WEBVTT - Walmart Shares Surge, Deere Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, card Playing and broyd Otto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's head over to talk about what's happening and our

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>good friends at Walmart again, a really good quarters and

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>revenues beat the earnings, talking pretty I think people again, people,

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I think really look at Walmart is kind of a

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>read on the US consumer and that was kind of,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 2>I guess, a pretty good report there. Let's check out

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Jen Bartashes. She follows all the retailers for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>She is in Prince, New Jersey. I'm guessing, Jen, what's

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 2>your takeaway from our good friends in Bettonville.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, good morning, Paul. When I look at today's results,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the striking things that is a

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>takeaway that is beyond just the story of the higher

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 3>income consumer which everyone is focused on, is that the

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>multiple year strategy that Walmart's been employing to change their

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>business mix is really starting to yield results, and that's

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 3>allowing them to grow operating income ahead of revenue. That's,

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, driving profitability, and it's driving that long term

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>margin expansion that they think they can sustain. So to me,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>this is a great quarter, and yes they do have

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 3>a great read on the consumer, but it is also

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 3>starting to show that all of those investments are really

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 3>paying off in the way that they're evolving the company.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>So, Jen, I'm vowing to do a store walk this

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Saturday for the Walmart near here.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 4>How do I do that?

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Would?

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 6>How would you do it?

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Like?

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 3>What do I do?

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 6>Will you drive there?

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to get there? There's a million aisles.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>These things are huge, they are you know.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what I would say, Paul is wander around

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 3>a little. But what I do when I go into

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 3>stores is I find one of the people who are

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>picking the online grocery orders or they're online orders, and

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I follow them around and that way I get a

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>sense of what it is, what is it that people

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>are actually buying, what are they putting in their basket?

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>And how are employees actually effectively navigating that big store.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 3>So that would be one tip I have for you.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 6>That's very cool. Okay, you definitely should be doing. Get

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 6>that guy Jen, when we look at the areas of

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 6>mix that you were mentioned that they sort of were

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 6>changing their business mix, that huge part is e commerce,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 6>right it is If their main competitor though, is Walmart

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 6>for e commerce, how does that evolve?

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what Walmart's been doing is they've added

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sellers to their marketplace. It's unlocking ad

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 3>revenue growth, it's unlocking the ability to charge for fulfillment services. Now,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>these are all things that sound very familiar because they

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>are things that Amazon, for example, is very strong at.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't mean that it can't help Walmart evolve

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and it can't help make Walmart a much stronger company

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>in the long term. I think the advantage that Walmart

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 3>has is because they have that strong store base, they

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 3>can help keep some of the costs to fill digital

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>orders down, which helps them with that overall profitability profile

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>When you talk to investors about Walmart, again, it's stock

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>hitting an all time high here today.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 5>It ain't cheap.

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>How do you talk to them about valuation? I had

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>like twenty six twenty seven times on a pe basis,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>how do you talk to them about valuation?

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 3>To get to your question, Paul it's really when I'm

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>talking to investors, it's you know, about where is the

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>company headed? Right. So I think one of the things

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that's admirable about the company, or that is is really

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>something they just do so well, is they keep their

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>cooperation tight. They're good at controlling costs, but they are

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>not They don't hesitate to invest in opportunity, but they

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 3>also will walk away from things that don't pan out.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think, you know, you saw that with the

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>announcement earlier this month about closing health clinics. At one

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>point they thought they might be able to you know,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>drive a big business out of that realistically couldn't make money,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>closed it down. So I think that that spirit of

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>trial and or the willing to the willingness to actually

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>try to flex, but then know when to say, Okay,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>this isn't this isn't what we wanted. It's something that

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>has become a strength of the company and helps, you know,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>helps put it up as a as a company that justifies,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, potentially a higher valuation versus some other strict

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>retail peers that are really just focused on growing a

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>retail business.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 6>I think she's gonna think and ask one more question. Yeah,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 6>I am gonna do it. What Amazon has, though, that

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 6>Walmart doesn't is a w S. That's where they're going

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 6>to get their bulk of their margin. That's where they

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 6>get all the juicy, sexy revenue. Walmart doesn't have that.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 2>So is that so?

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 6>So how does it sort of ramp up other revenue

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 6>streams that can yield that kind of growth and margin.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a that's a that's the question of the day,

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>right because you don't actually want Walmart to be another Amazon.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 3>You want Walmart to be Walmart. And so I think

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>that when you look at some of the areas that

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 3>they're doing well, especially in some of the international markets

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>where they're they're playing around with it in things like fintech,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, those are areas where I think that there's

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>some great opportunity for the company without them having to

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>try to be a cookie cutter of Amazon and you

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>know and have some you know, have something like an

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>AWS that is not natural to their their current operations.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jen, thanks so much for joining us. I

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Jen Bartasha. She covers all the retail stuff

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence, including Walmart again, which had a really

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>good Quarterstock up six percent here, all time high. So

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>good stuff for that, I think a good you know,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a little just kind of a bullet point there. For

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're trying to get a sense a beat on

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>how the consumer's doing, doing fairly well.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm Alexei alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 6>We are live interactive broker studio right here in midtown Manhattan.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 6>So here was the front page of the Ft today

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 6>when I logged in. Apparently, Starwood Real Estate Investment Trust

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 6>CREATE is one of the largest unlisted property funds, and

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 6>it has drawn more than one point three billion dollars

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>of its one point five to five billion unsecured credit

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 6>facility since the beginning of twenty twenty three. That sounds bad.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 6>That sounds like they're in a cash crunch kind of scenario.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Poul.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 6>And as we keep hearing, commercial real estate isn't a

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 6>really tough spot. But yet I haven't seen a lot

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 6>of shoes dropping.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I haven't either. I don't know how this is going

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to play out. Maybe our next guest I'll help us

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 2>out with that. Rich Hill, head of real Estate Strategy

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and Research at Cohen and Steers, joining us here in

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Why because we're here every

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>day m hm, And that's how we roll. Rich, I

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>walk from Penn Station to Hear every day, all through

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Midtown Manhattan. Now, I know this is not the world,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 2>it's only Midtown Manhattan. But there's a lot of vacant

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>real estate. People aren't coming back. I saw via Twitter

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>yesterday via a report Bank Bank of America research report

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 2>that kind of showed vacancies, and it seems like they're

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>calling this new normal, which is about fifty percent of

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>commercial real estate properties. They're calling that the new normal,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>just because that's kind of what the date is showing. A.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree with that? And B what does it

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>mean for the owners and the lenders and all that

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff?

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 7>The new system?

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 8>First of all, thanks for having me in this morning.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 8>It's good to see you guys. Look, I'll begin by

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 8>saying people like to talk about commercial real estate as

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 8>a big, singular asset class, but in reality, it's actually

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 8>eighteen different sub sectors under a big umbrella, and those

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 8>eighteen sub subsectors can behave very differently in very different

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 8>market environments. So you're leading with New York City, You're right,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 8>New York City office vacancies are high, retail vacancies are high.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Leading with maybe.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 8>Retail, that doesn't actually tell the whole story, because if

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 8>you actually look at what's happening with retail real estate

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 8>across the United States, it's actually really strong footing. For

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 8>two reasons. I think, you know, you rewind ten years ago.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 8>Everyone was talking about the retail apocalypse, so no one

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 8>really was building new retail properties over the past ten

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 8>to fifteen years, so you had no new supply coming.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 8>And then COVID was a great Darwinistic event where it

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 8>actually sort of right sized all the retail properties that

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 8>were maybe on the edgines. You couple that with the

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 8>fact that e commerce companies realized that physical retail real

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 8>estate can provide micro fulfillment to their customers. The retail

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 8>real estate market is actually on pretty strong footing, particularly

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 8>open air shopping centers, whether it be community centers, neighborhood centers,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 8>or even power centers.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 6>That's a really interesting point, and you're right, we kind

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 6>of lump it all in in commercial real estate. We

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 6>think office, So is that is that troublespot office commercial

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 6>real estate? And again like when is that shoe dropping?

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Look, it doesn't do any good to say anything

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 8>other than the facts about office. Office is struggling nationwide,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 8>by the way, we probably built too much of it

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 8>prior to COVID. Work from home dynamics have have tipped

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 8>that nationwide, office vacancies are twenty percent and they're increasing

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 8>from here. And so there's a lot of ways you

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 8>can unpack office. Though, just like I said, you know,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 8>maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle. It's not

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 8>as bad as everyone fears, and it's not as good

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 8>as everyone fears. If you look at office, new, clean

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 8>and green office even in New York City is doing exceptionally.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, like Hustin Yards is doing well, right, and that

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>one Vanderbilt thing.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 8>One vendor Bilt least up to almost one hundred percent

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 8>during the middle of COVID. So class B and C properties,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 8>Class B and C properties are properties that were built

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 8>in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties with no cop

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 8>X put CAPEX put into it over decades and decades

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 8>and decades.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 5>I get it.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 8>No one wants to work there. So we're sort of

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 8>in this weird time period where office is struggling. I

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 8>want to be clear. Office is only around twenty percent

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 8>of the serie market. It's only around three percent of

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 8>the US listed rate market. But look, everyone loves a

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 8>great Greek tragedy.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 5>I get it.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 8>Like it sells clicks, it sells papers. It is a

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 8>really challenging asset class. And so I don't want to

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 8>belabor that.

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>What's the lending environment like now for real estate investors?

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>What are the banks doing where they were the real

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>estate investors sourcing their capital.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so this is probably the single most important topic

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 8>when we talk about commercial real estate. The reason being

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 8>that commercial real estate isn't inherently a levered asset class.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 8>When people buy a commercial real estate property, they put

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 8>debt on it. There's not very few properties that don't

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 8>have debt on it. So it is a levered asset class.

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 8>And so that's actually why valuations are being pressured so much.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 8>We think property valuations generically are down around twenty percent.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 8>Office valuations are probably down thirty five percent. The reason

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 8>they're down so much isn't necessarily because of fundamentals. Fundamentals

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 8>ex office are on pretty strong footing. It's because the

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 8>right side of the balance sheet is repricing. Both financing

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 8>cost higher and the availability of debt much lower than

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 8>it where it used to be. So look, lenders aren't

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 8>lending as much as they used to. If you look

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 8>at the Mortgage Bankers Mortgage Bankers Association Senior Loan their

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 8>Loan Origination Index, it's close to the lowest level since

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 8>we've been in twenty fourteen.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 8>A lot of people have loans on their balance sheet

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 8>and they're working through those. But you made a really

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 8>good point. Distress hasn't really come about yet. And I

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 8>think there's a really important point. And I'll pause here

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 8>for a second. Lenders and borrowers are in a pretty

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 8>challenging position. So they're actually solving the prisoner's.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 6>Dilemma, meaning that a bank doesn't want to own an

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 6>office space.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 8>So a bank doesn't want to own it, they're not

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 8>in the business of it. And guess what the regulatory

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 8>capital charges for owning a property on your balance sheet

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 8>are actually higher than if you were just to modify

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 8>the loan at say a ninety nine percent LTV BLTV.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 6>Ooh, okay, break it down for US loan to value. Okay,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 6>So what would that mean if you if you brought

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 6>that down to nine nine percent LTV.

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 8>So let's assume ten years ago you did a loan

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 8>at a fifty percent and LTV. So you had a

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 8>property that was worth ten dollars and you put a

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 8>loan on it was the worth five dollars, so fifty

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 8>percent LTV. Fast forward ten years, the value of that

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 8>property drops from ten to five, and you still have

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 8>five dollars of loan. That's one hundred percent LTV. The

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 8>regulators are actually incentivizing the banks to actually modify and

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 8>extend loans. So some people might call it kicking the

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 8>can down the road. I don't necessarily think it's kicking

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 8>the can down the road. I just think borrowers and

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 8>blenders are incentivized to figure out way out of this

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 8>of this environment. It's a pretty challenging environment for everyone

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 8>right now, and so they are coming to a less

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 8>bad situation modifying extending these loans.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I've seen in the last ten

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>years and been amazed about. Alex n I talk about

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>it a lot, is the growth of private credit. Is

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>private credit coming into the real estate space to maybe

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>just find some opportunity here.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it has been for some time. Okay, twenty fifteen,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 8>private credit market share of total lending was probably ten

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 8>percent plus or minus, and I'd probably say it's a

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 8>little bit less than that. At the peak of the

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 8>market it was around twenty percent or so. But look,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 8>there is something to be said for private for private

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 8>credit finding a home within commercial real estate. There's forty

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 8>two hundred banks across the United States. Bank share is

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 8>around forty percent of total lending. There will be some

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 8>banks that pull back for various different reasons. There has

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 8>to be a home for those additional loans, and I

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 8>do think private credit, if you have the expertise not

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 8>to just underwrite the loans, but work out the loans

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 8>when some of them inevitably go bad, there's a home.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 8>There's a home for private credit. Do I think it's

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 8>going to fifty percent market share? No, I sort of

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 8>think the upper limits is around twenty percent. We're probably

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 8>a little bit less than that right now. But there's

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 8>a home for private credit.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 6>So when we talk about the shoe and commercial and

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 6>office commercial real estate not dropping, it sounds like maybe

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 6>it won't drop at all. It'll just be sort of

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 6>John Tucker's doing the wave and I don't really know

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 6>why that is, but get oh, we hit it.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 8>That person just came back down number for a moment,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 8>doubt the tick up counts.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes it does.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 6>That was amazing. This is not maybe going to drop.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 6>It's just going to be worked out and then no

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 6>one's going to be sitting with really terrible loans forever.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 8>So this is going to take longer than what was

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 8>feared a year ago. A year ago when you had

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 8>banks coming under stress, I think a lot of people

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 8>were fearing a quick collapse in commercial real estate lending.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 4>That has not occurred.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 8>This will be a slow burn over a number of years.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 8>I want to be clear, though, we are not calling

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 8>for no distress in the commercial real estate market. I

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 8>mentioned to you that property evaluations are down around twenty

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 8>percent right now. We are expecting them to be down

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 8>peak to trough around twenty five to thirty percent, So

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 8>around two thirds of the way through the next leg,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 8>lower is going to be rising distress. And by the way,

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 8>that actually might be a contrarian bullish sign.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So what do I mean by set at the bottom?

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 8>Maybe exactly exactly. It basically means sellers are finally capitulating

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 8>and knowing where buyers want to buy. That's a healthy

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 8>contrarian signal.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>See Richel Like, I think half of the real estate

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>finance people in the business came out of Morgan Stanley.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like a mafia there, those guys that are all

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>over the place. Richard is off one of them. Richiel,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 2>head of real estate strategy and Research at Cohen and Steers,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 2>joining us here in at Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio, talking

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>about the overall commercial real estate business, not just office

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and octimity. But that's a one of them. I can't

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>wait to see what some of these buildings on Third

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Avenue when they change hands, what the discount is going

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to be. I think it's gonna be huge, like the

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Lipstick Building, just to pick one, that iconic building, but

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not an a property.

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo car Playing and

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 5>On YouTube.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 6>From Alex Steel alongside Paul Sweeney and John Tucker. This

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 6>is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the top

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 6>news and economics and finance all around the world. But

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 6>they're great Bloomberg Intelli Legends analysts. They cover two thousand

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 6>companies and one hundred and thirty industries worldwide. What's not

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 6>at a record it's small caps. So they pushed higher

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 6>yesterday they were near a two year high, but not

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 6>yet at a record, and today they're a little bit softer,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 6>So you have to wonder if that whole rally broadening

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 6>out thing is still on the docket. Let's get more

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 6>here with David Kudla, founder's CEO and chief investment strategist

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 6>at Mainstay Capital Management. He's on Zoom from Naples, Florida.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 6>So that's not too shabby. Yeah, nice job on that one, David.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 6>Forty thousand for the Dow. It's a nice round number.

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 6>We like nice round numbers.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 4>You buying it, Yeah, I'm buying it. Good morning, Alex

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>and Paul. You know, the market just has a lot

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>of things going for right now. There are things that

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 4>were tailwinds or were headwinds have become tailwinds. We've got

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 4>strong earnings, we've got a fed that you know, I

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 4>think Jay Pal's looking for a reason to cut, and

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 4>I think the jan Ellen once Jay palett cuts so

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 4>that you can afford the service the debt our national

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 4>debt better. And we we look at we look forward

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 4>at at market fundamentals. We look forward to what's happening

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 4>with generative AI and what that means in terms of

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 4>what we're calling the next industrial revolution. Uh, this deal

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 4>with Apple and open AI and the power that people

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 4>are gonna have in the in the holding their hand

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 4>at a handheld device. Yeah, there's there's some things that

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 4>can trip us up. But you know, the market's really

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>really in good shape right now. On market sediment has

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 4>changed so much investor sediment from just two weeks ago,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 4>it's incredible.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So, Uh, David talks about earnings. What are your takeaways

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>here for this earnings which have generally been pretty solid

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 2>across the board, what are your takeaways?

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, we went through their earnings trough and

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, we've emerged from that, and now when we

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 4>look at first quarter earnings, we're coming in well ahead

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 4>of expectations. Profit margins are the best in two years,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 4>and that's really the key, you know, when when there's

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 4>a questions, so many questions about the FED. Look, we've

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>been just since the beginning of the year, we've been

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 4>all over the map on how many FED rate cuts

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 4>we'll get this year, anywhere between zero and seven or

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 4>even a rate hike. But when we look over at fundamentals,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 4>just corporate earnings are coming in better than expected, and

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 4>you know that's that's obviously positive for stocks and one

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 4>of the most important long term factors. And we're looking

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 4>for double digit growth and earnings down the road this year.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's a it's a scenario that if we continue

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>with some multiple expansion, earnings continue to do well. The Fed,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 4>if anything that is looking to show that they're on

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 4>a cutting cycle, they want to cut at least once

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 4>to show they're on a cutting cycle. It's just they're

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 4>having trouble. They got help with non farm payrolls, they

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 4>got help with retail sales CPI. You know, we're going

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 4>to see an opening here and that'll just be more,

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, another catalyst, more horsepower for the bulls out

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 4>there to take the market higher. So does that mean

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 4>that is coming I'm sorry, I was going to say,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 4>with it coming on more in the spirit of a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 4>normalization of FED policy, not because the recessionary forces out

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 4>there are becoming overwhelming and we're seeing a slow economy.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 4>We're not seeing that GDP has remained quite strong.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 6>So when you talk about the AI and New Industrial Revolution,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 6>what's so interesting is that utilities over the last few

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 6>weeks in may have been the second best performing sector

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 6>in the S and P along with tech. Can utilities

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 6>be a growth sector in this environment that you're outlining.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that's yet to be seen. You know, the

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 4>belief there are the thesis there is that there is

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be so much demand for all these super

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 4>chips and and all the the the the energy required

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 4>for this revolutionist implementation of of general of AI. I

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 4>think it's also investors looking for more areas they can

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 4>diversify into. But I think it's you have to be

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 4>seen how much that really translates. You know, that that

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 4>demand for energy translates into actually pushing utility stocks higher.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not it's not a typical reaction function we've seen

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 4>in the past, but we can see how it could

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 4>be one going forward.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 2>David, you know, aside from the AI play, you know,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investors feel like maybe they've kind of,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>at least in the short term, missed some of the

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Big seven Magnificent seven plays. What are some other areas

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that you think there's maybe value out there in the marketplace?

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well we we you know, we've been saying this

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 4>for a while, even when we've had these sell offs

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Magnificent seven or the Fabulous for or really

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 4>just megacap tech, to stay with them because you know,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 4>they're really becoming all weather stocks with these fortress balance

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 4>sheets and wide boats around them and uh, you know

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 4>they're balance sheets that you know, companies like Apple, it

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 4>doesn't Microsoft, doesn't matter what rates are doing. So so

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 4>it's it's such a good place to have a good

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Porsche or portfolio and large caps, specifically large cap tech

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 4>with that focus on AI. But yeah, we can we

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 4>look to other areas that have done well, and it

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 4>will depends how the economy moves forward. There's still this

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>risk we move into a stagflationary environment, which might lead

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 4>US towards commodities. Uh, there's also you know, do we

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 4>have a hard landing, soft landing or no landing. We've

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 4>been calling for the no landing scenario. I think we're

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 4>somewhere between soft landing and no landing. But clearly I

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 4>think golden locks economy. So a lot of different sectors

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 4>are looking good and overseas, you know, there are even

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 4>some areas there that.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Are attractive well well where over seeds. I know that

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 6>the NK in Japan has been a huge hot spot,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 6>particularly with the weaker yen.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's really our main play is Japan. You know,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 4>we've a lot of it is is in fact the

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 4>currency play, and you need if you invest in Japan

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 4>do with a currency hedged vehicle.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 5>But you know, the the the.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 4>Rally in the in the EK two twenty five, I mean,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 4>we reached a high here here that we haven't seen

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 4>since nineteen eighty nine when I was walking around the

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 4>campus at Stanford learning how to invest in learning about business, right,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's been that long, and so there's you know,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 4>with corporate reforms, things that still are bringing true from abbynomics,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Japan is in a position struggling with monetary policy obviously,

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 4>but with that week currency, they're just they're a ne

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 4>ex supporting country. Their products are so competitive abroad, and

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 4>so that's why they've done so well. You've just got

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>to hedge that bet. Europe is starting to look a

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit better too, from where they were a year ago.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 4>The concern here is where rates go, you know, when

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 4>you come to emerging markets and some of those some

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 4>of the other more interest rate sensitive economies like you know,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>we we've seen China researchs in China earlier but or recently,

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 4>but we would continue to avoid there for now because

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 4>of the structural problems they have. But it's really right

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 4>now for US. It's America first. The US economy is

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 4>on is still rolling, you know, in a in a

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 4>pretty strong manner. The consumer is still strong. We're wondering,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, how many times have we heard the consumers

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 4>running out of money? The consumer is gonna they're going

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 4>to run out of pandemic money, They're running out of money,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 4>they're borrowing. But the consumer's still strong. And that's that's

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 4>the mainstay of our economy. So no pun intended. That's

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the main stay of our economy. And you know we're

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>we're America first with looking for some opportunities to tactically yeah,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 4>out to some other areas to manage portfolio risk.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, David, I always appreciate checking in with you.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 2>David Coodley, he's a founder and he's a chief executive

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>officer and he's a chief investment strategist over at Mainstay

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Capital Management based in Michigan, but smartly right now in Naples, Florida,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>coming at us from zoom all right, the Naples days

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>a kind of done. It's going to get like unbearably hot.

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Where you want to be from now on Jersey Shore, baby.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you kind of do. Also, like today it's not

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 6>that nice in New York. It's rainy and grows, but

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 6>man is it humid? Yes, So henceforth the Jersey Shore,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 6>the Paulsweeni House. We're all waiting for our invite. I mean,

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 6>John Tecker and I were like, I don't really need

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 6>one down there too. I guess I haven't. Okay, I'm

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 6>waiting for an invite to y'all house. I guess that's

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 6>not gonna happen.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast Catch us Live

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Deer is one of those names that reported earnings, and again,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 2>when I think about Deer, I think about it in

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the context of being a really good snapshot of where

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the US farmer is in terms of their economic well being.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Chris Chilo, he follows Deer, He follows all those industrial

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>companies for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us here, Chris, what

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 2>does it takeaway from Deer this quarter in the outlook?

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>You're right, it's all about the outlook.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 9>We expected them to cut their twenty twenty four outlook.

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 9>You saw that from their peers at CNACH and Aco.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 9>They both lowered their expectations this quarter. But the haircut

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 9>this quarter for Deer was more than we had anticipated.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 9>They actually took net income down. So we're looking at

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 9>nettingcome around seven billion dollars this year, which would imply

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 9>earnings a little north to twenty five dollars a share,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 9>or roughly eight percent below the street. And really there's

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 9>two things for the reduction and the outlook. One, farm fundamentals,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 9>farm economics continue to deteriorate, so we're seeing weaker, broadly

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 9>weaker demand across the globe. And then two, they're going

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 9>to have to underproduce retail demand here because inventories continue

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 9>to pile up given the softer demand backdrop, So production

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 9>will be down significantly in the back half of the year.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 9>But I think now the question becomes, is this cut

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 9>going to be enough to de stock the channel moving

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 9>into twenty five?

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so, no, because I think we're going

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 9>to see further degradation and the retail demand environment. You know,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 9>the backdrop isn't particularly encouraging for farmers. I mean, we're

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 9>still looking at lower crop prices, you have higher production expenses,

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 9>interest rates, they're still quite elevated, so net farm income

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 9>is going to be double digits for a second straight year.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 9>On top of that, you have broadly weaker farmer sentiment.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 9>They went out and bought a lot of equipment over

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 9>the last three years, so there's really no impetus to

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 9>go out and start spending again. And this is an

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 9>election year, so add another layer of uncertainty on top

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 9>of that, So I guess really struggle to see a

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 9>catalyst at least in the near term that's going to

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 9>really really accelerate demand.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Well does that mean is that good news for the

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.719
<v Speaker 2>John Tuckles of the world who want to go out

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and buy it John dear tractor. Are they can get

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 2>a deal here? Are they going to get some competitive pricing?

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 9>You certainly can get a deal. We're starting to hear

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 9>more and more about competitive pricing, particularly in South America.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 9>But there's too much inventory globally. We heard that from

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 9>Deer on the call, at least for particularly for North America.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 9>That seemed to be a change intra quarter here where

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 9>they're going to have to underproduce for the back half

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 9>of the year. So both new and use too much inventory.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 9>That being said, a lot of this equipment, even though

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 9>it's sitting on lots, does come at an a significantly

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 9>higher price point than even just five years ago given

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 9>all the technological advancements.

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 6>So basically this is still a cyclical business and we

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 6>haven't hit the bottom of the cycle. Let yet. Do

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 6>you have visibility on when we may do that? It's

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 6>a great question.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 9>No, I'm one in the camp that thinks that we're

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 9>in a little bit more of a prolonged downturn. You know,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 9>historically downturns in this business don't last one year. And

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 9>if you look at you know, consensus expectations are for

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 9>roughly flat sales and earnings for deer and that the

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 9>ag equipment peers for next year. Historically, downturns last two

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 9>to four years. We typically look at peak to truck

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 9>the clients north to thirty percent. We'll be down roughly

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 9>fifteen percent in terms of volume this year. Historically speaking,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 9>that tends to accelerate in year two. So it really

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 9>ultimately comes down to I think what are crop price

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 9>is going to do? I think that would be probably

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 9>the early sign that maybe we're approaching a bottom. But

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 9>we're looking at another bumper crop this year bearings adverse weather,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 9>then I think you're going to see continued downward pressure

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 9>there though.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Chris, what are the what are the crops that you

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>look at and investors look at they see whether it's

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a good year or bad year for farmers?

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it soybeans?

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 10>Corn?

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:14.239
<v Speaker 2>What do you look at?

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 9>So there's three that matter. It's corn, It's soybeans, and wheat.

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.719
<v Speaker 9>If you think about in the US, those three crops

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 9>alone account for roughly fifty five percent of farmer cash

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 9>receipts or farmer crop cash receipts, which are essentially farmer revenue.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 9>So those are the ones that really move the needle,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 9>particularly for the large, high horsepower equipment which really you know,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 9>drive the earnings power.

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 6>For deer, this may be a really weird question, but

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 6>the used tractor business DoD Deer and Caterpillar, etc. Do

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 6>they own the resale the secondhand business or is it

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 6>a different type of dealer that does that and is

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 6>there any sort of benefit to be made for them

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 6>on that level.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 9>So, generally speaking, dealers independent businesses. That being said, the

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 9>OEMs do have pretty significant influence there, so they do

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 9>make their own business decisions. But you know, like I said,

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 9>it's both a problem in the used market as well

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 9>as that there's too much inventory out there, and until

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 9>you could start maybe clearing some of that out on

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 9>the second and third hand market, it's really tough to

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 9>re accelerate demand for new equipment because most new equipment

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 9>purchases typically will involve a trade in of older equipment

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 9>and really the second and third buyers tend to be smaller,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 9>mid sized type farmers. So unless there's some kind of

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 9>improvement in farmer profitability, particular for those those farmers that

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 9>are more pressured, it's really tough to you know, accelerate

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 9>that demand.

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So soybeans, wheat, corn, When does that stuff like get planted, harvested,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of stuff.

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 9>Right now, we're right in the heart of planting season.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 9>I think about roughly fifty percent of the corn crop

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 9>is in the ground. Yeah, particularly in North America, this

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 9>is the planning season. South America a little different. You

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 9>get multiple growing seasons down there due to the to

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 9>the climate. But really we're squarely focused in on corn, corn,

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 9>and soybeans right now. And really, you know, if you

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 9>look at soil moisture, it's actually quite favorable. So there's

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 9>really expectations that this is going to be another bumper crop.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So you think you're can get a bumper crop because

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the soil is moist.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 9>We have moist soil now, so you know, like I said,

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 9>bearing some kind of drought, I think you probably see

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 9>more downward pressure on crop prices, which kind of leads

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 9>us to be probably a little bit more cautious heading

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 9>into twenty twenty five, just because farmer incomes are still

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 9>going to be under tremendous pressure, really what we think

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 9>will be for at least a third straight year, and

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 9>that's really just going to you know, temper buying the expectations.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 6>All right, Chris, we really appreciate it.

0:31:58.320 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 9>Chris.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 6>You'll you know, joining us bloom We're gonna tell legends,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 6>senior US machinery analysts. But it keep you two moist,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 6>like you can't have floods and you can't have drought.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, John, your assignment today, Go home and feel

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>your soil. See how moist it Isn't I don't, but

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you run the danger of the seats rotting before they

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>sprout if.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 5>It's two moist.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>So exactly too much moisture gonn to be a problem

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>with farming businesses.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Top Oh my god, at least with my pegonias.

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's why you have crop insurns, like you

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 6>really need it because you're just I mean, even though

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 6>you might complain about all the handouts, et cetera, but

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 6>like it's huge, it's big.

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast Catch us Live

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple.

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 7>Car Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 2>If you remember, about a week ago, I attended the

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Boston Consulting Group Edge Expo in Boston, Massachusetts. Had the

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to chat with a lot of smart people top

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>execs at BCG. One was with Global Chair Rich Lesser.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 2>He engages with CEOs, boards of directors, and senior leaders

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>around the world on critical topics, including climate change and

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence. I began the conversation by asking Rich what

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 2>he spends the most time talking to clients about. Let's

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 2>take a listen.

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 10>So it's been a remarkable decade and it's not even

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 10>half over yet.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 5>And I think the two.

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 10>Characteristics that we are living with right now to a

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 10>very high degree is uncertainty and change, and they're not

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 10>the same thing. Uncertainty causes you to want to hunker down,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, just get through it. Change forces you to

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 10>be bold, to invest, to take some risk. And right now,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 10>more than I can remember, CEOs get pooled in both

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 10>directions how to navigate, particularly if you're like a European CEO.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 10>You've got two wars not so not so far away,

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 10>and you've got all the pressures of energy costs and

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 10>all the uncertainty of all these elections this year and

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 10>so forth. You've got an enormous amount of uncertainty. But

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 10>of course, just like CEOs everywhere in the world, you've

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 10>got rapid technology evolution, and you've got to prepare for

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 10>climate change, all sorts of things. So I think that's

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 10>the tension point, is how to balance.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Those Let's talk about climate change a little bit here.

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It feels like maybe we're at a little bit of

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>an ebb here in the US. I'm not sure if

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's necessarily case in Europe, but I'm

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>feeling a little bit here. How do you engage with

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 2>your clients about climate change? What's the challenge these days?

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it convincing them that it's there, that it's an issue,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>convincing them that they need to maybe invest in getting

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to a cleaner economy. What are some of the challenges

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you guys have seen.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 10>I think it's really important to separate what people want

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 10>to talk about publicly and what they do. Many many CEOs,

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 10>particularly of leading US companies, have made pretty substantial commitments

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 10>over the last two to three years.

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 5>But in making those commitments, they were.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 10>Very, very visible and public about it a couple of

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 10>years ago, and I think right now the sense is

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 10>you don't walk away from your commitments. And I know

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 10>very few CEOs, very few that I think are really

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 10>trying to walk away from their amendments. I think most

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 10>of them have tried to put them in their processes

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 10>and sure they get delivered. But at the same time,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 10>it's become such a politicized topic. We're all going to

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 10>live on this planet, we're all going to bear the

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 10>consequences of climate change, but unfortunately, in the public discourse

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 10>and in a very you know, it's an election year.

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 5>It's just become very political.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 10>And I don't think CEOs want to be so public

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 10>on these very difficult, divided, divisive topics.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 5>So they're much quieter.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 10>They're not walking away from their previous commitments, but they're

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 10>also being careful about new commitments, partly because of the

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 10>public attention and partly because they don't know where the

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 10>policy environment is going next year.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I guess an example that is ESG.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It was the termed for so many years and now

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it's really fallen out of favor here in the US

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>in particular. But again I guess the underlying commitment for

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 2>many of those folks are still there.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Well. The problem is ESG.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 10>Even people who were committed weren't always sure exactly what

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 10>ESG was and what it meant. It was initials that

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 10>were bundling three very different kinds of attributes together, and

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 10>then it got politicizes a term without even people knowing

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 10>why they shouldn't like it sometimes, so I think very

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 10>few CEOs are using ESG language right now. You talk

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.479
<v Speaker 10>about your climate and sustainability commitments, you often talk about

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 10>diversity and inclusion, good governance. I don't think anybody questions

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 10>makes for stronger companies. But when you put it together

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 10>in ways people don't understand, you're just almost looking for trouble.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 10>And I think CEOs the last thing they want to

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 10>do is look for trouble.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you look at the economic data, which

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>is what we get Boomberg do all the time, and

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 2>we talk about it all the time. For a lot

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of smart people, what are you hearing about the economy

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 2>from some of your CEO clients out there, seems again

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 2>there's some shifting wins out there for a lot of people.

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Those that won't assets, life's good. Those that don't maybe

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 2>not so much. That inflation thing, for example.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Is a real problem. What are you hearing?

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 10>So, Look, we've been on the more optimistic side of

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 10>the economic outlook for a while back, when everybody was

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 10>saying recession or super high inflation. We were of a position,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 10>led by our chief economist Philip Carlson, that we could

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 10>get to a soft landing and that that was not

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 10>as low a probability scenario. Now we're living in a

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 10>soft landing world. But one soft landings for companies have

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 10>hard edges. You still have wages growing faster than your

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 10>power to raise prices. You still have low growth, not

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 10>super high growth. It's hard to drive your own growth

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 10>agenda without doing a lot of innovation, and so it's

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 10>not so easy. And second, we're finding actually the glide

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 10>path for the last thousand feet to the ground. We

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 10>got a glidepath from thirty thousand feet of risk down

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 10>to a couple thousand. But you know, getting from a

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 10>world of high two s low threes down to a

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 10>well below two and a half. Approaching two is proving

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 10>to be tricky, and the consequence of that, as you say,

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 10>is that interest rates are high and there's much less

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 10>sign of them coming down, and in that environment it

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 10>makes a couple things hard. First, for many many consumers,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 10>you don't have much in the way of savings, buying

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 10>a car, buying a house, renovating a house, all of

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 10>those things go up much more than the underlying prices

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 10>do because of the interest costs. And second, for many

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 10>of the capital investments we need to make, including climate

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 10>and sustainability, things that look like they made a lot

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 10>of economic sense a couple of years ago are much

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 10>harder to justify now. So if you have a lot

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 10>of assets, you're right, it's not bad right now you

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 10>can get good value on But if you've got to

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 10>make investments, take on debt, do things, that is trickier.

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 2>We spent a lot of time at your conference here

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about AI and the investment needed in AI and

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the commitment needed and the ethics around AI. How prevalent

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>is that in your discussions with your declines at the

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>CEO level, the board level.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 10>I am blown away by how much energy CEOs are

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 10>putting into thinking this topic through. But for me, the

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 10>big difference between the last six months and say the

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 10>first nine or ten months since the big announcements. The

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 10>last six months people are less focused on thinking it

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 10>through in the sense of understanding the technology and more

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 10>about how they can drive business impact at scale. And

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 10>for us, it's been honestly one of the most exciting

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 10>periods I can remember on something where we went from

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 10>less than twenty clients a year ago to day working

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 10>on this to three hundred and fifty. I mean, we've

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 10>never had something like that. And I think that for us,

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of opportunity that we're seeing now get

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 10>materialized versus theorized, and CEOs are realizing it. They have

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 10>to balance it, they have other priorities they have to do.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 10>They have to do it in a responsible way. To

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 10>your point, be careful, there aren't hidden biases. Be careful,

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 10>they're not misusing the technology. But the underlying sense of

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 10>opportunity right now has gone up quite a lot. And

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 10>I think the more they see other companies delivering actually

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 10>putting it into results, that they post deeper customer relationships.

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 5>The faster we'll see that come along.

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we met with well the goodness for BCGS. You

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of smart people on this topic here,

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>we've met them here today. One aery was the ethics site,

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 2>your chief ethics officers talking about that. Yeah, that's got

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 2>to be front and center. I would think for total

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 2>discussions before you start thinking about putting dollars to work,

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you have to have a commitment, it seems like, to

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 2>try to do this as responsible.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.760
<v Speaker 10>As Yes, and it has to be owned by the CEO,

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 10>not owned by the technology team.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Right, this is a CEO level issue.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 10>What are the governance frameworks, What are the kind of

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 10>biases to look out for? How do you have a

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 10>process where you don't just put technology into the wild

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 10>and hope you did a good job, but you're monitoring

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 10>it in an ongoing basis, figuring out what the risks are,

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 10>escalating the things to the right level, intervening in the

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 10>right ways. That is a CEO and a top leadership agenda,

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 10>and it's really important. But we are seeing companies navigate

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 10>that really well. And so yes, you have to be

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 10>really careful, but that can't be the reason you don't

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 10>choose to act.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, You've been in this consulting game a

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 2>while here, how has it changed? You know, certainly before

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic. I'm guessing the business models for a lot

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of companies have changed.

0:40:58.760 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 10>Here.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 2>How how is your day to day house and consulting

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 2>business evolved in over the least?

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 10>Right, So, I'd say there are two massive changes over

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 10>the last five to ten years. Until five or ten

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 10>years ago, it was very clear, get to the right

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 10>answer for very difficult problems. Make sure the change really happens.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 10>I think the focus right now on driving real lasting

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 10>impact goes up and up and up. We see it

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 10>in so many clinident discussions. They don't just want partners

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 10>to give them good ideas or give them a page

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 10>of recommendations. They want impact partners that can team with

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 10>to drive stuff through. And two, they need an enablement focus.

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 10>They need a focus on building because the world's going

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 10>to keep changing, So making change once, however successful, is

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 10>not sufficient. What you need to do is enable your organization,

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 10>the people and the technology to keep learning, to keep growing,

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 10>to keep evolving. So the role of people like us

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 10>are not just to make great change happen one successfully,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 10>but to build skills within the organization, so in the

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 10>organist and keep growing and learning and evolving, and those

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 10>two things have grown dramatically over the last five years.

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 2>That was Global Chair Rich Lesser of BCG Boston Consulting Group.

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I was up there attending their Boston Consulting Group Edge

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Expo in Boston, talking to a lot of their leaders

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 2>senior partners there at bcgpas some of the issues they

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 2>are working with their clients are on. A lot of

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 2>it was about competition, global competition technology, particularly AI as well.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>So a lot going on there and they're getting more

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and more engaged with their clients.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Beheart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.