1
00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:05,160
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Action Network podcast, the number one show

2
00:00:05,280 --> 00:00:06,920
Speaker 1: for the invested sports fan.

3
00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:15,760
Speaker 2: All Right, here we go, throwing show. I'm saying it's

4
00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:16,759
Speaker 2: a cash touch.

5
00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:20,920
Speaker 1: We'll see most gamblers when they go to gamble, they

6
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:25,800
Speaker 1: go to win. God, that's incredible. Big bank, small banks.

7
00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:28,400
Speaker 2: I like to make money. All Right, this is the

8
00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:29,960
Speaker 2: ultimate kaba you.

9
00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:36,120
Speaker 1: Want to pull and we are underway.

10
00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:40,640
Speaker 2: Hello everyone, Welcome back to the NFL Week five Fantasy

11
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:43,519
Speaker 2: Flex on the Action Network Podcast. I'm Matthew Readman, the

12
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,240
Speaker 2: editor in chief of Fantasy Labs, with me as Sean

13
00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:48,960
Speaker 2: Corner and Chris Ravon. Shawn is our director of predictive

14
00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:51,320
Speaker 2: Analytics and one of the top end season fantasy football

15
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:53,600
Speaker 2: rankers for the past half decade, and Chris is a

16
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,040
Speaker 2: senior editor and analyst at The Action Network and a

17
00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:58,840
Speaker 2: co host of the Action Network show on Serious XM

18
00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:02,400
Speaker 2: Fantasy Radio. Sean, I believe you went to the Rams

19
00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:05,039
Speaker 2: Bucks game. Please tell me that you were on the over.

20
00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:05,840
Speaker 3: Yeah.

21
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:08,920
Speaker 4: I actually did hammer the end game over. After a

22
00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:12,640
Speaker 4: couple of Margarita's, I saw that the Buccaneers were ahead,

23
00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:14,000
Speaker 4: so I just knew it was going to turn into

24
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:16,760
Speaker 4: a shootout. It was nice being their pregame to not

25
00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:18,640
Speaker 4: rely on beat writers, and I got to see Chris

26
00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,200
Speaker 4: Goodwin warming up, and I tried to alert people. You know,

27
00:01:21,240 --> 00:01:23,440
Speaker 4: he looked really good. You know, I have Chris Golin

28
00:01:23,560 --> 00:01:25,800
Speaker 4: like ninety percent of my fancy teams, and I saw

29
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:29,040
Speaker 4: my preseason prop bet of one hundred and one odds

30
00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:32,199
Speaker 4: that he'd lead this the league in receiving yards is looking,

31
00:01:32,319 --> 00:01:34,639
Speaker 4: you know, alive still, so that that was fun to see.

32
00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:38,920
Speaker 2: Margerita fueled overs eyes instead of numbers, just based on

33
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:41,399
Speaker 2: watching Chris Godwin. I don't know who you are right now,

34
00:01:41,480 --> 00:01:44,280
Speaker 2: but anyway, it's it's good to have you on the show. Chris.

35
00:01:44,319 --> 00:01:45,400
Speaker 2: How was Week four for you?

36
00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:46,840
Speaker 1: It was pretty solid.

37
00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:49,440
Speaker 3: Sean did actually tip me off to the fact that

38
00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:51,840
Speaker 3: Chris Godwin was looking good, which was good because I

39
00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:54,440
Speaker 3: actually had him I believe a spot above Evans, but

40
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:57,840
Speaker 3: overall solid week saw. I saw this game with these

41
00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:00,680
Speaker 3: two rookie quarterbacks and they would tell me that one

42
00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:02,320
Speaker 3: of them was better than the other, and I didn't

43
00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:03,120
Speaker 3: quite see it that way.

44
00:02:03,200 --> 00:02:04,680
Speaker 1: So shouts to Danny Donns.

45
00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:07,160
Speaker 2: In this episode, we're breaking down the players at the

46
00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:09,600
Speaker 2: top of our rankings. Those, by the way, are available

47
00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,120
Speaker 2: at actionnetwork dot com slash Fantasy. We were discussing the

48
00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:15,040
Speaker 2: guys we're high or low on We're speculating on some props.

49
00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:16,880
Speaker 2: At the end of the show, we were answering your

50
00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:21,000
Speaker 2: Twitter fantasy questions. And joining us is Drew Dinkmeyer, a

51
00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:24,519
Speaker 2: co founder of Daily Roto dot com, a millionaire maker, winner,

52
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 2: host of the Sports Greade fantasy football podcast, and really

53
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,400
Speaker 2: just a all around top tier human being. Drew, how

54
00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:30,880
Speaker 2: are you doing.

55
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:31,720
Speaker 1: I'm doing great.

56
00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:34,520
Speaker 5: I was at that Danny Dimes game as well, the

57
00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:37,640
Speaker 5: Giants Redskins game. It was probably the worst football I

58
00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,520
Speaker 5: hope to see all year long. I cannot believe Washington

59
00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:43,080
Speaker 5: is a professional football team. Every play there was someone

60
00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:45,320
Speaker 5: wide open for the Giants, or a huge running ing

61
00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:47,160
Speaker 5: or a penalty. It was just insane. I've never seen

62
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:49,960
Speaker 5: defense play that poorly. Quite a terrible game to watch

63
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:52,760
Speaker 5: when you're looking for fantasy actions. So I have my

64
00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:54,160
Speaker 5: eyes kind of on the red zone in the suite

65
00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:56,359
Speaker 5: as well. But I'm doing great. Thanks for having you, guys.

66
00:02:56,520 --> 00:02:59,720
Speaker 2: Before we get into week five, let's talk about one

67
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:02,239
Speaker 2: of the things that I think everyone kind of knows

68
00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:04,919
Speaker 2: you for across the industry. That is the Welly Maker.

69
00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:07,160
Speaker 2: That is the water project that you've organized for the

70
00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,519
Speaker 2: past couple of years. You're doing it once again this year.

71
00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:11,760
Speaker 2: Can you talk a little bit about it.

72
00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:13,800
Speaker 5: Yeah, So the idea was a few years ago. I

73
00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:16,239
Speaker 5: was really inspired by a speech I heard from Scott Harrison.

74
00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:19,119
Speaker 5: You founded this company, Charity Water. That's a charity organization

75
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:23,160
Speaker 5: that's goal is to eliminate drinking water issues around the world,

76
00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:24,760
Speaker 5: and there's a ton of them where people just don't

77
00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:27,720
Speaker 5: have access to clean drinking water. It impacts daily life

78
00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:29,400
Speaker 5: in a substantial way. It takes a lot of time

79
00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:32,120
Speaker 5: away from women and young girls in terms of having

80
00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:35,320
Speaker 5: to reflect water. It also impedes diet and all sorts

81
00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:37,280
Speaker 5: of disease issues as well. A lot of people dying

82
00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,720
Speaker 5: of diarrhea and different things that you shouldn't be an issue,

83
00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:41,960
Speaker 5: and so everybody should have access to clean drinking water.

84
00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,080
Speaker 5: Charity Water is an incredible organization. They have one hundred

85
00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:46,119
Speaker 5: percent of the donations that go right to the water products.

86
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:47,920
Speaker 5: So I decide to partner with them. And the idea

87
00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,040
Speaker 5: was with the Millionaire Maker or the Fantal sun a

88
00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:52,640
Speaker 5: million whatever come of a Millionaire Chaser tournament. You're out

89
00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:55,240
Speaker 5: there playing basically the equivalent of one entry in that

90
00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:59,240
Speaker 5: is nearly the equivalent of giving one single person sustainable

91
00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:01,120
Speaker 5: clean water for the rest. So the idea was to

92
00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,480
Speaker 5: inspire people to hopefully give one entry away back to

93
00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:07,200
Speaker 5: this cause, and I would match all the donations that

94
00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:09,080
Speaker 5: come in. We're in year three now, so far we've

95
00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,160
Speaker 5: raised over forty thousand dollars this year. The next match

96
00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:13,000
Speaker 5: target will be at forty five thousand, where I'll match

97
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,320
Speaker 5: another five thousand. I've committed with son partner in this

98
00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:19,200
Speaker 5: to match the first thirty thousand in donations altogether. So

99
00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,000
Speaker 5: we've matched the first twenty thousands that I've come in,

100
00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:22,520
Speaker 5: and we'll keep matching kind of on the way up,

101
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:23,920
Speaker 5: and it's going to continue throughout the rest of the

102
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:24,640
Speaker 5: football season.

103
00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:28,600
Speaker 2: Fantastic. Everyone be sure to check information on that out, Dink.

104
00:04:28,640 --> 00:04:31,720
Speaker 2: Where can people where can they donate? How can they

105
00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:32,640
Speaker 2: find out more information?

106
00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:35,320
Speaker 5: Yeah, so if you google a wellie maker, you'll find

107
00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:37,000
Speaker 5: the link, or if you just check out my Twitter

108
00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:38,960
Speaker 5: at Drew Dink, Martin's a pin suite up there with

109
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:39,719
Speaker 5: all the information.

110
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:43,680
Speaker 2: All right, fantastic, Let's get into week five, Drew. The

111
00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:46,880
Speaker 2: players at the top of the rankings for quarterback for us.

112
00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:49,640
Speaker 2: By the way, again, those rankings you can find Action

113
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,960
Speaker 2: network dot Com, Slash Fantasy. Those players Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson,

114
00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:56,680
Speaker 2: Deshaun Watson. Not a surprise there. All three of us

115
00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:58,960
Speaker 2: have them in the top three. Are those your top

116
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:01,080
Speaker 2: three for this way? Is there anyone else that you

117
00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:03,039
Speaker 2: would maybe include in that group?

118
00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:04,719
Speaker 5: No, those guys are right there. The one on the

119
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,080
Speaker 5: guy that we'd include in that group is Carson Wentz.

120
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:11,320
Speaker 5: We found historically that implied team totals track really well

121
00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:13,560
Speaker 5: with quarterback projections on the whole. In Philadelphia has one

122
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,640
Speaker 5: of highest implied team totals on the slate, approaching over

123
00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:18,680
Speaker 5: twenty nine and approaching thirty early on in this game

124
00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,760
Speaker 5: against the Jets. I think people will be down a

125
00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,200
Speaker 5: little bit on Carson Wentz simply because recency bias and

126
00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:25,440
Speaker 5: seeing Jordan Howard kind of score all those touchdowns in

127
00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:27,599
Speaker 5: a primetime game where all your focus and your attention

128
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,719
Speaker 5: is on one single game. So Carson Wentz is one

129
00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:31,080
Speaker 5: of those guys that we have kind of knocking on

130
00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:33,520
Speaker 5: the door of that top three and someone that we

131
00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:35,240
Speaker 5: think will be pretty undervalued this week.

132
00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:37,760
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't want to brag, but out of the

133
00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,360
Speaker 2: three of us Sean and Raymond, I am the highest

134
00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:42,680
Speaker 2: on Carson Wentz. I haven't at number four, so you

135
00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:46,000
Speaker 2: guys need to catch up. You know, that's just me

136
00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:48,720
Speaker 2: being humbled there. Either way, I'm like dead last in

137
00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:52,800
Speaker 2: the Fantasy pros rankings. Probably not, but it hasn't gone

138
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,320
Speaker 2: well for me, so I shouldn't be braggy at all. Sean,

139
00:05:55,480 --> 00:05:58,680
Speaker 2: since we all have Mahomes, Jackson, and Watson in the

140
00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:00,680
Speaker 2: top three, it probably doesn't mean make a lot of

141
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:02,880
Speaker 2: sense to talk about it. Drew just mentioned that he's

142
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,160
Speaker 2: high on wins. Who is someone that you are relatively

143
00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:06,279
Speaker 2: high on entering the week?

144
00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,920
Speaker 4: It'd be Kyle Allen Right now, I have him ranked

145
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:13,000
Speaker 4: QB eighteen. It looks like his ECR is QB twenty two.

146
00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:15,240
Speaker 4: I think, you know, people are going to kind of

147
00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,800
Speaker 4: sour on him after last week's performance is pretty brutal.

148
00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,560
Speaker 4: I mean, he's lost three fumbles last week, so you're

149
00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,200
Speaker 4: going to see that kind of inconsistent production from him.

150
00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,640
Speaker 4: And then you know DK's priced him pretty cheap this

151
00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:28,280
Speaker 4: week fifty one hundred. You know people are going to

152
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,039
Speaker 4: see versus Jacksonville and sort of shy away. But you know,

153
00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:33,880
Speaker 4: if Ramsey doesn't end up suiting up again this week,

154
00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:36,080
Speaker 4: I think we could we could fire up Kyle Allen.

155
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:39,239
Speaker 4: You know the Jags, they've allowed three hundred yard passing

156
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,640
Speaker 4: games from Joe Flacco and Marcus Mariota now the past

157
00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:44,560
Speaker 4: two games. So you know, I don't think this is

158
00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:46,360
Speaker 4: a matchup you need to really worry about. And Kyle

159
00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:48,120
Speaker 4: Allen still has a ton of weapons, so he's a

160
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:51,080
Speaker 4: guy I might expect for a bounce back week Week five.

161
00:06:51,240 --> 00:06:52,880
Speaker 2: Raymond, who are you high on this week?

162
00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,960
Speaker 3: Well, Drew kind of alluded to, you know, imply team

163
00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:59,800
Speaker 3: totals track extremely well with quarterback production. That's because quarterbacks

164
00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:03,880
Speaker 3: are you responsible for two thirds of a team's offensive touchdowns,

165
00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:07,400
Speaker 3: give or take. And for me, it's Tom Brady this week.

166
00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:10,040
Speaker 3: I have him up there at my number four quarterback.

167
00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:12,680
Speaker 3: When I do my rankings, I go through each matchup

168
00:07:12,680 --> 00:07:14,480
Speaker 3: and I kind of look for, you know what spots

169
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:16,520
Speaker 3: receivers kind of have a good spot out with where

170
00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:19,000
Speaker 3: the running game and I kind of do some little adjustments.

171
00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:23,120
Speaker 3: I don't know what match up the Patriots can't exploit

172
00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:23,560
Speaker 3: in this game.

173
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:26,119
Speaker 1: I mean everywhere you look, they have a plus matchup.

174
00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:29,000
Speaker 3: Whether it's Julian Edelman in a slot, whether it's the

175
00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:33,000
Speaker 3: outside receivers, whether it's the run game with Michelle, you know,

176
00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:34,720
Speaker 3: anybody you look to has.

177
00:07:34,560 --> 00:07:36,680
Speaker 1: A great matchup. I think this is a spash spot

178
00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:37,320
Speaker 1: for the Patriots.

179
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:40,360
Speaker 3: Were probably getting a little bit undervalued because they're coming

180
00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,040
Speaker 3: off two straight games in which they did not cover

181
00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:44,840
Speaker 3: against the spread. So I even think they're implied total

182
00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:46,960
Speaker 3: might be a little bit underrated.

183
00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:49,080
Speaker 1: Tom Brady fifty one and thirty two against the.

184
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:53,480
Speaker 3: Spread following a failure to cover in the game before.

185
00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:56,400
Speaker 3: I just think it's a blow up spot for Brady.

186
00:07:56,440 --> 00:07:58,480
Speaker 3: And if you look at his numbers, two a little

187
00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:03,760
Speaker 3: bit deflated by facing the Buffalo Bills. And if you

188
00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:06,960
Speaker 3: look at his numbers with Josh Gordon in games not

189
00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:11,320
Speaker 3: against Buffalo, he's averaging three hundred and two passing yards,

190
00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:15,320
Speaker 3: eight point four yards per attempt, one point nine touchdowns,

191
00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:18,920
Speaker 3: zero point five interceptions. Essentially like the old smash Tom

192
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:21,280
Speaker 3: Brady that we always knew if you just take out

193
00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:24,320
Speaker 3: those two or three games he faced Buffalo since acquiring Gordon.

194
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:25,800
Speaker 1: So love Brady this week.

195
00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:28,200
Speaker 2: All right, the guy I'm relatively high on Jacoby Brissette.

196
00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,800
Speaker 2: I think it will be ugly, but I think going

197
00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:34,640
Speaker 2: against Kansas City, the defense I don't really respect all

198
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,480
Speaker 2: that much. I think he's going to be forced to

199
00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:38,560
Speaker 2: have to throw the ball quite a bit. He obviously

200
00:08:38,640 --> 00:08:41,520
Speaker 2: has some rushing ability, so I think just through a

201
00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:43,760
Speaker 2: pass heavy game script and then running the ball, he

202
00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:46,080
Speaker 2: has some potential there. So a little bit higher on

203
00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:50,280
Speaker 2: him than consensus. Drew. Who is someone or a couple

204
00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,400
Speaker 2: players that you are down on at the position.

205
00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:54,800
Speaker 5: Yeah, two guys that we have ranked kind of right

206
00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:57,960
Speaker 5: around the fifteenth best quarterback, so you know, high end

207
00:08:58,040 --> 00:08:59,559
Speaker 5: quarterback too, but I think a lot of people will

208
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:01,760
Speaker 5: naturally think of them as quarterback ones. One has been

209
00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:03,920
Speaker 5: very disappointing this year on the whole from a fancy perspective.

210
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:07,520
Speaker 5: That's Aaron Rodgers, who draws another difficult matchup in our

211
00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:09,600
Speaker 5: eyes this week, going kind of into Dallas. And then

212
00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:12,319
Speaker 5: Jameis Winston coming off of this incredible game against the

213
00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:14,920
Speaker 5: Rams in a tough matchup. We have him projected kind

214
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:17,160
Speaker 5: of right around the fifteenth best quarterback right now in

215
00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:19,319
Speaker 5: a matchup in New Orleans, a much tougher game environment.

216
00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:21,440
Speaker 5: New Orleans looks to be really slowing down the games

217
00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:23,640
Speaker 5: right now in the absence of Drew Breeze, and obviously

218
00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,120
Speaker 5: New Orleans defense has played very very well the last

219
00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:28,400
Speaker 5: few weeks. So both Aaron Rodgers and Jameis Winston and

220
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:30,280
Speaker 5: guys that I think will end up being lower than

221
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:30,679
Speaker 5: the market.

222
00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:33,080
Speaker 2: On Sean, I think you are with Drew right there.

223
00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:35,319
Speaker 2: On Jameis Winston, what are your thoughts on him.

224
00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,400
Speaker 4: Going into the season, My approach at QB was basically,

225
00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,680
Speaker 4: wait till round ten or later and either target Jameis Winston,

226
00:09:41,760 --> 00:09:44,440
Speaker 4: Lamar Jackson, or Dak Prescott. So after Week one, I

227
00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:46,640
Speaker 4: was just being flowed on Twitter, like what the hell

228
00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:49,160
Speaker 4: is wrong with you Jameis Winston, and I just had

229
00:09:49,160 --> 00:09:51,520
Speaker 4: to write a big article kind of explain to people,

230
00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:53,520
Speaker 4: you know, why we targeted Winston.

231
00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:53,880
Speaker 5: Later.

232
00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:56,200
Speaker 4: You know, he's probably gonna end up putting top ten,

233
00:09:56,280 --> 00:09:58,120
Speaker 4: top twelve members at the end of the year, but

234
00:09:58,160 --> 00:09:59,960
Speaker 4: the way he gets there is going to be pretty ugly.

235
00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:01,920
Speaker 4: So I said, you know, you can just keep him

236
00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:03,760
Speaker 4: and you know, roll with the punches. He's gonna have

237
00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:06,040
Speaker 4: his ups and downs. So this is a situation where

238
00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:08,400
Speaker 4: I think he's people are going to be overrating him.

239
00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:11,600
Speaker 4: After that that Rams game, He's top five price quarterback

240
00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:14,160
Speaker 4: on DraftKings. So I'm with with Drew here. You know,

241
00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:17,840
Speaker 4: it's a tougher matchup and with Winston, whenever he's super high,

242
00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:19,560
Speaker 4: I like to, you know, fade him a bit, and

243
00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:22,960
Speaker 4: then when he's down and people you know, are underestimating him,

244
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:24,720
Speaker 4: that's what I like to buy low on him. So

245
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:26,920
Speaker 4: this week it's it's part of just you know, the

246
00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:29,680
Speaker 4: the jamis Winston roller coaster. If you haven't, you just

247
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:32,640
Speaker 4: have to manage your expectations and not over or under

248
00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:34,959
Speaker 4: your act week to week. So this week I'm just

249
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:37,120
Speaker 4: a little bit lower on him. I'm right in line

250
00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:39,920
Speaker 4: with Dink. I have him at QB fifteen right now,

251
00:10:39,960 --> 00:10:41,880
Speaker 4: where you know most people are retreating as like a

252
00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:43,200
Speaker 4: QB one for week five.

253
00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:46,400
Speaker 3: Raymond, who are you down on similar kind of guy

254
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:48,760
Speaker 3: in terms of the recency bias? Because I do agree

255
00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:51,040
Speaker 3: with you guys on Winston have him around fifteen as well.

256
00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:54,760
Speaker 3: Daniel Jones barely in my top twenty this week. Listen,

257
00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:57,240
Speaker 3: Dank kind of mentioned it. There was no defense played

258
00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:58,559
Speaker 3: by the Washington Redskins.

259
00:10:58,800 --> 00:10:59,760
Speaker 1: We saw the Bucks too.

260
00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:04,079
Speaker 3: Shootouts for them this game against the Vikings, totally different

261
00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:05,600
Speaker 3: type of situation for Daniel Jones.

262
00:11:05,640 --> 00:11:08,520
Speaker 1: I think this is kind of his rookie wake up call.

263
00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:12,199
Speaker 3: If you look at the under per bet Labs twenty six,

264
00:11:12,559 --> 00:11:16,640
Speaker 3: fifteen and one, when Mike Zimmer coach teams go on

265
00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,560
Speaker 3: the road, this will just be a tough spot for

266
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:21,360
Speaker 3: the Giants. I think they come back down to earth.

267
00:11:21,520 --> 00:11:22,959
Speaker 3: And I mean even the fact that they only put

268
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:25,720
Speaker 3: up twenty four on the Washington Redskins and Daniel Jones

269
00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:29,560
Speaker 3: had more interceptions than touchdowns in that football game is concerning.

270
00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:33,200
Speaker 3: So as good as Daniel Jones looked in his first

271
00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:35,319
Speaker 3: two weeks, I think this is the wake up call

272
00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:38,360
Speaker 3: for him. Fringe top twenty guy, people have them a

273
00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,839
Speaker 3: little bit higher. It looks like around sixteen, So I'm

274
00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:41,880
Speaker 3: fading them at that spot.

275
00:11:42,160 --> 00:11:44,080
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I should say I think the difference

276
00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:48,280
Speaker 2: in the rankings between number fourteen and number nineteen, like

277
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:50,760
Speaker 2: that's a really small difference in terms of kind of

278
00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:54,480
Speaker 2: points per game that we're projecting. But you know, within

279
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:57,400
Speaker 2: that group there is still a really wide range of outcomes,

280
00:11:57,440 --> 00:11:59,520
Speaker 2: so you want to try to get it right. The

281
00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:02,760
Speaker 2: guy I'm relatively down on is Jared Goff, who had

282
00:12:02,840 --> 00:12:06,080
Speaker 2: I think one of the most like empty blow up

283
00:12:06,360 --> 00:12:09,360
Speaker 2: games I've ever seen last week, and then now we

284
00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:11,880
Speaker 2: have him, you know, short week, playing on Thursday night football,

285
00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:14,719
Speaker 2: having to travel to Seattle against a division opponent. It's

286
00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:17,560
Speaker 2: a tough place to play, you know. Obviously for main slate,

287
00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:19,320
Speaker 2: he's not on the slate, so you don't have to

288
00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:21,440
Speaker 2: worry about it. But for season long, he's still going

289
00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:24,280
Speaker 2: to be someone I'm probably gonna stay away from this week.

290
00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:26,000
Speaker 4: I mean, I was at that game and I wasn't

291
00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:27,960
Speaker 4: checking the box score throughout, and if you asked me

292
00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:29,880
Speaker 4: after the game how many yards got through for it,

293
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:32,440
Speaker 4: I would have guessed like three p fifteen or so.

294
00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:34,800
Speaker 4: So I saw that he threw for five hundred and seventeen.

295
00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:37,520
Speaker 4: I was blown away, because you're right, it was pretty empty,

296
00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:38,680
Speaker 4: gyuaradge in my opinion.

297
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:40,440
Speaker 2: By the way, everyone should be sure to check out

298
00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:43,000
Speaker 2: the props tool at Fantasy Labs, which has just been

299
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:45,480
Speaker 2: crushing it this year. Sean, what do you have for

300
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:46,480
Speaker 2: us this week?

301
00:12:47,360 --> 00:12:49,560
Speaker 4: Back to due to popular demand, I'm bringing back some

302
00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:52,520
Speaker 4: of these, like DK props. You could either take Patrick

303
00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:55,480
Speaker 4: Mahomes or any two qbs on the main slate not

304
00:12:55,559 --> 00:12:58,760
Speaker 4: named Lamar Jackson and whoever has the highest scard of

305
00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:00,960
Speaker 4: the two wins, So you can pick either side, and

306
00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:03,160
Speaker 4: just to help some of the qbs that would be available,

307
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:07,480
Speaker 4: like Deshaun Watson, Tom Brady, Kyler, Murray, Jamis Winston, Carson Wentz,

308
00:13:07,640 --> 00:13:09,000
Speaker 4: Dak Prescott.

309
00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:11,319
Speaker 1: Tom Brady, and Deshaun Watson.

310
00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:14,760
Speaker 3: Those are my QB two and QB four's Lamar Jackson

311
00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:18,120
Speaker 3: obviously off the table as my QB three, but yeah,

312
00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:20,559
Speaker 3: I think both of those guys have a extremely high

313
00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:22,920
Speaker 3: steeling and we saw what happened last week where you know,

314
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:25,440
Speaker 3: you can have these these games where Patrick Mahomes, as

315
00:13:25,440 --> 00:13:27,840
Speaker 3: good as he might play and help them win, the

316
00:13:27,880 --> 00:13:30,320
Speaker 3: touchdown variants can kind of work against you. So I'm

317
00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:33,840
Speaker 3: definitely going with the double QB option over Mahomes, and

318
00:13:33,840 --> 00:13:34,880
Speaker 3: it will be Brady and Watson.

319
00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:37,480
Speaker 5: I would take Mahomes here. We've got Mahomes with this

320
00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:41,480
Speaker 5: outrageous projection compared to the other guys. We've got Mahomes

321
00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:44,480
Speaker 5: like six DraftKings points ahead of everybody else. So I

322
00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:46,520
Speaker 5: would take Mahomes in that instance. I think it's a

323
00:13:46,520 --> 00:13:48,959
Speaker 5: big bounce back spot. Not often you will see Patrick

324
00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:51,480
Speaker 5: Mahomes throw for zero touchdowns, especially in the game that

325
00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:54,160
Speaker 5: Kansas City scores thirty plus points. I think that'll recorrect

326
00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:55,320
Speaker 5: this week, so I'll take Mahomes.

327
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,200
Speaker 2: I'm going with Watson wins. I think both of those

328
00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:00,400
Speaker 2: guys do have blow up potential in this spot. So

329
00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:02,640
Speaker 2: just just as Drew mentioned, it could be a big

330
00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:05,160
Speaker 2: bounce back spot for ma Homes, I think this also

331
00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:07,720
Speaker 2: could be a big bounce back spot for Watson, who

332
00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:10,360
Speaker 2: has you know, a pretty good matchup and you know,

333
00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:13,640
Speaker 2: just a slew of really good wide receivers available to him.

334
00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:15,960
Speaker 2: So uh yeah, Watson and Wentz for me.

335
00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:18,559
Speaker 6: Hope you're enjoying this great action network podcast. I want

336
00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:21,160
Speaker 6: to make sure you know about the Locked On podcast network.

337
00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:24,120
Speaker 6: Locked On has a daily podcast on your favorite team.

338
00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:26,520
Speaker 1: Welcome to you, Lockdown forty nine ers. You are locked

339
00:14:26,520 --> 00:14:28,520
Speaker 1: onwn of the Dallas Maverick. Hello everybody for the Locked

340
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:30,280
Speaker 1: On Lakers podcast. Let's Go.

341
00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:33,520
Speaker 6: Locked On podcasts are hosted by the local experts who

342
00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:35,760
Speaker 6: know your team better than anyone and give you the

343
00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:38,600
Speaker 6: inside scoop. So go to your podcast app and search

344
00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:43,120
Speaker 6: locked on your favorite team. Subscribe to your locked on podcast.

345
00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:49,680
Speaker 2: Let's transition to the running back position. Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara,

346
00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:52,520
Speaker 2: Dalvin Cook. All three of us have those guys in

347
00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:55,440
Speaker 2: our top three. Drew, where are you on your running

348
00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 2: back rankings? What does your top three look like?

349
00:14:57,640 --> 00:14:59,960
Speaker 5: We have those three and then we have Ezekiel Elliott

350
00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:02,160
Speaker 5: and then a little bit of a gap. So yeah,

351
00:15:02,200 --> 00:15:04,160
Speaker 5: those are the top three right there with you guys

352
00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:05,840
Speaker 5: in that order. McCaffrey, Kamarma, Cook.

353
00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:08,720
Speaker 2: So who is a player this week that you're relatively

354
00:15:08,760 --> 00:15:09,120
Speaker 2: high on?

355
00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:11,920
Speaker 5: So I think one guy that will be really high

356
00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,960
Speaker 5: on is Joe Mixon. Obviously, the Cincinnati offense again, another

357
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:17,360
Speaker 5: offense that really struggled in a primetime spot where you

358
00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:19,360
Speaker 5: have no other football to watch to pay attention to

359
00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:21,560
Speaker 5: a Pengals offense, and so I think people might be

360
00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:24,360
Speaker 5: a little bit disappointed in the start of the season

361
00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:27,320
Speaker 5: after Cincinnati played so well and that opener against Seattle,

362
00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:29,160
Speaker 5: the offense is really tapered off. I think this is

363
00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:31,800
Speaker 5: a really good bounce back spot. Obviously against Arizona. Arizona's

364
00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:34,280
Speaker 5: pretty much gotten everybody healthy throughout the course of the season.

365
00:15:34,840 --> 00:15:37,520
Speaker 5: Mixing has had a huge nap and market share of

366
00:15:37,560 --> 00:15:40,920
Speaker 5: opportunities when the games have been relatively competitive, which has

367
00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:43,560
Speaker 5: not been frequently the last two weeks for Cincinnati. But

368
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:45,040
Speaker 5: I think this is a really good bounced back spot

369
00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:45,680
Speaker 5: for Joe Mixon.

370
00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:48,640
Speaker 2: All right, Sean, where are you on players that you want?

371
00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:50,440
Speaker 4: You know, we were kind of low on him going

372
00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:52,840
Speaker 4: into the season, But I think it's a good BILO

373
00:15:53,080 --> 00:15:57,080
Speaker 4: opportunity for David Montgomery. You know, he's had workhorse usage

374
00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,160
Speaker 4: the past couple of games. They've completely phased out Mike Davis.

375
00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:03,760
Speaker 4: His numbers really haven't matched his, you know usage so far.

376
00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:06,240
Speaker 4: And you know with Chase Daniel's QB, we saw in

377
00:16:06,240 --> 00:16:09,320
Speaker 4: his two starts last year he was dinking and duncant

378
00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:11,720
Speaker 4: to the running back three. Coen had nineteen catches in

379
00:16:11,760 --> 00:16:14,320
Speaker 4: that two game span, and that's when they actually had

380
00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:18,040
Speaker 4: take one Mozelle, their pass catching back mixed in as well,

381
00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:20,160
Speaker 4: so you know, he had four catches during that span.

382
00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:22,520
Speaker 4: So I think, you know, Montgomery could be a candidate

383
00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:24,680
Speaker 4: for four to five catches this week, and I think

384
00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:26,400
Speaker 4: he could we could bake on him to get fifteen

385
00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:28,200
Speaker 4: to twenty and carries going forward. So I think he's

386
00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:30,720
Speaker 4: a guy just a perfect BILO situation. I have him

387
00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:33,440
Speaker 4: ranked as my running back fifteen ECR is closer to

388
00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:36,160
Speaker 4: running back twenty. So you know, this game's in London,

389
00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:38,120
Speaker 4: their favorite by five points, so we could see.

390
00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:39,760
Speaker 1: A big game from David Montgomery this week.

391
00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:41,360
Speaker 2: Finally, all right, rave On, how about you?

392
00:16:42,120 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: I also like a Chicago Bear.

393
00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:45,680
Speaker 3: I do like Montgomery, but I'm more in line with

394
00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:48,359
Speaker 3: consensus there, or at least our consensus.

395
00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:50,720
Speaker 1: But I also like Touriek Cohen a lot.

396
00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:52,720
Speaker 3: That's because it looks like we're going to get a

397
00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:54,240
Speaker 3: chase Daniel in this game.

398
00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:55,800
Speaker 1: And in his.

399
00:16:55,960 --> 00:17:00,240
Speaker 3: Two starts last season, Matt Naggi extremely kind of game

400
00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:03,600
Speaker 3: plan specific and allowed his players that can work after

401
00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:05,600
Speaker 3: the catch and make life easy on Daniel, you know,

402
00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:07,560
Speaker 3: really featured those guys in the offense. So you saw

403
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:11,800
Speaker 3: Tarik Cohen in the two games that Daniel started last season.

404
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:15,800
Speaker 3: He averaged eleven targets, nine point five catches, one hundred

405
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:19,120
Speaker 3: and a half yards and a half a receiving touchdown.

406
00:17:19,400 --> 00:17:24,160
Speaker 3: Also got five point five rushing attempts. So that's fifteen

407
00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:27,600
Speaker 3: touches per game for Tarik Cohen in those two games,

408
00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:30,920
Speaker 3: and that was compared to about exactly ten per game

409
00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:34,160
Speaker 3: in the other in the other fourteen last year, and

410
00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:35,959
Speaker 3: you know that's kind of closer to what he's been

411
00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,880
Speaker 3: at this year as well. So like that whole Bears

412
00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:40,639
Speaker 3: running game, and do think that they're not going to

413
00:17:40,680 --> 00:17:42,879
Speaker 3: really do too much down the football field. If you

414
00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:46,560
Speaker 3: look at Daniel's career yard for completion, it's in the

415
00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:48,920
Speaker 3: single digits. So I think this is going to be

416
00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:51,360
Speaker 3: a big Tarik Cohen Montgomery game.

417
00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:54,200
Speaker 2: All right, Raybon, you mentioned earlier that you are high

418
00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:56,720
Speaker 2: on Tom Brady. I'm high on one of his pass catchers,

419
00:17:56,880 --> 00:17:59,760
Speaker 2: James White. Even though this should be a game in

420
00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:02,600
Speaker 2: which the Patriots have positive game script and so you'd

421
00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:04,920
Speaker 2: anticipate that maybe they run the ball a little bit more,

422
00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:08,960
Speaker 2: the Redskins are just so incompetent on defense that I

423
00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:11,560
Speaker 2: think even just a few targets for James White can

424
00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:13,120
Speaker 2: make a difference. But I think he has a high

425
00:18:13,119 --> 00:18:16,040
Speaker 2: target floor and most importantly, he's on team sex, as

426
00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:18,480
Speaker 2: evidenced by the recent birth of his child, so he

427
00:18:18,520 --> 00:18:21,480
Speaker 2: has that going for him. Drew, who are you relatively

428
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:21,840
Speaker 2: low on?

429
00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:23,760
Speaker 5: So I think we're going to be relatively low on

430
00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:26,119
Speaker 5: James Connor. We have him kind of outside a running

431
00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:28,040
Speaker 5: back one status this week obviously put up that big

432
00:18:28,080 --> 00:18:30,600
Speaker 5: performance on Monday Night Football. We'll have to see on

433
00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:32,320
Speaker 5: the injury report what he comes up with, because I

434
00:18:32,400 --> 00:18:34,159
Speaker 5: did see that they kind of estimated that he might

435
00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:36,879
Speaker 5: be limited or a mispractice early in the week, So

436
00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:39,720
Speaker 5: we'll see what that ends up looking like. But for us, also,

437
00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:41,960
Speaker 5: we'll have to see what Brandon Williams availability for Baltimore

438
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:43,040
Speaker 5: is because I think a lot of people will be

439
00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:45,800
Speaker 5: excited after seeing Nick Chubb up such a huge performance

440
00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:48,600
Speaker 5: against Baltimore and then see James Connor kind of loosen

441
00:18:48,680 --> 00:18:51,359
Speaker 5: up things and Jalen Samuels get going against Cincinnati, but

442
00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:54,879
Speaker 5: we don't particularly see the same level of volume there Baltimore,

443
00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:58,199
Speaker 5: as a team that's generally held down opponent plays pretty considerably.

444
00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:00,320
Speaker 5: We expect Baltimore to play from ahead, and that and

445
00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:03,240
Speaker 5: limity kind of upside opportunity for James Connor. And I'm

446
00:19:03,240 --> 00:19:05,760
Speaker 5: not sure how successful that wildcat stuff that they were

447
00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:08,359
Speaker 5: using that kind of brought everybody by surprise against a

448
00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:11,000
Speaker 5: very very weak in kind of unathletics itin s Natti's

449
00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:13,360
Speaker 5: linebacking corps. I'm not sure how that'll play against Baltimore.

450
00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:15,119
Speaker 5: So We're probably going to be lower on James Conner

451
00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:16,040
Speaker 5: than the field, all.

452
00:19:16,040 --> 00:19:18,119
Speaker 2: Right, Sean, On the other side of that matchup, you

453
00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:20,760
Speaker 2: were looking at mark Ingram. What your thoughts there.

454
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:22,760
Speaker 4: Yeah, I just think mark Ingram was a good sell

455
00:19:22,880 --> 00:19:25,200
Speaker 4: high candidate after week three. You know, you had five

456
00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:27,960
Speaker 4: touchdowns after the first three games, and you know this is,

457
00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:30,240
Speaker 4: you know, sort of a two to three back committee

458
00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:33,399
Speaker 4: with Gus Edwards and even Justice Till getting twenty percent

459
00:19:33,400 --> 00:19:35,879
Speaker 4: of snaps last week, and then you know, if you

460
00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:38,320
Speaker 4: want to include Lamar Jackson, it's a three to four

461
00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:40,840
Speaker 4: way running back committee. I mean, I know they run

462
00:19:40,880 --> 00:19:42,920
Speaker 4: the ball a ton, but it's just going to make

463
00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:47,080
Speaker 4: Ingram more inconsistent than I think people realize. So I

464
00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:49,680
Speaker 4: treat him as sort of a mid range RB two.

465
00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,119
Speaker 4: But you know he's he's ranked right now inside the

466
00:19:52,160 --> 00:19:54,320
Speaker 4: top ten in ECR. So he's just the guy I'm

467
00:19:54,320 --> 00:19:56,679
Speaker 4: lower on due to just his week Threek variance is

468
00:19:56,680 --> 00:19:59,040
Speaker 4: going to be higher than most people think going forward.

469
00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,960
Speaker 4: He kind of who reads value based on his early

470
00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:05,160
Speaker 4: season touchdowns, but I think that's gonna aggress a bit.

471
00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:07,320
Speaker 4: I see him more as a you know, five to

472
00:20:07,400 --> 00:20:10,480
Speaker 4: seven rushing touchdown kind of guys. So, like I said,

473
00:20:10,480 --> 00:20:12,320
Speaker 4: I'm treat him as an RB two, so I think

474
00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:14,120
Speaker 4: there's still a window to sell high.

475
00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:15,880
Speaker 1: But I think you have to do it all.

476
00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:18,320
Speaker 2: Right, Raybon, you are down on Daniel Jones. You are

477
00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:20,879
Speaker 2: also down on Wayne Goleman. I should say you are

478
00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:23,720
Speaker 2: a Giants fan. I think there's some major reverse Jings

479
00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:26,120
Speaker 2: juju going on right here, Like that's what you're you're

480
00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:28,119
Speaker 2: going with, But talk to me about Wayne Goleman.

481
00:20:28,359 --> 00:20:31,159
Speaker 3: I mean, we need to unreverse Jinks, the actual juju,

482
00:20:31,200 --> 00:20:31,919
Speaker 3: because that game.

483
00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:33,000
Speaker 1: Last night yucked.

484
00:20:34,119 --> 00:20:36,600
Speaker 3: But listen, you know I've been clowned a lot for

485
00:20:37,119 --> 00:20:39,919
Speaker 3: lem of the Giants At points on this podcast. I

486
00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,000
Speaker 3: remember saying earlier in the season, Hey, if d Andrew

487
00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:44,200
Speaker 3: Jones is starting, I'm taking him a df BES like

488
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:46,480
Speaker 3: he's gonna be in my lineup because he can move

489
00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:48,600
Speaker 3: and he has decent weapons. But this is a game

490
00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:51,040
Speaker 3: I want no part of with any of these any

491
00:20:51,080 --> 00:20:53,680
Speaker 3: of these offensive pieces. If you look at the Minnesota Vikings,

492
00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:56,800
Speaker 3: their top ten in Pro Football Focus is run defense grades.

493
00:20:56,840 --> 00:21:01,159
Speaker 3: They're top ten in rush DVOA on defense, and you

494
00:21:01,240 --> 00:21:04,119
Speaker 3: combine that with the fact that they're a strong pass

495
00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:07,200
Speaker 3: defense and the way Golman kind of got those opportunities

496
00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,359
Speaker 3: last week. I just don't know if they're there, because,

497
00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:12,040
Speaker 3: first of all, Daniel Jones not gonna be able to

498
00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,239
Speaker 3: move down the field as much. Second of all, you

499
00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:18,320
Speaker 3: did see John Hillyman, you know, practice squad guy mix

500
00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:20,960
Speaker 3: in a little bit much too much for my liking

501
00:21:21,080 --> 00:21:24,560
Speaker 3: early in that game, So I'm get some goal line carries,

502
00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:27,640
Speaker 3: so you never know exactly how that rotation is going

503
00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:29,840
Speaker 3: to split out. And then you just have the fact

504
00:21:29,840 --> 00:21:33,399
Speaker 3: that Minnesota again twenty six, fifteen and under when coached

505
00:21:33,400 --> 00:21:36,200
Speaker 3: by Mike Zimmer, going on the road, so the touchdown

506
00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:38,679
Speaker 3: probability is low as well. And I just think we

507
00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:41,199
Speaker 3: are overrating the Giants a little bit coming off this

508
00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:44,960
Speaker 3: win against the Redskins and then the shootout win against

509
00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:45,280
Speaker 3: the Bucks.

510
00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:47,639
Speaker 1: And you also have the possibility that.

511
00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:50,320
Speaker 3: If the Giants get down in the game, Daniel Jones

512
00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:52,520
Speaker 3: may be running a lot, and you know, if they're

513
00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:54,600
Speaker 3: by the goal line, he's liable to kind of run

514
00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:56,160
Speaker 3: went in or do a.

515
00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:57,760
Speaker 1: Readoption or something like that.

516
00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:00,600
Speaker 3: So just not a lot to like with gold him

517
00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:03,480
Speaker 3: as well as a fringe top twenty guy versus last week.

518
00:22:03,520 --> 00:22:04,280
Speaker 1: And I think I had him.

519
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,160
Speaker 2: I think it was fifteen, Okay, So I am high

520
00:22:07,200 --> 00:22:10,040
Speaker 2: on James White. On the flip side, I'm relatively low

521
00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:13,000
Speaker 2: on Sony Michelle. Although he sensibly would be the guy

522
00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:15,560
Speaker 2: who would get a lot of the carries if things

523
00:22:15,560 --> 00:22:17,879
Speaker 2: are going well for the Patriots, I think he's just

524
00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:21,560
Speaker 2: been way too unreliable. And that's even with perfect game

525
00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:23,960
Speaker 2: script to this point in the year. The Patriots haven't

526
00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:27,360
Speaker 2: trailed for one snap this year, and Michelle has still

527
00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:30,320
Speaker 2: been pretty inconsistent. I could see this being something like

528
00:22:30,320 --> 00:22:32,760
Speaker 2: of a Burkhead game as opposed to a Michelle game.

529
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,359
Speaker 2: So he's someone I'm just wanting to stay away from.

530
00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:39,080
Speaker 2: Just don't think he's reliable enough. Sean, give us your

531
00:22:39,160 --> 00:22:40,600
Speaker 2: prop for the running back position.

532
00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:43,439
Speaker 4: Dank mentioned them, but I'm going to go with Jalen

533
00:22:43,520 --> 00:22:48,439
Speaker 4: Samuel's total passing, rushing and receiving yards for this week.

534
00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:50,159
Speaker 4: He's a guy who were you know, I had to

535
00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:52,840
Speaker 4: kind of update my model this week to handle you know,

536
00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:56,080
Speaker 4: projected passing yards. We saw him in the wildcat formation

537
00:22:56,359 --> 00:22:58,720
Speaker 4: the way he pitches it to Connor, and that counts

538
00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:01,639
Speaker 4: as passing yards. So I agree with think also that

539
00:23:01,680 --> 00:23:03,480
Speaker 4: I don't know if this is sustainable. So I just

540
00:23:03,520 --> 00:23:05,119
Speaker 4: want to get your guys full take on this. But

541
00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:08,520
Speaker 4: right now I have the total combined yards at over

542
00:23:08,680 --> 00:23:09,840
Speaker 4: under sixty and a half.

543
00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:12,960
Speaker 5: Ooh, that's a good line. We have fifty six or

544
00:23:13,119 --> 00:23:16,439
Speaker 5: fifty six or fifty seven combined with eleven passing yards.

545
00:23:16,520 --> 00:23:16,800
Speaker 2: Nice.

546
00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:21,640
Speaker 5: So yeah, so I'll take under, but very, very slightly.

547
00:23:21,920 --> 00:23:24,199
Speaker 5: I think the lack of confidence and Rudolph, especially in

548
00:23:24,200 --> 00:23:26,600
Speaker 5: that game environment where they're kind of playing from ahead

549
00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:29,720
Speaker 5: and it's pretty evident, I think it'll be really tough

550
00:23:29,760 --> 00:23:32,480
Speaker 5: to have that type of play type be pretty successful

551
00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:34,960
Speaker 5: going forward. So I'm actually a little bit concerned that

552
00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:38,080
Speaker 5: our projection might be a little bit aggressive, So I

553
00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:40,200
Speaker 5: would go under sixty or sixte and a half.

554
00:23:40,359 --> 00:23:42,560
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm going under as well. I have them at

555
00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:45,240
Speaker 3: fifty rushing and receiving, and I'm not, you know, projecting

556
00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,520
Speaker 3: them for eleven pass yards just off that one game.

557
00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:50,240
Speaker 3: But I will say this, I'm not you, guys, I

558
00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:51,920
Speaker 3: think seem to be able to will wear on the Steelers.

559
00:23:51,960 --> 00:23:54,479
Speaker 3: I am not Mike Tomlin in his career as a

560
00:23:54,480 --> 00:23:57,879
Speaker 3: dog thirty seventeen and one against the spread. I think

561
00:23:57,920 --> 00:24:00,000
Speaker 3: the fact that they were able to scheme, that game

562
00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,359
Speaker 3: plan up for Rudolph, I thought it was a really

563
00:24:02,359 --> 00:24:04,720
Speaker 3: positive sign. He only missed on four throws all day.

564
00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:07,200
Speaker 3: They got a lot of their best players involved. They

565
00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:10,240
Speaker 3: used Washington as a decoy all game. Deontay Johnson scored

566
00:24:10,240 --> 00:24:13,399
Speaker 3: a touchdown. They didn't need Juju. They didn't have a

567
00:24:13,440 --> 00:24:16,959
Speaker 3: tight end essentially with h with McDonald out and Gremble,

568
00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:18,239
Speaker 3: so they didn't have their two guys that have been

569
00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:19,240
Speaker 3: there like all preseason.

570
00:24:19,320 --> 00:24:21,240
Speaker 1: So this is a game that they they'll play well.

571
00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:23,200
Speaker 3: But I do think that you'll see them kind of

572
00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:25,399
Speaker 3: switch the game plan up, like they're not just gonna

573
00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:27,680
Speaker 3: do the same exact game plan two weeks in a row.

574
00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:30,040
Speaker 1: I think that, But I think it worked well enough

575
00:24:30,040 --> 00:24:30,480
Speaker 1: that you can.

576
00:24:30,359 --> 00:24:33,240
Speaker 3: Say, Okay, you gotta respect their ability to kind of

577
00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:35,439
Speaker 3: do that. And then and by the way, they played

578
00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:36,880
Speaker 3: three of the best teams in the league these first

579
00:24:36,880 --> 00:24:39,399
Speaker 3: three weeks, So I'm not buying on you know, Pittsburgh stinks.

580
00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:41,040
Speaker 3: I mean, they played in New England, probably the best

581
00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:42,520
Speaker 3: team in the league on both sides of the ball.

582
00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:45,960
Speaker 3: Then they play Seattle and they also played San Francisco.

583
00:24:46,359 --> 00:24:47,919
Speaker 3: Just go the three and zero team that is a

584
00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:49,960
Speaker 3: lot better on defense than I think people realize.

585
00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:51,560
Speaker 1: They played three excellent opponents.

586
00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:54,040
Speaker 3: Baltimore, on the other hand, played a couple of teams

587
00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:55,520
Speaker 3: you know early in the year that that weren't very

588
00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:58,080
Speaker 3: good in Miami and Arizona and have come back down

589
00:24:58,119 --> 00:24:59,760
Speaker 3: to earth. So I do think it'll be a solid

590
00:24:59,800 --> 00:25:02,159
Speaker 3: game for pit on offense, but not projecting Samuel for

591
00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:03,960
Speaker 3: double digit pass years off the one weeks of going

592
00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:04,600
Speaker 3: under on the lab.

593
00:25:05,640 --> 00:25:07,960
Speaker 2: Okay, Ravon, I hope you are right on the Tomlin

594
00:25:08,119 --> 00:25:10,320
Speaker 2: as an underdog trend because I just went and bet

595
00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:13,080
Speaker 2: all my money at points bets based on that trend.

596
00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:16,600
Speaker 2: So anyway, no obviously joking there, I'm taking the under

597
00:25:16,680 --> 00:25:19,439
Speaker 2: on Samuel. Agree with the logic year I think that

598
00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:22,399
Speaker 2: actually is a pretty good line, but I think it

599
00:25:22,440 --> 00:25:25,600
Speaker 2: is aggressive in that we've seen this only once. We

600
00:25:25,640 --> 00:25:28,240
Speaker 2: don't know if they can do it again successfully or

601
00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,040
Speaker 2: if they intend to do it again, so I will

602
00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:33,840
Speaker 2: I will take the under there. Up next, we have

603
00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:36,720
Speaker 2: wide receivers, but first let's check in with Peter Jennings

604
00:25:36,800 --> 00:25:40,000
Speaker 2: akacsu Ram eighty eight, a two time DFS World champion

605
00:25:40,119 --> 00:25:43,560
Speaker 2: and co founder of Fantasy Labs. Pete your Broncos are

606
00:25:43,680 --> 00:25:45,600
Speaker 2: zero to four. Where are you on the pain scale?

607
00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:47,960
Speaker 2: Keeping in mind that the nightmare of oh and sixteen

608
00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:49,520
Speaker 2: is alive and well.

609
00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:51,679
Speaker 7: I hope the Broncos finished on sixteen so they can

610
00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:54,239
Speaker 7: draft a quarterback. Bradley Chubb out for the year, so

611
00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:58,040
Speaker 7: Broncos should go full tank. I finally had a good

612
00:25:58,040 --> 00:26:00,720
Speaker 7: week and week four, so excited and right for week five?

613
00:26:00,960 --> 00:26:02,960
Speaker 2: For week five, how do you think you are approaching

614
00:26:03,000 --> 00:26:05,199
Speaker 2: cash games and guaranteed prize Bowls?

615
00:26:05,480 --> 00:26:07,119
Speaker 7: So it's an interesting slate with a lot of the

616
00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:10,840
Speaker 7: really good plays In the later games Sunday Night Monday Night,

617
00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:12,399
Speaker 7: there's a lot of really good plays. So on the

618
00:26:12,440 --> 00:26:15,880
Speaker 7: main slate, there's a couple of games I'm targeting specifically

619
00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:20,159
Speaker 7: this Arizona Cincinnati game. Two teams that have not played

620
00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:22,959
Speaker 7: well but should be very fantasy friendly of both teams

621
00:26:23,040 --> 00:26:26,000
Speaker 7: passing a ton and really trying to get as many

622
00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:27,800
Speaker 7: guys from that game in my lineups.

623
00:26:28,119 --> 00:26:30,120
Speaker 2: At quarterback? Who are you looking at?

624
00:26:30,400 --> 00:26:33,240
Speaker 7: So? I think Dak Prescott and Deshaun Watson both deserve

625
00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:35,879
Speaker 7: a lot of attention this week. I like both of

626
00:26:35,880 --> 00:26:37,920
Speaker 7: them with the rushing up side, and I think we've

627
00:26:37,960 --> 00:26:40,960
Speaker 7: seen some really great games from Dak Watson had the

628
00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:43,119
Speaker 7: really good Week one and has struggled since. I think

629
00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:46,520
Speaker 7: they're both really high ceiling plays. Also, obviously, like Kyler

630
00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:50,560
Speaker 7: and Andy Dalton, those are the quarterbacks I'm initially looking at,

631
00:26:50,600 --> 00:26:52,840
Speaker 7: but it's not as much of a standout position as

632
00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:54,920
Speaker 7: we've seen in the past. I do think people will

633
00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:58,239
Speaker 7: look to Chase Daniel as a cheap alternative, which I

634
00:26:58,280 --> 00:27:01,240
Speaker 7: don't hate, but I certain before the other four guys is.

635
00:27:01,320 --> 00:27:04,000
Speaker 2: Now running back who has caught your eye.

636
00:27:03,840 --> 00:27:06,400
Speaker 7: So I'm going to be buying Joe Mixon and David

637
00:27:06,480 --> 00:27:09,560
Speaker 7: Johnson heavily this week. I think both guys are really

638
00:27:09,600 --> 00:27:13,240
Speaker 7: talented players. Joe Mixon specifically just hasn't had a great opportunity.

639
00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:15,919
Speaker 7: Now you know, both players get an amazing matchup for

640
00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:19,200
Speaker 7: the opposing defense, and I think they're just a great

641
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:21,000
Speaker 7: place because they're going to be involved in the passing

642
00:27:21,040 --> 00:27:23,480
Speaker 7: game and I expect a lot of scoring in that game.

643
00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:26,560
Speaker 7: Like I mentioned before, obviously, Christian McCaffrey, you want to

644
00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:28,639
Speaker 7: get him in wherever you can, and with a lot

645
00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:30,240
Speaker 7: of my builds right now, I do have the money.

646
00:27:30,040 --> 00:27:33,119
Speaker 2: So I'll be targeting Christian McCaffrey as well at wide receiver.

647
00:27:33,200 --> 00:27:34,560
Speaker 2: What are your thoughts, So we'll.

648
00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:36,439
Speaker 7: See what happens with the injury to Christian Kirk. I

649
00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:38,359
Speaker 7: think all the Arizona guys are going to be in play.

650
00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:41,920
Speaker 7: Definitely buying a Tyler Boyd bounce back game. I'm monitoring

651
00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:45,120
Speaker 7: John Ross's injury as well. On the other side, I think,

652
00:27:45,240 --> 00:27:47,240
Speaker 7: you know, if you go to the more expensive receivers.

653
00:27:47,320 --> 00:27:50,960
Speaker 7: DeAndre Hopkins has underperformed relatively this year. I think this

654
00:27:51,040 --> 00:27:53,600
Speaker 7: is a good bounce back spot. I'm gonna be high

655
00:27:53,600 --> 00:27:56,560
Speaker 7: on Amari Cooper as well, and Will Fuller as the

656
00:27:56,640 --> 00:27:59,400
Speaker 7: tournament play. I'm just going to keep buying him. It's

657
00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:02,320
Speaker 7: been painful so far, but a big game is coming.

658
00:28:02,320 --> 00:28:04,159
Speaker 7: He had a seventy five yard TV that was just

659
00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:06,800
Speaker 7: right there, just a bat throw by to Sean Watson.

660
00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:09,440
Speaker 7: So I will be buying Will Fuller in tournaments.

661
00:28:09,320 --> 00:28:10,600
Speaker 2: At tight end. Who do you like?

662
00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:14,199
Speaker 7: Tight end stinks this week? Kelsey and Kittle not on

663
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:18,240
Speaker 7: the main slate. Although they haven't performed well, I'm expecting

664
00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:20,560
Speaker 7: some regression on the positive side for both of them,

665
00:28:20,640 --> 00:28:22,840
Speaker 7: So on slates where they're available, I'll be buying Kelsey

666
00:28:22,880 --> 00:28:25,840
Speaker 7: and Kittle on the main slate, it gets a little trickier.

667
00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:28,160
Speaker 7: I think zach Ertz is going to be popular, given

668
00:28:28,200 --> 00:28:30,800
Speaker 7: he's the kind of the top guy. Austin Hooper is

669
00:28:30,880 --> 00:28:34,160
Speaker 7: rating well. He's been very productive all year. But it's

670
00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:36,280
Speaker 7: a tricky position. I think you can get contrarian here

671
00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:40,320
Speaker 7: at the tight end position, and I'm still evaluating. I

672
00:28:40,320 --> 00:28:42,000
Speaker 7: think zach Ertz right now, I've had to pick one

673
00:28:42,040 --> 00:28:44,720
Speaker 7: would be the guy. Darren Waller also right there too.

674
00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:48,600
Speaker 2: You mentioned earlier Arizona and Cincinnati and liking that game

675
00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:50,920
Speaker 2: quite a bit. Are there any other games that you

676
00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:53,600
Speaker 2: might be looking to stack that you think could be contrarian.

677
00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:56,120
Speaker 7: I don't know if he'll be contrarian, but I think

678
00:28:56,120 --> 00:29:01,040
Speaker 7: this Atlanta Houston game sets up really really well. Julio Jones,

679
00:29:01,240 --> 00:29:03,520
Speaker 7: I did mention dere Hopkins and Will Fuller. I think

680
00:29:03,560 --> 00:29:05,120
Speaker 7: you can go to the secondary pieces. I think you

681
00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:07,120
Speaker 7: can look to the running backs. Carlos Hyde is an

682
00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:09,240
Speaker 7: interesting play this week as well. He's writing well in

683
00:29:09,280 --> 00:29:12,239
Speaker 7: the models. DeVante Freeman should have some big games, So

684
00:29:12,560 --> 00:29:14,680
Speaker 7: that's another one that I'm really looking to stack, although

685
00:29:15,040 --> 00:29:17,400
Speaker 7: there's a lot of expensive options in that game.

686
00:29:17,560 --> 00:29:20,040
Speaker 2: All right, That was Peter Jennings with his DFS thoughts

687
00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:23,600
Speaker 2: for Week five. Let's talk about wide receivers. The guys

688
00:29:23,600 --> 00:29:25,840
Speaker 2: that we have at the top of our rankings. We

689
00:29:25,920 --> 00:29:29,560
Speaker 2: have Julio, DeAndre Hopkins and Keenan Allen. I think there

690
00:29:29,560 --> 00:29:31,720
Speaker 2: are a number of guys who you know, could be

691
00:29:31,960 --> 00:29:36,200
Speaker 2: viable for top three spots. Drew, where are you in

692
00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:36,920
Speaker 2: the rankings?

693
00:29:37,120 --> 00:29:39,760
Speaker 5: The wide receiver position kind of gets always punched with

694
00:29:39,880 --> 00:29:42,880
Speaker 5: the projections at the hole at the top, so those

695
00:29:42,880 --> 00:29:45,240
Speaker 5: guys are like right there. We have Michael Thomas in

696
00:29:45,280 --> 00:29:47,400
Speaker 5: that range as well, who's had a huge market share

697
00:29:47,400 --> 00:29:50,640
Speaker 5: of opportunities early in the season, especially with Teddy Bridgewater.

698
00:29:50,680 --> 00:29:52,479
Speaker 5: It'll be interesting to see if they decide to kind

699
00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:54,560
Speaker 5: of throw the ball beyond like seven yards down the field,

700
00:29:54,600 --> 00:29:57,000
Speaker 5: because they haven't done too much of that since Bridgewater's

701
00:29:57,000 --> 00:29:58,920
Speaker 5: taken over. But we have Michael Thomas kind of in

702
00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:01,080
Speaker 5: that range as well as Obviously, Tampa Bay secondary is

703
00:30:01,120 --> 00:30:03,200
Speaker 5: given up, you know, a ton of passing yardish the

704
00:30:03,280 --> 00:30:06,400
Speaker 5: last few weeks. In the case of the Rams game,

705
00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:08,800
Speaker 5: obviously a lot of unimportant yardage. But in the case

706
00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:10,200
Speaker 5: of the Giants game, the Giants are able to go

707
00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:12,000
Speaker 5: kind of up and down the field against Tampa Bay

708
00:30:12,040 --> 00:30:14,480
Speaker 5: as well, So we would add Michael Thomas that mix.

709
00:30:14,480 --> 00:30:15,360
Speaker 5: So I think it is going to be a little

710
00:30:15,360 --> 00:30:17,400
Speaker 5: bit undervalued th in DFS and the consensus.

711
00:30:17,960 --> 00:30:20,520
Speaker 2: I'm there with you. I have Thomas number four in

712
00:30:20,880 --> 00:30:24,240
Speaker 2: my rankings. Who else are you relatively high on this week?

713
00:30:24,560 --> 00:30:26,040
Speaker 5: The other guy that I think will be pretty high

714
00:30:26,080 --> 00:30:28,760
Speaker 5: on is Keishawn Johnson from Arizona. It'll be really interesting

715
00:30:28,800 --> 00:30:31,280
Speaker 5: to see how the injury report shakes out for Arizona

716
00:30:31,320 --> 00:30:33,480
Speaker 5: this week. But obviously they were without Demir Bird last week,

717
00:30:33,520 --> 00:30:35,880
Speaker 5: they cut Michael Crabtree, then Christian Kirk kind of gets

718
00:30:35,960 --> 00:30:38,400
Speaker 5: hurt in game. And you know, this is a game

719
00:30:38,400 --> 00:30:40,760
Speaker 5: that for a lot of you know, traditional football fans

720
00:30:40,800 --> 00:30:43,080
Speaker 5: might not be that exciting Arizona and Cincinnati, but I

721
00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:45,400
Speaker 5: think for DFS players and fantasy players, it is a

722
00:30:45,440 --> 00:30:47,160
Speaker 5: game that will have a lot of opportunities that Keshawn

723
00:30:47,240 --> 00:30:50,000
Speaker 5: Johnson's really affordable. You know, Arizona plays such a high

724
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:52,800
Speaker 5: percentage of snaps with three and four wide receivers out there,

725
00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:56,120
Speaker 5: so even amidst even if they had a healthy slew

726
00:30:56,160 --> 00:30:58,760
Speaker 5: of wide receivers available, I think Keshon Johnson would be

727
00:30:58,760 --> 00:31:00,120
Speaker 5: on the field. I think he really is sad who

728
00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:02,400
Speaker 5: is the target ladder now behind Larry Fitzgerald and David

729
00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:03,760
Speaker 5: Johnson with Christian kirk hurt.

730
00:31:04,240 --> 00:31:05,959
Speaker 2: All right, Sean, what about you?

731
00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:07,920
Speaker 4: One guy just want to throw out there real quick

732
00:31:07,960 --> 00:31:11,560
Speaker 4: is Robbie Anderson at Philadelphia. If Sam Darnold is under center.

733
00:31:11,680 --> 00:31:14,680
Speaker 4: I like him this week as a GPP play. But

734
00:31:14,720 --> 00:31:17,080
Speaker 4: the guy that I'm focusing on, as you know, like

735
00:31:17,080 --> 00:31:20,520
Speaker 4: an ultra cheap he's thirty five one hundred right now,

736
00:31:20,600 --> 00:31:23,040
Speaker 4: is Auden Tate for the Bengals. They're at home against

737
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:25,000
Speaker 4: the Cardinals this week, so you know people are gonna

738
00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:27,400
Speaker 4: be loading up on the Bengals. Last week they benched

739
00:31:27,440 --> 00:31:30,760
Speaker 4: Damian Willis and Audentate replaced him in the starting lineup.

740
00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:32,719
Speaker 4: And as we saw last night, you know, the Bengals

741
00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:35,240
Speaker 4: run three wide over ninety percent of the play, so

742
00:31:35,280 --> 00:31:36,960
Speaker 4: he's going to be on the field for most of

743
00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:39,080
Speaker 4: the game. I think he's he's the big body receiver

744
00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:41,120
Speaker 4: they're going to target in the red zone, so I

745
00:31:41,120 --> 00:31:42,800
Speaker 4: think he has a ton of potential for a thirty

746
00:31:42,800 --> 00:31:45,080
Speaker 4: five hundred player in a game. They'll be much faster

747
00:31:45,200 --> 00:31:47,800
Speaker 4: pace and you know that the Bengals should be able

748
00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:51,240
Speaker 4: to put up points this week at home against the Cardinals.

749
00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:53,840
Speaker 4: So I love aud Tate as a cheap GPD flyer.

750
00:31:55,280 --> 00:31:57,440
Speaker 2: Raybond, who do you like this week?

751
00:31:58,400 --> 00:32:01,880
Speaker 3: A couple of bigger bodied guys are propping for me?

752
00:32:02,760 --> 00:32:05,400
Speaker 3: You know, quickly, I'll just say, you know, both Bucks receivers.

753
00:32:06,120 --> 00:32:11,680
Speaker 3: I don't respect the Saints cornerbacks Marshall Lattimore or not.

754
00:32:11,800 --> 00:32:14,280
Speaker 3: So I do think that the Bucks have some success

755
00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:17,760
Speaker 3: through the air this week again, but for me, it's

756
00:32:17,880 --> 00:32:21,640
Speaker 3: Josh Gordon and Alshon Jeffrey mentioned the Redskins defense already.

757
00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:25,200
Speaker 3: I just don't think that they're gonna have any resistance

758
00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:28,080
Speaker 3: to really any of the matchups that the Patriots could

759
00:32:28,080 --> 00:32:31,280
Speaker 3: potentially exploit. And the Patriots they'll go to their best

760
00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:33,480
Speaker 3: players when they can. You know, last week I wrote

761
00:32:33,520 --> 00:32:35,960
Speaker 3: up in our Favorite Bets section on Action Network that

762
00:32:36,040 --> 00:32:38,200
Speaker 3: I like the under in that Patriots game because the

763
00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:40,520
Speaker 3: Bills tend to take away everything down the field. They

764
00:32:40,520 --> 00:32:42,880
Speaker 3: make you go dink and done underneath. The Redskins are

765
00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:45,000
Speaker 3: not this type of team. They're going to their their

766
00:32:45,040 --> 00:32:47,760
Speaker 3: week on the perimeter, their week in the slot, the

767
00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:52,080
Speaker 3: week it's safety. So like Gordon to get going this week.

768
00:32:52,120 --> 00:32:54,560
Speaker 3: Have them as a top twenty five option after a

769
00:32:54,600 --> 00:32:56,640
Speaker 3: couple of weeks kind of out out of that range.

770
00:32:56,960 --> 00:32:59,520
Speaker 3: And then Alshon Jeffrey I also have as a top

771
00:32:59,520 --> 00:33:00,360
Speaker 3: twenty five option.

772
00:33:00,720 --> 00:33:00,960
Speaker 1: Listen.

773
00:33:01,040 --> 00:33:03,680
Speaker 3: I know he's hurt last week, still got the touchdown.

774
00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:07,880
Speaker 3: You know, only three catches though, But Carson Wentz actually

775
00:33:07,920 --> 00:33:11,480
Speaker 3: favors Alshon Jeffrey when when Carson Wentz is the quarterback,

776
00:33:11,680 --> 00:33:15,800
Speaker 3: Jeffrey's target share and catchers is significantly up from when

777
00:33:15,840 --> 00:33:18,520
Speaker 3: it was Nick Foles there. And that's kind of a

778
00:33:18,520 --> 00:33:21,560
Speaker 3: little bit of an unoverlooked thing that that Wentz really

779
00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:24,160
Speaker 3: loves to target Jeffrey and against this Jets defense. I mean,

780
00:33:24,160 --> 00:33:26,280
Speaker 3: we're all pretty high on Carson Wentz. I think most

781
00:33:26,280 --> 00:33:28,680
Speaker 3: people have him inside their top five. I think Alshon

782
00:33:28,760 --> 00:33:30,040
Speaker 3: is going to be a big part of that. And

783
00:33:30,560 --> 00:33:32,520
Speaker 3: number one receivers are going to eat against the Jets.

784
00:33:32,600 --> 00:33:34,240
Speaker 3: I think Sean if he's in there, he's going to eat.

785
00:33:34,280 --> 00:33:37,720
Speaker 3: But either way, Alshon Jeffery and with this huge implied total,

786
00:33:38,040 --> 00:33:39,840
Speaker 3: has to be one of the best bets at wide

787
00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:41,600
Speaker 3: receiver for a touchdown this week.

788
00:33:41,800 --> 00:33:44,600
Speaker 2: A guy I'm relatively high on is Keenan Allen. I

789
00:33:44,600 --> 00:33:46,760
Speaker 2: have him number one. I think most people have him

790
00:33:46,800 --> 00:33:49,200
Speaker 2: number two or three, and honestly, I might bump him

791
00:33:49,240 --> 00:33:51,120
Speaker 2: down a little bit as I think about this more

792
00:33:51,160 --> 00:33:53,400
Speaker 2: and we progress through the week, but I think he's

793
00:33:53,400 --> 00:33:55,120
Speaker 2: going to get a lot of targets and one thing

794
00:33:55,200 --> 00:33:57,720
Speaker 2: he has going in his favors that although he I

795
00:33:57,720 --> 00:34:00,400
Speaker 2: imagine will be shadowed on the outside by Chris Harris,

796
00:34:00,600 --> 00:34:03,760
Speaker 2: Harris actually hasn't followed guys into the slot this year,

797
00:34:03,840 --> 00:34:06,080
Speaker 2: which I think is pretty weird in that Harris was

798
00:34:06,120 --> 00:34:09,439
Speaker 2: an All Pro slot defender just a few years ago

799
00:34:09,920 --> 00:34:12,600
Speaker 2: and it seems like that is actually where he's best suited.

800
00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:16,280
Speaker 2: But if Keenan actually can play all of his snaps

801
00:34:16,320 --> 00:34:18,640
Speaker 2: in the slot without having to go against Harris, I

802
00:34:18,640 --> 00:34:22,120
Speaker 2: think that is a massive upgrade for him, especially considering

803
00:34:22,160 --> 00:34:24,759
Speaker 2: the target volume he's going to get. So I'm still

804
00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:27,960
Speaker 2: on him as the number one receiver. Drew, I want

805
00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:30,880
Speaker 2: to talk about Mike Evans with you, so Raybond mentioned

806
00:34:30,880 --> 00:34:33,919
Speaker 2: that he's relatively high on Evans. Evans right now leads

807
00:34:33,920 --> 00:34:36,239
Speaker 2: the league in air yards and he's going against a

808
00:34:36,440 --> 00:34:39,800
Speaker 2: cornerback in Marshawn Lattimore who has allowed the most receiving

809
00:34:39,880 --> 00:34:44,560
Speaker 2: yards to opposing receivers, but he did excellent work last

810
00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:48,280
Speaker 2: week against the Maury Cooper in shadow coverage, played against

811
00:34:48,320 --> 00:34:51,160
Speaker 2: him almost every snap. What are your thoughts on Evans?

812
00:34:51,560 --> 00:34:53,600
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think from our perspective, you know, for lower

813
00:34:53,640 --> 00:34:55,520
Speaker 5: on Jamis Winston, and the reasons that we're lower on

814
00:34:55,600 --> 00:34:58,359
Speaker 5: Jamis Winston is we are not projecting quite as many

815
00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:00,480
Speaker 5: plays as we usually do for Tampa Bay because we're

816
00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:02,359
Speaker 5: expecting New Orleans to be able to kind of slow

817
00:35:02,360 --> 00:35:04,200
Speaker 5: that game down with the absence of Drew Breeze and

818
00:35:04,280 --> 00:35:06,799
Speaker 5: kind of leaning on the running game. Conversely, like if

819
00:35:07,000 --> 00:35:08,160
Speaker 5: they're not going to be able to run a lot

820
00:35:08,200 --> 00:35:10,520
Speaker 5: of plays, they're going to have to be highly highly efficient.

821
00:35:10,719 --> 00:35:13,080
Speaker 5: I think Chris Godwin has historically been the more efficient

822
00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:14,880
Speaker 5: wide receiver. Sols to bet on one of the two

823
00:35:14,960 --> 00:35:17,960
Speaker 5: between Tampa Bay wide receivers, I bet on Godwin before Evans.

824
00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:20,160
Speaker 5: But these are two guys that for us, since we're

825
00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:22,080
Speaker 5: lower on Jamis, we're naturally going to be a little

826
00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:23,920
Speaker 5: bit lower on the wide receivers as well. We have

827
00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:26,319
Speaker 5: them more as like solid wide receiver twos. This week,

828
00:35:26,320 --> 00:35:27,879
Speaker 5: I think most people are going to treat them as

829
00:35:28,000 --> 00:35:29,960
Speaker 5: you know, very kind of mid or high end kind

830
00:35:29,960 --> 00:35:32,319
Speaker 5: of wide receiver ones for a lot of their fantasy teams.

831
00:35:32,360 --> 00:35:33,839
Speaker 5: So we're going to be a little bit lower than

832
00:35:33,840 --> 00:35:35,719
Speaker 5: the market on the Tampa Bay passing game as a whole.

833
00:35:36,520 --> 00:35:39,680
Speaker 2: All right, Sean, you are relatively low on Sterling Shepherd.

834
00:35:39,960 --> 00:35:42,520
Speaker 2: It makes sense, and that Golden Tate is returning, so

835
00:35:42,680 --> 00:35:45,279
Speaker 2: he presumably is going to steal a lot of a

836
00:35:45,320 --> 00:35:47,439
Speaker 2: lot of snaps, a lot of targets, and we'll also

837
00:35:47,440 --> 00:35:50,040
Speaker 2: see action in the slot, which is where Sterling Shepherds

838
00:35:50,080 --> 00:35:52,479
Speaker 2: done his best work. What are your thoughts with him?

839
00:35:53,160 --> 00:35:55,960
Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly. This has everything go to do with Golden

840
00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:58,759
Speaker 4: Tate's return and a guy like Sterling Shepherd. You know,

841
00:35:58,840 --> 00:36:02,520
Speaker 4: he's he's a pretty low touchdown dependent receiver. He relies

842
00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:05,360
Speaker 4: on volumes, So anytime you can anticipate a hit to

843
00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:07,839
Speaker 4: his target share, you should. You know it's gonna bump

844
00:36:07,920 --> 00:36:10,680
Speaker 4: him down. But right now, you know, he's priced inside

845
00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:14,600
Speaker 4: the top twenty receivers right now his ECRs wide receiver

846
00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:16,480
Speaker 4: twenty four, and I have him closer to wide receiver

847
00:36:17,040 --> 00:36:19,759
Speaker 4: thirty two. So yeah, I'm much lower on him the

848
00:36:19,840 --> 00:36:22,880
Speaker 4: most people, And you know I'm projecting Daniel Jones to

849
00:36:22,920 --> 00:36:25,400
Speaker 4: throw for about two hundred and fifty yards against the Vikings,

850
00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:28,640
Speaker 4: so they just can't really sustain more than two to

851
00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:31,399
Speaker 4: three guys in the passing game. And you know he's

852
00:36:31,719 --> 00:36:34,200
Speaker 4: Shepherd's coming off back to back seven reception games, so

853
00:36:34,239 --> 00:36:36,880
Speaker 4: you're gonna have some recency bias. But I think you know,

854
00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:40,279
Speaker 4: when making projections, it's easier to see just how much

855
00:36:41,080 --> 00:36:43,240
Speaker 4: you know Taate's target share is gonna take away from Shepherd,

856
00:36:43,320 --> 00:36:44,760
Speaker 4: So I'm pretty long on him this week.

857
00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:46,400
Speaker 2: All right, Raybon, what about you?

858
00:36:46,680 --> 00:36:50,520
Speaker 3: A couple of guys starting with Alan Robinson a little

859
00:36:50,520 --> 00:36:52,799
Speaker 3: bit lower on him, because first of all, you have

860
00:36:52,920 --> 00:36:56,160
Speaker 3: the Chase Daniel likely starting at quarterback going up against

861
00:36:56,160 --> 00:36:58,200
Speaker 3: the Oakland Raiders. A lot of people don't know this,

862
00:36:58,360 --> 00:37:02,840
Speaker 3: but they usually tend to prioritize taking away a team's

863
00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:05,960
Speaker 3: top wide receiver, and they've actually done it pretty effectively.

864
00:37:06,000 --> 00:37:08,560
Speaker 3: Last year they were number two in DVA versus number

865
00:37:08,560 --> 00:37:11,560
Speaker 3: one wide receivers per Football Outsiders, and this year they're

866
00:37:11,600 --> 00:37:15,160
Speaker 3: actually in the top eight in terms of fewest yards

867
00:37:15,160 --> 00:37:16,960
Speaker 3: per game allowed to number one wide receivers.

868
00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:19,479
Speaker 1: So not loving a rob this week.

869
00:37:19,960 --> 00:37:23,720
Speaker 3: A couple other guys Sammy Watkins have him at number

870
00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:26,280
Speaker 3: eleven right now, just you know, going up against the

871
00:37:26,280 --> 00:37:29,080
Speaker 3: Indianapolis coach. Yet there's the high imply team total, but

872
00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:31,120
Speaker 3: Watkins does spend a good amount of time in the slot.

873
00:37:31,120 --> 00:37:33,320
Speaker 1: The coach the position they can still cover.

874
00:37:33,239 --> 00:37:35,239
Speaker 3: Well, you know, they tend to kind of funnel a

875
00:37:35,239 --> 00:37:37,560
Speaker 3: lot of production to the backs, the tight ends, and

876
00:37:37,600 --> 00:37:40,080
Speaker 3: I think with their injuries at linebacker and safety that

877
00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:42,600
Speaker 3: will continue to happen. So, I mean, obviously you're not

878
00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:44,880
Speaker 3: Watkins is not dropping out of wide receiver one status,

879
00:37:44,920 --> 00:37:46,879
Speaker 3: but I think you could see the ball spread around.

880
00:37:46,920 --> 00:37:49,480
Speaker 3: I think it's a big Kelsey blow up spot. So

881
00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:52,959
Speaker 3: beyond that, it's just John Brown another guy that don't

882
00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:57,160
Speaker 3: love this week, low scoring game, some question marks at quarterback,

883
00:37:57,400 --> 00:38:00,480
Speaker 3: and I think you know Tennessee Logan Ryan in the

884
00:38:00,560 --> 00:38:04,680
Speaker 3: slot giving up a ton of catches targets per snap.

885
00:38:05,239 --> 00:38:06,960
Speaker 3: That's where I think the ball is funneled a little

886
00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:08,319
Speaker 3: bit more to Cole Beasley in this one. And you

887
00:38:08,320 --> 00:38:11,200
Speaker 3: combine that with the low scoring game, the odds that

888
00:38:11,239 --> 00:38:13,680
Speaker 3: it might stay close, and I don't think it's a

889
00:38:13,719 --> 00:38:16,120
Speaker 3: blow up spot for Brown this week. I think you

890
00:38:16,239 --> 00:38:18,160
Speaker 3: kind of see another one of these kind of average

891
00:38:18,200 --> 00:38:18,960
Speaker 3: ho home games.

892
00:38:19,719 --> 00:38:22,760
Speaker 2: All Right, one guy I am down on is Stefan Diggs.

893
00:38:23,280 --> 00:38:26,359
Speaker 2: He has a great matchup, so that is really one

894
00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:28,960
Speaker 2: thing going against the fade call here. But he is

895
00:38:29,000 --> 00:38:32,680
Speaker 2: in on a run heavy team that is going to

896
00:38:32,719 --> 00:38:35,440
Speaker 2: have a run heavy game script. We saw in a

897
00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:38,160
Speaker 2: Week one. You know what they do when they are ahead,

898
00:38:38,200 --> 00:38:42,560
Speaker 2: They just incessantly run the ball, and so you know, Diggs,

899
00:38:42,760 --> 00:38:45,480
Speaker 2: he might end up with like four targets. I mean

900
00:38:45,480 --> 00:38:48,560
Speaker 2: that's like within the range of outcomes for him this game.

901
00:38:49,440 --> 00:38:51,439
Speaker 2: He could also blow up and have one hundred yards

902
00:38:51,480 --> 00:38:55,240
Speaker 2: in a touchdown. But the inconsistency and the game script

903
00:38:55,320 --> 00:38:58,960
Speaker 2: and the inclinations of the offensive scheme are just putting

904
00:38:58,960 --> 00:39:02,920
Speaker 2: me off of Digs week despite the matchup. Sean, I

905
00:39:02,960 --> 00:39:05,640
Speaker 2: believe you have a prop on his teammate give it

906
00:39:05,680 --> 00:39:06,320
Speaker 2: to us.

907
00:39:06,840 --> 00:39:10,080
Speaker 4: Yeah, so I want to do Adam the Feelin's receiving yards.

908
00:39:10,320 --> 00:39:13,439
Speaker 4: This is a situation where you know, it's always good

909
00:39:13,440 --> 00:39:16,160
Speaker 4: to look at data and film when making projections, but

910
00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:18,239
Speaker 4: I think there is sort of the human element, and

911
00:39:18,320 --> 00:39:20,680
Speaker 4: you know, after the game, he was just slamming the

912
00:39:20,840 --> 00:39:24,120
Speaker 4: Vikings run heavy approach. You know, he had a two

913
00:39:24,200 --> 00:39:27,560
Speaker 4: reception six yard game, and he was clearly frustrated with

914
00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:29,799
Speaker 4: you know, the run heavy approach. So this is a

915
00:39:29,840 --> 00:39:32,120
Speaker 4: situation where you know, I think they might get him

916
00:39:32,120 --> 00:39:35,080
Speaker 4: more opportunities this week to make him happy. And you know,

917
00:39:35,200 --> 00:39:37,319
Speaker 4: at the Giants, it's it's a good matchup to do so,

918
00:39:37,320 --> 00:39:40,160
Speaker 4: so curious to hear your guys' thoughts on my over

919
00:39:40,200 --> 00:39:42,640
Speaker 4: run right now is sixty two and a half receiving yards.

920
00:39:43,640 --> 00:39:46,319
Speaker 3: I mean I was I was contrarian for going over

921
00:39:46,440 --> 00:39:49,200
Speaker 3: Diggs last week, and he obliterated that. I'm going to

922
00:39:49,480 --> 00:39:51,959
Speaker 3: try to make it two for two and go over

923
00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:53,759
Speaker 3: even though you know I hate taking these overs. I

924
00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:55,759
Speaker 3: did factor that in Seawan as well. I think that's

925
00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:58,640
Speaker 3: a sharp call. Defenses like the Giants, and you know,

926
00:39:58,680 --> 00:40:01,080
Speaker 3: this kind of tells you what space the Redskins are

927
00:40:01,120 --> 00:40:04,160
Speaker 3: in that they couldn't really do anything against that defense

928
00:40:04,160 --> 00:40:06,480
Speaker 3: because this has a potential to be historically bad defense,

929
00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:08,960
Speaker 3: and defense is like that. One thing I think that

930
00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:11,719
Speaker 3: goes underlooked is that they allow you to get the

931
00:40:11,760 --> 00:40:13,320
Speaker 3: ball to the players you want to get it to,

932
00:40:13,440 --> 00:40:16,240
Speaker 3: like there's no resistance in Okay, we want to target

933
00:40:16,719 --> 00:40:18,680
Speaker 3: Adam thee when he's our number one guy. We can

934
00:40:18,719 --> 00:40:20,160
Speaker 3: get the ball to him. We can get the ball

935
00:40:20,200 --> 00:40:22,480
Speaker 3: to Dig, we can get the ball to Cook. We

936
00:40:22,520 --> 00:40:24,880
Speaker 3: don't have to target anyone out. So I think the

937
00:40:25,800 --> 00:40:29,400
Speaker 3: ancillary players suffer a little more in these situations. And

938
00:40:29,440 --> 00:40:31,960
Speaker 3: I'm high on Thelan and Diggs and I have Delan

939
00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:35,080
Speaker 3: well over that sixty two yard problem.

940
00:40:35,560 --> 00:40:37,960
Speaker 5: I love the squeaky wheel narratives that we got going

941
00:40:38,000 --> 00:40:40,680
Speaker 5: here for Thilan, But we were just one week prior

942
00:40:40,719 --> 00:40:42,920
Speaker 5: from a stuff on Digg's trade request rumor that was

943
00:40:42,960 --> 00:40:45,360
Speaker 5: floating around out there. So I think this might be

944
00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:47,800
Speaker 5: a game in general where you just see the Vikings

945
00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:49,759
Speaker 5: kind of flip the switch a little bit more and

946
00:40:49,840 --> 00:40:52,120
Speaker 5: choose to be a little bit more pass oriented. As

947
00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:54,799
Speaker 5: you mentioned, Chris, the Giants defensively don't really have a

948
00:40:54,800 --> 00:40:56,840
Speaker 5: lot of things that they can take away from you.

949
00:40:57,080 --> 00:40:58,560
Speaker 5: And so I think if you're in Minnesota in this

950
00:40:58,640 --> 00:41:00,600
Speaker 5: spot and you've got kind of this, you had this

951
00:41:00,760 --> 00:41:03,520
Speaker 5: really bad offensive performance, kind of on the road against

952
00:41:03,560 --> 00:41:06,440
Speaker 5: a tough opponent, You've got a lot of players kind

953
00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:09,440
Speaker 5: of frustrated with their roles in the offense. This seems

954
00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:12,080
Speaker 5: like a spot where you might naturally facilitate a little

955
00:41:12,080 --> 00:41:14,160
Speaker 5: bit more of the opportunities just in the passing game

956
00:41:14,200 --> 00:41:16,279
Speaker 5: in the hole, and maybe scale down some of the

957
00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:18,920
Speaker 5: incredible workload that Dalvin Cook, a player who's had a

958
00:41:19,080 --> 00:41:22,040
Speaker 5: substantial injury history, has had early in the season. So

959
00:41:22,040 --> 00:41:24,000
Speaker 5: I'll take the overrun Adam Feelin as well. We're projecting

960
00:41:24,040 --> 00:41:26,360
Speaker 5: them for closer to seventy to seventy five yards, so

961
00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:28,319
Speaker 5: we think there's some good value on that number from Sean.

962
00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:31,680
Speaker 5: But I will say this, the Minnesota team that offense

963
00:41:31,680 --> 00:41:34,279
Speaker 5: in Seattle's offense have been so difficult to project from

964
00:41:34,320 --> 00:41:37,080
Speaker 5: a macro level because it's so dependent on game flow

965
00:41:37,120 --> 00:41:40,160
Speaker 5: and situation. This year, with how they play, I am

966
00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:43,279
Speaker 5: hoping though, that they choose to kind of, you give

967
00:41:43,320 --> 00:41:45,960
Speaker 5: the wheel a little bit of grease here, because both

968
00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:48,879
Speaker 5: their wide receivers, you know, were so dominant the last

969
00:41:48,920 --> 00:41:51,400
Speaker 5: few years, seem like they need a little bit of

970
00:41:51,440 --> 00:41:52,440
Speaker 5: love and a little bit of attention.

971
00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:54,640
Speaker 2: I'm going to take the under, Sean. I think this

972
00:41:54,680 --> 00:41:57,000
Speaker 2: is a pretty good line. I have it around sixty,

973
00:41:57,239 --> 00:41:59,759
Speaker 2: so I'm pretty close there. I'll take the under, though,

974
00:41:59,760 --> 00:42:02,280
Speaker 2: and I just say, like, I can totally see how

975
00:42:02,400 --> 00:42:05,040
Speaker 2: the Vikings go off with like four hundred yards passing.

976
00:42:05,080 --> 00:42:07,720
Speaker 2: They have the matchup and there is the Squeaky Will narrative,

977
00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:11,880
Speaker 2: But Zimmer doesn't strike me as the facilitator type of coach, Like,

978
00:42:11,960 --> 00:42:14,319
Speaker 2: if anything, I could see it being an instance where

979
00:42:14,360 --> 00:42:17,359
Speaker 2: he like doubles down the other way and is like, no,

980
00:42:17,600 --> 00:42:19,920
Speaker 2: I am the coach, you are the players. You're going

981
00:42:19,960 --> 00:42:21,920
Speaker 2: to do what I tell you, And we're going to

982
00:42:22,000 --> 00:42:25,640
Speaker 2: have Alexander Madison a twenty kids after a week. Give

983
00:42:25,840 --> 00:42:27,240
Speaker 2: Dalvin Cook thirty carries?

984
00:42:28,080 --> 00:42:30,360
Speaker 4: I think, yeah, maybe like a parent like Kyl Rudolph

985
00:42:30,400 --> 00:42:32,760
Speaker 4: hasn't been complaining he's only.

986
00:42:32,640 --> 00:42:34,919
Speaker 1: Getting one catch a game, so we're gonna give him

987
00:42:35,239 --> 00:42:35,960
Speaker 1: ten targets.

988
00:42:36,000 --> 00:42:38,440
Speaker 2: How about that? Yeah, I gotta get IRV Smith his.

989
00:42:40,040 --> 00:42:41,560
Speaker 1: Well, we all know it will be ob C.

990
00:42:41,800 --> 00:42:44,960
Speaker 3: Johnson like six for one oh three and two and

991
00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:47,480
Speaker 3: nobody else with anything, including Dalvin Cook, who will have

992
00:42:47,480 --> 00:42:50,160
Speaker 3: like an eighty six or something.

993
00:42:50,360 --> 00:42:53,360
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's too bad that Docson is on IR

994
00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:56,080
Speaker 2: because this could be the games.

995
00:42:56,719 --> 00:43:00,799
Speaker 1: Look Laclron Treadwell a breakout game.

996
00:43:02,440 --> 00:43:05,520
Speaker 2: Okay, let's talk about the tight end. We have the

997
00:43:05,560 --> 00:43:08,799
Speaker 2: big three at the top, Kelsey kittle Ertz probably not

998
00:43:08,880 --> 00:43:11,719
Speaker 2: a surprise, although I would make a case for Mark

999
00:43:11,760 --> 00:43:15,279
Speaker 2: Andrews being in there, But Dink, where are you on

1000
00:43:15,320 --> 00:43:17,000
Speaker 2: your top three at tight end?

1001
00:43:17,280 --> 00:43:19,400
Speaker 5: Yeah, we have those three, then we have Evan Ingram,

1002
00:43:19,400 --> 00:43:21,120
Speaker 5: and then we have your guy at Mark Andrews, who

1003
00:43:21,120 --> 00:43:23,120
Speaker 5: I like quite a bit this week from a DFS

1004
00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:25,360
Speaker 5: perspective as well. He's been on the injury report the

1005
00:43:25,400 --> 00:43:27,040
Speaker 5: last few weeks. It'll be interesting to see how his

1006
00:43:27,040 --> 00:43:29,080
Speaker 5: practice schedule is kind of managed this week. The snaps

1007
00:43:29,120 --> 00:43:31,359
Speaker 5: did come down a little bit last week, but he's

1008
00:43:31,400 --> 00:43:34,359
Speaker 5: not really a super snap dependent player because the way

1009
00:43:34,360 --> 00:43:36,839
Speaker 5: he's utilized is he's usually the number one or number

1010
00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:38,520
Speaker 5: two read for Lamar. I think this is a good

1011
00:43:38,520 --> 00:43:40,520
Speaker 5: opportunity for a bounce back spot. The price is very

1012
00:43:40,520 --> 00:43:42,600
Speaker 5: different than a lot of the other tight ends. So

1013
00:43:42,640 --> 00:43:44,520
Speaker 5: I'll probably have a lot of Mark Andrews this week,

1014
00:43:44,560 --> 00:43:46,759
Speaker 5: And I don't know that our fifth ranking on him

1015
00:43:46,760 --> 00:43:49,759
Speaker 5: will be consensus, like substantially different than the field. You know,

1016
00:43:49,800 --> 00:43:52,080
Speaker 5: maybe people will have Darren Waller or Austin Hooper ahead

1017
00:43:52,080 --> 00:43:54,760
Speaker 5: of him, just on some recency stuff. But I think

1018
00:43:54,880 --> 00:43:57,360
Speaker 5: in general we view him closer to that top tier

1019
00:43:57,400 --> 00:43:59,919
Speaker 5: than we do kind of the next tier down of tight.

1020
00:43:59,880 --> 00:44:05,440
Speaker 2: And Yeah, Dink, exactly. I'm right there with you. Okay, Sean,

1021
00:44:05,880 --> 00:44:08,680
Speaker 2: who are you relatively high on a tight end? Well,

1022
00:44:08,719 --> 00:44:09,239
Speaker 2: I was going to.

1023
00:44:09,280 --> 00:44:11,560
Speaker 4: Take a break this week by saying Austin Hooper because

1024
00:44:11,600 --> 00:44:13,799
Speaker 4: next week he faces the Cardinals, so I'm saving him

1025
00:44:13,840 --> 00:44:16,040
Speaker 4: for next week. So I was gonna say Tyler Eifert.

1026
00:44:16,920 --> 00:44:19,680
Speaker 4: And because he faces the Cardinals this week and last night,

1027
00:44:19,719 --> 00:44:22,000
Speaker 4: you know, on my football I was hoping he would have,

1028
00:44:22,400 --> 00:44:24,000
Speaker 4: you know, a pretty bad game, so people will be

1029
00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:26,719
Speaker 4: low on him, And sure enough, you dropped that touchdown.

1030
00:44:26,800 --> 00:44:29,000
Speaker 4: So I think that his ownership will be pretty low

1031
00:44:29,080 --> 00:44:32,520
Speaker 4: this week to you know, warrant spending down thirty three

1032
00:44:32,560 --> 00:44:35,440
Speaker 4: hundred dollars, it looks like on Draftking. So this is

1033
00:44:35,480 --> 00:44:38,200
Speaker 4: a matchup where clearly we're not expecting six catches for

1034
00:44:38,280 --> 00:44:40,680
Speaker 4: sixty yards. But you know, I haven'm pretty likely to

1035
00:44:40,680 --> 00:44:43,840
Speaker 4: get a touchdown, maybe a double dong this week. But this,

1036
00:44:44,200 --> 00:44:45,840
Speaker 4: you know, I think most people know now just to

1037
00:44:45,880 --> 00:44:48,520
Speaker 4: load up tight ends against the Cardinals, I think people

1038
00:44:48,600 --> 00:44:51,120
Speaker 4: might pass up on Eiffert just based on you know,

1039
00:44:51,200 --> 00:44:53,040
Speaker 4: season of eight. He hasn't looked great. But this is

1040
00:44:53,040 --> 00:44:55,160
Speaker 4: a spot where it's it's touchdown or bust, and I

1041
00:44:55,200 --> 00:44:57,439
Speaker 4: think at this price, it's willing to take that bet.

1042
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:00,319
Speaker 2: Okay, Raybond, I see in the outline and that you

1043
00:45:00,360 --> 00:45:02,399
Speaker 2: were also on effert What do you think of him?

1044
00:45:02,400 --> 00:45:03,279
Speaker 2: And who else do you like?

1045
00:45:03,680 --> 00:45:07,560
Speaker 3: I mean Efferts he's slow now, he can't move, and

1046
00:45:08,360 --> 00:45:11,400
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised if he put up two hundred.

1047
00:45:11,840 --> 00:45:14,080
Speaker 3: He went for his like Loane hundred yard game of

1048
00:45:14,120 --> 00:45:16,759
Speaker 3: the rest of his career. Because you just can't think

1049
00:45:16,800 --> 00:45:19,080
Speaker 3: about anything but the fact that this team stinks against

1050
00:45:19,080 --> 00:45:21,920
Speaker 3: the tight end, and the fact that the Bengals reeling

1051
00:45:22,000 --> 00:45:25,960
Speaker 3: right now, haven't gotten a win yet. Zach Taylor heavy

1052
00:45:25,960 --> 00:45:29,440
Speaker 3: eleven personnel, which means yeah, you Sama and sample get

1053
00:45:29,440 --> 00:45:31,520
Speaker 3: a couple of snaps here and there, but Eifort's gonna

1054
00:45:31,520 --> 00:45:32,920
Speaker 3: be that lone tight end. And they've been blocking with

1055
00:45:32,960 --> 00:45:34,440
Speaker 3: their running back a little more. And I think in

1056
00:45:34,480 --> 00:45:37,279
Speaker 3: this game, you know, they didn't have any success throwing

1057
00:45:37,320 --> 00:45:39,160
Speaker 3: to Joe Mixon or Jio Bernard in that last game.

1058
00:45:39,200 --> 00:45:41,239
Speaker 3: I think they're going to go back, you know, let

1059
00:45:41,239 --> 00:45:43,319
Speaker 3: mix it and Bernard stand in there and block and

1060
00:45:43,400 --> 00:45:46,000
Speaker 3: send Eifer down the field on these linebackers and these safeties.

1061
00:45:46,400 --> 00:45:48,520
Speaker 1: So I'm with you, but for that Sunday night game.

1062
00:45:48,640 --> 00:45:51,680
Speaker 3: I love both Ebron and Jack Doyle, assuming Doyle is

1063
00:45:51,920 --> 00:45:55,640
Speaker 3: okay either way. The Kansas City Chiefs have been funneling

1064
00:45:55,680 --> 00:45:59,799
Speaker 3: the football in opposing passing games towards the interior. They

1065
00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:04,480
Speaker 3: are allowing a league high thirty one percent of opponent

1066
00:46:04,520 --> 00:46:07,239
Speaker 3: targets to go to the tight end position forty five

1067
00:46:07,280 --> 00:46:11,120
Speaker 3: total targets two tight ends through four weeks of the season.

1068
00:46:11,760 --> 00:46:13,920
Speaker 3: White Hockinson to kind of get going last week against

1069
00:46:13,920 --> 00:46:16,760
Speaker 3: this team. Unfortunately he did get the touchdown, but unfortunately

1070
00:46:16,800 --> 00:46:19,040
Speaker 3: he also got broke himself later in the game. So

1071
00:46:19,880 --> 00:46:21,960
Speaker 3: you know, I'm looking for big games from those two

1072
00:46:21,960 --> 00:46:22,600
Speaker 3: guys as well.

1073
00:46:23,120 --> 00:46:25,279
Speaker 2: All Right. The guy I'm high on, Mark Andrews, really

1074
00:46:25,280 --> 00:46:27,560
Speaker 2: don't need to talk about him. I don't want to

1075
00:46:27,600 --> 00:46:29,920
Speaker 2: say that he's the number one pass catching option on

1076
00:46:30,000 --> 00:46:33,359
Speaker 2: the Ravens, but he pretty much is Tyler Eifert. He's

1077
00:46:33,400 --> 00:46:35,920
Speaker 2: a guy I'm relatively low on. Like maybe he gets

1078
00:46:36,000 --> 00:46:40,200
Speaker 2: into his TJ. Hawkinson time machine and can actually put

1079
00:46:40,280 --> 00:46:43,040
Speaker 2: up some numbers and we should all admit this is

1080
00:46:43,080 --> 00:46:45,920
Speaker 2: the nut matchup, like this is the best spot for him.

1081
00:46:46,080 --> 00:46:48,719
Speaker 2: But if there's one guy who could really underwhelm, it's

1082
00:46:48,760 --> 00:46:51,560
Speaker 2: a guy who isn't moving all that well, who is

1083
00:46:51,800 --> 00:46:54,400
Speaker 2: injury prone, is in it. I think one of the

1084
00:46:54,440 --> 00:46:57,280
Speaker 2: worst offenses in the league. I know that the Dolphins

1085
00:46:57,320 --> 00:46:59,280
Speaker 2: are bad, but are we sure that the Bengals aren't

1086
00:46:59,320 --> 00:47:02,600
Speaker 2: like just as bad. That's probably a bad take, but

1087
00:47:02,880 --> 00:47:04,960
Speaker 2: I don't know. Like this the Bengals team, I just want,

1088
00:47:05,040 --> 00:47:08,200
Speaker 2: like really nothing to do with And I could see

1089
00:47:08,360 --> 00:47:11,120
Speaker 2: Ross and Boyd being the guys who really exploit this

1090
00:47:11,200 --> 00:47:14,160
Speaker 2: team and then mix in potentially gets going and like

1091
00:47:14,200 --> 00:47:15,400
Speaker 2: at the end of the game, it's like, oh, what

1092
00:47:15,440 --> 00:47:17,600
Speaker 2: happened to Tyler Eifert. It's like, well, why would you

1093
00:47:17,640 --> 00:47:19,919
Speaker 2: expect a guy who looks like he's forty years old

1094
00:47:20,280 --> 00:47:23,560
Speaker 2: actually to have production? So I don't know, I understand

1095
00:47:23,680 --> 00:47:26,520
Speaker 2: that it's a great spot for him. I'm just I'm

1096
00:47:26,560 --> 00:47:29,040
Speaker 2: not on Tyler Eifert. And I say this knowing that

1097
00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:31,920
Speaker 2: he's averaged about half a touchdown per game since like

1098
00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:35,400
Speaker 2: two thousand and three, so this could easily go against me.

1099
00:47:35,560 --> 00:47:37,960
Speaker 2: And a Sean mentioned it is touchdown or bust for him.

1100
00:47:38,200 --> 00:47:40,719
Speaker 2: But if it's touchdown or bust, like, why do I

1101
00:47:40,760 --> 00:47:42,560
Speaker 2: want to bet on some guy to score a touchdown?

1102
00:47:42,719 --> 00:47:45,959
Speaker 2: So that's that's where I am dink. I believe you're

1103
00:47:46,000 --> 00:47:48,600
Speaker 2: also going against Tyler Eifert.

1104
00:47:48,520 --> 00:47:50,960
Speaker 5: So I will say that there's a couple things to

1105
00:47:51,000 --> 00:47:53,759
Speaker 5: be concerned about. Obviously the matchup, but then John Ross's health.

1106
00:47:53,760 --> 00:47:56,080
Speaker 5: If John Ross isn't available, that could funnel up a

1107
00:47:56,080 --> 00:47:57,759
Speaker 5: little bit of target share that I'd be concerned about

1108
00:47:57,800 --> 00:48:00,320
Speaker 5: as well. In general, I don't think people going to

1109
00:48:00,360 --> 00:48:03,440
Speaker 5: shy away from the tight end against Arizona narrative. After

1110
00:48:03,600 --> 00:48:06,879
Speaker 5: last week's kind of like Twitter debacle between people who

1111
00:48:06,920 --> 00:48:10,080
Speaker 5: were pro Will Disley and people who were against Will disleague,

1112
00:48:10,239 --> 00:48:12,279
Speaker 5: I think people are going to dig in again for

1113
00:48:12,360 --> 00:48:15,360
Speaker 5: an even inferior option in terms of, you know, athleticism,

1114
00:48:16,080 --> 00:48:17,960
Speaker 5: and so I think Tyler Effort is going to come

1115
00:48:18,000 --> 00:48:20,359
Speaker 5: with ownership once again this week, and I think will

1116
00:48:20,400 --> 00:48:22,000
Speaker 5: be lower than him on the field. We were lower

1117
00:48:22,040 --> 00:48:23,839
Speaker 5: than Will Disleey on the field. That didn't work out

1118
00:48:23,920 --> 00:48:26,240
Speaker 5: very well. It was very clear that Seattle was targeting

1119
00:48:26,320 --> 00:48:29,000
Speaker 5: him early and often. So it's very clear that around

1120
00:48:29,040 --> 00:48:31,640
Speaker 5: the league teams are seeing that Arizona can be attacked

1121
00:48:31,680 --> 00:48:33,239
Speaker 5: through the middle of the field with the tight ends.

1122
00:48:33,920 --> 00:48:35,920
Speaker 5: I do think you'll see the backs a little bit

1123
00:48:35,920 --> 00:48:37,360
Speaker 5: more involved in the passing game in this one, just

1124
00:48:37,360 --> 00:48:40,040
Speaker 5: because Arizona's pass rush isn't something that really you have

1125
00:48:40,120 --> 00:48:42,719
Speaker 5: to keep in kind of the extra blockers to worry

1126
00:48:43,000 --> 00:48:46,279
Speaker 5: to worry about. So I'm hoping that we're going to

1127
00:48:46,320 --> 00:48:48,759
Speaker 5: be on the right side of this. Eventually Arizona will

1128
00:48:48,760 --> 00:48:51,080
Speaker 5: stop giving up a touchdown to a tight end, I think.

1129
00:48:51,640 --> 00:48:55,000
Speaker 5: But yeah, Tyler effort, because you know, he's basically, you know,

1130
00:48:55,040 --> 00:48:58,279
Speaker 5: moving around out there like Frankenstein. I don't think he's

1131
00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:01,080
Speaker 5: got much potential outside of inside the twenties, and I

1132
00:49:01,200 --> 00:49:02,920
Speaker 5: just would rather bet against that when I think the

1133
00:49:02,920 --> 00:49:04,120
Speaker 5: field is still going to be on it.

1134
00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:07,440
Speaker 3: I'll just say this though, like you know, kind of

1135
00:49:07,440 --> 00:49:10,239
Speaker 3: to push back on, you know, the effort hate that's

1136
00:49:10,280 --> 00:49:13,719
Speaker 3: going down in this in this in this pod, you

1137
00:49:13,800 --> 00:49:16,360
Speaker 3: have to it's early in the season still, Iiford hasn't played,

1138
00:49:16,760 --> 00:49:19,040
Speaker 3: you know, for a while until now, so we're really

1139
00:49:19,080 --> 00:49:21,120
Speaker 3: only looking at these like last four matchups.

1140
00:49:21,520 --> 00:49:23,400
Speaker 1: You have the Seattle.

1141
00:49:23,000 --> 00:49:26,000
Speaker 3: Seahawks, who are notoriously stout against the Titan. I know

1142
00:49:26,040 --> 00:49:28,319
Speaker 3: they gave up to two touchdowns the Bmcdonalds, but they've

1143
00:49:28,320 --> 00:49:31,480
Speaker 3: been stout against the tight end. His going back, especially

1144
00:49:31,520 --> 00:49:33,319
Speaker 3: a tight end like Eiford, who is going to find

1145
00:49:33,360 --> 00:49:35,520
Speaker 3: himself kind of walking right into Bobby Wagner on some

1146
00:49:35,560 --> 00:49:39,920
Speaker 3: of his plays in kJ Wright. Then you face the

1147
00:49:39,920 --> 00:49:42,400
Speaker 3: the forty nine Ers, which you know, more often than

1148
00:49:42,400 --> 00:49:43,600
Speaker 3: not are pretty good against the tight end.

1149
00:49:43,719 --> 00:49:45,359
Speaker 1: Just a really good pass defense this year. I think

1150
00:49:45,360 --> 00:49:46,200
Speaker 1: it's going underrated.

1151
00:49:46,320 --> 00:49:48,759
Speaker 3: Then you also face the Buffalo Bills, who and I'll

1152
00:49:48,760 --> 00:49:50,960
Speaker 3: talk about this in a moment, but they've been top

1153
00:49:51,080 --> 00:49:53,319
Speaker 3: five in tight end coverage since McDermott took over.

1154
00:49:53,360 --> 00:49:54,120
Speaker 1: They've given up.

1155
00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:56,799
Speaker 3: Two, I believe it's five catch games since the start

1156
00:49:56,840 --> 00:49:58,759
Speaker 3: of last year to tight ends. And then you face

1157
00:49:58,800 --> 00:50:02,000
Speaker 3: the Pittsburgh Steelers, who you know they upgraded their their

1158
00:50:02,040 --> 00:50:06,120
Speaker 3: their their their secondary secondary with Minka Fitzpatrick, and you

1159
00:50:06,120 --> 00:50:08,200
Speaker 3: know they gave up some production to Disley that was

1160
00:50:08,239 --> 00:50:11,879
Speaker 3: before Fitzpatrick. But that defense was pretty stingy last night

1161
00:50:11,880 --> 00:50:13,960
Speaker 3: as a whole. Like it wasn't just Iiffert who was

1162
00:50:13,960 --> 00:50:16,879
Speaker 3: getting shut out. Tyra Boyd. I had the under six

1163
00:50:16,960 --> 00:50:19,680
Speaker 3: catches at plus one fifty it's and the yardage and

1164
00:50:19,760 --> 00:50:22,600
Speaker 3: surprise that hit so cleanly because I think he only

1165
00:50:22,680 --> 00:50:24,960
Speaker 3: ended up with two three catches. So this was an

1166
00:50:25,000 --> 00:50:28,080
Speaker 3: all out effort by the Steeer defense. And I just

1167
00:50:28,080 --> 00:50:30,160
Speaker 3: think that we're kind of underrating Eifford a little bit

1168
00:50:30,160 --> 00:50:32,440
Speaker 3: because he's had kind of these non ideal matchups, Whereas,

1169
00:50:32,480 --> 00:50:35,000
Speaker 3: as you guys mentioned, this is the nut spot for

1170
00:50:35,040 --> 00:50:36,640
Speaker 3: a tight end. So like i'm i'm I think in

1171
00:50:36,719 --> 00:50:40,040
Speaker 3: DFS there's this is a week where you have Ingram

1172
00:50:40,320 --> 00:50:43,160
Speaker 3: in it against a tough defense. You have ERT's in

1173
00:50:43,200 --> 00:50:45,880
Speaker 3: a situation where it's a good spot, but Jet Jets

1174
00:50:45,880 --> 00:50:49,360
Speaker 3: do have some safety play and weakret corner and and

1175
00:50:49,360 --> 00:50:51,880
Speaker 3: it could be a blowout, and you have Waller in

1176
00:50:51,920 --> 00:50:53,680
Speaker 3: a tough match up against the Bears. Like all these

1177
00:50:53,760 --> 00:50:56,400
Speaker 3: tight ends, they're not quite you don't feel quite as

1178
00:50:56,400 --> 00:50:57,399
Speaker 3: good about paying up for him.

1179
00:50:57,440 --> 00:51:00,160
Speaker 5: And that's what the play Eiffort. That's why Iffort's to

1180
00:51:00,160 --> 00:51:02,439
Speaker 5: be better, like like twenty plus known.

1181
00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:03,400
Speaker 2: Again, yeah, I'm not.

1182
00:51:03,360 --> 00:51:05,640
Speaker 3: Saying playm with tournaments, but like in a cash game,

1183
00:51:06,239 --> 00:51:09,080
Speaker 3: like you're minimizing your kind of loss and maximizing your upside.

1184
00:51:09,080 --> 00:51:12,160
Speaker 3: Because I think we won't argue that he probably his

1185
00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:15,080
Speaker 3: floor is probably zero, but his ceiling is on at

1186
00:51:15,200 --> 00:51:17,279
Speaker 3: least for this week, on par with those guys that

1187
00:51:17,320 --> 00:51:19,520
Speaker 3: are gonna cost like two K more So, I'd say

1188
00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:21,520
Speaker 3: in a cash game, you do it, and then in

1189
00:51:21,560 --> 00:51:23,200
Speaker 3: a tournament, I do agree what you think. I think

1190
00:51:23,239 --> 00:51:25,680
Speaker 3: he will get substantial ownership, and you've got to kind

1191
00:51:25,680 --> 00:51:27,600
Speaker 3: of pivot a little bit, especially if you're like, you know,

1192
00:51:27,640 --> 00:51:28,759
Speaker 3: one hundred percent on him.

1193
00:51:28,640 --> 00:51:31,440
Speaker 2: In Cat Sean give us the tight end prompt.

1194
00:51:31,480 --> 00:51:34,360
Speaker 4: Another guy that's coming off of four game suspension, and

1195
00:51:34,440 --> 00:51:36,959
Speaker 4: that's Ben Watson. You know, the Patriots really up haven't

1196
00:51:36,960 --> 00:51:39,279
Speaker 4: had a tight end presence this here, So here's here

1197
00:51:39,320 --> 00:51:42,440
Speaker 4: what you guys have on him. But over under at

1198
00:51:42,680 --> 00:51:45,640
Speaker 4: twenty seven and a half receiving yards.

1199
00:51:45,520 --> 00:51:47,120
Speaker 3: I can't see how he gets more than like a

1200
00:51:47,280 --> 00:51:50,080
Speaker 3: seven and a half percent target share because I just

1201
00:51:50,080 --> 00:51:51,839
Speaker 3: don't think they kind of get him go like, look

1202
00:51:51,920 --> 00:51:53,880
Speaker 3: to look at this game and just like reinsert him.

1203
00:51:53,880 --> 00:51:55,600
Speaker 3: I think he kind of just takes over, you know,

1204
00:51:55,880 --> 00:51:58,399
Speaker 3: the few targets here and there that that would cost

1205
00:51:58,480 --> 00:52:00,840
Speaker 3: an Izzo had been getting. And this matchup is so

1206
00:52:00,920 --> 00:52:03,239
Speaker 3: good for Washington that I think the Patriots are able

1207
00:52:03,280 --> 00:52:05,520
Speaker 3: to get Edelman the ball, able to get Gordon the ball,

1208
00:52:05,719 --> 00:52:07,359
Speaker 3: They're able to get White the ball. So I don't

1209
00:52:07,360 --> 00:52:09,719
Speaker 3: think they necessarily need to kind of, you know, put

1210
00:52:09,760 --> 00:52:12,880
Speaker 3: themselves through the misery of targeting like heero Van Watson,

1211
00:52:13,040 --> 00:52:15,919
Speaker 3: Like I take the effort over Watson prop all day.

1212
00:52:16,360 --> 00:52:18,640
Speaker 5: Yeah, I would go under here as well. I'm in

1213
00:52:18,680 --> 00:52:20,920
Speaker 5: the same bodhis Chris where I'm having a hard time

1214
00:52:20,920 --> 00:52:23,240
Speaker 5: getting him beyond like a ten percent market share of targets,

1215
00:52:23,280 --> 00:52:25,680
Speaker 5: just because historically, you know, you can't really compare anything

1216
00:52:25,719 --> 00:52:27,719
Speaker 5: New England has done at the tight end position because

1217
00:52:27,719 --> 00:52:29,880
Speaker 5: I had Rob freaking Gronkowski, and now if you look

1218
00:52:29,880 --> 00:52:32,080
Speaker 5: at their skill position players, they also have more skill

1219
00:52:32,120 --> 00:52:34,400
Speaker 5: position player depth than I think they had even in

1220
00:52:34,400 --> 00:52:36,560
Speaker 5: those years where they had Rob Gronkowski when you look

1221
00:52:36,560 --> 00:52:39,000
Speaker 5: at the wide receiver death. Now with Phil Dorsett playing well,

1222
00:52:39,200 --> 00:52:42,000
Speaker 5: Josh Gordon, Julian Edelman, and obviously the pass catching backs

1223
00:52:42,000 --> 00:52:44,400
Speaker 5: with James White, we'll see what rex bert head status was.

1224
00:52:44,400 --> 00:52:46,080
Speaker 5: It was weird that he didn't play as much last week.

1225
00:52:46,080 --> 00:52:48,800
Speaker 5: It looks like he was actually truly injured with the

1226
00:52:48,880 --> 00:52:50,960
Speaker 5: questionable type, which you don't always get with the Patriots.

1227
00:52:51,520 --> 00:52:54,120
Speaker 5: So I'm taking away and see approach with Watson before

1228
00:52:54,160 --> 00:52:56,440
Speaker 5: kind of moving that market share forward. Basically have him

1229
00:52:56,480 --> 00:52:59,240
Speaker 5: as a little bit more of a past receiving option

1230
00:52:59,320 --> 00:53:01,520
Speaker 5: than La costs or so we don't have a manywhere

1231
00:53:01,560 --> 00:53:03,239
Speaker 5: New York kind of the twenty five to twenty seven

1232
00:53:03,239 --> 00:53:04,280
Speaker 5: we have more than the teams.

1233
00:53:04,640 --> 00:53:07,360
Speaker 2: Yeah, Sean, I don't even remember the number that you said,

1234
00:53:07,400 --> 00:53:08,520
Speaker 2: and I'm taking over.

1235
00:53:10,520 --> 00:53:11,800
Speaker 1: It was it was twelve.

1236
00:53:13,680 --> 00:53:18,520
Speaker 2: He just lied to me, Hammerick Freedman. Okay, let's get

1237
00:53:18,560 --> 00:53:23,080
Speaker 2: into some start sick questions from Twitter. Sean, this is

1238
00:53:23,080 --> 00:53:26,160
Speaker 2: from DOM players to target when trading Digs away? And

1239
00:53:26,160 --> 00:53:29,080
Speaker 2: what are your thoughts on Shark's rest of season outlook

1240
00:53:29,400 --> 00:53:30,000
Speaker 2: for Diggs.

1241
00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:34,200
Speaker 4: The ideal sell high Bilo scenario would be trading him

1242
00:53:34,200 --> 00:53:36,560
Speaker 4: away for a guy like Marky's Brown. Towards the end

1243
00:53:36,560 --> 00:53:38,439
Speaker 4: of the season, we're gonna be considering mark He's Brown

1244
00:53:38,480 --> 00:53:40,800
Speaker 4: more of a top end wide receiver. Two is really

1245
00:53:40,840 --> 00:53:43,360
Speaker 4: interesting seeing him blow up like what was it, fifteen

1246
00:53:43,400 --> 00:53:46,360
Speaker 4: percent of snaps early in the season, and now that

1247
00:53:46,400 --> 00:53:49,960
Speaker 4: he's expanded to full time player, he's seen some you know,

1248
00:53:50,280 --> 00:53:52,359
Speaker 4: he's due for some positive regressions. So he's a guy

1249
00:53:52,400 --> 00:53:55,160
Speaker 4: that I'm saying to Biolo on and Shark, I'm not

1250
00:53:55,160 --> 00:53:57,960
Speaker 4: sure if that was a trade question. You know, if

1251
00:53:57,960 --> 00:54:00,840
Speaker 4: you want to trade him away, he's certainly exceeded expectations

1252
00:54:01,040 --> 00:54:02,839
Speaker 4: currently in the top ten for the season, but I

1253
00:54:02,880 --> 00:54:05,680
Speaker 4: still view him as a wide receiver three going forward.

1254
00:54:05,760 --> 00:54:07,759
Speaker 4: So if you're just asking if it was a good

1255
00:54:07,800 --> 00:54:10,720
Speaker 4: draft pick at this point, the answers, yes, you probably

1256
00:54:10,719 --> 00:54:12,400
Speaker 4: got to really late and you have a wide receiver

1257
00:54:12,440 --> 00:54:14,920
Speaker 4: three going forward. So I'm not sure what the question was,

1258
00:54:14,920 --> 00:54:17,879
Speaker 4: but yeah, if you took them, just write them out.

1259
00:54:18,000 --> 00:54:19,840
Speaker 4: You should be in your starting laps going forward.

1260
00:54:20,160 --> 00:54:22,719
Speaker 2: Think this is from len. Is Juju done or are

1261
00:54:22,760 --> 00:54:25,239
Speaker 2: we holding and hoping that Rudolph gets more comfortable and

1262
00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:26,440
Speaker 2: the offense opens up.

1263
00:54:26,640 --> 00:54:28,520
Speaker 5: I don't think there's anything you can do but hold

1264
00:54:28,520 --> 00:54:30,600
Speaker 5: in hope at this point. I think if you look

1265
00:54:30,640 --> 00:54:33,400
Speaker 5: at the way that they're attacking offensively, I think it

1266
00:54:33,400 --> 00:54:36,040
Speaker 5: would still make sense that Juju will have opportunities because

1267
00:54:36,080 --> 00:54:37,520
Speaker 5: a lot of the things that they're trying to scheme

1268
00:54:37,520 --> 00:54:39,560
Speaker 5: are things that they have these guys kind of on

1269
00:54:39,600 --> 00:54:41,680
Speaker 5: the move and so you can get yards after the catch,

1270
00:54:41,800 --> 00:54:44,640
Speaker 5: and that's really what Juju's been exceptional at his entire career.

1271
00:54:44,680 --> 00:54:46,839
Speaker 5: But you know, the volume that I think we all

1272
00:54:46,960 --> 00:54:49,440
Speaker 5: assumed would be there in the absence of Antonio Brown

1273
00:54:49,840 --> 00:54:51,640
Speaker 5: has not, and it's been in the absence of Antonio

1274
00:54:51,680 --> 00:54:54,960
Speaker 5: Brown and Van mccollins. So that's very, very concerning at

1275
00:54:54,960 --> 00:54:56,600
Speaker 5: this point in the season. I know we started with

1276
00:54:56,680 --> 00:54:59,840
Speaker 5: like a target share baseline for him in the high twenties,

1277
00:55:00,080 --> 00:55:01,840
Speaker 5: and now we're down to kind of the mid twenties

1278
00:55:01,880 --> 00:55:04,240
Speaker 5: and looking at maybe even dropping it into the lower

1279
00:55:04,280 --> 00:55:06,719
Speaker 5: mid twenties because the volume just hasn't been there, and

1280
00:55:06,760 --> 00:55:08,960
Speaker 5: so what more can you do with him? He's obviously

1281
00:55:09,000 --> 00:55:10,960
Speaker 5: not going to contend for the wide receiver one overall,

1282
00:55:10,960 --> 00:55:13,000
Speaker 5: which I thought he had that upside coming into this season.

1283
00:55:13,160 --> 00:55:15,719
Speaker 5: I think he still has the chance to post kind

1284
00:55:15,719 --> 00:55:17,920
Speaker 5: of high end wide receiver two numbers, but we're going

1285
00:55:17,960 --> 00:55:19,400
Speaker 5: to need to see that volume turn and we're going

1286
00:55:19,440 --> 00:55:21,160
Speaker 5: to need to see Pittsburgh's offense opened up a little

1287
00:55:21,200 --> 00:55:21,560
Speaker 5: bit more.

1288
00:55:21,920 --> 00:55:24,239
Speaker 2: Chris, This is from Chris Hass. Which side do you

1289
00:55:24,280 --> 00:55:28,040
Speaker 2: prefer in this trade? OBJ? Ronald Jones, Melvin Gordon, third

1290
00:55:28,560 --> 00:55:31,839
Speaker 2: or Cooks, Zeke and mvs.

1291
00:55:32,440 --> 00:55:34,919
Speaker 3: The first one side, just because I think that both

1292
00:55:34,960 --> 00:55:37,360
Speaker 3: Cooks and MVS they're going to have some kind of

1293
00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:41,600
Speaker 3: volatile weeks, whereas I think on the left those three

1294
00:55:41,600 --> 00:55:44,000
Speaker 3: players will be a little bit more consistent. Even with

1295
00:55:44,120 --> 00:55:46,600
Speaker 3: Ronald Jones and Melvin Gordon in there. I think they're

1296
00:55:46,640 --> 00:55:48,359
Speaker 3: going to kind of be more consistent as the year

1297
00:55:48,880 --> 00:55:50,640
Speaker 3: progresses than they settle into their roles.

1298
00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:53,360
Speaker 2: Sean. This is from Galper. What type of return should

1299
00:55:53,360 --> 00:55:55,319
Speaker 2: we expect for Juju Well?

1300
00:55:55,360 --> 00:55:58,160
Speaker 4: I definitely wouldn't be trying to trade away this week.

1301
00:55:58,480 --> 00:56:00,799
Speaker 4: The time to sell high on him post Big Ben

1302
00:56:00,880 --> 00:56:04,280
Speaker 4: injury was last week after he put up three catches

1303
00:56:04,320 --> 00:56:06,239
Speaker 4: eighty one yards in a touchdown. I think you have

1304
00:56:06,280 --> 00:56:09,440
Speaker 4: to kind of hold right now, especially after a game

1305
00:56:09,480 --> 00:56:13,040
Speaker 4: on Monight Football where everybody saw the conservative offense just

1306
00:56:13,040 --> 00:56:15,359
Speaker 4: to put away the Bengals. He could have some big

1307
00:56:15,400 --> 00:56:17,799
Speaker 4: weeks going forward, and that's when you should sell high.

1308
00:56:17,800 --> 00:56:20,320
Speaker 4: But if somebody is willing to give you Chris Godwin

1309
00:56:20,360 --> 00:56:22,080
Speaker 4: for him right now, obviously you want to do that.

1310
00:56:22,120 --> 00:56:23,600
Speaker 4: But I just don't think there's a market for him

1311
00:56:23,640 --> 00:56:25,480
Speaker 4: right now, So just just hold him for now and

1312
00:56:25,680 --> 00:56:27,680
Speaker 4: sell high the next chance you get Chris.

1313
00:56:27,680 --> 00:56:30,400
Speaker 2: This is from tumernad Is. Jamis a weekly start or

1314
00:56:30,440 --> 00:56:32,880
Speaker 2: top level streamer in a fourteen team league.

1315
00:56:32,960 --> 00:56:35,200
Speaker 3: I think he's fringe weekly starting a fourteen team league,

1316
00:56:35,239 --> 00:56:37,960
Speaker 3: but he's quite volatile because on a week to week basis,

1317
00:56:38,000 --> 00:56:39,960
Speaker 3: his interception projection is going to be one of the

1318
00:56:40,040 --> 00:56:42,719
Speaker 3: highest on a slate, and so it really depends on

1319
00:56:42,760 --> 00:56:45,440
Speaker 3: the matchup for him, Like if his touch his projected

1320
00:56:45,480 --> 00:56:49,200
Speaker 3: touchdown share can't kind of negate his projected interceptions in

1321
00:56:49,200 --> 00:56:50,839
Speaker 3: a given week, Like he could go as high as

1322
00:56:50,840 --> 00:56:54,640
Speaker 3: like top six or seven, but as low as like twenty.

1323
00:56:55,000 --> 00:56:58,520
Speaker 3: So it's volatile. So I wouldn't say every week starter

1324
00:56:58,880 --> 00:57:01,279
Speaker 3: or even every week stream. It's still week to week,

1325
00:57:01,320 --> 00:57:03,880
Speaker 3: But overall he gets out to about that QB fourteen

1326
00:57:03,960 --> 00:57:05,240
Speaker 3: fifteen Ring Drew.

1327
00:57:05,320 --> 00:57:08,759
Speaker 2: This is from Galper. What is your Jayalen Samuels rest

1328
00:57:08,760 --> 00:57:09,799
Speaker 2: of season analysis?

1329
00:57:10,320 --> 00:57:12,520
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think, I honestly think this next week will

1330
00:57:12,520 --> 00:57:14,200
Speaker 5: tell a lot in terms of if they're trying to

1331
00:57:14,239 --> 00:57:16,040
Speaker 5: still use some of these gadget plays. I was in.

1332
00:57:16,080 --> 00:57:17,920
Speaker 5: I was actually surprised that they didn't you get some

1333
00:57:18,000 --> 00:57:19,600
Speaker 5: snaps with him as like an h pack or a

1334
00:57:19,640 --> 00:57:22,120
Speaker 5: tight end, given their tight end injuries and given Nick

1335
00:57:22,160 --> 00:57:24,280
Speaker 5: Manette just kind of coming to the team on Monday night,

1336
00:57:24,360 --> 00:57:25,880
Speaker 5: I was hopeful that would be a way to kind

1337
00:57:25,880 --> 00:57:28,360
Speaker 5: of get him into the backfield. But it's going to

1338
00:57:28,400 --> 00:57:30,360
Speaker 5: be violatile from him. I think he's obviously a very

1339
00:57:30,400 --> 00:57:32,400
Speaker 5: skilled player, and he's a multifacet player that they can

1340
00:57:32,480 --> 00:57:34,280
Speaker 5: use in a lot of different ways. It'll be interesting

1341
00:57:34,280 --> 00:57:36,000
Speaker 5: to see if they can be creative enough to do so.

1342
00:57:36,320 --> 00:57:37,920
Speaker 5: But I think kind of, you know, the high end

1343
00:57:38,080 --> 00:57:40,960
Speaker 5: range of outcomes for Jalen Samuels is going to be

1344
00:57:41,040 --> 00:57:44,160
Speaker 5: like an occasional flex week starter. It's just it's gonna

1345
00:57:44,160 --> 00:57:46,720
Speaker 5: be a situation where you're going to have difficulty trusting

1346
00:57:46,760 --> 00:57:48,600
Speaker 5: that offense and trusting his volume in it.

1347
00:57:49,160 --> 00:57:52,080
Speaker 2: Drew, what content should people check out at their rodeo?

1348
00:57:52,480 --> 00:57:55,520
Speaker 5: Yeah, at Daily rodo dot com or Daily Rodeo dot com.

1349
00:57:55,520 --> 00:57:57,560
Speaker 5: If you follow Davis Maddock, you can check out all

1350
00:57:57,600 --> 00:57:59,120
Speaker 5: of our premium stuff over there, and then if you

1351
00:57:59,160 --> 00:58:01,080
Speaker 5: want free now since we do a game by game

1352
00:58:01,120 --> 00:58:03,400
Speaker 5: breakdown and we have free pods all throughout the week

1353
00:58:03,440 --> 00:58:05,520
Speaker 5: on the Sports Grid Fantasy Football podcast.

1354
00:58:06,000 --> 00:58:08,200
Speaker 2: Drew, thank you so much for joining us. Everyone. Be

1355
00:58:08,240 --> 00:58:10,680
Speaker 2: sure to follow him on Twitter at Drew Dinkmeyer. You

1356
00:58:10,680 --> 00:58:12,840
Speaker 2: can follow Sean, Chris and me in the Action Network

1357
00:58:12,880 --> 00:58:15,760
Speaker 2: app at the Underscore Odds maker Chris Raybond and Matt

1358
00:58:15,880 --> 00:58:17,960
Speaker 2: f the Oracle use the app to get real time

1359
00:58:17,960 --> 00:58:20,439
Speaker 2: odds and track your bets for free. That is going

1360
00:58:20,480 --> 00:58:23,320
Speaker 2: to do it for this episode of the Action Network Podcast.

1361
00:58:23,520 --> 00:58:25,480
Speaker 2: Check out the rest of our episodes and live shows

1362
00:58:25,520 --> 00:58:27,800
Speaker 2: this week. Please subscribe to and rate and review the

1363
00:58:27,800 --> 00:58:30,840
Speaker 2: show on Apple podcast radio dot com, or wherever you

1364
00:58:30,920 --> 00:58:37,560
Speaker 2: get your podcasts. See you again next episode.