WEBVTT - 2025 Ryder Cup Check-In

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 2>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Ball in a brid egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 3>egg Friday Frida Egg brid.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Egg, Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>up course.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Friday Golf Podcast. I am Andy Johnson,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>your host, and today I am excited to chat a

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the Ryder Cup. We haven't talked about

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the Ryder Cup on this podcast. Uh, obviously it's one

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of the huge subplots to the rest of the year

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in golf. We have one major left, we have the

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship. Our podcast will be out on as it

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>traditionally is, before the Open, but I thought that this

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was a great time to chat about the Ryder Cup.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>A quick note just you know, for you guys, if

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a golf course podcast, a golf course

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>specific podcast, I thought Garrett and Matt did an awesome

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>job on the Designing Golf Podcast breaking down Royal Port Rush,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so I would go check that out if you're looking

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit golf course content before the Major.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>As well as our video on YouTube Royal Port Rush

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>preview video which we did so. I am joined today

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>by Joseph Lamania from Friday Golf as well as Sean

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Martin from the PGA Tour. One of my favorite people

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world of golf to talk golf with is Sean.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Sean is the senior manager Content Development of the PGA Tour.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a comma in there. They use commas and titles.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Sean is so big. Thanks to Sean for joining. Before

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we get to Joseph and Sean, this podcast is presented

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>by our friends at Mercedes Benz. Mercedes Benz has been

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>partnered with the Open since twenty eleven and rooted and

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>shared values commitment to excellence and bridging tradition with modern luxury.

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes Benz SUVs are the perfect companions for golf enthusiasts

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>seeking performance, style and space on the way to the course,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and the GLS stands out as the pinnacle of this lineup.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I got to say, every time I see a GLS

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>on the road catches my eye. The GLS combines power

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and finesse backed by twelve drivers, systems, nimble handling, cutting

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>an edge AI technology, and superb craftsmanship. The GLS anticipates

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>your needs, ensuring every journey is as strategic as a

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>championship winning game plan. The GLS reflects Mercedes Benz philosophy

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the world's greatest view hicles and the Mercedes

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Benz GLS even standing still is moving forward. Learn more

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>about the GLS and Mercedes Benz full lineup of SUVs

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at MBUSA dot com. Also, just a quick note, Ludwig

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in the field at at the Open will be a

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.399
<v Speaker 1>big factor in the Ryder Cup. He's a Mercedes guy,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>so check that out. Check out MBUSA dot com and

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>big thanks to Mercedes for presenting this podcast. All right,

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk Ryder Cup. Joseph Sean, welcome on. You get

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Want to give one one quick open nugget

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're excited for before we get into the Ryder

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Cup discussion.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Does this coount as one of our things? Is a

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>pre thing?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is a pre thing, pre thing, This is

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an unplanned pre thing just off the top of your head,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup thing, open championship thing that you're.

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 2>You're Open championship.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, oh, open Championship. I met We're the week before.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>We're still you know, this is kind of multi service pod.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Now I think big thing for me. I think in

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 2>light of this pod, doing some research, it's going to

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 2>be a big factor in team selection, just points wise.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>But then also I think Rory obviously a big thing

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to. I think been kinding up and down

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple months after the Masters win. But I'm sure

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Port Rush and beth Page or two things that are

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>circled on his calendar, and so it'll be interesting to

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>see how Rory shows up for port Rush. I was

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>talking to Paul Hodwanick on our staff before he departed

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 2>for overseas, and I love that Rory and Shane last

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>time we were port Rush really showed the blessing and

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the curse of a hometown major. There's like the crowd

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>support that you get that third round. I'll never forget it.

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>At port Rush when Shane Lowry shot I think sixty

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>three to take like a four or six shot lead,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 2>they were were acting like he'd won the tournament. It

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 2>was an incredible scene. They're practically carry him on his shoulders.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>But then obviously he saw it to with Rory, just

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 2>the pressure and what happened to him there without you know,

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 2>getting his first t shot will be so I think

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>it might have our conversation. It's a huge for team selection.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>And then too, I think just seeing you know what

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Rory we see rock up to the first team this year.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I totally I think like the home game thing is

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>like it can be like a It's totally like a

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>blessing or a curse. Like you if you get off

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>to a good start, I feel like it's like the

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>greatest thing ever. But there's also this element of like

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>golf courses that you know really well, you also know

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like all the things that can go wrong on them,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like and sometimes if you go watch like somebody that's

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>played a golf course their entire life, I'll never forget.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I played a Usam qualifier at a golf course I'd

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>played hundreds of times years ago, and I played one

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of the holes one way my whole life. And we're

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>playing this Usam qualifier and literally I'm seeing everybody hit

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>driver on this hole. And it was a hole that like,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>because I had played it so many times as a kid,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I just always thought the play was like just you know,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I hit it to the one hundred and fifty yard marker.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Play in that way. I watch all these and it's

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's funny every time. I've never forgotten that because

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>then I just started hitting driver in the hole got

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so much easier. And it's because like you just have

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>this like built up memory of playing a golf course

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and you have the way that you play golf course

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>your whole life. So anyways, I and also then you

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>also know all the bad spots. So anyways, that's a

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>quick tangent, Joseph, what about you, Andy?

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>That is just classic back in the day, Andy playing

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the angles laying back. I mean, that is the most

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Andy Johnson anecdote that I think you could give. Learning

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 3>that hitting driver makes holes easier is the perfect way

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>to start this podcast.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I think that you are under rae

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the way this hole is set up. And also this

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was way before this is way before any of the

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>data revelations. This was probably before Twitter existed. It was

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely before Instagram existed when this happened.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough, all right, the thing you probably.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Were You were probably like five years old when this happened, Joseph.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Who knows? Who can say the main thing I'm looking

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 3>for at the Open Championship, I think a really interesting

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>storyline is how does Scotty putt? And we've seen the

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>return this year. He's being branded as a much better

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>putter and he has been a much better putter. Is

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that like, has he truly become a good putter? Or

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>no offense sean or the PGA Tour setups like consistent,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of learned how to put on those. And

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 3>when he goes overseas to grainier, slower greens where you

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>have to strike your putts better, can Scotty Hank can

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>he gain a shot a day on the greens or

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>something like that or does he finish tied for seventh

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and we look at it as another like ball striking

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>exhibition where the putter held him back. I think that's

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>a huge storyline going into Port Rush.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I do need to bring something up. I texted Andy

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 2>about this. I think Scotty's open record is underrated. I

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>think he finished twenty first in Saint Andrews in twenty

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. That was the year that he was in

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>contention through two or three rounds that had a bad

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>final round and the reason was revealed later. I think

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the tour championship. Someone asked him about it and

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>he had what amounted to basically an ingrown hair on

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>his butt, A painful, painful injury, an unlikely one, but

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 2>it made it hard to even pick his ball out

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>of the hole. And bendever said to grind Through that

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to go into too much detail, but

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it's on his transcript from the twenty twenty two Tour

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Championship and then Royal truon last year. John Wood, who

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>was on the ground following it, called one of the

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>best ball striking grounds he's ever seen. During that third round,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>when the conditions were awful, wind is blowing across the

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>golf course, I said, Scotty worked in both waves in

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the wind to flight his ball and curve it into

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the wind. And then you remember he almost hold that

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>three wood on seventeen. I think Scotty was a victim

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of the draw there at the Open. So I think

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the story behind Scotty's Open record I think I think

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>that's better than what it looks like on Wikipedia.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen. I think he should be the best Open player.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>What works well when the conditions get went like ball

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>striking is like the premiere. You know it's hard because

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you talk about like Augustin National you say the same thing,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like right, but you know, there's a reason that the

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>best players play the best in majors right consistently. And

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for the open, where you can get those like really

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>tough crosswinds and those really difficult conditions, that is an

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for or someone who hits the ball like Scottie

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to really separate themselves from the field. That being said,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the slow greens where you actually have to

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hit a putt is something to watch. Per Joseph's thought

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is like these greens are much slower, so what you

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>see is like longer strokes on six foot putts. And

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think like what gets miss construed as

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 1>skill putting is like the reality of like pro golf

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in America is that putting's really about just like hitting

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a line, and the greens are so fast that if

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you hit the line, it's going to go in. When

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you have slower greens, you have a wider range of stroke.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you use this for a cross sport,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>analogy is like you know, PGA Tour golf putting wise

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is like a quarterback who just has to make short throws, right,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like that's the skill when the greens get slower,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you you have to make the short throws still, you

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have to have the short stroke putting, but like you

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>also have a wider your stroke has to be good

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at at a longer level too, because you have long

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>putts that are slow that you have to hit hard,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So your dynamic range of putting stroke is much greater.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And that would be my case for links golf and

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>slow greens illuminate more skilled putting. Just just to follow

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the data would say something different, I know, just to

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>follo up.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 3>On I don't know the data would say something different, Andy,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>but just to fallo up on Sean's point, Like Scotty

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>does have a good Open Championship record, I believe we

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>have three years of Open Championship strokes gain data. He's

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 3>lost strokes putting in all of those, and he's lost

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>strokes putting a lot of places over the last three years.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 3>But it's not like that his Open Championship record defy

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>as some of the narrative around him potentially struggling with

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the potter on these types of greens, like it has

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>been something that if he had put well at Truon,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 3>he absolutely could have won that golf turn he probably

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 3>would have won Night Golf turn.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>The interesting thing with slow greens, you know, so when

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Scotty puts poorly, it looks like he desails, and you

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 2>would think slow greens would help him because you can,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>in theory, just hit it a little harder without the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 2>worry of that kind of running out right, Like I

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of us, probably, you know, we weren't

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>as let's say, finally tuned as a PGA Tour player,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>but you'd take a little shorter stroke and accelerate a

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit more. But now I think guys are so

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>dialed with kind of the tempo and pace of their

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>putting stroke that they, just, like Andy's saying, take a

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>longer stroke to hit at that extra distance on the

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>slower green versus just you know, putting a little more

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>pop into it. I'll at brand Snedeker, but it's interesting.

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Scotty, when he puts poorly and misses those

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>short ones, it looks like he's de selling on them.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I almost feel like maybe on the slower greens, if

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>you just pull a more pop into stroke to make

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 2>up for the you know, less get on the greens,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>might be a fix. I don't know, I'm not a

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>putting instruction This could be horrible advice.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should get us putting instructor on real quick,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>see if one's available, and see if they can join.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the topic of the of

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, the Ryder Cup. Scottie Scheffler is on the

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>American team. What we did for this podcast is we

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>each prepared three I'll just call them storylines that we

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are paying attention to for the rest of the year.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>For the Ryder Cup. It could be European team, it

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>could be US team Sean. Since you are the you

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>come in from a different organization, we'll give you the

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>right to go first. Here. Joseph, you can go second.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll back clean third.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Here sounds good. You know, I wish you always had

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Porter on here. I love Kyle, but this is

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 2>just somewhere we don't agree. You know, Kyle loves the

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>story of the European camaraderie and the motivational films and

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the chemistry and how it all works together. And to me,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the Ryder Cup in this era is a

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>logistics contest. And I think that honestly, jet lag might

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>be United States' biggest enemy and they don't have that

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>this year obviously, So I think of all the advantages

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of being a home golf course course set up being one,

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the United States has severely mismanaged its travel

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>when it's had long road trips recently, going back to

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen, part of that was scheduled unavoidable. The Ryder

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Cup in France was the week after the Tour Championship,

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>so literally those guys had to hop on a red

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>eye Sunday night after Eastlake can get into Paris Monday morning.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>You look at the twenty nineteen President's Cup, which, if

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you remember, the US was down three points going to singles.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>They played the Hero World Challenge the week before. Obviously

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Tiger was the playing captain. I'm sure that had a

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>lot to do with it. But again they arrived in

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Australia the Monday of after a long flight, whereas a

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of the international team played the Australian Open the

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>week before. And then last year you have a month

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>between the Tour Championship and the Ryder Cup, and yet

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>again the US team takes the Sunday night red Eye

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the week before or the Sunday before and arrives Monday

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>morning and you're behind the eight ball. You're getting off

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that red eye flight, You're just trying to stay awake

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to go to bed at a normal time. You're probably

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>sleep walking through practice. Now you do have that extra

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>day because the Ryder Cup starts Friday, but I think

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight, when you look even at player quotes, and

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I think even Zach Johnson's quotes later in the year,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>they realized that was a big mistake. The team also

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>got sick that week. You can't control that. But if

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>you look at it for last year's President's Cup, it

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>was in Montreal, so we're not talking big travel, but

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that team arrived the Saturday before, and they said a

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>big reason was they learned what a big mistake it

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>was arriving that late to a road Ryder Cup. And

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>so I think luckily we've learned. I would be surprised

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>if the US team doesn't arrive at the latest Sunday

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>before a to beth Page. You do have that month

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>between again the Tour Championship and the the Ryder Cup,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>which I think doesn't work to the US advantage because

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the only thing in between is the event in Napa,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Whereas one thing in Europe's favor is they.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Have a year you have to play that nap event they.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Have to or you either you go to beth Page

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and you have a three to four day team bonding

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 2>practice event like the European team did last year, because

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you wouldn't take a month off before major.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you should take a month off for

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the Ryder Cup. And then Europe they're going to have

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>a similar thing what we saw in twenty twenty three,

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>where they have a lot of good events on their

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>schedule to play and get momentum and bond you've got.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have the Tour Championship, which a lot

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>of their guys will play, but for the guys that

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>don't make it, the British Masters is the same week.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Then you have the OMEGA European Masters, and after that

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you have the Irish Open, which this year it's at

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the k Club which is a very American style venue,

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>whereas last year is at Royal County Down. I don't

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's a coincidence. And then twoaks for the Yder Cup,

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>you have the BMWPGA, the European Tour, the DP World

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Tour's biggest event, and so I think the US gets

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to avoid big travel and I think learned from that,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>but the schedule, they still need to plan a way

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to hit the round running and be successful for Beth Page,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 2>which I think we saw a Royal Montreal with them

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>arriving early, which was a conscious decision based on Rome.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think they just need to make sure that

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the week's leading in the Ryder Cup are used the

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>best possible way that they can, which includes rest of recovery,

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>but also includes practice and preparation.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's something for not necessarily Brian Roll

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 3>app not to derail it, like a full month off

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>between the Tour Championship and when the Ryder Cup is

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 3>historically played, Like you could pretty easily sell me that

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 3>pushing back the Tour Championship a little bit kind of

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 3>makes a little some sense from both a weather standpoint

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>and there being less of a layoff between, Like playing

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>NAPA is not the best preparation for playing the Ryder Cup.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I'd be surprised if I guess eight

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 3>years from now there's still that that significant of a gap,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 3>or that there's not a better event placed between them.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, what do you instead of playing NAPA.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I think a four day trip to beth Page Is

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>is the solution sufficient. I think it's the better option

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 2>of the two. Yeah, but a month off is too long.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know exactly what goes in with this coordination.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we saw in COVID all the organizations kind of

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>coordinating schedules have done before. But a month off is

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a long time. And really the DP World Tour has

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>some big events between the Tour Championship and the Ryder

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Cup that really give an opportunity to kind of gain

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 2>some momentum like we saw in twenty twenty three.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I it would be cool if they did like some

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of event at beth Page before and had like

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be like you know, you talk

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>about like ways to make cool stuff and make the

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tour more like you know, approachable and different things you

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>could do a whole like if they actually did matches

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that they created content around while they did these practice sessions,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, and treated it like you know you always

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>see like the footage of like the Dream Team scrimmages, right,

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Like these things would be really neat content ideas as well,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wish Paul McGinley was here to push

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>back on the On the camaraderie side of things, I

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think.

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it hurts, but I think that I

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>think you have two pretty evenly matched teams, and I

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 2>think that the advantages are in course setup and logistics,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 2>and I think those are really the difference in the

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup. I think I always say to Kyle, if

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the camaraderie thing was so big, you know why didn't

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>work in twenty twenty one or twenty sixteen. Or I'll

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>buy into the huge I'm not saying it doesn't help.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>The guys talk a lot about the logistics. You know,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>being so well ronic gives them confidence because they don't

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 2>have to think about anything. They know where they need

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to be, when they need to be there, who they're

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>playing with, how to prepare. It eliminates a lot of questions.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 2>But I just I'll believe it has a humongous impact

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>when it leads to a winning a road Rider Cup.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>And actually going back to the events thing, I like

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>what the USCA has done with the Walker Cup in

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>recent years, where like in twenty seventeen when the matches

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 2>at LACC, the USAM was like two weeks earlier at Riviera,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>so both teams could play. This year the Walk Cups

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>at Cyper's Point in the Usam's at Olympic Club, so

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>both teams can play. And so I think when you

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>doing that where you allow both teams to play in

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>a tournament two weeks ahead of time, they're both kind

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 2>of preparing the same. You get people they get a

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>chance to play competitively two weeks ahead of time, and

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>then they get to go see the venue in plenty

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>of time. Like I kind of like that idea and

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>that execution.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Something I had which I'll just butt in here. I'm

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>screwing up the order, but it's my podcast, so I

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>can do that. I thought a nice question I have,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the best setup of Beth Page for the Americans?

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You know you brought up setup. Is it no rough

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>really like short rough and you know is in softer

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or is it thick rough and like kind of more

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Championship style set up that we saw a

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>few years ago. Or do they do what they did

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with Hazel team where they really like mow the rough down.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fascinating question because in a way,

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the European team looks a lot more like what those

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>prior US teams like before the turnover and that European

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup roster where they were trotting out Ian Polter

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Lee Westwood. You know, these these shorter, more precise players

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>from a different era. Now that European team is filled

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with a lot more pop, a lot more long hitters.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm really fascinated as to how the US looks at

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>course set up and figures out how they have an

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>advantage there because this team and I think like some

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of this, like the back half of the roster, is

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on that. But they do not have

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like what I would call bombers on

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the team, don't. I don't know how you go about,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like what your avenue of setting up Beth Page is

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with their current team method makeup.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to leave that to Joseph. That's his area

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>of expertise.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, I think it depends on who fills

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 3>out the back half of these teams. I think there's

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good case that Team ussays would be in

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>their best interest is having shorter rough and allowing some

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of the good iron players and recovery players to potentially

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>have a chance I don't think these skill sets are

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be that different between the teams, which is

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 3>probably one of the biggest stories coming in. They have

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>their mix of long hitters. You got Bryson, you got Rory,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 3>You've got the shorter, accurate Fleetwood and lowry. Team USA

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to have that too with your JJ spawns,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 3>potentially Russell Henley Morikawa. So I actually don't think these

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 3>skill sets are going to be drastically different, but you know,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>potentially speak on the team crafty iron player from the

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 3>short rough like I think Bryson obviously has a tendency

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 3>to bash it around and get a little errant and

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 3>could be somebody you want to lean on. As TMUS.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I think there's probably a pretty good case that you

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>want to cut the rough down, especially since they will

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 3>be small favorites and I believe should be small favorites,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and generally the shorter the rough, that's there's going to

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 3>be less variance. So I'd probably lean as Team USA

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>towards cutting it short. But again we don't know the

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>full team yet.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I think you can go graduate a rough, which I

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>know Joseph is a big proponent of, and there are

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>some potential captain's picks where you could kind of load

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 2>this team and make them a more kind of accuracy

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 2>bias team. They'd be probably some controversial picks, but you know,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 2>if you really wanted to like suit a team to

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 2>a corese setup style, I think you could kind of

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>make some of your captain's picks some more accurate players

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>depending what happens over the last two months. I'm still

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>a big proponent of like just pick the best players

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>at the time or who've proven themselves over a good

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>period of time.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's one of the tricky things though about

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about the date that you eliminated with like a month off.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, we see how much golf can

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>change in a month, right, Like you think about like

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the month after the Masters. Where where we were at

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>after the Masters, and then where we were at one

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>month later completely different. You know, players that are hot,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like sam BYRN seemed completely out of

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the picture for a Ryder Cup spot. Now he seems

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like probably going to be on the team. So I

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>think the I think the thing is that's tough with

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with picking the hot player. It's easy if it's right

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>after the tour championship, it's a lot harder to when

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a month after and two.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's where it's a little bit harder for

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the US team with the smaller like field sizes in

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs where obviously you want all you guys to

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>make it to East Lake, but they probably won't, and

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>so their season ends at BMW. Let's say so, they've

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>got another week off in addition, whereas the European Tour,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they've got an event in Scotland the week of the

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>FedEx Saint Jude. They've got the Danish Golf Championship, which

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you know amount of candidates for the captain's picks or

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>some Danes. And it's a period where some guys last

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 2>time in Ludwig and Nikolai Hoygard like they separated themselves

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 2>or established themselves as captain's picks in those weeks where

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of guys were competing in the Fedest Cup

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 2>playoffs and if they were American they'd be sitting at home,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>whereas as Europeans they can go back over to the

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 2>DP World Tour and play in some of those events,

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 2>earn their captain's pick with their play and then join

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the team and go play like the

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Irish Open and the BMWPGA, which the BMWPGA in twenty

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty three is huge. That European team, I think like

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>they all finished like top fifteen, They spent the whole

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 2>week together, they repaired together, and then they made a

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 2>quick trip over to Rome to get ready for the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Club.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll go with my first one then, kind of going

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 3>off both of what you guys have said. I think

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a we're really putting home home course advantage

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 3>to the test here, and like the concept of home

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>versus the setup, because I do think this setup will

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 3>not be necessarily favoring one side or the other like

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in the past whistling straights like at le

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Golf Nationale. Those are two pretty extreme setups and teams

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 3>with very different skill sets. Now those skill sets and

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the talent gaps are much closer, and I personally, like

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I've I believe a lot in the home advantage. And

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a cool question across sports of why that even exists.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Is it because of travel, which again both teams are

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>getting better at. Is it because of the crowd, which

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I do think is a significant factor. And you watch

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 3>tennis tournaments where sometimes the home crowd like does seem

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>to boost the local player. During the NBA Playoffs, they

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 3>talked about how role players tend to do better at

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 3>home versus on the road, Like, where does that home

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 3>advantage come from? Is an interesting question, and I think

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll get another data point around it after this Ryder Cup.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it the better you know? Is it the back

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 3>end of the roster, those guys struggle in the away crowd.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 3>It's just an interesting inflection point the Ryder Cup and

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>how much home course advantage matters when you have two

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty similarly skilled teams on a setup that shouldn't favor

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 3>one necessarily more than the other team I say, blows

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 3>out Europe, it's going to go a long way towards

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 3>furthering that narrative.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's one of the more compelling aspects of

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this year's Ryder Cup. I think that you laid out

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we've seen this like huge advantage to the

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>home team to the to the point where like after

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>last Ryder Cup and after France, and you know, there

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was discourse of is should this exist? Should the home

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>team get to set the course up because it's causing

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>these blowouts and there hasn't really been like if you look,

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ryder Cup hasn't been very close. But this year,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I think like the makeup, I always go back to

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>that Whistling Straits one where it's like, oh, the US

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>is going to win the rec of these forever and

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you looked at like the European team and I think

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>like one of the stories out of that was like

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the the next wave of European players is actually continental

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>europe player European players, and you're seeing that come true

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and their power players and they you know this this

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>team looks so much different than twenty twenty one, where

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like the team, the type of player is very similar,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and it it's just you know, this is this is

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, and you know, I think like something you

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can you can pull on off of this is like

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the US team has so much more to lose than

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the European team, and if they lose this, like it's

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going I feel like we're going to have another situation

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of like what do we do to fix the US

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup? Like that's gonna be the discourse if they lose.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I think twenty twenty three was a wake up call,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 2>like I'm going back to the travel thing. Like I

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>think you look at post twenty fourteen Ryder Cup, the

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>task Force Air you can call it, and the US

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>had won six of seven team matches entering twenty twenty three,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and that was like they dominated in twenty sixteen a

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Hazel team, twenty seventeen Presidents Cup they almost ended on

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Saturday twenty twenty one Ryder Cup's record setting, and I

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 2>think that twenty twenty three was a real wake up

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>call for them. And you know, Jim Fierrich talked after

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the President's Cup last year of like it was the

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>players who decided to get in the Saturday before at

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Royal Montreal, and I think that's new of like players,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're very protective of their time. When would

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you hear of a guy saying, oh, yeah, let's get

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 2>into Saturday before before And so I think and then

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you saw a lot of the usual pairings I think

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of get disrupted at the President's Cup as well,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 2>like they were, you know, Scotty and Russell Henley paired together.

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Well Sam Burns, I kind of wrote tongue in cheek

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 2>like in the story I wrote that day. But like

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Burns, who's from like small Town, Louisiana, paired with

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>a couple of Californians in like Calinmorre Collo and Patrick

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Cantlay Like it's guys that maybe he normally wouldn't And

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that I think twenty twenty three was a

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>wake up call that like they were on such a

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 2>great run that I think they thought they could show

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>up Monday morning, it'd be fine. And I think now

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe they realized that that that's not the case.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sean, what's your next thing?

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 2>My next thing, I think is the back end of

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the lineups. I think Joseph when he said it about

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>role players in the NBA Playoffs, I think, I think,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's gonna be one on the

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>back end. I think the Ryder Cup format does force

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 2>your back end of your lineup to be a little

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>bit more useful because you have five matches in three days,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, basically playing all five is anathema nowadays,

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 2>so you're gonna need to use It's not gonna be

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>like nineteen ninty nine where Andrew Coltart and maybe Yarmo

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 2>sat until Sunday. And so I think I think both

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 2>teams like their first eight spots are set, and I

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 2>think that really it's the back end where I think

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of questions marks per usual, and I

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>think really looking at Europe, I think that their last

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>three spots. I was looking at names and there's really

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>no one that I think pops out of, like this

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>guy's definitely on the team named to fill it, Whereas

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I can make a decent case for nine

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>through twelve on the US team.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Are you not including Rose? Are you not including Rose?

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>In that he was he's on like my candidate's list,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>but ever since the Masters, he's played pretty poorly.

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I I had, so one of mine relates to this,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and we can just lump this together. I had the

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>European I think there's only one spot on the European team.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So I wrote down the names here and it's like

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get when you when you have a question, like get

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, say like no, Rory Fleetwood, Terrell Hatton, Bob McIntyre,

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Shane Lowry, Sepstraca, Ludvig Abert, h John Rahm, Justin Rose, No,

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Victor Hovlin. And that's eleven. Maybe Rasmus. I have Rasmus,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>who's seventh in points.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I think Rasmus is a question mark.

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's I had ten. I had question mark around Rasmus.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I think though where he is in the points.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>He's seventh, seventh in points, but.

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't he has no top tens this year. I

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>mean I have nine guys. I have all the guys

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you named except for Rose. I have as a maybe.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean Roses twenty three in the world ranking. It's

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>built on two incredible finishes runner up finishes at the

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Open last year and the Masters. But since then he's

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 2>played horribly. He's played really poorly. Plug your ears. But

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Deetrie has a win but hasn't done anything since then.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to point out that University of Illinois great

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Deetree was not listed.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, I think Rasmus probably gets on

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the team and that gives you ten. But then I

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>mean you look at their their points list. You know,

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Roses ninth, Matt Wallace is twelfth, Jordan Smith is thirteen,

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas nor guard and then honestly, I think Rasmus Nierguard

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Peterson I think could show some stuff in those couple weeks.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he's honestly like you're Ludwig of this year

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I think R and P is

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>probably their best choice for the twelve guy. If I

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>was gonna pick one, just based off of like what

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I watched him at the US Open. I'm really impressed

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with his game.

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I think interesting follow up on both of those. Nierguard

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Peterson excellent driver of the golf ball, which will be

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 3>at a premium. The biggest knock is that he has

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 3>done almost nothing in strong fields. He's a T twelve

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 3>at the US Open, and outside of that, there's there's

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>he was playing Challenge Tour for a lot of twenty

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. Like, there is not much to point to

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on his resume. He's other player I think that we

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 3>haven't mentioned that we should is David Pooge, who, despite

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>being on Live and you know, we don't see him

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 3>as often, he's an excellent driver of the golf ball

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and he's shown some promise too. Why I'm bringing both

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>of those up together is that at the BMW International

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 3>last week Luke Donald played with one of them. I

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 3>believe I believe he was. Yeah, he was paired with

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 3>David Pooge and then Dodo Molinari was paired with rasmusnierguard Peterson,

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 3>So I do think those guys are on the radar.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 3>And them being paired together, which I know that they

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 3>have some influence in being able to weigh in on,

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I think is evidence that they're looking at those guys.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just one other name, one other name we

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have not mentioned, veteran major champion Matt Fitzpatrick, who Sergia

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>has shown some life. He's got two top tens, you know,

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and he had a good finish at the PGA.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a goal you know, Quail and Beth Page

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't are actually fair comps. So that would be one

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that I would just I would just put on the radar.

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they wanted, they wanted to go experience.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean that team when you look at it, if

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you if you have Rasmus is in the eleventh spot

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and Fits is twelve, that is a team that's got

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>some like real bona fides and.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Fits is showing some signs of life and switching to

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Mark Blackburn, So that is an oversight probably on my part.

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I think he's trending in the right direction real quick.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>On David Pooge, he better from here on forward. Be

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 2>reference in the shot and start is David Puige Gyasiel's brother.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 2>I want to make sure that's a guarantee. And then

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 2>there are a couple young players at the top of

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the race to Dubai. Like you look at Laur Cantor

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is third in race to Dubai. He played well enough

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 2>this year to at least crack the top fifteen in

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the world ranking and has a candidacy. The people in

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Europe are very excited about Martin Kouvra. He's in a

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>feature group this week at the Genesis Scottish Open. And

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 2>then you've got Christopher Wright hand another one of those

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 2>young kind of continental players. I was fifth in the

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 2>raceist Dubai, so maybe some outside candidates.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Kevin Waugh will be able to play

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on the on the on the international team at mcdona, No, you.

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Don't get to pop bunkers.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 2>When I was a you or Brandon had said when

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>someone told you it was Patrick Waugh and not Patrick Roy,

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that blew their minds. I remember that exact moment in

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>my childhood as well. I was like, I don't understand

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>how that doesn't make sense.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 3>It's just to I guess not necessarily Tiebo, if we

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 3>want to keep going. But I think if you made things,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>if you stop things right now, I think Matt Fitzpatrick

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 3>would be in my top twelve. He's trees trending in

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the right direction. And I think Justin Rose similarly, like

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 3>those are guys that you expect to show up. So

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Fitzpatrick's results from one are.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I would be astonished, you know. I think, like I

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think Justin Rose probably could miss every cut the rest

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and he's on the team because of

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>his his track record at Ryder Cups. I mean, you're

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about like a legend who almost won a major

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, and like I think, like you've seen him

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to just like flip the switch.

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 3>I beg it was one of major last year.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, real quick to former Mighty Ducks goalie Gee Abar.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 2>I don understand how it wasn't Guy Herbert but Gieber.

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'll just go off this then, since we're

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 3>talking back.

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>In the teams, I think the fun thing is both

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>teams are gonna have to like bypass some guys on

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 2>their points list, which is gonna be fun discourse.

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's kind of where I'm going with my

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 3>second one. I think the Patrick Reid discourse is going

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 3>to be all time fun if he has a good

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 3>finish at the Open Championship. That if he doesn't have

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a good finish at the Open, it's not that strong

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 3>of a candidacy. If he finishes top eight, top ten,

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 3>outperforms a lot of these other guys on the bubble,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>you have to consider putting him on the team. And

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that's where so many of these conversations are gonna unfold.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be about the boys club. It's gonna be

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the opposite of the Justin Thomas discourse in twenty twenty three.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna learn about who has the power in the

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 3>locker room and does Kegan Bradley have the goal to

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 3>extend him a captain's pick. That conversation is going to

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 3>be very, very fun. So I think that's one of

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the most fun things to watch for with the Open

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Championship generally, in this Ryder Cup, do they even consider

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Reed And you know, obviously almost won the Masters

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 3>this year, was in the mix late just one on

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 3>liv If he finish his top ten at the Open

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Championship and you're not considering him. I think that's pretty

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>crazy with the.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>With the US roster. Sean, you mentioned eight guys locked in, Joseph,

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you said something so much.

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think seven the top seven I lost, nine are.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Locked, nine are locked.

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You just I'm just going to run down the list.

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You guys where I'm at with eight, and you guys

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>agreed disagree. Scottie Scheffler, Xander Schoffley, JJ Spahn, Russell, Henley Bryson, De'shambeau,

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas, Colin Morikawa, Keegan Bradley is can't Ley locked in? Yes? Yeah,

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so that gets you to nine.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 2>He was like my very first of my next level.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So I say eight, eight or nine, Sam Burns could

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>get you to ten.

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah. And then I think, I mean, honestly, I

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 2>think Ben Griffin ate. I think Barring just falling off

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a cliff, maybe literally a port rush and injuring himself

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>like is a lock. I mean the guy that his

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 2>MC at the Deer ended a run of six right

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>top fifteens, which was a TA at the PGA, winning

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Colonial runner up, a memorial and a T ten at

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the US opening that span. Now, obviously there's a lot

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 2>of time left the lock and change. And it's interesting too.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you had that quote after Oakmont where Adam

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Schreiber JJ spond swing coach said like, oh yeah, Keegan

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>told us no rookies are going to be picked. They

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 2>have to make the team. But then today on golf

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 2>we dot com, Keagan refuted that and said he did

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 2>not say that. So I don't know.

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was gonna say. If there's no rookies

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>outside of automatic births, you know, then then p Reid

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe bumps up.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 2>What about I mean, what about if Brooks does something

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Open?

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that I don't think that Brooks is even Yeah,

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess like, yeah, that's yeah. I had that same

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>thought though, as like if he finishes third at the Open, I.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Think you need to give him a little more credit

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 3>than that. Even though I'm not super inclined to pick Brooks,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I think he does. He's in the mix if he

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 3>finishes fifteenth at the openin's T twelve at the US Open.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Like I wouldn't be super inclined to pick him, but

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 3>I think he's probably pretty squarely in consideration. Having won

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 3>five major championships.

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Won the PGA at Beth Page obviously, you know course

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>history does matter per read.

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 2>You know who else won at one age talking about one.

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Of FedEx Cup event.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Before that, Beth Page, Wait for it, Lucas Glover.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Lucas Glover.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not crazy consideration, but it's not crazy.

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's top thirty in the vetex of he

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean if he makes it the East Lake and

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 2>some guys don't, I think, like, look, you don't have

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to pick it based on one week. But he's had

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>some flashes. He's an incredible like driving accuracy guy. If

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 2>you want to build out some foursome teams around it. Look,

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the two thousand nine US Open was wacky as far

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>as like the draw was insane. Ricky Barnes said the

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 2>US opened thirty six whole scoring record, like Tiger finished

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I think fifth, and he won his side of the

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 2>draw by like three shots. Because it's just a total

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 2>draw disparity. So I'm not advocating for the two thousand

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and nine US Open a factor into the selection process,

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But like Lucas is having a solid year and brings

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 2>like a very particular skill.

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Set, I am advocating for sixteen years ago to have

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a heavy influence on what you know, Ricky Barnes, maybe

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we should be considering Ricky Barnes.

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I think, though, what you we're all touching on is

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 3>that this ten to twelve spot is really up for grabs.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 3>We haven't even mentioned Maverick McNeely, who has a strong case.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 3>He's finished top thirty five, top forty in all the

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 3>majors this year, has some really good finishes outside the majors,

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a couple of thirds, finished second at Tory like, he

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 3>has a decent candidacy, and that's where this next month

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to determine how they round out the back

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 3>end of that roster. Spief is another name where he

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 3>he's he's withdrawn his most recent finish, Like is Jordan

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Speed healthy? Like I would put him on the I'm

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 3>inclined to put him on the team. But the back

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 3>of the spot's ten to twelve, or if you want

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 3>to call it ten to sixteen, Like, there's a lot

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 3>of discussion as to who's occupying those spots right now.

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I do think with mav I got to think high

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 2>correlation between success at Tory pines at that page black

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 2>and he finished second of the really get off the tea, Yeah,

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Genness is there. He finished fifth Memorial, which is I

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 2>feel like a quasi major. And then you do have

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a guy who's coming off back to back fourth place finishes,

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 2>who's known as a generational driver of the golf ball.

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>On New York's own Camon Cameyon, A gun to your head.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Who's your back end of the US roster right now?

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I have I'm not gonna go down the points I had,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Ben Griffin, I think, Keegan. I think we haven't mentioned

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Harris English. He's tenth in points. I think with another

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>solid two months. He was on that twenty twenty one

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 2>team toy. They wanted Tory, and then Patrick Cantlay and

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Sam Burns round out my team. Yeah, it ended right now.

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know exactly how many spots you picked there.

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I have nine as locks, including Russell Henley and Keegan

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Bradley and a lot of those names you mentioned Andy,

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 2>including Cample. My final three in right now would be

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Sam Burns, Jordan Spieth and Ben Griffin, and then subject

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to change with the Open Championship. I do think that's

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity for people to really move in and out.

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 2>The thing was stif he's gonna be one of those

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 2>guys who he's gonna have to do some work to

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 2>make it to East Lake, and I mean I think

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 2>even you know, make the top fifty. And so is

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 2>he a guy who if he is.

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't think forty spster's exemptions into east like.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:14.919
<v Speaker 2>They did not. Yeah, he's forty six in Fedest Cup points.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So like, hypothetically a guy who doesn't eve qualify for

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>BMW and then you make him a captain's pick after missing,

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 2>like sitting out for two events, and it's hard, I think,

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to pick a guy, you know, even if other candidate,

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you get into this quasi thing where it's like, do

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you then hold it against guys who play in those

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 2>two events but don't play well over a guy who

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 2>was sitting at home and you know, didn't have to

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 2>play in them basically a time, I mean speed. Obviously,

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 2>he finished third at beth Page in twenty nineteen with

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 2>like gaining ten strokes on the greens, so I wouldn't

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 2>really it doesn't feel very replicable. But at the same time,

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing with beth Page is the greens

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 2>are like really flat and it's possible to do it.

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of like the deer if you look

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 2>at the stats from the deer last week. Guy's tons

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of guys racked up just huge weeks on the greens,

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and so I think if there is a place where

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 2>you can rack up strokes on the green is probably

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 2>best page because the greens are pretty flat.

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I struggle.

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't He's not on my team right now, but.

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Well I do that if you're arguing that, wouldn't you

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like what about Denny McCarthy.

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he had I mean Speed is in like he's

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 2>in what I call Missouri. He doesn't show me categories.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's in the show me state.

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 3>One thing Speed has going in his favor, just that

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 3>we haven't hit on, is he is a much better

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 3>driver of the golf ball than he's been at most

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 3>points in his career, like consistently driving the golf ball

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 3>very well. So I think there's still question marks there.

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 3>If it ended today, I'd take him. But if he

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 3>doesn't show up at the Open Championship for a couple

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, he misses out on the playoffs, like he's

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 3>not in.

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for me, I think you almost go chalk points

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>till ten and then you then you have can't lay

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and Burns at fourteen and fifteen. That feels to me

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like nobody's gonna yell about who you picked Harris, so

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.439
<v Speaker 1>be Harris English Ben Griffin and then you have can't

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Lay and Burns at fourteen and fifteen. I think like

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Cam Young's Cam Young. If he plays well in the open,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>which he has played well at opens, like he he's

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a bona fide major championship player, like all of a sudden,

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>then you look at it and it's like, well, he's

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>played played really well at Oakmont, played really well to open,

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 1>and like it almost feels like you'll have to take him.

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, Burns too has been in the mixing majors recently.

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he was second going to the last round

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 2>at Troon and then played poorly ten nineteen and the

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 2>PGA this year and then t seventh US Open, which

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 2>really until the rain delay, looked.

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it was his.

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>You don't love her.

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm one of the biggest Cameron Young supporters in the world.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 3>I think he needs to show he needs to do

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the next month to be a serious,

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 3>big Cameron guy. You are.

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I heard anecdote I heard about

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about what was going on at the end of Oakmont,

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>which you know I was curious about, like, you know,

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>why the water was affecting certain guys. More is like

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball was effectively like hydroplaning, and if you hit

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a cut, all the guys were just hitting it where

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they on their start line, but the ball just doesn't

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>move because of the water. And that's why you know

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Burns hit that shot way left right. Is that the water.

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like basically they you know, uh, the all the

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>guys that hit cuts like and just they struggled coming

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch.

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm not a scientist. I don't have like

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 2>a guy spirting my golf balls and putting on a

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 2>launch monitor. But I mean you do have less friction

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I think on the face when it's wet. What that means.

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to I don't want to go there.

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to look at the comments.

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 3>If I try to explain it to say, I feel

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 3>like I'd be over my skis too. But JJ Spahn,

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 3>it's a nice cut.

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that that I was wondering if there's

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like something about the way he strikes it that's just

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like different than I think like he does compress it

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than like a Sam Burns.

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Sim Burns is not a great ball striker, that is true.

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, just an anecdote that you know,

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I threw in there. Last things I've already used all mind, So.

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Sean, go ahead. I'm trying to we you know, as

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 2>per usual, kind of zigged and zagged out of a

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of things.

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I can go if you want me want of you go.

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I just try to see what's still in my notebook.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 3>An honorable mention was Ben Griffin playing a Max Fly

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and does that impact people in the future if he

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 3>gets left off the team because he plays a Max

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 3>FID to more people just you know, go into the

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 3>accoushnet family a serious one. I think the Team USA

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 3>captaining and how the narrative changes around the advantages that

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 3>team you're up just being a much smarter in game

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 3>decision maker. They've always handled the logistics a little better,

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 3>as you've illuminated, Sean, but especially with potentially Keegan as

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 3>playing captain, the question of how competent Team USA is

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and should Keegan be a playing captain? How all that unfolds.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll be a There are going to be

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sweeping declarations made after this Ryder Cup

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 3>as to a Team USA understands what they're doing, and

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I think some of those things the optimal pairings, that's

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 3>a big one, right, I have more confidence that Europe's

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 3>going to do that properly than Team USA. I think

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 3>hiding people in best Ball and four Balls is another

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 3>huge thing, and you get to see kind of who Europe,

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 3>who they acknowledge, are their weaker links, Like, does Team

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 3>USA do that appropriately? And how do they make decisions

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 3>once the competition starts, right, once you see how people

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 3>are playing. I feel like that's a big area where

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the smart captains distinguish them. So how they make decisions

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:04.399
<v Speaker 3>once the competition starts, sticking to your game plan versus

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 3>adapting to information as it comes in. So watching Keegan

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 3>navigate that potentially as a playing captain, I don't know,

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 3>are you leaning on people like Kevin Kissner? Respectfully? I

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 3>don't know how much I trust some of the vice

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:19.280
<v Speaker 3>captains a Team USA.

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think on this one this was a cluse.

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I think I think it was like a half thing.

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I had Eduardo mon Auri thing kind of fascinates me.

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, Luke has always been super data driven,

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Like his assent to number one was kind of the

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 2>first success story for Stroke's game. Like him, I pact

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 2>oss really leaned into the data to help Luke kind

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of optimize everything. And obviously he was teammates with Eduardo

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Ryder Cup and you know, contemporaries with on

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the European Tour, but Europe had that great run with

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 2>a different kind of data consultancy, And was just the

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:51.399
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Ryder Cup was in Italy last time,

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 2>like just a little bit that pushed Eduardo over and

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 2>got him into the team room versus like that other group,

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and then it's turned into this huge success story or

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 2>is that just a quick incidents that I wonder about.

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 2>But I do think there's so much belief in in

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Wardo and the data because so many guys use him

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 2>for their personal game, and so they know him as

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a player, they know that he can speak the language.

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 2>They trust him from like both the qualitative side of

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 2>having that player's experience and the quantitative And I do

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.239
<v Speaker 2>think like the hard thing with data is to sell

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 2>people on it when it gives counterintuitive findings like that's

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the whole thesis of Moneyball, Like you literally had a

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.320
<v Speaker 2>best selling book and movie about that. Like people have

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:35.280
<v Speaker 2>trouble buying in when it goes against their longly held beliefs.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a huge advantage with Eduardo because

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 2>guys trust him. On the Keegan side, I actually think

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 2>the Keegan captaincy. Here's my positive been on and why

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it could be a good thing. When Fierich

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>was talking about the President's Cup last year and like

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>his picks, like he admitted, like you know, they get

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 2>to Paris late, he admits, like his decisions are coming

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.439
<v Speaker 2>into late to last minute, and he's like this time,

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 2>like in twenty twenty four, when the picks were made,

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 2>we'd already like set our parents, like we knew our

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 2>teams and we made our picks, like which I mean

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the way he said it made it sound like a

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 2>break from standard operating procedure for the US. If Keikan

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a playing captain, like it forces them

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 2>to stick to that of like we need to set

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 2>these teams weeks ahead of time, so we're not making

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 2>decisions on the fly. And so I kind of like

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Keegan playing of like cause I think what's going to

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 2>get the best out of the US team, Like, yes,

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 2>you can have marginal gains and kind of pairing guys

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 2>up with you know, the right statistical matchups. I think

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the bigger thing, frankly, is just getting those decisions in

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.720
<v Speaker 2>early so guys know what they're doing. Like the US especially,

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I think their players are very routine based. I think

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:39.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the like discourse we've heard of, like

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 2>unhappy players in the last few maybe Ryder Cup losses

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 2>is like too much stuff happening last minute and too

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>many like wild cards or unexpected pairings or whatever. So

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 2>I think, honestly, if the way the US plays best,

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 2>I think Europe they have high belief, Like the culture helps,

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the numbers help, They've high belief in that and they

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 2>feel like ready to go and they feel like their

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 2>team has put them in position to succeed. I think

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the way to get the US players to feel that

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 2>way is just tell them ahead of time, like this

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 2>is what you're doing, this is when you're doing it,

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 2>go out and like and do it. And I think

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the predictability and setting that framework is the way to

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 2>get the best of the US team. I think he

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 2>is a plane captain, kind of forces them to do it.

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the tricky thing with like presetting it is

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>we see this like weekend week out on tours, like

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some weeks you just don't have it, And like I

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>think there's like a lot of over analysis with the

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup where it's like some weeks, like you know what,

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>like seven of our guys kind of played like dogs

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, and that happens on tour week in week out.

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We see that like what happened? I just played bad?

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Then you b laid out too, Like, hey, you two

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 2>are going together, but if one of you stinks like

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you're playing with this guy, these are backup plan or

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>plan B.

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>That's like where I think like that it's identifying hot

0:53:54.840 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>hands is so important, you know, and identifying who is

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like the guy that would be leading the PGA Tour

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>event if we were playing this week and then riding

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that is like a very underrated aspect of the Ryder Cup.

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Is like not sticking to your guns and being like

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this is like we are going, you know, is like

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>maintaining some flexibility something like that. We all agree that

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Keegan's on the team right now, I'd be like shocked

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if he wasn't how much does he play as a captain? Like,

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>does this like make him?

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Is he?

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't imagine him going out twice any day. One

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's unique about Keegan is I think

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 1>he like pairs well with a lot of different players

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because he he's just a professional ball striker. He hits

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball really well. He has for twenty years. He's

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:58.839
<v Speaker 1>been like a very good in his limited Ryder Cup,

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>President's Cup, He's been very good. Does it does him

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:05.760
<v Speaker 1>being a captain put a cap on? You know, he played,

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:08.280
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna play three matches or two matches.

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:10.799
<v Speaker 3>I think you think he hits the opening t shot.

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's all this politics too to him playing

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like I I just I'm shocked that the US put

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the situation where they have it.

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I think you put him in the Friday and Saturday

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 2>morning sessions, maybe first up, first match, and then he

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 2>has a chance to play, and then he has the

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 2>rest of the day to play. I think if you

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 2>put him in an afternoon session like then you're just

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 2>asking for chaos because he's out there playing, he comes

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:41.760
<v Speaker 2>back in. You got to get the you know, teams

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 2>in for the next session within I think an hour

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of play ending, and it's just a scramble, and so

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you put him out in the morning. Honestly,

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like a high school golf match. Your

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 2>coach usually you know it goes out and plays ahead

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 2>of you, but you, uh, you put him in the morning.

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:56.359
<v Speaker 2>You put him on like the first match, and then

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>he has the rest that he plays and he has

0:55:57.920 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the day to kind of observe and

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:02.320
<v Speaker 2>make picks and with assistant captains and set pairings and

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 2>all that.

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 3>By the high school golf coach goes out and plays

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 3>in the morning before you do.

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or the coaches the usually I think when I

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 2>played the coaches, the coaches, I think played like the

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 2>middle group was the coaches. So you had like four

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 2>groups of players and the coaches and the like. That's

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 2>all they did. I mean, like they weren't sitting on

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 2>part threes picking clubs for you.

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 3>One thing.

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think going back to the team thing, I

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think like we love because it's the one time in

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 2>golf we get to kind of nitpick like roster building

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 2>decisions and play like sideline GM. But like the reality

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 2>is twenty of the twenty eight matches are basically a

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:40.919
<v Speaker 2>guy playing his own ball. Twelve singles matches, eight four

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 2>ball matches. Like, yes, you can coordinate guys who birdy

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 2>different types of holes and have different skill sets, so

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 2>you're not you know, you're hamming and egging it. You're

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 2>not overlapping birdies. But like, in reality, like the majority

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of the matches are guys playing their own ball.

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a very good point with all the

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 3>core spit stuff, like the one guarantee is that you're

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 3>playing the ball on Sunday, right, And the foursome I

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 3>think interestingly with Keegan, you're saying he should play in

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.839
<v Speaker 3>the morning. He's a good foursomes player. So the hard

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 3>part you think that would make some sense.

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 2>The hard part there is us traditionally wants to go

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 2>out first with four balls as the opening session to

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 2>get a lead. Right now, you could be saying, like,

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 2>lead it off with foursome's you know, take the pain.

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 2>If you can split the opening foursome session, that's really

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 2>momentum on your side.

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But well, like the other aspect is like what if

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Keegan goes out and he's your best.

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Player, He's also your oldest player, so.

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Well not if they take Lucas Glover.

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:36.919
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point.

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have disappointed in there's been noe Brian

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Campbell this course multi time.

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 2>That's your thing, that should be your thing.

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 3>He's not in the Open.

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think spot.

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:00.240
<v Speaker 2>You have won multiple times and not even be in

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the top fifty in the world ranking is.

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Something like, I wonder what Luke Donald and Dodo if

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 3>you pressed him, how much would they pay out of

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:14.439
<v Speaker 3>pocket for Campbell to win the Open Championship next week?

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Has that? I mean, I think in Wardo Molinari's played

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 2>as many majors this year as Brian Campbell.

0:58:23.720 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Guys that are just just being I mean, he brought

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it up.

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a great story. I mean, I like, like, I

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 2>love the story. It's a great story.

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I was.

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I texted you I wanted the Lipski Campbell. You know,

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 2>playoffs just an old school Big ten matchup to you know,

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 2>teams in leather helmets just playing smash mouth football. Northwestern.

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern shouldn't even be considered like ten team at this point.

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Play played basketball in a high school gym.

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Also, Brian Campbell played has played all the first three

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 3>majors and Ward only.

0:58:56.880 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Played the open.

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>At the end of this He's getting into the open too.

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>As of now, he's they got like six spots and

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like third on the He who knows is camp

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is Cam Davison.

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, Nod.

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's tough guy. He's never going to play an open.

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I think this is again though, this is illuminating how

0:59:21.640 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Davis Thompson is probably not going to be on the

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cup team. We haven't even mentioned, like right, we

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 3>never even mentioned what happens if he goes on around

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the next few weeks, like the back end is up

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:31.479
<v Speaker 3>for grass.

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 2>We know it's also okay, hear me out. This could

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 2>be wild. But like saw Hith has been injured much

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of the year, Saith comes back healthy. No, now he's

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 2>been out for a month with an injury. It's a

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 2>big lost. I think it's a bigger he didn't. I

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:46.520
<v Speaker 2>think it's a bigger loss. It's a big loss for

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 2>decent size loss for the US team.

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a better chance that I'm on the team than

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I did want to know.

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I was at the twenty nineteen PGA at Best Page,

0:59:56.760 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think that you know where they drop fans

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:02.919
<v Speaker 2>off matters, but like that Page is a tough course

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to get around. Fan wise, there's gonna be like eight

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand people there, don't get me wrong, but like

1:00:07.600 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>nine nine is like your first spot from the clubhouse.

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'm very curious see how they like disperse fans

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>because you have that section of like one I think

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 2>fifteen through eighteen are on one side of the street

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>because it's the story of like Keegan at Saint John's,

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>like they would play on Mondays when Bethpage Black was

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>closed because they'd sneak on a number two across the road. Like,

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm very curious to how they disperse fans to get

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>them like evenly dispersed, because the distance from one tee

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>to nine green is out there.

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've heard the first t is

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>good atmosphere.

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I've also heard Bethpage Black is an extremely difficult golf course.

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you think they should even evenly disperse the fans

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>or should you stack them on the high leverage holes

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>and really moneyball it.

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think they should rope off the holes that

1:00:56.360 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they think don't matter.

1:00:57.960 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, just rope them off.

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I think one of those latter holes have like limited

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>viewing around the green, like just because of topolicy.

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some hospitality sent definitely. All right, last question that

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we're done with this podcast. If you're going to predict

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a winner right now, who you got?

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the United States. I think the home

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>field thing, the home course I think matters. I think

1:01:28.520 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that the trend continues. I think it's just enough of

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>an advantage to kind of tip the scales. But I

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's I think it's the US team.

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's Team USA close. I do think that

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>this is not going to be a blowout. Think we

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>get a close one. I think both teams will be

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty prepped and optimized, and the home course does matter,

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 3>as Sean's illuminating. I also think TUSA has trended a

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>little better in the last couple of months than Europe has,

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>like Straca's fallen off a little bit, and some euro

1:01:55.960 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Rory isn't playing as well as he was at the

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the year. So I would say fifty six USA,

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think they win by like a point or

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 3>two points.

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm uh, I'm taking the Europeans. I think that uh.

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the US has a lot to lose and uh.

1:02:13.160 --> 1:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think if the Europeans, like I think, they

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fit the golf course really well, uh for the first time.

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, they did not fit the last time they

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>came to America with whistling straights and uh, I think

1:02:27.760 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>then it puts if they can keep it close, then

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much pressure on the Americans to win,

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because if they don't win, then it's like tear it

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all down. You know, we might see we might see

1:02:39.880 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Thibodeaux as the next captain of the US team.

1:02:43.920 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Of the US everyone plays five matches, do you have

1:02:47.440 --> 1:02:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Ditrie scoring the winning point?

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You know with d T d TRIEU D Tree could

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>win this week. You know at the Open he's played,

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>He's actually played well at the Scottish On's the scott Shopen.

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He's on on the team. All right, Sean, you got

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>any big projects coming out?

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually on PTO this week, taking time out of

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a little home staycation to do this podcast.

1:03:15.320 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>How much I want to get on you, haven't you?

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 3>No?

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, I think we got some stuff

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>around East Lake and kind of year or two of

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the restoration. I think it'll be fun with that golf

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>course is having grown in a little bit more, they

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>can kind of utilize some more of kind of the

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>fingers and plateaus and angles that Andrew Green built into

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the course. I think year one obviously, when you're restoring

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>golf course in one year's time, like it's pretty fresh

1:03:39.520 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and new when when the tournament comes back there. So

1:03:41.560 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think year two will be fun to watch, maybe

1:03:44.480 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of utilize poll locations and stuff a little bit

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 2>more with east Lake, But that's kind of next on

1:03:49.280 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>my radars. It's definitely our playoffs, Joseph.

1:03:53.080 --> 1:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You will be in Northern Ireland excited for you to

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>go over there, and you'll have a lot of coverage

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on the website. But thank you guys. This was fun

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll chat soon. Thank you, all right. This this

1:04:17.560 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>episode of Friday Golf Podcast was produced and edited by

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>p J. Clark. He was cheering on every time the

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>name cam Young was mentioned, as I mentioned at the top.

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We will be back later this week with h with

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Billy Billy Horschell uh previewing the Open Championship. Name that

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the American team is sorely missing. Now

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that I say that, you know, we haven't edited. We

1:04:45.120 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't recorded yet, so there's always subject for some recording

1:04:49.760 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>melt down to happen. You know, I don't want to

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>usually don't like to jinx myself, thank you for listening

1:04:57.120 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and UH we'll see you at UH. With Port Rush

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>coming here open last major of the year, I can't

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>believe we made it here.

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>M