WEBVTT - Nick’s Soapbox Anti-Jokić Rant, the Suns Face Injury Trouble, & Special Guest

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with all States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm so.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Why just look at this? This is from the Big Lead,

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>a major sports website. What does that say? What does

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the article say?

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 2>How tall is nick?

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Depends who you ask?

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Look at what they tweeted? Man First, I don't know why,

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>but that picture makes it look like I'm like five

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>to four you as someone you're almost six to four?

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>How tall?

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Am about sixty one?

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Just under six to one? But I didn't care

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>about this, But I do care about this. I hate

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>that people already thought I was short, and now that

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>picture's out there, I look like I'm five to four.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Wild tweeted for the record, I'm five to five on

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>a good book, I being wise. Well that's not great.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Coward saw it and responded, so happy to see my

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>little friend that Nick Wright smile in these as at

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the Big League. They do an investigation and they say

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 3>their research says I'm somewhere from five to seven to

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>five eleven. And again, I know I sound like a

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>jerk for all our five to seven brothers out there,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and I know I shouldn't care, but I do care,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>like legit angry and they just stand up at the

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>end of the show. We'll do it back to back.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 3>That won't help because you're so tall and people won't

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>know how tall you are. The problem is, for all

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>they know, you're five to ten.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm six three guys, I don't like it.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Show Welcome in. It is episode twelve of the What's

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Right with Nick Wright podcast and YouTube show. As I

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>ask you every week, please like, rate, subscribe, review, and

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>check out our continuing series special edition, released every Sunday

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube and your favorite podcast platform. The fifty best

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>players of the last fifty years in NBA history. This Sunday,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>we will get to players I think forty three through

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 3>forty including an incredibly controversial player makes makes his debut,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 3>and the single biggest snub from the NBA seventy five

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>list makes his debut. That coming out on Sunday. But

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 3>right now, as we always do, we start the show

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>by talking about what we're not talking about. So here

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is what did not make today's show. Not on today's

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>show is George Carl and Boogie Cousins Twitter view. It's

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna make the show a little bit. George Carl is

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the worst. He blew the ninety six finals by not

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 3>letting Gary Payton Gar Michael. He's terrible on Twitter. Don't

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 3>like the guy at all. There you go, it's in there.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Coach K's grandson leaving Duke. Don't care about that. And

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the match, the latest golf match with Tom Brady, Josh Allen,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers. None of that made the show.

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>There is no jacket rewarded for that, Demonse, It's just

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a charity thing. The only reason we talk about golf

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>is if Tiger's involved. However, I will now turn to Demanse,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>who might at some point today vacate that seat for

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>a different family member for the first time in the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>twelve episodes. We've done this. What are we starting with today, Demansey? Yep,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 3>as we know you've already started your victory lap with Jolkic.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Isn't too straight to Golden State? Yeah, you clearly don't

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 3>think he's MVP. Yeah, but he's going against the Warriors alone.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 3>What's your problem with this guy?

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I want to do this once and

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>for all, because by the next time we talk, the

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Nuggets might be done. They might already be eliminated from everything.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>So let's just blow out the rest of the rundown demonse.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Sorry about your prep about CP three's legacy in the

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>maps to the finals, We're not doing anything. We're just

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 3>going to spend ten minutes right now, and I'm going

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to give the kojent final Nikolajokic take because I'm sick

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of this being misrepresented and it is. I have the

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>benefit of knowing with utter certainty, with every fiber of

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>my being, that history is going to judge this opinion favorable.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>And so here's all I've ever said about Niko a

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Yogi over the last couple of years. He is an

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 3>excellent player. No one can deny he is an excellent player.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I have not denied he is an excellent player. However,

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I felt last year that he was being elevated to

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>a place a step or two above where he actually was.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Instead of excellent player, he was league MVP, and last

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 3>year I didn't like it, but I understood it. I

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>in fact, last year said he would be second and

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 3>on my ballot. Because Lebron got hurt, Embiid got hurt,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I said I would have Chris Paul first. People wanted

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>to give to Jokic. My general pushback was not just

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that I thought Chris Paul was better, but league MVPs,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>in all of NBA history, with one glaring exception, are

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 3>supposed to terrify their opponents in the postseason. I didn't

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 3>feel like Jokic did that. You can call it a

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 3>regular season award, but what also is true is the

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 3>way we've been doing it for seventy years in this league.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 3>And Mom, say, you know how much I care about this.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I did a damn recitation of every MVP in order.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the most prestigious professional award in sports.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>NBA MVP I think it matters, and when we're doing

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 3>the rankings of players, MVP in top five finishes really

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 3>really matter, and I thought last year Chris Paul deserved it.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Instead Jokic got it. And then a great confluence of events,

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul and Jokic play in the postseason. First of

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Paul's unbelievable they sweep the Nuggets and Jokic gets kicked

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 3>out of the final game. But I dealt, guy who

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I thought should come in second came in first. It happens.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>You have bad MVPs. Give me right, Karmelone won one.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>He shouldn't have. It happened. But then this year is

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 3>where it got truly bat crazy, because this year we

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 3>changed all of the rules literally and figuratively for how

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 3>we have done MVP voting since the media has been

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>voting for forty years to make an exception for Yokich,

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 3>so nobody that was a sixth seed or worse had

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>won MVP except for Russell Westbrook, and we'll get to

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>him in a moment. Jokics was the sixth seed all

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>year long, and they were like, no, he has to

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>be the MVP. And then at the same like, I'll

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 3>give you a great example of why to me it

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>had gone so crazy. Phil Simmons, who I have a

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of respect for voted Yokic MVP. He also said

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>on the same podcast that he said he's voting JOKICMVP,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that he thought the Nuggets were the single worst team

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>in the Western Conference playoffs. And I'm sitting here saying, guys,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that's never how NBA MVP is worked ever, where you

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>could be the now back to back MVP, the best

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>player in the league two years in a row, and

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>everyone thinks your team stinks. This isn't baseball with Mike Trout.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>You're on the court forty plus minutes, you play both INDs.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>And the only response was, look at the advanced numbers.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Look at the advanced numbers. They said, I was an

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>idiot if I said, listen, I think there's seven or

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 3>eight guys in this league better than him, still a

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>top ten player. But if we're if you're asking players,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and at some point players' opinions have to matter, who

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 3>scares you in the postseason. I think Giannis's name gets mint.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I think Kawhi when he's healthy, his name gets Mint obviously,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Durant obviously, Staph obviously. I feel Lebron.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 4>How scared would those teams be if they were missing

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>their second and third best guy. Okay, though, how he

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 4>he's not gonna beat the Warriors alone. No, you're right,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>he's not gonna beat the Warriors alone. But at the

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 4>very least, first of all, put up.

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 3>A good showing. Don't get ejected again. Fewer points, fewer rebounds,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>fewer assists, your field goal percentage go down by ten points.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 3>In the postseason, when Russ was the sixty one MVP,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a bad MVP, it was a bad vote. But

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>that postseason he went thirty seven to twelve and eleven.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>He had a fifty point triple double. They won a game,

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 3>and three of their losses were by six, four and

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>two points. He at least was competitive. But it's not

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>one mv it's a back to back MBB, and a

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 3>back to back MVB should never be an underdog. And

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>round one it's never happened. Who.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Lebron won back to back MVP two thousand and

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 4>nine and twenty ten.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Everybody gave him the excuse that you know, he to

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>have anybody.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 3>No, but so first of all, that's not true, and

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 3>second of all, they didn't lose in round one. So

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>let's go over guys who have won back to back MVPs,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and we'll go through it. Wilt and Russell did it. Okay,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 3>that was a thousand years ago. All time great players.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Kareem did it. Guess what. Kaream won a championship before

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>he got his second league MVP. After Kareem did it,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Larry Bird won three in a row. He had won

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>multiple championships before he got his second MVP. After him,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Magic Johnson did it. Magic Johnson had won multiple championships

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 3>before he got his second MVP. After him, Michael Jordan

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 3>did it. Michael Jordan had won a championship before he

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 3>got the year he got his second MVP after Jordan

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 3>did it just once after him. Tim Duncan did it.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Tim Duncan had won multiple championships before he got or Win.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>He got his second MVP, won a championship in ninety nine,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 3>got his MVP an two and o three after him.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 3>There's Nash. Nash is the bad one. Nash is the

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 3>one that everyone regrets now, and yet they're doing the

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 3>same thing with Jokis. But at least Nash. That team

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>won sixty two games and made the conference finals, and

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the next year won fifty some game and made the

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>conference finals. They weren't out in round one. Then Lebron

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 3>did it. Lebron, first of all, had made the finals

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 3>before he won a second, before he won any MVPs,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>because he made him an O seven. They the first

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 3>year in nine when he won MVP, they lost in

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 3>the conference finals in six to Orlando. He averaged thirty eight,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 3>nine and nine in that series, thirty eight, nine and nine,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and he got trust for losing. The next year he

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 3>won MVP again. He that was the series against Boston

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 3>when they lost in round two, and he was called

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 3>an all time choke artist. They said he quit on

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the team in game six. Game six, by the way,

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>he had I believe twenty eight, eighteen and twelve, and

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they said he quit. That was his final game with Cleveland.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 3>He then left. So again, let's go the next guy

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 3>to win multi back to back MVP, Steph. He already

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>had a championship in the bag when he won a

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>second one. And then there was Giannis. Giannis, by the way,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>got crushed for the second year that he won MVP,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 3>they lost in round two to Miami, even though the

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>previous here he had carried him in the conference finals.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 3>All of these guys had real championship expectations. No matter

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the supporting cast, none of them were Round one losers,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and the ones who didn't deliver and hadn't delivered got

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 3>incredibly criticized for it. I am now being told that

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 3>it is unfair to say, hey, Nikola jokicch be better.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 3>People are like, oh, you're holding him to an unfair standard.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>He's the goddog thirteenth player ever to win back to

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>back MVP. If we were listing the guys other than

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>jokicch and Nash, oh I left out Moses Malone By

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the way on the back to back MVP's list, he

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 3>had carried a team to the NBA Finals before he

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 3>won a second MVP. But if I am listing out

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the worst back to back MVPs ever other than Jokich

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 3>and Nash, the worst one is Moses. The second worst

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 3>one is is it Duncan? Might be? Is it Steph?

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess THEO we're everyone told me all year I

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>was a caveman for not putting Jokic in that tier.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 3>And then he falls on his face and everyone's like, oh,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 3>what do you expect from me? To be better? To

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 3>be better? And people like, oh, well, listen, the Warriors

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>are the better team. That's why we don't give MVPs

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>to six seeds because you're all playing a better team.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>The path we're walking is a path that leads to

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>why isn't Trey Young in the MVP conversation? Yeah, he

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 3>scored more points than they wanted basketball all year, He

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 3>had more assist than he wanted basketball all year. His

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>team won mid forties in games. Oh, nobody can blame

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 3>him for them losing their the nine seed. They stink.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That's so.

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, is always allowed to be awesome without having to

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 4>be an all time great.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like he's twenty seven, We let his career

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>pan out a little bit more.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 3>And the answer to that is yes, if he wasn't

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the back to back MVP. By being the back to

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 3>back MVP, it is demanded that you play like an

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 3>all time great because that is the group you're in.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 3>You are in that and that all I'm doing is

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>holding him to the standard that his defenders have claimed

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>he's in all year. The most vocal yogic defenders have

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>said the following things. And I know we're spending the

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>whole first segment on this topic, we're gonna go overtime

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit. They have said he is the

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>greatest passing big man ever. I think de Walden have

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 3>something to say about that. R Vida bonus maybe even

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>but fine, give him that. They told me that if

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 3>you if you care about the numbers, he just had

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the single greatest individual season in NBA. His player efficiency

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>rating the highest ever, one of the highest bpms ever,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>the first ever two K, one K point five K guy,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 3>which is not a thing we've ever carrid about before,

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 3>but with we did, Like so, if I were on

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>television arguing that, as people were fifteen years ago, that

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Lebron just had the greatest and people weren't arguing this

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>the greatest season ever, he would not be allowed to

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>then lose in Round one and this other thing that

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>happens here with Jokic's it's a weird spot where it's like,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>well he doesn't have Jamal Murray and Michael Porter junior. Listen,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Michael Porter Junior might one day be good. He is

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>a great high school prospect. His back injuries. He's had

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 3>a good playoff moment, some bad playoff moments. Jamal Murray

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 3>is a good player, Jamal Murray and Michael Porter Junior

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>are not good enough to be the difference between a

0:14:54.480 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 3>team being swept in round one and championship favorites. And

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>if you are the back to back league MVP with

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 3>a mediocre supporting cast, you should be championship favorites. Lebron

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 3>was he didn't deliver, and then he did when he

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>went to Miami. But Giannis was, he didn't deliver and

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>then he did, Steph was, all the other guys delivered,

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>and so it's just unbelievable to me. And it's the same.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It's the same. Don't trust your eyes and don't trust

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the players. The players show you and tell you that

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 3>they don't fear this guy. And one other thing about

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Jokics this postseason, then we move on. Draymond Green is

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the greatest defensive players ever. He's also six seven.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Nikola Jokic is almost seven feet tall. Jokic is like

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 3>six for twenty eight with Draymond guarding in this series,

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 3>has a half dozen turnovers and just got kicked out

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>of the game because he was so frustrated by it.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I have seen Draymond Green in playoff series against guys

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 3>who are actually in the discussion for best player in

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 3>the league. Saw him against Durant in twenty sixteen before

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Durant joined him. Durant got him, He got Durant, then Durant.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 3>He got Durant at the end in three one comeback.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I saw him in four finals against Lebron James Lebron

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>gott Is. The Warriors won most of them. Lebron got his.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I saw Draymond against Kawhi Leonard when Kwai was healthy. Yeah,

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Kawhi had to work for it. Kawhi gott Is the

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 3>idea that Jokic is that caliber of player, which is

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>what he must bean at. And we're like, no, you're

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>being too harsh. There is no too harsh. And here's

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the last point. People say all the time, add the MVP.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 3>You know it's an important award, but you know, Shack

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 3>only has one. And I don't know if you mean that.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Shack only as one MDP award and Kobe only has

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>won MVP award, and right now Chris Paul has zero

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>and Joel Embiid has zero. You know what would have

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 3>fixed that if Steve Nashon equally. Jokic never won him

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>because in five second place.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 5>The ship.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>God, damn, must you talk about this dude man falling

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>asleep over here? I mean, he's got to be done

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>here pretty soon.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean we've ended the segment about five minutes first.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 3>And this year it should have been Joel Embiid, if

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>you want to make sure everyone gets one, could have

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>been his first instead. Joel Embiid, Chris Paul, Shaquille, O'Neil,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Kobe Bryant combined have two MVPs, and Nikola jokicch and

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Steve Nash have four. And I'm the ass for saying

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 3>it's wrong. I'm the burden of proof is not on

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 3>me and the yokicch fans, and then we can wrap up.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like trying to prove a negative. If the Nuggets

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>won this look we're competitive, or won this series against

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Golden State, they would say, see our guy's amazing. They're

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>getting blown off the court, and their answer is, see

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 3>his team stinks. No matter what they were gonna say,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>we were right. We rewarded MVPs one way. For forty years,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>it has rewarded the greatest players in league history with

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a with a Nash mistake in Ali Yokas, all right,

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm done, talking about it forever until next year when

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm told, Hi gotta give you have you seen this?

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 3>R gotta give you three in a row and Larry Bird,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Wilton Russell the only guys do it. Gotta give it

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>to the Will.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Robles, who defined every expectation

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 6>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 6>including Jerrell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know Steve Nash runner over Kobe and Shack.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>That's actually kind of insane.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>When at least Nash's team was a championship continent. Yeah,

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the only guy they gave to that wasn't a championship

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 3>contender was Westbrook and Westbrook. I thought it was a

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 3>bad MVP in real time, but people were amazed by

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 3>the triple double average. But at least Russ then in

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs showed out. He's like, okay, I was the

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 3>MVP because I averaged a thirty point triple double. Here

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 3>he only played five playoff games that year because they

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>lost in five to Houston. And what Russ did, and

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 3>those five playoff games were game one, they got blown

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>out by thirty one. He had twenty two, eleven and seven,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and he got crushed the next four games. They lost

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 3>by four, they won by two, they lost by four,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 3>they lost by six. And here's what Russ did. Fifty one,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 3>ten and thirteen in a four point loss, thirty two

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>twelve and eleven in a two point win, thirty five

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.719
<v Speaker 3>fourteen and fourteen in a four point loss, and forty

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 3>seven eleven and nine in US six point loss. You

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>can't say, well, you know, he should have done more. Now,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 3>it was a bad MVP. He shouldn't given it to him.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>But at least if Jokic was out here doing what

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 3>he did all regular season, it's like he had thirty

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 3>eight points on eighteen shots, nine assists and they lost

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a close one. I'd listened to it. Instead, he is

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty five points and gets thrown out of the game.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 7>All right, so we finally talk about something different. Oh

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 7>we're yeah, absolutely, we only did twenty minutes on that. Sure, Yeah,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 7>we go on, this is a B block. Are we're

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 7>going to start the B block? All right, let's go.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 7>What are we starting with? Sons lost game two to

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 7>New Orleans. Yeah, Devin Booker left the game with a

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 7>hamstring injury, so this is concerning.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 2>But before d book left New Orleans.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Was hanging in with him at home or on the road.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Should I say, yeah, is this just one game or

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 4>is this the start of another CP three playoff collapse?

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Listen, losing to the Pelicans, even if

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Booker never comes back, would be a collapse. The Sun's

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 3>got to be able to get through the series even

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 3>if Booker never comes back, and I think they would.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I also think it's worth noting that we never talk

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>about this until it happens, but more often than not,

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs are at least part defined by an inn

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>last handful of years, twenty fifteen, Kyrie Irving goes down

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 3>game one of the finals after Kevin Love already went down,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and it changes everything. Twenty sixteen, pretty clean, the biggest

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>injury is probably Andrew Bogetting Game five of the Finals

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen. There weren't any super significant injuries other than

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess well, one could argue Kawhi when Zazob put

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 3>his foot underneath him, but I don't think anyone's beating

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 3>that Warriors team either way. Twenty eighteen, Chris Paul. They're

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>up three two on Golden Stakes. Christ Paul pulls his hamstring.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>They lose the next two. Twenty nineteen, Katie blows his

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>achilles and the rap you know what I mean. That's

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>the biggest reason the Raptors won of than Kawi's excellence.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty was pretty clean, but that's probably because you

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 3>had the stoppage midyear. Guys got healthier, and last year

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 3>there was oh Anthony Davis. Well, Anthony Davis goes They're

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 3>up to one on the Suns in round one, dominating

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 3>the series. Anthony Davis goes down, and then the Lakers

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 3>never went again. They're never the same Sun go to

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 3>the finals, So this happens. And I think the two

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 3>best players in the Western Conference this year were not

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Nikola Jokic, but Luka Doncic and Devin Booker and Luca

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 3>got hurt in Game eighty two, and Booker got hurt

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>in the second game of the playoffs, so you do

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 3>have to you have to be able to overcome that

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 3>in round one and the MAVs. You know, it's tougher

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 3>for the MAVs because they're not a great team. They

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>have a great player. But I believe the Suns will

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 3>still handle the Pelicans. What's most interesting to me is

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 3>does this raise or less than the likelihood that we

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe see zi Zion back in New Orleans? Can he

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>give them fifteen minutes? I don't know, but I think

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the Sun should be fine. But the Suns need Booker

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 3>fully healthy to deal with the mAbs in round two.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can beat the MAVs in round

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 3>two without Booker fully healthy. You know, I think the

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>MAVs are gonna win. Are Oh, Scott Foster's in the show?

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Tell me CP three has lost fourteen straight playoff games

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>officiated by Scott Foster.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Is this a coincidence? Okay? So I want to

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 3>be very careful here because I don't want to get sued.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>But here is what we know, and I don't know

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>why No one talks about this, and I don't know

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 3>why the NBA looked the other way. The NBA fifteen

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 3>years ago had a true scamp. There was a referee

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>named Tim Doneghe who was betting on games. Convicted of this.

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Nobody doubts that he denied. He doesn't deny it now.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 3>He'll deny certain aspects of it. But they had a

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 3>crooked run. He said, I wasn't swinging outcomes. I was

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 3>just swinging totals. But regardless during the time period, Google

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>This America, pause the podcast in Google Scott Foster Tim

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Doneghie phone calls. I'll do it right now and I

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 3>will read you the first result again because I don't

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 3>want to get sued on this, but this is it's

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>amazing that this is not discussed. The record show Doneghie

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 3>placed one one hundred and thirty four calls to refereen

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Scott Foster, more than the one hundred and twenty six

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>calls Doneghie made to his bookie between October of six

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and April of seven, the period during which he has

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>confessed to betting on games or passing on game information

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to gamblers. So he had a ref that we know

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>is crooked who seemed to amazingly all the time called

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>this other ref who was also refing games. That ref

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 3>is still reping games. He's a well respected ref, which

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 3>is maybe why no one talks about this. He also,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 3>oddly enough, fourteen straight times that he has officiated the

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 3>game involving Chris Paul, which crosses multiple teams. Chris has

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>played for Chriss team has lost. Hey, I don't love

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>how it smells. Is I guess my point on this?

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't prove anything. And again I think I'm clean there.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>But the Doneghie Foster thing always struck me as how

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>is he still refereeing? And now that fifteen years later

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that he seems to have some bias against Chris Paul

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and they've lost fourteen in a row. It strikes me,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 3>is at least a yeah, it gives me a little

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>bit of pause. All right, let's have fun. Let's play

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a little two rights, one wrong? What are we doing first?

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Two wrongs one right? Two wrongs one right? All right?

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Well I already got that one wrong? All right? What

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>are we doing first?

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie's Vitega five for his behavior in Boston is appropriate?

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Too harsh or not harsh enough?

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>No? I think it's right. I think that they I

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 3>think fifty k is the mosture allowed to find a

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 3>player for an individual act like this, right. I I

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 3>don't have a general problem with players going back at

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 3>fans as long on a moral ground, as long as

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>they understand they are going to be held to a

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 3>different standard than the fans, Like the fans aren't going

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to get in trouble at work, but they are at work.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 3>And what I don't love from Kyrie on this was

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is what he was saying after the fact. What are

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 3>you saying after the fact, Like what about the hostility?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean who says it was hostile? But

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 3>not just that the idea The Boston fans are particularly

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 3>harsh on Kyrie. I get that, but there have been

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>plenty of fan bases that have gone after individual star

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 3>players over the years, and most guys recognize as much

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 3>as they want to go back at them, they can't,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 3>And if they do, that's fine. I don't see Kyrie

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 3>complaining about the fine. I am very interested. We were

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 3>recording this before game two. I'm interested in what happens

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>if he does it again. Because you think you don't

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's on the board that he does it again.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, I'd be amazed if he did, but

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think I.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Mean, if he does it again, I wonder if they

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they would suspend him. But the money,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to matter that much. So

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm very curious to see to and you guys will

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 3>have already seen it by the time you're hearing this.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, what's next?

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 4>The books say they're not worried about the Tom Brady

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and Dolphins rumors. Yeah, having said that after this season,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Tom Brady will retire, re sign with Tampa Bay, or

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 4>own and play for Miami.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>All Right, the first two are zero percent after Tom

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Brady is not retiring anytime soon, and I don't think

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 3>there's really any chance he resigns with camp I think

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 3>he knows they're done. So my answer would be the

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>third one. But I just don't know if it'll be

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>my aunt. I don't know if he's going to go

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 3>to Miami, But like, what, well, try to be an

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 3>ownership part of any team or go play What if

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco the team he wanted to play four years ago?

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 3>What if Trey Lance doesn't work out like Brady's going

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to be a true free agent where he can go

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 3>anywhere he wants. So I believe Brady is going to

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 3>keep playing for years and years. I don't believe it's

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be in Tampa. I'm not certain it's gonna

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 3>be Miami. The other possibility, I don't think it's likely.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But what if Tua balls out this year? Mine was like,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 3>we've got our guy, he's young, he was our top

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 3>five pick. I don't think that's gonna happen, but I don't.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>We can't Tom Brady at the end of the day.

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>No, that is true. So maybe they would just move

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 3>on from him. But I think Miami there was a

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of things going into it that made it right

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>for him this offseason that won't necessarily be right for

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>him next off season. All Right, what's next?

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jordan Poole and Tyreese Maxie are zero future stars,

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 2>one future star for two future stars.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 3>All Right, So I'm very confident in Maxie and I

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 3>think Pool is in the best situation possible. If you're

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>going to be a perimeter scorer shooter. What is a

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 3>better you know, cauldron to learn in than the Warriors

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 3>with step and play. MAXI was a five star kid

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 3>coming out of high school, top ten pick college is

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 3>one of your college and go the way people hope

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 3>he would. So he fell in the draft, but he

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 3>is a star, so I believe. So. I don't think

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I either will ever be superstars. I don't think either

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 3>will people get throw around superstar a little too lightly?

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>MVP Candid, he's looking nice. I think I think his

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 3>ceiling is all star, and I think Tyree's Maxi ceiling

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 3>is all star. So like I think for both of them,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the absolute ceiling is a This isn't a perfect cup

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 3>but a Donovan Mitchell type of player, you know what

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean? Like the could be the best player on

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 3>a team. But if he is the best player on

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>a team, you can't win a title. You're in really

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>good shape if he's your second best guy. The interesting

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 3>thing is, is Maxi already the six or second best guy?

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 3>With the way Harden's been, he might already be their

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>second best guy? All right, what's last? Uh?

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Cupp doesn't care about having the largest wide receiver contract. Yeah,

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>he is a.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Team player, a bad negotiator or is he bluffing? Yeah?

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I think he's bluffing.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I see it.

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Listen, the media loves running with the story of particularly

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 3>how do I put this gently players that look like

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Cooper Cup that they are just selfless team first, don't

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 3>care about the money. They play for free if you

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>would let them. See just had one of the greatest

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver seasons ever. His team won the Super Bowl,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and they won the super Bowl because on the final

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 3>possession they finally started going to him and he won

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 3>him the super Bowl. He's been underpaid. We are also

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 3>living a world where the wide receiver market is exploding

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to unprecedented levels. He certainly has a case that he

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>is the best receiver in football, and the best receivers

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>in football now make almost thirty million dollars. Now, do

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a chance because they like la I

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>think Do I think he is going to force the

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>hand of I need to be the highest paid ever,

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily think just like Mahomes, by the way,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a thing.

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>They just want to this point, they just want to

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be the highest paid in their position.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Ever. Oh that's why it's always how it works. Like

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the next guy, like the agent starts the negotiation with

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 3>the team as okay, the highest paid is Tyreek kill.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 3>So my guy needs the wociation starts at a dollar

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 3>more guaranteed and a dollar more total. That way, because

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the agent wants to be able to say I got

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a record break in the contract the player, and so

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>that makes me okay. I was thinking of it.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And like the wide receivers, the wide receivers had not

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the age.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 3>No, that's and that's the Tyreek kill thing. First the

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 3>DeVante Adams, then the Tyreek kill thing screwed up the

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver market for a lot of teams, like Davonte

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>getting the deal he got. I think that's one of

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the reasons the Chiefs ended up having to trade Tyreek

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>because they were going to give Tyreek a new contract,

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.239
<v Speaker 3>but then Devonte's dual was so off the charts they

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't have to top that. So do I think Cooper

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 3>cups going to make them? You sometimes do get like

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs got with Mahomes, a bit of a just

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>won the Super Bowl, want to keep things together discount, right,

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 3>But that discount doesn't mean it's significant. It means like

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 3>eight percent. It means like instead of making twenty nine

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>million a year, I could see him making twenty seven

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 3>million a year. So I think for the most part

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 3>he's bluffing. I believe, however, and I not blumving on this.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 3>We have a very special guest, our first guest, Joan.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not Lil Wayne, but he will be on the podcast.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 3>He just told me so, a very special guest joining

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>us to finish up the show. That's next War Truck.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to towing, seeing is believing. That's why

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Chevy Truck's advanced camera technology offers up to eight available

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 5>cameras for fourteen unique views, so you can focus on

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 5>the view that really matters. Chevrolet Together, let's drive. Learn

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 5>more about Chevy Truck's at Chevy dot com Safety. Your

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 5>driver assistance features are no substitute for the driver's responsibility

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 5>to operate the vehicle in a safe manner. With the

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 5>vehicle owner's manual for important future limitations and information.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you got any warrants or anything you gotta worry about,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna show up. I have several. That's why I figured, Uh,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you just want to get started.

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, all right?

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 3>So welcome back in in my son's place now instead

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 3>of demands is none other than my grandfather in law,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 3>mister Jones. Mister Jones, granddaddy, I see how are you?

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing good? So I got a question for you.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>When you first met me fourteen years ago? Did you

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 3>ever think you'd be sitting here doing a little YouTube

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>show with your old grandson? Nick? Right answered no, no,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 3>what did? Can I tell the story of when we

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 3>first met? Okay, do you remember?

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Cool?

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh you remember? So I came to Sacramento. Yes, and Danielle,

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 3>your granddaughter, told me we need to go see grandmother

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 3>and grandfather and we need to get there early. So

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 3>we got there at like seven thirty in the morning,

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and grandmother was cooking, and I came in the kitchen

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I talk loudly. Would you agree with that? Indeed?

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And we hadn't seen you yet, And then you came

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 3>out of like a bathroom, the bathroom, that's correct. And

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 3>how would you describe your clothing situation? I will still

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 3>get Yeah, yeah, you were you were I think, shirtless

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 3>and coming out. And do you remember what you said

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 3>to me? Who held this white boy in the house?

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 3>And you actually said, who is this John brown white

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 3>boy making all this noise in the house? Yeah, that

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 3>is exactly what happened then, And I introduced myself, and

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 3>then you said, I'll be right back, and then you

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 3>went back to your room and you got dressed, and

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 3>then you asked me a question, and it was about insurance.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember that part of it? Okay, you tell,

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 3>you can tell the audience of online. I had just

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 3>met him. Danielle and I had been together for sick

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>seven months, but we knew we were getting married, and

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>so I really wanted to impress her grandparents. So her grandfather,

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 3>who's always been, you know, an imposing figure, but this

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years ago, so you were you know, you were

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 3>in your prime. You're in the mid seventies fifteen years ago,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 3>so you're even more of an imposing figure. You say, uh,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>do you have life insurance? You remember that? Okay, well

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you do? Yeah. Grandmother sitting over there and remember said

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 3>you said, do you have life insurance? And I said, yes, sir,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I do. And then you said, is my granddaughter a beneficiary?

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 3>And I said, yes she is, which I don't even

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 3>know if it was true, and you said perfect. I'll

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 3>be right back, and you called me outside, and you

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 3>had a ladder up against the side of your house

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 3>and giant hedge clippers and do you remember what you

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 3>made me do? Yeah? What what did you make me do?

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Grew up the ladder in pim Trie. Yeah, their direct

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 3>TV wasn't working, so he had me climb the ladder

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 3>in the most unsafe fashioned imaginable with these giant hedge clippers. Wait,

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 3>are you leaving us? You can't leave it, You can't

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 3>leave yet, the most unsafe fashion possible to trim the tree.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 3>But now, oh, he's fixing the mic. But now, let's

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 3>be honest. Fifteen years later, I'm probably your favorite non

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 3>blood relative. Correct correct?

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 8>Oh, yes, Oh, that's going to cause a lot of

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 8>drama Sacramento. Did you ever I mean, since your days

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 8>in the military, have you ever had this much affection

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 8>for as you put a white one? No, no, yeah

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 8>it probably didn't see that coming. No, this is one

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 8>of the greatest people I've ever known. He has been

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 8>how long you guys been married? Sixty close to sixty.

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Fifty nine years, ninety one years, young mister Abram Jones, granddaddy,

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, I appreciate it. Good to see you. She's

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 3>on the life insurance? Now? Am I on yours? Is

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 3>a better question? All right, We'll see you guys. Next

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 3>note about