WEBVTT - Two Minutes To Midnight: The Doomsday Clock

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert lamp and I'm Christian Sager. Robert,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you and I both grew up in the eighties. How

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>worried were you about nuclear annihilation as a kid? Because

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I was terrified of it. It was like constantly being

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the news or in popular culture. It's

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question because, you know, I look back on

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>it and I remember I think back on threats that

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>were present in the media or in the conversations of

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>adults and how they influenced me. Like I remember, I

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>remember going to church and being in hearing about the

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming battle of Armageddon and how everyone's gonna have to

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>fight on one side or the other. I remember being

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned about that. I remember picking up on some of

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the the the Aid's Scare material and thinking like, oh,

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>how does this affect me? How does this affect the

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>people I care about. I don't remember being feeling like

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the anxiety of nuclear war so much, and maybe I

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was just you know, part of this. Part of this

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was a time when I was I was living outside

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US, I was in Canada, we only had

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the one TV TV channel, so that might have played

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a role. Or maybe I was just you know, removed

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>enough from the or distracted enough from the the nightly

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, TV news that it didn't affect me, or

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's an I mean, we're about the same age though,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how to what extent that played

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>into In the past, I've kind of wondered, well, maybe

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I was just a little too young, Like I didn't

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to to to use the language of Queen. I didn't

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>quite grow up in the shadow of the mushroom cloud.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's interesting. Yeah, yeah, well, and I also,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, moved around overseas a little bit too, so

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that could have contributed to it in different ways as well.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely remember the eighties being like scary and

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>then like, you know, maybe it was also just because

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of my age, but then in the nineties it was like, oh,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>things are okay now, like that there's not as much

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>of a threat. We can all breathe easy, We're not

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to like we don't have to do

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole stop, drop and roll thing in the cross rooms, right.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I definitely looking back, I definitely see that trend where

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>there is the nineties, there was this feeling of, yeah,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this is not that big of a threat anymore, maybe

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's even not a threat. Don't worry about it, just

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>do your thing. But I've always been a fan of

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff from the eighties in the late seventies, from you know,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the fiction, the music, in the literature, and you certainly

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>see nuclear anxiety displayed in in that in various ways.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, I mean we've got, of course Terminator

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to Judgment Day. I mean, they are of course talking

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about an artificial intelligence bringing about the apoco Ellipse, but

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's through nuclear warfare. Uh. And then the big one

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that I always think of is Watchmen, especially when I

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think of what we're going to talk about today, which

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is the doomsday clock. Now I don't believe this was

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>featured in the movie version of Watchmen, but in the

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>comic book version, every issue began with the doomsday clock

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 1>blood dripping down the page further and further, and as

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you got to the twelfth issue, I think the blood

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was covering the clock like all the way or something

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>like that. But the idea was that the reason why

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>these events were happening in the story is because we're

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>inching closer to midnight on the doomsday clock. Yeah. I

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe when I first read Watchman, I wasn't

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, I never really put one and two

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>together on the doomsday clock. But yeah, I believe that

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's like a kind of synchronicity of the metaphor there

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with Dr Manhattan being connected to atomic energy. He's also

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a watchmaker, and he's obsessed with time and taking apart

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>clocks and putting them back together again, and then the

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>background metaphor of the doomsday clock. Now here's the thing.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know the doomsday clock was a real thing

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>until I was an adult, and actually just recently it

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>was updated. Now, we shared this on our social media

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for stuff to blow your mind, and there was a

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of comments about it, uh so much so that

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we thought this is probably worth digging into because there's

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of science behind the Doomsday clock and the

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>group that manages it, which is called the Bulletin of

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Atomic Scientists. So we figured, let's do a dive into that,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>explain what that is and see what's going on there. Yeah,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like there is a lot of confusion,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>especially and I don't mean I don't. I don't mean

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to vilify people who say didn't read the link, it

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't fall with the link and read the article that

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we shared, because I think we all have to do this.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Where it was so many different pieces of media and

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>our streams, you just can't click on everything. I don't

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that. But it's easy without without diving in to it,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to mistake what the doomsday clock is. On

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you might think, oh, well, this is a

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>this is a rigorous scientific like um, you know, FIRMI

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a contemplation on what the chances of nuclear

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>war are. Or you may think, oh, this is just

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>complete political bs. This is just somebody or some group

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of people just making some with with political motivation, deciding

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous the current climate is. And the answer is

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhere in the middle. Uh. And but it's worth

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at because while yes, it so, let's

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>make this very clear right from the top, the doomsday

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>clock is not managed by any kind of like supercomputer

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>or device that's calculating things and figuring out what the

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>exact time on the clock should ye do not confuse

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it with an actual atomic clock, which is a you

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>know a highly precise um time measurement system. This is

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is something where a human hand is essentially

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>going to reach up and change time exactly. And it's

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly subjective. But at the same time, the people who

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are in charge of making that subjective judgment call are

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>experts in their field. And we're gonna go over all

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. We'll talk about it, we'll talk about the group,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the journal surrounding this, the doomsday clock itself, and then

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at some arguments both four and against it.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, just to back up here in case you

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>missed it, at the beginning of the bulletin of atomic

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>scientists calculated that we're even closer to doomsday and they

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 1>adjusted the doomsday clock to two point five minutes to midnight.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Midnight being doomsday, meaning the human population will be completely

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>wiped out by something usually nuclear annihilation. Uh And by

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>their prediction, we're that much closer to the end of humanity.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the closest the clock has been to doomsday

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen fifty three, after the US tested its first

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thermonuclear device. Now, why why, why why did they push

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it forward? Well, certainly, if you've if you've been following

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the news enough to pick up on the doomsday story,

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>then you've probably been following the news enough to pick

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>up on all these various other stories. We can basically

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>reduce a lot of it to sort of to saber rattling,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to the testing of new regimes, to new regimes, uh,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, rolling out their stance on the issues of

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear armaments, uh, warfare in general, and international relations. Right. Yeah,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know this is going to get a little

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>bit political here only for the purposes of us describing

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>why they made this decision. So they cited specifically that

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the global security landscape darkened. This is a direct quote,

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as the international community failed to come effectively to grips

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with humanity's most pressing existential threats, and by that they

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>mean nuclear weapons and climate change. Now, this was announced

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in an op ed to the New York Times. There

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are two people, theoretical physicist Lawrence M. Krauss and retired

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Navy Rear Admiral David Titley, And they wrote on behalf

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Bulletin of of Atomic Scientists, and this was

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>their quote. They said, making matters worse, the United States

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>now has a president who has promised to impede progress

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on both of those fronts. Never before has the Bulletin

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>decided to advance the clock, largely because of the statements

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of a single person. But when that person is the

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>new President of the United States, his words matter. Now. Specifically,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're referring to some comments that that the

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>President has made regarding the arms race. I think he

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>said something to the fact of let there be an

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>arms race or you know, will outproduce uh, you know,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the competition in terms of nuclear armaments and if the

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if you've been following the news, you know that the

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>president will say one thing and then he may restate

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it later. Yeah, but this response was was coming to

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the spikes in the rhetoric. Yeah. And this

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is stuff that he said on the campaign trail before

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>he was elected too, So you know, there's a there's

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a well documented record of his policy or at least

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>stated policies on nuclear armament and on climate change. So

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>these are things that concerned the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Uh.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even since they made this announcement, he's

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>continued to say things for this effect. Um. Now, I

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>would be remiss if I did not mention the Iron

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Maidens song two minutes to Midnight, because I believe, looking

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>back at the time, wine two minutes is the is

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as close as we've come. It is, Yeah, and we

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are currently two and a half minutes to midnight now.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I there was a listener out there who pointed this

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>out to me. Actually, when we posted the original story,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>he shared the video for Iron Maidens two Minutes to

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>been Night, and oh of course, And man, this is

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those instances where I wish we could get

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>away with playing music on the show because that song

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is pretty great and it's perfect as like a as

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a theme song for this episode. But go check it

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>out if you're unfamiliar with it and you love metal. Uh.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's all kinds of other popular culture things that

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>would resonate with this. Uh. One of my favorite songs

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that isn't necessarily a big one is the SKA band

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Mephis Scopolise has a song called Doomsday that is about

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>this as well. Oh yeah, I'm not familiar with the

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Mephis scoff. Uh. They're silly nineteen nineties ska band. Okay, yeah, well,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know I already mentioned that. You know that I'm

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of so many things that came out

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of the late seventies and nineteen eighties, early nineties as well.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But but some of the big ones that of course

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>come to I think come to people's mind in addition

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to all the post nuke fiction out there. War Games,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, Yeah, that's the classic example. Well, the only

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>way to win the game is not to play. See

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this is why I think it was it had such

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so much impact on me. War Games is the first

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>movie I ever saw on videotape really, yeah, Beta Max.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.599
<v Speaker 1>My parents rented a Beta Max machine when I was

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a little kid. In the two movies they got for

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>me were War Games and Star Wars, both movies with

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>war in the title. But I think with war games

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like this probably didn't have that big an impact on

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>me personally, because I don't think I ever I may

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have never seen it in its entirety. I think it's

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>all of those films that I just later saw parts

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of on TV and got the general you know, just

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. But but it never had the opportunity to

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>really get its hooks into me like it did for

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for other people. Yeah. I mean, as I've said on

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the show before, I watched a lot of stuff when

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I was five years old that I probably shouldn't have.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>This was one of the three that was right when

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I was five years old, I saw war games. I

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>also watched The Shining when I was five years old.

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, you know, well that explains a lot. Well,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we were games. I think makes

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sense for for some younger viewers. But we in a

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>previous episode, the Butter episode, we talked about the Butter

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Battle Book, Pursus Book and subsequent Turner TV special that

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>deals with the arms race and deals with the idea

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of mutually sure destruction. So really, no matter what your

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>age was during during this era, there was the potential

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to be introduced to the larger cultural anxiety regarding this. Yeah,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a period that was rife with popular culture

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by this. And now that we're inching closer to

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>midnight on the doomsday clock, I kind of wonder if

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see more stuff like this again. Uh,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>time will tell. Now you're probably wondering who are the

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Bulletin of Atomic Scientists or what is this thing? Well,

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bulletin was actually founded by some of the people

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>who worked on the Manhattan Project. These were people who

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>felt that they could not remain aloof to the consequences

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of their work creating atomic weapons. Uh. And they were

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the people who the atomic bomb, but then they also

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>lobbied for its abolition. Now today it's a nonprofit organization

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and it has an international board of experts who assess

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>scientific advancements, then the benefits and risks that they give

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to humanity. Now, their stated goal is to influence public policy.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's be very clear here, Like they state, and

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they say very plainly on all their literature, like, yes,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this is our goal is to communicate and to change policy. Uh.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>They describe the bulletin as such. They say, it's like

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a doctor making a diagnosis by looking at data, considering symptoms, measurements,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and circumstances, and then coming up with a judgment on

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>how to treat a condition. And I do have to

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>throw in here that I I don't think anyone out

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there saying in the world is arguing that nuclear war

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is a desired outcome or you know, even you know,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned in the comments that the President has made

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and when pressed on the matter, he has said, oh, well,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons are horrible. You know that this is this

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is you know, bad, not good. That he very specifically

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>uses the term these are bad things. So I don't

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think anybody is arguing that that, yeah, let's have a

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war. That sounds like a great idea. The the

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>arguments come into the balance, and then how do you

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce etcetera, and then into the political, uh, situations that

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>increase the likelihood of one of these weapons being used,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>because really, we've we've we've been very lucky in the

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the in the regard that there have only been uh,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know too military uses of nuclear weapons, and of

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>course they were both both deployed by the United States

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the close of the Second World War in Japan. Uh.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Outside of that, we've had, you know, plenty of tests.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>We have had some testy situations regarding the are their

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>their positioning, and their potential use, but we have not

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>had to suffer any any subsequent users, and we haven't

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>had to see actual nuclear warfare between or any war

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>warfare between two nuclear arm nations. Right. Yeah. The idea

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>here being that the build the up of these armaments

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will be a deterrent to various powers to to either

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>either in the course of their militaristic actions or in

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>their own armament of nuclear weapons. Right, and it's not

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>just the United States and Russia anymore. And we'll get

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>into that. There's all kinds of factors that come into play. UH.

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Now The Bulletin is also an award winning journal, and

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it puts issues and events into context UH and provides

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>fact based debates and assessments about you know that, basically

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of humanity UH. And they have been around

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for seventy years. There's lots of other reports and analysis

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>on their site. Their site is is pretty fantastic in

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of like layout and all the contents available. UH.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Infographics to their infographics are really good. UM. But there's

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>also a bi monthly magazine. Now today we're talking about

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like the people who make the decision

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about the doomsday clock. We're talking about ten to twenty

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>people who literally sit in a room for a day

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and do the best they can to communicate disaster to

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us. Now, it's it's either once or

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>twice a year, the board's members get together and they

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gather for a one day discussion where they review what

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>worried them the following year and what they anticipate as

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>new concerns. They don't use devices or computers to calculate this.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>This is just experienced, expert adults trying to come to

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a consensus. There's no algorithm that is deployed here exactly.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So you may be wondering, well, who are these people,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what are they so expert at? And that this is

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe going to be a little dry. But

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to go through the list of the current

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>people so you have an idea of who who's making

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this decision now. The current membership of the board. It

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is the Science and Security Board for the Bulletin of

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Atomic Scientists UH, and they're said to also consult widely

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with their colleagues across a wide variety of disciplines before

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they get together to make decisions about the doomsday clock.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's go through these here. Okay, So the first

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is Lynn Eden, she's one of the co chairs UH

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and she's a research scholar at Stanford University who studies

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>military and society, science, technology and organizations, as well as

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons history and policy. Of Next, we have Robert Rosner,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>co chair, Professor of of of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Physics

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Chicago. There's rod Ewing he's a

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>professor of Nuclear Security and Earth Sciences at Stanford University.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a Steven kartha senior scientist at Stockholm Environmental Institute.

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Focuses on technological and policy options for addressing climate change.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Their herb Lynn uh this is a senior research scholar

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>for cyber policy and security at Stanford University. You're seeing

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a trend here. There's a lot of people from Stanford there.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Next is a Suzette McKinney, former Deputy Commissioner of the

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Public Health Preparedness and Emergency Response at the

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Department of Public Health. She's an expert in emergency

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>preparedness efforts. Steve Miller is the director of the International

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Security Program at Harvard University. Now, next we have Raymond T.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Humbert. This is professor of physics at the University

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>of Oxford. Specializes in how climate works. Rama murte Raja Rahman.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor of physics at Joel Harlal Nehru University.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Next we have Jennifer Sims. She's senior fellow at the

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Council on Global Affairs and a consultant on intelligence

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>at Homeland security. Susan Solomon is a professor of environmental

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Techno Oology. She's actually

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the pioneers in the work that explains why

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a hole in the Antarctic ozone layer, and she

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>specifically specializes in climate science. Next, we have Richard Somerville,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Professor of oceanography at the University of California, and his

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>focus his climate systems. Sharon Squassani. She's the director of

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the Proliferation Prevention Program at the Center for Strategic and

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>International Studies at Washington d C. She specializes in nuclear

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>non proliferation, arms control, and security policy. And then we

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>have David Titley, Professor of Meteorology and International Affairs at

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania State University, a former naval officer with the rank

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of your admiral who used to work in the Pentagon. Okay,

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so we've gone through that list. That is clearly a

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>list of people who have a lot of credentials under

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>their belt. Right It's it does not seem like a

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>list of I mean, I think we've got like a

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>little of her ten people. There's probably twelve or thirteen

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of them here. They're not just whimsically going to say

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>something like we're two minutes away from the world ending. Right,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, uh, yeah, maybe they have rhetorical agendas,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are all experts in fields like uh, nuclear

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>non proliferation, military, uh, climate change, and and a growing

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're looking at his cyber security. Right. And

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, there's not a single celebrity or or you know,

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't on the doomsday clok committee. Okay, let's take a

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>break and when we get back, let's really dive into

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what the doomsday clock actually is. All right, we're back.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>So everyone has probably seen a picture of the doomsday

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>clock thus far, if nothing else, it should be the

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lead art for this episode on the website Stuff to

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. But but beyond that, beyond just

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like, what is the doomsday clock? Okay?

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was originally funded by, as I mentioned before,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>people who were involved with the Manhattan Project, and one

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Bulletin's members was a nuclear physicist named Alexander

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Langsdorff and his wife, Martl. She was an artist, and

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>when they were coming up with this journal for the

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, she created a clock symbol, and

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>she said it to eleven fifty three for the cover

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the group's magazine. Now, she did this, she said,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>because quote, it looked good to her eye. So there

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>was no there was no reasoning behind why it was

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at eleven fifty three on the very first issue, which

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just more like, yeah, this, this feels about right exactly

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen nine, however, her husband reset it four minutes later.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Since then, this group has been around for seventy years

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and they've used the clock to draw attention to worldwide

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>crises that they believe threatened the survival of the human species.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And their focus is almost entirely on the availability of

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons and the world powers that are willing to

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>use them. So they kind of they describe it as

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>such as they say, it's a symbol obviously, but it's

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a symbolic intersection of art and science, and its goal

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is to get people to talk more about nuclear weapons. Basically,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think it's easy to say

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this now, like especially since like what we were saying

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with the nineties, it kind of was like, oh, the

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Cold War is over. Who I don't have to worry

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>about that? Being a think the clock itself went to

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>something like seventeen minutes. Yeah. Yeah, nineteen one was the

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>most optimistic position it ever was at, and it was

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen minutes to midnight. Uh. Now the clock itself is

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>wavered between that seventeen minutes and two minutes. Uh. Since

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>its inception in seven The time itself, like we described,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>as determined by this board of scientists and nuclear experts

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>who meet regularly. But ultimately, yes, this is a political

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>tool for communication. But here's the thing. It works. The

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>last few times they've announced a change of the clock,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it has been not only international news and that it's made,

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, headlines and every major news outlet, but it

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is also trended on Facebook and Twitter, so people talk

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. It works. It gets people to think about

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with nuclear weapons. Now the hand itself

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>has been reset twenty two times. It used to be

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that the bulletins editor decided when the hand should be moved.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>And his name was Eugene Rabinovich and he was a scientist.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But when he died in nineteen seventy three, that Science

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and Security board that Robert and I just went through

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with you, they took over, and like I said, they

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>meet twice a year to discuss world events relating to

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the clock, and the last time it was moved before

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>this most recent one was in uh. Two minutes were

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>taken away to express the bulletin's dissatisfaction with world progress

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on climate change and nuclear weapons. So they have four

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>criteria that they currently used to determine the status of

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the clock. The first is obviously the possibility of major

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>conflict between nuclear states. Then there is and this is

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively new, out of control climate change. The third is

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>risks of civilian nuclear powered disaster, especially when it relates

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to waste storage. Okay, this this tying in of course

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to accidents such as that at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly, yeah uh. And then the fourth and final

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one is they're looking at emerging technologies like genetically modified

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>pandemics or destructive artificial intelligence. So ultimately their focus here

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is about any kind of species wide catastrophe, no matter

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>what its origin might be. Now in their site, they

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>have this thing that's called the doomsday dashboard that I

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have to say, like, I think that there's like a

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of cheekiness to this too, write like maybe

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just me, but I like the idea of like

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the doomsday dashboard. You know, it's just kind of it

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>feels jokey, but at the same time as obviously the

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>most serious you can be about a possible topic. Right,

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're they're simplifying all of this into this

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>one simple and in doing doing that, there you know,

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>there's the value of some of simplistic and direct communication

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>via symbolism. But in doing so, I mean they are

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>realizing that they're boiling it down. Yeah. So this dashboard

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is a little different from the clock and that it

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>accounts for the amount of global nuclear weapons, the security

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear materials around the world, the amount of nuclear

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>materials that are stored, the rise in the sea level

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide, as well as

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the difference in global temperatures in the minimum amount of

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Arctic sea ice that we currently have. So it's this

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>big interface that shows you all those things, basically keeping

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>track of all of the modern woes, especially that came

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>out of indoors box, right and kind of and and

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>cared for or at least of, you know, by an

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>organization that it will at least founded by individuals who

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>played and arguably played a role. So the thing here

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>basically is they study events and trends, They tracked numbers

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and statistics. They also account for world leaders and citizen

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>efforts to reduce these potential dangers. They also recognize that

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy and climate change are intertwined, so they say, well, yeah,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of course some people advocate for nuclear power to reduce

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide emissions. So they recognize that there's kind of

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like a given take there, and then you need to

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to that. So why are we currently at

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>two point five minutes to midnight. Well, we gave you

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>their their stated answer, you know, in their op ed

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>piece earlier. But here's a couple of listed items, basically

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bullet items that are of concern to them and I

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>would imagine to all of us. So the United States

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in Russia together possess more than nine of the world's

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons, and we remain at odds in a variety

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of theaters. Now, obviously the US and Russia aren't facing

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>off one to one, but examples include Syria, the Ukraine,

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and the borders of NATO. Uh, there's also you know,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 1>both of these countries continuing to modernize their forces with

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>little arms control negotiations. So as of this recording, what

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>was it last week? President Trump announced that there was

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he was going to increase a massive amount of spending

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to the defense budget, So you know that that's in

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>line with this. Now North Korea is another factor. They

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to conduct underground nuclear tests. They're giving indications that

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it would keep trying to develop a nuclear weapon, one

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that has delivery capabilities. So we're talking about I C

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>B M S here. I believe Pakistan and India continue

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to threaten each other with nuclear warfare. Now they're facing

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>off over the line of controlling Kashmir. Now. The Bulletin

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of Atomic Scientists also adds that climate changes outlook looks

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat less dismal than it used to, but only somewhat.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They say that's a direct quote, uh so steen warmest

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>year on record, and sixteen of the seventeen warmest years

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on record have been recorded since two thousand and one,

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's of concern to them. They say climate change

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is a risk to human health and has adverse effects

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on our food availability. They also include within all of

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this the rise of nationalism worldwide, as well as both

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and Vladimir Putin's comments about the use and

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of nuclear weapons, as well as uh. President Trump's

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>disbelief in the scientific consensus on climate change. In fact,

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the US is scheduled to spend between one hundred billion

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and one trillion dollars on retrofitting nuclear weapons for another

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>four decades of service. Uh. I was just watching the Expanse,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the show that we've talked about on on Stuff to

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind many times. They fire a bunch of

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear missiles into outer space at one point, and I

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that it is supposed to represent the if not

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the entirety, then at least the vast majority of Earth's

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and nuclear arsenal is launched in that in that scenario. Yeah,

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it really made me think on this. Okay, So the

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bulletin also see, you know, Trump's rhetoric as a disregard

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for scientific expertise, and they say this is a growing problem.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's some additional factors as well. They say, the Russian

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack on the United States political system, the gene

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 1>editing tool Crisper. Uh. So we've talked about this on

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this show and in other How Stuff Works media. Basically,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that CRISP, Crisper could possibly make

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it easier to produce biological weapons. And then they also

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>listed the rise of quote fake news. Now, when they

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>probably released this thing, they weren't as sick of the

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>term fake news as the rest of us, and honestly

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I'd prefer to use other terms like disinformation.

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the the term has become muddy, even muddy

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or since we first talked about it in our episode,

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is social media driving me crazy? Because it's kind of

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>been it's it's it's kind of been co opted, so

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>now it is uh, it's um, it's an insult that

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is leveled at reputable news sources as well as intentionally

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>confusing or inaccurate reports. Yeah, so some of you are

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>probably listening and you're going, wow, this is really heavily

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>waited on the climate change thing. I'm not necessarily a

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>believer in that, or maybe you are, but um, but

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what does it have to do, you know with nuclear annihilation.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's where I kind of fall on this thing, which

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is that even outside of scientific reason I've always thought

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about climate change is being similar to Pascal's wager. You

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>know that Robert Pascal's wager um basically on the belief

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of God and the ideas. You know that as a

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>rational person, I think if climate change does exist and

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we fight to stop it, well we're going to experience

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>more gains and less loss. Right. But it's a probability gamble. However, I,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as a science communicator, do believe in the science behind

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Don't get me wrong, But so to me,

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's similar to the belief in God, and

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's it's not about science or religion as

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>much as like, you've got to think of it as

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like a rewards and risks game, right. Uh. And hey,

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what if I take up my recycling and

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit better about my carbon footprint. Uh,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a little bit of a strain

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on my lifestyle. Sorry, you know what, I'd rather do

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that than boil alive. Yeah, and you know, and and

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just to drive home the important thing here too, there

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is a scientific consensus that yes, climate it is occurring,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that humans um are are are the if

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not if are a major factor, if not the major factor,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>uh in its spinning out of control. Uh. Now, I'm

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sure there's of you out there who have your doubts you.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you have an expert or two that you

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>whose opinions you turned to. I'm sure you have a

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>list of pre prepared problems with with climate change, but

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you really can't argue with the fact that this is

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the scientific consensus. And if you were going to if

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're gonna work outside of scientific consensus, then

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that is that is ultimately an a logical choice. Yeah,

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and so look, like the reason why I'm addressing this

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>here is I know that this is contentious. I know

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have some listeners who are probably going to

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>write us in about this and say, I can't believe

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that you guys sided with this group that believes in

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>climate change, right, And I know for a fact that

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>when this episode goes up on Facebook that there will

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be dozens of comments, probably about how this is all

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a scam. But look, we have to address it. That's

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what I believe. This is where we are at with

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>scientific consensus. This is a show about how science is

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>used in our world, and the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is a group of experts. Yeah, I mean, ultimately you

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have to if you, well, what am I gonna side

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with if it's not scientific consensus. Am I gonna side

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with political consensus and I'm not gonna side with religious consensus.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I really haven't seen much in the way of I've

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seen religious arguments for combating climate change, but I haven't

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>seen much in the way of religious arguments that that

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that human uh created climate change is not occurring. So

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think even have an option in that

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>direction if I chose to go that way. Yeah, yeah,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly so and and and again. We're gonna get back

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>into this again in a later section because there is

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong argument against the bulletin of atomic scientists that

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>will will relate to you later. I just wanted to

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>set that up as we were talking about the climate

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>change stuff. Now, historical events have edged us this close

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the doomsday midnight before. In fact, in nineteen forty nine,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when the Soviet Union tested an atomic bomb and the

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 1>nuclear arms race began, that was one time. Then also

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in four when American Soviet relations deteriorated and deployed, they

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>both deployed short range missiles around Europe, and that's again

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>right around prime time for you and me as little kids. Uh.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And in nineteen fifty two when they both tested thermonuclear

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen bombs. That's the only time it's ever been closer

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to midnight than right now. So here's some nightmare scenarios

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that they pitch the Bulletin of atomic scientists that could

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>edge us even further. One is a NATO war with Russia. Yeah,

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be horrible. Two is an American conflict with China.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>That would be horrible. Three is an erratic launched by

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, meaning they're nuclear missiles. And we got it

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was like two or three days ago. Wasn't they do

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this all the time? North Korea like erratically has some

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>missile fly off into the and well, you can, you

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>can say erratic. But but also my understanding is that

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>there are certain military operations that go on every year

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>between with the US and South Korea and this they

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>always do something to sort of speak out and to

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>protest the events, and this is the latest version of this.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think I read this morning on my

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>way into work something about you know, China basically said like, hey,

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, cool your jets. United States and South Korea,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>can you kind of slow your role with the military operations.

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're trying to be the logical ones in

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this well, at least on the face of it, all right,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And another horrible scenario they predict as a war between

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>India and Pakistan. And the final one would be if

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 1>ISIS was somehow nuclear enabled. So all of these are

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>things that they see as complete nightmare scenarios that could

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, push us even closer to midnight. The Bulletin

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>themselves also called upon Trump and Putin to use their

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quote friendly relationship to reduce nuclear weapons stocks. So I

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>think that was kind of funny. Actually, I mean, given

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>all this, you know, we joke about it. S n

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>LSO is doing some kind of gag one way or

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the other about Trump and Putin. But you know, yeah,

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to take a step back from all of it,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it is a bit ridiculous that that we're in this

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>scenario where there's so much talk about these two uh,

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>these two uh governmental heads being in collusion with each other,

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and yet the the arms race rhetoric has has increased ramping.

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>You think you think that we that we'd at least

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>get the side effect of of of calm, calmer nuclear relations,

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but we can only hope. Thus this is the world

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>we live in. Okay, let's take another break, and when

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we get back, we're going to introduce these arguments about

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we should believe in the doomsday clock

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. Alright, we're back. So you're you're scrolling through

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.879
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook feed and you you you make out the

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the unmistakable symbol of the of the doomsday clock.

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Should you click on it? Should you not click on it?

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Should you give it a thumbs up or a smiley?

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Should you give it the frowny face, the angry face,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or just the sad face? How should we react to it?

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So we've already presented to you how they come about

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>their their decision making of of where the hands on

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this clock reside, right, Uh. And you can, you know,

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>judge for yourself whether or not you think that's logical.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>But there is an argument against it presented by a

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>guy named Tom Nichols. Uh. He is a professor of

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>National security affairs at the U. S. Naval War College,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and he says that, yes, the bulletin was right to

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>remind us of the problems with nuclear weapons during the

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Cold War. He says, actually says, look, this is a

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>great and venerable journal. Even though I don't necessarily agree

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with their politics, but he argues that the world today

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>is much safer, and so he dismisses the addition of

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>climate change to the doomsday clock, and he calls it notional.

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He says that scientists involved in this are catering to

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a liberal audience and that they have concerns such as

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>quote being mean to each other, so he says the

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>clock itself means nothing. He compares where the clock was

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 1>set to historical events and he argues that we're safer

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 1>now than we were in and that's when the clock

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was set at its best. So this is his argument.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>He also says the clock is quote simply theater, uh,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and that it's designed to create a sense of urgent

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>worry about these things that the scientists think we need

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. On this, I'm not going to argue

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with him that. I'm sure the Bolton would too, and

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>they are pretty clear about saying like, yes, this is

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a communication proping and a tool for us to get

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>people to start talking about these problems, and it's it's

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>also yeah Worth pointing out that even even when when

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the clock was at its best, you still have nuclear

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>states and there's a perceivable path to a potential nuclear

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>conflict or nuclear detonation that's always there just by virtue

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of having armed states. UH. This would be content for

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a later episode, but I was I was reading recently

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>about UH computing errors that have occurred here and there

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>regarding the systems that manage uh the nuclear armaments on

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on both sides, and that is terrifying. Yeah. Yeah, I

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I left some of those notes out, but that's absolutely

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>true that that there have been computing errors that basically said, oh,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody just launched a bunch of missiles at US, and

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it was only because there was a human being there

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>who who was able to recognize that there was a

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>malfunction and say, no, that's not actually happening. Do not retaliate. Yeah,

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>at all points, the technology is fallible and the humans

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>involved are fallible, and you just gotta hope and pray

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that that they're not not both fallible at the same time,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's when when when the clock starts moving again.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But nichols argument is that scientists since the end of

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>World War two have been trying to figure out how

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to translate their intelligence in things like chemistry and physics

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and earth sciences into political powers. So he's basically saying

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying things like the doomsday clock are an

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>attempted as a power grab by science. Uh. He argues

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that there are good reasons for leaders to reject scientific advice.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is his direct quote. It's easy to be

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a fan of scientists running things as long as your

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>own guys doing the sciencing. But scientists can be wrong

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about politics in all kinds of ways. Uh. And then

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to this. He has a particular

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bone to pick with Leon Cooper, who is a person

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's involved with the bulletin. I think he used to

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.879
<v Speaker 1>be on the security UH membership team, and the two

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of them apparently had a nasty debate with each other

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at Brown University. So he wants the bulletin to change

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the clock back to being only about nuclear danger, and

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that they should take out climate change, artificial intelligence, and

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, genetic modification. Either that or he says they

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>should just retire it in general. UM. Now, I would

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like to point something out here. The article in which

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he wrote this was published in January, and within it

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>even then he said, God help us if Donald Trump

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:43.399
<v Speaker 1>is elected and controls our nuclear trigger, so he may

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't have Nickels here in the room

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. But he may have a little bit of

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a different answer today because of you know, how they've

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>adjusted the clock, and he whether or not climate changes

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>on the board certainly were we've edged a little bit

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>closer and turns of nuclear armament. So this is my

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>counter argument on this, because he says things like, oh, well,

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>they're concerned about things like being mean to each other. Well,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe and I just did this two part

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:17.240
<v Speaker 1>episode where we talked about animal intelligence and we compared

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it to humanity, and I'm far more concerned right now

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about humanity's recent lack of empathy and how that's going

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to contribute to our moral decision making progress. You tie

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that into technologies of death like nuclear weapons or genetic

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>modification or artificial intelligence, all these things that the bulletin

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>lists above. I'm not so dismissive of those things. Yeah,

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would agree all of these these aspects

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of humanity are interconnected. Our technology, the way we view

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>each other, the way we treat each other, the politics,

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the science, and I think it it Uh, yeah, it's

0:42:55.960 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's counterproductive to want to just say, like you to

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to fall back on some of the arguments here presented

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>by Nichols, the idea that we should only look at

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>at this in a political sphere only, yeah, or or

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that the scientists are saying they only want to run

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>things from a scientific perspective. These are all interconnected. There's

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no avoiding that. Yeah. And the Bulletin themselves

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>address this by saying, uh, you know, sometimes they're asked.

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They even have this on their f a Q page,

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what's worse nuclear energy or climate change? And their quote is,

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, trying to answer the

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>question is like standing around in a burning house arguing

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's better to die of smoke inhalation or

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>from a falling timber. And that kind of gets back

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to my Pascal's wager thing, is that it's like, well,

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a it's a cost benefit rewards risks thing.

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>So now the Bulletin themselves, they don't as far as

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I could find, they didn't, you know, counter argue Nickels.

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But they do have an argument in favor of why

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>climate change is included in the Doomsday Clock, and this

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is written by Don Stover and it's available on their site.

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>She says John Cook, who's a research fellow on climate

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:16.800
<v Speaker 1>communication at the University of Queensland's Global Change Institute, said, quote,

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>our planet has been building up heat at the rate

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of about four Hiroshima bombs every second. Consider that going

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>continuously for several decades. Then this was reformulated by a

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>climate scientist, James Hansen, who is a member of the

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Science and Security Board, and in Hansen said that climate change,

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>its excess energy build up in the Earth's ocean and

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>other heat reservoirs, was equivalent to exploding four hundred thousand

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Hiroshima atomic bombs per day three hundred and sixty five

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 1>days per year. Now that sounds crazy, right, Like we

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>all go con now like this just the even like

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I can go all right, maybe I see where Nichols

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is at with like thinking that this is purely rhetorical.

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But Don Stover does a really good job in this

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>article of breaking down why these are important arguments, Because yeah,

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on on the surface of things, I hear those stats

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think, well, you're talking about like global heat

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>increases versus the very localized um heat output of a

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of a nuclear detonation. It's kind of disingenuous to compare

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>those two things. Yeah, exactly, But Stover says, okay, is

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>this comparison accurate. Well, she says Hanson, comparing the explosive

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>yield and not instant maths of death of a bomb yield, Well,

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that's measured in keylow tons of T and T. You

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>can take that and you can convert it into an

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>equivalent number of calories for direct comparison with the Earth's

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>rising heat content. The problem that Hanson argues is that

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gases reduce the amount of Earth's heat radiation that's

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>going out into space, So there's a temporary energy imbalance

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 1>here on the planet. And they've done the math figuring

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out that that totals two point six watts per square

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>meter of Earth's surface. Now, Anthony Watts dismissed this excess energy.

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>This is another person who argued against this and said, look,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's hardly a blip. It only has the power of

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one one of a sixty what lightbulb. And that's true.

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But then Stover points out the numbers are still right

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>when you consider the cumulative imbalance over time. So their

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>example is if you lived in a house and it

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.240
<v Speaker 1>had a point six what per square meter of heat

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>energy that never left the building. It would raise the

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>heat by four point five degrees per day, eventually boiling

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you to death and under a month. That's a pretty

0:46:55.080 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>big twinkie. Yes, it is, Dr Bankman. Uh Now, Stover says,

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>is the comparison effective well. Cook argues that his pronouncement

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:09.479
<v Speaker 1>was effective since it made headlines around the world, meaning again, look,

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a communications device. Uh. Since misinformation about climate change,

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>or what he calls sticky ideas, Cook wanted to fight

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>them with stickier ideas rather than speaking in complex, abstract,

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>dry language. He wanted to advocate for simple, concrete and

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>basically emotional rhetoric. But that was also credible, So math's there,

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But he also wanted to sort of condense it into

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>something that was I guess, as we say with in

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of social media, would go viral. Yeah. So the yeah,

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of being here that if you have anti

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>climate change statements that have to invoke Stephen Colbert's terminology

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 1>truthiness to them, like they they they feel like they're

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 1>they're accurate, and therefore people cling to them. He's trying

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to create things that that both feel truthy and our

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>truth exactly. Yeah, I think that's his goal here. And

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>then finally Stover says, well, is the comparison itself appropriate?

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And she argues, yes, it is. Climate change is a

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>manmade phenomenon that is also catastrophic, and she says the

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 1>atom bomb is a manmade phenomenon that is catastrophic. The

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:19.760
<v Speaker 1>goal of the bulletin is to spur people to action,

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be working. Also, she says climate

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 1>change does cause mass death by increasing the frequency of

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>extreme weather events like heat waves and floods, while creating

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>conditions that make it easier for disease to thrive and

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>crops to fail. Uh. In fact, it is already estimated

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that climate change kills four hundred thousand people annually in

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that respect. So I didn't see how she broke those

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers down, but I'm guessing what she means is that heat,

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, accumulatively, heat waves, floods, increases in disease and

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>uh uh, I would imagine starve ation due to crop

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>failure amounts to that many deaths per year. So all right,

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we're Robert and I are going to leave it up

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to you audience. We're not gonna tell you one way

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:12.919
<v Speaker 1>what to think or the other about the doomsday clock.

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But we've broken it down for you. Now you know

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what the doomsday clock is, you know who the people

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are behind it, you know how they calculate what it is.

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Are we two and a half minutes to midnight? How's

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Iron maide In song sounding to us? Now? I mean,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the end here, regardless of how you think about it,

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the the clock is achieving its purpose, getting people to

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>discuss it, to tease apart the issue, ask themselves, do

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are that is what's going on in the world today

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>making us safer? Do we feel safer? Um? And how

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>concerns should we be about nuclear weapons? About climate change

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and about some of these emerging threats that we discussed

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, ways more science sci fi threats,

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but but as but the threats that are still part

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of this, uh, this human invention, things that we've introduced

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>into the world by opening the technological Pandora's box, if

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you will. Yeah, speaking of sci fi threats, I saw

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this shirt when I was on the airplane on the

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>way to Seattle last week. That made me think of

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>all of this and and I did not realize it,

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but it is a quote from Aliens Uh, so I

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>went and looked it up. This guy on the airplane

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that I was on, he was wearing a T shirt

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that said no maste piece through superior firepower, and the

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 1>image was something like a somebody meditating in a lotus position,

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but the person was made up of two machine guns

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pointing upward. And so you know, apparently this is a

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.760
<v Speaker 1>slogan that one of the soldiers I believe it's Frost

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in Aliens has emblazoned on their uniform. Would Frost You're

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to think Frost is uh? Is Frost? The

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other guy with the giant machine gun? That's not Vasquez? Okay, okay,

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that one alright, a like gatling gun thing. Maybe I'm wrong.

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Aliens fans out there are probably screaming at us through

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the through the podcast headphones, but um, anyways, so it

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>came from that. But then you know, this is a

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>shirt that this guy was wearing basically saying advocating for

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the same you know, nuclear proliferation idea here that it's

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a deterrence. If we have superior firepower, then that will

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 1>create peace because no one will want to attack us. Right,

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I agree with that. Uh, and

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm an Aliens fan. Well, you know that that shirt

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>design reminds me of the cover art for a p

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>jo Or Rourke book that came out in called Give

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>War a Chance, And the cover art was the peace symbol,

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 1>but the center of the peace symbol was a B

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty two bomber. Uh yeah, it's ah, I feel like.

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But in both both of these cases, the symbol that

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the simplification of the message, which winds up with the

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:02.240
<v Speaker 1>symbolic simplification of the the doomsday clock. I mean, these

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>raised questions about how are we to think about about

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>nuclear arms? How are you think about about limiting and

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>decreasing the number of nuclear weapons out there? Because it

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>everything is interconnected. It's a it's it's a it's a

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a jinga game of a humanity survival. And yeah,

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you can say nuclear weapons are bad, but you can't

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just you know, you can't just pull out the jinga

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>block for one nation's weapons and expect that to it

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all be a reasonable response unless everybody else is uh

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is is coordinating, coordinating their movements as well. Uh. It's

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're treking scenario similar build ups in

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>other countries, right, like, first it was the US and Russia,

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>then it was India and Pakistan. Now it's North Korea

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and South Korea. Like we're going to keep seeing this

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of build up all around the world, If that's

0:52:57.840 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be the logic that we use for trying

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>keep peace. Yeah, I mean, because ultimately there is a there,

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a special table you get to sit at. If

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you have access to these weapons, it gives you. It

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>gives you a certain amount of power and in a

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>certain voice that you didn't have previously. Um. And my

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>argument would be, even if I did believe in peace

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>through superior firepower, based on what we were talking about earlier,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if there's either human miscalculation or technological miscalculation, having that

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>much firepower possibly go wrong, it's not worth it to me. Yeah,

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.839
<v Speaker 1>And in aliens it goes, It goes pretty wrong. It does, indeed, Yeah,

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it does. Indeed, although I guess we have to blame

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the engineers for that or we'll find out an alien

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 1>covenant in the UM. So, if you're concerned about this,

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if you've heard this episode and you're you've got the

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>doomsday clock fear, the bulletin says there's three things that

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you can do. The first is you can learn as

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>much as you can about the powerful technology that can

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>destroy our way of life. Yeah, that sounds like a

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:04.879
<v Speaker 1>fun homework assignment. Uh. Then you can share what you've learned,

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>either tell people in real life or put it on

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>social media or something. Uh. And then they say the

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>third thing is tell your government representatives what your concerns are.

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's the doomsday clock, that's the bulletin of atomic scientists.

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. Do you believe this whole climate change

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is as bad as nuclear war things? Should climate change

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>be included in the doomsday clock's calculations? And are we

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>really two point five minutes close to midnight? Or where

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>would you estimate us on the clock? Yeah? I'd also

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from listeners both younger and older than us,

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>uh with with their personal take on what it was

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like to grow up in the shadow of the mushroom class.

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of our older audience members uh may have memories

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>even from from before the advent of nuclear weapons, like

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and and our younger listen. We have listeners out there

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who came out of the nineties um or or even

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 1>even later. Uh. Terrifyingly enough, uh so so I'd be

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>interested to hear what how, what have you grown up in? What?

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>What is what is the environment? Then what is the

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.720
<v Speaker 1>media been telling you? What have you been picking up from? Uh,

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from adults in your life as well as all of

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the various media you consume regarding the these threats to

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our way of life? Yeah, should we be panicked? All

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the ways you can get in touch with us. Then,

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many social media channels these days were on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. And you should visit stuff to Blow your

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. Man, that is a good website. Ah, yeah,

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm partial to it. That's where because that's where you

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>find all the episodes of this podcast, as well as

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>blog post videos and links hotell those social media accounts

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that we mentioned earlier. And then if you just want

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to write us directly, you can always find us at

0:55:48.080 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>blow the Mind at how stuff Works dot com for

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Because it

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com. I think