WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 10 NFL Game (Ep. 380)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>your bets. This be Joey Pa Joe Pisapia, and it's

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>time to look ahead for Week ten in the NFL.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Week nine had some fireworks, some fun stuff, some crazy moments,

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>good bad, ugly, some great matchups too. I think we're

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>starting to get a picture of what some of these

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff teams are going to be, and some of these

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>playoff races are going to be really interesting. So make

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>sure you subscribe to the Betting Pros YouTube channel and

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribeer erever you get your pods, you can say. On

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>top of all of that, my top ten bets for

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the week video will come out tomorrow. We've got the

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>prop Show this week. Later on, we've got all kinds

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of fun things, including our Monday night football live stream,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so don't forget to subscribe. We'll check that out in

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Thursday nights too. But we're taking this Thursday off everybody

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because Joeyp's going on a little vacation. Now. Two guys

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>will never take a break, Pat Fitz Morris My Patty

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Cakes and of course Derek Brown Debro the King of Bros.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Bro coming over to betting Bro just for today.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam Hoppin taking a day off, so I guess this

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is the season here, so bro, looking back at week nine,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was there a certain circumstance that really kind of let's

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>be negative, let's have some fun that ruined your weekend?

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's always fun, man, when you hit the over for

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Saquon Barkley's carries and you're like, well that's a stone lock. Yeah,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and then the entire offense falls apart. The game goes

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>sideways and you're questioning everything that you thought you knew

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>about life.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that sounds about right. Poor Daniel Jones, who he's

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out for the year, man, talk more about.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>But guy could not catch a break this year. Pat

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fitz Morris, let's spend some positivity. What worked out for

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you on Sunday that you felt really good about when

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you look back.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I caught a huge break on under in Ravens Seahawks,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>where the Ravens decided to show the Seahawks mercy being

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>right at the doorstep of yet another score at the

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>very end of the game. And luckily, I swear to god,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 3>it took like the Ravens maybe like six minutes to

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 3>go the last twenty yards of that drive like they

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>easily could have scored again, and thank goodness, took the

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>foot off the accelerator and got me that under bet.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>So that was a positive result for sure.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Here you go. Mercy is not for the week, So

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Let's get to some of the picks

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>here for this week in the NFL, some early values.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The boys and are going to take a look at

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these games here. Don't forget to subscribe to

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the channel and drop a comment below let us know

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what your favorite pick is. We love our Betting Pros

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>community here. We're so happy to see all of you subscribing.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>It's great, keep it going. Let's go because we're giving

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>away a one year free premium upgrade to Betting Pros

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Premium for you just for dropping a comment and subscribing.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>What's better than that nothing I tell you? So make

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>sure you also ring that bell for notification so you

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>can be alerted when new episodes are up with the

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>VP Show or the live streams here on the VP channel.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you're the big winner so one year free

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>premium upgrade doesn't get better than that, you can follow

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>us too at bettingpros dot Com slash Joe slash fits

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>have some fun with that. Also, let's get to the games.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Boys.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look here, and it's Bettingpros dot Com

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sash Debro. I believe, yes, we can follow.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 5>You to say two weeks in a row. I get

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 5>left out right now. I almost did it to you twice.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 5>Third time's the chart. Let's get over to Thursday Night football. Yeah,

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 5>so Carolinas one and seven.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bears are two and seven. It's on Amazon Prime,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which is annoying to have to switch over and I

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can't DVR it. So let's look at the lines over

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on BP and see if we can make some money

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>on this one. The Bears are three and a half

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at minus one ten right now. Forty is

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the number you can get the Carolina Panthers plus one

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>forty five, Debro. Since you're our guest today, we'll start

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with you on this one. So many bad looks, bad

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>reads from Bryce Young. The pick sixes are not good.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get Carolina at plus one fifty two on

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the money line at Fandel right now. But we don't

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>know the status as of right now of mister one

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields. Do you want to bet this now and

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>hope that he plays on the Thursday in the short week,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and do you think that's where the value is or

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do you wait potentially and see where things go from here?

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Because if you don't think Fields is gonna play Carolina

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on the money line is kind of interesting? Is the

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>upset for me?

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to take Chicago here to cover. I think

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that Justin Fields does have a realistic chance to play.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>But either way, what is Carolina shown us this year? Nothing?

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 2>Bryce John has shown us nothing. This defense is in shambles.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And even if it's Tyson Baigen under center, he went

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>toe to toe with the Saints this last week, showed

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the rushing, showed the ability to play quarterback. Like I'm

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>willing to say that the Chicago Bears cover. I mean,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>outside of that, the only other action I'll have on

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>this game is probably betting the over for when Deontay

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Foreman's props come out. As far as rushing, rushing attempts

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, playing almost sixty percent of the snaps, but

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>past that, I'm off this game.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>FITZI Brian Burns is probably not gonna play in this

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>game either, that's a big loss in the Carolina defense

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears defense is played better of late. Do

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you see any value here on this Thursday Night contest?

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 3>I can't say I do show it does seem like

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 3>this line is maybe giving the Bears a little too

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>much credit, and it does seem like it is kind

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of anticipating the return of Justin Fields.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know. I mean, the Panthers were ahead

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>of the.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Bears and the Massy Peabody rankings going into Week nine,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and even if that gap has closed up, like I

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>think they'd still be pretty close to even for giving

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the Bears two points for home field. Like, maybe there's

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a little value on the Panthers, but it is hard,

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>as Deebro mentioned, to back the Panthers with.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Anything these days.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know, although they did knock off the Texans

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago, that was kind of an

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 3>impressive win. But exactly, I'm probably not gonna bet this one, Like,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>I just can't give more than a field goal to anyone.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 4>With the Bears early.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Money coming in on the Panthers too, I think people

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>are starting to see what I see, which is, hey,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>take the Panthers and then if Fields doesn't play, then

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.119
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, that's a good value.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 4>But it's a little even if he does.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 3>Even if he does, Joe like the Panthers can beat

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the justin Field's bad well.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I also mentioned here I think the unders in play

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>because both these offenses have been terrible. The pace of

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>this game is going to be disgusting too.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts and New England Patriots will go to Germany

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Guten mordon. We did that the other day, so I

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>learned a little German guten morton. So we have this

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>game here, sitting at forty three and a half at

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten. You've got the New England Patriots one

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>and a half point underdogs at minus won ten. The

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Pats a plus one ten on the money line. Fits

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick after this game, taking some questions here for

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the media. It was ugly. It was bad. I mean,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I know they won two weeks ago, but it just

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like things are going in a really bad direction,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>very negative. Whereas the Colts, I feel like, are competitive

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in these games. What do you think about this one?

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, I'm on the cult side of

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this one. In the early going.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've talked about the Colts Joe being one of

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 3>those vexing teams that I've been unable to get on

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the right side of all season long. So I guess

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't really like either side here. I just don't

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 3>like betting against the Patriots as home dogs, even though

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>you know I bet on the Patriots as home dogs. Wait, no,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they were slight favorites against the Commanders.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, how didn't work out, not at all.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>But then again, like they knocked off the Bills a

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago, now they're really kind of squarely at home.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't like either side, but the Colts have been

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>a pretty reliable over team. Week nine notwithstanding, I thought

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers were gonna be able to keep up their

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>end of the bargain and score enough to get that

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 3>game over. It didn't happen. It was the Panther's fault,

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>but I don't know. The Colts have gone over the

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>total in four of their last six and six of

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>their last nine games have gone over fifty points. The

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>average point total of the Colts game this season is

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty two point seven, So I do kind of like

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the over here. I think I'm gonna bet the over,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think I'm gonna bet either side.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, debro, what's interesting here? Obviously the neutral site comes

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>into play quite a bit, but still the you have

0:07:59.920 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to two of the Patriots, you know, not being able

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to find any consistency. The fact that they are underdogs

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game feels right to me. I like the

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Colts in the minus one and a half. At minus

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>one fifteen you get a FanDuel. But what do you think?

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if I got to take a side here,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll go with the Colts. I have no confidence in

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. But my favorite bet out of this game,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think fits hit hit the nail on the

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>head here, is betting the over. We quietly have two

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>teams that are top three in neutral pace, so I

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>think the play volume and neither one of these defenses

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>have been playing fantastic. Let's also throw that out there, like,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I know, Kenny Moore house two touchdowns and you don't

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>want to target the slot versus defense. The outside corners

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>have still been up and down. I like the over

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in this game because I think the play volume is

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna be fantastic.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, about the volume in this next one here,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay and Pittsburgh coming up here. I got one

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>word for you kids under unders. That's wharble. Thirty seven

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half is that number of my at minus

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>went aw eight on FanDuel, green Bay's plus one sixty

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>seven on the money line, Pittsburgh minus three and a

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>half points over on DK one on five de bro.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm kind of like quick to that and

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm being facetious, but it just neither of these offenses

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>give me a lot of real confidence necessarily week to week.

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The Pittsburgh Steelers like to play, you know, all these

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of down and dirty games. A little bit you

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>saw also the Christian Watson is gonna be dealing with

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an injury, so Green Bay is not gonna be one

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. You got Jordan Love on the road Pittsburgh defense.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at this under to me, that's the

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>best bet of this one. I think Pittsburgh can handle

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half. I would like it to

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>be three, to be honest, like god like, but whatever, Well,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>beggars can't be choosers. What are your thoughts here on

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>this one?

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, Joe. I think I wish this opened

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>at like two and a half.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Or three.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>But I still think Pittsburgh can cover because the thing

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>they do well is get after the quarterback, and the

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that Jordan Love can't handle is pressure. So he's

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna see one huge dose of TJ. Watt all up

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in his face all day. So I think Pittsburgh, Well,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>the money line has been good. Lord, it's been seduced

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 2>by the juice. But looking at I mean minus one ninety, No,

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>but you can give me to hope that the Steelers

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 2>will cover in this one. I'm in on the under. Really,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this comes down to I'm probably gonna attack this mostly

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>with props. But I do also think that once we

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>get the news that Christian Watson is out, we could

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>see this line move a little bit more in the

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Steelers favor.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Well here's the thing, Fitzy, this one did open at three,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and now every book has added the hook. What do

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you make of that?

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think they're recognizing that the Packers'

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>offense is pretty sickly and that it's hard to see

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>them going to Pittsburgh and winning. I mean, I've been

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 3>very guilty of over estimating the Steelers all season.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm you and me both brothers.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, We've talked about this, Joe, I'm wary of that,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 6>but like I still considering that, I can't see the

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Packers winning this game.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I think I am going to bet the Steelers, and Joe,

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to grab that under you better grab

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 3>it fast. You mentioned it's thirty seven and a half

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>on Fan Duel. It's already down to thirty seven on

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 3>DraftKings as of late morning on Monday, and I could

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>see this going down to thirty six.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I bet it before the show, my friends, and

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're making all your picks count. By the way,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're doing our fun Betting Pros contest at

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com slash NFL contest. We make five picks

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a week, one hundred on the season, and the winner

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>gets a Jackson Smith and Jigba autograph jersey. We're also

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>doing weekly prizes, monthly prizes, so you can join any

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>time in this contest and you don't even have to

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>make a bet. You just have to make a pick,

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all you have to do. We're giving away upgrades

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy pros, to betting Pros. We're giving away swag

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from our shops. Let you go shopping Black Friday sales

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or right around the corner. But again, have some fun

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>with us. Download the Betting Pros app and make sure

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you click on that community tab and go to NFL contest,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>or you can just go to betting pros dot com

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>slash NFL contest and when you download the app, you

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>get three free days of premium on iOS. So there

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you go, a little bonus for you with the NFL, NHL, NBA.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Someone told me college basketball is starting again. I know,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>fits cares, I do not, but whatever to each his own.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's only so much room in my brain at one

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>time for things.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>That's I like all the college basketball betting to fits.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll just tail, yeah, I just follow fits.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Betting pros dot com slash fits. Let's get to the

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints and the Minnesota Vikings. The Minnesota Vikings

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't a roll. I'm feeling it, boys. Let's go. They're

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at home against the Saints. You know the

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Saints are, obviously, you know, a defense that continues to

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>be steady. Here Taysom Hill continues to do Taysom Hill things.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Forty one is the number. Here you have the Minnesota

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Vikings home under dogs at two and a half, which

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is always appealing minus one oh two o Ron DK

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>can get that if you like Minnesota for the upset

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of plus one twenty five or a points bet. This

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>one's really intriguing to me. Both teams are five and four. Derek,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting narrative. It feels like the Minnesota Vikings have

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this good favor rolling and this confidence. The Josh Dobbs

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thing gave them this life. It feels like they're really

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>coalescing and the Jefferson injury almost kind of united them

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to get Yeah, there is it enough though to bet

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>them in this scenario at home week ten?

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. I was actually kind of surprised

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>where this opened that I thought the line was gonna

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 2>be closer. I feel like this is giving way too

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>much credit to the minute to the New Orleans Saints.

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 2>With Minnesota's secondary playing better, they're gonna blitz they ever

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 2>live in heck out of Derek Carr, He's been up

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and down. It's always an adventure with Derek Carr. Give

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>me the Minnesota Vikings money line, especially a plus money,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and I am intrigued by the over in this one,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>with Josh Jobs having a full week to actually learn

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>all the names of the people around him. What can

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>he do? And this Saints offense is starting to come together.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So give me the over and I'll take a Minnesota

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>money line.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Minnesota money line. I like where Debro's head's at.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It's two for two, for two, Pat, you want to

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>make it three for three? Yeah?

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I like Debro's call on this one too. Minnesota is

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>a tough place to play. And granted this is not

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 3>like a star studded edition of the Vikings, but man

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>like Brian Flores has really got that defense overachieving. The

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Saints defense has been really good too. But why do

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I also feel like the over is the right play here?

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this was supposed to be Josh Dobbs Vikings debut.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 3>He's already, as it turns out, had a week to

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>dig his heels in and get comfortable, and he makes

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings kind of plucky on offensively plucky offensively. So

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>at this low number I'm leaning over to It's it's

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>just kind of a vibe. I know both of these

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>teams have maybe been a little better defensively than offensively,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>but I think we're going to see points.

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>In this one. The over is probably the safest bet

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of anything on here. I think if you're trying to

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have a little little bit more juice there, you take

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings on the money line. But I agree with

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you Fits, I think the safe bet here, or if

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you like individual props, you want to put something along

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with the game, you take the over, and then you

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>take something you really like, whether now you know Madison

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>might be that you know, now that Acres is out

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with that torn Achilles, you know, maybe some Madison propsy

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>come a little bit easier to digest. Let's get to

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the next game on the slate here as a run

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>through Week ten in the NFL. Having a good time here.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The next one, we've got the Houston Texans and the

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals. Now, gentlemen Joe Burrow and c. J. Stroud

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>looked really good on Sunday. This one, in theory, should

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be a very entertaining contest. The number forty seven and

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a half pretty pretty good. Minus one ten on FanDuel,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals are seven point favorites at home. That

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>feels right. I think the Bengals have earned that plus

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>two to eighty over on the FanDuel side. Now that's

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Houston money line fits. I want to talk

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about this because there's that dangerous thing, and we talked

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about it last week.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, just because the team looks great one week

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it travels around. The Cincinnati Bengals are starting

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to really look like the Cincinnati Bengals of old, that

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>big time playoff team. The seven is a big number.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm still here for it. The forty seven and a half,

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is pretty high. I'm actually staying away from

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna go with Cincy in the seven. But Fitz,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do you see anything different here in this game? Do

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you think forty seven and a half is a number

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that this game can go over?

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about that. I'm not betting the total

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>this one. I think the total is pretty spot on.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>But I'm kind of with you and the Bengals, Joe.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>They like they've got it together. They are rolling. They

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 3>look like the AFC Super Bowl contender that we've seen

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years. And I do find it

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>interesting that this game opened up on DraftKings at plus

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 3>eight for the Texans and was quickly bet down to

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>like money must have come flowing in on the Texans

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>right off the bat, and it got down to seven

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>really quickly. But seven is a number one.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Good thing for everybody who wants to bet Cincinnati.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, And I'm pretty comfortable with it. At Bengals

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 3>minus seven, I think I want to hit that now

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>before it goes up again and you have to throw

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>a hook in there.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I'll tell you what too. This is why you're

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>watching betting pros, this is why you're subscribe to the channel.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Three weeks ago, I think I think it was before

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco game. I it was my number one

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>bet of the week, which was the plus five hundred

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on Cincinnati to win the AFC North, and I said,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you're never gonna see this number again if they bet

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>if they win against San Francisco, and then it went

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to three fifty. I didn't look at it what it

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:09.719
<v Speaker 1>is this morning. I'm gonna check it right now. But

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. It's like, you have to say, all right,

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in a position now if Cincinnati runs a couple

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of these big games, if they go and beat San Francisco,

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>they beat Buffalo, what does that number look like. I

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care what the Ravens are doing. I don't care

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>who they're beating up on, the Arizona Cardinals and teams

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. I care about the Bengals beating the forty

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>nine ers. I care about the Bengals beating the Bills.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>That says to me that team is ready. Trey Hendrickson

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>being back to has been such a huge piece for

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this defense. On that that defensive line get into the

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback making things happen. Debro any final thoughts on this

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>contest here? How do you want to approach it?

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm in locks up with you, guys. I thought I

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>thought you were gonna mention how we bet or we

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>both bet the Cincinnati Bengals money line against San Francisco,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>which was.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh we did that too, Oh we did that too.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 2>That was what was a joe plus two ten at

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>one point?

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Like it was plus two ten. I think I got it.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Plus two forty is what I got.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh it was so nice, man. But I'm with you.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 2>I think the Bengals cover this number. I'm intrigued by

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the under in this game. Cincinnati has been rolling. If

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>they get to the over, I think it's because the

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Bengals just mollywop them in this one. But I'm curious

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>what the line does if it goes up. I'm gonna

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 2>let this kind of simmer. I'm curious that this line

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 2>continues to go up a little bit, and then I'm

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna hammer the under later in the week depending on.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>What it does. Still good value the Bengals on FanDuel

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>plus three twenty to win that division. Baltimore's minus one

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five. It is wrong that it gets wrong. That's

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. Go better right now, folks. You know what.

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going back in the video again. It's going back

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the video again tomorrow because the people need to know.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to be the voice of the people. Let's

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the next TikTok superstar, Joey p I'm an

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>influencer if nothing else. The Cleveland Browns Baltimore Ravens. Again,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all credit to Baltimore. They are handling their business. Offense

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is starting to jive here with the new play calling

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and then everything going on here in the new OC.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore's six point favorites at home against this Cleveland defense,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that is for real. You can get minus one oh

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>five on Baltimore DK. You get minus one ten over

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on the plus six side Cleveland. Thirty eight and a

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>half is the number everywhere here for this game pretty

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>much right now, plus two twenty on the Cleveland side

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>for the upset debro. The Baltimore Ravens continue to be

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that team that kind of plays up and down to

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the competition. Now, Seattle was kind of a weird one

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like that was almost like a mid

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>so I guess this is to me where Baltimore starts

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to really prove itself winning these big Indivision games because

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they came up short against the Steelers. These are the

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>games you have to win. What do you think about

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this contest? You see the early value on the betting side.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is giving way too much credit

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 2>to the Cleveland Browns and their defense. This line should

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>be seven seven and a half. I think I'm willing

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>to say the Raven's going to cover this at home.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying away from the total. I think it's good,

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>but I think Baltimore evens just stomp the Browns in

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah see, I tend to go that way too, But Fitz,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I've learned one thing in all of these years, which is,

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, some times when it looks like this too

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>good to be true, Like the real value on this

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>game is to go bet the Browns, Like that's where

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the value lies. There's no doubt about that. And I

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>know it's Oh, I get it, it's so gross. But

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're the Browns, what you have to do is

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>defensively contain Lamar Jackson, make him beat you throwing in

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the football, and continue to sack and rush that passer. Now,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Lamar's a little slippery, That's that's true. But pat to me,

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the value on this game is the brown side, which

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I know it's gross, like Derek is alluding to, and

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, but I might even watch this one

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and bet it in game live because I feel like

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that is something. If you see that Browns come out

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>then looking like that team that played the forty nine ers,

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>right or leaving the team that came out yesterday, that

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>energized Browns team, that's a tough team to beat anywhere.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, although you know the Cardinals are such a punching bag,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't feel like we can take that much

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 3>away from that game, especially with Clayton Tune at quarterback.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, they should have beaten the Indianapolis Colts.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>They had that game in their grasp. That was a

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>road game they beat San Francisco, you know, and they're

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it with subpar quarterback play at times. But I

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to, like, this is one of those

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>games that you know it's going to be nasty. It's

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an indivision AFC North kind of grinding game, and I

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think that style favors Cleveland because of the defense.

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Where I agree with you in Baltimore.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Where I agree with see.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Where I agree with you on this show is that

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, like I think the Ravens are the more

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>complete and the better team, but this game, with these defenses,

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I do see this as being a classic AFC North

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 3>rock fight kind of game, and six points is too

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>much to give up in a rock fight. And like,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of have a policy where I do

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 3>not bet against the Ravens when they're at home. It's

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 3>either bet four layoff, and it's probably going to be

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 3>a layoff. I was mildly interested in the under here

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 3>when it was thirty nine and a half to open.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 3>It's already gone down to thirty eight and a half,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not quite as comfortable with it. They're so

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably just gonna enjoy this as sort of a

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>classic AFC North defensive struggle and not bet at at all.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's see if you can enjoy the battle of

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>two three and five teams in Tampa Bay. The Buccaneers

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to host the Tennessee Titans. Will Levis with

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit extra time to prepare for this one.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Give Levis credit. You know Pittsburgh, he got down to

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that last play and then he threw the picky. You know,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>bog and I were talking on that thursdaynight football game.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, there's just too many negatives against Levis here,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterbacks, short week on the road against the Seilers,

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was just and you know what, we got

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it right. Bogman hit four out of his five props

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that night, and I hit the three, and that's it.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Like that, we crush that game. Now it's time to

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>crush this one. Titans Tampa. I know here, you're getting

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>basically a pick them. I like Tampa. On this side.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's one point minus one ten over the minus one

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>side of Tampa. That's on DraftKings. Thirty eight and a

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>half is the over under the money line for tennesseet

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>fandels two DKs at minus one fifteen. So Vegas is

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>telling you this game is a pick him, and I'm pat.

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna pick Tampa and I'm gonna pick the

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>home team with Baker Mayfield coming off of a bad

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>loss there where I think the defense kind of grabs

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>itself up by the Haunches and has a better showing

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>here against Will Levis. What do you think.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you, Joe. The Buccaneers just have not finished

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>well lately. They've lost three straight, but all of them

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 3>have been one score games, two of them by a

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 3>field goal, and the Bucks do seem to play a

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of these close games. I just feel like this

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>line is giving Levis too much credit. And I understand

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the enthusiasm, like he immediately has looked like he belongs

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. But rookie quarterbacks are still gonna make mistakes.

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>And while the Buccaneers are, you know, like certainly not

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the better teams in the league, they're not

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 3>an NFL doormat. And it just seems like giving too

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>much credit to the Titans to have them be almost

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>to pick them in a road game against the Bucks.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 4>So I agree with you. I like the box here.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this too. I think I'm very comfortable going

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>up there to let's say, like right now, on the

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>alternate spread on fandle you can get at minus three

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half at plus one forty like I'm comfortable,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't want to go that far, you

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>can get minus two and a half at plus one

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.239
<v Speaker 1>oh four. I can move the needle just a little bit,

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>get plus money and just take that, because I think

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that is the best way to approach this game. Debro,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think?

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely agree? You bet the all line and I think

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay's gonna cover this. And the other part about

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 2>this is as news trickles out, I think we could

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 2>see this line move more in the Buccaneers favor because

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 2>none of us project that Traylon Burks is probably gonna

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>play this week. Now, that's probably not gonna be the

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 2>needle mover. But the other side of that is DeAndre

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Hopkins is not fully healthy. He's been dealing with a

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>toe issue. If anything comes out midweek about oh, maybe

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>he's more doubtful to play. Who the heck is Will

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Levis throwing to? And yes, this line is giving Tampa

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Bay at home. This line is giving way too much

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>credit to Will Levis. So give me Tampa Bay outright

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to win this game, and I agree Betett right now

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 2>with them at minus one or a pick them. I

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>think Tampa Bay wins this game.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think the cover. That's my favorite thing. The

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>best thing that came out of that Will Levis debut

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was the three touchdowns and all of this, like, oh,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe it. Nobody could believe it. But let's

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not forget the reason why we couldn't believe it. I

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think everybody has. And that's what Bogwin and I were trying.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We were trying to check the privilege. That's what we're

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. And Thursday night, damn it, we checked

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the privilege and I want to check it again here

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>checking privileges. That's what we do here at betting Pros.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to another game here. Can the San Francisco

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>forty nine er stopped the bleeding in Jacksonville five and

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>three going to Jacksonville six and two, Jacksonville three point

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>underdogs at home at minus one oh five, man is

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>attempting debro. Forty five is the number for this one.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Minus won ten in the under over at bet MGM

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half over on fand what minus

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>won ten. If you like Jacksonville for the upset at

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty five at points bet, you can get

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it there. Debro look, San Fran looked like first class

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden they got bumped down

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to coach. And now I think this is where you

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out where you are if you're the

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, because the headspace I feel like is

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a little iffy at this point. So do you think

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville has it in them for this kind of upset

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or do the forty nine ers get right?

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I can confidently say that Jacksonville

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 2>can upset them. I don't disagree that they've been bumped

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>down to coach. They're riding in the middle seat, somebody's

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>reclined back on them, and they're just questioning life and

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>all their choices. I agree with all of that. I

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 2>think the way that I want to attack this game

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>with I think Deebo Samuel's gonna be back this week,

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's gonna be a big boost to

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>this offense for me. I'm staying away from the sides.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>What I like here is the over in this game.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that this game could be a shootout. If

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco gets right, I think Jacksonville can push back

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>on the other side against what we've seen be more

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of a porous San Francisco forty Niners defense.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>They are giving well. Now they've added Chase Young, so

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what that pass rush look.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 2>But even with the pass rush, secondary has been more

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>poorishe you can get at them? I think I like

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the over in this game.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, to Derek's point, Pat, you know, when you

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have Dee Deebo Samuel in the game, party's numbers are

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>markedly different. Uh, the splits with that, It's like the

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones splits with and without Saquon Barkley. So if

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you have that in this one here, I start to

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>lean towards the individual rock party props here because I

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be low after these last couple of

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks that I think that is a great opportunity of

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>deep if if Deebo's healthy. So you're gonna wait till

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Friday for this one, have to wait for the Friday

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>show for it. But in your opinion, Pat, how do

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you see this one, because both of these teams I

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think you can throw on them. That's gonna be the

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting part. Do you think that tends to an over?

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any value there?

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you parse this game?

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 3>I think that the total is about right, and but

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I do kind of like those Rock Party overs if

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Deebo does in fact play, And it seems like things

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 3>are trending towards debo playing.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 4>But we've got two streaking teams here.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 3>We've got the forty nine Ers who've dumped three straight,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Jaguars have won five straight. And I mean,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 3>although I don't think anyone considers the Jaguars like legitimate

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl contenders, I do think they have stamped themselves

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 3>as a legitimate AFC playoff team. I still don't think

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>there's much disputing that the forty nine Ers are the

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>better team, however, although maybe Jags fans would dispute it.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 3>So I'm leaning slightly towards betting the Niners here to

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 3>end their three game losing streak.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I just think this team is.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Too good to lose four straight and coming off the buy,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 3>hopefully that gave them time to patch up some of

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the holes in the secondary and get the defense right again.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 4>But I kind of like the Niners here, all right.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Next game on the slate here, we got the Los

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers at home. We'll see what they do tonight

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>against the New York Jets. This is that Monday when

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this. Plus one and a half minus one

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ten on DK. The Los Angeles Chargers at home against

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions. Lions coming off of bye here, they

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are favorites, as they should be. I don't think their

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>favorites by enough. I know that sounds a little kooky

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>considering you know, they kind of got their rear end

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>handed to them, but they've had some time to think

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>about what they did wrong. Maybe you get David Montgomery

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>back in this game. I'm still waiting on news for that.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Forty eight and a half is the number pretty much

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>everywhere here. Plus one ten for the Los Angeles Chargers.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Pat The Chargers have no home field advantage. They are,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're an army without a country. They are

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this team that continuously lets you down. I would again,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't find the alternate spreads because they're not up

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>right now for this game. In particularly because the Chargers

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>play tonight, but I would say this. I would no

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens tonight. I don't care if the Chargers

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>win this game tonight against the Jets. I still don't

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like this number here. For the Charger side, I would

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>tease this one. Try to get it to three or so.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>For the Lions, what do you think?

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Chargers still can't close. Joe coffee is for closers,

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 3>no coffee for the Chargers.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's right.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm taking the Lions here. I've bet this one already.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 3>You've got the team coming off the bye well rested,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>probably getting David Montgomery back this week, and going against

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the team that's gonna be on short rest after the

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Monday night game in what's probably gonna be a hard

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>fought and physical game against the Jets.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 4>I love the Lions here.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I love a good Glenn Gary Glenn Ross reference. That's

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>what I love. And for those of you who have

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>never seen the play or the movie, you should. You

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>should find it. It's great, fantastic performances. Al Pacino sell

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in real estate. I got a piece of land I

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>want to sell you. I want you to take a

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>look at this. It's a good deal. It's a good

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>deal for everybody. We're gonna make so much money here.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But the fun fact, the Alec Baldwin character in that

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>movie who comes in does that amazing monologue. It's not

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the play. They wrote it just for Alec Baldwin

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to show up that day and be in the movie.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Fun facts. Here at betting pros and again people he's like,

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what wire you talking about? Just go look for it.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It's great. It's a dude movie. It's a true dude movie.

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown, you're a dude. What do you make of

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this game?

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>But you're going to bring up in this entire schools.

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem is again Glengarry Glenn Ross is not a

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>PG film necessarily to the way they talk to each other.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So any quotes that I could lend here, uh would?

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna tell your Paccino story. Your Pacino story is

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 2>very good, but we don't.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I met out a couple of times. He's very small,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's got a big head. That is as it is.

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It is. He has a huge head. I don't know

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>how it stays on top of his body. It's crazy.

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He just had a kid. He's like eighty years old.

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He just had a kid god blessed.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just that man.

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>His girl friends like in her thirties, Al Pacino, Robert

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>de Niro. These guys are like eighty years old, having.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Man, let's go off.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You want to legost lego? All right, let's let's caf

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>What do we have? Yeah, let's talking about Lord.

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we're still somewhere in the midst of the

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Lions and Chargers. Uh yeah, I'm with paddle this one.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Give me the Lions. I think all spreads are definitely

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>in play here. I think the total is spot on.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>If anything, I think the Lions could slow this down

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and drag the Chargers down, so the under in this

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>one is actually more in play for me. But I

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>think the Lions take this one.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 7>Man.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers, Yeah, they get no coffee, they cannot close,

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>they fall on their face. I think it's gonna happen

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>again at home this week. Now.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You haven't seen The Godfather? Have you seen Glenn Garry

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Ross?

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 2>At least I have seen that, And no I have

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 2>not seen The Godfather. But you take a little bit

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of ownership for this. Joe, I was up in Jersey.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying at the we just had no turn, no time.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Here's the excuses.

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We were at the draft, a big talk. I was

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>too busy embarrassing you and Madden. That's what's too busy doing.

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to talk about your three losses.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to talk about Alea Pacheco running for

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>three eighty five on you. You know what, we don't need

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>those screenshots, So I don't even in my life have

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a screenshot to prove it that Atlanta Falcons head over

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to aaron Zona, Arizona. You can get plus two and

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a half over on BETMGM at minus one ten. You

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>can get Atlanta at minus one and a half at

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten over on DK, So this game is

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>all over the map here. Forty one and a half

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is the number you can get at bet MGM, forty

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>two over on DK. Everyone's just trying to figure this

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>out because we don't know if Kyler Murray's gonna play

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>plus one ten on the money line for Arizona right now.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>That's the best number you get it. But bet MGM

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>debro we anticipate Kyler Murray's returned this week. I think

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that feels about right. So not being said, do we

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>want to jump on this one ten now before that

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>news comes out.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's in play. I would like this number

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>if it was a little bit higher. Honestly, my favorite

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>play in this game is just hitting me over. We've

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 2>seen theirs on a Cardinals y fans can't stop anybody

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>through the air on the ground. This number is going

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to go up as soon as we get news. And

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 2>I fully believe that Kyler Murray will play this week.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>This has been my thought the entire time that if

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this team wants to put Kyler Murray and won a

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>spot to succeed in his first game back, you're not

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 2>running him out there versus the Browns of the Ravens,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>as well as his trade value if they do want

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 2>to trade him this offseason, You're not going to put

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>him out there in his first game. So I think

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray does play, and for me, my favorite one

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 2>is just betting the over and moving on.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, bet in the over, moving on, Pat, how do

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to take this one?

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Cardinals' home dogs, Joe, and you can

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 3>interest me in that money line going against the Falcons.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Where is the Falcons morale going to be after losing

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that damn to the Vikings as maybe better if they

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>get rid of Arthur Smith, that would be great. And

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 3>like I'm a Packers fan, I can't stand the Vikings.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 3>I was cheering for the Vikings to pull off that

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 3>upset yesterday, like that was yeah. So I think the

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals can win this game absolutely with Kyler Murray at quarterback.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 3>And I do think we're going to see Kyler back so.

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>And people wanted to give crap for Bejon's fumble. Look,

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Bijon is a guy. He's carrying the football twenty five times.

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>He needs to be in a rhythm. And I don't

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>make excuse for him, but like, enough is enough already.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>If we're not gonna use John Robinson, why we spend

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the draft capital on him? It's crazy.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Roll that same clip for Drake Clundon and Kyle Pitt's baby,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and Arthur Smith has nothing to hide behind, because guess what.

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't pander to the media about the w's you're

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>getting this week, buddy, it's.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like it's it's like Chris Farley and

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Boy is like I'm like JoJo's the idiot's circus. Boy,

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to do. I get all excited.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I get a fleasant like. That's what he feels like.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>He's Jojoe the idiot circus boy, that's what he is

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point. He doesn't know what to do with

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>any of the toys that we've given him. And he's

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>got really good toys. Learn to play with them the

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>right way.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I just want him gone. I want to see victory cigars.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to see vibes all out out of the falcons.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Pearce is my spirit animal. All right, Let's get

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, Seattle. Seattle goes back home to the great

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Northwest here locking their wounds after just a butt kicking.

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest by the ravens, and we'll see who

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>shows up there. Washington. Let's you go against Philly goes

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>on the road, upsets New England. In New England, they're

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>still six and a half point underdogs. The though to

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>travel to Seattle, which is really interesting. Minus one tens

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that number forty five, forty five and a half. That's

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>where this range of the total is plus two thirty

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. FITZI, you might call me crazy here,

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Washington to go in there and handle

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>their business against Seattle, which I know sounds insane, but

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't get this whole Seattle like Seattle

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is mid to me, and those teams always scare me.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>So whenever I have a mid team, I'm gonna look

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>what the value of the line is. And the value

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the line is clearly on the Washington side. But

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe you see this one differently.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I do see it differently than you, guys. I'm afraid.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like I don't want to give Seattle too much credit,

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 3>but this defense has been pretty respectable. And although Gino

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 3>has not been the Geno of early twenty twenty two,

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 3>like I think he's kind of reverted to early career Gino,

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I still think they can beat the Commanders. And I

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>was expecting a dud performance by the Commanders last week

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 3>after getting rid of Montese sweat and Chase Young, and

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I seem to doubt Sam Howell at all the wrong times.

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 3>He went out and had a pretty good game against

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 3>the But this is still a guy who makes a

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of mistakes leads the leads the NFL in Sacks

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 3>has thrown nine interceptions in nine games. Now they're traveling

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 3>cross country to Seattle, which I think is gonna be

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 3>uh circling the wagons after let's just say, not their

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 3>finest effort in Baltimore in week nine. So I'm actually

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 3>willing to lay the points here and take Seattle, I think.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 3>But I think a lot of people are gonna be

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking the way you guys are, and I wouldn't be

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 3>surprised to see the line drop, which is why I'm

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 3>not taking it yet. I think it could go down

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 3>to like five, and in that case, I'll be bouncing

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 3>on Seattle pretty vigorously.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Debro what side of the game that you want with

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 2>any I'm on the I'm on the Commander side. For me,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at the plus two fifteen right now on the

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 2>money line for the Commanders, that's a side of one.

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I get Seattle is at home, and yes, the defense

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>has been good. This is a This offense stays in

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>games every single week. So even if you don't want

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to bet the money line for the Commanders, take the

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.959
<v Speaker 2>over here. We talked about Seattle's defense has played good,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 2>but Commanders have put up points. They've been in every

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 2>single game. If you can hang with the Eagles, you

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 2>can hang with the freaking Seahawks. So that's the way

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm approaching this game. I like the over is my

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>favorite bet in this game, but I am willing to

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 2>put some keshe down on the Commander's money line.

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>All Right, We'll see how you feel about this next one,

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because this one's a doozy. It's a big number of folks.

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It is fifteen and a half to sixteen right now,

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and the number is, of course, the Dallas Cowboys at

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>home against the New York Giants. I assume it's Tommy

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>DeVito playing quarterback, so I get it. I mean it

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like the Giant season is over at this point,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 1>which is two and seven, probably true. Look, Dallas, Dallas

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>hung in there, so like I'll take the I'll take

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little l, tiny little l on that because

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>they said the Eagles are gonna blow their doors off,

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't blow their doors off.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 2>You were not in on Dak Prescott this last week.

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>You said he was all and did Dak Prescot step

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds instead of explaining the session, did Dak

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Prescott not throw a ball in the end zone on

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the last play.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 2>Of the game, and that closing play sequence could not

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 2>have gone worse?

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Closing place like here's why I love the Eagles, and

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>here's why I bets at the beginning of the year

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven hundred to go back to the Super Bowl.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The reason why is because there's no other team in

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the NFC to me that plays upfront on both sides

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the football the way the Eagles do. That offensive

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>line is tough and the defensive line is tough. And

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can play on the if you play that

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of brand of football, you're gonna win football games

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. That being said, let's take a look

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>at this one here, Dallas right now with this big

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>line here, thirty nine and a half is the number

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>plus eight seventy for a Giants upset. Not gonna go there.

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a minus one thousand already on DK for this game.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>One thing I will say, Pat, if you don't think

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas completely blows them out and just kind of takes

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>their foot off the gas a little on Fandle they

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have that you know, winning margin four way plus one

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy five for Dallas to win between one and thirteen points.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting take on this game. What do you think

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about that? Pat?

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I could see that.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because like I you can't bet the Giants

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 3>with Tommy Devine, Like, their implied point total in this

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>game is thirteen and a half and it's hard to

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 3>kind it's hard to argue it should be any higher

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 3>than that, right, I mean like they might need a

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>defensive touchdown.

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 4>To get there.

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I don't necessarily love laying fifteen and a

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 3>half points with anyone in the NFL, but I'm certainly

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 3>not betting the Giants. So that is an interesting bet.

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Joe at that, what was what were the odds on

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 3>that winning one?

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>One seventy five win between one and thirteen, So basically

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's basically yeah, so not cover. But the thing

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>about that is it's like, Okay, you could still have

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this game well in check and just kind of take

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>your foot out of the gas and take starters out

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the third, like if it just becomes one of these,

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the defense, like you know, if they're

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a little i don't know, slow out of the gate. Like,

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just an interesting thing because you're giving yourself such

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a wide positive range of outcomes and positive mind. To me,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>that's the way to approach this game and not muck

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>around with the sixteen.

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not messing with anything from this game outside

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 2>of your bet, Joe, and I'm just going to wait

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 2>until the props get released and just bad seedee lamb

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 2>overs because they get their cash and every week, Baby.

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We can't have a week in the NFL without a

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>New York team in a primetime game. So the Jets

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go to Las Vegas because I hate life

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna see this one here. And look, I

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, I'm drinking the kool aid. I mean,

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>comic crazy. I don't know why Antonio Pierce got me

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>fired up. I don't know if it's gonna carry over.

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>The Jets defense. A very different piece here you're gonna get.

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>But asking Zach Wilson to go over there and cover

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half on the road is intriguing to me.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he could do it. Thirty six

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>and a half to thirty seven is the number you're

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>getting for this one. I like Vegas plus one eighteen

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on the money line, Derek, what do you think?

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Yep? I'm taking Vegas money line, man. I think Antonioppiers

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 2>got them fired up, and this is not to besmirch

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 2>with the Jets. Have been doing. They're reeling off wins,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 2>and they're doing it a lot with their defense. This

0:41:57.920 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is an easy spot where you could see the Raiders

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 2>can continued to be fired up and Zach Wilson implode,

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 2>especially on the road. So yeah, give me the Raiders.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying away from the line and the total and stuff,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 2>but Raiders' money line all day fits your thoughts.

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I told you, Joe that last week I bet the

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Giants plus one and a half. On Monday, when Josh

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 3>McDaniels was the head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>he got fired, that line went up to Giants plus

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 3>three and a half. And like, even though I was

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 3>getting the Giants, uh man, Like, I felt much worse

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 3>about that beat after McDaniels got fired, Like I'm like, no,

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Win all So yeah, when you cash out and you

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>go ticket somewhere else, that's called hedging.

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually tempted to be I've been just faithfully betting

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 3>against the Raiders every week with Josh McDaniels, and now

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 3>I might actually bet on them, Like, I can't back

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson as a road favorite.

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Are you kidding me?

0:42:58.320 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 3>No, No, there's as much respect as I have for

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that Jets defense.

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Like I'll take I'll take the money line with the Raiders.

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Here Monday Night football. I'm not gonna lie. I hate

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this line. Buffalo seven at home, minus seven at minus one,

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen at points bet. It's not that I don't think

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is good, but I don't know if I'm comfortable

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with Buffalo and a seven point lead with anybody nowadays.

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Denver's coming off of bye, Buffalo didn't look great like

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and I never felt like Buffalo was going to win

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that game with the Bengals, even when I got in

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the second half. It just never felt like that from

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the jump. To me, you're getting plus three twenty in

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the money line for Denver upset. Forty six to forty

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>seven is the numbers, So there's a range here. Pat

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>This one to me is as a stay away. I'm

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not a big fan of this game.

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I agree Joe, like I can't bet on the Broncos

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 3>as bad as they looked early in the season, but

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 3>I wonder, like have they fixed their defense. They did

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 3>a really good job against the Packers a few weeks ago,

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:57.760
<v Speaker 3>kept the Chiefs under twenty points. In that upset victory. Meanwhile,

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the Bills lost to the Patriot Yets needed to stop

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 3>the Giants on the final play of the game to

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 3>avoid being upset at home by the Giants. You know,

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 3>like played a decent game against the Bengals, but like

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you said, we're really in No, they weren't close to

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 3>winning that game. So there's no way I can lay

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown or more with the Bills right now to

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 3>a team that has played better of late. So I agree,

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to touch this game.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel great about the Broncos either, Debro, so

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that's why this game I have an individual game for me.

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So tell you think they can cover that seven and

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not worried about that. I'm betting the Denver

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Bronco's money line of plus three hundred.

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is let's go.

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 2>That's how this is getting way too much credit, giving

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 2>way too much credit to the Bills. Like if we

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 2>take out the Bills name Cache here and the fact

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that they're at home, this is giving too much credit

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to them. If we look at what the Bills have

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>been as far as offensively and defensively over the last

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 2>few weeks, this team is trying hard to find themselves,

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Broncos have found themselves. I think

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be a wopping dose of Javonte Williams. You

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 2>can run all over the Bills. The Broncos slow this

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 2>game down, pull like we've talked about with like the

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Titans love to do, Joe, Pull them down into the

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 2>muck and say this is going to be a nasty game.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>So give me the under and give me the Broncos

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 2>money line.

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, boys, I was just tinkering around a

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit on fandel. You could take that Dallas by

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>one to thirteen points and then the Lions one to

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>thirteen points victory at plus one forty five and plus

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>one seventy five respectively. Put them together for plus five

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy three. Kind of interesting, kind of interesting right there. See,

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what I come for betting pros. Here, you stay,

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you listen to Derek and Pat and Uncle Joey talk

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>about some football. So hopefully you had a good time here.

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you drop your comments below. We want to

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>hear what you are in on. Maybe you win a

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>free premium upgrade. Make sure you set your game notifications

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to with the line alerts over on the VP app

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to you so you can see all the moving pieces

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 1>here of what's going on here in the landscape of

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL for Week ten in the NFL. Great stuff, boys,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>great show, very fun. Go watch Glen Garry, Glenn Ross.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's my final thought for all of you. That'll do

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it for us, But the story of the game goes

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on for Derek Brown, Peppetts, Morris, I'm Joey P. We'll

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>see you next time.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 7>Kids who Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 7>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 7>Instagram at betting Pros NFL.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Also subscribe to our

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 7>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros