WEBVTT - RIP Nora Ephron You Would Have Loved Felching

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to the controversy section of Nora Ephron's

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia page. Actually there is none. I see no controversy section. Okay, great,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>unproblematic queen. Welcome to Like a Virgin, the show where

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we get yesterday's pop culture, today's takes. I'm ros Damnue

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fran Dorato, and we hope you had a

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lovely Valentine's Day. Valentine's Day, however you celebrated. Um, we

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are jumping right into things this week. No news because

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were too busy, I don't know. Sucking

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and fucking and eating chocolate or whatever. Those are the

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>things that people do on Valentine's Day, right They eat chocolate? Yeah, exactly,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And watch the Fifty Shades of Great trilogy and its entirety,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>which is what we covered last year for Valentine's Day.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So go back listened to those episodes if you are

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling spicy. But this week we are also talking about,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone who is very prolific when it came

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to romance, but from a slightly different perspective, slightly This

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 1>week we're talking all about nor Fron, the prolific writer

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>director of such films as When Harry met Sally sleep

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>List in Seattle. You've got mailed Julie and Julia and

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Queen of the rom com and as Fran just learned,

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and as I learned ten minutes before that from looking

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>at her Wikipedia. She also co wrote Silkwood, which neither

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of us have seen. Neither of us has have seen,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>despite me being a devout share stand um, I've heard

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually good and Share plays a lesbian. There was

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>also a really great documentary about nor eron Um on

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>HBO a couple of years ago called Everything Is Copy,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>which I did walk but don't remember a lot of Fran.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You you have claimed that you remember more of it.

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So do you want to start off by giving a

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>little context about who Nora Ephron was? Sure? So, Nora

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Efron is, you know, one of the better Neppo babies

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in our Neppo baby cinematic universe. Her parents were screenwriters,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>and she I think pretty quickly got into making films

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>UM after having a extremely prolific career as a magazine writer. Essentially,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so her work as an essayist was like immediately profound,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>recognizable something that everyone saw after UM, and she did

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it by simply like kind of captivating the world with

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>her own voice. And I think you see a Nora

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Fron voice in her movies. Right, It's very like conversational.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's from the first person perspective. It's like blunt and

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>funny and sometimes mean. And I think like sooner rather

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>than later, as she sort of took up this residency

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>at Esquire at a time when there weren't very many

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like women writing for magazines, let alone for Esquire, she

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of just became this like thought leader, like a

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of socialite thought leader like um, if not intellectual,

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that people were who were looking for and like looking

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>toward to like cultivate the culture. Like she was kind

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of famous while she was alive. She was the Tolentino

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of her time. She was she kind of she kind

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of was. And it's funny like I actually, you know,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read like a ton of Nora Frans essays

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and didn't buy like a compilation of her work when

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>she died or things like that. I actually only know

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>her from her movies, and I think that I personally

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the life that she had outside of movies. Right. Um,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's also so romantic, grows like so romantic compared to

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like our experience in magazines, like you know, Nora Fron

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>was writing alongside like Gay Tolles and like that old

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>school generation of writers when like they would get paid

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thousands and thousands of dollars to write one story totally yeah,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and that one story they would have like three months

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to finish. You know, this was a different This was

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of closer to Carrie Bradshaw's type of journalism. You

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>could where you could have a weekly column that kept

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you in Manila obloics and you know, or Eron had

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>an even more idyllic version of that going on, not

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>like us where we were writing you know, like click

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>bait about Javins, nail polish, Yeah, no, no health insurance, freelancing, begging,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>begging editors to give us like two fifty dollars to

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>write like a four thousand word essay, Um that to

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>do in two days. Um yeah. It's it's really definitely

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a more romantic version of like what it meant to

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be a writer before the Internet age. Um yeah. But

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>those are kind of I think the background things that

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are important to know. Um As she kind of went

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>into her film career and became like the filmmaker nor

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Efron as opposed to just the writer nor efron Um.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>What about nor Effron, I guess, like, do you have

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like a favorite movie of hers? Yes, And I have

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>argued about this with with my mother fairly recently. I

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>do think so. According to my mom, she thinks When

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Harry Met Sally is the best romantic comedy ever made,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I slightly disagree with that, and I think that

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of her movies, You've Got Male is definitely my favorite

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and part of the reason why I am drawn to

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that as opposed to When Harry Met Sally. Even though

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I love When Harry Met Sally. It's a fantastic movie.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But When Harry Met Sally nor efron wrote it, but

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't directed it, and she wrote and directed You've

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Got Mail because she did. She didn't make her directorial

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>debut until with This Is My Life, and then for

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the most part, she directed all of her movies, and

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>she co wrote most of her films with her sister

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Deelia fron Um. But I think, like, obviously it does

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of make sense that When Harry Met Sally is

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>written by a woman directed by a man, because like

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>literally the basis of the film is this question of

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>can men and women ever really be friends. But I

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely preferred later in her career, when Nora Ephron was

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>writing and directing all of her films because they feel

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so much more her vision in totality. Um, and I

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's what I respond to. And I do think

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>You've Got Mailed is just a perfect romantic comedy. I agree.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>I I honestly wish I had ranked, like thought to

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like rank the Nora Evon movies that I had, but

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that that is my favorite too. I

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>love when Harry met Sally. I think like it is something.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a movie that like sweeps you off your feet

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that her other films don't. But it's

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's an amazing well both both it and You've Got

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>My Little amazing New York movies. Yeah, they are their

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>love letters to New York. And like Nora Afron was

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a kind of classic new Yorker, like even her writing

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>style like sounds like New York, like her literal voice,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the infectiousness of her voice like sounds like what New

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>York sounds like. Is that corny to say? No, I

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's true when Harry met Sally also has this

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>quality that's like I think if you simplified it, like

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it could be a play. It could be a play

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about these two couples. Because it is kind of about

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal and then Carrie

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Fisher and whoever the guy is that she ends up dating.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>There is something um like theatrical about it. But then

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously like it's a much bigger story than that. I

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I rewatched it last year because I was watching a

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of rom coms last summer and it's it's such

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a great movie. And like, obviously the thing everyone remembers

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>from when Harry met Sally is the I'll have what

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>She's having orgasm moment in Katz's Deli. But it's just

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's so clever, and so much of the cleverness is

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the writing, the specificity of the jokes. Um. How

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>actually like heartfelt it is? Um And of course you know,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the performances are amazing. I'm not like the biggest Billy

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Crystal fan, although I do love City Slickers Billy Crystal

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>hot in this movie, Um, he's not hot, but he

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there is that image of him in like the chunky

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>cabled its sweater that always gets tweeted like in The Fall. Um,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, because it's very autumnal. It's well, it's a

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>very well, it's not a Thanksgiving movie, but it's a

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>very autumnal movie because the main action of the movie

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of takes place from like summer to New Year's Eve,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>which is when the movie ends. So it's it's super

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>autumn in New York, which I love. Which also I mean,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to You've Got Mail later, I think, but

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>You've Got Mail also has a very big autumnal quality

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to it, although I think it's more of a spring movie.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Are all of her movies automn movies honestly, are anything

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that Thanksgiving movie? To you? It was just like, yess

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a Thanksgiving movie. I mean Sleepless in Seattle, I guess

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is a little more winter. It's a little more winter.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually have only seen that movie once. Um, but yeah,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I gosh, I feel like I want to be Nora

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>f Fron. Is that like something that every does every

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right or want to be nor every And it feels

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>like very natural to like want the trajectory and the

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>success and the kind of cool girl factor that she had,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's I think, so I think a lot of

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>our friends who are writers are aiming for that kind

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of trajectory because, you know, the I I think, not

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing a lot about her life, I would imagine that

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a big part of what launched her was the second

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>movie she ever wrote was Heartburn, which was adapted from

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>her novel of the same name, which was like a

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of auto fiction novel based on her own divorce

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>when I think her husband cheated on her. Um. I

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>recently gifted the novel to my grandma for her birthday. UM,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should read it too, and she and I

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>can have a little book club moment. But it does

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like so many of our friends who are writers,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so many people of our generation, especially people who come

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>from journalism, that is how they launched their careers. They

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>write memoirs, or they right sort of auto fiction e novels,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe those get like adapted or like get

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like you know, huge like buzzy you know, internet success,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and then from there they go on and either like

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>write more novels or move into TV and film. Um.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that is kind of the north Front path.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It really is, especially when you're a Neppo baby. UM.

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I God, I wish my parents were screenwriters. That would

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>have been so much easier, right do you think? Okay,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's answer the question of when Harry met Sally,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think women and men can be friends? I

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>mean she also didn't and she also didn't take non

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>binary people into accounts, and when I was a man,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we were friends. M I feel like, um, honestly, I'm

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>literally I'm literally assessing the question. I'm literally as set

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>saying the question. Well, no, it's a very it's obviously

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a question from you know, the gaze of the hetero patriarchy.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh see, yeah, Okay, wait what do you mean by that?

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm like trying to evaluate it from like a

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>heterosexual person in the nineties perspective, like Ken, well, not nineties,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this was in this Yeah, it was really the eighties.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So yes, if you're thinking about if you're a straight

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>woman in the eighties, can women and men be friends?

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess is like a more real question. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly from the lens of today, Like obviously yes, but

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as Phoebe you just said in the chat, why would

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>she be friends with a man? She spilled you know,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because like Nora Fron was like a bit

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of a quote unquote feminist icon. I and you do

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like feminism imbued in her work, especially in like

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a line like that, can heterosexual men and women women

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be friends? I honestly can't think of a single example. Well,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing is that straight guys are always

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to fuck literally everyone every woman around them. So

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe from the woman's perspective, um, how is her work feminist? Her? Her?

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>She always writes these strong characters, these strong women, characters

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that don't give a fun I'm not talking about I

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think she was acclaimed as a feminist because of

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>her um screenwriting work. I think that by the time

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>she was writing for Esquire. So when she when she

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was invited to write for Esquire, which at this point

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in her career, she her her writing was already taking off.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They were like, what do you want to write about?

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You can write about anything you want, which is like

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an offer that like every writer would dream of from

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the editor and Esquire. And she was like, I want

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to write about women. And so she spent the whole

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>time writing from a women's perspective about women for men

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.119
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I think is like kind of profound,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and her angle, like when she was um,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>when she was on this like cusp of like whatever

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>wave of feminism was happening at this time, with like

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>glorious with Gloria Steinham literally like she was like one

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of Gloria Stadiams peers um. I think she felt like

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>feminist discourse at the time was like so unfun right.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>She was like, no one is like willing to self critique,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>no one's having any fun with it, no one is

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>being honest, like, no one is like kind of no

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one's taking it there like I'm going to take it

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there with feminist writing. And I think that her bluntness

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and her willingness to say like yeah, like I like,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>what's a stupid examples like she wrote this like this

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this story about breasts and how women always want their

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>breasts to be bigger and like what's in what how? How? Um?

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes exactly exactly as we pull out our heads like

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and and she would write about like, oh yeah, like

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I want my breast to be bigger, as does that

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not make me a feminist? And like why are women

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so insecure about hers? She was writing about insecurities a

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time. I think you see that in

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>her films. I think I think you see that in

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>her essays. It's like kind of in her personality. She's

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not afraid to self deprecate and to acknowledge her shortcomings

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and to and to say like, yeah, like you know,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I want X, Y and Z. That might be superficial,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but this is what I want. And I think that

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time, especially when you're in the middle of

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>movement work, you don't really want to acknowledge all your

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>flaws along with it. You don't want to add that

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of nuance. And she did, right, she was like,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this is everything else we're bringing to feminism. Um, I

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think I honestly like, that's just my guess. You you asked,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You asked the question, and I think that's kind of

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>how I understood it. I wonder what, I think it's

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>better if we don't know. I kind of yeah, I

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking she might be in in you know,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>moving forward in her career, the next big film and

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>probably the thing that put her on the map as

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as a filmmaker as well as a writer. Um with

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Sleepless in Seattle, which probably for most people is like

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the romantic comedy. Like I think when you talk about

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the lexicon of romantic comedies, Sleepless in Seattle looms larger

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>than any although for me, I don't think it would

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>even be in my top five, maybe not in my

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>top ten. What top ten nor Aron movies? No, I'm

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>talking top ten romantic comedies. Oh, I was talking about

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Nora Afron movies. Yeah, I would not be in my

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>act sual romcom ranking. You know, Sleepless in Seattle is

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a great movie. I love the Rose O'donald's in it.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Um for anyone who you know has never seen it,

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's about um, this little boy who like calls into

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a radio show looking for um a woman for his

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>dad and Meg Ryan looking for a woman. She and

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks fall in love somehow and then meet on

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the umpire state ble to get the end of it.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's It's sorry. This is the only thing I'm

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>contributing to the conversation. You want Tom Hanks's load in

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this movie, right, like this is one where you are

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks, Um, not not in this movie the movie

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that I want Tom Hanks's load in Splash One of

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the Way, which which which for for like a virgin,

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for like a virgin lore Splash was one of the

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>things that made us want to do this podcast, and

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we recorded this test episode talking about Splash because we

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>went on we went on a vacation to Joshua Treat,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but it actually was sort of like a retreat to

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>like basically blot out on the deck of this podcast

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and an excuse for us to write it off. Yes,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and Splash is one of my favorite movies, one of

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>my favorite rom coms, and Norah Fron famously wrote and

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>directed Splash. Well you know where Nora Efron is the

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>seed of this episode, but it's talking into a beautiful

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>garden that is more generally about and Splash is a

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>great romantic comedy starring Daryl Hannah and a young hot

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks. Load. I remember if I remember his butt.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember you pointing out his butt and being like,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>look at his butt, and I was like, WHOA. I

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>actually did not expect that from Tom Hanks. It was

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a dump truck. It's a it's a

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>very horny movie that he and Darryl Hammon has a

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of something that's so baffling. He loves having sex

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with her so much that he locks her inside of

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like a hotel room or something like that. Doesn't he

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>lock the mermaid inside a room He like literally holds

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>her captive so he can fuck her. But that's not

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>how it's. It's it's some weird. It's some weird vibes.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That also also it stars a young Eugene Levy. No

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Eugene Levy would get you his nose. It's about the nose.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Um wait, okay, that's some pretty good lore. Actually, like

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't I think the first things we ever watched were

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Splash and then I think, oh my god, to a

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Doubtfire episode because you know, it's one of my

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite films. Okay, okay, okay, are there any other? So

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there are fast forwarding a little further in in nor

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Fron's career. Um is You've Got Mail in my favorite

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of her films and definitely up in my like top

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>five romantic comedies of all time. Um it is a

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who doesn't know and if you have never

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>seen You've Got Mail, I like literally can't believe you're

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast. Um it's. It stars Meg Brian

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>as the owner of a charming little children's bookstore on

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Upper West Side, and she is um sort of

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>priced out of the neighborhood because a big bookstore, UM,

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like a sort of Barnes Noble type store that is

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>run by Tom Hanks moves into the neighborhood and they

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are secretly Internet pen pals and fall in love and

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it is just the sweetest, funniest but also kind of mean,

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>like most New York and like specifically Upper West Side

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>ass romantic comedy. It's so nineties, but like turn of

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the century nineties because of the A O L of

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it all. Parker Posey is in it, UM and she's incredible.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg Kneer isn't it He's Meg Ryan's boyfriend at the beginning.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Dave Chappelle is in it. Dave Chappelle, Um, this movie

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like captures like um. This this extremely specific era of

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at least our lives like this generation's lives were. Then

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the internet felt so new and scary and thrilling, like

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like this. Sending your first emails like that was such

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a Do you remember what they felt like? Do you

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>ever any idea what first email was or like, what

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>your first incidence is, what message was? No, but I

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot. I have so many memories of

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>logging onto a O. L. And specifically to read fand fiction.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. This was so um, this was such an

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>important time for the formation of almost everything about my identity.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the few things that I can remember are

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember having a girlfriend at the time. Her name

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was Katie Crow. I was in seventh grade. I remember

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>chatting with her over email and writing like cute emails

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to each other back and forth. And I remember taking

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>forever to decide the font and font color of my

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the background color, which was usually a

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>cloudy rainbow, which yeah, I think that, like that was

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the thing that like I obsessed over. I was like,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what the fund is the font? And this was this

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was the time of you know, children, our little gen

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Z listeners if you exist, you know, this was the

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>time when you had one family computer that everyone shared.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Mine was our our house that we lived and had

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>an enclosed patio in the back and that's where the

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>computer was. And I would go out there like early

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in the morning so I could log onto a well

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and ten minutes later once I was finally online. After that, um,

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>then I would you know, read my little Buffy fan

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>fictions and stuff, um and chat with probably like you know,

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty year old men who wanted to murder me and

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you were just a little girl. It was just a

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>little quote unquote girl. Um yeah, I god, I just

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I I miss when the Internet was like at this

0:23:54.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>cusp um, I do you so long to do anything? Yeah,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>But like our brains were better, Our brains were like

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Nora Afron, that's honestly, like when I was exactly no, truly,

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like are the Internet ruined our brains? That? I think honestly,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>there's something a little nostalgic about It's so weird to

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be nostalgic for a period that like we lived through.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>But there is a nostalgia to the kind of cinematic

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>universe of Nora Afron's characters and this kind of pre

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Internet purity that oh god, yeah, I'm just jealous of.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I like I missed that. I missed when writers didn't

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have to write about the Internet. Like now that we're

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in this like era of like work, like we can't

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>really have any of our conversations without acknowledging how social

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>media is influencing them or maybe like that it's like

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>about social media or like about some viral trend in

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>some way, And I don't know, I missed this like

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of cuspol analog time. Um, it is nice to

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>think about the Internet being something that you had to work,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that you had to work for, that you had to

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>put an effort to access, and that was actually a

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>barrier of entry for a lot of people. And I'm

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>sure at the time this movie came out, UM, this

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>was very much a novelty UM using the Internet in

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>this way. And like it makes sense that these the

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>leads of this film were like coastal elites, like you know,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like intellectual like book people, um, who were

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>falling in love online. UM. But also I don't know,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of love letters and like, um, you

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know mistaken identities is so romantic. But I do think

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this film is PROBLEMATICUM. I mean it's enemies to lovers.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, halfway the whole twist is that

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the film, Tom Hanks realizes that it's Meg

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan who he's talking to online because they're supposed to

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>meet I r L. And then he kind of like

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>uses his knowledge of her to get her to fall

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in love with him I r L. And then you know,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>by the by the end of the film when they

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>actually do meet, she says I wanted it to be you,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>which like is a is a great line, it's so romantic,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but also like he fully manipulated and her. You know.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>The thing is like if she didn't say that line

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I wanted it to be you, the movie would have

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>such a different ending, like it would be I think

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be easy to assume that she like hated

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>his guss and she's like, you're dead to me forever,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you needed her to say that in

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>order to have that little Well, she was clearly in

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>love with him by the end, but he was using

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in their actual lives once they started spending time together.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>He was using the information he got from her when

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they were anonymous to get her to fall in love

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with him. Maybe she knew it was him all time,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and she she wanted him to know these things. I know.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. No, I don't think so either.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, um this again with this movie,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like it feels like, oh god, I feel I don't

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be a redundant because like in our Julie

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Roberts episode, we were like, they don't make movie stars

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like this anymore, but like I do feel like they

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like there there aren't writers like nor Fron anymore. It's like,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like she belongs to this

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of internet cost generation of writers that like, we'll

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, I don't will never We don't

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>get writers that are so magnanimous and on every single

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>talk show the way nor Efron wasn't every single talk show,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and like was actually famous during her time. Well, I

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>think also what it is is that the um the

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 1>romantic comedy is kind of dead. Um. This nor Efron's um.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, heyday was the golden age of the romantic comedy,

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which I would I would argue was really the nineties, um,

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>when we were like post sexual liberation and pre you know,

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>jaded internet era. Um. And she, you know, she was

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the perfect writer for her time, Like there are these

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>ones in a generation people, I think. And of course,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like you know, she was speaking for a very privileged, white, sis,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>hetero like elite idea of life and love, of course,

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know it clearly did captivate a nation in

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the world in a way. And so yeah, I think

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>she was she was this handah horvat one to be

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the voice of her generation, or at least a voice

0:28:52.640 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of a Generation. Her last films were two five Bewitched remake,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which actually watched kind of recently. I think On a

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Plane really is Yeah, I mean it's awful. It's it's

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so bad, but but it's still I mean, it's still

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>has like some charming dialogue and Nicole Kidman's charming. Will

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Ferrell is just like woefully miscast. Kristin chenowis in it

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and like she's great. Of course, Michael Caine's fab But

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>did you just it's you didn't like the movie? Is

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there anything else? If you remember about it? It's just

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like a bad framing of the movie. I think, like meta, right, Yeah,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about an actor, like a sort of like washed

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>up actor who's making a reboot TV show of Bewitched,

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and it did kind of predict reboot culture. But then

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>an actual which gets cast in it and they fall

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in love and it's just like stupid um. But then

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>her last film was Julia and Julia, which is I

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think an incredible movie if you only watch the Julia

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>child scenes. Oh yeah, of course. I mean I've seen

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube version called and Julia. That is the movie

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with Amy Adams cut out of it. It's much better.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And totally watch the ball and Meryl Streep is incredible

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as Julia Child. Okay, it should be said Meryl Streep

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with Stanley Tucci. With Stanley Tucci very important. And I

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>love how how into each other they are, like they fuck,

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to ravish each other. It's so cute. I

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how there's that HBO Max Julia Child show

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that that literally in the midst of everything going on,

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>HBO got renewed for a second season when we already

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have kind of the definitive portrayal of Julia Child in media.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Street, Yeah, yeah, it really is. Um it doesn't

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.959
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't quite make sense, but you know, reboot culture,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. Well, okay, I want to talk

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more about romantic comedies in general and like where nor

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Efron fits into it, because you know, as we've said,

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>she does kind of she's the the part of the

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>romantic comedy landscape that's like very you know, like intellectual,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a little jaded, a little cynical, very New York very

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like coastal elite. I would say, like you

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>have fucking Nancy Meyers on one end of the spectrum,

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's making I would say, like more West

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Coast romantic comedies, like big, big white kitchen comedies. Um.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And then nor Efron is like East Coast. You know,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>she's making small you know, exposed brick kitchen. Um, still

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>still very nice kitch, still very expensive kitchen. So they're

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they're the two coasts. Um. But you know, like like

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>their characters, I think there's like a shared cinematic universe

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that their characters live in. I think so. I mean

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I frequently kind of like lump Nancy and Nora like

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in in the same kind of category in my brain,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even though the writing is so different. I am like

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>such a Nancy Meyers stand. Like, as I said on

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the pod before, I love like, you know, movies about

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like white women in crisis, like wealthy women who are

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going through it emotionally. Um. But yeah, no, they're there.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I think West Coast East Coast is like the perfect assessment,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like there is something Nancy Myers movies are just sorry,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like so much more shallow, Like they don't they don't

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have the voice Nora has. Like there Nora is, at

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the thing that has stuck

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nora through the entirety of her career and something

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that we remember her for, even if we don't say

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly, was like her voice, like she had a

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>very yeah the right the writing is Fancy does that

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Nancy doesn't? You know? Um? But god, but think about

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Nancy's She was like having so much fun. I want

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to write any Myers movie not a Nora Afron movie,

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Yeah, I wish, I do

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>wish that Julia Roberts had been in um, an Nora

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Efron movie at something. But but Meg Ryan is so

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is the Nora Efron protagonist? Like that is the kind

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of woman she was writing, I don't know, just like

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a white blood woman with short hair with with anxious

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking patterns. Yes, um I am. I love Meg Ryan.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>She was certainly a mother at some at one point

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the culture. Um and I will always love her,

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>especially for being the voice of Anastasia in the animated

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>film Anastasia. Oh God, I forgot about that. And that

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>movie was stacked. It had Christen Dunce, It had um

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>John qu Sack, Uh, Angela no no, Bernadette Peters, oh yeah,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Angela Lansbury. Um that Kelsey Grammar, Um yeah, Meg Ryan?

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Wait there was another really, oh Hankazaria? Yes? And then

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>who was who was Resputen? It was like Christopher Christopher Lloyd. Okay, Um,

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have we already talked about how rest we need you? We?

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Should we do an Anna station episode? Should we do?

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Should we do our Russian Dynasty episode? Um? Sure? Have

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you ever read we could we could do like a

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>non and Disney animated movie, um? Episode? Because I think

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Anastasia is one of those movies that everyone thinks as

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a Disney movie but it's not. And there were quite

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a few of those in the nineties when others studios

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>started to get in on the animation game that Disney

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>had like sort of created a monopoly around. Have you

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>have you ever read about when Risputant died? Yes? Like

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>how like how he died? It's so crazy. He died

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>like he like got shot like three times and then

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was like beaten to death and stabbed and thrown in

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a river, like a frozen river. And that's how I

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>want to go. Yes, And and it didn't in That's

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna do to you. But his body they

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>found that he died from like like freezing, like he

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't die from the gunshot. Runs or stabbing or anything.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. It's also crazy that when they adapted Anastasia

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 1>into a Broadway musical that I never saw, they cut

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>rascipute in from it, and his song is one of

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the best songs in the film. I wonder why is

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.959
<v Speaker 1>it like too dark or was because? I think because

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they did they didn't want it to be magical. Yeah, okay,

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that's fair, which is boring? This fuck? Um? I remember you?

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Will you watch season five of The Crown, the episode

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>about the Romanofs where they showed them all getting executed

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. Oh my, that episode is so gaggy.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>They really pretty gay. Yeah, they popped a couple of

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>bullets off into the Romanofs. Oh my god, it's so sad.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Meg Ryan Love love her. Who are the other like

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>rom com diva is obviously Julia Roberts We've talked about. Um,

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Lopez. Monster in Law is one of my favorite

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>rom coms. Would definitely be on the like top ten list.

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Queen Latifa is a rom com diva. Last Holiday is

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>she really is? Although he was? She? Did she do

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>any other? Oh Rene Salwagger, Bridget Jones. I've never seen

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Bridget Jones Diary. What I've never seen an Oh my god,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I wrong with you? Are those Christmas movies? Um? Yeah,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of. I always well, I always watch Bridget Jones

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Diary in the period between Christmas and New Year's because

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>it starts on New Year's Day. So mate, we'll do that.

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the end of this year, I can't

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>believe you've never seen Bridget jes Diary. It's going to

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rock your world. Okay, we'll do an episode on it.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it done, and it's gonna be and you're

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna be feel insane when they talk about how fat

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>she is when she's like not fat. Wait, there are

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>jokes about how fat she is. Hold that she's like

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fat and she's like, you know, she weighs like a

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifteen pounds. God. There's been so much discussion about

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how kind of romantic comedies are a lost art, and

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we did we did touch on this, you know, in

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the Julia Roberts episode, which definitely go back and listen

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to that if you haven't heard it. But the era

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of rom comms was also the era of movie stars,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's what a lot of these films were sold on.

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>By having these movie stars in the starring roles so

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that it almost didn't matter what the movies were about.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>People were coming to them to see these stars fall

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in love over and over again. And we kind of

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have that anymore. And now rom comms really are

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the main place they exist is on streaming, and so

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's maybe something to be said about how,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, streaming could create this like renaissance of rom

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>comms because they are you know, like cheaper to make

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>than big budget blockbusters than like Marvel movies, and they

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>might just not ever reach the same you know, highs

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of popularity and like universal peel that the rom coms

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of of yester year of year old he hot times times.

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, yeah, I think that a lot

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of the reason that we don't have like the volume

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of rom coms that we used to is has a

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with streaming and with like kind of

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Marvel stuff. Just as you said, like, I think

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that because the blockbuster movies are all actions now, it's

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like these got scooted out. Um, maybe because the

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>movies of the two thousand's, like the late two thousand's

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 1>are like bad, like the romantic comedies were like not

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>on the level. It's just you feel like nostalgic for

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>like what a rom com used to feel like before

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>social media and before like millennials started making things like

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Love Simon and like Nick and Nora's Infinite Playlist like

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like or or a five Days of Summer like that

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that actually feels like But those are kind of romantic

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>drama das most you think they don't count it. You

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think five hundred days of Summer that's a rom com,

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Maybe, Um, well, there really, there really is

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a renaissance of romance, but it's happening in books. Um,

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like there is a huge market now on

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>book talk for romance. You know, we've talked about like

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all the those books with like vector cover art of

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>little cartoon people. Like that's the biggest part of the

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>book industry outside of like you know, huge sci fi

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>novels is romance, and a lot of them are being

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 1>adapted into TV shows and movies. But it is books

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>more than anything, um that are selling. You know. You

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>look at like the like Colleen Hoover, which I've never

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>read a Colleen Hoover book, but um, the Seven Husbands

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of Evelyn Hugo bitch Um, Taylor Jenkins read Emily Henry,

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>who's whose books I like, although I've heard that her

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>book that's coming out this year is not very good. Um,

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but these books are like are like romance first, and

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>then some of them are funny, and then some of

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>them are dramatic, and it's more about the romance of

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it all than the comedy of it. And I think

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what what was so amazing about Nora Fron's work, and

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think why she maybe even haralded the age of

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>romantic comedies is that the emphasis I think was always

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on the comedy and the characters, and the romance was

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>really the container for that. That's a good way of

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>putting it. Yeah, it's just like it's like the framing

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what made I think, the framing and

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the lens on it is like what made it so great.

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see more queer rom colms, specifically

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because like you know, we were all kind of tired

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of the like sad gay period stuff and and like

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also talk a lot about how I like,

0:41:56.120 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, gay historical erotica, but those are usually not comedies,

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>although sometimes they're funny, but they're not specifically comedies. I

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>also like, wouldn't even really call Red White and Royal

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Blue a rom com what? No, I would call it

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a romance novel. I would call it a young adult

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I would not young. I would call it a new

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>adult because that's like the categorization that exists now. I

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>would call it a new adult queer romance. Um, it

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is funny, but it's not a comedy. Wait, Phoebe dropped

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Chat Happiest Season as a roum? Did you watch?

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Did we? Did we ever talk about that? Yeah? I

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>watched it when it came out. I rewatched it this

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>past Christmas season. Well, um, I was at my best

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>friend Ryan's moms for Christmas and she had never seen it,

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so we watched it on Christmas Day. That bad. I

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's good. I think it's a

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>cute movie that that has problems. The problems are mostly

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that one of the romantic leads is irredeemable, is irredeemable

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and Christ and Stewart should end up with opry Plaza.

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But I still think it's a It's a well made

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>movie with some really good performances. Yeah, it is a

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>well made movie, and it does have good performances. That's

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>very diplomatic. The cannon of queer rom coms is so

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>small that you know, we kind of have to take

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>what we can get, and like I do hope we

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where that's not true. I'm trying.

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting in the work now to make sure that

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the genre is expanded like I as as

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I have alluded too many times, I'm in the process

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of writing a queer romantic comedy and you know, look

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>out for that whenever I finish it plus probably two years. Um.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>You you know you you've consumed a lot of roum

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.439
<v Speaker 1>coms as market research for this book. Did you learn

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>anything new? Well, not necessarily like market research. More I

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>want to write something that is like aware of the

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>genre it exists in UM and like I think tropes

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>are very interesting and like it's fun to riff off

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of them and to acknowledge them and be aware of them. Um.

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you learn anything new in this in this exploratory

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:29.479
<v Speaker 1>period about raum commas, specifically, anything you noted? Well? Yeah,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what I learned is that, you know, I

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of had this revelation last summer, which is that

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I was I was dealing a lot with um, worrying

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that what I was writing was to the thinking that

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I needed to make the story I was writing more

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like general and like accessible to a wider audience. And

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what I kind of realized was that, no, in making

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>my story as specific as possible, that is what would

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.439
<v Speaker 1>make people want to read it. Um. And so that's

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what I learned from watching a lot of

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>rom coms and also just consuming a lot of queer

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>media and kind of Bros in particular. Rose, Oh my god,

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>but we are not gonna we are not going to

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>speak about Bros. No, we don't. There's nothing left that

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to be said about Bros. But God, do you

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>think Bros Is going to ruin it for the future

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of all gay rom coms? Do you think that I

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think will get a green light anymore? Okay, good,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because we need to make some movies. Rose, Yes, Um,

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who would you want to play your love interest in

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a rom com? Adam Driver? Definitely for a ent sure,

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Adam Driver. Adam Driver in a transamorous relationship. That's all

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I've ever wanted. What about you? Um? Kiki Palmer Balmer

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Tucci, Stanley Palmer and Stanley Tucci, and we like

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>form a polycule. Yeah, you're in a throuble with We're

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in a May December. I'm now trying to imagine when

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a March May December polycule. I'm trying to imagine Stanley Tucci.

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>We need a throuble rom com. Although I absolutely support

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>polyamory and throubles, I don't particularly like reading about them

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because like, yeah, I'm very much drawn to like two

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>people being in love and like, but that's also just

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way I was socialized. So I'm trying

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to unlearn that there should be throuble representation in rom coms. Like,

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we have never had a polycule rom com. We've never

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>had Well, what I always what I always wondered about

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the favorite is why didn't they just Why weren't they

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just in a throuble? There are a lot of movies

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>that are like, why aren't they just another terrible I mean,

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my best friend's wedding, Why aren't they just in a trouble?

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true because I do think that Julia and Cameron

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>how to vibe. Yeah, but I always think I always

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think everyone has a vibe and everything I watched famously,

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think everything has a vibe? Um? And you

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 1>know what, I think nor Evron would agree with me.

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, nor Efron would be so problematic about polyamorous

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>relationships if she were like problematic about a lot of things. Yeah,

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thank god she like died before the internet like really

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>became a same. Don't say that's so horrible. We love you,

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>We do love you, but you probably would have hated

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the Internet too. I mean you kind of did well. Anyways,

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, there needs to be Polly

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>representation in romances, like how come we have not had

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like a Polly Disney princess, Like we need we need

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Polly Nora Efron movies. We need um, Yeah, we need

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>like not we have not reached the representation part of

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. No, we have. We were fifty minutes. Representation

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. Representation matters, and we need polycueles on screen

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that we need. We need a Disney princess who felch is?

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to see a rom come with Felching in it.

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>That's when that's when I'll know that we really have

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>reached Um. It's a queer utopia in media. Will you

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>remind me what felching is? I feel like when you

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>eat your own come out of someone after you've come

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in them. How did you not know that the version

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the woman was too stun to speak? Have you never

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>felt someone or been felched? No? No? No? Really? Well

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't let you don't love come the way I

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>love come Bobe, Phoebe has Babe has felched. I really

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I really wish, I really wished. I really wish that

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I was on that level. Honestly, I honestly feel ashamed.

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had felched. Well, nor Evron. I hope

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that before you left us you learned what felching is,

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think you r I p nor Efron, you

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would have loved felching. You can follow our burner account

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>at Like a Virgin Fine. We will be keeping you

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>updated on an extra special announcement on the coming episodes.

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Um stay tuned for more surprises. Follow me at France

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Squish go and follow Rose Dammo at Rose Damu anywhere

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you want on social You can leave us a review

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or rating on Spotify and Like a Virgin,

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't I Heart Radio Production? Our producer is Phoebe Unter

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with support from Lindsay Hoffman and Nikki Etre Until next week,

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 1>See you later versions. Bye,