Speaker 1: Welcome to Verdict with Ted Cruz and part two of
Speaker 1: our three part series with James Comer talking about all
Speaker 1: of the financial crimes that the Biden crime family is
Speaker 1: now being accused of. They are on defense and the
Speaker 1: big question now is will Hunter Biden be forced to
Speaker 1: answer questions under oath? And how much trouble is he
Speaker 1: now put the president in, especially in light of a
Speaker 1: re election campaign. It is part two. Make sure if
Speaker 1: you miss part one you go back and listen. But
Speaker 1: here is what James Comer had to say about the
Speaker 1: financial crimes being committed.
Speaker 2: All right, So, how many phone calls do we know
Speaker 2: about between Joe Biden and various international business associates of Hunter,
Speaker 2: And how many meetings do we know about between Joe
Speaker 2: Biden and various international associates of Hunter.
Speaker 3: Well, Devin Archer, in his transcribed interview, testified that there
Speaker 3: were at least twenty, now at least twenty, could be
Speaker 3: anywhere from twenty to one hundred, but he said at
Speaker 3: least twenty. And now we know that Joe had lunch
Speaker 3: with some of these people.
Speaker 4: We didn't know we had.
Speaker 3: Lunch with the Russian oligarch who had sent Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: three and a half million dollars while Joe Biden was
Speaker 3: vice president, the same Russian oligarch who when Joe Biden
Speaker 3: became president, was the one oligarch he left off the
Speaker 3: sanctions list when Russia invaded Ukraine.
Speaker 4: So okay, just a lot.
Speaker 2: Of them say that again because I think it's important
Speaker 2: for our listeners and our viewers. The Democrats, the White House,
Speaker 2: the corporate media, they all say there's no evidence of coruption,
Speaker 2: no evidence corruption, and no evidence of Joe Biden's corruption.
Speaker 2: Just say what you just said again, because that is
Speaker 2: completely contrary to the talking points on the other side.
Speaker 3: One of the things we found out when we interviewed
Speaker 3: Devin Archer was that Joe Biden actually had lunch with
Speaker 3: the female oligarch from Russia, the former mayor of Moscow's wife,
Speaker 3: the wealthiest lady in Russia. She had sent Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: three and a half million dollars while Joe Biden was
Speaker 3: vice president, and we have no idea what the Bidens
Speaker 3: did to receive the three and a half million dollars.
Speaker 3: That's one of the questions we would ask Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: in his deposition. So we didn't know Joe Biden acts
Speaker 3: like he had never met her, but Archer said, yeah,
Speaker 3: they had. They had a very long lunch or dinner,
Speaker 3: like like several hours.
Speaker 2: Do we know where they are, Unner, do we know that?
Speaker 3: I think it was Cafe Milano, but I'm not one
Speaker 3: hundred percent certain. And when Joe Biden became president, and
Speaker 3: when Russia invaded Ukraine, he announced sanctions against all the
Speaker 3: oligarchs in Russia except one, the lady who had sent
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden three and a half million dollars.
Speaker 1: And in the updated because they've updated these sanctions throughout
Speaker 1: this war with Ukraine, have they ever then asked added
Speaker 1: her name to that list, because several times they've updated
Speaker 1: and added new people to that list, or has she
Speaker 1: been protected to date by the Biden crime family.
Speaker 4: She's been protected today.
Speaker 2: So look, there's an important thing to underscore. And we've
Speaker 2: talked about this at length on Verdict. Bribery, as everyone
Speaker 2: knows who listens to this pod, requires a quid pro
Speaker 2: quo Latin for this for that. And so you need
Speaker 2: this the payment, the benefit, and you need it in
Speaker 2: exchange for that. And that is typically a government either
Speaker 2: an affirmative failure or declining to do something that because
Speaker 2: of the payment, in this instance three and a half
Speaker 2: million dollars from a Russian oligarch to Hunter and again,
Speaker 2: and James jump in if anything I'm saying is wrong,
Speaker 2: But there's no indication Hunter did anything of value, has
Speaker 2: any expertise in anything relating to Russia, has any services,
Speaker 2: has any skills performed, did anything that someone would pay
Speaker 2: three and a half million dollars for. We do know
Speaker 2: that along with the payment, this Russian oligarch has lunch
Speaker 2: or dinner with Joe Biden while he is vice president,
Speaker 2: So that is directness, direct access, direct conversation to Joe, Hey,
Speaker 2: you know I'm giving your son three and a half
Speaker 2: million dollars. You know, we don't know he said that,
Speaker 2: but it'd be kind of weird in the conversation that
Speaker 2: if either she or Hunter didn't tell Daddy, Hey, this
Speaker 2: is the person that gave me three and a half
Speaker 2: million dollars. Particularly if this is not proven. Although we
Speaker 2: know the laptop makes reference with regard to China to
Speaker 2: ten percent for the big guy, and to the extent
Speaker 2: that there is a pattern of Joe profiting directly off
Speaker 2: of Hunter's revenue, he would have a real reason to
Speaker 2: care about the three and a half million. But the
Speaker 2: thing that is new that is connected here is that
Speaker 2: when Joe becomes president and he puts in sanctions on
Speaker 2: Russian oligarchs, the one person that is miraculously left off
Speaker 2: is the oligarch that gave Hunter three and a half
Speaker 2: million dollars. So that's a second example of a quo.
Speaker 2: We've talked quite a bit about the firing of Victor Chokin.
Speaker 2: Victor chokn was the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Barisma.
Speaker 2: The oligarch that owned Borisma paid Hunter a million dollars
Speaker 2: a year, and Joe Biden got him fired. That's a
Speaker 2: quo that would, I believe, support a bribery claim. This
Speaker 2: is a second quo that could support a bribery claim,
Speaker 2: which is not listing someone for sanctions who otherwise should
Speaker 2: be listed, and who would have been listed, but for
Speaker 2: the payment to your family member. That qualifies as bribery
Speaker 2: as well. Is what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: Accurate, it's accurate.
Speaker 3: I wish you were on the oversight committee to help
Speaker 3: me with all that, Senator.
Speaker 1: New Year's is coming, and you don't have to wait
Speaker 1: until New Year's to get on with your New year's resolutions. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can get a head start. Why wait till January
Speaker 1: the first, when right now you can do what I
Speaker 1: and many others did this last year. Boost your testost
Speaker 1: from levels up to twenty percent over ninety days with
Speaker 1: the Male Vitality Stack from our friends at Chalk. Now,
Speaker 1: the patriots at Chalk are here are helping real men
Speaker 1: just like you, take back your right to proudly maximize
Speaker 1: your masculinity by boosting Testostrom levels up to twenty percent
Speaker 1: over ninety days. So get rid of that weakness and complacency.
Speaker 1: Maybe you want to work out, maybe you want to
Speaker 1: go running, maybe you want to play sports, and you
Speaker 1: just feel like you're not yourself anymore, Well you can
Speaker 1: fix that with a Male Vitality Stack manufactured right here
Speaker 1: in the US of eight. Chalk's natural herbal supplements are
Speaker 1: clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy,
Speaker 1: your focus, your mood. So check them out. Go to
Speaker 1: chalkcchoq dot com. That's choq dot com. Use promo code
Speaker 1: Ben You'll get thirty five percent off for life at
Speaker 1: chalkschoq dot com. Plus they will deliver on a schedule,
Speaker 1: so you never have to worry about not having that
Speaker 1: mal vitality stack when you need it. Choq dot com
Speaker 1: that's cchoq dot com promo cood been for thirty five
Speaker 1: percent off. I have a question for both of you,
Speaker 1: and I go back to when I was on the
Speaker 1: Bush campaign, even as someone younger, there was a very
Speaker 1: clear warning that was given to us, and it was explicit,
Speaker 1: be careful who you meet with. Be careful about any
Speaker 1: meeting on the clock or off the clock with anybody
Speaker 1: that could be nefarious. And I remember that meeting because
Speaker 1: it was such a important line. Here is there any
Speaker 1: reason and I want to know more about the background
Speaker 1: of this of this oligarch and this woman, richest woman
Speaker 1: in Russia connected directly to Vladimir Putin. You don't get
Speaker 1: the job as the mayor of Moscow without Vladimir Putin's
Speaker 1: explicit picking you and consent and being in that world.
Speaker 1: Would this be a meeting that our US government would
Speaker 1: have warned against, like you don't meet with this type
Speaker 1: of person. You certainly don't do business with this type
Speaker 1: of person. You don't take three and a half million
Speaker 1: from this type of person. I mean, would that not
Speaker 1: be some sort of conversation that would have happened.
Speaker 2: Of course, Listen, this is freaking weird. This is weird.
Speaker 2: This is not something that, oh, this is typical what
Speaker 2: people in government do. You don't run around having dinner
Speaker 2: with Russian oligarchs. That that is a strange thing to do.
Speaker 2: I don't know anyone else in government. I don't know
Speaker 2: anyone else in the Senate. I don't know anyone else
Speaker 2: in the House who does that. I don't know anyone else.
Speaker 2: Getting millions of dollars from foreign countries. It's freaking weird. James,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go out on a limb. Have you received
Speaker 2: millions of dollars from any foreign country?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 3: But I keep expecting the associated priss or Washington boast.
Speaker 4: To write that, But no, I have done.
Speaker 2: Look the closest I've come is I got changed once
Speaker 2: at a Chinese restaurant for dinner. Like that is nuts,
Speaker 2: who the hell? But like it is weird? I mean,
Speaker 2: I mean, look, you know your four hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: four colleagues. I know my nine and nine colleagues to
Speaker 2: the best of my knowledge, none of them none other
Speaker 2: than Bob Benendez, who is under indictment. So let me
Speaker 2: set him aside because he's under indictment for this. That's
Speaker 2: actually a pretty powerful point. The only person I know
Speaker 2: who did something like this is currently being prosecuted for
Speaker 2: receiving brides because Bob Menendez, it is alleged, did government
Speaker 2: favors for Egypt, was paid tens of thousands of dollars,
Speaker 2: was paid in gold bars, and they're trying to put
Speaker 2: him in jail. Well, where is the indictment for Joe Biden?
Speaker 2: Because it's Joe Biden that's performing the government favors, And
Speaker 2: the closest analog I can find to someone who has
Speaker 2: done conduct similar to what Joe Biden did, although not
Speaker 2: as brazen, not as large scale, not as lucrative, not
Speaker 2: involving as many countries, the closest analogy is Bob Menendez
Speaker 2: to Joe Biden. And if they're indicting Bob Menendez, why
Speaker 2: on earth are they not indicting Joe, And why are
Speaker 2: they not indicting Hunter for bribery? I get the tax claims,
Speaker 2: but we've talked at length about this. At the end
Speaker 2: of the day, this is not about Hunter Biden. If
Speaker 2: his name was Hunter Smith and he was some corrupt,
Speaker 2: messed up guy with substance abuse problems, none of us
Speaker 2: would be talking about it. He would be prosecuted, he'd
Speaker 2: face consequences. But it's not his life. It's not his
Speaker 2: personal demons that matter. It is when you have the
Speaker 2: Vice president of the United States and then the President
Speaker 2: of the United States selling official favors in a corrupt
Speaker 2: way to foreign oligarchs. There is a reason the Constitution
Speaker 2: specifies bribery as a ground for impeachments.
Speaker 4: I agree.
Speaker 3: Well, one of the things that I wanted to get
Speaker 3: in here on the on the tax crimes that he
Speaker 3: was indicted on, that's from his W two from Baristma,
Speaker 3: so that that's like the most obvious thing. He he
Speaker 3: got a W two from Barisma, and whether he was
Speaker 3: supposed to be on the board or not, whether it
Speaker 3: was ethical or not, it wasn't illegal firm to be
Speaker 3: on the board. He gets a W two, which that's
Speaker 3: on the up and up. He just didn't pay taxes
Speaker 3: on it. He failed to pay taxes on the millions
Speaker 3: of dollars he got from Barriskma that's listed on his
Speaker 3: W two. What he's never been pressed on are these
Speaker 3: millions of dollars in loans and all these fake ride
Speaker 3: offs that he had in these show companies. I mean,
Speaker 3: he probably owes six or seven million more dollars that
Speaker 3: he hasn't been prosecuted on yet.
Speaker 4: The most obvious James.
Speaker 2: Tell us about the fake write offs because because that's
Speaker 2: something it doesn't get discussed much.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, you know, so in these shell companies, so
Speaker 3: he would wire you know, say you got a.
Speaker 4: Five million dollar wires, then he would wire different you.
Speaker 3: Know, maybe five million dollar wires to five different shell companies,
Speaker 3: and then he would take half that money and wire
Speaker 3: it to various Biden family members. You keep the other
Speaker 3: half in the shell. And he would pay for basic
Speaker 3: living expenses, and he would pay for things like prostitutes
Speaker 3: and drugs, and he would right them off as a
Speaker 3: business deduction.
Speaker 4: So at the end of the day, he did.
Speaker 2: Prostitutes and drugs were business deductions for Hunter Biden.
Speaker 4: Yes, that was that was part of the indictment in California.
Speaker 4: That was one of the things.
Speaker 3: He joined a sex club in California and paid for
Speaker 3: it out of a shell company that he claimed was
Speaker 3: his law firm Aasco. Now think about this, his law
Speaker 3: firm was paying his sex club membership, and on his
Speaker 3: taxes he put down that it was a golf Cotry
Speaker 3: club membership so he could ride it off.
Speaker 2: You know, Ben, I feel bad when I was at
Speaker 2: a law firm, they didn't pay for my parking. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I apparently need one hell of a bonus structure over there.
Speaker 2: Fundamentally differently, one hell of a write off there.
Speaker 1: For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile has been America's
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. They stand behind their values
Speaker 1: and they stand behind exceptional service. They're an example of
Speaker 1: putting the cause a head of profit, and that is
Speaker 1: why I am proud to partner with him. Starting today,
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is extending their Black Friday deal with the
Speaker 1: Every Friday Matters deal, and you can get a free
Speaker 1: smartphone when you switch today. Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage,
Speaker 1: giving you access to all three major networks, which means
Speaker 1: you get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without
Speaker 1: funding the radical left. Now, when you switch to Patriot Mobile,
Speaker 1: you're supporting free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life,
Speaker 1: are veterans and first responders, and more than just that,
Speaker 1: they are actually a one hundred percent US based company
Speaker 1: with customer service teams that make switching easy, so you
Speaker 1: can keep your same number you have right now, you
Speaker 1: can keep your existing phone, or for a limited time,
Speaker 1: get a free smartphone from Patriot Mobile. Go to Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson or call them ninety seven
Speaker 1: to two Patriot use the promo code Friday seven to six.
Speaker 1: That's Friday seven to six. Again, get a free smartphone
Speaker 1: with promo code Friday seven to six. That's the limited
Speaker 1: time offer. Join me make the switch today at Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash ferguson or nine to seven to two Patriot. Go
Speaker 1: back to Joe Biden for a second, and I want
Speaker 1: to play for you another montage of Joe Biden, uh
Speaker 1: consistently saying there's nothing, there's no there, there there's nothing
Speaker 1: wrong here. I wasn't involved. And he also says the
Speaker 1: media has investigated this and no one's found any wrongdoing.
Speaker 1: Here's the president in a montage in his own words.
Speaker 6: Every single solitary, serious investigator, including your network and others,
Speaker 6: have looked at this have said there's absolutely zero basis
Speaker 6: to the accusation. That I acted anyway inappropriately, or that
Speaker 6: my son did. Every major national, international, and local news
Speaker 6: operations looked into it has said it's a lie. This
Speaker 6: is a president's flat line. So there's not been a
Speaker 6: sentilla of evidence point out anything's wrong.
Speaker 5: There's not a single solitary anywhere.
Speaker 6: There's not been one sintilla to evidence that my son
Speaker 6: ever interfered, that I ever asked me anything, that I
Speaker 6: ever got involved in anything. I mean, come on, this
Speaker 6: is so the guys are amazing.
Speaker 5: So you think that everything that happened was kosher.
Speaker 6: You know, there's not one single bit of evidence, not
Speaker 6: one little tiny.
Speaker 1: Bit, not one tiny bit of evidence. Is the president
Speaker 1: a liar? Based on everything that you've seen and the
Speaker 1: idea that everybody's invested in this, they found nothing. Now
Speaker 1: the news media is reporting on some of this, so
Speaker 1: they're not even backing him up anymore.
Speaker 2: So I got to say, you know, Joe Biden is
Speaker 2: particularly fond of saying there's not a sentilla of evidence,
Speaker 2: And I couldn't help thinking of my favorite movie, The
Speaker 2: Princess Bride. You keep on using that word. I do
Speaker 2: not think it means what you think it means. I'm
Speaker 2: not sure Joe knows what the word sentilla means. So
Speaker 2: so let me just ask you directly, James, what is
Speaker 2: the most compelling evidence that you are aware of right
Speaker 2: now of corruption by Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Well, the fact that we've found five payments to Joe
Speaker 3: Biden that we trace the source of the payment directly
Speaker 3: from his family's influence peddling scheme. So when Joe Biden
Speaker 3: says that he's never benefited from his family's influence pedling scheme,
Speaker 3: that is a lie. We have two hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars. That's a quarter of a million dollars, which
Speaker 3: for the self proclaimed poorest guy in Congress, that's that's a.
Speaker 4: Lot of money.
Speaker 3: Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars directly to Joe Biden's
Speaker 3: back pocket from.
Speaker 4: His family's influence pedling seams. They want to say it was.
Speaker 3: A loan repayment, which that's a whole nother story. If
Speaker 3: if you pay me back two hundred fifty thousand dollars, Senator,
Speaker 3: then somewhere before you pay me back, I should have
Speaker 3: a check to you for two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
Speaker 4: They don't have that. But let's sen You know, I
Speaker 4: don't want to get.
Speaker 2: Into so let's let the two fifty give us the
Speaker 2: details of the two fifty. When was it paid, from
Speaker 2: whom and where does it look like the money came from.
Speaker 3: Two hundred thousand dollars came from Jim Biden and Sarah
Speaker 3: Biden to Joe Biden. That money came directly from that
Speaker 3: America ORPS Health company that was an influence peddling scheme
Speaker 3: led by Jim Biden. Okay, then forty thousand dollars went
Speaker 3: from uh, Jim and Sarah Biden to Joe Biden. That
Speaker 3: came from China. That was the ten percent of four
Speaker 3: hundred thousand dollars. That was the company that Babolinski said
Speaker 3: was gonna be ten percent held for the Big guy. Uh,
Speaker 3: they got four hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Wow, hold on, I got I gotta stop you there,
Speaker 2: because that's I'm following this pretty closely, and that to
Speaker 2: me is something new. So so I'm aware of the
Speaker 2: ten percent for the Big Guy that that was in
Speaker 2: the information on Hunter's laptop. What I was not aware
Speaker 2: of is that you now have a payment from China
Speaker 2: and direct evidence, by the way, not circumstantial direct evidence
Speaker 2: of a ten percent payment straight to Joe Biden. Is
Speaker 2: that right? To elaborate on that because the fact that
Speaker 2: the big guy is being paid ten percent.
Speaker 5: The exact amount, the exact.
Speaker 2: Percent, not nine percent exactly what was reflected what Mabolinski
Speaker 2: told us, that's pretty compelling. So just to explain that again,
Speaker 2: it's it's important not to miss this point.
Speaker 3: If you'll remember the WhatsApp message where Hunter Biden was
Speaker 3: shaking down the Chinese actionals saying, we expect you to
Speaker 3: fulfill your commitment, the commitment that was made while Joe.
Speaker 4: Biden was vice president.
Speaker 3: He said, my dad's sitting here beside me, and we're
Speaker 3: gonna unleash our wrath on you if you don't. Five
Speaker 3: days later, five business days later, five million dollars pops
Speaker 3: into the Biden account.
Speaker 4: They immediately wire four.
Speaker 3: Hundred thousand dollars to this shell company that was supposed
Speaker 3: to be the company that Joe Biden was going to
Speaker 3: be ten percent owner of.
Speaker 4: According to Babolinski, from that four.
Speaker 3: Hundred thousand dollars, they start wiring different wires to different
Speaker 3: Biden family members and different shells.
Speaker 4: This has caused Monday laundry, and it's confusing to explain,
Speaker 4: and that's bite his un Anyway, they.
Speaker 3: Wire money to Jim Biden from that four hundred thousand,
Speaker 3: and he writes Joe a check for forty thousand dollars.
Speaker 3: Forty thousand is ten percent of four hundred thousand in
Speaker 3: that particular shell that Joe Biden was supposed to have
Speaker 3: a ten percent ownership in. That money came directly from China.
Speaker 3: That cary gaining evidence.
Speaker 2: How close is the time period between the WhatsApp the
Speaker 2: five million dollar payment, the four hundred thousand dollars payment,
Speaker 2: and the forty.
Speaker 4: Thousand dollars payment, I mean a month, So.
Speaker 2: This is all really closely compressed.
Speaker 3: This is all. And remember you when you transfer money
Speaker 3: to an account, you have to keep it in there
Speaker 3: at least twenty four hours, so so you know a
Speaker 3: lot of times you say, oh, there's two or three
Speaker 3: days difference, Well maybe the bank wouldn't make it available.
Speaker 3: A lot of times when you deposit money in the
Speaker 3: bank will say your funds may not be available for
Speaker 3: twenty four hours or forty eight hours or until next one.
Speaker 3: So they got the money to Joe about as quick
Speaker 3: as you could do it in banking terms, going through
Speaker 3: that many different account.
Speaker 5: So then here's my question.
Speaker 1: We've talked about the tax issues with Hunter Biden and
Speaker 1: James Biden.
Speaker 5: I think there's some more questions there.
Speaker 1: But if all of this is happening in money is
Speaker 1: running through to the president or then vice president.
Speaker 5: What are the liabilities that we don't know about?
Speaker 1: And I'm talking from a tax standpoint for the President
Speaker 1: of the United States and America, because what we do
Speaker 1: know is there's money flowing in, then they claim its
Speaker 1: loans and there's claiming, there's repayment of loans, but we
Speaker 1: don't see the reclaimant payments, So is that a tax
Speaker 1: issue for the president? Second one I have is this
Speaker 1: if the bank accounts, these shell companies were acting as
Speaker 1: piggybanks for Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family. We've
Speaker 1: also heard there were payments being made for things that
Speaker 1: benefited the vice president and the president then through things
Speaker 1: that were done at their houses, his house home improvements, remodeling.
Speaker 1: What other benefits was President Joe Biden receiving through this
Speaker 1: money that wasn't directly coming to his bank account and
Speaker 1: would that be a tax issue in theory for the
Speaker 1: President of United States of America.
Speaker 4: I think so.
Speaker 3: So a lot of these show companies had credit cards.
Speaker 3: So we got the bank account and it'll say, all right,
Speaker 3: we spent fifteen thousand dollars this month on our City
Speaker 3: Bank card or our Chase card or whatever. We have
Speaker 3: to subpoena the credit card companies and start going down
Speaker 3: these bank statements. I mean, this is stuff, This investigation
Speaker 3: so big and so complex and so complicated. I mean,
Speaker 3: we're moving as quickly as we can for a little
Speaker 3: old congressional staff. This is stuff the IRS and the
Speaker 3: FBI and the Department Justice for better suited to do.
Speaker 3: But we're doing the best we can. So we know
Speaker 3: from the laptop there were things Hunter Biden was paying
Speaker 3: for a value for Joe, like a new roof and
Speaker 3: a cell phone bill and things like that.
Speaker 4: But the two hundred and fifty.
Speaker 2: Thousand on a second, did you just say Hunter Biden
Speaker 2: paid for a new roof for Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: According to the laptop.
Speaker 3: According to the laptop, And remember there's message from Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden to Hunter Biden's daughter saying, unlike Dad, I won't
Speaker 3: make I won't make you have to turn over fifty
Speaker 3: percent of your salary to me. So there's lots of
Speaker 3: references in the laptop where Hunter Biden was complaining about having.
Speaker 4: A pay for stuff for dad, for Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: That's why we wanted to depose him. That's why we
Speaker 3: wanted to ask that was one of those questions.
Speaker 2: Let's go to the deposition. Were you surprised that Hunter
Speaker 2: defied the subpoena and refused to sit for the deposition.
Speaker 3: I wasn't because I felt like that indictment was done
Speaker 3: to protect him from this deposition.
Speaker 4: Really, because you've been dined. Yes, you've been diicted him
Speaker 4: for two.
Speaker 3: Things, the line on a gun application and his basic
Speaker 3: failure to pay taxes on his W two income. I mean,
Speaker 3: those are the two things that you really can't tie
Speaker 3: to Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: But the money laundering you can.
Speaker 3: Tie to Joe Biden, the the loans, the tax evasion
Speaker 3: on that, the securities fraud, even the even the problems
Speaker 3: with prostitutes and possible human trafficking and all that. You
Speaker 3: can tie that to Joe because some of that was
Speaker 3: at at Joe's house. Apparently there's lots of things.
Speaker 2: That hold on A second, James, you said possibly human trafficking.
Speaker 2: What what? What is the evidence we have of that.
Speaker 3: There's a suspicious activity report filed against an escort service
Speaker 3: in Florida, and the suspicious activity report is on the
Speaker 3: escort service. But Hunter Biden is a subject of that
Speaker 3: suspicious activity report because he was a big customer and
Speaker 3: send him money to and from the bank notified. And
Speaker 3: this is public not because of us. You're not supposed
Speaker 3: to leak these activity but it's out there. It's out
Speaker 3: there on the internet. I think it was in that
Speaker 3: Marco Polo report, but we know it's it's real. And
Speaker 3: what it said was the bank notified, I think it
Speaker 3: was JP Morgan notified the treasury. That we believe is
Speaker 3: our client is operating an escort service and the two
Speaker 3: prostitutes that they're paying are here illegally, one from Russia,
Speaker 3: one from Ukraine.
Speaker 4: I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
Speaker 3: And we don't know if they were human traffic, We
Speaker 3: don't know if. All we know is they're not here legally,
Speaker 3: and we're pretty sure they're and engaged in prostitution, which
Speaker 3: is illegal in Florida. And they list like the two
Speaker 3: or three names of people that were spending a lot
Speaker 3: of money there and Hunter Biden was at the top
Speaker 3: of list, which is another reason they filed the star
Speaker 3: because then you Russia and Ukraine human trafficking and at
Speaker 3: the time he was living in Joe Biden's house, they
Speaker 3: were sending the prostitutes to him. He was going there,
Speaker 3: so they were sending them across state lines, which.
Speaker 2: Is you know, is there evidence that they were sending
Speaker 2: the prostitutes to Joe Biden's house.
Speaker 3: All we know is Hunter was living there at the time.
Speaker 3: We don't know if he was going to the hotel
Speaker 3: or whatever. But I'm just telling you what JP Morgan said. Okay,
Speaker 3: I mean this is so let.
Speaker 2: Me ask you about more. Let me ask you about
Speaker 2: the deposition. So Hunters refused to testify. What happens next
Speaker 2: in the next week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks.
Speaker 3: What happens next, Well, we're gonna have to issue contempt
Speaker 3: of Congress charges.
Speaker 4: We'll run that through the Oversight Committee and.
Speaker 2: Tell people how that was. What are the mechanics of
Speaker 2: what has to happen.
Speaker 3: I was hoping Jim Jordan would lead that through the judiciary,
Speaker 3: but it looks like we're going.
Speaker 4: To do it through the House. Oversight Committee. There's a
Speaker 4: lot of paperwork that's going to have to get done.
Speaker 3: Remember, we've got a new Speaker of the House, all
Speaker 3: new staff rolling in. Uh he kept some of McCarthy's
Speaker 3: staff on till the end of the year. We got
Speaker 3: new staff coming in. So we're going to try to
Speaker 3: get all this accumulated as quickly as possible and then
Speaker 3: have a committee here and then hopefully mark it up
Speaker 3: on the floor. But there's a lot of legwork that
Speaker 3: has to be done, a lot of documentation that has
Speaker 3: to be accumulated, and we're doing this at a time
Speaker 3: when we're shifting a lot of people in the Speaker's
Speaker 3: office in one thing center, a lot of people don't
Speaker 3: realize I have subpoena authority, but the.
Speaker 4: Speaker has to sign off on it. That's something that Darryl.
Speaker 3: Olysis talked about, and Trey Gowdy's talked about and Jason Chafits,
Speaker 3: but you know, former Republican chairsh the Speaker's General Counsel
Speaker 3: has to sign off on it because if it goes
Speaker 3: to court, they're the ones that represent.
Speaker 4: In court. It's the Speaker's General Council.
Speaker 3: So there's you know, there's some bureaucracy involved in these subpoenas.
Speaker 4: There's some bureaucracy involved in.
Speaker 3: The contempt of Congress, but we plan on moving forward
Speaker 3: to that and we're working on it as we speak.
Speaker 1: Let me talk to you about you, Kra and your
Speaker 1: four oh one k It has been a crazy year
Speaker 1: with our economy. It's been a crazy year on Wall Street.
Speaker 1: And if you are in retirement or getting close to
Speaker 1: retirement planning for it, then you know the stress of
Speaker 1: what happens when you see those dollars disappear and you
Speaker 1: know that there's not a lot of time left to
Speaker 1: make up those losses. That is where people turn to
Speaker 1: gold to help diversify their portfolio. Now, there are a
Speaker 1: lot of companies that sell gold. The one that I
Speaker 1: use is a gust of Precious Metals because they help
Speaker 1: me protect my retirement, they help me diversify, and they
Speaker 1: answer all of my questions and have a plan that's
Speaker 1: right just for me. Now here's the other thing about
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Metals. They do a one on one web
Speaker 1: conference with each and every person so that you can
Speaker 1: ask them and they answer every question that you have
Speaker 1: because they understand everybody's goals. Everybody's portfolio, everybody's retirement account
Speaker 1: is different, so they shouldn't be treated like they're all
Speaker 1: the same. That's what makes Augusta Precious Metals so unique.
Speaker 5: Is a company.
Speaker 1: You can call them and you can sit down with
Speaker 1: them and do a one on one web conference, and
Speaker 1: you can also get the free investor's guide on gold.
Speaker 1: Go answer your questions and talk to you about how
Speaker 1: to protect your hard earned dollars by using gold in
Speaker 1: your IRA or your four oh one K the number
Speaker 1: eight seven seven four, the number four gold IR. That's
Speaker 1: eight seven seven the number four gold ir A or
Speaker 1: online at Augusta Precious Metals dot com. That's Augusta Precious
Speaker 1: Medals dot com or eight seven seven the number four
Speaker 1: gold ir A.
Speaker 5: Congressman, We're not done yet, Senator.
Speaker 1: This is the best part about having James Comer with
Speaker 1: us for this three part series.
Speaker 5: I'm going to tell you right now.
Speaker 1: Please share this part two, and if you miss part one,
Speaker 1: go back and listen or watch it. It is on
Speaker 1: x formerly known as Twitter, on Facebook, and on YouTube.
Speaker 1: We ask you to share this on social media wherever
Speaker 1: you can. If you're on Instagram or Facebook, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Share Part one and Part two of this series with
Speaker 1: James Comer, and we will be back with you for
Speaker 1: Part three on Friday,