WEBVTT - What is quantum spacetime foam?

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, I've noticed that people just add quantum the

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>word quantum to things to make them sound cool. Oh man,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I hate when they do that. Yeah, like quantum combs,

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>quantum um cereal. I mean it''s like they put it

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on everything just to make it sound awesome. Yep. I

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was seeing quantum dog food recently, and I'm pretty sure

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that's not a real fact. Your dog both loves it

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and hates it at the same time. But does that

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>mean to just all of quantum mechanics is like a scam,

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not all of it, Like, there really is some physics

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in quantum mechanics, but I'd say most things that are

0:00:47.680 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>called quantum are probably bologny. Hi am Jorge. I'm a

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>cartoonists and the creator of PhD Comics. Hi I'm Daniel.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a quantum physicist and that is not bologny. Oh well,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it just happens. I'm a cartoon bologny cartoonists. So all

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>brings it together and welcome to our podcast, Daniel and

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in which we explore everything that's crazy and amazing about

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe, from classical physics to quantum mechanics and explain

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it to you in a way that you can explain

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>to your friends and sound super smart. Yeah, in ways

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that we do explain it and don't explain it at

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the same time. We're sort of like a quantum podcast

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way. We download individual, discretized units of explanation

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>into your brain. We spin it up and spin it

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>down for you guys. But quantum mechanics is one of

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite topics because it is so hard for people

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to understand usually, but there are ways to look at

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics and get a new sense of the world,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to reveal the reality that underlies everything. Yeah, it's your

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite because people don't understand it. It's my favorite because

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a great example of how in physics we can

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>learn that the world is really quite different from the

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>world we expected it to be. The world we grew

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>up in is not the way the world works. That

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to really understand the universe, we have to remove our blinders,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and quantum mechanics is a great example of that because

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it requires basically tossing out your entire intuition for how

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the world works and accepting something very different. Yeah, I

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like that every day that I wake up and

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>read the news, like, what is this universe we're living in?

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What quantum politics is that you're talking about? It's just

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the quantum news will say, it's just the quantumy. It

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense and doesn't make sense at the same time.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It's about a dead cat and in a life cat

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. I feel like quantum mechanics is

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>something a lot of people are fascinated by. They've heard

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about it, they hear people use words to explain it

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that don't quite make sense to them, and so people

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are thirsty for a real, honest to god understandable explanation

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for some of this bizarre quantum phenomena. Yeah, and it

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of seems, like you said, it almost seems like

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>two different universes. You know. There's like the universe that

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you grew up and as a kid and feel you

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>understand where you take a ball and you bounce it

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and comes back and you can throw a baseball and

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it lands where you think it's gonna land. And then

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's the kind of the quantum universe you learned

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>later on in life, where like none of those things

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you learned as a kid seem to apply precisely because

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>your brain develops all these ideas for how things move

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>based on what you've experienced. Things seem to move through

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe, it seems like they have a smooth path,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and so later to grow up and learn that things

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>don't actually move. They just have these snapshots and then

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>those later snapshots in your brain is filling in the

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in between slices to make like a movie of the universe.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Is quite shocking. I wonder if we had evolved to

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be much much smaller, if we would have sort of

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a quantum intuition, if we like had everyday experiences of

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum objects. You mean, like if it's taught at the

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>preschool level, if we try to teach kids quantum physics,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should be doing short in your

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>equation um one plus one, spin up, spin down, you know,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>just the basics that you need to deal with this

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy world we're living in. That's one approach, but I

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think that people would still struggle because they don't have

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>any actual experience with it. I'm talking about really experiencing

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics, Like what if they were quantum effects that

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>were macroscopic, you know, things that were the sizes of

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>baseballs operated under quantum rules. It's pretty hard to reveal

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is quantum mechanical. It took us thousands

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>of years before we figure that out. What if it

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't so subtle, what if it was more obvious and

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so people actually had an intuition for this, they're like, oh, electrons, Yeah,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>those moves just like these other quantum basketballs or whatever

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that I was playing in within my kindergarten playground. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the next wave of physics education, is we

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>need to develop some sort of technology that operates like

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:16.119
<v Speaker 1>quantum objects so kids can play with like quantum balls. Yeah. Well, um,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like it's kind of a separate and

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>new universe, and it feels like there's a quantum version

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of almost anything. Like for anything that we have in

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>our world, there seems to be like a quantum version

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. Like you know, I know I can spin

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>here in my chair, and there's also something called quantum spin,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, my battery has charged at it, but

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there's also something called quantum charge and so on and

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>so on. Yeah, there's even quantum flavor. Yeah, you think

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in kindergarten that there's only sweet and salty and sour,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's also quantum flavor, and we have quantum color.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>We had a whole podcast episodes about all these. Yeah,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can go to quantum Kindergarten too and learn

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum sharing and quantum And in some cases these things

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are metaphors, like quantum flavor. These particles don't actually taste

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like anything, but we're trying to make an analogy. We're

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to extrapolate from something we know, which is flavor,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and give you a sense for this weird new quantum thing.

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But in other cases it really does make sense, like

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum spin. Those particles are not spinning in the same way,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>but they really do have angular momentum, so spin really

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So in some cases the words are you know,

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>really a stretch. In some cases they really are applicable, right, Yeah,

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a pretty good way to you just sput

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it there, right, so obvious and clear. But but yeah,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes you know, I wonder, sometimes I wonder if

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it are pushing it a little bit too much. And

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so today on the podcast, we have a great question

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>from a listener that we're going to try to answer.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is a question from Dale from Dublin. We

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 1>had a very interesting question and about another strange sounding

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum thing. Here's Dale Dale from Toblin oiland here I

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>heard about a thing called quantum phone or spacetime phone.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Could you talk about that for a bit and let

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>us know what it is? Chairs Well, I love so

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>many things about this. First of all, I love Dale's

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>accent awesome, and I love the Dale wrote in. This

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is just an email he sent me saying, hey, can

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you explain this? And I asked him to send us

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a recording so we could talk about it on air

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>because I thought a lot of people might be interested

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the answer to this question. So thank you Dale

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for writing in, and thank you to everybody who writes

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in with their questions. Right, and just as a reminder,

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we are on Instagram and Twitter at Daniel and Jorge

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you want uh Daniel to answer back, try

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or the email because Instagram will not answer your question.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't do quantum social media. Yeah, so if you

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>have a question, send it on into questions at Daniel

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge dot com or engage with us on Twitter

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel in Jorge. Yeah, so this is an interesting question.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Quantum foam. It's sort of sounds like one of these

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>products that you sell in late night television that will

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>totally clean your bathroom at the molecular level. I think

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times in marketing, quantum is just used

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to describe something to make a sound more modern or technological.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, like like quantum dog food. That really is

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I mean, it's your mechanical No, Google, quantum

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>dog food. There is a product they really do sell

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>dog Foodn't call it quantum. I think what they mean

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>by that is new fancy, you know, savvy to the

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical world somehow new fancy. Yeah, well that's kind

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of what you guys do in physics as well, isn't it. Oh,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a charge, but it's kind of new and fancy.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll call it quantum quantum. Wait, no, but it actually

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is new and fancy. Sometimes we do discover stuff in physics.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's new and fancy. All the quantum mechanics is new

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and fancy. It really does happen. It's not just marketing.

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes dog food is new and fancy. Why not and

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>coming districted little chunks? That's true? Yeah, alright, so I

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>should order that product and I should evaluate it before

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I give my opinion on it. You're totally right and

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>content doct food. Please give us a call. We are

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>opening for sponsorship. In this podcast, I was wondering if

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Dale from Dublin was the only person thinking about spacetime foam,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I walked around and I asked people what

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they thought about space time folm, had they heard of it?

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Did they know what Dale was talking about? Did they

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>have any idea what it was? And these questions again

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen to e c Irvine. This happened at a

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>local coffee shop because I was trying to get a

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sense for the broader public and their understanding of this topic. Yeah,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>so before you listen to these answers, think about it

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for a second. If a physicist approached you at a

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>coffee shop, would you be able to answer the question,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what is spacetime foam? Here's what people had to say,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>upper layer to spacetime that kind of bubbles up or something.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>If that makes sense, Well, I'm no idea. I have

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>no idea spacetime phone, no spacetime phone, no spacetime phone

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for space. I guess, but I don't um space. I'm

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not all right. I feel like people were answering and

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they were just about to call the police on you.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>On these you can sort of hear that in responses.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like, I am so regretting answering this questions. What

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about? I think, yeah, I mean people

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>go to a coffee shop to wake up, and you're

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>asking them physics questions over their cappuccimo phone. Well, you know,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I specifically tried to choose people that looked like they

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>were studying, like they had a book open and they

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>were reading something, because I was hoping to find people

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who were, you know, like had their brains on or intellection,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>engaged in something, or maybe curious about this kind of thing.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't interrupt, like couples that were smooching, or if

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they looked like they were listening to a podcast, You're like,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that person probably knows everything already, right. I try to

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>avoid people who already have their earbuds in, because I

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like in public, earbuds mean don't talk to me. Well,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of an interesting question. Quantum foam and

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I I had never heard of it. If you have

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>approached me at a coffee shop, I would have just

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>said no, please, go on, please please asked me an

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>easier question. You would have been like, you look like

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this other physicist I know, and I definitely ignore him

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in public. So I'm not talking to you as a

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>blanket policy. That's my decision on physicists. All right, So

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this is an interesting question because it's it's like you're

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>marrying two words that are very common space time and foam,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but that together really don't make any sense. Yes, And

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that happens so much in quantum mechanics. People say things

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that use words together and you understand the individual words,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but you don't really know what it means when you

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>put it together. So we'll get into what spacetime foam

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is and what we know about it and how we

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>might be able to find it in in this frothy

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 1>little universe we live in. But first let's take a

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>quick break, all right, Dannel, we're talking about spacetime foam,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a weird product that you sell on

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>late night television. It's an actual physical theory in science,

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and so let's get into that a little bit. And

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess let's start with the first two words to

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>set us up for the foamy part um. So let's

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about spacetime, because in this case,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Dale from Dublin used the word as one word,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like spacetime, not space common time. He called it spacetime.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's maybe refresh for our listeners what it means

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>to say spacetime. Yeah, it's like you take two words

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you put them together. They mean something special, like green

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and house. Greenhouse is not just a greenhouse, right, has

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>its own meaning. So in the same way space time

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a special word in physics, and of

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>course you know it's spaces. Space is just the three

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of movement. You know, you have X, y, and Z.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And we have a whole other episode about like what

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>makes up space? Is it a thing because it can

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>wiggle and dance and jiggle and expand and all this stuff.

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But for our purposes today, let's just think about it

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>as sort of as the directions you can move in X, Y,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and Z. So that's what space means, like the space

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're in, like where we move around in. Yeah, precisely,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>nothing special there. And time is just time, right, time

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>flows forwards, and you can think of time in analogy

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to space. You can think of us as moving through

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>time the way you can move through space. And we

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have a whole podcast episode digging into how time is

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>connected to space and how time is different from space.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But Einstein is the guy who put these two things together.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the first one to construct this idea of space

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>time by taking three dimensions of space that you can

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>move in and adding the time dimension to it is

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a fourth dimension. So together space time is

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this four dimensional idea X y Z and then time. Right,

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you just said something profound though you

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just said time is time. That man, time is so fascinating.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I could talk endlessly about time. We could spend all

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of our time talking about time. But maybe it's not

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>time to do that. That one phrases made me think

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about my whole life and where I'm going with it.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And well, can I sell you my new product. It's

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>called quantum time the There you go, alright, quantum quantum

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>watch to keep track of the inevitability of time. It's

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>new and fancy and has to be charged every fifteen minutes.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go, alright. So spacetime is this idea that um,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>space and time are not separate, like maybe if you

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think about them altogether in one package, one four dimensional bundle.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Then it's more appropriate somehow like uh like the related

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like one of them affects the other, so therefore you

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>should keep track of them all at the same time precisely.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And it was Einstein's theory of special relativity that showed

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>us exactly how space and time are affected by each other. Specifically,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>how time flows depends on where you are and how

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fast you are going relative to something else, and so

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to understand time, you can't just have time

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>by itself. Time is not universal. Time is local. Time

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you are in space, and so it

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>makes much more sense to combine these two things together.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like having the weather, right. The weather is not

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the same everywhere, so you want to talk about the

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>weather where you are in Buffalo, or in New Delhi

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or in Barcelona, and so you pair the weather with

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the location because that makes more sense. It's called the

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>space time weather continuum, which you hear listen to my

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>new quantum weather reports. It's a new Toppler quantum three

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand that probably is a real thing. I mean, you're joking,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's probably some will station out there with quantum weather.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Dobbler some local weatherman in the middle of Barcelona. And

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Geinstein was not crazy, right, Like, he didn't just make

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this up and it didn't work. It actually works, Like

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>bundling space and time together does tell you something about

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and it's there's been theories and experiments done

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to prove that this is all for real. Oh, yes,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was right about this. That doesn't mean Einstein wasn't crazy.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you dig into that guy's personal life. He

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was more than a little bit across. What do you mean.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He was also right about spacetime, all right, So that spacetime.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And now the question from Dale was what is spacetime foam?

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say, I've never heard of this before.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this a new thing? Is this something that's only

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>been around for a couple of years, or is this

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like a fringe theory or French theory? I don't know

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>either one. What is what is going on with spacetime phoam? Well,

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't endorse your casual slander of entire culture there,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but it is a bit of a fringe in theory.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one of these things. It's like it's an idea

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that took hold in some people's minds, but then not

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of progress was made, so so HA just

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>been hanging out there, bubbling up in people's brains without

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>really turning into anything concrete. So it's been around for

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, but it's not really part of the mainstream physics.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>It's just been foaming up in people's research dockets. And

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so I know that you keep abreast of all the

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>latest topics in physics and you read all the physics journals,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably why you haven't heard about this recently. Right, Well,

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at first I thought it was maybe an acronym, like

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe fo a M stands for something. It's the first

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of a multiverse, which is a new theory by Jorge

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Cham about how we're the most awesome of all the multiverses.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And somehow Dale from Dublin knew about your theory before

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you even thought about it and thought to ask in advance. Wow,

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>good job, Dale. Yeah, well, in other multiverses he didn't,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>but this one, because it's the best he did, all right,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about this. So there is something

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>called spacetime foam that physicists think might be real and

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>might actually kind of describe what the universe is like,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so take us through it, Daniel, what does it mean

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to put the word spacetime and foam together? The idea

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>here is to try to resolve the conflict between our

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>two great theories of physics. We talked about space time

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of relativity, and that all makes sense. And

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>relativity has been tested out the wazoo and up the

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>wazoo and in the wazoo in every way around the wazoo.

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Because is that it's a great theory. Is that another

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>physics experiment acronym the wazoo, the wazoo, I'm not sure

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what it means collider in Italy apparently, but special relativity

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>has been extensively tested, and so has general relativity. But

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if it really holds universally. That we

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>have suspicions that it probably doesn't work on really really

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>tiny distances. So general relativity said is that space is

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of smooth, that you can chop it up into

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>tinier and tinier bits and you'll never sort of run

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>out of ways to cut it in half. That like

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>in Zeno's paradox, you could take smaller and smaller steps forever.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>That's what general relativity says. It predicts it, or it

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 1>assumes it. It assumes that it it uses that as

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>its essential description of what space is. That you could

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>have a particle or an object located at any point.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have an infinite number of locations

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>between me and you, that a particle could be at

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>any of those locations. Oh, I see. It's kind of

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like Newtonian physics, right almost in a way, like it

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>assumes that space is smooth, and it doesn't assume anything

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that anything is quantized. That's right, And you look

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at the universe around you, and the universe seems smooth, right,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems like you could sit anywhere. It seems like

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>if you took a ruler, you could cut it in

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>an infinite number of ways. Whatever that there's an infinite

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.239
<v Speaker 1>number of ways. But just like the screen on your

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>iPhone looks really crisp and smooth, but if you zoom in,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you discover that there are pixels there. And so general

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>relativity tells us that the universe is smooth. That's space

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is infinitely sliceable. But that's in conflict with quantum mechanics.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics says that you can't have infinitely sliceable space. Yeah,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that at the fundamental level, it's pixelated, kind of like

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my iPhone screen. Although my iPhone screen these days looks

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of blurry because as I've said before, I need

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>reading glasses. Now I'm not sure that's a problem with

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>your iPhone screen, but well it's a it's a problem

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for my new quantum reading glasses. Yeah. And so quantum

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanics has this impact on lots of things that we measure.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Things that at large scales seem smooth turn out to

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be discretized, turned out to be sliced up into chunks.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like a flashlight beam is not a smooth, continuous beam

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of light. It's a stream of tiny little packets called photons.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>The same way your bowl of ice cream is not

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>infinitely chopped herble into smaller and smaller spoonful. There are

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>atoms in there. It's made out of these tiny little

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lego pieces. So the same concept can be applied to

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of things, and quantum mechanics says that probably it

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>also applies to space. So we have this conflict between

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>these two great theories of physics, relativity and quantum mechanics,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and the conflict lies in a place that's really hard

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to spot where things are super duper small, so meaning

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that general relativity doesn't know that there's something called quantum

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>physics and quantum mechanics. Quantum physics sort of we don't.

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Do we know that quantum mechanics takes into account general

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>relativity or is there such a thing as bending a

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>space and quantum mechanics. So that's a great question. People

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>have tried to say, let's take Einstein's theory of general

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>relativity and let's make a quantum version of it. Can

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we make a version of general relativity where space is

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>pixelated or we know quantum mechanics comes into account, and

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>currently we have no great functioning theory like these. Reason um,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you can make a theory of general relativity that is quantized,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't work when space is really intense, like

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>inside a black hole. When the gravity gets really really strong,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>then the theory breaks down and predicts things that don't

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>make sense. It gives you like infinities and all sorts

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of crazy numbers. So we don't currently have a working

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>theory of what's called quantum gravity that tries to marry

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all the best things from general relativity and quantum mechanics.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that quantum mechanics operates kind of

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in a Newtonian or like perfect kind of pre Einstein universe.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics operates often in if what we call a

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>flat space, you know, space that's not bent by mass.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You can do quantum mechanics in curved space, where if

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like near the Sun or near a black hole

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and space is curved, you can do that quantum mechanics.

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you try to do it when space is

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>too curved, when the gravity gets really really strong, then

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't work. We just don't even have a theory.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We can't like even come up with a theory that

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>makes sensible predictions, not to mention check those predictions against

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>actual experiments. All right, So it sounds like general relativity

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>is good for kind of big distances and tells us

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works at large scales, and quantum mechanics

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tells us how it works in really really tiny scales.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are situations where the two theories just don't.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Neither of them work. Yeah, and what we need to

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>do is get inside a black hole and see what

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>happens when you have both small distances. So quantum mechanics

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is relevant and really intends gravity, so general relativity is relevant. Unfortunately,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>all the people we've sent into black holes have not

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>been coming. Yeah, I was gonna say that you're using

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the word we they're pretty broadly. There any volunteers out

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there who wants to be the first person to die

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at a black hole. And this is where the idea

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of space time foam comes from. It comes from an

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try to reconcile these two theories. I see.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's another one of these unifying theories, like

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>theories of everything. Precisely. There's one theory that says maybe

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe is made out of tiny little loops. That's

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>called loop quantum gravity. Another one says maybe everything is

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>just a tiny vibrating string at string theory. There's even

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>one called spin foam, where everything is like this weird

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>spinning kind of foam. But spacetime foam is a particular

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>theory that tries to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity,

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and it imagines space is being made of these tiny

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>little pixels, but these pixels would be quantum mechanical and

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so like bubbles and a frothing foam they might like

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>pop in and out of existence. All right, let's get

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people in the loop of this and get a little

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more into what quantum foam or spacelime foam is

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and how we know about it and what we might

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>discover if we poke around in the universe. But first,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. Yeah, all right, Daniel. So

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum foam is kind of like quantum dog food, and

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you're trying to make something that your

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>dog will both eat and enjoy at the same time.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to make something that explains both general relativity

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and quantum mechanics all and that your dog will like,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess, also um at the same time. And so

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's hard because, as you said, they're sort of

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>based on two very different views of the universe, that's right.

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for relativity to work, what we need

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is a new imagining of it. We need to start

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>from a different conception of what space is. Einstein assumed

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that space was smooth and continuous, and he built his

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>theory upon that assumption. So we need to start from

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a different assumption and say, actually, spaces made of these

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>tiny grains or these little bubbles and under stand the

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>nature of those and then build a theory on top

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I don't know this is true. It's

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>not clear that spacetime boom is a real description of space.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>You know. It might be the pixels are a better description,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or loops or little strings, or we really just don't know,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>but we need a new idea. And so theorists are

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just sort of being creative and smoking banana peals and saying, well,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's more like this, and you know, you look

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>around the macroscopic universe to get inspiration, you know, and

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe some physicist was smoking a banan appeal and looking

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at soap bubbles and thinking, huh, maybe space is just

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well it's it's interesting because I feel like,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's these two theories and it's not like

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you're saying like, oh, maybe quantum mechanics is wrong, and

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>really we just need to extend general relativity, or you're

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not saying, oh general relativity is wrong, we just need

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to extend quantum mechanics. I feel like you're saying that

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we we need to throw both of these into the

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>garbage and kind of come up with one theory, start over,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>re imagine the universe and come up with one theory

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it sort of looks like one and

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>looks at the other, but actually kind of works continuously

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>across the whole universe. Yeah, well, we don't know what

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the necessary process will be. It might be that we

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>can take what we have from general relativity and from

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics and marry them um. Or it might be that, yeah,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to toss it out and start all over again.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The process of science is iterative, right. It's like a

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>writer writing a draft of a screenplay or something. You

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just keep trying to make it better and better until

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it fits, and then at some point you realize, you

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, this is hot mess of garbage, and you've

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>got to toss it out and start all over again.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know. We don't know if you know,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we're one more draft away from something we can publish,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>or if you've got to toss it all out and

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>start on the next book, right, Or maybe the studio

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>head goes, well, it's too late, let's just make this

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bad movie and can you make it funnier? And we

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>live in that universe that should never have been made

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>where the plant is It don't make any sense? And

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the acting is stiffid best. That's even better than do

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we live in a simulation? Is? Do we live in

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a poorly written sim simulation? Like that? I got notes

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for you simulation authors. Okay, here's how you should have

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>done the simulation. Here's what rotten Tomato says about your

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>universe business ratings on on universe simulations. I like it.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Quantum Rotten Tomatoes is the name of

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>my new website. Check it out. Alright, So step us through.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>What is quantum foam? Then? Is it? What does it

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>poe mean? Why is it phone? It have bubbles in it?

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it like a froth? Why is it called quantum phone? Yeah?

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that quantum mechanical things fluctuate. They come

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in and out of existence. If you zoom into particles

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at the smallest scale, you can't follow them along the

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>way you would follow a baseball. They sort of pop

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>into existence and pop out of existence. They turn into

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>other particles. It's like a constant mess, right, and so

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of things are happening like it's bubbling at the surface,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of like foam. Those are the things in space

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and times. This is saying that space, time itself is

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like a phone, right, And so if space itself is quantized,

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's made out of these pixels, and these pixels are

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical, then it's possible that the pixels themselves are

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of bubbling in and out of existence. It's one

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>step to go from space is smooth to space is

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>discrete r it's made of pixels. It's another to say,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe those pixels themselves are not like permanent, they're like temporary,

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're ephemeral. They're coming in and out of

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>existence because in the end, a lot of quantum mechanical

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>things are Space itself is coming into and out of existence,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, like this bit of space run in front

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of my eyes here precisely the you know, the object

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, for example, whatever it is, it's

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in front of you right now. It's a banana, or

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an apple or whatever, that's made of quantum mechanical particles.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Now it seems solid, it seems like it's really there.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you zoomed in on the little particles, the

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>particles that make it up are popping in and out

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of existence. They're turning into energy, they're turning back the

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>particles that changing into other particles and then coming back

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't even notice, right, So that phone or whatever

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in front of you is a frothing mess, but you

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just don't notice it frothing because the frothing is so tiny.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So if it's hard for you to imagine, like that

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>space itself could also be frothing. Remember everything around you

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is kind of frothing. Oh wait, so this would be

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like under the quantum particles. Like you could have a

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle and it's really tiny, but the space it

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is sitting on could be bubbling underneath it. Is that

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying precisely, And remember that in modern quantum mechanics,

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't even really think of particles as like the

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>basic element of stuff in the universe. Particles are just

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>excited states of quantum fields. And quantum fields they had

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode on, are a property of space itself.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So you can't really separate the matter and the space

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>because matter is just an excited state of quantum fields,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which are a part of space, but is the spacetime

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>foam on the same scale as the particles like um

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what mean? Like what if there's a particle

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that just happens to be sitting on a spacetime bubble

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that bubble pops. Does that particle just disappear or

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is it like riding on top of a whole bunch

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of little spacetime bubbles. Yeah, I think you have to

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think of particles as part of space, because particles are

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>again excited states of these fields, and the fields themselves

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are part of space. And so I thinks it takes

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole new way of thinking about like the nature

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the universe at the smallest scale. It's not like

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>particles are sort of filling in slots in space. They're

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like excited space. Oh and you're saying that this space

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually more like foam, meaning that it's just a

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of little pockets of it kind of pressed together,

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and each one of these pockets is a quantum of

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>space time. That's right. And we don't know the size

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of these bubbles. If these bubbles exist, and we don't

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>know that they do, the question is how big would

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they be? And we suspect if they do exist, they'd

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be super duper duper duper tiny. But you have the

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>idea is that you know you have a localization of

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>energy that energy is an excited state of all the

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>quantum fields in that space, and that localization of energy

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you could extend across multiple bubbles of quantum space, perhaps

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, like a photon, and that you know, it

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>could be made of these little frothing bubbles. They're smaller

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>than that packet of energy. And so what am I

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>doing when I'm moving through space? Am I moving from

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bubble to bubble? Or do I take like each one

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of my particles might be in this bobble, bubble or

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that bubble. Well, you are those bubbles. You're not in

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>those bubbles. You are those bubbles and the spacetime foam.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You are the spacetime boam, and so am I. We

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are all one with the spacetime foam. Remember, you are

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just an excited state of the space that you are occupying.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And when you move that information, then that energy then moves,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it excites another part of the quantum space.

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like you are the wave on the string. Right.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>If I'm holding a string and I wiggle it, you

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can say, like where does that wiggle? It moves along

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the string the same way you are wiggling the quantum

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>fields where you are now and then when you travel

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>somewhere for Thanksgiving, you're gonna wiggle those quantum fields. So

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think about it as you are particles in space somewhere,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but you are excited wiggling of space. Oh, I see,

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just an excitation from one bubble to the next bubble, precisely.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>And the idea of spacetime foam is that maybe space

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is discretized and those little discrete blobs are popping in

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and out of existence. They're like not long lasting, They're

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>not eternal or permanent. They're sort of frothing, oh, coming

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in and out. But what if I get stuck in

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one that pops, I wouldn't recommend that. Does that mean

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm no longer in existence? Then you don't have to

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>buy quantum pet food for your quantum dog because the

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum out of existence. You know, these things are at

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a very very small scale. So unless you're a particle

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on the size of quantum foam, you don't have to

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. But also energy is conserved. So if

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>space is frothing somewhere and energetic, and there's an excitation

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>enough space here, that energy is going to go somewhere,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe into the next bubble with the next bubble, So

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the bubble itself might pop out of existence, but the

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>energy that is represented by that excitation is not going

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to go away. Oh, it's just gonna move on to

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>another bubble. Yeah, that's what you do. When you move

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>from place to place. You are exciting those fields, and

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>now you're exciting these fields over here, all right. And

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so there's a theory that says that the universe at

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the very core level is like a foam, But that's

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just one competing theory about what it looks like down there.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to find out which one it is?

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>How do we know if the universe is foaming or

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's well, we need lots of money to build

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge particle collecit That's my answer to everything, right right, Money,

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It just solves everything for you, doesn't it any It

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of does you know? If you want to answer

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>questions about high energy or heavy particles or tiny distances,

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>which you need is a microscope to look at the

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>really really small And the only thing that prevents us

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>from looking at really really small spaces is having enough

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>money to build a big enough microscope. We know how

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. It is just really expensive, so we could

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>probe these distances. We think the distances involved or something

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like ten to the minus thirty five meters, which is

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>ridunculously tiny. Like if you had a microscope with not

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just like a ten x hundred eggs, but like tend

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to the thirty five x, we might be able to

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see these phone bubbles and time. Yeah, we had a

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>whole episode about how you see tiny things and microscopes

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and electron microscopes and particle colliders, so people should dig

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>into that if they want more information. But basically we

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can see down to tend to the minus twenty right now,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty impressive. We think these bubbles are tend

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to the minus thirty five, so fifteen orders of magnitude

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>is is actually still a lot. You know, there's a

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we're far away from being able to see these pixels.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way is to build a really big collider.

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Another is to try to use like really long distances

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in space ah to use as base itself like a microscope.

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The idea is if space is bubbling and frothing, then

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you know it's sort of constantly changing. That means that

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like the distance that light has to travel from point

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>A to point B is not necessarily fixed. So they

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do these crazy experiments where they look at something really

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really far away and they try to see it in

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>two different ways. They try to understand, like, you know,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>let's look at two photons that left that really bright

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>source of light maybe a quasar, at the same moment,

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and see if they arrived here on Earth at the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>same time. If there's a difference, then maybe that's because

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there was more quantum foam bubbling up for one photon

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>then for the other. Oh, I see, because it's foamy.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>That means the path you take through this foam is

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of random. And so like one photon could have

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hit a really foamy patch I guess, and and gone

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>through a little bit of extra space more than the

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>other particle who just happened to go through a part

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of space it wasn't as foamy, and so that would

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you like, oh, space is not consistent, it's kind

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of frothy. That's the idea. I have to say that.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical because you know, on long distance scales, so

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you would think that these things would average out, like

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you're going for a billion years, then the number of

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>random tosses of a coin are gonna be pretty close

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to So two photons flying through incredible distances in the universe,

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you know we're going to have pretty even odds to

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>go roughly the same distance. Anyway, they look at these photons,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't see anything, no surprise, and so they haven't

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>discovered quantum foam. All right, Well, do you think we'll

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ever discover whether the universe is made out of quantum

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>foam or not? I think we will. I think it

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>will require some really clever mathematics to come up with

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>like how these theories might actually work. Because remember, we

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a functioning theory. We don't have a theory

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>we can actually go test the theory. If we ask

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you questions, it gives us gibberish. And so we need

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a good theory, and then we

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>need to be really clever about how to test it.

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think maybe some time far in the future,

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>when we can get closer to black holes, will be

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>able to test some of these theories in environments with

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>really intense gravity. But it's pretty far off in the future.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So we need clever ideas and we need awesome new experiments, right,

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess all of that is just to say, San Daniel,

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>more money is the entire takeaway. Who needs sponsorship from

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum dog food when you can just have a whole

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>podcast to ask people for money. That's right. Email me

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your quantum dollars to contributions at Daniel and Jorge dot com.

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that does feel like my bank account. It's

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>both there and not there. It's constantly fluctuated. Yeah, it's

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>poemy have phoney money, not phony money, phony money. All right, Well,

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>thank you Dale from Doubling. We hope that answered your

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>question about what quantum foam or spacetime foam is, and

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess the answer is stay tuned. Yeah, it's a

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>really fun idea. It's fun to speculate about what the

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>universe might be like at the smallest scales. It's fun

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>to take ideas from our everyday world and see if

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they apply at the quantum scale. But today we don't

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>really know if quantum bom is a thing or just

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>an idea bubbling up in the mind of physicists. So

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>keep on looking and keep us sending us your questions.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>We're happy to answer them. All right. We hope you enjoyed. Dad.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us see you next time. Before

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you still have a question after listening to all these explanations,

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>please drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge That's one Word, or email us at

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Thanks for listening

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.