WEBVTT - Former GM Thad Levine: Winter Meetings thoughts, Conversations w/Framber’s rep, Passive execs problem

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Bad Lebine joining us right now, great timing as the

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>winter meetings are approaching.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 2>So that great to have you on.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And good to see you again. What I want to do, though,

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is because the online world really needs to get hooked

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in from the jump, and I feel like the pressing

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>question that will really bring people in and we'll get

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of other things, is what do you

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think the twins are going to do with Byron Buckston?

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>A guy that you know pretty well as you spent

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with him. Do you think that

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he will end up getting traded? And do you think

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that Byron will wave a no trade clause to a

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>number of teams based on where the team's at Right now,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm hitting you with something hard to start because I

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>want people to know we're bringing it today.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You're playing the aj Perzinski role here. This is the

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>first time I've been on the show with no catchers present.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>It's quite shocking. I don't know how to respond. It's refreshing, Yeah, yeah,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>it's refreshing for goodness sake. Yeah.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Much better looking, much better looking too. We don't hide

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>behind the mask.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, better beards, that's for sure, fellas Hey, just

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>quick appreciation. I haven't got a chance to spend much

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>time with you guys. Saw you guys play, Kevin absolutely

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>spectacular defender is some of the most highlight reel catches

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen in my career. You made. I remember

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>so many of them, especially in Toronto. Just an absolute

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 2>pleasure to watch you play with your intensity on defense

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and Todd, I would say, in a word, freakish in

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>terms of your power, your pull side power. I remember

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the home run derby you hit and was highlight of

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>my career. You doing that in front of the home

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>crowd was spectacular. But you know, as we enter a

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>free agency and we can talk about that globally, like you,

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>two guys would be coveted right now based upon your

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>skill set. So pleasure to spend some time with you.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>With regards to Byron, you know, Byron is such a

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>unique player. I think keep in mind, guys, that one

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of the mentors he had, the captain who preceded him,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>was Joe Mauer. Joe Maller played his entire career in Minnesota.

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe Maher, who I know definitively because we offered to

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>him at the end of his career the chance to

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>go play wherever he wanted to. Derek Falvey myself ownership

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>was very supportive of that. Joe decided to stay in Minnesota.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, he felt a bond to that community. He

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>never wanted to turn his back on that fan base.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think Byron is wired in some similar fashions.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, last trade deadline, I think he made a

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 2>very bold statement to the media in which he said

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>definitively he was not going to be treated he was

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>going to stay with Minnesota. So while he is desirous

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>of winning a championship, I think he primarily would like

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to do that in Minnesota. So I think the question remains, well,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Derek Falvey will now skip for Derek Shelton sit down

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>with him. Will they convince him that they're going to

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>be competitive and competitive soon? And if so, I would

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>expect Byron Buckston will want to be part of that.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>He's going to want to deliver a championship as best

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>he can to the Minnesota fans. If, however, they say

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>that there are a number of years away, he may

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>start looking elsewhere. But I think he's going to be

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>very specific as to where he wants to look. He

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>is from Baxley, Georgia. I think the chance to get

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>closer to home would be very important to him. Otherwise

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I would see him staying in a Minnesota Twins Jersey.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Before we get into the specifics of teams and stuff,

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I always, you know, when I have an opportunity to

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>talk to someone like you, I kind of like to

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 3>just know kind of what the day to day is

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>like at the winter meeting for someone in your previous position.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I attended for the first time last year. I spent

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time on the ground floor kind of

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>walking around, but I always like to get a little

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>insight now that I'm done playing. Do you go in

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>with like a checklist in mind? Do you have, like

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, free agents that you want to set up

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>meetings with. As agents call on, you just kind of

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>take us into kind of the day to day and

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess the course of the winter meetings how that

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of shakes out for you.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, primarily we want to know if the traveling

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>secretary has good snacks in the suite. I mean, that's

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of the focus of it. Kevin, I would say

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>it's changed dramatically over the course of my career. When

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I started I was with the Colorado Rockies. Dan O'Dowd

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>was the general manager, and the way it started was

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I was literally handed a list of all the phone

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 2>numbers the other general managers. I would call all twenty

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 2>nine rooms and try to set up one individual meetings

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>where Dan o Daoud and his group could go sit

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>down with them. And so there was a lot more

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>individual engagement with teams. We would actually literally go visit

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 2>with at least twenty, if not all twenty nine other clubs.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>You would sit down, you'd have an open conversation about

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>what are your needs and surpluses, how do they align

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 2>up with our needs and surpluses, and are there opportunities

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>for us to get together to make deals. I think

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>things have changed now a little bit. At the winter meetings,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>there's far less meeting together. There's a lot more conversations

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>over the phone by way of text. There's a lot

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 2>of stuff done leading up to the meetings, so you

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>really are very targeted when you get to the meetings.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you're only meeting with four or five clubs. It's

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the clubs that you see the most likelihood of getting

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a deal done. And then, as you guys know, there's

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>so many agents, and there's so many members of the

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>media there that you're constantly meeting with agents, members of

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the media, And as the way the off season goes,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>we usually start looking into free agency and trying to

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>spend our owner's money to fill our holes. When that

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 2>seems exorbitant, we go to the trade market, and then

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>when it seems like the asking price to acquire talent

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 2>is too high, we circle back to the free agent market.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>And so it's a constant conversation balancing between talking to agents,

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>talking to other teams executives to try to find out

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 2>where's the best deal that we can make, to try

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to make the biggest impact on an organization.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you hit that well, man. Those things

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I always thought, like when I played, I would tell

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 4>my agent I was a free agent, like, just give

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 4>them a price. We already know what price we're at.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Just tell tell the team I want to go to,

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 4>or a team that's interest in me. It's going to be

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 4>sell and sown. Let's get this ball move. And I'm

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 4>sick of it. I got the holidays coming up here.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 4>But that's just just not how it goes, and I

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of wish it did, because I feel like more

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>guys that either get picked up or you know, there'll

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>be a little there'll be a little more stuff going

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 4>in motion. But that's just.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you're talking about two different approaches to an agent.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Once you know one you're talking to who's clearly trying

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to get the most money he can for the player,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>and totally respect that. That's one style of negotiation. The

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 2>other one is what you're talking about, which is where

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you're really contemplating what is the quality of life that

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that player wants to pursue. And sometimes that's playing in

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a specific market, Maybe it's an opportunity to play a

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 2>specific position. Maybe a guy's hunting the longest term deal

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>rather than the most money per year, and other guys

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 2>want the most money in the shorter term because they

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 2>want to get back to free agency. But when you're

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>talking to an agent, you get a clear picture right

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>out of the choot as to what type of negotiation

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you're undertaking. But I honestly always felt, from an executive standpoint,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the more transparency, the more likely we were to get

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a deal done. I never took advantage of somebody if

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 2>they were more willing to reveal that that player maybe

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 2>really wanted to sign with you. You know, I think a

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>measure of a person sometimes is how do you handle leverage?

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And so when an agent came to us and said,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, hey, listen, my guy really would like to

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>either stay with you as an existing player or come

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to you as a free agent. I never viewed that

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>as a compromise on their part. That was just a reveal,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 2>and I appreciated their honesty. You still want to treat

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the player extremely fairly in that situation, because the relationship

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.239
<v Speaker 2>is with the player moving forward, and if he doesn't

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>realize in the moment that you took advantage of him,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>he certainly will over time. He will be disinclined to

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>ever re sign with you, and his agent will be

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>disinclined to do business with you in the future. So

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the integrity of the agent starts that conversation

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>when he reveals that the player maybe wants to return

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to the team or join that team. The integrity then

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>shifts to the general manager in that instance to handle

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 2>that situation responsibly and still treat the player very fairly

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>in the process.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, on topic with that, because baseball is the only

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>sport where kind of free agency drags out over the

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>entire offseason. Give me your perfect scenario, things that could

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>be implemented. Obviously things have to be collectively bargain. But

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>how do we get free agency moving quicker? How is

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>it putting a deadline on you free agents or trades

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>or certain things. How do you see us as an

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>industry making big baseball free agency exciting and quick? And

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 3>then obviously you know there's gonna be some guys who linger,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>but let's get the majority of these guys signed so

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 3>fans could get excited about these new players. Players can

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>get acclimated, they can meet their teammates. As a player,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I always felt like, you know, my first couple of

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>years when I was with Toronto, I always worked out

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>with this mindset that I was improving to help my team.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 3>It got harder for me when I was always a

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>free agent. I was out there, I'm like, what am

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I training for? Like, obviously I want to be the

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>best version myself, but I like this collective approach that like, man,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to call one of my teammates and be like, hey,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>did you get in the gym today? Did you hit?

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Did you do this? It sucked, you know when you

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>had to wait till, you know, middle of February to.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Sign Well and Kevin, I'll add a few things to

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>your comments, which I think are spot on. Is you know,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>when we're signing a guy like you or signing a

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>guy like Todd, part of it is because of the leadership,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the experience you have, the championship pedigree. So if you

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>are coming on board February, you know, week before spring training,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you're not able to really spread your knowledge and your

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>wisdom to as guys and have as big of an impact.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>And also, my guess is you guys find that very

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>fulfilling to help mentor guys. And if we're saying you

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>can only start that process when you meet them in

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>spring training, we're missing an opportunity. Another thing I would

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>just add to the conversation is the fact that every

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 2>club is investing so much in their spring training facilities.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of you guys now are coming

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>down well in advance to spring training to work out

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>there because the facilities are just so great, And so

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>we're depriving you of the ability to get down there

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and also get to know some of your teammates, some

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of your coaches, some of the resources that will be

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>around you. You're getting to know that as spring training

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>begins or dare I say now a lot of guys

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>who are signing well into spring training. It's just such

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a disadvantage. So I think there's a real dangerous situation

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>going on in baseball right now, which is gms are

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 2>trying to get the best deals they can, so tour

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 2>agents agents believe if they wait longer, it'll be more

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>deadline driven teams will have to capitulate and give more money.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>But then there's a tipping point in that you get

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 2>past a certain date, the player and agent become a

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit compromised, and gms now are taking advantage of

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that and signing guys to you know, kind of deflated

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>deals late into February, sometimes March, when guys are really

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>needing to get back into camp and get back out

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 2>on the field, and so they're in a compromise position.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a terrible way to start a relationship. Furthermore,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing from a performance standpoint, those players are missing

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 2>out on spring training. There's something to do with the

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>at bats. You guys get that, the reps, you guys

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that get on the mound just to get into shape.

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Those guys aren't having great aprils, some of them spilling

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>into May, and so I think we're losing across the

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>boards as an industry on all the fronts you mentioned, Kevin,

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 2>and then additionally a few that I just brought up.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So as a result, I love the thought of having

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 2>some sort of deadline. Todd kind of referenced it. I

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>think we should get back to the point where when

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 2>you guys go and spend the holidays with your families

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and friends, you can tell them where you're going to

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>play the next year, and where your kids may be

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>going to school, and where you're looking for housing. So

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>if we could somehow figure out a way, maybe it's

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>not a hard and fast deadline too soon after the season,

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 2>but surely by the end of December, we should all

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 2>have a pretty good understanding of how good a fit

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of players for a team and a team is for

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that player. If we can accelerate decisions to be made

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>in the calendar year such that you then can spend

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 2>all of January February preparing with the team you're going

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.359
<v Speaker 2>to play for, ideally interacting with some of those teammates,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>sharing your wisdom, sharing your expertise. I think we all

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 2>win from that.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 4>How about making a deadline at the Winter Meetings? Wouldn't

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 4>that be helpful for a lot of guys to you know,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>get these free agents going a little.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Bit well todd. That would reinvigorate the Winter Meetings, which

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>right now, you know, we don't see a ton of

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>signings there. Would It would be the off season spectacle

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 2>that Major League Baseball wishes it was. You know, we

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 2>have media all over the place there trying to break news,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>but they're really hunting for stories and they really are

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>breaking a lot more rumors than they are signed. If

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 2>we actually had a need to sign and agreed to

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>terms with players, there, what an event that would be

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>for Major League Baseball? We put in on it, on

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 2>it on the map. Where's right now? It's just kind

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 2>of a slow bleed to get through free agency, and

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it captures the fans interest like MLB

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 2>would want it to.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>My next question, hold on, hold up real quick, because

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump in. Are you guys I'm just

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>making sure here from the player perspective, are you guys

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>good with like KP You're good? Everyone like you? You have

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to sign December eighth, I noise get taken care of,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and then you just get to take it or leave

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it off, or versus doing a trade deadline at the

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>winter meetings so that it can't be used as leverage

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and we can get the trade action done and then

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the signings.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a I think it's got to be

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 3>incentive driven. I don't think it's like a cutoff, like

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 3>you can't sign, but maybe incentivized teams for signing players,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Like maybe ninety percent of the deal counts against the

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 3>CBT and you get a ten percent discount on you know, luxury,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>something along those lines. To incentivize teams where you know,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 3>if we're fighting over just you know, a year. I

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 3>know year is a lot or you know, a couple

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 3>million bucks, which sounds like a lot, but to a

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 3>team it's not that much. But like, let's get the

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>ball roving. Incentivized teams. Maybe it's a draft pick compensation

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>if you sign a guy for X amount of years

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>for certain amount of dollars, whatever it may be. You know,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 3>they're smarter people out there than me. But I think

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>you incentivized teams and agents and players to sign by

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 3>a certain date. So all those things that we talked about,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>being able to get in and meet your teammates and

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, get your family settled.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>As a player who signed late, it was tough, you know,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think about my my most recent experience with

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the Rangers. You know, part of the reason I got

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>brought in was to be kind of a veteran guy,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>a leader, guy who's been there help out some of

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 3>these younger guys. And the first time I'm meeting them,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it's three or four days into spring training. I didn't

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of time. And obviously my time was

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>short there. I got released, you know, a couple months

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>into the season. But it felt like if I had

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>an entire offseason living here in Dallas, I could have

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>commuted down to arling in and you know, saw the

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 3>guys and worked out and got to know the staff

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better. You know, maybe things would have

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>turned out a little bit different. But you know, I

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 3>don't think you could just put a deadline on, like

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 3>if you don't sign your you're kicked out of baseball.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it has to be incentive driven.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>How about this as an idea, guys, how about if

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you don't sign by specific date, the most you can

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>sign for is like eighty percent of the qualifying offer,

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>and it could be over two three years if you

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>want to, or it could be all in one year.

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:30.239
<v Speaker 2>But like that's that's kind of now the cap for play.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 5>If you want the Yeah, But I just I think

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 5>it's such an unrealistic ask when you're saying that, I

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 5>mean that just gives you're coming from a long time

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 5>executive side, that where that's a way for that side

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 5>to squeeze guys, Like for me, why not do the

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 5>incentive side which incentivizes team to actually be active versus

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 5>them saying take it or leave it.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>If you wait until tomorrow, you're only going eighty percent

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the qualifying offer. I just think that's a trash

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>way to operate in a negotiation.

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm just assuming that the guys who are positioned to

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>make one hundred plus million dollars, you know, enter trying

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 2>to ecot one hundred and ten or signed for ninety

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Like I think executives would have to come to the

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>table much more sincerely earlier in that process is what

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I would hope as well.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the incentive side is a good

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>idea and that side ever go for it, okay, And

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what about the trade deadline? What about it? See to me,

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I think because I'm always trying to think that, I'm

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not trying to play like a player agent here. I'm

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just trying to defend the other side a little bit.

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>My thing is I always try to think of what

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>actually would get done in a negotiation, because anything that

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>happens has to get agreed to from player and ownership side.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>For me, the thing that I actually think is realistic

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is the trade deadline. Right so on the player side,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be happy with that. Players don't want

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to get traded in freaking February when they already think

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gone somewhere and then they get moved. Wipe the

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>trades off the board. Let the first month or so

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the offseason focus on what trades can happen, and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>then it's done. Now you can still do signings before that,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can only sign players to advance yourself as

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a team for an x amount of time period. Of course,

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to open up trades again, but we don't

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>get that many trades at the beginning of the season anyway.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So like, let's let's set this dead period where you

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>can't trade players on a forty man roster.

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think it's a very sound concept.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, As I said earlier, part of the reason

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we wait on free agency is because we have an alternative,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 2>which is going to the trade market. And part of

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the reason we wait on the trade market is because

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>we have an alternative, which is free agency. So if

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>you have tight windows in which you can only operate

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>in one space, you're going to have to accelerate conversations

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>in each of those spaces.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a good it's a good one. Yeah, I said

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 4>free agent. I meant to say trade deadline. I know

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 4>that's what I came off. But this is very interesting.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 4>This is this should be the language and the banter

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 4>back and forth with you know, the collective bargaining and

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 4>everything else like these should be the tall and I

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 4>hope that's what they're talking about, But there's other little

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 4>things that they go through with.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>While we're at it. One more thad, can we trade

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>draft picks too? Every other league gets to do that.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just coming from the fan perspective. All I care

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>about that is activity.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying it for a long time that I

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 3>think it would help advance trades, you know, like and

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>it's to my point too, Like I wanted to ask

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you about this too, and you know the trade that

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 3>happened yesterday between the Red Sox and the Pirates. But

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>we were just talking about teams covet prospects so much

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>that at some point you have an abundance of them

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>and you don't have enough room for them to you know,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 3>fill out your major league roster. At some point you

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>got to trade them, Like what is what's the what

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>is it the fear of that this prospect becomes this

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 3>player that you drafted, developed and you hoped. But at

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>some point I'd love to see teams like use their

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>prospects and their draft picks to improve their major league

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 3>roster because ultimately that's what, you know, makes everything work.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>If you have a productive major league team, everything else

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 3>would kind of follow.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think both these points kind of fall under

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a similar umbrella. For me, I would love to trade

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>draft picks. We've talked about this as from the GM

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>perspective at every GM meeting. I don't know why we

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 2>haven't implemented that. I just strongly believe we should have

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>every ability to try to build a championship organization. We

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be restricted like we currently are. I would take

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the safeguards off of the draft. I

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>would take it off of trading draft picks. I just

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>think teams should be able to spend money where they

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>want to spend money to try to build championship organizations.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's let teams be as creative as possible. Let's not

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 2>restrict creativity whatsoever. And then, Kevin, with regards to your point,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I do think there's a little bit of that fear

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that that prospect turns into the next role six, role seven,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>role eight player, the guy who's the perennial All Star,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the guy who's the goal glover or the silver slugger.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>But then I also think GM's probably put a little

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 2>bit too much onus on this notion of service time.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, yesterday's trade was really fascinating because

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 2>you trade a premium position player prospect who they're going

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to control for the next six years for a really

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 2>solid major league starting pitcher who you can control for

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 2>two years. And so you know, that is a very

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 2>calculated decision on both sides parts, and that's why Boston

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>probably receives additional value in this deal because they're giving

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>up six years of control for two. That's always a

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>challenge as well, because that's how you gain cost control

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in the game. Is for every guy you're signing to

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>a deal that is, you know, fifteen plus million dollars,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 2>you have to have four to five guys making the

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>major league minimum to balance out your payroll by and large,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and if you have one that is competing at a

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>very high level, they're worth so much value to the team.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So there is this balancing act of like how much

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>of your future value are you sacrificing to try to

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 2>win today. An addition that I would just bring up is,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think so many general managers are so

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>intelligent today, but one of the things we may be

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>missing is just that kind of that thirst to win.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think we all know the general managers who

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>are super aggressive out there, who are willing to try

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>those prospects in the name of trying to win today.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I think they are more general managers out there who

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 2>want to play it safe and want to keep their

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>prospects for the future to give a chance to win

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in the future. They're not necessarily willing to forego the

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 2>chance to win today. I think there's a little bit

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 2>of an imbalance in the general managers today. When I

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>started in the game, you know, the average GM was

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of the Kevin Towers, Dave Dombrowski, Jim Hendry types

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>of guys. Omar Minaya, Jim Bowden. These guys were going

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>forward at all the time, and they wore that on

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>their sleeves. Now, I think guys are a lot more

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>reserved about that, and they're playing for you know, not

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 2>only for tomorrow, but they're also playing for three, five,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>ten years down the road. I think we need some

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>more general managers with a little bit more short term

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>goals to be able to drive some of those types

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of deals. Otherwise they're going to hold onto those prospects

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>in the name of trying to win down the road.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 4>Preach Datt, that last part was money right there. Last

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>question for May I'm a shift gears here, Ron Washington,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 4>what do you think that? I mean, he's been around

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 4>the block, he's been everywhere as well, loved. I mean,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 4>what do you think he'll bring to the Giants moving forward?

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Todd, I'm glad you brought up. He is one

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 2>of my biggest friends and mentors in the game. Just

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a spectacular human being. Anyone who's touched this guy knows

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>that he just loves the game of baseball at such

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a high level. He's not a glass half full guy.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>He's the water's brimming over. He is tremendous. I've never

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 2>seen a guy who has the impact he has on

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the morale of a team. Just nobody was ever down

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>when wash was in the clubhouse. He genuinely believed and

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 2>he espoused when he was the manager of the Texas Rangers,

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>give us the double a roster tank, We're going to

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 2>kick somebody's butt. And that's basically what he said. Never

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>once in his tenure with the Rangers did he ever

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 2>come up to me or John Daniels and say, Hey,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 2>this guy can't play here or he's not good enough.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>He always embraced the best that every player had to

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>offer and put them in the ultimate position to succeed.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 2>In addition to that, guys, I think he's the best

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 2>infield I've ever been around. I've heard great things about

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Perry Hill and a few guys, but he was the

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>best guy I've ever witnessed. He's a great base running guy,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>tremendous third base coach. I know we won't be doing

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>that for the Giants, but in today's day and age,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how many competitive advantages you get from

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>your working coaches you unequivocally do that from Wash. You

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>see what he's how he's impacted every team's defense that

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 2>he has been part of. You know, Marcus Simeon, Eric Chavez,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 2>oz Alby's, all of these guys give him so much

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 2>credit for becoming the Gold Globe players that they became.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think on top of that, he's just such

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a effervescent, spectacular human. So does San Francisco. Giants obviously

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>have a very good left side of the infield. You've

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 2>got Raphael Devers potentially moving to first base. What better

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>guy to come in and not only make him an

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>average first basement, but if there's anybody out there who

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 2>can make him an above average first basement, it would

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>be Wash. One of their best prospects, Eldridge is going

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to be coming up at some point soon. Wash will

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 2>help him, yet to be determined what they're going to

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>do at second base. He's also going to help the

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 2>veterans on the left side. Chapman's obviously a perennial Gold

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Glove domas solid above average defender at short But he's

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>going to help those guys. I think he's going to

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>help the guys in the field. He's going to also

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 2>help the swagger and attitude in the clubhouse. This is

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a guy who believes he is going to be a champion.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Every time he sets foot on the field. It exudes

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to all the players around him. He is going to

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>be a huge advantage for the San Francisco Giants.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 3>All right, last one for me too. Rockies kind of

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 3>went out and made a let's just call it an

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 3>interesting hire. What are the Rockies kind of building with

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 3>who they brought in?

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, Paul is a exceptionally intelligent individual. He

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 2>and I happened to grow up in the same neighborhood,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>played high school baseball against each other, so I've known

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 2>him for quite some time. You know, I think he

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>gets a lot of credit and credit deserved for being

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 2>on the advent of bringing analytics into baseball. He had

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a great career in baseball then left to spend ten

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 2>years in the NFL, so I think he comes back

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to baseball even more polished. He's got some additional ideas

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 2>he's going to have about building a championship team. As

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you guys know, playing in Colorado is probably the biggest

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Rubik's cube in all of professional sports. Trying to help

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>turn altitude from what is now one of the biggest

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>atturns to the biggest competitive advantages. And if someone can

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>figure that out, that team has a chance to have

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous run, because I think people will be very

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 2>concerned about having to go play there, especially in playoff

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>type settings. So I think Paul is an extremely intelligent guy.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 2>No stone will be left unturned. He's going to be

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 2>researching altitude from every single angle. And then he partners

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 2>up with a guy named Josh Burns, who has had

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous career in the game. Another good friend of mine.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Josh and I went to college together, played baseball in

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>college together, and he got me my first job working

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 2>for the Colorado Rockies. Josh has been a general manager

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 2>twice over He's been to the World Series eight times.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>He has won four of them, one with the Red Sox,

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>three with the Dodgers. He's been instrumental in building out

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the player development and amateur scouting side for the Dodgers.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.479
<v Speaker 2>He's going to bring that knowledge and acum into the

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Colorado Rockies. I think the Rockies are in great hands

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 2>right now. Now. The question is what additional changes are

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>they able to make and how will they invest in

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 2>the players and staff on the field to compliment what

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Josh and Paul are doing in the front office.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, that last one, and I think this is

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating topic that you would have great insight on,

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk about it right after you

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>leave us. There was an article in The Athletic yesterday

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>called Inside How MLB teams evaluate player makeup from top

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>prospects to big time free agents. It is written by

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Enosarus and Chandler Rome. It is sparked by an interesting

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>case from Barbaldez had a very public incident that he

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has a side of a story to most people saw

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he was throwing at his catcher, right,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and that sparks the whole makeup conversation. So I'm curious

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on how you would handle a player like that.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And we got some inside on how there's videos that

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>are sent out which is pretty common from free agents,

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and they put a lot in there about his characters.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So how do front offices evaluate that? And you know this, right,

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not speaking for your group, but there are some

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>front offices sometimes that miss where like I'm pretty on

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the outside and I'll hear like that guy is not

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>good news, and it's like, why did the acquirements? Someone

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>will say to me that team doesn't do good enough

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>homework on makeup.

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Scott's a great question, and you know, I

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 2>think it's multi layers. So I just would say this is,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think there's some teams that are very

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 2>model driven in their decision making, and the bottom line

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 2>is makeup doesn't really show up well in models. It's

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>not empirical, it's a little bit softer, it's a little

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>more subjective than it is objective. So when you talk about,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, an eyebrow raised by you guys, when you

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 2>see a guy sign and you're like, wow, that doesn't

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 2>seem as if it's going to align, well, it's probably

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>with a team that really isn't putting a ton of

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 2>value on makeup at all because it's not measurable. I think,

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>in contrast, one thing, I've been Party two and I've

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 2>been so fortunate in both Texas and Minnesota. One thing

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that we did is we employed former major league players

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>to really help us sort through this discussion. So in Minnesota,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>two of our first hires when we got there were

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 2>LaTroy Hawkins and Tory Hunter. We then eventually added Justin

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Mornau and Michael Couldiere to the group. And so what

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 2>we would do is we would give them a list

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>of free agents and say, hey, guys, based upon your

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 2>personal experience and or your friends in the game, can

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you find out what is it like to go shoulder

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>to shoulder with this guy in a clubhouse, What is

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>he like on the field, what does he like when

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 2>things get tough, because we wanted to get firsthand experience

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 2>and knowledge on those things rather than us speculating. I

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 2>think it's really tough for scouts to break this down

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>because sometimes we see a guy who hits a pop

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>up in the infield and he doesn't run it out,

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and also we ascribe all sorts of negative attributes to them.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that has nothing to do with it.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>So we want to talk to players who've either played

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>with those guys and been in the clubhouse with him,

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>or who can access players or coaches who have been

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in the clubhouse with him to find out exactly what's

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 2>going on with these guys, so there's no surprises when

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>we acquire them, and with ram Berveldes specifically, you know,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>it's such a fascinating case. I actually had a chance

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 2>to work with Ulysses Cabrera's agent this offseason because I

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>am an independent person right now. He asked my opinion

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>of how our front office is going to perceive him.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 2>He did put together a video as you reference God,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and the video is fascinating because usually these videos are

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>hype performance videos. This is actually a twenty minute video

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 2>which really gives you insights into who Cranburvel does is

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 2>where did he grow up, what is his family like?

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's the classic story of a guy growing

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>up in a household with no electricity and no running

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>water and really having to fight for everything throughout his life.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>It really put the person in perspective, and I think

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>for teams that genuinely care about that this will be

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a video that will probably open their eyes. For teams

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that maybe put less of an emphasis on makeup, it

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>may not matter whatsoever, but the reality is, this guy's

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>been a really, really good performer for quite some time.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Hits the market a little bit older than some free agents,

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but no fault of his own. This was because the

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Houston Astros probably tried to do a few things on

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the front end to extend his tenure with them. He's

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a year older, but he is one of these guys,

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>who is, you know, throwing six seven innings every single

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 2>time he goes out there. I think that's going to

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>get the attention of teams. They're all going to ask

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>him what happened that night when he crossed up the catcher.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>As long as I think he's accountable, contrite and sincere

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>about his answer, hopefully he will be put in a

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 2>position where the teams can look past that and he'll

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>find the perfect team and the perfect fit for him

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to continue to showcase his talents on the mound.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>That's great insight. I didn't know you worked with the team.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Even more interesting to hear how that all works. And yeah,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's obvious, it's not in this case something

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that is hidden because the one incident was very public.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's cool to hear what goes on behind the

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>scenes to then say, hey, one thing happened for one

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>second about the other billion seconds that this guy exists

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>around your team and what that's going to look like.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, well, in Scott, I just would toss it

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to the players here for a second, Like I always

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>felt in my career when I was evaluating a situation,

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>if a guy was genuinely contrite about what happened, if

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>there was a transgression. And I come from a team

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 2>where we traded for Josh Hamilton, we signed Matt Bush,

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 2>these guys had done some things in their lives which

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 2>were challenging, to say the least. Both of those guys

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>were genuinely accountable to their actions. They were contrite about that,

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and they were aspirational of doing better. And one of

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the litmus tests I always talked about was can this

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>person stand in front of a sixth, eighth, or tenth

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>grade class of students and say, hey, listen, I made mistakes.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Here were my mistakes, here's what I learned from them.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Don't do what I did. And if they can do that,

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>then we're in position. We all want to forgive guys, right,

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 2>we want to give them second chances, provided that they're

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 2>genuinely accountable for what transpired.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, oh, go ahead, Todd.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, I mean, honestly, I think at the end

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 4>of the day, we don't know what he was going through. Uh,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 4>people make mistakes. It's how you come back from it.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 4>And you give somebody an extra mistake or two, and

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 4>you see how they come back from and listen, it

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 4>looked bad, of course it did on TV. You saw

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 4>what he did. It looked like everything was on purpose,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah. But guess what, do you know the person.

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Do you know what he was going through that day?

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Was there something on his mind? Okay, then let's get

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 4>to know the guy first before you make judgment. Of course,

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 4>love it.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I couldn't agree anymore. I think a

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of bringing guys into an organization, to your point,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like I'd be a perfect guy for

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 3>that job that you were speaking of because I played

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 3>on ten teams. I played with so many different guys.

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to judge a guy off of one moment

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 3>in their career. To Scott's point, that's one second of

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the billion second s he's lived on Earth. You know,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 3>some of these guys, you have no idea where they

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.719
<v Speaker 3>came from, how they grew up, what they did you know,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 3>personally speaking, I had a moment in my career that

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, was the lowest the lows. And if people

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 3>want to judge me for that one moment in time

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 3>where I made a mistake, so be it. But if

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 3>you ask anyone that I played with or that I've

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>been in contact with, coaches, front office players, they tell

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you that was just, you know, a moment of weakness.

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I grew from it. I stood up, I was accountable

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>for what I did. I moved on. I did everything

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:28.719
<v Speaker 3>I had to do in order to make it right

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 3>with the group of people that I offended and that

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I was hurt from. But it would kill me if

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 3>people still judge me for a moment on the field,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in the most competitive environment where I had a moment

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of weakness. You know, And for Framber, he's been an

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 3>outstanding picture. To me, what he did is totally forgivable.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>It was a moment of a weakness, a lapse in judgment.

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>But he shouldn't be defined by, you know, the one

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>moment of his career. He's been way too valuable of

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a picture to your point, what he brings. He's been

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 3>in an organization that's been you know, aside from maybe

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers kind of the gold standard of being in

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 3>a competitive environment and building a culture. So hopefully people

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 3>will either watch this video or go out and do

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>their research. I've been a part of a lot of

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>organizations where a GM will come down or is always

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 3>present around the trade deadline and he'll straight up be like, Hey,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 3>we're thinking about getting this guy. What have you heard

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 3>on him? Have you played with him? What's he like?

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 3>They want to go down? Is he going to fit

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 3>in this clubhouse?

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 3>And if the answer is yes, he's gonna fit in.

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>And if the answer is like, you know, he's a

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit difficult to handle. But I think what we've

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 3>created in this clubhouse is enough to kind of bring

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 3>him in and he's not going to be a distraction

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 3>because the talent is so great. You bring a guy

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 3>in and you know, people could change depending on their

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 3>environment and the people are around, they can improve, you know.

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully this is just a blip on the radar

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 3>for him, something we're not talking about, you know, once

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 3>he signs and just allow his body of work to

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 3>go kind of speak for him.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, Kevin, I'll add one thing to what you just said.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>There which is one thing we did in addition to

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 2>talking to some of our leaders. When we're talking about

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>bringing a guy into the clubhouse, we went and talked

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>to the visiting clubhouse manager and we asked him, Hey,

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>how does this guy conduct himself in the clubhouse? How

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 2>does he interact with the clubs? You know, these are

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>guys who are you know, he doesn't have to look

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 2>up to them. He can treat them however they want to.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's fascinating revealing how players interacted with clubhouse guys.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And we canceled trades based upon what we heard from

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>our visiting clubhouse guy in terms of the character we

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>thought that the player may have based upon how he

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>may be mistreated some people in the clubhouse. And we've

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>also enhanced our interest in players based upon the leadership

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that they showed in the clubhouse. So I think players

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 2>should understand we're trying to do our homework. We're trying

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 2>to get the best information we can. But the age

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 2>old discussion, hey somebody's always looking, I think is somewhat true,

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Like how do you conduct yourself when you think nobody's looking?

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Is part of how we're evaluating you. And then the

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 2>last thing I'll say, is we preach to our kids

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 2>all the time. You're not defined by the adversity, but

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 2>you're defined by how you respond to the university. We

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 2>should afford our teammates the same luxury we afford our children.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I like that, and I like bringing in players to help,

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and players that like the ones you're looking at on

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the screen here, because if they're doing podcasts and digital

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>shows and they're just delivering real talk all the time,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's good. You don't want a fluff guy that's just

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, yeah, everyone's okay, Like you need somebody

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>who's going to tell you, hey, this is really how

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy is. So I like that that. This was great.

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. Great to catch up with you again.

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Totally different combo this way, without the catchers. They'll probably

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be back next time we chat. But encouraging everyone also

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to check out your new show, Rosters to rings, check

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out the pod wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks dad,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>good to talk to you.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me on guys. Always a pleasure.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that Levine, longtime baseball executive. Let's just bring this

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>in for a couple minutes to wrap it up, because

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it does come from that article guys, specifically on Framberbaldez KP.

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 1>You provided a great context on what happened and how

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>you personally feel like you're someone that would forgive the

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.479
<v Speaker 1>situation look at it as a one off. The way

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>our world works nowadays is something like that goes viral

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and somebody just I don't want to say, cancels them forever,

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're like, oh, I would never want him on

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>my team, And hey, I get a little drastic sometimes

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm not going to lie, right, I didn't play,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm looking at it from a different sphere. I'm

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to look at it as if I own a

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>team and he costs one hundred and fifty million dollars?

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Am I okay with that? I'm not saying, hey, am

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I going to have another incident just like that? But

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is the character in line?

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this guy somebody that I feel like I can trust?

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to be a problem because we know

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that he's a good pitcher, we know that he can

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>pitch in a playoff game, we know that he can

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>be a number one or two starter for a team

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>for the next several years. But how do you think

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it owner looks at that look it.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't want to get into specific names here,

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 3>but there there are people employed by teams, players that

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 3>have done a lot worse. And you know, it's recent news.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 3>So and obviously the timing for him would never would

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 3>have been good. But for his own individual you know,

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 3>free agency, the timing couldn't be any worse. If this

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 3>was four or five years ago, people are probably talking

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 3>about it. The only reason it's still relevant is he

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>recently did it. He's about to be a free agent,

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 3>so you have to factor that in. But you know,

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 3>to that's point, you know, we we should give people

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more grace. We should give people the

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 3>ability to go out make an apology if it's sincere,

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 3>give him a give them an opportunity to to to

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>prove people wrong. And teams are not dumb. Teams are

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>going out and doing their homework. Much to his point,

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and I love that conversation, being able to get into

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 3>the mind of a GM and hear all these sort

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of things, you know, the visiting clubhouse guy, the travel secretary,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 3>your nutrition's, your chefs, all these people they're gonna reach

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 3>out to. You know, I in my opinion alex Anthopolis

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 3>is one of the best gms in baseball because he's

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 3>so real. He comes and talks to his players. And

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 3>when I was in Atlanta, when I was in Toronto,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 3>most recently in Atlanta, these things would come up all

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 3>the time. You know, hey, we're thinking about getting this guy.

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 3>He would come sit at you know, launch or dinner

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 3>with four or five of us and be like, hey,

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I know you played with this guy. What do you

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 3>got on him? Will he fit in? You know I

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 3>heard this. Do you think that's true? You know I

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 3>talked to this person, you know, so it's really it

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 3>is an important factor. But I don't think any one

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 3>player should be defined by any moment on the field.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Give him a chance to explain himself. And like you said,

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 3>you've never walked them out on any one of these shoes.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 3>You have no idea what this guy had come, where

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 3>he had come from, the amount of adversity had faced

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 3>in his life for him to be judged on this

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 3>one cross up of his picture, where yes, it did

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 3>look very intentional. You could look on the face that

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 3>he was obviously upset with, you know, maybe the way

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>he was calling a game. But this guy grew up

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 3>in a place that didn't have running water, probably slept

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>on the floor. Like, let that be kind of the

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 3>foundation of this guy's character more than this moment that

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of went viral.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's good insight. And hey, my last point on

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this It says in the article eighty seconds into a

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minute video, the content switches from on field

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>results to flushing out what kind of person Bramberbaldez is.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>That's cool.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, whoa twenty five minutes? We're doing a

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Netflix stock Let's let's maybe pair it down a little bit.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're going to keep tod Father

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on twenty five minutes on anything? Right?

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Nope?

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, no, Yeah.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the what's the sweet spot? Top Father?

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe five?

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Can I get five out of you? If it's a

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>good story.

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Now you didn't get me, you give me eight to twelve? Okay?

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, me talked to you to this to this point too, Like,

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we talked about a guy poping up of

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 3>the infield and jogging down the first base like that.

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 3>People don't know the the entirety of you know, what

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a player is going through, Like there's a lot of

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 3>times you're playing banged up and you've been told, hey,

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>don't run hard down the line. I mean, I know

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that's a microcosm of you know, what was happening, but

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 3>like we're just so quick to judge players from what

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we see and what is put on Twitter or Instagram

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 3>and it becomes these viral moments. But there's so much

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 3>that goes on behind the scenes. Like you know, you

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 3>could have a newborn at home and not have a

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of sleep, and you could just you know, not

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 3>be in your right mind and go out and do

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>something and you're judged for It's like, at the end

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of the day, we're human beings. We have emotions, we

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>have problems outside the field, we have lives outside the field.

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Like things happen, you know, but if you can stand

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 3>up and maybe that was maybe to his fault he

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't get in front of the camera after that happened

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 3>and said, hey, I made a mistake. It was a

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 3>lapse of judgment, you know, like I wasn't vibing with

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 3>my catcher, I was upset, I made a mistake or

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 3>I got crossed up. I don't know what the scenario was,

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 3>but the fact that he hasn't answered those questions. You know,

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's you know, maybe the bigger story here, but

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 3>it's not what he did, you know, allow people an

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to kind of, you know, have a comeback story.

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>That's my only thing, guys. I know we got to run,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard when you didn't get the public apology,

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of got the denial and maybe things happened behind

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, but it helps, like it would help him.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I know it sucks and maybe I'm wrong here, guys,

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but everyone that looked at the video kind of feels

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the same way. I wish that he would have just

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>come out or even now and said, like, I messed up,

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm a human. Can you feel me on this one?

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I apologize like forgive me to the public and forever,

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think it would have played out better.

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 2>That's me.

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think people do give forgiveness, but it seemed like

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a denial at the time and we've never

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really gotten it. I'm sure the conversation's different with teams,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>but that's the main issue I have. Do you guys

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>feel me on that one?

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Like if he just.

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Comes back and says that that part I think makes

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it easier it's hard to look at the video and

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>be like that was a cross up. That was a

0:41:57.800 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>real genuine cross up.

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 4>It's because and I think the biggest issue of the

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 4>whole thing, and I'll just button it up, it's because

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 4>he did it to his own teammate. You know. It

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 4>wasn't like, it wasn't like he did it to somebody

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 4>he didn't like, you know, he did like, what was

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 4>that about? And that's something that'll stick with him, you know.

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 4>And there's far more horror stories. Don't get me wrong.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 4>The guy's okay, it could have been much worse, don't

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 4>get me wrong. But yes, he did it to his

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 4>own teammate. And that's that's the problem that people are

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 4>going to have with