WEBVTT - Week 5 NFL Bets: Nick’s 5 Picks

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Love Herts. Keith

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>week Kwan has had quite a career, from childhood roles

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana, Jones and the Temple of Doom and The

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Goonies to a recent Academy Award win for Everything, Everywhere,

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>All at Once. But now Keith finally stars as a

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>leading man in the film Love Hurts. Love Hurts is

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a perfect date night movie with its mix of over

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the top action comedy and a ton of heart. Love

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Hurts Only at theaters February seventh.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 2>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheadle, Michael Pania, and

0:00:53.880 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Knavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in What's Right? Nick Wright. Episode seventy nine of

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube show and podcast like Rates Review, subscribe to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>all those things. It is our Week five NFL gambling show.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>The way the Gambling Show works is we give you

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 3>five picks. We put the rest of the eleven games

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 3>into three different categories, perfectly priced, stay aways, and be carefuls.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Then at the end of the show, we give you

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 3>a lock. More on that in a moment we see

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 3>if there's any exotics, any teasers, any parlay's we want

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>to do. I give you a survivor pick, which has

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 3>been right now worth the cost of admission on this

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>show Survivor pools. Through four weeks, the majority of Survivor

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 3>pools in America have lost more than eighty percent of

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>their injuries. We are not only four for four, but

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>none of our four survivors have even had a real

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>wet involved. They've been perfect, So that's been good. And

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Demons tries to get me to make a bet. I

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>feel like I made a bet with you last week

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>because I owed you fifty dollars and we agreed double

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>or nothing on something and I think you lost. Mm hmm.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Are you talking about the Rams game?

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 3>No, I think it was the Dolphins game. I think

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>it was the old Dolphins Bengals. We went double or

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>nothing on the fifty bucks.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 5>I thought it was double or nothing for all of

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 5>the reverse of your picks.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Well you would have lost that too, because I had

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 3>a winning week last week. Let's show it America. Okay,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 3>So we went three and two last week after three

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>straight two and three weeks, but once again we lost

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>our right move the lock of the week. So I

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>would like to discuss those picks briefly and we'll get

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>to this week's picks. First of all, what a sharp

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 3>side for me with Minnesota. This is where we talk

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 3>line value. We got Minnesota because these lines locked for

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>us when the Fox bet lines whatever they are, when

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the super Contest locks on Wednesday evening, because we do

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 3>this on Thursday morning, which sometimes screws us. Sometimes we

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 3>don't have all the information, but that's how we do it.

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>And I said I loved Minnesota laying less than a

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 3>field goal in that game in London. Then what happened

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>day of the game. Oh my god, Jamis is out,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Kamara's out, Michael Thomas is out. When all the way

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to Minnesota minus four or four and a half, Minnesota

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 3>one by three. So if you got it when we

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>said it, you won. Vegas covered easily, the Chiefs covered

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>by a million. My love affair with betting games involving

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chicago Bears must end. It will end. This week

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the Bears did not cover. And then there's the lock.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>So I would like to tell you how the locks

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>have gone for us this year. Week one, we had

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore covered easily. Week two we had Baltimore, they were

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>up twenty one in the fourth quarter. We were laying

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>three and a half. They did not win. Week three

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 3>we had San Francisco laying a point and a half.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Despite Jimmy Garoppolo's self safetying, we still were in fine shape.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Then the Broncos go down and score. The Niners had

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 3>the ball two more times. Down one, we're laying one

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and a half. We just need a field goal. We

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>cover back to back turnovers. And then last week Jacksonville

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>is getting six and a half. It's fourteen to nothing

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 3>before Demons got back from his night out at Pianos,

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden, we lose that game outright,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>we lose the game. They lose by eight points. So

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the reason I say that is this our process has

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>been sound on the locks. Our process has been sound

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 3>on these picks. We have made twenty picks so far

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>this year. I've done the I've crunched the numbers, if

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>you will. Eight of them win or law Eight of

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 3>them have been fifty to fifty games. Okay, so six

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of them we have been on the right side of

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>by a mile, and the other six we have had

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>five very unlucky go against us and only one very

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 3>lucky go our way. That was the Arizona game from

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago. So point is, we're not going

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>to change our process here, with the exception of we're

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 3>not gonna let the Bears ruin our record anymore. We're

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 3>not spilling to change our process. You tried to talk

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 3>me out of the Bears thing last week. I will

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>give you credit on that DEMANDE also gave us three

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>picks last week. I think we're gonna discuss those later

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>in the show. But right now, let's get to our

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 3>picks for the week. We're starting with the Prince that

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 3>was promised, Trevor Lawrence and the Jacksonville Jaguars laying seven

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 3>against the Houston Texans.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't typically believe in Jacksonville.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's why we like it. It's a good

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>catch by you. You as Jacksonville right now has been

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>a top ten defense and a top ten offense. Jacksonville

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 3>should be three to one, not because they should have

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 3>won the Philly game, but they should have won Week one.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>They have also shown an ability to blow people out.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 3>They blew out the Chargers and they blew out the Colts.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I like what they're doing on both sides of the ball.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Houston is the only win list team. Houston is just

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 3>going to try to run the ball. Run the ball.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Davis Mills has you know, reversed back to the regressed,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>pardon me, back to the mean. As far as turnovers,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I expect this to be a game that Jacksonville jumps

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 3>out early like they did against Philadelphia, does not make

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the same mistakes they made against Philadelphia. Trevor's not gonna

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 3>have five turnovers. He's not gonna have the most fumbles

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of any player lost fumbles of any player in the

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>last twenty plus years.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 4>As long as it's not Rady, Well, you.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Know that's a good point. Let's check the old weather forecast.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>This is also one of the issues potentially with betting

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>these games on a Thursday, You're not gonna get the

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>most precise weather forecast. But his game is in Jacksonville, Florida.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly not gonna be the torrential downpour that we

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>had to deal with. And guess what on Sunday Sonny high

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of eighty three, low of sixty four, no chance of precipitation.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a recipe for Jacksonville blowing out the Houston Texans.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>We will lay the seven points. Next game, Seattle catching

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>five and a half against New Orleans. Now, this is

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>another one where I, because I have promised to you guys,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I will bet all of these games. Obviously will bet

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>all of these games. I'm gonna recommend you guys just

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 3>keep your eye on the injury report for both teams,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 3>but particularly what it really matters for is the Saints

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>because at last check, we don't know is jamis playing.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>We do expect Alvin Kamara to be playing. Michael Thomas

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.119
<v Speaker 3>At this point, people need to stop backing like Michael

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Thomas some big difference. Finger right, Thomas, unbelievable player three

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>years ago. Then you heard his ankle two years ago

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>was barely you know, was on and off the field

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that year last year was missed the entire year with

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>that same ankle injury. This year came back Week one.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>He's been on and off since then. Okay, there is

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 3>no reason New Orleans should be favored by more than

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>four points against anyone. Seattle, on the other hand, has

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>had a frisky offense. Very bad defense, but a frisky offense.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 3>There's back door cover opportunity. I think Seattle could win

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>the game outright. Andy Dalton potentially is the starter, even

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 3>if he's not. Jamis has not exactly bathed himself in

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 3>glories so far this year. Dennis Allen has one of

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the five worst records of any NFL head coach in

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the last seventy years of football for a coach that's

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>coached as many games as him Seattle. I would have

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>when we were doing this you this Sunday. We didn't

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 3>do it because the Chiefs game was on, but Demonsey

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 3>and I like to do a Bill Simmons cousin south

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 3>thing of guessing the lines. I guessed it was New

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Orleans minus two and a half. I'm never off by

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 3>three points on that. I'm not saying I always picked

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the right side of it, but I'm usually pretty good

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 3>about guessing where Vegas is gonna set it. I don't

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 3>understand the respect New Orleans is getting when New Orleans

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 3>very very easily could be an zero to four football team.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Let me remind you about what New orleans Is year

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 3>has been like so far, because it's actually gonna come

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>into play in a later pick. But New Orleans so

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>far this season. Week one, they're down sixteen to Atlanta

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth quarter, furious comeback they win by a point.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Week two, they can't move the ball at all, Tampa

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 3>dominates them. Week three they lose to the hapless Panthers.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>And last week in London they lose to Minnesota despite

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota shooting itself in the foot repeatedly, and they got

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>a flyback from London. They didn't take the bye after

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the international trip. All those reasons. I like Seattle plus

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the five and a.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Half and Gino Smith.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>What about him?

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Are you buying into him being a top quarterback.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not buying into him being a top quarterback. But

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 3>am I buying into him not being awful? Yeah, he

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 3>wasn't awful when he filled in for us last year.

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 3>This year he's actually been excellent. Now that will regress somewhat,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 3>and New Orleans has a good defense, but five and

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 3>a half's too much. We like Seattle plus the five

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Speaking of Atlanta, next pick Atlanta catching

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>eight in the hook eight and a half at Tampa. Okay,

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>so let's talk about the Atlanta Falcons for a moment.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>A team that some people thought was gonna be the

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 3>worst team in football this year.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 6>And I can act like Atlanta what They're not far off?

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, except for this Week one Atlanta. We just mentioned

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 3>it up sixteen and the fourth they blew it. Week

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>two Atlanta, and this is why we like the plus

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half. Week two Atlanta is down thirty

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 3>one to ten with nine minutes left. Okay, that game

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>is thirty one twenty seven in the fourth quarter, and

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you know what happens. All of a sudden, Jared Goff

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>and Jared Goff uh. Marcus Mariota is thrown into the

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>end zone and Jalen Ramsey has to moss. I think

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 3>it's Drake London to save the game. But a furious comeback.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>They could have won. They shouldn't have won, but they

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>could have won. But furious comeback to cover Week two

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta they go to Seattle all the way furthest trip

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 3>in the one of the furthest trips in the NFL

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 3>scheduled this season. Atlanta, Georgia to Seattle, Washington. They win

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 3>the game out right twenty three to twenty or twenty

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>seven to twenty three, pardon me. And Week four Atlanta

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 3>a game that I told you all was a trap.

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I told you to stay away with Cleveland minus one

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half, and Demonsey's watching the game with me.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland takes a lead in the fourth quarter. He's like, oh,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>you said this was a trap. What does Atlanta do?

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Boom boom, back to backfield goal drives. They win the

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 3>game out right twenty three to twenty against a frisky

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland team. Now you're giving me more than a touchdown. Furthermore,

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to get into Tom Brady's personal life.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 3>It's been a rough week.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Gee.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>He's also banged up. Yeah, the Chiefs hurt him, got

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 3>his shoulder. His finger was already banged up. I'm not

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 3>picking Atlanta to win this game, but I do think

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>that if Tampa has a lead late, they are going

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 3>to grind the clock and run the ball and not

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 3>put Brady in Jeopardy that screams Atlanta. Furthermore, Atlanta has

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 3>shown because Arthur Smith, their coach, has talked all this trash,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 3>there are no give up team. So even if they're

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>getting their teeth kicked in, they are going to do

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>their damnedest to stay in the football game. Or you

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 3>could be down they've down fifteen with five minutes left

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and cover this game. I love the eight and a half,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I love it that extra half point.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 3>It feels good. Situation where they're down eleven with ninety

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>seconds left and they do the we're gonna kick the

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 3>field goal and then go on sidekick. All of a

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 3>sudden you're covering again. Additionally, the Chiefs just ran the

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>ball one hundred and eighty five yards on this Tampa

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 3>defense that previously you couldn't run the ball. Lanta's running

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 3>this weird college offense. I think they're going to run

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the ball. I think both teams are going to run

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the ball, which means it will be a fast game,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>lower scoring game. You're giving me eight and a half

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>points like.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Plus the eight, Atlanta's four and against the spread so far.

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing I did not know that I

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>saw it in your notes.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Might be too late to jump on that bandwagon, you know.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't love that. Yeah, I'll tell you that much.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't love the four and oh against the spread.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 3>It is scary it. I saw that, and it gave

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 3>me a bit of pause. But we're gonna disregard that,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 3>and we're gonna plow ahead with Atlanta plus the eight

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and a half. All right, next line, Dallas plus five

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and a half at the Rams. Someone make a case

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to me that the Rams are a great team that

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't involve last year's Super Bowl. It can't be made.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Someone make a case to me that Matt Stafford looks

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 3>like a top flight quarterback that does not involve last

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>year's Super Bowl and Super Bowl run. It cannot be made.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>The Rams so far this year got their teeth kicked

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 3>in by Buffalo. Fine, we just told you about the

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta game. Now, they dominated that game and then the

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter tried to give it away, so that no,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 3>not you know, no step on your throat there. They

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>then escape against a miserable Cardinals team and get totally

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean dominated by San Francisco. Okay, so let's talk

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 3>about that for a moment. That game was on Monday night,

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>so the Rams are on a short week. That's interesting.

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Their offensive line is in shambles. The Cowboys have an

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>argument that they have the best pass rushing duo in

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the whole league in Michael Parsons and DeMarcus Lawrence. The

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys also have shown you they're going to throw the

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>ball on first down and then run the ball. Just

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>try not to turn the ball over. Conservative game that

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>also lends you to side of the underdog. Dallas has

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>been better than I gave them credit for being able

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to be, particularly after Dack's injury.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 5>But don't you think like that time might be coming

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 5>up for Cooper Rush to have a slip up game.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 6>I do too many games in a row like we

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 6>saw it.

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>So I actually agree with that, and I think that

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>could happen this week. We could have the three interception

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Cooper Rush game. Right I don't think the Rams have

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 3>enough firepower to blow anybody out right now. I just don't.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think that Stafford is going to be under

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 3>such dress. It's going to be all quick passing game stuff.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 3>The Cowboys, if they're smart and they have a smart defense,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 3>will double Cooper Cup throughout. I just think this should

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>be Rams by three, and the Rams are getting an

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>extra two and a half thanks being Super Bowl champs,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and that matters nothing to me at this point. Dallas

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 3>plus I was thinking about Dallas at plus four and

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 3>a half, which is I think where it opened, Dallas

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>plus five and a half. I like, even though I

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 3>haven't been big on the Cowboys, I like Dallas catching

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the five and a half points. The final pick we

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>are giving out is Kansaity minus seven against the Raiders. Oh, Nick,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 3>you always picked the Chiefs false. Did not pick the

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs in week one and they covered. Did not pick

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs in week two and they covered. Did not

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 3>pick the Chiefs in week three. I had them in

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>a teaser. Oh I did not pick them against the

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 3>spread and they did not cover and they lost. Out Right.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I did pick the Chiefs last week, picked them on

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 3>this show lang one, and then I bet them a little.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't call it irresponsibly, but remember I told you

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 3>when you're gambling, you like to decide what your unit

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 3>size is. Yeah, and then you know, have that be

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 3>your typical bet. If you unit size one hundred bucks.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Occasionally you do a half or a three quarter unit

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 3>bet fifty or seventy five. Occasionally, if you really like something,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 3>you'll do a one and a half unit bet. We

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 3>don't need to talk about what my average bet size is.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>But we went with the old four unit bet on

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Manas City the night before my birthday. Here's why. In

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that game, first time in thirty eight games, Patrick Mahomes

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 3>was an underdog. You're not Gonnam. I might not get

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 3>that opportunity bet on him as a underdog again for

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>three years. I had to take advantage of it. The

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs kicked the Raiders ass except for two years ago

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 3>where they played two close games. They play the Raiders

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and they kick their teeth in. The Raiders also got

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 3>their win, so that the desperation a little gone. The Chiefs,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, understand because they I think they

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 3>still have the added edge of having given that game

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 3>away against the Colts. Yea at home. It's on Monday night.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Arrowhead is going to be absolutely out of its mind.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that right now, teams watched what the Chiefs

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>did against Tampa recognize the Chiefs are willing to just

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 3>run the ball, run the ball. They're not going to

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 3>be able to play in that two high shell the

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>whole game. And because of that Cat, I think Mahomes

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to have more opportunities. The only way any

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 3>team has ever slowed down Mahomes his entire career is

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>get constant pressure on the quarterback. The Raiders have one

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>of the worst pass rushes in the league. Listen, I

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>like what the Raiders are able to do on offense.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I think DeVante Adams is gonna end up being a

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 3>great player for them. I think you'll have a big game.

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I still like the Chiefs. I feel like this game

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>should be Kansaity minus nine and a half. It's Kansidy

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 3>minus seven. I like it.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 5>You said you have the opportunity to bet on the

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>Chiefs or bet on Patrick Mahomes being an underdogar that

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 5>won't happen for a while. You don't think that when

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 5>they play the Bills coming up here, so that they'll

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 5>be underdogs.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 3>That game's in Kansas City, right, If that game's in

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City, the answer is absolutely, unequivocally no, I don't

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 3>think they'll be underdogs. Now, what I will say is,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>is there a concern, a bit of a concern the

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs could be in look ahead mode to the Bills game,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 3>if the Bucks game in the Bills game, Raiders trap

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>game in the middle, maybe, except for the fact the

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Raiders have beaten the Chiefs once in Patrick Mahomes's career

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and those sons of bitches did laps around the stadium

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 3>celebrating it. And I don't think the Chiefs are over

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 3>that part of it. Okay, So Kansas City minus seven

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 3>should be nine and a half. So our five picks

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 3>are Jacksonville minus seven, Seattle plus five and a half,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta plus eight and a half, Dallas plus five and

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>a half in Kansas City minus seven. All right, We'll

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 3>go through the other eleven games on the slate quickly

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 3>coming up next, And there is never the one thing.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>While our record's been mediocre, we have been spot on

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>on the be careful category. We've prevented people from making

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 3>bets they shouldn't. There are four road favorites this week

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that we beg you to be careful on. We will

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>discuss all of those and the rest of the slate

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>before we get to our official lock Exotics survivor all

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 3>that coming up next. What's right? Nick right? NFL gamelin

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Show Week five.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 7>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 7>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 7>said for your investments. Cebo index options like SPX and

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 7>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 7>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 7>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 7>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Could be too.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 7>There are risks associated with Cibo company product review. The

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 7>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in What's Right, Nick Right, Episode seventy nine,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Week five NFL Gambling Show. We just gave you our

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 3>five picks. We'll get to the lock and all the

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 3>other fun stuff later, but there are eleven other games

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>we need to discuss. We put them into three categories.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Stay away, be careful and perfectly priced. First on the

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 3>stay away line, and then do we I think we

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 3>show you all of these here? Yeah, so here are

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>four stayaways. We're going to start with Indy at Denver.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Indy is getting three and a half. This is a

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>vintage stay Away for the following reasons. One is no

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Taylor, but also massive injury questions on both sides

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 3>of the ball, and it's a Thursday night game, so

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 3>people will already have known what happens here. I'm not

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 3>comfortable laying three and a half points with Denver right

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 3>now against almost anyone that has a pulse in this league.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 3>I know somebody want to like, the Colts don't have

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a pulse, and without Jonathan Taylor, they certain they shouldn't

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 3>have a pulse. However, the one thing the Colts have

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 3>done really well this year is get after the quarterback.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson will run himself into some sacks. I think

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 3>that the injury questions, the short week, all of that

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>to me, that to stay away for me for well.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if they lose this game to a Colts

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 3>team with though Jonathan Taylor, then they're a five win team.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Then I mean it's hard to find their wins. I

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>expect them to win this week, but it's gonna be

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 3>hard for them to ever get on a real hot

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>streak because so after this week, then they're at the Chargers.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a loss for them. Then they're home for the Jets.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>That's good. Then they're at Jacksonville. To me, that's a

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 3>loss for them, then a bye home for Tennessee home

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 3>for Vegas, or at Tennessee home Vegas at Carolina. They

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 3>get a nice little streak there, but then at the

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>end of the year for them at KC home for

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Arizona at the Rams at case again home for the Chargers,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 3>to must win game for both of these teams, both

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of them were without their star running backs. Stay away

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>next Green Bay against the Giants Giants catching eight.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Wanted.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 3>I almost included the Giants plus eight and my picks.

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>This game is in London. The reason it to stay

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>away for us right now is the total question of

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 3>what healthy quarterbacks do the Giants have. We don't yet

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 3>have enough information on it. Also, the Packers have not

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>looked great against anybody this year. They probably shouldn't be

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 3>favored by more than a touchdown against any team, particularly

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 3>a team and the Giants three and one, well, I

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 3>don't care so much to the three and one. I

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 3>do care that Sakwan's been one of the best players

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>in the league this year. The Packers have not been

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 3>able to consistently stop the run the way you would

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 3>have hoped or expected them to be able to. You

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 3>would think, I mean what did we see this past week?

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>The Patriots ran the ball, ran the ball, ran the ball,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 3>taking the final play of overtime. But because of the

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 3>questions at the quarterback spot, you can't bet the Giants.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>But you also can't lay eight with Green Bay right now,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 3>stay away. Next Detroit at New England. New England laying

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>three points. Okay, so the Lions defense has been so

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>awful this year, you feel like a Belichick team is

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to look at that film and

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 3>exploit them in every area on the offensive side of

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the ball. However, it might be Bailey Zappies starting this game.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones came back to practice. We don't If this

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 3>were Sunday morning, we might be able to give you

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>a line on it. But as we're sitting here Thursday morning,

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and when you guys hear this on Friday, we're still

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 3>not going to know who's playing quarterback for the Patriots.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not comfortable with laying three points with New England

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 3>against a team that can score a bunch. I'm also

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 3>not comfortable with betting on the Troit plus three against

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>a well coached team when the defense is that bad.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 5>I feel like We've stayed away from betting against coach

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Belichick every week except for the one time that they

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 5>played Baltimore, So you still well listen.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>He deserves listen. He's the greatest coach ever. And yeah,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>we've had two strong leans on the Patriots so far

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 3>this year Week two, Week three against Baltimore and Week two.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 3>We told you it was a trap. Everyone's gonna be

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>betting Pittsburgh. This is just the quarterback injury. That's why

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 3>you have the stay away category because of the quarterback injury.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, Tennessee at Washington, Washington getting two and a half.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 3>This is I'm gonna be totally honest with you. This

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 3>was the last game that I put in any category.

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 3>I had no lean or feel for this. These might

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 3>be two of the teams I've watched the least of

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 3>anyone in football this year. We can just move on.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 3>You have great insight on Tennessee Washington. God bless I don't.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 3>All right, be careful, home dogs, home dogs. It's not

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that you can never bet the road favorite, but be careful.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>We will start with Miami minus three and a half

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:19.959
<v Speaker 3>against the Jets. Miami. The reasons for Miami extended break

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 3>because they were off since Thursday. Teddy Bridgewater one of

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the better quarterbacks in all the football. They're playing the Jets,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>which is always a reason to bet. The other side

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of it, reason for the Jets a bit of a

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 3>stirring comeback last week is Zach Wilson. Maybe good, Probably not,

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>but maybe. But the reason this is in the be

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>careful category is nobody is going to be betting the Jets.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>This is going to be a game where eighty percent

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of the public money is going to be on the Dolphins,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>on the belief that Hill and Waddle by themselves are

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be another for twenty four points. The Jets

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 3>aren't going to be able to get there. They are

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>begging you to bet Miami, and it feels like a

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 3>game that that half point really matters. Now do I

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 3>have the gumption to bet on the Jets? I do not,

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 3>but be careful. Next one, Chargers laying just two and

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 3>a half against Cleveland. We've seen Cleveland lose to the Jets.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 3>We saw him lose last week to Atlanta. They have

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Jacoby Rsset at quarterback. Miles Garrett was just in a

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>big car accident. I do think he has a good

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 3>chance of playing this weekend though that line. I stared

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 3>at this for fifteen minutes trying to talk myself out

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 3>of betting the Chargers. I think the Chargers are an

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 3>excellent team. I think they have some of the most

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 3>talent in the league. I'm laying less than a field

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 3>goalies for the Chargers. The cross Country travel the old

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 3>West Coast team in a one o'clock East Coast kickoff,

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>short road favorite to trap. It's a trap. We need

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 3>a you know what for next week. Let's make an

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>animation for it's a trap, and it canna be like demonse,

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 3>like stepping into a bear trap or falling into a hole,

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>or maybe we make a bunch of them. They are

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>daring you to bet the Chargers. They're daring you too.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a trap. I again, I say all this. I

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>expect the Chargers to win by ten, but I know

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 3>it's a trap, all right. Next San Francisco at Carolina

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 3>another trapan No one is betting the Is anyone betting

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers. Can you imagine meeting someone this week who's

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 3>a football better and they're gonna be like, hey, I'll

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 3>tell you what. I love. Baker Mayfield against the defense

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that's allowing the the fewest yards in forty five years.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 3>The Niners just looked awesome. Niners have shown the ability,

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 3>even when their quarterback doesn't play well, to beat a

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 3>team by fifteen points. The Panthers have been one of

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the most poorly coached teams, and Baker's been arguably the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 3>worst quarterback in football this year. So why isn't San

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Francisco favored by eight?

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Why don't we like them against Baker?

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Because it's a tramp I know this sounds dumb. I

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 3>might bet this if it were San Francisco minus seven

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and a half. At six and a half, it looks

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 3>so good I feel obligated to stay away San Francisco

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 3>on a shorter week. You're always a little overvalued when

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you look great on national TV all you're a road

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 3>favorite of more than three points. You are now the

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 3>team that's the West Coast team going all the way

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 3>east for the one o'clock kickoff. It is a trap.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Six and a half is too good to be true.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 3>For a defense and running game that good against a

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 3>quarterback and coaching staff that bad, it's a trap.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 4>I hope you don't come to regret that one.

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Right well, listen, I'm not gonna regret it by not

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>betting it. You're the one that tortures yourself with bets

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>you make and bets you don't. I don't ever regret

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>like a bet I didn't make like that. But I'm

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 3>telling you right now, you love it, our producers, I'm

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>sure love it. That means it's a trap, all right.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Philly say a lot of the same logic

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>here Philly at Arizona. Philly laying five and a half.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Phillies looked like the best team in football. Arizona has

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>been a total mess all year. Why is Philly laying

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 3>less than six points? All of these games? What they

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 3>have in common, if we can put them all back

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>on the screen again, is every member of the square

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 3>betting public is going to be on the road favorite.

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>That is why we created the be Careful category. It's

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 3>not because I have great reasoning as to why you

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 3>should bet the home dog. It's just I know the

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 3>public is going to be on the road favorite. It's

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a trap, all right. Last group perfectly priced, and we'll

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 3>do this one quickly because it's perfectly priced. Cincinnati and Baltimore.

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a division game against two somewhat equally matched teams.

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>It should be a three point game. It's priced at

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 3>three points. That is a game that if a come

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 3>around kickoffs, it gets to three and a half. I

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 3>jump on Senci at three. I can't do it. I

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 3>do A small part of me thinks Cincinnati might win

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that game. But the line is exactly right. There's no

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>value on either of that line. Next one, Chicago at Minnesota. Again,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>we're taking a break from involving ourselves in these Chicago games.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota is a very poorly coached team. Chicago, on the

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>other hand, is the worst passing offense in seventy years

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 3>in this league. It would appear Minnesota divisional game to

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the far better team. It's priced exactly at seven. It's

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 3>just right. And then Pittsburgh at Buffalo. Pittsburgh needed five

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>turnovers and multiple miskicks or else they're owing four to

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterbacks first start. Buffalo, on the other hand, has

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>shown the ability when the team is overmatched to truly

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 3>blow them out.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 5>The fourteen points though against Mike Tomlin all to find

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 5>some way to cover that it's fourteen points.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't know if you can cover it.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 3>If listen, here's my take on it. I don't think

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the reason I'm calling it perfectly priced is you can't

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL unless it is an O seven Patriot

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 3>situation or a historically awful awful team on the other

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 3>side of its situation. You can't make someone more than

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 3>a fourteen point favorite. But this Buffalo team that hasn't

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 3>had a great game start to finish on both sides

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 3>of the ball in a few weeks against the Pittsburgh

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 3>team that is banged up and is starting a rookie

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 3>in his first game ever. Fourteen's what it should be.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 3>To me, that's just right. I'm not betting Pittsburgh plus

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>now I might include Buffalo in a teaser. We have

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 3>a teaser that I placed earlier in the week. The

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 3>lines have moved a bit, but I will share that

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 3>teaser with you. Guys. We have our Survivor pick, and

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 3>again we're four for four documented on Survivors. Demand's got

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 3>his picks. We also have to check Demonse's record from

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 3>last week. I'm not sure how well that went for you.

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 3>I haven't checked it yet. We'll do all that as

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we wrap up the Gambling show. What's Right episode seven.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Welcome back in What's Right? Nick Right? Episode

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine, Week five, NFL Gambling Show. Our five picks

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 3>of the week from earlier in the show are as follows.

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville minus seven against Houston, Seattle getting five and a

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 3>half at New Orleans, Atlanta getting eight and a half

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 3>at Tampa, Dallas getting five and a half at the

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Rams in Kansas City minus seven against the Raiders. Our

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 3>lock of the week, the right Move, as they've called it.

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 3>We are one and three on these. However, Week one

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>nailed it wasn't even closed Baltimore against the Jets. Week

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 3>two had Baltimore lanyg three and a half to the Dolphins.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 3>They were up twenty one points and blew it. Week

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 3>three we had San Francisco laying a point and a

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 3>half to Denver. Jimmy g self safety and we were

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>still covering, and then Jimmy g threw a pick and

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 3>then they fumbled and they lost by one. We're on

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the right side of it. Week four we had Jacksonville

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>catching nice to the graphic. Oh I didn't even notice it,

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 3>so rude. We had Jacksonville catching six and a half.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 3>They were up fourteen to nothing. They lost by eight.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Our process has been sound. The lock this week is

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the Kancity Chiefs minus seven against the Raiders. Demonse, you

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 3>co signed that because that was one of the birthday

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 3>picks you gave me. Correct.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't know about co signing. What do you

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 4>mean I just signed it?

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh you think you inspired it?

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 6>Okay?

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of do we have Demanse's record? When are we

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>doing that? Can we do? Are we doing that now

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 3>or later?

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey? Man?

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 5>It might be better than yours or it might get

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 5>the same, like we might be tied No.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 3>One and two?

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Buddy, what are you talking about last?

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Look?

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 3>You only you gave it out last week and Miami

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 3>plus four I told you was a trap. Minnesota minus

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 3>two and a half.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 6>You just followed me, not one in two total.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm like three and four.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well you've only given out three official ones on

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 3>the show. All right, so you're too. We'll get to

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 3>keep a record. Sweet and the Rams they got their

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:31.399
<v Speaker 3>asses kids wasn't even close. It was embarrassing. What has

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 3>not been embarrassing is our survivor picks. If you are

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 3>following along with us, Oh, look at that you have

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 3>already used Baltimore, Green Bay, Minnesota in the Chargers this week.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 3>There are so many attractive survivor options, so this week

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 3>your possible survivor options are last week, there wasn't that

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 3>many good ones this week, so Chiefs are not a

0:37:58.880 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 3>terrible one.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna say the Chiefs.

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 3>But you might want to want to save the Bills.

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Nobody's gonna be a bigger favorite anywhere in the league

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 3>this year than the Bills. The Vikings, if you hadn't,

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 3>we already used them. But the Vikings not a great team.

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 3>But they're playing the Bears laying a touchdown Tampa, you

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 3>don't love it, Tampa laying more than a touchdown against

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the frisky Falcons. The Jags are an option laying seven

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 3>against the terrible Texans. So you have a bunch of

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 3>good survivor. Our survivor pick of the week, having already

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 3>used Baltimore, Green Made Minnesota and the Chargers, is the

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 3>prince that was promised Jacksonville home against the Texans. He

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 3>is not going to lose consecutive games. The Jags get

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>back above five hundred, they are our survivor pick. Now

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 3>to exotics. We placed one early this week. It is

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a seven and a half point teaser, four teamer plus

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 3>one seventy. The Jags teased from minus seven to plus

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 3>a half point. They say, don't tease through zero specifically, correct, However,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 3>we need the seven and a half for the other

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 3>three legs, and if there are is a time to

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 3>tease through zero, it's win. One of the teams involved

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>in your teaser has already had a tie. Texans have

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 3>already had a tie. Plus half point could come in Andy.

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Tampa teased to minus half points, so Tampa just win.

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 3>The Bills teased to minus six and a half, so

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 3>they just have to win by a touchdown, and the

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs tease to a pick. So there it is our

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 3>four team teaser. Jacksonville to win, Tampa to win, the

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs to win, and Buffalo to win by at least

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown plus one seventy. That's my teaser. Now you

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 3>are going to try to convince me on a teaser.

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that correct?

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 4>What is it?

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 6>Packers minus two in London versus the Giants?

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, got niners minus half a point in Carolina, Jacksonville

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 5>minas one and this one hundred dollars wins you one sixty.

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's plus one sixty. It's a three team six

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 3>point teaser. I don't want it. I don't want it

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>because a little nervous about the Packers leg of it,

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and we're not gonna have multiple teasers.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 4>Geez what what that's disrespectful.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Saquon might run for a one sixty on them and

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 3>it's London weird game. I appreciate the producers and you

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 3>coming together for that. Not interested demons your picks this

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 3>week that you gave out on Monday? What are your

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 3>picks this week?

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 5>Denver minus three and a half versus Indiana? You all

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 5>in Indianapolis?

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I always call him Indiana?

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh second? All?

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 3>By the way, fun, it'll be fun for the audience

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 3>if by the time they're hearing this, you're already owing

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 3>one because that game's happening tonight. All right.

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 6>Next, you got.

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Kansas City minus seven versus the Raiders, yep, and then

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Arizona getting five and a half versus Philly.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I expect de Montay's three picks this week to go

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 3>just like they did last week. He'll get one, right,

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the one that he agrees with me on on

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the other two the one that he agrees with me on. Yeah,

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>it's true, all right. Lastly, what's the offer.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 5>The offer is Jaguars money line, Bronco's money line, Commander's

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 5>money line one hundred wins you three to thirty five.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 3>And if that happens, the Jags will be alone in

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the first place. That's the idea behind it. I am

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna reject that one too. I appreciate the offer. They

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 3>said I should go in on it with you. I

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 3>am not involving Nat Hackett were the Washington commanders in

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 3>any money line parlays, I'm not interested. I appreciate the offer.

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Not doing it, so thank you, though, you feel free

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to go ahead and place that one if you'd like.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do it.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 4>I know the.

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Producers were like, oh, you guys should go on this together, Prince,

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 3>that was promised this guys, I'm not putting bets on

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 3>the record that I don't believe in. Now. We've been

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 3>mediocre through four weeks, but we were barely keeping our

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 3>head above water. What we need is a nice crisp

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 3>four and one week. We go four and one and

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 3>we're above five hundred on the year. Get the lock right.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, maybe I should have put the Bears in there. Okay, no,

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 5>I might have warmed up the old taste buds.

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Listen, I have not bet on the Bears every week.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I have bet on games involving the Bears every week,

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 3>but I'm taking this week off. So there it is.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 3>There's our Week five gambling show. Good luck everyone. Don't

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.479
<v Speaker 3>bet more than you can afford to lose, or in

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Devonse's case, don't bet at all, because it's very, very

0:42:58.040 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 3>bad at this. All right, we'll see you guys next

0:42:59.520 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 3>week