WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 13 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Check it on, man, No down, man, there's good morning.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It's the Beating the Book podcast, Mega from the Day,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful downtown Las Vegas, the day home for the megapod

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>all year long. We couldn't be happier to do it.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Gil Alexander, by the way, Mike Palm, vice president

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>of Operations for Circus Sports, alongside and made it possible

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>here at the day. How you doing, Mike Gate, Good morning, Geod,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>morning Todd, Good morning, Pods. You got your little beverage,

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>my Bahama breeze or whatever this is. Do you even

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>let them know that you want them to, just that

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they see you and they just come back. There's there's

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>eye contact and a recognition nonverbal. We gotta talk a

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch about survival. Todd Wishnev is up on the screen

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from his mother's cork addic somewhere in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, with

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steel Stiller's logo behind him. Leven and O. Yes,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's in in honor of Wednesday afternoon, a National Football

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>League action which was tremendously interesting. Thankfully I was not

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on the regular point spread to see the end of

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that ridiculous NFL fixed line situation. But it went well

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for me because I had under Robert Griffin passing yards

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in the fandel in game props, which are just incredible.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't moved to Pennsylvania yet, you might as well,

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's unbelievable. We don't need to list all our

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>bets for actually that that backdoor quarterback did take a

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>great day for me into a very mid day. So

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I sympathize with people that can. I ask you a question,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because you've you've spoken glowingly about these endgame props. What

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of limits do they take on these endgame props?

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just started getting into them, so I

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know they existed until a week or two ago. Um,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't. I don't know the answer to that. Um,

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you certainly he hasn't challenged the limits yet.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But well, that's what I'm saying. Well, they take a

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>nickel on on these bets, and so you've answered, yeah,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have so far. I think it also

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>depends on what happens, and I'm sure there's all kind

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of high jinks involved in it, but the fact that

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so far it exists is nice. That's great. Thank you, Todd.

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Todd I'm gonna need more energy out of you today,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>need more in than this. It's a little seems like

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>subdued Todd. Right now I want singing music, singing singing,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>fight songs and that kind of thing. Later, Okay, yeah,

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just worried about you. Now he goes starting. Now he

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>goes silent. The hair is much better this, I have

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that. By the way, I want to

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>thank you. This is the most supported podcast episode in

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the history of podcasts. Behind in the control room over there,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Dez Karina, ken Book, Jason Miles, incredible, everybody working on

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Everyone that works at Visa are rotating guests

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to join us at the d today. I

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>hope to get into a big Survivor discussion because this

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>gentleman is a mult of a pole handicapping contest winner

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>here in Las Vegas. Been on the podcast many times before,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>we just never had him in person. He's won the

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Wind Casino one hundred thousand dollars single survivor back in

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, the winner of the Palms NFL Challenge. Hey

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the poems. Remember that was open uh winners stations

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty two thousand dollar last man standing in college football

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>multiple playoff appearances and Golden Nugget contests, including first and

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>second regular season finishes, multiple private eliminations resulting in fistical success.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But here I mean station's NFL Last Man Standing contest

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>had ninety six hundred plus entries. UH and UH. Las

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Chris had four of the remaining twenty live tickets

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>before his lucratively hedged knockout. When was that last year?

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Last year twenty nineteen one thousand in the one million

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pardon me? In the one million Dollar Circle millions appropriately

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>named at two entries. Last year he finished twentieth and

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one out of eighteen hundred and seventy five, and

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>then this year in the top two percent of thirty

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>one entries. Uh. Ladies and gentlemen, it's my buddy, Las

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Chris. How are you doing, man, I'm doing pretty well.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Happy to be here in person. I'm so glad this.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You are the perfect guests. We were talking about this

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>little before. I was like, let me just get through

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>survivor long enough where I can have chriss on because

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you have thoughts on and we don't do with them.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Now we can work up to it. Thoughts on what

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>what you would have done on Thanksgiving circus one quirky

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>rule where it's like Thanksgiving us its own week. Um,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>because I'm curious how you would have played it, and

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that and all the all these other

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of things you want to talk about. But you

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are more qualified than anybody. And of course the other

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you do for people are like, oh, but

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what about a t S three hundred plus documented place

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>since January and you're hitting in the NFL over six

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly sixty. That's unbelievable. By the way, it's a

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of places January. That's ti vo am. I worked

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>by a M rump Off to do it. Yes, every day,

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>all day, every day. I don't even sleep in the

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>bedroom anymore. You sleep on the couch next to the computer.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I go to the computer before I go to the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. That's why I feel about not sleeping there.

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>The better. She seems pretty happy. She's got the dog

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>dog better than Chris Mikey. Uh. Survivor has been phenomenal.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't have imagined it would be this great, could you?

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Only Derek Stevens could have imagined it would be this great?

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>And and where do we go from here, right, but

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>let's just enjoy it. Um. Three weeks ago I made

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a bet with Paul Howard. I let him take whichever

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>side he want. I made it one minus one six

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>there would be an eighteen and oh or multiple eighteen

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and os plus one. There wouldn't he jumped at the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>wooden for Nickel. He's got plus one four. I think

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the question now is how many people go eighteen and all?

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That should be the new thing. Give me a lot

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love I'd love Well. I have a number.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek and I are going to debate it later on

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>my guys in the desk. He thinks my number is ludicrous.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>U I'll tell you what my number is. I can

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you mine. It's twenty nine and a half. I

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was in the twenties two but not quite that high.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Mitches is eleven and a half. I think that's low.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Mine is twenty three and a half. Dave share Pan

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>put twenty four and a half out there. Yeah. I've

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>heard some people a'm all Shaw who is one of

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the So there's one hundred and three entries left. Seven

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of them are have to one of which I am one. Um,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm all Shaw who was in the one group as well. Uh.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He was saying he thought it was gonna be like

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy some at the end shop and I'm like, no, dude,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no way. He told me. But this was five

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. He told me he thought fifty people would

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>chop it. Yeah, so this was without all the information

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we have. Not I'm sure he'll adjust the numb there's

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>too many weeks left, yeah, too many weeks left. Is

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you know that there's so many people that

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have some teams available? Oh you think? Waitin how do

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys know that there's so many people left with

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>available teams that are locks to win like you seem

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to It sounds from what you guys are saying like

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people are going to make it through easily. So what

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand is how are you making that determination

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>without knowing what all the hundred people have left on

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>their team. We do, though, because circule out an availability

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>matrix every week where you can see who has who left,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and everybody who's in it now ought to have at

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>least scripted out the rest of the way. But there's

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>always mind. It's always a mind, so you can't so

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell and you can see that there's tons

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of people with really good teams about just good teams,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but that are playing there really bad teams that are

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>playing the Jets Jackson. There's a whole bunch of people

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that you can see have favorable matchups. They have path

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>paths to go the distance. You, Chris, you think this

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is a free pass week. I think it's a free

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>pass week. Well, we'll get to this because I'm curious

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>why you think it's a free pass week. Everything scares

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>me at this point. I'm terrified by everything you're playing

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>out in your head, how every pick could lose that

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about. Absolutely. Meanwhile, I'm I'm just shy of

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>them all in that I've known who I'm picking every

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>single week e'xcept for Thanksgiving. The entire time I said

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>varied based on COVID though, and the possibility either a

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>game was moved or the possibility a game could be

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, COVID is is. The COVID is as big

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a factor as winning your game at this point. That's

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>why when them all says he did it all on

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a plane flight back from Boston in two hours, and

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's never spent more than five minutes on it. How

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>could you not spend more than five minutes each week

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>diagnosing the COVID. That's right, that's right. I think there

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>might be a bit of an exaggeration. Let's let's start

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with the with the normal format, will work up the Survivor.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually talking about Survivor. But Todd records are

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're kind of cush. Last week, you and uh

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Mikey both went one and two to even up your

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>records at seventeen seventeen and two. I got crushed oh

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and three with my overs, and I am fifteen twenty

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and one in the teaser game, I am the leader

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at eight and four, and you guys both lost and

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have fallen to seven and five. The one that killed

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>me last week was Kansas City because we had three

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in a hook here on the show, Like, how did

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that turn into a loss? Um? Okay, so those are

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the records. Um, we don't have any Thursday Night football

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>tonight because the Ravens and the Catboys got scuttled because

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Ravens and the Steelers. By the way, the

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest takeaway from that game yesterday that Bud Dupree injury. Man.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Todd, you're a Steelers guy. They're eleven

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and oh but they don't have Bud dupre Now. They

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can't run the football, so Big Ben had to chuck

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it around fifty one times just to beat a bad

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Ravens team. In terms of who they had at starting quarterback,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>all the injuries they ended up having during the game,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, who they've beaten, doesn't look all that good.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That's I mean. I called the Browns a paper tiger

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>at eight and three, But I mean, who's who has

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a more inflated record in the end. I wonder because

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers had to make If I had to make

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City against Pittsburgh and the a f C Championship

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>game line, which even if it took place in Pittsburgh,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I would make Kansas City in Pittsburgh, I would make

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City minus five. Todd wish. Now that's a little strike.

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>That's too stiff, Tod, that's stiff. Maybe maybe three. Chris

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is already looking for a line of out to bet that. Alright,

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so what do we do best bets? We start with

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>best bets. We always start with our guest Las Vegas. Chris,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>your first best bet of the week, sir, Oh, this

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing I didn't work on. So I'm

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>just gonna pick everything randomly. You guys do them in order.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But my philosophy is to pretty much bet everything the same,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and I want to bet the same across the board,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll downgrade something for injuries or uh it

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>just smells rotten. Uh, you know, personal decisions. So but

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything is the same, and no matter how

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>good it looks on the metrics, Uh, I find it

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a longer and it doesn't make a difference. I'm having

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a tough time ranking my three too, so I get it.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that I personally like

0:10:54.200 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Titans in Cleveland over. Um, God, whatever you

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>got against the Brownies, I have as an over I

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have fifty three and a half. Yeah. I like that.

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about some you know, two teams with

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>really crappy defenses. You've got the in my rankings defense

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee and the twenty defense in Cleveland. And everybody

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>knows Tennessee is a solid offensive team. I have them

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>ranked five. Um and Cleveland, Ah, they've got some glamourus

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>stats on offense that make them look better than they are.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have them rated all that high offensively, um,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but they do have three or three weather games in

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a row that you know, brought down their offensive stats

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously and actually improved those horrible defensive stats. Cleveland was

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>down like in the thirty twenty nine range before the

0:11:55.240 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Weather games. But I just see that there that uh,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a key injury on the Titan side, day Ron Brown.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>They're key running a linebacker who would be good against

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland's number one rushing offense, and he's not gonna be there.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland should be able to move the ball, um,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and they should be able to pass the ball too,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And and is ridiculous as Baker look last week with

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>some of his passes, Uh, he's not making the same

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>mistakes he made last year. He had was it six

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>turnovers last year? He only as eight this year, probably

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because he just can't throw the ball anywhere. But uh, alright,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that was. So I I just see,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Tennessee is going to be as

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>focused on this game. I think that they really came

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to play last week, that there's been two weeks in

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a row where they've come to play. Uh, Indianapolis, UH

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is two games behind them now, UH for the division,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee can kind of let up a little bit, even

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>though we were talking about two identical teams for the

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a f C South lead though those teams eight and three, right, So,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't see tend I just see a

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a of a drop off for Tennessee.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Focus also, so I see mistakes, I see carelessness, I

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>see bad defense, and and the over just looks good

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to me. By the way, let me clarify Cleveland in

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the a f C North, but Tennessee with a one

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>game lead over Indianapolis and the a f C South,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>both teams Cleveland Tennessee eight and three, both on the

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>inside of the playoff race. Right now, Mike, I'm gonna

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>go back to the scene of a crime, UH in Glendale, Arizona,

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>where last time Todd and I were APO with him

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Cardinals and me on the Bills. I'm gonna

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and play the Bills as a short favorite

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in Glendale and rich is really a game where they've

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>played in this building this year in San Francisco has not,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>but is now assuming this is their home field because

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Santa Clara County restrictions. I I you know,

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I listened to Gil Gil Show talking about the decimation

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of injuries both on the defensive line, the quarterback, and

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>how this is still a top team in the NFL,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>top half, top half team in the NFL. You know,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we got killed. We got killed on this game last week,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and that everybody had San Francisco against the Rams. It

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was all one side of action and they were right.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan with two weeks to prepare was excellent. They you know,

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they got it out, they got tied and still won

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that game. They've they've overachieved here. I just think this

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bill's team, you really have to play well to beat him.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>They're they're there are no easy out any week, and

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they get the experience of traveling again, they've already been

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in this building. I think they're the better team. This

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>game is essentially a pick. I think Josh Allen has progressed.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget if there's not that halt yeah minus one.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget if there's not that hail mary uh.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Last week there there are ten points ahead. There went

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in that game by ten at home and covering against

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>San Diego. Notwithstanding that the nonsense with Anthony Lynn on

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the goal line once they did catch it. So I'm

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay one here in a game that's a neutral

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sight game with the bill in real life? Would you

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>just bet the money line here? I would? Okay, Yes,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I want to imagine. Buffalo minus one is

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what we'll log in as Mikey's official pick. There. That's

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the second of two Monday night games with COVID postponement.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You always have to keep track of his. Washington Pittsburgh

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is a five pm Eastern two pm Pacific Monday night

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday afternoon ish at least on the Pacific time zone game,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Buffalo San Francisco, which is at as Mikey said,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in Glendale, the first of two consecutive games the Niners

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>will play in Glendale, and by the way, a couple

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of weeks after that, they already have a game at

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Glendale against the Cardinals, so three out of four weeks

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll play in Arizona, Buffalo, and San Francisco. Is the

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>second of the two Monday night games, a fifteen eastern

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>five Pacific number one from my first of all, this

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is a ridiculous week. I mean, most weeks

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at the anti fire like this is ridiculous

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to bet pregame, and uh, this just seems even harder

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>than usual. I'm just gonna go with something. I'm going

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Belichick against Anthony Lynn. I mean, I know

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>all the struggles that New England has, and I know

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's good, and I could see the Chargers easily winning

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the game. But when it comes down to it, I

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>got Bill Belichick against Anthony Lynn. When is that ever

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen in the rest of our lives, a coaching

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>mismatch to that degree, Um, Patriots or minus one? I

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>see or pick them. I'll say, We'll say even Pats

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>minus one. I just have to win the football game.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick versus Anthony Lynn. I don't know. I don't

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say anything else. That's it, Bill Belichick versus

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn. Give me the Pats. Okay, you got the Pats,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which right now? What do you see? And Pats as

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>one point minus one? Yeah, drifting towards a pick them

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the more we go on this week, the I'm gonna

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>do two here because that's my number two pick as well.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Bill Belichick in the and the Patriots. And

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll just add to that. If we're just doing this

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on a blind you know, the blind comparison thing, and

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the Chargers personnel and the Patriots personnel, the

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Chargers should win this game every time as a pick up.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But it is Belichick against Anthony Lynn. And this comes

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>down to a self loathing thing. If I bet the

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and they lose, I hate myself. If I bet

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and they lose, I can live with that

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>every day. And you're right, we don't get this opportunity

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very much. By the immutable laws of football, you must

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>bet on Belichick against Lens. So that's my number too,

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>picky sir. If you switch the coaches, Belichick is coaching

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers personnel and Lynn is coaching the Patriots. What's

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the number on this? It's a great point, a touchdown,

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a touchdown, might be a touchdown. Uh, it's so true,

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I tweeted something out on Sunday that

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that the NFL announcers as bad as they are or

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>more often correct than Lynn is, which is amazing. I mean,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they miss everything, they miss everything. Yeah, there's a there's

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a writer in San Diego Sports columnist that has dubbed

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn Rolex for his precisely clock man phenomenal. I

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>asked the question for you because I almost lost two

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bets last week on that game. At the end, if

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in the last play, had they run the quarterback sneak

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with their lineman actually running forward instead of running backward,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and had gotten into the end zone, would they have

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>had to kick the extra point? Because I know in

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the old days you did have to kick the extra point,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but in the and then I heard that later there

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was a rule change that they don't have to kick

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the extra point. What would have the story been at

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of that game, you go down to the

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two yard line and near the ball. No, no, no, no,

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it had no effect because they were losing by ten.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling it was twenty seventeen. Had the Chargers gotten

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on fourth down, it was three seconds left.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>If the last play the game would have him been

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dumping into the end zone three would they have come

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and kicked the extra point? Because I know in the

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>old days you had to kick an extra point, you

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>had to do a final play. But then I think

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they changed the rule to make it like college where

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't do the extra point. Does anybody know what

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the actual rule is on that? Yeah, but I don't

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>really know if I understand the question, why wouldn't they

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I bet money that they still have to do it,

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>but they, Yeah, they do. I thought there was a

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.959
<v Speaker 1>rule change that in the NFL they stopped doing that

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>last extra point. May be wrong, you're gonna have sworn.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw Kyler Murray uhl remember that one. He just

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>came out and need the ball. But Todd, you're saying,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but there were still time left. So you're saying if

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no time on the clock, that's what I'm talking about.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't that Arizona game, otherwise they would That's correct,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right. No, the Arizona game, there was time. There was, Yeah,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because there was two seconds left. Because my my joke,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't really a joke. I thought that Cliff

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury was getting all this praise for being smart enough

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>not to kick the extra point, risking a block and

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>at two points the other way. I actually thought he

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think he thought it was a time down. Um. So yeah, um,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but my first pick, I'm going with the Colts, and

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I know this is the worst of it by the

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>time we did this show here Thursday morning, it's three

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and a hook, which obviously I don't like nearly as

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>much as I liked it earlier in the week. But

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with what my first reaction was on

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines. This was two and a half at the

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>time or three in favor of the Colts. I do

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think this is the Bilow Cell high that Chrissie andrews

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh framed it as the other day after I said

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I liked Indianapolis. I think the Colts couldn't have looked

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>worse in that game against the Titans. It was a

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect matchup for Derrick Henry and the Titans. DeForest Buckner

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and a couple other defenders were out of that game.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Buckner had was on the COVID reserve list, he couldn't play,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and so the Titans were just ran rough shot. Derrick

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Henry had ridiculous amount of yards in the first half.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Um I give specifically how much, but it was well

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred yards in the first half of that ballgame,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and so I just think you have to kind of

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>threw row that game out as bad as the Colts

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>were beaten there, and then On the other hand, Houston

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have looked better on Thanksgiving. They do have extra

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>rest here, but that was a game where they had

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller. Will Fuller is Donzo with performance enhancing drug

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>suspension for six weeks. They went ahead and they they

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cut Kenny Stills before that. I don't think they could

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have known. Maybe maybe they did, maybe they didn't, But

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think Houston they can't run the football. Indianapolis

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is getting defenders back, very really solid defense. I don't

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know how Houston scores here rampantly in this game. I

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like Indianapolis. I'll even give the three in the hook,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>even though I wish it were a better number. You

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>see three in hook, you see threes three in a hook, right,

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>it's three, Yeah, three and a half. I'm gonna do

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that's That's still my first pick, and then New England

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is my second. Mikey number two, Todd, I think, oh, no,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Chris number two before Mikey goes. I've just looked up

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Google machine. NFL changes rule removes p A

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>t s after game winning TVs at the end of regulation.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>They passed a rule in two thousand eighteen after the

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>stefon Diggs touched on at the end of the Biking

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Saints games. So I knew that there was some kind

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of rule, But that just says they don't have to

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kick it after a game winning TV on the last play,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>say happened? What was your point with that question? What?

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand what your point was with that question, though?

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you driving? My point is is that could

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>have affected things. Let's say the Chargers get that touchdown

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>right and now they're losing three. Do they have to

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kick the extra point to make it four? Or is

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the game over? Because that could affect your in game

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bets or you know a million other things one would

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>have affected. So you're saying the verdict is they have

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to or they don't have to. Well, I don't still

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because this says NFL changes rule removes p

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>E t s after game winning t ds at the

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>end of regulation. Now, this wouldn't have been a game

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>winning TV. This would have just been a meaningless backdoor

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>t D. So it doesn't whether the rules changed for

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>backdoor tds or just game winning TV. Game winning we

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>know because if you remember the amazing Stefon Dig's miracle

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>play here, they had to bring everybody back, scored a

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty one yard touchdown as time expired. That's when they

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>passed the rule after that, because it was so ridiculous

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that they brought everybody out after the locker room. I believe,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't bet on it. But I believe that

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Todd is correct that the rule has been changed to

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>reflect college where if it does not factor into the

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>winning of the game, it's no longer kicked. I thought

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it was. That's what I thought it was. Someone and

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wait till somebody loses a bet on it if they

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but you can so. I almost lost two bets this

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>week with that. Had they gotten that touchdown, I would

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>have lost whatever. Anyways, And you just should know about it,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because if you're betting in game lines, or even if

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you're betting regular game lines and you want to head yourself,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's important to know. You know, let's say there's twenty

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one seconds left and there's you know what I mean,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it could matter good point Chris number two. Sorry, Mike,

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I like your indie. Also, imagine how bad of a

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>team Houston would be if they weren't all on p

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>E d S. But I won't use that game though,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>let me come up with something else then. Um, um,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I like uh, I like the Raiders a lot this week. Um,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it's another you know, by low situation. That was a

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>really tough spot last week. They can't lay an egg

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>twice in a you know, it was just a you know,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>coming off of a Kansas City game and losing in

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that fashion and traveling to the East and and and

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody and their grandmother on them. You know, they were

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just you know, kind of full of themselves probably and

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not as focused. Even Gruden made a coaching error in

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that game. I couldn't believe it. I forget what it was.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But he did something silly. He's done some silly before. You.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Gruden did something silly and that surprised you. About the

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>field goal against field goal, Yeah, is that what he loves?

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Kicking field goals. If he's down seven, he figures way

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>nine scores were right back in it. No, he was.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>He was kicking a field goal on the five yard line,

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>right He Also he also did something earlier in the

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>year where it was like he could make the field

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>goal to basically win the game, but it was like

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a really low field goal. It went from him being

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a minus money line or if he went down to

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>minus six. I mean, it was not a great risk

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>reward analogy analyst. But I think, uh, what I also

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like about the Raiders is UH metrically, it's it's night

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and day versus the Jets. I think it's actually the

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>number one UH metric difference between teams this week. Believe

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it or not. The Raiders aren't all that high on

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>my list, so but and hardly the biggest spread. Yeah,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so Chris, you're taking Raiders minus nine. Um, No, I

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>prefer the eighth that it is. He'd actually prefer the Actually,

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I see it nine all over the place, Gil, What

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>do you see right there on the circuit board. It's

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all over the place form like seven and a half nine.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would say it's either eight or eight and

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a half consensus. Okay, we'll give him at I don't

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind. I was just trying to give this

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely not nine fair decision. How much am I responsible

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for in this? Oh so much? But and and and

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the little bonus. And it's a difference between a

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>team like Kansas City and and UH and some of

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the other teams like Pittsburgh When the Raiders can go

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for the juggular. I think they like to take out

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>their frustrations on other teams, and if they get the opportunity,

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to just go through the motions. They're

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to, you know, run free. They're gonna want

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to bully and run free in the pasture and and

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>get all their energy out. So that's one of the

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>other reasons I kind like it. At least you know that, uh,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>this team will probably play hard to the end. I

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about that defense so that I have

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>them rated thirty one, just above the Jets defense. So, uh,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, potential problem, but uh, I'm millionaire risk it.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>They do. They do great radio. This is compared to

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco sports radio, where I lived most of my

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>adult life. Local radio here in Vegas is quite good.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the quality of it is very good. And

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as somebody asked a question about the Raiders, they're like,

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we can We're already at the stage now where we

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can ask after they after they laid the egg against

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Derek Carr with a pick six and three lost bumbles,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>They're like, three or four years ago, three or four

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>years from now, who are we going to say, is

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the worst draft pick sugs Abram Feral Like you're already

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>going through that exercise, you know on defense. Uh, sugs

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously actually be not sugs rather rugs on offense, and

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>your answers may vary. Number two same, Yeah, I haven't

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't written down from before the chosen a different No,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it's okay. We just can't get three people. If

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>three people as I don't think things couldn't have gone

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>worse for I don't want to go long into this.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Things couldn't have gone worse for him last week. Um,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they can get I think that's one of

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those games you just throw out, you get it out

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of your mind. I mean, I made this number ten

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and a half, so I think there's value here in eight. Um.

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's probably gonna get to ten. I mean

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the way it's. It's trending. But they did this

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>last year when they were six and four, they got

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>beat by the Jets three. They Yeah, in New York.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>They're still in the playoff hunt. It's an important game

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for them, the Jets. I understand your concerns about the Raids.

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are a poor defense, but the Darnald couldn't

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>even they couldn't take advantage of Miami last week at

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>home either. They couldn't put points on the board. So

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that's my number two. Can I just did you see

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jets Dolphins game? By any chance, if you watch

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that game, I was scared the whole game exactly. This

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is my point. The Dolphins were no slam dunk. There

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was a play in the first half, the catch, where

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker caught a pass from Ryan Fitzpatrick. It was clearly,

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>by today's standards, not a catch, and they called it

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a catch on the field. Adam Gaze throws the challenge flag.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It survived replay, Like he said, they must not have

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the technology, it must be broken. And that led to

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the dolphins first go ahead touchdown. And you look, I'm

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not saying the Jets would have one. Probably wouldn't have,

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but you never know when something like that happens, you

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>never know what could have been. I'd like to make

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one comment, and this is not sour grapes. I've actually

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>benefited from from all these horrible, horrible calls. But the

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>standard of calls in the National Football League is atrocious

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's amazing how miraculously all these teams get

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>back into these games. And you have to factor it's

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a minor factor, believe it or not. Uh, you

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how gameflow might potentially go. And

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I honestly fully expect and that the refs are gonna

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>help me out when I'm behind. That's Chris. We've been

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about it for the NFL is either telling the

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>refs listen. We don't want the televisions to go off.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So when somebody's ahead by fourteen points, make a you know,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>strategic holden call. Every once in a while, make a strategic,

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, illegal hands to the face call. There's

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely something going on now me and you can't prove it, Chris.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But we've only watched a thousand games and we've seen

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this over and over and over. So don't tell me

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>something's not going on. Something is going on. And that's

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>why a d game. By the way, the bookies aren't stupid.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They make the line that the other team is coming

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>back every single time now because they know what's coming.

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You're a thousand percent right, Todd, You're exactly. I started

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at in game bedding trying to think if I

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>could get an edge on it. They haven't already factored

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the lines are way too short for these comebacks,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and that Phil Aladelphia, are you kidding me?

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But but there was also bad spots. The you know,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't even close to the first down mark. He

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>was just watch Mountain West College football. And the guys

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they actually called when I was gonna, I told Gil

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about this. They called the answer to the play wasn't

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>even a possibility. One possibility was either a catch, one

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>possibility was an interception. Incomplete was not a possibility because

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball never touched the ground. They called what incomplete?

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It was unbelievable. The ball was the ball had never

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>even came close to touching the ground. It was there's

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>only one possibility. One team got it or the other

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>team got it. The random giving of the first down

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>when somebody against nine yards instead of the guy is

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>walking in the ball and he's a yard short of

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the stick and he's telling them to move the stick

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>behind the college football it's an epidemic because no one complains,

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>They just let it just keep going. In Oregon State

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington game I lost because of fourth and one. The

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>guy was so clearly over the line. It was ridiculous

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and they called nope, nope, sorry, we gotta come and

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>do a measure. The zig zag spotting is we'll just

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>drive you did you see you see the end of

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Oregon State Oregon like Friday night after Thanksgiving? Oh my god,

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they missed the off sides. They missed him getting in

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on second do they missed him getting in on second

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>day and thank god Oregon State scored on four. Would

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have been one of the worst robberies. Brad Allen was

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>also terrible on Monday night with the clock. You know

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this handicap because I'm betting end game totals, so I

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't bet end game undernoing. He wasn't winding the clock correctly.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He does this all the time. They have a running play,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there's offensive holding, it's a running clock. They accept that.

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 1>They moved it back ten yards as soon as they

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>spotted the ball on that hash, she's supposed to wind.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>He waited till the team was at the line and

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be only two seconds run off of the

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>They should have got twelve seconds off. The whole last

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>drive shouldn't have happened. He had. He never ran off.

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You're you're a pent right. They screw it up. By

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, how about yesterday when when I knew what

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen. My mom and me were watching the

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Steeler game, and I'm like, Okay, here's what's gonna happen.

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens are gonna run the ball and then it's

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a fire drill because they don't have any

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>time outs left and they're gonna have to come to

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the line. The Steelers are gonna be laying on top

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of them, trying not to let them get the playoffs.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly what happened. It was unbelievable. They go into

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't call anything. And by the way, I

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was so happy because I had Ravens under team total

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and a half. But it was really unfair to

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. I mean what you could see what they're doing.

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They're laying on top of them intentionally, by the way,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I hit the first half under because of that, just

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>laying on top of them. Just unbelievable delay and and

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>John Harpo screaming his head off and they're like, I'm sorry, sorry,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>trapped on the court and they just kill They do

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the with the with the you

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>know how they do when the guy stands in because

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this team got to replace their players and the other

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>team gets to replace their players because they did substitutions

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the their team gets to do substitutions. And they

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have that one ref who stands over the ball and

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>waits while the play clock is going down and down

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and down, and and the quarterbacks like, what are we

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? We're gonna get a delay a game because

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's stupid fat guys running off the field, the nose tackle.

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like the refereeing is just it's beyond beyond. So Chris,

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you've opened a can of worms and it was a

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>good game. Good, which is alright, Todd. Number two, my

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>number two is going to be your Detroit Lions. And

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason I'm going to take your Detroit Lions is

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because I have one team with a quarterback and I

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have another team without a quarterback. Now, we've seen in

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League this past week where a lot

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of people don't know this, but the analytics say, if

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a quarterback, you probably can't win the game.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what the analytics say. Most people thought with hint,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and they could probably win the game at wake Forest quarterback,

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>but no, it turns out the analytics say, if you

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a quarterback, you may not be able to

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>win the game. That's sort of what happened to the Ravens.

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Also yesterday, r G three was not exactly a quarterback.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>How did you get a hamstring injury, then not have

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury, then have a handsty Every every Washington

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>fan watched that. By the way, what a glorious year was.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>We love RG three for life. But after his injuries,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of ship happened all the time. Pardon my French,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>right like it would be he would fall on his face,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he told so you Actually, when he had to hand me,

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, he's done. Oh he came back

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to the next play. And then that's the one that

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>put him out when he dropped back in his leg

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of gave out. Was the weird. It's like, he's

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just old, get him out of there. I love himself. Anyways,

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it turns out having a quarterback maybe part of an

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>important part of the football game. So the Troy Lions,

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I get a quarterback. The Chicago Bears, I'm not really

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sure I have a quarterback there, So I'll take the

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>team with the quarterback plus the three. So give me

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the lines. Okay. I listened to the Lions podcast this

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>morning about one of the beat writers and he expects

0:35:55.840 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>uh some so the attitude change it. He says, the

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>whole locker room is much more carefree and and and

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>breathing easily. And he commented that the stafford just looks

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>so much more relaxed. The whole key on that game

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be uh and swift. That's why. That's why

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I said, because you don't know who's playing, you don't

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have goladays In or swift or I also agree with

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what Chris is saying. I read a whole article about

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Bevil. They're all excited now because Darryl Bevil is

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the coach and now we got rid of the evil

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Darth Darth Vader Patricia and everything. So you know, I'm

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>getting three points and the other team doesn't really have

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback might get Matt Patricia's final record in Detroit

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and one. Jim Caldwells before him was thirty

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>six and twenty eight. G M. Bob Quinn also fired

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>his mark under his tenure over five seasons, twelve games

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>under five? Is that good? Should bring back Wayne Fons.

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Fons was the greatest Portuguese head coach in the

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>history of the NFL. I don't know he didn't get

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>him to an NFC championship. Isn't the the outfits still

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>involved there in Detroit? They can't get funds back in.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I was at the NFC Championship where nothing to a

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>mediocre red Yeah, only Aaron Shots is greatest team of

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all time. Three. I was in RFK Stadium, Theater of Thrills,

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Theater of thrills, Chris number three? Your last one? Did

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you do? I did two at once. Yeah. Uh, I'm

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with I'm gonna go against everybody else and

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>go with the New Orleans Saints. Oh going against the market, Yeah,

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going I'm going against the market. Going against the

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>market doesn't scare me too often. Although I lost last week,

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>uh the Colts, But that was COVID uh injury related.

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But what number do you have guilt for that game?

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I have it all over the place. I have

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>three reduced juice two and a half extra juice two

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half minus twenty. Yeah, we'll give him the

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>two and it doesn't matter. But I like the you know,

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are coming off that you know quote, you know,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lackluster performance against Denver, but hey, that was their strategy,

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was that their strategy was don't mess it up. Don't

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>mess it up. Let's be all vanilla. I watched uh

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Hill in the first half of the previous game and

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, boy, this guy is just awful. You know,

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted it out. I go, this guy, this, this

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>guy is not gonna make it. And uh he straightened up,

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he got comfortably at a monster second half and they

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>did well, um, amazingly enough. I chart every week of

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the season with Green or Brown on on how a trend,

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>how a team trends performance wise. I have one downgrade

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the entire season for the Saints somehow, some way, Wow,

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they improve every single week getting players yeah and so.

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And when you really look at the Saints the entire season,

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>they played without Breeze, or they played without Thomas, or

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they played without Kamara. So they're always missing somebody and

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they're getting better and and I have them ranked like

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the number sixth team offensively. They almost have it set

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>up that when Breeze does come back, it'll be the

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>well rested Drew Brees right, it will be like a

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>great thing at that moment for him. I I you know,

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and then we're talking about another situation where you're buying

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>high you know Atlanta, you know Rommed and and you

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, Atlanta is not garbage. They're they're rated. Uh,

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they've done very well since the coaching change. I have

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>them rated in the middle of the pack, probably fifteen

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>sixte believe it or not, which is higher than what

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people would think they are. Uh,

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing the same thing they did last season, and

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>they're in they're ending well, they liked this coach, they're

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>playing hard. Uh, they get bit by the injury bug

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably and they're gonna get everybody back, or

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>at he's gonna be back for his mediocrity and uh

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Ridley's supposed to be an a limited snap count and

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>uh um uh what receiver forgot his name? Julio Jones? Yeah, uh,

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know he's going to probably play until

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets, you know, touched, and then he'll be out again.

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So ah, but their defense is better, Chris, have you

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Atlanta's defense has gotten a lot better as

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the season has gone along. I don't know if you've

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:25.919
<v Speaker 1>noticed or if you if you think that's the case,

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think their defense has gotten better. No, it

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good and uh um, and that's how they

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have such a you know, a decent rating for me,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking it up on my sheet right now. Yeah,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta I have is uh like the number fourteen or

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>my eyes are out of focus, was like number fourteen defense.

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen defense. You'd never you know, associated Atlanta with a

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>good defense, and you know, I believe it or not.

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Offensively they're worse usually each other way around. So that's

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>what I right, I said, I said to Gil, I said,

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Maddie boiling hot water. I don't call him Maddie anymore.

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I call him Maddie boiling hot water because he is

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>not that good anymore. It's it's Atlanta is like switching

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>their thing. They used to be an offensive team with

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>no defense. Now they're becoming more of a defensive team

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with no offense. There's a couple of teams like that.

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Seattle's defense, which we've been planning all

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>year quietly getting better as well, exactly right now and

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>then just to finish. New Orleans defense has been just

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a monster these past uh past weeks. And then that's

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>probably why the they metrical metrically keep on getting stronger

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on my charts, is that defense has been the best

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>by far over the last six or seven weeks. Okay,

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans picked number three, Mikey, Mike Pale, I'm gonna

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>go Colts over in this game that you picked the

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Colts with the Texans. Yeah, this was an under team

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to start the year, the Colts, and now we've seen

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>in both games with tennessee a ton of a ton

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of points on the board. Obviously, the Texans are talented

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>and the Sean without a rinning game is gonna have

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball a heck of a lot, So

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the clock stopping a lot in this game.

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers is usually good for two touchdowns and one

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>or two picks, which inevitably leads to points on both sides.

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I really thought this game would be closer to fifty

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>three and a half or fifty four. I think there's

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>some value with fifty one, and that's where I'm gonna land.

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have written down here Bills Bill's minus

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one I just think that Nick Mullins is you know,

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he might have you know, played his greatest game as

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a forty nine er last week. And you know, the

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>forty niners. On defense, they still come to play. But

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>offensively they are very, very very challenged. I mean, they

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they really don't have a lot with this nick with

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins, and I don't I'm not a big fan

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of their offensive And of course the coach is fantastic,

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, and he did everything he had

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to do to get them that w after almost gave

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>away the game on the fumble touchdown. And uh, you know,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think the Bills. The Bills are a solid

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>football team. You know, they come, they come to play

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>every week. Offensively, I haven't been as impressed with their defense. Um,

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>although it seems to be improving a little bit. They

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>played real well in the first half last week against

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. UM, I don't see why the Bills can't

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>stomp on Nick Mullins and then just do their regular,

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, offensive normalcy against a pretty decent San Francisco team.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All I have to do is win the game. Give

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>me the Bills minus one, all right, the Bill, The

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Bills get back Milano, the key linebacker on that team too,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the h Todd. What do you got for the Green

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers? What's that number? I have? Eight and a half? Nine,

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half nine? Yeah, um, all right, I

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have to say a half. Okay, eight and a half

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it is Listen. I don't want to make a deal.

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to. I don't wanna, you know, as

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a regular thing, lay eight and a half in games,

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna lay the eight and a half here

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>with the Green Bay Packers. I just the Eagles. I

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>said on Primetime Action with Matt Brown the other night

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was picking Philadelphia in the in the Cleveland game,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, oh, they're getting all these players back.

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not picking on that because I was with him,

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but I did say to him before that game was

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland beats Philly. Here, can we just annoint Philadelphia as

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the team we should never ever bet again, because they

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they will, they stink, they will disappoint you within a drive.

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I can't believe I've been on this team

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>green Bay that game against Chicago, and I know it

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with Chicago. But Aaron Rodgers is in complete control of everything. Happening.

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Even Chris collins Worth during that broadcast was like, I

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know how he knew, Like Rogers was calling out Zoro,

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 1>He's calling out things on the defense. Even Chris collins

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, I have no idea how he was able

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell that that was gonna happen. But whatever it was,

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it happened. Uh. I'll take Aaron Rodgers here and give

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the eight and a half, no problem. The weather should

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be good. It's not a weather game. Um. But I

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>think Philly's the worst team in the NFC East, I

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really do. I think Washington has a better defense than

0:44:57.640 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Have played a lot of close games this year.

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas without Deck Maybe I don't know, maybe I stepped

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a little to it. But Carson Wentz just like r

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>G three. The Carson Wentz RG three comparison for me

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is they were both so good before injuries. After their injuries,

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not only were they physically limited, but something happened to

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>their mechanics and there their fundamentals. And Carson Wentz holds

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball way too long. When he's not holding the ball,

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>his offensive line is letting him down. They're not gonna

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>put Jalen Hurts in because Carson Wentz has this horribly

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>egregious contract. So they're gonna shove Carson Wentz down our

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>throats for at least another year. Jalen Hurt stinks too.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Who how do we know Jalen Hurts a good We

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>don't They overdrafted him a green Bay minus a leave

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it at you saw they put Jalen Hurts and there

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was a penalty, and then on second down he completed

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a pass I like a six yard out and then

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they put third down specialist Carson Wentz back, who was

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.760
<v Speaker 1>three for his last But what what was that? Well, again,

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets back to his his his contract structure. I mean,

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>since you asked, I don't know if on a board

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>people with this, but his contract is such that they

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything with him. By the way he is

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lasting interceptions last and fumbles, last in sacks now with

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>forty six, last in completion percentage, second of last yards

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>per attempt, worst off target percentage, on and on and

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on and on. But the deal is they had minus

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>four yards in the first quarter. Uh in that game

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle, they went three and out on their first

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>five drives, didn't get a first down until Wentz ran

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for twenty yards with five minutes left in the first half,

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>ten fumbles, forty six sacks, the most in the NFL

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>by eleven. By the way, but here's the deal. Thirty

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>four point six seven million cap hit next year seventy

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 1>five million cap decreased because of financial losses from the pandemic.

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't cut him until after next year, and so

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you won't get much channing yards. By the way, Also,

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing a lot of in game betting, you

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>should know Carson Wentz is approaching j Cutler esque status.

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yea for one of the greatest back door touchdown guys

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of all time. This week I thought he wasn't good

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to get it, and he even got it this week

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.439
<v Speaker 1>on ridiculous Hail Mary. But it seems like fourth quarter

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>under five minutes to go down by more than two touchdowns.

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is your boy. Jay Cutler used to do

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it and put up all the numbers and you had

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to play those in games. Uh, same thing with the Eagles.

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>No excellence, no excuse for people who had the Seahawks

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>minus six and a half pre flop. But what about

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who had the Seahawks minus six and a

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>half after getting to see the Eagles for a quarter

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half, I have simply I have sympathy for

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>those people because and then how about the people are screaming,

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>why is Doug Peterson going for two after he scores

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown down fourteen? Because he always does. We've been

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>through this um billion times. The math shows you have

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a better chance. Now. If you don't believe me, go

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to Google. Look it up. If you u understand the math,

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>then just retire from life and retire from gambling too,

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't understand the math, you shouldn't be gambling.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Look at your web gambling. It's looking to the right.

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 1>It's very disconcerting. Look at your webcam, so I mean,

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we're see you looking off to the right. Who are

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you preaching to to the imaginary people that don't understand

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>math here in the United States of America? And there

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of them. They're right there over there.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't see them right there. There's thousands, millions of

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>them who don't understand basic math. Math is hard, but

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Christmas even harder. You know what, don't you know? It's

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's funny that you said that, Chris, because I can't

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you how many people who just regular people you

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>try to explain the concept of the point spread to

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can't really grasp it right away. And you're

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just like you seriously don't understand what minus five and

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a half means, Like I you just it's that hard

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>for you, Like You're right, math, people just can't get math.

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's why are you know the world is the

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>way it is Because if you can't understand ratios, you

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>can't understand life. That's the problem with the world. Wait

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>till baseball season and you blow people's minds with money.

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Lines really loses that really makes them lose their crap

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on that. That's really a two. I'm going nuts with

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the soccer learning the half three point two five, three

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>points point seven five, and then then you've got the

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>three ways. I mean, it's it's glorious. It's glorious. Let's

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>do the teasers so we can get to the survivor

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the final two questions. Favorite teaser to like Teaser of

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the week, Chris, I am going to call an audible

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 1>because and hopefully this will be have some benefit because

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I the only teasers I like involve road teams and

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>uh as everybody should know you should not be teasing

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>road teams road favorites down. Um, so I obviously love

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders and I don't like anything else, so U,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to look something up because I was

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking a lot of people do these three team teasers

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hard one, so I wanted to take a look at it.

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 1>And by coincidence, this week is the perfect week to

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>show this example. Um, you know, a popular idea is

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 1>taking these ten point favorites down to pick them, and

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you for that, you're going to pretty much lay one thirty.

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So but let's look at the situation. If you laid Miami,

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>which is the eleven and a half, and you laid Minnesota,

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>which is minus ten and a half. And when I

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>looked at uh and when you and you look at

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay minus nine, if you just parlay those,

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you get the pick, you get extra you get extra points,

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and you lay lower Juice minus one. So I thought

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people might appreciate if you're considering, if you're one of

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 1>those three team teaser people that like to do those,

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>take a look at these any lines and and and

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and and just flinched them in and see what your

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>money lines are gonna pay. You'll pay, you'll pay pennies

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>less and you'll get a few extra points in the process.

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And on that same three team parlay, if you wanted

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to just throw in Kansas City, now you're laying even

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>money there, you go Seattle. Seattle's minus ten to. Yeah,

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't on the board for me to uh to

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>actually plot it in so but it would be very careful.

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember a week, and I might be prisoner

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of the moment. I don't remember a week where we've

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had eight out of fifteen games with such massive spreads,

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>but that that's what's gonna make the survivor and the

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which team is the most likely to let you down.

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>A discussion coming up based on what Chris was just saying.

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>What I've had a lot of fun with is DraftKings

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has alternate lines that you can are laid together so

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>you can actually create your own custom made teaser. So

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, on most teasers you have to pick seven

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>points or six and a half points or ten points

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like on the super teaser that Chris was just talking about.

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>If you go if on DraftKings, what you can do

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is you can make like let's say you need on

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one team you want to you want to move the

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>line eight and a half, so just go to the

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.640
<v Speaker 1>alternate line and pick that one. And then on another team,

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you only want to do four and a half or

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half or whatever it is to get

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you over the key numbers, and then you parlay them

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>all together you create what what basically an effect is

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a custom made teaser, which is really a lot of fun. Yeah,

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that was one thing I was going to mention. Also

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>is rather than looking at teasers, I don't tease often.

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I tease once every three weeks or so

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>two or three weeks. But what I do like to

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.879
<v Speaker 1>do is look at the alternate line. I would much

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>rather kind of go against myself and and and and

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.919
<v Speaker 1>basically sell back points and get some really nice plus

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>money on those propositions. So I'd rather do that than

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>deal with the teasers. So it's just something to look at.

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And and you can find UH an app that you're

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>familiar with promoting, and many other are smaller shops. They

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just put these alternate lines out in the morning and

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they never move them. You know, they've got they put

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>such low limits on it. You're only getting at three

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars on these things. Uh you know, generally, but

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these small books will just leave those.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Check those in the last thirty minutes, the last five

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>minutes before a game start, and you can find some

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>real value. There. Were you referring to the Manscape tapp

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>or something else? No, no, no kidding, okay, uh no,

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I I appreciate it. Again. The Stanford Wong teasers, the

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:30.919
<v Speaker 1>ones that Chris alluded to the very first part. Again,

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the historically solid teaser legs in terms of the six pointers.

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Are these short dogs teased up through the three and

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the seven, and the home a favorite above a seventies

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>down through the seven or three. This is a weird

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>home road year though. Uh So, it's a little quirky

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. But h I appreciate the thank you for

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the three team ten point versus money line par lay

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis on that. People should know that who like the

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>three team ten pointers? Mikey, your favorite two leg teaser

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.919
<v Speaker 1>picked the Packer, tease him down to two and a half,

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to take the Lions up to nine, okay,

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Todd green Bay minus he's saying green Bay minus, tune

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Lions He's going to nine, okay. So I

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>am going with the Lions up to nine because of

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the same reason that I talked about in the In

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the regular game, also, when your Bears team, it's hard

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to win a game, let alone win by nine. That

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 1>would be very difficult for an offensively challenged football team.

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take Detroit plus the nine, and I will

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 1>take the Raiders down to minus two. Um. By the way,

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I think Jon Gruden has done a very good job

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>this year. I just don't like his decision making on

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one at the thirty three yard line. That's

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the only problem I have with him. Otherwise, I think

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he's really done an excellent job. So I'll take the

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Raiders minus too. By the way, I think we round

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.320
<v Speaker 1>robin our teaser legs Almo, Green Bay and the Raiders,

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>even though the Raiders again fit you know, don't fit

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the bill with the routine, but those are my two.

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay down to two and a half, Raiders down

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to basically have to beat the Jets. I think one

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other things you need to look at with

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>teasers is you either get in at the beginning of

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the week or you get in at the end of

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the week. Uh, you have to have some sort of

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>teaser anticipation. Um, if you if you don't know where

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>lines are gonna go, now you're already potentially losing value

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that you don't even realize you're gonna lose because you

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:25.839
<v Speaker 1>can pretty much tell where a lot of the lines

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be going. So you know, sometimes you're

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:29.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to wait till the end of the week.

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, I've got a friend that's dying

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>for them for New England and become favored by one

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half so he can have the seven and

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a half charger and he's gonna go ballistic on that.

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>So just an example, we've all had those moments. If

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that would just check up, a half boy would do this.

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've got the final two questions, and

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the first question will double as the survivor discussion. So

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I to the other question first. We'll finish with Okay, yeah,

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. So the other one is if we're in

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a bizarro world and we had to bet every one

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of these games, you were forced to bet aside and

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>every one of those games, but you wanted one free pass,

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the game you want? No part of Chris, I

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know why. I just don't want my metrics come

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>out at exactly and a half of the Packers and

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in these Eagles are such pieces of crap and have underperformed.

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just fearful someday they're going to show up or

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and and I and I have the bad memories of

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>how poorly the Packers did against Jacksonville. H Packers have

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a history of slipping up sometimes, you know, all teams do.

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But in my personal head, it's just I don't want

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.399
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with it. Mikey, I don't want any

0:56:42.480 --> 0:56:45.839
<v Speaker 1>part of the Patriots Chargers game because I just think

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are such so much more talented, really are,

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But this coaching, it's just hard to pull the trigger

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with Anthony Lynn. So and I just I can't back

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to Patriots either because they're just not as good as

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a team. But that that doesn't mean they can't win

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 1>this game, So I can't it. Here's a question. Is

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this the first coach where you you literally see every

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>game is two to three points off just because of

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the coaching. And I mean that, sir, how Chris? How

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>can he not learn anything from week to week? Right,

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You're allowed to make a mistake, You're allowed to make two.

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he repeats him, but how how can you not

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 1>learn anything? He takes the time out at the end

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the half so he can't throw it. I talked

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>about that one too, talking about oh my god. The

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>run though might have been the Kuda girl. I still

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think that handoff against the Bucks was the Hall of Famer.

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>R G three couldn't do that, couldn't do the read option.

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>He's been so far, and then they want to do

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a read option from the six yard line when they

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>could have knelt down. They listen. There's no bad talking

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 1>RG three on this. I'm just saying it's not an

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 1>easy play. With the quarterback pulling it out of the belly,

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a high risk. There's r G three with a

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fumble on that one. Um Todd Well, it's the crowbar

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>portion of the pro grammed. We're not gonna want to

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>touch the Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins. If I don't sing

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this song, they get mad. The Miami Dolphins. They're getting

0:58:12.400 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>better every week, but I don't want to lay eleven

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>n F. You know, if I if I wasn't winning

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with them every week, i'd hate that song. That's actually

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good pick. That was my number two, but

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Chicago is my first, just because if it's no

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Gola Day, he really means a lot to that team.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>If they don't have him, let alone the other guys,

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good football team. If they have him,

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a totally different story. So I want no part

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of that. Currently, on the Thursday, the Bears are playing

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>hinting at quarterback Kendall hinting one for nine. All right,

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk survivor before we get so, let's just do

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it this way. Let's go back to Thanksgiving first, Chris,

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what would you have done were you in a circus Survivor?

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't know, hopefully this reflects your Survivor

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>pull at home. But Circus Cork this year, Mikey was

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving Day was its own week. It really was a

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>great herd thinner. Now, had you known that the third

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>game was going to get postponed, you probably wouldn't have done.

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't have We thought you had six teams to

0:59:12.840 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>choose from, not four. Would you do it again next year?

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>What happens? Gil? If we get five thousand entries, we

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta make this harder to get through. We might have

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to put another wrink all day, right, must pick a

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 1>prime time game I don't know it, or have tiebreakers

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end, and kind of like tear the payouts

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would a tiebreaker be though? Well, I still liked the

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>total point differential level the eighteen winners you picked, Dude,

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I would lose. I would lose every time. I would

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>lose every tiebreaker this year because I've had so many

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>miracle wins. I've had like five. The one you referred

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to green Baby Jacksonville would be one of them. What

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:51.439
<v Speaker 1>would you have done? On face? And now we don't

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>know who you would have played already, and we don't

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know what you would have still had to play, But

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at least Thanksgiving, you, like most of us, would have

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>planned to have at least five of the six teams,

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>if not all six teams still in your quiver. I

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>will say this. The only people I say this on

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game at Visa earlier this week. The only

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>people that I feel truly sorry for this year in

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Circus survivals, the people who had strategically saved Pittsburgh. Those

1:00:16.360 --> 1:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>people really did get the worst of it. Like that's

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a tough way because if and I know and people

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are like, well, you got through picking Houston. Yeah, but

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>those and those people picked the wrong team. If they

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't get through, they maybe they picked Dallas, but that

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sucks because they had planned on it. It's horrible. I

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have remorse that I didn't enter for the you know,

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for the third time, because if I had known four

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>people were gonna lose week, one would have to have

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>been lost on the courts. I was one of my

1:00:43.120 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>entries as well. And uh I did tweet out a

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>warning the week before Thanksgiving, don't use your Dallas, minister,

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.959
<v Speaker 1>or don't use your Minnesota because I have Dallas better team.

1:00:56.080 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They were all very well, may win, and they did win.

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But Thursday was pretty It was only you had to

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>look at it. It was not a handicapping week. You

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>were wasting your time handicapping. You had to figure out

1:01:12.360 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>where your best value was to win. You you have

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to decide am I playing your survivor or I may

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>playing to win? How many times you heard me say

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's a misnamed game, right, so you know you

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have to play to win. Okay, And for example, last

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>week I was piste or I would have been pissed

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>if the Saints game had gone off the board. I

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want the half a point. I I want to

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>play to be able to win a full point. That's aggressive.

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>If you had more than one pick, why would you

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice one. You are sacrificing an opportunity to become powerful.

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's and let me just stop you right there.

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So there was if you had a multiple picks, and

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>different people or groups did some had to, some had

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>three entries left. You could do the most aggressive thing,

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>which has put all your entries on one team. You

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>could do the least aggressive things. These are just your options.

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying which is best. You could do the

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>least aggressive thing, which is to sacrifice and play the

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>different side of one game, meaning sacrifice a you know,

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas versus a Washington and ensure that the other

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>one will get through for three entry players. You could

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do it two and one. Whatever you want to do.

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But the hybrid play, which I think is what you're

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>getting at here we'll see the hybrid play, which is

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not the most aggressive or the least aggressive, was take

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>my two entries and play one team in one game

1:02:38.720 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and one team in another game. Yes, you had to,

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, obviously if you really absolutely loved

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those teams. All Right, you go out with

1:02:53.160 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that team. I mean, you know the heartache of I

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take this team, and I really love that

1:02:58.680 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I handicapped it well and I've got you know, you know,

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>mathematical foundation for this and metrics and i have insight information. Okay, yeah,

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you take that team. But my perspective was it was

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just a math equation. Uh and and it's really simple,

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you want to advance and how will you

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>be most powerful? You're talking about? Uh? Like with the

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington Dallas game, it's a coin flip. It was absolutely

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a coin flip game. You could have gotten. You know,

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't even you know, it was minus two, which

1:03:30.520 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a coin flip. So you have a coin

1:03:33.080 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>flip game. And if you put your pick in with Washington,

1:03:38.920 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you you know for a fact everybody's on Dallas in

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that game, that's gonna be the game that has the

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>most that would be the most pick game, hands down.

1:03:48.360 --> 1:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You already know that everybody. If you did not know that,

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>then something that was in fact the case they had

1:03:55.000 --> 1:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the two games. Here, figure out what the other

1:04:01.840 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>people are doing and go the other way with the

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>coin flip, because if the coin flip goes your way,

1:04:06.280 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you just knocked out a whole bunch of people. Yes

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you will, you get your your three times better off.

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would you want to advance with ninety people when

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you can advance with thirty said times On a numbers game,

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the object is not to survive, even though it's called survivor.

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The object is to win. You would be surprised how

1:04:21.040 --> 1:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>many people that we know that are otherwise sharp betters

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that don't get that. They don't get that well. And

1:04:25.840 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I felt bad because even the people that did sacrifice, um,

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:33.439
<v Speaker 1>they chose the wrong game. Five out of the six

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people use the Dallas Washington game. Yeah. Well, no, if

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you're going to pick a game, you take the game

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna have the fewest number of people. You know

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that the most people are gonna be

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas. And if Dallas wins, you sacrificed one of

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your entries to advance with the most popular pick. You know,

1:04:54.480 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and and and and I'm it's not easy to figure

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff out. It's it's not that anybody did anything stupid.

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's but it's what makes these games so fun to play, right,

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much to think about. There's it's just

1:05:09.360 --> 1:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>something years of experience and and and as as Todd says,

1:05:12.800 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it's game theory, and sometimes you have to throw out

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the handicapping. Yeah, I agree. What what you know? We

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago before Thanksgiving here on this podcast,

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we were railing against the people that we're going to

1:05:26.280 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>go all in on one team that we didn't understand,

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I didn't understand that strategy. If you had two

1:05:31.480 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or three entries, I don't know if that was the

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>time to do that. Now, seven people ended up getting through.

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure it was none of the ones that

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>went all in on one team. I think it was

1:05:42.920 --> 1:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>people who did different hybrid stuff. Um. In the end,

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I ended up with Houston. And the only reason I

1:05:48.240 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>ended up with Houston was the injury report on the lines.

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>For me, the injury report made the pick for me. UM.

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So no, I appreciate that. So Thanksgiving was a complete

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Um was a was a fascinating thing to navigate through.

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And for those lucky enough to get through it, ninety

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>did go down with the Dallas Cowboys. Um, you do

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have some hundred and three entries left Another person didn't submit, right,

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so week ten was the only week that everyone submitted.

1:06:16.640 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Crack asked made it. I was like, it's only one

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>week that somebody didn't submit, And these were the expected

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>value if all A hundred and three got to Let's say,

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say no one ever lost again the rest of

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, which obviously isn't gonna happen, but let's say

1:06:26.440 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it did. Twenty three thousand plus is the is the

1:06:29.680 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>value of each of these pools with A two point

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>three nine million, because Derek kicks in another mill so

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty three thousand plus right now. So when you

1:06:37.520 --> 1:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>don't submit, you're just essentially throwing that away at this point.

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I have nightmares about not submitting. I'm like,

1:06:44.000 --> 1:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I can I need to go to California. Nope, can't

1:06:45.920 --> 1:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>do that. I'll be out of state. Last Saturday I

1:06:47.800 --> 1:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>jerked my head. I'm like, oh my god. Oh you know,

1:06:52.200 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was close. I thought I was at

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the deadline for some reason. But I turned in one

1:06:56.280 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of my circuit entries right at so close that I

1:06:59.800 --> 1:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just vegged the higher powers let me get in my

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>better because I had one horrible entry and I had

1:07:05.480 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>one great one, and I go, just let me get

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the first one in. I don't even care if I

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can't get the second one in. And it was my

1:07:11.040 --> 1:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>watch at two fifty nine and I got the first

1:07:13.800 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one and I go who And I go, Okay, maybe

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I can get the second one. And it was like

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>A maybe. He was like maybe I can't. And I

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>did get the second one, and uh, Mike, he was

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know at three oh one it locks out have three? Yeah,

1:07:28.720 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you really might watch seconds of the three minute and

1:07:31.520 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you had the guy a couple of weeks ago three

1:07:32.920 --> 1:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>oh eight pm with three entries. That was the email.

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He got knocked out, two Chargers and one Viking. Sorry buddy.

1:07:39.120 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>The other big thing was this week, um people were saying,

1:07:43.880 --> 1:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe ten people picked New Orleans and the

1:07:47.600 --> 1:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans remember the Denver quarterbacks ended up getting scuttled.

1:07:53.280 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I was one of them. I was one of them.

1:07:56.560 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the thing. Here's what I say to everybody

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:00.479
<v Speaker 1>who who First, of all the people who are talking

1:08:00.520 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about this, most of them aren't playing the game. And

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the other people who are saying it are in the game.

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It might not be as good survivor players as they

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think they are would I don't know most of them

1:08:14.840 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are saying with the balls that it took or how

1:08:17.280 --> 1:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>stupid it was, but it was. I don't think it

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was stupid. It wasn't stupid at all. Wouldn't have done it.

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>There was definitely enough and for me stupid to have

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>played New Orleans because because the theory was that game

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:34.799
<v Speaker 1>could get postponed. And so what I'm what I explained

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to people is who who make that comment is it

1:08:37.479 --> 1:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was neither ball Z's. It was neither ballsy nor stupid.

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a bunch of players who have played Survivor

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a million times more than they probably have and actually

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have it planned in a certain way. And our play

1:08:49.439 --> 1:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is not to survive. Our play is to win. We

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>actually like, like I said, a Mall Shaw might be

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>better at this than you are. Is what I said

1:08:57.160 --> 1:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on the radio yesterday. Maybe a mall Show actually is

1:09:00.040 --> 1:09:02.599
<v Speaker 1>better at this than you are. Um, And I'll use

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>them all as a proxy for the rest of us.

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We have we have it. We know who we played already,

1:09:08.479 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we know who we're going to play. So for those

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of us who played New Orleans, I can't speak for

1:09:12.520 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the others who did, but for those of us who

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>played New Orleans, we were always going to play New Orleans.

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, and again I can't speak for

1:09:21.040 --> 1:09:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the others, but it wasn't as wide of a choice

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as you might think. It was a binary choice in

1:09:27.280 --> 1:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>the end between New Orleans and the New York Giants.

1:09:31.400 --> 1:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a bunch of us who there was

1:09:33.840 --> 1:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>no chance in hell we were going to lose with

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. By the way, the Bengals had the ball

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was the only game in it on a huge thing,

1:09:44.000 --> 1:09:46.479
<v Speaker 1>and I had to heage it because I was like,

1:09:46.560 --> 1:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe that the Giants are gonna punt this ball.

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They had it at yard line win the game. That

1:09:54.960 --> 1:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was the only game where any of the Jet the

1:09:56.920 --> 1:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>survivor picks was in jeopardy. I don't really believe the

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>brow were in jeopardy. That was in jeopardy twenty yards

1:10:03.200 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and Cincinnati's kicking a field go to win the game.

1:10:05.200 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you if people understand that that was your

1:10:08.479 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>choice and you were going New Orleans, and you had

1:10:11.160 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans planned the whole time, I'm not wavering off

1:10:14.280 --> 1:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>what I've had planned for months and risking the game

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Giants now after the fact, those same people

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>want to say, you just don't want to admit you're lucky. No,

1:10:24.600 --> 1:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you just don't want to admit that maybe you're not

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>as good at this as a show. How do you

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>handicap whether they're going to cancel the COVID game or not?

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you put a percentage on That's the other

1:10:33.200 --> 1:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that those people don't understand. They don't understand that

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that game was never in jeopardy of being postponed. So

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's after the fact what I'm saying, Even if they

1:10:43.040 --> 1:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>are saying that it was in jeopardy, how do you

1:10:44.880 --> 1:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>put a percentage on it? Well, that's the thing you can't.

1:10:49.040 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't so exactly, so how can they? Here's the

1:10:52.200 --> 1:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's because those people don't have the humility gene. Here's

1:10:55.720 --> 1:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the crux of the argument, I think is why guild

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you believe or Michael Barr, Lombardi or others believed that

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>there was no chance that game would be postponed Because

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you had been following COVID nineteen, you would see

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that the latest things that the NFL had been doing,

1:11:12.360 --> 1:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stafford was in COVID nineteen reserve list. The context

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger was in COVID nineteen reserve list. Those guys

1:11:20.960 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>had to do a series of five negatives in a

1:11:22.920 --> 1:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>row before they were allowed to play previous games. If

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you've been paying attention to that, you realize that the

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL already had this overall umbrella thing where competitive advantages

1:11:32.880 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>don't matter to them. This year don't matter. The Titans

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens were breakouts and in the NFL. Now

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>we can argue whether the NFL is full of crap

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with how they distinguished between the two things. That's another conversation.

1:11:45.840 --> 1:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But the way that the NFL had handled it most recently,

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just because the Broncos thing happened too close to game time,

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it was consistent. The NFL doesn't care. It was totally consistent.

1:11:55.120 --> 1:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way Vic Fangio has told you, it's totally consistent.

1:11:58.080 --> 1:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Loret, who won Super Bowls with the Broncho has

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>told you it's totally consistent. So all of that is

1:12:03.080 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just people who who you know, don't really understand what

1:12:07.360 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the rules are. And by the but but yeah, but gil, so,

1:12:13.479 --> 1:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the percentage they canceled? So that means you have

1:12:16.800 --> 1:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven percent chance that you won the game. Do

1:12:19.400 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you so it's not either way, Yeah, it's it's It's

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>just amazing to me that the people who chirped most

1:12:26.160 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about Survivor was saying this yesterdo other day. My biggest

1:12:28.040 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>pet peeve is people who are not involved in Survivor.

1:12:32.720 --> 1:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what the what what has been

1:12:35.400 --> 1:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>played by certain people or what hasn't been Survivor is

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a very tough game to tell people that are in

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it when you're out of it, what you should or

1:12:42.640 --> 1:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>should not have played. The COVID thing is is sort

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of after the fact. The COVID thing is like people,

1:12:47.880 --> 1:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>oh you got lucky, did I Well, let me ask

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:57.599
<v Speaker 1>you this. Did you make your pick before the news

1:12:57.680 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of four quarterbacks being out? I had made the pick.

1:13:00.680 --> 1:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I knew what I was picking all week, so that

1:13:03.160 --> 1:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was not relevant to your pick. No, you always were

1:13:05.400 --> 1:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the Saints. Yes, because because it

1:13:09.680 --> 1:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was for me, it was Saints versus Giants, even had

1:13:14.000 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I known about that, Even if I put the pick

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:20.479
<v Speaker 1>in right at the buzzer, is what I'm saying, I

1:13:20.600 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>was still going to pick the Saints. And I can't

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>speak for the other nine people who book the Saints,

1:13:24.800 --> 1:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm guaranteeing you they're savvy enough that they were

1:13:27.160 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the same situation I was. Those Giants were not.

1:13:31.080 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You really want to play the By the way, the

1:13:32.880 --> 1:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Giants were available to everybody, one out of three people

1:13:35.479 --> 1:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>played them, only the Cincinnati Bengals not running the kickoff back,

1:13:41.760 --> 1:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the game wouldn't have been anyway. I mean, I think

1:13:47.880 --> 1:13:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting conversation too. But I just think Survivor

1:13:50.880 --> 1:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is one of these games where you had to have

1:13:53.920 --> 1:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>played at a bunch of times in your life to

1:13:56.840 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of understand there's a lot going on it. Don't

1:13:59.720 --> 1:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>want to but COVID is absolutely a layer. Don't get

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:08.479
<v Speaker 1>me wrong. I'm more scared of COVID things than losing

1:14:08.560 --> 1:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the actual game. Would you agree that the worst way

1:14:14.600 --> 1:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to be eliminated from Survivors by your tea the game

1:14:17.439 --> 1:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>that you picked being moved. Yeah. With the worst way

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:25.559
<v Speaker 1>that has been lost so far the Pittsburgh Steelers pickle

1:14:26.040 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>who didn't get to pick Pittsburgh, or or what about

1:14:29.040 --> 1:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the person that picked them and then the game was

1:14:30.800 --> 1:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>moved that picked them early? Well, that's interesting that person. Yeah, yeah,

1:14:36.760 --> 1:14:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that person. I wonder, I wonder what they were doing there,

1:14:39.920 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>maybe they had to go somewhere. They claimed they believed

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that they could move, they could change their pick if

1:14:45.920 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a game was moved before the deadline. That was their claim,

1:14:48.920 --> 1:14:53.439
<v Speaker 1>although it never has never has a Survivor picked been recently,

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:56.479
<v Speaker 1>nor any pick put on can be that's done on

1:14:56.600 --> 1:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>your on your phone mobile contest. What's with the one

1:15:00.240 --> 1:15:04.479
<v Speaker 1>time except possible exception rule? Is that only a good question.

1:15:04.760 --> 1:15:08.439
<v Speaker 1>It only applies to circule millions and if it was

1:15:08.560 --> 1:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>done on the count over the counter. Okay, so the

1:15:10.360 --> 1:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>app you're a card laid as a card play card. Yes,

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no possible way to even do it. And let

1:15:15.840 --> 1:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>me say it mechanically. The other thing about Survivor, I

1:15:18.640 --> 1:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>know everybody who's got an entry left ought to at

1:15:21.960 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this point feel pretty good about what they have left

1:15:24.120 --> 1:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. But it's still a minefield COVID and you

1:15:27.200 --> 1:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>know it takes us one. Let's go back to the

1:15:29.160 --> 1:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>over under question. Yeah, your number was what twenty three

1:15:32.160 --> 1:15:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and a half, We would go eighteen and oh, alf

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I said twenty nine and a half. What's your number, Chris,

1:15:39.479 --> 1:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you had to make a number, But I haven't

1:15:41.120 --> 1:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>looked at the matrix so I don't know, but I

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I I would think that people are going to get

1:15:47.560 --> 1:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>through and Week eighteen is going to be the toughest

1:15:49.920 --> 1:15:53.479
<v Speaker 1>week obviously, Week seventeen and eighteen. I think eighteen for

1:15:53.520 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sure because sixteen and seventeen, and without seeing the matrix,

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's going to be lower. There's something

1:16:03.680 --> 1:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>can always you know, throw monkey wrench. Tod might be

1:16:06.720 --> 1:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>right because by that time your your lowest is in

1:16:10.640 --> 1:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. Right, I'll go over over my number twenty

1:16:14.360 --> 1:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. I mean, it's really hard to

1:16:17.760 --> 1:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>know because right and first of all, we're assuming no minefield,

1:16:21.800 --> 1:16:24.599
<v Speaker 1>no COVID. But imagine if you still get two week seventeen,

1:16:25.360 --> 1:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what peace and motivated was motivated? Who's

1:16:29.120 --> 1:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not well? At least you can hedge at that point though,

1:16:31.200 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you can. So you're the perfect guy. You're my first

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:36.439
<v Speaker 1>call if he gets to that, and you know everybody's picks,

1:16:36.439 --> 1:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know how exactly. All right, So here's the

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with this week. And you called it earlier, Christ

1:16:42.120 --> 1:16:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and this is the final thing we'll do on the show.

1:16:43.520 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Here you called it a free pass week. The eight

1:16:46.439 --> 1:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fifteen games, we don't have a Dallas Do

1:16:48.320 --> 1:16:51.519
<v Speaker 1>we have a Dallas Baltimore line anywhere seven and a half,

1:16:51.560 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>it will be seven and a half. Probably, yeah, it's

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. I guess seven and a half.

1:16:55.880 --> 1:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You okay? So those are the games, So the games

1:16:58.439 --> 1:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that are the biggest favorites, Which of the which are

1:17:00.680 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the big favorites is the most likely to lose? Out right?

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't have weeks like this where there are eight choices.

1:17:05.080 --> 1:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota ten ten and a half point favorites against Jacksonville,

1:17:08.439 --> 1:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Vegas eight and a half point favorites at the Jets currently. Uh,

1:17:12.560 --> 1:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>don't hold me to these exact numbers, but you get

1:17:14.160 --> 1:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Miami eleven and a half point favorites

1:17:16.400 --> 1:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>hosting since Sinnati, uh, Seattle ten point favorites hosting the Giants,

1:17:20.720 --> 1:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay eight and a half hosting the Eagles, Kansas

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>City two touchdown favorites hosting the Broncos, and as we oh,

1:17:26.439 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh sorry Monday, Pittsburgh ten point favorites or eight and

1:17:29.160 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a half depending, I think it's eight and a half

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>now hosting Washington, and then the Dallas Baltimore game, which

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't see consensus lines, but Tuesday, is Baltimore north

1:17:37.280 --> 1:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of a touchdown? Who, Chris, in your opinion, is the

1:17:40.680 --> 1:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose outright? And why do you think

1:17:42.960 --> 1:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a layup? Who would you? Who would you

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pick as a layup? You know what, I think it's

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just a free pass week. I would I would go

1:17:50.920 --> 1:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Green Bay as the most likely to lose. Yeah,

1:17:56.960 --> 1:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean most likely is the wrong way to phrase

1:18:00.840 --> 1:18:05.559
<v Speaker 1>at least likely to win, least likely to win Green Bay. Okay, Mikey,

1:18:06.280 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Chris. It's really hard to pick one of these.

1:18:08.439 --> 1:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But I would say Minnesota. I'm in Minnesota to You've

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>got Kirk Cousins. Anything can happen with Kirk Cousins. I

1:18:16.080 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's Minnesota. It just feels a little off their defense.

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just you never know. I mean, they could give

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up thirty and you know if Cousins could be awful.

1:18:26.040 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Do you imagine if everybody gets through again this week?

1:18:28.720 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Not that you know a lot of people. The last

1:18:30.400 --> 1:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>big knockout was Cowboys seventy two people when the Cowboys

1:18:33.479 --> 1:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>went into Minnesota and one. It wouldn't surprise me to

1:18:35.640 --> 1:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>see the ninety on thanksgiving up the Cowboys too. Yeah,

1:18:39.000 --> 1:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack Wires could win. What's that they could win if

1:18:41.920 --> 1:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they got the first the new coach bomb they show

1:18:44.160 --> 1:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>up every week. The Redskins, By the way, the Redskins

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>are not that bad and dealers, like you said before,

1:18:50.760 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are not as great as everyone thinks they are. That

1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:56.519
<v Speaker 1>that could also happen at every There's a lot of

1:18:56.560 --> 1:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>teams where almost everybody has available to them this week.

1:18:59.120 --> 1:19:02.519
<v Speaker 1>What do you think will be the most most people

1:19:02.560 --> 1:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have used Miami? I think either in one of their

1:19:05.240 --> 1:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>two places. I don't have the numbers off the top

1:19:07.400 --> 1:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of my head. Ah. I think people might save Seattle.

1:19:14.320 --> 1:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. You'll see more vikings if you haven't got

1:19:16.760 --> 1:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>knocked out on the vikings already. Key, I'll close it

1:19:20.040 --> 1:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>by saying thank you to you and Derek. This is

1:19:21.760 --> 1:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the most This has been the most fun contest ever. Seriously,

1:19:26.320 --> 1:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want it to tear friendships apart. Yeah

1:19:28.960 --> 1:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. Seriously, there's so much passion

1:19:31.600 --> 1:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>involved in this. People involved, but people, people are really

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean take it to heart, and they're angry and

1:19:38.720 --> 1:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>people people should give other people credit and they don't

1:19:44.479 --> 1:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>know everything. How about that Shaw might be pretty good?

1:19:49.960 --> 1:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do they give a ship's excellent children? Well they

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they might still be in two, they might still have

1:19:59.080 --> 1:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>one of their entries left. Oh my god, people are

1:20:03.360 --> 1:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I'm just tired of people. I don't

1:20:05.000 --> 1:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>know if you've ever heard me say this before you,

1:20:06.920 --> 1:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but this whole people idea, that worst invention ever, worst

1:20:10.960 --> 1:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>invention ever. Um, all right, thank you all, Las Vegas Chris,

1:20:17.640 --> 1:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of fun, dude. I could have this conversation

1:20:20.240 --> 1:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with you every day. I love it for Las Vegas, Chris.

1:20:23.439 --> 1:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And good luck is circumillion. Man. How look, how obsessed

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:27.599
<v Speaker 1>are you with this down the stretch? You're you're kind

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of calm about all this stuff. Yeah, you know, I'll

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>give a piece of advice to to to everybody. I

1:20:35.720 --> 1:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't give it any thought until you'd be surprised at

1:20:39.240 --> 1:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>how little thought. I mean. I handicap all my games.

1:20:42.960 --> 1:20:46.559
<v Speaker 1>And you don't watch much either, do you. I try

1:20:46.720 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>not to watch. I I the Monday game was important

1:20:52.000 --> 1:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to me because it made me nine and one between

1:20:56.200 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the two and I bet it and I watched that

1:21:00.280 --> 1:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>first half and it just nauseated me. So I just

1:21:04.320 --> 1:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>started working in the next week. But you know, you

1:21:08.000 --> 1:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you have your games and you and you just work

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>backwards and you you eliminate, you know, you eliminate what

1:21:15.200 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely will not use, and then you're not it's

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not that hard as you eliminate so and it it

1:21:24.360 --> 1:21:27.519
<v Speaker 1>really takes you know, there are you know, there is

1:21:27.600 --> 1:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>contest strategy in determining what other people are using. Uh

1:21:32.120 --> 1:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know here last week I had one game that

1:21:35.960 --> 1:21:38.479
<v Speaker 1>was on the consensus. The two weeks ago when it

1:21:38.600 --> 1:21:40.559
<v Speaker 1>was the blood Bath, I didn't have a single one

1:21:40.600 --> 1:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of those games, and I had a great week. So

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm also considering, well, what are going to be the

1:21:46.479 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>popular games? Do I want to be on them? So

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to win. I don't want to be on him.

1:21:51.760 --> 1:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I need the game. So are you using the same

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>picks on both enders? No? Clearly because you're different places.

1:21:56.720 --> 1:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You're No. Last year I used entirely different picks and

1:21:59.280 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>still ended up uh that close. And this year, how

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>many are similar? Absolutely? None? I mean one of mine

1:22:08.040 --> 1:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was in the wow. So dude, good luck the rest

1:22:12.160 --> 1:22:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of the way. Thank you. We'll be in contact. Las Vegas,

1:22:14.680 --> 1:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris for Mike for Las Vegas, Christopher Mike Palm, the

1:22:17.720 --> 1:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>vice president Operations and Circus Sports and god wish that.

1:22:22.120 --> 1:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Todd, though he was frozen there. First kill Alexandra,

1:22:27.560 --> 1:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Good luck with everything in Week thirteen,

1:22:30.600 --> 1:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a TS survivor whatever you're betting on the