WEBVTT - EA Agrees to Largest Leveraged Buyout in History

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and ever Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Electronic Arts agrees to

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>sell to a group of private investors in a deal

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that values the company at about fifty five billion dollars

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>in the largest leveraged buyout in history.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Plus Jawe plans to ramp up production of its most

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>advanced AI chips in a bid to take market share

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 3>from Nvidio, and.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Big Tech pushes hire as investors look at and beyond

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the magnificent seven.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 4>In a key week for economic.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 3>Data, and talking of keywek for economic data, let's check

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 3>out these markets ahead of non farm payrolls on Friday.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>We are really seeing Ashley market sentiment trade higher on

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>the NASAK one hundred, up eight ten percent. After a

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit of digestion last week, we're back on top

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>f big tech, and I'm looking at crypto also getting

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a bit of buying. We're up almost three percent on bitcoin.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>We're still of our record high zed but it's notable

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 3>after some of those leverage bets came out of the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>market last week, there's some tentement buying as we see

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>gold og gold and a record high. We see digital

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>gold pushing high.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 5>To what have you got?

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to our top story and that is Electronic

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Arts the biggest leveraged buyout in history. It equates to

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>an offer of two hundred and ten dollars per share.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>It's the chop behind Illustrates. That is a significant premium

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 2>over where the stock was trading when the rumors started

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>coming out. We now have confirmation and we're not that

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>far off two hundred and ten dollars a share. The

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>structure really important silver Lake, Saudi in Public Investment Fund

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and a group of other investors, and there's a debt

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 2>portion here as well. JP Morgan's involved, and I remind

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone look at the historic relationship between Saudi's PIF and

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Electronic Arts.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 4>We need more details, we do, and we.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Can do that exact thing. Someone helped break the news,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Deanna Bakers with us. Of course, whenneberg Us deals Managing editor,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the deal is an one just from the shas scale

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 3>of it, Leanna, but also the players involved, and why

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>are this group of investors interesting considering what they already own.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 6>So Ed mentioned a bunch of investors, but he didn't

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 6>mention Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners. It's a firm that he

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 6>founded during Trump's first administration, and as you know, the

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 6>son in law of the president. There's a view that

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 6>maybe his involvement could help ease the approval of the deal.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Any foreign takeover does need sephia's approval.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>This is really interesting, but it's in line with what

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia has been doing in video games. Like three

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>years ago, billions and billions of dollars pledged to this

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and they already held ten percent of Electronic Arts. Anyway,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>could you just explain a little bit the structure of

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the leverage buyout and how we think it's going to work.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 6>So you mentioned JP Morgan, So they're providing about twenty

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars of financing. So that's just you know, bank debt.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 6>Goldman Sachs advised Electronic Arts. But in terms of the structure,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 6>it's just a leverage buyout. These investors are putting debt

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 6>on the company. They're valuing it at over fifty billion.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 6>We'll try to report out, you know, how much money

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 6>specifically are these equity checks that silver Lake, PIF and

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 6>Affinity are putting in. But we're hearing you know. As

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned, PIF already is a big shareholder with about

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 6>ten percent of EA. They're certainly going to be involved.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 6>They have a huge portfolio video games.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we've got a penny more to discuss. We're

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>going to get a little bit more detail, of course

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>from our gaming report as.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Well at it.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I just point out one thing real quick.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>This is a company that's free cash flow positive, just

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a massive growth story. Blue mostly on a

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Bak who leads the deals team, Thank you very much.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>What does this mean for gaming? In fact, the question

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>is why is Electronic Arts going private? Let's get out

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to Bloombos. Jason Schreier, who leads our video games coverage industry.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>When I was a kid, you know this story.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I would save up for weeks and I would spend

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>my allowance at a store to buy a disc from

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>my PlayStation or my PC. The video games industry does

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>not work like that anymore, and I think it speaks

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to the core of how EA is running right now.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 7>And I think nowadays you would be saving up to

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 7>buy a new costume for your character in EA's Apex Legends.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 7>The big number that I would look at that I

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 7>think helps illustrate why this happened is EA's revenue split

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 7>between what they call live services and products. Live services

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 7>meaning in game transactions where people spend with inside their

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 7>games rather than buying new ones. And that's what is

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 7>seventy five to twenty five. Seventy five of EA's revenue

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 7>in the last fiscal year came from live service micro transactions,

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 7>people buying costumes, people buying FIFA players Ultimate Team players,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.239
<v Speaker 7>and that to me is a is a shocking number

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 7>in many ways, but I think largely what it says

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 7>is that gaming has started to become. If it's not

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 7>already a mature market where it is not seeing a

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 7>ton of growth, it is certainly not seeing double digit

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 7>growth anymore. It is seeing maturity and predictability among its

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 7>games and EA's yearly sports franchises, which is kind of

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 7>generating predictable revenue is free to play titles like Apex Legends.

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 4>That tells that story.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Just to go in on why private equity therefore thinks

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 3>this is the moment to take this out of the

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 3>public markets. You're not having to report on a quarterly basis, Jason.

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's also interesting timing because they've got a Juggernaut

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>about to come out in October, Battlefield six.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Could this change the.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Dynamics of what this is priced out, whether other people

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>come into the field and try and scoop it up.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a little baffling to me. I was actually

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 7>pretty surprised at the time, in because I would think

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 7>that EA would want to hold off for a better price,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 7>given the Battlefield is expected to be a pretty big hit.

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 7>That said, from what we've heard, from what other people

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 7>have reported, this deal has been in the works for

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 7>months now. EA has actually been looking to sell themselves

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 7>or to participate in an m and A of some

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 7>sort for years now.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 8>Andrew Wilson has been, if.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 7>Not quite public, at least semi public about that fact

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 7>about wanting to become a bigger BDA company, whether through

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 7>a merger or an acquisition. And it could be just

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 7>that the timing worked out kind of independently of their

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 7>release schedule and they were looking to do this regardless.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 7>But yes, I would think they would be able to

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 7>get a better premium if Battlefield six comes out and

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 7>does Gangbusters or even beats Call of Duty, their biggest rival.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Wilson did put out a statement to his own

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 3>employees saying that entering a new era of opportunity will

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 3>dig into what that looks like a little bit later

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 3>in the show as well, but most Jason Schua, it's

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>great to have you meanwhile, broad a market outlook for

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you right now with Michael Green, Simplify Asset Management, chief

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>investment Strategists and portfolio joining us now, Michael, just this

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>scale of desire to hold and buy into debt. We

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 3>think of Oracle's sale and bonds we've got leveraged by

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>out now being clearly taken down by banks because they

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>think they can syndicate this. What does it signal about

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the wash of cash that we have in the market

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and the valuations we're getting on companies.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think there's two separate components that are coming through. First,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing more and more evidence that the cash flow,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 9>that is the prodigious cash flow that has come through

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 9>many of the technology companies now has claims against it,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 9>and taking on debt is simply a way of pulling

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 9>that forward. You've effectively said the two billion dollars a

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 9>free cash flow that Electronic Arts currently has is going

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 9>to go to servicing debt as compared to significant investment.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 8>And I'll be honest with you, this is part.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 9>Of a signal that we are very, very interested in

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 9>actually buying debt. We have incredible tightness in both a

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 9>high yield market and in the investment grade market. The

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 9>demand for debt is very very high given the retirement

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 9>needs of the baby boomers, and interestingly enough people are

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 9>trying to deliver into that. This is very very similar

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 9>in a lot of ways to what we would have

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 9>done in historical time periods of manufacturing IPOs if that's

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 9>what's demanded.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing that on the platforms like.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 9>Robin Hood and coinbase, where there's a ton of demand

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 9>for new IPOs. The older generation really wants to own

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 9>investment grade debt and high yield debt.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Michael, I just scrambled a bit, if I'm being honest,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think you guys do have like less than

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a thousand EA shares. I don't know why, whether that's

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of a historical or tangential fact, but just talk

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about that. You know, biggest leveraged

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>buyout in history has a big shiny headline. We've reported

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that JP Morgan is going to do like twenty billion

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>of the debt. You sort of interest in a mechanism

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>like that, Well.

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 8>If we have exposure to.

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 9>Electronic arts, it's going to be through one of our

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 9>index oriented products. We are not going to select shares

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 9>in electronic arts. So I would be misspeaking if I

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 9>spoke about a particular inserted desire that drove that.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 8>I would just highlight that.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately, when we think about the quantity of debt that

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 9>is being offered, there is tremendous demand for debt, both

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 9>in actual form as we're discussing, and then also in

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 9>synthetic form. You know, Eric Bokunas of Bloomberg speaks often

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 9>of of boomer candy, the idea of products that offer

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 9>extremely high yields. That the type of call overwriting is

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 9>just a way of creating synthetic debt exposure. So that

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 9>is demographic demand that's driving through on all of this stuff,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 9>and I think this is just telling you there is

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 9>more of that out there.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>There is an alternative to market based debt, and that's

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a mechanism that we're seeing from Nvidia. It's called circular

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>financing to some you give an equity investment or capital

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to a company and they use some of that to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>then buy the product that you're known for. Can you

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about that, Michael.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, A lot of people are starting to become increasingly

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 9>aware of this component of vendor financing. And it's not

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 9>just vendor financing. We see it not just with InVideo,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 9>with their deals with core Weave that are circular, and

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 9>an equity investment is made into core Weave that then

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 9>flows back into repurchases of in video products. One that

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 9>reduces the price competition associated with it. If in Video

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 9>is giving me the equity investment or lending me the

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 9>money to make purchase and going to be less willing

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 9>to negotiate speaks to in videos extraordinarily at high margin

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 9>j genes.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 8>And the protection of those.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 9>The more transactions that are going through in that form,

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 9>the more I would argue we have to be thinking

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 9>perhaps the margin is not as sustainable.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 8>As it actually appears.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 9>The thing that I would emphasize is if we look

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 9>at other types of debt that are being taken on,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 9>they're being taken on. Meta in particular has taken on

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 9>an extraordinary amount of debt where they are simultaneously financing

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 9>or underwriting the debt for the financing of building of

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 9>data centers, and they are also entering into operating lease

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 9>agreements where they are effectively committing on both sides of

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 9>the equation. We're seeing more and more evidence of this,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 9>and one of the great ironies I would highlight is

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 9>is that all of this is equity finance at its core.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 8>It's really not.

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 9>Subject to the whims of federal reserve rate policy. It

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 9>tells us nothing about whether policy is restrictive or not.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Michael, It's interesting that below the surface, when you think

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>about the check the money that's being promised to open

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>AI from Nvidia, many it said, actually it then helps

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 3>open AI go out and take on debt because they've

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 3>got this backing from Nvidia. More broadly, is this an

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 3>asset class you want to be piling into at this moment?

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>What are the risks clear for everyone to see, and

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>what are some of the hidden risks when you're piling

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 3>into a very few names who are going all in

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 3>on each other and indeed data sent the More broadly.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that there are two really really interesting

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 9>components to it right. One is, remember that the vast

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 9>majority of people are piling in here without any explicit

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 9>thought behind it. You guys obviously know the work that

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 9>I spend talking about the impact of passive investing.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 8>The average American investing.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 9>Into their four oh one K putting money into a

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 9>target date fund, has no interest in Video or Microsoft,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 9>or has any critical evaluation of it. It's simply the

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 9>way we plan our retirement today. And so a huge

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 9>chunk of the money that is flowing in is not

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 9>being sent through thoughtfully. It's being sent through mechanically. So

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 9>people are very allocated to this, regardless of whether it's

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 9>discretionary or not. The second component that I would emphasize

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 9>is that this type of circularity is again a byproduct

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 9>where in many situations you would look at this and

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 9>you would say, wait a second, this really seems like

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 9>anti trust activity.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 8>Google just lost a verdict in terms of anti trust.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 9>The judge failed to forest remedies, and immediately they turn

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 9>around and engage in the activity that they were actually

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 9>dinged for, working with Apple to basically lock in a

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 9>monopoly position in Apple's user interface. So we're seeing this

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 9>circularity across multiple components of it, whether it stops, whether

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 9>it continues to be enabled by the way that we

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 9>invest We simply can't know yet.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 2>Michael Green of Simplify Asset Management across Asset News of

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the Day, really appreciate it. Now coming up, Israeli Prime

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Minister Benjamin et Yaho discusses AI with investors and tech

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>leaders last night here in New York ahead of his

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>visit with President Trump. He's due to arrive at the

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 2>White House any moment. We'll have the details. This is

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Is re any Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyah, who met with

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>tech executives and investors in New York during his United

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Nations General Assembly visit, And now, according to sources, Nestanya,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>who discussed using AI to boost his country's economy and

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>his military capabilities.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 5>For all Blueboks of aidances.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Co host amriy Horden joins us now from the White House,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>where President Trump now is set to meet the Prime

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Minister netanya who and that's much more about military, much

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 3>more about geopolitics right now.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, we're just moments away though for Prime Minister

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 10>Benjamin netna who firm arriving at the White House to

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 10>have this really crucial meeting with President Donald Trump after

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 10>the President last week at the UN General Assembly, met

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 10>on the sidelines with a number of Arab leaders and

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 10>discussed this twenty one point plan alongside the UN General

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 10>Assembly Benjamin Nenyaw, who also had a little bit more

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 10>of an informal conversation with these tech executives. According to

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 10>reporting from my sources as well as ED sources, individuals

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 10>like Lyman, venture capitalists like Josh woolfel part of this meeting,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 10>and most notably Jacob Helbert was also there.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 5>This was an individual that was.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 10>An advisor to Pallenteer that he was tapped to join

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration. He had his hearing, he'll be an

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 10>under secretary of the State Department, just waiting for final

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 10>Senate confirmation. And the discussions really involved around how to

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 10>use artificial intelligence to not just boost the Israeli military,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 10>but also Israel's economy as we see an absolute arms

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 10>race when it comes to AI infrastructure and development. It's

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 10>also on the keels of almost two years ago Pallenteer

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 10>deciding to have this strategic relationship with the Israeli military.

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 10>So Bendri Ninya, who's sitting down when none of these

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 10>tech leaders on how exactly Israel was going to advance

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 10>some of this capability in a military format as well

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 10>as an economic one before he sets foot inside the

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 10>Oval Office with President Trump.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Exactly.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 2>So, Amory, I think the point that the sources made

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to you and I is that this was a group

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of tech industry people that had exist relationships with President,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister net and Yaho. What do we need to

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>know about this upcoming meeting with the President?

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 4>What's on the agenda?

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, this one is going to be incredibly important for

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 10>both President Trump and Prime Minister net and Yahoo. As

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 10>I mentioned, it comes on the heels of President Trump

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 10>outlining how he can see an end of the war

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 10>in Gaza, which is feeling very optimistic about with this

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 10>twenty one point plan he discussed with Arab leaders, and

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 10>I sat down with the Egyptian Foreign Minister on Friday,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 10>who was optimistic after being in that meeting with President

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 10>Trump that they do have a path forward on ending

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 10>the war in reconstruction. Of course, the devil on all

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 10>this is going to come in the details when it

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 10>comes to the Israeli red lines as well of Arab

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 10>leaders red lines as well.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Za, Marie Harden, thank you very much and be

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>sure to stay with Bloomberg for complete coverage of that

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>meeting between President Trump and Prime Minister net and Yahoo.

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>That's coming up at one fifteen pm New York time.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on Bloomberg Tech, Huawei plans to ramp up

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>production of its most used to advance AI chips in

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>a bid to take market share. From the video, we

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>have the details. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. We're seeing

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 2>live pictures of President Trump walking in with Israel Prime

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Minister Benjaminette Naho, who's just arrived at the White House.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>The two set to participate in a bilateral meeting in

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>just a few moments time. Back to our other top story,

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Huawei is preparing to sharply ramp up production of its

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>most advanced AI chips over the next year, aiming to

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>win customers in the world's biggest chip market. Is in

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia struggles with geopolitical headwinds. Bloomberg's Global Technology Executive editor

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Peter Elstrom joins us, we're talking about the nine ten

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>c ascend chip, right. This is kind of the marquee

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Huawei talk us through the numbers that we learned in

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the course of reporting about the next two years.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Right one.

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 11>Wai course is probably best known for its communications equipment,

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 11>had smartphones for a long time too, but it is

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 11>also really the leading developer of semiconductors within China. It's

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 11>put a ton of research and development into this process

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 11>and it's made quite a bit of progress. So what

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 11>sources are telling us is that the company is preparing

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 11>to ramp up production of some of these high end

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 11>chips that would be used to run AI models within

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 11>the country and also train some models in the country.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 11>As you mentioned, the nine ten C is the most

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 11>advanced chip that they have on the market right now.

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 11>We understand from sources they'll produce about three hundred thousand

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 11>this year and they're planning on ramping that up to

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 11>about six hundred thousand next year. That's not enough to

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 11>meet all of the domestics supply, but they're hitting the

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 11>market at a very vulnerable moment for Nvidia. In Nvidia

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 11>had hoped to be able to sell a bunch of

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 11>chips into China. There's a very vibrant AI see there.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 11>Companies want to buy their chips, but there have been

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 11>these geopolitical tensions where the H twenty chip was banned

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 11>for a while, then Washington allowed it to be sold,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 11>but then Beijing pushed back and said they don't want

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 11>their companies to buy that chip right now. So as

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 11>in Vidia stalls, Huawei is racing ahead and trying to

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 11>fill that market need.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Temeracon Technology is also trying to raise a This is

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a moment for domestic chip making talent, but ultimately we're

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>still worried about how Smick can actually produce or manufacture

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and how powerful any of these next iterations that Eric Shue,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the rotating leader of the business, can actually be compared to.

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 3>In video, it seems as though analysts think they're not

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 3>going to nearly rival the GPUs and the next iteration

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 3>from Nvidio.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 11>Right they're still very far behind in video. I mean,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 11>in Video is the most valuable company in the world.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 11>They have tons of resources to be able to throw

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 11>at this, and obviously they've helped companies in the US

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 11>like OpenAI and Microsoft a ton on this front. Now,

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 11>Beijing is very concerned about that reliance on American technology

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 11>at this critical juncture, so as Hi Jimping and President

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 11>Donald Trump entre into these trade negotiations. They have many

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 11>issues on their plate, including TikTok. The Communist Party wants

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 11>to do whatever they can to be able to wean

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 11>themselves off of that American technology, so they poured a

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 11>ton of resources into building these domestic capabilities. As you mentioned,

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 11>Cabrico is coming on one of the upstarts that's probably

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 11>the most promising in the market. And then Huawei is

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 11>also spending a lot of money on this front. Ali Baba,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 11>the e commerce company, is investing in semiconductors too, So

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 11>you're seeing really this nationwide effort to try to make

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 11>some progress in chip production. Again, they're very far behind

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 11>what the Americans can do and the Taiwanese can do

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 11>right now, but they are making progress, and I think

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 11>what sources are telling us now is they're making progress

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 11>over the next year to an extent that we had

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 11>not anticipated.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Feate Astrom always breaking it down. We so appreciate that. Meanwhile,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 3>fitness company Peniton, it's that to.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 5>Unveil new products this week, refreshing.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Its exercise equipment, hardware, and its software lineup. Of course

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>it's including AI Let's get more from Lumo. Consumer Tech

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Managing Editor Mark Gum and how wholesale is the change

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be for Peloton this week.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 12>This is going to be their biggest hardware revamp in

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 12>at least half a decade. This is under new CEO,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 12>Peter Stern. I know a lot of us love and

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 12>use Peloton, but they've been struggling lately from a revenue perspective,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 12>from a sales perspective, from a profit perspective, management perspective,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 12>but also from a products perspective, and it's time for

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 12>them to step it up under new leadership, and that's

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 12>what they aim to do this week. Peter Stern will

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 12>be holding a keynote address in the middle of the

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 12>week and introducing an end to end hardware refresh that

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 12>includes new bikes, new treadmills, new rows, a fully upgraded

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 12>operating system across all a Peloton hardware that deeply integrates

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 12>what they call internally Peloton Intelligence. This is AI for

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 12>personalized coaching and creating plans for users.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 8>So this is a big refresh.

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 12>This is Peter Stern's moment to put his stamp on

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 12>the company. The last CEO, Barry McCarthy, basically ran the

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 12>company into the ground, something that they said was necessary

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 12>after the CEO before him, co founder John Foley, pulled

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 12>some levers that put the company in a very bad

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 12>financial position. So we'll see if Stern is the ones

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 12>to be able to turn things in the correct direction.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Mark, Karen and I are both uses of the hardware

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and subscribers to the platform. There'll be an audience watching

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 2>the show that have like deja vu and say, well,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 2>hold on, isn't this the latest of several turnarounds that

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 2>have happened in the last many years.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 12>The last turnaround was mostly focused on re architecting the

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 12>fundamentals of the company. They moved production to third party manufacturers,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 12>they shut down facilities, they tried to right size the company.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 12>They did I think four or five different rounds of layoffs.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 12>What Peter Stern is doing after that was done by

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 12>the last CEO is actually trying to go into the

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 12>growth mode here, which means rolling out new products and

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 12>new initiatives. No new products or major initiatives are rolled

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 12>out under the prior regime, So this is about bringing

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 12>new hardware into the market and we'll see if that's

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 12>successful for them. You know, so far, they're up quite

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 12>a bit on an annual basis, let's see if investors

0:21:59.040 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 12>like the hardware.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>The end of twenty twenty, the pandemic year, this was

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>the stock there was at one hundred and sixty two dollars.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 2>It's now just above eight dollars. Bloomberg's Mark German a

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 2>big week, Thank you very much. Now coming up is

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 2>EA goes private in a fifty five billion dollar deal.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to speak with Jason Chapman of investment firm

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Convoy on the impact of the gaming industry. This is

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a firm that only looks at the gaming industry and

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>we've gone over the.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Details of this deal, Caro.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 2>We've looked at how historic it is from a financial perspective,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>but there will be gamers out there going, look, I

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>love some of these EA games.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, why are you doing this?

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 3>My son recently new to the whole EA experience. But

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking though at the market effect. We're up four percent,

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 3>but remember the market moved on Friday. That was an

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 3>initial reporting came out. It's a nice tacy premium. We'll

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 3>see what private equity could do for the business.

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 5>This is a Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Electronic Arts or EADEO, Game company is going private in

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the largest leverage buyout in history. We talked about the

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 2>structure of the deal throughout the program, but like we

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>started the question, why this is a five year chart

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of the stock and apart from that spike on the

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 2>far right hand side, which was the trading, remember two

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten dollars for shares the offer at like

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>two one hundred and three right now, So stock this

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>traded sideways five years and there are a lot of

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>questions about whether executives at EA saw the writing on

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the wall or on their console screen or whatever that

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>there's some uncertainty for the future, Carrot, and I'm still

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to understand it.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've got a good voice to dig into it.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>For more on in the EA deal, Jason Chapman, Convoy

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Managing partner, joins us. Convoy is an investment firm. It's

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 3>dedicated to video game and interactive entertainment industry. You understand

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>better than anyone the disruption that's happened within this industry.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Is going private the right tactic for EA.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 13>Thank you for having me on again, Caroline and Ed

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 13>and I absolutely do think it is the right thing

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 13>for you to go private and here's here's why today

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 13>EA has represented kind of the digital home for many

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 13>core tenant properties and games. Think of the sports division,

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 13>which composed about sixty percent of revenue. You've got the sins,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 13>You've also got Battlefield which is about to launch. And

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 13>a lot of speculation for EA has been that they

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 13>continuously go back to the well of producing the same

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 13>types of IPS and they haven't come up with anything

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 13>quote unquote new in a while. Going private will allow

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 13>them to take a risk to develop some new IP

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 13>and also be a powerhouse once again for generating new

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 13>experiences for gamers. And so for therefore, as a gamer myself,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 13>I like the transaction.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>You're investing in the frontier of gaming and the next experiment.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 3>So what is it that they can innovate on at

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the moment. What are the trends that you're seeing in

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 3>your portfolio companies that can be adopted by the biggest studios.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 13>So one of the challenges for large studio driven public

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 13>entities is that the public market cycle is difficult for

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 13>developing new IP. And so you know, you saw the

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 13>act vision Blizzard acquisition by Microsoft. You're seeing this again

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 13>finding homes where these companies can actually innovate in private.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 13>Think of what Rockstar is doing with Grand Theft Auto.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 13>That is difficult to do as a public entity. It

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 13>just is unless you have a multitude of properties that

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 13>can kind of play defense for you in the short term.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>And so what am I excited about.

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 13>I'm excited to see what that infrastructure optimized, let's call

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 13>it further refined, which I have full confidence the PIF

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 13>and their other partners will do here in this transaction

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 13>to see what they can produce on the other end,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 13>and they produce Battlefield. I don't know if you all

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 13>saw that test, but it was the nineteenth most successful

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 13>CCU event on Steam and ed.

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I've seen the test, and like all over Instagram reels

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and TikTok, is the early access experience. What you just

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 2>said about PIF though, this is the letter that that

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Wilson sent employees right and in the limited amount

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>of time I've spent with EA's leadership this year, they've

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about IP in the context of going outside of

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 2>games and this letter. He talks about sports, and he

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>talks about gaming, and he talks about entertainment broadly. This

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>is something that Saudi Arabia has been working on for

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 2>a number of years. Do they just give EA a

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>new domain to move into.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely so. You know, roughly, right now about two percent

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 13>of the PIF's assets are in entertainment in sports. That's

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 13>going to move to about three and a half percent

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 13>at the conclusion of this transaction. They've seen massive success

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 13>with Scope Ly they acquired that for just a hundred

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 13>five billion. They've rapidly expanded and acquired Nyantic for an

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 13>additional three and a half billion. They are now looking

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 13>at EA as the mothership of their gaming strategy outside

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 13>of mobile. I believe that you will continue to see

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 13>scopely dominate their mobile strategy, and EA will now probably

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 13>dominate their popular console and PC and alternative strategies outside

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 13>of mobile. And so this is this is form a

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 13>four pmative move by the PIF, and I'm excited to

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 13>see what they do with it.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm keeping a team in New York on their toes.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 2>But like Battlefield six we're showing on the screen right now, SIMS, Madden,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 2>EAFC formerly known as FIFA, what are the future of

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 2>those properties? Do they change somehow?

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 13>People are spending less time on new titles and more

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 13>time in existing titles that's going to continue to propagate here.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 13>And that's why I look at this transaction by the

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 13>PIFs as a very intelligent move. EA has dominated the

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 13>digital homes that we're familiar with for years, and that's

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 13>what people want. They want innovation on things they're slightly

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 13>familiar with. Also, they will have the ability when going

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 13>private to risk it and go for some new properties

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 13>that will come to love, like a new battlefield. I'm

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 13>excited to see them challenge Call of Duty with their

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 13>battle reale. And so for all these reasons, I like

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 13>the transaction.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>What about consolidation do they start picking away at companies

0:27:58.680 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 3>that you invest in?

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 13>I think when you have a new buyer in the market,

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 13>which the sovereign wealth funds appear to be, you know one,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 13>we're seeing this with PIF mainly, but secondarily we're seeing

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 13>this with Tamasik with their move into Keyword Studios. So

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 13>absolutely having a new buyer on the scene is a

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 13>good thing for the industry. It is not a bad thing,

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 13>and especially one that's willing to pay a premium. You know,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 13>typically when you look at privately, you're not that excited

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 13>given that the multiples you may receive or not quite

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 13>what you would hope for if you're going to go public.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 13>But sovereign wealth funds are here to play, They're here

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 13>to play well, and I think having another place of

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 13>capital liquidity is only a good thing for startups and

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 13>for those who motivating building.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 4>I saw a twitch and r about that very quick.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I think Cara's question.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it's a good opportunity for your portfolio companies to

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>get acquired by a bigger beast, because like EA goes

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>for very technical acquisitions.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 13>Yes, yes, absolutely, and I'm very excited about this. I

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 13>think it's a good sign for what is to come.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 13>And there's many good companies in our portfolio that I

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 13>think would love to work with EA and many of

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 13>the parties involved in this transaction.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Jason Chapman of Convoy really appreciate you coming on Bloombo Tech.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. At Caroline, we're looking at shares

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>for Comcast. So much news coming out today. Basically it's

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a very simple story. They're down three tens of percent,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 2>basically flat the story. Michael Kavan has been promoted to

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>co CEO, joining Brian Roberts. I don't know much more

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to save you on that well landscape's interesting.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because he used to be heading up M

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 3>and A and another big bank and institution before he

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 3>came on board to Comcast. So clearly whe are dealing

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 3>there as they particularly sell off some of their assets.

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>But coming up, we're getting through the world of crypto

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 3>ed I'm Immersinger, CEO of the Rock Chain Association, can

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 3>be joining us discuss the group's new campaign to defend

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 3>the stable coin legislation.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 5>It was only passed in July or on that.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>This is bloombog Tech, Soft Bank and Arc Investment are

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 3>among potension investors in a major funding round for tether holdings.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 5>According to sources, the funding could.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Give the company behind the world's largest stable coin I

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 3>value is high as five hundred million dollars. It's got

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>the details of bling bag Finance reporter Catherine Doherty and

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 3>why are we seeing such a gargantuan overall valuation for

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 3>this company? What are they thinking? What is Ark and

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>soft Bank backing here?

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 14>So there's a few against the backdrop of a changing

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 14>regulatory environment. I would say that is probably the number

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 14>one force behind the decision that firms like soft Bank

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 14>and Arc Investment are looking into When you have a

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 14>firm like Tether that has been at the forefront of

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 14>stable coin and emerging technology in the crypto space, these

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 14>firms in putting their money behind a private firm and

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 14>the development that Tether is working on behind the scenes

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 14>is really a signal to the rest of the industry

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 14>of where things are potentially headed. It also sets up

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 14>the stage for a really increasing environment of setting up

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 14>major firms in what they're trying to do in expanding

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 14>into other forms of payment and lending. So it's really

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 14>all eyes on how big the valuation really does become.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 14>The numbers that we're reporting out at Bloomberg are on

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 14>the higher end, so it really remains to be seen

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 14>whether or not they come in or are lower than expectations.

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's this moment in time about whether this

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>round is sort of unique to Tether and what it

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>tells us about valuation a moment more broadly, then there's

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the strategy, how does this backing help Tether grow as

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>an issue of stable coins?

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Give us the one two and answer those Catherine, Yes.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 14>Well, on the second point that you're making, it really

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 14>is about where they're going to put their money, where

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 14>they go next I mentioned lending payments. These are all

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 14>emerging technologies and Tether has always been a firm that

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 14>is at the forefront. And now that the regulatory environment

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 14>is changing, where there is engagement with the industry and regulators,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 14>that is really where the industry is going to look

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 14>to see what happens next. And in terms of the

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 14>actual size, that is really the big question here on

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 14>if they do get the higher end of the range,

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 14>how will they put that money to work and what

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 14>does that mean for the rest of the sector. Will

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 14>there be other firms that are looking to raise money

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 14>either privately or going out and potentially we've been seeing

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 14>some big IPOs and that really sets the scene. When

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 14>you have a firm like Circle that is out there

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 14>publicly having to report to their investors and disclose what

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 14>kind of money and the investments that they're making. That

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 14>really sets up a stage between Circle and Tether. You

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 14>have a public company and a private company both working

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 14>in the same industry and looking to compete in the

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 14>stable coin issuance space.

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Luis Kevin, doc's great to have you back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate it.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Elsewhere in the world of stable coins are Battle's brewing

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 2>between crypto supporters and traditional finance over the Genius Act.

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the perspective of some immersing a CEO of

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the Blockchain Association context. The Genius Act creates a regulatory

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 2>structure for the issuance of stable coins, a form of

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>crypto pegged to the dollar, and it was just signed

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>into lauren' ly and I think you and I talked

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, surely there are yeah, absolutely, you know.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Like we've discussed the idea that David tax is out

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>there like talking this is dollarization, this is fantastic. But

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about now tension between a more modern industry

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and traditional finance. How for your association is that tension

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>being debated?

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 15>Well, we're coming out pretty strongly against some of the

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 15>proposals that the traditional banks have in front of Congress.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 15>They'd like to row back a lot of what the

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 15>Genius Act does. They have claimed that they want to

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 15>close some loopholes that truly are not loopholes. They were

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 15>out the table when we negotiated this bill, so any

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 15>concerns that they have now are kind of you know,

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 15>late to the game concern At the end of the day,

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 15>stable coins have the opportunity to change how we move

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 15>money in this work, in this globe, in the globe,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 15>and we want to make sure that the regulations are

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 15>such that we can continue to see that innovation thrive

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 15>and grow.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 5>If you can't beat them, join them, as the saying.

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 3>So it's the idea that I've heard of just bank

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 3>crafter bank considering launching their own stable coins. Why then

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 3>fight the Genius Act which would allow them to do that.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean, I believe they will start to issue

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 15>their own stable coins. This is a competition question right now.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 15>A lot of the exchanges are able to offer a

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 15>reward around four percent for stable coins. Your traditional savings

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 15>account is offering less than one percent, and they don't

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 15>want to compete. So the idea is, let's try to

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 15>stop the competition and really kind of create a regulatory

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 15>mode around traditional finance and let them get out ahead

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 15>where the stable coin issuers are our ahead of the banks.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 15>And I think that's probably the biggest concern they have.

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 15>Right now.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 3>You're sending a letter to Congress, You're you're arguing against

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 3>some of these actions taken by the big banks, but ultimately,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 3>when you're looking at the broader context of TeV out

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 3>there raising funds fifteen to twenty billion dollars maybe giving

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 3>it evaluation five hundred billion doing those those the numbers

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 3>are reasonable as to the market opportunity right now.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 15>When you think about how money moves in the in

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 15>the world, it's tradition, it's slow, it's inefficient, there's a

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 15>lot of friction. Stable coins take that out of the system.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 15>It's an opportunity to again move money quickly and efficiently,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 15>and it's something that I think the financial services sector

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 15>has been waiting for. So I'm not surprised by the

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 15>evaluations we're seen for these companies. I think there's just

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 15>a lot of opportunity in the stable coins sector going

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 15>forward real quick.

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>As the point of clarification, Tether Holdings is a member

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>of your association, somebody that you are support.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 15>Tether No, they're not a member. They just you know,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 15>we were just at their launch for tether us. Certainly

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 15>somebody that we would love to see in our membership

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 15>circles in our membership. So if you have stable coin

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 15>issuers in our membership.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 2>The reason I also I want to go back to

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 2>the Genius Act point, which is that the banks want

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 2>one thing and you your association as members want something different.

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 2>You basically don't agree. That being said, what is it

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that the banks are wrong about? Just distill that please.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, So they're calling this loophole where the exchanges are

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 15>able to offer a reward for stable people putting money

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 15>in stable coins. This is no different than a reward

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 15>you would get if you're using a bank credit card.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 15>They are claiming that that is a loophole around the

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 15>yield prohibition in the bill. This is not a yield offer.

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 15>This is a separate reward offered by the exchanges. This

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 15>is not the stable coin issuers offering yield. Again, it's

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 15>the exchanges offering a reward. It's very different. It is

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 15>not a loophole. And again, if the banks want to compete,

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 15>their welcome to do so by offering similar rewards or

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 15>similar interest rates on savans accounts.

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is Tether, of course, makes its money by

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 3>allocating the money it holds and the US treasuries it

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 3>holds and farming yield from those. All of this is

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>about regulation. Yes, you come from the CFTC. At the moment,

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the CFTC has one person in it with yet to

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 3>see a new leader installed. Is there an anxiety? Is

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the anxiety that some have about a void of regulatory

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 3>over seeing of this very nascent industry group.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Is that right or wrong in your perspective.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 15>Right now, I think there's some concern that there's not

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 15>permanent leadership at the CFTC that probably you see that

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 15>play out more with potential market structural legislation that the

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 15>Capitol Hill's working on. But at the end of the day,

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 15>you see very strong leadership coming out of book the

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 15>SEC and the CFTC. They're holding a round table together today,

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 15>So it's certainly, you know, even though there's only one

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 15>person at the CFTC, that's not stopping the agency from

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 15>moving ahead doing what is necessary to ensure that they

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 15>are allowing innovation to thrive. So I think the concern

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 15>while it, you know, probably is something to think about

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 15>with market structure, because they do need long term leadership

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 15>at the CFTC. Right now, the CFTC and the SEC

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 15>is doing everything they need to be doing to make

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 15>sure the innovation is going to thrive in the US.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Caroline fram Republican Acting Chair, the sole member at the

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 3>moment of the CFTC. It is great to have you

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 3>here though, of course we really appreciate some there coming up.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Motor Lab CEO Eric Burden, how does Beern Hodgson is

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 3>joining us to talk about the aim structure company Series

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 3>B funding around and at one point one billion dollar

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>post money valuation.

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 5>There's a really big tech.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Startup.

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Modal Lab says it provides AI infrastructure for AI native startups,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>enabling the building and testing of AI applications.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 4>It's just close of you.

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Eighty million dollar Series B funding round led by Lux Capital.

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Model Labs CEO Eric Bernhardson joins us.

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 13>Now.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Caroline and I have been discussing all morning, kind of

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a bit like the salesforce question what does model do?

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>But I think like the understanding is it's more analogous

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to like a together AI and maybe nearer to a neocloud.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>But just explain that basic question to us to start.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, totally, and it's great to be here about it.

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 16>So we built the infrastructure layer of a lot of

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 16>AI applications. So if you think about a lot of

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 16>all these AI applications, you know, people building things like

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 16>generator media or large language models or things like Vibe

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 16>coding platforms, they only need a software layer to run that,

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 16>and so we basically provide a software layer by aggregating

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 16>a lot of underlying physical infrastructure, a lot of GPS

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 16>all over the world, and then make it easy for

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 16>engineers to build things on top of that. Build things,

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 16>whether that's related to training or inference or batch processing

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 16>or code the execution, or many other things. We have

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 16>a lot of customers like Meta, Lovable, Pseuno, Ramp and Scale,

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 16>a lot of happy developers who basically build things using

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 16>our SDK on top of this infrastructure platform.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So that sounds very much like AWS and AWS Lambda.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair?

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Like what's the landscape here?

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 16>There are some similarities like AWS LAMB that is built

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 16>for more of a traditional infrastructure, and I think what

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 16>we realized when we started this company was basically a

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 16>lot of traditional infrastructure, you know, things like you know

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.720
<v Speaker 16>a WSLAM or Kubernators or Docker just isn't built for AI.

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 16>So we realize in order to build this new layer

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 16>of infrastructures to support all these applications, basically to throw

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 16>out a lot of the existing infrastructure and build a.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 8>Whole news stack.

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 16>But we're very happy customers of AWS. We run an

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 16>AWS we run many other hyperscalers. We have great partnerships

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 16>with them. I think what they're good at is running

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 16>all the physical infrastructure, all the data centers, and then

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 16>what we're very good at is innovating in the layer

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 16>above with the developer experience and building this platform that

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 16>enables engineers to build all these AI applications on top

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 16>of it.

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 3>So you've got eighty million dollars more in funding. We've

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>raised more than eighty million, and now that takes you

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred and eleven. What do you need all

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the money for? What are your absolute costs?

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Eric? What's keeping you up?

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 16>For sure, So so far we've actually been pretty capital efficient.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 16>But we see a lot of demand out there. There's

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 16>so many customers building these applications, you know, starting to

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 16>see a lot of adoptionals in later stage company. A

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 16>lot of enterprise companies are now taking what's maybe previously

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 16>research prototypes and putting it into production and they need

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 16>a platform to run these applications, and that's when they

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 16>come to you. We think there's just a massive opportunity

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 16>that the market is exploding, so much demand out there.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 16>Since we're going to take this money and you know,

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 16>first first and foremots hire a lot of engineers to build,

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 16>you know, because we need to.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Invest in this platform.

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 16>We're building a very deep platform, but also invest of

0:41:58.520 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 16>course in sales and marketing.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 3>How hard is it to find the right talent? How

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 3>expensive is it?

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 4>It's hard, It's hard.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 16>I mean we're in New York, so I think we're

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 16>actually a little bit sheltered from the very worst part

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 16>of it. But yeah, it's very hard to find all

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 16>these you know hard you know, these people solving these

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 16>hard infrastructure problems.

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Eric, we're going to bring back some video. We're just

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 2>showing the platform. It still comes back to access to infrastructure,

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the GPUs, the underlying technology, right, are you taking on

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 2>the capital burden of that? Like who's actually paying for

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>access to lease or buy out the capacity?

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 16>Now, we're trying to be a very capital efficient in

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 16>the sense that we don't actually own any underlying physical

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 16>and infrastructure. Like I mentioned, we run on top of

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 16>a lot of different clouds. We run on all the majorhyperscalers.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 16>We're adding a bunch of neoclouds and so our view

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 16>is that, you know, in order to move fast, in

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 16>order to expand very quickly, it's much better to build

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 16>in the existing physical infrastructure, and we focus more on

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 16>the layer above the software layer, and that enables us

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 16>to move very quickly and expand very quickly in a

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 16>more capital efficient way.

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Eric, you're going global.

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 3>You've got a lot of love from the likes of

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Scale AI, but Lovable as well. That's more an overseas play.

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 3>How much you able to broaden this.

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 4>A lot more?

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 16>And it's great to see customers like Lovable. I actually

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 16>grew up in Sweden and so you know Lovable is Swedish.

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 16>But yeah, most of the customers are in the US.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 16>But we're seeing a lot of very wide different types

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 16>of use cases, right, Like I mentioned, you know things

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 16>like generated media or large language model applications. But some

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 16>of the stuff we've also seen more recently is you

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 16>know a lot of computational bi tech. Well literally I

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:35.919
<v Speaker 16>talked to a customer the other day. It's literally using

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 16>model to cure cancer. And then you know weather forecasting.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 16>There's many other applications. So it's super exciting.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 3>All right, Ben Hadson, it's great to have you on

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the show. Thank you, CEO Modile Labs. And then he's

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 3>just funding around Meanwhile, that does it for this edition

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Tech, right here in New York.

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 15>Both.

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's taken US fifty six minutes, but I am

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>here in New York this week. I'm really happy to

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>be here. Incredible amount of news recap this show. EA,

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 2>that's a big moment podcast. You know where to find

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 2>it online on the Bloomberg platforms. Let's do it from

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 2>New York today. This is Bloomberg Tech.