WEBVTT - Everything is On the Ballot

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to Will Kate f Daily

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>with Meet your Girl Daniel Moody pre recording from the

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Home Bunker, Folks. In today's conversation, I bring on one

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of my faves and longtime analysts that we go to

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>every time there is a legal web to unravel, and

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that is Glenn Kirshner. And in today's conversation, Glenn and

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I look at what happened in twenty twenty three as

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>it pertains to ninety one charges for indictments across multiple

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions for Donald Trump. We talk about, you know, the

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>latest news around Rudy Giuliani being forced to pay nearly

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty million dollars to the two the

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>mother and daughter, Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss that he

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>defamed and whose lives he destroyed. We talk about what

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we think this unelected body, the black robes of the

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court will do now that Jack Smith has kicked

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>up a question to them, which is can former presidents

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be prosecuted or are they above the law? And Glenn

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gives us his thoughts about whether or not he thinks

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of democracy.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Or not, but what this setup is going to look

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like for us in twenty twenty four, Make no mistake, folks,

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>everything is on the fucking line. And I keep trying

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to get people to see that, to understand that, to

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>wrap their minds around it, because we don't get another

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>bite at this apple. Donald Trump gets in and he

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is telling you he's going to be a dictator. On

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>day one. His a sycophants are telling you that they

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>want people burned at the steak who are dissenters, that

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they're coming for everyone and everything, and they will bankrupt

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this society in order to seek their revenge. And no one,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>no one will be fucking safe. And so I think

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's really important for us not to be placing

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our bets on the fact that these legal

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>cases will transpire and somehow Donald Trump will find himself

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in a jumpsuit before he finds himself back in the

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office. The decision on whether or not he makes

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it back inside the Oval Office is going to depend

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on all of us deciding that we are choosing democracy,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>not a person, not between Biden and Trump, but between

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>our freedom and our annihilation as a country of laws

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that conversation with our friend Glenn Kirshner is coming up next, Folks.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I am so excited to welcome back to WOKF Daily

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>our friend, the host of Justice Matters MSNBC legal analyst

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Kirshner, to kind of round out twenty twenty three

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for us and shape the crystal ball and look into

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty fourd's legal news. Glenn, I don't know that

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>when you went to law school, when you were even

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a federal prosecutor, if you would imagine that your degree

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would be as worked at as it has been in

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. I mean, the legal news. Your neck

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>looks good, but I'm assuming that your head has been

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on a swivel for twelve plus months. Just give us

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like an overview and your impression of the legal drama

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that is played out in so many ways around Donald

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump in this country and what has like stood out

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for you.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Danielle, after retiring, I did thirty years as a

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>federal prosecutor. I never thought my retirement would involve discussing

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>what we're going to do about a presidential candidate who

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>is the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, declaring that

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>he will be a dictator on day one. That was

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>not on my bingo card. So where we are at

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the moment, let me not bury the lead. I think

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four is do or die for democracy, plain

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and simple. In other times that would sound like hyperbolic nonsense.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's due or die time for democracy. So

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>on the legal front, you know, we can look back

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 2>at twenty twenty three as the year of becoming accountability,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>because accountability is not here. But you know, it ain't

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>nothing that We've got this big orange mob boss, right,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>the biggest orange criminal blowfish in the ocean, indicted in

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>four felony cases too federal and to state. That's a

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>really good start. That is at least getting after Donald

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump for some of the crimes he committed against we

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the people, the people of New York, the people of Georgia.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the ending is as of yet unwritten.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>We don't know where things are gonna go. We don't

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>know if he's actually gonna be held accountable. I mean,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 2>there is potentially a Supreme Court hurdle that we the

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>people will have to overcome if we're gonna hold Donald

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump accountable for his crimes. There are jury trials. Jurors

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>will have to sit in that wooden box as the

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>conscience of the community, and here the mountainous evidence of

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump's guilt, and they will have to conclude beyond

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable doubt that he committed those crimes and find

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 2>him guilty. So, you know, we are far from home.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>But I do think twenty twenty three was the year

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of becoming accountability and twenty twenty four is do or

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>die time. So you know where we are at the moment.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>We are kind of in this holding pattern because we

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>know that. You know, let's focus on the case with

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 2>the most imminent trial date, the DC four count indictment

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>for Donald Trump trying to overturn the results of the

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>presidential election being presided over by Judge Tanya Chutkin, and

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>there's a March fourth trial date. Now, that trial date

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>may or may not hold because there are there's what

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I call a legal belt d suspenders approach going on

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>to the issue of whether Donald Trump can ever be

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>prosecuted for his crimes. The reason I say it's belt

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and suspenders the issue of whether a president is absolutely

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>immune against prosecution for all the crimes he commits while

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 2>in office. That issue is sitting right now in the

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 2>DC Federal Circuit Court of Appeals because Donald Trump appealed

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Judge Chutkin's ruling that Trump ain't king and he can

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>be prosecuted, and it is also sitting at the Supreme

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Court sort of. And here's why I say sort of.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Jack Smith did two things. Once Judge Chuckkins ruled that

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Trump can be prosecuted and Trump appealed, he filed emotion

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>for an expedited appeal with the DC Federal Circuit Court

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 2>of Appeals, and they instantly granted it. And that thing

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>is on a very fast track. All briefs on that

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>issue are due January second, and I can only imagine

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have an oral argument on January third,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 2>or very soon after all of the briefs are in.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>It may take a few days or a week or two,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>but it will be quick. Simultaneously, Jack Smith asked the

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court to take up the issue immediately to leap

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>frog over the appellate court. These two things aren't inconsistent

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>because Jack Smith doesn't know which court might exercise jurisdiction,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>so he's going with the Belton suspenders just to get

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>this issue resolved quickly, So you know, we have to

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>sit here and wonder and gameplay about whether the Supreme

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Court will grab hold of this case or whether they

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>will wait for it to run its usual course, albeit

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>on an expedited tract, through the Appellate Court in DC,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and then grab hold of the case.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>This was great explanation. And I have some follow up,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which is this this Supreme Court, I mean, my god,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough terrible things about the grifting of

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Thomas, the just I mean abhorrent behavior in the

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>overturning of precedent. This Supreme Court will probably go down

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if we still have history books, as one of the worst.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Three of them were appointed by Donald Trump. Gorsic Kavanaugh

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>can So I'm looking at this and I'm saying to

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>my Barrett, excuse me. And I'm looking at this and

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, do we already know, Glenn, how this is

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going to play out? What are your beliefs and your

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hopes that we have justices who are appointed by Trump

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>who are going to actually rule as if they were

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>regular justices that were listening to cases.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have very little confidence in the Supreme Court.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>As you say, not only have they been grifting, but

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>they have enjoyed their status of being above the law.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>They have enjoyed operating under no mandatory rules of ethics.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>When Congress begged and pleaded and the American people begged

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>and pleaded with them to please promulgate a code of

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>ethics that applies to Supreme Court justices, what they gave

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>us was a pamphlet of suggestions. It says the Supreme

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Court justices shouldn't act unethically, but they can. They can

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>because the Code of conducts doesn't say they shall not

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>act unethically, just says they shouldn't. These are suggestions, right,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and there's no enforcement mechanism, and there's no punishment if

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>they act unethically. One thing I'm confident in is that

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court loves being above the law, which is

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 2>ironic because they're actually the last stop for a government

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>institution to interpret the law and the constitution. But they

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>consistently put themselves above the law. Here is why I

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>am completely confident they will rule that a president can

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>be prosecuted. A president is not a king. They can

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>rule that way for one of two reasons, the right reason,

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 2>for the wrong reason. The right reason that there is

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>absolutely not one shred of support. There are three sources

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 2>of law, statutes, case law that's precedent from an appellate court,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 2>and the Constitution. There is not one shred of support

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>in any of those three sources of law that a

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>president can't be prosecuted for his crimes. So they can

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>get it right for the right reason. I will drop

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>as a footnote that Kavanaugh wrote a paper twenty five

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago saying a president can be prosecuted once he

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>leaves office. Not that consistency is a thing for these justices.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 2>We saw it in the Roe v. Wade arena when

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>they promised us in their confirmation hearings that Roe had

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>nothing to worry about from them, and then they overturned it.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>So consistency is not really their strong suit. But they

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>can do it for the right reason, or they can

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>do it for the wrong reason. The wrong reason is

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>if they rule that a president is king above the law,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>can commit all the crimes he wants in office and

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>can never be touched for them, then that will be

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 2>putting the Supreme Court out of business. Because Donald Trump,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>aspiring dictator that he is, will come in he can

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>literally order the Supreme Court justices summarily confined without charges.

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>That would be a crime, but he can't be prosecuted

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 2>for it. And if you tell Donald Trump he can

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>do whatever he wants without the risk of prosecution, we

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>know what Donald Trump will do. So because they love

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>their supreme status, because they don't want to put a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>dictator in the oval office and announce he's above the

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>law and can cut the legs out from under the

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, they will do for the wrong reason self preservation. Right.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 2>They may say, oh, oh, he's not king. He can't

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>invite us all out onto Fifth Avenue and shoot us.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>He can't do it. Right, So, one way or another,

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>for the right reason or the wrong reason, they're going

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to rule, in my opinion, that a president can be

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>prosecuted for his crimes.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's say right or wrong reason. They rule

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that they should, which is to say that

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 1>no president is above the law, even though they themselves

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are the unelected black cloaks. What happens then with this

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith case. We're looking at the documents case, we're

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at the insurrection case. Let's look at his two

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>cases before we go down south.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 2>So what happens is the Supreme Court can decide this

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 2>issue quickly or slowly. If they decided quickly, we should

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 2>be in jury selection beginning on March fourth in Washington,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>DC for Dom Trump's election busting crimes democracy busting crimes.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 2>That is entirely up to the whim of the Supreme

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Court justices whether they want to act quickly or slowly.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I still don't think. You know, listen, if they wanted

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 2>to install Donald Trump back into the White House, give

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>him the reins of power again, they could have done

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>it in the election challenge cases, you know, a couple

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of years ago, and they didn't because they don't want

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a dictator in the Oval office because that puts them

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>out of business. So, but we don't know how quickly

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>they will resolve it. I think they'll do it quickly

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>because I actually think they want to be rid of

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump. I really do. They want to get back

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>to a good, old, reliable Republican president that they're hoping

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>for so they can keep the grift and the money

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>flowing into their coffers without having a code of ethics

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that they're bound by. What does it do to the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>judge canon case? That's an interesting question. Let's assume Supreme

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Court acts quickly. They ruled it a president isn't king.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Before I finish the thought, you know, if they rule

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>that a president is king, Joe Biden doesn't have to

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>leave the presidency.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is what I You know, I was gonna

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wait right, and I was just like. And also the

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bullshit impeachment inquiry that they opened in the House, which

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know what the basis for that is,

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't told anybody that Republicans have done in

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the House is null and void because then a president

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is above the law, which is what it is that

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you've wanted all along. So it actually does not work

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in their favor. But I don't know if they think

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>five steps ahead when it comes to Donald Trump.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>No, if Trump gets to commit crimes with impunity while

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in office, so does Joe Biden and every other president. Now,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I think we all have a sense that Joe Biden

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't but he would be given permission by the Supreme

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Court to do it. So correct, there's a philosophical question

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 2>there that I even I hesitate to articulate. I mean,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>if you know you're going to have a benevolent dictator

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>or an evil dictator, and you have to pick a

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>dictator because they're all above the law in the Supreme

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Court's opinion, who do you pick? Okay, philosophical discussion for

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>another day. So, but here's what is interesting about the documents,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>and I don't I never just call it a documents case.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>In Florida, the Judge Cannon is presiding over because it's

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>a document substruction of justice, espionage case. Those are the

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>charges against him. Because that has a May twentieth trial date.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>If the DC trial starts on March fourth, it's going

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to go for probably six weeks, maybe a little longer,

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and it will bump right up very close to the

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 2>May twenty trial date in Florida. Under those circumstances, I

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>have every reason to believe the May twenty trial date

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>will be vacated and will be pushed down the road.

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Danielle, on March first, three days before the

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>trial in DC is scheduled to kick off, Judge Cannon

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>has invited everybody down, prosecutors and the defense attorneys, for

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>what's called the scheduling conference. What that means is if

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>on March fourth, when they're all down in that courtroom

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>in Florida. They know that three days later the trial

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>in DC will begin. At that point, I can all

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>but promise Judge Cannon will vacate, that is, cancel the

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>May twenty trial date in Florida, and they'll be picking

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a new date well down the road. Because it actually

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 2>is unfair in my experience, to make a defense team

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 2>spend two months in trial in the highest profile case

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 2>in our nation's history, only to immediately go into another

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>lengthy trial that is also one of the highest profile

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 2>prosecutions in our nation's history. People do need to breather,

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>they need time to prepare. I get all that, so

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're going to see these trials go

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>back to back.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also like, I don't care, don't work for

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a criminal. Let's put a pin in Jacksmith. Now that

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we have some kind of murky understanding of where things

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could go, it looks like arch depending all on the

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Supremes and what it is that they decide to do

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with the question of can a president be above the law?

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think to all of the points that you made,

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that the decision is going to come to

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>self preservation. I do not think that they are going

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to rule because you know, they care one way or

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the other about the country or dictatorship. They care about

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it so much as they care about their own skin.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's in one space. I want to move now

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to the ruling that we all saw out of Georgia

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>with regard to Juliani. And so Rudy Giuliani was found

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely and we knew this libel for the character destruction

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that he did on Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman. This

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>decision that came out of the Georgia courts was about

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>how much money he would need to pay to make amends,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and it has come out Glenn too close to one

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollars. Now we know there's going

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to be appeal, appeal, appeal, appeal. How does this decision

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>land with you? And how do you think that it

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>plays into the other case that Rudy Giuliani is a

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>part of, which is the larger Rico case that that

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we have Fannie Willis has in Georgia playing out.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, it lands pretty well with me in theory.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I think one hundred and fifty million dollars in both

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>compensatory damages for the harm he did to Shay Moths

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 2>and Ruby Freeman, and seventy five million of that is

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>impunitive damages to punish him, to send the message anybody

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>else looking to lie about, defame and call all sorts

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of racist names and endanger the lives of our election workers,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you can expect the same fate. Rudy Giuliani will die penniless.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Now he may die penniless trying to hide whatever assets

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 2>he can try to hide. But there are lots of

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>vehicles in the law. Listen, what we always say is

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>half the battle is winning a money award like this

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>a civil judgment. The other half is collecting it, Okay,

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 2>but there are also you can attach property, you can

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>put leans on homes, you can garnish wages, you can

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>do all sorts of stuff to get after Rudy Giuliani's money.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think the signal it sends. And I was

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>sitting in the courtroom in DC watching some of the

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 2>closing arguments, watching Rudy Giuliani sit there, not fifteen feet

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>away from the women he lied about defamed. Who's lie

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>he put in danger people saying sending messages. This is

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>right after he launched his lies about them. Saying we

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>want to see you hanging from a tree in your

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>front yard, and we want to be so close, we

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 2>want to hear your next snap. And the horrific circumstances

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that Shay's fourteen year old son had to go through.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, there are no words for how

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 2>disgusting this is. Ye, So I think it sends a

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>message you're looking to mess with our election workers, the

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>good people who are working the polls, trying to promote

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 2>free and fair elections. Yeah, you got real trouble coming

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>your way. And I look at this in conjunction with

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>the fact that three states have now criminally charged fake electors.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, so and Wisconsin brought a suit and successfully

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 2>sued the fake electors. So accountability is spreading, and the

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>message should be spreading that you want to play this way. Oh,

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>you're going to pay. You're going to pay, even if

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it takes a long time, You're gonna pay. Hopefully that

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 2>deter that message of deterrence, both civilly and criminally is spreading.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, as we close out and you we

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are now looking at twenty twenty four, we have four

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>cases ninety one charges an election coming up. Caucuses all

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things are happening at the same time. Glenn,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking you to take it out and dust it

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>off your crystal ball. Do these trials impact the election?

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Will any one of them be decided by October, you know,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>November twenty twenty four.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I think the answer is yes. They at least one

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of the criminal cases will come to fruition with a

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>verdict and a sentencing before November twenty twenty four. I

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>think the most likely candidate is the DC trials, scheduled

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to begin on March four. Really, we are at the

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>whim of the timing of the Supreme Court resolving this

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>absolute immunity claim. But even if they take a month

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>or two to decide it and that pushes the trial

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 2>day till let's say June, it can still be tried

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and resolved well in advance of the November election. So

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm guardedly optimistic that we will get a jury verdict,

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 2>a guilty verdict, a sentence to incarceration. I also happen

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to believe Judge chuck In will order him remanded to

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I don't think she will

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>leave him on release pending appeal, because that is not

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the norm. When somebody is convicted of crimes, and these

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>are democracy busting crimes, they are to report to prison,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 2>begins serving their term, and then they can take as

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 2>long as they want to appeal conviction. So I think

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the cases will at least come to fruition.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Will it impact the elections, that's anybody's guests, because sadly,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you can be a convicted felon and run for president.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 2>You can be an imprisoned felon and run for and

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>be elected to the presidency, which is probably something we

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>ought to try to take up and the future, but

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that is the reality. So will it hurt Trump's numbers

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 2>enough to finally get him out of the game of

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 2>trying to kill our democracy? That I don't know. I

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>forever am believing that at some point the Republican Party

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>will stop slicing themselves up with a thousand cuts by

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>continuing to support him, because they're going to do the

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 2>party in if they continue down that road. It feels

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>like the Republican Party is circling the drain as we

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>speak now. At some point, don't you have to turn

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>away from a convicted, imprisoned felon who's serving life. I

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 2>would think so if you care about preserving and rebuilding

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>your political party. But what do I know?

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I know, and that is just the sickest thing that

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I have heard that you know, I don't

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>see them turning away. I see them turning Donald Trump

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>into a political prisoner and a martyr, and you know,

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and the fame and the legend of him growing even

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>more so. It's you know, we will see and time

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>will tell. And I hope Glenn, that you will be

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>checking in with us throughout the year because the news

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to keep coming and so are the hits, unfortunately,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but we always appreciate you your time and your analysis.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>It's great being with you. Danielle. In twenty twenty four

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>is do or die for democracy, and I think we

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>should all do.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent. That is it for me today.

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Dear friends, on woke a f as always, Power to

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the people and to all the people. Power, get woke

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and stay woke as fuck.