1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,120 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:10,159 Speaker 2: Now, we welcome our TV and radio audiences for a 3 00:00:10,200 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 2: conversation with one of the most respected traders on Wall Street. 4 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 2: Paul Tudor Jones made his name calling the Black Monday 5 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 2: market crash in nineteen eighty seven, shortingstocks during the largest 6 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:24,680 Speaker 2: single day percentage drop in US history. Jones became a 7 00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:27,160 Speaker 2: gold bowl in the aftermath of the GFC and bought 8 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 2: bitcoin as the money printer went burr during COVID. He 9 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:34,000 Speaker 2: also founded the Robin Hood Foundation in nineteen eighty eight 10 00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 2: and has helped since then to raise nearly three billion 11 00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:41,160 Speaker 2: dollars to get New Yorkers permanently out of poverty. Paul 12 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 2: Tutor Jones, a coach, chairman and chief investment officer of 13 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:45,879 Speaker 2: Tutor Investment, joins us now on set. 14 00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:47,800 Speaker 3: Paul's great to have you here. It's great to be here. 15 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:48,960 Speaker 3: Thanks so much for joining us. 16 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:51,440 Speaker 2: I want to talk, first of all, before we get 17 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 2: into the markets, economics, and AI, about your philanthropic efforts 18 00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 2: and specifically a partnership that Robinhood has with Blue Blomberg 19 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 2: in a contest called pick a Ticker. 20 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 3: You have a ten thousand. 21 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:08,200 Speaker 2: Dollars bet essentially one long, one short. How did this 22 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:09,959 Speaker 2: contest go and who was the winner? 23 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 3: Well, we did it right. 24 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:15,119 Speaker 4: It actually starts right before our investor conference that we 25 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:19,240 Speaker 4: hold every fall. This year we had forty participants. We 26 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 4: raised about four hundred thousand dollars that went, three quarters 27 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:27,680 Speaker 4: of which went to Robinhood. It was fantastic. The winner 28 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 4: was Bill Ackman, a Pershing Square. He was long Fannie 29 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:35,400 Speaker 4: May and see number two was a guy named Mark 30 00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 4: Gallott who actually used to work for me. In three 31 00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 4: was Stan Druckmiller. No surprise, he's going to always be placing. 32 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:43,680 Speaker 3: They came in. 33 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 4: I think if you took the top three or four 34 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:49,440 Speaker 4: and you had made their bet, you would have made 35 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 4: seven times your money in six months. 36 00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 3: So it's a great competition. 37 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 4: I really hope this year we can expand it so 38 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:01,000 Speaker 4: it'll be a much bigger group. It's ten thousand dollars, 39 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:04,760 Speaker 4: it's a six month competition, one long, one short, and 40 00:02:05,080 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 4: uh yeah, it's it's a lot of fun. 41 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,240 Speaker 2: Actually, shout out also to Anna Nikolsky, you got up 42 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 2: there on the board with. 43 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 4: Who's our only female entront I hope we get a 44 00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 4: lot more ladies that'll participate this time, so. 45 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:21,040 Speaker 2: They have another chance coming up this fall, and I thought, 46 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:24,040 Speaker 2: since we have you here, you could help us give 47 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 2: us a tip. 48 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:26,119 Speaker 3: What's the what's the one. 49 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:29,680 Speaker 2: Long you would hit for the next contest. 50 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:34,640 Speaker 4: I would say probably probably the yield curve. It just 51 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:36,720 Speaker 4: depends on where I think it'll be higher at that 52 00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:39,680 Speaker 4: point in time. Mine would be very esoteric, so let 53 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 4: me think, uh, well, it would definitely I would definitely 54 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:49,400 Speaker 4: be betting on substantially lower front end rates. We'll have a 55 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 4: we'll have a new FED chair within six months at 56 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 4: that point in time, and I think Trump's gonna pick 57 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:57,680 Speaker 4: someone who's gonna be uber dubbish. 58 00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 1: Well, let's talk a little bit more about the yield curve. 59 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 1: Matt and I were actually emailing it like four in 60 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:04,800 Speaker 1: the morning about the yield curve because it's broken a 61 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:07,360 Speaker 1: lot of hearts that's steepener bed, and the way you 62 00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:09,400 Speaker 1: lay it out, short end rates coming down, you have 63 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:12,640 Speaker 1: concerns about the deficit potentially boosting the long end. It 64 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 1: seems like a no brainer, but it feels like it 65 00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 1: just hasn't worked. 66 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 3: So what's different this time. 67 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:21,320 Speaker 4: Well, it's working, it's just you know, it's vall adjusted 68 00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 4: it's just a slow moving train. 69 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:25,919 Speaker 3: But I think in the long run it has to work. 70 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:31,680 Speaker 4: We are fiscally constrained and we're going to have budget 71 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 4: deficits of six percent plus. 72 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 3: As far as the I can see. 73 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,520 Speaker 4: So one of the major offsets if I was the 74 00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 4: president would be to lower my interest rate cost appointing 75 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:46,400 Speaker 4: a FED chair who is as dubvish as could possibly be. 76 00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 4: That's kind of the playbook when you're one hundred percent 77 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 4: debt to GDP and you're fiscally constrained. 78 00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 3: You can see it happening in Japan right now. 79 00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 4: He's way is reluctant to raise rates more than beyond 80 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 4: fifty basis points, even though they have inflation pick a 81 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 4: number somewhere between two and three percent. I think they 82 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 4: fudge the numbers down all the time. You've got wage 83 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 4: growth at three and a half percent there, So that's 84 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:14,800 Speaker 4: you know, Historically, the way that you get out of 85 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 4: a debt trap is you run the lowest real rates possible, 86 00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:21,680 Speaker 4: you lower your interest burdens, and I'm sure that's what 87 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 4: we'll see beginning when the next FED chair comes. 88 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,560 Speaker 1: Well, we definitely want to talk about who the next 89 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:29,440 Speaker 1: FED shair might be. And who you would like to see. 90 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:31,320 Speaker 3: But let's talk first a little bit. 91 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,040 Speaker 1: More about the deficit, because it feels like, you take 92 00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:36,200 Speaker 1: a look at the bond market over the past few weeks, 93 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:39,440 Speaker 1: the past few months, you can see those fears being expressed, 94 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 1: but concerns about a higher deficit. It feels like one 95 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 1: of those evergreen issues out there. So give us first 96 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:50,720 Speaker 1: your feel how you're feeling about the deficit, production projections 97 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,080 Speaker 1: that we've been getting, and also how you might invest 98 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:53,600 Speaker 1: around that. 99 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:59,479 Speaker 4: Well, the Big Beautiful Bill is really interesting. It's it's 100 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 4: first of all, well, it's a genius in branding. The 101 00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 4: name of it's a genius in branding. 102 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 3: But I think what. 103 00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 4: You've got to do is you you have to go 104 00:05:08,080 --> 00:05:13,919 Speaker 4: to first principles. What would the actual budget look like 105 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:18,599 Speaker 4: if we were trying to balance the budget, If we 106 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 4: were actually trying to balance the budget, what is the 107 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:25,160 Speaker 4: counterfactual to the Big Beautiful Bill. 108 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 3: So if you actually had. 109 00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 4: To balance the budget, it probably would be the Big 110 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:31,000 Speaker 4: Beastly Bill. 111 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:34,720 Speaker 3: And at some point down the road, who knows when 112 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:35,320 Speaker 3: that's going to be. 113 00:05:35,480 --> 00:05:39,480 Speaker 4: Maybe it's next year, maybe it's the next administration, Maybe 114 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 4: it's ten years down the road. At some point, probably 115 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 4: the bomb markets are going to call bs on governments 116 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:55,800 Speaker 4: around the world playing chicken with them, right. So to 117 00:05:55,839 --> 00:05:58,280 Speaker 4: give you an idea if you were to balance the 118 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 4: budget today, let's assume the first thing I would do 119 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:03,760 Speaker 4: if I was president, I was trying out to point 120 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 4: the most douvish central banker I could to lower interest costs. 121 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 3: So let's assume that I could. 122 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 4: Make a pack with my UH, with my Chairman of 123 00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:17,719 Speaker 4: the Fed. But I'm going to go through an austerity package. 124 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 4: I'm going to balance it, but I need you to 125 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 4: really drop rates to let's say two and a half percent. 126 00:06:24,880 --> 00:06:26,480 Speaker 4: So if you drop rates to two and a half 127 00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:29,159 Speaker 4: percent and you get a fifty basis point reduction or 128 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 4: let's say even one hundred basis point reduction in ten 129 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:35,080 Speaker 4: ure rates, that saves you one hundred and seventy five billion. 130 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:37,839 Speaker 3: The starting gap is nine. 131 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 4: Hundred billion, so that saves you one hundred and seventy 132 00:06:39,920 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 4: five Now I'm down to seven hundred and twenty five 133 00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:47,480 Speaker 4: billion that I've got to find through tax hikes and 134 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:50,479 Speaker 4: spending cuts. So let's assume that we're going to do 135 00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,680 Speaker 4: this fairly. We're gonna do fifty percent tax hikes in 136 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,239 Speaker 4: the rich because they've benefited the most in the last 137 00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 4: thirty forty years. 138 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 3: Fifty pp and cuts. 139 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:06,440 Speaker 4: What does that look like On the spending cut size side, 140 00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 4: I would just do, just to make it simple, let's 141 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 4: just call it a blanket six percent reduction in everything, 142 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:20,520 Speaker 4: social Security, medicaid, defense, spending, you name it. I'm just 143 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,120 Speaker 4: going to cut everything six percent across the board. That's 144 00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 4: what it would take to get you three hundred and 145 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:28,320 Speaker 4: sixty billion half. 146 00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 3: Of that sentence to do with Congress, right, I'm. 147 00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 4: Just saying there'll be a point where the markets are 148 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 4: going to demand it. I don't know when it'll be. 149 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,920 Speaker 4: Maybe it'll be in my lifetime. Who knows when it'll be. 150 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:40,640 Speaker 3: By the way, how do you invest around that? 151 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:43,520 Speaker 2: Because you famously made a lot of money shortening the 152 00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:45,960 Speaker 2: end in Japanese assets into the last decade, which was 153 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 2: another situation where you saw a country just boost its 154 00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:51,520 Speaker 2: fiscal debt and deathicis. 155 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 4: I will get to that, but let me just finish 156 00:07:54,920 --> 00:07:58,640 Speaker 4: the tax hike side. So to get three hundred and 157 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 4: sixty three and tax hikes, you're gonna have to raise 158 00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 4: the top income rate to forty nine. You're gonna have 159 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 4: to have a one percent wealth tax annually, and you're 160 00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 4: gonna have to raise the capitol games right. 161 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 3: To forty huh. 162 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 4: So if we're just gonna if all we're gonna do 163 00:08:17,280 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 4: is stabilize debt to GDP, that's the big beastly bill 164 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 4: that's somewhere down the road. 165 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,600 Speaker 3: And again who knows what it's gonna be. 166 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:32,080 Speaker 4: Remember you have Italy, France, and Japan who on the 167 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 4: current projections, will be in worse fiscal shape than we are, 168 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 4: and they seem to be doing okay. And that's why 169 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 4: we keep that's why we keep the we keep going 170 00:08:41,679 --> 00:08:46,559 Speaker 4: with the cafe in wrestling, the suspended reality where we 171 00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:48,920 Speaker 4: like to watch the show, but we know it's not real. 172 00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:53,280 Speaker 4: So we know that these six percent budget deficits are 173 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:56,440 Speaker 4: not sustainable in the long run. But it's okay because 174 00:08:56,440 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 4: it's okay now, it's okay the short run, and it 175 00:08:58,960 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 4: feels good and it's not. 176 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:01,960 Speaker 3: It's actually really easy. 177 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:06,559 Speaker 4: Remember in the first Trump administration, he normalized four percent 178 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:10,040 Speaker 4: budget deficits, that's what we had pre COVID, and now 179 00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:14,920 Speaker 4: in this administration he's normalizing six percent budget deficits. So 180 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:19,120 Speaker 4: and I'm not judging I'm just calling balls and strikes. 181 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:20,040 Speaker 3: That's where we are. 182 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 4: So with that in mind, knowing that we have a 183 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:31,439 Speaker 4: whole pricing structure that's created on something that's not sustainable, 184 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 4: it's really really hard to invest for the long run 185 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:40,079 Speaker 4: because the day that it'll probably be the bond market first, 186 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 4: or maybe it's the dollar, who knows, the day that 187 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 4: we're called a carpet on that and the day that 188 00:09:47,480 --> 00:09:50,679 Speaker 4: you actually went through that exercise that I just described, 189 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:54,960 Speaker 4: and you know that multiples on stocks will not be 190 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:56,400 Speaker 4: where they are right now. 191 00:09:56,520 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 2: Right, But are you short the dollar? I mean you 192 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:00,640 Speaker 2: mention you're into yields. 193 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,400 Speaker 4: I would say that the easiest long term trades are 194 00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:07,599 Speaker 4: you know, the yield curve's going to steepen probably to 195 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:11,160 Speaker 4: historic wise. You know, we're going to cut short term 196 00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 4: rates dramatically in the next year, and you know the 197 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:21,719 Speaker 4: dollar will probably be lower because of that, a lot 198 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:22,840 Speaker 4: lower because of that. 199 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:26,640 Speaker 2: How much lower off ten percent from our high right now? 200 00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:30,679 Speaker 4: Yes, I would say that that's I think that's a 201 00:10:30,760 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 4: year from today and that's probably a realistic assumption. 202 00:10:35,080 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 1: I want to go to one point that you made 203 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:40,200 Speaker 1: in that blueprint that you laid out, and that comes 204 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:43,960 Speaker 1: to appointing the most stubbish fed chair possible. Jerome Pal's 205 00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 1: turn ends in May twenty twenty six. We've heard from 206 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:51,080 Speaker 1: the President recently that he's going to announce some contenders 207 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:54,200 Speaker 1: sometime soon. Bloomberg News has reported in the past twenty 208 00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 1: four hours that Scott Besson has emerged as a pick. 209 00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:01,040 Speaker 1: Kevin worsh is under consideration. I mean, if you had 210 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 1: your pick, who do you think is best suited. 211 00:11:03,320 --> 00:11:03,840 Speaker 3: For the chair? 212 00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:12,320 Speaker 4: Those are two great names. Those are two fabulous names. Again, 213 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:17,440 Speaker 4: if I was president, if I just think about President Trump, 214 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,199 Speaker 4: he's just a he's a growth guy, right, He's a 215 00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:24,720 Speaker 4: He's a loyalty and growth guy. You're gonna be my pick. 216 00:11:24,720 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 4: If you're loyal to me, you're gonna be my pick. 217 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 4: If you're you're a growth guy. And I'd pick a 218 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:34,719 Speaker 4: growth guy. And probably Scott would be more uh in 219 00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:38,840 Speaker 4: line with that than Kevin Wood. They will have had 220 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:44,680 Speaker 4: a really close working relationship at that point. I also think, again, 221 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 4: the playbook's pretty clear, uh historically and right now, we're 222 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:54,440 Speaker 4: we are fiscally constrained, We're in a debt trap. 223 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:55,839 Speaker 3: You're gonna have to. 224 00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:59,040 Speaker 4: Run negative real rates to get out of it. 225 00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 3: That's what we did in the fifties. 226 00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:04,280 Speaker 4: We had if you'll remember, we had a variety of 227 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:07,120 Speaker 4: prices fixed by the treasury, why we had five and 228 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 4: six percent inflation for a period of time. We're gonna 229 00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:13,840 Speaker 4: have negative real rates, and that's why you have to 230 00:12:14,440 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 4: think about what is facing our policy makers in this 231 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:23,320 Speaker 4: debt trap as you constructure portfolio. So what would an 232 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,040 Speaker 4: ideal portfolio be and something like that, Well, what has 233 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 4: worked so far, What has worked so far has been 234 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:30,920 Speaker 4: some combination of. 235 00:12:30,920 --> 00:12:34,120 Speaker 3: Stocks which won't do great, which. 236 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:37,600 Speaker 4: Would do terribly if we ever actually had if they 237 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:40,600 Speaker 4: called us out and the bottom market actually gave us 238 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,720 Speaker 4: an accident that then spilled over. But it would be 239 00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:49,880 Speaker 4: some combination of probably gold vall adjusted bitcoin gold stocks, 240 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:56,440 Speaker 4: that's probably your best portfolio to fight inflation vol adjusted 241 00:12:56,480 --> 00:13:00,440 Speaker 4: because the vall of bitcoins obviously five times out goal. 242 00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:04,480 Speaker 4: So you're gonna you're gonna do it in different ways. 243 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:07,000 Speaker 2: You said at one point you would allocate one or 244 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:08,800 Speaker 2: two percent of your portfolio to bitcoin. 245 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:10,319 Speaker 3: Is it still yeah? 246 00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 4: I mean I think you just particularly now that the 247 00:13:14,760 --> 00:13:20,400 Speaker 4: that the roadmap is clear, then I mean the the again, 248 00:13:20,440 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 4: if I'm a policymaker, I'm gonna run really low real rates, 249 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:30,080 Speaker 4: I'm gonna have inflation running hot. Uh, and I'm gonna 250 00:13:30,360 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 4: tax the American consumer to get out of my debt trap. 251 00:13:34,400 --> 00:13:37,599 Speaker 4: And that's exactly what Japan, who's the most fiscally constrained 252 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:41,600 Speaker 4: in the world, doing, And it works until until the 253 00:13:41,679 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 4: population throws you out because you're let inflation get too hot. 254 00:13:45,640 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 3: So maybe you're in a world with three three. 255 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:52,000 Speaker 4: And a half percent inflation and two and a half 256 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 4: percent overnight rate and you're kind of trying to run 257 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:56,600 Speaker 4: hot and grow your way out of it. 258 00:13:56,840 --> 00:13:57,240 Speaker 3: Mm hmm. 259 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 1: Well, let's talk a little bit more about equities. You know, 260 00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:03,199 Speaker 1: you mentioned in that scenario that you laid out equities 261 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,240 Speaker 1: obviously would do terrible. But where we stand right now, 262 00:14:06,280 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: I mean, we're back to six thousand ish on the 263 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: S and P five hundred, We're slightly positive for the year. 264 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: It feels like after the big performance that we saw 265 00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,080 Speaker 1: in May, though, that people are not sure where to 266 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:22,160 Speaker 1: go from here. So, assuming we continue along this path 267 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 1: where inflation is under control, it seems like the labor 268 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:29,200 Speaker 1: market is under control, and trade negotiations continue to progress. 269 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:31,200 Speaker 1: I mean, what's your base case on equities. 270 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 3: Well again, so. 271 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:38,760 Speaker 4: A year ago, I never thought the bond market would 272 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,320 Speaker 4: tolerate the big beautiful bill. I just didn't think it would. 273 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:47,800 Speaker 4: I thought, wow, I thought there'd be a revolt. I 274 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 4: thought bomb vigilantes actually has. 275 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:54,120 Speaker 3: Some stuff, but they'd come back out. But they clearly 276 00:14:54,160 --> 00:14:54,960 Speaker 3: haven't surfaced. 277 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:59,880 Speaker 4: And as we haven't seen inflation, and and well there's 278 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,840 Speaker 4: there's a couple of things going on. One we know 279 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 4: twelve months from now rates are going to drop recipitously 280 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 4: with a new FED share If you I mean, was 281 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:13,040 Speaker 4: it last week when Donald Trump. 282 00:15:12,760 --> 00:15:15,920 Speaker 3: Saw after was it I forget? Was it adp I 283 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 3: drop rates? 284 00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:19,120 Speaker 4: One Hunter Basis points yes, So we know where his 285 00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 4: head is. We know who he's going to point well. 286 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 2: And just now the Vice President jd Vance said this 287 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 2: is monetary malpractice in a tweet reply to our Joe Weisenthal. 288 00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:33,600 Speaker 2: So they really want the FED to cut rates. 289 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 4: So that also is a tailwind for the bond market, 290 00:15:37,560 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 4: right because you know, short rates right now aren't going 291 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:44,080 Speaker 4: to be there a year from today, So that's. 292 00:15:43,920 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 3: A tail wind. 293 00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 4: And again, I think the biggest threat to the stock 294 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:53,000 Speaker 4: market has been the has been our fiscal profligacy, something 295 00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:56,720 Speaker 4: like the Big Beautiful Bill, because that was always going 296 00:15:56,760 --> 00:16:01,520 Speaker 4: to be a threat to the safety and security the 297 00:16:01,560 --> 00:16:05,560 Speaker 4: bond market, whether investors would tolerate what's going on. And 298 00:16:05,760 --> 00:16:10,120 Speaker 4: right now it seems like, both globally and domestically that 299 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:14,240 Speaker 4: the world's okay with Cafe kicking the can down the road. 300 00:16:14,240 --> 00:16:17,760 Speaker 3: We're going to suspend reality. It's okay. So in that 301 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:20,960 Speaker 3: scenario again, if. 302 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:24,320 Speaker 4: I have to make a decision on stocks and I 303 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 4: think that rates are going to be three percent twelve months, yeah, 304 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:28,800 Speaker 4: I'm probably long. 305 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:31,480 Speaker 2: By the way, you keep mentioning KFE and we're all 306 00:16:31,560 --> 00:16:33,920 Speaker 2: kind of watching this knowing it's fake, but don't really 307 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:36,840 Speaker 2: care right now? Is that because we're not invested Because 308 00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:39,680 Speaker 2: Brad Gershner has this idea and Ted Cruz was on 309 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 2: Bloomberg talking about it yesterday. 310 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:43,520 Speaker 3: I think it's invest. 311 00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:47,480 Speaker 2: America where you give every child born one thousand dollars 312 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:51,040 Speaker 2: and then allow parents or relatives to invest five thousand 313 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:52,920 Speaker 2: a year. Then by the time they're eighteen of the 314 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 2: stock market continues to appreciate they have a serious nut, 315 00:16:56,120 --> 00:16:58,480 Speaker 2: but they're also they've got skin in the game. 316 00:16:58,680 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's see here, I'm here. 317 00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:08,160 Speaker 4: I'm I'm I'm the I'm the budget I'm the budget. 318 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:10,160 Speaker 3: Hawk. 319 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 4: And yeah, i'm the budget in the in the in 320 00:17:13,359 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 4: the in the cranky guy. But that's the best four 321 00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:20,600 Speaker 4: billion dollars that would ever spend in history, because the 322 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:24,919 Speaker 4: idea of making kids stakeholders from an early age and 323 00:17:25,080 --> 00:17:29,440 Speaker 4: capitalism is so important, Oh my gosh, and then allowing 324 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 4: employers or relatives or whatever to build that account so 325 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 4: that at an early age they understand the idea of entrepreneurialship, 326 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 4: of free markets, of of self individual excitement, about understanding 327 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 4: how productivity actually works, how we build things through our 328 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:54,960 Speaker 4: own shared initiatives. 329 00:17:54,960 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 3: I think it's just spectacular idea. 330 00:17:57,040 --> 00:18:00,200 Speaker 4: It's the best four billion this government could ever spend. 331 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 1: So there's a good way to add to the deficit, 332 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:05,200 Speaker 1: and there's a bad way. That would be the best 333 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 1: four billion. I'm very conscious of the clock. We only 334 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:10,680 Speaker 1: have about eight minutes luck with you, so let's talk 335 00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: a little. 336 00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:12,320 Speaker 3: Bit about AI. 337 00:18:12,720 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 1: You've expressed concerns about AI in the past, and may 338 00:18:16,800 --> 00:18:19,040 Speaker 1: I believe you said that. I mean, it could be 339 00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,600 Speaker 1: pretty disastrous if you think about, if you really put 340 00:18:22,600 --> 00:18:26,360 Speaker 1: your thinking cap on. But I'm curious from the investment perspective, 341 00:18:26,760 --> 00:18:30,199 Speaker 1: when you wear your investor hat, how do you view it? 342 00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:30,400 Speaker 3: Then? 343 00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:33,480 Speaker 1: I mean, there's plenty of things to gets concerned about. 344 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:35,680 Speaker 1: But we were having a great conversation with Cliff Astiness 345 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:37,919 Speaker 1: of AQR last week. He's had a real change of 346 00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:40,960 Speaker 1: heart when it comes to AI. He's embraced it. Are 347 00:18:40,960 --> 00:18:41,800 Speaker 1: you embracing it? 348 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:47,120 Speaker 4: Well, for sure, I'm embracing it. We tested two models 349 00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:50,639 Speaker 4: last week. Internally, we have a variety of quantinems a tutor. 350 00:18:50,720 --> 00:18:58,000 Speaker 4: We tested two models, commercially available models. Where AI has 351 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:01,440 Speaker 4: gone in the last four months. In the last four 352 00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:08,160 Speaker 4: months is so incredible. These models will the do democratize 353 00:19:08,800 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 4: quant modeling for the markets Like I can just say 354 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:18,200 Speaker 4: I've I've been an investment in quant modeling for the 355 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:23,960 Speaker 4: last thirty years. Internally, externally, variety of ways, and what 356 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:25,440 Speaker 4: these new models. 357 00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:25,920 Speaker 3: Do is. 358 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 4: What you know, there's a huge barrier to entry if 359 00:19:30,880 --> 00:19:33,840 Speaker 4: you think about quant modeling, which is I need to 360 00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:36,879 Speaker 4: have dozens. If you look at the big ones, the 361 00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:40,560 Speaker 4: really whether it's two Sigma or Jumper Human, they have 362 00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 4: one hundred thousands of employees. 363 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:46,680 Speaker 2: That's the edge, That's that's Cliff's edge, right with these 364 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:47,440 Speaker 2: new models. 365 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:52,800 Speaker 4: Wowie, it's it's incredible what these new models do. And 366 00:19:53,119 --> 00:19:55,240 Speaker 4: the reason that I bring that up, of course, you 367 00:19:55,320 --> 00:19:59,360 Speaker 4: have to embrace it. In our business, there's larger issues 368 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,479 Speaker 4: regarding to Yeah, I think if you don't mind, I 369 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 4: can't tell you because I don't really trade individual stocks 370 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:10,560 Speaker 4: that much. I'm actually using the models from a quant standpoint, 371 00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 4: so I can't tell you which companies to buy. 372 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:13,720 Speaker 3: It's pretty clear. 373 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:19,760 Speaker 4: That this is obviously the most disruptive technology in the 374 00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 4: history of mankind. If I can just give you that, 375 00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 4: here's the way I think of AI. You're too young 376 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:25,840 Speaker 4: for this. 377 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 3: But there was a great Twilight Zone Okay, great. 378 00:20:29,040 --> 00:20:32,600 Speaker 4: Twilight Zone episode where Aliens came down to Earth and 379 00:20:32,640 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 4: they had this and they hand this book. 380 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:37,600 Speaker 3: It says to serve Man, and everyone goes. 381 00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:42,560 Speaker 4: Hooray, they're gonna They're gonna save humanity, see Humanitarian God. 382 00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:45,000 Speaker 3: And it turns out to be a cookbook. 383 00:20:47,080 --> 00:20:50,000 Speaker 1: I was ready to push back, but it's a beautiful kid. 384 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 3: Book I have seen. 385 00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:58,160 Speaker 4: So anyway, we just had a Robin Hood AI poverty 386 00:20:58,160 --> 00:20:59,920 Speaker 4: summit on Monday, which I was at. 387 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:02,520 Speaker 3: Oh my lord, the things that AI are going to 388 00:21:02,640 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 3: do for education. 389 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:08,720 Speaker 4: There is no excuse for a low income. 390 00:21:08,359 --> 00:21:10,400 Speaker 3: Kid not to have the greatest education. 391 00:21:12,200 --> 00:21:15,800 Speaker 4: If his parents are caregiver is taking care of them, 392 00:21:15,880 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 4: My gosh, they're going to have an individual tutor to 393 00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:25,040 Speaker 4: walk them through everything. So it's really spectacular. The downside 394 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:30,199 Speaker 4: of AI is that we've been served. Right when I 395 00:21:30,240 --> 00:21:34,280 Speaker 4: say we've been served, you had in February Elon Musk. 396 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 4: You can think what you think of and with regard 397 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:39,960 Speaker 4: to his moral compass, but he's the Thomas Jefferson Thomas 398 00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:44,399 Speaker 4: Edison of our time said AI has the twenty percent 399 00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:49,040 Speaker 4: possibility of wiping out humanity. There's the safety side that 400 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 4: should send off alarm bells throughout the world, particularly in 401 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:59,640 Speaker 4: this country, particularly with this administration. And then just last 402 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:06,760 Speaker 4: week you had Dario Entropic amadai am I pronouncing that correctly. 403 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:08,760 Speaker 2: Anthropic is good enough. 404 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:12,280 Speaker 4: So anyway, he said that in one to five years 405 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:16,720 Speaker 4: we could have ten to twenty percent employment because of 406 00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:20,560 Speaker 4: the displacement of white collar jobs by AI. 407 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:25,320 Speaker 3: So now we have unemployment, unemployment in this country in 408 00:22:25,359 --> 00:22:26,439 Speaker 3: one to five years. 409 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 4: So now you have this massive stability issue. You've got 410 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:35,960 Speaker 4: a safety issue in a stability issue, and within the 411 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:43,080 Speaker 4: big beautiful bill is a moratorium, a moratorium on AI regulation. 412 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:49,640 Speaker 3: So no guardrails. Oh my gosh. That is when you've 413 00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 3: just been certain and no one would see. 414 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:53,959 Speaker 4: The interesting is no one in the AI community pushes 415 00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:57,720 Speaker 4: back on this right because they anyone that understands it 416 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:01,640 Speaker 4: and sees how it's progressing. These models are increasing one 417 00:23:01,680 --> 00:23:06,600 Speaker 4: to five percent in their efficiency every four months. Understand, 418 00:23:06,760 --> 00:23:08,440 Speaker 4: these are real possibilities. 419 00:23:08,560 --> 00:23:10,960 Speaker 2: So Paul, how do we get to guardrails Because in 420 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:14,240 Speaker 2: the case of the debt bomb, right as Gary Shilling 421 00:23:14,240 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 2: would call it, you've got bond vigilantes to push back. 422 00:23:18,680 --> 00:23:22,119 Speaker 2: In the case of the AI bomb, which we fear, 423 00:23:23,560 --> 00:23:27,120 Speaker 2: there's no government that's gonna regulate this because they'll lose 424 00:23:27,119 --> 00:23:28,119 Speaker 2: out to another government. 425 00:23:28,760 --> 00:23:33,680 Speaker 4: So I've come to this realization in the last two 426 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:38,280 Speaker 4: years that actually, I think libertarianism is as much. 427 00:23:38,119 --> 00:23:40,320 Speaker 3: Of a threat to our society as. 428 00:23:40,520 --> 00:23:44,200 Speaker 4: Socialism the other it's the other end of it, right, 429 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:48,720 Speaker 4: And you've really got this libertarian bit that's taken hold 430 00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:51,920 Speaker 4: of this administration so many of the biggest backers. 431 00:23:51,960 --> 00:23:55,679 Speaker 3: But oh my gosh, our country's. 432 00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:59,520 Speaker 4: Built on I mean, we're built on a system of 433 00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:04,280 Speaker 4: law and regulations. My private property rights, laws against the 434 00:24:04,359 --> 00:24:07,720 Speaker 4: soul robbery, etc. So what we have to figure out 435 00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:10,480 Speaker 4: in a thoughtful way, which is why you have to 436 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:14,160 Speaker 4: sit down and begin a discussion, how do we have 437 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:15,280 Speaker 4: AI for good? 438 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:19,960 Speaker 3: How do we prevent the AI for bad? 439 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:23,200 Speaker 4: Both on a safety standpoint and a security standpoint. One 440 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:25,919 Speaker 4: thing that we really need to do is again, what 441 00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 4: is the government's responsibility? What are company's responsibility? We're gonna 442 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:36,960 Speaker 4: have this productivity boom, right, capitalism is so spectacular at 443 00:24:37,119 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 4: maximizing productivity, but it's. 444 00:24:39,280 --> 00:24:42,520 Speaker 3: Actually really bad, really bad. 445 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:47,119 Speaker 4: In the tales in the tails, I'll say, it's really 446 00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:55,360 Speaker 4: bad about distributing income in a society a socially beneficial fashion. 447 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:58,840 Speaker 4: The best example can be if we look at say 448 00:24:58,880 --> 00:25:04,360 Speaker 4: since nineteen the mid eighties, If you look and see 449 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:08,240 Speaker 4: how the productivity gains in the United States have been distributed, 450 00:25:08,280 --> 00:25:14,520 Speaker 4: it's about fifteen percent to the bottom ninety and eighty 451 00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:15,960 Speaker 4: five percent of the top ten. 452 00:25:16,680 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 3: And so what happens when you. 453 00:25:17,920 --> 00:25:23,760 Speaker 4: Do that, well, you get the incredible divisiveness that we 454 00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:24,600 Speaker 4: have right now. 455 00:25:24,640 --> 00:25:25,200 Speaker 3: We have a. 456 00:25:25,280 --> 00:25:29,960 Speaker 4: Crisis of trust in this country. No one knows who 457 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 4: to trust. Hell, we had a faction of the Republican 458 00:25:32,320 --> 00:25:37,480 Speaker 4: Party storm the capital in twenty twenty because. 459 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:38,199 Speaker 3: They lost an election. 460 00:25:38,400 --> 00:25:42,439 Speaker 4: So we're at a really socially fragile time because of 461 00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:46,280 Speaker 4: wealth disparity, and now we have AI that unless we 462 00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:52,080 Speaker 4: think about think about how we distribute those productivity gains 463 00:25:52,560 --> 00:25:57,239 Speaker 4: in a way. So is it Dario mentioned we're going 464 00:25:57,280 --> 00:26:00,560 Speaker 4: to have a token, and every time a model's Bill 465 00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:03,320 Speaker 4: Gates said we're gonna suggest it, I think six or 466 00:26:03,359 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 4: seven years ago, maybe be tax robotics. 467 00:26:05,960 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 3: There has to be a we need. 468 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:12,760 Speaker 4: To sit down and thoughtfully think through how we distribute 469 00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:19,240 Speaker 4: becoming productivity gains so that people are happy and not unhappy. 470 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:22,280 Speaker 2: Paul, it's been a real pleasure having you. I appreciate 471 00:26:22,320 --> 00:26:24,680 Speaker 2: you coming in. I hope we can get you back 472 00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:27,440 Speaker 2: sometime soon. Paul Tutor Jones there coach, chairman and chief 473 00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 2: investment officer of Tutor Investment, also the founder of the 474 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:32,400 Speaker 2: Robin Hood Foundation.