WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Tony Pollard

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now here's

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Charge Fantasy Football Weekly Micro edition on

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchian. This is an experiment that we're doing that.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you may have heard several times, I hope, so anyway,

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which we do a deep dive on one player who's

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>got some controversy, some unique elements, some shifting sands around

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that player. My conversation today is with Tyler knabilely gid

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Keuillotine Leagues dot Com writer Hi, Tyler, Hi, I'm excited

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some Tony Pollard. Tony Pollard, Yes, he

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>has the upside to be the highest scoring player in

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football this year. You think, so the upside, everything

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>goes perfectly, Okay, right, I'm intrigued. Now, Well, you do

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>not agree that if if, if they do not bring

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in another running back to meaningfully take carries away from

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard. If I tell you he's gonna get three

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty touches in on high powered offense that loves

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to give the ball to running backs at the strike,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>which he's never gotten the past, if he takes all

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>those Zeke carries inside the five. You tell me Tony

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Pollard can't be the high scoring player in fantasy football

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>if they don't bring in another meaningful running back. I'm

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>totally with you. I think they will, just because I

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna give to Tony Pollard three fifty

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>plus touches. But we'll see. This is a team that

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>gave DeMarco Murray three hundred and fifty touches when they

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>franchise tagged him, knowing that they were just going to

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>grind him up and if at the end of the

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>year they felt like he was you know, there was nothing,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he was washed. They were just gonna let him go,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>which he did and went to Philadelphia. They signed him

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to a big deal and he was he was totally washed.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>That could be the scenario here with Pollard. You know

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they could they could just and Josh Jacobs on the

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on the franchise tag last year, got all those all

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>those carries last year on the franchise tag. Now the

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Raiders decided to bring him back. So I feel like

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs still is still going to be a good runner,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they'll do that with Pollard. What I'm saying

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the franchise tag tells me you're getting use Okay, well,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I like this kind of a little satin.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the first hot take we've had a little bit

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>like Tony Pollard could be RB one, he could be

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>RB one. Okay's got I think he's got RB one

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>upside in him if if everything breaks right for him.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, well let's talk about his game a little bit.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's seen the highlights. You know that Tony Pollard's got

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>big play potential. Yeah, so he went as the RB eight. Uh,

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he finishes the RB eight last year, RB nine average

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>points per game. He's currently going RB ten. That's middle

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of the round two in best ball, which I

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think RB ten and ADP usually means end of the

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>first round in like home league stuff like that. So

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>there's that. There's that as well. I think the name,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of the game of Tony Pollard is efficiency.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>He it's everyone always talks about how he's been the

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>most efficient running back because Zeke's getting the carries third,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>one fourth and one ye your one yard. But Tony

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Pollard in twenty twenty one fifth highest and yards per

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>attempt at five point five twenty twenty two third highest

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in the yards for attempts at five point two, So

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>actually went down, but he was higher up high. Yeah, exactly.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Still great efficiency of anything over five is great. Now

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>here's the reason I think RB one might be a

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>little lofty for me. Is there receiving profile. So he

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was tied for seventeenth in receptions among running backs in

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two with thirty nine catches. Okay, which is

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the exact same as the season prior. All right, Naji

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Michael Carter had more than him last season. It's

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just two notable names. I'd okay, but I would come

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>back with Ezekiel Elliot's not gonna be there to catch

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>his past there. That is very fair. Now, another telling

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>staff that I thought was actually very interesting. Seven of

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the top of the top ten high scoring running backs

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from last year were also in the top ten for

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>receptions among running backs. The only three that weren't were Pollard,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Derreck Henry, Nick Chubb. Now, Derrick Henry and Nick Chub

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are two completely different types of players, and what Tony

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Pollard is. Yeah, So I'm interested to see because I

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like like in my head when I looked up

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the number, I was like, oh, he's pie finished like

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>six or something, and receptions among running for the seventeenth

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was very surprised. Yeah, And in fairness, Eeke

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>only at seventeen catches last year, but we know traditionally

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Zeke had been had a lot more than that. For

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they dialed down his receptions last season. But still,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if I throw seventeen more receptions at Tony Pollard, He's

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to be tied for seventeenth among running backs,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and receptions will probably be in the top ten at

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that point. And that's why I still think. I still

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think he can have potentially RB one upside in him.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So well, how different is this offense with

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Zeke out of it? So only two of I think

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is the thing you want to look at is maybe

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard, if he is the guy as you think

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he might be, is just the scoring opportunities that he

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>could have. Because only two of Pollard's twelve touchdowns came

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five yard line, he had just six

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>rushes inside the five right, and Zeke, of course is

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>known for his rushes inside the five exactly, Zeke had

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen attemptions at the five yard line. Those carries were

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>good for seventeen total yards and nine touchdowns. Yeah, the

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>nine touchdowns on sixteen attempts is great return you're trying

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to get for carries inside the five. You want to

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>see touchdowns at at roughly half of the carries should

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>be touchdowns. He turned sixteen attempts into nine touchdowns. That's good.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a number we want to see. If Pollard's going

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to be at fifty percent now, I mean, you know

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we can we again, if we can roll these together,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that's and six rushes and twenty two attempts from inside

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the five between the two of them last year. If

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Pollard's gonna get twenty two attempts from inside the five

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and convert half, that's eleven touchdowns right there, just from

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line. Yes, I think I think

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you're just being a little too much on They got

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring somebody in. This running back draft class is loaded,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so they might just draft a big guy like a

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Roshawn Johnson. Dwayne McBride's just a big guy to just

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>be Zeke two point zh pye a little bit more

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>efficient because it'd be a younger, younger running back. But yeah,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna bring somebody else in. I'm not

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>saying it ain't Ronald Jones. I can tell you that

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>much because that guy doesn't worry me. Yeah, I'm not

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about Ronald Jones. I don't think anyone's worried about

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones. But I just, I just I'll believe when

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I see it. That's what kind of with the stance

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking on this right now. Like, I honestly think

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they could draft Bijean Robinson. That is the most Cowboys

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is just get an elite running back talent.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they drafted Zeke fifth. Overall, they're gonna get

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Like a lot of people think that's gonna happen,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't. This team already got burned on the whole

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott. The whole the lifetime Ezekiel Elliott thing burned them,

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're just coming out of that burn. So they

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>made they made the big investment in Zeke. Then he

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>held out for a bunch of money, which they eventually

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>gave him at the expense of keeping Amari Cooper, and

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they desperately needed a wide receiver. Now that was a

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake for them a tactical blunder. I don't think

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go back to the well with a first

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>round running back again after they just got burned on

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole Ezekiel career. Arc Not that Zeke was never good,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>because he was very good for a while, but you

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>watch your first round draft pick deally to be good

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for longer than running backs are usually good for. I

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think they got burned because they paid him. I think

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the only reason they got burned. Like when

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it was in the beginning of Zeke was a rookie

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on that rookie deal for the first I think. I

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think he asked for that deal early. So the first

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>two or three years, I mean, Zeke was dying in mind.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He was rb RB one type finishes year year after

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>year after year. And the other thing is in this draft,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it feels like they need offense, like they their defense

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is elite. The problem in San Francisco in that playoff

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>game last year was their offense. They got Brandon Cooks

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that receiver. They could drop another one. I'm not saying

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that they can't, but I think that I just think

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Bijan are like not chamer Gives because that's pretty much

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>just Tony Paul or two point oh, but it is Yeah,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that profile isn't right, Yes, but I just think that

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't put it past them. It's Jerry Jones, like

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't put it as to draft Bijan Robinson. Maybe

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to trade out for them a little bit

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think they're at twenty five twenty six in

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft. I think he'll I think he'll be there

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for that. I think Bijan will be there that far. Yea,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>just you know, just because that's what running that's what

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs to do now. Should buy talent. B John

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Robinson should go a way before that, should probably go

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten. But that's not where the reality

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is at the running back position. So we'll find out.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so uh, let's talk about dynasty value for

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard where you know, at what at what what

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>level would you prescribe him from a dynasty standpoint, because

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>he's still young and has gotten pretty low mileage at

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this stage of his career. The thing is is he's

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the Cowboys the season after this next one,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because like you said, they just got burned when they

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>paid They're like there, I don't think they would go

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the well and then you're gonna pay twenty Follard.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be twenty He's twenty six right now,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>so he might be twenty twenty seven next season. Yeah,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you already passed the prime at that point for a

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>running back age And is he even better like on

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a different team. I feel like this is the perfect

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>situation for him down It is the perfect situation the

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth highest scoring offense last season. So I think I

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think right now, if you're a win now team and

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to go make a trade, at no problem

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>trading for totally Tony Pollard right now. He's a great

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ass that's definitely gonna help your team win now. After

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this season, I don't think his value is gonna get

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>any higher than it is right now. Let's try. I'm

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with you on that. I agree the unknowns of his

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>landing spot Latin next year make Tony Pollard somebody you

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>could consider trading away in Dynasty and Empire formats. Let's

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the running backs drafted around him.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And again you said it's second round average average trap

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>about the middle of the second round for Tony Pollard. YEP. Okay,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so who's going around him? We got Derrick Henry Pollard.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm of the opinion that Henry's close to washed. Have

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we been saying that for four or five years now,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>some more than others. Okay, before we do this, is it?

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing Tony Pollard with no one else coming

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in the front? Yes? Well, but BASI all we know

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'll still go in the middle. Maybe he

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>may not, he may maybe it makes a big difference. Okay,

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so you're taking taking Pollard over Henry? Yeah, I think

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I would at this point Nick Chubb Chubb

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's super safe and a team that runs the

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ball constantly, great offensive line, yeah, and better probably better

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sailing for their offenses year with Shawn Watson playing a

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>full season, I hope. So, yep, Breeze Hall coming off

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>from ACL Let's say Roger's Ghost the Jets, which, uh,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Breese Hall assuming that you know the cl is a

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>huge question mark, but just assuming he's slated to begin

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year and you think that's gonna

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be the case, Breese Hall looked great in that offense,

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'd go Breese Hall. Josh Jacobs also want

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a franchise tag. Dude, it's a long pause right there.

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't like Pollar. What's your thought if PAULA,

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go, I gotta I just I started out

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>this thing by saying you could be the high scoring

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>running back in the league. So I've gotta go Pollard

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>here until i have a reason to believe he's not

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>going to get most of the work. Pollard last one.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I know your answer, Travis Etn Yeah, I'm out. Okay,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah Pollard. So if I'd take Pollard over most of

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys, but not all of them U with the

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>unknowns now again, we'll see, We'll see who ends up

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in that backfield with him and the Cowboys. To your point,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a very salient one. The Cowboys

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe they don't draft Bejean Robinson, but they may be

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking two next year, knowing that Paul It's probably not

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on the team and they want to go get their

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>running back this year for next year. Yeah, exactly so.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, then you know, paul It

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>gets to be a lot less interesting at that stage.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>As in a time share. I'm not taking him in

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the second round. It would be interesting

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to see what that offense would be like if he's

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy, because we've never seen that. Yeah, we haven't

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seen his career, so but he's earned it. He has

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>earned it. He's earned it. He's a really good player.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this edition of Fantasy Football Weekly

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Micro Edition. Be sure to stay tune. You're gonna get

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>more Fantasy Football micros Monday through Thursday, and then of

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>course Friday is the big edition of Fantasy Football Weekly

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. We'll talk to you soon, everybody, Bye bye,