1 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: Good morning, peeps, and welcome to Will Kate f Daily 2 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: with Meet your Girl Daniel Moody pre recording from the 3 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 1: Home Bunker, Folks. In today's conversation, I bring on one 4 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: of my faves and longtime analysts that we go to 5 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:32,960 Speaker 1: every time there is a legal web to unravel, and 6 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 1: that is Glenn Kirshner. And in today's conversation, Glenn and 7 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:42,239 Speaker 1: I look at what happened in twenty twenty three as 8 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:46,559 Speaker 1: it pertains to ninety one charges for indictments across multiple 9 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:50,879 Speaker 1: jurisdictions for Donald Trump. We talk about, you know, the 10 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:56,760 Speaker 1: latest news around Rudy Giuliani being forced to pay nearly 11 00:00:56,760 --> 00:01:00,440 Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty million dollars to the two the 12 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:03,640 Speaker 1: mother and daughter, Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss that he 13 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:08,960 Speaker 1: defamed and whose lives he destroyed. We talk about what 14 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,080 Speaker 1: we think this unelected body, the black robes of the 15 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 1: Supreme Court will do now that Jack Smith has kicked 16 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:21,240 Speaker 1: up a question to them, which is can former presidents 17 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:26,680 Speaker 1: be prosecuted or are they above the law? And Glenn 18 00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 1: gives us his thoughts about whether or not he thinks 19 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:33,880 Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of democracy. 20 00:01:34,280 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: Or not, but what this setup is going to look 21 00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 1: like for us in twenty twenty four, Make no mistake, folks, 22 00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 1: everything is on the fucking line. And I keep trying 23 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:49,080 Speaker 1: to get people to see that, to understand that, to 24 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:51,919 Speaker 1: wrap their minds around it, because we don't get another 25 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 1: bite at this apple. Donald Trump gets in and he 26 00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 1: is telling you he's going to be a dictator. On 27 00:01:56,840 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 1: day one. His a sycophants are telling you that they 28 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:03,560 Speaker 1: want people burned at the steak who are dissenters, that 29 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 1: they're coming for everyone and everything, and they will bankrupt 30 00:02:08,520 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 1: this society in order to seek their revenge. And no one, 31 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,639 Speaker 1: no one will be fucking safe. And so I think 32 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,360 Speaker 1: that it's really important for us not to be placing 33 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,320 Speaker 1: all of our bets on the fact that these legal 34 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: cases will transpire and somehow Donald Trump will find himself 35 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 1: in a jumpsuit before he finds himself back in the 36 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 1: Oval Office. The decision on whether or not he makes 37 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: it back inside the Oval Office is going to depend 38 00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: on all of us deciding that we are choosing democracy, 39 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 1: not a person, not between Biden and Trump, but between 40 00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:49,000 Speaker 1: our freedom and our annihilation as a country of laws 41 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 1: that conversation with our friend Glenn Kirshner is coming up next, Folks. 42 00:02:58,520 --> 00:03:02,359 Speaker 1: I am so excited to welcome back to WOKF Daily 43 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:06,800 Speaker 1: our friend, the host of Justice Matters MSNBC legal analyst 44 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 1: Glenn Kirshner, to kind of round out twenty twenty three 45 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 1: for us and shape the crystal ball and look into 46 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:19,080 Speaker 1: twenty twenty fourd's legal news. Glenn, I don't know that 47 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,639 Speaker 1: when you went to law school, when you were even 48 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:26,080 Speaker 1: a federal prosecutor, if you would imagine that your degree 49 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: would be as worked at as it has been in 50 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:34,359 Speaker 1: twenty twenty three. I mean, the legal news. Your neck 51 00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 1: looks good, but I'm assuming that your head has been 52 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 1: on a swivel for twelve plus months. Just give us 53 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: like an overview and your impression of the legal drama 54 00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: that is played out in so many ways around Donald 55 00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 1: Trump in this country and what has like stood out 56 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: for you. 57 00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:00,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, Danielle, after retiring, I did thirty years as a 58 00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:05,880 Speaker 2: federal prosecutor. I never thought my retirement would involve discussing 59 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:11,000 Speaker 2: what we're going to do about a presidential candidate who 60 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 2: is the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, declaring that 61 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:19,440 Speaker 2: he will be a dictator on day one. That was 62 00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 2: not on my bingo card. So where we are at 63 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:26,320 Speaker 2: the moment, let me not bury the lead. I think 64 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:31,280 Speaker 2: twenty twenty four is do or die for democracy, plain 65 00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:36,280 Speaker 2: and simple. In other times that would sound like hyperbolic nonsense. 66 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:40,880 Speaker 2: I think it's due or die time for democracy. So 67 00:04:41,160 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 2: on the legal front, you know, we can look back 68 00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:50,279 Speaker 2: at twenty twenty three as the year of becoming accountability, 69 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:53,680 Speaker 2: because accountability is not here. But you know, it ain't 70 00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:59,039 Speaker 2: nothing that We've got this big orange mob boss, right, 71 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:04,599 Speaker 2: the biggest orange criminal blowfish in the ocean, indicted in 72 00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:09,880 Speaker 2: four felony cases too federal and to state. That's a 73 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:14,400 Speaker 2: really good start. That is at least getting after Donald 74 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 2: Trump for some of the crimes he committed against we 75 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 2: the people, the people of New York, the people of Georgia. 76 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 2: But you know, the ending is as of yet unwritten. 77 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:29,880 Speaker 2: We don't know where things are gonna go. We don't 78 00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:33,080 Speaker 2: know if he's actually gonna be held accountable. I mean, 79 00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 2: there is potentially a Supreme Court hurdle that we the 80 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:40,760 Speaker 2: people will have to overcome if we're gonna hold Donald 81 00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:45,280 Speaker 2: Trump accountable for his crimes. There are jury trials. Jurors 82 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 2: will have to sit in that wooden box as the 83 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 2: conscience of the community, and here the mountainous evidence of 84 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:55,679 Speaker 2: Donald Trump's guilt, and they will have to conclude beyond 85 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:59,000 Speaker 2: a reasonable doubt that he committed those crimes and find 86 00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,919 Speaker 2: him guilty. So, you know, we are far from home. 87 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:04,440 Speaker 2: But I do think twenty twenty three was the year 88 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 2: of becoming accountability and twenty twenty four is do or 89 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,279 Speaker 2: die time. So you know where we are at the moment. 90 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 2: We are kind of in this holding pattern because we 91 00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 2: know that. You know, let's focus on the case with 92 00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:23,839 Speaker 2: the most imminent trial date, the DC four count indictment 93 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 2: for Donald Trump trying to overturn the results of the 94 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 2: presidential election being presided over by Judge Tanya Chutkin, and 95 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:36,159 Speaker 2: there's a March fourth trial date. Now, that trial date 96 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:40,039 Speaker 2: may or may not hold because there are there's what 97 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 2: I call a legal belt d suspenders approach going on 98 00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 2: to the issue of whether Donald Trump can ever be 99 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 2: prosecuted for his crimes. The reason I say it's belt 100 00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:54,400 Speaker 2: and suspenders the issue of whether a president is absolutely 101 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:58,000 Speaker 2: immune against prosecution for all the crimes he commits while 102 00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:02,279 Speaker 2: in office. That issue is sitting right now in the 103 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 2: DC Federal Circuit Court of Appeals because Donald Trump appealed 104 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 2: Judge Chutkin's ruling that Trump ain't king and he can 105 00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 2: be prosecuted, and it is also sitting at the Supreme 106 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 2: Court sort of. And here's why I say sort of. 107 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:22,600 Speaker 2: Jack Smith did two things. Once Judge Chuckkins ruled that 108 00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 2: Trump can be prosecuted and Trump appealed, he filed emotion 109 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 2: for an expedited appeal with the DC Federal Circuit Court 110 00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 2: of Appeals, and they instantly granted it. And that thing 111 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 2: is on a very fast track. All briefs on that 112 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:42,280 Speaker 2: issue are due January second, and I can only imagine 113 00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:45,400 Speaker 2: we're going to have an oral argument on January third, 114 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:48,600 Speaker 2: or very soon after all of the briefs are in. 115 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:50,680 Speaker 2: It may take a few days or a week or two, 116 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 2: but it will be quick. Simultaneously, Jack Smith asked the 117 00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 2: Supreme Court to take up the issue immediately to leap 118 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:03,640 Speaker 2: frog over the appellate court. These two things aren't inconsistent 119 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:08,000 Speaker 2: because Jack Smith doesn't know which court might exercise jurisdiction, 120 00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 2: so he's going with the Belton suspenders just to get 121 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:15,440 Speaker 2: this issue resolved quickly, So you know, we have to 122 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:19,680 Speaker 2: sit here and wonder and gameplay about whether the Supreme 123 00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 2: Court will grab hold of this case or whether they 124 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 2: will wait for it to run its usual course, albeit 125 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 2: on an expedited tract, through the Appellate Court in DC, 126 00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 2: and then grab hold of the case. 127 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:41,960 Speaker 1: This was great explanation. And I have some follow up, 128 00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:46,600 Speaker 1: which is this this Supreme Court, I mean, my god, 129 00:08:46,679 --> 00:08:52,080 Speaker 1: I can't say enough terrible things about the grifting of 130 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas, the just I mean abhorrent behavior in the 131 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:03,439 Speaker 1: overturning of precedent. This Supreme Court will probably go down 132 00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 1: if we still have history books, as one of the worst. 133 00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:15,400 Speaker 1: Three of them were appointed by Donald Trump. Gorsic Kavanaugh 134 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 1: can So I'm looking at this and I'm saying to 135 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:23,160 Speaker 1: my Barrett, excuse me. And I'm looking at this and 136 00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: I'm saying, do we already know, Glenn, how this is 137 00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:31,120 Speaker 1: going to play out? What are your beliefs and your 138 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:37,280 Speaker 1: hopes that we have justices who are appointed by Trump 139 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:43,240 Speaker 1: who are going to actually rule as if they were 140 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:47,040 Speaker 1: regular justices that were listening to cases. 141 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 2: You know, I have very little confidence in the Supreme Court. 142 00:09:50,559 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 2: As you say, not only have they been grifting, but 143 00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:56,680 Speaker 2: they have enjoyed their status of being above the law. 144 00:09:56,800 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 2: They have enjoyed operating under no mandatory rules of ethics. 145 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:06,360 Speaker 2: When Congress begged and pleaded and the American people begged 146 00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 2: and pleaded with them to please promulgate a code of 147 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 2: ethics that applies to Supreme Court justices, what they gave 148 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:19,040 Speaker 2: us was a pamphlet of suggestions. It says the Supreme 149 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:25,080 Speaker 2: Court justices shouldn't act unethically, but they can. They can 150 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 2: because the Code of conducts doesn't say they shall not 151 00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:34,240 Speaker 2: act unethically, just says they shouldn't. These are suggestions, right, 152 00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:38,200 Speaker 2: and there's no enforcement mechanism, and there's no punishment if 153 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:41,720 Speaker 2: they act unethically. One thing I'm confident in is that 154 00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:45,400 Speaker 2: the Supreme Court loves being above the law, which is 155 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:49,679 Speaker 2: ironic because they're actually the last stop for a government 156 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:53,280 Speaker 2: institution to interpret the law and the constitution. But they 157 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 2: consistently put themselves above the law. Here is why I 158 00:10:57,559 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 2: am completely confident they will rule that a president can 159 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 2: be prosecuted. A president is not a king. They can 160 00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:09,520 Speaker 2: rule that way for one of two reasons, the right reason, 161 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:13,560 Speaker 2: for the wrong reason. The right reason that there is 162 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 2: absolutely not one shred of support. There are three sources 163 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:23,959 Speaker 2: of law, statutes, case law that's precedent from an appellate court, 164 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:28,439 Speaker 2: and the Constitution. There is not one shred of support 165 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 2: in any of those three sources of law that a 166 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:35,880 Speaker 2: president can't be prosecuted for his crimes. So they can 167 00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:38,360 Speaker 2: get it right for the right reason. I will drop 168 00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:41,400 Speaker 2: as a footnote that Kavanaugh wrote a paper twenty five 169 00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:44,320 Speaker 2: years ago saying a president can be prosecuted once he 170 00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 2: leaves office. Not that consistency is a thing for these justices. 171 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,200 Speaker 2: We saw it in the Roe v. Wade arena when 172 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:55,240 Speaker 2: they promised us in their confirmation hearings that Roe had 173 00:11:55,280 --> 00:11:59,040 Speaker 2: nothing to worry about from them, and then they overturned it. 174 00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:02,360 Speaker 2: So consistency is not really their strong suit. But they 175 00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:04,520 Speaker 2: can do it for the right reason, or they can 176 00:12:04,559 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 2: do it for the wrong reason. The wrong reason is 177 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:12,680 Speaker 2: if they rule that a president is king above the law, 178 00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:15,080 Speaker 2: can commit all the crimes he wants in office and 179 00:12:15,160 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 2: can never be touched for them, then that will be 180 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:21,959 Speaker 2: putting the Supreme Court out of business. Because Donald Trump, 181 00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:26,920 Speaker 2: aspiring dictator that he is, will come in he can 182 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:32,520 Speaker 2: literally order the Supreme Court justices summarily confined without charges. 183 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:35,360 Speaker 2: That would be a crime, but he can't be prosecuted 184 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:37,319 Speaker 2: for it. And if you tell Donald Trump he can 185 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 2: do whatever he wants without the risk of prosecution, we 186 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 2: know what Donald Trump will do. So because they love 187 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:47,720 Speaker 2: their supreme status, because they don't want to put a 188 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,600 Speaker 2: dictator in the oval office and announce he's above the 189 00:12:50,679 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 2: law and can cut the legs out from under the 190 00:12:53,679 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 2: Supreme Court, they will do for the wrong reason self preservation. Right. 191 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:01,679 Speaker 2: They may say, oh, oh, he's not king. He can't 192 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,080 Speaker 2: invite us all out onto Fifth Avenue and shoot us. 193 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 2: He can't do it. Right, So, one way or another, 194 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:09,520 Speaker 2: for the right reason or the wrong reason, they're going 195 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,960 Speaker 2: to rule, in my opinion, that a president can be 196 00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:14,720 Speaker 2: prosecuted for his crimes. 197 00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: Okay, so let's say right or wrong reason. They rule 198 00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:23,400 Speaker 1: the way that they should, which is to say that 199 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:26,359 Speaker 1: no president is above the law, even though they themselves 200 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 1: are the unelected black cloaks. What happens then with this 201 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:39,040 Speaker 1: Jack Smith case. We're looking at the documents case, we're 202 00:13:39,080 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 1: looking at the insurrection case. Let's look at his two 203 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:45,800 Speaker 1: cases before we go down south. 204 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:49,839 Speaker 2: So what happens is the Supreme Court can decide this 205 00:13:49,960 --> 00:13:54,959 Speaker 2: issue quickly or slowly. If they decided quickly, we should 206 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,199 Speaker 2: be in jury selection beginning on March fourth in Washington, 207 00:13:58,280 --> 00:14:04,600 Speaker 2: DC for Dom Trump's election busting crimes democracy busting crimes. 208 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:08,199 Speaker 2: That is entirely up to the whim of the Supreme 209 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:11,720 Speaker 2: Court justices whether they want to act quickly or slowly. 210 00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:14,560 Speaker 2: I still don't think. You know, listen, if they wanted 211 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:17,959 Speaker 2: to install Donald Trump back into the White House, give 212 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:20,320 Speaker 2: him the reins of power again, they could have done 213 00:14:20,360 --> 00:14:23,160 Speaker 2: it in the election challenge cases, you know, a couple 214 00:14:23,200 --> 00:14:26,200 Speaker 2: of years ago, and they didn't because they don't want 215 00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:29,360 Speaker 2: a dictator in the Oval office because that puts them 216 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:32,040 Speaker 2: out of business. So, but we don't know how quickly 217 00:14:32,080 --> 00:14:34,480 Speaker 2: they will resolve it. I think they'll do it quickly 218 00:14:34,640 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 2: because I actually think they want to be rid of 219 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:38,920 Speaker 2: Donald Trump. I really do. They want to get back 220 00:14:38,960 --> 00:14:43,280 Speaker 2: to a good, old, reliable Republican president that they're hoping 221 00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 2: for so they can keep the grift and the money 222 00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:49,480 Speaker 2: flowing into their coffers without having a code of ethics 223 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 2: that they're bound by. What does it do to the 224 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:57,760 Speaker 2: judge canon case? That's an interesting question. Let's assume Supreme 225 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 2: Court acts quickly. They ruled it a president isn't king. 226 00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 2: Before I finish the thought, you know, if they rule 227 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:04,680 Speaker 2: that a president is king, Joe Biden doesn't have to 228 00:15:04,760 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 2: leave the presidency. 229 00:15:06,680 --> 00:15:09,160 Speaker 1: So this is what I You know, I was gonna 230 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 1: wait right, and I was just like. And also the 231 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:16,840 Speaker 1: bullshit impeachment inquiry that they opened in the House, which 232 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:18,920 Speaker 1: we still don't know what the basis for that is, 233 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: because they haven't told anybody that Republicans have done in 234 00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 1: the House is null and void because then a president 235 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:26,960 Speaker 1: is above the law, which is what it is that 236 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 1: you've wanted all along. So it actually does not work 237 00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 1: in their favor. But I don't know if they think 238 00:15:33,640 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: five steps ahead when it comes to Donald Trump. 239 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:38,520 Speaker 2: No, if Trump gets to commit crimes with impunity while 240 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:40,920 Speaker 2: in office, so does Joe Biden and every other president. Now, 241 00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:42,800 Speaker 2: I think we all have a sense that Joe Biden 242 00:15:42,880 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 2: wouldn't but he would be given permission by the Supreme 243 00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 2: Court to do it. So correct, there's a philosophical question 244 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:52,720 Speaker 2: there that I even I hesitate to articulate. I mean, 245 00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 2: if you know you're going to have a benevolent dictator 246 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:56,640 Speaker 2: or an evil dictator, and you have to pick a 247 00:15:56,680 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 2: dictator because they're all above the law in the Supreme 248 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:02,880 Speaker 2: Court's opinion, who do you pick? Okay, philosophical discussion for 249 00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:07,840 Speaker 2: another day. So, but here's what is interesting about the documents, 250 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:10,320 Speaker 2: and I don't I never just call it a documents case. 251 00:16:10,320 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 2: In Florida, the Judge Cannon is presiding over because it's 252 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:16,720 Speaker 2: a document substruction of justice, espionage case. Those are the 253 00:16:16,800 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 2: charges against him. Because that has a May twentieth trial date. 254 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:26,040 Speaker 2: If the DC trial starts on March fourth, it's going 255 00:16:26,080 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 2: to go for probably six weeks, maybe a little longer, 256 00:16:29,280 --> 00:16:32,960 Speaker 2: and it will bump right up very close to the 257 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:36,960 Speaker 2: May twenty trial date in Florida. Under those circumstances, I 258 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:39,520 Speaker 2: have every reason to believe the May twenty trial date 259 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 2: will be vacated and will be pushed down the road. 260 00:16:42,280 --> 00:16:46,240 Speaker 2: In fact, Danielle, on March first, three days before the 261 00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:49,520 Speaker 2: trial in DC is scheduled to kick off, Judge Cannon 262 00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:53,400 Speaker 2: has invited everybody down, prosecutors and the defense attorneys, for 263 00:16:53,480 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 2: what's called the scheduling conference. What that means is if 264 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:00,520 Speaker 2: on March fourth, when they're all down in that courtroom 265 00:17:00,520 --> 00:17:04,720 Speaker 2: in Florida. They know that three days later the trial 266 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 2: in DC will begin. At that point, I can all 267 00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:12,000 Speaker 2: but promise Judge Cannon will vacate, that is, cancel the 268 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:16,000 Speaker 2: May twenty trial date in Florida, and they'll be picking 269 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:18,920 Speaker 2: a new date well down the road. Because it actually 270 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:22,600 Speaker 2: is unfair in my experience, to make a defense team 271 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:26,119 Speaker 2: spend two months in trial in the highest profile case 272 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:30,400 Speaker 2: in our nation's history, only to immediately go into another 273 00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 2: lengthy trial that is also one of the highest profile 274 00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:36,680 Speaker 2: prosecutions in our nation's history. People do need to breather, 275 00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,840 Speaker 2: they need time to prepare. I get all that, so 276 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,119 Speaker 2: I don't think you're going to see these trials go 277 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 2: back to back. 278 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:45,560 Speaker 1: And I'm also like, I don't care, don't work for 279 00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 1: a criminal. Let's put a pin in Jacksmith. Now that 280 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:58,200 Speaker 1: we have some kind of murky understanding of where things 281 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:03,200 Speaker 1: could go, it looks like arch depending all on the 282 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:06,160 Speaker 1: Supremes and what it is that they decide to do 283 00:18:07,080 --> 00:18:11,520 Speaker 1: with the question of can a president be above the law? 284 00:18:12,400 --> 00:18:14,840 Speaker 1: And I think to all of the points that you made, 285 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:17,040 Speaker 1: I think that the decision is going to come to 286 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:19,560 Speaker 1: self preservation. I do not think that they are going 287 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 1: to rule because you know, they care one way or 288 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,720 Speaker 1: the other about the country or dictatorship. They care about 289 00:18:26,760 --> 00:18:28,960 Speaker 1: it so much as they care about their own skin. 290 00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 1: So that's in one space. I want to move now 291 00:18:34,160 --> 00:18:38,639 Speaker 1: to the ruling that we all saw out of Georgia 292 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:46,360 Speaker 1: with regard to Juliani. And so Rudy Giuliani was found 293 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:53,480 Speaker 1: absolutely and we knew this libel for the character destruction 294 00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:58,920 Speaker 1: that he did on Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman. This 295 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 1: decision that came out of the Georgia courts was about 296 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:10,440 Speaker 1: how much money he would need to pay to make amends, 297 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:15,120 Speaker 1: and it has come out Glenn too close to one 298 00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:20,760 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty million dollars. Now we know there's going 299 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:25,399 Speaker 1: to be appeal, appeal, appeal, appeal. How does this decision 300 00:19:25,600 --> 00:19:28,399 Speaker 1: land with you? And how do you think that it 301 00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:32,600 Speaker 1: plays into the other case that Rudy Giuliani is a 302 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 1: part of, which is the larger Rico case that that 303 00:19:37,040 --> 00:19:41,000 Speaker 1: we have Fannie Willis has in Georgia playing out. 304 00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:44,399 Speaker 2: You know, it lands pretty well with me in theory. 305 00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 2: I think one hundred and fifty million dollars in both 306 00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 2: compensatory damages for the harm he did to Shay Moths 307 00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:54,639 Speaker 2: and Ruby Freeman, and seventy five million of that is 308 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:59,760 Speaker 2: impunitive damages to punish him, to send the message anybody 309 00:19:59,840 --> 00:20:05,160 Speaker 2: else looking to lie about, defame and call all sorts 310 00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:10,120 Speaker 2: of racist names and endanger the lives of our election workers, 311 00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 2: you can expect the same fate. Rudy Giuliani will die penniless. 312 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:19,440 Speaker 2: Now he may die penniless trying to hide whatever assets 313 00:20:19,440 --> 00:20:21,480 Speaker 2: he can try to hide. But there are lots of 314 00:20:21,560 --> 00:20:24,879 Speaker 2: vehicles in the law. Listen, what we always say is 315 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:27,560 Speaker 2: half the battle is winning a money award like this 316 00:20:27,640 --> 00:20:30,480 Speaker 2: a civil judgment. The other half is collecting it, Okay, 317 00:20:30,880 --> 00:20:34,680 Speaker 2: but there are also you can attach property, you can 318 00:20:34,760 --> 00:20:38,600 Speaker 2: put leans on homes, you can garnish wages, you can 319 00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:42,639 Speaker 2: do all sorts of stuff to get after Rudy Giuliani's money. 320 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:48,480 Speaker 2: But I think the signal it sends. And I was 321 00:20:48,520 --> 00:20:51,000 Speaker 2: sitting in the courtroom in DC watching some of the 322 00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:54,960 Speaker 2: closing arguments, watching Rudy Giuliani sit there, not fifteen feet 323 00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:59,960 Speaker 2: away from the women he lied about defamed. Who's lie 324 00:21:00,560 --> 00:21:04,040 Speaker 2: he put in danger people saying sending messages. This is 325 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:08,760 Speaker 2: right after he launched his lies about them. Saying we 326 00:21:08,800 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 2: want to see you hanging from a tree in your 327 00:21:10,520 --> 00:21:12,159 Speaker 2: front yard, and we want to be so close, we 328 00:21:12,200 --> 00:21:17,440 Speaker 2: want to hear your next snap. And the horrific circumstances 329 00:21:17,480 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 2: that Shay's fourteen year old son had to go through. 330 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:24,040 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, there are no words for how 331 00:21:24,200 --> 00:21:29,439 Speaker 2: disgusting this is. Ye, So I think it sends a 332 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:32,720 Speaker 2: message you're looking to mess with our election workers, the 333 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 2: good people who are working the polls, trying to promote 334 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:38,879 Speaker 2: free and fair elections. Yeah, you got real trouble coming 335 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 2: your way. And I look at this in conjunction with 336 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:45,879 Speaker 2: the fact that three states have now criminally charged fake electors. 337 00:21:46,119 --> 00:21:49,480 Speaker 2: Yeah right, so and Wisconsin brought a suit and successfully 338 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:53,119 Speaker 2: sued the fake electors. So accountability is spreading, and the 339 00:21:53,240 --> 00:21:57,440 Speaker 2: message should be spreading that you want to play this way. Oh, 340 00:21:57,440 --> 00:21:59,280 Speaker 2: you're going to pay. You're going to pay, even if 341 00:21:59,280 --> 00:22:02,360 Speaker 2: it takes a long time, You're gonna pay. Hopefully that 342 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:07,920 Speaker 2: deter that message of deterrence, both civilly and criminally is spreading. 343 00:22:09,520 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 1: So you know, as we close out and you we 344 00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:19,280 Speaker 1: are now looking at twenty twenty four, we have four 345 00:22:19,359 --> 00:22:26,560 Speaker 1: cases ninety one charges an election coming up. Caucuses all 346 00:22:26,600 --> 00:22:30,240 Speaker 1: of these things are happening at the same time. Glenn, 347 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:32,119 Speaker 1: I'm asking you to take it out and dust it 348 00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 1: off your crystal ball. Do these trials impact the election? 349 00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:47,840 Speaker 1: Will any one of them be decided by October, you know, 350 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:50,480 Speaker 1: November twenty twenty four. 351 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:54,440 Speaker 2: I think the answer is yes. They at least one 352 00:22:54,480 --> 00:22:57,000 Speaker 2: of the criminal cases will come to fruition with a 353 00:22:57,080 --> 00:23:04,359 Speaker 2: verdict and a sentencing before November twenty twenty four. I 354 00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 2: think the most likely candidate is the DC trials, scheduled 355 00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 2: to begin on March four. Really, we are at the 356 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,840 Speaker 2: whim of the timing of the Supreme Court resolving this 357 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:18,600 Speaker 2: absolute immunity claim. But even if they take a month 358 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:21,440 Speaker 2: or two to decide it and that pushes the trial 359 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,640 Speaker 2: day till let's say June, it can still be tried 360 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:29,000 Speaker 2: and resolved well in advance of the November election. So 361 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:33,840 Speaker 2: I'm guardedly optimistic that we will get a jury verdict, 362 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:38,639 Speaker 2: a guilty verdict, a sentence to incarceration. I also happen 363 00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:42,320 Speaker 2: to believe Judge chuck In will order him remanded to 364 00:23:42,359 --> 00:23:44,720 Speaker 2: the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I don't think she will 365 00:23:44,760 --> 00:23:48,600 Speaker 2: leave him on release pending appeal, because that is not 366 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:52,000 Speaker 2: the norm. When somebody is convicted of crimes, and these 367 00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:55,960 Speaker 2: are democracy busting crimes, they are to report to prison, 368 00:23:56,040 --> 00:23:58,159 Speaker 2: begins serving their term, and then they can take as 369 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:03,680 Speaker 2: long as they want to appeal conviction. So I think 370 00:24:04,440 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 2: one of the cases will at least come to fruition. 371 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:10,120 Speaker 2: Will it impact the elections, that's anybody's guests, because sadly, 372 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:13,040 Speaker 2: you can be a convicted felon and run for president. 373 00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:17,760 Speaker 2: You can be an imprisoned felon and run for and 374 00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 2: be elected to the presidency, which is probably something we 375 00:24:22,080 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 2: ought to try to take up and the future, but 376 00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:28,120 Speaker 2: that is the reality. So will it hurt Trump's numbers 377 00:24:28,280 --> 00:24:31,199 Speaker 2: enough to finally get him out of the game of 378 00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:34,639 Speaker 2: trying to kill our democracy? That I don't know. I 379 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:38,200 Speaker 2: forever am believing that at some point the Republican Party 380 00:24:38,600 --> 00:24:46,960 Speaker 2: will stop slicing themselves up with a thousand cuts by 381 00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:50,000 Speaker 2: continuing to support him, because they're going to do the 382 00:24:50,040 --> 00:24:53,479 Speaker 2: party in if they continue down that road. It feels 383 00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:56,760 Speaker 2: like the Republican Party is circling the drain as we 384 00:24:56,880 --> 00:24:59,720 Speaker 2: speak now. At some point, don't you have to turn 385 00:24:59,760 --> 00:25:04,600 Speaker 2: away from a convicted, imprisoned felon who's serving life. I 386 00:25:04,640 --> 00:25:08,199 Speaker 2: would think so if you care about preserving and rebuilding 387 00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 2: your political party. But what do I know? 388 00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:15,639 Speaker 1: I know, and that is just the sickest thing that 389 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:21,600 Speaker 1: I think I have heard that you know, I don't 390 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:24,679 Speaker 1: see them turning away. I see them turning Donald Trump 391 00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:28,680 Speaker 1: into a political prisoner and a martyr, and you know, 392 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:33,160 Speaker 1: and the fame and the legend of him growing even 393 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:36,840 Speaker 1: more so. It's you know, we will see and time 394 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:40,439 Speaker 1: will tell. And I hope Glenn, that you will be 395 00:25:40,600 --> 00:25:44,680 Speaker 1: checking in with us throughout the year because the news 396 00:25:44,720 --> 00:25:48,320 Speaker 1: is going to keep coming and so are the hits, unfortunately, 397 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: but we always appreciate you your time and your analysis. 398 00:25:52,040 --> 00:25:54,560 Speaker 2: It's great being with you. Danielle. In twenty twenty four 399 00:25:54,680 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 2: is do or die for democracy, and I think we 400 00:25:56,760 --> 00:25:57,320 Speaker 2: should all do. 401 00:25:58,320 --> 00:26:06,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, one hundred percent. That is it for me today. 402 00:26:06,520 --> 00:26:10,639 Speaker 1: Dear friends, on woke a f as always, Power to 403 00:26:10,720 --> 00:26:14,200 Speaker 1: the people and to all the people. Power, get woke 404 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:15,960 Speaker 1: and stay woke as fuck.