WEBVTT - Fed Readies to Cut and In Conversation with Iraq's PM

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. One of

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the great things I do when I lecture is I

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about critical thinking skills. These are developed mostly by

0:00:54.400 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>having a greater sense of correlations and interdependencies between different ideas,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>holding the high.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Ground on that from B and HY.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Reu joins us in studio, usually askanced in London.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Jeff thrilled to heavy.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 2>In our studios. This morning way too short. We could

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 2>do an hour which this morning.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Is the market ahead of the Fed? I've never seen

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>such an ex post.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>X into a jumble?

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Is this constructive for markets to have this communicative uncertainty.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, what's constructive for markets might not be as constructive

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 4>for the FED. I think there's a bit of a

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>dissonance there, and the fed's message, whatever it is not

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 4>too so. So the fed's priority responsibility almost is not

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>to induce panic, and the market should not be going

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 4>into thinking that it can actually drive the FED in

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>that direction. So I think now that's where we need

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 4>to draw the fine line tomorrow. But you know, ultimately,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 4>if you ask me, is pricing a bit too assertive,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 4>a bit too airing on the side of the hard landing, Yes,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 4>it is right. So we clearly would be want to

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 4>be on the side of that for the time being.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>And the rest of the world is watching right because

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>in the past, if the US, you know, sneezes, the

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 4>world catches a cold. But looking at how other central

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 4>backs are behaving right now, I'm not so sure.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 5>I know that I was in your shoes years ago.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 5>I know that your salesforce is running. You are all

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 5>around the United States and this week talking to clients.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 5>What's your number one message?

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>So number one message is, well, firstly, you know, from

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 4>my side of the pond, can a conversation on fiscal

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 4>happen at some point. You know, it's not like in Europe.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, the conversations on fiscal are taking place in

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 4>earnest and in fairness, It's not like you're presenting a

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 4>good example either. But that is the concern because the

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 4>US is the reserve asset at the end of the day,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 4>and the second side is is so going back to

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>the hard landing conversation, how is the economy actually doing?

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 4>And how's business investment doing? You know, how is how

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 4>a household's behaving. I was in a Texas yes, yeah,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 4>it was my first time there. Yeah, and as far

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 4>as I could tell, again just to speak from personal experience,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>you know that. So clearly a lot going on investment, construction,

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 4>taking advantage you know, of the states and natural resources

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>in terms of land in it and the light. So

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 4>you're clearly there, whereas if you look at Europe, you know,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>if you look at you know the investment intent you're

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 4>going on there, you just highlighted some pulling of investment

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>or lack of investment you going through, so you can

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>see a bit of a divergence. So that begs the

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 4>question if there's that much going on in the US

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 4>right now, wise market pricing and hard landing.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's just I'm going to tear up here. I

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>got Jeffrey you in Texas. Where do you go with that?

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Jeff You?

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>What does it then say about productivity differentials? Trudeau's flat

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>on his back after a disaster in Montreal, Germany's flat.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>On its back, et cetera.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>So I got a labor dynamic, a capital guide dynamic.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I got total fact or productivity, whatever you want to

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>call it. But how do you overlay productivity and the

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>confidence to be in the markets?

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 6>US?

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Productivity a right? So if you just do it simple

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>equation nominal growth or sorry, so potential growth, of which

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 4>productivity is the key factor, plus demographics plus your inflation

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 4>target is your terminal rate?

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Just for bog standard Central Bank US productivity warrants justifies

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 4>us exceptionalism. That's my message.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Chair Jones is a stand for if he

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>flies over to your London School of economics, he's got

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to be sharkins in in the bottom line on productivity,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 2>is America is different?

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Is it just because we don't believe in.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Austerity with our multi trillion dollar budgets.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.799
<v Speaker 4>No, because America believes in its people. America has people,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 4>has the talent, and continues to attract that. That is

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the fundamental difference. Yes, there's a bit of a demographic

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 4>argument there, But how it fosters productivity through innovation, that's

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 4>that's a lesson you badly need to learn. Look at

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 4>the Office Budget Responsibilities report based on the baseline scenario

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 4>right now for UK productivity and this is the power

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>of compounding. Right has UK's debt to GDP ratio in

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty seventy five at two hundred and seventy percent. If

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 4>you lower the productivity basedline by one percentage point, it

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>goes the six one hundred and fifty percent. If you

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 4>increase the productivity baseline by one percent and the baselines

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 4>one and a half so to two and a half,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 4>which probably the US is not far from, then you

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 4>can keep to GDP ratio below one hundred percent. That's

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 4>what the US has going for.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 3>It is Stiglit's little g Yeah.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Stiglan's just screams about growth rate as being the key dynamic.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Jeffrey, what do you tell our good friends in Texas

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 5>about Europe, Middle East in Africa in terms of opportunities.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 5>What do you tell our friends.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 4>In well Europe right now it's you know, I'm struggling

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>to get my head around your evaluations in the currency

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 4>and the exchange, in the currency and equity markets. I

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 4>thought the UCB was hawkish last week, you know, to

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 4>be honest, and look at all the bad news and

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>in terms of data on the corporate level and an

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>aggregate level, why are you still hawkish? And they can say, well,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 4>we don't have a growth mandate, we're different from the FED.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Fair enough, right, But then you should take a step

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 4>back look at drag use report, how he highlighted compesitiveist

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 4>issues and the like. So you know that's that really

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>is a message that he's trying to hammer home. Can

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you deal with it? You know, So let's see in

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 4>terms of the UK finally getting to some kind of

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>political normalcy, I would say, but the budget up ahead

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>again focusing on growth and productivity. Middle East. No, to

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 4>be honest, now, that over the last few years has

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>been the big change. You know, it's what our clients

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 4>have been highlighting where the opportunity is. You know, there

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 4>is a plan there to boost things. Of course, oil

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 4>price is very much in focus right now, clients are

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 4>looking for proxies, but medium longer term capital flows and

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East clearly as benefiting.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey, you are on China, so a lot of.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Clients asking about President She's comments last week. They will

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>hit the growth target. Let's just look at simple mathematics,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 4>right So if you look at the growth data for

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Q one and Q two and probably Q three below

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 4>the target on an annualized basis, then Q four has

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 4>to be strong. We cannot discount that, you know, at

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 4>this point, I think the one thing China from an

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 4>asset allocation basis has going for it is investment relative

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 4>to benchmark is quite low right now. I think at

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 4>this point, especially commodities market less so oil, but maybe

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>industrial commodities Aussie dollar, you cannot afford to discount the

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 4>risk of a major boost in Q four. Yes, it's

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 4>probably a tactical plate rather than structuring the same.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I can't.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know how the totalized, folks, but

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm in the You can't on this.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>When the facts change, She's going to change.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sorry, it's the same old story going

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>back and lay they going to have a strategy, But

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>would you suggest that Beijing will capitulate to realities allowing

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>an FDI, allow an investment.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>So the recent announcement, you know, allowing foreign investment into

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 4>healthcare into China for example. You know that is a

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>very large market. So you look at the demographics of

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the premiere. Ever since he's been appointed, has been stressing

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 4>need for FDI and the like, allowing visa free travel

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 4>to China for business person, that kind of facilitation. That

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 4>message is there. But going back to mathematics, capitulation to mathematics, right,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>especially if you believe in the growth target, you have

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 4>to realize reality and accelerate everything.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey, you thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. It's a pleasure.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So he hasn't been here since seventeen eighty four. Now

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a big It goes back to ya.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 5>I know it's number one Wall Street, the best address

0:07:59.280 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 5>on global water.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey, thank you so much.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 6>He is with b and wife.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>This is what Bloomberg Surveillance is about. Advancing the conversation,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the quality of the debate today, an economics finance investment

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>in all The only reason it's here is because Texas

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>is number one in the NCAA Football ratings. Ed, Heyman's

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>having the best September is he's ever go get them

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>log arts and you've got the fight and Texas aggy's

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>coming up here. My father was at A and M

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>so college station will do it to you here in

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>a distance, Ed, you are here within your horrifically busy

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>schedule to explain a shift. What did Julian and Manuel

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and your team at Evercore is I do to convince

0:08:55.760 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you to move to a construct economic outcome for mister Powell.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 7>Some of data dog as you know. And I'd been

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 7>lugging around a recession forecast for about a year and

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 7>my kids were laughing at me. My wife was kidding

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 7>me about it, and I d I just I couldn't

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 7>take it. And the fourth quarter's coming up more substantly.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 7>Fourth quarters coming up in a couple of weeks, and

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 7>it's gonna be positive.

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 7>So I have to change my forecast again to push

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 7>it out. And anecdotal is coming in pretty strong. UH

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 7>unemployment claims, which is the best government data has been strong.

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 4>UH.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 7>System's got a lot of liquidity in it, and money's

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 7>not tight, as you know, yep. And so I decided

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 7>I should retreat to fight another day.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So if a recession is not in the imminent you

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 5>know future, what is what should the FED do tomorrow?

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 7>I don't really care right now?

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 3>You don't really care?

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay?

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 7>I mean I don't care in the sense that if

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 7>they don't do fifty, I'll be shocked. Okay, because I've

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 7>been at this so long, and the FED picks out

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 7>somebody like Timors to communicate, frankly to me and you,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 7>this is not a situation where they're peddling their own view.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 7>And Timorus has said over and over the FED is

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 7>going to do fifty, and if he's if they don't

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 7>do fifty, go back.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 3>We got to stop. This is very important.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Nick Timro is not standing with the Wall Street Journal

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and Colby Smith at the FT full disclosure. Colby worked

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>for surveillance for years. We're really proud of what she's

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>done at the T Okay, this is really really important.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>They've lost control of communication.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>We had Arthur Burns smoke signals from his pipe, we

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 2>had Greenspran with we're all on the same page, one line,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and we're now where we are for everybody nationwide, listening

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>worldwide listening. What's Ed Hyman's best communication model for our

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>central bank?

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Timorous? Nick Tamros, You think they should be doing it

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>through the media.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 7>That's the way they do it, they know.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 3>But what do you recommend we do to write my game?

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 7>Game?

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Come on?

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Should we be more fractious like the Bank of England?

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 7>We are what we are? The Bank of England first,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 7>the of the Buddhist Bank. They would actually try and

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 7>mislead people.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 8>Fair, I will give you you cut and you say

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 8>you're in these and or Piden and then Volker was

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 8>close to the vest and then.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 7>Green Span came in and introduced the transparency program.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Which we have today.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 7>But you know it's it's going to happen tomorrow, right

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 7>and twenty five or fifty. It's not a killer one

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 7>where the other.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 5>So how do you think about this US economy in

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 5>the context of the global economy? We've heard about the

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 5>US exceptionalism. Is that something you buy into is it

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 5>new or is it it.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 7>Is not particularly new? I tend to buy into that story.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 7>But there have been plenty of plenty of ink spilled

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 7>on this that the US really is an exceptional place

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 7>and compared to Europe, which is not a particularly high bar. Right,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 7>and then China, I've almost lost touch with China.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Well let me go there in your acclaimed note, folks

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>who protect the copyright of all our guests to get

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Edheim and Julian Emmanuel's work, go to evercore isid. I'm sorry.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>The second derivative on China isn't pretty. You've got China

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>M two China Bank loans ugly, ugly ugly. Do you

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>have a faith that Beijing could clear the market, almost

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in a Hyekian way? They could come in say we

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 2>got this wrong, straighten it out and rebuild FDI in investment.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 7>Yes, but no, they're not doing it. And so every

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 7>day in the past, particularly the past two or three months,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 7>I thought they might come in any day and clear

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 7>the boards. And I've waited and waited and waited, and

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 7>we survey twenty one companies that have sales in China,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 7>and that survey is twenty nine on a zero to

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 7>one hundred. It's been as high as seventy nine. It's

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 7>been really wrong. And the US sort of a equivalent

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 7>is forty eight. So I mean twenty nine is really bad.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 5>Yet you still see time and time again. Elon Musk,

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Tim Cook making the pilgrimage to China, because no matter

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 5>what you say, it's still there.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 3>It's still big.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 5>The middle class presumably is great. It's all the arguments

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 5>that we've heard of the last twenty or thirty years

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 5>are still true. But the government doesn't seem to be open.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 5>I guess as.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 6>It used to be.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm a big China fan, Okay. I'm on the board

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 7>of the China Institute. I have many friends who are Chinese.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 7>I want to encourage US Chinese relations. But I'm at

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 7>the end of my rope and I'm not sure if

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 7>I'll ever go back.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 5>And is that simply a reflection of the political environment

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 5>where all you talk about is tariffs here, tariff's there,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 5>and then on the other side of President g you

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 5>know again, I'm not sure.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm not sure they'll make come back.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, uh.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And we got to finish strong here. We got too

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>much going on. The Dow up one hundred points now

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>up eighty eight points. The University of Texas is one

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of the few schools in the planet that actually make

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>money at sports. Football contributes, basketball contributes, baseball pops six

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>million dollars a year at the University a Texas.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Where is your University of Texas right?

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's it's I've had the privilege of talking

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to Michael Dell about this, and it just seems like

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>everything's moving in the right direction for the academics, the

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>athletics of the University of Texas.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you see there right now?

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 7>It's a great school and he shouldn't uh say the

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 7>truth and the truth still set you free? Whoa on

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 7>the tower of the University of Texas. It's just the

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 7>school that does a great job for kids, and I'm

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 7>proud to have gone there. Academically, it's really good.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeaports together like you know, the only equivalent I could

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>think of its Michigan.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Where they do you know, there's place and you know.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>They had football coaches making one tenth of what ed

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Hymen's making. That's a problem, but the answer is that

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>they're you know, it's.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Like a real deal Catholic.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Like Dukes as well. A generous of you to come

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in again. We wanted to get Julian Emmanuel, but he

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>was so we got.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 3>You to thank you.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Edmenqu Si with a view to move away from economic

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>slowdown to someplace new. We will look for the data.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>A very important interview for all of America within the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>election and the distraction of domestic debate versus our four

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in policy future. Jermani Bertecci had a wonderful conversation with

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister of Iraq, Mohammad Shia al Sudani on

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the tensions of Iraq Iran in the Middle East.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Let's listen.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The understanding of this relationship between Iraq and Iran is

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>based on mutual interests and mutual respect. Iran is a

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>neighboring country and we share one four hundred kilometers and

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that's in our interest to have a close relationship, especially

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that Iran has been supportive of the political process and

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>our efforts in combating terrorism. Of course, Iraq is the

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 1>only country in the region that has a special relationship

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>between Iran and the United States, and we try through

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>this positive characteristic to help in bringing opinions closer. And

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>we are interested to have stability in the region away

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>from the access policy. We don't want the tense relationships

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and the stances of other countries of the world to

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>impact the Iraqi situation. This is our diplomatic effort and

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>movements in terms of our bilateral and regional ties.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister of Iraq Mohammad Shia el Saddani there

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and the distinction always made within the levant and over

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 2>towards Persia is Shia versus Sunni, and it is unusual

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to have a Shia Prime Minister of Iraq as in

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Iran versus a Sunni heritage Jamani Bertecci joins us now

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>from Dubai Jamani. Most people across America this morning are

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>unaware that there's accountable half a million who lost their

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 2>lives in the Iraq Iranian War of the nineteen eighties.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 2>How does Iraq and Iran begin to communicate now?

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 9>It's such an interesting perspective that you bring in, and

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 9>that is true the War of the eighties, very historical

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 9>war in the region that probably doesn't get a lot

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 9>of airtime. But the situation today is very different. That

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 9>you have to remember there are a couple of things

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 9>that bind Iraq and Iran together. It's starting with religious

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 9>religious binds. And you've got to think about the two

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 9>holiest site for Shia Islam. That's Najaf and Kharabala. They

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 9>both fall in Iraq. So that is always going to

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 9>be the case, and that's always going to be that

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 9>religious draw and that religious tie that brings them together.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 9>But increasingly what we are seeing, especially in the last

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 9>couple of years, is they've got politically a lot closer.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 9>And I had the opportunity to speak with the Prime

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 9>Minister of the course of the weekend, and it is

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 9>worth noting that he does enjoy a parliamenting majority. But

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 9>the reason he enjoys that parliamenting majority is because he's

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 9>been given legitimacy by political groups that are closely supported

0:19:55.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 9>and affiliated to Iran. And so it is very worthy

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 9>that just in the last couple of years, Iraq has

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 9>fostered much closer political relationships to Iran. And one of

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 9>the concerns in the region is that there are several

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 9>non state actors that are again operating within this so

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 9>called axis of resistance, that have been carrying on attacks,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 9>either US targets or Israeli targets.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, your leadership of the conversation in Dubai, how does

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Sunni Middle East react to a combined Shia Iran and Iraq?

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>How does Saudi Arabia, How does UAE create the rest

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 2>out of frankly to the west to Morocco. How do

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>they respond to this combination.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 9>So the impression that I got from speaking to the

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Prime Minister is that they see themselves as somewhat of

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 9>a mediator. Now you will remember again this went under

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 9>the radar, but there was somewhat of a mediation that

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 9>took place between Saudi Arabia and Iran a couple of

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 9>years ago. And everyone gave China the credit for hosting

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 9>the talks between the two countries, but of course one

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 9>being Signy and one being shira But in reality it

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 9>was Iraq operating behind the scenes, going in between the two.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 9>Now you have to remember there's another link between Iraq

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 9>and Saudi Arabian that is, of course, they're the second

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 9>largest oil producer within OPEK. They're a very important member

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 9>of OPEK. There's a lot of focus obviously within OPAK

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 9>to support oil prices right now, and so Iraq is

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 9>pitching itself as a country that can mediate between oil

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 9>countries and the Gulf and also one that looks to

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 9>enjoy bilateral security relationships with the US once the full

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 9>withdrawal of the Coalition forces take.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Place, and to that end, Dremana. In your interview with

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 5>the Iraqi PM, he said that US troops are no

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 5>longer needed following a near defeat of ISIS. What's the

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 5>latest on that relationship and the troop deployment.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so you have to go back all the way

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 9>to twenty fourteen. Remember, back then ISIS was a very

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 9>clear and present danger. At one point, the ISIS forces

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 9>were thought to have taken over about one third of

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 9>the land mass in Iraq and Syria. So twenty fourteen

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 9>was a very different situation, which meant you had the US,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 9>alongside a coalition forces from all around the world, deploy

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 9>troops into Iraq to defeat the threat of ISIS. You

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 9>Platford to today. It's a decade later, and what the

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 9>Prime Minister was telling me is ISIS is no longer

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 9>a threat. It's no longer a threat to the state. Yes,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 9>there are few commanders here and there hiding out to

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 9>use his language in caves or in remote villages, but

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 9>they don't have any political support, they don't have ISIS incubators,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 9>and therefore are much less of a risk. The same

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 9>way they would look at drug smugglers is how they

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 9>would view ISIS and the isis risk and therefore, in

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 9>his eyes, there's less of a justification for US troops

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 9>and US advisors termain on the grounds now. He suggested

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 9>that there have been ongoing discussions with the Biden administration

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 9>and that an announcement would be coming soon, or at

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 9>least that is his hope. But in their eyes, there's

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 9>no need anymore to have that arrangement with the US

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 9>and with the Coalition forces.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Jamana thank you so much leading her coverage into Middle

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>East horizons on Bloomberg Television in duvide Jamana Vertecci.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Daily.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Look at the front pages, Alisa Matteo hour, Lisa, what

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>do you have?

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 10>Okay, this is Bloomberg Business Week. You have to check

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 10>this out in the terminal. Came out with its best

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 10>business school rankings for twenty twenty four twenty twenty five,

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 10>and they look at the areas like compensation, learning, networking, entrepreneurship.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 10>Stanford took the top spot for the sixth year in

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 10>a row. They scored in four of the five areas

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 10>they look at. And then you round out the top five.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 10>You have Chicago's Booth School, then you have northwesterns Kellogg

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 10>Dartmouth's Dartmouth's Talk and then Virginia's Darden, So that kind

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 10>of rounds out the whole top for you.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 2>There and each of them different, them different.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and each of them different. And also what it's

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 10>interesting too in this list you have to check out

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 10>it breaks down which industries are hiring and from which

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 10>schools too. So if you're looking out, they're consulting hiring

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 10>the most, and that's followed by financial, technology, healthcare and consumer.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 10>So that's how they bring it down to.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Over in Europe, I am d is I E s E.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Business London Business School in NEBERCONTI. Good morning to those

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 2>in Italy and see it as well with some monitor

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>their Bloomberg BusinessWeek with that, and you know, it's it's

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a great It's all it is.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a great list. I always, you know, seventy seven schools.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 5>And Doukems in number twelve obviously underrated.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 3>The should top ten of course.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 2>I think the big you know, you know, within the

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 2>competition of this Harvard's number six, which I think would

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>be the surprise within our work. Sloan Carnegie Melligan, Carnie

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>mel I'll get it. Three two one Carnegie, Mellon, m

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I T nine and ten, Duke twelve, and on we

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>go and there than Carolina? Though is there really you

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>care about?

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Next?

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you go?

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 10>We're keeping with education. This one I saw an associated press.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 10>It stood out to me because it says students are

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 10>reading fewer books in English class nowadays. So if you

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 10>remember how many books we used to read, yes, yes,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 10>so here's what the teachers are doing. Instead, they're focusing

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 10>on select packages passages from the books instead of having

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 10>kids read the entire book. They're given chapter summaries for

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 10>every novel that they were assigned, so they sometimes go

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 10>to that. They're playing the audio books. They were assigning

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 10>fewer books, more quizzes. But they're saying there's a reason

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 10>behind the mass reason, the reason shorter attention spans. Kids

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 10>can't sit there and read, and.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>You have to teach them.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the joy of getting to the back end of

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Tale of Two Cities.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 10>Yes, pressure for standardized tests, they say, that's it, it's another way.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Got that email the other day, don't get me?

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 7>Oh see see.

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 10>And then the sense of short They say that short,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 10>firm content is going to prepare them for the digital world,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 10>so they need.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>But not college.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 3>That's the difference. Let's say they get into duke Swing.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Who's the duke?

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 2>They it's Friday, and they go, okay, this is the

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>reading in this weeekend.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, boom your eighty.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 2>P one hundred pages and it's two different courses. You

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>wake up, you try to get through it, and you

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>got to figure out what to do with the second book.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>That's and they're not. I see it every day. I don't.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 3>You're upsetting. I gotta get you going.

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 5>That's why I do it.

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 10>This one's day Draft Kings being sued by the MLB

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 10>Players Union. They're using the names images of their members

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 10>without their permission. So this is a lawsuit filed in Philadelphia.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 10>So Draft Kings also Bet three six five they're also involved.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 10>They've been using pictures of these professional players and marketing campaign.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 10>The lawyer said that DraftKings and at three six five,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 10>they don't have to do that. They could offer the

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 10>same type of bets and other sports without using the images.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 10>But it's you know, Draft Kings has been expanding the offerings.

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 10>You know, the last month they acquired website Simple Bet.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 10>So it just goes to show you kind of like

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 10>the different changes that are going.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 5>And then Michael Barr had the story about the sports

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 5>gaming in New Jersey. All, I mean, this is just

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 5>we're the early innings of all this sports betting and

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't know where it takes.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Us quite from.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 10>And yeah, casinos in New Jersey are down.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Right is you can do it. You can do so

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 3>much just from your phone sitting on your car.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>You have to link the ratings success right to Betty.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so, Yeah, I think that brings right right.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Next, what do you have?

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 10>Okay, this is the last thing. A shift in home

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 10>ownership in the US. More millionaires are choosing to rent

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 10>instead of buy. They say it's just the lack of

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 10>suitable homes. The Wall Street Journal they analyze some data,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 10>but the millionaires say they'd rather keep their money in

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 10>cash and the stock market another investment. Since home prices,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 10>transaction fees are so high, you have property taxes on

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 10>the rise, and of course insurance premiums where you have

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 10>those mega mansions on the cliffs, you know, right by

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 10>the water. So that's some of the reasons. But one

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 10>guy said he has a three bedroom apartment luxury Manhattan

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 10>high rise, nineteen thousand dollars a month. That's what he'd

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 10>rather do because he can't find a house.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolute sea change, absolute see change going on. I

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.719
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to make of it other than if

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>people look at it and it doesn't work, if you're

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 2>not investing it somewhere else, it's a failed strategy if

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you're just rent and to rent right dead on arrival.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 2>But if you're investing as well, you know, everybody's story

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>is different, but you do the math and go from there.

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Lisa Mateo, thank you for the newspapers.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>This is a Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You can also

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 2>watch the show live on YouTube. Visit Bloomberg podcast channel

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings from seven

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to ten am Eastern from our global headquarters in New

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.