WEBVTT - Surveillance: Landlords Fight for NYC

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>uproar at Bloomberg today is off one article. Let me

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>look down at the terminal New York City landlords press

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>finance bosses to speed return in safe city. And as

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I said to Anna Edwards in the simulcast a bit ago,

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I heard the same story out of the city of London.

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was two or three weeks ago as well.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>To give us perspective on this is Anthony Malkin of

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Empire States Reality Trust. He's got a big fancy title.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, what you need to know is he

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>holds ordered five O one seventh Avenue at thirty seven

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>one Grand Central Place, at the Grand Central Terminal two

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty West fifty seventh at Broadway. These are tangible properties

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of his Empire State Reality Tony, what's the what's the

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>level of panic right now about the empty Midtown that

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I observe? And I really don't think it's a. It's

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a matter of panic. I think it's time for people

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the Hampton's and get out of Aspen,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and get out of the mountains and show up to work.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>The leaders who are very comfortable in their their their

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>country homes need to lead. People want to be back

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at work. The young people want to be back at work.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a competitive advantage to those people who come back

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to work. It's maybe an elitist thing. I take your

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>point on the fancy people are at the fancy properties

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and the people that work for them, do they want

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to the office as well or do they

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be at home? You know, I think that

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole issue of work from home, the death of

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>work from home, has been written Amazon, Facebook, smartest companies,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>biggest companies have stated very clearly they're expanding, and they're

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>expanding in cities, are expanding in New York City. And

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is that you cannot understand

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>halloway validation what happens before the zoom after the zoom,

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you're actually in the office. And I attended a

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>board meeting the public company on his board, I sit

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in minny Apolais on Monday, and Tuesday last week. It's

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so critical to be there. Uh and and in person,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you just don't get the world from the shoulders up

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and in the length of the zoom call, it doesn't work.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>What you can you can you can maintain and you

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>can sustain, but you cannot build and you cannot grow.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is Tony and you and I know

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>all the restaurants have frequent all your wonderful properties, those

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 1>restaurants have to be open. Essentially, they're not. I mean,

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you can go down to Benoit on fifty fifth Street,

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, and they've got their wonderful cafe outside and

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>do the French a faith thing Alan dukas, thank you.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Guess what you can't go in the restaurant. How critical

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is it to link your opening of real estate to

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>their opening of restaurants. You know the fact is that

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Empire State Building, for instance, we have a

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of services, a lot of restaurants, a lot of

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>different food vendors. They will deliver two people's desks, they'll

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>deliver to their offices. People need to be there for

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people to have the justification to open their stores and

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>open their doors and employ people and and it all

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>starts at the top. That's where it starts. And if

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>people are going to sit there, comfortable in there and

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>looking in there, I'm tired of zooms with people who

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are in their beach homes getting delivered iced tea by

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's off camera, you know, get to your desk.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I take I take your message on board, Anthony. I'm

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>not in New York. I'm not in the Hampton's Lam

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in London, but I am in my house. And parts

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of that is to do with and keeping occupancy of

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>office space down. It might be possible for some people

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to go back to offices, but do you accept that

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be in a sort of new normal

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>situation in some of these big world cities where not

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody can go back at the same time. Not yet.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got four phases lockdown, pre therapy, vaccine,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>post therapy vaccine, and then clean up and and replanting

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the field, if you will. We're definitely in that phase

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>two right now, and we've got a ways to go

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>till we get to phase three. So there absolutely are

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>quote new temporary normals unquote, and we have to adjust

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and address that. That said, if people will not lead,

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>people will not follow. And what really is interesting is

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the young people today, ranging from their junior year in

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>high school to two years out of college, they will

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>follow those people who lead, and those people who sit

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at home will remain at a competitive disadvantage from those

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>people who show up and work. So the bottom line is, hey,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>look you need indoor environmental quality. It has been a

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>major factor of all of our work in the over

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars we've spent modernizing our PORTFOLI you in

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>New York City, making an energy efficient MERV third team filters, ventilation,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ion transfer, air purification. We have a benefit in our

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>buildings the fact that they are older, so they didn't

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>used to have centralized air conditioning systems. Consequently, fan rooms

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are located per floor. You're not recirculating the air for

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire building when you cooler heat and individual floor.

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>That said, you can make these changes. You can make

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>these adjustments, and people need to adjust and adapt. That's true.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that you don't try and you don't start.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Those people who do are going to win. So, Anthony,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think people are afraid of? The

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>managers you say aren't coming back. Are they afraid of

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the virus, or they're afraid of the legal system perhaps

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and the legal implications of getting back bringing people back

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if it isn't entirely safe. You know, you make a

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>really good point. This whole issue of liability capping is

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so critical. You cannot take a look at let's say,

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>what happened in New York City and compared to what

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>happened in Miami. Miami happened several months after what happened

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. The lessons learned in New York

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>City have helped everyone else in the world. Nobody's fault

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>that these things occurred when we didn't know what was

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going on. Now that you do know what's going on, however,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to take prudent steps, wear a mask, have

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>your distancing, have your cleaning, do the appropriate measures. That said,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it is a matter where you can operate at the

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>occupancy which is allowable. We're operating at the Empire State

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Building Observatory right now. We've got the same ventilation they're

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the density that we planned for visitors there.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The fresh air comes into that space three to twenty

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>two times an hour, very quickly. Or Tony Malco and

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>last question, what portion of rents are not being paid.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So h in July we reported collection lower in retail

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>than in office. Very good, Tony Malcoln, thank you so much,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just really really love have you, and we'll do this

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>again soon with the Empire State Reality Trust. Mr Melkin,

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of course part of New York City. I really can't

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>say enough about the Bloomberg article right now. We need

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a clinic any equity market. We turn to Laurie Calvacina

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of RBC Capital Markets, airhead of all of US equity

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy as well. Laurie, what will you write about? What

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>will you frame from Monday morning? So look, I think

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a quiet week. I think that there hasn't been

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of news, but the news that has come

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>out has moved markets, and I think what my takeaway

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for the week so far is that there's still an

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>undercurrent of nervousness. I mean, arguably the Fed minutes really

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have rattled markets, and it's not like they rattled

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>them in a major way, but they did reveal that

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's still some underlying concern about this fork in the

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>road that the US economy seems to be at. Which

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>way are we going? Are we going? To start recovering

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>again after a bit of a plateau over the summer,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or are we going to take another leg down? And

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think markets are still concerned about that. We have

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>seen a reaffirmation this week, Lorie, of digital dominance. We

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>see it in any number of companies. We all know them,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot, Walmart, etcetera. Apple with the two trillion dollar

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>valuation as well. How do you do a strategy in

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a time of big box digital dominance. So our call

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>has been not to chase all of the little individual moves,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and we think that we're going to see a lot

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of volatility in terms of leadership at the style level,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at the sector level. UM. We're continuing to tell people

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to stay balanced between things like growth and value. We're

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>neutral on the tech and T I M T space.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We fully understand what's driving it. And as well as

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>those big buck retailers that the work from home UM,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of quarantine type names. We get what's

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>going on there. But we think we're going to see

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility, that this is going to be

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a long, uneven recovery and you just need to buy

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the best in the cyclical camp, the defensive camp, and

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the longer term growth camp and not try to chase

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these little individual moves because we think you'll

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>get whiplash. Wise, were as lowering good morning. Why do

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you not have a moll positive view on small camps

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>If you think they're cheap, if you think they could

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have the potential to capt up with some of those

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>big box moves, that's only talk me about that. And

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're underowned and they and they like recoveries, why

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>not go more aggressively into the smaller camp. End. So

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>our call on small cap is very nuancedpace on your

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>time horizon. And you know, I think everybody on the

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>street likes to think of themselves as a long term investor,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, a lot of

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>people aren't and can't really afford to be a lot

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of people live in that kind of six months, next

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>few quarters, one year time horizon. If you're in that

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve month time horizon, we think you should

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>stay neutral. Um, we think that the small caps are

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>giving you a historic valuation opportunity. That means said, we

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>do also think that they're functioning the way that they

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>typically function as cyclical expressions of confidence in the market.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>So as we you know, as we think one of

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the reasons, frankly, they haven't broken out in a bigger

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>way is that there are still all these doubts about

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the near term trajectory of the economy. But if you

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really are, in your heart of hearts, a three to

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>five year investor, and you can ignore the noise of

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the next year, no, we will come out of this.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>We know that valuations are back to tech bubble extremes,

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and what I mean by that is that small caps

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are historically cheap relative to large caps. So we think

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be in a good place in this

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>trade on a three to five year view, but over

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the next six to twelve months, our confidence level is

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>a bit lower, and so we want to be intellectually

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>honest about that. Okay, so you'd be a bit more cautious.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They're picking up on something you said earlier about the

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>fork in the road, and and it makes me wonder

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>whether actually what we're dealing with in the US is many, many, many,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>many different forks. Because of the size of the economy

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and the way that the coronavirus regulations are being implemented

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>rightly in a very localized fashion, and you can apply

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this to Europe to some extent. If we don't see

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>big lockdowns, big statewide or big country wide lockdowns, if

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they are more nuanced, more targeted, that's going to make

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the job of of working out which fork in the

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>road is going to be taken here for the for

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the big picture economy, that's going to make that really difficult.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. And you know, we're all watching

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this alternative high frequency economic data, things like the open table,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>restaurant book games, flying trends, public transit activity, that sort

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And one of the things that we do

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on my team is an addition to looking at it

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at say US versus Europe, where we can, we try

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at the different regions around the country. Within

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the US, and we noticed over the summer, as the

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>case counts were rising in Texas and Arizona and Florida,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you were seeing different reactions and consumer confidence, you were

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing different reactions in mobility and engagement. UM that the

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>trends were simply not uniform across region different regions of

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the country. Oftentimes the you, the Northeast was looking a

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>bit better than some of these other hotspots. UM And

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes it very very difficult. UM. But

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, Um, what we're seeing

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at the national level is the data has generally plateaued.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>A few things are starting to perk up a little bit,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of stuff has stayed stalled. And that's

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>telling me this economy hasn't decided which way it wants

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to head yet. Will we see M and A here

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the coming quarters simply because of a dearth of

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth? I think you'll get M and A down

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the road. Um. You know, one of the things our

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>industrial analyst Dean dre has talked about is just how

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>strong the balance sheets are of his companies, and he

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks they'll have a lot of dry powdered down the

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>road once confidence returns to go out and do some deals. UM.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's probably a pretty true statement of

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the broader market. UM. But I'll tell you tom As

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I went through the transcripts of this last reporting season,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing that really struck me was that companies, when

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they were giving guidance, we're giving you a quarter's worth,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>not generally anything more than that. Um. And also, you know,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of companies that said, hey, things

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are better in June and July, but still had a

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>cautious tone about the longer term outlook. So that's telling

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>me they're going to keep that dry, that powder dry

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit longer. I mean, I'm glad you

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Dean Dre. He's just wonderful on Honeywell and on

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the other great industrials and what i'd almost call multinational

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>industrials as well. I know you can't talk individual stocks,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>but what does Mr Dre tell you about the confidence

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of these executives? You know what I what I think

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we've heard on the industrial side is that the trade war,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know it really was was was a great sort

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of test run for this not intentionally, obviously nobody saw

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this coming. But these companies are really focused on cost cutting,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They're really focused on margins, they're trying to defend the dividends.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>They're really in a good place to weather this pandemic.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's really, you know, what I've seen in my work,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>That's also what I've been hearing from Dean and some

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of our other industrial analysts. And I'm actually overweight the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>industrial sector while I have, you know, an expectation that

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this market is going to give back some of the

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>games in the final few months of the year, and

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be holy encyclicals right now. Industrials

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>is the one spot in cyclicals that I'm really comfortable

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>leaning into at the sector level. Laurie Calvacina, thank you

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so much. With RBC Capital Markets, there's a really great

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>indecision about where we're heading on inflation and particularly on

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the general economy. Kathy Jones studies this. She has a

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>great joy of working with Lizzie Sanders at Charles Schwab.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It's arguably the best flow team on the street. Kathy,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>question I'd ask liz Anne, let me ask you to

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you as well. Schwab sees the flow of money nobody.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing right now among Schwab clients? Are

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they in the markets? Yeah? Absolutely, Um. I think our

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>clients have learned the lesson of hanging in there after

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the ups and downs of the markets. Uh. You know,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a lot of different clients, so each has

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of view, but in general, our clients

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have stayed in. We didn't see a big exodus when

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy declined, and we've actually seen clients come back

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh and increase their positions as the markets improved.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>What is your general yield prediction given the worries this

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>morning over future aggregate demand. Yeah, so we've been saying

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of the year that we thought that

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>well actually since the pandemic hit, that we thought the

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>tenure yield would stay in a fifty two five hundred

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>basis point range this year. We're looking for a continued

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>improvement in the economy, but the pace will probably slow

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>down now that we've had this as quick rebound, and

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we think that that puts a lid on the upper

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>end of yields. But with the improvement in the economy,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>even to a small extent, or even if we continue

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of roll along here, should hold tenure yields

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>around fifty basis points. And of course the short end

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is completely anchored by the fed um near zero, so

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be a lot of play there. Kathy,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>good to speak to you Anna in London. Let me

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go into the minutes. We're just getting through from the ECB,

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just dropping across the bloomberg right now. They talk about

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>positive market developments not being fully backed by data. Let's

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>remember this is for July. This is the minutes of

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the fift to the sixteenth of July. But something catches

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>my eye at Kathy, and that is what they're saying

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>around the PEP, and that's the plan that the ECB

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>put in place, of course, to to buy up assets.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Some said in the minutes that the pet envelope should

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be a ceiling, not a target, and I wonder if

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that will lead some to conclude that maybe the ECB

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't about to increase the amount of money it puts

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>into the PEP in the future. What are you expecting

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to see. Um, I think that that's still going to

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat flexible. You know, in the ECB you have

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>different different factions there, and I think probably that statement,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head sounds like they're trying

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy different different factions within the e c B.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that they're still under Christie regard this,

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the continuation of the draggy whatever it takes philosophy.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So if they have to increase, they will increase. But

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the short run that probably sends a little bit

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of a signal that will firm up the Euro if

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>people believe there is a ceiling on it. Yeah. They're

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>also saying that they expect more clarity about inflation and

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for that in September. They'll have plenty more

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>data to play with in September when it comes to that.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The global conversation that seems to be going on around inflation, Kathy,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>if we can, if we can talk globally about inflation.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I know these things are much more nuanced and geographical,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but in general terms, we spent many years with central

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>banks struggling to get inflation ray to meet their targets

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in developed markets. This is going to be even more

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult now, isn't it, with unemployment rates as high as

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they are, or as high as they're going to be.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So where do you see the inflation and narrative gemming? Yeah,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a real struggle. We've got

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>several years here before we close those output gaps, we

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>get unemployment rates down, we get wages up, and enough

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that you have, you know, enough money in people's pockets

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to fuel some inflation. It's going to take a couple

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of years. But I'm not in the doom and gloom

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a deflation camp. I think the abundant liquidity

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and the efforts of the central banks will mean that

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we will gradually see a little bit better inflation. But

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take time because we doubled into unemployment and

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on all of the damage that's been done to the

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>major developed economies economies around the world. It's going to

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>take some time. The kitty, you know, we just had

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>launched time. I'm Bloomberg, folks. This is an incredibly important

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>story and I'll get it out shoot Nagina Natalie Wong

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the real estate and the emptiness of our big cities.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>The article focuses on New York City, but in Edwards.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I saw a like article on London

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago as well. Kathy Jones to Schwab,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just assume that there will be a lower g d

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>P number and that the level we get back to

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>could even be sub two real g d P. No,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're assuming that at all. Um. You know,

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we do know that there are structural changes taking place.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So a commercial real estate is certainly an area where

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions as to how that's going to evolve.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I really take on more optimistic view of things.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>If you look at how anxious people are to get

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>back to their quote unquote normal lives. What you see

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is they're willing to risk their health and well being

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to just go to a bar or have

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a party or go to the gym. Um, I'm actually

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>fairly optimistic about the resilience of the major economies once

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>once we get further down the road. Obviously a vaccine

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a huge game changer, but I don't assume

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that we necessarily go to a lower level of economic

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>activity below two percent going forward. I think we can

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>get back to that two to two and a half

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>percent area. I don't know that we can go be

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a pond differ. Well, that's yield up at some point,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that's yield up priced down. How do you protect on

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>price erosion on fixed income? Well, right now, we're keeping

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>duration a little bit short of average or whatever the

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>benchmark is. So if you take the egg the benchmark,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's around six or seven. Right now, we'd keep it

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit shorter because the risk reward at the

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>long end just isn't that great unless you have a

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>very deflationary outlook, which we don't have. So we're keeping

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>duration a little bit short. Um, we like high quality credit,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I investment grade credit. You can actually take

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>some duration there and get a bit more yield, and

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you can venture out into some of the riskier segments

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of them market if you have the risk appetite for

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit um and get some duration plus yield there. Yeah.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>What is appetite like for some of the new issuance

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>we've seen coming through Kathy from the corporate world in

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and I'm thinking of investment grade. I

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was looking at a chant that showed issue instead of

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>record for the year, and that was on Monday, So

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>midway through August, we've already reached a full year record

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on on corporate issues. Is there still the appetite and

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the market still soaked this up? Oh? I think so. Um,

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the issue that Apple did a

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>little while ago. Um, I think investment grade will find

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>very strong appetite. You know, have the support programs from

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED. We know the FED has been buying some

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>investment grade. You can't get a lot of yield anywhere,

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and um, when you're up in credit quality, there's just

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>tremendous demand for some sort of yield out there. And

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I g definitely satisfies that. Kathy, thank you so much,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Jones and rush So I greatly appreciated. What we

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>know for certain is that the gentleman from Delaware has

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to go out and find disaffected Republicans. That's happened before,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>including the disaffected Republican Dean family of years ago, where

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Howard Dean wandered from GOP over to the Democratic Party

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and had a sterling career in Vermont and wandered out

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as a presidential candidate just a few years ago. We're

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thrilled that Howard Dean could join us this morning. The

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>former d n C chair, Howard the vice president, has

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to go out and find disaffected Republicans. How does he

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>do that? Actually he doesn't. He's going to do that,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't. All he has to do is get

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a bigger turn out than we had in two thousand sixteen.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're well on their way to doing that.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is a convention that is aimed at Republicans.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>You just want to see honesty back in our government. Uh.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you had two or three pretty big

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican figures, Guy John Kasey, Cindy McCain, and Colin Powell

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>basically giving permission for disaffected Republicans to vote for Joe Biden. Uh.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a good job that I don't think conventions

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>are ever going to go back to the way they work.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>This convention has been very effective with this format, and

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously much less expensive and much easier logistically. What

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>happens when these two odd conventions are over, how do

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats move forward to get the vote out and

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to get those independence and disaffected Republicans. Well, that's why

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing so much hassle about the male system and

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Trump's attempt to disrupt the mail. Uh, it's clearly going

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be mail ballots. In Vermont, we had the largest

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>turnout in the history of the primary. The primary vote

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>was up something like over the previous record of primary voters.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>That's just unheard of. Uh. And I think you know,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>voting by mail is convenient, people like it. Five states,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>including Utah and Oregon, both at the opposite ends of

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the political polls, have been doing this for a while

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's very successful in people like it regardless of

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>their party. So that's going to be a critical key.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Has have the post office run and function properly and

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a big get out of the vote tool. How

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is it easier to vote by posts than vote in

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>person as far, well, it's much easier in the COVID

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>epidemic where you have to worry about getting you know,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty serious medical problem. And uh and it's always been

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a problem, and more so recently voting machines. The voting

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>machine technology really doesn't work in this country because they've

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>adopted a system that you can't really recount it. You

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just keep staring at the numbers. That's that's the recount.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there's some states that don't use that technology that

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you can actually see ballots that get counted by the machine,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>which is the right way to go. So voting in

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this country has been a big problem since about two

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand with a very controversial Bush versus Score court case,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and we need to do much better there. What is

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the message that the Democrats should do not to make

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>sure that people just turn out and vote. How do

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you energize people? It's pretty well, you know, Trump is

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the interget I mean most most inner interim elections when

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a president's running for re election is about as a

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>referendum on the president. So Trump is our best weapon

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump is incredibly destructive. He's certainly the most dishonest president

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had, and going back over the years, that's

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a statement to make. So people are first they're

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out and vote against Trump. Second of all,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they do want decency. One of the great things about

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden's candidacy, even though he's seventy eight years old and

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, is he's a decent guy and he

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>does listen to people. He has empathy, which Trump completely lacked.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be a huge contrast between the personal styles.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know we all talked about issues and what

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna do with the real issue is always

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>does this person care about people like me and Joe

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Biden does and Trump doesn't. Where do you sit Dr

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Dean with the idea of shocking the nation in October

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>into the third week of October by starting to announce

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cabinet members. If this is a president Biden who has

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to delegate authority for whatever the reasons, can he like

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>tear up the political playbook and say so and so

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>will be my Secretary State, so and so will be

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>my Secretary Treasury. That's controversial. I thought about that when

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I was running. The reason people don't do it, I

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>think is because, um, there's some concern that if you

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, it appears that you're trading your your cabinet

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>appointment for a for support. And you know, I've I've

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>always heard this. We thought about doing it ourselves. That

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was an explanation I got from a lawyer. Uh So

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think may have something to do with the

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that candidates just don't do that. What is the

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>best process for the vice president when he debates President Trump?

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We always saw the debate of of Trump Clinton. How

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>should Biden debate the sitting president? He just needs to

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be himself. Trump will get out there and say all

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of Atlantish things about conspiracy theories and drinking bleach

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and god knows what else, and Biden testing himself for

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever Biden's position on the political spectrum, and he's probably

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more conservative than I am. Um, he's just a good

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>guy and just people would like to have a normal

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>president again after this four years of reality television. So

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he just has to be himself. And if he makes

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a flub or says something you know that's uh, you know,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that's out of line and out of whack. He's been

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that for thirty five years. He's just just makes

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>him more human. But Howardina, I also keep on reading

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and that actually that there's a lot more googling on

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories. I think we had a story, um you know,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on Q and On and the fact that President Trump

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't say it was nonsense. Does it really you know,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is it really you know taking ground in the US?

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Are a lot more people, um, you know, believing in

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories or is it just still a very small part. Well,

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a small part, but it's a lot more people

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>than it was. Because Trump floats these conspiracy theories and

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>then Q and on, look, he has he has energized

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that what I would call the crackpot, right, um and

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's a problem. And because people do believe this

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. I mean we did, we seriously did

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have two Americans who died because they drank a swimming

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>pool cleaner because Trump apparently recommended that that was how

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get rid of coronavirus. I mean, really, you know,

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say that, I think I don't hate

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to say it's true. I think Trump is crazy. I

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>really do think he's mentally unbalanced, and he's been mentally

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>imbalanced most of his life. Dr Dean, we didn't have

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you on to talk politics. We need to get some

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>medicine out of the way here. Right now. We have

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a new solution for this virus. It is a derivative

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>called oleander her oleand rin whatever it is. And the

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>President is not endorsed it, but said quote will look

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at it. Can you speak to our global audience about

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the pathology and the the almost the physiology of these

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>these easy solutions on a virus pathology? Isn't there are

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>no easy solution. There are plenty of fantastic sciences scientists

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in many countries around the globe. There's a hundred potential vaccines,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>several of which are probably gonna work. I think the most,

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>uh most further furthest along is astro Zeneca and Oxford

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>University in the UK. That appears to be far advancing

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because the drug company is going to do an unusual

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of test called the Challenge tests, which will even

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>move that and they're also already making doses on the

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>com That is uh to to take the risk of

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>making something that's not gonna work, I think it will work. Uh.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It certainly isn't going to be there by the election,

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's possible it will be there by January,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and that will make a difference. It won't make a

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>difference right away because there's seven billion people in the

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>world and at least sixty or seventy of them have

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to be vaccinated in order to get hurt immunity. But

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>these cracked by theories people should not. I mean, the

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>President the United States is just keep his mouth chef

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's clinically impossible for US. Dr Dean, thank you

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so much, of course, a former DNC chair. Thanks for

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.