Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: It's only going to get worse. I wish I could
Speaker 1: say otherwise, but we are not at the end of this.
Speaker 1: If anything, we're just in the opening phases of the
Speaker 1: left's attempts to completely silence conservatism online. I think it's
Speaker 1: important that we all establish some rules here, some principles,
Speaker 1: like the following. Everything is now political. Your enemies do
Speaker 1: not seek to convert you, but to destroy you. Your
Speaker 1: basic freedoms are under assault, and we're losing winning matters
Speaker 1: a lot. This is an ideological street fight, and you
Speaker 1: should act with honor, but expect none in return. Those
Speaker 1: are principles that I've put out that you will need
Speaker 1: to remember in the days and weeks ahead, because the
Speaker 1: Left is now unleashed, and they're using their most powerful companies,
Speaker 1: They're most influential and wealthy corporations to do it at
Speaker 1: a time when you've already seen a Democrat consolidation of
Speaker 1: government power. What are the issues that we've had here
Speaker 1: for a while. I think is that in the media,
Speaker 1: we talk a lot about social media, and people who
Speaker 1: are just trying to go about their lives think that
Speaker 1: there's some exaggeration. Oh how powerful can Facebook and Google
Speaker 1: really be? Well, we're seeing now they are more powerful
Speaker 1: than really any government. They have more influence, certainly than
Speaker 1: any media corporation. They're among the wealthiest companies in the world,
Speaker 1: and they are oligopolists. There are a handful of companies that,
Speaker 1: for all intents and purposes, control the Internet, and they
Speaker 1: have decided openly. I mean, it's been going on for
Speaker 1: a while, but now they're just saying that this is
Speaker 1: what's gonna this is what's happening. They're not hiding it anymore.
Speaker 1: They're not pretending, Oh, it's just the algorithm, it was
Speaker 1: a mistake. No, they're saying, we are purging you. If
Speaker 1: you're a Trump supporter who is too vocal about your
Speaker 1: concerns about the election, or if you're somebody who wants
Speaker 1: to battle against lockdowns and mask mania, we will get
Speaker 1: rid of you. We will erase you from the Internet,
Speaker 1: destroy your business, and also silence you in the process.
Speaker 1: This is a level of censorship, my friends. This is
Speaker 1: a level of control over the flow of information that
Speaker 1: until recently, would have been unthinkable. How could anyone do this?
Speaker 1: How could they be so effective in deciding what the
Speaker 1: boundaries of acceptable political debate and conversation are. That's what's
Speaker 1: happening here. We have been talking about creating, as I've said,
Speaker 1: unsinkable aircraft carriers or free speech. And before any of
Speaker 1: you pointed out, I'll just admit it, I didn't realize
Speaker 1: how easily they'd they'd be sunk, or at least they
Speaker 1: would try to do it. Parlor Rumble and other sites
Speaker 1: out there that have tried to take a free speech perspective,
Speaker 1: they're not right wing sites by mission. That's not true.
Speaker 1: You keep hearing this in the media, their places where
Speaker 1: people on the right, where conservatives have been growing in
Speaker 1: number because we're not allowed to disagree with the Democrat
Speaker 1: left consensus. On the other big social media sites. I mean,
Speaker 1: they may very well have delivered the election to Joe
Speaker 1: Biden just by suppressing the Hunter Biden story. The way
Speaker 1: that they did will never know. But then when you
Speaker 1: add on top of that the way that they adjust
Speaker 1: the algorithms, you add on top that the way that
Speaker 1: they try to tilt the playing field in the favor
Speaker 1: of Democrats all the time. We can't really account for
Speaker 1: this because people believe, because we've been led to believe
Speaker 1: by these companies that they are free and fair and
Speaker 1: that they are just trying to to provide services to people.
Speaker 1: They're not pursuing an agenda beyond profit and growing their
Speaker 1: user base. And profit is fine, growing users is great,
Speaker 1: But no, they're evangelists for the left. Google, Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: Amazon evangelists for the left, and those companies put together
Speaker 1: are such a huge portion of what is even possible
Speaker 1: on the Internet. If you don't have a single social
Speaker 1: media account, you understand how much this affects you. Google
Speaker 1: can cut off if it wants to, all adds to
Speaker 1: any website that it chooses to do so, it can
Speaker 1: make your website go bankrupt in a matter of weeks.
Speaker 1: So if you're saying, well, block, I don't, I don't
Speaker 1: use social media, I don't really care as long as
Speaker 1: I can still get my favorite authors and writers and
Speaker 1: commentators and support their content, what I'm telling you is
Speaker 1: no that they won't be able to either. They won't
Speaker 1: be able to do there. I mean, thankfully I'm on
Speaker 1: terrestrial radio as well as having a podcast and a website.
Speaker 1: You know, you can go to bucksexen dot com and
Speaker 1: please do so because my ability to tell you all
Speaker 1: I've been saying for all please bookmark it be you know,
Speaker 1: make bucksex and dot com a site that you're checking
Speaker 1: in to see. You can always listen to the show
Speaker 1: there too, on demand. It's very easy. There's a pop up,
Speaker 1: just click the play button. You can do it from
Speaker 1: your smartphone. I'm telling you this because it's really a
Speaker 1: matter of time right now. Before my what was almost
Speaker 1: five hundred and I was getting getting close to five fifty.
Speaker 1: I think fouls in Twitter, and anyone tells you they
Speaker 1: don't pay attention to their Twitter following, who's on Twitter
Speaker 1: and as a blue check is a liar? A liar? Okay,
Speaker 1: that's that's ridiculous. I've seen some people who even cares,
Speaker 1: please let's see and then that's all they care about.
Speaker 1: It's all just one big vanity project for them anyway.
Speaker 1: But I've I've been losing I think at this point
Speaker 1: I'll be close to one hundred thousand Twitter followers down
Speaker 1: in a week. In a week, it's a lot of
Speaker 1: people to no longer be able to reach in any capacity,
Speaker 1: And I know some of them are bots, and there's
Speaker 1: all these theories out there, But if they weren't doing
Speaker 1: a purge of conservatives, explaining me why it's only happening
Speaker 1: to conservatives at that, I would like to know if
Speaker 1: it were just Russian bots they were they were taking
Speaker 1: off the off the Internet, and the way that Amazon
Speaker 1: can go after people now is even in some ways
Speaker 1: more frightening. You need servers. There's an actual technological infrastructure
Speaker 1: that has to be in place for you to have
Speaker 1: any kind of website, for you to do any of
Speaker 1: these uh, any of this conservative content that I'm talking
Speaker 1: to you about. If you don't if you don't have
Speaker 1: the servers, you can't do anything. They are now denying
Speaker 1: people access to servers, right, And that's what's happened to Parlor,
Speaker 1: for example. It wasn't just Amazon and Google and UH
Speaker 1: and Twitter all effectively saying you know, they're they're going
Speaker 1: to be target This is a competitor. I mean, there
Speaker 1: are rules. There are laws about collusion and about monopoly
Speaker 1: for a reason because ultimately the consolidation can be anti competitive,
Speaker 1: so it can produce an outcome that is the opposite
Speaker 1: of what you want. A free and competitive market. They
Speaker 1: all came together. But it's even worse than that, because
Speaker 1: not only did you have these tech bands come together
Speaker 1: against against Parlor in the way that they did, but
Speaker 1: they also the secondary order effects are that your lawyers,
Speaker 1: your accountants, you know, other people that work for your company.
Speaker 1: Once you're targeted and targeted by Amazon and Google and Facebook,
Speaker 1: you're radioactive. Nobody wants to go near you. And that's
Speaker 1: also why you've seen all these other corporations like Marriott
Speaker 1: is suspending donations to Republican senators who voted against certifying President,
Speaker 1: like Joe Biden for example. I mean, you know, Marriott Hotels,
Speaker 1: City Group, the huge financial services company, right, City Group,
Speaker 1: the huge bank. They've decided they're going to cut off
Speaker 1: donations from City Group, also to a number these senators.
Speaker 1: And this is this is all out purge. That's what
Speaker 1: we're going through right now, and it's the beginning of it.
Speaker 1: How is this going to make things better in the country?
Speaker 1: Ask yourself that question, how will this bring us together?
Speaker 1: Where is the spirit of unity that we were told
Speaker 1: was going to come about? When Joe Biden whens you know,
Speaker 1: the the eighty to ninety percent, and that's what the
Speaker 1: polls are showing of Republicans who condemn who just outright condemning,
Speaker 1: and you should know that's what the number is. It's
Speaker 1: eighty to ninety percent of Republicans condemn the the Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill riot, separate from the protest, but the riot on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. That's not going to save them though, meaning
Speaker 1: there's still going to be consequences. They're still going to
Speaker 1: be targeting of anybody on the right as part of this.
Speaker 1: This is why I've been warning for years about how
Speaker 1: the left has expanded the term white supremacy, for example,
Speaker 1: to be if you oppose a firm of action, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's a white supremacist position. If you oppose racial preferences
Speaker 1: in hiring or in admissions for schools or whatever, that's
Speaker 1: white supremacists. They expand this. It used to be for
Speaker 1: neo Nazis. Now it's for anybody that has a position
Speaker 1: touching on a whole range of issues that the left
Speaker 1: that the Democrats don't share. They smear everybody. And what's
Speaker 1: really concerning are these early stage move I mean, there's
Speaker 1: so much here, these early stage moves to make a
Speaker 1: big push on domestic terrorism, and by that you know,
Speaker 1: they're going to be going after people on the right
Speaker 1: who aren't really engaged in a terroristic activity, but they'll
Speaker 1: abuse this. They'll be a tremendous mission. Cree. There's already
Speaker 1: laws against all terrorism, there's no there's no legal terrorist.
Speaker 1: But what they want to do is increase the surveillance
Speaker 1: state and make harsher penalties for people that don't even
Speaker 1: do anything illegal, let's say, but who are running their
Speaker 1: mouths about something, and they want to increase surveillance. They
Speaker 1: want to have a chilling effect on the opposition to
Speaker 1: the Biden administration. That's really what this is. They will
Speaker 1: abuse this tool. And I was somebody who was working
Speaker 1: in the War on Terror, and yeah, there were abuses.
Speaker 1: So this happened under the Bush administration, but it wasn't
Speaker 1: abuses against Democrats. It was abuses around the world and
Speaker 1: the international arena. Right, That's what we've all seen Democrats,
Speaker 1: you know, we were so upset and we learned all
Speaker 1: these stories about about black sites and waterboarding and the
Speaker 1: mass surveillance state, which did affect all Americans. Democrats now
Speaker 1: are planning to do to use that same overreach playbook.
Speaker 1: But they're planning to do it for domestic political purposes
Speaker 1: against their fellow Americans. That's really the plan here. This
Speaker 1: is going down a very dark and dangerous path. And
Speaker 1: I think it's really necessary if you to understand. We
Speaker 1: complain about this, We appeal the principle. We say, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, guys, this is reckless, this is bad,
Speaker 1: this is unfair. You're penalizing a lot of people under
Speaker 1: false pretenses. And you know what their response is good,
Speaker 1: you deserve it. They don't care. They think your ideas.
Speaker 1: The Democrats, the left have convinced themselves that your ideas
Speaker 1: that they want to suppress are not just wrong, they
Speaker 1: are a danger and they need to be destroyed and
Speaker 1: you need to be punished for them. That's the prevailing mentality,
Speaker 1: that's the overwhelming sentiment of the left. Falls into that category.
Speaker 1: It's not I don't like what you say, but I
Speaker 1: understand that you have a right to say it, and
Speaker 1: you should not face concerted consequences to ruin your business,
Speaker 1: your life, your reputation around it. No, they've moved into
Speaker 1: the destruction of anybody who stands in their way, and
Speaker 1: they feel good about it. And if there are people
Speaker 1: that get caught up in this, that are ruined or
Speaker 1: that go bankrupt, to have their reputations destroyed. That's collateral damage.
Speaker 1: They're absolutely willing willing to pay. Because if you're on
Speaker 1: the right, there is no such thing as collateral damage.
Speaker 1: You're on the wrong team, you should suffer. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: this is the attitude. That is how they feel. I
Speaker 1: also want to talk about what can we do about this?
Speaker 1: What is the path forward? People keep saying to me,
Speaker 1: we'll buck you. You're telling us about the problems, What
Speaker 1: about the solutions? First me who don't understand the full
Speaker 1: scope of the problem, Because the mobilization that is required
Speaker 1: on our side to tackle these issues is massive, and
Speaker 1: we are now out of power, and it is only
Speaker 1: fair to point out that Republicans didn't do a damn
Speaker 1: thing about this for four years, and now we are
Speaker 1: exactly where some of us were warning we'd be. Where
Speaker 1: you have political power and private sector tech power colluding
Speaker 1: and consolidating to eradicate right wing views. That is what
Speaker 1: is happening right now, and we are finally seeing it
Speaker 1: at a time when we're in the worst position we've
Speaker 1: been in four years to do something about it. So
Speaker 1: I want to be clear on that there are people
Speaker 1: in positions of power who are supposed to be on
Speaker 1: our team who let us down. Here this is the truth.
Speaker 1: I told you all, speak the truth. The Trump administration
Speaker 1: did not do a damn thing about this, and here
Speaker 1: we are. How many times did we talk about it?
Speaker 1: Section two thirty What's going to happen next? Nothing was done?
Speaker 1: And now we the people have to figure out a
Speaker 1: plan of action to return this country to some sense
Speaker 1: of political equilibrium because this this can deteriorate very rapidly.
Speaker 1: And I do not get worried easily about the future
Speaker 1: of this country. If this trend continues of really punishing
Speaker 1: political enemies in the way that they're already doing and gone,
Speaker 1: it's gonna get much worse if this trend continues. I
Speaker 1: don't know what happens this country, but I am worried.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest news and information from Buck by heading to
Speaker 1: Bucksexton dot com. What do I think is coming next?
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about what we should do,
Speaker 1: but I want you to also understand where this is
Speaker 1: all heading. You're going to see an escalation until we submit.
Speaker 1: It used to be build your own app. And it
Speaker 1: took us too long on the right to do it,
Speaker 1: but we did. We we have an app that's just
Speaker 1: it's free speech. It's not actually even conservative or right wing.
Speaker 1: But build a place, you know, it's the private businesses.
Speaker 1: Build a place that you know, you can have the
Speaker 1: free speech you want. So we did, and then they
Speaker 1: shut they shut that down. And if we say, okay,
Speaker 1: well we're going to have our own you know, we're
Speaker 1: going to create our own ad sales company, they're gonna
Speaker 1: go after not only they're going to try to boycott
Speaker 1: companies that that partake in conservative ad sales to support
Speaker 1: media and voices out there like mine. They're also going
Speaker 1: to then say, well, we're going to cut off your servers,
Speaker 1: which has already happened. I mean is essentially we're heading toward.
Speaker 1: The left has so much dominance of the Internet that
Speaker 1: the answer is going to be too bad, build your
Speaker 1: own Internet. That's unacceptable in society. All of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you'll notice the left or a bunch of free market absolutists, right, Oh,
Speaker 1: there's no no need for regulation, no need for government intervention.
Speaker 1: Isn't that so convenient? The people that tell you bake
Speaker 1: that cake. Christian put you know, a satanic phallic symbol
Speaker 1: on on some cupcakes or something, because because we say so,
Speaker 1: you have to, right. I mean, they made the guy
Speaker 1: at Masterpiece Cake Shop actually write satanic messages. I mean
Speaker 1: you've been told that he denied service to a gay couple.
Speaker 1: That's actually not true, that's a lie. He didn't want
Speaker 1: to write messages like there is no God, or you know,
Speaker 1: to do something that's contrary to his faith. And they
Speaker 1: want to make you submit. You know, it's not baked
Speaker 1: that cake. It's baked that cake, and write what we
Speaker 1: say as part of your business, or else the government
Speaker 1: comes down on you, right, or else the government attacks you.
Speaker 1: And then beyond that you have the left telling us, oh,
Speaker 1: but now we want free market absolutism. Now, now we
Speaker 1: want there to be the destruction, the destruction of conservatism
Speaker 1: through the principle that we've established power, we have an
Speaker 1: effective monopoly, and that's what's gonna end up happening. That's
Speaker 1: where they want to take this. So I would just
Speaker 1: say to you all, this is they're going to escalate.
Speaker 1: They don't they don't care that this attacks very fundamental
Speaker 1: free speech principles in this country. There's free speech as
Speaker 1: an issue of law, and then there's free speech as
Speaker 1: a cultural issue. There's free speech as something that we
Speaker 1: have in in society. And sure enough, what they're doing
Speaker 1: is the eradication of that culture. And they're they're open
Speaker 1: about that. They're going for it. They are not held
Speaker 1: back at all by shared principle on this. So just
Speaker 1: understand that their plan is to make this much much worse.
Speaker 1: Understand that their next steps and all of this are
Speaker 1: going to be to punish anyone who does not come
Speaker 1: to heal, and that's going to be a lot of
Speaker 1: us that could be that could be me among them.
Speaker 1: And that's why you need to get ready for this
Speaker 1: and find ways to support the content and the voices
Speaker 1: out there that you like directly, and not to rely
Speaker 1: on social media to find what people are saying and
Speaker 1: what they're up to. You're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from More Bucked. Head
Speaker 1: to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast.
Speaker 1: What can we do about it? I understand that's that's
Speaker 1: a question that we should all be asking right now,
Speaker 1: and I've been getting it a lot recently because asking
Speaker 1: what can we do about this? The answer is, for one,
Speaker 1: I think we have to take stock of the fact
Speaker 1: that one one of our big problems with the Trump
Speaker 1: administration on the right. And people may not really enjoy
Speaker 1: hearing this, but everyone listening to this knows it's true.
Speaker 1: There was no internal criticism allowed of Trump from within
Speaker 1: the team. I don't mean never Trumper, Oh, I hate
Speaker 1: Trump stuff. I mean, hey, I really want the MAGA
Speaker 1: agenda to succeed. I want Trump to be a very
Speaker 1: effective president while in the Oval office, to follow through
Speaker 1: on the promises that he made to his voters. It
Speaker 1: would be better to that end if he did more
Speaker 1: of this, or if he focused on this, or if
Speaker 1: he stopped listening to and fill in a couple of
Speaker 1: very obvious blanks there. That was shut down. People who
Speaker 1: were the run of the mill Trump supporter generally did
Speaker 1: not want to hear that stuff. And if you did that,
Speaker 1: and I can tell you from personal experience, you got
Speaker 1: people saying, why, why don't you really support our president?
Speaker 1: So what do you mean, of course I support our president.
Speaker 1: If a coach tells you you're throwing into double coverage
Speaker 1: too much, hate your tight end, you know, running across
Speaker 1: the middle. Is he playing for the other team or
Speaker 1: your team? You know, if he sees a couple of
Speaker 1: interceptions that happened and he tells the team we got
Speaker 1: to go to the time, is he playing for the
Speaker 1: other team or your team? We forgot this. There was
Speaker 1: it was a lack of willingness to push Trump in
Speaker 1: the right And I'm gonna tell you I got I
Speaker 1: got tired of trying a few times, and I probably
Speaker 1: should have kept pushing, but a lot of people would
Speaker 1: have just tuned it out, would have been mad at me,
Speaker 1: And I figured, okay, well, I'll focus on what I
Speaker 1: think is going well about the administration and try to
Speaker 1: try to hammer home those gains instead of looking at
Speaker 1: what's not going well and say that we need more
Speaker 1: of a focus on this. But now here we are
Speaker 1: in a place where we've got nobody, nobody who is
Speaker 1: really in much of a position of authority in the
Speaker 1: political sense to do much about this at the federal
Speaker 1: level and the Biden administration. Remember, you're just seeing the
Speaker 1: private sector action right now, which is which is very powerful.
Speaker 1: But soon we'll be in a place where the actual
Speaker 1: political apparatus is taking this same approach. Soon we'll be
Speaker 1: in a place where the Biden administration is leveraging openly
Speaker 1: the big tech oligopolists and federal law to shut you down.
Speaker 1: What do we do about this? Well, going back to
Speaker 1: what I mentioned before about bake that cake or else,
Speaker 1: and remember it's not It wasn't bake the cake. It
Speaker 1: wasn't about not selling to people. It was about the
Speaker 1: message on a cake that is contrary to one's religious beliefs.
Speaker 1: That was That was really the heart of the issue.
Speaker 1: And the left, Oh, and the same people, and I
Speaker 1: don't have to keep going with that analogy, the same
Speaker 1: people that want to make nuns pay for birth control. Right, sorry, nuns,
Speaker 1: you gotta pay for birth control. That's not free market.
Speaker 1: So under what? Under what auspice is? Well, what is
Speaker 1: the justification for making nuns by birth controls? Public good?
Speaker 1: That's what democrats say, it's it's public good, public health. Sorry,
Speaker 1: so you have to do it. Well, isn't it for
Speaker 1: the public good to be able to have free and
Speaker 1: open political debate? He's in it for the public good
Speaker 1: to have the internet like the phone lines, And imagine
Speaker 1: if the phone company was privately owned in such a
Speaker 1: way that the Democrat owners in the weeks before an
Speaker 1: election could just shut off all shut off all phone
Speaker 1: service to every GOP outreach effort, every GOP campaign all
Speaker 1: across the country. That would theoretically be private sector action, right,
Speaker 1: But no, we've established that there are utilities. It's necessary
Speaker 1: for society to have phone lines as a source of free,
Speaker 1: open communication for people to use. Right the same way
Speaker 1: that you know, we've done that, We're going to have
Speaker 1: to approach more aspects of the Internet this way. And
Speaker 1: the only answer friends is regulation. If you think the
Speaker 1: answer is free market, we'll get ready for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: And when I say free market, a kind of free
Speaker 1: market absolutism, you'll see the Left use they're built in
Speaker 1: advantage right now to destroy the Republican Party. But we're
Speaker 1: not even gonna be able to get our pants on
Speaker 1: and get out the door before they'll have complete online
Speaker 1: dominance that has been used to destroy the voices of
Speaker 1: opposition to the Biden administration. It's going to be all over.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna be able to build their own internet
Speaker 1: in the next you know, the next two years. So
Speaker 1: there needs to be for one, just the kind of
Speaker 1: public outrage and at least put the Democrats on notice.
Speaker 1: We see what they're doing and it's disgusting. Beyond that, though,
Speaker 1: if you're looking for for action, you need to have
Speaker 1: at the state level. You need to have state governments
Speaker 1: that start to add in state legislatures, have to add
Speaker 1: Republicans as a protected status under law for things like
Speaker 1: you know, doing doing transactions for and with banks and
Speaker 1: you know, online servers. And this is what what Democrats
Speaker 1: have done, and they've created this whole extra this whole
Speaker 1: all these extra layers of law that say that because
Speaker 1: for the good of society, you can't discriminate on the
Speaker 1: basis of race in public accommodations, for the good of society,
Speaker 1: you can discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and
Speaker 1: public accommodations. So what I'm saying is the only legal
Speaker 1: pathway that I can see here. And I'm not a lawyer,
Speaker 1: but I am somebody who reads all this stuff constantly
Speaker 1: and tries to understand what the options are in layman's terms.
Speaker 1: But the only the only pathway that I can see
Speaker 1: would be to start to add Republicans as at the
Speaker 1: state level, because I know we can't do we're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to do this the federal level
Speaker 1: because we didn't take action on this for four years
Speaker 1: under Trump, would be to add so in the state
Speaker 1: of Texas, for example, in the state of Florida, you
Speaker 1: could have you are not allowed to and then and
Speaker 1: then that would lead to lawsuits, right, it would lead
Speaker 1: to lawsuits and more. But this is it. This is
Speaker 1: our only this is our only shot. As I see it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to force people to think twice at least,
Speaker 1: because right now they don't think twice at all. They
Speaker 1: don't care what we think. That there's no sense whatsoever
Speaker 1: that we have to be that they have to be
Speaker 1: careful about what doing. They can go around YouTube and
Speaker 1: Facebook and Twitter and just Google, which is of course
Speaker 1: the owner of YouTube, an Amazon, which has a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of cloud computing services that they do and servers.
Speaker 1: They can crush you without consequence because they don't like
Speaker 1: what you say. All this stuff about terms of service
Speaker 1: violations and Trump and violence at the Capitol, that's why
Speaker 1: we're shutting people down. That's not true. Okay, They're not
Speaker 1: shutting parlor down because it was a place where violence
Speaker 1: was planned anymore. So than violence has been planned by
Speaker 1: Antifa and BLM and many others on Twitter, on Facebook.
Speaker 1: These are communication platforms. Parlor doesn't advocate for the violent
Speaker 1: overthrow of the government. Parlor is not doing anything other
Speaker 1: than refusing to play the game the way the left
Speaker 1: wants it to, which means suppressing conservative speech at every opportunity.
Speaker 1: You know, I mean, I've been dealing with this. These
Speaker 1: companies are a nightmare and they don't care what you think. Facebook, YouTube,
Speaker 1: they suspend you, Instagram suspends you. Good luck, good luck
Speaker 1: getting your account back. If you do, it'll be after
Speaker 1: you know, dozens of hours of time filling out forms
Speaker 1: and on the phone and trying to reach a rap
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff. And meanwhile, the left they
Speaker 1: got no problems. They're run any ads they want, do
Speaker 1: anything they want, say whatever they want. They're not getting suspended,
Speaker 1: they're not getting they're not getting booted off. These places
Speaker 1: you can have right now, you go, you can go
Speaker 1: and check it out for yourself. Yeah, there are Iranian
Speaker 1: pro genocide against the Jewish state. People in the Iranian
Speaker 1: government who they have their Twitter know the Aetola, I
Speaker 1: mean they or you know, the the Guardian Council. They
Speaker 1: have their Twitter account. The Iranian Revolutionary regime they have
Speaker 1: their Twitter account. So that's okay, you know poot, I
Speaker 1: mean the Russians. There are the Chinese with there with
Speaker 1: putting wagers in concentration camps in in uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Shenjang Province in western China. They they have their Twitter accounts.
Speaker 1: So this isn't about stopping human rights violations or violence.
Speaker 1: This is about suppressing conservatives and this is in a
Speaker 1: huge problem. And then there's the blacklists. You're already starting
Speaker 1: to see it. Uh, you know, the Lincoln Project, which
Speaker 1: is really a bunch of sociopaths who are doing unbelievable
Speaker 1: damage to the country with the nonsense that they put forward.
Speaker 1: But they're they're now circulating lists. What they want to
Speaker 1: do is put out a very easy to read public
Speaker 1: shaming lists of anybody who work for the Trump administration
Speaker 1: so that they will not get jobs in corporate America.
Speaker 1: They will not be they will effectively be unhireable. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the most vicious kind of political retribution you
Speaker 1: can fine sort of advocating for violence. It's they're not
Speaker 1: necessarily targeting you for violence, yet if you work for Trump,
Speaker 1: although that has also happened, as we know. But they're
Speaker 1: going to make sure that you can't pay your bills,
Speaker 1: feed your family, have a career, pay your mortgage. You know,
Speaker 1: that's that's what you deserve if you work for Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what they really believe, and this is increasing widespread.
Speaker 1: There are these lists that are circulating. My friends. They
Speaker 1: don't care. They really believe that if you support Trump,
Speaker 1: you've been a part of a coup attempt, and that
Speaker 1: you must be supportive of white supremacist ideology. And the
Speaker 1: fact that seventy five million Americans, including a lot of
Speaker 1: as we know, an unprecedentedly high number of Latino and
Speaker 1: black voters compared to GOP norms, voted for Trump, none
Speaker 1: of that matters. Not to the left. It's white supremacist support.
Speaker 1: It's a coup, it's fascism. It's the worst kinds of
Speaker 1: the worst kinds of political mouthfeeas, and whatever they have
Speaker 1: to do to stop it, they feel entirely justified in doing.
Speaker 1: And if you and your livelihood and your freedom is
Speaker 1: a casualty of that, great they don't to say they
Speaker 1: don't care is even correct. They celebrate it. They're happy
Speaker 1: when conservatives get booted off the internet. They're happy when
Speaker 1: their opposition is You know, this would be like if
Speaker 1: we were playing in a sports league and we think
Speaker 1: that they would want to they would want to meet us,
Speaker 1: let's say on the actual playing field. No, what they
Speaker 1: want is to slash the tires of the bus for
Speaker 1: the opposing team so they can't even get to the match.
Speaker 1: That's how they're playing this. That's what they're doing now.
Speaker 1: They're slashing our tires. They're you know, setting up actual
Speaker 1: roadblocks and saying, sorry, we win by forfeit. We're in charge. Now.
Speaker 1: What this does to America if it continues, I I
Speaker 1: can't say. I don't know. I just know that it's terrible.
Speaker 1: And at the left is that this is a psychosis.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting and there is no good faith. They're operating
Speaker 1: with no good faith whatsoever. They have decided that the
Speaker 1: worst elements of Trump support, which are a tiny, tiny
Speaker 1: fraction of those who actually voted for trumpet support President Trump,
Speaker 1: the absolute worst for ingelements, you know, the q Anon
Speaker 1: behind Trump, that's representative of all of us. Therefore, we
Speaker 1: all have to be we all have to be purged.
Speaker 1: And this is the mentality, So be aware of it,
Speaker 1: understand it, and get ready for it. We're in this together,
Speaker 1: but it is going to be rough. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: more from Buck by following him on social media at
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Articles of impeachment
Speaker 1: have been introduced in the House by Pelosi and the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They're charging Trump with incitement of insurrection. Now based on
Speaker 1: the Senate schedule, this is this is all unlikely to
Speaker 1: result in the President's removal from office. But understand that
Speaker 1: what this is, what this is doing is trying to
Speaker 1: get on the record, and that's it is getting it
Speaker 1: on the record that President Trump tried to incite a
Speaker 1: mob to overturn the election results. Now the people who
Speaker 1: are comparing that capitol he'll write. And I just wonder
Speaker 1: also if anyone out there who when I immediately condemned
Speaker 1: this thing, which I think was an obvious move. I
Speaker 1: don't think there was any question that that was the
Speaker 1: right move. And I don't care if any anyone's welcome
Speaker 1: to disagree with me. I think they're wrong. I do not.
Speaker 1: I will not be swayed on this. I wonder if anybody, though,
Speaker 1: who disagree with me that this was going to result
Speaker 1: in a terrible backlash and that it was entirely counterproductive,
Speaker 1: they'll admit that I was right about that too, which
Speaker 1: was also I think obvious. Now you have Pelosi and
Speaker 1: the Democrats getting on the record that they're they're alleging
Speaker 1: there and tried to steal an election using a mob
Speaker 1: and inciting a mob to violence at the US Capitol.
Speaker 1: And if you see the video, and I'm not going
Speaker 1: to pretend like it's not there because people don't want
Speaker 1: to hear it, if you see the video at the
Speaker 1: Capitol of what was done to some of these police officers.
Speaker 1: Every bit is grotesque and awful. Is what you've seen
Speaker 1: from the worst of Antifa, you know, every bit as
Speaker 1: awful as what you've seen from many of these BLM mobs. Now,
Speaker 1: there weren't assassins on behalf of BLM killing cops, which
Speaker 1: we've seen in other cases, but that's usually loan. That's
Speaker 1: usually a lone wolf actor separate from the actual BLM mob.
Speaker 1: That tends to have been the case. Anyway, point here
Speaker 1: is that you see the video of the way the
Speaker 1: mob was treating these cops, and it's a disgrace. There
Speaker 1: was nothing. Those cops were doing their jobs. They weren't posing,
Speaker 1: they weren't posing some illegal threat to law abiding citizens.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't have happened. And now Pelosi and the Democrats are
Speaker 1: going to leverage this whole thing to the hilt. They
Speaker 1: want a totally open pathway to Democrat to the Democrat
Speaker 1: agenda in twenty twenty one, and they want to make
Speaker 1: it to the Republican Party is a party that is
Speaker 1: wounded beyond repair. And this is their biggest opening for this.
Speaker 1: If Trump, if this had not happened, if we had
Speaker 1: not had the Capitol Hill riot, they still would have
Speaker 1: been doing Don't don't make don't misunderstand me, They're not.
Speaker 1: It's not like the Democrats were going to be good
Speaker 1: and fair minded. And but we would have been a
Speaker 1: much stronger position. I mean, Trump would have been out
Speaker 1: of office and been able to mobilize people from you know,
Speaker 1: from private life essentially in order to be an opposition
Speaker 1: of Biden, and we would have had a mid term
Speaker 1: in two years. Would have been here before you know it.
Speaker 1: There was a lot that could have happened. This makes
Speaker 1: all of that much more difficult. And that's what Pelosi understands,
Speaker 1: which is why she's going forward these articles of impeachment.
Speaker 1: How could anyone think that this would help the country,
Speaker 1: as if the way we are at a particularly tense moment,
Speaker 1: a truly concerning moment, and we're we're to believe, we're
Speaker 1: to believe that the Democrats think this will make things
Speaker 1: better somehow, That's that's just nonsensical. Removing President Trump through
Speaker 1: this kind of mechanism will only result in in further
Speaker 1: exacerbation of tensions, will only result in even more sense
Speaker 1: of outrage that the that the votes of Trump supporters
Speaker 1: don't count, and they really want to do this to
Speaker 1: erase the twenty sixteen election. The whole thing was a mistake.
Speaker 1: None of it matter, It didn't count. That's why Pelosi
Speaker 1: and the rest of the Democrats want this so badly.
Speaker 1: Gave you this as a way to completely repudiate all
Speaker 1: things Trump, and I'm I'm honest with you, a lot
Speaker 1: of other people aren't. The Trump brand is greatly damaged
Speaker 1: right now that that it's just a fact. The the
Speaker 1: the political power that it would have had as opposition
Speaker 1: to bide in right now is substantially less than it
Speaker 1: would have been because of what we have seen, but
Speaker 1: because of what has happened. But this would just tear
Speaker 1: the country apart. Trump is going to be gone in
Speaker 1: what is it nine days or so? Yeah, nine days.
Speaker 1: Trump is going to be gone pretty soon from office.
Speaker 1: You're gonna try to kick you know, if he's already
Speaker 1: walking out the door, why kick him in the behind?
Speaker 1: You know? Why? Why do that? Because it's spiteful and
Speaker 1: it's vindictive, and that's what Pelosi and the Democrats want.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest news and information from Buck by heading to
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton dot com. Where do we go from here?
Speaker 1: What do we do next to fight back against the purge?
Speaker 1: And what is also the next step for MAGA in
Speaker 1: all of this? Is that even a phrase we're going
Speaker 1: to be hearing the months ahead. We got our friend
Speaker 1: John Cardillo back with us, formerly of the NYPD, now
Speaker 1: a conservative commentator, radio host, and a TV guy. John.
Speaker 1: Great to have you back. Always good to be with you. Buck,
Speaker 1: crazy week though, so so John. I've been saying that
Speaker 1: we were facing a purge, and I knew that they
Speaker 1: would eventually come after these conservative platforms. I didn't know
Speaker 1: that it would happen. I'll say this, they've They've exceeded
Speaker 1: my expectations. The Democrats have for concerted vindictiveness. What do
Speaker 1: you see going on here? Oh? Oh, this is they
Speaker 1: want us eradicate it. I mean, they're not going to
Speaker 1: accept anything less than than total subservience, and they're vocal
Speaker 1: about it. All you gotta do is read their their
Speaker 1: social media postings. They want us to either surrender and
Speaker 1: in some cases they are using words like a cleansing.
Speaker 1: Others are being extreme. They're calling for death to conservatives.
Speaker 1: And then, so I don't I don't see this getting
Speaker 1: better anytime soon. And I just wish Donald Trump would
Speaker 1: have used some of his presidential power and prosecuted some
Speaker 1: of these people over the last four years or installed
Speaker 1: an attorney general that would have These are dark days
Speaker 1: ahead for the right. What do you think we can
Speaker 1: do about this? I mean people are asking me that question,
Speaker 1: and I come up with state level adding conservatives as
Speaker 1: a protected category the same way you'd have people with
Speaker 1: people with disabilities and gender discrimination and things like that.
Speaker 1: Don't I don't see another way because I know the mentality,
Speaker 1: as do you of the left, and especially at these
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley companies where they know how much power they have,
Speaker 1: and the people when you talk to them on the inside,
Speaker 1: they'll tell you. You know, some of them will sort
Speaker 1: of whisper to you because they're terrified too. They'll say,
Speaker 1: we can do whatever we want. Right. They've got armies
Speaker 1: of the of the best lawyers, endless capital and funds
Speaker 1: to do what they want, and anyone who stands against
Speaker 1: them they can crush before they even get any momentum.
Speaker 1: So do you think do you think that state level
Speaker 1: action and when I say it's the answer, is that
Speaker 1: a necessary step? What are the steps that we have? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it absolutely is. I remember, they've also got government affairs
Speaker 1: people everywhere, a federal, state, local. But here's the one
Speaker 1: thing that everybody's missing in the discourse on shows social media.
Speaker 1: Rather when they're saying, oh my god, what's food? As conservatives,
Speaker 1: they took our social media platform away. Local elections and
Speaker 1: state legislative elections haven't worked around the electoral process for years,
Speaker 1: going back as a teenager knocking on doors still tend
Speaker 1: to be grassroots. They're not as dependent on social media.
Speaker 1: We need strong America first, candidates running for district attorney,
Speaker 1: running for Supervisor of Elections, running for Secretary of State,
Speaker 1: running for state legislature, because they have so much power,
Speaker 1: and most of those are grassroots campaigns. They're not dependent
Speaker 1: on social media. Yeah, Facebook to a point, but Facebook's
Speaker 1: really not going to crack down. It's too hard on
Speaker 1: what they perceive right now to be insignificant state legislative races,
Speaker 1: which if we put the right candidates in, we run
Speaker 1: them correctly, we win, and we weaponize those offices like
Speaker 1: Democrats do well. When Facebook finally catches on and the
Speaker 1: other platforms, it'll be too late because we'll at least
Speaker 1: have some bills, some laws in these states with teeth.
Speaker 1: So right now we should not be focusing on twenty
Speaker 1: two federally, and then we should be focusing on it,
Speaker 1: But our real effort needs to be at the state
Speaker 1: and local level to call these people a task and
Speaker 1: also to secure that federal vote in twenty two. We
Speaker 1: can do all these things culturally, and we can shift ideologies,
Speaker 1: and we can drive people to the polls, but if
Speaker 1: you can't protect the vote because you have the secretary
Speaker 1: of State, the DA or the Supervisor of elections, what
Speaker 1: good is it all? So that's where we need to
Speaker 1: focus find the right candidates. John, What do you think
Speaker 1: is going to happen here? Over the next week and
Speaker 1: a couple of days, Pelosi has introduced articles of impeachment
Speaker 1: against the president. There are's a lot of stories, and
Speaker 1: I'll tell you they're they're not making up the twenty
Speaker 1: fifth a mint stuff, because I've heard it from other
Speaker 1: people that at least there are that has been discussed
Speaker 1: by different people at high levels in DC, whether they're
Speaker 1: forward or against it, it it is. I know it is
Speaker 1: being talked about by some people. What do you think
Speaker 1: happens here? And what would what would it mean if
Speaker 1: they were able to remove this president before he left? Well,
Speaker 1: it's very real because of verified political account. I forget
Speaker 1: who it was. I just retweeted how insane it was
Speaker 1: said they're giving Mike Pence until Wednesday. They've given my
Speaker 1: thing about this Congress has breached separation of powers and
Speaker 1: is now threatening the vice president of the United States.
Speaker 1: They're giving him an ultimatum that if he doesn't invoke
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment by Wednesday, they're moving forward with
Speaker 1: articles and impeachment. This is disgraceable. So that talk is
Speaker 1: very real. Now your congressional far left blue check Twitter
Speaker 1: accounts are tweeting, yup, we are giving the ultimatum, Speaker Pelos,
Speaker 1: he's doing it. I think they removed Donald Trump before.
Speaker 1: And I was very critical of the President this morning
Speaker 1: for not fighting, very frustrated with him. So I'm not
Speaker 1: being from cheerleader today. Did you remove Donald Trump before
Speaker 1: his term? Because let's face it, the twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: you and I have spoken about, the president can't discharge
Speaker 1: his duties. There's no indication that Trump's unable to discharge
Speaker 1: the duties in the office. There's no grounds for the
Speaker 1: twenty fifth. So Pelosi's throwing a tantrum, saying, well, Mike Pence,
Speaker 1: if you don't want to violate the Constitution and do this,
Speaker 1: I'm going to violate the Constitution with a shaman teachment
Speaker 1: and do that and getting a complete pass on it
Speaker 1: from the media. I think if they do that, it's
Speaker 1: going to make what happen at the Capitol Wednesday looked
Speaker 1: like child's play. I heard a lot of upset people
Speaker 1: in this country, and the Democrats are just pushing him harder.
Speaker 1: This is what really we're speaking of John Cardillo, former
Speaker 1: NYPD and he's a conservative commentator. You'll know him from
Speaker 1: this show as well as others. John. You know, I
Speaker 1: people are starting to I see some pretty bleak stuff
Speaker 1: circulating on the internet these days about what you know.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that it's just it's just bluster. I really do.
Speaker 1: I hope that it's people that are just venting and saying.
Speaker 1: But if the president is removed at this stage, it
Speaker 1: does seem it does seem like that crosses an additional line.
Speaker 1: He's going there's no one that I know and think
Speaker 1: and has has any credibility is saying other anything other
Speaker 1: than in nine days, Donald Trump will not be the
Speaker 1: president of the United States anymore. To get rid of
Speaker 1: him now for a lot of people would seem like
Speaker 1: a crossing of a line that shows what's coming beyond right.
Speaker 1: So I think people may almost view whatever they do
Speaker 1: next as preemptive action, because look, the Democrats have been
Speaker 1: talking about treason and sedition and a stolen election for
Speaker 1: four years and help create this climate of quite honestly,
Speaker 1: a climate of political hysteria that I'm I'm worried about
Speaker 1: right now, and I'm not somebody who are You know,
Speaker 1: when when Trump initially lost the election, I was saying,
Speaker 1: all right, we got we gotta find out I mean,
Speaker 1: the silks, fishy, we gotta find out about if there's
Speaker 1: any voter for aud or whatever. And now I know
Speaker 1: we've lost the Senate. So it's even worse than it
Speaker 1: was at that time. But I was thinking, Okay, we rally,
Speaker 1: we come together, we do what we can. If they
Speaker 1: pulled Trump out of office with nine days left to go,
Speaker 1: I just feel like I don't know what happens. I
Speaker 1: just know that it's really bad. Yeah, I mean, look
Speaker 1: all of these crazy conspiracy theories, but that there is
Speaker 1: some you know, Intel nuke dropping, and there's these mass arrests,
Speaker 1: and the cracking is popping out of the Potomac, the rescue,
Speaker 1: it's all crazy. Donald Trump is going to be leaving
Speaker 1: the White House on the twentieth of January. Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: going to be entering after his inauguration. So it is
Speaker 1: mind blowingly dumb, petty, and vindictive that the Democrats are
Speaker 1: even going down this road. Meanwhile, meanwhile, they don't even
Speaker 1: mention that additional fourteen hundred bucks and stimulus money to
Speaker 1: struggling Americans that was so important before the Georgia runoff.
Speaker 1: They're not even talking about that fourteen hundred bucks. They
Speaker 1: are now solely focused on the final nails in Trump's
Speaker 1: political content. It just shows you where the Democrats priorities lie.
Speaker 1: It's not with the American people. John, I want to
Speaker 1: switch gears to the vaccine rollout. I know you're you're
Speaker 1: a New York guy, but you've made the very bright
Speaker 1: move of going down to Sunny Florida years and years ago,
Speaker 1: and now that looks certainly very prescient that I a
Speaker 1: matter of time, I may be joining you down there.
Speaker 1: But the mean just because the flight New York and
Speaker 1: San Francisco. Right now, I keep saying this to everybody
Speaker 1: as cities to live in, the value proposition is not good.
Speaker 1: It's just not good. And and that's it's getting worse
Speaker 1: the more people see the leadership failures here. I mean,
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo, it has taken. The vaccine rollout has been abominable,
Speaker 1: and people want to blame the federal government. This was
Speaker 1: a state and local issue that it was handed to
Speaker 1: state and local. They are given vaccine and told get
Speaker 1: this to your people. That's the way this has happened,
Speaker 1: state and local should be you know, the tip of
Speaker 1: the spear on this. They have not been able to
Speaker 1: get it done. Interestingly enough, West Virginia has done a
Speaker 1: really good job. Maryland, by contrast, has been has been
Speaker 1: awful at this. I mean, like twenty five percent of
Speaker 1: their vaccine was actually distributed until recently. And in New
Speaker 1: York they threw out vaccine in cases this has been
Speaker 1: established instead of giving it to people because of the
Speaker 1: Cuomo rule, which rules which he's now adjusting. But how
Speaker 1: is it possible to be so dumb, John, and being
Speaker 1: such a such a prominent position in a large and
Speaker 1: serious state like New York. I'm almost running out of
Speaker 1: ways to describe this guy's buffoonery. No, I think I
Speaker 1: think he loves power. I think he's a guy who
Speaker 1: loves power, and he gets off on more rules on
Speaker 1: top of more rules, on top of more bureaucracy on
Speaker 1: top of more layers, the most inefficient way to run anything. Fuck,
Speaker 1: you've got people that are conspiratorial. I'm not saying this
Speaker 1: is all planned right there, They're going to start releasing
Speaker 1: this vaccine and mass the second after Biden's inaugurated and
Speaker 1: credit him with it. So I think that's the case. No,
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you why, having worked for the New
Speaker 1: York City Police Department, having lived in New York, having
Speaker 1: seen how New York politics and government operates. It really
Speaker 1: is that inefficient, that staff with civil servant bureaucrats who
Speaker 1: can't lose their jobs, who are completely incompetent and ignorant.
Speaker 1: And I think we're just seeing a byproduct of that.
Speaker 1: Cuomo grew that incompetent, ignorant, inefficient government even larger, and
Speaker 1: this is the end result. John. I also am seeing
Speaker 1: that the people are finally recognizing the same government officials,
Speaker 1: the same government health experts and everything else. Who are
Speaker 1: the ones determining the duration of lockdowns are the ones
Speaker 1: who have been unable to figure out how to distribute
Speaker 1: this vaccine. And it's interesting to me because you know,
Speaker 1: Cuomo tweeted out, because you know he still has his
Speaker 1: Twitter account, tweeted out this morning. We simply cannot stay
Speaker 1: closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is
Speaker 1: too high. We will have nothing left to open. People
Speaker 1: like you and me have been saying this four months,
Speaker 1: and we were always shouted down with you just want
Speaker 1: grandma to die so you can get a haircut. You're
Speaker 1: putting profit over lives. And now we're looking around saying, okay, jackasses,
Speaker 1: we've done the lockdowns, the mask maniacs and the lockdowners
Speaker 1: have gotten their way. It's clearly not working in California,
Speaker 1: in New York and a number of states, even the
Speaker 1: most extreme lockdowns we've gone to. And so now all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, it's yeah, maybe destroying millions of people's
Speaker 1: livelihoods for an untested and reckless plan of lockdown wasn't
Speaker 1: such a good idea, John. Now even the Democrats are started,
Speaker 1: but they'll never admit that that's how they came to this, Right,
Speaker 1: they're gonna say, oh, no, the data has changed now, No,
Speaker 1: it actually hasn't. We just know they were wrong. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: My favorite was when I put up a picture of
Speaker 1: me having dinner with a Martini and Florida saying how
Speaker 1: it was open that you responded, your martini killed my grandmother.
Speaker 1: The later found out the guy's grandparents are alive, and well,
Speaker 1: God bless them. But anyway, look look up in New
Speaker 1: York in California, did bug they locked down? Their cases skyrocketed,
Speaker 1: commerce and industry was devastated. They locked down more, They
Speaker 1: destroyed more businesses, more lives both from locking down. But
Speaker 1: in terms of COVID and businesses that went out of business,
Speaker 1: we haven't even tallied. We haven't even tallied yet the
Speaker 1: true cost in terms of opioid addiction, other drug addiction, suicide,
Speaker 1: and people who lost everything. We haven't even looked at
Speaker 1: those numbers yet. They're gonna make the COVID numbers I
Speaker 1: believe pale in comparison. But you nailed it. This was
Speaker 1: all about hatred of conservatives, hatred of Trump, hatred of
Speaker 1: public figures like you and I who all contradicted their narrative.
Speaker 1: They couldn't bring themselves to say, hey, we're wrong, let's
Speaker 1: do what's best for everybody. Nope, they had to be
Speaker 1: proven right at the expends. I mean, is it is
Speaker 1: so infuriating what they did. I hear from the business owners.
Speaker 1: All you got to do is watch the Barstool Sports
Speaker 1: videos when he gives these people those grants, and how
Speaker 1: these people were so desperate they were losing everything. The
Speaker 1: politicians who watched that and aren't moved to act, especially
Speaker 1: on the left, they're disgraceful. Every last one of them
Speaker 1: needs to be primaried and voted out of office. John Cardilla,
Speaker 1: everybody follow him on social media while you still ken, John,
Speaker 1: we got to start talking about creating lifeboats, my man.
Speaker 1: So this audience is good. Unfortunately, we got we got radio,
Speaker 1: we got podcasts still for now, but we got to
Speaker 1: make sure that there's a lot of ways to reach
Speaker 1: this audience. So follow John Cardillo folks if you're not already,
Speaker 1: Facebook and Twitter and John. Thanks thanks as always. You
Speaker 1: got it my man. Thanks Buck