WEBVTT - Our Enemy Is Targeting Naval Assets: Mike Lyons Talks to A&G

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The official name of that defensive umbrella is Operation Prosperity Guardian.

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a coalition of more than twenty nations that includes

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom, but most of the ships, aircraft, and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>firepower are coming from America. When was the last time

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that the US Navy operated in this place for a

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of months?

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you'd have to go back to World War

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Two where you have ships who are engaged in combat.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>When I say engagement, combat where they're getting shot at,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>we're getting shot at and we're shooting back.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to go back to World War II. Since

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Navy's been engaged in that sort of thing sustained

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>period of time.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Sounds like combat to me.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Let's discuss the developments in the Gulf, in the region

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 5>around the world with CNN military analyst Mike Lyons, who

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 5>joins us.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 4>Mike, thanks great to talk to.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 6>You, Hey one, guys, great to be back with you.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>So does that sound accurate to you? That's the most

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>engagement our Navy's had since World War Two.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Probably from a naval perspective. If you take out the

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 6>naval air assets that have been participating in combat, you know,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 6>really in every conflict for the past twenty twenty five years.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 6>This is you know, combat towards the ships, you know,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 6>the destroyers, the aircraft careers were always safe, you know,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 6>naval tactics or protect carry at all costs. Well, now

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 6>they've got to be concerned about that. The fact that

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 6>our enemy is targeting actual naval assets in the water

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 6>is somewhat new. And this new thing is this underwater drone.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 6>Doing some research on that coming from irun it loiters.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 6>It's kind of like a loitering torpedo is kind of

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 6>the best way to describe it. And the fact that

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 6>they were able to shoot that out before it got

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 6>close to it. Things are getting dicey. No question for

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 6>the naval operators in the Red Cina.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Just a quick tangential question, Mike.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot about the navy for various reasons,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 5>both personal and patriotic. I'm troubled by our lack of

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 5>capacity for shipbuilding as China's navy grows.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>By leaves and bounds.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 5>At the same time, though, with the growings of shistication

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 5>of missiles, both ours and the Chinese in particular, I

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>wonder how long a big manned surface fleet is going

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 5>to have the significance it has now.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 6>Well from a principle of war perspective, it provides mass

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 6>on that domain. So I think that's always going to

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 6>be there. I'm turned about it as well. I do

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 6>think we need to increase our enable capacity, both what

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 6>we have in the water and the sea as well

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 6>as underwater. We're talking about submarines there as well. So

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 6>I do believe that as the Chinese are going to,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 6>you know, kind of rely on the old school gunboat

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 6>diplomacy and what's happening in the Pacific, we've got to

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 6>match that with similar assets. Now we use our technology

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 6>to gain the advantage. But right now that's being flipped

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 6>on its head. You saw that sixty minutesry for Norah

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 6>O'Donnell talking about you know, we're taking million dollar cruise

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 6>missiles and knocking out ten and fifty thousand dollars drones.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Let's say with it, because we have to protect our shifts.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 6>So from an economic perspective, we're not on the right

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 6>side of that. We have to you know, kind of

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 6>figure that as well. We can we get away with

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 6>that because we're prosperous country. We can afford it, but

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 6>we might not be able to afford that in the future,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 6>especially as these countries change their taxes. I'm concerned about

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 6>swarming technology for example, that's going to impact the battlefield

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 6>on the sea.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought it was interesting. I mentioned a couple

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of different times. They're not exactly sure what they're up to,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Like what's their goal? Picking a fight with the biggest,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>baddest bull in the barn and what you know is

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 3>an attrition like you guys were just talking about her.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know what the Huthi's goal is, just

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 6>just besides from a purely religious perspective, to go meet

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 6>their maker there. It doesn't make sense. And that's why,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, the rational negotiation with these terrorists don't. It

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't go go anywhere because they don't have the same

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, kind of value sets we do. So they're

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 6>going to continue to until until where they've been deterred

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 6>or either out of ammunition. They're going to continue to

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 6>do exactly that, and the Ron's going to use them.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a laboratory. And again, the submarine rones

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 6>and the surface drones and the things that they're doing,

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 6>these unmanned the things, they're easy to they're easy to

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 6>get there, and they're easy to deploy.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I saw your tweets about Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine lost

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a major city over the weekend to Russia. But you

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>seem to say Russia is not quite on the verge

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of winning. What's going on there?

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 6>No, I don't think so. I think that. You know,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 6>for the last four months, they've expended about forty thousand

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 6>soldiers that have been lost on their side and all

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>kinds of battle damage assessment from thirty square kilometers. You know,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 6>there's not this immediacy with regard to Russia breaking through

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 6>on an offensive operation. Ukraine's got to go into a

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 6>defensive mode now and and stop any kind of counteroffensive.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 6>And what Russia's doing is taking back some of those

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 6>areas that they lost during that counter offensive in the

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 6>past nine months. But Russia is learning, they recognize that

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 6>they've they ask forces in certain areas they'll be successful.

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 6>That this area Aft Difcas in the middle of this

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 6>very long front, and you know, you look at it

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 6>from a strategic perspective, it looks like a divide and conquer,

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 6>but they just still don't have the resources to do that.

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Eventually they might if they Ukraine government doesn't get resupplied

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 6>the military, I think't resupplied in the next let's sake,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 6>thirty sixty ninety days. They're running out of ammunition, no

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 6>question about that. Artillery. We saw Denmark decide to give

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 6>all of its artillery inventory to Ukraine. That's a that's

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 6>a nice gesture. But they need the fifty or sixty

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars of aid that's that would come from the

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 6>from the West in order to have this fight to

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 6>be sustained for the next couple of years. And what

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 6>we'll do is take stock things out of our stocks,

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 6>send them to Ukraine, and rebuild them here in the

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 6>United States. So it's kind of a win win from

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 6>a political perspective. But I guess right now neither side

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 6>wants to give the other side any kind of political victory,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 6>which is it's going to hurt the Ukraine military.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting to watch the arguments.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Listen to the arguments here domestically, particular on the right

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 5>side of the aisle between those who are staunchly in

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 5>favor of helping Ukraine and those who seem to think

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 5>it's a bad idea for a variety of reasons. But

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 5>there doesn't seem to be a lot of disagreement in Europe.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 5>The EU is remarkably united in thinking Putin's a hell

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 5>of a threat.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 6>Right, yeah, and look what he's done to Nivaldi now.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 6>And he does this because it's getting closer to the election.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 6>He picks and chooses when he wants to assassinate people.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 6>And you know, these kind of bloody leaders, they exist

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 6>because they take their they take their opponents out before

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 6>they you know, they get close to becoming more powerful.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, over the weekend you saw the foreign minister

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 6>of Latvia and Lithuania make comments about the threat as

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 6>they are close to Putin, They're close to what's going

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 6>on in Russia there. We've got to get you know,

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 6>the Germans and the French and know others involved and

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 6>start spending more money. Only seven countries in NATO are

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 6>meeting that two and a half percent goal that they're

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 6>supposed to be for GDP.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 5>That's just not enough, my clients, CNN Military analyst Mike,

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 5>it's always great to talk before we let you go

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 5>on this President's Day. Are there any is there a

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 5>president or are there a couple that you admire, particularly

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 5>that you think about a lot read about a lot

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to maybe use his role models.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 6>There's so many. I've studied them. JFK was inaugurated in

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 6>the year of my birth. I guess, but I guess

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 6>my favorite president has got to be Abraham Lincoln. If

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 6>you go to the Lincoln Memorial and you look above

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 6>the statue that the great statue that exists in that

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 6>the monument to him, and there's a quote above it

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 6>and it says something goes like this. I don't have

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 6>it exact, but it's like, for who we saved the nation,

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 6>the memory of Abraham Lincoln is enshrined in this temple forever.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 6>And I was with that and said, you know, forever

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 6>was a long time. You know, I'm sure the Romans

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 6>put up a lot of statues and said the memory

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 6>of this guy is going to be here forever. So

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 6>the soldier I get to the Lincoln Memorial, I look

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 6>up and there, I said, you know, I would look

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 6>around here. It's going to be defending this place someplace

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 6>because the United States said his memory is going to

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 6>be here forever.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>That's a good one.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Amen to that, Mike, Thanks very very much, good

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 5>to talk to you.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>Thanks guys, thanks for having me.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong and Getty