WEBVTT - Actually, the Office Dress Code Is Alive and Well

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development, rewards and

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>succession planning. Corn Fairy can help you realize the full

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>potential of your people, so you can take your business

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>where it wants to go up. Learn more at corn

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Ferry dot com slash up. There's this notion that the

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>office dress code is going away. Offices are becoming more

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>casual and the variety of things people can wear is increasing.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>But we're wondering if the dress code still exists, but

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe in a different form. This is game plan. Welcome

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to game Plan. I'm Rebecca Greenfield, a reporter at Bloomberg,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>where I cover the workplace, and I am Sam Grosbart.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I am a writer at Bloomberg Business Week magazine. This

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>week we're talking about the office dress code, what you

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>wear to work. There was an article that came out

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in The New York Times earlier this year that declared

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the office code and said that everything

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is confusing and up for grabs. Now, can I make

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a snap judgment on that horse hockey? That's a weird phrase.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>The point the article is making is it's looking around

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>offices and saying, you know, maybe fifteen years ago, business

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>casual rained, and people were wearing khakis and buttondowns, and

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>women had to wear more formal clothing. And now you

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>look around offices and even here at Bloomberg, and there's

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge variety of what people wear. Some people are

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in jeans and a blouse, some people do dress up.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Some people, like the developers at certain offices, where really

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>really casual jeans and T shirts and tiva's and socks.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>And part of that has to do with what those

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people do for a living. Obviously, if you sit at

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>your desk all day, never really interact with a client

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a customer, your job is entirely internal. Take those developers

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you were just mentioning, well, then it really doesn't altogether

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>matter what you wear as long as you get your

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>tasks done, you get done on time, you get them

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>done effectively. But if you're in a sales position, something

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that happens in this building, or you are a lawyer

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to court, or you have clients, or

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you have accounts that you're visiting, then your personal appearance

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably a little bit more important. You're representing your firm,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you're representing yourself. It's another tool you have to well

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>what all business people are trying to do. Get money

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>from something, convince people you're worth paying for. So I

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>read a story last year about an accounting firm, Crow

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Horror Wath that updated their address code policy. So accounting

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty old school, i'd say industry where they

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do have more formal address codes because it's in client services,

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and they updated it with something that's called address for

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>your Day policy. So it's like, if you are seeing

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>someone that day, you need to dress in a way

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that reflects that client and what they would want. But

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in accounting you are sitting in front of an

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Excel spreadsheet, I presume, and so you could dress more casual.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They stilled rules you couldn't wear leggings to the office

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or sneakers, but it was under any circumstance. Yeah. Right.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a huge deal for that industry, But also

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is reflective a little bit of this. It's still not

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a dress code. It's more up to you. It's about

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what your work is. You have to figure out what

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to do well. And that also seems to correspond to

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some common sense. Again, if you're going to visit a client,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to wear your stained Philadelphia eagle sweatshirt.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you are coming to the office and you

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>know that you're basically going to be in there all

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>day and you're gonna be sitting in front of your computer, yes,

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a polo shirt and a pair of jeans is

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>more than adequate for you to complete your job. And

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think employees really like that because I don't know.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>As an employee, I like being treated as someone who

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>can make good decisions on my own where yes, but

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but but you know, employers don't always feel that way.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>There are accounting firms that one accounting firm I believe

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>has business formal Well, you know, I will say this much.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>There is something very easy about a strong dress code.

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>In some respects. It's the fuzzy ones that leave people guessing.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And maybe there's more room for error because the parameters

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't really been defined and so you don't know and

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>then you come in and realize, oh God, I went

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>too far, or I'm out of sync with the rest

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of the room, or what have you. That sort of

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>illusion of liberty can also breed a certain degree of anxiety. Yeah,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one thing that the article does

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>get right. That New York Times article and to speak

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.559
<v Speaker 1>to that anxiety, I want to bring up a friend

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of mine. She's in her late twenties and just started

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on the tenure professor track at a university, and she's

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>been thinking a lot about her dress code because again,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not an institution that has a formal dress code obviously,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and then she had just been a grad student. Then

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, grad students where pajamas, and she loves huge clubs,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and she's been thinking a lot about how she wants

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to signal that she's not a guy student and she

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>is a professor, so she's dressing up more. That makes sense.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's no office dress code, but she's still dressing formally, right,

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>She's using her clothing to help her achieve something. And

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think hasn't changed with this article doesn't

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>quite get at, which is like, yes, there's no specific,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>codified uniform, but people are putting on uniforms, maybe now

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more than ever, to signal who they are, what they do,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and what their clothing says about them. And that's what

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>our guests are going to talk about today. Today we

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of a different format. We talked

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to three different people who work in three different industries

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>about how they use their clothing to signal who they

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>are at work. Our first guest is Carrie Goldberg. She

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lawyer here in New York who often operates

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>in the shlubby confines of the New York State Supreme Court.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I was drawn to Carry because I read about her

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the New Yorker. They had a great profile of

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>her work. She defends revenge porn victims. But they had

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this paragraph in there that talked about how her industry

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>tends to be schlumpy. But she stood out because of

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the way she dressed, and she would wear five inch

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>heels and mini dresses and trench coats, and as we learned,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked to her a lot of leather, and I

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that that was really striking details. So that's why

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>we have around today. How would you describe your work look?

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I would describe my work look as sort of Axl

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Rose meets Olivia Pope meets manic pixie dream girl. Maybe

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like glam goth lawyer geek. Okay, I'm getting that's a

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>very clear picture. I think if you obviously you can't

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>see Carry right now, but now you have a very

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>strong idea what would be a typical outfit that would

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>live up to that description. I always like to have leather,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's always leather coat or leather leggings. I like

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>long nails, sharp eyelashes, stiletto heels, like like a lot

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of stabbing things in my look. How long have you

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>been practicing law? I've been a lawyer since two thousand seven,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so nine years. Have you always dressed this way? Yeah?

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So my first job was as a housing court attorney

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>representing low income tenants that were being evicted. And there

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was this really glamorous landlord tenant attorney named Carmen. Who

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was. It was just this really schlubby

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>environment housing court is, and but Carmen was this like

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>blonde bombshell that would wear Chanel and really stood out.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh, everyone who knew who Carmen was?

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh, maybe I could be like

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, low income tenant attorney version of Carmen.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like totally emulate Carmen or anything like that,

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but I just I kind of made my own version

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. And it helps you know, if you're a

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>new attorney or new at anything, it helps to have

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a look just to make yourself like kind of memorable

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond being memorable? Is there a reason why you addressed

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this way for the type of alaw you practice. I

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>represent victims of online harassment, sexual sult so always my

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>clients are people who are under attack, So there is

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of an armor to the clothes I wear. I

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>feel more protected and protective if I'm in something something

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like leather or something something sharp, like sharp heels or

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>something that that it could become an attack weapon, which

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I've never had to use in a court environment, but

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that was pre existing before I. Before I started my

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>law of practice, I dressed like this already. How do

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you think the judges perceive you and what you wear?

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think about that? I should think about that.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care that much. If I ever thought

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that how I looked was going to have a negative

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>impact on my client, I would absolutely scale it back.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not showing up to court and lingerie and

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and Stiletto's. I'm I'm in business attire. It's just got

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an edge. And what about your clients?

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you think your clients perceived the way you look?

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they like to feel that they're being protected

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>by somebody that has a vision and has preferences and opinions,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and that can really be conveyed very easily through clothing

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and how somebody looks. And if if somebody looks put

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>together and like they're making deliberate decisions just in something

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>as basic as you know what shirt and choose and

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>watch their wearing, then there's an assumption that that translates

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to other strategic decisions as well. Kry, I want to

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you a question as if I were a recent

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>law school grad about to embark on a legal career

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and I come to you as sort of a mentor

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and ask you how should I dress for my profession?

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an overall philosophy of how your clothing

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>works within your profession. I think the most important thing

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is to dress for confidence and not for comfort. People

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>often like conflate confidence with comfort, and I just don't

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think you need to feel comfortable too in what you're wearing.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You know you're not going to be wearing your eyes atoners,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>slippers and fleece long John's to court. You know you're

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to feel confident that you have to like

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you look good. Well, it's like a power

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Suit R version of the power Suit basically yeah, and

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's super or a costume. I definitely feel like

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when I'm in core or when I need to be

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly on, I'm putting a costume on, and it's like

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>it's getting me into the mindset that I need to

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be on. Carry is clearly a firm believer in the

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>work uniform or like costume. I think she. I mean,

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as she sort of described in the interview, you know,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>she uses artifice and she uses sort of the weaponry

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of clothing to put forth a particular image about herself,

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>even at the expense. I thought quite interestingly of comfort, right,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's clearly working for her because she wins and

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has become very high profile. But it's also something she chooses.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And for our next guest, we talked to somebody who

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite get to choose what she wears to work.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Shantiana Bowers is currently a salesperson at the Stephen Allen

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Boutique in Tribeca here in New York, and before that

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>she worked at Madewell. To places that have very specific

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>ideas of how you should dress. How would you describe

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your work look? Okay, so I have to be a

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>bit cool. Basically, my coworkers and I we all kind

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of had an unspoken understanding about which one of us

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>hid twitch points um my current stories, Steven Allen. They

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of basics that are slightly elevated, so

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we all have to find our own angle. For me,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit quirky but still quite tailored, so

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of button downs under sweaters with like a

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>pleated slack or something, but really funny looking socks and

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like low Oxfords. You said that you kind of negotiate

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this with your colleagues, so other people take on different approaches,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>different sort of interpretations. Yes, we're all basically whatever store

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>that we worked that version of ourselves, So Ed Madewell,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I was still like kind of relaxed, cool girl Brooklyn,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also like an actual New Yorker, So it

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would be like Timbaland's but not really because we can't

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>actually wear Timbalands there. But yeah, so, can you tell

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>us about some of the rules that these retail stores

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have made well wear their rules that you have to

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>abide by. Oh, totally, but it's mostly dress the look.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't actually have to buy it. For a lot

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the retail stores, so they encourage us to buy

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it with different sentives to get different things. They have

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>contests to keep up moral and things like that. But

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what you really have to do is look at the collection,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>look at what you have. Make it work so you

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>can sell this product to customers instead of them coming

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in and being like, hey, you look really cool, but

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>you obviously don't shop here. We heard a rumor, I

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is true. Somebody on our show

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>said that people at Madewell have to wear a certain

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of layers. Yes, really, what so what is that role?

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>So the layering rule works if you don't have a collar,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a jacket. But it's not nearly

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as strict as j Cruise. I'm gonna just put that

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. Yeah, Ja Cruise is like and blazer and

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Scott and like it's and top hat and please, you

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are the most tailored man in the world. If you're

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>working at is there a big difference between the clothes

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you wear to work and the clothes you wear when

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>you're not at work? Um, when I worked at made

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>well no, now, yes, okay, how would you describe the difference.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I have to be a lot more tailored now than

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I had to before. I could still be relaxed, but

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot more pants instead of jeans or a

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fancier sweater than I would normally wear made well, a

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>little less all around casual, a little bit more elevated casual,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like a nice a shoe. It's interesting to hear you

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about how they want you to have pick your

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>personal style but then also conformed to the storre. So

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I liked when you were talking about, Yeah, like normally,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like your Brooklyn so you would wear Timberlands, but like,

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't wear Temberlands it made well, So you have

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to conform to that. So how do you, I guess,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you negotiate that? Really? You wait and see

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to collaborate the next you. For me,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't wear Timblance, but there was a point in

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>time when we started selling Doc Martin's, so I got

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to figure out at my docks and I was super excited.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Does the way you dress for a particular retailer attract

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a particular kind of customer among your colleagues? Is it

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of known or if not expressed, that it's understood, Oh,

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you're dressing for these kinds of people who come in

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and somebody else was dressing for a different kind of

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>customer who's coming in. We all try our best to

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>work with a variety of customers, but I tend to

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get more men and usually guys who are lawyers who

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>need something that they can wear in the office and

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>also still express their style. So I'm a person who

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sells a lot of overcoats in like fun but still

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>muted colors. Like, why do you think that? What about

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>your person? I saw a lot of overcoats and fun

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>muted colors totally. Why do you what about your personal

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>style do you think attracts that? Um? I really like

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>wearing slightly men's wear inspired things, and I think that

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>makes guys very comfortable when it comes to dealing with me.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of the other female associates can sometimes seem a

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, you know, curly, and they have a

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit more confidence. Is like, Oh, this girl, I

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can ask her about a perislas. It's so interesting that

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>these retailers have very specific rules, but they still want

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>their employees to look like they're interpreting them in their

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>own individual way, but still in this very specific confine.

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also I think a practical issue here, which is

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that the retailers are not prepared financially to outfit all

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of their salespeople with all of the clothing that they need,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so instead of taking on that cost, they have this

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of fuzzier you should dress like you work here,

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to use everything we have here

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because we're not going to give it to you. But

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to buy, some kind of goes back

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and forth. But I think you know, interestingly, sometimes it's

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>fun to work within those limits. Yeah, a lot of

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>creative people in general. I used to interview creative people

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in a former job. They love talking about how limits

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>boundaries what makes you creative? Up happens when the power

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and potential of every employee and leader in your workforce

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is released and corn Fairy can get you there by

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>aligning your people to your strategy, attracting, developing, engaging, and

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>rewarding them to reach new heights. With corn Ferry, you

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>get a partner who truly understands people, leadership, and the

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>new landscape of work. A partner who knows how to

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>take your business up. Learn more at corn Ferry dot com.

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Slash up. When it comes to sort of the world

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of creative people and the kinds of clothing that they wear.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Kim Hashtriter has been observing them for decades. She is

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Paper magazine. She's famous in her

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>own right for wearing a uniform every single day, variations

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on a theme that she came up with probably about

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago, And we got to talk to her about

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>her own style and the style that she's been observing

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>here in New York and around the world for quite

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>some time. How would you describe your work style your

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>work word from my work wardrobe. I can't even describe

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>my work what I do. So it's like hard to

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>describe my work style because my work and my life

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are one thing. So there's no difference in my work

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>style and my lifestyle, which is not true for a

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, right they have one uniform for work

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they have a different uniform. And I've always

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>been in love with uniforms. So I created a uniform

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for myself twenty years ago and I've worn the same

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thing every day. Yes, it's based on kind of a

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>mouse suit, which is my favorite uniform ever. And um,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I love uniforms generally. I love army uniforms. I love

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>peak coats. I love because their design is based on function.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not really decorative to decorative. Really, I don't love

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>decorative stuff, although I accessorized. It's sometimes fun to throw

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>in some like pizzas in a decoration sense, or to

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>make the uniform unique to you. So I can't say

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I hate all decorative things. But also I have a

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>very big personality and um, even paper. When we designed paper,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted it to look generic because what we wrote

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about was really wild and outrageous. And I thought that

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>if you had a wild and outrageous design and you

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>had wild and outrageous content, it would be like two

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>much wouldn't be the right yan yang balance. But if

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you present it in a simple classical way, very wild material,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's much more more people can read it and understand it.

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the original paper was designed very simply in black

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and white, generic classically. So I've always been a kind

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of I love a yen nin yang and I love um.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think when you have outrageous ideas, it's good to

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like package things simply so that you can get your

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas across. So I mean, I know it's like abstract

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, but it kind of filters into also

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what I wear. So that's when I just decided one day, okay,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I went to my friend who used to make suits

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for Steven Sprouse, the designer, and he Steven Sprouse. I

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>always loved what he did because his clothes were actually

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>very classic and plain, but that he did them in

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like day glow and wild fabrications. So I love that

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of um simplicity, but using fabric to kind of

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like make it more interesting. So I went to his Taylor,

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>who I was a friend, and I brought my favorite

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>jacket in the world was what was this maud style

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>jacket that Isaac Mizrahi had designed and I had it

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and it had huge flowers all over, but I loved

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the shape. And I brought my favorite skirt, which was

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the O g Alma motor skirt, and I had my

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>friend make patterns of it and together it was kind

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of like my version of a mouse suit. That's what

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I always said. And I had n't first make it

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the indigo color of mouse suits because just to

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>see if it worked and it had actually wearing it today,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a version that Levi's, the company, actually made

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>me one where I sent them the pattern and they

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>made me one of Levi's because I thought that would

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>be cool to have a Levi's version. So when I

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>realized I loved it and it was really simple and

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just a skirt and this jacket, I decided

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to make it like thirty of them, and I made

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>them for daytime. I made them for evening, but they

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>were all exactly the same, and they all were simply

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>like if you I mean Levi's did it with a snap,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little different, but it has a simple

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of mouth collar and it's boxing and it has

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>two pockets. And um I made linen for summer and

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all different colors and yes in indigo and in black,

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but also in hot pink and turquoise, and then I

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>made for winter. I at it in like a beautiful

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I just would get really good fabric and make them,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and then for dressy I'd make them in taffoda, so

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>i'd have a black tie version. But twenty three years

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or so, I've been wearing the same thing. Do you

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>ever get bored? Never know? We hear a lot about

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>uniforms now in the tech world. People just not wanting

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to think about what they wear. The Steve Jobs uniform,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely a different twist than what you have. They

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>do it so they don't have to think about fashion.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs did wear uniform. Didn't you wear levis in

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a turtleneck? I mean that's what he's And if you

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>look a lot of there's a lot of people that

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>wear uniforms, but visual people. Sometimes I'm very visual, and

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as a visual artist, I think Steve Jobs was a

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bit very visual person. I think it's more if you're

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a visual person that has good taste. I think that

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're not, it doesn't work as well because then

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you just look like a mess. Probably. Um, So I'm wondering,

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who's in the art and fashion world, what

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>do you think that having a uniform has done for

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you professionally? If anything, it just makes it not about

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like what I'm wearing, you know, So I don't really

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>need to be a peacock. That's not what I do,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm more interested in Um, I'm an explorer

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a m discoverer and it's not about me.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So what I do is not about me. So even

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>though I wear a uniform, I do and I say

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want it all to be about me. I

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>make it about me. I wear red glasses, I wear

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I always accessorize with my personality. I

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do insert my personality into my uniform definitely. But it

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like if you are in what is a visual profession,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>then you may yourself not you may dress very plainly.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>In contrast, if what you do is not considered a

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very artistic visual profession, maybe like a like an attorney then,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>or you're a banker, then you want to address and

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to do a lot more yes, because your

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>work is not visual. Whoever you are, whether you're in

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a visual or creative or not creative, you have to

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>feel really good in what you're wearing so that you're

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not thinking about it. If you're working person, you shouldn't

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about how you look when you're working, you know,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you just shouldn't. So you need to feel good about it.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's why whatever your issues are, like your self

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>image issues, just that's why I found the jacket that

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I adored the most, and I wore it so much

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I had holes in it, so I had my tailor

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>make a pattern out of it. I found the skirt

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that I loved, so, you know, I found my favorite

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>things and I put them together and I made my

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>own uniform and it was like, so it's like very comforting,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, it's just natural. It feels natural

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to wear that. So Kim said a lot of great stuff.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that's it out to me was when

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>she said that it's important to be comfortable. It's interesting

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear that from a fashion person, first of all,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and then it was in stark contrast to what Carrie

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>told us, in which case being comfortable has nothing to

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do with it. It's about what you project and the

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>strength and the defense of it all. Yeah, And for her,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think comfort was forgetting that your clothing says something. Right.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It was like, if you're comfortable, you're not using your

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>clothing as a weapon exactly. And that seems like the

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lesson here from all these three people. They have very

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>different ways that they use their clothing at work, in

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>different philosophies or how they dress, but they all do

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>dress very intentionally and use it in ways to benefit

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>their job. Yeah. I mean in a Shantiana's case, it

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>actually has an effect on her commission on exactly how

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>much money she's probably going to make in a given

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>day or a given week, which is something I think

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that women are more acutely aware of when it comes

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to what they wear at work. Surely. I mean, historically,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>women are sort of on the outside of the power

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>structure in many industries, many companies, And so for me,

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>as a guy, well, I suppose I wouldn't have to

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it all that much because I'm already benefiting

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>from the patriarchy. Yes, I love when we get that

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>word in here. But even if you think about women

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>wearing power suits or pant suits, oh yes, like a

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>certain a certain former presidential candidate, it's a way to signal, oh,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>take me as seriously as a man. I will dress

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>like a man, and then you will take me seriously. Yes, exactly.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And that happened a great deal, particularly in the right,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>when women were entering these professions for the first time.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And now we're seeing women try to signal power in

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>different in other ways, not by emulating necessarily masculinity, but

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps accentuating femininity or other aspects of their person. One

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>example of this that I can think about is Megan Kelly,

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fox News host. I remember it was a big

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>deal when she cut her hair, because all the Fox

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>News hosts have long, wavy mermaid and she cut her

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hair to be the short, slipped back kind of more

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>powerful seeming, right, but then also a little bit more androgynous,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>And how are we going to know if she's a

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>lady if she doesn't have that long lady hair exactly.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely a power move. And the fact that

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of course we even know about this, or that we're

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>even talking about this as opposed to Anderson Cooper's latest haircut. Right,

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody ever describes what men are wearing in the opening

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>paragraph of a story about them pretty much never maybe

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Depp, he gets one. Yeah, so yeah, this is

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>something that women have to deal with more than men.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's really great and refreshing to see three women

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>using that to their benefit. Exactly. They've taken the time

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to kind of consider it and they're putting it into action.

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that that lesson can apply to

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people of all genders, being conscious of what you wear

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that it is something you can use to

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>get what you want. That's right. I will speak for myself.

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I am silently judging everyone, men and women, both so

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you may as well know that, and you should dress

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at least to impress Sam anything else. Yeah, No, I

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that's pretty much a good rule all around.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this will be a good time for us

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to transition to hap big takes, happy fake takes. So Sam,

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. What is your not quite fully

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>formed thought about work or maybe not work this week?

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>This is semi work related. I want to talk for

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a minute about our phones and the etiquette of using

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>them when in the presence of other people, particularly at

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>things like say, lunches. I have found it be quite

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>liberating for myself and my guest to, perhaps an hour

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>into the occasion, suggest that we take a moment to

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>both check our phones. That way, we're relieving ourselves of

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the anxiety that there's an email or a text or

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>something that's waiting for us and is going unanswered. And

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>then when if presuming everything is fine and well taken

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>care of, we can continue on with our time together

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing that you know, we've checked in and everything's okay.

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just think it's perfectly okay. If, in fact,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's helpful to periodically say, hey, let's

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just check our phones for a second. Yes, I am

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really into this. We did it kind of informally the

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>other day an a meeting. That's right. That's right. Yeah,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think you can do it too much.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the most frequent thing you could

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>do maybe is once every forty five minutes. Yeah, and

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just better than people kind of side eyeing

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their phones the entire time you're hanging out. That's right.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That could be interpreted as rudeness, because perhaps it is,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But this way you say so stressful for you personally

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to be the one doing that, right for all of us. Yeah,

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we it's two thousand, almost seventeen. We have phones, We

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>communicate all the time, acknowledge it, take a moment to

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>check it and then move on. Love it. Awesome. I'm

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull a Sam Growbart and this week do a

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>recommendation for my half big take. I've been listening to

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fellow podcasts, and I think right now

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in my podcast moment, I'm looking for something that's a

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit not about the news I mean, and also

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>not too dense. I need something a little bit lighter.

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So I've been listening to this podcast who Weekly w

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>h O w h O Weekly and it's about B list, delist,

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>C list celebrities and what do they tell you about?

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And they talk about there's this whole industry of entertainment

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>reporting and entertainment watching about these like unimportant side characters,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they just kind of talk about their lives

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and who they are, and they have terminology like who'se

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>versus them? So them are famous people like Robin Wright

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>would be of them, and who would be I don't

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>even know, just someone you've never heard of. And they're

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just really funny. It's good. You know, this might be

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>useful to me because I will confess something. I sometimes

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>see the covers of in a supermarket let's say People magazine,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>US Weekly, in Touch, and you're like, I don't is

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that any of the people on them anymore? Yeah, it's

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>probably because they're Who's. They're all who's exactly. They're all

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like reality show like third level exactly. Those are all who's.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So I could listen to this podcast and this but

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>actually catch up and it's just entertaining. They're funny. It's

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Finger and Lindsay Webber, who are two writers on

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the internet. And I really enjoy it. That sounds right up. Yeah,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks all right, and that is half big takes, half

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>baked takes. Thanks for listening to game Plan this week.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at rs Greenfield and

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I am at Sam Grobart. If you like this show,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>please head on over to iTunes or wherever you listen

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts to rate and subscribe and review. We love

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Game Plan is produced by Liz

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Magnus Hendrickson. The Head of Bloomberg Podcasts is

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Alec McCabe. Thanks for listening and we'll see you next week.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>By get the most from your people and send your

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>business soaring with corn Ferry. From executive search to talent strategy,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>leadership development, rewards and succession planning. Corn Ferry knows up

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is more than a direction, it's your future. Learn more

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at corn ferry dot com. Slash up Hi I'm hi, Hi,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi Hi there, Hi, I'm do we say hi Hi