WEBVTT - Pleasant (and Unpleasant) Surprises

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal coll that for me, I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for Dake Edith state is that woo woom and Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and Tie.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the solid burb of boys and girls.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>My name is Ty Hilden Brandon, joining me as always

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>over there in beautiful New York City. The one and

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>only Dan Rubinstein, who graciously pinch hit for me last year. No,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>who graciously pinch hit for me last week as I

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>was quasi dying from illness.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Yeah, youth only sound like you have a

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hint of illness.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, that's sort of the beauty of modern audio

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>editing equipment. Dan, let's just leave it at that.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how are you? I'm terrific, Ty, I am great.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>We haven't spoken since the day after the LSU National

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Championship because, correct, you fell ill. You were supposed to

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>come to New York and got sick, and solid wife

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Kate was under the weather, all defensible reasons not to

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>come to New York and eat Korean barbecue with me.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>But I've missed talking to you. We have an exercise

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to sort of look back on the season today, and

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited for that, but I'm glad that Andy could

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>pinch it last week talking about new coaches and their

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>spiciness quotients. And today, if you're up for it, we

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are just going to talk about we spent a lot

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of the summer previewing and figuring out our thoughts about

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the season and how we felt about certain teams and

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>what our expectations were fair, deserved, undeserved, and I think

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to I think hold ourselves accountable. And I'm

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to ask you to rehash all of your

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>predictions for every team, but I'm going to ask you

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and provide my own because that's only fair. We are

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss the biggest surprises of the season. We

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>expected Team X to do blank, but instead they did

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>why and that was shocking. Or we didn't expect Team

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>A to do blank, but it turns out they were

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>really good at doing this or had a terrific season

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or a terrible season. So what I think we should

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>do is we should go through the teams that we

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of talk about the most and probably not enough,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and figure out where the pleasant surprises were and where

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the not so the e sort of surprises were and

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of admit where we overlooked teams good or bad.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying a good old fashioned surprise.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Oh and I like that you're pushing

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>yourself almost excite bike style. Yeah.

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I know you're holding down that B button and the

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>meter is going red.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I appreciate it.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So there's gonna be no voice later tonight, but

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. As you said, we haven't talked, actually talked

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 2>in about two weeks. So it's good to be back

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>in front of a microphone with you about all things

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 2>college football. If you're just finding the show, Hello, I'm Tie,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>He's Dan. We're going to be with you all off season.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be doing one show a week. We

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about all sorts of topics here in the off season.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Go back and listen to the show we put out

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>late last week. Andy Staples, our friend from the Athletic,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>was kind enough to pinch hit talk some new coaching

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 2>news with Daniel. Today. We're going to talk about surprises.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 2>We've got a bunch in store for you as we

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>progress through the doldrums that is the college football off season.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Please do subscribe. If you like the show. You can

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>also find all of our old stuff out on solid

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>verbal dot com. And if you really like the show,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>don't forget to follow along on social media. We're very

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>active on Twitter, not as much on Twitter and Instagram.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>That will try to change that this off season. We've

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>also got a newsletter that you can sign up for

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>on our website. We use that generally to keep you

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>up the speed on when we're going to be doing

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>some of our live shows, yep, and some other odds

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>and ends throughout the course of the off seat that

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>might be interesting. We won't spam me. That's not our

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>cup of tea. And finally, if you just want to

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>talk to other for ballers. If you're wondering where can

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I talk to other people who listen to the show,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Our great friend Peter does an awesome job running a

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>soliverbal subreddit started buyver Ballers Fourverballers. All you gotta do

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>is going out to solidverbal dot reddit dot com and

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>you can take part in the discussion long after the

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>final bell of each and every episode.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Daniel correct, we're recording this late January, just in case

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't see the date in your podcast app So

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we are under the I don't know, the working understanding

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing crazy happening right now when there are

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>new coaches that we haven't really you and I haven't

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>really done a deep dive into I think we're still

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>waiting for because we have what signing day, the official

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>signing day, not the early signing day, in a little bit,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>all the dust to clear before making sense of all

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of the transfers, all of the coaches. Obviously I did

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a preliminary version of that with Andy, but people want

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to know how you feel. TI sure you are at

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>least twenty percent of this show, at least at least

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we are obviously going to touch on all

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the transfers and new coaches and firings,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>hirings and movements of the college football the early college

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>football offseason, and how we feel about all those things.

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.559
<v Speaker 1>But I think just because we're still in the after

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>glow of the season, we should take a glance at

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>things in twenty nine.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, man, I'm with you. So because my voice is

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in excite bike mode when you hold down the B

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 2>button a little too long mm hmm, I want to

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>try and avoid it cutting out during this broadcast. So

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>if you would be so kind as to be our

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Shirpa here oh on this broadcast, this podcast and lead

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>us through each conference all the areas that you think

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>would be fun to cover here.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I have thoughts. I can do your part of the

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>show too, though. I just can you do an impression

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of me. I can do something like Tye, I think

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>my PAC twelve surprise, and this is true. I guess

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we could start with a PAC twelve because why not, Tye?

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think my Pack twelve surprise is Oregon State? And

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then I will say from you Dan never heard of them?

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Right right?

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So okay, that's my best Why don't we Why don't

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we do that? Let's start with the PAC twelve. Okay,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you go first.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>What is your biggest surprise during after whatever time limitation

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to put on this? Yeah, relating to the

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's Oregon State. I didn't make it up with

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that little tell. Yes it was not as twelve.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>There was.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of surprises to me. So Jonathan

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith in his second year takes Oregon State to five

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and seven. Damn near Bowl team. If you especially if

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you watch the end of that Washington State game, and

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with how far they appeared to come on offense. You know,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>two good running backs splitting time, Jake Luton improving. Isaiah

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Hodgins was obviously very good all year. The defense at

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>least showed flashes of competence. I came away very impressed

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in a pac twelve that I wouldn't call it up

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for grabs, but I would call the third and second

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tier perhaps wide open for business, and Oregon State should

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be a bold team. And considering how they've done on

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the transfer market. Trey Low is a four star from Washington,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Treyshawn Harrison a four star from the Pacific Northwest, but

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>from Florida State. They are more talented than people realize

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>considering how low they got fifteen, twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I am quite excited to see what Oregon State can

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do moving forward and how competitive they were this year.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I did not see coming. Pleasant surprise.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pleasant surprise for me is Oregon State as well.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 2>For many of the reasons that you listed. I'll go

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>on the flip side of the coin and I'll say

0:07:54.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>not so pleasant surprise. Washington losing Chris Peterson, Yeah, perhaps

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>that could be the center square on the Bingo card

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>because I think that caught a lot of people off guard.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 2>But we can't do a show like this without talking

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>about what that means. Now, clearly, Jimmy Lake steps into

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>that role promoted from within. If he's able to establish

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 2>some continuity within the Husky program, that would be a

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>good thing. But guys like Chris Peterson don't grow on trees.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And we come back to the same thing that we

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>set about the coaching transition at Ohio State. Sometimes it's

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a coin flip, and I'm always sure

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>what you're gonna get. Jimmy Lake's been there, he sort

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of knows the system. At this point. We'll see what

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>he can do if he can pick it up and

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>run with the baton. But losing Chris Peterson, I think

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 2>is notable. I would also add that I'm sort of

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>mixed on the retention of one Clay Helton.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And somewhat surprising. Yeah, you know, talk about there are

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of eche surprises in the back twelve.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>There really are talk about other items that could fall

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>into that center square on the Bingo card category. The

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Clay Helton thing. We talked about that for months on end.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Long before the season, we looked at the schedule, we said, wow,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>if they don't get past X nine wins, I forget

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>what it was, They're not going to retain Clay Helton.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And they didn't get past X. They still decided to

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>retain Clay Helton for myriad reasons, many of which will

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>probably never know. But after maybe pursuing a guy like

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>an Urban Meyer and some other hot commodities out there,

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>they elect to keep Clay Helton. They also retain Graham Harrell,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>which I think is a nice move for them. I'm

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>not sure which of those two things is better for

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the health of the program moving forward. But I think

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of USC fans, to say the least, were

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>very surprised that Helton was ultimately retained.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no. I would imagine that there are a

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>number of USC fans who were so down on the

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>administration and pessimistic about the new administrators that they, in

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some form weren't all that surprise that he was retained.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I think my not so pleasant

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>surprise was Stanford in the season they had, and they

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>were so beat up that a certain amount of their

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>results are defensible. I guess but they looked horrific at times.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>They really did look horrific. And this was not a

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>year where there was a robust middle class to the

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve. After Oregon, Utah, and USC. I don't think

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>any other teams had winning records in the conference. A

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of four and fives. Now, you know, Cal has

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>an injury at quarterback. Washington State probably kind of a

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy bad surprise with their defense looked like this year,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but this was a PAC twelve with winnable games, and

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so the fact of the matter is a team is

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>talented as Stanford. Not being able to survive a crazy

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>amount of injuries, to be fair, was still pretty surprising.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Washington State doesn't win a road game, a true road game.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>They beat Houston on a neutral field, But just how

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ugly the middle class the PAC twelve was was an

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ugly surprise as well.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Does it surprise you know that Jacob Easton left?

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>No? I think he won to leave as much to

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the imagination as possible before really leaving no doubt as

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to what he is or is not capable of.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>That one sort of caught me off guard. I get

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 2>why kids would want to leave. I don't begrudge him

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 2>for doing that, but clearly flashes. Yeah, we've mentioned Purple

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Cutler countless times on this program over the last six

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>months or so. I don't know if that's so much

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a compliment, But nonetheless, he's clearly a kid with talent.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>He can make a lot of the throws, and in

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>a clean pocket, he looks very good. But when you

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>bring the pressure on, or when you mix up coverage

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, that's when things start to get a

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit more interesting. And certainly he falls into that

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 2>category of having a ton of talent. Clearly an NFL

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>caliber arm I'm just not sure it's NFL caliber everything else.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And I caught me off guard.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ty, when your temperature is ninety eight point six and

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you sleep for ten hours, you feel pretty good. Right,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this is true? This is true? How often that happens? Okay,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what conference do you want to go to?

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the ACC. So I want to read

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 2>something here that I wrote about Sarahcuse preseason.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready.

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>These are my notes for Batim. How much do you

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>temper last season's results given that it was sort of

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>a down ACC in twenty eighteen? Fairness, I think a

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>good question. I love the line I love the secondary.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I loved Andre Cisco and the defensive backfield, who is

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>already a star coming into the year. The defensive backfield

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>was mostly freshmen and really good in twenty eighteen. They

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty much all came back this past season. The line

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 2>looked as if it was going to be able to

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>get after the passer. Talked about Alton Robinson on many

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>a preseason show. Sure, Kendall Coleman, those are some names

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 2>that we were watching. I liked Syracuse with nine wins

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>in the twenty nineteen season.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I was a little less in on the Orange.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Syracuse did not win nine games, Dan, and

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>at many points in the season they looked awful, downright,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>just dreadful. So from an analysis standpoint, as you said

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 2>at the top, going back and reevaluating some of our

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>preseason picks, Syracuse was a mighty whiff for me, to

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>say the least.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>They I'm looking right now did Syracuse did not win

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a Power Five game until November sixteenth, Yeah, when they

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>beat Duke on the road. Yeah, it was a tough

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>year Syracuse offensively without your boy grungy Eric Donee. Sure,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>who did so much they you could run on Syracuse

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>you could throw on Syracuse and they couldn't do much

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of anything. When they had the ball. They generated some

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger plays on the ground, but other than that, yeah,

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a nightmare for Syracuse. I have Miami as

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>my unfortunate surprise, okay, and what the back half of

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>their schedule looked like with as much as they returned

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on defense, a defense that was still good. But the

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me is that they couldn't get it figured

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>out with quarterbacks that were in the system. I know

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it was an open quarterback job going into the air,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but with the experience they had all over this offense,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and I know the line was rough, but with DJ

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and Cameron Harris at running back, with how promising

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought Jaron Williams looked at time the first half

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year, Yes, as a red shirt freshman, but

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>still I was surprised they couldn't get it together and

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't improve on offense over the course of the season

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>before losing to FIU Duke and being blanked in their

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>bowl game against Louisiana Tech. And so that caught me

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>by surprise, I thought, even though it was a first

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>year coach of many Diaz, it caught me by surprise

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the wide swaths of ineptitude that creeped into the Miami bloodstream.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, and you know, as we've now got into

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the off season, some of the storylines surrounding Miami are mixed.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>We've got Jaron Williams. He mentioned I think the promise

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that we saw in him wasn't consistent per se. He

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 2>has entered the transfer portal because Deeric King is coming

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 2>over from Houston. The Tate Martel thing hasn't really yielded

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>much fruit, to say the least has not, So we'll

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>have to wait and see what Manny Diaz does in

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>year two.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Pleasant surprise, but rtt lashly you know, yeah, some success

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as an offensive coordinator takes over Miami. My pleasant surprise

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is the new quarterbacks of the ACC. You mentioned the

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen season and the fortuitous road. I suppose that

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse had to whatever extent good teams take advantage of

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>fortuitous roads, but the addition of Hendon Hooker, Michael Cunningham,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Howell to the ACC was a breath of

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>fresh air. I was pleasantly surprised by the ceiling of

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>each of those guys. Hendon Hooker becomes that full time

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>starter into the year. Michael Cunningham is wildly efficient and

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>appears I think he'll be a red shirt junior next year.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I forget, I should look that up while I'm talking.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And of course Sam Howell with his almost immediate impact

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>into North Carolina's offense under mac Brown, I could not

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be more excited for that trio moving forward for a

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>conference that sorely needed new exciting faces.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, you kind of touched on two of my pleasant surprises. Okay,

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina for starters obviously hired Mac Brown in the offseason,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>and as I look back here on my acc notes,

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I have marked pretty boldly five wins would be a revelation. Okay,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a revelation. They finished six and six, that's a big deal.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>They didn't just dominate in the bowl game. They destroyed

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Temple by a fifty five to thirteen score, and a

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of their losses were very close. They were within

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>one point of the Clemson Tigers, within a touchdown, one possession, yeah,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown of teams like app State, who were very good.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Even Wake Forest too maybe had to dip down the stretch,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 2>but still looked pretty good for the majority of the season,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Virginia Tech, Virginia Pit All these were one possession games.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is a team that fought hard, obviously caught

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>lightning in a bottle with Sam Howell, and I think

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Mack Brown did a really good job coming off a

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 2>two to nine year in which they obviously made the

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>coaching change. North Carolina was.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>A great story and we talked about it before the

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen season. The twenty eighteen season, pre mac Brown,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that team was in games. The record wasn't there, but

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they were competitive, they fought. They just whether it's bad luck,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>ball bouncing the wrong way, whatever, they were in those games.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So mac Brown should be commended for flipping Sam Howell

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and entrusting him to run the Tarhill offense.

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>The other team that I throw out there, and they

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>were two to ten a year ago.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Is Louisville Louisville Louisville.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 2>New coach Scott Saderfield. The commentary on them before the

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 2>year is that they're going to want to run it,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>because Scott Saderfield was pretty run happy at app State.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it was a question of well do they

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>really got the personnel to do that. They also had

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>a really difficult schedule in that they played Notre Dame,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Florida State, Clemson Miami. I had Syracuse down here, woe

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>was me Kentucky obviously to close out the year in

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that rivalry game. And it wasn't a situation preseason where

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I thought you could measure success in terms of wins

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and losses. He wanted to hope that Scott Saderfield could

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>lay down a new foundation upon which he could build

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>for the future. Never in my wildest dreams did I

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 2>expect that we'd be sitting here late January talking about

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a Louisville team that went eight and five total with

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the bull win over Mississippi State, a Mississippi State team

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>which you may get to a little bit later when

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>we talk about the SEC. But lo and behold, Scott

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Sadderfield comes in makes an immediate impact. Talked a lot

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>preseason about trying to change the culture of that program.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not close enough, You're not close enough to know

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>for sure if that's something that did occur. It would

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 2>seem as if though through one year of Scott Sadderfield,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 2>he has done something right, and if culture is among

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 2>those things, then clearly he's headed in the right direction.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was surprised watching my guy, Michael Cunningham, thinking

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy wasn't your starter. This guy didn't start the

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>season atop the quarterback. Maybe it was an injury thing,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but I was surprised that the most efficient quarterback in

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the country, not the best, the most efficient the ball

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in his hands on a per play basis was Michael Cunningham.

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Javian Hawkins goes forward fifteen hundred yards on the ground

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>too to at well was terrific as a sophomore, little guy,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe, I believe it's a sophomore. I know he's

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>totally but yeah, I think Louisville, Yes is included is

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in that pleasant surprise tent with Hendon Hooker and what

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech was able to do in the second half

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of the season in unc Where are we going next?

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Where are we going next? By the way, Florida State's

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the center square in the bingo card there.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But is that a surprise the way that they looked late,

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could be surprised they didn't improve.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised they didn't improve. I'm surprised they fired Willie

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Taggert before the end of the season. Yeah, and so Yeah,

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not that I was expecting a ten win year

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 2>out of Florida State. I wasn't, but just the manner

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>in which the season all went down was surprising to me.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 2>It did not feel like they improved.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>No, it seemed that you would think God for him

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to go in the middle of the season. Yeah, that's

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, and it is a surprise that they couldn't

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>address the clear weaknesses that were addressable over an offseason.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't all of a sudden snap your fingers and

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have a competent offensive line. But the discipline, the defense,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals, the clock stuff. Yeah, that's a bit of

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. They couldn't really figure that out given the

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>months they had.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's go over to the SEC. Okay, what do you

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 2>got in the SEC? What surprised you other than other

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>than lsu.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, So, Kentucky is my pleasant surprise that they lose

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Terry Wilson when they do, they lose Sawyer Smith when

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>they do, and they're basically completely without a competent throwing quarterback.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>They turn things over to maybe the most athletic player

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the conference in terms of what he was able

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to do under center, and Lynn Boden and they are

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>full on good. Kentucky becomes a full on good team

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>when they turn the ball over, much like a high

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>school team does to just the clear best athlete on

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the team. They turn the offense over to Lynn Bowden,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they are dangerous. They become one of the best and

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>most explosive rushing teams in the country. The defense missing

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>key guys I thought was going to I thought twenty

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen was sort of a once every blue moon type

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>season for Kentucky where they become a legitimate threat to

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>decent teams, and it wasn't. The job Mark Stoops did

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with the entirety of the twenty nineteen squad was I think,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to me the conference's most pleasant surprise. What el the

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>heights LSU reached was certainly a surprise, but considering the

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>degree of difficulty differences between LSU and Kentucky, we knew

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>LSU had, you know, an elite ability inside of them.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But this Kentucky second half, especially, that to me, really

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>blew me away. Yeah.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I love the way they steered into it because you know,

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>they had Sawyer Smith available down the stretch. I don't

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>know if he was one hundred percent healthy, but they

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 2>elected to go with Lynn Bowden junior. They elected to

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 2>stick with that offense, and it was a ton of

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>fun to watch. Glad it worked out. It was a

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>charm season in many respects. Yeah, probably didn't fully go

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the way Kentucky fans won it, but on the heels

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of their year that they had in twenty eighteen, I

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>thought this is a nice follow up. Yes, so I

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>was a fan of what they did. I think quarterbacks

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 2>as a whole in the SEC were somewhat surprising. We

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 2>saw in good and bad ways, or in good and

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 2>bad ways. Yang in good and bad ways. Kyle Trask

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>is a story sure. Kyle Trask is a pleasant skiles

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 2>for sure. Twenty five touchdowns, seven interceptions, threw for two

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty five point one yards per game. And

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 2>by the way, that was sort of on a whim.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>The way that Dan Mullen reconstructed that offense after his

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>starter went down, I thought was really admirable. And I'm

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>not surprised that Florida would have a good season. I

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 2>think we saw that coming. But I'm just pleasantly surprised

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in a manner that Dan Mullen was able to cobble it.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 2>All together on the fly, make Kyle Trask look really good,

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 2>arguably like the second best quarterback. No, that's a little

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>bit too generous. Maybe the third best quarterback in the

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>SEC and obviously put together a really good year for Florida.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>The other topic that I would posit here, Okay, I'm

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>ready is Mississippi State.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have that down here.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Mississippi State. Mississippi State, I think caught us both by surprise.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>We were really high on Joe Moorehead when he was

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>hired at Mississippi State.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Let the record show. I still am yep, that's fair.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, continue, it did not work out, he was let go.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>They're obviously going in a much much different direction now

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>with Mike Leach. But where do you want to start

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 2>with Mississippi State.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So I underestimated, or I suppose overestimated, the defensive issues

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that they would have losing what they did up the

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>middle on all three levels and really upfront on the

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>defensive line. After the twenty eighteen season, I thought they'd

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>be fine. I like Bob shop as a defensive coordinator.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I liked that the depth that they were able to

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>acquire under Dan Mullen and the early part of Joe

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Morehead's tenure in Starkville. I figured that their offense would

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>improve with what I assumed would be more of a

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>throwing threat than what they'd had the past few years.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was wrong. I was definitely wrong. There were

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>issues at receiver with drops. The one bright spot is

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Kylon Hill, but he couldn't do everything. He had a

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>terrific season and did as much as he possibly could

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>within the offense. I was surprised that even if a

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>step back from twenty eighteen was to be expected, with

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>how talented that defense was, I was surprised that offensively,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I know it's Tommy Stevens, it's Garrett Schrader,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a freshman quarterback. I understand the issues and the lumps

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that either were going to take if thrown into the fire,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>but I just figured it would be schemed around and

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>they lost to good teams. I have the schedule in

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>front of me. It's not like Mississippi State other than

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Tennessee. You can make the case, and I know

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it was. I believe it was. In Knoxville. State had opportunities.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>They looked ugly in games, they looked lost in games

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they should have beaten Kansas State at home, and to

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>lose to Tennessee the way that they did the manner

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest surprise. You know, losing to this year's

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Alabama team by thirty, Okay, that happens, obviously, the ugliness

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with the bowl game against Louisville is not any way

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to finish out a season. It's certainly not a ten

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>year for Joe moorehead. I was I think I was

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>expecting more and I was wrong.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit about Missouri if we could.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's yeah, that's a pretty enormous surprise. Missouri went six

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 2>and six this season. Missouri was bad. Yeah, bad down

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the stretch. You could argue bad from the game go.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Losing opening weekend on the road at Wyoming. Not a

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 2>bad team in Wyoming, but not a team that missoo

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>sho should have lost to. They started their year five

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 2>and one, won five in a row. After that, Wyoming

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>seemingly got things back on track. Then they lose consecutively

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>on the road at Vandy, on the road at Kentucky,

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 2>on the road at Georgia, home against Florida, and home

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 2>against Tennessee before eventually winning their sixth game on the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>road at Arkansas. One of the things that we like

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to look at is Bill Connolly's sp plus, and one

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of the measurements that he gives on a game by

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 2>game basis is something he calls postgame win expectancy. Postgame

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>win expectancy looks at your efficiency in game and then

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 2>grades out based on that how likely you would have

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>been or not been to win a football game. Right,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the Kentucky game zero percent. Yeah, the Georgia game zero percent,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the Florida game one percent. The Tennessee game they only

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lost that by four four percent. So what that's telling

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you is in the games when they didn't get blown out,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>mainly that Tennessee game, which they lost by four, they

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 2>definitely did not play well enough to be within four

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>points of Tennessee. By Bill's measure, they only played well

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 2>enough to be within fourteen points of Tennessee. I'm not

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>even going to talk about the Kentucky, Georgia, and Florida games.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>All of those were blowouts. So this is a team

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that did not put its best foot forward. We had

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>talked in the preseason about hey, watch out first week

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in November squaring off against Georgia on the road, Maybe

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>they'll be unbeaten. No boy, no, Dan, this was not

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a good football team.

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw. But Bill Connolly obviously

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who're speaking of, and Miszoo fan, longtime Mizoo fan, posted

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a graph of the percentile performance of MISSOO so essentially

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll probably get this wrong, but what their ceiling

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is and how close they got to their ceiling given

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>their advanced metrics whatever, that's somewhere in the range of it.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And he posted the graph and basically said, by looking

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at this, you'd have thought that after I don't know

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what the old Miss game or something like that, you'd

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have thought all of their players got hurt. Yeah, all

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of their players got abducted, all of their starters all

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>took a deeply aggressive jacuzzi in the wrong dup, something

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that infected the entire depth chart, because they really they

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>did fall off a cliff. And this was a team

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>with a blessed schedule tie going into the season, getting

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia with a first year coach at home, having

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>their road games in the East be Vandy, Kentucky, Georgia,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and then a road split with the West at Arkansas.

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a beautiful, beautiful thing. I think they also had, Yeah,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they had Old Miss from the West. So this was

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a per fixed ten in two season with I don't know, competence,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and it ends with disaster and they fire their coach. Unbelievable. Unbelievable,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And I mean with Larry Rowntree, with Big Albert Oh

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with we weren't super high on Kelly Bryant but still

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>led a team, a very talented team to the playoff,

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and he had injury issues. Cale Garrett was a star

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on that defense. He goes down, so they're affected by

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>any number of things. But really, I know they were

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>not allowed in the postseason. But to go six and

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>six with that schedule, where do you want to go? Okay,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Big twelve.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve is the center square Texas.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Here as the unfortunate surprise. Yes I've lumped Texas in

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with and I talked about this a little bit the

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Pac twelve. I have an unfortunate surprise being no middle

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>class of a sort of entertainment value, which we always

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.239
<v Speaker 1>seem to have with the Big twelve. Good year, bad year.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It always seems to be like, well, something weird is

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in TCU Iowa State, Well, something weird.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It's going to happen with West Virginia, Texas Tech, And

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>yes there was. There were definitely weird moments. There were

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely fun players, individual players, be it Chewba Hubbard, be

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it Brock Purty, Jalen Rager, whatever. But to have nobody

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>string together and entertaining September through December, I suppose other

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>than Oklahoma and Baylor, but those are not middle class teams.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>That was a bummer. That was a pretty significant bummer.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I figured that a number of teams, even though there

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>were a number of new coaches and Matt Wells, Neil Brown,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Climb and Les Miles, just an unfun middle class

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was something I was not expecting. Was pretty bummed out by.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Kansas State is a team that I think we should

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about. You mentioned the new coach, Chris Clemon, comes

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>over from North Dakota State, had a previous stint working

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>with the now athletic director at KNA the state, and

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know if we knew what to expect.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>It was a question of personnel before the year, personnel

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback, personnel across the board. What are they going

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 2>to do to try and fill some of these gaps

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>or take a step forward. They ended up being very

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Kansas State in the end. This was a good football team.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>They obviously took down Oklahoma during the year, finished with

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>an eight and four regular season record, lost to Navy

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 2>in the bowl game. This is a team that I

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know that they did anything spectacularly well, but they

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>were decidedly above average.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I did not like watching Kansas State all that much.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say like watching yeah, but no, I mean,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a lot to be encouraged by. But yeah,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking strictly from an entertainment standpoint. Other than the

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma game, I didn't. I didn't love watching a lot

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of the middle class in this conference.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>What about Kansas Were you surprised at all by the

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Jayhawks given the fact that they brought in less Miles

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and less Miles was a fun talking point right before

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the season started, because of course, the mad Hatter and

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the grass seating and his flowery personality. But Kansas won

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple games. Kansas was plucky.

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it seemed a lot more encouraging after

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they went at Boston College. Is that a Friday night

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>where they went into BC and ran all the hell

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>over them. Oh right, yep, yep, and then they keep

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a close against West Virginia. They have the shootout loss

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>against Texas. That was really that was one of the

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>more fun moments obviously, that just game in general, the

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ending of the Texas Tech game was very strange. It

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>felt like as good as you could hope for from

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>year one for less Miles, I wouldn't go as far

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as saying I'm encouraged that there was going to be

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent growth in Lawrence, but I don't know how other

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>than the the offensive showings, I would say, yeah, pleasant surprise.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the offensive showings have led to it becoming

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a pleasant surprise for me. Yeah. Sure.

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 2>The other team that I'll throw out here very quickly

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll move on TCU. I am never going

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to talk about TCU again.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Off watch.

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm never going to talk about TCU again. I miss

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 2>every year they missed a bowl game. They were five

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and seven this season. That's off of a seven and

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 2>six season with the Bowl win, the legendary cheese At

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Bowl win over Cow. Yeah. I just can't predict this team.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Max Duggan gave reason for optimism as we

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>move forward, BEng quarterback. Maybe right, I'm looking for bright

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 2>spots here because you know my saw spot for TCU.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But five and seven, five to seven is not something

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I had on the radar.

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's very strange that TCU does not win nine games

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>every year exclusively, especially with what the Big twelve looks

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like right now, That to me is just incredibly strange.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Anything else in the Big twelve. Oh Baylor, what about Baylor?

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Baylor's my surprise in a pleasant way for Baylor, and

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I know certainly the outlook is different, could be better,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>could be worse, whatever under Dave Randa. But for Matt

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Rule to do what he did in Waco, especially with

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Phil what Phil Snow who has worked with Matt Rule

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years. Now, we have the snow

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is snow alert snow alert. Yeah, yeah, we have the

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>snow alert. But I guess we can't really no advisor,

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>no advisor, excuse me. What Baylor did this year was exemplary,

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>especially that defense. The offense wasn't a great watch, but

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>generally did enough save for the second half of the

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma game or games. Yeah, for what they're able to

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do to take advantage of a down conference, which is

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what good teams do to build out over those three

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>years under Matt rule. How can you not be impressed

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with what the Bears look like most of the year.

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 2>For sure? For sure, this is a team that finished

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 2>eleven and three. Obviously, lost in that Sugar Bowl to

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Georgia and made it to the Big Twelve Championship, lost

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>by I think it was three in the end to Oklahoma.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>But defense, you're right to call out the defense because.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>James Lynch tied James Damn Lynch. Yeah.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Entering the season, the problem was playmaking on defense. They

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 2>didn't force a lot of turnovers all year. Last year

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>they allowed twenty five touchdowns of thirty or more yards

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen touchdowns of forty or more yards. They were

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 2>killed by big plays the year prior. So what did

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 2>they do this year? Well, first things first, they came

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 2>out and they improved their HAVOC rate, which is a

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 2>number that you and I love to call out, but

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>basically number of plays behind the line of scrimmage and

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 2>defensive line linebacker all on the front seven. They were

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 2>very very good.

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Tackles for loss, forcing turnovers stuff, right, yeah, yeah, stuff

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of allowing big plays. Again, as we

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 2>look at this from an SP plus standpoint, very good

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 2>both as a passing defense and rushing defense in big

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 2>plays allowed, marginal explosiveness is way way down. I think

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>they did a good job on that front. So what

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Matt Rule was able to put together, what Phil Snow

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>was able to put together along that defensive side of

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the ball was really impressive. It was the engine that

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 2>drove this team. I'm sure Baylor fans are screaming for

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more consistency on offense, and I know

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Brewer got nicked up a little bit down the stretch,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 2>which didn't do them any favors, right, but nonetheless a

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>hell of a year for Baylor. I remember talking in

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 2>that preseason show where we previewed the Baylor Bears, and

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I had gone out to a Baylor blog I forget

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 2>which one, and I remember seeing nine wins and commenting

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 2>that I thought that was, ooh, that's a little ambitious.

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Right there. I could see a pathway, but it's very

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 2>narrow and it doesn't seem at all realistic. As the

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 2>year wore on, it became very realistic. Like you said,

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the top not a big middle class, if any middle

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 2>class in the Big twelve. So for them to get

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to that eleven win plateau in total, that's a pretty

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 2>big deal. Kudos to met rule.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I Uh yeah, what a strange year that a team

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>with an OK offense and a lights out defense is

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>an overtime period away from winning the Big Twelve. No,

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>strange season.

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Strange strange season. Shall we move on to our final

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Power five conference?

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 2>A Big ten, Daniel, the big big ten.

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh, let's talk about the Northwestern Fighting Wildcats. We always

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>figured that they had. They always seemed to have the

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>highest floor. Like, Northwestern might not be great this year.

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to a bowl game, They'll go seven and five.

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>They did not go seven and five. No, they most

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 1>certainly did not. I don't think they won their first

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Power five game until the Illinois game? Is that right, am?

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I looking at their schedule correctly.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>They did not win their first Power five game until

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the last week of the year.

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the offense was a disaster. The injuries were a disaster.

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>On offense, Hunter Johnson did not work out all that well.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>He's beat up when he's in does not work out

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>all that well. They make a change at offensive coordinator

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>after the season. They're unable to run the ball, They're

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>unable to pass the ball, they're unable to score the ball.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>They're unable to move the ball in any sort of

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>creative fashion. All season long, at least, I guess before

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the Illinois game, they scored twenty points. I'm seeing zero

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>times before November. This was a historically bad not just

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Big Ten, not just Power five, but FBS offense. And

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>while they had their offensive struggles in years past, it

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>always seemed like Northwestern was what you could count on

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of competence, sheer competence, and you could not

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this season. That was a shocker to me.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Interesting now I think I'm I think I'm with you

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 2>on that front. I'm surprised by a couple of things.

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised that Michigan State didn't get better already been

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 2>No I am, I am actually okay, No I am,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I am for real. I wasn't necessarily expecting a nine

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 2>win campaign from Michigan State, but I wasn't expecting what

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 2>we saw. Like the defense was still pretty good, and

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 2>of course they won the bowl game to get to

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 2>seven wins, but six and six is is not something

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I was expecting. I wasn't expecting a thirty four point

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 2>loss or a thirty eight point loss against Michigan or Wisconsin.

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>There were many games this year we talk about a

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>zero percent postgame win expectancy. I'm looking at goose eggs

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 2>at Ohio State, at Wisconsin, and at Michigan. These are

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 2>really bad showings. This was a hapless offense that just

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>could not get going. We talked about before the year,

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 2>how we talked before the year about how Mark D'Antonio

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 2>was jumbling up his offensive coaching staff in hopes of

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 2>jump starting things that didn't work out.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, what did you so you say you're surprised by

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the offense at Michigan State not working out, But what

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>gave you confidence that it would when there was no

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>significant change, There was no catalyst, there was no spark,

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there was no overhaul of anything.

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a fair question. It's a fair question. Perhaps

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>it was a bit of wishful thinking, but I have

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of respect in Mark D'Antonio. I still think

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 2>he's a good football coach. Now recent Mark D'Antonio maybe

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>unbiased based on past results, right, but I had more

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>faith that he would be able to resurrect this situation

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 2>and put out a better offense that just didn't happen,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 2>And be the jokes on me for feeling surprised by that,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but I just I did expect more and I don't

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 2>think we ever saw it. So the Michigan State thing

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 2>caught me a bit off guard. I was pleasantly surprised

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 2>by Ohio State and Justin Fields. This is an incredible

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>season and you know, to be three quarters of the

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 2>way through the year to be in the playoff. Reading

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>comments from fans, and it wasn't just our friend Dane,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>there were multiple fans who wrote in saying, this is

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the best Ohio State team I've ever seen. To do

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that a year after rbi Meyer leaves the program, hands

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it off to a first time head coach. That was

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a hell of a debut effort, to say the least.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So the way they look, the way they put their

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.280
<v Speaker 2>defense back together after a bit of turmoil the year prior.

0:42:55.960 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Justin Fields goes without saying I was very surprised, pleasantly

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>not too too surprised, but I was encouraged. I was

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>happy to see the job that took place at Ohio State.

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That's boring tie. That is just a boring answer. I

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't care, I know, I mean I was. I was

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>more pleasantly surprised by revn to seven to drive for six,

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Illinois taking down Wisconsin in the last second Michigan state

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that crazy comeback, hanging with Michigan for as long as

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they did. For a team that loses to Eastern Michigan

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in what mid September, that win alone would have gotten

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>them to rev to seven. They're close against Nebraska that

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ends on sort of a not great call. This was

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a I'm not gonna say good, I'm not gonna say plucky,

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say frisky. Just damn weird team all

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>year long, and they were crazy beat up against Northwestern.

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>They hang with Iowa on the road, I believe in November,

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and they take the elegance cal which is to be

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>expected in the barry and the ball game. But the

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ups and downs of this season and the fight I

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:08.839
<v Speaker 1>guess that they showed when somewhat healthy. Illinois is one

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the teams that, strangely enough, will come to define

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteen season. If you dig far.

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Enough, here's a hyper local answer. Okay, if you would

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 2>have told Lehigh. No, not Lehigh, I'm not going to

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:27.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about Tyler Monico.

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Sorry.

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 2>If you would have told September Tie that November Sean

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Clifford would leave him feeling this underwhelmed, that would have

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>been a pretty big surprise. Remember the context here. Yeah,

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the all time winning his quarterback left the program. But

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to lose Trace and enter a new season with a

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of turnover you lose Miles Sanders. There were ready

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>questions about the wide receiving core going into the year.

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 2>To lose a guy of that caliber and turn it

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 2>over over to Sean Clifford after the Tommy Stevens transfer,

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 2>there were questions about how are they gonna fare at

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 2>this quarterback position? And I think to start the year.

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 2>To start the year, he looked way way better than

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 2>he did as the year wore on. He had like

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a gosh, what was it like, a nearly four hundred

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 2>yard game against Maryland who Maryland was found out by

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the point in time when they played them, but still

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 2>he completed like eighty percent of his passes in that

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 2>game and looked really good the first half of the year.

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Towards the latter half of the season when they started

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 2>playing better teams, he started looking a bit yippie and

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>gave me serious like branded Wimbush vibes where he was

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 2>staring at the offensive line sure and maybe not sure

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of the pocket and making some weird decisions. He had

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 2>some of his own injury concerns. Didn't think he looked

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 2>all that great in the bowl game. Got the job done,

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 2>but he has a lot of questions to answer. As

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 2>we entered the twenty twenty season, I did not feel

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>at all great about Sean Clifford, outside of maybe that

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota game down the stretch where he was able to

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 2>rally late and put up some nice numbers.

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You could argue the number of teams had surprising elements.

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Indiana to have the success that they did. Granted,

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the Big Ten was horrific this season.

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's ascent this year, yeah yeah, also fortuitous situations, nothing

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could really control, and they took advantage like

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>good teams do. They lose to tie those two teams together,

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they lose their offensive coordinator to Penn State. There's never

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>anything surprising about Iowa. I surprised Perdue and dealing with

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess Purdue is covers both. For me, I was

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>surprised at some of the success they had with all

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the crazy injuries that they were suffering, but also

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised that they looked as poor as they did at

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>certain times. The Nebraska that's a bit of a shocker still,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're dealing with injuries as well, especially with Adrian

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Martinez his health all season long, but even when he

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was in there, A Nebraska was a rough, rough watch

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I would agree with that, Dan, for sure.

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of surprises in the Big Ten.

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to do a group of five? Quick?

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>You got anything?

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to?

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how about Air Force?

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you could only talk about the service academies

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with this situation.

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Air Force had a legitimately good offense and run a

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 2>different scheme. Granted, but they were pretty good down.

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The street on the same scheme as they always run.

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But they run the same scheme tea.

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but closed out the year winning a bunch of

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 2>games in a row, like eight straight games if you

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:44.399
<v Speaker 2>include the Bowl. Beat Washington State thirty one to twenty

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 2>one in the Bowl them, Yeah, ran all over them.

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.800
<v Speaker 2>They're only two losses all year. Were at a Boise

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:54.799
<v Speaker 2>State and to Navy, both on the road. So I

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>think by a large are really good year. Beat Colorado,

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:01.479
<v Speaker 2>beat a team like a Utah State who maybe wasn't

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 2>as good as we thought entering the year, but still

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 2>a nice win the Army. Another team that made that category,

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 2>oh for sure, Hawaii was a nice win on the road.

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Hawaii ended up being a pretty good team.

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, I I love the hell out of watching.

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Caden Remsburg. They're back in the bowl

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>game against Wazoo. They had a hell of a year

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was sort of I would go as far

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.439
<v Speaker 1>as saying like their defense in a number of ways

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>led the way. They were very stout upfront against the run.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So really nice surprise there. I was surprised, I don't

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>want to say fully surprised, but I would say I'm

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>impressed by the bounce back here that Navy had almost

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>getting themselves to the American Championship Game, especially with how

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>much better their defense got year to year. Also surprised

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>by the dip Army took, and that was to be

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>expected with the number with the amount of attrition from

0:48:55.560 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, but still sort of surprised there and elsewhere

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in the G five, I don't know, pleasant surprise Hawaii

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>continues to improve to the point where they lose their

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>coach to a Power five conference.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Hank Bachmeyer was a pleasant surprise.

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess when he played.

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 2>When he played, showed a lot of promise and definitely,

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 2>gay Broncos fans are reason to be excited.

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I was impressed by Western Kentucky, especially that defense this year. Well, yeah,

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the lows that they fell to and then to beat

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas the way they did with a former Arkansas quarterback

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and tie story. I thought Western Kentucky and Tyson Helton

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>did a really nice job. Any other surprises to you

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in the G five ranks.

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:46.240
<v Speaker 2>It's tough to be surprised by app State at this point. Sure,

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Billy Napier did a good job at Louisiana. Yes, I

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.399
<v Speaker 2>don't know how big of a surprise that ends up being,

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 2>but they were formidable a team that we liked in

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 2>awful lot in bull season. Hopefully got a lot of

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 2>confidence points for some of our participants.

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I guess Georgia State bouncing back the

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>way that they did, Yeah, a really nice surprise yeah, yeah,

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>especially with how they start out the season. Yeah, I would,

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I would lump the Panthers in there.

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, I think that's it, Dan. Let us

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.720
<v Speaker 2>know your surprises again. You can do that by emailing

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 2>unless it's so oliverble at gmail dot com. If you

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 2>want to follow along on Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram, you

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 2>can comment in any of those places. There is also

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.919
<v Speaker 2>a subreddit, which I mentioned at the top of the show.

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 2>It is solid Verbal dot reddit dot com. You can

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 2>go out there and discuss your pleasant surprises not so

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 2>pleasant surprises with other for bawlers who listen to the show.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>If you like what we do, subscribe. You can subscribe

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 2>on any of the podcasting apps, doesn't matter. If you

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 2>really like what we do, you can leave a review.

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 2>We always appreciate that. But beyond that, Dan, again, as

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 2>we now enter this off season mode, one show a

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 2>week most weeks.

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, and that's not to say there will be

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 1>zero one show if not more. If you really really

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>like what we do. Tie's phone number is six one

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>oh four. No, shoot, I'm reading this wrong, Okay, I'll stop. Ty.

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought you did great, Thank you, thank you. I'm

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surprised that I was able to get

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a newborn to one full year of life.

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations, and happened to the little guy.

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that after hearing that you had the flu,

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that I found out that you were in urgent care

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>last night with a fully separate issue that yeah, recovery.

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Well it wasn't. It wasn't the full blown flu. I

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 2>came to find out later, but I was swabbed multiple

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 2>times at two different doctors' offices to see if I

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 2>had it.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay, and then you went with some sort of

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>respiratory situation.

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 2>I think I pretty much have everything wrong. The only

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:59.320
<v Speaker 2>thing working right now is to some extent my voice

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 2>into a lesser extent my brain.

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well listen, you go heel up, have some chicken soup,

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.279
<v Speaker 1>get some rest, rest those pipes. We got a long

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:10.800
<v Speaker 1>off season. We've got a lot of very strange shows

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in our future. As we have guests, we probably have

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>deeper conference looks that require some investigation. We have all

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of fun plans for the off season, new stuff,

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>old stuff, And you know what, why don't you go

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to solid verbal dot reddit dot com and tell us

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically what you want out of this Off Season from

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine the best podcasts in the world.

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.439
<v Speaker 2>I want it titled off Season Dash, What you Want,

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 2>What you Want, what you Want? Let us know.

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, make it. Whoever starts that, make it as uncomfortable

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as time made it sound.

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what you want on that note or that guy

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 2>over there, the proud Papa Stan Rubinstein for myself, Tie

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Hilton Brandt, thank you so much for listening to the show.

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 2>We will be back a week from now to talk

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 2>more college football. In the meantime, enjoy the rest of

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 2>your week, all of your weekend. Hope y'all stay healthy

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and by all means stay solved.

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Nice