1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,200 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Mollie John Fast, and this is Fast Politics, 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: where we discuss the top political headlines with some of 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: today's best minds. And Donald Trump says his very talented 4 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:14,400 Speaker 1: daughter in law, Lara Trump, should run the RNC. We 5 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:18,320 Speaker 1: have such a great show for you today. MSNBC legal 6 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:23,599 Speaker 1: analyst Andrew Weissman stops by to debunk all Things her. 7 00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 1: Then we will talk to Harvard professor Fetis scotch Pohl 8 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 1: about how the right wing is mutating. But first we 9 00:00:32,360 --> 00:00:36,839 Speaker 1: have the host of the Bulwark Daily, The Bulwarks, Tim Miller. 10 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 1: Welcome back to Fast Politics. Fan favorite Tim Miller. 11 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 2: All right, give me that gold watch. 12 00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: I'm going to give you a minute of plugging. Tim 13 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:50,520 Speaker 1: is now the daily host of the Bulwark podcast, which 14 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:53,880 Speaker 1: means every fucking day you can get Tim. 15 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:56,760 Speaker 2: Miller in your ears every day. That's right, baby, and 16 00:00:56,800 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 2: then even sometimes twice when I come hang out with 17 00:00:59,080 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 2: Molly John Fast. 18 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:02,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, the melodious sounds of Tim Miller. 19 00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:05,760 Speaker 2: I did mention when I did the handoff from Charlie, 20 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:08,760 Speaker 2: I don't really have his radio voice. He had that 21 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:12,399 Speaker 2: beautiful cadence and the dulcet tone, and I said, you're 22 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 2: just you're gonna have to substitute that beauty for my snark. 23 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 2: You know, hopefully the laughs will overshadow the vocal fry. 24 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: Well, I, as a practitioner a vocal fry myself. He 25 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: does have a real dulcin I mean, he is like 26 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:31,560 Speaker 1: from the radio world that doesn't exist anymore, which is 27 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 1: why we love him and think he's so really important. 28 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 1: So let's talk for a minute about I have a 29 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 1: piece coming out today, so I always have to plug 30 00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:42,440 Speaker 1: my work in other venues. No, I'm just kidding, but 31 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 1: the anxiety election, because that's basically what this is, right. 32 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, And I haven't read your piece, so I'd look 33 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:51,920 Speaker 2: forward to reading it. But we all have anxiety, and 34 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,200 Speaker 2: I think this explains I talked about this a little 35 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:56,560 Speaker 2: bit the end of the Monday Bollard Pod. People are 36 00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 2: mad at each other right now if they have different 37 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:03,240 Speaker 2: opinions about like the right strategic approach, you know, like 38 00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 2: all of us on the same team, like the anti 39 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 2: Trump pro democracy team. Like there's a lot of infighting 40 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 2: happening right now. It's like, oh, you're being too mean 41 00:02:10,720 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 2: to bind and it's like, oh no, we're actually trying 42 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 2: to help by pointing out, this is a real problem 43 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:17,359 Speaker 2: that needs to be solved, and it's like, no, if 44 00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 2: you mentioned age, then you're then you know, you might 45 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 2: as well be a Trump or just put your red 46 00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:22,840 Speaker 2: hap backer. And it's kind of like everyone needs to 47 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 2: take a breath. Tensions are high, Anxiety is high for 48 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 2: good reason because the threat is so big, and it's 49 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,440 Speaker 2: like everybody that's on the same side, Like if somebody 50 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,079 Speaker 2: is a different strategic approach than you, it's okay to 51 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 2: listen to It's okay to say that's dumb idea, actually, 52 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 2: but it's also okay just to listen and say, Okay, 53 00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 2: how can we work this through to put the good 54 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 2: guys in the best position for victory possible nine months 55 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,760 Speaker 2: from now? And I think that there's there's just the 56 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 2: nerves are fraying discussing that for sure. 57 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 1: I think that's really right. I also think that what 58 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,080 Speaker 1: you're saying about the stakes is really important. Right. The 59 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:57,080 Speaker 1: thing that's like so hard for me as I watch 60 00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 1: it is like twenty sixty and we thought, okay, Trump 61 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 1: is it's not going to win then, And I kept saying, oh, 62 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: He's going to win, you guys, and everyone'say, no, no, 63 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 1: he's not gonna win, It's okay. So then he wins. 64 00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 1: Then there's this feeling in twenty twenty you know, if 65 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 1: you ignore him, he'll go away. What happens instead is 66 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: that he poisons what little was left of the Republican Party. 67 00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 1: And now there are like what was heartening was the 68 00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: Senate vote yesterday at foreign aid right, foreign aid, This 69 00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 1: is like what Reagan ran on foreign aid right, Like, 70 00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 1: this is what we do. We are the country where 71 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:36,120 Speaker 1: you know, we protect Again. I personally that's it's not 72 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 1: my worldview, but like you know, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Obama, 73 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 1: you know, we are the shining city on the hill. Again, 74 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: not my personal view. 75 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:48,640 Speaker 2: What what you don't think we're shining? You don't think 76 00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:50,720 Speaker 2: we're on a hill, Molly, We're not the land of 77 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:51,400 Speaker 2: milk and honey. 78 00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: I get itchy with nation building, but the point is here, 79 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 1: it is this is like a central tenet of American democracy. 80 00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 1: And the numbers were pretty good in the Senate. I 81 00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: was actually surprised that they were so high, but then 82 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 1: Mike meg and Mike Johnson was like, now we're not 83 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 1: going to do that. 84 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 2: Well, anytime you're heartened, I like to just kind of 85 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 2: rip that heart out and bring in the darkness. Yeah, 86 00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 2: I was not that hardened twenty nine. I'm not at 87 00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:19,120 Speaker 2: all itchy about jingoism. So those are just two areas 88 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:23,039 Speaker 2: of disagreement to the USA. So here's the problem. Two 89 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 2: things happened in the past couple of days that are 90 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 2: disheartening for me. On this bill. You're right, you're right. 91 00:04:28,720 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 2: It passed seventy votes. That's good, and I think that 92 00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:34,320 Speaker 2: that is very important for Ukraine in the short Ukraine 93 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:36,840 Speaker 2: needs this because if they don't like that, you know, 94 00:04:36,880 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 2: it's handing this thing over to Putin and the time 95 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 2: is ticking and having a window to do this, So 96 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,600 Speaker 2: that was important. The problem is thirty nine center Republicans 97 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 2: voted for it two years ago down to twenty two, 98 00:04:45,880 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 2: so it's moving the wrong direction. Let me tell you, 99 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 2: I'm teen. People didn't change their mind, Okay, like they 100 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 2: just are bowing to pressure from the base, which wishes 101 00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:56,919 Speaker 2: this bill was killed for the most part a majority 102 00:04:56,960 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 2: of the party. Then the other little nugget I want 103 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 2: to throw on top of there's my Gallagher. That little 104 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 2: coward left the Congress at a from Wisconsin at age 105 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 2: thirty nine. He's the one that every all of my 106 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:11,240 Speaker 2: friends who are still in the Republican world like hanging 107 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:13,480 Speaker 2: their hat on, like there are still some good Republicans. 108 00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,360 Speaker 2: Look at Mike Galigher, Well, Mike Gallagher voted against impeachment, 109 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 2: so he's not that good. He leaves. This is the 110 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 2: old Adam Smith. You know, markets, supply and demand, this 111 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 2: is my this is my my free market as I'm 112 00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:28,039 Speaker 2: coming back in, free market is at work in the 113 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 2: Republican Party. The demand from the voters is for mega 114 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 2: it's for isolationism, it's for bigotry. You know, it's for 115 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:38,840 Speaker 2: closing borders. And if you are the type of candidate 116 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 2: that does not like all that stuff, you're either checking 117 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 2: out voluntarily like Mike Gallagher, or you're losing in primaries, 118 00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:47,840 Speaker 2: or you're very old and in the Senate and people 119 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 2: are waiting for you to be pushed out. Okay, that's 120 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:53,400 Speaker 2: like that is it? Like the things are moving in 121 00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:56,600 Speaker 2: exorably the wrong direction with the GOP that said it's 122 00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:59,160 Speaker 2: good for Ukraine. Hopefully they can figure out a way 123 00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 2: to get this up for in the House, because it 124 00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 2: would pass if it got up for a vote. It's 125 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 2: just a question about whether Maggie Mike Johnson has the 126 00:06:04,720 --> 00:06:06,559 Speaker 2: stones to just block it. 127 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,719 Speaker 1: It's so interesting, Mike Johnson. I want to have a 128 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:11,080 Speaker 1: minute on Mike Johnson. One of the weird things about 129 00:06:11,080 --> 00:06:13,480 Speaker 1: trump Ism is that you get jobs that you absolutely 130 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 1: are not qualified for because no one else will do that. Yes, right, 131 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:20,039 Speaker 1: like the whole Trump administration. You'd be like, you're the 132 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:22,440 Speaker 1: under secretary of what And it was like, well, the 133 00:06:22,480 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 1: other choice was like a guy who was like somebody's cousin. 134 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 2: That is true. I had a whole kind of chapter 135 00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 2: about these people in the book about how, like you 136 00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:35,280 Speaker 2: just these strivers that got into Trump world, that they 137 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 2: had no chance getting this job in any other administration. 138 00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:39,960 Speaker 2: Like the idea that Sean Spicer would have been the 139 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 2: press secretary for any other Republican president like is insane, 140 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 2: Like nobody would ever have picked him. You could say 141 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:47,919 Speaker 2: that about all all this press secretaries really, and so 142 00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: it like self selects people that are like particularly sociopathic, right, 143 00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 2: because I am so ambitious that I am willing to 144 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:01,160 Speaker 2: take a job for a guy that has no loyalty 145 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 2: and that I recognize is completely morally repugnant, because this 146 00:07:06,040 --> 00:07:08,599 Speaker 2: is my one chance to do it, And so that 147 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:11,840 Speaker 2: is not really a great personality trait to have for 148 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 2: people running the country. 149 00:07:13,640 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: I think that's a very good point. So Trump has 150 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,560 Speaker 1: now he controls the House of Representatives, or at least 151 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: he feels he does. They're not a huge majority, but 152 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 1: he feels he has it. He is in a power 153 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:26,560 Speaker 1: struggle with Mitch McConnell. They try to get him out 154 00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 1: so he can control the Senate right, which Republicans don't control, 155 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 1: but they hope they will soon. And then the RNC. 156 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 1: Now you have some RNC experience here, I do as 157 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:42,240 Speaker 1: an outsider. It seems to me like Rana Mitt Romney's 158 00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 1: niece has the worst job in the entire world, but 159 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:50,960 Speaker 1: still Trump wants to give it to his daughter in law. 160 00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:52,880 Speaker 1: Discuss a lot there. 161 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean Rona Romney had the worship of the 162 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:57,640 Speaker 2: world and somehow managed to keep it for like over 163 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 2: a half decade, like despite being the worst party chairman 164 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:05,360 Speaker 2: in modern political history and being miserable. It's hard to 165 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:07,160 Speaker 2: understand it. I guess she just liked those mar A 166 00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:10,400 Speaker 2: Lago Cougar parties so much that she couldn't give him up. 167 00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:13,400 Speaker 2: But yeah, so she gets pushed out. Now Trump is 168 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 2: going to push in a guy that was the North 169 00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 2: Carolina party chair for the head gig. And this guy 170 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 2: was famous basically for claiming to Trump that Trump won 171 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,400 Speaker 2: North Carolina because they did such a good job of 172 00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 2: shutting down the fraud, like, you know, like they put 173 00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:34,720 Speaker 2: on the good machines in North Carolina, mister Trump, fantastical 174 00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 2: lies about the twenty twenty election or how you advance 175 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,440 Speaker 2: yourself in the Republican Party. Now, so he gets the 176 00:08:39,480 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 2: main job, and then Trump is going to have his 177 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:45,440 Speaker 2: daughter in law as the co chair, you know, just 178 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:47,679 Speaker 2: to make sure that he has somebody on the inside 179 00:08:47,840 --> 00:08:50,839 Speaker 2: in case he needs the party to like write checks 180 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:52,959 Speaker 2: for his legal defense or whatever, you know, just to 181 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:54,840 Speaker 2: just to make sure that any kind that there's a 182 00:08:54,920 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 2: question of, well whether the party should do the right 183 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,880 Speaker 2: thing or whether it should just be a service to Trump. Yeah, 184 00:09:01,040 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 2: they'll make sure there's a Trump family member on the 185 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:05,800 Speaker 2: phone call to hear if there are any dissenters in 186 00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:09,080 Speaker 2: the building. It's very it's very third world. It's very 187 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:10,719 Speaker 2: like Bella, Russian it is. 188 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:12,959 Speaker 1: It's very like Banana Republic. Right, are we allowed to 189 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:14,040 Speaker 1: say Banana public? Yes? 190 00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:14,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so. 191 00:09:15,040 --> 00:09:17,800 Speaker 1: It's interesting to me, like part of the reason why 192 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:21,280 Speaker 1: Trump has decided it's rawn A's time to go. Partially 193 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: it's because he wants the RNC to pay his legal bills. 194 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: The excuse he's using is that she's not raising enough 195 00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:30,160 Speaker 1: money for him. Would anyone else do a better job? 196 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:32,439 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sorry to do this, but I mean 197 00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:35,040 Speaker 1: just I mean, and I'm hardly a fan of Rana, 198 00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:37,800 Speaker 1: but it seems to me like this is like one 199 00:09:37,840 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 1: of these times where Trump is like picking Carrie Lake 200 00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: to run for Senate after she is already the governor. 201 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,280 Speaker 1: It's one of these things where it's so incredibly self 202 00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: destructive and stupid you have to pause and be like, what, yeah. 203 00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:54,520 Speaker 2: And did you ever watch the TV series about Chernobyl? 204 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:59,720 Speaker 2: You know, like he's like Soviet like systems where everybody 205 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,680 Speaker 2: is in service to one god king. Like there's some flaws, okay, 206 00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 2: you know, because people lie and there's backstabbing and so yeah, 207 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 2: it's it's scary that Trump and these guys are out 208 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 2: there and that he's winning in the polls. But like 209 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:15,800 Speaker 2: the internal processes are not efficient, Like this is not 210 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:20,000 Speaker 2: a well operating machine here. Okay, it's hard to see 211 00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:22,199 Speaker 2: how somebody could raise more money, Like the question is 212 00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:24,079 Speaker 2: who would you raise more money from, Like they are 213 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:28,559 Speaker 2: already juicing the ten dollars MAGA donors. 214 00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: And those people are going to Trump. 215 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, Like those people are already giving to Trump, so that 216 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:35,240 Speaker 2: like there's not a lot of juice left on that orange, right, 217 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:37,000 Speaker 2: And so then it's like then you go to the 218 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,520 Speaker 2: big donors and they're going to give to the RNC 219 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 2: for what, right, Like like the RNC has to give 220 00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:47,000 Speaker 2: them a rationale that they're going to do something that 221 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:50,320 Speaker 2: is useful to those guys, and they're like you're them, 222 00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 2: Like why won't you just give money to you know, 223 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,920 Speaker 2: Mitch McConnell, right, like the NRSC or somebody like hoping 224 00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 2: Nicky yeah or Nikki right. So I'm with you. It's 225 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:00,520 Speaker 2: hard to see how I think that they're a really 226 00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 2: bad way kind of at least organizationally. Unfortunately, there's some 227 00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:06,040 Speaker 2: other things that are working in their favor right now, 228 00:11:06,080 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 2: but the organization, they're in a bad spot. 229 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:13,480 Speaker 1: Do we have enough information to go on? Like we 230 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 1: in the media industrial complex who are in a full 231 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: on freak out about everything right now about this anxiety election, 232 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: Like what is the information we are going on? Right, because, like, 233 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:30,000 Speaker 1: the polls are bad, but the polls have been consistently bad, 234 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:32,800 Speaker 1: and like, for example, I had this guy on who 235 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: did this piece for the Economists. He's a recovering pollster, 236 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:40,560 Speaker 1: and he talked about how actually the really good polls 237 00:11:40,640 --> 00:11:43,520 Speaker 1: have Biden down by point five and this is something 238 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:47,600 Speaker 1: we saw, We've seen since twenty eighteen, flooding the zone 239 00:11:47,640 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 1: with junkie polls to help MAGA candidates. So like there's 240 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,040 Speaker 1: certainly some of that going on, right, Like that's not 241 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,120 Speaker 1: to say that Biden is like, but I'm just saying, 242 00:11:57,160 --> 00:12:01,160 Speaker 1: like I do wonder we're not getting great information here, 243 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:03,880 Speaker 1: and I'm not sure we're transmitting great information either. Like 244 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:06,360 Speaker 1: it's a country of hundreds of millions of people, Like 245 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:09,200 Speaker 1: how many are actually reading the New York Times. 246 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree with that. I think that two things 247 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:15,640 Speaker 2: are true here. One is that it's just hard to judge. 248 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:17,960 Speaker 2: We don't have full information on how to judge what 249 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:20,640 Speaker 2: a Trump Biden matchup is going to really look like 250 00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:23,800 Speaker 2: in February for a couple of reasons. One that we 251 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 2: don't know exactly the third party situation is going to be. Two, 252 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 2: I think that there's a lag on economic kind of response. Right, 253 00:12:30,559 --> 00:12:32,839 Speaker 2: the ecounty has been getting better, but it takes people 254 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:34,520 Speaker 2: a while. You know, you have to do your bills 255 00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:37,320 Speaker 2: for a few months before you realize that you're like, oh, actually, 256 00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 2: like things are looking up right before you, you know, 257 00:12:39,640 --> 00:12:42,520 Speaker 2: look at your Charles schwamb account or whatever and say okay. 258 00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 1: And that's the Harry Truman's inflationary transitory inflationary argument, which 259 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 1: is Truman had this massive transitory inflation after World War 260 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:58,000 Speaker 1: Two that pundons thought Dewe would ride to re election 261 00:12:58,160 --> 00:12:59,160 Speaker 1: and that did not happen. 262 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:01,240 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, so there's a delay. So I think that 263 00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:03,080 Speaker 2: there's a and you see some of this. We can 264 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:04,719 Speaker 2: do a whole history lesson, but you've seen some of 265 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,440 Speaker 2: so many presidential elections, and then there's the Trump. I 266 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:10,360 Speaker 2: do think that we don't really know what Hayley voters 267 00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:12,480 Speaker 2: are going to do because like the Trump of it 268 00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:14,680 Speaker 2: all hasn't sunken in yet. You know that it's like 269 00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:16,880 Speaker 2: it's really going to be this asshole. It's just starting 270 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,200 Speaker 2: to sink in with normies, so all that stuff. I 271 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 2: think that the polls will be not perfect, but just 272 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 2: a better indicator in April than it is now. And 273 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 2: I think we'll have a better sense of the state 274 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,439 Speaker 2: of play in April or May. I do think though 275 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:31,480 Speaker 2: it is just it is just reality that like people 276 00:13:31,480 --> 00:13:34,800 Speaker 2: are worried about by age, right, Like that's not bad information, 277 00:13:34,880 --> 00:13:36,960 Speaker 2: it's like people worried about it. How much are they 278 00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:39,000 Speaker 2: worried about it? Are they so worried about it that 279 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,160 Speaker 2: they might vote for a third party or Trump? You know, 280 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:44,040 Speaker 2: I don't think that we really know the second question yet, 281 00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 2: but I think it's pretty clear for the numbers that 282 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:47,280 Speaker 2: people are worried about it, right. 283 00:13:47,440 --> 00:13:50,800 Speaker 1: I mean, I think that denial doesn't do anything for anyone, right, 284 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 1: But I also do think we don't have great mechanisms 285 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:56,640 Speaker 1: for telling what's going on, right, Like, I mean, Sarah 286 00:13:56,640 --> 00:13:59,320 Speaker 1: a long while does these focus groups, so she at 287 00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 1: least is like in their way with voters and me 288 00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:04,680 Speaker 1: and I talk to someone at the White House who 289 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:07,240 Speaker 1: said that they do a lot of focus groups and 290 00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:09,320 Speaker 1: one of the things they see is that it's very 291 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: hard to dislike Biden. You can think he is too old, 292 00:14:13,760 --> 00:14:17,520 Speaker 1: but you don't dislike him. And I wonder how much 293 00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 1: that is actually an important bit of data right there, right, 294 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 1: like that the candidate that even if you have a 295 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:28,240 Speaker 1: candidate who is old and who you feel, for whatever reason, 296 00:14:28,280 --> 00:14:30,600 Speaker 1: you don't like the fact that he's old. One of 297 00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:32,760 Speaker 1: the things with Hillary was that, I say this as 298 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:35,320 Speaker 1: a feminist who spends a lot of time thinking about 299 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:38,960 Speaker 1: why women candidates have such a terrible time in this country, 300 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 1: I just wonder if being an old white guy actually 301 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: serves Yeah. 302 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:45,720 Speaker 2: Maybe, And I mean this was the key. I mean, 303 00:14:45,800 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 2: the difference between Hillary and Biden was just the intensity 304 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 2: of that dislike, right I In Biden one basically you 305 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:54,880 Speaker 2: can just cut away all the other bs and it's 306 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 2: like voters who told bolsters I don't like Hillary and 307 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:01,040 Speaker 2: I don't like Trump, mostly voted for trum. The voters 308 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:02,960 Speaker 2: are told posters, I don't like Trump and I don't 309 00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:04,800 Speaker 2: like Biden, mostly voted for Biden. 310 00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:05,040 Speaker 3: Like. 311 00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:06,920 Speaker 2: There could be a lot of reasons for that, but 312 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 2: one of the reasons is almost certainly that, which is 313 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 2: why it makes it hard sometimes to interpret the polls. 314 00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:15,600 Speaker 2: Is like the intensity of the unfavorability right like, they 315 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 2: were intensely unfavorable towards Hillary and to Biden, it's like, 316 00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 2: I don't really like him. He's not my cup of tea, 317 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,720 Speaker 2: Like okay, and so you know, I definitely think that 318 00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:25,800 Speaker 2: there's a gender element to it. I think that there's 319 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 2: a conservative media complex attacking Hillary, you know, to it. 320 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 2: I think that some of it was self inflicted. We 321 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:34,400 Speaker 2: just know that that is true based on the results 322 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:35,400 Speaker 2: from sixteen to twenty. 323 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:39,720 Speaker 1: It's interesting too, though, that the conservative media has decided 324 00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:42,640 Speaker 1: to attack and they've been doing this attack right basement 325 00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 1: Biden since twenty twenty. But it is interesting to me 326 00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 1: that the attack they're using is that Biden gets stuff 327 00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:55,040 Speaker 1: wrong and seems out of it, and their guy suffers 328 00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:57,560 Speaker 1: from the very same problem, right, Like, even if you're 329 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,040 Speaker 1: just to to say, like, even if you take this 330 00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:03,520 Speaker 1: attack and say it's true, I don't think it's true, 331 00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:07,120 Speaker 1: but okay, but you are running someone who you could 332 00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 1: make the exact same attack on. 333 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:11,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, dude doesn't do anything and he goes to court 334 00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 2: and golfs. I literally. I saw one of his defenders 335 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:17,680 Speaker 2: said recently that he was golfing so much now because 336 00:16:17,680 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 2: he knows he's not going to have time once he's 337 00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 2: saving the country as president. What I mean, he has 338 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 2: four trials and we're in the middle of an election, 339 00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:29,200 Speaker 2: like that is just not believable, you know. I mean 340 00:16:29,240 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 2: the videos you see at Trump were like cow many 341 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:33,600 Speaker 2: videos have you've seen of mine, just randomly showing up 342 00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 2: to people's weddings and walking around to say hello. 343 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 1: Well Trump, though Trump wrote, people say Trump can't do 344 00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:41,840 Speaker 1: as many events as he used to be able to. 345 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 1: And I think about twenty sixteen, like watching him zip 346 00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:48,600 Speaker 1: across the country. Remember, like you do a rally and 347 00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 1: then you get on explaining you do another rally, you know, 348 00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 1: so it is. I just wonder if your attack on 349 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 1: the Democrat can be very well repurposed to be the 350 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:01,720 Speaker 1: attack on the I don't know that that's a great 351 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:04,160 Speaker 1: place to be in, No, thank you. 352 00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:07,080 Speaker 2: I can it's not a good place to be in. 353 00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:10,040 Speaker 2: But you know, again, you just go back to this whole. 354 00:17:10,560 --> 00:17:12,240 Speaker 2: It shouldn't he be in a worse place? Right? 355 00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 1: And you know, you. 356 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:16,399 Speaker 2: Go around and around on this. But I think that 357 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:20,080 Speaker 2: he has some very very real vulnerabilities and I think 358 00:17:20,080 --> 00:17:22,080 Speaker 2: that some of them are not showing up in the 359 00:17:22,119 --> 00:17:24,199 Speaker 2: polls yet. There's a little bit of a lag, and 360 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:25,280 Speaker 2: God will and they. 361 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:29,760 Speaker 1: Start Tim Miller, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. 362 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:32,640 Speaker 2: Molly John Fast anytime, thank you, thank. 363 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 1: You, thank you. You're the best. Did you know? Rick 364 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:45,359 Speaker 1: Wilson and I are bringing together some friends for a 365 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 1: general election kickoff party at City Winery in New York 366 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:53,040 Speaker 1: on March sixth. We're going to be chatting right after 367 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:57,840 Speaker 1: Super Tuesday about what's going on, and it is going 368 00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 1: to probably be the one fun night for the next 369 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 1: eighty days. If you're in the New York area, please 370 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:09,600 Speaker 1: come by and join us. You can go to City 371 00:18:09,640 --> 00:18:14,159 Speaker 1: Winery's website and grab a ticket. Andrew Weissman is the 372 00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 1: co host of the MSNBC podcast Prosecuting Donald Trump and 373 00:18:18,040 --> 00:18:22,199 Speaker 1: the co author of the Trump Indictments. There are a 374 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 1: lot of them. Welcome back to Fast Politics. Andrew Weisman, Hey, Molly, 375 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:30,679 Speaker 1: so great to be here. I love having you, and 376 00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 1: I love running into you, and I'm god we're friends, 377 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:37,560 Speaker 1: and I also really like you as a human on 378 00:18:37,600 --> 00:18:40,760 Speaker 1: this earth, of which hopefully we'll be here for a while. 379 00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:43,160 Speaker 1: But I wanted to talk to you. Not to get 380 00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:43,760 Speaker 1: too dark. 381 00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 4: We're going to get really really dark, really fast. 382 00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:49,520 Speaker 1: Really fast. One of the many things I like about 383 00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:52,640 Speaker 1: you is that you have had a lot of these 384 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:57,200 Speaker 1: jobs so well, I can speculate all I want. You've 385 00:18:57,240 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 1: actually like worked on the SPET, You've worked in a 386 00:19:00,560 --> 00:19:04,880 Speaker 1: Special Council investigation, You've been in the Mueller investigation. You've 387 00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:08,000 Speaker 1: sort of been in those places where the rest of 388 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 1: us can only speculate. So I feel like your take 389 00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:15,320 Speaker 1: on her is much more meaningful than pretty much ninety 390 00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:17,679 Speaker 1: nine point nine nine nine percent of the world, with 391 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:20,760 Speaker 1: the exception of Eric Calder, who I think had a 392 00:19:20,800 --> 00:19:22,800 Speaker 1: pretty was pretty pissed he did. 393 00:19:22,840 --> 00:19:24,600 Speaker 4: Although I have to say, I don't think he's ever 394 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 4: been in a special counsel But by the way, I 395 00:19:26,359 --> 00:19:29,120 Speaker 4: don't think I actually agree with you that Eric holders. 396 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 4: Obviously he's been the Attorney General and has incredible experienced. 397 00:19:32,880 --> 00:19:34,919 Speaker 1: I was shocked when I saw that tweet, Like I 398 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 1: was like. 399 00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:38,240 Speaker 4: Whoa, Yeah, people have come said all sorts of very 400 00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:40,479 Speaker 4: interesting things. I mean, one of the things that I 401 00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:43,600 Speaker 4: think he has said is why is he even asking 402 00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:47,240 Speaker 4: what the date is of the death of Joe Biden's son. 403 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:50,480 Speaker 4: I didn't realize he was giving like a memory test. 404 00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 4: I mean, like, how does that even come up? 405 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:57,280 Speaker 1: You also were appointed by George W. Bush in a 406 00:19:57,320 --> 00:20:00,600 Speaker 1: world when things were normal, so you really understand the 407 00:20:00,680 --> 00:20:03,880 Speaker 1: sort of the nonpartisan space that is supposed to be 408 00:20:04,320 --> 00:20:04,920 Speaker 1: the DOJ. 409 00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:09,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, I have served since nineteen ninety one. I've served 410 00:20:09,400 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 4: under I think every Attorney general since then in various capacity. 411 00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,400 Speaker 4: So I think Mary mccordy and I talked about this, 412 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:20,080 Speaker 4: which is until, like the Trump era, you can't think 413 00:20:20,119 --> 00:20:24,199 Speaker 4: about politics at all in your job. It just was irrelevant. 414 00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:27,879 Speaker 4: And then when I was on the Moller investigation, it 415 00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:30,119 Speaker 4: suddenly was like a big thing. And it's so funny 416 00:20:30,119 --> 00:20:33,680 Speaker 4: because now people think of me as some far left liberal, 417 00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 4: whereas like most of my friends are like liberal. You 418 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:40,360 Speaker 4: were in the government for twenty one years. I teach 419 00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:42,639 Speaker 4: at NYU Law School. I can tell you I'm not 420 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 4: viewed as liberal there. It's sort of the warping of 421 00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 4: norms and perceptions that has happened, I think during the 422 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:54,440 Speaker 4: Trump era, and I mean Trump era, whether he's president 423 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:55,960 Speaker 4: or running for president. 424 00:20:56,280 --> 00:20:58,280 Speaker 1: I want you to talk us through the decision to 425 00:20:58,320 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 1: pick her, and I think it comes back to the 426 00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:05,560 Speaker 1: decision to pick Merrick Garland. In twenty twenty. The world 427 00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:07,800 Speaker 1: looked a little different, right. There was a sense that 428 00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:11,640 Speaker 1: maybe if Democrats, though we were, weren't warned. I want 429 00:21:11,680 --> 00:21:14,440 Speaker 1: to say this because I think it's important we were 430 00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:20,800 Speaker 1: warned by certain experts in authoritarianism that Democrats would not 431 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,280 Speaker 1: be able to just pretend that things were normal and 432 00:21:24,400 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 1: go back to norms and that it would all work 433 00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:29,840 Speaker 1: like that, But they tried, and I think that appointing 434 00:21:29,880 --> 00:21:32,840 Speaker 1: Merrick Garland, Biden was trying to say, you know, here's 435 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:35,920 Speaker 1: a guy who was a judge. Just talk us through 436 00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:38,479 Speaker 1: what you think Biden was doing by putting Merrick Garland 437 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:41,160 Speaker 1: on the job and then subsequently what he was doing 438 00:21:41,200 --> 00:21:41,840 Speaker 1: by picking her. 439 00:21:42,119 --> 00:21:44,240 Speaker 4: I think that's a great place to start, because there's 440 00:21:44,280 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 4: a lot to be said, and there's a lot that 441 00:21:46,480 --> 00:21:50,719 Speaker 4: has been said about her report itself, but it's useful, 442 00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:53,560 Speaker 4: I think, to pull back the camera to it's a 443 00:21:53,640 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 4: secondary issue, but a really important one, and in many 444 00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:00,480 Speaker 4: ways maybe the bigger issue. So I think think that 445 00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:04,720 Speaker 4: in picking Merrick Garland, Joe Biden was doing frankly what 446 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:07,239 Speaker 4: he said he was doing, which is he viewsed the 447 00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:12,680 Speaker 4: Department of Justice as apolitical and its individual charging decisions 448 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 4: would be made independently of the White House, and they 449 00:22:17,840 --> 00:22:20,439 Speaker 4: need to be made independently of the White House. You know, 450 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:22,840 Speaker 4: there was as a break from the sort of unitary 451 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:26,919 Speaker 4: executive why but precisely because it's not appropriate to have 452 00:22:26,960 --> 00:22:29,600 Speaker 4: Donald Trump when he was president saying let's go after 453 00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:32,840 Speaker 4: Democrats and not go after Republicans. You know, I want 454 00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:35,800 Speaker 4: them to not charge my friends. I want them to 455 00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:38,440 Speaker 4: dismiss those cases. I mean, so this was a way 456 00:22:38,480 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 4: to say, you know what, who's going to have more 457 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:44,800 Speaker 4: integrity than somebody who has years ago been in the department. 458 00:22:44,840 --> 00:22:47,160 Speaker 4: So he's aware of how it works. But he's been 459 00:22:47,200 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 4: a very respected judge for over twenty years the DC Circuit, 460 00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:56,720 Speaker 4: and you know, by all accounts, is an honorable, good person, 461 00:22:57,160 --> 00:22:59,879 Speaker 4: and I think nothing that's happened in any way make 462 00:23:00,119 --> 00:23:03,200 Speaker 4: me doubt any of that in terms of his being 463 00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:08,960 Speaker 4: acting in good faith and being a brilliant, smart, lovely, thoughtful, 464 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:11,840 Speaker 4: empathetic person as you can tell. But I do have 465 00:23:11,880 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 4: a butt coming, right, which is that I think that 466 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:22,240 Speaker 4: the appointment that where you say, in order to investigate Democrats, 467 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:26,440 Speaker 4: you need to have a Republican appointed as a prosecutor, 468 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:29,480 Speaker 4: a lah Ken Starr, right, And the idea is like, 469 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 4: it's a Republican who is looking into Hunter Biden, but 470 00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:38,160 Speaker 4: by the same time, it's a Republican who's looking into 471 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:41,880 Speaker 4: Mike Pence. So it's like Republicans investigate republicans, and republicans 472 00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:47,800 Speaker 4: investcape democrats, and it's republicans who investigate republicans because you 473 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 4: would be subject to attack if you've had a Democrat there, 474 00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:54,360 Speaker 4: but you have a Republican, investigate democrats because if you 475 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 4: appointed a Democrat and you would say, oh, they're going 476 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:59,400 Speaker 4: to pull their punches. So no matter what you had, 477 00:23:59,400 --> 00:24:03,359 Speaker 4: America on appointing Republicans for all of these things. I 478 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:07,080 Speaker 4: think that that sort of taking the easy road up 479 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:10,040 Speaker 4: front of Oh, I don't want to have an attack 480 00:24:10,160 --> 00:24:12,600 Speaker 4: on me for doing this. I want to show that 481 00:24:12,600 --> 00:24:18,000 Speaker 4: I'm bending over backwards buys into one that's a political decision, 482 00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 4: a small p political decision, and you're there precisely because 483 00:24:22,359 --> 00:24:25,399 Speaker 4: you weren't supposed to take politics into account. If you 484 00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:28,240 Speaker 4: are picking the best person for the job. Come on, 485 00:24:28,480 --> 00:24:30,760 Speaker 4: you think all three of those people just happened to 486 00:24:30,760 --> 00:24:32,400 Speaker 4: be the best person for the job. I mean, it's 487 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:35,159 Speaker 4: like what Bush said about Clarence Thomas. I mean, come on, 488 00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:37,520 Speaker 4: by the way, I'm not saying that you shouldn't consider 489 00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:40,560 Speaker 4: race and the apployment to the Supreme Court. I think 490 00:24:40,600 --> 00:24:42,359 Speaker 4: you should. I just don't think you should deny it. 491 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:47,160 Speaker 4: And so here I think you're buying into the idea 492 00:24:47,560 --> 00:24:49,879 Speaker 4: that people don't act out of principle, and it was 493 00:24:49,920 --> 00:24:54,639 Speaker 4: an overreaction to the attack on Muller and his team, 494 00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:56,600 Speaker 4: of which you know, as you said, I was one, 495 00:24:56,880 --> 00:24:59,320 Speaker 4: and is the kind of thing that I think missed 496 00:24:59,440 --> 00:25:04,240 Speaker 4: an an opportunity to educate the public about why you're 497 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:07,359 Speaker 4: not going to be looking at the party politics as 498 00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:11,320 Speaker 4: somebody that it's irrelevant in the department. I understand why 499 00:25:11,359 --> 00:25:13,680 Speaker 4: he did it. I just think it was the wrong decision. 500 00:25:13,960 --> 00:25:16,080 Speaker 4: And I would say that, by the way, even if 501 00:25:16,119 --> 00:25:20,199 Speaker 4: I thought that her report was flawless. It's just you 502 00:25:20,240 --> 00:25:24,359 Speaker 4: are buying into the idea that people cannot be impartial. 503 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:27,479 Speaker 4: And you know what, Judges can be impartial, Jurors can 504 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:31,440 Speaker 4: be impartial, prosecutors can be impartial, and so you don't 505 00:25:31,520 --> 00:25:34,840 Speaker 4: sit there and pick a jury by saying, oh, listen, 506 00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:37,440 Speaker 4: it's a Republican on trial. So, by the way, all 507 00:25:37,480 --> 00:25:41,000 Speaker 4: of you have to be Republicans, you right, right. 508 00:25:41,119 --> 00:25:45,680 Speaker 1: The thing is democrats playing by these twenty twelve rules. 509 00:25:45,920 --> 00:25:48,560 Speaker 1: The assumption here is that her will not be a partisan, 510 00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:52,240 Speaker 1: that her will go into this committed to the truth 511 00:25:52,840 --> 00:25:54,920 Speaker 1: and I think this is true. And you tell me 512 00:25:54,960 --> 00:25:57,640 Speaker 1: if you think this is true when you read the report, 513 00:25:57,840 --> 00:26:01,879 Speaker 1: and I thought Joe Scarborough some so succinctly. He couldn't 514 00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:05,760 Speaker 1: indict him legally, so he indicted him politically. There's so 515 00:26:05,880 --> 00:26:09,840 Speaker 1: much editorializing, and so the reality is he's not there 516 00:26:10,119 --> 00:26:14,640 Speaker 1: to talk about what he thinks about Joe Biden. Neurologically, 517 00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:15,760 Speaker 1: he just isn't. 518 00:26:16,040 --> 00:26:18,639 Speaker 4: I agree, And I think there are two ways to 519 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:21,240 Speaker 4: look at what Rob Herd did. I think in terms 520 00:26:21,280 --> 00:26:25,560 Speaker 4: of the substance of what he found, it was presented 521 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:29,160 Speaker 4: in a way that I thought was misleading. 522 00:26:29,359 --> 00:26:31,399 Speaker 1: Will you talk about that a little more? Yeah. 523 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 4: So Ryan Goodman, who's a professor at NYU, with me, 524 00:26:34,680 --> 00:26:37,800 Speaker 4: we write a piece for Just Security. He's one of 525 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:42,240 Speaker 4: the managing editors of it. It's a legal forum that's 526 00:26:42,320 --> 00:26:46,240 Speaker 4: really terrific as wonderful pieces on the website. So we 527 00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:49,120 Speaker 4: did a piece on Saturday where one of the things 528 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:52,520 Speaker 4: we did is posited another way. The introduction could have 529 00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:55,320 Speaker 4: been written that would have been very clear as to 530 00:26:55,320 --> 00:26:57,800 Speaker 4: what it was finding and what it wasn't finding. What 531 00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:01,359 Speaker 4: we were reacting to was that in the news. I 532 00:27:01,359 --> 00:27:06,840 Speaker 4: won't say uniformly, but major outlets reported that Rob Hurr 533 00:27:07,080 --> 00:27:13,120 Speaker 4: found that Joseph Biden had in fact committed a felony, 534 00:27:13,400 --> 00:27:17,359 Speaker 4: but that they were not recommending prosecution because of discretionary 535 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:19,720 Speaker 4: reasons like his age or his memory. 536 00:27:19,920 --> 00:27:23,200 Speaker 1: I mean, this is what somebody transmitted to Trump, which 537 00:27:23,240 --> 00:27:25,720 Speaker 1: made him so furious because he was like, well, then 538 00:27:25,800 --> 00:27:27,960 Speaker 1: they shouldn't prosecute. 539 00:27:27,320 --> 00:27:31,159 Speaker 4: Me either, right, So that is not what he found. 540 00:27:31,359 --> 00:27:36,120 Speaker 4: And we cite over and over again the passages from 541 00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 4: this four hundred page plus report, but the introduction was 542 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:46,840 Speaker 4: particularly inept in the way it was done or intentionally misleading. 543 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:49,800 Speaker 4: I'm not going to speculate about the intent for it. 544 00:27:49,920 --> 00:27:51,880 Speaker 4: I'm just saying that one of the things we did 545 00:27:51,880 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 4: in our piece was we wrote a different way the 546 00:27:54,840 --> 00:27:57,000 Speaker 4: introduction could have been written that would have been one 547 00:27:57,040 --> 00:27:59,840 Speaker 4: hundred percent accurate and would have been very very clear 548 00:28:00,440 --> 00:28:03,560 Speaker 4: that there was evidence to open the case. Because of 549 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:06,400 Speaker 4: course there was classified documents found where they shouldn't have been, 550 00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:09,119 Speaker 4: So there's a basis to open the case. But the 551 00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:12,880 Speaker 4: key issue is knowledge and intent and whether this was wilful, 552 00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:16,200 Speaker 4: meaning that you had knowledge of the documents, you knew 553 00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:19,600 Speaker 4: that they were classified, and national defense information, and you 554 00:28:19,640 --> 00:28:22,280 Speaker 4: knew you were doing something wrong, and over and over 555 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:26,200 Speaker 4: and over again, one, two or three of those things 556 00:28:26,359 --> 00:28:30,160 Speaker 4: were not present, and over and over again. Her later 557 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 4: in the report says that, and he says there are 558 00:28:32,800 --> 00:28:37,399 Speaker 4: innocent explanations that could not be refuted. I'm paraphrasing, but 559 00:28:37,520 --> 00:28:40,520 Speaker 4: that's like page six. He says, they're innocent explanations we 560 00:28:40,600 --> 00:28:43,840 Speaker 4: cannot refute. In fact, he says they're innocent explanations. We 561 00:28:43,920 --> 00:28:47,360 Speaker 4: found evidence in favor of affirmative evidence to prove. You 562 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:49,320 Speaker 4: know what that means as a prosecutor, you cannot go 563 00:28:49,440 --> 00:28:52,400 Speaker 4: forward if they're innocent explanations that you cannot refute. That 564 00:28:52,640 --> 00:28:54,640 Speaker 4: actually means innocence. 565 00:28:54,400 --> 00:28:57,080 Speaker 1: Right, right, But it's written in such. 566 00:28:56,880 --> 00:28:59,880 Speaker 4: A way that I mean, how about their innocent explanation 567 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:02,840 Speaker 4: that are true? 568 00:29:02,920 --> 00:29:03,200 Speaker 1: Right? 569 00:29:03,280 --> 00:29:06,800 Speaker 4: So that's sort of one aspect which has gone less attention, 570 00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:10,280 Speaker 4: which is that the report's getting misreported, right. 571 00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:14,040 Speaker 1: Right, because reading comprehension is fucking hard. I say this 572 00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:16,040 Speaker 1: as someone who myself has failed. 573 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:17,960 Speaker 4: And then the second piece, which of course has gone 574 00:29:18,040 --> 00:29:21,360 Speaker 4: lots of attention, is the embroidery, the sort of James 575 00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:25,240 Speaker 4: Comy two point zero aspect of this, which is positing 576 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:29,360 Speaker 4: what would happen at a trial that's not going to happen, right, 577 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:31,760 Speaker 4: You're not going to bring a case, but you're now 578 00:29:31,880 --> 00:29:34,880 Speaker 4: speculating at that trial, which I'm not going to bring, 579 00:29:35,080 --> 00:29:38,080 Speaker 4: it is possible that Joseph Biden will testify, which you 580 00:29:38,120 --> 00:29:41,240 Speaker 4: don't know, and if he testifies, he could say I 581 00:29:41,280 --> 00:29:43,840 Speaker 4: have a bad memory, which, by the way, is also 582 00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:47,200 Speaker 4: irrelevant because what his memory is like today is irrelevant 583 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:49,840 Speaker 4: to what his memory was at the time that the 584 00:29:49,920 --> 00:29:52,880 Speaker 4: documents were found. And by the way, I'm also going 585 00:29:52,920 --> 00:29:55,600 Speaker 4: to speculate that at this trial that's not happening, where 586 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:58,040 Speaker 4: he may testify, but I don't know if you will. 587 00:29:58,320 --> 00:30:00,440 Speaker 4: I'm going to then say he's going to to say 588 00:30:00,480 --> 00:30:02,440 Speaker 4: that I do have a bad memory. That was, by 589 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:05,760 Speaker 4: the way, disproved within twenty four hours when Joseph Biden, 590 00:30:05,880 --> 00:30:08,600 Speaker 4: of course said I don't have a bad memory. So 591 00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 4: everything about it was so gratuitous it just was not needed. 592 00:30:13,960 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 4: And that's where to go back to your point about 593 00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:19,760 Speaker 4: I worked on a special counsel investigation just to be 594 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 4: slightly in the weeds. Don't worry, I won't be too 595 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:25,600 Speaker 4: boring or too long. A special counsel is a person 596 00:30:25,600 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 4: who is part of the Department of Justice. You are 597 00:30:28,520 --> 00:30:31,560 Speaker 4: not outside of the Department of Justice, and the Special 598 00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:36,240 Speaker 4: Council Rules require it's not optional. It is required that 599 00:30:36,320 --> 00:30:40,360 Speaker 4: you adhere to Department of Justice policies. Nothing about the 600 00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:43,400 Speaker 4: Special Council Rules exempt you. In fact, the Special Council 601 00:30:43,480 --> 00:30:46,200 Speaker 4: Rules say you can be fired if you do not 602 00:30:46,280 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 4: follow a Department of Justice guidelines. One of those is 603 00:30:50,080 --> 00:30:53,080 Speaker 4: that you do not denigrate people if you are not 604 00:30:53,320 --> 00:30:56,560 Speaker 4: charging them. I'm just giving paraphrasing it. In fact, you 605 00:30:56,600 --> 00:30:59,959 Speaker 4: know you can't denigrate people even if you are charging them. 606 00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:02,680 Speaker 4: People have gotten in trouble for bringing an indictment and 607 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:06,840 Speaker 4: then giving a press conference where they then start denigrating somebody. 608 00:31:07,080 --> 00:31:10,240 Speaker 4: That's something you're not supposed to do. Your personal opinion, 609 00:31:10,320 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 4: those kinds of issues you leave aside, and as people 610 00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:16,640 Speaker 4: have probably heard here listening to this podcast, you speak 611 00:31:16,680 --> 00:31:20,280 Speaker 4: in court. And so this was just not adhering to 612 00:31:21,240 --> 00:31:24,360 Speaker 4: the best traditions of the Department. And I guess I 613 00:31:24,360 --> 00:31:28,320 Speaker 4: would say at the very least, it showed incredibly poor judgment. 614 00:31:28,720 --> 00:31:31,080 Speaker 4: And the best example of that is, even if you 615 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:35,080 Speaker 4: thought it was appropriate to talk about Joe Biden's memory, 616 00:31:35,120 --> 00:31:40,040 Speaker 4: that you would choose to talk about his son. I 617 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:42,440 Speaker 4: don't just don't know how that's relevant, even if you 618 00:31:42,520 --> 00:31:44,960 Speaker 4: thought it was relevant. I know, there's even if you 619 00:31:45,000 --> 00:31:49,560 Speaker 4: could cobble together some convoluted, fanciful theory that you would 620 00:31:49,640 --> 00:31:54,920 Speaker 4: choose that example tells you much more about Rob Her 621 00:31:55,240 --> 00:31:59,640 Speaker 4: than Joe Biden. It is so classless and shows such 622 00:32:00,080 --> 00:32:04,960 Speaker 4: a corese sense of propriety and respect. I mean, it 623 00:32:05,040 --> 00:32:06,440 Speaker 4: was truly shocking. 624 00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:06,840 Speaker 1: You know. 625 00:32:06,840 --> 00:32:09,160 Speaker 4: I kept on thinking of constantly saying, like, you know 626 00:32:09,200 --> 00:32:11,440 Speaker 4: who raised you? I could just see if I did 627 00:32:11,480 --> 00:32:14,080 Speaker 4: anything like that, my parents calling me up and saying, 628 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:16,360 Speaker 4: I don't know who raised you, Like you know, you 629 00:32:16,400 --> 00:32:19,760 Speaker 4: weren't raised by wolves. That's not appropriate behavior. 630 00:32:19,960 --> 00:32:22,840 Speaker 1: It feels like when you read it, I think you 631 00:32:22,880 --> 00:32:25,200 Speaker 1: were the one who said this, but somebody said or 632 00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:27,720 Speaker 1: wrote that part of what it looks like is her 633 00:32:27,960 --> 00:32:32,280 Speaker 1: trying to have a long future in Trump world, that 634 00:32:32,360 --> 00:32:35,800 Speaker 1: there are so much gratuitous stuff with that. I mean, 635 00:32:35,840 --> 00:32:37,080 Speaker 1: do you think that's true? 636 00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:39,800 Speaker 4: You know, I don't know what's going on in his head. 637 00:32:40,080 --> 00:32:44,280 Speaker 4: We certainly have seen instances where people have done that, 638 00:32:44,360 --> 00:32:47,640 Speaker 4: and it's like a tryout for a senior position in 639 00:32:47,680 --> 00:32:52,080 Speaker 4: the Justice Department, like the Bill Barr memo, right exactly. 640 00:32:52,240 --> 00:32:55,240 Speaker 4: I'm not going to go there as to what was 641 00:32:55,320 --> 00:32:57,920 Speaker 4: running through his head. I just know what's on paper, 642 00:32:58,280 --> 00:33:01,040 Speaker 4: and I can judge that I don't think one needs 643 00:33:01,080 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 4: to even get to his motivations that. I mean, you 644 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:07,200 Speaker 4: can speculate there are certainly ways in which there could 645 00:33:07,240 --> 00:33:11,600 Speaker 4: be those improper motivations. But even if it was well intentioned, 646 00:33:12,120 --> 00:33:14,040 Speaker 4: it was still inappropriate. 647 00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:17,960 Speaker 1: It's hard to imagine it's well attention. Now Republicans are 648 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:21,560 Speaker 1: incredibly excited and think that they have a sort of 649 00:33:22,040 --> 00:33:24,920 Speaker 1: great way to stick it to Biden. So they're going 650 00:33:25,000 --> 00:33:29,280 Speaker 1: to have now hearings where he's going to testify. And 651 00:33:29,560 --> 00:33:31,920 Speaker 1: will they be able to play the audio? Is there 652 00:33:31,960 --> 00:33:35,840 Speaker 1: a precedent for playing audio from these interviews. I've never 653 00:33:35,920 --> 00:33:36,360 Speaker 1: heard it. 654 00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:39,440 Speaker 4: But it's hard because I don't think we've seen all that. 655 00:33:39,480 --> 00:33:41,400 Speaker 4: But I mean, I'm sure there'll be an effort to 656 00:33:41,440 --> 00:33:44,280 Speaker 4: try and get the transcripts in the audio and to 657 00:33:44,840 --> 00:33:47,000 Speaker 4: play this on a loop. I have to say my 658 00:33:47,120 --> 00:33:50,320 Speaker 4: view on that issue, there's sort of the underlying issue 659 00:33:50,400 --> 00:33:52,920 Speaker 4: of does the president have memory problems that would make 660 00:33:52,960 --> 00:33:55,720 Speaker 4: it inappropriate or difficult for him to serve I don't 661 00:33:55,760 --> 00:33:58,680 Speaker 4: really care what Rob Hurr has to say. He's another person. 662 00:33:58,800 --> 00:34:02,320 Speaker 4: I mean, that's where people shouldn't buy into giving him 663 00:34:02,360 --> 00:34:04,720 Speaker 4: any more weight than I don't think people I didn't 664 00:34:04,720 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 4: care what James Comey had to say about Hillary Clinton. 665 00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:10,320 Speaker 4: We could all make our own judgment. I don't need 666 00:34:10,520 --> 00:34:13,080 Speaker 4: Rob her or James Comey to tell me that. I 667 00:34:13,120 --> 00:34:16,719 Speaker 4: think that's one where I can leave that aside. If 668 00:34:16,719 --> 00:34:20,680 Speaker 4: there's an issue that either Donald Trump or Joe Biden 669 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:24,839 Speaker 4: has as to their fitness in terms of their policies, 670 00:34:24,960 --> 00:34:29,359 Speaker 4: their character, their memory, their health, whatever it is, they 671 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:31,360 Speaker 4: can go ahead and talk about it, and they do. 672 00:34:31,440 --> 00:34:33,759 Speaker 4: There's some evidence, and that's the way they should deal 673 00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:36,840 Speaker 4: with it. To my mind, this is not a particular 674 00:34:36,880 --> 00:34:38,279 Speaker 4: point of interest, but. 675 00:34:38,400 --> 00:34:40,560 Speaker 1: Is there a precedent for playing the audio? 676 00:34:40,880 --> 00:34:43,440 Speaker 4: I don't know if it's in this exact context, but 677 00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:47,240 Speaker 4: you can certainly if you were calling somebody, you could 678 00:34:47,400 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 4: and there was audio or there was a transcript, you 679 00:34:50,560 --> 00:34:54,200 Speaker 4: could try and get that information and then use it. 680 00:34:54,360 --> 00:34:57,200 Speaker 4: I'm sure there's a transcript of it. And I think 681 00:34:57,239 --> 00:35:01,200 Speaker 4: the White House is still considering what do because they 682 00:35:01,200 --> 00:35:04,080 Speaker 4: have to do a classification review. So I think there's 683 00:35:04,120 --> 00:35:06,560 Speaker 4: going to be more to come on that, but at 684 00:35:06,560 --> 00:35:08,880 Speaker 4: the very least there would be a transcript, but there 685 00:35:08,920 --> 00:35:10,120 Speaker 4: could be audio as well. 686 00:35:10,200 --> 00:35:12,600 Speaker 1: But the fact that this is being released, I mean, 687 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:16,480 Speaker 1: they're like, I think about the Mueller Report, right, And 688 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:18,960 Speaker 1: there was a lot of hymning and hawing about the 689 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:21,960 Speaker 1: Mueller Report, and then in the end we saw Bill 690 00:35:22,040 --> 00:35:25,360 Speaker 1: Barr was like, this is too long to read. Don't worry, 691 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:28,760 Speaker 1: it's fine. Our guy didn't do anything wrong. Trump World 692 00:35:28,880 --> 00:35:33,160 Speaker 1: politicized the report, and the way it was released there 693 00:35:33,239 --> 00:35:37,799 Speaker 1: was just much more sort of couching and partisanship around it. 694 00:35:37,920 --> 00:35:40,640 Speaker 1: I sort of almost wondered why Biden World. I mean, 695 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:42,960 Speaker 1: I understand why they didn't do more of that, but 696 00:35:43,200 --> 00:35:46,839 Speaker 1: I wondered if Democrats are like still not meeting the 697 00:35:46,840 --> 00:35:47,480 Speaker 1: moment here. 698 00:35:47,760 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, so one guess what, Molly, I still remember that 699 00:35:51,760 --> 00:35:54,840 Speaker 4: me too. I actually I read this book about the 700 00:35:55,040 --> 00:35:58,080 Speaker 4: Mueller investigation and it starts with that. It starts with 701 00:35:58,160 --> 00:35:58,720 Speaker 4: the moment. 702 00:35:59,040 --> 00:36:01,880 Speaker 1: And you were working for Mueller at that point. 703 00:36:02,080 --> 00:36:04,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, I was working her Mueller. And I was in 704 00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 4: a car when I heard about the bar summary, and 705 00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:10,080 Speaker 4: I just thought that the reports I was hearing over 706 00:36:10,120 --> 00:36:12,919 Speaker 4: the radio just had to be wrong. Everyone expected that 707 00:36:12,960 --> 00:36:15,120 Speaker 4: he was just going to release if you wanted to 708 00:36:15,120 --> 00:36:18,000 Speaker 4: do a summary. We wrote summaries of the report and 709 00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:20,040 Speaker 4: we thought, oh well we did that, so he can 710 00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:22,799 Speaker 4: just release those. And of course he wrote his own. 711 00:36:22,920 --> 00:36:25,280 Speaker 4: And by the way, just just say something positive about 712 00:36:25,280 --> 00:36:27,520 Speaker 4: Merrick Ireland. I mean, this is one where if you 713 00:36:27,560 --> 00:36:30,640 Speaker 4: want to know anytime a summary would be vindicated to 714 00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:33,759 Speaker 4: say this report vindicates the principle, it would be the 715 00:36:34,120 --> 00:36:37,680 Speaker 4: rob Her report vindicates Joe Biden. There was no crime there. 716 00:36:37,719 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 4: I mean, it's so similar to Mike Pens whereas Bill 717 00:36:40,760 --> 00:36:43,719 Speaker 4: Barr spun it the other way when he wrote a 718 00:36:43,760 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 4: purported summary that wasn't I have to say that's to 719 00:36:46,440 --> 00:36:50,080 Speaker 4: Merrick Garland's credit that he was not trying to do that. 720 00:36:50,160 --> 00:36:52,160 Speaker 4: He was like, you know what it is, what it is. 721 00:36:52,719 --> 00:36:55,879 Speaker 4: I think where you can fault Merrick Ireland is that 722 00:36:56,080 --> 00:36:58,759 Speaker 4: he does have an obligation if he thinks that it 723 00:36:58,920 --> 00:37:03,000 Speaker 4: violated DIO rules, he could have pushed back. There would 724 00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:06,080 Speaker 4: have been political upheaval or that he would have been 725 00:37:06,120 --> 00:37:08,480 Speaker 4: accused of, you know, trying to change it or and 726 00:37:08,520 --> 00:37:10,960 Speaker 4: doing it for political reasons. But you know what, that's 727 00:37:11,000 --> 00:37:12,680 Speaker 4: why they pay you the big bucks. If you're not 728 00:37:12,719 --> 00:37:14,920 Speaker 4: doing it for political reasons, and you're doing it because 729 00:37:14,960 --> 00:37:18,880 Speaker 4: it is gratuitous smirching of someone who is not being charged, 730 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:22,160 Speaker 4: that's your job, and the fact that you're going to 731 00:37:22,160 --> 00:37:25,440 Speaker 4: be falsely accused of doing it for political reasons is 732 00:37:25,480 --> 00:37:27,680 Speaker 4: not a reason not to do it. That goes very 733 00:37:27,760 --> 00:37:31,000 Speaker 4: much back to the initial appointment issue, where I think 734 00:37:31,280 --> 00:37:33,799 Speaker 4: you know what, pick the best person. And as a 735 00:37:33,840 --> 00:37:36,719 Speaker 4: friend of mine said in a nutshell, the appointment of 736 00:37:36,800 --> 00:37:41,080 Speaker 4: Rob Hurr was fundamentally a political decision, a small p 737 00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:44,600 Speaker 4: not a merit decision. You were not picking the best 738 00:37:44,640 --> 00:37:46,799 Speaker 4: person for the job. You were trying to find a 739 00:37:46,880 --> 00:37:50,560 Speaker 4: qualified person who would not get sort of blowback because 740 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:54,280 Speaker 4: this person is of the same party as the person 741 00:37:54,320 --> 00:37:55,239 Speaker 4: being investigated. 742 00:37:55,400 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: Thank you, Andrew, thank you, thank you, thank you. 743 00:37:58,480 --> 00:37:59,080 Speaker 4: You're welcome. 744 00:38:01,040 --> 00:38:01,440 Speaker 3: FEEDA. 745 00:38:01,719 --> 00:38:05,120 Speaker 1: Scotch Cole is a professor of government and sociology at 746 00:38:05,160 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 1: Harvard University and the author of russ Belt Union Blues. 747 00:38:09,800 --> 00:38:13,200 Speaker 1: While working class voters are turning away from the Democratic Party. 748 00:38:13,680 --> 00:38:17,399 Speaker 1: Welcome to Fast Politics, Professor scotch Pol. 749 00:38:17,600 --> 00:38:19,759 Speaker 3: Thank you, nice to be here, so. 750 00:38:19,920 --> 00:38:24,440 Speaker 1: Great to have you. I just really wanted you to 751 00:38:24,600 --> 00:38:28,919 Speaker 1: come on the podcast to talk a little bit about 752 00:38:29,040 --> 00:38:32,160 Speaker 1: the Tea Party and how it relates to where we 753 00:38:32,200 --> 00:38:34,200 Speaker 1: are right now, because I think I feel like we 754 00:38:34,239 --> 00:38:37,200 Speaker 1: don't spend enough time talking about the sort of we 755 00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:39,600 Speaker 1: are the United States of Mnesia, and we don't spend 756 00:38:39,680 --> 00:38:42,400 Speaker 1: enough time talking about just the very recent history. 757 00:38:42,760 --> 00:38:45,800 Speaker 3: Right Well, you know, the Tea Party erupted, of course, 758 00:38:46,160 --> 00:38:49,680 Speaker 3: soon after Barack Obama was elected in two thousand and 759 00:38:49,719 --> 00:38:52,759 Speaker 3: eight took office in two thousand and nine, along with 760 00:38:53,160 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 3: the Democratic control of both Houses of Congress. At that time, 761 00:38:57,200 --> 00:39:00,400 Speaker 3: that kind of trifecta of control for one party was 762 00:39:00,800 --> 00:39:05,360 Speaker 3: a rare occurrence, and even while Barack Obama was running 763 00:39:05,400 --> 00:39:08,960 Speaker 3: for office, but certainly after he was elected, with Democrats 764 00:39:08,960 --> 00:39:13,239 Speaker 3: in control of the federal government, conservative people in the 765 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:18,160 Speaker 3: United States were I would say startled and terrified, right 766 00:39:18,280 --> 00:39:23,200 Speaker 3: And within a very short period of time, the activists 767 00:39:23,280 --> 00:39:29,520 Speaker 3: among them dressed up in costumes and started running demonstrations 768 00:39:29,560 --> 00:39:32,640 Speaker 3: that suggested that the America they believed in was at 769 00:39:32,680 --> 00:39:37,240 Speaker 3: stake with this presidency, a message amplified by conservative media. 770 00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:41,719 Speaker 3: So we all know that demonstrations occurred from then on. 771 00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:46,360 Speaker 3: My colleagues and I also honed in on the fact 772 00:39:46,400 --> 00:39:49,920 Speaker 3: that over the next couple of years up to two thousand, 773 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:54,480 Speaker 3: regularly meeting local tea party groups, volunteer groups of people 774 00:39:54,680 --> 00:39:58,920 Speaker 3: protesting Democrats, and the Obama presidency took to the field 775 00:39:59,520 --> 00:40:04,040 Speaker 3: in the United States, and by twenty eleven, my co 776 00:40:04,120 --> 00:40:06,920 Speaker 3: author of Vanessa Williamson and I were out in the 777 00:40:06,960 --> 00:40:12,000 Speaker 3: field in several states to the United States interviewing grassroots activists. 778 00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:15,440 Speaker 3: We weren't contenting ourselves with a national polls set or 779 00:40:15,480 --> 00:40:19,320 Speaker 3: with what national spokespeople on TV said. We were actually 780 00:40:19,400 --> 00:40:22,359 Speaker 3: talking to the grassroots activists and attending some of their 781 00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:28,080 Speaker 3: tea party meetings. Those people, older, white, conservative minded people, 782 00:40:28,120 --> 00:40:34,120 Speaker 3: overwhelmingly were fascinated by Donald Trump. While we were in 783 00:40:34,160 --> 00:40:38,360 Speaker 3: the field interview Oh wow. Even then, I can remember 784 00:40:38,520 --> 00:40:43,040 Speaker 3: one lady saying to me that she was intrigued because 785 00:40:43,040 --> 00:40:48,680 Speaker 3: grassroots tea partiers were not enthusiastic about Mitt Romney as 786 00:40:48,719 --> 00:40:52,960 Speaker 3: a possible candidate for the GOP in twenty twelve, and 787 00:40:53,040 --> 00:40:55,759 Speaker 3: that was the time when Donald Trump was making a 788 00:40:55,840 --> 00:41:00,799 Speaker 3: name for himself by challenging Barack Obama's birth certificate and 789 00:41:00,840 --> 00:41:06,160 Speaker 3: his citizenship, and that fascinated some of those grassroots activists. 790 00:41:06,160 --> 00:41:08,720 Speaker 3: And I remember thinking at the time, if he were running, 791 00:41:09,280 --> 00:41:12,640 Speaker 3: he would be a very attractive candidate for these people. 792 00:41:13,280 --> 00:41:17,160 Speaker 3: Now flash forward over the years, we know that surviving 793 00:41:17,280 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 3: Tea partiers, activists, people who told national posters that they 794 00:41:22,160 --> 00:41:26,080 Speaker 3: sympathized with the Tea Party wing of the Republican Party, 795 00:41:26,120 --> 00:41:29,960 Speaker 3: and ultimately people elected to Congress, especially after twenty ten, 796 00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:35,520 Speaker 3: who considered themselves Tea Party supporters, they have been all 797 00:41:35,600 --> 00:41:40,239 Speaker 3: along and still are if they're alive and are still 798 00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:44,800 Speaker 3: in office. They are the core of the most enthusiastic 799 00:41:44,880 --> 00:41:48,120 Speaker 3: MAGA supporters. And I can say that partly because I 800 00:41:48,200 --> 00:41:50,960 Speaker 3: continued personally to go into the field and interview very 801 00:41:50,960 --> 00:41:56,160 Speaker 3: conservative people after Donald Trump was elected and those still meeting. 802 00:41:56,160 --> 00:41:58,200 Speaker 3: There were still some Tea Parties meeting as late as 803 00:41:58,239 --> 00:42:03,279 Speaker 3: twenty seventeen. They were gung ho for Donald Trump. But 804 00:42:03,320 --> 00:42:07,640 Speaker 3: we also know from national polls in recent years that 805 00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:09,759 Speaker 3: those who say they were active in the Tea Party 806 00:42:09,760 --> 00:42:14,279 Speaker 3: you're sympathetic with it, are very exercised about immigration and 807 00:42:14,480 --> 00:42:17,400 Speaker 3: very supportive of Donald Trump and his attempts to build 808 00:42:17,400 --> 00:42:18,839 Speaker 3: a wall around America. 809 00:42:18,920 --> 00:42:20,360 Speaker 1: I want to go back to what you said a 810 00:42:20,400 --> 00:42:22,120 Speaker 1: little bit earlier when we were talking about this, because 811 00:42:22,200 --> 00:42:25,160 Speaker 1: I don't know that I realized exactly the timing on this. 812 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:30,160 Speaker 1: They didn't like Mitt Romney because he felt insufficiently I 813 00:42:30,200 --> 00:42:33,319 Speaker 1: want to say racist, But what was the complaint about 814 00:42:33,360 --> 00:42:34,040 Speaker 1: Mitt Romney. 815 00:42:34,239 --> 00:42:38,000 Speaker 3: Well, I think the accurate term is ethno nationalists because 816 00:42:38,120 --> 00:42:41,719 Speaker 3: Tea Party people have been and MAGA people still are 817 00:42:41,840 --> 00:42:46,680 Speaker 3: very exercised about immigration into the United States, particularly by 818 00:42:46,680 --> 00:42:50,400 Speaker 3: people of non European origin, as well as upset about 819 00:42:50,719 --> 00:42:55,200 Speaker 3: African Americans gaining political power. This is an ethno nationalist 820 00:42:55,320 --> 00:42:58,160 Speaker 3: view of the world that you could call racist. I 821 00:42:58,239 --> 00:43:02,240 Speaker 3: prefer the eth non nationalist term. But look, Mitt Romney 822 00:43:02,400 --> 00:43:06,040 Speaker 3: was not satisfactory to Tea partiers for the same reason 823 00:43:06,239 --> 00:43:09,480 Speaker 3: that all of the people running against Donald Trump in 824 00:43:09,520 --> 00:43:13,560 Speaker 3: twenty fifteen on that were dispensed by him one after 825 00:43:13,640 --> 00:43:17,359 Speaker 3: another and their Republican primaries were not as acceptable. There's 826 00:43:17,440 --> 00:43:21,719 Speaker 3: a sense that the Republican establishment has not responded over 827 00:43:21,760 --> 00:43:26,560 Speaker 3: the years, or didn't until recently, until it was trumpified 828 00:43:26,840 --> 00:43:31,440 Speaker 3: to what are the most intense concerns of grassroots conservatives, 829 00:43:31,960 --> 00:43:36,080 Speaker 3: and those concerns certainly included putting a stop to immigration, 830 00:43:36,480 --> 00:43:40,200 Speaker 3: making sure that black political power in and through the 831 00:43:40,200 --> 00:43:44,520 Speaker 3: Democratic Party does not go too far for some of them, 832 00:43:44,680 --> 00:43:48,240 Speaker 3: maybe about half going back to a more traditional family 833 00:43:48,680 --> 00:43:52,440 Speaker 3: roles and limiting access to abortion and other kinds of 834 00:43:52,560 --> 00:43:53,320 Speaker 3: rights for women. 835 00:43:53,640 --> 00:43:56,360 Speaker 1: Right and birth control goes with that, right. 836 00:43:56,320 --> 00:43:58,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, really a whole set of it. And also 837 00:43:58,840 --> 00:44:01,960 Speaker 3: just tension out well professional women. 838 00:44:02,200 --> 00:44:04,120 Speaker 1: I can't believe we're having this conversation. 839 00:44:04,480 --> 00:44:08,319 Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton was in some ways the perfect emblem of that. So, 840 00:44:08,920 --> 00:44:11,240 Speaker 3: I mean, all of these concerns are kind of piled 841 00:44:11,280 --> 00:44:14,320 Speaker 3: on top of each other and have created a movement 842 00:44:14,360 --> 00:44:16,520 Speaker 3: that I think goes in a straight line from the 843 00:44:16,560 --> 00:44:18,920 Speaker 3: Tea Party to the Maga movement, although the Maga movement 844 00:44:18,960 --> 00:44:23,000 Speaker 3: includes more younger men than the TEEP originally did. That 845 00:44:23,080 --> 00:44:25,759 Speaker 3: they think the kind of America they believe in is 846 00:44:25,800 --> 00:44:29,280 Speaker 3: being stolen, is being taken away from them. And Donald 847 00:44:29,320 --> 00:44:31,960 Speaker 3: Trump is admired because he tells it like it is 848 00:44:32,000 --> 00:44:35,440 Speaker 3: and because he's promising to bring back the real America. 849 00:44:35,560 --> 00:44:38,200 Speaker 3: And one Tea part of her that I interviewed as 850 00:44:38,280 --> 00:44:41,800 Speaker 3: late as twenty seventeen, still meeting in his tea party, 851 00:44:41,840 --> 00:44:43,640 Speaker 3: and when I finally got around to the end of 852 00:44:43,640 --> 00:44:45,160 Speaker 3: the interview and I said, well, you know, I'm not 853 00:44:45,239 --> 00:44:49,280 Speaker 3: sure he's really going to build that wall. My interview 854 00:44:49,360 --> 00:44:53,240 Speaker 3: is a very very I'm listening. I'm not preaching people, 855 00:44:53,640 --> 00:44:55,799 Speaker 3: but toward the end of an interview, I will kind 856 00:44:55,800 --> 00:44:59,880 Speaker 3: of gently he said, it doesn't matter because his heart's 857 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:02,279 Speaker 3: the right place. He's trying, and you know, I want 858 00:45:02,360 --> 00:45:05,080 Speaker 3: to say that there's nothing foolish about that. I think 859 00:45:05,640 --> 00:45:10,000 Speaker 3: people in general partly make decisions about politicians in terms 860 00:45:10,080 --> 00:45:11,880 Speaker 3: of whether they're trying, whether they seem to be on 861 00:45:11,960 --> 00:45:15,160 Speaker 3: your side, whether they seem to express your value. So 862 00:45:15,480 --> 00:45:18,000 Speaker 3: I didn't think that there was anything scandalous about what 863 00:45:18,040 --> 00:45:20,720 Speaker 3: he said or surprising, but that's what he said. 864 00:45:20,880 --> 00:45:23,360 Speaker 1: I think that's a really important point, right, that this 865 00:45:23,560 --> 00:45:27,799 Speaker 1: is not you know, people don't vote for candidates because 866 00:45:28,160 --> 00:45:30,840 Speaker 1: I mean, they know that politics are not an ATM. 867 00:45:31,080 --> 00:45:34,719 Speaker 1: When we talk about this group, I always think of 868 00:45:34,800 --> 00:45:38,920 Speaker 1: this as the kind of America's like, and maybe this 869 00:45:38,960 --> 00:45:44,320 Speaker 1: is overly optimistic, as America's last gasp before a possible 870 00:45:44,400 --> 00:45:48,400 Speaker 1: multi racial democracy that we are in the sort of 871 00:45:48,640 --> 00:45:52,359 Speaker 1: democratic growing pains small day. Do you think that's right 872 00:45:52,520 --> 00:45:54,680 Speaker 1: or do you think I'm being overly optimistic? And what 873 00:45:54,960 --> 00:45:56,840 Speaker 1: supports or doesn't this idea. 874 00:45:57,120 --> 00:45:59,640 Speaker 3: I'm teaching a course right now in which we're looking 875 00:45:59,719 --> 00:46:02,360 Speaker 3: back at that period from the end of the Civil 876 00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:05,360 Speaker 3: War through the turn of the twentieth century, when a 877 00:46:05,480 --> 00:46:10,840 Speaker 3: multi racial democracy, or possibilities for it briefly emerged, actually 878 00:46:10,880 --> 00:46:16,960 Speaker 3: took shape during congressional reconstruction, and then was brutally rolled 879 00:46:17,000 --> 00:46:23,799 Speaker 3: back and ultimately snuffed out legally for decades. Now I 880 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:26,080 Speaker 3: have to hope I'm an old lady now so I 881 00:46:26,080 --> 00:46:29,480 Speaker 3: won't live to see it that nothing like that could happen. 882 00:46:29,560 --> 00:46:33,759 Speaker 3: Now things move faster, but we are definitely in a 883 00:46:33,880 --> 00:46:39,640 Speaker 3: period where outright reversal, not just stopping progress toward a 884 00:46:39,680 --> 00:46:44,360 Speaker 3: multiracial democracy, but outright reversal of the rule of law 885 00:46:44,520 --> 00:46:49,360 Speaker 3: and of participatory accountability for our government is at stake. 886 00:46:49,960 --> 00:46:53,400 Speaker 3: And that's because once Donald Trump was elected, and it 887 00:46:53,440 --> 00:46:55,840 Speaker 3: was a flucal election in many ways, a lot of 888 00:46:55,880 --> 00:46:59,640 Speaker 3: things had to come together to give him that minority 889 00:46:59,680 --> 00:47:04,040 Speaker 3: when through the Electoral College in twenty sixteen. From then on, 890 00:47:04,280 --> 00:47:07,360 Speaker 3: it's not just Donald Trump, is it. It's an entire 891 00:47:07,520 --> 00:47:12,240 Speaker 3: political party that has bought into even the most extreme 892 00:47:13,040 --> 00:47:18,000 Speaker 3: Harvard graduates, like a least Deefonic, are suggesting that we 893 00:47:18,040 --> 00:47:21,280 Speaker 3: should have what amounts to a dictatorship in this country. 894 00:47:21,920 --> 00:47:25,160 Speaker 3: There are a lot of people now invested in the 895 00:47:25,239 --> 00:47:31,600 Speaker 3: project of holding minority authoritarian power and exercising it with 896 00:47:32,040 --> 00:47:38,040 Speaker 3: cruelty and fierceness against those who are opposed. And that 897 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:41,719 Speaker 3: has happened in US history before, it has happened in 898 00:47:41,840 --> 00:47:45,560 Speaker 3: many countries' histories before, it could happen here. 899 00:47:46,000 --> 00:47:49,359 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm struck by what you're saying, because it does 900 00:47:49,400 --> 00:47:53,880 Speaker 1: seem Trump was just Trump, right, he was not the 901 00:47:53,960 --> 00:48:00,440 Speaker 1: party until systematically he and his people basically removed everyone 902 00:48:00,440 --> 00:48:03,200 Speaker 1: who wasn't him. I think you saw it really in 903 00:48:03,239 --> 00:48:07,280 Speaker 1: this most recent primary contest, right, You did see DeSantis 904 00:48:07,360 --> 00:48:10,920 Speaker 1: ran as mini Trump, and I actually was more anxious 905 00:48:10,920 --> 00:48:14,640 Speaker 1: about DeSantis because I felt like DeSantis had taken the 906 00:48:14,840 --> 00:48:21,160 Speaker 1: scary authoritarianism that is trump Ism, but was also much smarter. Ultimately, 907 00:48:21,560 --> 00:48:23,960 Speaker 1: Trump's people were attached to him in a way that 908 00:48:24,000 --> 00:48:26,920 Speaker 1: couldn't be transferred to DeSantis. Is that a good sign? 909 00:48:27,280 --> 00:48:31,040 Speaker 1: Or am I just being optimistic to be optimistic. 910 00:48:30,760 --> 00:48:33,359 Speaker 3: DeSantis, I don't know how smart he is and an 911 00:48:33,440 --> 00:48:37,799 Speaker 3: unlikable and non entertaining person if there ever was one, 912 00:48:38,120 --> 00:48:40,640 Speaker 3: and I would not argue that he embraced all of 913 00:48:40,680 --> 00:48:45,040 Speaker 3: trump Ism. I think this whole anti Dei thing is 914 00:48:45,480 --> 00:48:49,560 Speaker 3: a middle class version of trump Ism. It's people who 915 00:48:49,600 --> 00:48:52,440 Speaker 3: attended colleges and felt like they weren't in the mainstream, 916 00:48:52,640 --> 00:48:54,759 Speaker 3: you know, at the Stephonics stands up for that to 917 00:48:54,880 --> 00:48:58,000 Speaker 3: thinking that the fight over Harvard is the I don't 918 00:48:58,080 --> 00:49:02,560 Speaker 3: think ordinary grassroots Trump supporters are all that interested in 919 00:49:02,600 --> 00:49:05,400 Speaker 3: that battle. I think they are much more interested in 920 00:49:05,719 --> 00:49:09,799 Speaker 3: blocking immigration, in carrying through kind of the use of 921 00:49:09,880 --> 00:49:12,920 Speaker 3: government power to regulate what they would like to see 922 00:49:12,960 --> 00:49:16,839 Speaker 3: as the ability to win elections by real Americans, which 923 00:49:16,880 --> 00:49:19,960 Speaker 3: they think of themselves as, and getting back at those 924 00:49:20,000 --> 00:49:23,640 Speaker 3: who they feel have dissed them, who have taken the 925 00:49:23,680 --> 00:49:27,040 Speaker 3: reigns of cultural and economic dynamism in this country and 926 00:49:27,520 --> 00:49:31,840 Speaker 3: pass them by. Remember, people who were overwhelmed for Trump 927 00:49:31,840 --> 00:49:36,160 Speaker 3: and therefore living communities where everybody likes Trump are exurban 928 00:49:36,440 --> 00:49:40,000 Speaker 3: to not so much rural as small town. There's a 929 00:49:40,280 --> 00:49:43,520 Speaker 3: sharp geographic divide. And of course those are areas that 930 00:49:43,600 --> 00:49:46,440 Speaker 3: have a lot of extra leverage in the electoral College, 931 00:49:46,560 --> 00:49:50,080 Speaker 3: the Senate, and in gerrymandered legislatures. 932 00:49:50,600 --> 00:49:52,920 Speaker 1: So those are the states with not a lot of 933 00:49:52,960 --> 00:49:54,080 Speaker 1: electoral votes. 934 00:49:54,440 --> 00:49:59,320 Speaker 3: Well, they're also the people who are beyond the circle 935 00:49:59,360 --> 00:50:04,120 Speaker 3: of counties around Philadelphia and Pennsylvania, which I've studied closely. 936 00:50:04,640 --> 00:50:06,120 Speaker 3: You know, they're very competitive. 937 00:50:06,200 --> 00:50:08,000 Speaker 1: I mean, they captured. 938 00:50:07,600 --> 00:50:12,120 Speaker 3: Both in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan in twenty sixteen, and 939 00:50:12,280 --> 00:50:15,200 Speaker 3: Joe Biden only kind of inched his way back to 940 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:18,440 Speaker 3: better margins in some of those outlying areas. It starts 941 00:50:18,520 --> 00:50:21,400 Speaker 3: right at the edge of the inner ring of suburbs 942 00:50:21,400 --> 00:50:23,680 Speaker 3: around the metropolitan in every state. 943 00:50:24,000 --> 00:50:28,080 Speaker 1: Is it right to believe, not morally right, but correct 944 00:50:28,280 --> 00:50:31,520 Speaker 1: to believe that what is happening in this country is 945 00:50:31,560 --> 00:50:35,759 Speaker 1: a divide largely not always true, but that people who 946 00:50:35,800 --> 00:50:38,560 Speaker 1: are more educated tend to be Democrats and people who 947 00:50:38,560 --> 00:50:41,200 Speaker 1: are less educated tend to be Republicans, with the exception 948 00:50:41,280 --> 00:50:42,120 Speaker 1: of the very wealthy. 949 00:50:42,560 --> 00:50:46,440 Speaker 3: Well, both parties are cross income and cross to a 950 00:50:46,520 --> 00:50:51,480 Speaker 3: lesser degree cross educational credential coalitions. The Democrats are a 951 00:50:51,520 --> 00:50:56,040 Speaker 3: coalition of college educated, with more and more college educated 952 00:50:56,400 --> 00:51:00,160 Speaker 3: who used to be moderate Republicans moving toward the Democrats, 953 00:51:00,239 --> 00:51:04,919 Speaker 3: especially in dynamic metro Politan areas. But they are also 954 00:51:05,080 --> 00:51:09,720 Speaker 3: dependent on a constituency of lower income people of color 955 00:51:10,200 --> 00:51:13,120 Speaker 3: who live in the cities, and those people are drifting 956 00:51:13,160 --> 00:51:17,120 Speaker 3: away to some degree. The Republicans are a coalition of 957 00:51:17,480 --> 00:51:21,680 Speaker 3: I would say small business type people, construction type people, 958 00:51:22,200 --> 00:51:25,919 Speaker 3: middle class people in more religious areas, more right wing 959 00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:29,279 Speaker 3: religious areas of the country, and a fair number of 960 00:51:29,280 --> 00:51:32,360 Speaker 3: blue collar workers. Although I think our tendency to think 961 00:51:32,400 --> 00:51:36,000 Speaker 3: of all Trumpers as non college educated is not quite right. 962 00:51:36,200 --> 00:51:38,720 Speaker 3: It's right overall, but there are a lot of college 963 00:51:38,840 --> 00:51:40,520 Speaker 3: educated people that are bought into this. 964 00:51:40,840 --> 00:51:44,480 Speaker 1: Which is a terrifying sentence in itself. Right, talk to 965 00:51:44,480 --> 00:51:50,120 Speaker 1: me about the dependency Democrats have on these lower income 966 00:51:50,960 --> 00:51:54,560 Speaker 1: voters and why they're leaving the Democratic Party. 967 00:51:54,880 --> 00:51:57,320 Speaker 3: Well, I think some of the men among them are tempted, 968 00:51:57,719 --> 00:52:01,200 Speaker 3: but let's think about it. I mean, the Democrats have 969 00:52:01,520 --> 00:52:04,040 Speaker 3: been and there's a new paper out by Jacob Packer 970 00:52:04,080 --> 00:52:06,799 Speaker 3: and Paul Pearson that really does a brilliant job of 971 00:52:06,960 --> 00:52:12,000 Speaker 3: showing that the Democratic Coalition has been reinvented recently among 972 00:52:12,160 --> 00:52:18,080 Speaker 3: using government spending pretty aggressively to both address concerns that 973 00:52:18,200 --> 00:52:21,239 Speaker 3: college educated voters have, like the environment, and to try 974 00:52:21,239 --> 00:52:24,479 Speaker 3: to deal with some of the lower income people's needs, 975 00:52:24,480 --> 00:52:28,600 Speaker 3: particularly their needs for family supports. So the Democratic Party 976 00:52:28,719 --> 00:52:33,040 Speaker 3: is not they're not AOC, but they've put together a 977 00:52:33,120 --> 00:52:37,719 Speaker 3: more progressive economic program that speaks to the needs of 978 00:52:37,760 --> 00:52:41,400 Speaker 3: a very broad cross class coalition in the metropolitan areas. 979 00:52:41,640 --> 00:52:44,520 Speaker 3: The trouble is the Republicans have enough power to block 980 00:52:44,600 --> 00:52:46,160 Speaker 3: a lot of that. And if you look at not 981 00:52:46,239 --> 00:52:48,080 Speaker 3: just what happens in a lot of state legislatures, but 982 00:52:48,160 --> 00:52:50,480 Speaker 3: look at what happened with Build Back Better. It started 983 00:52:50,560 --> 00:52:54,960 Speaker 3: out with a really bold redistributive, that is, equality enhancing 984 00:52:55,040 --> 00:52:57,560 Speaker 3: set of proposals, and as it finally made it through, 985 00:52:58,160 --> 00:53:00,880 Speaker 3: a lot of the things like the Chin tax Credit, 986 00:53:00,920 --> 00:53:06,479 Speaker 3: which had reduced poverty enormously, were stripped away, partly because 987 00:53:06,520 --> 00:53:09,160 Speaker 3: of Republicans and partly because of Joe Manchin. If you 988 00:53:09,200 --> 00:53:12,479 Speaker 3: can't deliver, if you promise and you can't deliver, which 989 00:53:12,520 --> 00:53:15,520 Speaker 3: is the Democrat's dilemma. They can get to fifty to fifty, 990 00:53:15,560 --> 00:53:19,640 Speaker 3: but they can't quite get enough federal power to deliver, 991 00:53:19,719 --> 00:53:23,080 Speaker 3: and they've lost the courts. That is something that Trump 992 00:53:23,480 --> 00:53:27,480 Speaker 3: rives on. Trump thrives on the idea that appeals to 993 00:53:27,560 --> 00:53:31,760 Speaker 3: many non college people that oh, if just a powerful 994 00:53:31,800 --> 00:53:34,960 Speaker 3: president would just cut through all this nonsense and just 995 00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:38,560 Speaker 3: do things. And of course Trump will promise anything to anybody. 996 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:41,680 Speaker 3: He will in this election. He's going to promise everything, 997 00:53:41,920 --> 00:53:44,319 Speaker 3: and a lot of people don't even pay attention till 998 00:53:44,360 --> 00:53:47,319 Speaker 3: the last minute. And of course the media system completely 999 00:53:47,400 --> 00:53:53,400 Speaker 3: magnifies everything Trump says while mainly broadcasting legal cases that 1000 00:53:53,440 --> 00:53:57,000 Speaker 3: the college educated people are following, which really turn off 1001 00:53:57,120 --> 00:53:59,600 Speaker 3: the color people. I mean, they're just not interested in 1002 00:54:00,480 --> 00:54:05,759 Speaker 3: whether the fourteenth Amendment is officers or come on, you know, 1003 00:54:06,560 --> 00:54:10,640 Speaker 3: let's face it, that's ridiculous. So Trump rides, I'm not 1004 00:54:10,760 --> 00:54:11,920 Speaker 3: getting things done. 1005 00:54:12,080 --> 00:54:16,560 Speaker 1: Okay, thank you so much, professor. This was so interesting, 1006 00:54:16,719 --> 00:54:18,680 Speaker 1: and so I hope you will come back. 1007 00:54:19,080 --> 00:54:21,440 Speaker 3: Sure, let's make sure we don't feel one of the 1008 00:54:21,480 --> 00:54:23,800 Speaker 3: cases that the college educating are following. 1009 00:54:26,480 --> 00:54:27,440 Speaker 2: No Mo. 1010 00:54:30,040 --> 00:54:34,239 Speaker 1: Jesse Cannon, Maley, Jong Fast. You know what violence I love. 1011 00:54:34,280 --> 00:54:38,200 Speaker 3: There's only one type, Crazy Texas Republican on crazy Texas 1012 00:54:38,200 --> 00:54:40,520 Speaker 3: Republican violence the best. 1013 00:54:40,760 --> 00:54:45,160 Speaker 1: It's worth remembering that as much as Democrats and Republicans 1014 00:54:45,280 --> 00:54:50,120 Speaker 1: have iire between each other, this Republican party really really 1015 00:54:50,160 --> 00:54:52,520 Speaker 1: has a lot of ire. So here we go. Ken 1016 00:54:52,600 --> 00:54:59,240 Speaker 1: Paxton ag You will remember they tried to impeach him once. 1017 00:54:59,719 --> 00:55:04,560 Speaker 1: He is trolling John Cornyan, who again this is like 1018 00:55:04,680 --> 00:55:08,480 Speaker 1: Pexton is Maga maga, So he's mad at John Cornyan 1019 00:55:08,760 --> 00:55:13,040 Speaker 1: for voting to send aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. 1020 00:55:13,320 --> 00:55:16,399 Speaker 1: The thinking here is that sending this humanitarian aid, some 1021 00:55:16,480 --> 00:55:20,239 Speaker 1: of this as military aid, will prevent further conflicts, but 1022 00:55:20,280 --> 00:55:24,240 Speaker 1: it doesn't matter because maga Ken Paxton wants to score 1023 00:55:24,280 --> 00:55:27,200 Speaker 1: the points with the megabase and so he is now 1024 00:55:27,280 --> 00:55:30,480 Speaker 1: declared war on John Cornan. There are no winners here, 1025 00:55:30,600 --> 00:55:35,200 Speaker 1: only losers. That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. 1026 00:55:35,560 --> 00:55:38,480 Speaker 1: Tune in every Monday, Wednesday and Friday to hear the 1027 00:55:38,520 --> 00:55:41,960 Speaker 1: best minds in politics makes sense of all this chaos. 1028 00:55:42,200 --> 00:55:44,759 Speaker 1: If you enjoyed what you've heard, please send it to 1029 00:55:44,800 --> 00:55:48,160 Speaker 1: a friend and keep the conversation going. And again, thanks 1030 00:55:48,239 --> 00:55:48,840 Speaker 1: for listening.