointed when they see

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of inflation, when they see the impacts of

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a strong dollar. You know, financial reality needs to step

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in and kind of tame the craziness in the market. Now,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>taming the craziness in the market probably means a decline

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which is not fun, but but we love it. I mean, honestly,

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>for for our strategy, we love volatility. We love when

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>things go down because that's when we can going to

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the free money that might be out there.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, all that sort of gets me back

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to the point about that that signal that comes from

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets sometimes you know where you'll see uh

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>spreads wide and aggressively long before the stock market peaks.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if there's something to be said that,

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in credit markets, you're only dealing with

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>professional investors. You don't have a bunch of kids on Reddit, teenagers,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, pumping up beame stocks and you know,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>at in general, just the the you know, retail investing

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>population in general, which is you know, less sophisticated, but

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten so much more influential over the years. Is

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that is that crazy talk to you to think that

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, there maybe the credit markets are a little

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>less crazy and and that's why that signal works. There's

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more sobriety. They're a little bit more

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of professional analysis. Uh that's driving things than say

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that the stock market, especially these days when the you know,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Reddit crowds are are running the show. I think

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair point. If if you met you know,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 1>my CopM scott ellis Greg Zapp and v met mark

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Up installed over a pen mutual you know, and and

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Jim Fonts and and and our team you know, these

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are these are traditional you know, bond guys and then

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>really good credit guys and and and they do a

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>really good job. They're very rational, very sensible, and and

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so just using them as an example, I would say absolutely,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of um, you know, running around

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know, screaming trading, nothing like that. It's it's

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty common environment and um and yeah, I think

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that. There there there is though,

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, just going back to it, you know,

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>there there will always be these peaks in troughs in

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of an interest in a given area. And I

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things specific with high yield to

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>your point, is that there was so much demand for

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>yield because there was none for a long period of time.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>So we've kind of broken that now now that we

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 1>see you know, get money market rates at four percent

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or seeing a cur yield curve that's looking at you know,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>three point seven five plus you know, throughout most of

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the curve, and and so again I think that mentality

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>should break a little bit in terms of UM. Again,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's available yield, so hopefully people won't have to be

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 1>as desperate. Because what happens is if you think about

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the psychology where you're like, well, I if you target

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a yield and say, look, I want to get five

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or six percent, and if you said that over the

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>last few years, the only way to get it was

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to extenderation or go down in credit quality, those were

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the only two ways you were taking. You were taking

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>more risk period. So you know so so but you know,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just going back to your point, yeah, credit spreads are

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>very important. I do think you know, the credit markets

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>uh tend to be a little more same, but they

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can get crazy too. I just think at this point, UM,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's definitely it's certainly not um you know the

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>same as the growth markets from west here. The relative

0:38:54.480 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>value of the craziness is uh. Alright, Emily. Then else

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to your real test as a professional financial journalist, Uh,

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you got to bring a good crazy thing to this

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>podcast to really gain some respect. So so what do

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you got for us? All Right? So this was something

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that I saw on Bloomberg News. It involves Elon Musk

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So his ex girlfriend. Um. I read this article a

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago. Ex girlfriend is selling off um

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>photos and memorabilia. This is his college ex girlfriend on

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>an online auction site. Mike, do we have time to

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>play a little bit of The price is correct? The

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>price it's precise, I believe. I think the price is precise.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that Alex prices correct anything, but price is right

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because that that's gonna get us. Uh, that's gonna get

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>me punched by Bob Barker. This is you. Not only

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>did you pass the test, I think you get a

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>percent because this is my crazy thing too. Oh my gosh.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh well though, I think I can beat you on

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices precise, but we gotta get George to Uh.

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which item you're going to with. Is

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it the birthday card? It is? It's the birthday card.

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's signed love Ellen um and this I guess it

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was the ex girlfriend in college. It was her birthday.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So all right, I did. I did do you one

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>better though, because I actually looked up the auction site

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and I found the actual live bidding on this uh

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on this particular item and it says happy birthday Jennifer

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a k A Boo boo love Elon. And I gotta say,

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if we were ever to have like a Crazy Thing

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame or a Crazy Thing museum, Elon Musk

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would get like his own wing of that of that

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely for this. So I think we just gotta stick

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>George with the prices correct here, George, what do you

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think that? What do you think the current bid is for?

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And Elon Musk signed birthday card to Boo Boo from college.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Elen, what's a you? Penn? So

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a Philly guy too. And Emily, you know what

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit you can play too, Emily, because I

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think you have a live bidding prices in front

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of it. I don't. I did not look it up,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so props to you, Mike. I can't cheat a week it.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>We're not allowed to sheet Okay, this guy always with

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the cheap code is another way you can tell he's

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from Philly? All right? Ten thousand dollars? Holy cow? Emily,

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>what's your bid? What's what do you think? Alive? Fit is?

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I gave I gave away my poker face there. Uh

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>so in the story the current bidding was at ten thousand,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So George, George is pretty ready And I did not cheat.

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I promise you I did not cheat. I actually real quick, though, Michael,

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I do have one. I didn't get like a really

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>crazy way. I didn't get the point even though I

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>listened to the show. But I got one for you

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>real quick, A right honor the Queen. The crown estate

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is estimated to be worth over thirty four point three

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>billion in assets now belongs to King Charles. He will

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.959
<v Speaker 1>not have to pay a diamond inheritance stacks. That's pretty cool. Usually,

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>isn't that crazy? Wow? That is nuts? Yeah, I mean

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's all that real estate I've read somewhere there,

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like the um the biggest landowner in Scotland for one thing,

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and all those castles even put a value on you know,

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the value of pose castles. So though I don't know,

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who's gonna who's gonna buy? You got

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a limited uh market for those Maybe on Musk would

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>buy one. But anyway, current bid and there's three hours,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine minutes left on this auction, Emily, in case

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to make a bid twelve thou and three

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the Elon Musk love letter. Emily. I don't

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>know much about your romantic life, but if, if, if

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you had any significant others from college, did you save

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>their their birthday cards? And yeah, I have some mementos. Well,

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still together, so I'll keep all the pictures of us.

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You better say that one day if he's the next

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, that'd be nice. Better. You gotta push him, Emily,

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you gotta push him, he'll be the next. That's fantastic. Well,

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that is all our time for the show. George.

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Great to catch up the Emily. It makes me homesick

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear George with that Philly accent. Is before you leave, though, George,

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta hear you say. When you go to the

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>fawcehead and you turn it on and you put a

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:48.760
<v Speaker 1>glass under it, what's coming out? Water? Water? Of course,

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>it's water. I know. You go, you go get water

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>out of the creek. And then George, if you wanna say,

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get a six pack of beer and you want to

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>keep it cold, and you've got an appliance in your kitchen,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you what's that appliance called bridge refrigerator A

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to say definitely refrigerator refrigerator. Yeah, no, you're saying

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it right, you're saying it right. Okay, Okay. Finally a guy. Finally,

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a guy on this show without an accent. Emily, where

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you got a supermarket? What's what's your favorite supermarket? Uh? Boy,

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>where are you going with this? Yeah? It's so funny

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>because when I first moved up to New York from

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Philly and uh years ago, um, my co workers are like,

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>are you from the South talking about accent? Right? Right?

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be from far away. Uh. Finally a

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>guest with the proper pronunciation of all the amquitant words.

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>George seppalone, is so great to catch up with you.

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for sharing your time with us and your insights.

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. Thank you both appreciate it. Thanks George

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Acromy achromy what goes up? We'll be back next week

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and so then you can find us on the Bloomberg

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Terminal website and app or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>We love it if you took the time to rate

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on Apple Podcasts, so more listeners

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>can find us and you can find us on Twitter,

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>follow me at Rea Anonymous, Well Donna hierarch Is at

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Bildonna Hirach. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at Podcasts.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Stacy Wang. Thanks for listening,

0:45:41.360 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>See you next time. B