WEBVTT - SEC & Big Ten Reality + Sark vs Texas Tech

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>You know what hurts me a lot is when you

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have a friend and then you have another friend, and

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>then those two friends are fighting because it's like they

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>want you to choose a side. And even if they

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>don't ask you to choose a side, you fear the

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>inevitable is they're going to ask you to choose a side.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that's kind of where we are Jesse

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>with Sark and Joey Maguire right now, friends of the program,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and I just hope they don't make us choose sides.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>What we are going to choose to do is talk

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about this little lone star spat could be the name

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of a future rivalry game. Sounds corporate enough, so we'll

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. Were jam Pack. We're high top a

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty stormy downtown Nashville, Tennessee, on this Sunday night, May

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty first, the Year of Our Lord twoenty twenty six.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of trying to walk a tight rope, as

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I vowed to you that I would walk in the

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Year of Our Lord two thousand and twenty six, about

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not letting the show slash my mood take a negative turn,

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as it can do in May and June when there's

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>no games happening, and we're after spring and we're before

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>media days, and everyone's just got to find something to

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about. So if people stir things up, couldn't be us.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We just react to the stirring, but we don't contribute

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to the stirring. So far, we've done I think a

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>solid B plus job of that this year, and I'm

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to maintain. So we're gonna talk about some conference

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>superiority stuff tonight. We're gonna have some Bowl predictions on

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the show. Somebody asked a question about Alabama's aura, and

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about that. We got Steve Sarkis and

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Joy maguire sniping a little bit, and as someone who

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>has recently sat down with one and may just sit

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>down with the other within the week, I will comment

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on the goings on out there in Texas, and I will,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and I mean ever so briefly touch on this whole

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Senate bill. There are some things you need to know,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I will tell you they're watching us in Mayra, Texas, Omaha, Nebraska, Bogata, Columbia.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Checked then in the live chat and slidell Louisiana. Thank

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much. I say thank you every time, but

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not in the script. I mean it. Thank you.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We get to do this year round. I'm not forced

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk Spurs Nicks, not that there's anything wrong with that,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but we just get to talk college football year round,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's all we do because that's really what we're

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>passionate about around here, and it's because of you. So

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just one small request, if you're not already subscribed to

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the channel, subscribe to the channel, because that is how

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we keep this show the way we want it. By we,

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you and I because if you're here, I

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>presume that you want college football year round as well.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Big week for the Speaker series because there have been

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>some allegations thrown around about us in the past. You know,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether G five Josh is dead, Jesse. Some people

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think G five Josh is dead, and I've told you

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>five Josh is not dead slash G six Josh. But

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what we'll find out this week. We'll find

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>out this week. In the meantime, let's dive into the mailbag.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we go mailbag to lead the show off, and

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one of you, you were noticing some things this week

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>about some comments that had come out of these various

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>spring meetings. So Josh from Miami, Florida, said, did you

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>see where Brett McMurphy had a poll where the SEC

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Big Ten are basically even in terms of

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>being the number one conference? What says you? Well, the

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>first thing I say, Josh is have you talked to

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Jesse and has Jesse told you that we have proof

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that this pole even happened? I mean, do we know

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that the poll exists? Okay, well, let's take a look

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>at the poll them because I've got I gotta see

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the wording from myself. Not that I'm calling you a liar, Josh,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta see the wording. So Brett McMurphy's wording

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>was SEC Commission Greg Sanki said the SEC is quote

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>by far the strongest football league unquote. Do you agree

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which conference is the strongest football league? That was a

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>poll question from Brett McMurphy, friend of the program. The SEC,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>by zero point one percentage points ends up taking the

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>number one spot. So you're asking, Josh, do I agree

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>with these results? No? I don't. The Big Ten's the

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>best conference in college football right now, So I would

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have voted Big Ten. It turns out my vote would

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>have tied it up, so my apologies to everyone, and

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>then we would have gone to a runoff, and I

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how that works in Twitter poll. So yeah,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten's is the best conference in college football

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. So no, I don't agree with the Twitter

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>poll results. Now, what Brett McMurphy said there, as you'll notice,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is by far the strongest football league. Well those weren't

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>his words, those were the words of the SEC commissioner.

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll get to that in a second. But look,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just rerack the balls here for a second. No immunity.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I know what the argument for the SEC is. I

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>make it a lot of times on this show. But

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about conference superiority. But even even if

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I was, like if I had to take the side

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC, I just talked about conference depth, which

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is the same thing Greg Sinkie's talked about. But nobody

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>judges leagues from the middle of the pack. Like, let's

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>be real, now, if the SEC was in the Big

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>TENHS position, all you guys would be banging the drum

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of Ohio State, Michigan, and Indiana past three national champs.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how you judge conferences now, It would be different

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>if it was one team, if it was Ohio State

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that had won back to back to back titles and

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone else sucked, that's a little bit different. But having

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>three different teams win three different national championships over the

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>last three years, and then you got Oregon sitting there

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as a prime candidate to maybe make it a fourth

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and four years. For all we know this year, Yes,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the best conference in college football. We don't really

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>need to argue how Vanderbilt stacks up against Iowa or

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State, all due respect, but if you did want

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to argue conference depth, yeah, I do think that's a

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>little different conversation. But I do want to go back

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to what Greg SANKI was talking about because I do

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's some different layers to this. Okay, so I've

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>already answered the question Big Ten's the best conference in

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>college football. But Brett McMurphy put up this Greg sank quote.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>This is from SEC spring meetings about a week ago.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>This was a quote from the league commissioner. He said,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the entirety of our football league,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>we are by far the most competitive and the strongest

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>in football by far. The depth of this league. This

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>league stands alone. I don't have a huge issue with

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>most of what he said there. It really is all

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes of the beholder. Conference superiority, as Memo

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>once said, is in the eyes of the beholder. If

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>best means deepest to you, the SEC is the best

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>in college football. I choose to look at the top,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and at the top, the Big ten's the best, and

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think disproportionately, that's how most people, including me, judge

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>best conferences. So it's the Big Ten for me. However,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if you then want to remove it a little bit

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>and go with all these different qualifiers, like you want

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask about the most entertaining league, the most parody

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>wrought league, the most competitively balanced league, Well, I would

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>actually argue the Big twelve has been the most competitively

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>balanced for a little while. But you know, comparing these

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>two leagues, yeah, the SEC. I think the bottom of

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is probably ahead of the bottom third or

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pybly a bottom quarter of the Big Ten. You can

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make that argument. I wouldn't really mind that a whole lot.

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think it matters, although it could be

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>argued that it matters when it comes to strength of schedule,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to argue the strength of conference

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>schedules are tougher than the SEC, that's fine. If you

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>want to argue that the overall lineup of games is

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>more appealing and more entertaining on a Saturday, these sound like, oh,

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you would call them. They sound

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like backup arguments when you can't tout the main argument,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which is just we're the best at the top. But

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>if that's the route you want to go, then I'm

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>happy to agree with you on that, just as long

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as you circle back around and acknowledge why you've resorted

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to that, Because, Jesse, what I noticed when the SEC

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was running off that string of consecutive national championships is

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>no one was talking about the things they're talking about now.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're having to resort to these things, which is fine,

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but let's just make sure we tell the truth about that. However,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it is truth. It is definitely truth about the entertainment aspect.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I work in the media business, so I pay

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more attention to this than I talk about

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>on the show. But I remember when we were at CBS,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>still in the latter days, maybe like the last year,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>when I was at CBS. I was so mad that

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even put a competitive bid on the table

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for the SEC contract and ESPN got the whole thing,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't make a serious run at that. I

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.119
<v Speaker 1>don't even think they submitted a bid for the playoffs.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was mad about that because I wanted to

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be network that had the most valuable inventory. And so,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not at CBS anymore. But obviously CBS

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>has a deal. They get a package of Big Ten games.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>NBC's kind of got something similar. You know that Fox

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>has the number one game per week from the Big Ten,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but man, some of those some of those lineups are sparse,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and Fox gets first pick. But even with Fox, like

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten does not really schedule up all that

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>much in out of conference play early in the year.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, notwithstanding, they played Texas this year, last year,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Michigan's played Oklahoma this year last year. But there aren't

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of marquee matchups as evidenced by the Big

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Noon on Fox. The Big Noon kickoff lineup came out

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the other day. Jesse, I think Kent State's on there, right,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and Ohio's on there? Who is it? It's it's North Texas, Indiana,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and then they got a huge one in ann Arbor

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in week two of Oklahoma and Michigan, and then it's

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Kent State, Ohio State. It's just not a lot to

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>choose from. And then you look at those lineups, those

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>triple hitters that ABC gets to stack up. So yeah, man,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to talk about ratings, I don't care.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to talk about that, and you

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about entertaining top to bottom and keeps

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you tuned in, great, okay, advantage SEC. I'm pretty sure

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that conference are traded in a heartbeat right now if

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they could have back to back to back national titles.

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really know what the end result of

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that argument is. Here's my question, how long does this

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>status quo last? How long do we continue to look

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>at this picture and say, well, the SEC may be

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the deepest conference, but man, the Big ten's the best

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at the top. Is that just something that starts to

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>become a trend that's a constant over the next five

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>years or is it just that? Is it a trend

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right now? Is it cyclical? Is there like an ebb

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to the flow? What could happen which I would laugh

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>at is someone like Texas any given year, Let's say

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. Let's say Texas just rattles off dominant

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>season this year and they win the national title, but

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere nobody else in the SEC even sniffed it. What

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>would be funny is everybody who thinks national titles are

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the end all be all would look and say, well,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess the SEC reigns supreme now, and you'd have

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>other people look and say, well, in totality, the league

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was worse this year than it has been in recent years.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there's context that has to be added. I

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>get all of it. Here's what I do know. I've

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>never seen the SEC take the field. I've never seen

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten take the field. I've seen Georgia take

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the field. I've seen Penn State take the field. So

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of choose to discuss it like that. But

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand that doesn't look as good on the thumbnail,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and I understand we don't get nearly as many questions

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the inbox about that. Let us move on. Eleven minutes,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesse not one of those thirty minute specials for the

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>A Bloc tonight. So there's been there's been some argument.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>There's been some some chirping back and forth. James from Midland,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas hit me and said, Sark calls out Texas Tech schedule,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>and Joey Maguire then says, play us, you coward, and

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>now crickets. Is Sark running away from a check his

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>mouth could in cash beautifully worded question. I assume most

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know what James is talking about, but if

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't, Sark was I believe the Houston Touchdown Club.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to say that's where he was recently, and

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he made a comment, truthfully that he made to me

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, but it was off the record, so

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't run my mouth about it. But then Sark

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>chose to say it publicly. So whatever, it's his belief

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that his backups could go undefeated against Texas Tech schedule.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Now it is important to note what he did not say,

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>because here's what he did say. I'm about to read it,

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>but let's just make sure because we had a lot

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of questions in the inbox asking me about what he

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>did not say. And what he did not say is

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they could beat Texas Tech with their backups. Okay, because

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you heard it wrong, So I did

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not put those on the air. I put that question

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on the air because that question was worded correctly. Here's

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what sark did say. There is a team in our

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>state that plays in another conference that has a schedule

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that I would argue if I played with our twos

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in our threes, we could go undefeated and they'll probably

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>make the playoff this year. He's talking about Texas Tech.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll give you my take on that in

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a second. But then the rest of the story is

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all Paul Harvey would say. Once upon a time when

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I was a youth in Georgia was Joey McGuire was

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to sit still and take that. And so

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>word got to Joey McGuire and Joey McGuire, I think

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>was at Big twelve Spring meetings, which has not become

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a full on circus like the SECS has as of yet,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and Joey McGuire decided to do what people in West

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Texas do. You take a shot at him. That's fine,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>but they're probably going to return serve at the very least.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So here was Joey McGuire's response to Steve Sarkesian's quote.

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>And I said, there's no way they're talking about us,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>because Sarks a pretty tough guys. Teams are really tough,

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and I would think that if he was talking about us,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>that he would call us out, like he wouldn't just say,

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, just kind of this comment of well, there's

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>another team in our state, and so I guess he

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>was talking about us. So I've actually talked to Keith

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Patterson and I've talked to GJ. Kenny, and they're willing

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to take our games and Aveline Christian will go to

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Texas State. We'll buy our contract out of Ablene Christian.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure because Texas has got a lot of money,

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>they can buy their contract out. But I do know

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of Red Raiders that will help them

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>buy that contract out if they don't want to. And

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>they can come to Love a week one and you know,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>we can figure out if they're twos and threes can

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 2>win this conference.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I know not everyone's a body language expert, but if

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you are a body language expert, rich rod rig has

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>actually had the best quote in that whole sound bite,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't open his mouth, but if you can

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>read body language, rich rod said a ton. He was

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just kind of seeded off to the immediate left of

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Joey McGuire stage right. I guess so that was great.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to get rich Rod's thoughts on that, because

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's commented on it publicly. Look, that

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is Joey McGuire. That's the entire attitude of Texas Tech.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech has either become the heel athletic department in

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>college football or the biggest babyface athletic department in college football,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>depending on your point of view. Either way, it's wonderful

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to me because I go back to a couple of

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>beliefs I have about sports, college football included, not everybody

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>has to like each other. In fact, I encourage this

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment as a child of the spur Your era.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I encourage an environment where everyone doesn't get along and

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone's not concerned with hurting someone else's feelings. This time

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of year, especially, you want to take a shot at someone,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Take a shot at someone. I don't care they're going

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a microphone because everyone does now, and they're

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to take a shot back at you. But

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if the worst thing in the world is that the

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>head coach at Texas Tech and the head coach at

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas aren't getting along. If the worst thing in the

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>world is people in West Texas and people in Austin,

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Texas figure out we don't have a whole heck of

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot in common, which is not breaking news, by

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, then I'm happy to live in that world. Frankly,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it had gotten a little too cushy in hear from

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>my liking anyway. Too many people just want to be friends. Look,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you want a friend, go to the playground. This is

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>college football, this is major major collegiate athletics. This is

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not the worst thing in the world. Okay, So that's

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the first thing. The second thing is that is the

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>attitude Joey maguire should have. And of course the scheduling

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>challenge is not going to be I think Texas has

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the toughest schedule in the country this year. They caught

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>him in a perfect spot. It's just a little chess

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>move by Joey McGuire. There. Sark ran his mouth a

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit and I'm gonna address what he said in

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a second, and Joey McGuire heard it and said, you

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>know what, let's throw out a challenge. We know that

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to accept we'd be happy to play them.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas has no illusions of adding to what is already

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the toughest schedule in the country. So, like you knew,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it was a risk free shot back. But the overarching

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess story here is Texas Tech could be happy

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to join the SEC if the SEC called and invited him,

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but that call's not coming. So Texas Tech plays the

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>hand that's dealt to them every year. They can only

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>play the schedule they play, and they play it last

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>year very effectively, and they'll probably play it very effectively

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. And that's whether or without Breton Soresby at quarterback.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But here's the other part of it, all right, So

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Joey McGuire, I'm not mad at him because Joey MacGuire

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.959
<v Speaker 1>probably handled it exactly as I would. And then on

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, I don't think Sark's even wrong, which

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is the crazy part. So here's a little backstory. When

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I was out in Austin last month, we did to

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sit down with Sark. I hung out with him for

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a little while afterwards, and we got to talking about

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>things of this nature. Okay, So the part of the

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation that's no longer privileged is the part he went

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>public with. So he rattles that off. He says, man,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I really believe our twos could go undefeated against Texas

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Tech schedule, and that's a power force schedule. What we

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about was the great disparity in strength of

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>schedule in this sport. Okay, So I shot back and

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, you have the opportunity, you slash. You had

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to play Texas Tech schedule every year. It

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was called staying in the Big twelve. But you guys

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to do that. What in Sark's decision. But

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to do that. They wanted to come

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to the SEC. So to whom much more is given,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>much more is going to be asked. So we have

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>all that, and everyone understands that's the world we live in.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't even think he's wrong. Now, you can't

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>prove a counterfactual. So Texas's backups are not going to

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>play Texas Tech schedule, and so we don't know how

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>they would do. I will say, if we went to

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel Mic right now and had the traders over their

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>work up hypothetical lines for whatever that's worth, Yeah, they'd

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>probably be favored in most of these games Texas's backups. Yeah,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever that's worth is whatever that's worth. Obviously, the overarching

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>point he's trying to make is they were sitting there

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>with three losses last year, and they firmly believed that

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>they were a prisoner of scheduling up scheduling Ohio State

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>out of conference, not to mention playing a full SEC slate.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Opponents to that theory would say, you didn't get punished

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>for playing Ohio State. You got punished for losing to

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a really bad Florida team. And then I think the

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>deeper dive there and the the opinion that I have

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is I'm not even sure they got totally imprisoned because

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they lost those two games. Jesse. I think the committee

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>remembered how they were dead in the watering it's Mississippi State,

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>how they struggled to get past Kentucky, and those were

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in wins, very close wins. So Texas was not a

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dominant team last year. But Sarks looked, he looks at

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it and says, you know what, even if we weren't

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a dominant team, we could have scheduled cream puffs and

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>just skated by on the strength of our conference schedule,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we would have been a playoff team. We got punished

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for scheduling up in his point is, and it's not

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>entirely unfounded. Is there a lot of other P four

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>schedules out there? We'd probably go undefeated against and we'd

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>be the same team in both scenarios, but we'd be

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>left out in one and we'd be in the playoff

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in the other. Now, to sarks credit, it sounds like

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>he's making an argument for playoff expansion there. He's not.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>He's not. And this is where I kid you not.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>When I was talking to him, I think my voice

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>raised louder than his did, because this has been one

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of my soapboxes I've been on for a long time.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Is I don't have a problem with you scheduling really tough.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with someone not playing a

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>tough schedule as long as we're going to get to

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the finish line, and I have committee protocol in place

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that properly judges your record and your body of work

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>strength to schedule. I always have believed it's been misinterpreted.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I've always believed that there is a real seat at

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the table, or should be a seat at the table

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for a Vegas odds maker's perspective, not on your record

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>against the spread. I'm not talking about any of that foolishness.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about coming in and providing metrics that really,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really are the definitive stance on how tough your schedule was.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you need to put a nine to three

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>team in over an eleven to one team, so be it.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't bat an eye at that. But there is

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>still this really, really archaic clinging to you are what

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>your record says you are mentality, and enough of college

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>football doom that people like start look and say, why

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>should we even schedule up if all it's going to

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>come down to is wins and losses at the end

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Which makes sense in pro sports because

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone plays roughly the same kind of schedule, but makes

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>very little sense in college sports because people play varying

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>degrees of difficulty and schedule. I get what they're both saying.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>None of them, neither one of them is even wrong.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>My feelings aren't hurt a bit by it. But Texas,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>just to give you an idea of this year's landscape,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we went over and looked at the odds to win

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a National Championship on FanDuel. Texas plays eight teams this

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>year that have top twenty odds to win the national title.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech plays zero teams in the top thirty guys.

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't say anything about how good Texas or Texas

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Tech will be. It only says something about the relative

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>challenge that their schedules will present them. Now here's the

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>other follow up to that. This is just preseason stuff,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so the regular season will ultimately determine how tough their

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>schedules were. But the season hasn't happened yet, so this

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is the only view that we have. But rest assured

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas is going to play a pretty tough schedule and

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech's strength of schedule will pale in comparison to Texas.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Now what it could be is Texas Tech ends up

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>being the best team in the country anyway, and it

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. I've always said it doesn't matter who won

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl lest year. Jesse. Remind me right quick, Seahawks.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>If the Seahawks played hardaway high school schedule in Columbus, Georgia,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they still would have been the Seattle Seahawks. As it

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>turns out, they played an NFC West schedule, and they

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>still won the Super Bowl. But my point is, you

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are the team you are, So it's not like this

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>eliminator that, oh, it's impossible for Texas Tech to be

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the country. Look at their schedule,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>their schedules, their schedule. Teams aren't their schedule, but teams

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>play their schedule. And so if we get to the

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the road, and this is really the only

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>point Sarks made, and if we get to the end

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the road, and hypothetically it came down to nine

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and three Texas getting in or ten and two Texas

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Tech getting in or nine in three Texas versus eleven

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and one, Texas Tech starts looking at it and saying,

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I highly doubt that committee's putting a nine to three

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>team in over an eleven and one team, even if

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a mountain of data that supports one over the other,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because they can't get past that win loss record. And

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what, maybe that's just the price you pay

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for being a member of the SEC. Every other aspect

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sport is tilted in your favor. I do

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>not believe if Steve Sarkisian and Texas were presented the

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>option today to just trade places in life with Texas

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Tech that they would. And so if you are accepting

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your position, it comes with pros and cons. It comes

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with pluses and minuses, and this just happens to be

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the Minuses's that's the only way I've talked

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to myself off the ledge, because I told him, man,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like I almost I think I screamed once Savannah State

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>was there. She saw it. A couple of people were

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in there actually, but like, I get worked up over

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. But then I just have to tell myself self, ultimately,

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a show the following Sunday. Either way,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you personally are not losing any of these games. And

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>if you are basically presenting the supporting argument for a

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>playoff expansion, you need to be careful about how loud

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you yell it. Jesse, did you know last week that

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when I held up that football is Coming t shirt?

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We saw some web traffic. They didn't crash the site,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>but we saw some pretty significant web traffic, which begs

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the question why haven't I been holding up petstatemateial dot

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>com products on set before this? And the answer is

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I forget to bring them in. That's really all there

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is to it, but take my word for it, or

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the TV screen. Look the monitor that director

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Bradley has dialed up over here. Football is coming. The

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>hats are there, the sleeveless options are there. We've got

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the baby onesies there. There's a lot of new products

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>over there at the Peyt State Store. Paystatematerial dot com.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They make great Father's Day gifts, birthday gifts, random things

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on a Tuesday. Because your paycheck there's a little more

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>cheese on the whopper than you expected in the last paycheck,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>why not paystatematerial dot com. All right, let's move on.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna spend a ton of time on this,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>but I did promise that I would fill you in

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on my thoughts on this whole Senate bill thing. Ron

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>from Cincinnati, Ohio, Why are we wasting time on a

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bill that we all know isn't gonna pass? Ran, Let

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>me tell you why we're wasting time on a bill

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that we all know isn't gonna pass. Cause the bill

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>is gonna pass. That's why we're spending more time on it,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're taking it a lot more seriously.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll notice, as many of you have because I read

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your submissions in the in you'll notice that it seems

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like we've batted a thousand on predicting the way this

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to go, and all the way back to January,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about how the Score Act was going to die

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>again because it was terminally flawed again, and how despite

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and the Big Ten putting their full lobbying

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>weight behind it, it was going to be a moot

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>point because it was going to die again. And then

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it died. You'll notice how during all that I kept

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>telling you, you know, what they should do. What they

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>should do is they should take the versions of the

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>School Act that work, i e. Governance, and they should

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>take this SBA overhaul, this Sport's Broadcasting Act overhaul concept

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>aka revenue, and they ought to just merge it in

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>one bill well long and behold Jesse. It turns out

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Senate was working on that all along. It turns

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>out Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell and the folks there

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate Commerce Committee just happened to be working

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on it all along. Dumb luck there. We got lucky

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>with that one. So you'll notice we had a pretty

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>good hit rate. As it turns out talking about this

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. So I am going to put

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that hit rate on the line here tonight, Jesse. I

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>am going to put our perfect record on Senate bill

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>discussion on the line, and I'm gonna say, not only

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>is this bill going to pass, it's going to pass comfortably,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 1>it's going to pass the Senate comfortably, and it's going

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to pass the House comfortably. So let's just write that down.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>It's May thirty first, still got a ways to go,

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's May thirty first, but let's just see how Let's

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>see how that stands the test of time. But here's

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what I want to ask you, guys, because there have

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of people having a lot of takes

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on this, and truthfully, a lot of you are probably

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>driving around listening to this show or watching it live

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right now and you'd like, don't even know what's in

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the bill. The very very long and short of it is,

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there has been an attempt by people who screwed up

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>college sports for a long time and could not even

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so much is right rules that were enforceable because they

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>were illegal, to get Congress to bail them out. We

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can't do our jobs. Please make it legal for us

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to do our jobs. Okay. Not surprisingly, they could not

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get enough support. They couldn't get bipartisan support. We screwed up.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Please bail us out unless you run a major bank.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Turns out does not get bipartisan support very often. And

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so enough people looked and said, wait a second, what

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about the players, what about the non revenue sports. You

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>guys have screwed your world up nine ways from Sunday.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>If we give you rules, and we're able to give

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you enforcement via anti trust exemption, how are you gonna

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fix anything? You guys are running yourselves into the ground financially.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So then there was this bright idea I don't say

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that sarcastically, to amend the Sports Broadcasting Act, which would

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>allow college football to do what the NFL did a

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>long time ago is take one pooled media rights deal

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and then bid it out. You'll notice how there is

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>no NFC West or AFC South media rights deal. There's

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>just an NFL media rights deal. And college football doesn't

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>do that. College football can do that if the SBA

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is amended, and I think it will be. And at

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that point, you don't force conferences to pull the media rights,

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but you present the option to and the theory goes,

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and I happen to buy into it because it's true,

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>despite the best lobbying and pr efforts out there of

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>certain big conferences, it's true that it would put a

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ton more money on the table. And then the follow

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>up theory is that that waterfall would absolve a lot

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the financial crises that currently face college athletics. Notice

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say it would put out all the fires.

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I said it would alleviate a lot of the crises.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But beyond all that, I want to ask you guys

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a simple, very selfish question tonight, because this is really

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>where my head's on this, and with all due respect,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I would advise your head to be in a similar

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>place on this. It's kind of a play on that

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Nick Saban question from like a decade and a half ago,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>only he was talking about offense and I'm talking about

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the overall sport. The only thing you ought to really

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be asking yourself, as a fan of college football when

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this Senate bill, is what do you

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>want college football to be? Not a guy on Twitter,

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>not a lawyer on TV, not your buddies, not anyone else.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Just be selfish for a second. Everyone else is Why

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't you just be selfish for a second, and you're

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting in Des Moines, Iowa, Fresno, California, Valdosta, Georgia, wherever

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you're watching the show tonight or listening to the show,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and just look in the mirror and ask yourself self,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what do I love about college football? Me and only me?

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Just look out for number one? What do I love

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about college football? What appeals to me? What draws me

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to it? Why am I so passionate about this game?

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do I love it more than any other sport

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world? And then ask yourself, what are we

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lacking now that we could gain from the wording of

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this bill? An imperfect bill. It's the very nature of

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>bipartisanship is no one gets everything they want. But ask yourself,

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you want? So I'm going to tell you

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what I want. I'll tell you what I want out

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of college football. I would love to see structure. Therefore,

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see rules that make sense and

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that are enforceable so it doesn't really have a Wild

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>West feel to it. I would love to, at least

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, stop worrying about the constant financial

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cliff that seems to be in the mere distance. And

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that is the fault of many, many people, mostly just

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the adults in the room, well, the people who are

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of adult age in the room. But whoever's fault it is,

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to take care of that. I would love

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for a track and field student at Iowa State to

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not feel that their scholarship may one day not exist

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>anymore because people screwed football up for a long time.

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I would love that. I'd love to live in that world,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I would love fans and players to win both.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I would love both fans and players to win. And

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so if you tell me that you have things like

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>five years to play five in this bill, if you

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have one penalty free transfer unless your coach leaves, in

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which case you know you have the addendum language in there.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>If you tell me that, then that to me means, Wow,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the transfer portal's not out of control anymore. In this structure,

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>people aren't playing for four or five schools. Full grown

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>adults twenty eight years of age are not threatening to

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>come back and play college football. I love that. I

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>love what it does to the value of a commitment

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>out of high school. I love what it does to

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>completely reignite what high school recruiting used to mean and

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like, because there's a much much higher percentage chance

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that a guy who commits to South Carolina out of

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>high school will be there three years from now. I

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>love what it does to reinforce the G five rosters

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>because you will have far less total and complete rating

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of those rosters. But more importantly, if you can only

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>move once, think about how much more strategic you have

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to be on that. And I also I look at it,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>especially from the second part of this, the revenue piece

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of it, and I think to myself, how awesome could

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a viewing experience be for a fan if they were

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to ever pool media rights. Now, there's a long way

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to go on this, and the SEC and the Big

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Ten are diametrically opposed to it. But I don't think

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the last of that story. But I'm asking myself,

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm being selfish for a second. I think about an

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State fan, a Michigan fan, a Penn State fan.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I think about fans of major schools in the Big Ten.

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You guys live in a world right now where you

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>know if you've got a big game on the calendar.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Ninety percent chance it's gonna kick off at noon Eastern,

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and your boy here does not mind a noon kickoff.

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm in the vast minority, and I know that

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like Ohio State just never gets to play major primetime

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>games at home, which is just stupid. But that's the

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>world we live in right now because everyone's locked into

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one network. The SEC's got a great deal with ESPN

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because they can just stack them triple header style, and

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>so all the big games are in primetime. But that's

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>not the way it is for the Big Ten. And

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>forget which conference you're in. Think about this. Think about

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a world where everyone's making more money in the aggregate.

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>But for us as fans, if I am a Michigan fan,

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I may be playing on Fox one week at noon,

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I may be playing on ABC in primetime the next week.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I may be a mid afternoon kickoff on NBC the

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>next week. And so all the networks are invested in

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all the leagues instead of this silo and tesstuous marketing

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 1>approach that you see right now, where it's like one

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>conference and one network locked arm in arm and basically

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you might as well fuse the two logos. That world stupid,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's the one we live in right now. The

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>NFL did away with this a long time ago, so

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>if you ever want to know about a category, I

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 1>think we should copy the NFL in it's that it's

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the way media rights work now. Networks don't like that

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because they got to pay a lot more money in

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of world. But I'm not a network executive.

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of college football, so I love a

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>world where all of the networks are invested in all

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the leagues because they cover all the leagues. And I

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>also love that all networks theoretically are invested in the

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>college football playoff, although that's a tirely separate argument here.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>We're just talking about media rights right now. But I

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>love that as a fan. Okay, I would argue most

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of you probably agree with that. But the tough part

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about supporting this bill is I agree with like sixty

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the opposition's viewpoints on it. Because if you

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>oppose this bill, I'm not so much talking about the

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>people who say, oh, this victimizes the player. Screw that.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 1>No it doesn't know it doesn't at all. No, it

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>does not. And if you really want to get a

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>real worldview of this, just go campus to campus, Go

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to college football players, not the ones who are

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sent out there from organizations. I mean just normal everyday

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>college football players and college athletes, but specifically college football players,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and go look at their day to day lives. I

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>do all year, I'm around them all year, and I

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>can tell you there is none. I don't think, Jesse,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard any major arguments about quality of life

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and about being victimized. It's all. It's all adults that

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>are speaking on behalf of players, almost without the player's

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>involvement in it, And so I don't buy that part

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of it. The part I do by is you guys

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are pushing back on this bill and saying this is

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially bailing out terrible decision making. The adults who screwed

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it up are getting bailed out, And you're not wrong.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You and I are locked arm in arm on that.

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want to talk about how administrative spending has

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been out of control, if you want to talk about

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>how buyout structures have been out of control because it's

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>monopoly money and they know that, Oh, don't worry, someone

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>will take care of us. Well, we'll get bailed out

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. Yeah, it's pathetic. It's pathetic.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Those people ought not be in charge of anything, but

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it's the best we can do. If you guys could

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>show me a magic lever where I could pull it

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of those people are flushed out during the process,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to pull it right along with you. That'd

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>be a bipartisan lever pull. I'd love to do that.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not the world we live in. So in an

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>idealistic world, I'd be happy to have that conversation with you,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>because you're right about it, even though you're opposing the

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>viewpoint I have, I agree with you. But in a

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>more realistic world, a lot of these folks are going

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to be around for a long time. They're just their

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>career collegiate bureaucrats. Basically, this is all they have. They

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>never built anything in their lives, so they got to

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>leach on to what someone else built, or a bunch

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of people built a long time ago, and just ride

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it as long as they can. Realistically, they're going to

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be here. So is the bill a net positive or

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a net negative. It is a supreme net positive, supreme

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>net positive. If selfishly I'm looking to get what I

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>want out of college football, because it returns a lot

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of what's been missing in college football the last few years.

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Keep an eye on the SEC in the Big Ten

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in this. They opposed it, they currently oppose it. They

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>lobbied hard against it, and I understand why. I understand

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>why I disagree with them. This was the fun part, Jesse.

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I told you for like a month when we were

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>talking to about this stuff and the comments, certain people

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in the comment section kept saying, Oh, man, you're just

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.479
<v Speaker 1>an SEC shill, or you're just a Big Ten shill.

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You're just shilling for the power to conferences. Me knowing

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all the while these people are in Washington lobbying hard

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>against the bill that when it comes out I'm going

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to voice support of. And so now I'm taking a

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>stance against the SEC in the Big Ten. I hope

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't get their way on this. They tend to

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get their way on it, but I hope they don't.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>What I do hope is I hope that, especially when

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the revenue sharing piece of all this,

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which is really the key, pretty much everyone wants rules

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that are enforceable. You got consensus on that. They don't

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>want to have restrictive language placed on them, I e.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Telling them who they can and can't add to their conferences,

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because really, there are a lot of folks in those

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>leagues that love the super conference idea, that love the

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>idea of just breaking away entirely, and I absolutely hate it,

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just at my core. I hate it. Everything you can

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do does not mean you should do so. A lot

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of people in these two leagues cried for a long time,

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we want help from congress Man. We want rules that

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are enforceable, and man, we want to back away from

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>this financial cliff. We're all headed towards. Well, a bill

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just landed in your lap that gives you both of

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>those things. And now you're about to be called. Your

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bluff's about to be called. Because if you meant what

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you said about the greater interest of college athletics, and

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you were on record, by the way,

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as saying you care about the greater good of college athletics,

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then this bill serves those interests. It gives you the

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>enforcement piece, and it gives you the revenue piece. But

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you still fight it behind the scenes. Why Well, it's

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>because it may not put you in the most pristine position.

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay. If you openly claim that you're only

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at for yourself, But that's not what you guys claim.

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You guys claim that you wanted what was best for

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the overall greater good of college athletics. Did you mean it?

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.439
<v Speaker 1>If you meant it, then you'll take a good hard

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>look at concepts that would serve the greater overall interest

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to college athletics. But look, no one's asking the SEC

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Ten to go full charity case. Here.

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's what's going to end up happening. And this is

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>why we're still very early in this game. I know

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the SEC came out immediately and said, yeah, we're totally

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>opposed to this concept of pooling media rights. You just

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>give that some time. Here's what the SEC is opposed to.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>The SEC as opposed to pooling media rights, not on

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>their terms, the Big Ten as well. Now, the networks

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that are behind those two leagues, mainly Disney and Fox,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>they're against it full stop because it would cost them

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more money at the end of a day. But again,

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't run those networks, so I don't have to

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think like that. I think like a fan. But as

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for Greg Sanki or Tony Pittt for that matter, here's

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>what that's going to end up looking like. They take

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a stand and say, yeah, we're not on board with that,

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and then those other conferences are going to have to

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 1>suck it up and say, all right, well, what if

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we negotiate with you? And then the SEC in the

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Big ten will come to the table, or at least

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they should. It doesn't cost anything to listen. And what

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>should end up happening is there should be a negotiation

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that arrives at a revenue split that makes sense for

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the SEC in the Big Ten, the same way they've

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>done the playoff deal. It's the only way you got

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>them to sign off on that. Is that idealistic to me?

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>No it is not. But that's the only realistic way

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're ever going to get the SEC or the

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Big ten to listen to any conversation about pooling meteorites.

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>And they may still not, but I imagine there's going

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a conversation on that front. And university presidents

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and chancellors ought to think long and hard, because that

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>is who mister Petiti and Sinking answer to. Ultimately, they

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ought to think long and hard about what your role

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in all this is now? I mean, do you really think,

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, your role as the

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>president or chancellor of a major university is just to

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the conference whose sticker is on your

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>chest sucks every dime out of a sport you had

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>no part in creating, by the way, but that should

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>be your mission statement, if that's what you think your

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>spot in this whole game is, and that's what you

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>really think your role is as a university president. I

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally disagree. I think there's got to be some part

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of you that says, you know, maybe it's on me

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>holding the position I hold to maybe waive a little

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of my influence for the greater overall good of

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>collegiate athletics, which, by the way, is a gravy train

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that has made all of you a boatload of money

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and will in the future, by the way, if you

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>play your cards right. So this is going to pass.

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>This bill is going to pass, okay, And it may

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>happen pretty quickly by quickly and senate to I mean,

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 1>over the next three or four months. But I think

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a shot that's done before the college football season.

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So I know that a lot of people who disagree

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. I'm I'm happy to bookmark that statement. But

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the real piece I'm interested in is the revenue piece,

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the pulling of the media rights and how flexible in

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the end the SEC or the Big ten end up

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>being willing to be on that front. They're watching us

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in Speedway, Indiana, They're watching us in Seaside, Florida. They're

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>watching us in a home or Alaska. Jesse, Alaska checked in,

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is it true that we're still the number one college

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>football show in Alaska? Well, there is no OPO researcher

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on that. Just say yes, yeah, absolutely, Okay, let's move on.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>The Truth Teller series is continuing in about two weeks ago.

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We were going to do the truth about the ACC

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on the show and then what did we do? We

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just forgot. I think we bumped it and then we

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>never got around to it. So the piece of paper

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is like a month old. But here it is. What

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is the truth about the Atlantic Code Conference? Now with

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>multiple member institutions who can see the Pacific Ocean out

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of their window, what is the truth about this conference?

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a conference with an identity crisis. That's

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what I think it is. I have viewed the ACC

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as a supreme disappointment for a long time, because I

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think the ACC should be a powerhouse conference. I have

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at the ACC for a long time and said,

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it is inexplicable that you guys have struggled like you

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have the Big twelve. I get they're in the middle

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and outside of Texas being a pipeline

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, there's not a huge talent footprint there. This

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is a conference that has the Carolinas, the Virginia's, Georgia,

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Florida all in its conference footprint, and you've looked in

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of clums and carrying the entire thing

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for a decade. There was some Florida state early in

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the twenty teens and Miami as of late, but there's

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>never been a sustained period where there's like a Big three,

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Big four, Big five, and there's no reason for that.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That grant of rights deal in twenty twelve looked good,

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and it ended up being an albatross, and it may

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>very well be what sinks the conference. Some people think

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it's already sunk. It's not already, but it very well

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>could end up being that way. Because I am a

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>believer that conference realignment is not done. But that's another

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>show that's not tonight. But it's not just the media

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>rights thing. It's not just the grant of rights because

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Florida State in Miami failed to ever put together what

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>we thought they'd put together. If you're seventeen and you're

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>watching now, you don't recall when Florida State in Miami

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>first got put in the same conference. The thought was, oh, dude,

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna dominate every year. It's just gonna be

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>them every single year. And it hasn't been at all.

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's mind boggling that one of them couldn't get

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>out of their own way while the other one was good,

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and then there were both bad for a little then

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>vice versa, and all the while, Virginia Tech fell off

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and Virginia has never got it ziged together. North Carolina

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>has been a perennial underachiever. North Carolina State has not

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>been able to put together any kind of run, although

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it has not been a bad football program, but it

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>hasn't risen above just good. It's been merely good. It's

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>not a crime. And you've just you'd had outside of

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Clemson again, you had perennial under achievement as a conference,

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and Miami has now taken the place of Clemson. So

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at Miami and you think that's a bona

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fide national championship threat every single year. At least that's

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the current status of Miami. But now Clemson's fallen off

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And so you just never have this

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>period where you look at the ACC at the beginning

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the year and say there are multiple teams in

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that league that could win it all this year. You

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't feel that way. The conference champion this league

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>was seven and five last year. I kid you not, Jesse.

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even do a Duke Virginia pre did we.

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>We never even previewed the conference title game. That's how

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that was mainly a tiebreaker issue that they had. And

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know if they fixed that rule. We

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 1>just assume they're going to fix that rule. But that's

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what screwed the playoff up last year too, So we

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:17.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't even preview the game. I don't think we broke

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.320
<v Speaker 1>down the game on the back end. Congrats to Duke,

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>congratulations sincerely in Virginia for making the game, But it

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was an afterthought and so inexcusable for this conference to

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be in this position because of what it should be.

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And I have never convinced myself that I'm just wrong

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in what this conference should be. I think I'm right

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in what it should be. It just has not been.

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 1>The future's very uncertain here, And that's the ultimate truth

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about the ACC Like I judge it very harshly only

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because I know what it is capable of and hasn't achieved.

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:56.919
<v Speaker 1>And now you look out on the horizon, and if

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I told you at any given point over the next

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>three years, you're gonna wake up one morning and Ross

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Dellinger is gonna have this big breaking story that there's

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 1>major conference realignment. Which conference would you think it is?

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You all know which conference that would emanate from. Everyone's

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>been sitting on pins and needles about Florida State or

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina or Clemson Miami, And it's been varying degrees

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of rumors for like four years. Now. Those aren't going anywhere.

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't gone anywhere. Now, guys, they're happening right now.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's been a major headline about it

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>recently to my knowledge, I don't think there has. Oh,

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they're happening right now. Trust me. This time of year,

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>especially all these people getting in the same rooms. They're

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>happening right now. Just there's so much uncertainty, and I

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>hate that. I hate that because I think the ACC

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>could be a premier conference and it's never lived up

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>to it in my lifetime. I don't remember it ever

0:50:56.840 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>living up to a sustained run. I'm not saying they

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't had good endi years, but like I, sustained a

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:07.240
<v Speaker 1>stretch of greatness. Never been that way. Let's talk about games.

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the players on the field. Someone asked

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a question. Someone dared to ask a question about football players.

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Doug from Westminster, Colorado. Which players are you most

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>excited to watch this year? Great question, Doug. Has nothing

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with the Senate bill, has nothing to do

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with conference versus conference. I am excited to watch Jeremiah

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Smith because I think he's the best player in college football.

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 1>So this year, Jeremiah Smith I think will go off.

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>We had a bold prediction the other night from one

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of you, and your prediction was, I think he's going

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to have eighteen hundred receiving yards and fifteen touchdowns. And

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I only rated that a nine and a quarter. On

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bowldines scale, because that's how capable I think he

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is as a player. He is the biggest potential game

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 1>wrecker any given play in the sport. He easily would

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have been the top receiver in last year's draft. He's

0:51:55.640 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>played alongside guys that have ended up being first round

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 1>draft picks just by being associated with him. And so

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess my follow up question there really more so

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 1>than questioning Jeremiah Smith, is who takes that role this year?

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Who falls in behind him this year? Brandon Ennis? Is it?

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>His year is at Chris Henry as a freshman. I'm

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really high on him, But yeah, whoever's on the field

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with him him is Jeremiah Smith? Good t shirt idea

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there by the way, So that's one player. Darien Mensa

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at Miami Darian Mensa, I'm looking very much forward to

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.280
<v Speaker 1>watching because I think he's kind of of a blend

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of the best aspects of cam Ward and Carson Beck,

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's in a perfect situation. He gets

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>to play in an offense that can really really mold

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>itself around his full skill set, and man, he's not

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 1>there alone. He brought bar Kate, who was his number

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one receiver from Duke. He brought him down to Miami

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with him. But also he just walks onto the same

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>roster as Malachi Tony. They've got really really good tailback talent.

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an overall loaded roster, but just the wide receiver

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>group that he's gonna throw to and the overall leadership

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.280
<v Speaker 1>piece that I think he walks in with. He walks

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in with a much different vibe about him than Carson

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Beck and he's not walking in just grabbing everyone by

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the throat like Cam Warre did. But it's a really

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really good blend of what's worked down there at Miami

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so far. He is one of the main reasons I

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think they could end up being a better team than

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the team that played for national title last year. Leadership

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>plus fit plus overall talent roster. Dylan Stewart still at

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Looking forward to Dylan Stewart this year. It's

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:43.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of a regression last year on his stat sheet.

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>He only had four and a half sacks last year,

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but that was kind of South Carolina's story as a team.

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>They've got to have him explode. I remember watching him

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in person as a freshman and it's really it's amazing

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:59.479
<v Speaker 1>when you get that high level of player. It's you look.

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember Miles Garrett, like when Miles Garrett was at

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a and m seeing him in person as a freshman

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and saying that person looks different than everybody else in

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the field. Dylan Stewart's that way. Dylan Stewart just looks

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>different than everybody else on the field. And he's six five,

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:19.399
<v Speaker 1>two forty five and he's entering his third year, and

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of him and Colin Simmons as those big

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>time game wrecking edge presences. One of them, though, is

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>at Texas where they're expected to do a lot. Dylan

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Stewart's at South Carolina where everyone's asking, I mean, can

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they make a Bowl game? Will they win seven games?

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>If they win seven games, they go over the wind total.

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So I look forward to watching him. I just wonder

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is the context him going off and having a great

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>year in the middle of South Carolina having a bad year,

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.359
<v Speaker 1>or does he go off as Leonora Sellers goes off

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden South Carolina is this surprise team,

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are two different compartments there. Leonard Moore at

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame I think is the best corner in the

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>country entering the season and you look at him like

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.959
<v Speaker 1>when they played USC last year, Jesse mkayle Lemon didn't

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>do a whole lot against Leonard Moore. And you know

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen this year. They're gonna play Miami. They're

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna play Miami in Week ten in South Bend, and

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>so Notre Dame schedule might not be loaded. So you

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.800
<v Speaker 1>might not see Leonard Moore against a ton of future

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>first round draft talent, but you will see him in

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>premier matchups when they end up playing Miami. That we

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can pretty much promise ourselves. Those are four names I

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to rattle some off. I could rattle off

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred right now. We could probably go deeper than that,

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we will because we have a few more

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>shows before the season starts, obviously, But yeah, Jeremiah Smith,

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Mensub Stewart More, those kind of players I'm looking forward

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to watching this year. Let's move along, merrily along, I

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>would say, fairly good pace tonight. Woo man, it's small writing.

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry. Don't worry. I'm gonna I'm gonna lean in.

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We bump my readers up. Jason submitted a question in

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the fandual discord, which means Jason's about to get one

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in bonus bets dropped into his account just

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for asking this question. He said, Alabama's loaded with talent,

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but they've lost their physicality and their reputation because of it.

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Can they fix it in time for the twenty twenty

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>sixth season. Well, we all watched Alabama last year. I

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think we all agree. Alabama looked a little down physically,

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>couldn't run the ball and struggled to stop the run

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at times. Not terrible, but it's not great. Defensively overall,

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty good. But can they find it? People talk

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about physicality and toughness like it's an easter egg, like

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you just go search for it. Once you find it,

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you got it. It's a lifestyle. It's not an easter egg.

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a lifestyle. You have to live it. Notre Dame

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>does not play the way they play because they kind

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of just find it, and then other teams don't because

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>they haven't found it. You have to live it, and

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so the question is not are they gonna find it?

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>The question is are they living it? Are they living

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in an environment? Are they creating a culture? Do they

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have a DNA that exhibits that toughness. You don't find it,

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you just have it, You develop it, you live it.

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It isn't a talent thing either, because there are far

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>less talented teams than Alabama that were far better running

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball than Alabama last year. So if it's not

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>just a talent thing, then what does it come down to.

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It comes down to a lifestyle. It comes down to

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a belief system. It comes down to what you believe in,

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>what you emphasize, what you tolerate, and you don't tolerate.

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the beautiful thing about the best teams in the

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>country is the environment that you walk into Ohio State Practice,

0:57:56.200 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Miami Practice. When you go watch them and you you

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 1>look around and you've got recruits there, and you realize, man,

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>some of you, some of you probably need to look elsewhere.

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this place is for everybody.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 3>That's how practice should feel. That's how it feels to Georgia.

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.480
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely how it should feel. There ought to be

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:18.960
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of five star recruits any given year that

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 3>would fail miserably in your program because you're running it

0:58:23.240 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 3>at such a high level, and the cultural filters are

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 3>so fine on your program that they'd squeeze out even

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 3>most of the premiere high school talent in the country. Now,

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't want them so fine that for the sake

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 3>of making a point, you create an environment where good

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 3>players don't.

0:58:40.600 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Want to play for you. But there's a fine line there,

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a balance. Your place ought not be for everybody,

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but the ones who do come in there, they ought

0:58:48.800 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a mentality that leaves very very little doubt

0:58:54.080 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>whether your team collectively possesses the required physical nature, the

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>required toughness. So if you don't have it, it's a

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 1>gut check, it's a mirror look. It's a top down

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 1>assessment of who are we, What are we accepting that

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be accepting, What are we tolerating that we

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't tolerate? And how long does it take to find out?

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're not in the building every day, you and

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I are just watching from the outside, how long does

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it take? Well, I'd say not very long. For this

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:28.520
<v Speaker 1>upcoming year, not very long. Now. I do think with Alabama,

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the element of the RPO in their offense this year

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a game changer for them, regardless

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of who starts at quarterback, but especially if it's Keilan Russell.

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The element of the RPO is going to open up

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:42.560
<v Speaker 1>their ground game. I think they will be very very

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>much improved running the ball this year just because of that.

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And so that's one thing, and a lot works off

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. But there's no shortage of effort. I mean,

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that staff. We've been down there this spring.

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I've watched and practiced this spring. There's no shortage of

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>effort being put in. They pretty much overhauled their entire

1:00:03.240 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. They went and got a new offensive line coach.

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>They tried to get Hollywood Smothers out of the portal

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at tailback, and Texas took care of that, which is

1:00:14.640 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what it is. But they've got plenty good enough players there.

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>They signed an incredible pair of freshmen. One of them's

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a five star and everyone knows about him, and the

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>other one's not out of East Texas and everyone will

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>know about him. But they got plenty good enough talent there.

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But they had good enough talent last year. Talent wasn't

1:00:31.200 --> 1:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue there. Last year. It was it's a lifestyle.

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>They didn't live that lifestyle last year. You got to

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>live the lifestyle. FanDuel right now is where you can go. Like,

1:00:41.520 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if you believe in Alabama, you go over there and

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>bet them to win the national title. Right now, you

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get bet them to win the SEC right now. You

1:00:47.200 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>could bet anything you want to over at fandual. They're

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the exclusive odds provider of the show. We appreciate them

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. That question was just delivered to us

1:00:56.080 --> 1:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>via the FanDuel discord and the added bonus quite literally

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. If you ask a question for the show

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that winds up on the show, and you ask it

1:01:05.640 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the FanDuel discord, you just get one hundred dollars

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets dropped into your account. Like Jason, I

1:01:11.880 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's who it was that asked the question. Jason

1:01:14.200 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>will check his account tomorrow morning and ask did I

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>place a bet? I forgot? Did I win? No, you

1:01:20.120 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just got your question asked on the show. In this economy,

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal.

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Must be twenty one plus and present in select states

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 4>for Kansas in affiliation with Kansas Star Casino, or eighteen

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 4>plus and present in DC first online real money wager.

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Only five dollars first deposit required. Bonus issued as non

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:39.960
<v Speaker 4>withdrawable bonus bets which expires seven days after receipt. Restrictions

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:43.760
<v Speaker 4>apply see terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel dot com. Gambling

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>problem call one eight hundred gambler, or visitfanduel dot com

1:01:46.920 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 4>slash rg call one eight eight eight seven eight nine

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>seventy seven seventy seven, or visit CCPG dot org slash

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>chat in Connecticut, or visit nd gambling heelp dot org

1:01:55.960 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>in Maryland. Hope is here, visit gambling Helplinema dot org

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>or call eight hundred three two seven fifty to fifty

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 4>for twenty four to seven support in Massachusetts, or call

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>one eight seven seven eight Hope, n y. Or text

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Hope and Why in New York.

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's wrap it up, bold predictions. What do you believe?

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe something that's bold enough to get a

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half or higher on the Boldness scale?

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Because if you do, and it hits chilive supremacy plural

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of chalice. Headed out to anyone that fits that description.

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>First up, Tonight Connor from Rogersville, Alabama. He predicts half

1:02:30.720 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the college football playoff field this season will be made

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>up of teams who were not in last year's playoffs.

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Hm hmm, all right, so we got twelve of them

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for now. I think that the two G five teams

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are highly likely not going to repeat. I don't think

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>two Lane and JMU are going to be in the

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>playoffs this year, So that's two newbies. So we got

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to find four more, at least now, the remaining teams,

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the remaining ten teams from last year, they all have

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen odds to make the playoffs. So there wasn't

1:03:03.480 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>some team that made it last year, a lah like

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Auburn twenty ten that's expected to fall off a cliff

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the next year. All of them are expected to be

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>back in the mix this year. So we got to

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>find four more that made it last year that aren't

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>going to make it this year. Now. I think Notre

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Dame in Texas are highly likely to make the playoff

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, so they got to be taking somebody's spot,

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or so one would think. But what if they take

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>JMU and two lane spot, then we just did a

1:03:29.320 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>straight two for two trade off Jesse. Really quickly we

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>start having to ask ourselves, is Michigan going to make

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoff this year? Is Clemson gonna make the playoff?

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>This year. Will Oklahoma or Alabama not make it? Could

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>LSU make it? In? Is Ole miss gonna make it

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in again? If you're telling me, I got to find

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>six of them, especially if two of them I think

1:03:51.120 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>are already virtual locks. I think I can make it.

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the season could be that unpredictable. I'm only

1:03:58.720 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going to put a nine on the Bolden scale here.

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>My number would be like four or five, but I

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think we can get up to six, So I'm only

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a nine on the Boldness scale. Next up, boy,

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>things are going sideways for Oklahoma. Cody and Katie Texas

1:04:14.200 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>not so ironically predicts Oklahoma will finish with a losing record.

1:04:18.560 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna fire Brint venables harsh. Nine and a quarter

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is my boldness rating for that. Oklahoma's win total of

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, so for them to go five

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and seven would not be the biggest shocker in the world. Now,

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we assume that a losing season would be five and seven,

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but it could be four and eight, it could be

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>three and nine. It's highly unlikely. But in this post

1:04:45.600 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four Florida State World of Ours, don't dismiss anything,

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:54.439
<v Speaker 1>but let's say they go five and seven. That's one thing.

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Then the other part is are they firing Print Venables

1:04:57.200 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>over that? So you gotta have both of those things happen.

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a nine and a quarter. Injuries

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>could happen, Variants in schedule could happen because they play

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a tough one again. Now, this would be Venable's third

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>losing season in five years. So six and seven, ten

1:05:15.000 --> 1:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and three, six and seven, ten and three, another losing

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>season here? Is that enough? Is that enough for him

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the acts? I don't know. I don't know, guys.

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put a nine and a quarter on it.

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Next up, Bob from Jimmy Sorry from Austin, Texas. Indiana

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>runs it back, no losses, undefeated season. Signetti puts himself

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Saban conversation with back to back national titles.

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>That is a nine and a half. I respect the

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>boldness because notice he didn't even say just Indiana's gonna repeat.

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>He said they're gonna go undefeated, another perfect season and

1:05:57.600 --> 1:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>repeat his national champs. Back to back perfect season national champs.

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Who was that? It wasn't Nick Saban in Alabama? Who

1:06:07.040 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it was Nebraska ninety four, ninety five. So this

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is not easy to do. It's not easy to do.

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>One time they do play Ohio State and USC at home,

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they play Michigan and Washington on the road. Then theoretically

1:06:22.680 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have the Big Ten championship game. Then you

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>got to win three playoff games. It's just tough to do.

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>New quarterback, got to have multiple new guys at wide receiver, workout,

1:06:33.440 --> 1:06:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of defensive production lost. Brian Haynes is still

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there though. Guys, I think even if they win the

1:06:40.240 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>national title, they're doing it with at least a blemish

1:06:42.400 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. So that's a nine and a half on

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the boldness scale for me. And then lastly, what a world?

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What a change in our world? Kent believes in his

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>predictions so much he sent the bet slip in. He said,

1:06:58.360 --> 1:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>energized by the events of the offseason, Dabbo leads Clemson

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the playoffs by winning the ACC. Now here

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is here's what I mean by what a world. Clemson

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>has won eight of the last eleven ACC titles, and

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it is a bold prediction now to predict Clemson to

1:07:18.160 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>win the ACC. I'm putting an eight and a half

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on it. They have the fourth best odds to win

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the conference, behind Louisville, SMU, and Miami. It should be

1:07:28.640 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>noted Clemson is well behind SMU and Louisville, who themselves

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are well behind Miami. But this is the ACC. Okay,

1:07:37.720 --> 1:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Duke played Virginia in the ACC title game last year.

1:07:40.600 --> 1:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The winner of the league was seven and five. Crazy

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>things can happen. Of course, you still got to make

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the playoff. That was part two of the prediction here.

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it just makes perfect sense from a script

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>writing perspective to have Dabbo make a crazy run to

1:07:56.320 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a conference title the year after everyone expected him to.

1:07:59.800 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the most Dabbo sweenty thing in the world.

1:08:04.480 --> 1:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, I'm only putting an eight and

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a half on this, because I will not be the

1:08:11.120 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>poster child that he is finding at the end of

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the year to claim that no one believed in little o' Clemson.

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>He has already referred to his roster multiple times as

1:08:20.320 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of nobodies. Okay, the plot is being set

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:27.639
<v Speaker 1>right now. I will not fall victim. I'm only putting

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>an eight and a half on that. Appreciate you guys

1:08:29.360 --> 1:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so much. Speaker series a lot of travel this week,

1:08:32.760 --> 1:08:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of travel. We're gonna set out Tomorrow night

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>will be somewhere, Tuesday will be somewhere Wednesday. One of

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>those somewhares is a first time trip. In fact, unlike Bradley,

1:08:43.920 --> 1:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I've never even been to the state that we're gonna

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 1>be in Wednesday. Bradley has inexplicably been to two states

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that he has no business being to, and so we're

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to one of them Wednesday. And I was

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in the other one the other day stormchasing. So if

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you really really star me hard by process of elimination,

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you just eliminated one. We will be back probably Thursday,

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>unless I randomly make a trip to the Women's College

1:09:08.240 --> 1:09:11.519
<v Speaker 1>World Series as UCLA game final yet do we even know?

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll go find it? Anyway, Stay tuned with socials at

1:09:14.840 --> 1:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Paint CFB. I'll let you guys know what's going

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on this week. Until then, let's have a great week

1:09:19.000 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 1>for director Bradley, Producer Jesse. I'm Josh Pate, Take care

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and God bless.

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Must be twenty one plus and present in select states

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 4>for Kansas in affiliation with Kansas Star Casino or eighteen

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 4>plus and present in DC first online real money wager

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 4>only five dollars first deposit required. Bonus issued as non

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:51.960
<v Speaker 4>withdrawable bonus bets, which expires seven days after receipt. Restrictions

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:55.759
<v Speaker 4>apply see terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel dot com. Gambling

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:58.599
<v Speaker 4>problem call one eight hundred gambler, or visit FanDuel dot

1:09:58.640 --> 1:10:01.120
<v Speaker 4>com slash RG call one eight eight eight seven eight

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:04.280
<v Speaker 4>nine seventy seven seventy seven, or visit CCPG dot org

1:10:04.320 --> 1:10:07.920
<v Speaker 4>slash chat in Connecticut, or visit nd Gamblinghelp dot org

1:10:07.960 --> 1:10:11.920
<v Speaker 4>in Maryland. Hope is here, visit gambling Heelplinema dot org,

1:10:12.040 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 4>or call eight hundred three two seven fifty fifty for

1:10:14.520 --> 1:10:17.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty four seven support in Massachusetts. Or call one eight

1:10:17.280 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 4>seven seven eight Hope n Y. Or text Hope n Y.

1:10:20.000 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>In New York