WEBVTT - Apple Rebounds in China, Bitcoin and Ether Retreat

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Love.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heide, Bloomerg's world headquarters in New York.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 4>And I med Lolo in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Coming up Apple, it rebounds in China as iPhone shipment's

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 3>spike in April. We bring you the details and the

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 3>discounts driving the moves US.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll have full crypto coverage. Ahead is Bitcoin and Ether

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Retreat and.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 3>We discuss all things AI as musks XAI raises six

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars, an open AI adds an oversight board. All

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>that and so much more coming up ahead. But first

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 3>let's go to these public markets. And there's a lot

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>of macro dat to be digesting. This week shortened training

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>week thanks to the holidays. It was in the US

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 3>and the UK. But we're up five ten percent on

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq. As we do see sentiment recovering, you see

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>home sales recovering too. With this strong economic data, what

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 3>then does the FED do? It seems though for now,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>we're still pushing long technology, even in the face some

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>hawkish sentiment coming around the Federal reserve.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 5>Two year yield just down a little bit.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 3>That we've got some key auctions coming two year, five

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>year this week. How will that see demand respond to

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that supply. For now we're saying, actually, just yield to

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 3>tick a little bit lower. We're still at elevated levels.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>New York crewed up two point two percent. This is

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>more of geopolitical risk once again, concerns happening in the

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Middle East. Keep an eye on commodities, not also is

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world of risk assets. Let's look at

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin for a moment. Look, we're down under pressure more

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>than two percent coming off of our low's ed It's

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>notable that there's sixty seven thousand dollars trying to factor

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in what happens that nine billion dollars of bitcoin, the

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>value of bitcoin held by Mount Gox creditors. Will we

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>start to see some of the movement within those wallets

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>where we see creditors regain the bitcoin, Well, we see

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>finally them able to sell.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>That's a key question.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Or what have you got on the micro There's going

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 4>to be a really big focus on semiconductors throughout the

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 4>show and on Ai. We're going to go to our

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 4>team around the country to talk a little bit about that.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>But in Vidio is the biggest points boost on both.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Then as that one hundred s and P five hundred,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 4>the story that we're going to focus on is Elon

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Musk's Xai closing that mega funding round. But the next

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 4>step of the conversation is well, they'll probably use the

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia H one hundred as a cluster to train their

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 4>large language models. There are other names doing well by association.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 4>AMD is coming to market more and more with its

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>three hundred x dell by association, with Nvidia looking strong

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>also one of the biggest gainers in that context, and

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Intel feeling the love a little bit as well. And

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 4>then there's Apple. So we're zero done on this data

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 4>from the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Bloomberg

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 4>crunches the numbers and it looks like last month. In

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 4>other words, April iphoneshipment in China jump fifty two percent

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>year on year. Things are improving. That The backstory is

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 4>that for most of twenty twenty four, Apple and some

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 4>of the resellers have done a lot of discounting in

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>China to get that smartphone market going.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, certainly, And we've got a factor in there for

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 3>what this really points to in terms of Chinese consumer demand,

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and Agrana is here with us some reallymergan intelligence and

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 3>we try to piece together the picture of a very

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>important consumer base to Apple and ultimately discouts are working.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 7>You know, one of the things is we have had

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 7>nothing but bad news coming out of China for a

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 7>fair amount, I would say, now, but when you look

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 7>at it, it seems that the China situation for Apple

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 7>is more cyclical in nature and not structurally people just

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 7>giving away the phone. So I think it's a good

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 7>news for China, mean for Apple. But at the same time,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 7>we are also not hop you know, harping a lot

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 7>of these numbers into our calculations of sales data because

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 7>one of the things we saw in the in the

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 7>last quarter, even though Jan Feb sales were really bad,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 7>but Apple came out and said that, you know, their

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 7>mainland China revenue grew. So I'm not extrapolating this information

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 7>down to revenue. But you know, from a sentiment point

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 7>of view, I think this is good news for Apple,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 7>all right.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 4>One of the drivers of sentiment among the Chinese consumer

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>has been discounts and incentives. We're entering June, which is

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of another modern day period of sales events in China.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 4>How sustainable is it to rely on that?

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's, you know, something new that Apple

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 7>has to grapple with. Before this was a brand that

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 7>did not, you know, go out and give sales in China.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 7>But we have seen that, I think two times in

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 7>a row now that that's one way to drive the

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 7>channel to make sure they don't have a butt built

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 7>up inventory.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 7>I think it's going to be a partner in June

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 7>because if they do decide or they do announce decent

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 7>enough features of AI in their phone that could potentially

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 7>lead to a better referce cycle this winter, then they

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 7>need to get those older phones out, you know, as

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 7>soon as possible. Otherwise, you know, you're stuck with all

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 7>those phones, and I mean there's no sales.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 8>There at that point.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's important for them to continue this

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 7>momentum at this point.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And will WWDC be the momentum driver going into June?

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 9>I think so.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think we have heard a lot of

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 7>good news, but at the same time, the stock's already

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 7>done so well even ahead of those news. Now, I

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 7>think by the fault, Apple itself may not have those

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 7>amazing features, but if it's able to announce as Mark

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 7>has alluded to a partnership with Open AI, I think

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 7>that will tell people that, you know, Apple, even if

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 7>they don't have their own technology, they're okay to license

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 7>that from the best vendors out there. And with over

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 7>a billion phones out there with people's hand, I think

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 7>they can give a boost to any AI vendor who's

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 7>going to give their technology to them.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Blueberg Intelligence Senior analyst Santa rag Rana and all things Apple,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much. Meanwhile, and sticking with China, the

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 4>country is set up largest ever semiconductor investment fund to

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 4>propel development the domestic chip industry. The fund, worth forty

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>seven point five billion dollars, is the latest effort from

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 4>Beijing to achieve self sufficiency as the US seeks to

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 4>restrict its growth. Meanwhile, since Time Group co founder Ju

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Bing says, China's domestic AI chip makers and making fast

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 4>progress in closing the gap on international leaders listen to this.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 10>There are shortage of resources here in Asia in general.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 10>For instance, to the shortage of compute. I think in

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 10>general it's like the ten times our gap of the

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 10>compute resources that we have here compared to the US leaders.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 10>But I think the Asian market is never lack of

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 10>talents and never lack of data. So in terms of

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 10>talents and data, I think eventually we will also be

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 10>able to, you know, even though that we have lack

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 10>of compute, we're able to, you know, make sure that

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 10>we squeeze the last beat of the compute.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating global take on the necessities of compute.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk chips a little bit more.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>But from the Texas Instruments perspective, we have an activist

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 3>investor on our hands. Two and a half billion dollars

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>worth of Texas Instruments is how much Elliot Investment Management

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>has just taken in the company. What do they want?

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And improvement and free cash flow arout three ten percent.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>This technology, it's the air hardware names, the kind of

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor names in AI space and some others and chips

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 4>that are leading the charge this Tuesday morning and videos

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 4>up five percent, continuing to push fresh record highs. The

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 4>story we'll get to you later in the program is

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Exail Musk's AI company raising significant money, the assumption being

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>they will train current future gen models on the H

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>one hundred series, and by association you see names AMD

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 4>and Dell. That's so closely aligned within video at the

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 4>moment higher texas instruments. Kray was just talking about more

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 4>muted now three tens percent higher, but it had been

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 4>much higher. As Elliott takes a significant stake and is

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 4>concerned about free cash flows, there is an excellent conversation

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 4>to be had with Mazuo's America's desk based analyst Jordan Klein.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 4>You have your ear to the ground, so to speak,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 4>more than anyone that I know. Let's start with in video, right,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, the AI story is well told, it's well traded. Now,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 4>how much do you think the activity in VideA this

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 4>session is that oh Xai is going to buy a

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 4>whole load of H one hundreds or is it kind

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>of treading water to the stock split that's coming in June.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, thanks for having me ed.

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 11>I think it's probably seventy eighty percent the mask XAI

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 11>story versus the Starlex split. I mean, I definitely think

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 11>that that stock split is going to continue to pull

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 11>in retail investors. I don't think institutional money managers care

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 11>so much. They're pretty much all long and overweight this stock.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 11>But I think retail investors seeing a ten for one

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 11>stock split, and it's coming up soon, so that'll get

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 11>people more active in the near term. But anytime you

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 11>see a headline six billion in financing, you've got to

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 11>assume the line's share that is not hiring people. It's

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 11>actually buying compute infrastructure, which is going to be pretty

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 11>good for in Vidia.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Are they, therefore, these long and overweight institutional investors right

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 3>to be so focused on in video? At what point

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>do we see further divisification going on?

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 11>Hand Jordan, Well, that's a great question, and I think

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 11>you're really starting to see it accelerate beyond just in Vidia.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if you pulled up a chart of Qualcom,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 11>you wouldn't You probably wouldn't know that Qualcomm's up the

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 11>same amount as in Vidia over the last In May,

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 11>they're both up about twenty eight percent, pretty unbelievable, But

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 11>no one really talks about Qualcom because it's not a

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 11>direct AI story. The other thing is memory stocks have

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 11>been just you know, on a blistering pace higher this year,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 11>particularly Micron SEMIICAP Equipment, Taiwan Semi who makes all these chips,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 11>and the other group that I think is really catching

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 11>attention as these cyclical analog semis like Texas Instruments, analog devices,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 11>microchip that have started to call a bottom in industrial

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 11>demand with you know, expectations that demand will start to

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 11>improve later on this year.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I want to linger on Qualcom just a moment longer.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I get what you're saying. We actually do talk about

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Qualcom quite a lot on this program, Jordan, to be fair,

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 4>but the story is about AI shifting from the modern

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 4>day version of the computer, which is the server rack

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 4>back onto device smartphone and PC. The concern that I

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 4>hear all the time is Qualcom might be the main

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 4>beneficiary in the first instance. What happens if the consumer

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't buy any of these devices.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's a great question.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think that is the risk that unless

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 11>you give consumers a reason to go out and replace

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 11>or upgrade their smartphone or their PC or notebook, they're

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 11>probably just going to sit there and use what they

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 11>already have.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 8>These phones are so good today.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 11>I think that's why you need to see Apple and

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 11>other you know, like Google, who controls Android, you know,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 11>create real new functionality and features related to AI that

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 11>offer efficiency, productivity, real new things that you can do

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 11>with your phone that you can't do with an existing

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 11>phone to drive you to upgrade. If they don't do that,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 11>then I think it's just going to be all a

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 11>marketing ploy and consumers going to are going to basically say,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 11>there's no reason for me to spend another eleven twelve

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 11>hundred dollars to get a phone that's going to basically

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 11>operate the same way. So the so the onus is

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 11>on the ecosystem, the software. But I think it's going

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 11>to evolve and develop faster than people think. So I

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 11>think it a year from now a lot of people

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 11>are going to be motivated to actually upgrade. The other

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 11>thing is is if you hold your phone for longer,

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 11>you're probably more willing to future proof a new purchase

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 11>and say I'd rather just have the product that can

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 11>handle AI, even if it's a year or two out,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 11>than buying something right now that can't.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think all owners therefore is on WWDC that

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>comes in June, is on understanding how we use aipcs.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft trying to articulate that recently, Jordan, going back though

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 3>to your focus on Analog, and you've been saying, look,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 3>this is being brought up more and more by investors.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>The news case today that an activist investor is getting

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 3>into Texas instruments. Well, they want cashflow, they want rewards

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 3>to shareholders. But what are you hearing that shareholders want

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 3>from Analog right now?

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, Analog is probably one of the most forward looking

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 11>groups of semis. They have a lot of exposure to auto, industrial,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 11>you know, communications, consumer, so they're very macro sensitive and

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 11>you know, people tend to buy analog when they think

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 11>estimates have bottomed, and in six months.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 8>Those numbers are going to start to go up.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 11>Pretty much what you heard in April and May from

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 11>all these analog companies is that industrial, which is one

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 11>of the biggest end markets for analog, has bottomed. You know,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 11>June July will be the bottom quarter, and that order

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 11>rates and a book to bill will start to improve thereafter.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 11>Now we don't really know how fast, but they're saying

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 11>the pmis are starting to show improvement globally and that

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 11>should lead to you know, probably upward revisions by maybe

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 11>late this year, but definitely in the next year. So

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 11>that's why people buy these. They don't have AI, but

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 11>that's actually good. They kind of diversify investors beyond just

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 11>AI into more macrocyclical and markets.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Your cell sites desk made some upgrades in the analog

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 4>space last week. Having had a long holiday, wee can

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 4>think about it. What was investor reaction to that?

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'll be honest, I didn't get any pushback.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 11>You know, sometimes on these upgrades people are like, you,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 11>guys are way too late. You know, this is going

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 11>to be a poor call because the valuations don't support

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 11>the fundamentals.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 8>I didn't get any of that.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 11>I get a lot of people asking, you know, is

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 11>now the right time to buy these? They are up

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 11>a fair amount this year, not as much as Nvidia

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 11>and the AI trade, but they're up fifteen to twenty percent,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 11>and the valuations are quite high on next year's numbers,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 11>so they already discount or let's say, you know, assume

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 11>a pretty good recovery from let's say the end of

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 11>this year into next year. So that's where the pushback

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 11>is is that isn't this all in the stocks already?

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 8>Isn't it too late to be buying? You know? TI

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>and ADI and microship.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 11>At these levels, and we don't really have a lot

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 11>of visibility into the shape of the analog recovery. Is

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 11>it going to be a V shaped recovery or is

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 11>it going to be like a U or L shape

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 11>recovery that takes a long time time. So still a

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 11>lot of questions, But my sense is that if you

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 11>keep seeing these stacks act well, even if the new

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 11>flower is mixed, they're going to keep going up.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Jordan klinem Zuo always plugged in. Okay, it's time for

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 4>talking tech and in the news. Asia's e commerce leader

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 4>C is under increased scrutiny by Indonesia's antitrust authorities for

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 4>unfairly favoring its own delivery service and hearing C and

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 4>its e commerce arms. Shoppy is alleged to have set

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 4>up an algorithm that prioritized its own services over competitors.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 4>A follow up hearing has been scheduled for June eleventh,

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 4>in which Shoppy's legal team will respond. Plus Home Dimotors

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>has tapped more banks, including Morgan Stanley, as advisors for

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a potential IPO of its India units. This could be

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>one of the biggest listings in India. Ever, the banks

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 4>joined City, HSBC and JP Morgan, which could all raise

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 4>about two point five billion dollars, as previously reported by Bloomberg,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>and healthcare payment software maker waste Star is looking to

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 4>raise as much as one point zero four billion in

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 4>an IPO that would make it one of the biggest

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 4>this year. According to a filing, wastereters offering forty five

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 4>million shares for twenty dollars to twenty three dollars apiece.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 4>The company filed for a NASZAK listing in October, but

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 4>it has been monitoring market conditions as it weighs timing

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 4>of a launch. Wastar plans to trade on the NASDAK

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Global Select Market under the ticker way Cara.

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Now let's turn our attention to other types of assets

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>that people are training and these one's being digital, the

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>world of crypto, and we've got so much to digest.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>We're still awaiting potentially a further decision from the SEC

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>on Ether ETFs.

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Those are for issuers. Meanwhile, Bitcoin on.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>The downside, as you can currently see, that's after administrator's

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 3>really been trying to step up efforts to return nine

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars worth of bitcoin from the failed mount Gox

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>that was once the world's biggest bitcoin exchange. We've got

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to break it all down. I can turn of it

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 3>just with us co CEO, co founder of August. You've

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 3>got a platform basing design for the management and settlement

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>of digital assets. And I'm just going to quickly dwell

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 3>on some of the price pressures on bitcoin. Ultimately, this

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is a story of supply of people waiting finally for

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 3>creditors to be repaid in some way and then maybe

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>they sell out. But Mountgox always seems to overhang the market.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Would it be a long term overhang?

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, as you.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 12>Mentioned, we have roughly one hundred and forty two thousand bitcoin,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 12>one hundred and forty three thousand bitcoin cash, and roughly

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 12>sixty nine billion yen that's due to creditors.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 8>That being said, we've.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 12>Seen historically in the past where there is custodial movement

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 12>for different wall preparations due for distribution, although both the

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 12>company and the former CEO have said that that's going

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 12>to likely be much closer to October thirty, first of

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 12>twenty four this year, and so you know, I think

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 12>a lot of this is very much narrative sell pressure

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 12>as opposed to actual distributions that we're expected to happen.

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Les goes to the narrative of a four because is

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 3>it me or did everyone get upended by this? There

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 3>is so much debate as to why suddenly the SEC

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>seems to have, against its own self and own desires,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>be allowing that to be an eth ETF coming sometime soon.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>We know that issuers have still got to get some

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 3>sort of go ahead, But I wats your view on

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>why this has happened.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean to your point around you know, everyone

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 12>being relatively surprised and under exposed. You could even see

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 12>it in polymarket So a prediction marketplace which earlier last

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 12>week showed roughly five percent probability for the ETHTF approval,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 12>and that was then immediately repriced to roughly seventy percent,

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 12>and then of course the approval announcement. And so I

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 12>think what has been more surprising for everyone to see

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 12>in the space is that we're continuing to see crypto

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 12>becoming a center topic for the twenty twenty four presidential election.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 12>We obviously had the FIT twenty one. The Financial Initutional

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 12>Technology Bill also get passed in Congress as well, and

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 12>so that's been a full focus this year, and so

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 12>we're going to continue to see that as we near

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 12>the debate in June of this year as well.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Will you take him by surprise, Hia.

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 8>I certainly was.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question, I would say again, not only

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 6>you know, I myself am very bullish ETH and the

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 6>entire ETH ecosystem, but we did see a number of

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 6>our clients under exposed to ETH, and there was a

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 6>large rotation into both ETH BTC EATH Salana rotation.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of anticipation right now around Salana ETF

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 12>being next on the list. And you know, you really

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 12>saw also the ETH ecosystem tokens outperformed. So you Sawlido,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 12>for example, that was up roughly forty percent, and in

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 12>options a lot of activity.

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 5>That said, implied.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 12>Volatility is still down and we're seeing muted activity since

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 12>the announcement, and a lot of that is because Caroline,

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 12>as you mentioned at the beginning, there's still questions around

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 12>what the timeline is for the listing of the ETF itself.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 12>We've heard anything between the next week through end of summer,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 12>and so there's a lot of expectations right now over

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 12>what that timeline will be, since as well the issuers

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 12>themselves were caught off guard.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Is too all right, I'm trying to get to the

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 4>root of what the bigger picture is here. You know,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 4>we talk about Ethereum being the most commercially used blockchain.

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Kavita Goodzo's on the show with me on Friday saying that, well,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 4>if Bitcoin is digital gold, ether is digital oil, what's

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>your kind of bigger picture on why this is important.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 12>Eth is truly one of the foundational pieces of the

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 12>entire ecosystem today. If you look at where most of

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 12>the activity is centered, it is centered around Ethereum and

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 12>its layer twos, and without question, it's one of the

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 12>most active chains.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 5>In a space.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 12>And so even though you've seen alternative chains come about,

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, Ethereum is still very much the main chain

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 12>where most of the activity in the space is happening

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 12>and where a lot of the total value locked still

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 12>stays to this day. Even if you look at some

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 12>of the upcoming token launchers, those projects are very ETH

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 12>specific independent, and so, you know, I think the question

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 12>here is that ETH is a core foundational token for

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 12>the industry, and having that be accepted as an ETA

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 12>is really the main narrative for us being able to

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 12>bring crypto mainstream.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 3>That and in presidential election in the United States could

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 3>have thought it.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 5>We thank you.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 3>I Cantarovich, August co CEO, co founder.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Lilimberg Technology. I love Low in San Francisco.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Caroline how I'm right here on Neil.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's get you to check on these markets, because now

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 3>we're managing to power through what had been a little

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>bit of concern as we head towards an all important

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>week from economic data perspective PCE number, that favorite inflationary

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 3>data for the Federal Reserve, and indeed we still got

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>some strong data that's been happening throughout the day. We've

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>got sentiment looking pretty good, housing data strong. What does

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 3>that mean for the offend? We're looking at managing and

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>now's that one hundred to the higher side of three

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>tenths of a percent.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 5>But on the downside we are.

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Seeing Europe closed lower ed and we're off by just

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>six tens percent. Remember, we maybe have a slightly thinner

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 3>liquidity this week all round, as we've had holiday shorten

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 3>weeks both in the UK and indeed here in the US,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at bitcoin under pressure as we think about

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>potentially mantgoxx smilar movements within the wallets of that previous

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>big bitcoin exchange that went under all the way back

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>in twenty fourteen, still nine billion dollars worth of bitcoin

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>locked up.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 5>Will we start to see that move Will it's still

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 5>that start to be sold.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on to have a look at what's happening

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 3>on individual movers. What's the microdata telling us on a

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 3>company like mRNA Moderna down because we the run up

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 3>that we saw last week, we had a record run

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 3>ten days back to back of gains for this particular stock.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 5>We're just taking some profits, perhaps perhaps for Maderna at

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 5>the moment.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking what's happening though, for the likes of Texas Instruments.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 5>We talked about it.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>This is all about an activist investor taking two and

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a half billion dollar steak. This coming come of course

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 3>from Elliott what do they want more cash? Please coming

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>from Texas Instruments, but also keep an eye on other

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 3>chip makers in video leading the child.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Maybe this is why.

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 3>We managed to see tech stocks do well and the

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>face of some anxiety around data and the macro. We're

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 3>up five percent on in video and that's all around

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the key story of Elon Musk raising money for xai

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 3>ed and well that means for key chip makers.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is a story that we've covered step by

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 4>step for a number of months now. Elon Musk's artificial

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 4>intelligence startup Xai has raised six billion dollars in a

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 4>bid to challenge his former allies over at open Ai.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 4>It comes less than a year after Xai's debut and

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 4>marks one of the bigger investments in the field. Joining

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 4>us now is Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner. We know the numbers,

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 4>they published them in a blog, but I guess a

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 4>good place to start is that he also managed to

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 4>attract some very big name investors, those that you kind

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 4>of want behind you.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's right, Alor Equity and recent horror with Sequoia Capital.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 9>You may realize or recognize that a lot of these

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 9>names are also folks who invested in x or. You

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 9>know what was Twitter when Elon took over, and so

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 9>he's kind of tapped into a similar or familiar pool

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 9>of investors. As you mentioned, raised six billion dollars. I

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 9>believe the pre money valuation was eighteen billions, so when

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 9>you attack on the six we're now looking at evaluation

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 9>around twenty four billion. And what's still a little confusing

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 9>is you know whether these XAI investors who are also

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 9>invested in x you know what the terms or what

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 9>the structure of that arrangement looks like. But you do

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 9>see him going back to a very familiar pool of

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 9>investors here.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, interesting is Tesla has been under pressure and there's

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 3>always that ongoing anxiety as to where Elon's focus really

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 3>lies here at the moment. How much are we seeing

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 3>this is well, he's frustrated by a lack of ownership

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla now and shareholder ownership and what he now

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>wants to create when it comes to a supercomputer to

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>power Grock AI.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think the big difference here is that

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, investors in particular are just incredibly excited about Ai,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 9>more so than I think they probably were about Twitter.

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 9>And so you know, you look at Twitter and you

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 9>see him spending all this time there and think like,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 9>what's the business upside and it's not very promising. But

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 9>when you look at an AI company, you know, the

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 9>returns are much more exciting. Or at least you could

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 9>imagine much more exciting. So if he's going to be distracted,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 9>I would imagine investors are more comfortable with him being

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 9>distracted with Xai than they are with X right now,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 9>just simply from a business standpoint.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has been saying a lot on X but

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth just spending a moment cut and

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 4>reminding the audience the relationship between X the social media

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 4>platform and company, and Xai and how they work between

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the two of them.

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 9>So Xai's main product, and really only product right now,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 9>is a chatbot called Grock, and it is trained using

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 9>data from x and so you know, all the conversation

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 9>that's happening on X is being used to.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 8>Train this chatbot.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 9>And Elon has talked about the importance of making groc

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 9>very real time and how X is a differentiator there

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 9>right because it's it's a platform that's full of news

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 9>and commentary around current events and how that plays into Grox.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 9>So that's the relationship right now right here. Total speculation,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 9>but I don't think it's crazy to think of X

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 9>as you know, kind of becoming a more formal part

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 9>of x AI in the future. It would certainly, you know,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 9>take a little pressure off of the company. It would

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 9>tie it to again, this this AI business model that

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 9>I think people are very excited about, certainly investors are

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 9>excited about. But right now, you know X Data Training XAI,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 9>which is the Grock output, and we see that product

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 9>being integrated into X right now as well.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 5>And to be as truth seeking as possible. Co Wagner,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 5>we thank you so much for breaking it down.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>And of course that was what was being talked about

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 3>by Elon Musk last week at the Viva Tech conference

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and some of his frustration with open ai, which of

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 3>course remember back in the day he did help co

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>create and then left. Let's talk about open ai right

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>now because it has created a board committee to evaluate

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the safety and security of its AI models. Is a

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>governance change basically made weeks after top executive on the

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>subject resigned along with some deputies, and the company basically

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 3>disbanded this internal team. I'm going to break it all

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>down when Blueberg's Rachel Metz and that they're trying to

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>make an effort here to show they are caring about safety,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>about alignment with humanity. But who is on this board

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and should we therefore take them at face value.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was one of the first things I noticed, actually,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is that they said in a blog post that Sam

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Altman is one of the leaders of this board, as

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>well as a couple of the board members, existing board members,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and a handful of current employees. And then it sounds

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like they're going to include consultation without side people, and

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they need two of them. I mean, I think it's

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to watch and see how these

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>people all work together and then like what kind of

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>recommendations they actually come up with. We know that Ilia Subskiper,

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who had been the company's chief scientist and was involved

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the ousting, the very brief ousting of Sam Altman,

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I disagreed with Altman about safety related issues. Ilia is

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>gone now, as is his chief deputy, and so things

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are things are changing. It is important to say, though,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that the company has long had lots of safety people

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>working on safety across the company, so it's not like

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there weren't already people working on safety of models there.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>This is an additional layer.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>The timing is interesting that to former board members of

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 4>open Ai pend and op ed in The Economists over

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 4>the weekend basically saying that they are worried continue to

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 4>be worried about governance of open in AI. You know

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 4>it's difficult, Rachel, but does this new format or oversight

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 4>board answer some of their concerns.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that it does. I would guess that

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they would say not really, because this is created with

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that are already at open AI.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>One thing that also stood out to me is there

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't to be a lot of diversity in this group,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>especially in terms of gender diversity, So that just on

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the on the surface, I feel like that's like a

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious thing that is missing from there. But also

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have a lot of people that are already

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in the company involved in this kind of group,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for me to see how you would get

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that much outside input that would then be taken seriously.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And Rachel, I'm so glad you bring that up because then,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>of course, last week we saw that Meta has an

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 3>AI oversight board.

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 5>Guess what that is.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 4>For white guys? Yeah, blue most Rachel Mets. I think

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 4>you know the issue of the people behind the models,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that the actual human oversight is super important, and we're

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 4>really grateful to you and the team on the AI

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 4>team for all of the coverage. Boo Versus, Rachel MeTx,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 4>thank you. A lot. More to come here on Bloomberg

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming out. We're going to be joined by Framework

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Ventures co founder Van Spencer, and we're going to go

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 4>back to that conversation about crypto and in particular the

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 4>idea of spot ef ETF. Stick with us. We'll be

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 4>right back. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Right up platforms. Of course, we're talking crypto mining here.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 3>It's made an unsolicited nine hundred and fifty million dollar

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 3>offer to buy arrival Bitfarms after the smaller bitcoin miner

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 3>actually rebuffed it's takeover approach last month.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to it. Bloomberg's Matthew Monks. They've been building

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 5>up a stake and.

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Now they want to buy sort of against their own desires,

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it seems.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so this is really exciting. We have our hostle

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 13>takeover situation in the bitcoin space or a mining space.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 13>This is a classic old school bear hug maneuver. They

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 13>took a nine point twenty five percent stake in the target,

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 13>they're going public with the offer, and they're effectively launching

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 13>a proxy fight against the board. Put some new board

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 13>members onto it. So you know, bitcoin is a whole

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 13>new fangled thing, but this is like old school, classic

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 13>M and A.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 3>And then not liking the governance, for example of farms

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 3>after they've had some changing within corporate leadership. But I'm interested, Matthew, like,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>what does this tell us about consolidation in the newest space.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 13>Well, listen, big fish eats little fish. The bitcoin mining

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 13>space right now is under enormous pressure following the having

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 13>as which we all know, which really cut down the

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 13>bitcoin rewards and really cut into the revenue of these companies.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 13>Riot isn't much better, stronger financial shape. It's got like

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 13>eighty nine hundred bitcoin, seven hundred million in cash, and

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 13>as you know, as you noted, the target has you know,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 13>got some CEO corporate governance challenges. So it's right for

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 13>the taking.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Really fascinating what we're going to be seeing in the

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 3>crypture space, particularly as everyone worries about energy going forward

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to I think monks in the house, we appreciate you

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 3>taking us through the old school in the new school,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>and you're going to be focusing a little bit more

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 3>on the newest school of it.

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, dive deeper into the world of cryptod this time

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 4>from the investors perspective. With Framework Ventures co found Events,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Spencer joins us in today's VC Spotlight, and you know Events.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Where we start is by asking if you, as an individual,

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 4>were taken by surprise at the pace of conversation around

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 4>a spot eth etf Absolutely not.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 2>We were one of the few firms that predicted, I think,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 2>on this show that it was going to happen. And

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 2>we've still got a couple of months until it starts trading,

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 2>so people have time to get into position. But Ether

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>is the clear asset that should have the second etf.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>It has the most stable coins, it has higher feed

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>based than Bitcoin, it has a dividend, it's deflationary. This

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is an asset that people want to own. And so

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I know the bears were prognosticating for quite some time

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>about how the odds were ten percent or you know. Now,

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the line is that the Ethan flows will

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 2>be lower than expected, but we'd happily fade that as well,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and we're firmly in the camp that eth is going

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to be a huge beneficiary from these flows.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 4>Vance you said a couple of months, what leads you

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 4>to believe trading will start in a couple of months

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 4>and what you think the regulatory roadmap is from here.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the nineteen B fours, which is the first

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>part of the process, had been approved, and that was

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of the crux of the political pivot that happened

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 2>last week. Now you have to get the s ones approved,

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, there's a lot of complexity in the

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>s ones in and of themselves, but we view this

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 2>delay as positive. You're going to have that same natural

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 2>build up that bitcoin had once it looked like it

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>was going to get approved. You're going to have additional

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 2>sales and marketing that's going to happen. And I think

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the bigger thing is that, to some extent, eth is

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>going to ride the codetails of all the access that

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin is created, the access into the ris, the financial advisors,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the wirehouses, and so you know, you think about someone

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 2>wants to put a dollar in the crypto, what do

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>they do? When people think about the Magnificent seven, they

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 2>don't go all in on one of them. Maybe they

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 2>do a peanut butter spread. Maybe they go overweight one

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 2>or the other, but you know, both or all seven

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of those are components of a smart investing strategy. We

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 2>think the same thing is going to happen here.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't really know where to go with the peanut

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 4>butter jelly analogy. You got to if you're talking about nvidio,

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 4>you've probably got a pretty thick peanut butter layer and

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 4>a very small little jaml chunky. That's one way of

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 4>putting it. I always do my best to be consistent

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 4>and ask the same question consistently. This happens, and that

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 4>is what are the principal differences in bitcoin spot etf

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 4>ether spot etf But I guess what we're actually asking

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 4>is the principle difference between an ethery and based blockchain

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 4>and bitcoin blockchain.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>So Bitcoin's digital gold, right, and you know, you can

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 2>view the rigidness of its roadmap. You know there is

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 2>no future roadmap for bitcoin being either a future of

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 2>a bug or a bug in the sense that you know,

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin is going to be bitcoin for the next one

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred years. Eth is at the forefront of the tokenization

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>movement that it's going to really define the next few

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>decades of traditional finance. We're going to start with the

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 2>stable coins one hundred billion dollars of stable coins that

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 2>are on chain today, but now black rocks bringing on

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>fixed income, people bringing on equities, people are bringing on commodities,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 2>people are bringing on private credit, and so ETH is

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>at the forefront of that movement. And it's also just

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a very different asset. You know, it does about two

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to three billion dollars of profits per year. It dividends,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 2>is out. The asset itself is deflationary. You know, it's

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 2>proof of steak. It's it's a very different asset than Bitcoin.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I would say, it's more of a textile growth play.

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And if if bitcoin is digital gold, eth is Apple.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 2>It's building the app Store of finance. And just like

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>people thought that, you know, the app store was a

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>toy or a gimmick, you know, ten years ago, people

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to be really surprised at the uniqueness of

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the fees and and just the scale of the business

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 2>that Eth is going to generate from the tokenization weight

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 2>that's taking place. And it's literally think it's al Tutor Jones,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 2>it's all these guys, you know, they're all in the stream.

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So that the Van spencercle is that Ether is Apple.

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 4>Kavita Gupta was on the show on Friday and said

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 4>it's digital oil. If bitcoin is digital gold, Ether is

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 4>digital oil. I'd love to talk try about kind of

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the ripple secondary effects of what might happen if the

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 4>approvals come as expected. You know, we talk often in

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 4>our Bloomberg use coverage on this program. The Ethereum blockchain

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 4>is the most commercially used globally. There is a DeFi

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 4>component to all of this. What is the sort of

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 4>crystal ball into the future if the approvals happen in

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 4>the cadence at which you set out.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, you know, I think we take pride in

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, we manage just around one point eight billion

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 2>dollars today. We're a venture firm at our core, but

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 2>we play in the liquid markets as well, and we're

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the few firms that's bought nine figures of

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 2>crypto pretty consistently on on open market exchanges over time.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 2>And I can tell you from first and experience that

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 2>that moves the price pretty meaningfully. And eth is a

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 2>much smaller asset than bitcoin. It's a much more reflexive asset.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>There's much less of it available. If you have you know,

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 2>even pro rata the share of flows to bitcoin by

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 2>market cap, that is going to make a significant impact

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in the market structure. And flows of crypto writ large,

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and so you can think about it back to twenty twenty.

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty, you know, Michael Saylor was on the scene.

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 2>We were buying digital gold that was going to be

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the only asset that we were going to buy in

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that bowl run. And sure enough, you know, eth bitcoin.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 2>The ratio between the two went up three x in

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the span of three months. And I think with this catalyst,

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 2>with the setup of the relative lack of supply and

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 2>just the narrative that you know, these are not just

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, pet rocks that sit around and we call

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 2>stores and value, but there are things that we actually

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 2>build with as technology that's going to be a huge

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 2>tailwind for ETH. And so it's hard to overstate just

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 2>how positive we are. And this is kind of a

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>surprising decision for a lot of people, the ETF, but

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 2>this has always been baked into the cake for us.

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Thence you use the word political earlier in this conversation.

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 4>It's an election year. We have a presidential election in

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 4>this country where at least one of the candidates has

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 4>tried to make crypto a battleground topic. Does this approval

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 4>process for spot EFTF have any relevance to that.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, there's sixty million of US in the US that

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>hold crypto. There's hundreds of millions, if not a billion,

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 2>globally that hold crypto. You know, in a lot of

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>these emerging markets as well, there's more wallets on crypto

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>accounts than there are bank accounts. Like, this industry is

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>not going anywhere. And I think it's you know, the

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Democrats that have finally gotten the memo on this, and

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing to see, you know, the party that I

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 2>call home finally pivot on this decision. And FIT twenty one,

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>which is the Regulatory Clarity Bill, provides a pathway for

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>stable point issuers, application developers, people want to tokenized assets

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to stay in the US, and that is so important. Tether,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 2>which I think is the you know, the thirtieth largest

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 2>buyer of US treasuries is overseas. That is absolutely embarrassing.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>And we want those industries in the US. And so

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, we should be rooting for any growth industry

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>with entrepreneurs and real technology to stay here. And I

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 2>think that's finally what's happening politically.

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Framework Ventures, co found Events, Spencer come back talk to

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 4>us later in the year. And let's see if the

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 4>approvals came into your timeline. Thank you.

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Now, perhaps while you were celebrating, you weren't doing it.

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>At the box office, a disappointing Memorial Day weekend for

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the movies furiosa Man Max Saga took in just thirty

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 3>two million dollars domestically, while the Garfield movie came in

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 3>close second thirty one point one million dollars.

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 5>According to data from.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Com School Now, the Furio results might be the worst

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 3>performance for a number one film released on Memorial Day

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 3>weekend in decades. This all comes as the industry bounces

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 3>back from strikes remember writers actors last year, and a

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 3>consumer shift to watching films at home now and Bloomberg

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence actually notes that, look, twenty twenty five has going

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to be much better film industry. That's when perhaps some

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 3>of the strikes uncrystallize themselves. But ed we're having to

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 3>depend on less marketing as well budget tightening.

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 5>It's all about word of mouth and it's not really working.

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I find Furious so interesting because I saw it everywhere

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 4>on social media. You know, Chris Hemsworth doing all the

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 4>media events around the world, but I didn't go and

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 4>see it and for me, it goes back to the

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 4>idea of theatrical release at the box office or a

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 4>streaming release. This weekend, I wasn't in the movie theater.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I was at home watching Atlas on Netflix, which is

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 4>the new Jennifer Lopez movie about her trying to take

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 4>down humanoid AI that's gone rogue. So that's interesting. On

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 4>the strategy side, was that any good actually was pretty

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 4>good and Jennifer Lopez was pretty good in it. But

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that Chris palmery are editor notes

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 4>in his column about the box office this weekend is

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 4>they were unfortunate because there's some good stuff it's coming

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 4>in the summer, and as you note twenty twenty five,

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a much bigger kind of pipeline.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 3>But just think about the hype around Oppenheimer and Barbie

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 3>in the previous year. No wonder you're going to see

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 3>perhaps year on year comparisons being tough.

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the actual fact that we came in.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Well below the worst case scenarios being fought out here.

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 3>It is what thirty seven percent down from this time

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 3>last year's holiday weekend.

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 5>At the box office.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>People are not wanting to spend in that way right now,

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and certainly like even though it's a rainy Monday, I

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>wasn't thinking about getting and hitting the cinemas at the moment.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm more thinking about, you know, how to do it

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 3>at home?

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 4>What one quick thing Garfield from my childhood, our childhood, right, like,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 4>why remake another Garfield? Just come up with a new

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 4>movie please at.

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Some point, Well, if it's going to be frozen, take

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 3>four or one thing like that.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes these franchises they work out. Meanwhile, look that does it.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 5>With this edition of Really.

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Big Technology, it was a really busy start to a

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 4>short week. So check out the podcast. You know where

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 4>to find it, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and it's carry noted

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 4>like this is a really big week for economic data

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 4>and markets. There's some earnings thrown in there as well.

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 4>But we started talking about AI and crypto and I

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 4>probably suspect that's how we'll carry on from New York

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 4>City and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology