WEBVTT - The State of Autonomous Vehicles

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and I love all things tech. And

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't noticed already, yeah, my voice is all

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of jacked up because I'm getting over a cold.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for that, but the tech must go on now.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Just a couple of years ago, the tech world in

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>general was pretty optimistic about autonomous cars, and I include

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>myself in that group. I remember seeing the remarkable progress

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that had come out from the first DARPA Grand Challenge

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>up to about I don't know ten or so, and

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like we were just on the verge

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of having fleets of robo taxis at our back and call.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But now we've gone on for several more years and

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we're still at a point are only a handful of

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>companies are conducting limited tests. Plus there have been some

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>high profile cases of accidents involving vehicles operating under autonomous

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or semi autonomous modes that ended in tragedy. So in

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we're going to take a look at autonomous

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>cars and where we stand today. Now, let's start with

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps if we run through the levels

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of autonomy, and not everyone uses these levels to talk

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>about autonomy, and to be honest, the barriers between levels

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are a bit fuzzy, and sometimes we're not really able

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to say where we are at as far as levels

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of autonomy. We can look back at previous developments and say,

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, judging on where we are now, we'd

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>say that this falls into level two or level three,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But it can be a little difficult to see what

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>level we are currently in without you know, truly remarkable evidence.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But in general, this is a useful way to talk

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>about how far along we are uh as far as

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>getting fully autonomous cars. So technically the levels range from

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>zero to five, so that means there are really six levels. However,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>level zero really means there is no autonomy at all.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So with that type of vehicle, the human driver is

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>responsible for all operations of the vehicle. Every driving task

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is handled by the driver alone. So some folks will

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>say that they're really just five levels of autonomy. Zero

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>would refer to vehicles that really, honestly, they don't exist

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that much anymore. Now you might be thinking but hey,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr smarty Pants podcast person. I drive a car and

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have any autonomous vehicle features, but depending upon

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>whom you ask, features like power steering or anti lock

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>breaks or cruise control and other pretty common features fall

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>into the low level autonomous range. It doesn't mean your

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>car is at on this, but it has some of

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the components that are identified with this concept of autonomy.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>So most cars today are actually above level zero if

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>we go by that definition there level one are higher.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So level one autonomy would apply to cars where the

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 1>driver still controls the vehicle. The vehicle is still under

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>driver control, but the car has some driver assistance features

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>like power steering or antilock brakes. The car might have

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what is called an advanced driver Assistance system or a

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>d a S, and the word advanced makes it sound

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit fancier than it is at this particular level

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of autonomy. The car might have systems that help people steer,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or it might have systems that help accelerate and or break,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but the steering and accelerating or steering and breaking can't

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>happen simultaneously. Either one or the other can be taken

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>over by these systems, but not both. At the same time,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>not with level one. If we get up to level

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to autonomy, then we're talking about partial automation. The A

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>d A s on these cars can do stuff like

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>control steering and breaking, or steering and accelerating at the

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>same time, at least under certain circumstances. But even in

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>those cases, the car's driver still remains primarily in control

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of the vehicle. With this level of autonomy, a driver

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would still not remove their hands from the wheel, as

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the car would need the humans participation to you know,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>works safely. So with level to autonomy, you still have

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to have your attention on the road, you still have

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to have your hands on the wheel. It's just that

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the car can occasionally kick in and assist in various scenarios,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>typically in very restricted cases. Now at level three autonomy,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting up to conditional automation. These cars would still

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>require a human driver, but there can be times when

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the car systems can operate the vehicle on its own

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and the driver is essentially a passenger. During those moments.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The driver is still supposed to monitor the environment. They're

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>still supposed to be prepared to take over the car

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>should the vehicle indicate it needs to hand over control

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the person behind the wheel. So ideally there would

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>be a system where the car would identify a situation

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in which the driver needs to take over, and then

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>well in advance of that situation becoming imminent, it would

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>alert the driver to take over control of the car. Uh.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>This is trickier, right. This is harder to do than

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it than to say, because the car would have to

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>know far enough in advance to be able to send

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that alert to the driver, and the driver would have

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to respond to that. And while we

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like our response time is really fast, in computational terms,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we are snails. We move super slow. So this is

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty tricky, especially if you're talking about a dynamic

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>situation where things are changing very rapidly. At level three,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars are supposed to uh do this seamlessly, and

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, that is a pretty tricky thing to

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 1>do technically. Most vehicle systems were looking at now, especially

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the ones like Tesla's autopilot, falls somewhere in level three.

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Level four autonomy is at a point where a vehicle

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>can automatically operate itself at least under certain conditions, but

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily all driving conditions, the vehicle would likely include

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the option for a human driver to take over operations,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but under normal, you know, conditions that the car would

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much drive itself. So with level for autonomy, you

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would have self driving cars that could act as a

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>self driving car for most of the time, but also

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>allow a human driver to take over if the human

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>driver wanted to. UM. Level five autonomy is a fully

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car. The car can operate itself under all driving conditions,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So any condition where a human would be driving a car,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a level five autonomous car should be able to operate

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in that same situation. There may not be any steering

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>wheel or any controls at all in a vehicle, meaning

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no option for a human driver to take over.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not our prerequisite. You can have a level

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>five fully autonomous car that would still have controls and

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>still allow humans to take over manually if they if

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they chose to do so. It's just that it's an option,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's no longer a mandatory thing to have

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>those human based controls with a level five autonomous car.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>UM So we don't have any of these yet, So

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really talking about this is purely in the hypothetical. Arguably,

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we have some that are in the level four range,

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but there will get to that they're under very strict parameters,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, So most experts agree that the versions of

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars we've seen so far are mainly in the

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>level three and level four categories, uh, creeping more toward

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a firm level four. We're kind of in the early

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>stages of that, and there's several tests programs that are

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>operating almost as if we're at level five. But there's

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>disagreement about whether or not technology is really sophisticate enough

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to warrant us calling any existing vehicle a level four

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>or level five autonomous car. And so, while we have

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>some examples of cars and I'll talk about a couple

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of them that lack control systems for human drivers, they

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are almost all prototypes and concept vehicles or in very

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>limited testing situations. Uh. And so therefore they don't really

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>rank as level five autonomous cars because while they lack

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the controls, they cannot operate in every situation an environment

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that humans drive in. So it's it's too early for

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>us to talk about deploying cars that have no way

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to hand over control to human driver in all regions

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and in all you know, driving situations. Okay, so let's

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>do a very quick rundown on the history of autonomous

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cars up to say, like or so, and to see

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>why sub folks like like yours truly we're so bullish

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on the future of autonomous cars. So the history stretches

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>back a good long ways, particularly if we're looking at

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff like power steering. But that's getting way too granular.

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do that. And the history is

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>also really complex, and that involves lots of different disciplines

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>converging into the autonomous car form factor. You have stuff

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>like robotics, you know, sensored development, artificial intelligence, computational processing, power,

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>range finding technology, lots of things that all have to

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>come together. And to really dive into the complex history

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of all the technologies that are coming together to make

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars possible would require a whole mini series of episodes.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're not going to jump into all of that

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Instead, I want to focus on things

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like the DARPA challenges that were created in the mid

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand's. The first one was in two thousand four

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and DARPA, as you'll recall, is the research and Development

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Arm of the depart I'm in the defense in the

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>United States, so it's technically an organization that funds various

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.719
<v Speaker 1>other groups to do R and D in technologies that

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately stand to benefit the defense of the United States.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So while there are other uses for those technologies that

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>don't directly relate to defense or military systems, that's the

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>primary purpose for DARBA. So in two thousand four they

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>created this this challenge. They called for teams to build

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>or convert vehicles into autonomous cars that were capable of

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>navigating a long distance desert course is more than a

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred miles long, and there it needs to be no

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>human operators, so it could not be remotely controlled, nor

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would there be a driver in the vehicle. And the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>idea was design a car that would be capable of

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>traveling a predesignated route from beginning to end. For that

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four challenge, no team was able to complete

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eat the challenge. Uh cars failed. Some of them went

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>off road and got stuck, some of them just got

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>confused and stopped. So no one completed it within the

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>time frame that DARPA had set. But it's set the

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>stage for subsequent competitions. In two thousand five, DARPA held

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>another Grand Challenge again with the desert course. This one

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was a hundred thirty two miles long and this time

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>five teams were able to complete the route and the

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>winning team was from Stanford Race. Stanford University was the

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Racing team. They clocked the shortest time on the course.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>By shortest time, I'm still talking about a long time.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It took them six hours fifty three minutes to make

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the one thirty two mile journey. That would mean that

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the average speed for the vehicle when taken across the

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>whole course was somewhere around eighteen miles per hour or

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>approximately twenty nine kilometers per hour, which isn't exactly tearing

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>up the track, but it was still a very impressive achievement.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take away from what they achieved.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It was incredible, especially for the time, but it's not

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the sort of speed you would look at and think, oh, well,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the replacement for the modern car. The next

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge would happen in two thousand seven, and it switched

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>things up by requiring teams to design a car capable

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of navigating through a simulated urban environment complete with traffic

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and traffic laws like you know, traffic lights and stop

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>signs and simulated pedestrians. It wouldn't be enough to design

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a car that could detect a road and follow it,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or even a car capable of managing stuff like how

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to how to send torque two different wheels. In order

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to get out of a tricky situation, the cars would

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>need advanced collision detection and decision making capabilities. They have

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to obey traffic laws, they'd have to be able to

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>adapt to potentially changing situations, the kind of stuff you

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>might find if you're driving around a city. So in

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that case, six teams were able to finish the course,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Racing would actually take second place that time. They

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>clocked in at just under four and a half hours.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>First place went to a group called Tartan Racing from

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Carnegie Melon University and they finished in four hours ten minutes. Now,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of these competitions wasn't just to find out

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which groups of smarty pants engineers were able to build

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the best car. It was an attempt to kick start

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>serious development in the various fields related to making autonomous

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>cars a possibility. Engineers worked on all sorts of different designs.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Some incorporated lots of optical cameras. Some used lie dar,

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a type of laser based range finding technology

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>similar to radar. So it works by zapping out a

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>laser and then detecting any reflections coming back from that

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>laser light. It uses an array of sensors looking for

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>any evidence of that laser light coming back to the sensor,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and then measures the time difference between when the laser

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>went out and when it picked up the reflection, and then,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>working with some math, it can figure out how far

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>away an obstacle is from the vehicle. Not only that,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it can also figure out whether or not that obstacle

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is moving, or if it's stationary, or if it's moving

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>away from or toward the vehicle. It can figure out

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all that. Uh, and I've talked about that in past episode,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so I won't get into the whull technical details here,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was one of those key components that's used

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in some, but not all vehicles that are following under

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this autonomous card development. It's interesting because there are lots

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of different companies that are working on autonomous cars. They

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are not all relying on exactly the same technologies to

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>achieve that goal. Some of them are much more heavily

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>focused on optical cameras. Some of them are more focused

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on things like lidar and other sensors. Some of them

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>involve a whole, you know, slew of different technologies that

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are meant to be both uh, you know, primary systems

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and redundant systems. So it's really interesting and it was.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It was really impressive to see these teams complete the

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Urban Challenge, but again, it didn't immediately make everyone think

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>driverless cars would be available right away. The challenges, while impressive,

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't compare to what the average human driver deals with

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on a on a regular day. The competition times were

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty long. The average speeds were all below fifteen miles

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>per hour, so they're all below twenty four kilometers per hour.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>At that speed, it was clear that these vehicles were

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just the earliest incarnations of technologies that would power autonomous

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>cars in the future. So they were airing on the

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>side of caution, which frankly, you want in the first place.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to see a lot of people say

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>let's take some chances, when when you're talking about vehicles,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're human lives at stake. Meanwhile, another narrative

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>drives home pun intended why a lot of folks got

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>really hyped up about autonomous cars. It's also a sobering

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>line of thought. And I'm talking, of course, about the

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frequency of fatal car accidents and how many of them

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>can be traced back to human error. Now, getting global

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>statistics is pretty tough on this, so I'm going to

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>focus on the United States because we have a lot

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of organizations in the US that track these kinds of numbers,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can kind of get an idea of how

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>big the problem is. So in tween, the National Safety

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Council released a report that stated and estimated forty thousand

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>people had died in car accidents in the United States. Uh,

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that actually amounted to a decline of one percent from

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen. That was when forty one people died.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Another four and a half million people on top of

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that had become seriously injured in car crashes in Meanwhile,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the National Highway Traffics say D administration in the United

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>States said that of serious car crashes result due to

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>human error or dangerous choices. So, in other words, mechanical

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>failures only contribute a very small percentage to the overall numbers.

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to serious car accidents, most serious car

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>accidents aren't caused by a tire blowout or you know,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a car failing in some way. They're caused by humans

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>doing something wrong, whether it's totally by accident or someone

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just makes a really bad decision, like they think, oh,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sure there's no there's no dashed line here, but I'm

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and try and pass this person on

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>this windy rural road because I bet nobody's coming the

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>other way. That's what we would call a bad decision,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So says the tech optimist. If you could create autonomous

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>cars that operates safely, you could eliminate the vast majority

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of car crashes and thus fatalities on the road. You

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just remove the human error element, and suddenly you're talking

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>about a staggering result, and that is an incredibly powerful motivator.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Tens of thousands of people wouldn't die each year from

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>these car accidents. Millions more would never be injured or

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>affected by the tragic loss of a loved one from

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an accident. Then you start moving outward, you go out

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>another circle. You think of this as a ripple effect

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and you think, imagine all the contributions those people might

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>make in the future that they'll get a chance to

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>make because they wouldn't have had this terrible car crash.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>These are things we never would see come to fruition

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>if they were to get in a fatal car crash,

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes this butterfly effect issue. And of course,

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we want to make the roads safer for everyone. Now,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all of you have already hit upon the

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>major issue here. The whole concept of people being safer

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in autonomous cars is contingent upon those autonomous cars performing

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>better than humans already do and in every type of

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>situation in which humans find themselves driving in. If we

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>can't get that right, then we haven't made things safer

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at all. All we would have done is shifted the

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>cause of the accidents from human error to machine error

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>or computer error. So we must be absolutely certain that

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles we make meet a very high standard if

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>our goal is to reduce car accidents. So we have

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to prove that these machines operate better than people do

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in all the different situations people find themselves driving in

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>before we can make any sort of declarative statement of

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the best way forward. Now, when we come back,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about why this gets super tricky, and talk

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>about thought experiments and things, and and also some real

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>world scenarios that kind of illustrate why this is harder

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>than what it sounds. But first, let's take a quick break.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, I positive that a future with autonomous

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cars that all but eliminate fatal car crashes hinge upon

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>building driverless vehicles that are much better at driving cars

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>than humans are in all situations. Now, we could get

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit more lucy goosey here, but doing so brings

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>up some tough ethical issues. So, for example, what if

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we knew that machines were better. Right, autonomous cars are

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>better than human drivers, but they are by no means perfect.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So what if we could be certain that autonomous cars,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if widely adopted, would reduce those fatalities by half, for example,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but they would still be at fault in the case

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of the other half of fatal car accidents. So let's

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>say it's you know, I don't know, and we have

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>level four autonomous cars that are pretty reliably level four

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and they are better as a whole than human drivers are.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen a vast reduction in vehicles operated by humans.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>And let's even assume that most cars are now controlled

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>by computers, but let's also assume they're not perfect now.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Using the numbers from if humans were still in control,

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we would expect to see another forty thousand fatalities due

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.239
<v Speaker 1>to human error. And I'm just using that number as

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>an example. I realized that in reality we'd be talking

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>about nine of forty thousand. But now that cars are

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in control, it means half of those accidents are totally prevented.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But we still see fatal accidents that claim twenty thousand lives.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, we could look at that scenari

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are you and say, based upon what we know from

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>past experience, we would have seen many more people die

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in accidents if humans were actually still operating cars. But

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, that's all hypothetical, right, I mean,

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we can only know anything based on what actually happened,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not on what might have happened if things had gone

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a different way. We can't be sure. But more than that, though,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still talking about twenty thousand people losing their lives

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and all the ripple effects that that makes throughout society,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and moreover, we have machines that are at the fault

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for those twenty thousand lives being lost, and the idea

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that people have built machines that, through a failure of

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort or another, resulted in deaths is a very

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>difficult proposition to accept. Also, it's just a key to

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think of in terms like that. I mean, clearly, one

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>death is too many. We don't want to see anyone

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>die in a car accident. Having a discussion in which

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you compare a fewer number of deaths and referring to

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it as quote unquote better is something that's pretty hard

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>for us to process. It's easier to do it the

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>other way, right, I mean, it's obvious that forty thousand

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>people dying is worse than twenty thou people dying, But

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to view it the other way because anyone

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>dying at all is awful. Now. Part of this also

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>really boils down to a fear of handing over control

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to a machine. I know a lot of people bulk

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at that idea. They don't like the idea of not

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>being the actual entity making decisions behind the wheel. Confronting

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>them with statistics showing how human error leads to catastrophe,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't tend to sway them. I mean a lot of

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>people think, well, yeah, that's other people. I am not

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that person. Also, to be fair, we don't have the

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence to show that computers would necessarily be better, so

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're something to that right now. Okay, let's let's get

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>back to where we were in our history. The Grand

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Challenges helped set the stage for the next phase of development,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which was mostly the realm of startups and some big companies,

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>namely Google, would hire participants from the Grand and Urban

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Challenges to come and work in new divisions dedicated to

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>creating driverless cars. The early pioneering work was now shifting

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>pun intended into a phase of rapid iteration, as engineers

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and computer scientists and mechanics began to refine technologies to

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>help make them better. So going from the first sort

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of proof of concept approach to how do we make

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this a better design so it does the thing it

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>does but more effectively. Google's program began in earnest around

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, not long after the Urban Challenge. In

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, publications began to report on the project. So

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it's been secret for about a year, maybe almost two years.

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Google had been testing vehicles in and around the Mountain View, California,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>headquarters for the company. And while the vehicles still had

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>manual controls and they still had a driver behind the wheel,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there were at least some segments of some of these

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>test drives that felt totally under the control of the

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicle itself. It was ranking up miles of autonomous driving experience.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It was gathering data, and those people who are working

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the division use that data to further refine their approach.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>By the company had logged more than one hundred forty

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand miles driven by autonomous vehicles, which equals out to

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>around two five thousand kilometers. And that's pretty, you know,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>respectable distance. But let's compare that against the miles that

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>were driven by human drivers in the United States. So

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>in US drivers accumulated nearly three trillion miles trillion. So

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that means if you were to do a percentage and

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you were to say how many how much percentage of

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>miles did Google cars drive compared to human drivers in

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, in the Google cars would account for about

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>point zero zero zero zero zero four seven percent of

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>all miles traveled vehicle miles. So not you you can

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>call it a fraction of a percent, But even that

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is being generous. It's a fraction of a fraction of

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of a percent. Now, if you're familiar with

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the idea of things like conducting surveys, you know that

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>sample size is really important. Right, If you ask five

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>people a question, extrapolating those five answers to try and

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>apply it to the population at large is a bad idea.

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not a good sample size. You don't have enough

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>data to draw any conclusions. It's definitely bad science. So

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it makes little sense to compare the results of autonomous

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that haven't even come close to accumulating a percentage

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of the my was driven by the population at large.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>You cannot compare the two because the experience is so

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>monumentally different. Now, for several years, Google's cars operated without

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>any accidents, at least not any that were the fault

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the driverless car itself. There were a few incidents,

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but they either happened when the safety driver was operating

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the car, so a human driver was driving the Google

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>car not autonomous vehicle mode, or there there was the

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fault of some other driver. Right, someone in a totally

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>different car got into an accident with a Google car,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't the fault of the autonomous system, but

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>rather the other driver. Those were really the only two

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of categories of incidents that happened in the early

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>days of Google's testing. So at first glance, it looked

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like the driverless cars were truly safer than a human

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>operated vehicle. Right, They had a much better record than

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>human drivers did, and it may very well be the

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>case that they were in fact much much safer than

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>human drivers. But we have to go back to the

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of scale here. So in the United States, drivers

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>travel more than three trillion miles by vehicle per year.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the most recent one was almost three point

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>three trillion. We're getting ridiculously high in numbers, and there

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>are around forty thousand fatalities per year. And for the

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>sake of this example, will assume all of those fatalities

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>were caused by human error or bad decisions, just to

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>simplify things. So if we do some rough math, we'll

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>see that that amounts to one death per seventy five

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>million miles driven. Now that's my estimate just based on

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>back of the napkin. The actual estimates even more generous

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>than that. The National Safety Council estimates that there's one

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>point to five deaths per one hundred million vehicle miles driven.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean for autonomous vehicles, Well, they

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't driven close to a hundred million vehicle miles. It

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>means those early days when we first learned that Google

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>had launched its project, there were so few miles accumulated

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can't draw any meaningful conclusions. Now. To be fair,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think many people were trying to argue that

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car technology as it was in two ten, was

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>already clearly superior to human driving. This was still an

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>early testing phase. This was a point where it wasn't

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about showing that the technology was already better than humans.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It was rather showing, hey, we've created technology that will

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>allow this card to navigate and maneuver through human environments

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>without making it a problem. So it wasn't even that

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>our our standard is higher than human capability. It's more like,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>can this machine operate at the same level as humans

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>within certain parameters pretty restrictive parameters. Skip ahead a few years,

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>several companies invested in driverless car technologies that included big

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>car companies, you know Toyota and Chrysler and others GM

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they've all invested huge amounts of money in autonomous car

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>research and development. UH. It also included startup companies independent

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>startups that either we're working on components for autonomous cars

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like light our systems, or they were attempting to convert

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>or build fully autonomous vehicles themselves. And then there were

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>ride hailing companies, most notably Uber, that we're also investing

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in this technology with an eye on

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>replacing the fleets of human operated vehicles that were the

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bread and butter of their company to uh turn them

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>all over to robotaxis. So instead of having human drivers

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>over at Uber, you know, Uber at the highest level

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to replace them with autonomous vehicles for reasons that

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are complex but mostly come down to money. So meanwhile,

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer vehicles were getting more and more sophisticated, and higher

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>end vehicles started sporting some really nifty features that relate

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to autonomous cars are semi autonomous in themselves. Some of

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>them are more modest, like lane assist or breaking assist

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>safety features. Some are a little more spectacular, like the

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>self parking capabilities that some cars have where they can

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>park themselves and and pull out of parking spaces all

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>by themselves, like that's pretty cool. They weren't intended to

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>make consumer cars autonomous, but were rather positioned as sort

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of value added options for cars, like this is something

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nifty this car has, other cars don't have it. Don't

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy this car? And they give a

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>hint of what might be in days to come. In

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk started talking about an autopilot like feature for cars,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough, the following year, Tesla unveiled a driver

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>assist suite of features called autopilot. Now, personally, and I've

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before, I think naming it autopilot was

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the wrong move. I feel like the word auto pilot

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>has a loaded meaning to it. It conveys a sense

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that the car will take care of everything for you,

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's not necessarily the case. In fact, that's not

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the case at all. The company tried to walk that

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>back a bit, uh not by renaming it, which I

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think they needed to do, but they included messages, and

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this they also need to do, But they included messages

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that said drivers were not meant to remove their hands

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>from the wheel or to take their attention away from

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the road, that these systems can assist, but they don't

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>replace the need for a driver, and you have to

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>agree to that before you can enable the autopilot feature.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So the goal was saying, well, you have to acknowledge

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that no, this is not meant for it

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an autonomous car, and not to go off

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on too much of a tangent. But I feel as

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>though Elon Musk might be a little too aggressive with

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his projections about autonomous cars. And I don't mean to

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>suggest that Elon Musk and Tesla are interchangeable. I do

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>see that happening a lot in techt circles, where people

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>will use one or the other interchangeably, and they are

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>two different entities. But maybe Tesla the company's bravado stems

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from Elon Musk's own personality. But whatever the case, autopilot

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>has proven to have its own limitations, and we saw

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that manifest in some rather high profile and tragic accidents.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Beginning in ten, there have been several fatal accidents involving

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla vehicles operating in autopilot mode. The first one took

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>place on January twenty, two thousand sixteen, in China, and

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the most recent examples I know about took place on

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>December two, thousand, nineteen, and there are actually two crashes

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with fatalities that day involving Tesla vehicles reportedly engaged in autopilot.

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I say reportedly, because I don't have access to all

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the data, I don't know if conclusively they've discovered that

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>both of these vehicles were actually operating an autopilot mode.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>One of these happening California and the other happened in Indiana,

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>both in the United States on December nineteen. Now, Tesla

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>states that autopilot is meant as a driver assist feature

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's only semi autonomous. But at the same time,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has said repeatedly that his goal was to

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>get a fully autonomous vehicle on the road by the

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty nineteen, which now has been pushed back

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to sometime in the first quarter of so there are

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>some conflicting messages coming out. Since a fully autonomous car

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking about something that we would at least

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>classify as level four, if not level five, is well

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond just a driver assist mode. And I should also

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>add that Tesla drivers have a responsibility to use these

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>features safely and as intended. If someone is taking their

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>attention off the road, or they're sitting back from their

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>steering wheel, or they're taking a nap, or they're watching

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Netflix or whatever, that's dangerously irresponsible behavior, and they are

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>accountable for it. I don't want to give the implication

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to you guys that I think Tesla the company is

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>fully to blame in this case. I actually think it's

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a shared responsibility, and that you've got some drivers who

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are eager to test out admittedly really cool and technologically

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>advanced features, and you have a company that might message

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>out these features in a way that isn't perhaps the

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>most realistic or responsible method. It's a really bad combination, right.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got people who are tech heads who are eager

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to play with the newest stuff. You've got a company

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that's Bill's reputation on creating super cool new stuff. It's

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 1>only natural that you get when you combine those two,

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you can get some bad situations if they haven't been

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>messaged properly. And I really feel that Tesla bungledness that

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the rollout needed to be done in such a way

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>where there was never the implicate atian that this was

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous mode. Uh. Saying hey it's not autonomous after

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you've already called it autopilot and put the idea in

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the into people's heads is a little late in the game.

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that all parties here share accountability.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not just Tesla the company's fault, and it's not

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>entirely the driver's faults, although I think it's more their

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fault than the company's. Honestly, I mean, we're all adults, right,

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you should be if you're driving a car, and if

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you're an adult, you should be able to make the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>determination of hey, this is a bad idea. I should

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>also add that Tesla is not the only company that

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>has had autonomous or semi autonomous vehicles involved in fatal accidents.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a case in Tempe, Arizona, involving Evolvo that

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>had been converted into a semi autonomous vehicle that was

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>being operated under Uber and that car hit a pedestrian

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>while an autonomous mode, and the pedestrian died as a

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>result of that accident. So Tesla is not the only

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>company that has had tragedy befall it due to you know,

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>failures in autonomous systems. Getting back to the scale argument

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>for a second, when we're talking about autonomous systems allegedly

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at fault for accidents that lead to fewer than a

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>dozen deaths, you could say, like, well, it's all tragic.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You never want to see anyone die. One death is

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>really too many, but still twelve less than twelve, that's

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's so much fewer than you know, forty thousand. And

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you might be tempted to say these are tragic accidents,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at how many are caused by humans,

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>there's really no comparison. But once again, you have to

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>remember that humans account for way more vehicle miles traveled

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>by several orders of magnitude. So really the only way

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you could compare the two is if you had autonomous

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>systems driving as many miles as humans are driving, and

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>then you'd have to see if they still stacked up favorably,

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>if those numbers were still matching up are still mismatched,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like if if a ton of this car is still

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>accounted for, you know, uh, significantly fewer accidents. But we

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>can't say that because the autonomous cars are driving far

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>fewer miles than humans are. So it is true that

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>most accidents involving autonomous vehicles seemed to be the fault

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of human drivers. You know, it's not like most of

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the accidents we hear about were caused by the autonomous

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>vehicles themselves. It tends to be that someone else, some

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>other human, caused the accident. But the case of these fatalities,

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it does look like it was the autonomous system at fault,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's truly truly concerning um. And also, you know,

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>when when it's when it's a person who's at fault.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>We understand that people make mistakes, and we can feel,

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at least in some cases, we can feel some sympathy

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>for a person where perhaps the situation was truly out

0:38:55.239 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of their control, that that situation was was partcularly extreme

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>or unusual, and so we can feel so some sympathy

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for the person. But when it's a machine, then we've

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>already surrendered control up to it, and that's where it

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>gets particularly scary. You know, we have to trust in

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the machine, and when the machine betrays that trust by failing,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a big problem. So what happens when there are

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>no controls at all? The humans can access more on

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that in just a moment but first, let's take another

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>quick break. One of the challenges autonomous car companies and

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>engineers have faced is how do you balance between computer

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and manual control of a car? You know, how should

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>control switch from one to the other. When should an

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 1>automated system take over to avoid an accident like a

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>collision prevention system, or when should a driver be able

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to override autonomous commands and bring the vehicle under manual control.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Doing this is not as straightforward as you might think,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and and doing it in a way that's safe and

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>has a seamless transition of control is really hard. But

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what if there's no question about it at all? Because

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>there are no controls to take See back in twenty

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>four Google showed off a driverless car prototype that had

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>no steering wheel, had no accelerator, no brake pedal, so

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there were no controls for a human to take over.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The car would only operate autonomously because there were no

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>other options. The prototype worked with a smartphone app and

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>acted as sort of a ride hailing or robo taxi service.

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Users could summon a car using the app and they

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>would indicate where they were wanted to go within a

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>very restricted range of operation. Like it was geo fenced,

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>so you couldn't go beyond a certain border that was

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty limited, and that meant that the vehicle had a

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of variables reduced, right it It cut back on

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the types of conditions and routes and situations the car

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>might encounter, and thus made the problems of having an

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car slightly less complicated. There's still opportunities for complications,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but you've drastically reduced them because you've reduced the variables. Well.

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The vehicle used an electric motor that was good for

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about one miles of driving per charge, and it boasted

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a top speed of twenty five miles per hour. So

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>this little car would only really be suitable for transportation

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and restricted situations such as the campus of a big

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>company like I don't know, Google. It wasn't intended as

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a practical vehicle for widespread adoption, but rather another iterative

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>step towards fully autonomous cars. The robotaxi vision is one

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that tends to be the most common across the autonomous

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>car space. That's largely because the technology used to of

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>cars autonomy, you know, the the sensors, computers, robotic systems,

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff they don't come cheap, and a

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicle would cost significantly more than a manually operated vehicle

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a traditional car, So most experts agree that the future

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of autonomous cars, at least in the near term, will

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be in fleets that are operated by companies like Uber

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>or Lift. They will be ride healing vehicles or robo taxis,

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and they will take passengers to their destinations, and then

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>those cars will then move on to pick up their

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>next fair, or they'll return to some sort of h

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Q for recharging or maintenance or whatever. It's unlikely that

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see autonomous vehicles offered up for private ownership

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>right away for the most part, due to the prohibitive

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>expense of this additional technology. The Google's experiment pointed out

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>both the advances of the tech and the limitations of

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car technology. Yeah, the car had no controls, which

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is what you would expect only if you had a

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>level five autonomous car. But it also had very strict

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>geo fencing restrictions and operational restrictions, so it couldn't go

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>very fast, it couldn't venture very far, it wouldn't likely

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>encounter unusual situations. So because of that, it wouldn't be

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Level five anyway, because you've you've limited the scenarios where

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it would be operating in the first place, it would

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not be driving into all the different situations that a

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>human driver would encounter. A truly autonomous vehicle would need

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to handle everything, all sorts of unpredictable situations.

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>The average person isn't likely to encounter a truly unusual

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>experience on any given drive, right, It's not like if

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you drive down the road you're going to see every

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>single outlier. That's very unlikely. However, when you have a

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>collective three trillion vehicle miles traveled per year, you're bound

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to get some pretty extreme situations somewhere in those three

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>trillion miles. So you might have a person who has

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to drive through a dangerous environment, like maybe mud slides

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are coming across a road, or when people were evacuating

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of California that were affected by wildfires, or there

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>might be you know, animals in the road. There could

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>be people in the road. Weather effects can be unpredictable,

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and they can change driving conditions rapidly. There are all

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things that humans encounter every year, with varying

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 1>degrees of success and maneuvering around or through them. And

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>if we actually do see autonomous cars take up more

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.919
<v Speaker 1>of the car landscape, those autonomous cars are also going

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>to encounter those situations too. It's just a matter of

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the odds, you know. And there are a lot of

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.959
<v Speaker 1>unanswered questions about how these cars are going to deal

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with those situations when they arise, and that includes the

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>famous trolley problem dilemma. Now, in the classic trolley problem,

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you're presented with a hypothetical situation in which a trolley

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is out of control. It's moving down the tracks, uh

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and it cannot stop. So if you do nothing, if

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you do not act, the trolley will continue down the

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>track and it's going to hit a group of five people.

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna there's no doubt it will kill those five people. However,

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.919
<v Speaker 1>there next to a lever, and if you pull that lever,

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>you will send the trolley down a side track, so

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>it will miss the five people, but it will definitely

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>hit and kill one person. So if you do nothing,

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>five people die, But if you act, one person dies.

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So does making the choice to pull the lever amount

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to murdering that one person? Did you just choose to

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>kill that person. Does doing nothing mean that you've murdered

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>five people or does it just mean that you allowed

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>five people to die? Is there any meaningful difference between

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those two things. Well, these are all questions and ethics,

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but with autonomous cars it gets into less hypothetical territory.

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to actually start to answer these questions. Cars

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.399
<v Speaker 1>may very well encounter, since you, ations in which there

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is no way to avoid injuring or killing someone. So

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>in those cases, what do the cars do you know who?

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>How do the cars choose which person is to be

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>put at risk? How do they decide what action to take?

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Do they try to protect the people who are inside

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the car at all costs, so in other words, yeah,

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make this decision which will protect the people

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>who are inside the car. By anyone else there they

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are fair game. Or do they try to protect people

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>who are outside the car who maybe don't have the

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the car's other safety features. Maybe you build

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it into an autonomous car that the people inside the

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 1>car are allowed to encounter a bit more risk because

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>your thought is, well, the inside the car is very safe,

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so we want to make sure we protect say a

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>pedestrian or bicyclist. We don't want the car to hit

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>them because they will suffer way more damage than the

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>people inside would. So we're going to make that decision.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a possible choice too, But these are

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily answered questions. There are questions that are being

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>answered as people are designing these vehicles. One benefit that

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars might have is that organizations overseeing them could,

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at least in theory, use the collective information across an

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>entire fleet of autonomous cars to improve performance of each

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>vehicle within that fleet. So if one car were to

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>encounter a really unusual experience, engineers could take the data

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>from that experience and tweak the behavior of all the

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>cars across the fleet. So when one individual encounters something new,

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone learns from that experience. So it's sort of like

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the borg in Star Trek. It's a collective and that's

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a big advantage over human beings, right because when it

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 1>comes to humans, the person who experienced something, they might

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 1>learn from that experience, but that that learning, that knowledge

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't automatically spread across the population and general So in

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that way, autonomous cars can have a big advantage over

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>human drivers. If that is used properly on the flip side,

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to something as potentially deadly as a vehicle,

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty cavalier to say, well, the cars will learn

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as they go, and we'll apply that knowledge to all

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles. They'll get better the longer they drive, because

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if learning also includes accidents that could potentially result in

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>injuries or fatalities, that's a really steep price to pay

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for knowledge. And we're seeing more companies developed vehicles that

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>have no manual control systems. You know, Google came out

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>with There's in but that's not the only case of it.

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>In January, g MS Autonomous Car division, which is called Cruise.

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Originally it was an independent startup, but GM gobbled them up.

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, they unveiled a driverless car

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>called Origin. And the Origin, like Google's prototype, has no

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>steering wheel, has no accelerator, no brake pedal. It has

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>seats that all face inward. They're kind of like, you know,

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>think imagine two benches with with backs, but the two

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>benches are facing each other, so the people sitting in

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what would consider to be the front of the vehicle

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>would have their backs to the windshield and they'd be

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>looking back at the people sitting in the back seats,

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>who'll be looking forward. Uh. Now, it's about the size

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of a crossover suv, and that means there's a pretty

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>good amount of space inside the vehicle. So while you

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are facing the other folks, like if if you're in

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the front seat, you're facing the folks in the back

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're facing you. Because there's so much space, you're

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>not likely to accidentally kick each other or anything. It

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty roomy. On top of that, the car has

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a cool little keypad on the doors. And the idea

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is that a production model of this car would be

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>used like a robotaxi. So you would hail a ride

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on your smartphone and this little robo car would come

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>driving up to you, and then it would give you

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a multi digit pass code. You would get one on

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>your app and you would look at that ask God,

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you would type the numbers into the keypad and

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that would open the doors. So that way, you know,

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.799
<v Speaker 1>some unauthorized person wouldn't just jump into your car and

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>then go gallivanting off without you. You would be able

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to unlock the car yourself because you had a one

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>time use key code. That's a decent concept for a

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>working robotaxi, but the fact remains that we haven't hit

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>level five autonomy yet. At best, we have limited level four.

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Most of the vehicles we've seen in testing can perform autonomously,

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but only with pretty tight restrictions like that along specific

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>predefined routes or within very strict geo fencing, or at

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>particular times of the year or even particular times of

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the day. Again, that helps reduce the variables that the

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.399
<v Speaker 1>car mine encounter on any given day, and it gives

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it the best chance to operate safely, but that really

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>limits how useful the cars are in practical applications. For

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.280
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars to work as an alternative to manually controlled vehicles,

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.359
<v Speaker 1>they need to brand and pretty much all the same

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>conditions that regular cars do without restrictions, and we just

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't there yet, and we might not be for several

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>more decades. The Prognos Research Institute actually identified four factors

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that are in the way of autonomous vehicles. They include

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>technological maturity, which is what I was just talking about.

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Infrastructure development, so having you know, cities that are designed

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that they can allow for autonomous

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>cars the inertia of the fleet. This means that you know,

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of manually controlled vehicles out in the

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>world already, right The vast majority of cars that are

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>out there are manual control vehicles. They might have some

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.760
<v Speaker 1>limited autonomy, but for the most part, they're controlled by humans.

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It would take a very long time before autonomous vehicles

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>represent a significant percentage of the overall vehicles on the road,

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>let alone a majority. So it will take many, many,

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>many years to wean off of a human controlled cars

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and go to autonomous cars, barring any legislation that outlaws

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>vehicles um or human controlled vehicles, I guess I should say.

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And then finally we have legal hurdles to overcome the

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>regulations that are going to be coming out around driverless cars.

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing a lot of money poured into research and

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>development to push the technological limits further and to establish

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the foundation for truly autonomous vehicles. But I wonder if

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these various companies and their investors are really in it

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for the long haul, so to speak, because I suspect

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a pretty long time to get

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we feel there's really reliable safe

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>level five autonomous vehicles in the world, let alone a

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>world in which governments have also agreed and have caught

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>up and have defined the legal parameters for the operation

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of these vehicles. Because you know, it's one thing to

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>prove the technology works. That doesn't necessarily mean that technology

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will be legal to to operate, right Like, governments tend

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to move a lot more slowly than technology does. So

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.919
<v Speaker 1>if investors are willing to play the long game, then

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think their investments will ultimately pay off. But it's

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take a long time, which means lots of

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>repeated investments are going to be required to keep these

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 1>companies going, to keep them innovating and improving technologies. And meanwhile,

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be an actual market for them

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize on outside a few, you know, test programs

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that don't really count, because there's no way that the

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue they're generating is actually eclipsing the cost of operation.

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be a money losing proposition right now

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in all the different test cases at scale, with fully

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>legal vehicles that are embraced by the general public shore

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it could work from a financial standpoint right now, though

0:53:55.880 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it's all just proof of concept that hasn't uh seem

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>full fruition. Now. I still believe in autonomous cars. I

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>still believe they will ultimately make the roads safer and

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce the number of deaths and injuries from car accidents.

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's going to take a lot longer

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that I had previously imagined. And that's not necessarily a

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. This isn't important enough issue that we have

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we get it right that we can

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.320
<v Speaker 1>deploy vehicles in ways that makes sense, that are truly safe,

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that are ethical, that there are in as an ideal

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 1>implementation as we can manage UH. And we have to

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it makes financial sense too, right. We

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>need to have h make sure that it truly represents

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>an affordable way to get around that eliminates the need

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for stuff like garages and parking lots and dense urban centers.

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Those areas could be reclaimed and used for other stuff,

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and that stuff might be far more productive than just

0:54:56.920 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>being a storage place for a car when it's not

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 1>being in use. Personal ownership could really be on a

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>serious decline in that kind of future, replaced with on

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>demand car service, and the cars that are in service

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:11.840
<v Speaker 1>would be used much more frequently rather than just sitting

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>idle and taking up space for the vast majority of

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>their existence. If you think about your average car um

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the amount of time you're actually using it versus

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of time it's just sitting there doing nothing

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is staggering, right. So if you're able to make more

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>use of the vehicle, uh, then it's a more efficient

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>use of the technology. It's a it's a better investment

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for all the the materials that went into making that vehicle.

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>So you could argue, well, this makes more sense from

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple perspectives if we're able to make better use of

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this technology and not just have it sitting someplace taking

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:53.960
<v Speaker 1>up room. But it's it's a lot a lot of

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>things have to fall into place for that future to

0:55:55.600 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>come true. I think it's a future that it makes sense,

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but only if we can get the tech just right

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and before then, what we're really risking is making bad

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>decisions that just make it harder to get to the

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>right future. So we have to be careful in how

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.959
<v Speaker 1>we're testing these things. We have to minimize risk while

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>maximizing our our ability to learn things, which is a

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>very tricky thing to do because Ultimately, you do have

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to start deploying autonomous cars into populated centers or else.

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 1>All you've done is created something that works really well

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the lab, but not well in the real world,

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and that would be useless to us because most of

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>us don't live in a lab. I know I don't,

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 1>not since two thousand fourteen, but that's another story. Guys.

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.760
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions for future topics for tech Stuff,

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me. You can find me on social media.

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Facebook and on Twitter with the handle tech

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff h s W and I'll talk to you again

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Hext Stuff is a production of I Heart

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from I heart Radio,

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.