WEBVTT - Brexit, Trade, Consumer Tech

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Right now, let's turn to Maria today.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh she is an E. M. E. A reporter for

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Television. She joins us on the

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>phone from Brussels. Maria, thank you so much for joining us.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Give us your thoughts on what we heard from uh

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>speaker bark How this morning. That's right, So essentially there

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of hype build into this, but I

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's not been surprising that he's decided the vote

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot happen today, just purely on the basis that is

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so similar to what was presented and delayed on Saturday,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there is no meaningful vote today, which, to

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of distripboy the jargon, it basically means the Brexit

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>deal which was agreed between the UK and the EU

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>last week Thursday, after a very long, very difficult negotiation,

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>cannot be voted today. And of course the tricky bit

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on this is that that deal between the EU and

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the UK is worth nothing unless it can clear the

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>House of Commons. We've been here before many times, It's

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>been rejected many times. And the issue here, of course

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is that we're running up against a very hard deadline,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>which is thirty one for the UK to crash out

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>without a deal. Indeed, this does seem like the expected outcome,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as the pound is now basically unchanged from before the vote.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that Maria, what will it take for

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>markets to be surprised here? Because it seems to be

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>baked in that Parliament will debate this, some people might

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>raise a couple issues, it might get tweaked, and then

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>people will vote and it will go through as planned exactly.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a number of things, um that

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are being priced in and to sterling now. And based

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the analysts that I've spoken to today, they point

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to two things. And want is the fact that it

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>does seem that the Prime Minister UH may not have

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the votes he needs now, but they do feel he

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>will get them at one point, So this is the

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>closest we've actually ever been to the deal passing. And

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>then the other issue, which is also very apparent now

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that the threat of a no deal

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>brexit also seems very unlikely because the Europeans could deny time,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>they could deny an extension, and principle they all have

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to agree to it, and if they didn't want to,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they would say, well, I'm sorry, but you don't get

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>more time and you crash out. But the reality is,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at every single European summit that we've

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>covered every time we've been here, the Europeans don't want

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be blamed for a no deal breakfit. They don't

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>want to push a prime minister who's close to perhaps

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>getting this deal and force everyone into a chaotic exit

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>from the EU. They Alvays said the best way to

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>leave is with a deal. So the market is looking

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>at those two things. The prime minister that is edge

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and closer to winning the vote, even if it was

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>delayed on Saturday, is then delayed again today, but also

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the EU will probably give more time

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and they don't want to go no deal either. So Marian,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>what we did not get a vote today, clearly, Um,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>what our next steps would you say over the next

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>several days. Well, there's a huge bill that the government

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to put forward, which is all the legislation going

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>into Brexit, and then's also a possibility for other MPs

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to amend that deal, and that's perhaps when

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it gets difficult for the government because one of the

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>things that the poor Johnson said is that he does

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>not want to be put in a position where his

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>deal gets amended so many times that it becomes meaningless.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So that is perhaps a source of tension there. And

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of course we also know that he's trying to push

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for a general election, and that is again another factor

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that the market has priced in and to stern, which

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that if we do go to a

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>new election, although the situation is very volatile, the polls

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>would suggest that he would increase his majority and that

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>makes passing anything much more easy. So I want to

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the theatrics of this, because John Burco is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a genius when it comes to the theatrics. His voice

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely has the inflections. I loved how right before he

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>made the decision, he paused, he castigated someone for for

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for for for delaying him, but he paused, and he

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, really laid it out. Uh and and you

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>know with perfect timing. How how has this sort of

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>event risen him in a way that he hadn't previously

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been I mean, who is John Burko? I mean he

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he has definitely become a star and and and everyone

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>knows who this man is. But also I think the

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that he has become so well known has also

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>put him on the spot. And there is a lot

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of criticism in terms of what is driving his decisions

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and his motivations. And I'm sure you know just as

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>well as I do that in many occasions he has

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>been criticized for being seen as to remaining is allowing

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the remaining side of the parliament. You should, by the way,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you should trademark that remaining but go on. But um

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and and that has become an istion and and it's

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's obviously an obstacle today for the premise to

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>put this vote um quickly to vote, which he wants

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. But it was also an issue for the

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>reason may And you're right, there's a lot of optics.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of theatrical moves that we see and

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw also a lot of UM optics on Saturday

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>when the Prime Minister sent out three letters which essentially

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>contradicted each other to the EU, one of which he

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>asked for more time than another one which he said

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't want more time, and then a third

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one in which he said if I do get an extension,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be bad for us both. So I

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're used to this, and what it highlights is

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>aid this is still a country is very divided, but

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to h there's many scenars that could still play out,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course you have the the the general alection,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>which is still very much looming on everyone. So everyone

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>wants to be seen as fighting for something and for

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>the EU. I guess at this point, after three years

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of back and forth, they're just not

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>surprised by any of this anymore. They do think that

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this is almost a country that has become so difficult

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to read and there is no clarity coming out of

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>UM the Parliament. Which is interesting for for the EU side, however,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the perception around Brexit has really changed. At

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year, you could hear many voices

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is still felt Brexit could be undone who's still pushed

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for a second referendum. But at this point you do

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>get a sense that the Europeans just want to get

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>it done with, especially because there is a new Commission,

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>there is a different set of priorities and in a

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>different agenda, and they feel like right now is probably

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the time to move on. All right, Finally, Maria, just quickly,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>is a couple thirty one a real date or do

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you think there will be an extension beyond that? Well,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the truth is when you look at Brexit, all of

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>these UH deadlines have become completely meaningless. They every time

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been in a make or break moment, there's been

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more time. Granted, if you look at the legislation now

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the UK law, well, the

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>UK would crash out without a deal in a week's

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>time if it doesn't get that extension. The question is,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with that extension, which has now been asked, would it

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>would that be rejected by the Europeans. Well, you heard

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from Eminuel Macron and Jean Call do you occur the

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>head of the European Commission last week that they do

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>not see a need for more time because there is

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a new deal that We're for everyone, but the reality

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is if you don't give more time, the UK would

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>crash out, and that's something that nobody wants. I guess

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the debate is around the length of the extension. Do

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you just go for a short technical extension and the

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>hope that that can focus everyone's minds and get the

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>legislation you need in order to leave, or do you

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>actually go, well, you know, we need more time, and

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>then that opens many other scenarios, which, as you know,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the vote, the people's vote, second referendum and so on.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's tricker for the Europeans because they do not

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen as interfering in the politics. Maria today,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I thank you so much for joining us, and you're

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>very busy in Brussels right now with all that's going on.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Maria covers the Europe for Bloomberg

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Television and Bloomberg News. She joins us on the phone

0:07:41.880 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>from Brussels. Well, it looks like the US and miner

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are making some headway on what is being coined Phase

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>one type of trade deal. To get the latest we

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome Troy Gaski, Partner co Chief Investment Officer, Senior Portfolio

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>manager at Skybridge. So Troy again, it looks like there

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.559
<v Speaker 1>is sub movement. We're having trade delegations go back and forth.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>What is your sense of how the US China trade

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>negotiations are going right now? Well, the good news is

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there's at least a short term to

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>ton and that was really being priced into market. So

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a week ago, in terms of the left tail, the

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>probability of escalation or a significantly negative outcome went down

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I saw markets rally because we think

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here is markets are trying to focus

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that both for the US and China

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>UH clearly they're both interested in having some type of

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>uh lack of deterioration and at least a face saving

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>deal focused on agriculture and energy and then pushing back

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the thornier issues of IP STAFT and s SO support

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>into the post election and so we don't think the

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>coast is necessarily clear, but the probability of dramatic escalation

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>has gone down significantly, which we think has led to

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the rallying markets late last week. Are you buying or

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>selling anything based on that development? Well, yeah, so from

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>our perspective on the margin. You know, a trade reconciliation

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least lack of escalation should lead to a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>steeper yel curve, which should lead to better NIM, which

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>should lead to better bank credit quality. So we have

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a significant exposure in regional community bank credit. And when

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're looking into next year, a lot of the focus

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>on the outcome will be do interest rates continue to

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>drop or to at least stabilize here And so certainly

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a right tail outcome or at least less escalation will

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>lead to better growth, better earnings, better NIM, which means

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>will more than likely continue to run those exposures as

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed to cutting them. So try from the perspective of China,

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the calculus is for China right now?

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>That seems like, you know, we were close to a

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>deal earlier in the year that might have had a

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of meat on the bone, but now both

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>sides seem to have pulled back. You think that they

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>are let's do a deal now, even if it's a

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>light deal, or let's just push it. Well, look from

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there's two calculus, right, There's the Trump calculus and the

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>China perspective, right, and you know, as time has gone on.

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>We think it's become clear and clear to China that,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Trump loses reelection, right then they're gonna

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with Warren, Pelosi and Schumer, who are

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>far more hawkish on China than even Trump. And to

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>give Pelosi and Humor credit their entire political careers, they've

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>been hawkish on China in terms of trade and the

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on the middle of the working class. And now

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's basically a non elite bipartisan consensus that

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>China has to be addressed. It's one of the few

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>areas of bipartisan consensus that we see, you know, whether

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you're in the Bay Area of California or in the Midwest,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>um and that China has to be addressed. So as

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>China's economy continues to deteriorate in the contract election, you know,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>start to come into sharp relief, it's become more apparent,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we think, to China that's in their best interests to

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>de escalate the conflicts sooner rather than later. That doesn't

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>mean we have a sweeping agreement on s o E

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>support and I p SF, but it seemed like earlier

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the year they were willing to roll the dice

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that if enough pain was inflicted on the U. S economy,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly the farm belt and the rust belt, that would

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>cause Trump in the American political system to capitulate. But

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as time's gone on, they're realizing that what lurks around

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the corner maybe a more severe confrontation if the folks

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like Marco Rubio or Elizabeth Warren or Human Pelosi are

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>driving the policy discussions. So one thing that you knowed

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is that just simply a Phase one kind of deal

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that de escalates isn't really enough at this point to

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>undo some of the damage of the uncertainty that we've

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>seen around trade. What would it take to reverse some

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of the economic damage that you see being in lected

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by how long the trade scribblers has carried been carried out? Yeah,

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at this point it's going to be

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>more comprehensive. So we need phase one right where at

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>least you addressed the trade balance in ways that have

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>teeth that markets can actually analyze. It's not some vague

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>promise coming out of a White House meeting. And then

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to see some contours of how whether it's

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>reconciliation panels or some type of w T O in

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>internal w t O mechanism, meaning it would be outside

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the w t O but just focused on the China

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and US administration to address ongoing trade conflict. UM. And

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>then from there I think we would need some Brexit

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>resolution and then also a better understanding of how the

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>contours of the one policy coming out of DC will

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>look like. UM, So it's not just a trade reconciliation

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point. UM, it would also be Brexit plus

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>some idea of policy coming from one. If we got

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>all three of those, which again at this stage looks unlikely,

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and next month or so you could see CAPEX bounce

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>back up to roughly five percent, maybe three to five,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a healthy growth rate, certainly much better than

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the contraction we're seeing today. But it's you're really hard

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>pressed to see what would lead to the high single

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>digit growth rates that we enjoyed very briefly in late

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen early eighteen, given the dramatic slowing a global growth. So,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, for the time being is a

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>market participant. The best you can hope for us the escalation,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a gradual return of investor and CEO confidence, and then

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>some chance to grow it close to two percent again

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>over the next six to nine months. More than likely

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that will be stuck in this one and a half

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to two percent range for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, Troy,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I ask you, thank you so much for being with us.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Troy Gayski is a partner, co chief investment Officer and

0:13:49.640 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio manager at Skybridge Capital. All Right, well, the

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>costs for the drugmakers associated with the opioid crisis are

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>really starting to add up. We had some more news today,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>some more fines. Let's get the latest from Max Neeson,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Max's biotech, farm and healthcare calumnist for Bloomberg Opinion. Joins

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So another

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>set of fines coming down, some litigation still out there, Max,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the latest year? Yeah? Absolutely, So. This was a

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>settlement for the three largest distributor drug distributors in the

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>country and have with two Ohio counties. This is the

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>first federal trial of you know, trying to assigned blame

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and extract damages over the opioid crisis. Basically, what this

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>does is delay a trial that that was would have

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>been potentially um troublesome or or led to a large

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>verdict UM and and lets them work on a large

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your settlement works. That's still going on, I think for

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for other drug makers have already settled with these two counties.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It just sort of kicks the can so they can

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>try to come up with a broader resolution that you know,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still thousands upon thousands of these suits out there

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and they still need to work that out. It seemed

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like they were getting close to a deal that might

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have been valued at as much as fifty billion dollars,

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but UM that kind of fell apart due to apparently

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>some objections from from local and county governments. Do we

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of how big the settlement has to

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be to sort of remove the uncertainty? I mean, what

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the brank breakpoint of when the settlement doesn't

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily get received as good news by simply taking away

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty of these opioid cases. You know, I think

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's still a good amount of room before we

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get there, just because I think UM shareholders are just

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of so hungry for relief when it gets to

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the point for some of these drug makers that have

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy debtloads that you know, it starts to make solvency

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or our meeting credit evidence a little little risky, then

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>then you might see a break point. But but I

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's some wiggle room, especially when it comes to

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the distributors and and uh, a company like Johnson and Johnson,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>which can afford pretty much anything. I think you've got

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a way to go before it would be seen as

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>anything but relief. So, Max, are we at this stage

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>now where we want to get all these thousands of

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>suits together, wrap them all up, and then get all

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are on the hook here and then

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>assigned blame and get one massive global settlement. Is that

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the goal here? That's exactly the goal. And

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and that that was sort of one of the explicit

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>goals of the judge that they've consolidated all of these

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>suits under just because you know, then you actually get

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>money into communities more rapidly. Um, you know, you resolve

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this uncertain instead of dragging it out over you know,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>years and years in many cases, which there's a lot

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of variation and um generally you know, not not all

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that productive for anybody involved. So that that's the hope,

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and there still seems to be a chance of it happening.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It just isn't gonna come this morning, is I think

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>some investors were hoping, which is why you see shares

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of the distributors and Inteva down today. So far, Where

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is the money going? Is it going to people who

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>had loved ones who died or who lost productivity as

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>a result of addictions, or is it going to municipalities.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It generally will be going to municipalities, although you know,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the structure of the settlement. Um, all

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of that still to be worked out. Well, we'll see

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the details. Um. You know. I think that's

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>really the fascinating thing to think about, is what comes next?

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you actually direct that money in a productive way? Um?

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I I hope that that happens. But what what what?

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>What would be productive? I mean in my opinion, and

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have to be coupled with some

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some reforms as to how we actually spend money on

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>opio treatment the first place, and and a dramatic increase

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in investment in making medication assisted treatment more more available.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>There's sort of a stigma against it, um, you know,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>because we have the sort of twelves a a based

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>model where it's abstinence or nothing, and there's been just

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>resistance communities to having things like method o clinics or

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or making it really easy for doctors to to prescribe

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and administer that sort of medication. But it works. UM,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the important thing. It's been shown over and over

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>again to be one of the few things. You know,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>opioddiction changes your brain chemistry. You have to account for that. UM,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>just going to a treatment center and and you know,

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just squaring off you need medication, you need to help

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in many cases and making that more available, making safe

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>injection sites available, these things that that are are a

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>little more controversial but more effective. UM. That needs to happen.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>If the money goes there, then then great. But if it, UM,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>if it just sort of gets wrapped up, you know,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>goes to financing other things and municipalities, then it won't

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be quite as effective. So we'll see Max News and

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. I'm sure we'll

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be talking about this repeatedly as these cases go on.

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever wanted to watch someone else watch a

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>movie or a show to see their reaction, this next

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>guest has you covered. And we're so glad to bring

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in Derek Forbes chief executive officer of Stardust, which is

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a very cool name I have to say here in

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studios. Can you just start by saying

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what is Stardust? Hey, guys, thanks for having me on. Yes. So,

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>startusts a social media app all about movies and TV

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>shows where you can talk about the latest episodes you've

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>been watching, find out what people had to say about

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>movies and theaters, and figure out what you want to

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>watch next. So who is on it gives a sense

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of kind of who is on this app and who

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to be on this app? Yeah, so,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's a whole lot of entertainment fans on

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>their passionate entertainment fans that love talking about shows they've

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>been watching, obsessing about the latest episode. You know, think

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones people got really into it. They like

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what happened on the episode, what was

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 1>going to happen next week, predictions, theories, as well as

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just hearing analysis and figuring out what they might like

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch next. So how many people have actually downloaded

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the app? Yeah, so we're around about a hundred thousand

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>users at the moment. It's pretty new we're really just

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to get going with our marketing efforts now and

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get that in front of a much larger audience.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that that there's sort of a flip

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>side to this, which is the more information you get

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as to what people like, how they talk about films,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that it can be monetized, right, that data. Yeah, Well,

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of this came from hearing from a

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of film and TV executives that every time they

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>come out with a new title, it's a whole exercise

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to try and find an audience for that and then

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>reach those people to get in front of them. What

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we can do with Stardust is is help connects new

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>titles with audiences that are actually going to really like it.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And so, yes, it's using that data, but we see

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it as really benign way of using that data because

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>we're helping people to find content that they're going to

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they like. Um. One of the new features we've just

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>released is really exciting. It's it uses machine learning and

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>based on all of your ratings of movies and TV

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>shows that you put in, it will give you a

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>set of a few titles every week that you're going

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>to really love watching UM and we we've found that

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>people have been really stoked with some of the recommendations

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they've had. So how do you work with the content creators,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the TV networks, the movie studios. What's your relationship with them,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>because I would think they would want to work with

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you to again try to reach an audience. Absolutely. Yeah,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we have great relationships with a number of the big

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>studios and we're starting to work on some initiatives with

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>them in terms of promoting their titles into users of

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the app, and then also helping to to use videos

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>from our app of people talking about titles to to

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>help promote their movies on other forms of social media

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and platforms. How do you make money right now? We're

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>pre revenue, so we don't right now, but we have

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a plan and it's going to be all about getting

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>titles in front of audiences and and that's very valuable

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to studios to connect their UM their releases with an audience.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've actually seen some pushback from investors with companies

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that have an idea but that don't make money yet.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>How do investors handle what you're giving them? Yeah, it's

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a great question, and I think with a social media

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, it's all about the user numbers, and it's

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>all about how engaged those users are and how strongly

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they're retained. If you have eyeballs that are regularly coming

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>back to an app, then there is no question that

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there is value in that in terms of its ability

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to draw users attention to a product. H and UM.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, unlike some of these

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>other horror stories that you've seen recently, there aren't all

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the same costs associated where you're kind of like

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>throwing money out the window wherever user you get, right,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>So this sounds like an advertising driven model at some

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>point based upon audience. So that to me means you're

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>competing against anybody else who's trying to get eyeballs and

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>advertising and things like that. So you know, a Facebook

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>for example, or on Instagram. So how do you kind

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of position your app versus maybe some of the bigger ones. Yeah,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>great question. And so startus is specialized. So it's because

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all about movies and TV. UM. It's a place

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>where you can go and get richer information about the

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>titles that you're interested in UM and connect with people

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>who are also interested in it and and I think

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's at the heart of the draw. Also, we've

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>done a really good job of making it anti troll.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And so if you want to go there and talk

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>about The Mandalorian when that show comes out in a

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks time, and follow it episode by episode, you

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>can do so in a place where you're not going

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to get like attacked or have like random people posting

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>hateful comments. We're going to keep the conversation about the

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>show well. Thank you so much for being with us,

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Derek Forbes, I really appreciate it. Derek Forbes, chief executive

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>officer of start US, twining us here in our interactive

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>broker Studios. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyds.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa A. Bram Woods One. Before

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio