WEBVTT - Spillover Week 8 Thoughts + Teams To Take Seriously

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for a day? Edo Steak

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is that woo whoom? And Dan and tie me Tuesday,

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Anna Rubinstein, my good friend out there in the heart

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Midwest, Chicago, Illinois. Dan Rubinstein, Sir, welcome back

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to the show, my friend. How are you.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, Tye, I'm good. I have I have spillover thoughts,

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I have verbala answers, I have whatever you need from

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm here for you, Tie, I'm here for the listeners.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot to get to. We aim to

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>serve here on the solid verbal. If you're new here

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to our little college football pirate Chip, I am ty

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>he is Dan Hit follow Hit subscribes that you don't

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>miss any of our episodes.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 3>We do the.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Recap episodes Saturday night at midnight. We do the preview

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes bright and early on Thursday morning. But wedd right

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the middle is this here spillover episode. It's all

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the stuff from the past week that we've been ruminating

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over thinking about, didn't have a chance to give voice

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to what we did these Saturday at midnight livestream in

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>recap of the week eight action. Yes, we are now

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>approaching week nine. We can deal with that in our

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>own time a little bit later on this week, but

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>great to have you with us. We've got a new

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Verballer Top twelve poll that we're going to unveil here momentarily.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got some news in the coaching world starting to

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>trickle in. Took a little bit longer maybe than we thought,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but starting to occur. We do have those leftover thoughts

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>from week eight, and we're going to take a glimpse

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead at some of the big games this coming weekend

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as look at the weekday games and play

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a little game of well, I won't spoil the surprise

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at way? Oh okay, Averballer suggestion from our ardent supporters

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>out at verbowlers dot com Dan loaded Hut can't wait.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we start with our new verboler Top twelve pole,

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>though we've kind of grown accustomed to starting here. Whenever

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we do these Tuesday spillover episodes, it is voted on

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>by our paying subscribers out at a verbolers dot com.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested, that's one way you can support the show,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>get bonus episodes, add free content. You know the deal

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at number twelve, it's BYU at number eleven, It's Indiana

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at number ten, It's Tennessee. Number nine, is Clemson number eight,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>LSU number seven, Iowa state moving up, just creeping on up,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>number six, Miami, number five, Texas, Yes, they drop down

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to five, number four, Penn State number three, Ohio, state

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>number two, Georgia, and number one your Oregon Ducks, Dan thoughts, reactions,

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>deep inner feelings.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Who else received votes? Do you have that in front

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of you as well like you have thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 2>am I putting you on the spot.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>With thirteen would be notre dame? Okay, fourteen would be

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a and m okay. Fifteen is Alabama? Uh huh? And

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen is the Army Black Knights ooh okay.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>So, as a Notre dame human, do you feel like

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>they should have received more Top twelve consideration or you

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 2>find because they are ranked higher than the eighty people?

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Right they are? They are? And no, The answer is no.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, ok I think putting BYU in Indiana in

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>front of them at this point is totally justifiable. I look,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I have been a Notre Dame skeptic for a while now.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Really ever since that n You game, I've You've been

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a Notre Dame skeptics since nineteen ninety three thirty three.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I have struggled a little bit with where to put

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this team on that totem pole, and so it doesn't

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bother me to see them outside of our group's top twelve.

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there are varying opinions on that, but by

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and large it's the back half of the top ten

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if they're in at all. Right now, I do think

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>if push comes to shove, if they keep winning out,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks probable that they will continue winning out. Notre

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Dame will find a way into a playoff. There's almost

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. But certainly Army on the schedule

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in a few weeks, Navy on the schedule this week,

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>which will preview on the Thursday episode. If you've got

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>games against Florida State, they still got that game against

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>USC as well to close out the year, So Notre

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Dame will have opportunities here, I think, to showcase what

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they can do on national television. YEP, But for the

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>time being, this seems about right. To me, Iowa State

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at seven is the only team I really react to.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know that I'm pretty high on Iowa State.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I've been for a while. Seven feels high to me.

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Seven fields high to me. Based on what we saw,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>be inclined to put LSU above Iowa State just based

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on recent results and the poll if we look at

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the points, seems to dictate, dictate. Excuse me that there's

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a drop off after Miami. After Miami

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>at six, that's when there's a lot of sameness, let's say,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for the next five or six spots, and my sense

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>that that's where our voting public really struggled to place

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>teams in order.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Interestingly, when I look at the back half of

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>this top twenty five, I see a lot of danger,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Like I see a lot of potential for dramatic jump ups.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Whereas you're right, I mean, I don't think I would

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>consider myself an Iowa State skeptic. But the way that

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the defense performed, or rather didn't perform against UCF just

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 2>has me has me has.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>My eye a skance. I don't know if that's the

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>right way to say. No, Well, I it just gave

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>up so many big plays, you know, the big place.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>And look they won their clunker, right, That's what winning

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>teams do. That's what good teams do. They have down weeks,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 2>but they still win in their down weeks. But when

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I look at the back half, I look at the

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>ceiling of ole Miss, I know, not a great loss

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to Kentucky. I grant you the ceiling of ole Miss.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>The ceiling of Poise State has now one of the

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>best laws in America. They've exclusively lost to the number

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 2>one team in America, America's Oregon Ducks.

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're Orgon docks. Yeah, America's Surgon Ducks. If you see.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Kansas State is looking stronger by the week. And

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>we'll get into this a little bit more with spillover thoughts.

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>My god, did their offense look clean? I don't know

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 2>if the Kansas State equipment managers need to do laundry. Yeah,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>after how little West Virginia was able to get to them,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and they appear to be especially Avery Johnson like he is,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it's no surprise the quarterback is the identity right now.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>He is a grower. He is an absolute grower. May

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>not have been a shower in September, but is growing

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 2>into his role quite impressively. So I look at those

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>two teams, Kansas State, Ole Miss, which.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I should add if you want, I mean,

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really read these off. But if we want

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to go through the full top twenty five, I know

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>ball Side please do. Boise State at seventeen, followed by

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Pitt Navy, Illinois, Kansas State, SMU, Old Miss Vanderbilt in

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the Zoo. That will be your full top twenty five.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>SMU another team that has vault potential. I have some

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>leftover thoughts on SMU. I do.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I imagine you do, because I have some leftover potential here.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>But there are leftover thoughts on their potential SMU, just

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 2>with the rest of their schedule, with how the defense is.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Peaking right now.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>It was Stanford this past weekend, So I don't know

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>how much spillover you have about SMU Stanford specifically, but

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of danger in this back half, and

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, like with what Texas's schedule, I don't

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>have Texas schedule in front of me. Another at Vandy

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>this week. Oregon schedule has opened up a little bit,

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 2>like I don't know Miami, you're sure is going to

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>take a hit here or there. Indiana is now and

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>this is another spill over without Curtis Rourke for an

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>indeterminate amount of time. Right, it's a Taven Jackson Indiana

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>program right now. Just there's a lot of interesting wiggle

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>room in this back half.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, right in soliverbogmail dot com or we're

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have this posted out on our social media accounts.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Chime in out there if you haven't had a chance

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to do so already on overbowlers dot com, comment thread

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>or discord server, any of that stuff. We'd love to

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hear your thoughts on who's too high, who's too low?

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And again, if you go on out tiverbowlers dot com,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you can sign up and vote in the poll next week.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Every now and again, maybe next week I'll give out

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a few invites to vote. I've done that on occasion.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That was a lot of fun. How do you feel

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about Penn State at four? It's fine, it's fine, slow

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>down with the enthusiast, Well, it's okay. In our poll,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Georgia's above Penn State, and I think that's right. That

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>feels about right to me. I'm glad that they're getting

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the nod over. I'm not glad, but I think it's

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>right that they would get the nod over. I think

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>their performance on the road has earned them something. Yeah. Yeah,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out what Penn State's all about in two

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks when Ohio State comes to town. But for the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>time being, anyway, I think it's I don't know. I

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem with this. I don't have a problem

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>with Texas at five. I think this kind of act

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>up in a pretty good way.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Texas is better, but Penn State hasn't lost

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 2>and so and that's the time with them before does

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>winning is better than losing no matter who you're playing.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Penn State has won. Below Texas is where I start

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to see, like, as much as Clemson has grown, I

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>want to see it against somebody interesting. But I think

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Clemson being the top ten is totally good. Tennessee winning

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>as a skill. They won. That was a nice win.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I just think there's so much volatility potential here between

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 2>six and sixteen.

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're not ready to let this go. I was

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>ready to move on. You're ready, I know, my business man.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm hyped tie, I'm into it. You're not even a

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>pole guy and you're into this poll.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm into it because when I see it organized

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in front of me, and I look at AP poles

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>and coaches poles and everything. But when I see top

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to bottom what the top twenty five is looking right now,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I get a little tingle.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>It's great. Let's get to some news, shall we. Okay,

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we do have some breaking news. Seth Latrelle out as

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator at Oklahoma. Brent Vnables made that announcement. They

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are turning the reins over to Joe John Finley along

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Johns, who was formerly an analyst, formerly an

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator for Duke, but Kevin Johns was with Oklahoma

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in an analyst role. They're going to be kind of

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>tag team in this. It looks like Joe John Finley

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be sort of the main guy. We've

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>got Andy Ludwig resigning as offensive coordinator at Utah kind

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of came out of nowhere. And we've got Mike Houston,

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the first head coach fired this season, fired by ECU.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ECU lost a week ago, and it turns out that

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was the final straw ECU came into the season, notably

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with one of the better defenses in conference, but offense

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is always going to be a bit of a struggle bus,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and as such, they decide that they are going to

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>cut the cord. SEU, the first on the board, will

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>confer coach an in reaction to these coaching maneuvers.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you look at what Seth Latrell the

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>hand he was dealt a little bit this year, and

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>same with Andy Ludwig with quarterback injury, you say to yourself,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>on one hand, behind your back, what are you supposed

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to do with the receivers that are hurt for Oklahoma?

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>With Jackson Arrold not working out? That said, as the

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator, you're supposed to help Jackson.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Arrald to work out. Yeah, exactly.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 2>And I know they had losses on the offensive line

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>as well, and it's a tough schedule and there's a

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>number of checkboxes there. But also you got to make

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 2>chicken salad, and Oklahoma's ability to make chicken salads seem

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to get worse every week. And so obviously we're not

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>privy to exactly what's happening behind the scenes, and or

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>heads budding if you know, the communication was broken down whatever,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 2>But bigger picture, Brent Vnables has now fired a defensive

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>coordinator and offensive coordinator in the lasts something like that.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he had to do something though, I mean,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the offense has been an unmitigated disaster.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.599
<v Speaker 2>You risk total mutiny. Oh, I'm not saying it's the

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>wrong move. I'm saying Brent Venables's ability to go after diagnose,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>connect with potential coordinator candidates. If it's not, we're if

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about both sides of the ball in ten months,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>where's the confidence that Brent Vnnibles is working out long term?

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he has just has a small

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>network because he was at Clemson for so long, or

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>it was just unwilling to take a shot on somebody

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>he didn't know or hadn't spent time with. Like, I

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the thinking was behind those two hires.

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Those were very much people he was familiar with, instead

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of like, what is the best thing to do in

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 2>college football in twenty twenty four? In the SEC it

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>wasn't Seth Latrell, it wasn't Ted Roof. So I'm calling

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>into like the program vision right now of Brent Venables.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I was going to bring up the ted

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>roof thing. I mean, it's become a popular punchline on

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this show. I talk about the leaky roof often. But

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a guy that he sort of knew, right,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And we have seen other recent instances of hiring the

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that you know, not really working out. Marcus Freeman

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>did that with Jared Parker, right. We see how well

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's working out at Troy at present, So you know,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they had to do something. This offense was not in

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a good place. It is not solely because of the quarterback,

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but the quarterback is going to be the most prominent

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>reason why that people I think cite and that will

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they won't they start Jackson Arnold? Will they go to

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Hawkins Junior. You know, we've kind of gone a

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>few cycles through this now, and I suspect if you're

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>an Oklahoma fan, there's reason for frustration. This was a

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>move that needed to be done just so not to

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>forget about the locker room so you don't lose the

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>fan base. Fan base was extremely frustrated. What do you

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think of this? Andy Ludwig resignation? At you tak Utah?

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think I looked this up Utah had like

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the one hundred and twelve points per drive offense has

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 2>the most, has the one hundred and twelve points for

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 2>drive offense thus far this year and Oklahomas at about

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and eleventh.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They're right there, neck and neck.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if this was a conversation to

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>say face, I don't know what the agreement was behind

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the scenes. I mean, always get fired instead of resigning

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>just for money reasons. I guess severance, right, what that

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>take that money? Yeah, I don't know if some sort

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>of agreement was in place that he would get his severance,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>but you know, has the dignity to be the one

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>stepping down because he felt like he wasn't able to

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>get the most out of his players and that he

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>should take the responsibility. Maybe behind the scenes there was something.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But I've got some thoughts on Utah. By the way,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>when we get to leftovers, I have well, by the way,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly a secret theory, but I have a

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>theory on this decision. I have.

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I have a theory myself, and I think Utah just

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>lost their their by far, their best recruiting, their biggest commitment.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Dunn offensive lineman. They may have all a couple

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 2>of pretty decent sized ones, and now Andy Ludwig decides

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to resign.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, don't say it. Don't say Let's save it for

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the next segment. Okay, we're both going to the same

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>place with this. Wait, i'd not have to finish a

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sentence no, No, you're not, because I know where you're

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going with it, and I don't need to steal my thunder. Okay,

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>oh ty, I was gonna make a point before you could.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Everybody listening knows where we're going with this. Okay, mm hmm.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, speaking of behind the scenes, I have

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a very small dog here that I'm trying to keep

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>entertained while we are doing this episode. So far, so good.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>She's chewing on a box. But I'll keep you posting.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>They're both lady dogs. There are lady dogs.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, that's all okay, And news wise, they Mike

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Houston also lost Mike Houstonie. He also lost to Charlotte

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 2>a couple weeks ago, correct, which was probably like very

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>close to the last straw. Let's see how you do

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>against Navy. Yeah, the Tavian Jackson news is a bummer.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Just in terms of news, I mean not Tavin Jackson,

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 2>but that the injury Indiana is about Curtis Rourck. I

0:15:55.320 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 2>hope Taven Jackson succeeds. I praise that completely inappropriately. David

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Jackson came in to look pretty good against Nebraska in

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the second half.

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We were calling him Raven Tavin last year. Yeah, for

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment like two weeks and there was a stretch.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Any other news to you right now? That is newsworthy.

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into my spill over thoughts place,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>place place I have. I have some good ones from

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this past week. So we mentioned smu Dan smu Hammered

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Hammered Stanford forty to ten. The sp plus our trusted

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>metric is projecting them to win their next five games

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:41.119
<v Speaker 1>over Duke Pitt, Boston College, UVA, and Cal understandably. So

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>something that I trained in on when I was going

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>through and trying to build one of my spreadsheet specials

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was this switch at quarterback to Kevin Jennings. Caught a

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of us by surprise because Preston Stone was pretty

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>good last year and in the early part of the season.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they had that eighteen to fifteen loss against Boy

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You that raised some myebrows. This is before we knew

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>what BYU was going to become a that lost his

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>age pretty well, to be honest, Yeah, but notably on

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Kevin Jennings front. Right now, PFF has him ranked

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>as the tenth best passer in the Power for And

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there are two really interesting trends in his game that

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I noticed and that I want people to watch out

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for moving forward. So it's it's a little bit of

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a spillover thought from the weekend and from the Stanford game,

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think broadly speaking, it's just it's a trend

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch as SMU rounds the bend and gets into

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these games. Here the rest of the way,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>his completion percentage when you blitz him is seventy nine percent. Wow, Okay,

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it is higher when you blitz him than when you don't.

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>When you don't blitz him, his completion percentage is sixty percent.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>When you do, it's seventy nine. Loves his hot routes. Yeah,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>when you do get the pressure on him, the completion

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage comes way down, like fifty percent. And so I

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>think the long and short of it with SMU is

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>who can get the pressure without blitzing. And if you're

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at this in terms of the teams that remain

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on that schedule, if you know a little bit about

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>defensive lines, you know a little bit about how some

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of these teams play, it's not that difficult to calculation

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who can and can't do that. Guy's

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a mobile quarterback. Most of his rushing guards come on scrambles,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not designed runs. The game plan has to be getting

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the pressure without blitzing, keeping him in the pocket, keeping

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>him in a spot where you're not bringing his legs

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>into the equation. So I don't know if you're playing

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>contains with your ends or what you're doing, but something

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of keep him bottled up, prevent him from

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking outside the pocket, and then all of a sudden

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you got your receivers doing scramble drills. I think that's

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>where SMU right now is finding a lot of success.

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Duke Pitt, Boston College, UVA and Cal

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe Cal maybe Pitt, maybe Duke, Like we could debate

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the merits of who can and can't do that, but

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the game plan, at least defensively

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing against a team like an I enjoy that.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>How many weeks into the season are we were pre

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>week nine?

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, your hot tip for the rest of SMU's schedule

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>is have a killer defensive line who can get pressure

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>without help. That's the big the big time tie strategy.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's okay, it's not a big time strategy. It's like,

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>here's here's my strategy.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Have a Heisman caliber quarterback and two bullet and a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>coff Receaver's a case in point.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Pressure without blitzing gas. Of course, here's a case in point.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Why bring this up? It wasn't all that long ago.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>On one of these Tuesday shows, I talked about the

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>value of Louisville. This is early season. Yeah, early season

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Louisville being able to get pressure without blitzing. And I

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>talked specifically about the game against Miami and how if

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they could do that against a guy like a cam

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Ward that would give them more success. Now, they didn't

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really have that success, especially in the first half. They

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything to get any pressure on him. In

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the first half, they didn't even try to blitz and

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as such, cam Ward's sort of went wild. Second half,

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they started dialing up pressure. That's when the game got

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of wild. So this is of course not any

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>foreign schematic advantage or anything, but I'm just saying this

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is what the numbers are showing. With Kevin Jennings.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>You can do more interesting things with four than just

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>right send them straight at a quarterback, like you can

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>do your stunts and twists and drop into zone blitzes

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, and you know, simulated pressure. There's all sorts

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of things you can do. But yeah, easier said than done.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Because look, the connection between Kevin Jennings and I think

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 2>it's r J. Maryland tight end has been thriving for

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Burschard Smith on the ground like they're able

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to adapt pretty quickly. The receivers seem sharp obviously, you know,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Rehet Lashley is a sharp offensive mind. And by the way,

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>just in terms of top assistance this year and Broils

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Award whatever Scott's is it Simmons or Simons, and he's

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>been a Rhet Lashley guy for some time. He was

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 2>at Liberty before. But that defense has done a remarkable

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>job this year.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It has all right, my next item, Yeah, we didn't

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>talk enough about Virginia Tech this past week because they

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>played earlier in the week. They beat Boston College soundly

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>forty two to twenty one mentioned them as a lurker

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on our Saturday I mention it. We did mention them

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as a lurker. Everyone present, company included was high on

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this team at the start of the season, and then

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it cooled. Why did it cool because they lost to Vandy. Yeah,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>losing a Vandy historically kind of a black eye. Not

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>as much the case this year.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 2>AP top twenty five program, vanderbil anchor down.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. They have also since lost to Rutgers

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in Miami, the Miami game. We know about the Miami game.

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They could have won that one. All three losses have

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been by one score. Again, there are some in there

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that maybe could have gone a different way. First Off,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that Vandy loss, in hindsight is not bad at all.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Even the Rutgers loss was not terrible. But to your

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point crazy well, but ye, to your point, I know

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to buy in on Virginia Tech, and I

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>needed to go and look at the numbers to see

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 1>if I was there too. Okay, there has been a

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>trend emerging over the last three games. In each of

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their last three games, they have outperformed their projections. By

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen points. That includes the Miami game back in

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Week five, That includes every game since. What we have

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>yet to see is both the offense and the defense

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>both overperforming in the same game. But it seems like

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>when you've got a team that very clearly is building

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>some momentum, Dan, the writing is on the wall. Yeah,

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you don't want to peek in early September.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the writing is on the wall. I think

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to start happening soon. I'm back. I am

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>back in on the tech train. Is there room on

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the tech train for me? Yeah?

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, there's room on what the Brent Priy

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>massive hog, caboose whatever, that's what it's called. That's such

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 2>like a specific reference that we at one point did

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a show in which we reacted to messageboard geniuses and

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 2>somebody said, you can just tell Brent Priby as a

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 2>massive hog. That's the way he carries himself, right, And

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>we had to react to that. There are always gonna

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 2>be there are these teams in every conference, and we

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>can go through them. When we went through a little

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 2>bit with the Lurkers or the Growers or whatever, that

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Virginia attack, You're right, if they can put it all together.

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it was the second quarter against Miami, yep,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 2>if they could be a little bit less streaky and

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit more decent all the time. I

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know who's on the back half of their schedule,

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>but I suspect it's workable given your enthusiastic.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Consistency is key. Consistency is key. All right, let's talk

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about that Utah theory. Now. Okay, so Utah lost thirteen

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to seven. It was the late night game on Saturday

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't get a chance to discuss. First off,

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a big win for TCU, gets them to

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>four and three. It looks like they should be slightly

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>favored and like four their next five maybe have a

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>shot at eight, four, nine and three. That seemed impossible

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to me personally when we did our preseason stuff because

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just in on the under seven and a

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>half of this team. I was convinced. But right now,

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna act like this is some sort of juggernaut.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But four and three, the schedule in front of them

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is workable after going three and three the first six

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season. Right now, TCU, if you're a

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>TCU fan, I think you gotta like the direction that

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>they're headed and this is a big win. Yeah, I

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think so. I mean there are still

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>real questions, don't get me wrong, but you know, beating

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Utah that was not really one that we had planned

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>for before the season. So I think I think you

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like you got one here that you can use

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know, propel you into a bowl.

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>If you think the story there is TCU's defense has

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 2>finally woken up and they performed super well against a

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 2>good Utah offense. Sure, I think the story here is

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Utah's collapse. Utah's collapse. So this profile as a game

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that Utah should have run wild in literally run wild, Yes,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 2>and instead they finished with sixty eight yards on the ground.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Utahs now four and three. There's a good chance they're

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a dog in four of their next five. At this point,

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there is zero shot of them hitting their over nine

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half, which I think we were both in on. Yeah.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll make a bold dan. That's not a

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>given though, And I think this is building to Kyle

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Whittingham's last year. I think so too, because he named

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Scalley as the head coach in waiting. That was

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>something of a story before the season kicked off. It

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just feels like the momentum is there for a coaching change,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>that after all of these preseason expectations, the letdown of

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cam Riisen getting hurt again, it feels like Utah may

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be ready to turn the page of sorts. Kyle winnie

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Hand's been a great coach at Utah, don't get me wrong,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like now would be the time to

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of get a fresh start with somebody else in charge,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>even though he's been there forever. I am I wrong

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with that? Is that where you were going with it too?

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly where I was going with it that. It

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>just seems that, like, I don't know if it's Morgan Scalley,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm fully speculating irresponsibly, but with how recruiting has gone recently,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 2>with the on field stuff with Andy Ludwig, you know,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>stepping down, it just has the the air of like, yeah,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Scalley is gonna be taking on more responsibilities now,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and like this show might, this particular segment might be

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 2>out of date by the time this show is even released,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Like the vibes are pointing in that specific direction.

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's.

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the vibe I get from how things are going

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes. That utah right now, my.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Only other spill overthought and then I'll kick it over

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to you in I want to circle back to LSU

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Oh yeah, rewatched that this morning. Yeah,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we kind of panned LSU's overtime win against

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Ole Miss two weeks ago, I think because so much

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:16.239
<v Speaker 1>else happened that week and got an email about that.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Wanted to make sure that I gave LSU it's due.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is a spot in which we looked. We

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>saw LSU's on the road at Arkansas in a game

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that's historically kind of weird, and it's a week before

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they were squaring off against Texas A and M and

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Field. Yes, it's kind of getting to the point

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where you shouldn't just pan this LSU defense. When you

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>say pan, what do you mean, hand wave it? You

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>know what happened last year? You know what happened last year?

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>They stunk. They were historically bad. Yes, and there have

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>been moments this season, for sure where we've seen that

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>version of it, but I have seen real strides. For one,

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the tackling is way better, way better tackle success rate

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a measure of this last year hovering around fiftieth in

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Right now, it's fourth best in the nation,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>right and that's without Harold Perkins. To without Harry Perky. Yeah,

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they're creating those havoc plays again. Last year finished in

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the sixty to seventy range nationally. So we're talking tackles

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for loss, pass breakups, interceptions, fumble recovery, things like that.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So far tenth this season again doing it without Harold Perkins.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So whatever they are doing, whatever they played, whatever, they

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>paid Blake Baker to come in there and try a

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, paid him a lot of potatoes to

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>come over and try to fix this thing. It may

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have taken a little bit initially, but LSU defensively is

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>looking much much better. And this is another team that

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we had in that lurker category last episode. Tough One

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this weekend at A and M. But let's look at

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>their November there's a good chance going four to oh

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>against Bama, it could beat Bama, Florida, Vanderbilt, and Oklahoma.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are four games in November with the trajectory of

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>LSU right now, and you look at where those other

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>teams are at I'm not saying it's easy. Nothing in

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is, but in light of losing two coordinators

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jaydon Daniels and dealing with the whole defense thing,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if they go eleven and one here, if they go

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>ten and two, that's like, that's a coup. That is

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a coup in my book, if they're able to put

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of season given some of the questions

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they had coming into it.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a couple thoughts. One, LSU lost Week one to

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>USC in a crazy tight game.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Week one.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>As I've said all season long, I'm always willing to

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 2>extend grace for Week one results. That was a wild game.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Ls was not fully formed. They've gotten better over the

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 2>course of the season.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Two.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Nussmeier, I would imagine there is a certain quality

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>of LSU fans that, as much as they've enjoyed this

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>season thus far, that dude throws off his back foot

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>a ton, that dude feels pressure and says, all right, scool,

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>let's see what's going to happen, and.

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Say let's just throw it up. Let's and you know what,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>when you've got receivers that are good, a lot of

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>times get away with it. I agree, it works better

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>when you've got Kyrien Lacy than it does this you've got,

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, most of the other receivers in college football.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>But I take your point and it's not invalid.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 2>He's not always a feel the pressure on the edge,

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>step into the pocket and throw it over the middle

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and be decisive about his footwork and his progressions college.

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 2>That's okay, that's okay. He'll get there hopefully, but just

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what he does when he feels things

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>breaking down there, there are some risky decisions that he

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>is still prone to making, and that's okay. And the

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>emergence of Caden Durham hopefully will help keep sort of

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>defenses on their heels kind of thing, because I thought

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>he was very good against Arkansas. I don't know if

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>he went for one hundred yards but burned out some

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 2>tough yards. The other thing was I still worry a

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit about LSU because you're right about the defense.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 2>The defense has improve. They're getting a ton of pressure.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Brayden Swinson like, I'm not crazy about their linebackers right now,

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 2>but if you're generating pressure, you know, it's a way

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to cover up for some defensive deficiencies. There is something

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 2>about the drive finishing in this moment. I don't know

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's a play calling thing. I don't know if

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>it's an execution thing.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They had.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 2>If memories are two touchdown drives against Arkansas, they kicked

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of field goals. They had, like the three

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>yard short field touchdown after an incredible interception. I'm not

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 2>saying only having two touchdown drives is bad. If you

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>can generate points elsewhere, it's a plus on LSU overall.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a question on LSU's offense in this moment that

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to start saying, here's who they have left,

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 2>this is their record right now, we'll see what happens.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty workable. There is something about LSU. Now, if

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the big things seem to be operating, let's look the

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>little things and a little the casual nature of Garrett

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>and Usmyer under pressure and their ability to finish drives

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 2>right now. Look, they did it at Arkansas, they uncomfortably.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>They checked every box for me as a quality team.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, if you're gonna nitpick, that's where I

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>might look the little things. Not finishing out drives and

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>emphatically sending messages. But they'll get there. It's a new team.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a new team. What else do you got from weekate?

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I watched the Colorado Arizona game in its entirety.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I watched a lot of Big twelve that I didn't

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>fully watch on Saturday. Colorado's defense is pretty interesting to me.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Sam Oakinlola bj Green like they're getting after the quarterback

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>in impressive ways and they're still dealing with a beat

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>up Travis Hunter, who only played part of the game

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona.

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I like their corners more than I thought I would

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona because that's a measuring stick game in terms

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 2>of a passing attack. How can they handle Noah Fafida

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and t mac and some of the guys there. I

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>thought they handled themselves really nicely on defense. The defense

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>looks ahead of the offense to me, and I like

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that they leaned on the run a little bit when

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 2>they had that lead. Dalan Hayden had a couple nice runs.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm still not a huge fan of this offensive line.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of Shador as a playmaker, one of

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 2>his pay he had two picks, one of them was late.

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 5>In the game.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>It was a tipped ball and it was bad low

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>throw from him, but it wasn't a consequential interception.

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Colorado's pretty good and you've come around. Man,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You've come around on him. I've come around.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not going to say like I was super

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>low on Colorado, and I'm going to stick with that

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>feeling as they as I watched their games all season long,

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I was a low.

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't high.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>It was just sort of neutral and not super bought

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in on them dramatically improving. But this Big Twelve, and

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>again this is not a knock on Colorado's performance this year.

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of drek. There's a lot of garbage

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 2>in this Big Twelve this year, maybe not as a

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>full team, but a garbage offense, garbage defense, a garbage quarterback,

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 2>and Colorado is doing what a pretty good team should do,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 2>which is take advantage. Arizona is a mess. By the way,

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Arizona is a mess. They're beat up on defense. Offensively,

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>No Fafita is constantly running and trying too hard to

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 2>make plays that are ending in poor decisions.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, you.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Brought up the buyout stuff. I'm not willing to pour

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>dirt on the Brent Brennan era. I didn't like his

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 2>HighRes before in Duyna Quina and Dino Babers as coordinators,

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 2>and they've already made a change in terms of play

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 2>calling on offense at least a couple times. He better

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 2>be recruiting. I have not looked on Arizona's recruiting, but

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this was the year for Arizona. There were opportunities on

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 2>this schedule, and Arizona.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Is a mess.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 2>They are thin pretty much everywhere in terms of quality depth,

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And it is you mentioned to me, like, who are

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you ready to just give up on Arizona's making it

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty easy right now?

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>One final point on the Colorado stuff, then I want

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the remainder of your thoughts here. We do

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>still have our verball or segment and some other stuff

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>here to get through. Colorado improved both offensively and defensively

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and dramatically, so not as dramatically on offense because they

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty good offense all things considered. Last year.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It was mostly built around the pass and shadoor. But

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the sp plus, which is not gospel

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.439
<v Speaker 1>but something that I like to use forty eighth last

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>year at the end of the year. Offensively, now up

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to twenty ninth, so a top thirty offense is pretty good.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And defensively, this is where we've really seen the Strides.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>The final year of Carl Durrell. They were one hundred

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eighth nationally last year. They only moved up

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen spots to one hundred and thirteenth this year, all

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the way up to fifty sixth. This will change. We're

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>only about halfway or so ish through the season, but

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>given what we've seen, it seems like there's real steam

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on that defensive side of the ball and more people

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>or taking notice that, yes, this is in fact a

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>much improved defense. It's not gonna shut you down. You're

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>going to score points on Colorado. But to the extent

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Big twelve is still sort of in a

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>blender and still sort of has a lot of weakness

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Yeah, I don't know Colorado's remaining schedule

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>For those playing the home game, Cincinnati, Texas Tech a

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>very flawed Utah, Kansas, and Oklahoma State yet to win

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a Big twelve game, yes, almostate yet to win a

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Big twelve game. The projected margin right now in all

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.479
<v Speaker 1>five of those games is five points or fewer. In fact,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>most of them are less than a field goal. So

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just there. It's there for Colorado. They're projecting to

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be in some close games here, but by this measure,

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>winning four out of five, you're Colorado, you win four

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>out of your next five, you finish the season with

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>nine wins. That's a pretty good season. That's a pretty

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>good campaign for Dion.

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 2>These are decidedly half teams by the way that they're playing.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, oh, he has a ton of opportunity.

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:05.479
<v Speaker 1>In terms of.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati, I think is quality and they've been pretty consistent.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 2>They haven't played a ton of good teams. Texas Tech

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>defense is willing to fall apart at any moment. They

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>are on call to fall apart the Texas Tech defense.

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Utah's offense falling apart. Kansas is a nice

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>one against Houston, but you're talking about two basement dwellers

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 2>right now in the Big Twelve going at it. We'll

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 2>see if Jalen Daniels has turned a corner. That becomes

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 2>more interesting if true, because he did have a really

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 2>nice game and Oklahoma State's a mess on defense this year. Yeah,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 2>and so no, there's a lot of opportunity there for Colorado.

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I have two lane down once again. The lost Oklahoma

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't great. They should have beaten Kansas State, which I

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you can say like a should have

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 2>beaten Kansas State. Moment has aged nicely, I guess. But

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 2>for twu Lane, who has North Texas on the road,

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 2>which will be challenging to hold down that offense. They

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 2>finish at Navy and then a bye week before Memphis.

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Tulane is either deciding the American excuse me for somebody

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>else or for themselves at the end of this season.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 2>They're real interesting. They look pretty complete, they're well coached,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and they look beautiful.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>In those uniforms. Yeah yeah, oh I love those uniforms.

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So Tulane's they're lurking their quality. I'm paying you know,

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be tough to get that that that G

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 2>five spot with two losses, but I mean it's Kansas

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 2>State and Oklahoma.

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They're a quality team. I like Tulane a lot. I'm

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna talk about that Boise UNLV game a

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on because that has real significance with

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>respect to that G five playoff spot, and that game's

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on late Friday night, you know, if you're if you're

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>young enough, stay up to watch the whole thing. Uh

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>late kick, but definitely has I think some real significance

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with respect to not just that G five playoff spot,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>but also two lane role in that conversation, Yes, what

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>else do you got? The Boise thing is interesting, We're

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get there. They've just taken care.

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Of business in a way that I love to see.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 2>And they had a bye week this past week before UNLV. Correct,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 2>but I went back and watched a little more Boise.

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't love their passing game, but if they continue

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 2>to play defense and run the ball, I don't know man.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Continue to play defense for the first time, Yes, that's

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the problem I have with them.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, the defensive numbers aren't great because of that first

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>game against Georgia Southern and the game against Oregon, but

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that fully characterizes their season. I'm willing

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to extend grace on Boise. When I was looking at

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>some updated numbers, they're a couple of outliers within like

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the top fifteen or twenty. Do you know who has

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 2>by far the worst defense in that like top fifteen

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to twenty range.

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about spot for Bowl or top top twelve.

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Poll anybody, I'm looking at the net points per drive.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at analytics here, but like these are all

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 2>relatively the same teams. We're talking about Texas Miami. Miami

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>has by far the worst defense. They are around I

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 2>think sixty ninth or seventieth in points per drive allout.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>And you look at the Virginia Tech game, you look

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 2>at the col game, now you look at the Louisville game,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and that would be a concern point to me right now.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Kansas State's defense needs to improve, but I think they've

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>gotten better. My other point about Kansas State, by the way,

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 2>is in rewatching or really watching in full for the

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>first time that West Virginia game, it looked like practice.

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Kansas State looked like they just came off of the

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>practice field. And Chris Climban's talking to Beat reporters and say,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:53.959
<v Speaker 2>I thought we were really crisp out there. I thought

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 2>it was a really nice Wednesday practice. We're really like

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 2>firing on all cylinders. I'm excited for the weekend and

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>for the season that we have to come. West Virginia

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 2>did not offer much, and.

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>That surprised me. It surprised me, you know, I it's

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that k State would win. They were favored.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Garreck Green went down, didn't come play in

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the first in the second half, excason.

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not surprising that case State would win

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that game. I do think on the whole, they're a

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>better team. I am surprised by how easy it felt.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised by that, truly, because Kyse State, especially in

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the road, especially with Avery Johnson, who I think generally

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we like Avery Johnson a lot, but he's had his

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>moments of inconsistency this year. To go on the road

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>at night in Morgantown and to basically just throttle West

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Virginia and the manner that they did, that's it should

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>open some eyes, right. And it wasn't just that, I

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>mean they did they held West Virginia town. It was

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a domination of both sides of the ball.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've ever played a like a

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 2>six year old in one on one basketball tie the best.

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It's the only time I feel good about my basketball game.

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 2>You're palming the ball over their head and you're hitting

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 2>fadal way to Avery Johnson, it was as if in

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 2>a in an offensive meeting leading up to the game,

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a QB coach, a coordinator, somebody you you know when

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at the bottom of a website and there's

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>those weird paid ads like doctor say this one trick,

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Kelly Fly. It was as if a coordinator said, Avery,

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I've got this one trick that's going to make life

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 2>so much easier for you. He looked so calm in

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the pocket. He didn't take off prematurely in the way

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 2>that he had early on in the season. He looked

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>out at that West Virginia defense and had his own

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>offensive line smothering the West Virginia front, but was going

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 2>through progressions that again, it's West Virginia. I don't know

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 2>what this means for the rest of their schedule. I

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know what this means if they end up in

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a Big twelve championship game against Iowa State or something. Well,

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to play Iowa State and Farmageddon, but I don't know.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 2>It looked like a man reborn. Okay, what else do

0:42:57.920 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>we got any other?

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Any other trailing thoughts here before we get into our

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>overballer segment. I don't think so. I think we're good,

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we kind of have this thing on

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>our show. It started years ago. It actually ended up

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>on college game Day. It was in the midst of

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>an Iowa season where they weren't playing offense. Nothing new there,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but in the middle of that season we started a

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>little line that we said, well, we got to talk

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to our kids about Iowa. We thought I was going

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to go and defet it. Yeah, caught on College football

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>World took notice. As per usual, we ended up being trendsetters.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Your favorite podcast, favorite podcast. That's right, that's right. We

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>have the talking to your kids about dot dot dot

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>question comment line that comes in via email every year,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and now it has come into us from Kyle out

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at verballers dot com. He says, which college football things

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>need to be taken seriously and explain to our children

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 1>who may or may not comprehend the gravity Dan. My

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>question is which teams are we talking to our kids at.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you a bunch of questions. I want to

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have them answered immediately immediately. Who needs to be taken

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>more seriously? Who do we need to talk to our

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:18.439
<v Speaker 1>children about?

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Dan?

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's sort of dovetails with what we were

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 2>just talking about. Like, I think Tulane needs to be

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 2>taken more seriously. I think SMU needs to be taken

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they haven't lost in the a sec but

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>still they're sort of an afterthought in this moment because

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a Clemson Miami race. I mean, in sort of

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 2>mainstream thought, I would say, who needs to be taken

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 2>more seriously? Colorado once again, ASU with a healthy Sam

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 2>levitt is a team that I would take seriously.

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Can I be honest with you about something here? Yeah,

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched a whole lot of ASU this year. Okay,

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been kind of wrapped up in whatever

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 1>we do, and sometimes it's easy to miss teams, teams

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to fall through the cracks. But yeah, I watched that

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>last game that Sam levit Pley didn't play the last

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>game because he was hurt, didn't play against Cincinnati, but

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the one before that, I forget against which team I

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was really impressed. I was really genuinely impressed by how

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>good he looked, He seemed to have command, he was accurate,

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he was tough to get in his face and pressure.

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean Kenny Dillingham, his pedigree is as an offensive

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>mind is as a child of Tempe Arizona. So clearly

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with everyone out in the field a couple weeks ago,

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you could see Kenny d was feeling it. But it

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>felt to me like with Sam Levitt in there, they

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have a chance of beating you, and there was a

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit of spark there. There was spark last year

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the personnel, but there was definitely spark

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:46.479
<v Speaker 1>this year, I think with a little bit better quarterback play.

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how I feel about Wisconsin in terms

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of tell your kids about. I'm trying to find that

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 2>big ten team that is being overlooked in this moment.

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin is both Penn State and Oregon in Madison. Yes,

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Wisconsin is actually good or is decent.

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Situationally, Okay, so what am I telling my kids about Wisconsin?

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't count them out?

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's as like dramatic as I can be

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 2>about Wisconsin in this moment. Otherwise, who we should be

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 2>taking seriously Vanderbilt.

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Vanderbilt seriously. You know I am already. I

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>know I'm trying to avoid the obvious ones like Indiana

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and Yu and I will state like they're all ranked,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>they're borderline top ten teams if they're already not in it.

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Vandy just cracked the top twenty five

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>five and two. They need one win to get Bowl

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 1>eligible against what right now projects as the sixth toughest

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>schedule in America. Yeah, they do project as underdogs in

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>their next five games, but I do not see them

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>going on five, Dan, I don't think the improvements of Fluke.

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Eighth most improved offense in terms of points per drive

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>in the Power For twenty fifth most improved defense by

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that metric in the Power For. This is a team

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that has definitely seen something of a transformation in the

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>off season. It's not all just Diego Pavia. They are

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>better across the board. They're obviously taking teams to the gun.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>They knocked off Alabama, So I'm just feeling like Vandy's

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a tough out. I don't know what their final record

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be. They could be one of these teams

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that gets into a bowl game with a six and

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.720
<v Speaker 1>six mark, and you're you got to pick them because

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you know that the schedule made them six and six.

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just a team that was foundering, right, Vandy

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>need to take Vandy seriously. The other one I have

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>here per your analytics, by the way, of course, is Army. Yes,

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you can speak a little bit more to the context

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of your net points per drive improvement stat that you

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>keep track of and how you calculate that and what

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that means. I don't want people's eyes and ears to

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>glaze over talking about this, Okay, I am guilty of

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that more than a few times. But fair enough, Army

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is like four and a half points better per than

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they were a year ago. And that's including both offense

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and defense.

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, So the offensive points scored per drive minus the

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.720
<v Speaker 2>defense points allowed per drive.

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't. I mean, you've been doing this a

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>while now, the points per drive thing, that's kind of

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>been your stat. Yeah, minus their yards. But yours is

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>always points per drive relative to others.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting you on the spot. Four point five to four,

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe is the number in improvement that feels astronomically

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>larger than most of the other ones I have seen.

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:35.439
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty crazy. Now here's the added context, Hie, they've

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:40.320
<v Speaker 2>played the worst schedule in America. Well, their strength of

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>schedule is sitting at one hundred and thirty third right now,

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 2>they're yet to play a team with either an offense

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 2>or a defense. Yeah, the last team they played Army

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>just fired their coach. They're playing one of the most

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 2>disappointing teams in search of the Commander in Chief trophy

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 2>and Air Force after a buye. They have a North

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Texas team that doesn't play defense. They've got a very

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:07.479
<v Speaker 2>good maybe Notre Dame team, a UTSA team that fell off,

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 2>and a resurgent Navy. So I have no idea how

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.919
<v Speaker 2>seriously or not seriously to take Army. But if they're

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a good team, they've performed like a good team should

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 2>have against this schedule thus far, so I have I'm

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 2>fully selling on not selling on or selling on Army.

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm fully selling on having an opinion about Army other

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 2>than winning is so much better. Okay, More interestingly, who

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 2>are you not telling you? Who are you not taking seriously?

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Who are you telling your kids like you can go

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to sleep? They're not winning me.

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not really taking Illinois seriously. I know they're

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a top I'm not taking them seriously the top whatever team,

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>top twenty caliber team. They're one to me that I'm

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not fully in on. I still struggle with the BYU thing.

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, I really do, and it's I'm running out

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons why because they have been a or Jake rehtz

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.359
<v Speaker 1>laugh has been pretty good, He's gotten better both as

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a passer and a runner. This team just feels like

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they're unkillable, and those are the teams generally that I

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gravitate towards. So personally, if I can just kind of

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>have a moment of self reflection, hm, I think it's

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those deals where I kind of hated them

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason and it has taken me a long time.

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we're eight weeks into this deal. Yeah, it has

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>taken me a long time to start having this conversation

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with myself about you were wrong, dog, you were really

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong about I think team.

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think you're right and wrong. Like, I

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 2>just think you should view the BYU thing through the

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 2>lens of let's not think about what they can be,

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 2>let's appreciate.

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 1>What they are. That's fair. I've been that's fair, and

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I probably need to come around to that.

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But I understand when you're undefeated in a power conference,

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you start thinking about a team as a potential conference

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>champion at this point, and maybe you're not taking them

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 2>seriously in that regard, but I think you can accept

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 2>their success for what it is.

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking into Miszoo seriously in their mind. I

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is any kind of surprising revelation at

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this point. The win that they had against Auburn was gutsy.

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a gutsy win to come from behind and

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>win in the manner that they did. Brady Cook kind

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of coming literally coming back from the hospital after having

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an MRI to go out there and win the game.

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That all that stuff is good. Yes, the reason I

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 1>am not buying is because the big plays just are

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>not there. There aren't there are not there. They have

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not been able to create big plays. And like I

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:30.959
<v Speaker 1>said a few months ago, months a few weeks ago,

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna need to do a full like sixty minutes report.

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need the athletic in on this. Give me

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand words in the offseason about how you have

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Luther Burden on the team and you can't generate big plays. Yeah, right,

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna need those. They are predictive of success and

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>they have not had any of those So for as

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.439
<v Speaker 1>long as Missou remains this team on offense not being

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>able to generate any of that explosion, I just I

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>can't take them seriously against an SEC schedule. You know

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 1>what am I betting on here? I'm betting on Fluke

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>wins essentially like we saw this past week against Auburn.

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 2>For all of these teams, I take seriously what they've

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 2>done so far, but I don't take seriously what it

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 2>means for the back. You know, four or five games

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Pitt Douke and Syracuse in the ACC.

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm not there.

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 2>They've played a lot of down teams that they've snuck

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 2>by in retrospect. Just I respect the wins. I appreciate

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the wins. The wins don't sway me in any sort

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of meaningful way. But I like that they're winning. I

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's a good thing. I am not a believer

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 2>right now in Texas Tech with their record, No, no,

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I and look, I really want to be the butt

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 2>game tie. I want to be a believer. Yeah, I'm

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 2>not there. I'm not there with Texas Tech. I'm not

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>there with Illinois. I am definitely not there after this

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 2>weekend with Iowa in the way that they I'm not

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 2>there with Michigan State in the opposite direction yet, but

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I like seeing it. I liked seeing something new and

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 2>unexpected from Michigan State. Yeah, a novel performance is always

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 2>welcome to my end in the SEC. You mentioned Miszoo,

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I'm fully in on Texas A

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:05.959
<v Speaker 2>and M right now.

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting because I felt like you were a week ago.

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 5>I was.

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I just another week where they are what one of

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 2>two teams that are undefeated in the conference. I think

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 2>they're good, but now we're talking about like winning the SEC.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Connor Wigman is an SEC winning quarterback,

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. I again, I appreciate what they've done.

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a really nice story near one of

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Mike Elco. I mean, needless say, I'm not in on

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Bama right now. Yeah, are you a.

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Believer in Bama long term? This season?

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:46.479
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a real tough watch. Again, I'm extending grace

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to Kaylin de Boor in year one. It's an impossible job,

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it's an impossible ask. It's it's just it's all on

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Milroe. Yes, it's all in jail. Milroe I'm telling

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 2>my children to watch South Carolina games.

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina is just a fun TV show watching Looney Tunes.

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's great. It's just a good TV show and you

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>never know what kind of madness you're going to see. Yeah,

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, but I can't get there on Bama.

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I just can't not after what we've seen this season.

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's one two weeks feeling like the offense

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't getting into gear. That's one thing. But yeah, this

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>has been a trend, man. I mean it's been like

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 1>four or five weeks now where we're saying the same thing.

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just at some point, you are who you're telling us,

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you are, right, I am. This is a big picture.

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 2>If you're talking about telling your children something, I'm telling

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:35.240
<v Speaker 2>my children not to fall in love with any freshman

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 2>for your team.

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Right. This is big twenty twenty four. This is bigger.

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Like I just bought my kid a show hey O

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Tani shirt, and I feel pretty great about that. In

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 2>terms of long lasting stick around, stick aroundedness, stickuitiveness. Yeah,

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:55.439
<v Speaker 2>if you have a dream freshman, I don't care who

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 2>you are, don't fall in love. Tell your kid that

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's another freshman all the way next year. No,

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what about you anybody else that you're

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 2>not believing in, believing in?

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you tell the kids about you stole my

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse pick. I was going to go there next okay,

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to talk about some of the week days.

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm into it. I'm into their success. I celebrate their success.

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 2>But I don't look at somebody else's schedule and when

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I see Syracuse and Pitt think to myself, ooh, that's

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 2>going to get real difficult.

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, Syracuse and Pitt play. Let's get to that. By

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you've got any more that you want

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to add to our list, please how to reach out

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>social media, solid verbal at gmail dot com. We do

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have a few early bird specials this week. Early Bird

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Special Thursday at seven thirty on ESPN, It's Syracuse at

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>five and one, It's Pit at six and oh pit

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 1>favor by five and a half points. This is a

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>perfect segue into the Pit Syracuse conversation. Yeah, you set

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>me up perfectly. I look at Syracuse for what it's worth.

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Every defense at Syracuse play is the rest of the

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:06.320
<v Speaker 1>season is better than every defense they've played thus far. Yes,

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and yes. That also includes their game on November twenty

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>third against the Yukon Fighting Huskies. So you're right. I

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:18.880
<v Speaker 1>want to root for the for animal. I still believe

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in the Syracuse project. I like watching the team, but

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their past defense is really bad. Yeah, really suspect, and

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what holds them back. It would not

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:32.399
<v Speaker 1>surprise me if this game against Pitt ends up being

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a quasi shootout, because I have questions about Pitt as well.

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think both teams can score. I think it's a

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fun Actually, I think there are a handful of fun games.

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great game May Thursday and Friday.

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Pitt thirty eight thirty. I like pitting this spot.

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>They're at home.

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I think so too. I think I'm I said thirty

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 2>seven thirty four actually in my mind. So I don't

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 2>know what the spread will be a kickoff, but so

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 2>you would go, you would go Syracuse. Then I would

0:56:58.520 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 2>go points in a shootout.

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame it. Yeah, I understand that the big

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>one here with real consequence, I think, is on Friday

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:10.839
<v Speaker 1>at ten thirty CBS Sports Network, Boise at five and one,

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>favored by three on the road in Vegas against UNLV

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 1>coming into this game at six and one, So both

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 1>teams have that loss, but both were to non conference opponents.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Boise to your Oregon Ducks, UNLV to the aforementioned Syracuse Orange.

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a monster matchup, man, yes, say big matchup

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Mountain West. Also, we're probably going to see

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a rematch of this game, so get ready for that.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.080
<v Speaker 1>These are the top two teams in the Mountain West

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at present. Both of them are too clear in the

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>lost column of the next best teams per the standings.

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if either team is taking a loss

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>after this game, right, and so that's why schedule was

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing after this game amazing amazing. That's why I say

0:57:58.280 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it looks to me like this is a rematch the

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>first of two. Yeah, I expect a lot of points.

0:58:04.080 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So is Vegas sixty five and a half? Is your

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is your over under here? I'm going UNLV home dog

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the week? Play the wrong sound there? It is

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the Yokos home dog of the week. Let's not get

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>crazy and lock this up, all right. Okay, okay, okay,

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hit the wrong button there, But I think lost in

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ashton jenty craze is the fact that the Boise

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>defense is very suspect and so, yeah, it's been better,

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been better. You're right to bring that up. Yeah

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of bad. Yeah, I think you and

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 1>LV is good for thirty seven, thirty eight, forty five

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>points on Boise. I can see this being one of

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>those deals where there's like a late touchdown, someone's got

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to go for two or they want to go for

0:58:55.360 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>two and get the win. UNLV outright, forty two, forty one.

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have this high smat. I like UNLV as well,

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and they have your pet stat. I think their yards

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 2>before contact. You gotta look at a team's rush defense

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 2>right before they play ashion gent and it's nice. I

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 2>think it's top fifteen or so. UNLV's it's not bad.

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I like Barry Odom's ability. We did see winning as

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a scale. They went to Oregon State last week in

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Corvallis and won that game. Thirty was seven or eight

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 2>points they won that game. I'm going UNLV here. I'm

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 2>going UNLV at home. Stadium's gonna be rocking. And I

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 2>like the versatility of their offense a little bit more

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 2>than I like Boyse's as.

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I might have to stay out for this ten

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty kick.

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait ten thirty. Yeah, you're going to stay up.

0:59:40.520 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 2>You'll make it a Vegas has set the line. This

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 2>is a UNLV game. If Time makes it to the

0:59:46.240 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 2>midway point of the second quarter, it will be the

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 2>upset of the week.

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, sixty five and a half see over under sixty

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 1>five and a half minutes is probably a good over

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 1>under for how long I make it.

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And I like that ten thirty kicks, so making it

0:59:57.000 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to eleven thirty five.

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And then the other game on Friday at eleven on Fox,

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Rutgers traveling to USC. USC favored by fourteen points.

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a big time vibe check game right here. Sure

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know USC and Rutgers both coming in with three

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>straight losses. On the Rutgers side, two of them were blowouts,

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and one of them was against UCLA, which is almost worse. Yeah,

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think they get annihilated by USC here.

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>That's my instinct, that's my gun. I kind of think

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they get annihilated because USC may not have a great defense, right,

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is better. And I am not of the

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>mind here that Rutgers is going to come in and

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>consistently put together long clock killing drives. Sure, I think

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's their only shot to keep this one close. They're

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to win a shootout if they get into

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>one with USC. They just don't have the offense. I

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven seventeen USC. I think they win handily in

1:00:57.160 --> 1:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this game.

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I saw somebody tweet out or on Instagram somewhere said,

1:01:02.880 --> 1:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can take your Dodgers Yankees. The clear

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>tri State Area Southern California matchup of the weekend, Rutgers

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>traveling to whatever three and four USC. It's a If

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>USC loses this game at home, USC fans should just

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>pay attention to the Lakers, pay attention to the Dodgers.

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>They're in the World Series. Yeah yeah, yeah, and just

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>abandon the season. You should not pay attention to USC.

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>If they lose this game at home to Rutgers, this

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>would be a waste of your time. You deserve better.

1:01:32.360 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>This would be a horrible loss. And you know what,

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers isn't necessarily a horrible team, but this is a

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>game they should win. Yes, Okay, I got a dog

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bark in here. I apologize. Okay, Oh it's okay. We

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have some other big ones this week. Once we get

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to the weekend. We got the Notre Dame Navy game,

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a line that's come down already. By the way. We've

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>got Washington versus Indiana. We will talk more about the

1:01:59.200 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Curtis rourkean.

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>By the way, vir check looks your vibe check. Now

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned vibe check usc rutgers the vibecheck Navy Notre Dame.

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Notre Dame is gonna cream them, Okay. I

1:02:08.760 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>think Notre Dame should cream Navy. Okay, they should not

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to say they will. That line when I made this

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>document was thirteen in favor of Notre Dame. I looked

1:02:18.400 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>before we hit Live Eric Live here down to eleven

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>and a half. So there is steam on Navy. I

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>hope it keeps coming down. I'm inclined to go heavy

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>on Notre Dame, so I think that's a good matchup

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>for them. We got Oregon playing host to Illinois. Alabama

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>favored by a pretty hefty margin against Miszoo, Penn State

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 2>minus about a touchdown on the road against Wisconsin. By

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the way, it was just announced that the Penn State

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State.

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Game is going to be a noon kickoff. Which means

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that Oregon Michigan will be a three thirty, won't wear out.

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh great, goodbye, my pretty good, pretty good time

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>set up. Love that and uh LSU against A and

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>M is sort of like the big matchup in the SEC.

1:03:03.480 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That game's in Kyle Field. It is at seven thirty

1:03:06.040 --> 1:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on ABC. An M is favored by two and a

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>half points. So those are the big games. There are

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>some other ones of note Nebraska, Ohio State, Georgia Tech,

1:03:14.680 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech byu UCF, Texas Vandy who knows right in Nashville, right, Yeah, Yeah,

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got Michigan, Michigan State, SMU Duke not bad, Cincinnati,

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Colorado so maybe lacking for obvious Georgia versus Texas style headliners,

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's plenty of intrigue here. There are a bunch

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of games on this docket that I'm pretty excited about.

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>By the way, did you see that the SEC ruled

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>on the bottle throwing for Texas. They got fined I

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>think two hundred and fifty K and they have to

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>use all available technologies to identify and ban any of

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the bottle throwers.

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw that. I saw, I saw one of the

1:03:56.480 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>barstool Accounts was tweeting out a screen grab of a

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>text message that was reportedly going around to students. I

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that actually confirmed anywhere. Yeah, but yeah, that

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>would be something.

1:04:06.840 --> 1:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>To students announcing that they're banned from Texas events the

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year.

1:04:09.960 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that they're pulling their tickets. I don't know

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's legit, but you know, if they're using all

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>available technology. All of these stadiums have high powered cameras

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>where they can look for people.

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the ultimate losing effort is everybody who

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>threw bottles. It was a winning effort for that play

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know if the SEC commented on the

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>horrible play or the horrible call that brought out the throwing.

1:04:33.600 --> 1:04:37.439
<v Speaker 2>But all those Texas throwers getting banned for the rest

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of the year as they watched their team lose the

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>biggest game of the season for them.

1:04:42.000 --> 1:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You miss games at home against Florida and Kentucky. Okay,

1:04:46.320 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it would have been a fun night. A and M

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is on the road this yere Kyle Field. Yeah, so

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>those are the big games. Again. We're going to do

1:04:53.560 --> 1:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>our Thursday preview a little bit later on this week

1:04:57.880 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We would encourage you to stop on by hit follow,

1:05:00.200 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribe if you are ever so inclined, Tell your friends,

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>leave a rating or review if you've been here a while.

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>All this stuff helps us grow with overballer hood. It

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>has been a very successful season for us. A lot

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of new people have found in the show, so we

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciate having you here. Always fun to grow our little

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I keep calling a pirate ship. I think that's a

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:21.439
<v Speaker 1>good way to I like that. That's great. Yeah, cool

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with that. So look final bit here. Our guy Shay

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>put together an extended cut of the reverbs because we

1:05:28.840 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>had so much going on when we did our last

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>episode on Saturday night. Also kudos to Shae for cutting

1:05:36.600 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>reverbs on his tenth wedding anniversary. Okay, this is a

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>separate conversation, but he put these together after the fact.

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I assured him he did not need to get these

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to us right a SAP because we would do them

1:05:49.000 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the Tuesday show. These aren't super long, but

1:05:52.280 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it is indicative of I think how fans were feeling

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>here the rest of the way in week eight. So

1:05:57.560 --> 1:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a quick listen.

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 3>It's Jimmy fromman All and I can't wait for tomorrow

1:06:02.360 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 3>morning to see if Dusty May can get the Wolverlines

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 3>ready to make a run at the dance.

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>This yeah, dan Ty Travis from Ferndo, Key, Florida.

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:17.920
<v Speaker 6>This is Patrick from Tavia, Hellen. Hello, this is Alex

1:06:17.960 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 6>from East Lansing, Michigan.

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Get out of your muster packet because it's the home

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>dog of a.

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Week baby, No Green go stay.

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Jonathan Kim more like Jonathan him sick. Field goals to

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:32.160
<v Speaker 6>beat Iowa at their own game.

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 4>No Green, So wait, is Texas not back? Or is

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Vanderbilt better than Georgia? Or are both of those things

1:06:43.640 --> 1:06:46.560
<v Speaker 4>true or neither of them true? I'm very confused.

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 7>Hey, asverb, this is Don in Maryland. This call is

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 7>being overturned because my household members just threw a water

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:54.000
<v Speaker 7>bottle at me.

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:56.120
<v Speaker 6>Any who are showing the beer on the fielders?

1:06:56.160 --> 1:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>That's just me? No, No, Carson, Carson, We're wearing the

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>white shirts, not the white helmets. We've been over this, Carson,

1:07:05.160 --> 1:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Go dogs.

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Be those tears, take slight, crappy, burnt, overdone Texas barbecue,

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:13.400
<v Speaker 6>Go dogs sick the woof woof.

1:07:13.920 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I just watched my Gators absolutely kick Kentucky's ass. It

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was glorious period. Just letting you know that this happens

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>against your lock of the week, Dan Arkansas Razorbacks.

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Go Taggers.

1:07:29.160 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Hi, This is e J and Family checking in from Madison,

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin after the latest edition of October Go Go.

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 7>This is Steve from Atlanta, Georgia talking about seven wing Diana.

1:07:40.320 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So what when we got on boys?

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 5>Coach stick wins again.

1:07:42.560 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>So I write a newsletter called the Solid Plates, and

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of the year I made a bunch

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>of predictions. One of them was that this is Miami's year.

1:07:51.160 --> 1:07:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Other ones were that Oklahoma would do better than expected

1:07:54.880 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and the UCF would win the Big twelve. Yeah, all

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:01.880
<v Speaker 3>those aren't panning out. My Miami one's doing great.

1:08:02.320 --> 1:08:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Main fan here. Could Maine really get their first shutout

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 5>in eleven years against number five with Villanova? Uh No,

1:08:10.800 --> 1:08:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Villanova scored with two minutes left to make it thirty

1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:16.640
<v Speaker 5>five to seven, one of the most surprising results of

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 5>the year.

1:08:17.360 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Go Black Bears.

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 6>California gold Bears are like the little brother of the

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:25.760
<v Speaker 6>entire acc. It's like when you're playing Smash Bros. Your

1:08:25.760 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 6>little brother, and you let him get you down to

1:08:28.000 --> 1:08:30.560
<v Speaker 6>twenty cent and then you come back and beat the

1:08:30.600 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 6>everlove and crap out of him about cal You'll you'll see.

1:08:35.000 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 7>What my prosper When will the WVU end the Neil

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Brown era? Can we please wow stop watching this horrendous

1:08:45.200 --> 1:08:49.080
<v Speaker 7>product and bring back home the prodigal West Virginia native

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:52.160
<v Speaker 7>and Jimbo Fisher at the next EP coach.

1:08:53.520 --> 1:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Wow, you just extended Neil Brown. Yeah.

1:08:58.800 --> 1:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't a huge believer for last year, but I

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>always appreciate improvement.

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's tough. It's a tough watch this year. Thank

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you to everybody who dialed in at eight five five

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>verbal three. As always, it's a pleasure to hear your messages. Yes,

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we got inundated this past week with calls, and Shay

1:09:13.960 --> 1:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>said there are too many on the cutting room four.

1:09:16.000 --> 1:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>We need to do a whole other segment. So that

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:22.639
<v Speaker 1>does it for the spillover episode. Don't forget previews coming

1:09:22.680 --> 1:09:24.879
<v Speaker 1>up on Thursday. We've got a lot of games to discuss.

1:09:24.960 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>You heard just a small sampling of them. I'm excited

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about what this week has in store as we get

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>into week ten. Don't forget Dan, We're going to that

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Orgon Michigan game. Can't wait the aforementioned organ Michigan. We're

1:09:36.880 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there. So if you're gonna be an ann

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Arbor or some parts around ann Arbor, give us a holler.

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. We'd love to meet up. We're gonna

1:09:44.439 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>try tailgating. Yeah, if you're tailgating.

1:09:46.840 --> 1:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>If you own a breakfast sandwich restaurant and want to

1:09:49.840 --> 1:09:52.639
<v Speaker 2>give Tie the full spread, let us.

1:09:52.560 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Know Solid verbal at gmail dot com. Where's this dog at?

1:09:57.439 --> 1:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Come here? Dog? He see? I put her on the

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>screen since she's been For those who have the new one,

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>this is the new one.

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for those how many weeks old, how many months?

1:10:08.479 --> 1:10:11.879
<v Speaker 1>There she is. She's gonna buite my microphaz Look at her.

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>There she is. People watching a YouTube video.

1:10:16.240 --> 1:10:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Some would say the best dog of any college football

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>personality around.

1:10:21.520 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, shots fired at Ben? Say, shots fired at Ben? Okay,

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't take her off leash and let her roam

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:32.799
<v Speaker 1>around campus. She would run away from me. Yeah, especially

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. But for those watching the video, if you're wondering,

1:10:35.120 --> 1:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>why have I been distracted and kind of all over

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the place, I've been chasing her around the room. So

1:10:39.120 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your patience. Try not to do this again.

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>All good in the meantime for that guy of there,

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:48.599
<v Speaker 1>my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself Tye Hildebrand, thanks

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for downloading, for listening, for supporting the show. We will

1:10:50.680 --> 1:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>talk to you all on Thursday. I meantime, stay solid, peace,