WEBVTT - Tech News: The Mystery of McAfee

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, June twenty one. We've got a

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>short one for you today. I'm heading into my birthday

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend and I'm celebrating by unplugging. But let's get to

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>some news. Top of the news today is that yesterday

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we learned from authorities in Spain that John McAfee, who

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>founded the McAfee anti virus company, was found dead in

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>his jail cell. There is a lot for us to

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>unpack here, because there are elements to McAfee's life story

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that sound like they could have come from some over

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the top film about excess and handle. McAfee founded the

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>company back in the late nineteen eighties to market anti

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>virus software, but he actually resigned his position in nine

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sold off his stake in the company. So McAfee Anti

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Virus hasn't had anything to do with John McAfee for

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>nearly thirty years now, and in fact, McAfee would go

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>on to kind of slag off on McAfee anti virus,

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>calling it unnecessary, recommending people not install it, arguing that

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it had bloatwear in it. He even said at some

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>point that he had never bothered to install anti virus

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>software on his own computers, that rather he would just

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>keep his devices UH disconnected from his own identity, he

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>would not link them to him, and that he wouldn't

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>go to sites that would typically host malware anyway. He

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>went on to found or work for several other companies.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>He accumulated a pretty sizeable amount of wealth, but lost

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of that during the global financial crisis

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand eight. He lived in Belize for quite

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a while, where authorities once rated his home on suspicion

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that he was connected to unlicensed drug production. That was

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole story, and he was also accused of having

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>hired a hit man to torture and kill one of

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his neighbors in Belize. That was stemming from a long

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of feud between the two UH. The neighbors certainly

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was murdered, and there were questions about whether or not

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>McAfee was involved, either directly or, as is the case

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with the hitman allegation, indirectly McAfee fled Belize in the

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of that, and after refusing to show up in

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>court for charges connected to that neighbor's murder, the court

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>ordered him to pay twenty five million dollars to the

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>neighbors next of ken, which was a judgment that McAfee

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>just dismissed out of hand. But then he had a

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>habit of dismissing court judgments out of hand, kind of

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>made it part of his His stick is not paying

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the court mandated finds that he got hit with multiple times.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He toyed with presidential campaigns at least twice, but they

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>never really seemed terribly serious to me. It seemed more

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like almost a publicity stunt. Last October, Spanish authorities arrested

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>McAfee as he was preparing to travel to Turkey, and

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the charge was that McAfee had been committing tax evasion

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for four years, essentially not filing taxes, which he thought

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of as being illegal. Uh. Turns out that's not how

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the US government sees it, and this week a Spanish

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>court ruled that he would be extradited to the United States,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a ruling that could have been appealed, but he was

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.279
<v Speaker 1>found dead in his jail cell. Not long afterward, authorities

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>say that it appears that it was suicide. McAfee himself

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>actually sowed the seeds of out about suicide a couple

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. He claimed he would never do such

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and he got a tattoo that said whacked on.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It actually had like a dollar sign in w H

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>A C K D. He argued that if he were

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ever found dead by quote unquote suicide, that all his

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>true believers could take faith that it was actually murder,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that he had been killed while in prison, And not

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>long after authorities discovered his body, his own Instagram account

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>posted an image of a giant Q on it, presumably

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a reference to the Q and NON group. But McAfee

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>also has a team of folks who worked with him,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of them were managing his social media profiles.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>That has been a thing that's been going on for

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a while, so it's not like McAfee had some sort

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of dead man switch to to post a picture of Q.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And while I'm certain there will be no shortage of

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories coming out about McAfee, I do want to

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>point out that he was certainly not a reliable narrator.

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>By any stretch of the imagination. I'm not saying that

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>there aren't questions about his death. There certainly are. There

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are questions, um, whether it was by suicide or some

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>other means, there are definitely questions. However, I wouldn't take

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>anything McAfee said in the past as something truly reliable.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>In rock Steady, the Spanish court had already ordered him

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to be extradite to the United States, which would give

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the US the chance to prosecute McAfee. So the story

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that was being pushed around is that the US wanted

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>McAfee dead. But if the US had just successfully one

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>out an agreement to have McAfee extradite to the United States,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seems like having a murdered wouldn't make a whole lot

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>of sense to me. I mean, I'm not like deep

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>state Michael Crichton level kind of thing thinking sort of stuff.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'm just missing it. But my advice is,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>don't go spreading conspiracy theories. Use critical thinking. You can

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>ask questions. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, but it's

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the leaping two answers that part that is the problem. Um,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happened. I I'm inclined to think

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is a case where he committed suicide after

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>coming to the realization that he was not going to

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to slip out of this like he had

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>previous times. But that's just a guess. I don't have

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the information to make, you know, a solid statement on it.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that there will probably be a billion

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>movies made about this guy in the years to come,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe one with Adam Sandler playing the part. I think that,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is sort of an uncut Gems kind

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity here. In other news, the reddit crowd over

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>at Wall Street Bets might be doing a little bit

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of a victory lab this week. Vice reported on Tuesday

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that White Square, a hedge fund that had recommended a

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>short cell of game Stop stock, has shut down. All right,

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're like me and financial stuff is a

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bit outside of your wheelhouse, let's go ahead and break

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all this down. And for the record, you know, I

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>had to refresh myself on all this kind of stuff

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because this isn't my world. But hedge funds are investment

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bouls in which people, typically really rich people, pour a

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of money into the fund in the hopes of

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>turning it into a lot more money. So it's one

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of the many ways on how the wealthy get even wealthier. Anyway,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds tend to have more risky strategies than other

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>types of investment funds. Uh. It tends to be a

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>high risk, high reward kind of situation. So when it works,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's paying off big time. Hedge fund managers have to

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>be accredited by the SEC, but in return, hedge funds

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>have less oversight and less regulation than other types of funds,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which gives them the freedom to make these kind of

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>risky moves. All right, we got hedge funds. So what's

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a short sell? Well, if you suspect that a company's

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stock price is going to go down, you can do

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>something called selling short. And essentially what's happening is you

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't own any of this company's stock already. Okay, you

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just think, oh, this company X is about to have

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a decline in stock price. Maybe you thought that the

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>stock price was overvalued and it's going to be readjusted.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you think the company's entering into some choppy waters.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the case. So what you do is you borrow

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>shares of that company's stock from some other investor. And

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially saying, I'll give these shares back to you

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at this specific date. So you you're you set a

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>date when you have to return the shares to that investor.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Then you sell these borrowed shares, You wait for the

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>price of the stock to go down. Then you buy

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>back the shares you borrowed, but at a lower price.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You return the borrowed shares and you get to keep

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the difference. So, in other words, uh, let's say that

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you borrow some shares and you sell these shares at

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars apiece, but you buy them back when they're

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>down to five dollars a piece. That means you would

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>make fifteen dollars per share profit. But if the price

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go down, if the stock price goes up, then

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you're in trouble because you still have to return those

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>borrowed shares. So let's say you sold off the borrowed

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>shares for twenty dollars each, but now the price is

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars each and you're due. That means you're gonna

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>lose thirty dollars per share because you have to buy

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>back the borrowed shares to return them to the other investor,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so White Square shorted game Stop, and then, because a

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of folks really wanted to mess with hedge funds,

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and more than a few of those folks also wanted

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to make some money in the process, a ton of

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>small independent investors began buying up game Stop stock that

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>eventually drove up the price to a point where when

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>it came time for White Square to return those shortened shares,

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the company was hurting pretty badly. Now, for the record,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>White Square reps say that the closure of the hedge

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fund is unrelated to the game Stop stock issue. Instead,

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>according to the reps, the issue was that two of

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the really big investors into that hedge fund withdrew their

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>investments from the pool, which made the hedge fund untenable,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and that this really was marking a shift toward a

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>different approach to making investments just generally that's happening in

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the market. Which might be true, But I do imagine

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that the company was rocked pretty hard by the game

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Stop issue, just you know, perhaps not enough to precipitate

0:10:55.320 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the funds actual demise. Over in the UK, authority these

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>want to have a word with Amazon and I t

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>V News investigation captured footage of Amazon warehouse workers packing

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>returned and unsold merchandise, including stuff like laptops, tv other electronics, books,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>into boxes, and those boxes had the word destroy on them,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and that the workers then loaded trucks down with these

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>boxes before driving the trucks over to landfills or recycling centers.

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>A former Amazon employee told the investigative team that workers

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>were expected to dispose of more than a hundred thousand

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>items every week. Activists pounced on this. They pointed out

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the enormous amount of waste that this generates, and they

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>also questioned how can a company behave in this way,

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>throwing out hundreds of thousands of products each week and

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>still remain profitable. As Greta Thunberg pointed out, quote that's

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a clear sign that something is fundamentally wrong end quote.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And I concur if a company can afford to throw

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out hundreds of thousands of unsold products each month, you know,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>high end products at that, like TVs and computers, then

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>something wacky has got to be going on in order

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep that company profitable. Now, Amazon reps have actually

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>responded to this. They said that no items were actually

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sent to landfills. In the UK though, that could be

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a qualifier, but they rather went to some recycling centers

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for a quote unquote energy recovery, and that the company

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>routinely donates unsold items to charitable organizations in the like.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Other unnamed Amazon employees seem to contradict this, but a

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>full investigation would need to follow to really ferret out

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the truth. I think it's pretty phenomenal. It's kind of

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think about a company literally throwing out hundreds

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of products. It just it's so wasteful, and

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you you sit there and think, if you had a

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>different approach to business, you wouldn't have that waste, which

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>presumably would mean you would profit more. But maybe there's

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>other stuff going on that I just don't understand. I

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>admit I look at the world when it comes to business.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I look at the world in a pretty simplistic way,

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and I acknowledge that things are way more complicated than

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I particularly understand. Finally, a change in how Google handles

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>unlisted links could mean that we'll see some stuff sort

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of just disappear from the web, or at least become inaccessible.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So in an email to YouTube creators, I got one

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of these emails. Just so you know, the company wrote quote.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand seventeen, we rolled out an update to

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the system that generates new YouTube unlisted links, which included

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>security enhancements that make the links for your unlisted videos

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>even harder for someone to discover without you sharing with them.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We're now making changes to older unlisted videos that were

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>uploaded before this update took place. End quote. So in

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, the company is retroactively applying this updated security

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>SCHEMEAU to YouTube and also to Google Drive documents as

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>well that have you know, links in them, and users

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>will be able to choose one of several options with

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>regard to this. They can opt out of this change

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>entirely by filling out a form. They have to do

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that by July twenty one in order to keep those

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>documents and those videos in their current unlisted states. So

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in other words, no change is made, the unlisted u

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>r L remains the same, and that way people who

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have the links to those videos will still be able

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to get them, or embedded videos and other platforms that

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise are unlisted will still be accessible. Or creators can

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>change unlisted videos and make them public, which just gets

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>around the problem. Now the unlisted videos are public, they're

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>publicly available. That will take care of it as well.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They can also re upload the old video as a

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>new unlisted video, so essentially they just swap out one

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for the other, or they can do nothing at all,

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and the unlisted videos that were posted before will switch

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>over to become private videos, which means no one will

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to access it other than the channel creator

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>or channel administrator. Now why is this all important, Well,

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it means that any videos that were made before but

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>are unlisted, but are also embedded on other platforms like

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on a blog or something like that, those videos will

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>disappear unless the creators actually take one of these options.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So if I had made a video in two thousand fifteen,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and I made it unlisted on my channel, so you

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't just come across the video if you were to

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>visit my channel. However, I then embedded that video on

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>say a personal web page or something, then that video

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a broken link. Later this year,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you would go and you would find a like one

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of those YouTube embedded videos that just has the little

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>X on it where like there's no video there, You

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>push play and nothing happens. Because the link doesn't work,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a dead link. The same is true as I

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>said with Google Drive links. So if you have links

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to documents created and Google Drive from before, that's unlisted

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>documents and things like that, the same sort of rules apply.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>This was all in an effort to improve privacy and security,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the right move, but it is

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a hassle for some creators and for

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>channels that have been inactive or even abandoned. That might

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.479
<v Speaker 1>mean that that video content will just disappear from Discovery,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so that videos that people once were able to watch

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>suddenly they won't have access to them anymore because those

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>will be switched to private and the channel administrators just

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>don't deal with that channel anymore, which is kind of

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a bummer. I mean, we always say that everything lasts

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>forever on the Internet, but things like this, where you

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>break links, that kind of stuff is an exception to

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the rule, and I've certainly had experience with this kind

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff before air a change in policy meant that

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>suddenly linked documents were no longer linked, and it is

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge pain in the butt when that happens. Anyway,

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the news for Thursday. June twenty one. I hope

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you all have a great day, a great weekend. As

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, it is my birthday weekend, so make sure

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you go out and do something you know, nice and

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful for someone else. That's that'll be a great birthday

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>present for me. Just doesn't have to be big, just

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a nice, thoughtful gesture to someone else. And after you

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>do that selfless act, you are to turn your face

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to the heavens and cry out, this was all for you,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, and I'll know wherever I am, i'll know

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that you did that. Now, if you have any suggestions

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for topics I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me on Twitter handle is tech Stuff

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>h s W. I've been getting a bunch of those recently,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. I am currently still working through the

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>glossary of tech to rms, or rather tech acronyms and initialisms,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>But as soon as that series is over, I'm going

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to be tackling some of these suggestions sent in by listeners,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>so you can get your suggestions into and I look

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>forward to hearing from you, and I'll talk to you

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. YEA tech Stuff is an I Heart

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from My heart Radio, visit

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.