WEBVTT - Why Insurers Are Pulling Out of High-Risk Areas

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Loots Podcast.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Whysenthal.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe, do you do you like watching the weather? I

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can hear the pain in your voice as soon as

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I asked them.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>It's so funny. I didn't. I was wondering how you're

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna start this one. I hate rain. I hate rain

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>so much. Other than that, I don't know. It's not

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>a big thing for me. What about you up in Connecticut?

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Is it a bigger deal up there?

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I love weather. I am sort of an armchair meteorologist,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>by which I mean I have several weather apps. I

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>get very excited about thunderstorms and other types of storms.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>My husband, however, does not. He gets extremely anxious whenever

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a forecast of a severe thunderstorm because inevitably it

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>ends up dumping like two inches of where we are,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and our basement starts to flood.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I've lived in a house that had flood damage. It

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 2>is extremely stressful experience too. I mean there's just like

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the direct issue of like cleaning up all of the

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>lost damage and then like compensation and damage to the

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>house is probably one of the more like sort of

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>like stressful things a homeowner can deal with.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know one of the stressful things happening right now,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're recording this on let's see September eighth. There's

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a major hurricane brewing in the Atlantic right now, Hurricane Lee.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It exploded from a tropical storm I think just two

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>days ago into a category four hurricane. Now it's category

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>five and there's a lot of deliberation about whether or

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not it's going to sort of run up the Atlantic coast,

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>might even get into New England. So an interesting one to.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Watch, yes, and I guess I guess by the time

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>people listen to this will be resolved. But I'm glad

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned that. But it's also coming in the context

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of a time when there is a lot of anxiety

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>about the property market and insurance. And this came up

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>on our recent episode that we did with Howard Hughes

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Holding CEO. We talked about this huge surge in the

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 2>cost that the company is paying for insurance. And there

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 2>have been so many stories about natural disaster prone areas

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and homeowners are either just getting staggering sticker shock when

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the cost of homeowners insurance and other

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>property insurance or there's no one at all, or you know,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>companies abandoning markets like Florida, like California, et cetera.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and it's not just hurricanes and floods. Of course,

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen wildfire risk becoming a more major thing, particularly

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in Hawaii and Maui. Recently, there have been a number

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of headlines, as you just mentioned, of certain insurance companies

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>pulling out of markets all together because they're no longer profitable,

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>or in some cases, like Florida, they haven't actually been

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>profitable for a very very long time. And insurance premiums

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are going up all over the United States. But it's

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting if you look at them on a regional basis.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in Miami the average cost of insurance is

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>something like five thousand dollars versus less than two thousand

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the rest of the US. So that gives

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you some idea of how this risk is starting to

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get repriced. But it opens up all these interesting questions

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about what is going to happen to cities, to houses,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to other buildings that are in these natural disaster prone areas.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, the thinking of things like flood insurance, which

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>is already sort of socialized or there's publicly funded. There

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to be a lot of appetite politically to

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>let property owners sort of completely be without insurance in

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>other words, right, So it's like if the private market

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>leaves an area, you don't really see politicians like, Okay, well,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess we can't build here anymore. There's usually the

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>government steps in in some way, maybe there's like a

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>state insure, a national insurre in the case of flood.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>And of course this creates its own issues, and that

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of another one of these financial services that's

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>like sort of post market, kind of like banking in

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>some respects. And so there is a lot going on

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 2>with this market. And you know, obviously comes in the

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>time of other financial tightening financial conditions, comes at so

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 2>much attention played to climate risk, and I think we

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>need to understand more of this area.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, it's a complex market. It seems to be getting

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>more complex by the day, So let's dig into it.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I am very pleased to say that we really do

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have the perfect guest. We are going to be speaking

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with Melanie gall She's the co director of the Center

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for Emergency Management and Homeland Security at Arizona State University.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>She also manages the Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for the United States, something known as SHELDUS. We're going

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to dig into exactly what that is in a few minutes,

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but Melanie, thank you so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>So maybe just to begin with, can you explain what

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the co director of the Center for Emergency MA Management

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and Homeland Security at Arizona State actually does. What does

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that entail?

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 3>So I may be the kind of person that you

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily directly associate with, that kind of you know,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 3>leadership position because by training, I am a geographer. I

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>started out making maps, digital maps, and I came into

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the field of emergency management through a stint that I

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 3>did in Africa. I was actually in Mozambique and I

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 3>did training on you know, how do you collect data

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>in the field with a GPS, this kind of information.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And it was after a massive flood event and then

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 3>I realized, ooh, there's a great connection between what I

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 3>was doing geographic information system and emergency management because you

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>need a lot of logistics support, you need to know

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>where your stuff is, where you should set up shelters

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and alike. And that was my route into emergency management.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>And so what I do here now at Arizona State University,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I teach. Obviously, we have a master's degree in an

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 3>undergrad program in emergency management and homeland security, and I

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>do numerous research projects. I work with out a nonprofit

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 3>organizations here in Arizona. So it's really a broad variety

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>of things. So it's very exciting as a job.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, you mentioned data collection, and of

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 2>course you have this database, and you know, it strikes

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>me that collecting natural disaster data seems extremely difficult for

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of reasons. I mean, even something as simple

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 2>as like tallying up the dollar amounts spent on recovery

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>strikes difficult. And what these trends are and I could

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>imagine that you could have an increase in dollar amounts

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>for an area and because there's more disasters, or maybe

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>because there's just more building and more people there that

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>could also cause that, and so like disambiguating some of

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>these effects. Talk to us a little bit about just

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the challenge of measurement, because if we're going to get

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>into insurance and know like how much risk is in

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a given area that you have to start with, like, well,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>how much dollar what is the dollar value of the

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 2>property in an area? So talk to us about the

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>challenges of measuring these types of things.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So let me start with telling you a little bit

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>about where we get our data from, and then too

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the measurement because we are a secondary user of disaster

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 3>loss information. So we get the vast majority of our

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>data from the National Weather Service or better you know,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the National Weather Service feeds the information to the National

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Centers for Environmental Information in CI, and that is where

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>we get the majority of the data from. So it

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>is actually your local forecast office, your local meteorologist that

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>collects that information. So it is not an economist or

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>an assessor or anything like this. So it's the local

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 3>forecast office that collects that information. So I came into

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>this arena of collecting disaster losses way back in the

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>days when I was a PhD student, where my professor

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>had this idea that as a geographer, it should be

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>fairly easy to develop profiles for the country. You know,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 3>how does County A suffer more from hurricane damage than

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>flood damage than County B and LO and behold, there

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>was not really easily accessible database where you can get

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>this information, and that was really the starting point for

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>setting up this database. So now we are in the

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>business of compiling data that is already assessed from different

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>federal agencies. So NCI is one of our main data sources,

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and then we also use data from the US Geological Survey,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>especially related to geological hazards earthquake damage, volcanic eruption damage

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>tsunamis analyte because the Weather Service obviously only collects data

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>related to mitrological and hydrological events, but we are interested

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>in compiling a database that covers all natural hazards. So

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 3>we are vistly using data. And there's only a tiny

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>fraction where we compile our own data, and that is

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 3>landslide data. So landslide data is really not or has

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>not been easily accessible. There was a Landslide Act passed

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago, so that now triggered the US

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Geological Survey to get most serious about collecting that data.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>And so we decided that we want to include landslide

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 3>data in our database. And that's where we then started

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>like scouring newspapers, websites, and we're applying the same sort

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of assessment methodology that the Weather Service is employing. Because

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the main users of our data are local planners, hazard

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>mitigation planners. And hazard mitigation planners sit in the emergency

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>management division of your county or of your state, and

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>they are actually charged by law. They are not required

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>to compile what it is called hazard mitigation plans, but

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they are incentivized to compile these hazard mitigation plans. And

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>in these plans you have to do risk assessments. These

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 3>risk assessments need to include a history of past losses

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's then when people tend to come to us.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>So measuring losses and assessing them goes exactly you know, Joe,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 3>you already mentioned it's a question of you know, how

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 3>much property do we have in an area and what's

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the property worth. So there are two types of losses.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>There's what's called direct losses and indirect losses. So direct

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>loss is when you see, you know, the destruction of

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a storm or a hurricane, like a loss directly tied

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 3>to the event. That is what we include in our database.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 3>We only include direct proper damage, direct crrupt damage, injuries,

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and fatality, So that would be for instance, a person

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, who got injured or drowned in a flood

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. And the indirect losses is, for instance,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>when a business has to shut down for a given

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 3>time because they can't operate their power is down or

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>something like that. And the indirect losses we do not

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>include in our database. So what I'm trying to say

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>is even what we have in our database is way

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 3>underestimating really the burden of losses that we have in

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the country from natural hazards.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>So I was going to ask, what happens when you

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>see I mean, you just gave us a great summary

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of how tricky it can be to measure some of

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>these costs. But what is happening if you get a

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>wildly different estimate of the cost of a certain disaster?

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And for instance, one thing I read was that, I

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>think the NCDC estimates that the damages from Hurricane Katrina

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>or something like one hundred and twenty five billion dollars

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>versus what Shelda says at eighty billion. What's happening there

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>when you get a discrepancy like that, And does it

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>matter in the real world in terms of contingency planning?

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 3>So it does to some degree. So it matters when

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you as a community have to justify why you need

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>money and why you want to invest to reduce the losses.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So communities have to do cost benefit analyses to justify

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 3>why it makes sense to invest maybe you know, building

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>a new retention pond or you know changing their building

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>codes and anything that has a price tag associated with it.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, these communities have to run benefit cost analysis

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and say, what we're investing is reducing losses in the

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 3>long run. And that's where it matters what you can

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 3>document in terms of past hazards. So the discrepancy and

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 3>estimates that you just mentioned is really that's our standard

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>business because it is so tricky to estimate these losses.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>There's the direct, there's the indirect losses. There's also insured

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 3>and uninsured losses. So it's always a question of sort

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of what slices of the pie and how much of

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the pie people looking at when they estimate losses. And

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>that's also where you see you've probably seen it many times, Noah,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 3>the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, they have what is

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 3>called billion dollar events. They get cited all over and

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>their estimates are always vast hire than what we have

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>in our database because they rely heavily on enshort data

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>and so in short data is again different from direct

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 3>losses what we document, and this is where all these

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>discrepancies come from. So in my line of business, when

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>it comes to direct losses, we tend to be conservative.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>So if we have competing estimates, we use the lower

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>estimate just to be on the safe side of not

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>over estimating losses. But that really just you know, might

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>aggravate the problem because we already have under estimation problem

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 3>and then we are conservative. But that is the approach

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>we've taken at the start of you know, developing this database.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, I want to get into you know, obviously we

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>want to get into what's happening right now and what

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing in insurance markets. But I think just to like,

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>before we get to that, are the cost of natural

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>disasters going up? And maybe that's a naive question, but

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I always have these states, Oh, is it just that

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 2>we're getting more attention to natural disasters in the media,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and is it just a sort of like is it

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>just a narrative that there are more that there are

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>more wildfires, et cetera, Or is it like, what are

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>we actually seeing big picture in the data. Are things

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 2>are we you know, is it getting worse?

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>It is getting worse, So our risk is going up.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We have more severe events, we have more events. The

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>question is why do we see higher losses. So higher

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>losses could be a function of simply having, you know,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 3>more events, more extreme events, and or it could also

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 3>be a function of what you mentioned earlier, Joe, more

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 3>people living in high risk areas, more property, or simply

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>more value being accumulated in high risk areas. It could

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 3>also be that maybe as a society we don't do

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 3>enough to mitigate these losses so that we get outpaced

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 3>by the risk that we're experiencing. Or it could also

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>be that we have not as resilient of a society,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>resilient infrastructure, resilient residential homes, and or it could also

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 3>be an increase in what we call social and nobility,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>meaning you have more people that lack the capacity to

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>prepare for, respond to, or recover from an event.

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's pivot to insurance and talk about what's going on there,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And maybe just to begin with, could you sort of

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>walk us through the landscape of this type of insurance

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>as it exists now, So let's say, you know, a

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hurricane happens in Florida. What's the sort of process by

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>which a homeowner would expect to get reimbursed? Because my

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding is there's different layers of private insurance and then

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of federal potentially as well, and of course

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>there are also the reinsurers who are sort of backing

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the upfront insurans. Can you walk us through how all

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that would work in a typical case.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so you know, just let me stay again. I'm

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>a geographer and training, I'm not an economists expert, but

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you that a it's very complex because

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>it varies, like you said, from state to state. And

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I think what a lot of people don't realize is

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you might have to purchase different insurance policies to be covered.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think most people assume all this is covered

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in my homeowner is insurance, and it is not, and

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>it depends on where you live. Like, for instance, landslide

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>risk not covered in any policy in any state in

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the US. So landslide risk is something that you cannot

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>file an insurance claim on because you can't get insurance

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 3>for it. So let's go to Florida. So if you

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>live in Florida, so you would let's say ideal scenario,

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 3>as a homeowner, you have homeowners insurance. You also have

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 3>flood insurance from the federal government. Also, many people don't

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 3>realize that that's a federal program because it's ministered by

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 3>your local insurance agent. So you buy your flood insurance

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>policy from your local agent, but actually you know the

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>company that ensures you is the federal government. And then

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 3>depending on what stayed you in and exactly how you

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>know the policy works. You also have to buy wind insurance,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 3>and states have different sort of thresholds. You know, when

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 3>is a storm actually a hurricane, does it have to

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>reach a certain wind speed then for the wind insurance

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>to pay out over the homeowners insurance. So for you

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>as an individual a you have to navigate what do

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I want to ensure, what can I afford to ensure,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>what kind of different policies do I need to buy?

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>And then when you actually have damage from an event,

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen this for instance after Hurricane Katrina, you

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>very often might face a situation where you then have

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 3>to argue with the insurance company if the damage that

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 3>you have was caused by wind or cause by flooding amazing,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen discrepancies where you know, one neighbor their

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>wind insurance paid out because their insurance company said, yes,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 3>we recognize that this is wind damage, and the other

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 3>neighbor didn't get anything from their policy because they're the

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 3>insurance said, oh, this is flood damage that you have.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>So having insurance does not necessarily mean that policy is

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>also going to kick in because they might be disputes

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 3>with regard to what type of data, but what type

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 3>hazard caused that damage?

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>What insurance rates up so much? I mean, I know

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this is like the whole question, but if someone asked

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 2>you that me why, Like in Florida, you know, I

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>saw there's a stat forty two percent higher for home

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>owned home insurance premiums. I mean I get that, like, okay,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>generally speaking, maybe natural disasters they're trending higher, but that

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>is like a staggering amount. And you know, I'll add

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to that. You see when you see companies dessert a state, why,

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why can't why don't they just charge more?

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 2>And what's happened in the last couple of years that's

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>so different than in the past.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 3>So let's maybe start with the statements that these insurance

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>companies released why they are shoring out of the market,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 3>especially like in Florida. So they cited a higher risk

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>in California was higher, while fire risk, which guest check,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>we see higher risk of that. They had higher building costs,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, you know, spending paying for the cost of

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>somebody rebuilding a home that has gone up as well.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 3>And then they also cited an increase in their own

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>insurance policies, meaning insurance companies ensuring with what is called

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a reinsurance company that raid has also gone up for them.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>So they had to make a decision, you know, are

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>we going to or can we pass on these higher

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 3>costs that we have and create an insurance product that

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 3>is competitive in the market. So can they then offer

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>a insurance premium that people would be willing to pay?

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 3>And obviously they made the decision that they're going to

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 3>pause writing policies. And I think, you know, calling this

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 3>a pause is important because this is not the first

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>time that we've seen this happen. Insurance companies have retreated

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 3>for a certain time period and then have come back

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>into the market. So we've seen this, for instance, in

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the state of Louisiana when this happened before the same

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>happened in Florida. You could also what you didn't see

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 3>in the statement, you could also interpret this. This is

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 3>what I personally interpret this approach as well, is sort

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 3>of a signal to a state government saying maybe we

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 3>need to rethink our partnership or maybe we need to

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 3>engage in a partnership, and maybe they need to be

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>legislation that incentivizes us to come back. Because, as you

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>mentioned earlier, we do not want people to be without

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>insurance because we know research shows that people recover much

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 3>much slower from a disaster if they do not have insurance.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's obvious because you don't have the financial resources.

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Unless you have massive savings, then maybe you don't need insurance.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 3>But if you're a person like me who doesn't have

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 3>massive savings, I need insurance if I need to recover

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and rebuild my home. And so we want people to

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>be insured. So the fewer people we have that have insurance,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>we are really foregoing what we know is a key

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 3>factor to disaster recovery.

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Melanie said something, there's a lot there, but one

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>thing that I just want to or sort of pull out.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that point about higher construction costs because we talk

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>about this all the time with inflation and labor costs

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and materials, et cetera. I mean, if it's like significantly

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 2>more expensive in twenty two twenty three to rebuild a

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 2>home than in twenty nineteen, then just not everything else aside,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 2>like mathematically you'd expect. Yeah, of course, like Insuran's got

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to be a compensated for.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>That, absolutely, Melanie. I want to go back to something

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you just said about, Well, maybe the insurers are sort

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of angling for legislative assistance and no one wants people

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>to go uninsured. I mean, another way of looking at

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it is maybe we should be incentivizing people to move

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out of these risk prone areas by not providing them

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>insurance and saying like, hey, if you want to live here,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you're on your own, and if something happens, that's on you.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that a legitimate thought to have about this?

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And is there any evidence that people not having insurance

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>actually does encourage them to move elsewhere?

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>So what really encourages people to have insurance is having

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>gone through a disaster, like we know, a key drive

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 3>force for people to become proactive for instance, with regard

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to maybe thinking about elevating their home, purchasing insurance, maybe

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 3>even moving, sort of really bracing for a future event

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 3>and preparing to have less impacts in the future. The

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>key driver for that is having gone through a disaster before,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>so experience is a key factor.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So no, not change their behavior until they've actually been

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>flooded out of their house.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Very much. For a lot of people, yes, that's the

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 3>case because you see it all the time. Like you

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>turn on the you know, turn on the TV. You

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 3>will see people say all the time, Oh, I've never

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 3>thought this is going to happen. And this I never

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>thought is going to happen factors into the decision to

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 3>not buy insurance because you know, if you think it's

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 3>likely to happen, and it's a good investment for you

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to make, Like you know, you only have a limited

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 3>amount of resources, so you have to make trade off decisions.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Do I spend what I have on buying insurance. You

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 3>will do this if you see it's likely to happen,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>so that you have a backstop when the event actually unfolds.

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you in your mind think, oh this is

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>so unlikely, I'm not going to do it, then there's

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 3>a high chance unless you force you not going to

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 3>buy insurance. I mean, think about it. It's very similar

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to our thinking with health insurance investing in retirement. We

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>humans have a real problem thinking about the future and

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>not discounting the future. So this is why we have,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of carrot and stick approaches to being

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 3>insured regarding any health issues and retirement because we are

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 3>not very good with this long term thinking, and buying

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>insurance also factors into that long term thinking. So it's

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 3>really really hard now to your point about moving. So

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I have to say, I get this question quite a lot.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Should people not just move? I always, you know, sort

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of just ask yourself, where would you move and how

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 3>likely would you be to move? How far away would

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you move? Like what holds you? You know, what ties

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 3>you to this place that you're in right now? Is

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>it your job opportunities? Is it your family? Is it

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe the amenities of where you live and most of

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the time, you know, it's sort of a combination of

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 3>all of these things. Or it could be you know,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>your family lived in this place for a long time,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe you inherited the land that you live on, and

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of people moving is not necessarily a

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 3>thing they want to do or they can do, especially

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe if you live in a maybe more rural area

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 3>or so there's not maybe a lot of money you

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 3>can get for selling your property and then moving somewhere

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 3>else and starting over. So the question of you know,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>willingness to move is one thing, and then you know

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 3>for which type of hazards sort of where would we

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 3>start making people move, Like is it hurricanes? Is it earthquakes?

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Because if you think about earthquakes, I mean, there is

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 3>not many people that should be living in.

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>California right, All of California needs to move immediately exactly.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 3>So there is really if you like break it down

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and say, okay, everybody has to move out of high

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 3>risk areas, there is not a lot of you know,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>land that will be left for then because the Midwest

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 3>has hurricanes, you not hurricanes, no good things. They don't

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 3>have her they have tornadoes. You know, you also have

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>winter storms. They have massive hail events sometimes, so there

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>is really no place to hide in the country, I

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 3>would say, or hardly any So how would you make

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>that decision? I think that is I mean, I think

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 3>ethically and politically a topic you people really don't want

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to get into. And I think what's happening is we

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 3>have sort of implicit migration out of high risk events

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 3>when something happens, you know, because when something happens, people

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>have to make a decision. Am I staying here? Am

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I rebuilding here? Or am I moving? And the research

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 3>shows that people who decide to move after they've after

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 3>they've been impacted by a disaster, they actually don't tend

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 3>to move very far. So they still tend to stay

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 3>within their state. They maybe move, you know, within the county,

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe to the neighboring county, But people don't take tend

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 3>to pack up and leave and move from let's say,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 3>from from Louisiana to New Jersey or something like that.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about you know, you mentioned

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that companies leave states, but then they might come back,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and part of it is an implicit negotiation with state

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 2>regulators and state governments to change some policies. What do

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>we think I mean, like, what do you think, like

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 2>when you see a company leave California or Florida or

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 2>some of these other markets are there, what are the

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 2>policy levers that these states could pull in order to

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 2>or are pulling in order to bring more competition and

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 2>care back into the state, or like what is historically

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 2>what types of changes prompt and insured to come back

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>into a given market.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>So the market in the state of Louisiana is actually

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 3>often referred to as an example of what could be

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 3>good policy choices or offerings to the insurance market. So

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>meaning the state what decide or decides to protect insurance companies,

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, only up to a certain level is when

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 3>they have to step in with payments, and then the state,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, jumps in above that level. And it's Louisiana

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 3>also has they have a what's called the insurer of

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>last resort, So if you know, you as a homeowner,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you can find a policy from a private insurer, then

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>you can ensure with Citizens. So it has the same

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>name as the program in Florida, but they are distinctly

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 3>different because in Louisiana, Citizens is required that they do

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.239
<v Speaker 3>offer the premium at a slightly higher price than the

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 3>private market. Okay, so they do not offer let's just

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 3>call it reduced or kind of sort of cheaper insurance premium.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's not a lot of savings because when it

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>comes to insurance what's really really tricky in setting these

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>premiums if you don't want to set them too high,

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 3>because then people forego insurance. But you also don't want

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 3>to set it too low, and that's something that we've

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>struggled with all along with now the National Flood Insurance Program,

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 3>because when you set insurance premiums too low, then the

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>decision to live and stay in a high risk area,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you don't really have to pay for that risk. You

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 3>don't have to pay the adequate price for that risk.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's say the risk is fairly high, but your

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 3>premium is not very high, so the decision to stay

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 3>where you are is easy because your premium is not

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 3>high and it doesn't cost you a lot of money.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>So you actually start incentivizing stay in high risk areas

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 3>if you set the premium too low. So back to

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Tracy's point about thinking about migrating, migrating and shouldn't people move.

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>So also when you have insurance premium being really high,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you as a homeowner or as a renter, you can

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 3>make the decision, okay, am I purchase insurance to stay here,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of being able to sleep at night not freaking

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>out about the risk I'm facing will possibly also move.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's kind of a signal that really the

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>risk is really high in this location and it's not

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 3>easy to get.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Insurance, just in terms of things like governments could do. Again,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going back to this idea of insurers maybe wanting something

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from either state or federal government, like what would be

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the risk sharing arrangements here? Would it be something on

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the level of the flood insurance that exists now.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 3>So when you think about managing risk, the question is

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>for governments, insurance companies, any private sector company. You as

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>an individual, how much are you willing to pay to

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 3>reduce your risk. So it's really a decision about of

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 3>how much or how low you want the risk for

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>people to be. And so there's different when you look

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 3>around the globe, there's different approaches. Like in the Netherlands,

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>people don't have flood insurance. Why do they not have

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 3>flood insurance because the government is committed to reducing flood

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 3>risks so that people don't have to purchase flood insurance.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not an option for us. And here in the

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 3>US our flood insurance program there is no requirement. Nobody

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 3>is forced to buy flood insurance unless you purchase a

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 3>mortgage from a federally backed mortgage company. So then the

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 3>government says, okay, if you live in a one hundred

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>year floodplan, plus you hold a mortgage from US, you

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 3>have to buy flood insurance. But if you live in

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a one hundred year floodplane and you maybe hold your

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 3>house free and clear, nobody is forcing you to purchase

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>flood insurance. So it's really still up to people to

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 3>buy insurance. For the vast majority, you know, it's a

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 3>free decision to purchase insurance. And so the question is

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the government could step in. There are always discussions about,

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, should we have national disaster insurance? You see

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 3>this sort of the topic rises and falls very much

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 3>depending on, you know, the crises of disasters we face.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>That could be a potential, But think about, you know,

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 3>what kind of risk the government would be taking on

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 3>in terms of financial costs if the government where to

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 3>offer them, And then the government also has to decide,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, then what is the premium for these policies.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's really there is no easy answer to this. I mean,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I would also say, you know, when you think about

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 3>purchasing insurance, what is often forgotten an insurance company or

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 3>insurance is a highly highly highly data driven process and

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 3>product and setting those premiums. Does the government, if let's

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 3>say the federal government, where to offer an insurance product.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Does the government even have the data and the information

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to really price a product like that adequately. We are

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 3>already struggling, you know, on trying to understand how many

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 3>people should have flood insurance versus how many people actually

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>have flood insurance. So I think data would be really

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 3>really important if the government where to get into this business.

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 3>And then also insurance companies, can you know you get

0:33:57.800 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>a letter every year if you want to renew your

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 3>homeowners insurance on that you as a person are not

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 3>deciding every year are you moving or not? So the

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 3>insurance market is so much more volatile in terms of

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>being able to offer it or retreat. And you as

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 3>a homeowner, you know, you are in your property, you

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 3>stay in your property. You might be able to switch,

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 3>but you don't have this annual choice off what you

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 3>want to do.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I was going to save this thought to the end,

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 2>but I just keep getting flashbacks to like it's like

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the bank conversation all over again, because we think of

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 2>this as a private market deposit taking.

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we all have direct insurance? Right?

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 2>But this is like the degree to which it's really

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a public utility. It's like so many of the same

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 2>like sort of philosophical economic moral questions come up, and

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 2>like deposit insurance and things like that. As an insurance insurance.

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to something you mentioned that

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the Louisiana approach in the Florida approach are different. There's

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 2>two sort of like state level public insurance. They both

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>happen to be named citizens. Can you compare and control?

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Asked what Florida is doing versus what Louisiana has done

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in the past.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 3>So in Florida you do not have this requirement that

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 3>citizen has to offer a fairly high premium four product.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 3>So they're the amount of property properties that are now

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 3>insured by the state. That number has exploded. Plus it

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 3>is truly a state backed insurance program, so the state

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 3>holds the risk. Plus Florida's also apparently a highly litigious state,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 3>so a lot of the insurance companies have to deal

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>with homeowners filing lawsuits, which is completely different from any

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 3>other state here in the US. And this is for

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Florida that's really the big issue, the sort of litigation

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 3>against insurance companies and for how long you can file

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 3>a lawsuit in Florida. So that's what makes Florida very different.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that you truly have insurance program that's

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 3>backed by the state and you hold that much risk

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I find very concerning in terms of, you know, financial

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 3>soundness of a state budget. So that's very very different.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 3>It's very unique in terms of insurance solution. So one

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 3>thing I wanted to mention. So there's a researcher, Howard

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 3>come Ruther, and he unfortunately just recently passed away. He

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>has long proposed this idea of maybe having the policy

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>not with you as a person, but with the home,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>because that would incentivize that maybe people invest more in

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 3>building or reconstructing disaster resistant homes because what happens right

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 3>now and maybe this is going to change cricket. Then

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 3>we think about right now, the risk is not priced

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>into a home like you know, you go on a

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 3>website like Zillow or redfin you see, okay, what's your

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 3>square footage and how many bedrooms and do you have

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 3>granted in the kitchen. Now, when you look at those websites.

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 3>It just happened over the recent years. You get a

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit of information on what they know slabeled climate

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 3>risks are, and then it will say, oh, your risk

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 3>for heat is going up, and maybe you have limited

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 3>flood risk. But the information I personally think is not

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 3>really translated in actionable information. You know, what are you

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 3>going to do as a potential home buyer with fifteen

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 3>different hazard types? How does that factor into your decision making?

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 3>If the risk goes up or not? Factors into your

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 3>decision making when it affects the home price. And for

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, there is now something starting where

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 3>people decide or potential buyers decide they have there's a

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 3>contingency to buy the home or not if they are

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 3>able to buy insurance, purchase insurance for that home. And

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, you know, these struggles that we're seeing

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>in the insurance market, the ability to buy insurance might

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 3>be really the starting point the impetus for possibly risk

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 3>being priced into home values, and that hasn't happened yet,

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 3>so it's not very common right now that people are

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 3>aware of the risk. There's also no disclosure of risks,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>so there's also different policies across the country, for instance,

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 3>in Louisiana. Now there are some risks that have to

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 3>be disclosed to you as a home buyer, but very often,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, you buy a home, do you get a

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 3>car fax on your home? Do you know how many

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 3>times this property has been flooded before or damaged, you know,

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 3>by a windstorm. We don't have that information. It's if

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking of it's kind of crazy, you know, because

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 3>it's a pretty substantial investment when you buy a home

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 3>and you don't have that history of a property because

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 3>there's no requirement in many states that that gets disclosed,

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 3>and we only look at sort of the superficial things

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 3>in a home square footage, number of bedrooms. But do

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 3>people know, you know, if they actually have the appropriately

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 3>rated shingles on top of their roof, or if their

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 3>roof is connected adequately to the rest or the structure

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 3>in the house to you know, withstand hurricane forced winds.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>We just somehow assume, because we got a building permit

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 3>from our local community, that this is a safe place.

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 3>And then when a home inspector comes, you know, for

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 3>you to decide if you want to buy this house.

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 3>You also don't get much information all that. So we really,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 3>I think at a point right now where there is

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe also more demand from potential home buyers to want

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to have information about the risks that they are taking

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 3>on when you are purchasing a property, because you're also

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 3>purchasing the risk that comes with that property.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Melanie, that was a fantastic overview of this very complicated issue.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave it there, but thank you so

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on all thoughts. That was great.

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me. I know it's

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 3>a slightly depressing topic.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Joe.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>That was a great overview of that topic. I feel

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like we hit a lot of the major points. The

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing that Melanie brought up that was really interesting

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to me was that idea of tying the insurance policy

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to the house itself as a way of incentivizing, you know,

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 1>better construction methods or more resiliency to disaster risk.

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 2>There were so many things that were interesting. So the

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 2>one thing I knew is that a typical homeowners insurance

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>policy doesn't have floods, right you like sure, So I

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 2>was aware that I didn't realize that wind insurance was

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>often in many cases a separate thing. I didn't realize

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 2>that there is no insurance policy whatsoever they can protect

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 2>against landslides, which I have to imagine in places like California. Yeah,

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 2>and then the big thing that really drove me home

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 2>is just like the sheer complexity, right, if you can't

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 2>really calculate it, well, like you're not going to get

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>any price, And so it sort of makes sense to

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 2>see like, Okay, we're gonna companies is gonna leave for

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 2>a while, Like if there's just so much like complexity

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 2>with the rising number of natural disasters or the rising costs,

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 2>like maybe the market just doesn't work. Well.

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Also the point about well why don't we all just

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have federal insurance? You know, to some extent, maybe that

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, But then how does the federal government with

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>no expertise in this or very little expertise, very little data,

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>actually start to price those products and that risk that

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>seems really interesting.

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, and furthermore, even if you did have like say

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>like a public option for national homeowners insurance, it would

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 2>inevitably be subject also to political fights like should the

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 2>government you know, It's like you'd have some people in

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 2>some places like no, why are you like not, why

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 2>are you pricing it? In Texas and Florida and California

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 2>this way is this because it's a red state or

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 2>like they're just it would you could do it, and

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 2>then it would introduce a whole new set of complications

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that wouldn't exist in a private market.

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I just say I live in fear of bureaucratic

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>paperwork and the idea of having to like talk to

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you if your house is destroyed by a hurricane and

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>then having to file paperwork about whether or not the

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>damage was caused by wind or flooding. That's just my nightmare.

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>On many leave.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was gonna say this, but like you, I'm

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 2>completely agree. So it's like your house is damaged and

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to get through to an insurance agent and

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 2>talk to them and prove and have the paperwork, and

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 2>then it's like, yeah, I kind of want maybe the

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Florida system where you could just sue your insurer and

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 2>then it's right, and then it's like it have put

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>some fear of God in them because well, and then

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the insurance company leaves the state because you have this

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 2>highly litigious state like well.

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think also one of the issues in Florida is

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of those lawsuits are fraudulent in one

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>way or another. Sure, there's all these roofing scams that

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>are in and of themselves quite interesting and would make

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting episode.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh No, there's just there's a lot there and no

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 2>easy answers. But I feel like that helped me understand,

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>like why this space is such a mess right now.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, we're definitely to be doing some more insurance

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes in the future, I feel but for now, shall

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there?

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there?

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:05.439
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the oud Loots podcast.

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman and Dashel

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at dashbot, and check out all of our podcasts

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 2>under the handle at podcasts and for more odd Lots content,

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 2>go to bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>have a blog, we post transcripts, we have a weekly newsletter,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure there's gonna be a lot to talk

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 2>about this one discord dot gg. Slash odd Lots is

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 2>where listeners hang out and chat twenty four to seven

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 2>about all of these topics. Go there and check it out.

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you would like

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>us to do an episode on Florida roofing, insurance scandals

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and frauds, then please leave us a positive review on

0:43:52.800 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening in