WEBVTT - Baseball Owners Score Big Win

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clovel News. Let's get right to our guest.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Lucky for us, he's back again. Andy Kurtzig's founder and

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Just Answer. Just Answer. It's based in San Francisco.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It helps connect people with experts for professional advice. Uh. Andy,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's good to chat with you again. We talked to

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you just a few weeks ago. Because you have such

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a large portion of your your staff in Ukraine, two

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus employees in Ukraine, I just want to start

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with how how are they doing right now and what

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are they doing well? So they're all live and uh

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and doing as well they could possibly be doing in

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the situation that we're in. So all of our preparations

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have paid off. We've been asking to keep them all

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>safe and so far it's working. And you in your

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>notes you said that six of them are currently fighting,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and those who are fighting are still being paid a salary. Yeah,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>so what we what we promised to them even before

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the war started, when we thought that this might happen,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was we'd pay them fifty percent of their salary in

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>addition to the sellary and they get for being in

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the military, and then we guarantee their jobs when they

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>come back, because hey, and if we can take a

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>step back, um, and we're grateful that you've given us

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some time. What are you here, I mean, it's hard

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for any of us, UM, I think in terms of

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the atrocities that we're seeing in some of

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>the news coverage of what's going on in Ukraine right now.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing, um from your team members who

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are on the ground in Ukraine. I'm hearing pretty much

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in the news, which is it's dreadful.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. I mean the that that seeing the bodies

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and the torture and the reality now that they've taken

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>back some of their territories near Kiev is just awful,

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and they're horrified for those who the rest

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the world is. For those that have stayed on

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the ground um and decided not to leave Ukraine, why

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is that, Well, so a few reasons. I mean. So

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we have of the two eight now employees that we

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have in Ukraine, thirty nine of them have We've been

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>able to get them out, but the rest either they

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get out because of there are men between eighteen

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and sixties, it's against the law for them to leave

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the country. And then we've got people that that you know,

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe their spouse or their their family members are stuck

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there and so they don't want to leave either. So

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the women are staying by the side of

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the men that are forced to stay in Ukraine. And

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then we've even got like what the woman that leads

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their office in Ukraine, her son just turned eighteen, so

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he can't leave, and so she's not leaving her son behind.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the message that that you want to send to

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>other people? And still can Valley other Americans who are

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States and really just just watching

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this play out. I mean, I think a lot of

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people have this feeling that well, Okay, the government is

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>doing what it can do. There's only so much I

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>can do. You know. The first thing is that this

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>suspects all of us. This is not some small skirmish

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in Eastern Europe. This is about democracy and about freedom

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and East versus West. This is everything that we worried

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about during the Cold War. It's actually happening now. And

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, this aspects all of us, and so we

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all need to do our part to help. You know, Andy,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder too. And obviously you're doing everything and

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>anything you can to help UM your team that are

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there in Ukraine. How do you though our audience, a

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>business investing audience as well, obviously caring though about the

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian aspect. But when you look at the market over

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, you know, will this ultimately lead to kind

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of business rethink about exposure, whether it's in Ukraine, whether

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Russia, Like, how what's what's the what is it

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the longer lasting UM strategy that stays with us because

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of this? Yeah, so we've already seen lots of companies

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>boycotting Russia. And hopefully more will continue to do that.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as this goes on, what my hope

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is that companies will not just think about boycotting Russia

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but also buying Ukrainian goods and services. I mean, this

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>war is about you know, Russians aggression and bombs and tanks,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's also about the economy and sanctions, and we

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>can all do a part to help the Ukrainian side

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. And so that's what just Answers trying to do,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and I hope any other companies will do it as well. Andy,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you and your family are actually planning to go to

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the border of Ukraine. This is a mission to deliver

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>medical aid, body armor, laptops and more. Um, you're taking

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>your kids. Why why is this important to you? Well, so,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>when my family and I got together a few weeks

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>ago and we're deciding what we wanted to do for

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>spring break. You know, normally we would go to Hawaii,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>where my mom lives and we love. We just couldn't

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bear to go somewhere fun for spring break when our

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>friends and colleagues and the people of Ukraine are suffering

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>so much. And so we got together, the family, and

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we decided that we wanted to go and help. Is

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>there a message in terms of the governments that are

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out there who have already imposed a lot of certainly

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>economic and business sanctions, as you mentioned, a lot of

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>companies pulling out. Um, what more do you think should

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>be done at this point? Well, I mean they should

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>continue to escalate the sanctions. They should continue to send

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>military equipment and and any humanitarian supplies as well. So

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more to be done. I mean, they've

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of people in Ukraine that are ready

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and willing to fight, but they need the the supplies

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to maintain the this war and too and

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to beat back Russia and for democracy. They're fighting for

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>our democracy just as much as their own. And the

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>less less bit of time with you just about thirty

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. What's your message to to other CEOs who

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have employees in Ukraine right now or thinking about hiring

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine? As we know it's a huge tech hip. Absolutely,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think they should go for it.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we had some offers outstanding when the

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>war started. We've honored those offers. We've actually hired a

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>few more people since the war started. You know, We're

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to support the economy as much as we can

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and and hiring people there is one of the best

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>things we can do. You know, Unfortunately most of the

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian economy is crippled right now. Right trucking business or

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a warehouse or you know, chocolate company, whatever it is,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not operating. But I can kind of operate,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>and so we're able to support that we have to run.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>We wish you well, um safety on your journey, and

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>your family are well as well. Andy Kurtzik of Just Answer.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Measure and

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for those of you even sticking around, we're going to

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>finally do the great reveal. Almost almost the story is

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>among the most read on the Bloomberg today and it

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>involves probably the most followed individual on Wall Street. We're

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about Jamie Diamond, the JP Morgan Chase CEO and

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>board chair. Is that with his annual letter he's calling

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for more sanctions on Russia, expresses pity for the Fed

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, says, hey, they got a tough task ahead

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of them. Hanna Levitt is finance reporter for Bloomberg Near.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from New York City, Hannah,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the before we get to the details here,

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>what is the change in tone of this year's letter

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>versus last year's letter? Hey, guys, thanks for having me. Um.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The last year's letter, if you remember, gave a pretty

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>rosy outlook. It was, you know, Jamie was saying this

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>boom could run into three. He was saying, you know,

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>everything could add up to a Goldilocks moment um. And

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's definitely a change in tone when you know,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in the four four pages of the letter this year,

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, really breaking down all these massive issues

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're facing globally at the moment. Well, and so

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>among those massive issues is of course the war. Talk

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about what he said

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about the Russian war and invasion of Ukraine. Yeah, so

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he called for increasing sanctions UM in whatever way security

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>experts recommend. And he also said that he's not worried

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about JP Morgan's exposure to Russia, but that it could

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>cost the firm a billion over time UM and that

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the firm continues to look for secondary impacts are on

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the globe. And that's something that we've heard a lot

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks, is that, you know, even if a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>firm may not have a huge impact right now, um,

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of tv D on what could

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>happen six months from now or what what kind of

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, how it will impact companies and countries and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what impacts that will end up having having on these things.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And a billion dollars is a lot of money to

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, but over an extended period of

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>time to you know, the bank with the most assets

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Uh, is it is that a lot? Uh?

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>No revenue projected for this year, right, it's a lot. Yeah.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Well so then when he says that, though, it's a

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>reminder that you know, when you're thinking about either the

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>financial markets or economic growth, like little bits and pieces

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of things though from different places, whether it's the war,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's inflation, whether it's supply strain constraints or they

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>were supply chain constraints. All of this though, it's important, right, Hannah,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm curious how you see it that it can

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>add up to significant eating into economic growth. Yeah, for sure.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I Mean one of his key points was about the

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis, which you know has been obviously influenced by

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the War Ukraine. Um. But it's exacerbating inflation. So that's

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just one of the examples of where we're seeing, um.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, these big issues all being interconnected. Um. And

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>he called for the US increasing energ reproduction and also

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>getting more lergy to Europe immediately um and and wrote

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit about how he doesn't view it as mutually

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>exclusive with longer term clean energy goals, which I also

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting. Okay, let's get to monetary and fiscal policy,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering about his comments with regard to the

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>FED and what the FED has ahead of it in

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>order to get inflation under control. Yeah, for sure. UM. Well,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he said he does not envy the FED for what

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it has to do. Um. But you know, really his

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>point was that in hindsight, all the fislan monetary stinglass

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in one was probably too much for too long. Um.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And so he's predicting that the FED could raise rates

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more than the market currently expects or is pricing in

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if they get it right, there could

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>be years of growth still, but the process will cause

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility either way. Um, and it's definitely

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>challenging and the whole thing listen, this is your world, um, Hannah.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, and Jamie Diamond, you know, when he speaks,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we kind of sit up a little straighter and take

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 1>notice of it. And it certainly he's always among the

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>most on the Bloomberg. I do think he thinks about

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>his words because he knows, um, that people do listen

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to what he says, you know, pretty closely. What was

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the most stark thing for you? Um? I think for

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>me reading it just kind of the the tone change

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about at the beginning, um, compared with

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, and it's not you know, he still did

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>say that, like the economy is in good shape, consumers

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and companies are still in the US, you know, flushed

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with cash for the most part. But it wasn't like

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>he was saying everything is terrible by any means. Um.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, his his outlining of the challenges ahead

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really start to me to begin anything on whether

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to stay there longer. What's his deal? Girl?

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>More years? Always hashtag five more years? Um, exactly, Hannah,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really appreciated Hannah of it. She's

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>financial reporter at Bloomberg News. As we said, this is

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>among our most read on the Bloomberg has been all

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>day on this Monday. There is the big reveal when

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>people when he talks, people listen. But I think it's

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting at tone right, and we keep hearing about a

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more negative tone out there in terms of the outlook. Yeah,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a real fair characterization. A lot has

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>changed in just a year. Yeah, exactly. This is Bloomberg

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio Opening day for Major League Baseball

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's happening later on this weekend. With that in mind,

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week tapping into who are the real winners

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>already of the season. We'll give you a hand. It's

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not the players at this point. Joel Weber is editor

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Brokers studio. Ben Writer is a freelance contributor. He's

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>also the author of astro Ball, The New Way to

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Win It All. He's a freelance contributor Bloomberg Business Week.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He's his story is featured in the current issue of

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Business Week magazine. It's available on newsstands, on the Bloomberg

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com slash Business Week. So, Joel,

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they've got the most powerful union when it comes to

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>pro sports. Why are their salaries falling? Though franchise values

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.239
<v Speaker 1>continue to go higher, they can't quite win the negotiation

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and in like a real, real meaningful way. And and

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously the lockout was something that um got all of

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>our attention. And there's this labor element to it that

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I was really captivated by. Ben being a long time

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>sports illustrated writer. Also, in addition to the book that

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, he's uh hosted a podcast called The Edge

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and I basically you know, got him on the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>phone with um Max Chafkin colleague and said, you know what,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to write about baseball? And I

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>think you know he did this step back story. This

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is Opening day week, right, if you want to go

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>watch baseball, it's finally going to start. And what been

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>really I thought, this iscinctly summed up, was that the players,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can root for millionaires or billionaires first

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of all, and the owners are the billionaires and the

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>players are the millionaires. UM. So sympathies might lie a

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more with the players at this point. But

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>but really, um, they did not come out with the

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>upper hand here, did they been. No, they didn't. And

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear, this is a hard thought labor negotiation,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a nine nine day lockout. The players union were resolute,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they had solidarity, and they did emerge with some games.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, the minimum salary for players went up quite significantly. Um,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But overall, this is a case in which the owners

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>maintained the upper hand in a business that, despite everything

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you've heard about baseball's decline, is booming. Revenues exceeded ten

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in twenty nineteen, while player salaries went down.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The medium salaries declined from one point six million in

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to one point one five million in one This

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was the economic This is the economic landscape that the

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>players were contending with as they were negotiating this new

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>labor agreement. Um, they did gain some concessions, but on

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the overall landscape, the owners held strong. You know, the

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>economics of this been Let's just break it down a

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, because there's there's the upper echelon of player

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>who's doing great. No matter what you're in your out.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Those marquee players are are getting bigger and bigger contracts,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>But what about the rest of it of the league? Right? Well,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody sees the big contracts, right. Major League Baseball has

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>ten players with guaranteed contract exceeding three hundred million dollars

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in value. Make no mistakes, these are some of the

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>largest contracts for any athlete in the world. But the

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>vast maturity of the player body is not doing so well.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>More than half the league operates on the minimum salary,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>which was five seventy thousands there about last year. That

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was the lowest among major sports. And teams are getting

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>smarter and smarter. They know that it is beneficial to

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>them to pay superstars more and where every year, but

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>keep the majority of their teams to those minimum salary players.

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>That helps to suggest why that media has fallen and

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>also why the average salaries fallen as well. Okay, so

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Bob rob Manfred h a central figure

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in this. The Commissioner of Baseball, a Harvard trained labor lawyer,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>served as the chiefs. The league's chief negotiated for several

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>collective bargaining agreements going all the way back to two

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand two. Where does he come into all this? Right?

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think that the commissioner is, you know,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>an impartial figure, right, operating for the best interest of

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the sport as a whole. That's not true in any

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>professional sport. He works at the pleasure of the team owners.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>In baseball's case, the thirty team owners. That's really whose

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>interests Rob Manfred was representing, and he's always represented them

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>very well, and it's not a constituency with uniform interest.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You have some owners like Steven Cohen of the Mets,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>who is the wealthiest owner in the league, and he

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>wants to spend whatever he wants to spend. His tirole

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be two undred and fifty million dollars this year.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You have a lot of owners that don't want to

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>spend at all or as little as possible. One of

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the problems structurally in baseball is that spending on your

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>team has been decoupled from profit. You can turn the

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>very handsome profits uh not spending a lot and not

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>winning at all. So you have four teams this year

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who are going to be spending about forty million dollars

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or less on salary. To do the math, you know

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's a fraction of what some of the higher

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>spending teams are. These are the interest that Manfred had

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to represent these negotiating uh sessions, and clearly he satisfied

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>all of them because the owners came away, in my opinion,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>very well. Then how did it go over with in

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle of negotiations, when Manfred was practicing his golf swing,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>How did that go over with players? Right? Well, this

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is a very tense negotiation. This is the second longest

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>labor stoppage in the history of the league, second after

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>only the horrible strike of Rob. Manfred was about to,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, do something that is very serious. You know

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of people, which is to actually cancel games.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Like no matter how nasty negotiat Asian get, the cancelation

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>of regular season games is kind of a bridge that

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to cross. An Associated Press photographer captured him practicing,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>practicing his golf swing and the string taining stadium the

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>day that he was going to cancel those games. Clearly,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter how brought these things got, Rob Manfred remains

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in control and confidence, and he had every reason too,

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>because the fact is, no matter how bad in the

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>industry is the whole cancel games would have been for

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>all parties. The players have much less capacity when push

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to show to withstand that and the potential lots

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of salaries than the far wealthier owners. All right, So

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>what's the likelihood that anything changes in the near future,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not like you know, sports contracts with media,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean especially baseball, they're doing just fine. So there's

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of money coming into this, you know,

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sport if you will. So what's the likelhood anything changes

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for players more broadly? Well, you know this, this collective

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bargaining agreement tarrell last for five years, a long time.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>We're we have five years of labor peace quote unquote ahead.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>As Gene Orza, who is a long time players union

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>official told me, collective bargaining produces incremental change, it doesn't

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>produce a revolution. Did the players win some incremental change

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in this deal? Yes, especially for those minimum salary guys

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>who really might never be millionaires, whose careers have no

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>guarantees as far as their longevity, they will be better compensated.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But as far as the big structural things that tilts

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>toward the owner's advantage, no, that's not gonna change anytime soon.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So who wins Opening day? Owners? You know, it seems

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like the owners always wins and they swart the negotiations.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think we have to talk this one

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up to the owners. The players put up a very

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>good fight. They didn't make some gains, but you know,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's another one for the owners, something we already know

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>about the season. Yeah, I was gonna say, might not. Hey,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Ben writer, it's a great read. Thank you so much,

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 1>freelance contributor. Check out his book Astro Ball joining us

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York, and of course or

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Joe Webber. He's the editor of Bloomberg Business

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine. This story in the current issue. Find it

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg and also at Bloomberg dot com. A

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>really great read. Go pick up the issue now. Check

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>it out at Bloomberg dot com and of course on

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. This is Bloomberg Radio and this is

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Roy. How about you let me drive? Oh no, no, no,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who's home? All right? Please? I'll do vels. I want

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to drive. It's a good question, good drive. This is

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the closed on Bloomberg Radio. All height

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>folks were just about ten minutes away from the closing bell,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have seen some buying, certainly in the last

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>half hour hour of trading, so we are pretty much

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hovering near our best levels of this session. So let's

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get to it. Let's get to the drive to the

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>clothes and with us right now. Back with us is

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Alan Zaffron, who's founding partner and co CEO at I

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>e Q Capital. He's with us once again on the

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>phone from Foster City, California. Hey, Alan, nice to have

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you back here on Bloomberg Radio. How are you and

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you think the markets are doing? Hey, Carol

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is doing great, Thank you? Do you? And Tim? How

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets doing. I think they're trying to reconcile all

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the risks inflation Ukraine. Uh. Not clear about what the

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>inflation does to earnings growth rates going forward. But you

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>know what we're actually seeing even today a semblance of

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>light because you know, when we start talking about the

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>yield curve being inverted, here's the interesting thing. When a

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>two year bond is yielding you as much or more

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>than a tenure bond, it's telling you that the tenor

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>bond you'll probably isn't going to go up much more,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if at all, it's signaling to you that's going to

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>raise rates to the point that it's going to either

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>stop inflation or sadly put the economy and recession. Let's

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hope the former, not the latter. But this is the

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>hint well, and that box up sex because the interest

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>rates are the people are saying rates just probably aren't

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>likely going to go that much more. On the long end,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I can now buy long duration growth stocks, so it's interesting.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting about that too, And we've been focusing on Okay, oh,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>what the longer end is telling us is that the

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed is gonna have to start cutting rates because there's

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be problems in the economy. But is there that

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>possibility that the Fed gets it just right in terms

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of policy and rate moves, that it doesn't do anything

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to over stimulate growth or slow it down too much.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible that we can kind of get back

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to that lower for longer scenario even with a higher

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>rate strategy, it's still gonna be pretty low historically. But

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your betting that the Fed gets this just right?

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Because it sounds like it's pretty tricky for the FED

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to do that. My my betting is the said does

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get it just right, and I'll tell you why. Um.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>First of all, through a long term investor, eventually things reconcile,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>thing go up into the right and companies grow the profits.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But secondly, we all know even once the curve inverts,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it takes twenty four to thirty months before you see

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>equity prices peak and actually go into recession on average.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And see, you have plenty of time to figure out

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you think the market's going to peak

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or not. And it turns out if you look in

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>eight of the last night said tightening cycles, stop, some

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>people haven't went up knock down during the tightening now

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't go up as much ten percent per year. You

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>go back to two and you look at the last

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>nine tightening cycles, stocks were up on eight of them.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The place you want to avoid, obviously, or it was,

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was long term bonds because they're sensitive to rates, and

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly now when interest rates are so darn loan bonds

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, the risk reward still isn't that compelling.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But stocks, you've got earnings growth estimates if anything going up.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>And so this year's decline has been driven by the

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple going down greater than the fact earnings estimates actually

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have still been going up a bit. So I'm still

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>betting on equity so the wrong and but I'm also

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>betting on the said, may it well, it may in

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>fact get it just right. And that's what I think

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the bond curve is telling you is there's only so

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>many tightenings that economy cantolerate. Alan what happens before the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>long run? Though, what does that path look like with

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the US equity market? And I asked, because you know,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we are only about four and a half percent off

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of all time highs right now, but it's been a

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rocky It was a rocky first quarter, and uh we

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>see us we saw quite the recovery in the last

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Yeah, I think what what's going on right

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>now is I think you're watching a market which is

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get its head around what the implications

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are of all these cross dynamics. But you know, recognize

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>valuations have driven so selected software stocks have fallen out

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to their average valuations of the last five years. So

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this whole um argument stocks over valued, stocks overvalued. I

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're overvalued anymore. And so you know, crisis

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>begets opportunity. There are certainly selected stocks that I'll pick

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>on the growth stock in a market that is going

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to struggle with long term secular growth. Fine companies that

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can persistently grow earnings regardless of the economic environment still

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>willn't be winners, and so in the market hands you

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity and drives valuations down, those are the names

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the rubble that you want to start picking at,

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>along with the large big camp winners, which clear they

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>have held up. So I think the short run is

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have a little bit more of stock selection,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but I would tell you growth is likely to continued

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>out pulform value in the long run, that's not going

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to change. But because we've seen longer term yields also

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>moving up, is there some expectation that that's some confidence

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe about growth, but also a danger that eventually it'll

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>crimp growth in equity valuations, which is I think something

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>similar to what are John Author is writing about this

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>what we saw back in two thousand seven. Well, first

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, John Author's a plug rint He's a fabulous writer,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so I welcome people read his writings on Bloomberg. But

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>what we would argue is obviously you want to look

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at selected names, but as a generalization, there are a

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of comings that have a durability in the revenue

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>streams and licensing models that people renew payments, and in fact,

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>if if you're in a modestly inflationary environment, these can

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>go up, just like rents can go up on real

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>estate alongside rates going up. So if the drop in

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>valuation is driven exclusively by rates and not by the

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>business model itself, it's the actual costs of the business

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone a materially or can be passed on fully

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to the customers, those businesses are going to flourish. It's

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the businesses that are over leveraged and are very dependent

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on economic growth that will indeed struggle in that rising

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>rate environment and will continue to struggle Allen one thing

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you sound like you have a lot

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of conviction and confidence, and you've seen a lot of

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>market cycles. But I feel like, man, no one would

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have set us up. This is not what we're expecting

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in December, and I feel like the carpet got pulled

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>out from under us in a lot of ways. Even

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>though a lot of folks are saying, you know, we're

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>getting overvalue. We're getting overvalued. But the war, the continue

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>move in inflation, people rethinking global energy supplies. What is

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the big caveat to what you're saying? And only got

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>about twenty thirty seconds here. Uh COVID created an additional

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars of cash sitting on bank balance sheets.

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So Ukraine high inflation interest rates to the market and

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all can do is fallen peak the valley. That's telling

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>me there's a ton of money on the sidelines ready

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to support this market, along with a strong dynamic US

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>econmudists growing. So don't sell the US short, stay long

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>term oriented, stay on your goals, but don't don't neglect

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact of love capital just aiming to get into

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this market at any kind of debt. It's still pretty

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>slashy out there when it comes to liquidity. All right, Allan,

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Alan Zaffron, he is founding partner

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in co c I O at co CEO excuse me

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at i e Q Capital. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News