WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Pfizer, Micron Earnings 

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 3>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 3>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 4>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul'sweeny on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>business story is impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Today, we'll look at why US Vacation has planned to

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>increase travel spending in twenty twenty five.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we'll break down my Micron Technologies revenue forecast missed

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 4>analyst projections.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 3>First, we begin with earnings from the biopharmaceutical company Pfiser.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 4>This week, viser forecasted twenty twenty five sales and earnings

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>in line with analyst projections.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a step towards offering relief to weary investors that

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>feel the drugmaker is being mismanaged.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 4>For more, we are joined by Zam Fazelli, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Director of Research for Global Industries and Senior Pharmaceuticals, and

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 4>we first asked Sam about Pfizer's guidance for investors.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Look, this is the story about a company that didn't disappoint.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I think, having seen what happened during twenty twenty four,

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 5>this is the company that people were a bit worried about.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, is it going to come out and give

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 5>us a whole bunch of guidance that is actually below consensus?

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 5>And here we are with something that's in line with

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 5>consensus pretty much mostly. There are some moving parts that's

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, to think about it if you want to

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 5>get into the nitty gritty, but at the end of

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 5>the day, it's pretty much in line with consensus. And

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 5>that's a sigh of relief for a stock that's pretty

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 5>much close to I don't know if it's an all

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 5>time lobe, because this company has been around for a

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 5>long long, long time. But it certainly is a very

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>weak share price compared to where it's been before, especially

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 5>in the heights of the pandemic with COVID sales and

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 5>everybody think it's going to be one hundred billion dollar market

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 5>a year. So U that's where we are.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of vaccines for a second. We were watching the

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Stewart Scrooge movie. We like to do Christmas movies,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 4>and my daughter goes, when was this set like in

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the eighties? Right, so to the point we're like, no, honey,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 4>like it was, it was a long time ago, and

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>we will I'll be dead at this point if we

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 4>learnt that time. Okay, But I guess my question is,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 4>how do we have conviction on what these docks are

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>going to do next year? We have no idea what

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 4>the administration is going to be like or what their

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>relationship with drug companies is going to be.

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Like, Yeah, but Alex, you know the government can't change

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 5>things overnight, right, so by the time they take off

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 5>is by the time they start putting new laws into play, which,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 5>of course one of them is possibly going to be

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 5>some way of trying to rain in the PBMs. The

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 5>pharmacy benefit managers, the middlemen who take the big fat

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 5>chunk of a profit out of these high drug prices.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 5>By the time that happens, it will be twenty twenty

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>six or something like that. The reality is that it's

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>all going to be about rhetoric. Right, So are we

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>going to have a health and human services run by

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 5>RFK anti vaccine? Is you're going to tone down his

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 5>anti vaccine? Is he going to get confirmed? So it's

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 5>going to be all about the optic optics of it,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 5>and it's also all about the rhetoric no real impact.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 5>But investors don't look at what's happening next year. They

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>always look at two or three years down the road.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Now here we have a company and that's dealing with IRA.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the first farmer company has put out

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 5>their guidance and they're saying that the changes in the IRA,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 5>which are good for patients. By the way, I have

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 5>to say that right up front, is going to hit

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 5>them about one to one and a half billion dollars.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 5>I think the number or a billion dollars, so one

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 5>and a half percent hit right. So that's because they're

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 5>going to be having to cover the catastrophic.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Pay that.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 5>In terms of the part the medicare coverage, and of

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 5>course they've got drugs that are high priced, so that

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of thing I do expect. And of course, you know,

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 5>sentiment is all in our world, so it just tells

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 5>you where we are in some of these names.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the great new functions on the Bloomberg terminals

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 3>MODL for financial models, and this is where Bloomberg Intelligence

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and Bloomberg have compiled a lot of the earning estimate

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 3>models from a lot of the leading Wall Street and analysts.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>And what you see there is for a company like Pfiser,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>they got a lot of drugs, and investors really focus

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 3>on the various drugs and how they're growing. What do

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>you focus on for Pfizer, Sam.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Sozer's twenty twenty five is about execution and getting

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 5>this new company that they bought Sea Gun. It's now

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 5>that new anymore. It's a while ago they bought it

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 5>fully integrated, and managing those if you think about it,

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 5>a lot of what they've said today with regards to

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 5>the growth on the EPs line is due to managing costs.

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 5>So they've come below some Wall Street expectations in terms

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 5>of sales and marketing costs and you know with within

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 5>even R and D costs. So but that's been the case.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.239
<v Speaker 5>This is a company that's trying to find its new world,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 5>in the new world of COVID. How much vaccine am

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I going to sell? How much black Slovia that I'm

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 5>going to say? I remember, that's a nine billion dollar

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 5>line or so, right, that's not a you know for

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 5>a company that's guiding into six sixty one to sixty

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 5>whatever the number is here, sixty one sixty four billion

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 5>dollars sales range. So that's where there is. There was

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of sensitivity here and worry and of course

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 5>they've said, I think we're on a straight line from

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 5>last year to twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 5>so that's where they worry was. And frankly, new drugs

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and stuff. It's always important, but we need City Day

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 5>to come through.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Our Thanks to Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 3>for Global Industries and senior pharmaceutical scentalists, we.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Move next to commercial real estate. This week, we focus

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 4>on a story titled office real Estate is facing a

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>year of reckoning in twenty twenty five.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>You can find the story on Bloomberg dot Com and

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>The Terminal. It discusses how commercial real estate is bracing

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>for losses in twenty twenty five as lenders run out

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of patients and borrowers struggle to refinance loans for more.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 4>We were joining by Patrick Clark, Bloomberg real estate reporter.

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 4>We first asked him why commercial real estate may suffer

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 4>next year.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 6>These things take time. It's like a slow grind down,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 6>just in the way that post GFC. You know, the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 6>delinquencies in default really didn't spike until or didn't peak

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 6>untill twenty twelve. It takes time for the stuff to

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 6>work its way through the system. Everyone's running out of

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 6>patients a bit like on the lender side, you know,

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 6>the extensions no longer come free, and they might not

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 6>come at all at this point. So part of it

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 6>is that I think the one thing that's changed is

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 6>a year ago people might have expected we were going

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 6>to get six or seven rate cuts this year, and

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 6>now that's you know those Not only the does not happen,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 6>but we don't expect them next year later. So you

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 6>can no longer sit there hoping and expecting that interest

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 6>rates are going to save you. So you kind of

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 6>got to make a decision.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So how does this come about? Is it in terms of, oh,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>my goodness, the equity folks have to write down the

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>value of the building. That only or usually happens when

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I've got a loan coming due and I've got to

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 3>renegotiate it, and then I've got to get a determination

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>of the value the building or the lender will put

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>evaluation of the building. Is that typically the precipitating factor.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's you know, it's the maturity wall.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 6>As you're you know, it comes time you have to

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 6>pay off that there's a big Almost all these loans

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 6>have big balloon payments at the end of them, and

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 6>you got to pay them off. That means you've got

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 6>to get a new loan. And the new loans have

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 6>not really been available, and we're certainly not available at

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 6>pricing that would be tolerable. And so that's where that's

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 6>where the negotiations come in. And I think the again,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 6>the way those negotiations have played out over the last

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 6>eighteen months have been the can down the road, extend

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 6>and pretend, or sometimes the cleaned up version of that

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 6>is amend and pretend, which means you actually have to

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 6>put something in to get the extension. But again, it's

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 6>like the extensions are a little they become harder and

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 6>harder to get over time, particularly as this hope that

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be an event which makes all the

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 6>problems go away and dissipates.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 4>When is the maturity wall sort of coming up? And

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate it's probably property by property and who takes.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 6>The hit the maturity wall is you know, it's permeable, right,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 6>things pass through it. They in some ways, you know,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 6>there's there. The one thing that happens when you extend

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 6>loans is that you add them to next year's maturity wall,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 6>and so the more the more loans don't pay off.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 6>And I saw stat I don't think we got into

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 6>the story, but something like, you know, it's only like

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 6>a quarter of Central Business District office buildings that are

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 6>financed in the CNBS market have paid off at maturity

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 6>over the last three or four So it's like a

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 6>lot of them are pushing out. They're pushing out, and

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 6>that just makes the maturity wall go higher. Now they

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 6>can continue to be pushed out until they can't. And

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 6>we don't know exactly when that moment will hit or

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 6>with what force or with with what volume?

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Right, a sprinkle of companies are coming sing we're getting

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>people back five days a week. And I wonder if

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 3>that's being perceived by the commercial real estate market is

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>all right, maybe the worst is behind us in terms

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 3>of vacancies and that kind of thing. Is there any

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>any discussion of real estate business that maybe just the

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 3>business fundamentals have bottomed.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 6>I think yeah, sure, yes, and I but in some

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 6>ways I think that is more of a catalyst for

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 6>resolution of these situations. It's sort of like, we know

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 6>what it is now. It's not great. It's it's great

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 6>if you own one Vanderbilt or you know, a brand

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 6>new high tech office building seven thirty one les. But

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 6>you know if you own commodity office and in you know,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 6>in the garment district or something, and that's you know

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 6>what it is now, and it's not great.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm just wondering, is it big banks that have a

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of these loans? Is it small guys, Like where

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 4>do we see the ripples?

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 6>I think that one of the things that I think

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 6>we've seen happen is that the bigger banks that are

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 6>in you know, better situations across their business have been

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 6>able to and have been reserving at a you know,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 6>at a faster at a higher rate. So they are

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, they've been quicker to acknowledge the issues and

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 6>to prepare themselves to ultimately realize losses, whereas smaller banks

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 6>we've seen much less of that. You know, we're starting

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 6>to see smaller regional banks modify loans at a greater pace,

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 6>which again I think we see as like they're pretending less.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 4>They're still they're extending and pretending less.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 6>No, no, well they're pretending less anyway, like they're acknowledging. Yes, okay,

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 6>like more stuff is still yet to happen. We can't

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 6>just push these things out. We have to get ourselves

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 6>in position. But nobody wants this all to happen at once, right,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's in everyone's interests for these problems to

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 6>be realized, you know, gradually and at a pace where

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 6>they can kind of be controlled our Thanks to Patrick Clark,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Real Estate.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Reporter, coming up, we're going to dig deeper into a

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 4>retirement crunch that's haunting Americans nearing sixty years old.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing into

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 3>research and data on two thousand companies in one hundred

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 3>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigo

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>on the terminal.

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 4>I'll Paul Sweeney and I'm Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Playing and broud

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the travel and leisure sector. According

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 4>to a Bloomberg Intelligence survey, US vacationers plan to increase

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 4>travel spending in twenty twenty five from last year.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 3>And for more on this research, we were joined by

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Jody Lourie, Bloomberg Intelligence Credit Analysts.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Jody to walk us through some of

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 4>these findings from her survey.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 9>I have to say, as a credit analyst, and I've

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 9>mentioned this a few times on your show, we get

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 9>uncomfortable with the amount of optimism, and we got on.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 9>I was uncomfortable personally because we did our credit outlook

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 9>and it was a bit too optimistic for my liking.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 9>That said the data doesn't lie. And when we surveyed vacationers,

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 9>seventy two percent said that they're willing to spend more

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 9>in twenty five versus twenty four. Now you compare that

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 9>to last year, where it was only sixty seven percent

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 9>said they were planning to spend more in twenty four

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 9>over twenty three. So it's a pretty big bumb.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Where are they spending? How are they spending?

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 9>Sure, so, Paul, I mean, I think if you think

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 9>of the average person, going on vacation is.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 10>A big thing.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 9>We zeroed in on people who are planning vacation as

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 9>a priority for next year, and for those people, they

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 9>are actually saying seventy nine per center saying that they're

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 9>spending more on travel overclothing, and that was compared to

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 9>seventy percent last year. Now, where they're going is also

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 9>interesting because we saw a big spike in vacationers who

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 9>are planning on going on cruises that's thirty seven percent,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 9>as well as on all inclusive vacations. And we did

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 9>see a pullback in theme parks, We saw a pullback

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 9>in casinos and race tracks, and so what we're seeing

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>is a lot of I guess set in and forget

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 9>it type vacations, vacations where people can do these big,

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 9>luxurious things, and also in hot places like the Caribbean,

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 9>Italy or Mexico.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's interesting. And also then in terms of budget,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 4>like you said, set it and forget it, like you

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 4>get the budget, it's done, like you know exactly how

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 4>much you're gonna pay, you don't have to think about it.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 4>That's quite interesting. Is there what's taken a hit like

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, maybe where they're not spending money as much?

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 9>Right so, I think what we're a little bit concerned about,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 9>Alex and we've been expressing this for quite a few

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 9>months now, is in theme parks. You know, theme parks

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 9>had a very good run in twenty twenty two, and

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 9>the question is are they going to see that same

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 9>run in twenty and twenty five, And so far the

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 9>data is saying no. It's it's a little bit hard

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 9>to say, but I would suspect that a lot of

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 9>people are getting sticker shop for the destination theme parks

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 9>and then the regional theme parks. Of course, you know

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 9>we had the big merger between six Flags and Cedar Fair.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 9>We of course have United Parks formerly SeaWorld, and I

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 9>don't know if people aren't necessarily either counting that as

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 9>a vacation because their one day trip, or if they're

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 9>choosing instead of doing these one day trips to do

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 9>these big lavish vacations and that's where their budget is going.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>How about Europe because you know, you hear stories about

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 3>how Europe was just overrun by American tourists over the

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>last several years, and after September is my Europe. That's

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>our new thing. So we do in Europe in September

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>last year, we did Ireland. This year, I think we're

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>going to do Italy. Confirming that to tomorrow with Kelly

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 3>with Hawaii talk to us about Europe Americans still going

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to Europe because I mean, I get the euroed almost parody.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, Paul, you are going to be one of

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 9>many people going to Italy next year. It seems we

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 9>had a big bump from last year, so people who

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 9>are going to Italy. Last year was only about eighteen

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 9>percent and now it's twenty five percent of our vacationers.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 9>So that's pretty big spike. Now putting it into context,

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 9>Italy isn't quite back to where it was pre pandemic

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 9>in terms of vacationers or travelers into Italy, but they

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 9>are getting there. What we are seeing is, you know, Mexico,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 9>the Caribbean, it's it's very, very high, and it's going

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 9>to get higher. Places like Italy, Portugal, Spain, those are

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 9>going to do very well next year too. Whether or

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 9>not we get back to pre pandemic levels for some

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 9>of those countries remains to be seen. But you might

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 9>see that you're a little bit crowded. Paul, and perhaps

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 9>the government of those countries they've been talking about limiting

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 9>cruise lines, for example, in terms of docking and so interesting.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, it might be a little bit harder to

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 9>get there. You might have to be a little bit

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 9>more creative.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Going to September. Yeah, he's going in September. He doesn't

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 4>have kids like he's septembery.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 9>You'll be fine.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm the one with the problem. I'm planning a Scotland

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 4>trip in July. That's going to be something. So yeah, okay, yeah,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 4>So let's talk about individual companies. So your credit analyst,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 4>which kind of companies are going to win from this.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 9>We're suspecting that Royal Caribbean and Carnival in particular, are

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 9>going to do quite well from this. You could also

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 9>say a Viking would do well because the smaller vessel

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 9>cruise ships are going to be able to access these

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 9>small islands and you know in the Mediterranean. But companies

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 9>that that also could potentially do well, we think is

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 9>something like a Marriott or a Hyatt in terms of

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, publicly traded companies, I should say, and the

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 9>reason being is, you know, Hyatt, for example, they bought

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 9>Apple Leisure in twenty twenty one and that gave them

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 9>a bigger footprint into Mexico, into the Caribbean. These companies

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 9>folk have been focusing a lot of their dollars on

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 9>the Caribbean. But also something interesting is Marriott announced an

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 9>acquisition of a company that focuses on wilderness and sort

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 9>of these natural cabin type places. So really really getting

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 9>a big kind of mix of things competition with I

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 9>guess you could say the Airbnb or the outpost airbnbs.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 9>And we are seeing that a lot of people are

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 9>preferring domestic vacations next year, you know, it's spiking to

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 9>ninety eight percent or planning or going on domestic vacation

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 9>versus ninety six I believe it was last year, and

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 9>international is staying flat at about seventy eight percent, so

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 9>people are looking domestic. We might see more national park

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 9>spending or national park visits than we saw, and Marriotte's

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 9>taking advantage of that.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Jody Lorie Bloomberg Intelligence Credit Analysts.

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 4>We move next to a Bloomberg Big Take story we

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 4>focused on this week, titled need to Grind Retirement crunch

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 4>haunts Americans nearing sixty. You can find it on Bloomberg

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 4>dot Com and The Terminal.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 3>The story looks at how Generation X face's significant financial

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 3>stress as they approach retirement age, with many feeling they

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>won't be able to afford to retire comfortably.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 4>For more, we are joined by one of the story's authors,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Suzanne Woolley, Bloomberg Personal Finance reporter. We first asked Suzanne

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to break down what she found in her reporting.

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, there's a lot of stress about it because, you know,

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 10>as the oldest exers become sixty, I mean they were

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 10>sort of the guinea pigs for four one k's. The

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 10>boomers had pensions, you know, and the four one k

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 10>on top of that, and now the exers are sort

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 10>of looking at their balances and looking at the news

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 10>about maybe Social Security having to be reformed within the

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 10>next decade, and looking at the money that they're spending

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 10>supporting their adult children and possibly also their parents aging parents,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 10>and it's just leading to a lot of concern about

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 10>how the heck are you going to be able to

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 10>retire in comfort anytime soon?

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 4>So, I was struck by it, was it forty three

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 4>percent say they can't afford to retire at sixty five.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 4>That is staggering.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 10>It is staggering, you know. It's it's just a combination

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 10>of a lot of things. I mean, housing affordability has

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 10>been an issue, you know, the high cost of living

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 10>is an issue. These are sort of the peak earning

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 10>years for a lot of exers, and they're hit with

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 10>the pandemic, which a lot of them say was a

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 10>big blow to their savings, you know, and then just

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 10>the cost of groceries, the cost of housing. Everything has

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 10>been going up and up and up, and it's harder

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 10>to save and it's harder to see, you know, how

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 10>you eke more out of an already stretched budget to

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 10>put away more for retirement.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 3>So is the expectation that since we're living longer, we're

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 3>just going to have to work longer.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 10>I think that's part of it, yes, because exers are

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 10>obviously going to live longer.

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 10>The truth is really that a lot of people, at

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 10>least boomers, have a lot of challenges when they retire.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, they feel sort of rootless. So in a way,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 10>maybe it's not so bad if we can work longer.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 10>There's this epidemic of loneliness in America. It gives people

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 10>a sense of purpose. But the fact is, you want

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 10>to have the option to retire when you want to, or.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 4>To work differently. Right, so maybe you're working part time,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 4>or maybe you're working at a job that you work

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe eight hours a day versus like fourteen hours, you know,

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 4>like it's a different kind of environment and pace. Like

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Paul wants to be a Walmart greeter in his third career.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm not entirely kidding about that, but we don't

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 4>support that part.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 10>No, no, I mean, but that is, you know, that

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 10>is sort of the reality. You know, in your later years,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 10>you may not want to grind away at the same

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 10>job you've been doing for you know, the past couple

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 10>of decades, but you might do consulting in your area,

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 10>or you know, at least you'll make some money later

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 10>in life. It's not just like you'll turn the switch

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 10>a sixty two or sixty five and then all income

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 10>coming into you is over. But I mean social security

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 10>makes people a lot of nervous because that's something it's

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 10>sort of the one thing in our so we can

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 10>sort of depend on, and something's going to have to happen.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 3>What is the feeling in with your reporting here about

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 3>social Security? I mean, do we I'm not.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's not good. It's not good, Paul. People are

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 10>really not feeling that social Security is gonna be there

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 10>for them in the way they need it, and you know,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 10>unsurprisingly they place a lot of flame on that in politicians.

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm gen X and I'm assuming I'm not

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 4>getting Social Security. If I do, that's super like benefit

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 4>go me. But that would be like extra stuff. So like,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 4>my whole life is revolved around how do I put

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 4>my money in a way that will make me money

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 4>later in some kind of tax free way, because that

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 4>I've seen with my parents how difficult it is to

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 4>pay taxes when you don't have any income. Except for

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 4>like attentionional or social Security.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 10>Yes, and for most people, you know, eighty five percent

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 10>of the social Security benefits are taxed, which is bananas exactly. Yeah,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 10>that's my personal fing Yes, yeah, I like that formal

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 10>assessment the bananas.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So what what's a solution?

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there are a lot of ways you can

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 10>sort of, I mean, obviously you can. If you're over fifty,

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 10>you can contribute more to your four one K. You

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 10>can contribute next to seventy five hundred dollars a year

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 10>if you have it this this coming year. There are

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 10>ways to you know, increase your savings. They're you know,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 10>side hustles. It's really hard to come up with an

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 10>answer to that question because it's different for every person.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 10>You know, what they can do. I guess just like

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 10>smarter savings and making sure you're doing everything you can

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 10>to optimize your tax advantage savings if your four one

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 10>K and maybe I mean roths are something I think

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 10>younger people should really look into.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Susanne Willie Bloomberg Personal finance reporter.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we're going to break down some of the

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 4>challenges that could be faced by President ELEC. Donald Trump's

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 4>nominee for Treasury Secretary.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 3>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Big on the terminal.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>I'll Paul Sweeney and I'm Alex Deel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the semiconductor company Micron Technology.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>This week, the largest US maker of computer memory chips,

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 3>game a revenue forecast that missed Anamal's projections by about

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 3>one billion dollars.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>The company was hurt by sluggish demand for smartphones and

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 4>personal computers. So for more, we were joined by Jake Silverman,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence semiconductor analyst.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Jake for his take on Micron's earnings results.

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like there might be a trough in

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>fiscal two q which is next quarter. It will kind

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of depend there was an inventory build up, so it

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of depends on how fast those tories deplete. Because

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>while demand isn't particularly strong, it might be kind of weak.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It is somewhat stable for the most part, So in

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of unit demand, when we think about end markets,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>smartphones doing a little bit better, PCs definitely doing a

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit weaker. But you know, on the other hand,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as we think about the second half of the calendar year,

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we might see seasonal demand pick up. We might also

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>see some content expansion opportunities for Micron. When we think

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about AI smartphones and aipcs, we're not exactly sure what

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the demand will look like yet there is you know,

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we do believe that there will be some uplift from that.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>So as Micron is a company that does have an AI,

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 3>angle doesn't have what would like to develop one, how

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 3>do you guys think that has the stree think.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually, if you look at their data center revenue, a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is coming from AI right now. So

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a number of different products that are actually

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from AI. I think the one talked about the

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>most is high bandwidth memory, but that's still very nascent.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>We think it's only going to be about ten or

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so percent of sales, maybe a little bit more now

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>after the recent guidance for next year, so it's pretty early.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's growing off of a low base. But you take

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a look at some of the other products. They also

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have high capacity dims with your DRAM modules that go

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>into servers. They have lpdd R five similar style product,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they have data center SSDs, which a slightly

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>different story. We're seeing a little bit of a demand

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>moderation right now, so things are maybe cooling off, but

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>could re energize.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Later in the year. So that's what I'm wondering. Do

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 4>you feel like the stock reaction then is overdone based

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 4>on their AI of potential.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>It's I think right now. It's just expectations were pretty high.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it was based on AI. I don't

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think there was a particularly strong expectation for traditional markets.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, the weakness in those markets

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was more pronounced than expected, and so you're starting to see.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 2>The sell off.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>High band with memory really hasn't quite inflected yet, so

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not really seeing those results when I was seeing

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that in their results yet.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>How much of this is a sector issue PCs no

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>handsets versus a Micron issue, because I like this story

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's like back in the day when I was

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>actually running some money there, I'd be like, I take

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 3>a look at this name here in this pullback Today?

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, I mean again, I think it'll come down

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to how much traditional demand sort of re emerges in

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the how much seasonality really exists.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a few catalysts to re energize that,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those being PC refresh cycle. There's also been

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a push towards a more premium tier mix of smartphones,

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>people upgrading say from just the iPhone fifteen to the

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>iPhone sixteen pro.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 4>Or iPhone twelve. But whatever, that's not me, not me,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not that actually.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Six I do ever iPhone twelve, so.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 4>I can throw shade. Where does this is a supremely

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 4>silly question, but where does Microns sit in the AI world?

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Like their customers are who they get product from? Whom?

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so some of their customers, including video. They now

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have three high band memory customers. I think one of

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>them is a MD and another one might be Google.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Given that they have such high demand for their TPU

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's partially internally, but they also you know, that's

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for high bandwith memory. But then also some of their

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>other products that I mentioned before, like lpdd R five,

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>their high capacity dims, those are being sold into AI

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>servers as well. But then you know, you have to

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that some of that revenue, in fact,

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the majority of that revenue right now, is coming from

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the traditional compute side, if you think about servers that

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are based on the Intel and AMD CPUs.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, thanks to Jake Silverman, Bloomberg Intelligence Semiconductor analyst.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 3>We turned now to a Bloomberg Big Takes story we

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>focused on this week, titled Debt Risk that Lord Bessant

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>to US Treasury now Loo Large.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on Bloomberg dot com and the terminal,

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 4>and the story looks at Scott Bessont, President elect Donald

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump's nominee for Treasury Secretary.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 3>The story focuses on how Bessont faces the challenge of

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 3>reducing the US federal deficit, which is projected to exceed

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>six percent of GDP in twenty twenty five.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 4>For more, we were joined by one of the stories authors,

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Victoria dend Renew Bloomberg US Treasury reporter.

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Victoria to break down some of the

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 3>findings from her story.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 7>What we were trying to show is that the dead outlook,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, a lot of experts ad looks quite challenging.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 7>And Scott Vesant, if and when not confirmed as Treasury Secretary,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 7>is going to have to deal with the challenges that

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 7>the outlook poses while also trying to execute the Trump

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 7>administration's economic vision. And he himself has spoken about the

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 7>fiscal outlook in the past. He said he wants to

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 7>bring the deficit down to three percent, essentially halving it.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 7>So we basically take a look at how possible that is,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 7>how budget and markets experts think, how likely that is

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 7>based on, like you said, the drivers of the deficit,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 7>like for instance, interest cost has become a key driver,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 7>particularly in the year that just passed. So it's you know,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 7>all of the experts were most of the ones we

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 7>spoke to talk about quite how halfing it to three

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 7>percent will be quite quite tricky.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So the US government's debt load, to put a nice

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 3>round number on it, is now over twenty eight trillion dollars.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it seems like a big number to me.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Is there political willpower on either side of the Aisle

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 3>of Victoria. Have you learned to address this at all?

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's tricky because you know the new administration, they're

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 7>going to have to face this issue quite early on. Obviously,

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 7>the tax cuts that expire at the end of next

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 7>year are going to be a very big part of

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 7>the debate, and Donald Trump and his administration has said

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 7>they want to extend those. That's obviously. That obviously means

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 7>that a source of revenue is not going to be

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 7>there if the tax cuts are extended. They do think

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 7>that that's going to boost the economy in a way

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 7>that's going to reduce the deficits, So that could help.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 7>But it's hard to know. I mean, there are fiscal

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 7>hawks in Congress right now. You know, the Republicans. They

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 7>control the House, So on the one hand, it could

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 7>it could be that they it's easier for them to

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 7>pass legislation, but it is a very thin minority majority. Sorry,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 7>So it could mean that actually congressional deal making when

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 7>it comes to the fiscal issues is going to be

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 7>much harder than it looks.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 4>And not only is it twenty eight trillion, that's up

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 4>from seventeen trillion, or less at the end of twenty nineteen,

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 4>and as a share of GDP debts on a trajectory

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 4>to exceed even World War II levels. The idea is

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 4>that you get these blowouts when you have a war

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 4>because you need to fund it. We're not at war

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 4>in the same kind of way, and that's part of

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the issue. Talk to me about issuance. We've seen Janet

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Yelle and Treasury Secretary issue a lot on bills. Do

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 4>we think Scott Bessen is going to do more on

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 4>the long end or going to stay on the bill side.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, that is a great question, and that's when a

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 7>lot of market participants are going to be looking to

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 7>get hints or answers to I think when we talk about,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, the US debtload and issuance, I don't think

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 7>anyone is saying that the US is not going to

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 7>be able to find buyers for instead. But as we

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 7>saw last fall when heels were up, it could get

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 7>a bit more expensive for the US to borrow. So

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 7>that is a consideration because it weighs so much on

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, the overall spending of the government. In terms

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 7>of Scott bessin we don't have too many clues yet

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 7>as to how he would proceed with issuance, But what

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 7>we know is that he was critical of the current

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 7>treasuries and of Janet Yellen's treasuries strategy to issue more

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.719
<v Speaker 7>on the shorter end of the curve, which was, you know,

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 7>at a time when heels were very high. So I

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 7>think part of that strategy was to you know, essentially

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 7>whether the higher interests at the time. So if we're

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 7>going by what Scott Besson has said or other people

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 7>in the kind of Trump economic orbit, we could see

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 7>a shift and focus to longer treasuries. But it's always

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 7>different experts, sellers when secretaries actually become secretaries and they

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 7>deal with kind of a more holistic view of how

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 7>issuance works and the feedback they get from markets as well,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 7>which is very critical to this.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.479
<v Speaker 4>Our Thanks to Victoria Dendrinu Bloomberg US Treasury Reporter, we

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 4>move next to m and A. The impact of US

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 4>elections reverberated across sectors and geographies with respect to M

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 4>and A in November, and a.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Crucial catalyst for much of the deal making globally is

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>future tariffs. This is according to research from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 4>And for more on this, we were joined by Andrew Silverman,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior policy analyst.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Andrew what his expectations are for M

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and A in twenty twenty five.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 8>So it's actually really interesting. For the past year, we've

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 8>seen basically the same pattern. Month after month. We've had

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 8>tech companies being acquired. That's sort of like the leading

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 8>target tech companies. Then we have financial companies, and then

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 8>in normally in the third place, we see traditional energy companies. Right,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 8>But in November we saw this really interesting development. We

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 8>saw a lot of We saw a big spike in

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 8>basic materials companies being acquired, and we also saw this

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 8>increase in telecom companies being acquired, and we saw an

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.959
<v Speaker 8>increase in media companies obviously earlier in December. And I

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 8>think that that companies are positioning themselves after they saw

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 8>what happened in the election and trying to proactively protect

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 8>themselves for what might come in a Trump presidency.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Do we think that these will be transformative monster deals

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 4>we talk in like small Bolton's.

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, these are big deals like one.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>OK.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 8>For example, it's an eight point seven billion dollar deal

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 8>for end Link. Now that's a traditional energy deal. It's

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 8>sort of it's interesting companies are coming up with with

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 8>different sorts of conclusions about what's going to happen in

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 8>Trump presidency. We see these sort of traditional energy companies

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 8>still doing these big acquisitions. But then Blackrock did an

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 8>acquisition of HPS Company, and and that company is a

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 8>big credit investor in clean energy. So obviously they think

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 8>that either the Republicans aren't going to be as hard

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 8>on clean energy companies as people might think, or maybe

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 8>even there they're going to be good for clean energy companies. Obviously,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, if he puts tariffs on on on you know,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 8>foreign investment in the United States, then you know, clean

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 8>energy is a place where we might say a lot

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 8>of it because a lot of the the batteries and

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the solar cells and the even the

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 8>minerals that we use in our and our batteries are

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 8>coming from China. So if what's a sixty percent tarif

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 8>on China, not so great for a clean.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, another reason to maybe get some deals done

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 3>now before the tariff's kind of money up the situation. Perhaps,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember Paul Talbot, one of the leading M and

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 3>A bankers on Wall Street formerly Morgan Stanley. Now is

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 3>he has his own firm. He's out there saying they're

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 3>hiring investment bankers now in anticipation of deal activity really

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 3>picking up. One of the areas I think should be

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 3>better is just the regulatory environment. It seems every time

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 3>over the last three, four or five years that we

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 3>saw a deal announced big deals, the Federal Trade Commission

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 3>would have her problem, the Department of Justice would have

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 3>her problem. Now, I think the expectation is that's going

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 3>to ease up a little bit. Is that what you're

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 3>hearing out there.

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, certainly with Lena Congan, I think that's the single

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 8>most important factor because.

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>She's head of the FTC right exactly, very tough on

0:34:59.360 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 3>on consolate.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 8>Actually, Jen Rey and I have done some research on this,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 8>and we think that that the perception is that it's

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 8>going to be a much better environment for M and A.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 8>But not so fast because there's also that strong populist

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 8>stream to the Trump administration. In fact, you know, his

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 8>Vice President jd. Vance is a big fan of sort

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 8>of some of these progressive pieces of legislation that are

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 8>trying to make you know, that's some P five hundred

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 8>companies taxable when they do the organization. So it's possible

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 8>that even though people are very sort of optimistic about

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 8>what the environment is going to be without not only

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.479
<v Speaker 8>in a con for example, it may not be as

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 8>spectacular as they think, all right.

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Andrew Silverman, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Policy Analysts.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 2>the Ihart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal