WEBVTT - Malcolm Gladwell and Adam Grant

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:20.196 --> 0:00:25.076
<v Speaker 2>Hi everyone, Malcolm here. The countdown is on on June

0:00:25.076 --> 0:00:28.916
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourth. We'll be back with Season six, the most

0:00:29.076 --> 0:00:33.076
<v Speaker 2>banana season of Revisionist history ever. I finally get out

0:00:33.116 --> 0:00:36.476
<v Speaker 2>of the house. I've got Phoenix, New Orleans, and I

0:00:36.596 --> 0:00:42.276
<v Speaker 2>go metaphorically to the Magic Kingdom on a mission of mischief.

0:00:42.876 --> 0:00:45.356
<v Speaker 2>Season six is so fantastic. I don't want to give

0:00:45.396 --> 0:00:48.676
<v Speaker 2>too much away. Just hang tight, It'll be here soon.

0:00:49.836 --> 0:00:52.156
<v Speaker 2>It's been an especially busy time for me working on

0:00:52.196 --> 0:00:55.956
<v Speaker 2>season six and promoting our new book, The Bomber Mafia.

0:00:56.436 --> 0:00:58.356
<v Speaker 2>One of the events on my book tour was a

0:00:58.396 --> 0:01:03.436
<v Speaker 2>conversation on Clubhouse with my good friend Adam Grant. He's

0:01:03.476 --> 0:01:07.036
<v Speaker 2>an organizational psychologist at the Wharton School the University of Pennsylvania,

0:01:07.316 --> 0:01:10.556
<v Speaker 2>and he hosts the podcast Take for Granted from the

0:01:10.596 --> 0:01:14.236
<v Speaker 2>Ted Audio Collective. We've actually both had new books out

0:01:14.236 --> 0:01:17.956
<v Speaker 2>this spring. Adams is called Think Again, which I really loved.

0:01:18.636 --> 0:01:20.956
<v Speaker 2>It seems he and I are always crossing paths on

0:01:20.996 --> 0:01:23.716
<v Speaker 2>the book tour circuit, and we always challenge each other

0:01:24.196 --> 0:01:26.716
<v Speaker 2>and we always have fun. I wanted to play you

0:01:26.836 --> 0:01:31.316
<v Speaker 2>some snippets of our recent conversations forgive Me by the Way,

0:01:31.356 --> 0:01:35.956
<v Speaker 2>for stating the obvious, but books make great Father's Day gifts.

0:01:36.316 --> 0:01:39.716
<v Speaker 2>Why not make it both? Get the Bomber Mafia audiobook

0:01:39.756 --> 0:01:43.716
<v Speaker 2>from Bombermafia dot com and then think again from wherever

0:01:43.756 --> 0:01:46.636
<v Speaker 2>you get your books, and I'll see you very soon

0:01:47.036 --> 0:01:52.836
<v Speaker 2>for season six of Revisionist History. Okay, here's our clubhouse

0:01:52.876 --> 0:01:54.996
<v Speaker 2>discussion about the Bomber.

0:01:54.716 --> 0:02:03.076
<v Speaker 3>Mafia thrilla to welcome Malcolm Gladwell back to clubhouse. Malcolm

0:02:03.116 --> 0:02:03.836
<v Speaker 3>glad you're here.

0:02:04.516 --> 0:02:06.156
<v Speaker 2>Yes, thank you. I was going to say, not a

0:02:06.156 --> 0:02:09.676
<v Speaker 2>week passes when I'm not engaged in some kind of

0:02:09.676 --> 0:02:10.796
<v Speaker 2>public conversation with you.

0:02:11.116 --> 0:02:16.436
<v Speaker 3>Be careful what you wish for. Yes, I wanted to

0:02:16.476 --> 0:02:18.596
<v Speaker 3>kick off by just asking you to tell us a

0:02:18.636 --> 0:02:22.236
<v Speaker 3>little bit about the Bomber Mafia. I think it's anybody

0:02:22.276 --> 0:02:24.836
<v Speaker 3>who's listened to Revisionist History the last couple of seasons

0:02:25.436 --> 0:02:28.316
<v Speaker 3>knows how obsessed you are with it. But for those

0:02:28.356 --> 0:02:31.076
<v Speaker 3>who are not initiated, give us the teaser.

0:02:31.516 --> 0:02:36.156
<v Speaker 2>Bomber Mafia is the story of a group of pilots

0:02:36.196 --> 0:02:42.076
<v Speaker 2>in southern Alabama in the nineteen thirties who believed that

0:02:42.196 --> 0:02:47.556
<v Speaker 2>they had and could reinvent warfare. That they could through

0:02:47.556 --> 0:02:51.716
<v Speaker 2>the use of technology particularly the bomber and means of

0:02:51.796 --> 0:02:55.076
<v Speaker 2>dropping bombs with accuracy. They could render every other part

0:02:55.076 --> 0:03:00.836
<v Speaker 2>of the military obsolete, and they could turn wars from

0:03:01.596 --> 0:03:04.516
<v Speaker 2>something that where hundreds of thousands of civilians died as

0:03:04.516 --> 0:03:08.436
<v Speaker 2>a matter of course, to a kind of clean and

0:03:08.516 --> 0:03:13.156
<v Speaker 2>surgical exercise. And they took that dream with them into

0:03:13.156 --> 0:03:15.436
<v Speaker 2>the Second World War and tried to make it real.

0:03:15.516 --> 0:03:19.316
<v Speaker 2>And it's the story of it's the story of that attempt.

0:03:19.556 --> 0:03:23.436
<v Speaker 2>What happens when a group of people with an idea,

0:03:23.636 --> 0:03:27.436
<v Speaker 2>fired by morality and technology meet the real world.

0:03:27.956 --> 0:03:30.036
<v Speaker 3>This is a very different kind of book than you've

0:03:30.076 --> 0:03:33.556
<v Speaker 3>written before. First and foremost because the cover is not white,

0:03:33.916 --> 0:03:38.516
<v Speaker 3>which threw me, but also also because it's a history book,

0:03:39.156 --> 0:03:45.236
<v Speaker 3>and because despite your going back in history decades and decades,

0:03:45.636 --> 0:03:48.596
<v Speaker 3>it's also more personal, I think than anything you've ever written.

0:03:49.276 --> 0:03:50.676
<v Speaker 3>And I'd love for you to share with us a

0:03:50.716 --> 0:03:53.276
<v Speaker 3>little bit about the seeds that were planted in your

0:03:53.316 --> 0:03:55.476
<v Speaker 3>own life that got you curious about this topic.

0:03:55.876 --> 0:04:01.236
<v Speaker 2>Well, my father, who was English, grew up in Kent

0:04:02.076 --> 0:04:05.996
<v Speaker 2>in which is the which was called bamb Ally because

0:04:06.076 --> 0:04:09.916
<v Speaker 2>the German bombers on their way to bomb London during

0:04:09.956 --> 0:04:13.676
<v Speaker 2>the Blitz would pass over my father's little town in Kent,

0:04:13.796 --> 0:04:16.996
<v Speaker 2>and he, as a child, would be instructed by my

0:04:16.996 --> 0:04:19.916
<v Speaker 2>grandmother to sleep under his bed, which was the only

0:04:19.996 --> 0:04:24.676
<v Speaker 2>plausible defense against a bomb dropping on her house, and

0:04:24.716 --> 0:04:28.316
<v Speaker 2>he would He had all these stories like a bomb

0:04:28.316 --> 0:04:32.196
<v Speaker 2>once landed in her backyard and luckily didn't explode. He

0:04:32.316 --> 0:04:35.676
<v Speaker 2>was once out picking strawberries with my grandmother and German

0:04:35.756 --> 0:04:39.996
<v Speaker 2>planes passed overhead and my grandmother hid my father and

0:04:40.116 --> 0:04:44.356
<v Speaker 2>my uncle under newspapers for reasons that no one really knows.

0:04:44.556 --> 0:04:46.636
<v Speaker 2>She thought maybe she hid them from the pilots they

0:04:46.636 --> 0:04:49.436
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't bomb them. But it was like a He would

0:04:49.476 --> 0:04:52.356
<v Speaker 2>tell these stories and to me, at you know, the

0:04:52.396 --> 0:04:56.436
<v Speaker 2>age of five or six, these stories were unbelievably excited.

0:04:57.796 --> 0:05:00.916
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was. I was in We were in

0:05:01.156 --> 0:05:06.316
<v Speaker 2>rural southwestern Canada, maybe the most boring part of the

0:05:06.356 --> 0:05:09.916
<v Speaker 2>western world, and my dad was telling me nothing happened.

0:05:09.956 --> 0:05:12.476
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a great good thing. And my father

0:05:12.556 --> 0:05:15.316
<v Speaker 2>was telling me these stories about you know, like bombs

0:05:15.356 --> 0:05:18.076
<v Speaker 2>dropping in his backyard when he was my age, and

0:05:18.116 --> 0:05:20.116
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I think that probably instilled in me

0:05:21.196 --> 0:05:23.076
<v Speaker 2>a kind of romantic love of this era.

0:05:24.156 --> 0:05:27.156
<v Speaker 3>It shows and I know that you're a huge fan

0:05:27.196 --> 0:05:29.676
<v Speaker 3>of spy novels, and you've read all the fiction you

0:05:29.676 --> 0:05:32.916
<v Speaker 3>can find about war. I think you've done something more

0:05:32.916 --> 0:05:35.916
<v Speaker 3>impressive than writing a page turner of fiction in this book,

0:05:35.996 --> 0:05:38.916
<v Speaker 3>which is you have brought these real life characters and

0:05:38.956 --> 0:05:41.516
<v Speaker 3>their stories to life in a way that feels like

0:05:41.556 --> 0:05:44.436
<v Speaker 3>I'm reading a thriller. I could not put it down.

0:05:45.076 --> 0:05:47.076
<v Speaker 3>I've read now the print version and listen to the

0:05:47.116 --> 0:05:50.836
<v Speaker 3>audio version, and I'm still hooked. And I wonder if

0:05:50.836 --> 0:05:52.996
<v Speaker 3>you could talk a little bit about how you got

0:05:52.996 --> 0:05:54.836
<v Speaker 3>into the minds of these people that you've not been

0:05:54.876 --> 0:05:55.596
<v Speaker 3>able to meet.

0:05:56.156 --> 0:05:58.036
<v Speaker 2>Well you write it is a departure for me. So

0:05:58.036 --> 0:05:59.956
<v Speaker 2>I've never done a book which is so much of

0:05:59.956 --> 0:06:02.076
<v Speaker 2>a kind of first of all, a single narrative. Usually

0:06:02.116 --> 0:06:04.796
<v Speaker 2>I hop around, you know, I tell all kinds of

0:06:04.796 --> 0:06:07.236
<v Speaker 2>different stories. But I also have never written a book

0:06:07.276 --> 0:06:12.436
<v Speaker 2>which was so singularly focused on two characters. This book

0:06:12.516 --> 0:06:16.796
<v Speaker 2>is the story of the conflict between two kind of

0:06:16.956 --> 0:06:20.716
<v Speaker 2>legendary World War Two Air Force generals, Curtis Lamey and

0:06:20.756 --> 0:06:22.156
<v Speaker 2>Heyward Hansel, and.

0:06:23.476 --> 0:06:24.796
<v Speaker 1>I really do you know.

0:06:24.756 --> 0:06:31.236
<v Speaker 2>They're incredibly vivid characters, and we because we started this

0:06:31.276 --> 0:06:33.716
<v Speaker 2>project as an audio project. I was always thinking that

0:06:33.756 --> 0:06:36.716
<v Speaker 2>this first is an audiobook, and the reason for that

0:06:36.876 --> 0:06:41.236
<v Speaker 2>was that we have so much incredible archival tape of

0:06:41.276 --> 0:06:45.076
<v Speaker 2>these generals in the Second World board there's Maxwell Air

0:06:45.116 --> 0:06:49.276
<v Speaker 2>Force Base in Alabama. There's a room full of tape

0:06:49.876 --> 0:06:54.516
<v Speaker 2>of interviews with virtually every major figure in the Air

0:06:54.516 --> 0:06:59.036
<v Speaker 2>Force in that period. And once you know you can

0:06:59.116 --> 0:07:02.436
<v Speaker 2>hear them, you I think you have a lot more

0:07:02.436 --> 0:07:06.276
<v Speaker 2>confidence that you could bring them to life. And you know,

0:07:06.396 --> 0:07:10.276
<v Speaker 2>like particularly le May, who is this kind of unbelievable,

0:07:10.396 --> 0:07:15.836
<v Speaker 2>cold blooded, you know, bulldog of a man. When you

0:07:15.876 --> 0:07:18.516
<v Speaker 2>hear his voice, you feel like you you know who

0:07:18.516 --> 0:07:21.756
<v Speaker 2>he is because he has this kind of guttural grunt.

0:07:22.596 --> 0:07:26.476
<v Speaker 2>And that just gave me confidence that I could they

0:07:26.516 --> 0:07:28.916
<v Speaker 2>would be more than two dimensional characters on the page,

0:07:28.956 --> 0:07:31.796
<v Speaker 2>if I could, If I could, you know, use a

0:07:32.116 --> 0:07:35.476
<v Speaker 2>do a kind of enhanced audiobook that would bring them

0:07:35.476 --> 0:07:35.876
<v Speaker 2>to life.

0:07:36.556 --> 0:07:39.276
<v Speaker 3>Well it shows And I thought one of the other

0:07:39.396 --> 0:07:42.436
<v Speaker 3>interesting features of the book was the way that you

0:07:43.316 --> 0:07:47.556
<v Speaker 3>almost tantalize us with these questions of morality. Early on

0:07:47.676 --> 0:07:50.236
<v Speaker 3>you ask us to consider what would I have done

0:07:50.716 --> 0:07:53.516
<v Speaker 3>and which side would I have been on? And I

0:07:53.556 --> 0:07:56.076
<v Speaker 3>want to hear your answer to this because you avoided

0:07:56.116 --> 0:07:58.916
<v Speaker 3>it the whole book. But first, can you just walk

0:07:58.996 --> 0:08:01.916
<v Speaker 3>us through the central moral dilemma of the bomber Mafia.

0:08:02.636 --> 0:08:05.036
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the barmber Mafia. One of the reasons I was

0:08:05.036 --> 0:08:08.156
<v Speaker 2>so attracted to this story is that they are they

0:08:08.196 --> 0:08:13.596
<v Speaker 2>are obsessive, and they are their technological obsessives. They're they're

0:08:13.596 --> 0:08:16.196
<v Speaker 2>a very familiar figure for us now there are They're

0:08:16.236 --> 0:08:18.676
<v Speaker 2>young men who are in the grip of a kind

0:08:18.676 --> 0:08:22.836
<v Speaker 2>of passion that has been fired by a technological innovation.

0:08:23.436 --> 0:08:25.876
<v Speaker 2>They would not be out of place in Silicon Valley today.

0:08:25.876 --> 0:08:30.116
<v Speaker 2>They would, in fact, you know, be be utterly They're

0:08:30.196 --> 0:08:32.996
<v Speaker 2>utterly familiar in one sense, but in another sense, they're

0:08:33.116 --> 0:08:37.876
<v Speaker 2>not because they're they have a moral vision. The reason

0:08:37.956 --> 0:08:41.476
<v Speaker 2>they are so passionate about what bombing can do and

0:08:41.476 --> 0:08:44.716
<v Speaker 2>how bombing can transform more is that they are desperate

0:08:44.756 --> 0:08:50.076
<v Speaker 2>to avoid the carnage of the First World War, and

0:08:50.156 --> 0:08:55.516
<v Speaker 2>that part of them I love. I love that they

0:08:55.796 --> 0:09:01.596
<v Speaker 2>considered the the moral implications of their dream were as

0:09:01.676 --> 0:09:06.156
<v Speaker 2>important to them as the kind of technological implications. That

0:09:06.156 --> 0:09:09.276
<v Speaker 2>that's not something I see today, and so that I

0:09:09.596 --> 0:09:12.316
<v Speaker 2>thought that they were this extraordinary role model for how

0:09:12.356 --> 0:09:18.956
<v Speaker 2>you can bring together moral desires with technological obsession. But

0:09:19.036 --> 0:09:22.716
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work, right. You know, the story of this

0:09:22.756 --> 0:09:25.236
<v Speaker 2>book is the story of the failure of this dream,

0:09:25.556 --> 0:09:28.196
<v Speaker 2>and so you, you know, you, I don't know if

0:09:28.196 --> 0:09:30.796
<v Speaker 2>it is possible. I do not you. You're quite right.

0:09:30.956 --> 0:09:33.316
<v Speaker 2>This book does not give you an easy answer to

0:09:34.236 --> 0:09:36.836
<v Speaker 2>which side should we be on? Because there is no

0:09:36.916 --> 0:09:40.916
<v Speaker 2>easy answer. All I can say is I like the idea.

0:09:40.956 --> 0:09:43.556
<v Speaker 2>I like the fact that they tried to bring a

0:09:43.636 --> 0:09:49.996
<v Speaker 2>moral vision to h to their way of fighting wars.

0:09:50.396 --> 0:09:53.476
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sad that they failed. But that's as far

0:09:53.516 --> 0:09:54.636
<v Speaker 2>as it goes. I don't know.

0:09:55.676 --> 0:09:56.396
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to.

0:09:57.436 --> 0:10:00.436
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of I'm kind of overbooks that give you

0:10:00.476 --> 0:10:03.556
<v Speaker 2>a neat little conclusion. I find that condescending almost.

0:10:04.596 --> 0:10:07.876
<v Speaker 3>I respect that. I also think, Malcolm Gladwell, that you

0:10:07.916 --> 0:10:11.996
<v Speaker 3>are letting these people off the hook awfully easily to

0:10:12.076 --> 0:10:14.836
<v Speaker 3>say that, Yeah, of course, they come in with a

0:10:14.916 --> 0:10:19.916
<v Speaker 3>moral vision. They have a sense of almost ideological superiority,

0:10:20.236 --> 0:10:22.236
<v Speaker 3>that they are going to fix all the problems with

0:10:22.316 --> 0:10:27.636
<v Speaker 3>war while still fighting a war and essentially torturing countless people.

0:10:28.356 --> 0:10:31.236
<v Speaker 3>And okay, you know what, good that they had a

0:10:31.276 --> 0:10:34.116
<v Speaker 3>sense of morality, even though they did so much harm. Really,

0:10:34.276 --> 0:10:35.076
<v Speaker 3>are you okay with that?

0:10:36.316 --> 0:10:40.156
<v Speaker 2>Well? I don't know how much choice you have once

0:10:40.236 --> 0:10:43.556
<v Speaker 2>you are committed to a conflict. I mean, part of

0:10:43.596 --> 0:10:45.876
<v Speaker 2>the reason the story I think is so compelling is

0:10:45.916 --> 0:10:50.436
<v Speaker 2>that the deep way you get into the story the book,

0:10:50.676 --> 0:10:54.636
<v Speaker 2>the more you're aware of how constrained the choices available

0:10:54.676 --> 0:10:59.436
<v Speaker 2>to the characters are. You know, you think about the

0:11:00.276 --> 0:11:01.956
<v Speaker 2>kind of second half of the book is all about

0:11:01.956 --> 0:11:06.756
<v Speaker 2>what happens when my two protagonists Curtis lemanne heywould Hansel

0:11:07.276 --> 0:11:11.196
<v Speaker 2>come into conflict in On in January of nineteen forty five,

0:11:11.556 --> 0:11:13.756
<v Speaker 2>when the focus of the war has turned from Europe

0:11:14.196 --> 0:11:16.996
<v Speaker 2>to the war against Japan to the Pacific theater, and

0:11:17.036 --> 0:11:22.756
<v Speaker 2>they are given the task by the Allied leadership of

0:11:22.796 --> 0:11:26.556
<v Speaker 2>bringing Japan to its knees and they get to choose

0:11:26.636 --> 0:11:31.756
<v Speaker 2>how they will do that, and neither of the options

0:11:31.756 --> 0:11:35.476
<v Speaker 2>available to them are any good. And I don't know,

0:11:37.556 --> 0:11:41.156
<v Speaker 2>I really don't know whether you can It's not their fault.

0:11:41.276 --> 0:11:44.276
<v Speaker 2>The options are no good, right, war is there's no

0:11:44.436 --> 0:11:48.756
<v Speaker 2>kind of easy moral solution in these situations. It's like

0:11:49.596 --> 0:11:51.396
<v Speaker 2>you're support you have to win a war, and if

0:11:51.436 --> 0:11:54.196
<v Speaker 2>you don't win the war, many many, many, many, many,

0:11:54.276 --> 0:11:56.316
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of thousands of people will die, right, There's just

0:11:56.396 --> 0:11:59.636
<v Speaker 2>no doubt about that. When wars drag on, they exact

0:11:59.716 --> 0:12:03.036
<v Speaker 2>an enormous human toll. So everybody's agreed we need to

0:12:03.036 --> 0:12:06.996
<v Speaker 2>get this war over with. But there's basically, actually there's

0:12:07.036 --> 0:12:10.756
<v Speaker 2>three options. And you know, Heyward Hansel has one option.

0:12:11.476 --> 0:12:14.556
<v Speaker 2>He wants to use bombs as sparingly as possible. It

0:12:14.636 --> 0:12:18.996
<v Speaker 2>is a complete and utter failure for reasons outside of

0:12:18.996 --> 0:12:23.516
<v Speaker 2>his control. Curtis L. May has another option. He wants

0:12:23.556 --> 0:12:30.356
<v Speaker 2>to napalm every city in Japan, which is brutal and

0:12:31.116 --> 0:12:37.156
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably horrifying. But he would say, well, I don't have

0:12:37.156 --> 0:12:39.836
<v Speaker 2>any other options now. The third option, of course, is

0:12:39.876 --> 0:12:44.556
<v Speaker 2>the option taken by in August of nineteen forty five

0:12:44.556 --> 0:12:48.316
<v Speaker 2>when we dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Nagasaki. Again,

0:12:48.356 --> 0:12:53.196
<v Speaker 2>another thing, another option that leaves us sort of leaves

0:12:53.236 --> 0:12:56.396
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of moral questions dangling. I just you know,

0:12:56.836 --> 0:13:02.076
<v Speaker 2>I have difficulty from my comfortable perch in twenty twenty

0:13:02.076 --> 0:13:06.076
<v Speaker 2>one passing judgment on people who didn't have any good

0:13:06.116 --> 0:13:07.356
<v Speaker 2>options available to them.

0:13:07.716 --> 0:13:11.356
<v Speaker 3>Now, I understand I was trying to figure out as

0:13:11.356 --> 0:13:14.236
<v Speaker 3>I listened as I read why you were so reluctant

0:13:14.316 --> 0:13:16.996
<v Speaker 3>to take a moral stance here because you are not

0:13:17.076 --> 0:13:20.396
<v Speaker 3>shy about moral stances, And I thought, this is not

0:13:20.476 --> 0:13:23.876
<v Speaker 3>at all Gladwellian. You normally have a strong view about

0:13:23.916 --> 0:13:26.396
<v Speaker 3>what's right and wrong. And as I listened to you,

0:13:26.516 --> 0:13:31.356
<v Speaker 3>now it clicked that they were stuck choosing between wrong

0:13:31.396 --> 0:13:34.556
<v Speaker 3>and wrong, and you appreciate and admire the fact that

0:13:34.836 --> 0:13:36.436
<v Speaker 3>they at least tried to do what was right.

0:13:37.436 --> 0:13:40.276
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's this is a side thing, but

0:13:40.356 --> 0:13:43.996
<v Speaker 2>this is an idea that I've become kind of obsessed

0:13:44.036 --> 0:13:48.876
<v Speaker 2>with recently. I've been doing a two episodes of my

0:13:49.116 --> 0:13:52.916
<v Speaker 2>podcast this season, Revision's History, on the dilemma of a

0:13:52.956 --> 0:14:00.916
<v Speaker 2>little small HBCU in New Orleans and the problem of

0:14:01.076 --> 0:14:07.556
<v Speaker 2>if you choose to educate lower income students, and if

0:14:07.596 --> 0:14:10.596
<v Speaker 2>you choose to serve them by keeping your tuition low,

0:14:11.636 --> 0:14:16.996
<v Speaker 2>you create all kinds of problems. Right, can't pay for anything,

0:14:17.676 --> 0:14:20.836
<v Speaker 2>your school is not considered to be prestigious. You, I mean,

0:14:21.196 --> 0:14:22.316
<v Speaker 2>you can go on and on and on and on

0:14:22.356 --> 0:14:26.196
<v Speaker 2>and on. And the president of the school told me,

0:14:26.276 --> 0:14:29.196
<v Speaker 2>he's like, you know, the problem with the way we

0:14:29.436 --> 0:14:32.516
<v Speaker 2>think about higher education is that we we don't consider

0:14:32.556 --> 0:14:35.516
<v Speaker 2>the degree of difficulty. Now, Adam, you know I'm raising

0:14:35.556 --> 0:14:38.636
<v Speaker 2>this with you because you are a former diver and

0:14:38.676 --> 0:14:42.836
<v Speaker 2>the great, the great contribution of diving to the world.

0:14:42.956 --> 0:14:46.676
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not I am not being flipp here. Honestly,

0:14:46.756 --> 0:14:50.316
<v Speaker 2>the one of the great contributions of your sport to

0:14:50.356 --> 0:14:52.996
<v Speaker 2>the world is that it introduced that phrase and that

0:14:53.116 --> 0:14:57.716
<v Speaker 2>concept degree of difficulty into common parlance. And it's a

0:14:58.036 --> 0:15:03.716
<v Speaker 2>crucial idea. It says that you cannot simply judge an

0:15:03.796 --> 0:15:08.036
<v Speaker 2>outcome all by itself. You have to judge the obstacles

0:15:08.076 --> 0:15:11.916
<v Speaker 2>that were that the person pursuing that goal had to

0:15:11.956 --> 0:15:15.236
<v Speaker 2>go through. Right, was faced with and this guy in

0:15:15.636 --> 0:15:18.756
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans, he was like, the problem with HBCUs is

0:15:18.796 --> 0:15:21.396
<v Speaker 2>that no one gives us credit for the degree of

0:15:21.436 --> 0:15:24.636
<v Speaker 2>difficulty involved in what we do. Right. I just thought

0:15:24.636 --> 0:15:29.076
<v Speaker 2>that was absolutely true. And you can go through all

0:15:29.236 --> 0:15:31.716
<v Speaker 2>manner of things in society. The one thing that was

0:15:31.756 --> 0:15:35.996
<v Speaker 2>absent from the debate this past summer about police and

0:15:36.036 --> 0:15:40.756
<v Speaker 2>by the way, a debate that I had been writing

0:15:40.796 --> 0:15:44.516
<v Speaker 2>about and arguing for police reform for twenty five years

0:15:44.516 --> 0:15:46.876
<v Speaker 2>at this point. But the one thing that was absent

0:15:46.916 --> 0:15:50.636
<v Speaker 2>from this summer was a sense of the degree of

0:15:50.636 --> 0:15:55.316
<v Speaker 2>difficulty involved in police work. It's really hard, right, really

0:15:55.596 --> 0:15:58.516
<v Speaker 2>really hard, and I wish that had been a part

0:15:58.556 --> 0:16:01.156
<v Speaker 2>of it, and it wasn't there to the same extent.

0:16:01.436 --> 0:16:05.396
<v Speaker 2>And that's also what I feel about these characters back

0:16:05.436 --> 0:16:07.916
<v Speaker 2>in the Second World War is the degree of difficulty

0:16:07.956 --> 0:16:11.476
<v Speaker 2>was to the roof, and you just have to build

0:16:11.476 --> 0:16:13.676
<v Speaker 2>that into your consideration of their actions.

0:16:14.196 --> 0:16:16.956
<v Speaker 3>I love that lens in part because one of my

0:16:16.956 --> 0:16:20.236
<v Speaker 3>biggest frustrations with diving is that the formula for a

0:16:20.276 --> 0:16:24.356
<v Speaker 3>degree of difficulty is almost completely bogused. How did you

0:16:24.436 --> 0:16:28.436
<v Speaker 3>decide that when somebody does a front four and a half,

0:16:28.516 --> 0:16:30.796
<v Speaker 3>that's a three point eight degree of difficulty on a

0:16:30.796 --> 0:16:34.356
<v Speaker 3>three meter, but when they do an inward three and

0:16:34.396 --> 0:16:37.596
<v Speaker 3>a half it's only a three point four. You could

0:16:37.676 --> 0:16:40.596
<v Speaker 3>change that scale dramatically and we would have different Olympic

0:16:40.596 --> 0:16:43.636
<v Speaker 3>gold medalists, we would have actually completely different dives done,

0:16:43.716 --> 0:16:46.316
<v Speaker 3>and we could have a whole rabbit hole about this,

0:16:46.356 --> 0:16:49.116
<v Speaker 3>which I'm very tempted to do, but I think it.

0:16:49.276 --> 0:16:52.636
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, hold on, hold on, Adam, this is like fantastic.

0:16:52.916 --> 0:16:56.196
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying that there is an underappreciated degree of

0:16:56.236 --> 0:16:58.836
<v Speaker 2>difficulty with the concept of degree of difficulty.

0:17:01.276 --> 0:17:05.956
<v Speaker 3>Minimum, there's an underappreciated degree of difficulty in asking people

0:17:06.076 --> 0:17:08.476
<v Speaker 3>who judge a sport to come up with a meaningful

0:17:08.556 --> 0:17:11.236
<v Speaker 3>quantitative metric for scoring the sport.

0:17:11.836 --> 0:17:14.956
<v Speaker 2>Adam, Adam, you know more about diving than ninety nine

0:17:14.996 --> 0:17:19.596
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent of humanity. You are a You are

0:17:19.636 --> 0:17:22.196
<v Speaker 2>a prominent psychologist who writes no matter of things, and

0:17:22.276 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 2>you have never written about this. Do I have to

0:17:25.156 --> 0:17:28.476
<v Speaker 2>take this idea from you? Can I interview about this?

0:17:28.876 --> 0:17:32.076
<v Speaker 3>I will give it to you. It's yours right now.

0:17:32.316 --> 0:17:34.196
<v Speaker 2>This is just the most interesting thing that I'm sorry,

0:17:34.236 --> 0:17:37.956
<v Speaker 2>this is like fantastic, This is just amazing that even

0:17:38.356 --> 0:17:40.156
<v Speaker 2>divingt degree of difficulty wrong.

0:17:43.076 --> 0:17:46.036
<v Speaker 3>Well, but isn't that isn't that part of the point

0:17:46.276 --> 0:17:50.436
<v Speaker 3>that Well, I mean, first of all, inventing something almost

0:17:50.036 --> 0:17:53.356
<v Speaker 3>almost always means you get it wrong, because the hard

0:17:53.356 --> 0:17:56.356
<v Speaker 3>work of creating it usually blinds you to the different

0:17:56.396 --> 0:18:04.196
<v Speaker 3>hard work of optimizing it. But also that the concept

0:18:04.196 --> 0:18:09.876
<v Speaker 3>of degree of difficulty is so much more complicated everywhere else,

0:18:09.916 --> 0:18:11.556
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that we couldn't get it right in diving.

0:18:11.756 --> 0:18:14.156
<v Speaker 3>It's like all you have to do is, you know,

0:18:14.236 --> 0:18:16.676
<v Speaker 3>measure how high people jump, how fast they can spin,

0:18:17.716 --> 0:18:20.476
<v Speaker 3>and you know how much control you have. Actually, there's

0:18:20.516 --> 0:18:22.596
<v Speaker 3>a there's a whole metric of jobs for a degree

0:18:22.636 --> 0:18:25.996
<v Speaker 3>of difficulty, right, we can we can measure job complexity

0:18:26.636 --> 0:18:30.196
<v Speaker 3>and know that when a job has higher degree of difficulty,

0:18:30.396 --> 0:18:35.036
<v Speaker 3>intelligence seems to become more important. And oh, there's there's

0:18:35.036 --> 0:18:36.436
<v Speaker 3>so much we can talk about here, but I want

0:18:36.436 --> 0:18:38.116
<v Speaker 3>to I want to get back to the one of

0:18:38.116 --> 0:18:43.116
<v Speaker 3>the central questions that applying degree of difficulty to moral

0:18:43.116 --> 0:18:46.836
<v Speaker 3>dilemmas raises, which is, once you recognize you're in a

0:18:46.876 --> 0:18:49.916
<v Speaker 3>situation with high degree of difficulty, what do you do?

0:18:50.036 --> 0:18:52.596
<v Speaker 3>What are your what are your takeaways from from studying

0:18:52.716 --> 0:18:54.276
<v Speaker 3>these bombers.

0:18:54.316 --> 0:18:57.076
<v Speaker 2>The great mistake the bomber mafia makes is they is

0:18:57.116 --> 0:19:01.396
<v Speaker 2>they like many technological innovators, by the way, is they

0:19:01.676 --> 0:19:04.876
<v Speaker 2>they they do not have the imagination and it's not

0:19:04.916 --> 0:19:07.636
<v Speaker 2>a fault, but no one would to come up with

0:19:07.756 --> 0:19:14.316
<v Speaker 2>all of the possible complations of their dream. And this

0:19:14.396 --> 0:19:17.036
<v Speaker 2>is the time honor problem of the innovator, right that

0:19:17.556 --> 0:19:19.916
<v Speaker 2>the thing that makes them good at innovating in their

0:19:19.956 --> 0:19:27.836
<v Speaker 2>specific rate region is the narrowness and and intensity of

0:19:27.876 --> 0:19:31.876
<v Speaker 2>their focus. They don't They're not distracted. They're like I

0:19:32.036 --> 0:19:34.316
<v Speaker 2>on the prize, right. But the problem is that when

0:19:34.316 --> 0:19:37.996
<v Speaker 2>they take that idea in the real world, that becomes

0:19:37.996 --> 0:19:40.436
<v Speaker 2>a liability all of a sudden. You've got to think

0:19:40.436 --> 0:19:43.436
<v Speaker 2>about fifty things that never occurred to you tomorrow. So

0:19:43.516 --> 0:19:46.156
<v Speaker 2>the skills that get you to the real world are

0:19:46.196 --> 0:19:48.876
<v Speaker 2>the skills that also impede you once you reach the

0:19:48.876 --> 0:19:49.676
<v Speaker 2>real world.

0:19:50.076 --> 0:19:53.476
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, so you have a parallel here which I

0:19:53.476 --> 0:19:57.476
<v Speaker 3>didn't see until just now, between the bomber's dilemma and

0:19:57.756 --> 0:20:00.636
<v Speaker 3>how we think about degree of difficulty in diving, which

0:20:00.676 --> 0:20:02.876
<v Speaker 3>is I think the central tension in diving into greed

0:20:02.916 --> 0:20:06.396
<v Speaker 3>difficulty is do you base it on how hard it

0:20:06.476 --> 0:20:09.436
<v Speaker 3>is to do at all or how hard it is

0:20:09.476 --> 0:20:09.956
<v Speaker 3>to do well?

0:20:11.116 --> 0:20:11.236
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:20:11.316 --> 0:20:13.196
<v Speaker 3>Like, there there are some dives that only a few

0:20:13.236 --> 0:20:16.796
<v Speaker 3>people in the world can even make, and those some

0:20:16.796 --> 0:20:19.356
<v Speaker 3>people would argue those should have the highest degree difficulty,

0:20:19.636 --> 0:20:22.156
<v Speaker 3>and others would say, no, you take the the hard

0:20:22.196 --> 0:20:25.036
<v Speaker 3>dive that everybody does but everybody misses, and that's the

0:20:25.076 --> 0:20:28.276
<v Speaker 3>dive that gets the highest degree difficulty. Your version of this,

0:20:28.436 --> 0:20:34.356
<v Speaker 3>I think is is precision bombing, which is you it's like, okay,

0:20:34.396 --> 0:20:37.116
<v Speaker 3>how you know how many bombs can you drop or

0:20:37.436 --> 0:20:41.196
<v Speaker 3>you know how much? How much can you terrify or

0:20:41.236 --> 0:20:45.276
<v Speaker 3>demoralize a city with your bombs versus can you hit

0:20:45.316 --> 0:20:49.636
<v Speaker 3>your target perfectly? What is what does that teach us

0:20:49.716 --> 0:20:53.596
<v Speaker 3>about what's really difficult? Is it the execution or is

0:20:53.636 --> 0:20:56.076
<v Speaker 3>it the ability to show up in the first place?

0:20:56.716 --> 0:20:58.756
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, that's a really good question.

0:21:01.756 --> 0:21:05.796
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm going to cop out and say bose

0:21:06.756 --> 0:21:11.476
<v Speaker 2>or it depends. I can tell you what interests me more,

0:21:12.396 --> 0:21:16.276
<v Speaker 2>which is I'm more interested? Particularly this is a weird

0:21:16.276 --> 0:21:19.476
<v Speaker 2>thing to say, particularly as I get older in the execution,

0:21:20.796 --> 0:21:26.116
<v Speaker 2>because more and more I find myself I am interested

0:21:26.156 --> 0:21:31.476
<v Speaker 2>and fascinated and amused by people's obsessive dreams. But what

0:21:31.636 --> 0:21:37.116
<v Speaker 2>impresses me is execution. That you can just do it

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:40.836
<v Speaker 2>in a way that so everyone starts tries to do

0:21:40.876 --> 0:21:43.996
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, there are three people who pull it off.

0:21:44.716 --> 0:21:48.476
<v Speaker 2>Those are the three. That's what impresses me. Is like,

0:21:48.916 --> 0:21:53.956
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like, you know, any of us can

0:21:53.996 --> 0:21:57.396
<v Speaker 2>make an attempt at Mount Everest or run a marathon,

0:21:57.836 --> 0:22:00.676
<v Speaker 2>but a handful of people get to the top or

0:22:00.716 --> 0:22:04.596
<v Speaker 2>break you know, two hours and thirty minutes. Those are

0:22:04.636 --> 0:22:06.836
<v Speaker 2>the people I take my hat off to Okay.

0:22:06.956 --> 0:22:09.716
<v Speaker 3>That speaks to something you've alluded to a couple of times,

0:22:09.956 --> 0:22:13.276
<v Speaker 3>and something you made me rethink in this book, which

0:22:13.356 --> 0:22:16.956
<v Speaker 3>is the idea of obsession. I have always thought of

0:22:16.996 --> 0:22:20.356
<v Speaker 3>obsession as something bad. I think of people with OCD,

0:22:21.036 --> 0:22:24.996
<v Speaker 3>I think of an obsessive stalker. And you you have

0:22:25.076 --> 0:22:28.116
<v Speaker 3>a very different take on obsession. I think you even

0:22:28.156 --> 0:22:30.356
<v Speaker 3>see it as a beautiful thing. And I want to

0:22:30.396 --> 0:22:30.796
<v Speaker 3>hear more.

0:22:31.716 --> 0:22:35.836
<v Speaker 2>I do I, and I wonder why I do. I

0:22:35.836 --> 0:22:37.236
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I have a good answer to that.

0:22:37.876 --> 0:22:40.436
<v Speaker 2>I don't. It's not as if the easy thing would

0:22:40.436 --> 0:22:42.916
<v Speaker 2>be to say that I you know, I grew up

0:22:42.916 --> 0:22:44.236
<v Speaker 2>with an example of obsessiveness.

0:22:44.276 --> 0:22:45.636
<v Speaker 1>Actually I didn't.

0:22:47.636 --> 0:22:50.436
<v Speaker 2>Neither of my parents could even plausibly be described as

0:22:50.476 --> 0:22:55.756
<v Speaker 2>even coming close to that standard. My brother is the

0:22:55.836 --> 0:22:58.956
<v Speaker 2>least obsessive, although I mean he's sort of, he's not.

0:22:59.436 --> 0:23:00.236
<v Speaker 1>He's not obsessive.

0:23:01.996 --> 0:23:05.076
<v Speaker 2>Were dabblers my whole but Dad's whole thing was he

0:23:05.076 --> 0:23:07.196
<v Speaker 2>loved doing lots of things, even if he did them badly.

0:23:07.236 --> 0:23:11.876
<v Speaker 2>That was his favorite thing. He built a greenhouse in

0:23:11.916 --> 0:23:18.316
<v Speaker 2>her backyard, and he was so proud of how inexpertly.

0:23:16.516 --> 0:23:17.036
<v Speaker 1>He built it.

0:23:17.076 --> 0:23:20.076
<v Speaker 2>He would show off all of the crazy angles and

0:23:20.116 --> 0:23:23.356
<v Speaker 2>the gaps, and the he thought that was hilarious.

0:23:24.436 --> 0:23:26.636
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I have a few things that I'm curious about then.

0:23:26.796 --> 0:23:30.756
<v Speaker 3>The first one is you called yourself a dabbler, and

0:23:30.836 --> 0:23:33.756
<v Speaker 3>yet you're also an elite runner. I think you once

0:23:33.876 --> 0:23:38.116
<v Speaker 3>beat the Canadian record holder if I remember correctly. Isn't

0:23:38.156 --> 0:23:41.116
<v Speaker 3>running the most obsessive sport ever? I mean you literally

0:23:41.236 --> 0:23:44.636
<v Speaker 3>just do the same thing over and over, step, step.

0:23:44.596 --> 0:23:48.996
<v Speaker 2>The opposite, the opposite. So how many when you were

0:23:49.636 --> 0:23:52.636
<v Speaker 2>diving as a kid, how many hours would you spend

0:23:52.676 --> 0:23:53.116
<v Speaker 2>in the pool?

0:23:53.716 --> 0:23:57.516
<v Speaker 3>I mean, actually in the pool, probably four seconds a dive.

0:23:59.516 --> 0:24:00.996
<v Speaker 2>From the time you left the house to the time

0:24:01.036 --> 0:24:02.996
<v Speaker 2>you got home. Again, what are we talking about time

0:24:03.036 --> 0:24:04.156
<v Speaker 2>devoted to the task?

0:24:04.556 --> 0:24:06.996
<v Speaker 3>I'm three hours during the school year, probably eight or

0:24:07.076 --> 0:24:07.756
<v Speaker 3>nine in the summer.

0:24:08.236 --> 0:24:09.036
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:24:09.356 --> 0:24:13.796
<v Speaker 2>In my entire time as a you know, I was

0:24:13.836 --> 0:24:16.556
<v Speaker 2>a very good age class runner. In my entire time

0:24:16.556 --> 0:24:18.796
<v Speaker 2>as a very good age class runner, I never never

0:24:19.596 --> 0:24:22.516
<v Speaker 2>spent more than an hour a day running never, and

0:24:22.596 --> 0:24:25.916
<v Speaker 2>I never ran more than five days a week. And

0:24:26.476 --> 0:24:28.436
<v Speaker 2>by the way, nor did anyone else I know. In fact,

0:24:28.476 --> 0:24:30.876
<v Speaker 2>and if I had done that, I would have gotten

0:24:31.876 --> 0:24:34.956
<v Speaker 2>I would have gotten hell from my coach, he would

0:24:34.956 --> 0:24:38.916
<v Speaker 2>have said, you are destroying your running is all about restraint.

0:24:39.116 --> 0:24:39.436
<v Speaker 3>You know what.

0:24:39.476 --> 0:24:43.676
<v Speaker 2>The little adage they repeat to you when you start

0:24:43.716 --> 0:24:47.636
<v Speaker 2>out running is trained down, Strain for tomorrow.

0:24:47.236 --> 0:24:47.916
<v Speaker 1>Is another day.

0:24:48.396 --> 0:24:54.116
<v Speaker 2>Running is the op It's the anti obsessives pastime. It's

0:24:54.156 --> 0:24:58.596
<v Speaker 2>all about restraint. It's all about never only when you

0:24:58.676 --> 0:25:00.596
<v Speaker 2>race do you push yourself to the edge. At all

0:25:00.636 --> 0:25:05.556
<v Speaker 2>of the times, you hold yourself in check. Right the coach,

0:25:05.636 --> 0:25:07.516
<v Speaker 2>I have a I'm in training right now for this

0:25:07.636 --> 0:25:09.756
<v Speaker 2>mile race I'm doing, and I have a This guy

0:25:09.836 --> 0:25:12.956
<v Speaker 2>is helping me coach, and he looks at my my

0:25:13.076 --> 0:25:15.716
<v Speaker 2>workouts online. You know what he tells me. He's like, yeah,

0:25:15.756 --> 0:25:17.836
<v Speaker 2>you need to probably take a little more recovery on that,

0:25:17.956 --> 0:25:22.076
<v Speaker 2>or you should take some more days off. He's making

0:25:22.116 --> 0:25:26.076
<v Speaker 2>sure I'm not obsessive runners. You totally misunderstand running. This

0:25:26.116 --> 0:25:28.556
<v Speaker 2>is probably why you don't run. You don't get it.

0:25:29.756 --> 0:25:30.636
<v Speaker 3>That might be true.

0:25:30.956 --> 0:25:34.916
<v Speaker 2>You're bringing your crazy eight hour a day memories from

0:25:35.116 --> 0:25:38.196
<v Speaker 2>childhood to bear on a completely different sport.

0:25:38.756 --> 0:25:41.956
<v Speaker 3>I don't know you have bursts of obsession in running.

0:25:42.196 --> 0:25:45.436
<v Speaker 3>I've heard about your stair routines, for example.

0:25:45.716 --> 0:25:49.756
<v Speaker 2>No, those are it's it's an obsession that I used

0:25:49.796 --> 0:25:52.716
<v Speaker 2>to get together with three very good friends of mine

0:25:53.076 --> 0:25:55.436
<v Speaker 2>and we would do a workout on the stairs in

0:25:55.476 --> 0:25:58.236
<v Speaker 2>Fork Green Park and Brooklyn. To say that was obsessive

0:25:58.676 --> 0:26:03.876
<v Speaker 2>is nuts. It was totally fun. We would like you

0:26:03.916 --> 0:26:06.316
<v Speaker 2>have a long recovery because you jog down the stairs

0:26:06.316 --> 0:26:08.556
<v Speaker 2>and you sprint up them on the job down the stairs,

0:26:08.836 --> 0:26:12.276
<v Speaker 2>you like gossip and ketch up on stuff and chad

0:26:12.356 --> 0:26:15.156
<v Speaker 2>and then you just have a little zip up the

0:26:15.156 --> 0:26:18.116
<v Speaker 2>stairs and it's just like it's the furthest thing. You

0:26:18.116 --> 0:26:21.196
<v Speaker 2>don't know what you're talking about. Meanwhile, you're executing these

0:26:21.236 --> 0:26:25.156
<v Speaker 2>insanely complicated dives that if you if you're off by

0:26:25.156 --> 0:26:30.276
<v Speaker 2>two inches, you lose. This is nothing, there's nothing in

0:26:30.316 --> 0:26:31.516
<v Speaker 2>common with But when what I'm.

0:26:31.396 --> 0:26:34.316
<v Speaker 3>Up to, well, I have to tell you that one

0:26:34.356 --> 0:26:36.236
<v Speaker 3>of your so called friends said that when he went

0:26:36.276 --> 0:26:37.796
<v Speaker 3>with you for the first time, he wasn't sure if

0:26:37.796 --> 0:26:41.476
<v Speaker 3>he was going to vomit or die. So not everyone's

0:26:41.516 --> 0:26:42.716
<v Speaker 3>experience mirror is yours.

0:26:42.796 --> 0:26:46.116
<v Speaker 2>But on every other occasion than he smoked me, So

0:26:46.236 --> 0:26:49.756
<v Speaker 2>I know what he's talking about. Anyway.

0:26:49.796 --> 0:26:51.556
<v Speaker 3>The other the other thing I wanted to ask you

0:26:51.636 --> 0:26:56.996
<v Speaker 3>about obsession is I think about this research by Valoranz

0:26:57.636 --> 0:27:01.756
<v Speaker 3>two kinds of passion. He calls them obsess obsessive passion

0:27:01.756 --> 0:27:06.236
<v Speaker 3>and harmonious passion, and he says, obsessed obsessive passion is

0:27:06.276 --> 0:27:11.516
<v Speaker 3>basically it's it's externsically motivated, is driven by guilt, by pressure,

0:27:12.396 --> 0:27:17.756
<v Speaker 3>by this, you know, compulsiveness that really undermines people's ongoing

0:27:17.796 --> 0:27:22.276
<v Speaker 3>interest and commitment. Whereas harmonious passion, instead of feeling like

0:27:22.316 --> 0:27:24.716
<v Speaker 3>you constantly have to push yourself to do it, you're

0:27:24.716 --> 0:27:28.676
<v Speaker 3>pulled in by the activity. You're interested, You're intrinsically motivated,

0:27:28.756 --> 0:27:32.996
<v Speaker 3>you're curious, you're excited, and your energy is sustained by

0:27:33.036 --> 0:27:36.996
<v Speaker 3>your enthusiasm. And I wonder if if that's part of

0:27:37.036 --> 0:27:39.396
<v Speaker 3>what you're describing, or if you think there's actually still

0:27:39.436 --> 0:27:41.996
<v Speaker 3>an upside to the obsessive part of passion.

0:27:42.916 --> 0:27:46.116
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's funny that the word I was waiting for

0:27:46.196 --> 0:27:49.916
<v Speaker 2>you to say in what you in that in that,

0:27:50.236 --> 0:28:00.116
<v Speaker 2>in that little dichotomy you described, was pleasure. So I

0:28:00.316 --> 0:28:04.676
<v Speaker 2>grant I suppose that there are there are different motivation,

0:28:04.836 --> 0:28:10.996
<v Speaker 2>initial motivations for certain kinds of obsessive pursuits. But to me,

0:28:11.076 --> 0:28:13.996
<v Speaker 2>the real issue is not why you start, but where

0:28:14.036 --> 0:28:18.996
<v Speaker 2>you end up and does the immersion bring you pleasure?

0:28:19.396 --> 0:28:25.716
<v Speaker 2>And it always amazes me how little that word is

0:28:25.996 --> 0:28:29.116
<v Speaker 2>used in particularly in connection with people's work. I always

0:28:29.116 --> 0:28:32.156
<v Speaker 2>ask people, well, do you find you your work fun?

0:28:33.116 --> 0:28:36.796
<v Speaker 2>To mean as simply the most important question, And I'm

0:28:36.796 --> 0:28:38.836
<v Speaker 2>not interested in some people. We have all kinds of

0:28:38.836 --> 0:28:40.676
<v Speaker 2>reasons why we work. Some people work because they have

0:28:40.676 --> 0:28:43.076
<v Speaker 2>a family to support. Some of them will work because

0:28:43.276 --> 0:28:44.916
<v Speaker 2>they would be bored otherwise, I go on, some of

0:28:44.996 --> 0:28:47.396
<v Speaker 2>will work because their parents would, you know, disdain them

0:28:47.396 --> 0:28:50.676
<v Speaker 2>if they didn't. Whatever. The question is, once you're at

0:28:50.716 --> 0:28:53.996
<v Speaker 2>work and immersed in it, are you enjoying yourself? And

0:28:54.596 --> 0:28:58.756
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I think about the people I like

0:28:58.916 --> 0:29:03.436
<v Speaker 2>working with, they're all people I don't. I like working

0:29:03.436 --> 0:29:05.876
<v Speaker 2>with people who do a good job, sure everyone does,

0:29:05.996 --> 0:29:08.436
<v Speaker 2>but I really like working with people who are enjoying themselves.

0:29:08.516 --> 0:29:09.276
<v Speaker 1>That's really what.

0:29:11.196 --> 0:29:15.836
<v Speaker 2>Compels me to and I think of for some people,

0:29:15.876 --> 0:29:19.476
<v Speaker 2>the route to enjoyment is obsession, right, It's like that's

0:29:19.796 --> 0:29:23.196
<v Speaker 2>you get singular in your pursuit because it just brings

0:29:23.196 --> 0:29:27.996
<v Speaker 2>you joy. I don't understand why those words are so

0:29:28.156 --> 0:29:32.036
<v Speaker 2>rarely used in this context. So like to go back

0:29:32.036 --> 0:29:34.756
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom Offie for a moment. They're in the

0:29:34.796 --> 0:29:37.476
<v Speaker 2>middle of Alabama in the nineteen thirties. You could look

0:29:37.516 --> 0:29:40.716
<v Speaker 2>at them objectively and you could say these losers off

0:29:40.716 --> 0:29:42.836
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of nowhere pursuing an idea they'll never

0:29:42.876 --> 0:29:45.956
<v Speaker 2>go anywhere. Or you could say these are a group

0:29:45.956 --> 0:29:49.276
<v Speaker 2>of people who have successfully found a place where they

0:29:49.316 --> 0:29:55.236
<v Speaker 2>can find joy in their passion and work, and that

0:29:55.316 --> 0:29:58.356
<v Speaker 2>makes them winners. No one else is having joy in

0:29:58.396 --> 0:29:59.916
<v Speaker 2>the army in nineteen thirty five.

0:30:01.316 --> 0:30:05.356
<v Speaker 3>Wow. So when you talk about obsession, then you're talking

0:30:05.396 --> 0:30:10.156
<v Speaker 3>about a single minded focus to pursue mastery in a

0:30:10.196 --> 0:30:11.316
<v Speaker 3>way that brings joy.

0:30:11.836 --> 0:30:16.316
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the social aspect is really crucial here. It's

0:30:16.356 --> 0:30:20.356
<v Speaker 2>funny because you know, the this book, The Bar of Mafia,

0:30:20.916 --> 0:30:24.116
<v Speaker 2>is the really the first book that I've ever done

0:30:24.116 --> 0:30:27.996
<v Speaker 2>where from the from the very beginning of this book,

0:30:28.036 --> 0:30:29.276
<v Speaker 2>it was a team effort.

0:30:29.796 --> 0:30:30.436
<v Speaker 1>It literally.

0:30:30.516 --> 0:30:34.076
<v Speaker 2>I know my name is on the cover, but that's

0:30:34.116 --> 0:30:37.956
<v Speaker 2>a misnomer. There's six people, seven people at Pushkin who

0:30:38.036 --> 0:30:41.076
<v Speaker 2>played as large or in some of thess larger role

0:30:41.116 --> 0:30:43.116
<v Speaker 2>than me and putting this together. I've never done that

0:30:43.156 --> 0:30:46.836
<v Speaker 2>before ever, not I can't even I was not the

0:30:46.876 --> 0:30:48.796
<v Speaker 2>guy in college who you know had a team of

0:30:48.796 --> 0:30:50.716
<v Speaker 2>people we were to No, no, no, no. I never did

0:30:50.756 --> 0:30:52.876
<v Speaker 2>a team. I was never on a basketball team, never

0:30:52.916 --> 0:30:57.356
<v Speaker 2>did any team sports, never teams. Not in my I

0:30:57.396 --> 0:30:59.516
<v Speaker 2>did not. I didn't even I wasn't a kid who

0:30:59.516 --> 0:31:02.356
<v Speaker 2>went home from school and did homework with his dad.

0:31:02.916 --> 0:31:07.476
<v Speaker 2>Never happened, Right, this is not doing stuff with other

0:31:07.516 --> 0:31:09.876
<v Speaker 2>people is not something I have ever done on and

0:31:09.956 --> 0:31:12.556
<v Speaker 2>I did it with this book. And you know what,

0:31:13.036 --> 0:31:15.636
<v Speaker 2>this is most fun book I've ever done. Never had

0:31:15.636 --> 0:31:18.756
<v Speaker 2>so much fun writing a book. It's like fantastic, right

0:31:18.876 --> 0:31:22.316
<v Speaker 2>it's not? And why because everyone else was as into

0:31:22.356 --> 0:31:26.796
<v Speaker 2>this idea as I was, right and pursuing different parts

0:31:26.836 --> 0:31:30.756
<v Speaker 2>of it. And that's so like I. You know, here

0:31:30.796 --> 0:31:33.476
<v Speaker 2>I am writing about a group of people who find

0:31:33.556 --> 0:31:37.196
<v Speaker 2>joy in each other's obsession, and I am with a

0:31:37.196 --> 0:31:40.716
<v Speaker 2>group of people finding joy with each other's obsession. It

0:31:40.796 --> 0:31:44.596
<v Speaker 2>was as lovely at my you know, at my advanced age.

0:31:45.116 --> 0:31:47.596
<v Speaker 2>I'm much older than you, Adam, I get to say

0:31:47.636 --> 0:31:51.556
<v Speaker 2>things like that. At my advanced age, I discovered this

0:31:52.076 --> 0:31:58.236
<v Speaker 2>fantastic thing called, you know, strength and numbers.

0:31:56.836 --> 0:32:04.516
<v Speaker 3>The joy of shared obsession. Yes, I love that.

0:32:04.516 --> 0:32:09.276
<v Speaker 2>That was Grant and Gladwell Clubhouse Part one. After the break,

0:32:09.796 --> 0:32:25.916
<v Speaker 2>we meet again to discuss Adam's book Think Again. Adam,

0:32:25.956 --> 0:32:28.636
<v Speaker 2>can you can you give us an overview of Think Again?

0:32:29.396 --> 0:32:31.636
<v Speaker 3>The core idea it builds on some brilliant work that

0:32:31.676 --> 0:32:35.276
<v Speaker 3>my colleague Phil Tetlock did, and the premise is that

0:32:35.316 --> 0:32:39.676
<v Speaker 3>we spend a lot of our life with these mindsets

0:32:39.756 --> 0:32:43.196
<v Speaker 3>of occupations that we never have worked in. We find

0:32:43.196 --> 0:32:47.076
<v Speaker 3>ourselves thinking like preachers, prosecutors, and politicians more often than

0:32:47.076 --> 0:32:49.476
<v Speaker 3>we would want to admit. When I'm in preacher mode,

0:32:49.516 --> 0:32:53.276
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to proselytize. When I'm a prosecutor, I'm trying

0:32:53.316 --> 0:32:55.996
<v Speaker 3>to win a case and prove you wrong. When I'm

0:32:55.996 --> 0:32:59.756
<v Speaker 3>a politician, I have a constituent, I'm trying to get

0:32:59.796 --> 0:33:02.396
<v Speaker 3>their approval, so I'm doing all this campaigning and lobbying.

0:33:02.796 --> 0:33:05.716
<v Speaker 3>My big worry with preaching and prosecuting is that people

0:33:05.796 --> 0:33:08.996
<v Speaker 3>are not willing to think again because I'm right, you're wrong.

0:33:09.396 --> 0:33:12.596
<v Speaker 1>You're the one who needs to change. I'm good. When

0:33:12.596 --> 0:33:13.036
<v Speaker 1>people are.

0:33:12.956 --> 0:33:15.396
<v Speaker 3>In politician mode, they look a little bit more flexible,

0:33:15.436 --> 0:33:17.436
<v Speaker 3>but all they're doing is they're flip flopping what they

0:33:17.516 --> 0:33:20.316
<v Speaker 3>say in order to communicate what they think their audience

0:33:20.356 --> 0:33:23.436
<v Speaker 3>wants to hear, and so if it looks like they're rethinking,

0:33:23.436 --> 0:33:25.716
<v Speaker 3>they're doing it at the wrong time for the wrong reasons,

0:33:26.196 --> 0:33:28.356
<v Speaker 3>or they're just towing the party line and appealing to

0:33:28.356 --> 0:33:32.676
<v Speaker 3>their tribe without actually changing their internal beliefs. My hope

0:33:32.756 --> 0:33:34.316
<v Speaker 3>is that people will think a little bit more like

0:33:34.356 --> 0:33:37.396
<v Speaker 3>scientists and say, you know what, I don't have to

0:33:37.396 --> 0:33:40.196
<v Speaker 3>believe everything I think. I don't have to internalize every

0:33:40.236 --> 0:33:43.196
<v Speaker 3>emotion I feel when I start to form an opinion

0:33:43.356 --> 0:33:45.916
<v Speaker 3>that's just a hypothesis. Let me go out into the world,

0:33:46.036 --> 0:33:50.196
<v Speaker 3>run some experiments, observe, talk to people, and test the hypothesis.

0:33:50.676 --> 0:33:53.396
<v Speaker 3>And I should be then surrounding myself with people who

0:33:53.596 --> 0:33:56.516
<v Speaker 3>don't just agree with my conclusions, but actually challenge my

0:33:56.516 --> 0:33:58.836
<v Speaker 3>thought process. And the goal of all that is is

0:33:58.876 --> 0:34:01.716
<v Speaker 3>to try to break us free of overconfidence cycles where

0:34:01.756 --> 0:34:03.996
<v Speaker 3>we take pride in our knowledge, we have too much

0:34:04.036 --> 0:34:06.956
<v Speaker 3>conviction that leads us to confirmation bias, and then we

0:34:07.036 --> 0:34:09.116
<v Speaker 3>become a little bit arrogant. What I want to do

0:34:09.276 --> 0:34:12.156
<v Speaker 3>is activate rethinking cycles where we have the humility to

0:34:12.196 --> 0:34:14.956
<v Speaker 3>know what we don't know. We doubt some of our convictions.

0:34:14.956 --> 0:34:17.476
<v Speaker 3>That makes us curious to go and discover new things,

0:34:17.796 --> 0:34:21.476
<v Speaker 3>and that reinforces this mindset of being a lifelong learner, saying, wow,

0:34:21.556 --> 0:34:22.476
<v Speaker 3>I just learned something.

0:34:22.996 --> 0:34:24.356
<v Speaker 1>There's so much more to learn.

0:34:26.876 --> 0:34:32.316
<v Speaker 2>Well, you have written another, uh wonderful book, and I

0:34:32.676 --> 0:34:35.516
<v Speaker 2>find it. Actually there's so many fascinating things. My only

0:34:35.556 --> 0:34:37.356
<v Speaker 2>critique of this I have a critique of this book.

0:34:37.196 --> 0:34:39.116
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I hope you have more than one.

0:34:39.196 --> 0:34:42.116
<v Speaker 2>I have several, but my my large one, which is

0:34:42.156 --> 0:34:48.396
<v Speaker 2>a is it's four books. I'm reading this book. It's like,

0:34:48.436 --> 0:34:51.396
<v Speaker 2>why you I You're like jumping ahead of the next

0:34:51.436 --> 0:34:53.196
<v Speaker 2>study and I'm not done with the one. You're wrong,

0:34:54.316 --> 0:34:57.196
<v Speaker 2>I I either you either you have to you have to,

0:34:57.276 --> 0:35:01.116
<v Speaker 2>like you know, slow down and write, write and chop

0:35:01.156 --> 0:35:03.756
<v Speaker 2>your ideas into pieces and devote. Oh, you have to

0:35:03.756 --> 0:35:06.476
<v Speaker 2>write longer books. You can't do you can't keep doing

0:35:06.516 --> 0:35:08.956
<v Speaker 2>this and like race it anyway, that's a it's a.

0:35:09.596 --> 0:35:15.156
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's a. It's battery designed is disguised as criticism.

0:35:15.636 --> 0:35:18.956
<v Speaker 2>But I wanted to start. I kept thinking when I

0:35:18.996 --> 0:35:21.236
<v Speaker 2>was reading this book, how does this fit in with

0:35:21.516 --> 0:35:25.156
<v Speaker 2>Adam's previous books? And I'm wondering, do we have a

0:35:25.276 --> 0:35:31.876
<v Speaker 2>kind of emerging Adam Grant's philosophy of life. Can you

0:35:31.876 --> 0:35:35.996
<v Speaker 2>talk about how does this one fit with your previous books?

0:35:37.076 --> 0:35:40.396
<v Speaker 3>I think this it's an interesting question, and I will

0:35:40.396 --> 0:35:44.356
<v Speaker 3>accept your backhanded compliment any day. Thank you for the

0:35:44.436 --> 0:35:46.876
<v Speaker 3>enthusiasm and also the criticism, which I look forward to

0:35:46.956 --> 0:35:50.436
<v Speaker 3>more of. I guess this book is sort of a

0:35:50.476 --> 0:35:53.996
<v Speaker 3>meta book in that in each of the books I've

0:35:53.996 --> 0:35:56.876
<v Speaker 3>written before, what I've tried to do is I've tried

0:35:56.916 --> 0:35:59.196
<v Speaker 3>to get people to rethink something that I think that

0:35:59.236 --> 0:36:03.076
<v Speaker 3>they've gotten wrong, or maybe an assumption that's been incomplete.

0:36:04.756 --> 0:36:08.676
<v Speaker 2>The I mean, but do you What I want is

0:36:09.156 --> 0:36:11.716
<v Speaker 2>whether you think there is a kind of Adam Grand

0:36:11.796 --> 0:36:15.676
<v Speaker 2>ideology that's emerging from writing all these Are you getting

0:36:15.716 --> 0:36:17.636
<v Speaker 2>a kind of sense of well, wait a minute, here

0:36:17.716 --> 0:36:19.796
<v Speaker 2>is how I see the world, and if you read

0:36:19.836 --> 0:36:23.036
<v Speaker 2>all my books you'll get this Grantean vision.

0:36:24.396 --> 0:36:27.476
<v Speaker 3>Yes, although it would be a little ironic to commit

0:36:27.516 --> 0:36:30.596
<v Speaker 3>to an ideology because then I'm not staying open to

0:36:30.676 --> 0:36:32.516
<v Speaker 3>rethinking my opinions and beliefs.

0:36:32.516 --> 0:36:35.036
<v Speaker 2>Am I No, No, you could have a component, you

0:36:35.036 --> 0:36:39.916
<v Speaker 2>could have ideologies, which is that you revisit your ideology.

0:36:39.956 --> 0:36:40.596
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.

0:36:40.836 --> 0:36:42.756
<v Speaker 3>No, I think I think there is a there's an

0:36:42.796 --> 0:36:46.196
<v Speaker 3>overarching thread that runs through all my work, which I

0:36:46.436 --> 0:36:48.516
<v Speaker 3>didn't see until I'd written a couple of books.

0:36:49.236 --> 0:36:51.436
<v Speaker 1>The thread is that the.

0:36:51.436 --> 0:36:56.036
<v Speaker 3>Very things that you think are critical for success in life,

0:36:56.596 --> 0:36:59.996
<v Speaker 3>I can actually be attained through building character. And I

0:37:00.036 --> 0:37:02.556
<v Speaker 3>think that my work has looked at different kinds of

0:37:02.596 --> 0:37:06.156
<v Speaker 3>character strengths and said, you don't have to choose between

0:37:06.316 --> 0:37:11.396
<v Speaker 3>your goals and those virtues. It's generosity, or now it's

0:37:11.476 --> 0:37:13.116
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's humility. And so I guess what I'm

0:37:13.156 --> 0:37:16.476
<v Speaker 3>looking for at large is a way to align character

0:37:16.756 --> 0:37:18.796
<v Speaker 3>with with achievement.

0:37:19.116 --> 0:37:20.996
<v Speaker 1>How's that? Yeah?

0:37:21.396 --> 0:37:26.116
<v Speaker 2>No, that that actually that fits with That's what I've

0:37:26.156 --> 0:37:28.156
<v Speaker 2>always sort of sensed in.

0:37:28.116 --> 0:37:29.356
<v Speaker 3>Well, why didn't you just tell me that a few

0:37:29.396 --> 0:37:31.316
<v Speaker 3>years ago, because then I would have understood who I was.

0:37:31.276 --> 0:37:32.396
<v Speaker 1>And what I was trying to achieve.

0:37:32.636 --> 0:37:35.716
<v Speaker 2>No, No, but I'm curious. I mean, because I'm always

0:37:36.036 --> 0:37:41.876
<v Speaker 2>very attracted to religious themes in things to sort of bear,

0:37:42.076 --> 0:37:45.636
<v Speaker 2>particularly if they're kind of slightly sublimated. But it always

0:37:45.636 --> 0:37:48.036
<v Speaker 2>struck me that there was some there was some kind

0:37:48.076 --> 0:37:52.156
<v Speaker 2>of moral case being made in your books that maybe

0:37:52.156 --> 0:37:56.156
<v Speaker 2>you weren't making explicitly, but that there was something about

0:37:56.196 --> 0:37:59.756
<v Speaker 2>reading a book that felt very comfortable to someone who

0:37:59.876 --> 0:38:05.236
<v Speaker 2>was used to thinking about the world in terms of character, ethics, morality,

0:38:05.636 --> 0:38:08.676
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of things. Like if I was thinking, if

0:38:08.716 --> 0:38:12.636
<v Speaker 2>I had a Bible study of evangelicals and I said,

0:38:12.876 --> 0:38:16.276
<v Speaker 2>this week, we're not reading the New Testament, We're going

0:38:16.316 --> 0:38:20.116
<v Speaker 2>to read the works of Adam Grant. I think actually

0:38:21.156 --> 0:38:23.636
<v Speaker 2>people with that kind of world would be very at

0:38:23.676 --> 0:38:25.396
<v Speaker 2>home with the arguments that you're making.

0:38:27.916 --> 0:38:28.636
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:38:29.236 --> 0:38:34.356
<v Speaker 3>I love it when ancient wisdom matches up with modern science.

0:38:35.196 --> 0:38:38.756
<v Speaker 3>And I think where the ancient wisdom often leaves me

0:38:38.836 --> 0:38:43.116
<v Speaker 3>short is around you know, Okay, a lot for me

0:38:43.156 --> 0:38:46.676
<v Speaker 3>at least, a lot of the principles and recommendations that

0:38:46.716 --> 0:38:50.356
<v Speaker 3>come out of religious traditions are missing the nuance about

0:38:50.356 --> 0:38:51.836
<v Speaker 3>how do you actually do this in life?

0:38:52.436 --> 0:38:52.636
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:38:52.676 --> 0:38:54.836
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, of course you want to be a generous person,

0:38:55.276 --> 0:38:57.076
<v Speaker 3>but how do you give to others in a way

0:38:57.116 --> 0:38:59.836
<v Speaker 3>that prevents you or protects you from burning out or

0:38:59.876 --> 0:39:03.356
<v Speaker 3>just getting burned by the most selfish takers around. Yes,

0:39:03.596 --> 0:39:05.996
<v Speaker 3>I want to be humble, but I don't want to

0:39:05.996 --> 0:39:09.476
<v Speaker 3>become meek or lack confidence. And so I think, I think,

0:39:09.836 --> 0:39:11.396
<v Speaker 3>I guess what I want to do In a lot

0:39:11.396 --> 0:39:13.316
<v Speaker 3>of my work is try to use evidence to pick

0:39:13.396 --> 0:39:18.876
<v Speaker 3>up where where these these higher principles leave off and ask, okay,

0:39:19.036 --> 0:39:22.356
<v Speaker 3>what does it mean to do this without sacrificing you know,

0:39:22.396 --> 0:39:23.676
<v Speaker 3>our ambitions?

0:39:23.916 --> 0:39:29.036
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I was struck by because I am, as

0:39:29.076 --> 0:39:33.756
<v Speaker 2>you know, a BlackBerry fanatic user. Not saying too strong

0:39:33.796 --> 0:39:36.836
<v Speaker 2>a word. It's from they make it in my hometown.

0:39:36.876 --> 0:39:39.076
<v Speaker 2>I have a you know, it came out of my

0:39:39.196 --> 0:39:42.516
<v Speaker 2>dad's university. And you have a little thing where you

0:39:42.556 --> 0:39:46.596
<v Speaker 2>talk about Mike Lazaridus who ran rim BlackBerry for many years,

0:39:46.796 --> 0:39:48.956
<v Speaker 2>and he made this error and they went from fifty

0:39:48.996 --> 0:39:52.436
<v Speaker 2>percent market share to whatever it was, five percent in

0:39:52.676 --> 0:39:56.636
<v Speaker 2>five years because they failed to understand the smartphone revolution,

0:39:56.836 --> 0:39:59.436
<v Speaker 2>the typing on a keyboard as supposed, typing on a

0:39:59.436 --> 0:40:01.876
<v Speaker 2>screen supposed, et cetera, et cetera. He was not willing

0:40:01.876 --> 0:40:05.956
<v Speaker 2>to revisit his assumptions about what a smartphone could be.

0:40:06.396 --> 0:40:07.836
<v Speaker 2>And I was thinking about that, and I was like,

0:40:08.116 --> 0:40:11.716
<v Speaker 2>but you know, when I go home sometimes to visit

0:40:11.756 --> 0:40:15.876
<v Speaker 2>my mom, I sometimes see Mike Lazaridis like buying books

0:40:15.916 --> 0:40:19.996
<v Speaker 2>at the bookstore. He doesn't live that far from my mother.

0:40:20.516 --> 0:40:23.436
<v Speaker 2>He's a very happy guy. He didn't have any regrets

0:40:24.116 --> 0:40:26.716
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he built this beautiful house, all these

0:40:26.756 --> 0:40:30.196
<v Speaker 2>trees outside. You know what, I think he's like doing

0:40:30.236 --> 0:40:34.196
<v Speaker 2>cool projects he made himself, I don't know, billion dollars.

0:40:34.236 --> 0:40:38.116
<v Speaker 2>Probably at the end of the day, you know, I

0:40:38.196 --> 0:40:42.676
<v Speaker 2>suppose he could have his shareholders might be upset that

0:40:42.756 --> 0:40:46.156
<v Speaker 2>he didn't rethink his assumptions. But it was very hard

0:40:46.156 --> 0:40:50.836
<v Speaker 2>for me to think of Mike Lazaridis as being a loser.

0:40:51.676 --> 0:40:55.356
<v Speaker 2>And also like, so what if he wrote it all

0:40:55.396 --> 0:40:59.356
<v Speaker 2>the way down like he believed in a certain kind

0:40:59.396 --> 0:41:04.356
<v Speaker 2>of ascetic functionality in a phone like I happened to

0:41:04.356 --> 0:41:08.396
<v Speaker 2>believe that too. Mike chose me over the many millions

0:41:08.436 --> 0:41:10.756
<v Speaker 2>who wanted to phone did everything like, I don't know,

0:41:11.716 --> 0:41:15.636
<v Speaker 2>isn't any different with this solid troupe. I was thinking

0:41:15.716 --> 0:41:20.556
<v Speaker 2>this into context of I'm also a fan of a

0:41:20.596 --> 0:41:24.596
<v Speaker 2>deeply committed, die hard fan of the Buffalo Bills. If

0:41:24.636 --> 0:41:27.236
<v Speaker 2>you know any well football, you know that that is

0:41:27.316 --> 0:41:32.156
<v Speaker 2>just an has been for thirty years in invitation to masochism.

0:41:32.156 --> 0:41:35.196
<v Speaker 3>Starting with Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas four Super Bowl

0:41:35.356 --> 0:41:36.316
<v Speaker 3>zero wins.

0:41:36.156 --> 0:41:40.436
<v Speaker 2>Exactly do I re You know, if I read your

0:41:40.436 --> 0:41:41.876
<v Speaker 2>book one way, I would say, well, Malcolm, you should

0:41:41.916 --> 0:41:45.636
<v Speaker 2>just rethink you your football allegiances. They make no sense.

0:41:45.716 --> 0:41:47.796
<v Speaker 2>Like you got it? This is not working, this Buffalo

0:41:47.836 --> 0:41:51.636
<v Speaker 2>saying there's a certain pleasure in me sticking with them

0:41:51.676 --> 0:41:56.556
<v Speaker 2>through thin and thin, But so like, do you see

0:41:56.596 --> 0:41:57.316
<v Speaker 2>what I'm getting at?

0:41:57.396 --> 0:42:00.516
<v Speaker 1>Like I do. Oh, there's so much to work with here. Okay,

0:42:00.596 --> 0:42:02.316
<v Speaker 1>let me let me start by saying.

0:42:02.596 --> 0:42:05.676
<v Speaker 3>I love that you are rethinking your claim that you've

0:42:05.676 --> 0:42:08.636
<v Speaker 3>made to me several times in this friendship that you

0:42:08.716 --> 0:42:11.636
<v Speaker 3>always for the favorite, because the Buffalo Bills are definitely

0:42:11.636 --> 0:42:15.036
<v Speaker 3>not the favorite. Yes, that's true, So welcome to the underdogs.

0:42:15.036 --> 0:42:16.556
<v Speaker 3>It's about time you came around.

0:42:16.836 --> 0:42:17.156
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:42:18.436 --> 0:42:21.636
<v Speaker 3>Secondly, on BlackBerry, I still want the keyboard back.

0:42:21.676 --> 0:42:24.116
<v Speaker 1>I hate typing on a screen. I will never be.

0:42:24.076 --> 0:42:27.196
<v Speaker 3>As fast as I was. I'm not worried about Mike

0:42:27.276 --> 0:42:30.596
<v Speaker 3>Lazarid's at all what I'm worried about.

0:42:30.676 --> 0:42:32.196
<v Speaker 1>And Malcolm, where is your empathy?

0:42:32.236 --> 0:42:34.796
<v Speaker 3>Where is your compassion for all the people who lost

0:42:34.876 --> 0:42:36.756
<v Speaker 3>jobs because RIM went under?

0:42:37.756 --> 0:42:40.436
<v Speaker 1>They didn't go under, I mean.

0:42:40.276 --> 0:42:42.836
<v Speaker 3>It basically did. How many people are working there now?

0:42:43.076 --> 0:42:43.276
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:42:43.316 --> 0:42:47.836
<v Speaker 2>No, well, actually this is a sidetrack. But years ago

0:42:48.476 --> 0:42:52.356
<v Speaker 2>I wrote this piece about what happened. When I think

0:42:52.356 --> 0:42:55.116
<v Speaker 2>it was General Dynamics had a very large presence in

0:42:55.236 --> 0:42:59.196
<v Speaker 2>Rochester and they shut down their factory and left. This

0:42:59.236 --> 0:43:02.396
<v Speaker 2>is in the seventies, and everyone in Rochester said, oh

0:43:02.396 --> 0:43:04.476
<v Speaker 2>my god, this is the end of Rochester. And then

0:43:04.516 --> 0:43:08.556
<v Speaker 2>this researcher forgot who it was, went back ten years

0:43:08.596 --> 0:43:10.116
<v Speaker 2>later and said, what happened to all the people who

0:43:10.116 --> 0:43:13.436
<v Speaker 2>got laid off from General Dynamics? And he pointed out

0:43:13.436 --> 0:43:16.076
<v Speaker 2>that the resurgence in the tech industry in Rochester was

0:43:16.076 --> 0:43:19.436
<v Speaker 2>a direct result of all the people who were freed

0:43:19.476 --> 0:43:21.596
<v Speaker 2>from General Dynamics and went on to do cool things.

0:43:21.996 --> 0:43:24.956
<v Speaker 2>The exact same thing happened in Waterloo, my hometown. All

0:43:24.996 --> 0:43:27.716
<v Speaker 2>the people who left for Rim are the foundation of

0:43:27.756 --> 0:43:33.316
<v Speaker 2>this incredible tech resurgence in southern Ontario. So do you know,

0:43:34.156 --> 0:43:36.476
<v Speaker 2>Mike just educated a bunch of people about how to

0:43:36.476 --> 0:43:40.596
<v Speaker 2>be entrepreneurs and how to think about I think it's

0:43:40.716 --> 0:43:43.356
<v Speaker 2>it's win win for Waterloo anyway. It's a side point. No,

0:43:43.516 --> 0:43:44.436
<v Speaker 2>I think I think you're right.

0:43:44.476 --> 0:43:46.676
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a great point, and I'm feeling the

0:43:46.756 --> 0:43:49.916
<v Speaker 3>joy of being wrong right now because I think you

0:43:49.956 --> 0:43:52.556
<v Speaker 3>can see the impact on the ecosystem. If you know,

0:43:52.596 --> 0:43:56.196
<v Speaker 3>if you go to Canada, I think there's a part

0:43:56.276 --> 0:43:59.276
<v Speaker 3>of me though that I guess. I also I also

0:43:59.316 --> 0:44:02.716
<v Speaker 3>feel bad for you and me because we want that keyboard, right,

0:44:02.756 --> 0:44:05.156
<v Speaker 3>I would love it if there was an iPhone competitor

0:44:05.556 --> 0:44:07.476
<v Speaker 3>that you know, that worked a little bit more like

0:44:07.516 --> 0:44:09.556
<v Speaker 3>the BlackBerry did. And so I feel like a missing

0:44:09.556 --> 0:44:12.956
<v Speaker 3>out on frankly, some possible technological advances that didn't occur

0:44:13.436 --> 0:44:16.436
<v Speaker 3>because they know they stopped producing products.

0:44:17.116 --> 0:44:21.476
<v Speaker 2>What this book is is a kind of rebuttal to

0:44:21.556 --> 0:44:26.876
<v Speaker 2>don Quixote. Don Quixote is everything that he stands for

0:44:27.596 --> 0:44:31.876
<v Speaker 2>is something this book is refuting. Right that this book

0:44:31.916 --> 0:44:36.996
<v Speaker 2>is saying to persist in tilts and at windmills, to

0:44:37.116 --> 0:44:39.796
<v Speaker 2>persist in you know, the whole story of don Quixotes's

0:44:39.876 --> 0:44:43.396
<v Speaker 2>is don Quixote continues to wage these battles that cannot

0:44:43.396 --> 0:44:48.356
<v Speaker 2>be won. He will not rethink anything. And you know

0:44:48.556 --> 0:44:51.796
<v Speaker 2>that book suggests as a kind of nobility in that

0:44:51.996 --> 0:44:55.396
<v Speaker 2>romantic attachment to a cause, even in the face of

0:44:55.676 --> 0:44:58.916
<v Speaker 2>and you're saying, actually, no, don Quixote is going to

0:44:58.996 --> 0:45:02.996
<v Speaker 2>be much better off if he rethinks this position about

0:45:02.996 --> 0:45:08.196
<v Speaker 2>being this chivalrous knight and starts scientifically examining his options, right,

0:45:08.396 --> 0:45:10.956
<v Speaker 2>Like this is this book is anti It's the anti

0:45:11.036 --> 0:45:11.716
<v Speaker 2>don Quixote.

0:45:13.356 --> 0:45:16.036
<v Speaker 3>I never thought of it that way, but I like it.

0:45:16.636 --> 0:45:18.476
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying you should always give up on your

0:45:18.476 --> 0:45:20.676
<v Speaker 3>passions or let go of the causes that are important

0:45:20.676 --> 0:45:23.036
<v Speaker 3>to you, right. I want people to stand by their principles,

0:45:23.036 --> 0:45:27.316
<v Speaker 3>their core values. But I would be thrilled if more

0:45:27.356 --> 0:45:30.196
<v Speaker 3>people were willing to say, look, I'm committed to a

0:45:30.196 --> 0:45:33.236
<v Speaker 3>set of principles, but I'm willing to be flexible about

0:45:33.276 --> 0:45:37.276
<v Speaker 3>the best plan to advance those principles. And I think

0:45:37.796 --> 0:45:40.356
<v Speaker 3>that really requires us to think a little bit more

0:45:40.436 --> 0:45:43.756
<v Speaker 3>like scientists and a little bit less like preachers or

0:45:43.836 --> 0:45:48.476
<v Speaker 3>prosecutors or politicians who are convinced I'm right, you're wrong,

0:45:48.916 --> 0:45:50.916
<v Speaker 3>and I'm only going to try to cater to my

0:45:50.956 --> 0:45:52.756
<v Speaker 3>own tribe.

0:45:53.876 --> 0:45:56.636
<v Speaker 2>That's all for now, dear listeners, Thanks for hearing us out.

0:45:56.956 --> 0:46:00.076
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Adam Grant and his team at TED for

0:46:00.196 --> 0:46:03.476
<v Speaker 2>their help with this episode. My audiobook, The Bomber Mafia

0:46:03.556 --> 0:46:08.476
<v Speaker 2>is available at Bombermafia dot com and Adams Think Again,

0:46:09.236 --> 0:46:14.436
<v Speaker 2>available wherever books are sold. Till we Meet in the

0:46:14.476 --> 0:46:16.996
<v Speaker 2>Clubhouse again, I'm Malcolm Godwell,