WEBVTT - Amazon Prime Data and Grayscale's SEC Feud

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay i'me Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up the next hour. Early results

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>from third party shows Amazon's latest prime day not much

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>better than any other day, Amazon saying not so fast.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Our conversation with a prime executive is coming up. Plus

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Gray Scale collapse back at the SEC after rejecting a

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin e t F, I'll speak with CEO Michael Sonenshein

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about their legal challenge and ongoing friction between Gary Gensler

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and the crypto community. Plus Andrew Yang joins us to

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about the state of tech entrepreneur ship in a downturn,

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>plus his outlook for president Meantime, this week's Bloomberg Business

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Week cover story focuses on the roller coaster ride that

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>has been the Musk Twitter deal. Kurt Wagner writes that

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter, there are no good outcomes, no matter what

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>path a deal with Elan takes. Musk has publicly trashed

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's top management and alienated thousands of its employees. Vowed

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to slash rules that were put in place after misinformation

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>threatened election integrity and wants to make Twitter the everything app,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but hasn't really explained what that means. Here to discuss

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner. So the headline, Kurt is that Twitter

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>faces only bad outcomes if this still closes, why do

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you say so? Yeah? Well, remember, Emily, there's there's two

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>options here. One, uh, you know, the deal falls apart,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and this stock that has been sort of artificially inflated

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to crash um. Employees who have sent the

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>last six to nine months, you know, just in this

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>total state of certainty, are gonna have to pick up

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and pretend like, you know, nothing ever happened. Or if

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>if things go the way Twitter wants, then they get

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the guy in charge, who, you know, for the last

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>three months has been saying that Twitter has been lying

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about its user base and it's, uh, you know, it

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the right business model and all these things right,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's just sort of like it feels to me

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's not really a lot of good outcomes here. Now.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of fan mail after this story

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>came today, Emily for people who disagreed that they think

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the free speech uh kind of vision unmust

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps talking about is going to make Twitter a much

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>better place very shortly. But you know, even that, I

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>would probably argue is going to create a lot of

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>other headaches for for this platform very soon. Well, and look,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Musk does have millions and millions of fans, so that's

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly not you know, out of the question that you know,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>some folks are are going to be very happy if

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this deal gets done that side. You use the words

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>very shortly there, and I'm curious, say, say the deal

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>does get done before October, could Elon must make significant

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>changes to the platform before the midterm elections before November eight?

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the deal is supposed to close by, right,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and so to me that means that Elon Musk would

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be in charge, and therefore are they going to be

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>able to, you know, bring President Tromp back on the

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter within the next week like possibly it is possible.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But how much of an impact is that going to have?

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know, right, but I do think that

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>there could be changes to some of these policies. They

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>could say, Hey, all the folks who have been looking

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for misinformation or hate speech or voter misinformation, stand down,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>don't don't bother, don't do your job, and all of

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, we could have a very different

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>level of content on the platform very soon. What's the

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>latest negotiations between the two parties. What are they actually

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about right now? Yeah, I mean there has been

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that we have reported at Bloomberg that, you know,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that both sides want the same deal price,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there have been some hang ups, right is specifically that

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it sounds like Elon Musk wants to reserve

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>his right to possibly sue some of these executives, wants

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to deal closes to go after you know, maybe people

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of personally UM as a way to say, hey,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you've been misleading investors and misleading me, the potential buyer

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole time. Right. Twitter of course doesn't want to

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to have that in there. They're also worried about this

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>debt contingency that Ellen had to add to um, you know,

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations. So I imagine at this point both sides

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying to iron through those types of details, right,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they claim they want the same price. I

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think the debt is is for the most part locked

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>up and so you think, like, Okay, they're really at

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the end here where they're kind of going over those

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>those very minute elements of a deal. All right, Kurt Wagner,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for keeping us updated as always, and check out

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that story in the latest edition of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>This week's Amazon Prime flash sale may not be all

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it's chopped up to be. Third party researchers are saying

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Day sales generating the same traffic as any

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>regular day. Bloomberg's Had Ludlow asked Jamil Ghani, Amazon's head

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of Prime about the data. Here's how he responded, I

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's the accurate read. We've been really

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>impressed with how many Prime members are showing up, how

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>they're engaging with the event, and how they're shopping. They're

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>shopping the entire store. Some of the favorite categories so

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>far are electronics, toys, home apparel, health and personal care,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>top brands like Apple, lenej HP, Shark, and many many others,

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>including items off our curated top one hundred lists. So

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been really really happy with the event so far.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Our members can engage through midnight tonight, so I encourage

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>them to check it out. What is Amazon tracking to

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>do for this October window in dollar turns relative to July.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us some granularity about the impacts of

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>having a second window in the same calendar year. Yeah,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to keep in mind that Prime Day this

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>year was the largest Prime Day we've ever had, one

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars in savings for our members around

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the globe. And so what we're trying to do with

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this event is give our Prime members yet another opportunity

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, we know that our members are always looking

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for savings, but no more sort than now where you know,

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the macro economic environment um has everybody trying to make

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the dollar stretch a little bit further. And so this

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for forty eight hours for our members

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to get an exclusive jump on their holiday shopping, its

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>needs and wants across the entire store. And so far

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the engagement has been really strong. So it's too early

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell, but I expect that there will be deals

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>throughout the event. That's something that we learned in Prime

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Day that our members like top brands and they like

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>having deals throughout the entire event. You're going to continue

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to see that through midnight tonight. So this window will

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not be as big as the July window. It's too

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>early to tell, but we're very excited by the early

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>engagement um and it is the kickoff to uh the

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>entire holiday season. We're gonna have deals and discounts throughout

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire period. Black Friday Cyber Monday continue to be

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important, but we wanted to take care of our

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>most engaged, are most important customers first, those are our

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Prime members, and so this is the kickoff to the season.

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>That is interesting, right, the idea around the pool forward

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in holiday spending. He told me about how that might

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>help clear out some inventories ahead of the holiday season. Yeah,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this event is not about inventory. This we

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>built this event purpose built on the top brands that

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are members we know are looking for as they go

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>into the shopping season. And so this is an exclusive

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for eight hours for our Prime members to get a

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>jump on their holiday shopping, ensure that they get those

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>must have giftable items, get some of the holiday rush

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the way earlier in the season. But we're

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>going to continue the deals and discounts for all of

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>our customer including Prime members, going into Black Friday and

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Cyber Monday. You alluded to it earlier, but what are

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you learning about the consumer based on what they're buying.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems through third party data they might be going

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for this sort of cheaper ended the spectrum in terms

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of the items they're buying. Is there any sense that

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is feeling the pain of inflation. Well, I

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think all of us as Americans are feeling the pinch

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. Um, all of us want to stretch our

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar as far as we can. What we saw in

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day is that members engaged across all um sales prices,

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>from consumables and everyday essentials all the way up through

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the electronic devices. It's needs through wants, and that's why

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we built Prime Early Access sale to have the top

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>brands across the entire store so that members can meet

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>those needs and wants. We've got top brands in health

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and personal care all the way to toys, to home

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>apparel and electronics, which are you know, uh, clearly a

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>member ever every holiday season and so we're seeing the

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>same in engagement now. We expect that to continue over

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the next several hours through midnight tonight. Amazon's head of

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Prime there Jamil Ghani, with our own at Ludlow For

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>more on this, I want to bring in our Bloomberg

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>reporter Spencer, So we're who of course covers Amazon. So Spencer,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about a potential disparity here and what the

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>third party folks are saying and what Amazon is saying.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Just how good has this prime day actually been so far? Yeah?

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh, what we're hearing is that there's,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, slight lift from a usual day. Now we're

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>getting summer biased data from what we had earlier. You know,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some uh you know deep a deeper look slight lift

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>from from a typical day, but not nearly the same

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of lift as they had in the summer prime day.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that we're that far off. I mean,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if you listen carefully to what the Amazon executive says,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he uses words like shop, and he uses words like engagement,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and so he doesn't use words like by and he

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't use words like spend, you know, so so engagement

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can be just a cute way to say people. People

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming on the site, they're noodling around, they're looking

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at this, that and the other, but they're not really

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>buying a whole lot. So What does this tell us

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the consumer potentially more broadly leading

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>into the holidays, or doesn't tell us something more about Amazon? Well,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little of both, right. I Mean,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a secret that that consumers are pulling back,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're dealing with higher food and fuel prices, things

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that they have to buy and have less money you know,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to spend on things that they want to buy. And

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then on Amazon, we're learning like on these kind of things.

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of the top categories are like household essentials and

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>pantry items and things people just kind of spending the

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>stock up on things that otherwise buy and not necessarily

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>splurging on things like electronics and whatnot. But then in

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>terms of Amazon, is just they figured, hey, what the heck,

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>will do another sale? And it was interesting he said

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't about inventory when it What it is about inventory.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That's really why Amazon was able to spin this thing

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>up so quickly, is because a lot of merchants, you know,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the inventory is already there they have. Meantime, there's been

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>some developments in unionization efforts at an Amazon warehouse in California.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest on that. Yeah, this is pretty interesting

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch. So there's a one warehouse in Morino Valley

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Inland Empire, and that's a real stronghold for Amazon.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's probably where they where they've got the most

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>concentrated number of facilities and employees. And so one of

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them just submitted signatures to push for a union election

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>affiliated with this Amazon labor union, which was the one

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that uh, you know, one approval for union in in

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Saten Island, which Amazon is still contesting. And now there's

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>another vote coming up next week in Albany, again affiliate

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with this Amazon labor union. So starting to look like

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing's spreading and and and Amazon is having a

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>hard time containing it all right. Sponsor Soaper who covers

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon for us, thank you. Coming up weeks after the

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>massive Adobe figmdial, the other hot enterprise software startup has

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>some news. Air Table CEO Howe lou is with us next.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, the collaboration software startup. Air Table just

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>announced its biggest launch of the year at its inaugural

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>air Table Leaders Forum, coming up with a new connected

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>apps platform that will help companies like Netflix, linked In,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and i heart Media share data, manage workflows, track product

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>roadmaps and more. Co founder and CEO, Howelu with me

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>now for more on this, So, you know, talk to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>us about the trends that you're seeing an enterprise software

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and why an announcement like this in your mind is important,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Like what problems does this solve? I mean, I think

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's best to explain it in terms of where we

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>came from and where we're going. So ten years ago,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Marke and Reeson said software is eating the world. We

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>created air Table really to kind of execute against that

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and empower the team's closest to the work in every

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>company to be part of that disruption, to build the

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>apps for themselves that they needed. Now we've seen this

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem within enterprises where it's not enough to just

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have individual apps, but those apps need to be connected

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and to allow the entire enterprise to all share a

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>source of truth while enabling all those individual teams to

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>still be really, really flexible and agile. So it's kind

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of the next frontier of air Table, you know, combining

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what we've already done literally in these connected apps across

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>an enterprise. Air Table benefited from some of those pandemic

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>tail winds, the shift to hybrid work has that kept up?

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What sort of workplace trends are you seeing now? I

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of what we're seeing now is that

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there is this huge need to rethink how work is

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being done right, especially in today's economy. It's not just

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about throwing more people at every problem. You can't just

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, double your your head count and every department

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to get more output. You need to rethink how efficiently

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you work. And that's where I think our our enterprise

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>vision of connected apps is really going to come into plan.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It's already showing up. And how we sell our table,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>how we're seeing our our customers adopt air table. It's

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>really about enabling more agility and more output. Um. You know,

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this this customer case study during our

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>event earlier today of Equinox actually accelerating their content production

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>efforts by four with the same team and during a

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>pandemic where they were all working from home, nonetheless using

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>air table and connected apps. How do you see competition

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>shaping up? There's a Sauna, Monday, dot Com others that

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are vying to be the project management tool of choice.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>What is air tables advantage? Yeah, I think the whole

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>idea behind declaring our north star as connected apps is

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're actually elevating ourselves out of that world of

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>project management. We actually don't really care as much about

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the task management small team use cases that I think

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other products are are going after,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and instead we're really trying to solve this bigger problem

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>across an entire enterprise where you need these shared sources

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of truth, these high value golden data sets as we

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>call them. You know, for instance, Netflix having this this

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>master list of all the content titles they're producing and

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>then wanting to manage all of their marketing, their post production,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>their legal rights management, etcetera. Workflows across that data set. UM.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really you know, us going out and

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>taking on more companies like service Now or even Salesforce

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with their app cloud efforts. UM. When we think about

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>going and deploying apps across every other part of the enterprise,

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not just doing projects or tasks. I think some people

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are still recovering from the shock of the big Adobe

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Figma deal twenty billion dollars, and I just I'm dying

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear your thoughts on it. Given that air table

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few you know hot enterprise software

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>startups that's often mentioned in the same breath as Figma.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on this deal. I think Figma is

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>an incredible product company, has a great team. Um you know,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they started around the same time as us, so weirdly

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been parallel. I think we both started around both

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>spent years building a pretty technically interesting product before launching.

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>These were not products air Table nor Figma that were

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>built overnight as a hack project, but really a deliberate

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>taking on of a really, really large market opportunity. I

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately the trend that's really benefited both of us

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is that for the first time on the web, when

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>both of us started, you could build these really rich

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>desktop grade experiences, right Sigma could not have been built.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't build that level of experience in the web,

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>nor could you build air Table in the web. And

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think we're both bright place right time to

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>take on really large market opportunities and disrupting some incumbents

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>as a result. Is getting acquired like that something that's

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>attractive to you. Are you on the I P O path? Instead?

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the best companies have to think about

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>how to build an independent business, right I mean, when

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at Figma, one of the reasons why it

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was so attractive as a business and why it's valued

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so much in this steal is because actually they could

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>go to Long alone. They have the leverage. I mean,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's growing very quickly, it's an amazing business, there's

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a massive tam and it's truly a disruptive and delightful product,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>right And so I think if you can go out

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and build a company that is truly capable of being

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a star in a star independent business on the I

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>P O path, then I think that also raises your attractiveness,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in this case for Figma, through M and a deal.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So we've always been squarely focused on just building the

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>best product and ultimately business and company that we can

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're not optimizing foreign acquisition. So we've

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>seen valuations of tech startups fall across the board. You

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>raised at an almost twelve billion dollar valuation at the

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>end of last year. Does that number hold up in

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a downturn or is air table in the rare category

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of startups like Figma potentially where that number potentially goes up.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>So the way I've always thought about it is the

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>short term valuation is just it's a point in time.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And what really matters for both us as team members

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>working on this company, for shareholders who may consider investing

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in our table is what is the long term expected

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>value of this business? And especially since we're private and

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a public liquid value right now, what

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do we think this company will be worth in one year,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>two year, or three years, And especially as the operators

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>within the business, what can we do to drive towards

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the best possible result? And so I think as we

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>push into connected apps and this bigger and bigger possibility,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, solving a problem for enterprises at large um

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>actually generating you know, multimillion dollar contracts repeatedly. Uh and

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>even you know, driving up are already best in class

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>left dollar retention. I think we feel very good about

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the clear path that we can get to building a

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really extraordinary business that's highly differentiated as the unit economics

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to support a really freemium multiple. And you know, whether

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>there's overall multiple compression in the public markets in the

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>near term, you know, I think the great businesses that

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately go after really large hands and have durable growth

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 1>potential can outgrow any of that compression because they just

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>keep growing and growing. All right, interesting, interesting response there,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Air Table co founder and CEO, Howelu, good to have

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you back here on this show. Thank you for stopping by.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomer Technology and Emily Changing in San Francisco.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>The global self and semi conductor shares continues, but one

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>name in Japan bucking the trend. Are all back with

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a look at Socio next. Ed. Yeah, we don't often

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about Japan, but let's look at Socio next in

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the context of this big sell off we've seen in

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>global chip stocks. It had its trading debut in Japan

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in Tokyo on Wednesday, jumping a lot of investor interest here,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>generating around sixty seven billion yen or four hundred and

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty six million dollars of proceeds. And what's so interesting

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about this name. It's a maker of systems on a

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>chip or logic processes for one of A better description

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is there's a lot of appetite right now for what

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it's offering in a market where we have a lot

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of questions about global chip demand. If we bring up

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the next chart, this was actually the biggest I PO

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, so far this year on a gross proceeds

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>generated basis. It was the four f p O for

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a chip maker out of Japan this year. So it's

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see that name buck the trend. We're

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>also getting data points out of vander this Wednesday. They

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>actually see retail investors taking a keen interest in the

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>chip space, even if we see institutional money kind of

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the sidelines or pulling out because we have

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>concerns about a global slowdown, and speaking about those concerns,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at this terminal chart. It investors are really

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>pulling back earnings expectations for the chip sector. We've had

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bad news from a broad range of names. We're concerned

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>about a slowdown in demand for consumer electronics, for memory

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>chips in particular Aro and the PC market that scoop

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>overnight from Bloomberg. The Intel, according to sources, is going

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to cut thousands of jobs because of the PC slowdown. Well,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the result the market pulling back its expectations.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But one name in Japan's socio next, as we said,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>m bucking that trend. All right, ed, thank you a

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>name we don't normally hear about. Appreciate it. I want

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to zoom out now of chip stocks and get back

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to the broader macro environment with rising inflation and a

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>falling market. The state of valuations and venture capital and

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>startup innovation on top of mind. At the Greenwich Economic

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Forum that is underway right now. Our next guest, entrepreneur

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and former presidential Canada, Andrew Yang, joins us from there. Now, So, Andrew, obviously,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so much talk about what is going to happen with

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this economy. Are we or are we not going into

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a recession? Given your Venture for America background, I'm curious

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what your outlook is if you are an entrepreneur trying

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to get started in a downturn. Well, if you look

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>at the track record of high growth companies, Emily, and

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know this full well, most of the really meaningful

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>companies get started in a downturn like this one for

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a host of reasons. The fact is that an enterprise

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that succeeds in this time is going to be poised

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to really mushroom as soon as the climate starts training

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>more positive. So I do think that this is going

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a very very tough time, but guaranteed we're

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see tons of meaningful firms come out of

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this period. What's your sense of how this tough time

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>will compare to let's say, the financial crisis or even

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bust. Is there's something different about it. No,

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we have a ways to go on the

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>down slope myself. I mean, we can all see very

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly that the Fed is going to be checking up

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rates for the foreseeable and there are a lot

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of valuations that don't make as much sense in that environment.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're going to all find out together how

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this compares to some of the tough times of the past.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But I certainly think that, uh, folks should try and

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>keep some powder dry, you know, make sure that you

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have enough cash to make it through for a little

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>bit longer than you might hope. San Francisco is one

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>city that's having a tough time recovering from the pandemic,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and now there's this downturn. You've got companies going remote,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 1>You've got companies moving to Austin or a Miami. Do

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you think this the center of innovation, that the fundamental

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>center of gravity is actually going to shift and become

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more distributed or is it too early to say that? Now?

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You and I both have friends who have decamped to

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin or Miami, and I'm a big believer that innovation

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and growth will follow wherever the talent goes. So if

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you have people who have permanently settled in Austin, I

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see uh permanent shift truly. Um Now,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bay Area, in my view, still has the highest

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>concentration of tech talent, so it's still going to be

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the envy of many other cities. But I do think

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>we're in a permanently different time where talent is going

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to be more distributed, and because of that, you want

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to see capital be more distributed, uh and growth companies

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>come out of places where they might not have otherwise.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Congress has been trying to rein in big tech, and

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>big tech has retaliated by spending a ton of money

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to kill one of the most aggressive oversight bills in years.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Your thought on on whether that bill potentially needs to

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be revived and whether strong regulation is really needed. Oh,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, Emily. The political climate has changed such that

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>tech now is a bit of a punching bag for

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>both parties. UM And I'm of the belief that there

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have been some excesses that regulation would be appropriate for

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and a lot is going to hinge upon what the

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>political climate is after these mid terms. Right now, the

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Senate is toss up. By most accounts, Republicans are slightly

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>favored in the House, and I think that might change

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the prospects of some of the bills that we're talking about.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>You've been very vocal about data collection. You launch the

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Data Dividend products to help Americans take control of your data.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling about how tech companies are handling

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that data right now and especially going in to an

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot action. Uh, you know, it's it's fascinating, Emily,

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>As you know, I I championed the c p r

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>A and data privacy UH regulations in California, where you are,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And because California is now set a higher bar, UH,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>national legislation is increasingly likely and on the table in

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>part because tech companies wanted to supplant and replace the

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>rules in California. Our data is being used not to

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>our benefit. It's uh two hundred billion dollar plus a

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>year industry. It's eroding our democracy, our kids, mental health. UM.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm someone who thinks that we should own our

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>data UH and not only have it used more to

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>our benefit. But if there is going to be market

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>value game, but we should join in that benefit. UM.

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So that that's where I'd like the national approach to go.

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe has new rules that are coming online in which

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is right around the corner, and I think that's going

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to increase pressure on the States to have a more

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>modernized approach. You've been branching out into crypto and Web three,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious what role or how much of a

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>role you think crypto will play in fundraising going into

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you think Democrats or Republicans have more of

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. No, I think the single biggest donor in

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the last cycle with Sam Bankman Freedom you all probably

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>know well. Uh So Web three, in my view, is

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very fascinating UM political force to

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>be reckoned with UM. Right now, they're concerned obviously UM

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>largely with the regulation on crypto itself. UM, but I

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think that you're going to see more people pushing into

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>politics because now, uh the interaction with DC is going

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the main drivers of whether enterprises

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are able to grow and operate UM succes fully anywhere,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>but certainly whether they're going to be headquartered here in

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the US. You also launched Lobby three earlier this year.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm so curious how many people have bought into the

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>tokens and what positions is Lobby three going to be

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>advocating for. Lobby three has been a great energized community

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of people that want to push for a common sense

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>regulation out of dc UM that is intelligent and sophisticated

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't try and throw different UM types of assets together,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that has one regulator instead of kind of a hodgepodge UM.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's been awesome getting to know people who want

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the best things for creators and entrepreneurs in the space UM.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Any time I go to a web gry gathering, there's

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some folks who are part of the Lobby three community

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a lot of fun. As a former

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate and the code chair now of the Forward Party,

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see into your crystal ball. Do you

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think of Biden Trump face off in? Is that inevitable?

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the most likely matchup right now, Emily Uh. The

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>odds are that Trump declares at the end of this year,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>after the mid terms, and then Biden declares either Q

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one or Q two of next year. UM, I will

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>say that those two candidates will have a combined age

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of a d Fifty nine percent of Americans are not

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>excited about either of them. So the question is whether

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>unity ticket or some independent effort arises, and a group

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>called No Labels is very publicly invested fifty three million

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars in ballot access for a potential unity ticket. I

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be a lot of enthusiasm for

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>some alternative after people face the reality that it is

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a rematch in between Trump and Biden. So let's say

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden doesn't run. Do you think the Democrats have a

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>strong enough bench. Who's on that bench? Would you consider

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>running again? Well? I think Joe Biden likely declares because

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he feels he's the only one who can defeat Donald

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump because he did it once, and you can't argue

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that he did defeat Trump once. UM.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's also tough to slot in another Democrat who

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you have the same confidence in. Uh, necessarily if you're Joe,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or even if you're anyone, because right now, UM, it's

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>unclear who the Democratic nominee would be. UM. I think

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that's one reason why Joe is going to run again, honestly, So,

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to spend the next couple of

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>years if you're not running again? You know, where are

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we going to see you place your energy and efforts

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and priorities Given a very critical election coming up, So

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Board Party has endorsed a number of candidates around

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the country, including a US ended candidate named Evan McMullen,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>whom I'm going out to campaign in Utah for UH

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. We think we need to change the underlying

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>incentives for our lawmakers and leaders by doing away with

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>closed party primaries and replacing them with primaries where anyone

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can vote for anyone through something called ranked choice voting.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>If there's one thing you remember from this interview out there,

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're you know, generally not that into politics, ranked

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>choice voting is the way out of this mess. It's

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a way that anyone could vote for anyone with no

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>spim er effect, and it rewards more moderate, reasonable, collaborative

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>candidates who actually come through for voters. Um. So I'm

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be trying to make rank choices voting the

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>law and as many places as possible, and I'm happy

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to say it's spreading around the country all right. Uh,

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Yang. Always great to have you with us, entrepreneur

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously a former presidential candidate co chair of the former party.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Andrew for stopping by coming up. The latest

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>salvo comes up from Gray Scale versus the SEC. Gray

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Scale CEO joining Snack to talk about the case for

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a Bitcoin e t F. This is Bloomberg Crypto Acid

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>manager Gray Scale Investment says there is no justification for

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the SEC's rejection of a Bitcoin e TF earlier this year,

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the firm saying the secs rationale raises more questions than

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>answers and will undermine trust in crypto. Here to explain

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is Gray Scale CEO Michael Son and Shine. Michael, thank

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So give us the latest.

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Where does the lawsuit with the SEC stand at this moment? Well,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>last night, Emily, we filed our opening brief for the lawsuit.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So this lays out our initial legal arguments to the

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>court um and it's really the first substantive document as

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the litigation process. So it's important to remember

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a case about bitcoin, but we're putting in

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>front of our you know, in front of the court system,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>really straightforward, common sense arguments. I think one of the

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>new arguments that's laid out here has to do with

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a significant market tests which the SEC

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>has applied to bitcoin ETF applications. They've applied this very

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>stringently to spot bitcoin e t F applications like gray

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Scale UM and other spot bit cooin e tfs that

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have been denied, but very leniently to Bitcoin futures et

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>F applications, which is why we have several of them

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the market. And there's really been no justification as

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to why this test is the in fact only test

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that the SEC should be using. And we've also never

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>seen them use a test like this before when it

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to evaluating new products to bring to market. Have

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you spoken at all with Gary Gainsler directly? You know,

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we have regular dialogue with really everyone in d C,

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>my legal team and myself for down in d C

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>almost weekly these days, so we speak with all different

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of the SEC and other regulators. Now, look, recently,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there have been a ton of cases fraud and bankruptcy

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. There's Tera, there's Celsius, there's three hours. Why

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is now the right time to prove to the SEC

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that this market is no worse in terms of market

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>manipulation than others. Well, that's exactly the point. This significant

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>market tests that the SEC has laid out they believe

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>protects investors from fraud and manipulation, and they got comfortable

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with that. When it comes to bitcoin futures, Well, the

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing in the flaw in that logic is that

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin futures derived their pricing from the underlying spot bitcoin market,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>which underpins GBTC and any other spot bitcoin et F

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>application that's become, you know, in front of the SEC

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and ulterily been rejected or denied. I think what we're

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing though in d C is probably the most engagement

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and understanding we've ever seen around crypto. You've bipartisans support

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>now with a variety of bills passing across the floor

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, and I think we and other industry you

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>know heavyweights are calling on our regulators, calling on our

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>legislators to really develop new frameworks because otherwise we're squandering

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>innovation here in the United States. The Winkled Boss Brothers

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>were the first to try this spot bitcoin ETF. It

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't fail. The road is littered with carcasses of others

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>who have tried and failed, how is gray Scale, with

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>its huge scale, in your view, different? It's a great question, Emily.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So today Gray Scale Bitcoin Trust ticker g BTC is

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the largest bitcoin fund in the world. It owns over

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>three percent of all bitcoin outstanding. A recent count said

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are more than eight hundred and fifty tho

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>investors who own shares of g BTC in the US alone,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and that represents all fifty states. So, when we, as

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>an asset manager, are taking a product that's been in

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the market, has billions of dollars of assets, hundreds of

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars of daily trading volume, has voluntarily become

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an sec reporting company, and we know that the right

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors to protect them, to put additional disclosures

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and surveillance in place by becoming an et F is

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the right thing for them. But our regulator is really

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>shunning the opportunity to do so. Well, we certainly take

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>issue with that, and so our team has been putting

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire resources of the firm behind the et F

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>initiative and we're as committed as we've ever been to it.

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>What kind of timeline do you see for a resolution

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of this case? Well, we filed the lawsuit earlier this summer,

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and at that time we were guided to believe it

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>could be anywhere from nine to twelve months, although it

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>could be longer, could be shorter. What you're going to

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>see now that Grace Scale has filed its opening brief

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is over the coming weeks you'll see a variety of

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>amikus briefs. So these are other parties that are filing

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>briefs with the court to put in front of the

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>judges presiding over the case to really talk about their

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>points of view on the issues at hand. And then

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you'll see a brief from the SEC a couple

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of weeks later with their responses to the arguments that

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>our legal team is outlined. We're also, you know, in

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle of what could be a really massive economic downturn.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>We've just heard from Andrew Yang who said he thinks

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot further downward to go. What is

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>your outlook and what it means for crypto. We're certainly

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in a crypto winter, and a crypto winter is characterized

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>now by sustained lower prices. We're seeing from the investment community,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>though that the lower prices are not causing them to

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>shy away from the asset class. In fact, we're actually

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing investors continue to diversify. So a lot of investors

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>now kind of have that core position in bitcoin or

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>position in ethereum or both, and they're now looking at

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>other opportunities, and one of them is actually infrastructure. Just

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.919
<v Speaker 1>last week, our team launched a totally new offering, Gray

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Scale Digital Infrastructure Opportunities LLC, which is an operating company

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that investors can put capital to work in that's actually

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>buying bitcoin mining hardware, plugging it into the network, and

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>distributing that value back out to shareholders. So for a

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors, they've had that token exposure now and

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>now it's time that they think about the underlying infrastructure

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that secures the network. And so there's a lot of

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and a lot of activity going on despite the

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sustained lower pricing environment we find ourselves in speaking of

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the underlying infrastructure. The etherory emerge ended up being kind

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of a non event. What do you think the next

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 1>big event is going to be? You know, that will

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, catalyze changes and potentially blockchain technology. You know,

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Emily respectfully, as someone who's been in crypto for nine

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>years of it actually was a big event because this

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was a question mark hanging over Ethereum for a long time.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Could we see a very well known, very well trafficked,

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>very well utilized digital asset protocol move and make such

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful move from proof of work to proof of

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>steak and Ethereum did it now? I think as we're

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing the outcome of that, it's very very early days

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and we're starting to see the development of more and

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>more staking around Ethereum and other assets um. What's coming

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>next is other upgrades to the Ethereum network, things like

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the ability to unstake assets that are put into the

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>network for staking, and other upgrades that will come down

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the line. But I certainly think it's an accomplishment for

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>all the developers and everyone who really put a lot

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of time in many, many years of planning and energy

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>into getting Ethereum to make the switch over. Alright, point taken,

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael sawnashein Gray Scale CEO. We're gonna continue to follow

0:38:51.640 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 1>your challenge to the SEC. Appreciate you stopping by. Apple

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is withholding its latest employee benefits from staff at its

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 1>only unionized retail store, the reason given the store needs

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate the perks with Apple via their collective bargaining arrangement,

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but excluding unionized stores from new benefits not a new trend.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks also rolled out a series of new perks at

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>nine US in union stores, including raises and student debt coaching,

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>while saying that it can't legally provide them unilaterally two

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sites with union activity. SpaceX plans to pronounce two new

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>space tourists slated to fly on the Starship Rocket, Dennis Tito,

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the world's first ever space tourist in two thousand one,

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and his wife. The couple paid an undisclosed amount to

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>fly around the Moon on Starship. Once the vehicle is complete,

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they will travel with ten other undisclosed passengers on a

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>roughly week long journey. The trip doesn't include a landing

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>on the lunar surface, and it's unclear if the other

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>passengers have been chosen yet. And that does it For

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Bloomberg Technology On Thursday, we've got Tron's

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin Son on s talk about the future of DOWS

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and all things crypto and web three and don't forget

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg