WEBVTT - Tech New: The Era of Killer Robots

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, June one, twenty twenty one. And

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one story that I haven't really covered on this podcast

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is that there is a global semiconductor shortage and that

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>has a cascading effect on the computer and electronics industries

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. So let's dive into that really quickly. Now.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It mostly comes down to a couple of big things

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that happened in twenty and one of those is, of course,

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. The global shutdown of various industries disrupted supply chains,

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that shortages and raw materials became an

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>issue really quickly. It just had this you know, ripple effect.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like the whole world went on pause

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, and it certainly isn't like they

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>all started up again in synchronization along with everyone else.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, this kind of led to the

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>supply chain version of a traffic jam, except instead of

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cars going through you know, stop and start traffic, because

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of some other event that happened Further down the road.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You have various manufacturers who found themselves waiting on other

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>elements in the supply chain, and thus they had to

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go idle because they didn't have the stuff they needed

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to do their part in the chain. Everything got knocked up.

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Related to that, the silicon used to create the vials

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to hold vaccines is the same stuff that's used in semiconductors.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, because the vaccines are understandably of very

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very high priority, it meant the semiconductor industry experienced a

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>silicon shortage, and thus the price for silicon went up. Now,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>when the price for materials goes up, you get one

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of two outcomes. Either the companies that are making stuff

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>out of that raw material have to increase prices or

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they experience a smaller profit margin. Either way, the squeeze

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is felt further up the chain. But the other big

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>issue on top of that is that the demand for

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors grew a lot in by nearly seven per cent.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>More of our everyday tech relies on semiconductors, everything from

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, video game consoles to automobiles. Now, because of

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the shortage of semiconductors. Everything else down the line gets

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>held up too, and this is likely to lead to

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>massive losses in several industries. Automakers are probably going to

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be losing billions of dollars in the short term because

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors are important components for nearly every system inside a car,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like there's more than fifty of them, and that includes

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>everything from entertainment two breaks to steering. Pat Gelsinger, the

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>new CEO of Intel, warrants that this could just be

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the start of a shortage and that we could see

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the effects of the shortage stretch on several years. Gelsinger

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>has said that the semiconductor industry has reacted quickly to

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>near term challenges, but that the long term effects are

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>still a big concern. Meanwhile, on the consumer side, we're

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing the effects of this crisis. The laptop maker ACER

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>has said that due to this semiconductor shortage, the company

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is only able to fill half of worldwide demand for

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>laptop production on any given day. So what this means

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for all of us, you know, you and me is

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that the supply for all sorts of tech, from smartphones

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to computers to cars is going to be more limited

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>than what we've come to expect, at least for the

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>near term, and demand is likely to be high. So

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>when you've got high demand and you've got limited supply,

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the next thing you typically see is prices go up.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So get ready to spend more money to buy your

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>tech over the next year or two until things shake

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>out and while we get ready to pay out more money,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian reports that the Silicon Six have actually paid

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>out less than they claimed. The Silicon Six refers to

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>six gargantuan tech companies. That would be Alphabet, which is

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Google's parent company, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, and Netflix which interestingly,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>uh is the first time I've seen Netflix added to

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this particular list. Totally makes sense though, and according to

0:04:55.640 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian, these six companies overstated their tax payments by

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly one hundred billion dollars over the last ten years.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>A report from the Fair Tax Foundation claims that these

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>six companies paid ninety six billion dollars less in tax

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>between two thousand and eleven and two thousand twenty than

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their annual reports indicate. Moreover, these six companies paid a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>tax rate that you or I would go bonkers over.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>According to Fair Tax Foundation, these companies paid out three

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>point six percent of their total revenue in tax that's

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>two d nineteen billion dollars of taxes. And yeah, that

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is an astounding amount of money, two hundred nineteen billion dollars.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>But let's compare that to the amount of revenue they generated,

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>which was more than six trillion dollars trillion. That goes

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond a princely sum. Now let's be fair. That is

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue that is not profit, right, Like, profit is what

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you get after you remove all the costs from the

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>money that you've brought in. So luckily the Guardian digs

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>down into that a little bit as well. Over that decade,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last ten years, Amazon collected around one

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>point six trillion dollars in revenue but collected a mere

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty point five billion dollars in profits. So I mean,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm being a little flippant because honestly, these numbers are

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so big I can't actually comprehend them. Like, from an

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>abstract perspective, I kind of get it, but you know,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if I try to dive any further down, it's just

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>too big. But you see that the amount of profit

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>compared to revenue is very, very tiny when you look

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at them in ratio right, not by sheer amount. Sixty

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars is a huge amount of money anyway. The

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Guardian reports that Amazon ended up paying well below what

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it should have been expected to pay, almost half as much.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there's a shifting movement around the world to

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>apply new tax laws that would limit companies from being

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>able to to put profits over into tax havens. Whether

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that actually happens or not, whether countries around the world

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>really act on this, Uh, that remains to be seen,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sure there will be more than a few

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars spent on lobbying to oppose those measures. So we'll

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have to see how this develops further. Okay, but what

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>if money is no object to you? What if you

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are swimming in the stuff you know, Scrooge McDuck style,

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you flaunt your wealth in a way that's

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>both flashy and environmentally friendly. Well, my friend, maybe it's

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>time you look into the silent Shadow, a luxury electric

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicle concept in the works over at Rolls Royce. Now,

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the brand Rolls Royce has long been associated with luxury

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and opulence, and the word shadow has significance for the

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>company because back in nineteen Rolls Royce introduced the Silver

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Shadow luxury car. When it comes to the Silent Shadow, well,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have that many details about the car.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>The company says that the plans are to have the

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>vehicle ready for purchase within the decade, but we don't

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>know any specs. We don't know what the projected prices,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>although you know, if you have to ask, you can't

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>afford it. We don't know really any real details except that,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, Silent Shadow. The name tells us

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that we know it's going to be very, very quiet.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But then again, Rolls Royce is known, at least in

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>part for engineering cars that operate quietly, because the whole

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>point of a Rolls Royce is that the experience of

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>driving it, or for those who prefer to employ a driver,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the experience of riding in a Rolls Royce is to

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoy luxury rather than that you know, chassis shaking, engine

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>revving experience you get with like muscle cars. Rolls Royce

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't the only luxury car maker that's diving into electric vehicles,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and as I've reported in previous episodes of Tech Stuff,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much a necessity because a lot of places

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world intend to phase out the sale of

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>new fossil fuel powered vehicles over the next decade and

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. Earlier this year, I talked about how the

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>electronics company l G was exiting the smartphone industry. The

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>company had shown off a couple of interesting concepts at CES,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like they're never going to hit store shelves,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So that magical expanding smartphone is just gonna be a

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>thing of legend. I think we're not, at least we're

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to see it from l G now Korea.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Biz Wire reports that l G is switching its former

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>smart phone manufacturing facilities over to make home appliances instead.

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>The company is also consolidating its operations in Brazil, expanding

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>facilities in the city of Manouse. And I apologize for

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the terrible mispronunciation of that. I am certain I got

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it completely wrong. While LG pulled the plug on smartphones

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>after finding the market too competitive, it was dominated by

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>companies like Apple and Samsung, home appliances are a totally

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>different story. One of the many consequences of the pandemic

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of twan. I guess I shouldn't give it a year.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It's still going anyway. One of the big consequences was

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this increased demand in home appliances as people spent more

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>time at home, and LG saw its sales skyrocket as

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a result. Now this move reflects that increased demand was

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really the driver for l g S decisions. However, it

0:10:55.360 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>will remain to be seen if that demand will contin nue,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.119
<v Speaker 1>right if the demands that were generated by the pandemic

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in are going to stick around even as we start

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a better handle on dealing with the consequences

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of that pandemic. So we don't really know if this

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is the start of a trend in home appliance sales

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or if it's more of a blip in the radar.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>C Net reports that some recently unsealed court documents show

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that Google purposefully obvious skated the location settings in its

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Android phone software so that it would be harder for

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>users to find those settings and then turn them off.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>As we've seen when numerous tech companies, including one we're

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>going to cover in a second, the real business of

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>those companies aren't necessarily in hardware or social networking sites

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the surface level businesses. You know, Google's business

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't really search. It's in data. That's where the real

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>money is collecting and then exploiting data in different ways,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>primarily when it comes to user data that comes in

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the form of the company's relationships with various advertisers. You know, obviously,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the more information you can give an advertiser about their

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>intended market, the more effectively that advertiser can serve up

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>ads to that market. So it becomes this the cycle,

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this feedback loop between these companies and advertisers that in

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>turn inform the business decisions of those companies like Google. So,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>according to this document, Google discovered that if the location

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>settings on an Android phone were relatively easy to navigate to,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people opted to turn off their location settings.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>How about that folks are not super jazzed about being

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tracked wewere and so google solution to this issue was

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not to shift business operations away from the benefits of

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>harvesting location data. No, the answer apparently was to make

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those settings just way harder to find so that users

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>would continue to generate those geo located zeros and ones

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for Google, so that Google could profit off of them

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>without those users actually really being aware of it. On

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>top of that, Google apparently reached out to various manufacturers

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that make Android products in an effort to convince them

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to hide the location settings away in deep various menus

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and clunky user interfaces like LG pushed geolocation settings to

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the second page of Settings and its phones, And anyone

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>who's had any experience on the Internet knows that if

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you are below the fold, that is, if you have

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to scroll down in order to see the ticular entry,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you lose like the vast majority of people who are

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at your stuff like this is clear in Google Search. Right,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're not in those first few hits of a

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Google search, the traffic that comes to you thanks to

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Google Search is super low because you know, most people

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>don't bother to school down any further. Sayings true with

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>settings on phones. If it's not right there, a lot

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of people don't take the effort to go any further.

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>This revelation comes on the heels of an investigation from

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>three years ago by the Associated Press into Google, and

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that investigation found that Google was tracking location even if

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>users opted out of the location history feature. So apparently,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>if you turned off location history on your Android device,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it just meant that Google was going to keep on

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>tracking you everywhere you go. They just wouldn't tell you

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. I mean, why should you care about all

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this anyway? Why why is this important? Well, location data

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about collecting information on where you go and

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when you go there. It's also about collecting the data

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of everybody else at the same time. Anyone who has,

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a device that has geolocation connected to it,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a space that has a lot of

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>folks with phones in it. Well, now, as a data

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>collection company, you can do all sorts of interesting things.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to give you an example. And this

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually something that's related to a Twitter thread I

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>saw and I wish I could remember the person who

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>posted it because it was very good. But I'll give

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you kind of an example. So let's say that you've

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>got a good friend of yours you haven't seen in

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and you go to visit this friend

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for a few days. So you're staying at your friend's house. Now,

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>your friend also has various devices, and you've got your smartphone,

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and location tracking tells Google where you are. And assuming

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Google also has at least some access to the data

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that's generated by your friends devices, Google also knows who

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you are with. They know that you're at this specific

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>person's house, and they know things about that specific person too.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Google knows all about your friends activities and what they

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like and where they like to go and all that

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So now Google starts to integrate ads

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>into your various experiences that aren't just targeting you, They're

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>also targeting your friend. I mean, you like this person

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>well enough to stay at their house for a few days.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you like them well enough to shop for a

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>birthday present for them, and Google happens to know when

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>their birthday is because that's some of the data that

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>these companies collect, like email, addresses, birthdays. A lot of

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff these companies collect not through directly grabbing it

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>off of your device, but by you know, cross referencing

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the databases that have your information in them from across

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>all the different services you use. So if you've ever

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>used a service where you've had to put in things

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like your name and address and phone number and your

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>birthday and your email and all that kind of stuff,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>all that data ends up getting mixed up with information

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that's gathered from sources like devices, and that's a really

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful thing. So now, because Google knows where you are

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and who you're with, and they know about that person's birthday,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe they serve up ads about something that this friend

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of yours really likes, and the suggestion is, hey, it's

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's my friend's birthday coming up. I should, you know,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>click on this ad and buy this stuff. So now

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you get this weird sensation that you're getting served ads

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that are very specifically targeted at you and the experiences

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that you've recently had. It feels like Google is listening

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in on you right, like it's just spying on you,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's picking up stuff from say you're your phone's

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>microphone or whatever. But no, Google doesn't have to do

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>any of that. Google doesn't have to do any active

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>spying on you. It doesn't have to listen to you.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just collecting all the data from you and your

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>friend just by being who you are and where you are,

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then cross referencing that data with other data sets,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and then analyzing that data and then acting on it.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>This is just one way where data collection can become

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>intrusive and creepy. Now we're gonna take a quick break.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I'll give another update about another

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>company that's equally obsessed with your information. It rhymes with

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a space look. But first, let's take a quick break. Okay,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're back, And before the break, I was telling you

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about Google and geolocation data and how the company was

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>apparently trying to hide the settings for geolocation away so

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that fewer people would turn it off. I mean, that's

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing. These companies are often compelled by various legislations

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world to offer up that solution. But then

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the companies do their best to make that option, you know,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>harder to find so that fewer people actually use it

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's we've seen when people are given the option,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they often like to opt out of these features. And

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>when your entire business is dependent upon those features, that's

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>where you see these companies coming up with these clever

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>ways to try and get around the issue. So along

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that same vein, remember how Facebook put up a fuss

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about the new privacy settings that are included in the

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>latest version of Apple's iOS. So one of the new

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>features of the iPhone operating system, well really the iOS

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>operating system, because it's for all sorts of devices, not

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just an iPhone anyway, one of the new features is

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that users will get a prompt asking if they will

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>allow certain apps like Facebook, for example, to collect data

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about themselves outside of the app itself, So that includes

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>data that comes from other apps that are on your phone. So,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, Facebook, if you were to allow this option,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>would potentially be allowed to collect information about your shopping

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>habits on other apps, or what restaurants you like to

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>order from whenever you use delivery services and so on. Now,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.239
<v Speaker 1>because of apples change in policy, users will get a

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>message asking them to grant permission to allow apps like

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to do this. And Facebook really hates that. And

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason the company really hates it is pretty much

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the same reason that Google was burying location settings. Because

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>data is money, and if you give people the option

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to share less data about themselves, they might actually take

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that option. And I mean, really, isn't that just stealing?

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you get down to it, isn't it

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just ungrateful for users to not hand over all the

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>information about who they are and what they do and

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>who they know so that poor scrappy companies like Facebook

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>can just make a buck off that info. Now, I'm

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously I'm being incredibly obnoxious and sarcastic here because I

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think Facebook is like literally the worst anyway. Now, a

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>new study suggests that Apple's changes to privacy are in

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fact bad. The study says Apple is doing a bad

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>thing by including these privacy options. It says that those

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>policies only serve to help Apple, and they hurt all

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>other companies, and thus these are anti competitive practice. Is

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that Apple has put in place, Apple saying if you

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>want to operate on our system, you must follow these rules, which,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we don't have to follow as Apple.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>As Apple, we it's cool for us to collect all

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the information, but you companies out there, you cannot do that,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and that this hurts other companies. Also, Facebook totally funded

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that study. Now that might cause you to question the

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>studies objective perspective, right, Like, the studies outcome is essentially

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in line with Facebook's complaints against Apple. So I think

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a pretty darn healthy attitude to have to

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>question the objectivity of the results because the study itself

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>was funded by the company that has a beef against Apple.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But all that being said, does that mean it's possible

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that the paper actually has a point in that Apple

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be fit while other companies do not.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe it's very likely Apple is certainly no

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 1>innocent lamb in this equation either. Right, You've got all

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>these different companies that are leveraging data in different ways.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's obvious and sometimes it's subtle, but they're all

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>profiting off of it. Now. I don't have a solution

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that addresses this whole issue unless it's just to give

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>up on smartphones in general and go to like really

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>simple cell phones and and just kind of opt out

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of the online experience. That's not really an option for

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>most people, or at least not a you know, an

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>attractive option. But the flip side is, unless there's some

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>specific legislation in place that that directs how data can

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and cannot be used, I don't see really a way

0:23:55.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of fixing this. Um it's a mess. It's speaking of messes.

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>In science fiction, autonomous killer robots are a common trope,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from terminator to RoboCop to the classic chopping mall. The

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>threat of AI powered killing machines is made apparent, and

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen numerous experts in robotics and AI speak out

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>against the development of these kinds of devices. They've pointed

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out that autonomous weapons would very likely lead to a

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>new type of arms race, and that we would also

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>see horrific uses of this technology. It does not take

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much imagination to conjure up a scenario in which a machine,

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>all under its own power, mistakenly identifies a group of

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>people as being targets and then attacks them. Or heck,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard to imagine a machine that identifies a

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>group quote unquote correctly, But the people behind the machine

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>are committed to wiping out specific populations, and they're just

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>using the machin jeans to carry out the awful, horrific work.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And according to the u N, we are essentially in

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that terrifying era. A u N Security Council reports said

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that in March of twenty the Nation of Turkey deployed

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an STM cargo to military drone. This drone, apparently under

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>autonomous command, attacked Libyan armed forces that were repositioning and

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>withdrawing from an area. The report claims that the drone

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>could identify an attack targets without first establishing any line

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of communication back to a human operator. The u N

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>had previously warned against this sort of thing, advocating for

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a global ban on the production of autonomous weaponry. That

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was a move that was opposed by two major world powers,

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Russia and the United States. Now this was back in

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Isn't a very different place politically today.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>In however, I am not confident enough to say that

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the US would unilaterally condemn the development of these kinds

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of autonomous weapons. And I say that mostly because the

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration had its own serious burden to bear when

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the use of lethal military drones, though

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>those were under the control of human operators. Anyway, the

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>report has prompted more experts in the fields of AI

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and machine learning to speak out against the practice of

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>developing and deploying autonomous weaponry. So it pretty much falls

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to governments to take action from here and perhaps give

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the U N the authority to to have a unilateral

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.959
<v Speaker 1>ban on the development and thus, you know, processes in

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>place for any countries found to have violated that ban,

0:26:55.560 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise, without that kind of global operative approach, we're

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>going to see countries say, well, we can't let there

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>be an autonomous weapon gap. If we don't pursue it,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we will be destroyed by these tools. Because our our

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our opponents will surely go down that pathway, so we

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have to and it becomes the sort of escalation that

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen time and time again. Pretty concerning stuff. We've

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>got another cyber attacks story to cover, this time targeting

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the food industry. A company called JBS Foods had to

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>shut down operations over the weekend due to a cyber attack.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>JBS Foods is the world's largest producer of beef and

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>poultry and the second largest producer of pork, which surprised

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>me because I mean, I guess pigs have to be

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the biggest producer of pork. Uh huh jokes. Anyway, a

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack forced JBS Foods to shut down operations in

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple countries, including the UK, the United States, Australia, Canada,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and more. The attack hit the I T systems of

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the company, and at the time of this recording, I

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have specific details about the nature of that cyber attack.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, and again this is just

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a guess, I would say it's very likely another ransomware attacks,

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we saw with Colonial Pipeline earlier this year.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>If that is the case, then JBS Foods could, in

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>theory be weighing the option about whether or not to

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pay off a ransom. If that is the case, I

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>still maintain paying off ransoms is always a bad idea

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>because it consistently fuels more attacks in the future. The

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>more times hackers get paid off, the more they see

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is profitable, and they'll do it even more.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The company is definitely working to restore functionality to its

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>systems and JBS Foods as that it has no evidence

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that this attack compromised any data relating to employees, customers,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or suppliers, but that processing transactions might take a while

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because the company has to restore functionality, So we'll keep

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>an eye on this story. And finally, up in space,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station's robot arms suffered some damage recently,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and at first I was kind of hoping to read

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about how the I s s got into a robot

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>arm wrestling competition will Sylvester Stallone and that this was

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>finally my eagerly anticipated sequel to the hit film Over

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Top, And I think that this one could be

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>called way over the Top. And now Stallone is like

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a space trucker who likes to arm wrestle. But I'm

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>told that none of this is true, and I should

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just probably not talk about that anymore. But what is

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>true is that the arm did get damaged, and the

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>real reason it got damaged was because of space debris,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a real issue and a growing one as

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we send more stuff up into space and we lack

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a coheri adhesive approach to getting that stuff down. Once

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it ends its its useful life cycle, it's going to

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>get worse. And when this actually happened is hard to say,

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but NASA states that the Canada Arm two, which has

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>been part of the I S S since two thousand one,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>has a puncture in its thermal blanket, so this is

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially like insulation around the arm, and that the boom

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>underneath also suffered some damage. As to when this happened,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not actually sure, but the issue of space debris

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 1>is one that has been growing over the years without

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>much action on the part of terrestrial governments to create

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a foundation for rules and processes to mitigate that issue, or,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>as Jack right Nelson from the National University of Singapore

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Faculty of Law said to the Register quote, the whole

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in Canada Arm two is minuscule compared to the whole

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in the international legal regime concerning space debris. End quote.

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't have said it better myself, Mr Nelson. All right,

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that is it for the news for Tuesday, June one,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. If you have any suggestions for topics I

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out to me on Twitter the handle we use as

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff H s W and I'll talk to you

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Y. Tech Stuff is an I Heart

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.