WEBVTT - Musk and Twitter's 'Unresolved Matters

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Elon

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk tells Bloomberg there are still unresolved matters when it

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to his bid for Twitter, and that he believes

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a recession is likely. We'll bring you our conversation with

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla CEO from the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>plus the first for Apple workers at a retail store

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in Maryland vote to unionize. We'll talk to the former

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>chair of the National Labor Relations Board about whether the

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone maker should brace for a wave of union votes

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at stores around the world, and monetizing meta how the

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>company is shifting priorities and its algorithms in an effort

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to chase TikTok. We will get to all of that

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, but first, U stocks rebounding after last

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>week's route eraised nearly two trillion dollars from the SMP

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>five hundred blueis Katie Gray felt here to walk us

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>through the day and how tech played in it. Katie

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>take it away. Well, Emily, was a big broad rally today.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You had both the SMP five hundred and the NAZAC

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fishing two and a half percent higher. That

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was even though you did seal yields continue to climb.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.919
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the tenure treasure yield fishing about

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.919
<v Speaker 1>five basis points higher today, but still volatility taking a breather.

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at the vix. They're breaking below thirty at

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>one point, finishing a little bit above thirty, but still

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of the volatility exit the market. As we

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>saw stocks rebound today and within that rally, two stocks

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>caught my eye Tesla and Twitter. Of course, like you said,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we heard from Elon Musk in conversation with Bloomberg News

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief John Michael Swaite. This was an interesting

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so on the Twitter front, you heard Musk, like you said, Emily,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>say that there's still a few unresolved matters with the

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter deal, leaving a few question marks. There still Twitter

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>shares finishing three percent higher. Tesla even more so, even

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>though we heard must say that layoffs have started at Tesla,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that the company plans to layoff ten percent of its

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>salaried workforce. Over the next three months. Still you saw

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a big rally in Tesla shares, finishing over nine percent higher.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you zoom out away from just today's rally,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is that we know that tech has had

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a really tough time this year. If you look at

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundreds top ten largest tech companies, they're

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>down about thirty percent so far this year. But cracks

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>are starting to show up outside of tech too, And

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the top ten largest non tech companies

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP five hundred, that's the white line you

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>can see now down over two percent, Emily. So we'll

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>see if this rally that we saw at least today

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>can sustain itself as other areas of the market begin

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to come under a little bit of pressure. Here all right, Katie,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that. I want to take a look at

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the crypto markets now and this weekend's bitcoin drama downs

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and some up spoilstering hope for some relief from the

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto winter. Bloomberg Shnale Boss here to break it all

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>down socanally. Is it gonna keep up? Well, it's already

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to slow down. We are still seeing a lift

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin, Emily, but remember Sunday brought you a more

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>than fifteen percent lift in bitcoin prices. Now you're looking

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>at about a two percent rise in the last twenty

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>four hours. Earlier today it was about five percent. So

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that shows you that that the steam is starting to

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>slow down a little bit. But you are still seeing

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>still a rise. So yes, Bitcoin higher, hovering above a

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand. Let's take a look also here at ethereum,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because like bitcoin got a massive rise on Sunday, even

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger jump than Bitcoin, but you are seeing that rise

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>start to slow down significantly now only up about two

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>tenths of one percent. Still, you do see ethereum giving

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>some life back to the n f T market as well.

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing an n f T indecks rise once again.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And look at these volumes up quite a bit when

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at the largest market places, look at open Sea,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's actually up much more than that right now in

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of volumes. Looks rare volumes are also higher in

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours. And interesting magic even yes,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the volumes are down over the most recent period, but today,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just today they announced a funding round that had their

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>valuation announced as surging tenfolds, and so you are seeing

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the n f T market come to life, just as

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>people gather at NYC n f T. There's a lot

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 1>of excitement around what the future brings. Despite the SCRIPTO

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Winter Shinali, thanks for that. We've got the co founder

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of Magic Eating coming up with us later in the show.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll be back for that meantime. Elon Musk commented on

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>everything from Twitter to the markets to Tesla in a

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>wide ranging interview with Bloomberg's editor in chief John michel

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Sweet at the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha. But anyone

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hoping to hear him commit to his deal to buy

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would be disappointed. Take a listen of what do

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you had to say about that and more? There are still,

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>um a few unresolved matters. You've You've probably read about

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the question as to whether the number of fake and

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>spam users on the system is less than five percent

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter claims, which I think is probably not most

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>people's experience on we're using Twitter. UM So we're still

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>awaiting resolution on that matter. UM. And that that is

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a very significant matter. UM So we're awaiting resolution on that. Um.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And then of course there is the question of will

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the dead portion of the round come together, and then

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>will the share holders vote in favor? So I think

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>those are the three things that um standard. Uh, you

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>know if that needs to be resolved before the transaction

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can complete. What about the general state of the economy?

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Does that weigh on you when you think about this?

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just described it. You have a super bad

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling about the economy. Are you still in that position?

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I just said to you earlier Joe Biden has just

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>come out and said that a recession in America is

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not inevitable. How do you feel about the economy? Well,

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a recession is inevitable at some point. As

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>to whether there is a reception in the near term,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that is more likely than not. Certainly isn't.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not a certainty, but it appears more likelier than that.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Can you set the record straight on one thing, which

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is this issue about the layoffs? I think you said

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>initially that Tesla ten percent of the workforce would be cut,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then ten percent of salary would be cut, then salaried

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>would stay fl flat and overall headcamp would go up.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>What what what is the number? I know there's already

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think being a lawsuit about the ten percent? Is

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. The goal to reduce the workforce or what

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is the number that we should think about all that

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you're planning. Yes, so it TESLA is reducing the salary

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>workforce are roughly ten percent over the next probably three

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>months or so. UM. The UH we expect to grow

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>out our hourly workforce. Act quite clear that we expected

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to grow our own hourly workforce, but we uh, we

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>grew very fast on the on the salary side, UM,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and we grew a little too fast in some areas,

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it requires reduction in the salary workforce. And

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we're about two thirds hourly and one third salary. So

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess technically attempts at reduction in the salary workforce

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is only probably a three three and a half a

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>cent reduction in total headcount. TESLA CEO Elon Musk. They're

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Bloomberg editor in chief John Michael Weight from

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha. I want to break

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>some of that down with our own at Ludlow. Let's

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>start on Tesla since that's where they ended. What's the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>significance of what we learned right there? Yeah, I think

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that the main takeaway and what he goes on to

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>say is that demand is really strong, that they have

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a really long wait list for their vehicles, and he

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about how they need to build more factories quicker.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And the point he was making that piece of tape

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 1>is that they are reducing ten percent of salary staff.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>The salary staff is only a third of the workforce,

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so it kind of nets out at a three to

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent reduction of headcount globally and

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>tests a kind of ballooned right over the last few years,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand employees. They're kind of trimming back in

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>some areas, according to Mask and the focusing on priority,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>which is people that actually build stuff, the cars, the

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>battery packs around the world. Talking about other people that

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are building stuff. The employees at Twitter probably didn't get

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>an answer one way or another whether or not he's

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go through with the deal. You know, it

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was it was like recent appearances by Ask. He did

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not explicitly state that he is committed to the deal

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>as its outlined twenty cents to share. You know, he

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of went through the motions and he gave this

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>caveat that he was trying to do deposition minimization. He

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to get into legal trouble because it's appending deal,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but still problems with bots. Still need to shareholder vote

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to make this happen. We keep forgetting that. And the

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>debt real quick reference of debt thirteen billion dollars a

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>debt committed by banks, and he seemed to suggest that

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that too is not solid. I wonder how much it

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help that he thinks a recession is likely at

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>some point and Twitter, along with the rest of the markets,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>has taken a turn. Yeah, continuation of his thoughts right.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He said previously as a super bad feeling about the economy,

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>referencing internal memo, and he said that, you know, a

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>recession is kind of going to happen at some point.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>The economy is cyclical. That makes sense. But is it

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in the near term? He said, more

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>likely than not. Twitter's market cap twenty nine billion dollars. Yes.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>At the end of this trading session, he did talk

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about DOJ and we had some interesting commentary there along

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with his support for cryptocurrencies. So those coins really interesting.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He clarified, first of all, he's not suggesting that people

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>go out and invest in cryptocurrencies. That was part of

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the question that was put to him, he said, I'm

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying that. He said that he went across the

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>factory floors a Tesla SpaceX and he has workers, you know, engineers,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of people in the workforce saying to him,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we're invested in doge coin. Can you support it? And

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he says that's his rationale for supporting it, And of

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>course he's bought dogecoin himself. You can buy test the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>merchandise and not vehicles, but merchandise using doged coin. So

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be suggesting that his support is because

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he has a wide network of employees that also support

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency UM and he kind of made the bitcoin side

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of things with TESSAs Holdings being a very small, inconsequential

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the balance sheet. Interesting, a little bit more

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>meat on the bones there at Bludlow. Thank you for

0:10:52.960 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>your analysis. That's the sound of Apple workers in Tosa

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in Maryland, just outside of Baltimore, which just became the

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>first Apple retail store in the country to unionize. Store

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>employees voted overwhelming Lady unionized to thirty three, and this

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is likely just the beginning, as more stores are expected

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to organize around the world. In recent months, we've seen

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>more and more workers at tech companies unionized, But with

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the tightening labor market and the economy turning down, how

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>much influence can they have for more? I'm joined by

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>William Gould the fourth. He is the former chairman of

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Labor Relations Board, a scholar on labor law

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford Law School, and author of the book for

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Labor To Build Upon Wars, Depression and Pandemic. William, thank

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So look, the vote

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even close. What does that tell you about the

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>chances that this is going to happen at many more

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple stores? Well, I think it's likely that it will

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>happen at many more stores. We don't know really how many,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>uh it's likely to be, but clearly something is happening.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking for a long time about the unrelenting

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>decline of organized labor and the absence of organized labor

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>from tech altogether. That's beginning to change a bit. How

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>much we don't know. I think there are a number

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of factors and issues which have made this possible. But

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about the fact that something is happening,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's quite feasible possible that it will happen elsewhere

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there and another companies. Apple has said in a statement

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of this happening in the past, We're

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>fortunate to have incredible retail team members, and we deeply

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>value everything they bring to Apple. We're pleased to offer

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>very strong compensation and benefits for full time and part

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>time employees, including healthcare, tuition reimbursement, new parental leave, paid

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>family leave, annual stock grants, and many other benefits. You know,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>how do I think the benefits that Apple, which is

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, one of the wealthiest companies in the world,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>compared to what workers in unions elsewhere receive, you would

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think they'd be a step above the rest. Oh, there

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are a step above the unionized sector of the economy,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's certainly a step above a number of them.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that probably UH the impetus for this comes

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.359
<v Speaker 1>from a desire of workers to to shape these employment

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>conditions with the employer, not to have them unilaterally imposed

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>upon them, and UH to to address issues like scheduling,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like safety issues. And we've seen in this period of inflation,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a decline in real wages. I think all of these

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>issues a confluence of these issues and and the circumstances

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that have emerged in this period of uncertainty. I talk

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about wars and de Russian and pandemic in my book,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's a period of uncertainty where workers are

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>frequently I'm more likely to look to unions and some

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of protective mechanism and some kind of participatory mechanism

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than they otherwise would now. Amazon, of course, has been

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>facing unionization efforts of its own at warehouses, a vote

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in Staten Island, for example, to unionize. I recently sat

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>down with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and asked for his

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>response to these efforts. Take a listen to what he

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>had to say. We happen to think they're better off

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>without a union for a number of reasons, including the

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, it's it's much harder when you

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have a union to have a direct relationship with your

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>manager and to get things done quickly. Amazon's labor union

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>interestingly filed a charge over those remarks that he made

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. I'm curious what you see is the parallels

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>between Apple and Amazon and what the difference between a

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wave of tech union unizations, how how that compares to

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the history of unions in this country. Well, there there

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have been uh waves of of trade union movement at

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>various points. UH. The Great Depression, World War two are

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the most recent illustrations. UH, when workers are

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know really what's uh what lies ahead. UM, there's

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we can just sit down and work

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>things out together. Is fine so long as the worker

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>really has a say in it. And I think that

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the what the workers are saying through UH. These initiatives

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in Tech and Amazon Amazons are very formidable effort because

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many employees that you have to organize in

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>one uh and one swoop. Uh. You know, with the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Staten Island being approximately eight thousand workers, that's a

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>tough thing for for union to do. And they were

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>able to do it effectively in part because they were

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>able to uh. It was a it was an independent

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>ground swell. Though the workers came to the union. Um,

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the union is not coming to the workers. And that's

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the way it's been in every period of great union growth.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that this is going to be a

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>great period of union growth. I think we're in early days.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think these tech companies Apple, Amazon

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at Teter should prepare for How do you see this

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>playing out? Are they just going to have to pay

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>these employees a lot more, give them much better benefits?

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like on the other side. I

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think the big thing is the two. It's not simply

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter of benefits. It's a matter of UH worker involvement,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>worker participation UM in determining schedule, in UH input into

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>safety issues which have become so important in this pandemic

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>era in a number of contexts, and UH and they're

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to in some instances, UH really come through

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with money for workers who, as I said, see their

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>real wages declining for reasons that are totally beyond their control.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>And it seems at the present to anybody's control. All right, well,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly very long chapter yet to be written here, William Gould,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>former Chair of the National Labored Relations Bards Stifford Law professor,

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate having your perspective here today on the show

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, changes are coming to metas it shifts its

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>algorithm to bring more creators to the platform, creators you

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>may not have heard of before and expand into the metaverse.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Will explain it all next, Mr Bloomberg. Meta has big

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>plans for creators as it looks for ways to continue

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to expand, especially in the metaverse. Mark Zuckerberg has announced

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>new ways for creators to make money, including through n

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>f t s, reels, and even from paid online events

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and subscriptions. On top of trying to lore more creators

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to better compete with TikTok, Meta is also shifting its algorithm.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Since the invention of Facebook's news feed, the company has

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>been focused on delivering content that it knows users want

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to see. However, after more than a decade, it's becoming

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>clear some users need a little more to stay engaged.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The success of TikTok has unearthed a new kind of

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>algo magic, giving people content they didn't even know they

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see. This is why creators with little followings

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have been being able to gain massive traction on TikTok,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but less so on metas platforms. Now, Mark Zuckerber wants

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to change all that. For more on all this, I'm

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>joined by Bloomberg's tech editor Sarah Fryar So talk to

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>us about what Meta a k a. Facebook is doing

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>here and if it's gonna work. It's really a big

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bet to focus on showing people content from people they

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>don't already follow, that they haven't already expressed interest in,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the hopes of helping those people build a following

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>as creators. But it's really risky because it just flies

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the face of all of the curation you've done

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of your feed, who you decide, who you want to follow,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who you're friends with, etcetera. Um metas deciding that it

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thinks it has something to show you that might be better. Uh,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it might or might not work. So it's a

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>big moment of experimentation. They're really betting the company on

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this because if they can't make money um from this pivot,

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>then you won't be able to really fund the metaverse,

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and they won't have the creator relationships that they need

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>take into the metaverse eventually. How A creators looking at

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the differences between a TikTok and a Facebook or on Instagram, Well,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>creators have their audiences on on Instagram that they where

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>they really have this like back and forth relationship. Um,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's it's easier to connect in some ways on Instagram

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that it is on TikTok, But TikTok is is really

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>offering people an opportunity for more followings, and is considered

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the easier place to become famous overnight compared to Instagram,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>which is already kind of established. And and Facebook is

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>simply not top of mind for young people anymore. And

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing that the company really needs to change.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're leaning on Instagram, and they're also leaning on

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>changes to Facebook itself that are going to help draw

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in young people and make them more entertainment destinations than

0:20:54.080 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>simple social networks. UM, that's all trying to compete with TikTok. However,

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this is what they really need to

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>do to stay relevant. And if it doesn't work, UM,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>then they're going to have have um potentially alienated from

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people who have depended on the platforms working the way

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>they already do. Fascinating a big bet. Indeed, we'll be

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>watching to see how that one plays out. Bloomberg's certifire

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>our tech editor, and also the book about Instagram, No Filter.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Chang

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Time now for some tech news you

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>might have missed. Uber is bringing back its shared ride

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>service for the first time since the pandemic it's now

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>called Uber x share instead of Uberpool, joining Lift, which

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>reactivated car pool services in some markets. Back in May,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's at Bloodlow here with the details and what do

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>we know. Yeah, it's interesting. So if you choose to

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do Uber x share, you get partnered with the co writer,

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's just you and one other person. And Uber

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>says that uses its algorithms to calculate your co writer

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>based on your route, and who gets dropped off first

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on the route. There might be periods of time

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>where you're riding on your own and someone gets in.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You might be riding as a two and someone gets

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>out and you carry on on your own the rest

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the way. And they're introducing this and limited markets

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>including l A, New York City, San Francisco. In fact,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we have this tweet from somebody that noticed the news

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York City channeling their inner pandemic experience or

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic experience, just with a bit of batter excited

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>for a summer of chaotic encounters in the back of

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a Nissan Ultimate. We can all relate. I remember uberpool

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and other shared right services pre pandemic right, and you

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>could have three or four people in the car. You're

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>all in the back like somebody's got a briefcase and umbrella,

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>a dog. Whatever is going on. This is kind of different,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be interesting to see the psychology

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of how users act to this after the pandemic. I mean,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the share performance right of Uber and

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Lift since June when things started to recover in the

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>share price after the initial shock of the pandemic, and

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still down significantly. Right. Uber's story has been one

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>where they've diversified the business with Uber eats Lift. You know,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been debating in the recent weeks and quarters about

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>whether the demand is really there, how much both of

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies will have to do to incentivized riders and drivers,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and how that will weigh on the bomb line. Interesting

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Uber x share, if you offer

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that you get an immediate discount on your ride, which

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>could be a way to lure people in. Right, and

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you see Uber and Left just trading in tandem. Really there,

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask why why did they change the name?

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Uber x share doesn't just doesn't have the

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>same ring as uberpool. Yeah, I lact songs to this

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. So what Uber saying their blog post is

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that after the pandemic shut down shared rides in they

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>did a complete revamp. Right. They did pilots around the

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>world in different markets. They redesigned the feature. And this

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is the core principle, Right, it's not really a pool

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of people. It's a co sharing ride that it's you

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and one other person, and it's limited. I'd also point

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>out that there's there's no mask requirement, at least here

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, right, And Uber is saying that it's

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>at the comfort level of riders whether they wear a mask.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's the key point. It's just one and another,

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not a big pool of riders like uberpool. And I

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of the mainstay of why they've changed

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the name. Right. I can only imagine the awkward masks

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>now mask conversation. It's okay at ludlow, thank you. Following

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the recent collapse in token prices, one crypto lender is

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>covering its spaces. Block five has asked for f t

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>X as help to get more cash, with a two

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>million dollar revolving credit facility. To be precise, this to

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>avoid the same fate that other lenders have faced, like

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Celsius and Babble, which froze withdrawals on their platforms. Here

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to break it all down, our crypto contributor Shinnali. Boss,

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you scratch your back, I'll scratch mine, I guess. And

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some deals that come from a position of weakness

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and some from a position of strength and all that. Remember,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>as you said, some of the rivals to block By

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>had paused withdrawals, and now you have a block By

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>after also recently acknowledging that I had to liquidated a

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>large client taking some funds from f t X. Remember

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>when you look at why why this happened, you have

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>spf Sam Bankman freed saying that sometimes leadership means acting decisively,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's what block By did, removing troublesome counterparties before

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>they became a problem and adding cash before it was necessary.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember Sam Bankman Freeze Alimated Research also had extended credit

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to Voyage or Digital as well as a safeguard for

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>client assets. In light of this a very volatile crypto

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>market environment. And you know, you look at what people

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are saying about the whole thing. Is Sam bank been freed?

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Is f t X the white night here? Uh? You know,

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Scaramugi told Bloomberg it makes him the JP Morgan

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto industry and to talk about deals also

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that come from a position of strength. They also announced

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a deal to acquire an f T x c U S,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a deal to acquire m bed, a clearing firm as

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks to expand. Interesting. Okay, so now I stay

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with us. I want to talk now about how the

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>world of n f T s will evolve amidst this

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto winter. Our next guest Joshan Yin, who is the

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the n f T startup Magic Eden, which

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I know you mentioned earlier in the show and backed

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>by Lightspeed Venture Partners and Sequoia joining us. Now, so look, Josan,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the start of n f T n y C.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe last year was a big year for n

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>f T s, but we've seen the market quiet down.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the impact of the crypto winter been on the

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>n f T market and how do you see that

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>playing out? Yeah, since, first of all, thanks so much

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>for having me, I think, yeah, definitely that has been

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a broader downtown and macro impact recently, I think from

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>our point of view with Magic Eaton though it's been

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few months has been going from strength to strength.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Um So, we are one of the fastest growing marketplaces

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world. We are about market share on Salana

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we uh and May actually was the largest ever month

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for us, so it's been about a ten x growth

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>from the last time we raised. So I think from

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>our point of view, we still see pretty significant demand

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>from creators as well as end users to come and

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>interact with and discovery f T s. And you know,

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the way we think about it is it's a long

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>term time horizon here. We we sort of measure success

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>on a multi year cycle and you know, ups and

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>downs are part and parcel with crypto. So we're here

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for the long haul and super excited to be announcing

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>this today. How is Magic Eating different from other n

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>f T marketplaces like open Sea. Yeah, great question. This

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>comes up a lot actually, and the reason we started

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Magic Eating was it was very intentional. Um So for us,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like we consider ourselves a very very community centric and

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and deeply create a focused marketplace. Um what does that

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mean exactly? It means that this permeates everything that we do.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So for example, one of the earliest products that we

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>built was actually a launch pad, which is an end

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>to end create a create a tool, and create a

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>service that helps create as launch n f T Collections UM. Secondly,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we actually partner with Collections through the entire journey, so

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not just at launch, but through the end to end

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>experience where they may want to build a customer embedded marketplace,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we're also a partner for that. UM. And then on

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the community side, I really think that it's important to

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>consider marketplaces is more than just the point of sale,

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So we actually want to work with communities to to

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>actually be there around the entire discovery journey, whether it's

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, analytics, whether it's research, whether it's actually the

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>point of sale. We want to be there. So I

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think from our point of view, we're really excited to

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>continue building for the future UM and for us UM

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that means you know, continuing to expand the team, continuing

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to grow the line of docks, so we're super excited

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. So you made a very specific decision to

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be a Salona and f T market place, and I'm

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>really curious, you know, find faster speeds, lower transaction costs,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but also real outages. So what's the trade off here

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and what are some of the things that are going

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to need to be worked through to make this a

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>viable solution. Yeah, for sure. So it's obviously still very early,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the tradeoff here was going with Salana

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is that it's a it's a newer chain, right, so

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>they're still working through a lot of the growing pains,

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and as much as we have grown over the last

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>nine months, which has been pretty insane, they are experiencing

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>something similar. But we have obviously huge faith in what

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and the decision to launch there was very

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>intentional because the cost of experimentation is lower when the

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>when when transactions are cheaper, and for us, that means

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>more creatives, more end users who are willing to come

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and try n f T s for the first time,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, hopefully that means that will continue to

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>grow over the long term, and we want to be

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>here as a part of that. I'm wondering about n

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>f T pricing also here, because you've seen things self

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for extraordinary amounts in the last year, millions and millions

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, and some of those same assets are now

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>trading for a lot less. Uh, And so what is

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a normal price here? What where does the markets start

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize, what is the average price of an n

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>f T. It's really hard to say. I wish I

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>could answer that for you, but I think overall we

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we definitely see strong demand still for n f T

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>s um you know, effectively. I think about n f

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>T s in a really similar way in terms of

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the market cycle to where fungible tokens where four or

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. So it's okay to talk about prices

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>up down sideways. Ultimately, what matters is like, look at

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory of the growth. Fungible tokens became became a

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market, right and n f T s, I think,

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>are a much more applicable technology to many, many things

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>across the spectrum of culture. So regardless of where we

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>see the price end up, I think there's a lot

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to build. Josh and I have to ask you about

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates's remarks recently about the n f T market.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>He said it's entirely based on the greater full theory,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and then added odd obviously, expensive digital images of monkeys

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to improve the world immensely. With not a

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>small dose of sarcasm, what is Bill Gates getting wrong?

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bill, come and come and try out Magic Aid,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'd love to have you on the platform. No.

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the couple of things that I would call

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>out is that, yeah, we're very early in the general

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>n FT category and FT ecosystem. Um. Yeah, like profile pictures,

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they may not seem like something that's very

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting or very exciting to a lot of people, but

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that they got very popular, and they're fun,

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they're social. It's at the intersection of culture um, and

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they have permeated a lot of society. I think one

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we are really excited about is

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>enabling more forms of utility for these n f t s.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So part of this raise is actually going to go

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to what's building out a gaming vertical at Magic Eiden.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, gaming is an inherently social activity. It's

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>where communities already gather, and you can imagine the same

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the same types of behavior where people are buying I

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't and skins already that are not crypto related. People

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be doing those things with n f

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>t s. And the cool thing about that is that

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's actually true ownership that's happening here. So

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's early. I mean, we invite Bill to come on

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and check out Magic Eating, we we'd happily walk him

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>through all the all infrastructure. I wondering also if you

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>can speak a little to the overall fundraising environment here,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>because you're a rare company that was able to see

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a tenfold surge invaluation since March. Find you right, So

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>how hard is it out there to actually raise money?

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>What are investors looking for when they're putting their money

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to work. Yeah, I'd say it's it's absolutely tougher right

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>now than it was probably two three months ago, for sure.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I still think that if you are a really

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>high quality team with clarity of thought, clarity of vision,

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>strong execution, long term focused investors will still, you know,

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to do these deals, and I think Magic

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Eating is a testament to that, where, you know, despite

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a deteriorating market over the last couple of months, our

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers have been a strong as ever, and we actually

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of appetite and interest inbound from both

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>our existing investors in the previous round and new investors.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So there is appetite still to do deals. But I

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think the implication is you need to there's a longer

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dating period, shall we say, right, with a lot of

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>teams and investors, and I think that's actually probably healthy

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for the market. So obviously you're optimistic. Paint the picture

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>five years out. What does the n f T market

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>look like, how much is it worth? What problems is

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it solving? Yeah, I think the n of team market

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>will be a trillion dollar market. Going back to the

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>point earlier around sort of mimicking the growth of fungible tokens,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that n f T s will permeate many,

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>many different types of assets. And one of the things

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that we really pumped about is, let's explore the universe

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of gaming n f T s. Let's explore the universe

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of music n f T S. I really don't think

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that it all stops with profile pictures and um, this

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very inherently social experience. It's it permeates a

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things around culture, and you know, hopefully

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this is just the beginning and it spurs a lot

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of other amazing innovation in the n f T space.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>So we're just stick to be a part of it,

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we can push the ecosystem forward with a

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of other builders out there Josh and CEO of

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Magic Eating and our very own Shinelli Bossa thank you both.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Coming up the future of work and how to power it.

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Will speak about all that and more with Coral CEO

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Christo Quarrels, who's also got a view on the market

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and lived through her share of downturns. She joins us. Next,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. In this week's Teconomics, we bring you

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the story of Coral, a developer of business productivity, graphics

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and operating system solutions that wants to drive the future

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of work and compete against the likes of vm Ware

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and Citrics. Coral CEO Crystal Corals joins me now to

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about this vision and more so, how do you

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>intend to compete with Citrics, vm Ware, which are to

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be fair giants in the tech space. They definitely are giants.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at our largest product, it's Parallels, which,

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>as many people know, enables you to do such things

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>as running Windows on a Mac. But it's more than that.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So we have the desktop solution that millions of people

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoy and love and enable them to do a better job.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But we also have a server cloud and we just

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bought a company this week that enables us to be

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>anywhere so you don't have to download anything. But really

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>about a zero trust security way of streaming applications. And

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so we think about the virtualization space. There are the

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>big giants like Citrics, m VM where who are really

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>serving clients that have five thousand and up consumers. We're

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>here to make it easy for every company, every worker,

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and every company to work from wherever they want, be

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at the coffee shop, the sofa, the office in a

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>really secure and easy way. You've been around the block,

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Christa at you were the CEO of Open Table. You've

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been through some ups and downs when it comes to

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the markets. How do you see the shift to remote

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>work playing out? Is this here for good? Are some

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>companies going to regret telling their employees they could work

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>from home forever? I think the genieu is clearly out

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the bottle. If you look at pre pandemic work,

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of that came from what it

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was like to come into a factory. It didn't imagine

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a world where zoom and collaboration tools and software really

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>enabled people's daily lives. And we believe that when you

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>work better, you live better, and people don't going to

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>give that up. We've seen that in how people are

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to accept a salary decrease for not having to

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>come into the office. And I think the companies that

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 1>remain abject about their desire to get people in they

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to suffer as it relates to where talent

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to go. That's not to say we don't gather.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say that we don't get people together.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>But I believe that your personal productivity pod should be

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>where you ever you wanted to be, and you should

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to connect securely and hopefully use some of

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>our products while you do so. So Ellen us calling

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>workers back in the office, do you think he's going

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>to be on the wrong side of history. I mean,

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>could this hurt companies that are forcing employees to come

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the office. I think it's all about understanding,

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>also what your business is. We have the benefit of

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>being what I like to say, we're in the bits

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>business and not the Adams business, meaning we ship software.

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a physical product. Obviously, they're delivering a

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>large and complex physical product with a supply chain to boot.

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are times in which he's he

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to demonstrate from a cultural standpoint, how those people

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>need to come in. I think if you're building software,

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>which is our case, we can be more flexible and

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we can lean in and give the knowledge worker not

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just flexibility but freedom, which is ultimately what they're seeking.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You live through the dot com bust, and I'm curious

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>how you think this compares. Do you think a recession

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is inevitable? And if so, is it a big R

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or a little R? Yeah, this is my second down turn,

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it's always interesting to see people who have

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just been operating for the last thirteen years and think

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fully representative. It does feel to me more like

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bust, how albeit with much higher interest rates.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>And so I do think is a big art recession.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Anytime inflation is north of five percent, you're going to

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty significant challenge out there in the market.

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a question of how quickly you do

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>companies respond. I was at an event the other day

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and somebody said, uh, economics are the new black, and

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was amusing, because you know, I come

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from the private equity landscape, as we're backed by Ker

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and the unit economics have always been a mainstay of

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our business, and it will need to be so going

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>forward for many other companies. So how do you think

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>this is going to impact the broader landscape of of

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these tech unicorns that have raised money at

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>high valuations on top of these huge public tech companies

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that have been enjoying very nice multiples, and you know,

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>will they recover well? I think if you need to

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>raise capital, that capital got significantly more expensive, you know

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the flat round is the new upround.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think the reality is, you know, how are

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>managers employees going to respond in this environment? So when

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is up, oil is up, and interest rates

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are up, it means equity has to be down. And

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when equity is down, the primary driver of uh tech

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>first workers who work for the equity. They get cranky

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's getting more challenging and by the way, they

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>might be losing a job. And so the whole ecosystem

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is being thrust into this world where the cost of

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>capital is such that you cannot grow at any price.

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got to grow at a thoughtful, unit economic driven price.

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So how is this all going to impact the war

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>for talent? On the one hand, you've had the great

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 1>resignation and workers who are deciding, you know what, I

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to do this anymore, and I have

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these options. Now you see the market contracting

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>people don't necessarily have that kind of optionality. There are

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and hiring freezes happening across the tech industry. How

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>do those two balance each other out? I think you

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>have to look at which labor market you're in, So

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be very concerned if you are in a

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>market like San Francisco or New York where you're cost

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of your labor generally is higher than cost of other

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>labor out there in the marketplace. I think what it's

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>done is created a level playing field for twent across

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not just the United States, but across the globe. And

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we clearly employ UH developer teams outside of

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the United States. We think it's a critical advantage for

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>US as an organization. But I think it is a

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>great leveling of talent too. It used to be that

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you had to be at a certain location to manage

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and benefit from the ecosystem, and now I think that's

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>gone as our tools and our collaboration software enables people

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to truly be effective from any place. So it's a

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>great level of her talent. Okay, So if it's a

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>great level of her talent, who wins and who loses?

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 1>If you're a San Francisco engineer, it could be probably um.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But great talent is always always in need. And I

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>think what you see in some of these companies who

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>have raised exceptionally large rounds, they couldn't even hire their

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, according to their hiring plan. Um. But you're

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>also going to see those hiring plans get dramatically scaled back.

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, I talk about management by haiku.

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>If you had no bounds, you could do anything, but

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you might not be as creative as you otherwise would

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have been. So how do you manage within seventeen syllables

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and actually still build a great product? And I think

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>that's where a lot of people look at the incredible

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>companies that get born out of our session because they

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had to be mindful and choosy about where they spent

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>their money. Management by haiku, that is a new one

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. I will remember Corals, Christopher Corals, thank you

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as always to have you back here on the show.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't for the edition of Bloomberg Technology We're

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be back tomorrow with a number of great guests.

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Slack CEO and co founder Stewart Butterfield will be with

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>us along with Shopify president probably finglestoned to talk about

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>new features the company is launching. We don't forget to

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 1>check out our new podcast as well. Wherever you get

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, This is Bloomberg.